What is the cause of the extremely high mortality rate among the firemen, policemen, and others who worked on or near "the pile"? This is the crucial question that Jon Stewart and others in the controlled media have ignored since September 2001.
WHY DO THEY IGNORE IT?
Why does the controlled media ignore the obvious cause of the rare cancers and other systemic diseases that have killed so many 9/11 first responders?
The reason why the controlled media - and Jon Stewart - avoid discussing the cause of the rare cancers and other diseases that have killed so many of New York's finest is because they are trying to protect the official myth of what happened on 9/11 -- and its utterly false explanation of what brought down the Twin Towers.
I understand that many people like Jon Stewart because he made them laugh as a comedian on the long-running Daily Show, which he hosted. Stewart is, however, also on the board of directors of the 9/11 Memorial and Museum, a tax-free organization dedicated to supporting and teaching the false account of what happened on 9/11 -- and that is not so funny, to say the least.
Stewart and the controlled media who support the official myth of 9/11 will not go near the subject of what has caused the high mortality among the first responders because understanding the cause of the disease also blows the official 9/11 myth to smithereens, just like the Twin Towers.
Because this subject is so important, and because there is so much confusion about it, I need to be very clear in my explanation. One person asked me if there were many sick first responders from the Pentagon site, which is a good question.
I have not heard about any sick first responders from the Pentagon, although there may be some, and that is because the two sites were very different. The Pentagon site was, of course, much smaller and involved fewer responders, but more importantly, the fire was quickly put out at the Pentagon whereas the "fires" burned beneath the WTC rubble for more than three months.
A bluish smoke, laden with toxic ultra-fine particles, rose from the pile for three months after 9/11.
This is the key: understanding that these "fires" raged for more than three months - beneath the rubble - and that the smoke that was produced by these "fires" was extremely toxic exposes the falseness of the official explanation of what brought down the towers.
These "fires" were not normal fires, but extremely hot chemical reactions that burned beneath the rubble despite being continuously doused with water. We know that these hot-spots were hotter than boiling iron because the smoke that they produced contained nano-size particles of iron and other elements. This was the subject of one of my key research articles about 9/11: "Why Did Iron Boil beneath the Rubble?"
The smoke from "the pile" was extremely toxic because it contained "unprecedented amounts" of extremely small (i.e. nano-size) particles. Because these particles are so small they are able to pass through the protective barriers in the body until they wind up in the nucleus of the human cell, where they do immense damage to our health.
The first responders working on the pile did not have respirators.
The first responders worked on the smoking pile without respirators, which was "like working in the stack of an incinerator," as professor Thomas Cahill told me:
The conditions were "brutal" for people working at Ground Zero without respirators and slightly less so for those working or living in adjacent buildings, Cahill, a professor emeritus of physics and atmospheric science, said. "It was like they were working inside the stack of an incinerator," he said. "The debris pile acted like a chemical factory. It cooked together the components of the buildings and their contents, including enormous numbers of computers, and gave off gases of toxic metals, acids and organics for at least 6 weeks," he said.
The DELTA Group's work revealed the presence of extremely small metallic aerosols in unprecedented amounts in the plumes coming from the burning WTC rubble. Most of the particles in these plumes were in the category of the smallest ultra-fine and nano-particles: from 0.26 to 0.09 microns. The extraordinarily high level of ultra-fine aerosols was one of the most unusual aspects of the data, Cahill said. "Ultra-fine particles require extremely high temperatures," Cahill said, "namely the boiling point of the metal." - Why Did Iron Boil beneath the Rubble? Bollyn, May 2006
The people, like Jon Stewart, who are involved in the 9/11 cover-up cannot discuss the peculiar toxicity of the smoke that has sickened and killed so many people in New York because it would raise questions about what produced this deadly smoke. Pray tell, why did iron boil beneath the rubble? This subject simply cannot be discussed by those protecting the official myth because it demolishes their explanation of what brought down the towers on 9/11.
This is why I have spent so much time trying to explain this matter. It is an urgent matter of public health and scientific integrity, and it completely exposes the pack of lies we have been told about what caused the destruction of the World Trade Center, and that is of the utmost importance.