The Peculiar Similarities between 9-11 and the Assassination of RFK
June 5, 2018
Sen. Robert F. Kennedy at the Ambassador Hotel shortly before he was ushered into the pantry where he was shot.
The Zionist-controlled media pretends that the truth about the murder of Robert F. Kennedy is "out of our reach." Why would they maintain this absurd position?
"The truth appears to be out of our reach." - Tony Dokoupil, "Who Killed RFK?" CBS News, May 28, 2018
“In the three years since 9-11, we've begun to understand that it's possible to know what happened without knowing what happened.” - "The Public Knowledge of 9-11", New York Times, September 11, 2004
The murder of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy (RFK), the leading presidential candidate when he was shot in Los Angeles on June 5, 1968, profoundly changed American history. The RFK murder case, in which a Palestinian immigrant was blamed, has several similarities with the assassination of the senator's brother, President John F. Kennedy in 1963, and the terrorist attacks of 9-11 three decades later. If we examine the peculiar characteristics these crimes have in common, what will it reveal about the culprits? If we find a high degree of commonality linking these political atrocities is it possible to deduce something about the nature of the criminal network behind them? Are we dealing with different criminal networks, or one? Is it domestic or foreign?
These three crimes are similar in several ways. On the general level each crime was in effect a coup that radically changed American political history through violence. The murder of John F. Kennedy abruptly ended a progressive and popular presidency; the assassination of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy prevented JFK's reform-minded crime-fighting brother from becoming president; and the terror attacks of 9-11 ushered in a radical policy coup and a new era focused on waging the fraudulent War on Terror, an Israeli stratagem to rule the Middle East.
Another shared characteristic is that these crimes were all false-flag deceptions in which a fall guy was scapegoated to conceal a more elaborate crime. Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Bishara Sirhan, and Osama bin Laden are the "lone gunmen" blamed for the crimes in the official narratives. In spite of ample evidence clearly disproving the official stories, to this day the mainstream media promotes the false narratives.
In all three cases official investigations were set up to support the false narrative. The agencies involved in the investigations participated in the confiscation and destruction of evidence that challenged their story. Likewise, in each case the controlled media failed to conduct its own investigation and ignored irrefutable evidence that disproves the official story. The media cover-ups have gone on for decades in spite of well-documented evidence, such as the autopsy report of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy which clearly proves he was killed by a second shooter behind him. How is it that decades go by without the truth coming out in the media; without the evidence being discussed? Who has the power to exercise such control over the media?
The autopsy of Robert Kennedy clearly shows that the fatal shot was fired from directly behind the senator, while Sirhan Sirhan was several feet in front of him.
This means the false narratives are being protected to allow the secret cabal behind these crimes to avoid being exposed and prosecuted. This has been going on for more than fifty years, which means the criminal terrorist network responsible for all three atrocities remains in power and is able to carry out similar crimes whenever it wants – and it does. The cabal behind the murders of the Kennedys and 9-11 is still in power at the highest levels of our government and media. This is why it is extremely important that the criminal network responsible for these heinous crimes be identified.
"SIRHAN DID NOT KILL MY FATHER."
The fact that Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has spoken out and is calling for an investigation into the assassination of his father fifty years ago is commendable. His doubts about who really murdered his father were published in a Washington Post article on May 26, entitled "Who killed Bobby Kennedy? His son RFK Jr. doesn’t believe it was Sirhan Sirhan."
“There were too many bullets,” Kennedy Jr. said. “You can’t fire 13 shots out of an eight-shot gun.” Furthermore, as the article reported, "Kennedy was shot at point-blank range from behind, including a fatal shot behind his ear. But Sirhan, a 24-year-old Palestinian immigrant, was standing in front of him. Was there a second gunman? The debate rages to this day."
It should be clear that we are not really talking about a raging debate, but rather a media and government cover-up of well-documented facts. Los Angeles Coroner Thomas Noguchi conducted the official autopsy on the body of Robert Kennedy on the morning of June 6, 1968, and found that the shot that killed RFK “had entered through the mastoid bone, an inch behind the right ear and had traveled upward to sever the branches of the superior cerebral artery.”
Noguchi wrote about the murder in a book entitled Coroner (1983), in which he said, "Until more is precisely known...the existence of a second gunman remains a possibility. Thus, I have never said that Sirhan Sirhan killed Robert Kennedy."
Paul Schrade, a member of the Kennedy entourage, has been trying since 1974 to persuade authorities to reinvestigate the case and identify the second gunman. Robert Kennedy, Jr. has joined forces with Schrade in calling for a new investigation. "The fact that Robert Kennedy Jr. would say, 'Sirhan did not kill my father,'" Schrade told the Boston Globe, "I think that's very effective."
“Yes, he did shoot me. Yes, he shot four other people and aimed at Kennedy,” Schrade said about Sirhan. “The important thing is he did not shoot Robert Kennedy. Why didn’t they go after the second gunman? They knew about him right away. They didn’t want to know who it was. They wanted a quickie.”
In a statement to the author of “Who Killed Bobby? The Unsolved Murder of Robert F. Kennedy,” before Sirhan's parole hearing in 2016, Schrade said:
The LAPD and LA DA knew two hours after the fatal shooting of Robert Kennedy that he was shot by a second gunman and they had conclusive evidence that Sirhan Bishara Sirhan could not and did not do it. The official record shows that [the prosecution at Sirhan’s trial] never had one witness – and had no physical nor ballistic evidence – to prove Sirhan shot Robert Kennedy.
Evidence locked up for 20 years shows that the LAPD destroyed physical evidence and hid ballistic evidence exonerating Sirhan, and covered up conclusive evidence that a second gunman fatally wounded Robert Kennedy.
In calling for a new investigation into the murder of his father, Robert Kennedy, Jr. is like the relatives of the 9-11 victims who want a proper forensic investigation of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The fact that none of these cases were properly investigated from the beginning is the first shared characteristic; in all three cases there was flagrant tampering and outright destruction of evidence. Who is being protected by the failure to investigate the evidence from these crimes? Who has the power to control and corrupt such investigations?
Another peculiar similarity is that the Ambassador Hotel, where RFK was killed, and the World Trade Center were both owned by Zionist Jews who had very high-level connections to the state of Israel. In both cases the ownership of the building also appears to have played a key role in the crime. In the case of World Trade Center, having control of the property allowed the terrorists to prepare the buildings for the explosive demolitions that occurred on 9-11. Larry Silverstein, former national director of the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), a major funding operation for Israel, obtained control of the Twin Towers about five weeks before 9-11. For years prior to 9-11, Silverstein had regular weekly phone calls with Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the godfather of the War on Terror, which began as a result of the false-flag terror attacks. What were Netanyahu and Silverstein talking about every Sunday afternoon?
The Ambassador Hotel was owned by J. Myer Schine who was connected to the Jewish Mob and the Henry Crown family.
The Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles was owned by Junius Myer Schine, father-in-law of Lester Crown, son of Henry Crown (born Krinsky), the largest shareholder of General Dynamics, a leading defense contractor. Henry Crown was a high-level Zionist agent who sent an aircraft manufacturing plant to Israel in the early 1950s in violation of U.S. law. The factory he sent to Israel illegally became the original Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) plant. The Crown family is also connected to both Kennedy assassinations and the 9-11 cover-up. (See: "JFK and 9-11: Henry Crown and the Cover-Ups of Our Time")
Under Myer Schine's ownership the Ambassador Hotel hosted the gambling operations of Mickey Cohen, the West Coast lieutenant of Jewish mob boss Meyer Lansky. U.S. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy had been involved in the prosecution of Cohen in which he was convicted for tax evasion and sent to Alcatraz in 1961. Who arranged for Kennedy to use the Ambassador Hotel?
The Ambassador Hotel had been Mickey Cohen's base of operations in the late 1940's when he became friends with the Jewish terrorist leader Menachem Begin who was hiding out in Los Angeles after a terrorist bombing in Palestine.
The Jewish gangster Mickey Cohen is not only connected to the Ambassador Hotel and the Santa Anita Racetrack, where Sirhan worked and gambled on the horses. Most notably, Cohen is also closely connected to Menachem Begin, former head of the terrorist gang, the Irgun, who was in position to take advantage of his relationship with Cohen to infiltrate his criminal network, which would include being able to set up Sirhan the Palestinian to be the Manchurian Candidate fall guy in the assassination of Bobby Kennedy. How neat.
The fact that the hotel was owned by Myer Schine, whose family was closely connected to Israeli intelligence, could explain how Sirhan, an armed stranger, was allowed to loiter in the hotel pantry for thirty minutes while Bobby Kennedy was speaking to a crowd in the adjacent room. Why would Sirhan linger in the pantry if his goal was simply to kill Kennedy? Why wouldn't he pass through the corridor and approach the candidate on the podium from behind? Why wait in the pantry when there was no plan for Kennedy to come that way? Who was choreographing the movements of Sirhan – and Kennedy?
Who was the hidden hand guiding Robert Kennedy into the pantry where Sirhan was waiting?
As the author of "I Was There When Robert F. Kennedy Died" wrote:
Later, after events began to wind down, I remembered the strange incident where Frank Mankiewicz was insistent that Bobby leave through the kitchen, rather than the ballroom. I discreetly asked others who had campaigned with him for a long time if it made any sense that Bobby would leave through the kitchen rather than through his crowd of supporters and they all said RFK preferred to walk through a crowd after a speech. Neither at the time—nor for many years afterward—did I mention the incident that I witnessed, nor did I see any published accounts anywhere explaining why Bobby went through the kitchen.
Frank Mankiewicz, who had previously served as a West Coast director for the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, worked with the Kennedy campaign. Why did Mankiewicz insist that Kennedy go through the pantry, where Sirhan was waiting with a loaded gun? What kind of hotel security would allow an armed stranger to loiter in the kitchen for a half-hour with a presidential candidate speaking in the next room?
The fact that the Ambassador Hotel and the World Trade Center were owned and controlled by individuals with high-level connections to Israel is very significant. This makes it possible to consider that Israeli agents could have taken advantage of these connections to carry out both false-flag operations. This would explain the use of an apparently mind-controlled Palestinian as the fall guy and the universal reluctance of the mainstream media to look beyond the official story. This would also explain the position of Zionist-controlled media outlets such as CBS News (controlled by Leslie Moonves, the great-nephew of David Ben Gurion, Israel's founding father) and the New York Times that we will never know what happened. They want us to think that the truth is "out of our reach" because if the truth were known it would mean the end of the Zionist project.
The Pentagon's Abandonment of its Own People on 9/11
November 2, 2017
"The Pentagon's functioning," Rumsfeld said on 9/11, but was it? The Pentagon's 9/11 press conference - Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, flanked by Secretary of the Army Tom White, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Hugh Shelton, and Senators John Warner (R-VA), and Carl Levin (D-MI), the Ranking Member and Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Why did the Pentagon fail to rescue its own people, and why did it turn the site of an "act of war" over to the F.B.I.?
Carol Valentine gave me a binder with some of her articles about 9/11 during my recent tour. One of the articles about the attack on the Pentagon is titled, "Pentagon RESCUE? - Open Bloody Questions..."
Valentine raises many questions in this article, some better than others, but the one that strikes me as most important is this: Why did the Pentagon turn over the site of an "act of war" to the F.B.I. on 9/11?
WHY WAS F.B.I. PUT IN CHARGE OF PENTAGON SITE?
We know the F.B.I. was in charge of the Pentagon site because the Secretary of the Army, Thomas E. White, said so during the Sept. 11, 2001 (6:42 p.m.) Dept.of Defense News Briefing.
Q: Mr. Secretary? A: Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld: Yes? Q: Can you describe the fire-fighting efforts that are going on right now in that corridor and the search-and-rescue efforts that are beginning? A: Rumsfeld: Can I describe them? Q: Yeah. A: Rumsfeld: Why don't we let the Secretary of the Army, who was out there with me a few minutes ago and has been talking to the incident commander on the site. A: Secretary of the Army Thomas E. White: I think it's fair to say at this point that the fire is contained, and will shortly, if not already, be sufficiently controlled to allow entry into the building. That entry will be supervised by the FBI, who are in charge of the site, assisted by the fire departments that are present. We, on the Army side, will support them as they go in the building and search for casualties and bring them out, then we will support them in dealing with that. That's what's going on on the ground.
Carol Valentine described this as the military abandoning their responsibilities and turning the military site of an act of war over to civilian authorities:
RUMSFELD, MILITARY, HAND THEIR JOBS TO FBI
Let's go back to the beginning, and state the obvious. The Pentagon is not your ordinary run-of the-mill office building. The Pentagon is the military headquarters for the mightiest military power on earth. It is the home of the US Navy, Army, Air Force, Marines, and Special Operations.
According to the Official Story, the 9-11 attack on the Pentagon was an act of war. Rumsfeld and the top brass had lawful jurisdiction over the piece of real estate on which the "act of war" had just occurred; the Pentagon building was a war zone. But what did Rumsfeld, Gen. Shelton, and the top brass do? On September 11, 2001, they gave jurisdiction of the war zone to the FBI — a division of the civilian Department of Justice. (Robert S. Mueller had just been appointed FBI Director the week before on September 4.)
This may sound like a small detail to some people, but it is of crucial importance. It is exactly what happened in New York City and Shanksville, Pennsylvania: The F.B.I. took over the sites and investigation, actions which resulted in the destruction of evidence and cover-up of the truth. On 9/11 the F.B.I. was under the control of a son of the Mossad, Asst. Attorney General Michael Chertoff, the Israeli-American dual national who ran the Criminal Division of the Dept. of Justice and who was in charge of the investigation.
Under Chertoff, rather than carrying out a blue-ribbon investigation of 9/11, the F.B.I. oversaw the cover-up of the worst act of mass murder and terrorism in U.S. history. A proper investigation of 9/11 would, therefore, have to begin with the arrest and investigation of Michael Chertoff.
Of the media products that suggest prior knowledge of the 9/11 attacks, the Iron Man cartoon that aired on October 22, 1994, must be at the top of the list because the 17-minute television cartoon depicts a plane and missiles hitting the Twin Towers and a plane smashing into the Pentagon in the first minute. The 52-second video clip (above) from the episode entitled "The Grim Reaper Wears a Teflon Coat" shows these depictions.
Because this program clearly suggests prior knowledge of the 9/11 plot to attack the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the first question to be asked is, who produced this program?
The producers of "The Grim Reaper Wears a Teflon Coat" episode in which the Twin Towers and Pentagon are attacked are the Israeli Avi Arad and Stan Lee, born Stanley Martin Lieber in New York City.
The strike on the Pentagon as depicted in the cartoon by Avi Arad and Stan Lee
Avi Arad is an Israeli producer who has worked closely with Arnon Milchan, the senior Israeli agent in Hollywood who smuggled nuclear triggers for Israel's nuclear arsenal in the 1980s. Here Arad and Milchan are seen at the premiere of their film Daredevil in February 2003. Milchan also made a film depicting an airplane attack on a high-rise tower in New York.
Milchan's first film, The Medusa Touch (1978), depicted a large plane striking the Pan Am Building in New York City. Milchan has worked closely with Israeli military intelligence all of his adult life.
When agents of a foreign government, like the criminal Arnon Milchan and Avi Arad, produce films and television programs that clearly indicate prescience of an attack that later occurs, why are they not arrested and interrogated on suspicion of having prior knowledge of the attacks? The fact that these Israelis made films depicting the 9/11 attacks years before they actually occurred shows that the planning by Israeli military intelligence of the 9/11 attacks goes back to the 1970s, when the Likud party of Menachem Begin came to power. The planning for the 9/11 attacks in the late 1970s coincides with the planning, by Israeli military intelligence, for the War on Terror to deceive the U.S. military into waging war against Israel's enemies on behalf of the Zionist state. The Israeli-designed terrorism of 9/11 was carried out to kick-start their long-planned War on Terror.
Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts. Donate by PayPal to: email@example.com or click here: www.bollyn.com/donate/
The Israeli Origin of 9/11 and the War on Terror
May 8, 2017
Both 9/11 and the War on Terror are products of Israeli military intelligence. 9/11 was meant to start the War on Terror. Understanding the Israeli origin of both is key to understanding the deception.
Although the terror attacks of September 11, 2001, have had a tremendous impact on world history, global society, and our way of life, the events that are commonly referred to as 9/11 are not well understood. What is most peculiar about 9/11 is that in spite of the huge effect it has had on modern history, the crime itself has not been properly investigated and examined as one would expect. The structural steel from the World Trade Center, for example, crucial evidence from the crime scene where some 2,700 people were killed, was hastily cut into small pieces and shipped to Asia. This indicates that the decision had been made at the highest level to destroy the evidence to prevent a proper investigation of the crime. The failure to investigate the 9/11 crime means that much of what passes for modern political history is nothing more than unproven allegations and assumptions.
DECEIVED INTO WAR
A growing number of people who have examined the 9/11 evidence understand why the administration of George W. Bush allowed the evidence to be destroyed and why he delayed any inquest into the matter for more than a year. The evidence proves without a doubt that high-level officials of the government and owners of the major media networks conspired from the beginning to deceive the public about what really happened on 9/11. The purpose of the conspiracy was to promote a false narrative in order to take the United States and its allies into an open-ended and criminal war known as the Global War on Terror. Fifteen years later, both the conspiracy and the criminal wars it started are ongoing.
On the day of the atrocity, before a criminal investigation could even begin to examine the evidence, the Bush administration declared the terror attacks to be "an act of war" and that very evening the decision was made to go to war against Al Qaeda and the Taliban regime in Afghanistan. The haste with which the decision to go to war was made suggests it had been prepared prior to 9/11. By claiming the attacks were "an act of war" the government was relieved of having to present its evidence in a court to prove that Osama Bin Laden was guilty.
So rather than carrying out a proper criminal investigation, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was primarily engaged in confiscating and concealing crucial evidence to protect the official story. If 9/11 had been investigated as a crime government prosecutors would have had to prove that Al Qaeda had the means, motive, and opportunity to commit the crime.
Rather than allowing the public to see the evidence and hear the results of a proper criminal investigation, the American population was immediately given a prepared, but wholly unproven, explanation that the deed had been planned and carried out by Osama Bin Laden hiding in a cave in Afghanistan. Less than three hours after the first plane hit, Ehud Barak, the former prime minister of Israel, chief of staff, and head of military intelligence, appeared in the London studio of BBC World television and pinned the blame on Bin Laden. Although he provided no evidence to support his allegation, the Israeli military chief's conclusion that it was time to begin a global "war against terror" soon became the accepted interpretation of 9/11:
The world will not be the same from today on, it’s an attack against our whole civilization… If it is a kind of Bin Laden organization, and even if it’s something else, I believe that this is the time to deploy a globally concerted effort led by the United States, the U.K., Europe, and Russia against all sources of terror, the same kind of struggle that our forefathers launched against the piracy on the high seas… It's time to launch an operational, concrete war against terror even if it takes certain pains from the routine activities of our normal society.
The same day, Ehud Barak appeared on Rupert Murdoch’s Sky Television blaming Osama Bin Laden and advising Western governments to join a concerted effort to combat terrorism:
Most obviously my guess is a Bin Laden organization… The leadership of the world should be able to take action… Bin Laden sits in Afghanistan… We know where the terror sites are. It’s time for action.
Nine days later, President George W. Bush told the American people that Osama Bin Laden and nineteen Arabs had attacked the United States because "They hate our freedoms." In the same speech, on September 20, 2001, Bush laid out his plan to wage a global War on Terror:
Our war on terror begins with Al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped, and defeated… Americans should not expect one battle, but a lengthy campaign unlike any other we have ever seen… And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation in every region now has a decision to make: Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists.
The haste with which the Bush administration took the nation to war in Afghanistan, without presenting any evidence to support its claim that Al Qaeda was actually behind the 9/11 terror atrocity, suggests that starting the War on Terror was the real purpose of the terror attacks. The fact that evidence from the crime scenes that contradicted the official narrative blaming Osama Bin Laden was being omitted from news reports seemed to confirm this suspicion.
By leaving crucial evidence out of their reporting the controlled media has effectively protected the false narrative, the criminal wars, and the real terrorists from being exposed. Had the media presented and discussed all of the available evidence the public would have been aware of the utter falsity of the government's story that was being used to take the nation to war.
It was obvious from the very beginning that certain aspects of the 9/11 story were being censored by the media. Eyewitness reports of explosions at the World Trade Center and reports of the arrests of scores of Israeli men who were apparently involved in the terror operation were among the stories that were reported once, and never repeated. These omissions of important facts and evidence from the media narrative indicated that a high-level conspiracy involving the government and media was afoot to sell the public a false story about 9/11 in order to take the nation into "a war on terror… a lengthy campaign unlike any other we have ever seen."
As President Bush promised, the War on Terror has been a "lengthy campaign unlike any other." Fifteen years later, the United States and its allies are still fighting two wars that his administration started in the guise of fighting terrorism. The wars and "homeland security" measures that followed in the wake of 9/11 have cost the United States more than $2.5 trillion dollars, all funds borrowed at interest.
One of the best indicators that 9/11 and the War on Terror are products of the same criminal conspiracy is the fact that the government and media continue to censor scientific evidence that disproves the 9/11 narrative: the false story they used to take the nation into the open-ended military campaign. Indeed, when we examine the historical roots of the 9/11 atrocity and the War on Terror we find more indications that 9/11 and the War on Terror both originate from the same source.
The following are some of the most important forensic discoveries that have been completely omitted from the mainstream media reporting about the 9/11 atrocity.
Evidence of molten iron, the presence of which contradicts the narrative that the towers fell due to fire-induced structural failure, has never been reported or discussed in the mainstream media. A large amount of light-yellow and white-hot molten metal (i.e. 1100-1200 degrees C), presumed to be iron and obviously much hotter than burning jet fuel or an office fire, was seen falling from the 81st floor of the South Tower for seven minutes before the explosive demolition of the tower.
Firemen reported seeing "molten steel" running in the rubble like "lava in a volcano." Contractors also reported finding "pools of molten steel" at the base of the elevator shafts of the three demolished skyscrapers (i.e. North Tower, South Tower, and WTC 7) when they got down to the bedrock of Manhattan, six basement levels below street level – weeks after the attacks.
The clouds of hot dust that buried lower Manhattan on 9/11 also contained molten iron in the form of billions of tiny micro-droplets of molten iron, called iron-rich spheres. An independent survey of the dust in the Deutsche Bank building on the southern edge of the World Trade Center found that iron spheres comprised nearly six percent of the mass of the dust ("WTC Dust Signature Study: Composition and Morphology," R.J. Lee Group, 2003).
A government-funded study of the dust published by the U.S. Geological Survey (Particle Atlas of World Trade Center Dust, USGS, 2005) contained micrographs of the iron-rich spheres. The USGS survey also found tiny spheres of molten molybdenum, which has a very high melting point of 2,623 degrees C, or 4,753 degrees F. The micrographs of the molten molybdenum were not published in the USGS report, but were obtained later through a F.O.I.A. request.
The spheres of iron were evidently produced by a highly energetic nano-composite of super-thermite, chips of which were found in the dust by Dr. Steven E. Jones ("Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009). When the bi-layered chips of this active thermitic material were heated to 430 degrees C, they ignited and produced extreme heat and iron-rich spheres identical to those found in the dust. Although this discovery, published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal in 2009, provides essential information about how the iron-rich spheres were created – and how the towers were demolished – it has never been discussed in the mainstream media in the United States.
PERSISTENT HOT SPOTS
Another important scientific discovery was made by analyzing the particles in the smoke that rose from the rubble in the weeks after 9/11. The smoke was found to contain large amounts of ultrafine particles.
In the days after 9/11, when he saw the light blue smoke rising from the rubble of the World Trade Center, Thomas A. Cahill, an expert on airborne aerosols and director of the DELTA Group at the University of California at Davis, knew the plumes contained large amounts of the very smallest particles, the extremely toxic ultrafine particles less than one-millionth of a meter in size, and smaller. Unlike the larger dust particles from the destruction of the Twin Towers, these ultrafine nano-size particles are particularly hazardous because of their extremely small size, which allows them to penetrate into the nucleus of the human cell where they wreak havoc on the human system.
The DELTA Group's research revealed the presence of these extremely small metallic aerosols in unprecedented amounts in the plumes rising from the World Trade Center rubble. Most of the particles in these plumes were in the category of the smallest ultrafine particles: from 0.26 to 0.09 microns. The extraordinarily high level of ultrafine aerosols was one of the most unusual aspects of the data, Dr. Cahill said. "Ultrafine particles require extremely high temperatures," he said, "namely the boiling point of the metal."
The data showing high levels of ultrafine particles in the smoke plume proves that incredibly intense hot spots, capable of boiling and vaporizing metals and other components from the debris, persisted beneath the rubble for many weeks after 9/11.
These important scientific discoveries have never been reported or discussed in the so-called "mainstream media." These significant findings have been omitted by the controlled press not because they lack importance, but because they disprove the official narrative of 9/11. The fact that the government and media have protected the official narrative for fifteen years indicates that they are actually both controlled by the same people who carried out 9/11 and deceived the public into supporting the fraudulent and criminal War on Terror.
The evidence indicates that 9/11 was a highly sophisticated false-flag terror atrocity designed to inflict "shock and awe" on the public in order to instill fear and rage in their hearts. The purpose of the terror attacks was to compel U.S. public opinion to support an open-ended war agenda known as the Global War on Terror. If starting the War on Terror was indeed the primary reason for the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11, we need to understand who is behind the war agenda and where it comes from.
THE ISRAELI WAR ON TERROR
The War on Terror is basically an Israeli stratagem developed in the 1970s to deceive the American public into thinking that Israel's enemies are America's enemies. The purpose of this deception is to bring the U.S. military into the Middle East on a long-term basis to defend the Zionist state by waging war against its foes. The terrorist masterminds behind the War on Terror stratagem knew that a massive and spectacular act of terrorism would be required to trick the U.S. into fighting their enemies, so they began – evidently in the 1970s – planning the attack which befell the United States on September 11, 2001.
A timeline of some key events is helpful to understand the common origin and development of the 9/11 and War on Terror plot.
1977 – In a major turning point in Israel's political history, the Likud, a right-wing political coalition founded by the Zionist terrorist Menachem Begin (former head of the Irgun) comes to power in Israel ending three decades of Labor Party dominance. Begin is a notorious terrorist leader known for having ordered the bombing of the King David Hotel in July 1946, in which 91 people were killed, and the Deir Yassin massacre in April 1948.
1977 - Likud, the terrorist faction headed by Menachem Begin, comes to power in Israel.
1978 – Arnon Milchan, a top-level Israeli intelligence agent, produces his first movie, The Medusa Touch. The film's climactic scene depicts a Boeing 747 crashing into the Pan Am Building in New York City. Milchan was responsible for illegally sending 800 krytrons – triggers for nuclear weapons – from the U.S. to Israel's Ministry of Defense between 1979 and 1983. Although his company, Milco International, was behind the illegal smuggling, Milchan himself was not indicted.
1979, July – The War on Terror doctrine is rolled out onto the world stage in a well-planned propaganda offensive at the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism. The conference is headed by the Israeli Prime Minister, Menachem Begin of the Likud. Begin's propaganda blitz is hosted by the Netanyahu Institute, an organization set up by Benjamin Netanyahu and his father for the purpose of promoting the War on Terror ideology.
"The conference organizers expect the event to initiate a major anti-terrorist offensive," Ian Black writes in the Jerusalem Postafter the first day of the conference.
"The use of the military term 'offensive' is accurate," Philip Paull wrote in "International Terrorism": The Propaganda War. "Four former chiefs of Israeli military intelligence participated in the conference: Gen. Chaim Herzog, Maj. Gen. Meir Amit, Lt. Gen. Aharon Yariv, and Maj. Gen. Shlomo Gazit."
The fact that four former chiefs of Israel's Directorate of Military Intelligence attended the three-day conference indicates that Israeli military intelligence was involved in the planning and preparation of this "propaganda offensive."
1979, September – Isser Harel, the former chief of Israeli intelligence, predicts with uncanny accuracy the events of 9/11 to Michael D. Evans, an American Zionist, saying Arab terrorists will attack the tallest building in New York City:
I sat with former Mossad chief Isser Harel for a conversation about Arab terrorism. As he handed me a cup of hot tea and a plate of cookies, I asked him, "Do you think terrorism will come to America, and if so, where and why?"
Harel looked at his American visitor and replied, "I fear it will come to you in America. America has the power, but not the will, to fight terrorism. The terrorists have the will, but not the power, to fight America - but all that could change with time. Arab oil money buys more than tents."
As to the where, Harel continued, "New York City is the symbol of freedom and capitalism. It's likely they will strike the Empire State Building, your tallest building [he mistakenly thought] and a symbol of your power." - "America the Target," Jerusalem Post, September 30, 2001
1982, February – The Yinon Plan, "A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties" written by Oded Yinon, is published by the World Zionist Organization (in Hebrew). Thanks to Professor Israel Shahak, the essay is translated and published in English under the title "The Zionist Plan for the Middle East." The Yinon Plan calls for "Balkanizing" the Arab states, i.e. breaking them up into ethnic enclaves, as was done to the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s.
"There is one thing that we do know," Middle East expert Linda S. Heard wrote in 2006, "Oded Yinon's 1982 'Zionist Plan for the Middle East' is in large part taking shape. Is this pure coincidence? Was Yinon a gifted psychic? Perhaps! Alternatively, we in the West are victims of a long-held agenda not of our making and without doubt not in our interests."
The Yinon Plan specifically calls for breaking up Syria and Iraq, which is exactly what has happened to these nations after the U.S. military intervened.
As Oded Yinon wrote:
Lebanon's total dissolution into five provinces serves as a precedent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and the Arabian Peninsula and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel's primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi'ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druze who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach today.
1982, June – Under the leadership of Menachem Begin, Israel invades Lebanon with the intention of occupying the southern part of the country up to the Litani River, as per the Yinon Plan. The Israeli aggression results in the deaths of more than 20,000 Lebanese and Palestinian civilians.
1983 – Israeli military intelligence (AMAN), headed by Ehud Barak, begins arming and training the virulently anti-Western Hezb-i-Islami mujahedeen of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar in Pakistan. This operation is supported by U.S. Congressman Charlie Wilson and funded by the C.I.A. and Saudi Arabia. Israel provides the mujahedeen with weapons it has taken off the battlefield in Lebanon. Israeli military intelligence is creating the cadre of a radical "Islamist" terrorist foe to prepare the stage for U.S. intervention in the Middle East. Hekmatyar and Osama Bin Laden begin working together in 1984 when Bin Laden's "Afghan Arabs" join forces with Hezb-i-Islami. Ali Mohamed, Bin Laden's first trainer, is a Hebrew-speaking Egyptian working for Israeli military intelligence. In 1994, these Israeli-armed and trained terrorist forces merge into Al Qaeda and the Taliban.
1986 – Benjamin Netanyahu publishes Terrorism: How the West Can Win, a collection of papers from a second Netanyahu Institute conference (Washington, D.C., 1984). The book is part of his continuous effort since 1979 to promote the doctrine of a global War on Terror with books, articles, and speeches.
1987 – Eight years after Israeli intelligence chief Isser Harel predicted that Arab terrorists would attack the tallest building in New York City, two of his veteran Mossad agents obtain the security contract for the World Trade Center and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. The Port Authority tears up the contract when it discovers that Avraham Shalom (Bendor), the head of Atwell Security of Tel Aviv, is using a fake name and has a conviction in Israel – as the former chief of the Shin Bet – for the murder of two Palestinians.
1993 – The World Trade Center is hit by a truck bomb in the North Tower, killing six people. Emad Salem, an FBI informant and critical witness is paid more than one million dollars for his testimony. Since the alleged conspiracy took place in New Jersey, the Israeli dual-national Michael Chertoff, serving as U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey, plays a key role in the prosecution. Chertoff's Israeli mother was one of the first Mossad agents. The media interpretation of the bombing leads Americans to believe that Muslims want to destroy the Twin Towers.
1998 – Philip Zelikow heads the Catastrophic Terrorism Study Group with Ashton Carter and John Deutch. Their report is published in Foreign Affairs (CFR) at the end of the year. The Zelikow report begins by "imagining the transforming event" of catastrophic terrorism "that could happen next month." Ashton Carter and John Deutch are senior partners of Global Technology Partners, "an exclusive affiliate of Rothschild N.A., formed to make acquisitions of and investments in technology, defense, and aerospace-related companies." Zelikow, the head of the group, will go on to head the 9/11 Commission and write most of the commission's report. Carter goes on to be Secretary of Defense under President Obama.
2000 – Arnon Milchan and his business partner Rupert Murdoch produce a TV series called "The Lone Gunmen." The first episode of the series, "Pilot", is about a passenger airliner being remotely hijacked and flown into the World Trade Center. The footage for the climactic sequence when the plane is approaching the Twin Towers is actually filmed flying a helicopter over Manhattan. The program airs on Murdoch's Fox Television on March 4, 2001, six months before 9/11, and is viewed by 13 million U.S. viewers.
2000, September – A Neo-Con think tank, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan in 1997, publishes a paper entitled "Rebuilding America’s Defenses," which specifically calls for the U.S. to occupy Iraq and other radical changes in U.S. military policy. The "process of transformation" the paper says, "is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."
2001, 9/11 – In a spectacular act of terrorism the tallest buildings in New York City are destroyed, just as Mossad chief Isser Harel predicted 22 years earlier. The terror attacks of 9/11 bear the hallmarks of an Israeli false-flag operation designed to start their long-planned war agenda. Ehud Barak immediately calls for an operational "war against terror" on BBC World and Sky News television. Barak is Israel's most senior military officer as the former commander of the Israel's covert commando force (Sayeret Matkal), head of military intelligence (AMAN), chief of staff, and both prime minister and defense minister until March 2001.
While tens of thousands are feared dead in the rubble, the New York Times asks Benjamin Netanyahu on 9/11 about the effect the terror attacks will have on U.S.-Israeli relations. Netanyahu says: “It's very good… it will generate immediate sympathy.”
2001, October 7 – The War on Terror begins with a U.S. bombing campaign in Afghanistan. In December, the Taliban is ousted and Hamid Karzai is installed to head a transitional government. The war in Afghanistan goes on to become the longest war in U.S. history.
2001, October – General Wesley Clark visits the Pentagon and is informed of the planned war agenda: "We’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off, Iran.”
2003, March 20 – The Bush administration invades Iraq claiming that Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and that the Iraqi government poses an immediate threat to the United States and its coalition allies. No evidence, however, of WMDs is found to verify the claims used to start the war.
2003, March 31 – The 9/11 Commission headed by Executive Director Philip Zelikow holds its first hearing in New York City. Zelikow has a complete outline of the commission’s final report before the commission even begins its work. His outline is detailed with chapter headings, subheadings, and sub-subheadings. Zelikow shows his report to Commission Chairman Tom Kean and Vice-chairman Lee Hamilton and they like it, but think it could be seen as evidence of having a pre-determined outcome. They decide to keep it secret from the commission’s staff.
2008, April 16 – "Netanyahu Says 9/11 Terror Attacks Good for Israel" the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz reports, quoting Benjamin Netanyahu: "We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq."
Although this timeline is by no means complete, it is sufficient to show the common origin of the 9/11 terror atrocity and the War on Terror. Both originated from the same source at the same time – Israeli military intelligence under the political leadership of the notorious terrorist Menachem Begin of the Likud (formerly Irgun) in the late 1970s. A closer examination of the evidence is found in Solving 9/11: The Deception that Changed the World and Solving 9/11: The Original Articles, a set of books containing my 9/11 research that shows exactly who had the means, motive, and opportunity to commit the crime – and carry out the cover-up upon which the War on Terror depended.
It is not, as the American people were led to believe, that the terrorism of 9/11 simply fell out of the clear blue sky and that the War on Terror and radical changes in U.S. domestic and foreign policy followed as a result. Rather, the evidence proves that the 9/11 attacks were carried out in order to kick-start the Israeli war agenda known as the War on Terror.
Support Christopher Bollyn's work. Donate by PayPal to: firstname.lastname@example.org or click here: www.bollyn.com/donate/
"The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from this madness is to expose the true source of terrorism."
- Christopher Bollyn
9/11 Truth is Anything but Radical
Updated May 7, 2017
"The first signs of America’s transformation after 9/11 were obvious: mass deportations, foreign invasions, legalizing torture, indefinite detention, and the suspension of the laws of war for terror suspects. Some of the grosser violations of democratic norms we only learned about later, like the web of government surveillance… Shocking policies abroad, like torture at Abu Ghraib and extrajudicial detention at Guantanamo Bay, today are reflected in policies at home, like for-profit prisons, roundups of immigrant children, and SWAT teams that rove through communities with Humvees and body armor. The global war on terror created an obsession with threats and fear — an obsession that has become so routine and institutionalized that it is the new normal." – "We are the war on terror, and the war on terror is us" by Thanassis Cambanis, Boston Globe, March 23, 2017
The "mainstream media" – a complete misnomer if ever there was one – would have us believe that 9/11 truth is the domain of radical and wacky "conspiracy theorists." These labels, however, are simply more misnomers used by the controlled media, which is complicit in the 9/11 cover-up, to misrepresent and marginalize the growing number of people who understand that we have been lied to about what really happened on 9/11.
The 9/11 truth movement is anything but radical. The real radicals are, in fact, the traitors in the political and media arenas who have pushed the lies about 9/11 and the War on Terror for the past fifteen years and counting. This distinction needs to be made absolutely clear.
In political terms, radical is defined as "in favor of thorough and complete political or social change." Conservative, on the other hand, is defined as "opposed to great or sudden social change."
The "transformation" of the United States with radical political and social changes began in the aftermath of 9/11 as a result of the government accepting and acting on an utterly unproven narrative about what happened on the day America was attacked.
The real radicals and revolutionaries are the ones who transformed America by taking the U.S. military into Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, and Syria, as part of the Global War on Terror after 9/11, without ever presenting any proof to justify going to war. The fifteen-year-old War on Terror campaign has robbed the U.S. of trillions of dollars, killed and wounded millions of people, and radically changed the way of life in America.
The 9/11 truth movement, which I have been a part of since the beginning, is strongly opposed to the War on Terror because the truth movement is comprised of concerned and responsible citizens who grasp the essence of 9/11 truth and understand that the War on Terror is based on a complete fabrication, the official 9/11 myth that has been proven to be utterly false. In spite of abundant evidence disproving the false narrative, the controlled politicians and media continue to promote it. All of the drastic political and social changes that have been imposed on America and the world as a result of the 9/11 deception are based on nothing more than a pack of lies and fabrications.
TRAITORS vs PATRIOTS
It needs to be made crystal clear that the controlled media, which is complicit in the 9/11 cover-up, has shown that it is part of a criminal conspiracy by going on the offensive against the 9/11 truth movement. The truth movement is, after all, comprised of responsible, courageous, and patriotic citizens who stand by the sensible and logical demand to see the evidence before assigning blame and rushing to war. The people in the 9/11 truth movement have no reason to be ashamed, while those in government and media who have supported the criminal cover-up of 9/11 are guilty of no less than treason.
Treason is specifically defined in the U.S. Constitution: "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."
"Levying War" is defined as:
The assembling of a body of men for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable object; and all who perform any part however minute, or however remote from the scene of action, and who are leagued in the general conspiracy, are considered as engaged in levying war, within the meaning of the constitution. - A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States, John Bouvier (1856)
The U.S. government declared the 9/11 attacks to be "an act of war," which means that the people "who are leagued in the general conspiracy" have engaged in levying War against the United States. This would include those "who perform any part however minute, or however remote from the scene of action." This would also include those who participated in the 9/11 cover-up for they have given "Aid and Comfort" to those who carried out the attacks.
The traitors and radicals among us are those in positions of power in government and media who have used their influence to cover up the truth about 9/11 as they promoted an open-ended and illegal war agenda based on nothing but unproven allegations. These people have no defense for their treasonous acts.
Sixteen years after 9/11, we live in an artificially imposed reality where everything seems topsy-turvy, but don't let the professional liars in the media and government fool you. 9/11 truth is neither marginal nor radical. It is in fact the most important political issue of our time. It is a common sense peace movement comprised of patriotic and responsible Americans who demand truth and justice and refuse to accept their nation being hijacked into criminal and costly wars of aggression waged on behalf of a foreign power. Truthers should be proud of having the intelligence and moral courage to stand up for what is right.
Behind George Bush and the Vulcans were their deputies and advisers...
...the Zionist Neo-Cons pushing the Israeli "War on Terror."
Support Christopher Bollyn's work. Donate by PayPal to: email@example.com or click here: www.bollyn.com/donate/
"The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from this madness is to expose the true source of terrorism." - Christopher Bollyn
Dying 9/11 First Responder - Avenge Us.
March 2, 2017
The following text is from the last five minutes of "September 11: The New Pearl Harbor," an excellent video on the 9/11 evidence by Massimo Mazzucco. The "Epilogue" is highly recommended viewing (as is the whole video) and begins at 4:48:00 with the Question for Sen. John McCain and leads to the "Final Question" and "Last Word" at the end of the video at 4:53.
This brings us to the last question, which is not only for the debunkers, but for anyone who cares about freedom, democracy, and an honest government.
Question: If you were aware of solid evidence disproving the official version and suggesting the involvement of some rogue elements of the government in the terrorist attacks, would it be more unpatriotic and anti-American to ask for a new investigation, or to turn a blind eye to it and pretend such evidence doesn't exist?
Given that the people's trust in institutions is of paramount importance for a nation's well-being, would that trust be better served by denying the evidence of a conspiracy, or by bringing those suspected to accountability in a court of law?
"The Last Word" by David Miller, First Responder
I want to tell you tonight about the people we call heroes and are still in growing numbers living in terrible physical and economic circumstances as they struggle with the carcinogenic effects of the toxic chemical soup ground zero became…
I don't think we're crazy. Conspiracies are only evidence the courts won't hear. We who are still dying from 9/11, who went to the towers and into that pile, now live with those buildings in our lungs, our digestive systems, and our blood. For myself and far too many of us, we search and the effective treatment is going to arrive far too late. I have double metastisizations in both lungs; that's just a reality.
We were also killed on 9/11 - Avenge us.
– David Miller, 9/11 first responder, 2006 (passed away four years later in December 2010)
A former employee of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has stepped forward and criticized the government agency for ignoring the scientific errors found in its report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) more than eight hours after the September 11, 2001, attacks.
Awareness is growing of the disconnect between the NIST WTC reports and logical reasoning. The level of interest in '15 years later' is a good example. Due to the nature of communication in today's world, that awareness may increase approximately exponentially. Why not NIST blow the whistle on itself now while there is still time? - Truth is where our healing lies. - Peter Michael Ketcham, former NIST employee
Why Are You Not a 9-11 Truther?
January 13, 2017
I think we can all agree that understanding what really happened on 9-11 is of tremendous importance to the people of the United States, and indeed to the entire world. As the seminal event of the "War on Terror," 9-11 led directly to two wars, in Afghanistan and Iraq, and a whole host of military interventions across the Middle East and beyond. It also brought profound changes at home, changes which have affected many aspects of life in America. All of this, of course, has come at great cost to the American people. Since September 2001, the wars and "homeland security" measures have cost the U.S. about $2.5 trillion.
The TSA airport security inspection is just one of the changes imposed on the public as a result of 9-11.
Because 9-11 is of such historical importance it is essential that we know the truth of what really happened and who is behind the terror attacks. Polls have clearly shown that the American people do not think their government has been truthful about 9-11.
In the first five years after 9-11, the New York Times and CBS News did three polls in which they asked the public:
When it comes to what they knew prior to 9/11 about possible terrorist attacks against the U.S., do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying?
In 2002, 73 percent thought the administration was "mostly lying" or "hiding something". That number went up to 76 percent in 2004, and to 81 percent in October 2006. When they found that only sixteen percent of the population thought the administration was "telling the truth"… they stopped polling.
With four-out-five Americans convinced the Bush administration was "mostly lying" or "hiding something" a new word entered our vocabulary in 2005 - "truther". An informal word, Merriam-Webster defines "truther" as "one who believes that the truth about an important subject or event is being concealed from the public by a powerful conspiracy." By this definition more than 80 percent of the population would be 9-11 truthers.
ARE YOU A TRUTHER?
If you are not a truther, why aren't you? This is a serious question that needs to be asked of anyone and everyone who is not interested in finding the truth about what really happened on 9-11.
Let's be logical. We certainly agree that 9-11 is of the utmost importance so it is not a matter of someone dismissing 9-11 truth as being unimportant. If you are not a truther there can be only two possible reasons why: either you think that the official story is true, or you have doubts about the government narrative but are afraid to let people know what you think.
If you are in the latter category it is a matter of overcoming your fears and standing up for the truth. The best way to do this is to inform yourself about 9-11 so your knowledge gives you the confidence to stand up and defend your position. Don't worry about others being offended. The facts will turn them around too, when they know them.
If, however, you are in the first category and think the official story is true, then it must be a matter of a lack of awareness of some crucial facts and evidence from the scene of the crime. While there are many facts that raise serious doubts about the veracity of the official story of 9-11, there is also compelling evidence that proves it is false.
The evidence of molten iron seen falling from the South Tower and found in large amounts in the rubble and dust is such compelling evidence. The evidence of molten iron simply rules out the possibility that the government story about the destruction of the Twin Towers is true.
Molten metal, presumed to be iron, cascaded from the 81st floor of the South Tower for seven minutes before the explosive demolition of the tower.
The fact that molten metal, presumed to be iron, was present in large quantities on the 81st floor of the South Tower proves that temperatures much higher than those given by the government were reached in the towerprior to and during the explosive demolition. Such high temperatures could not have been caused by burning jet fuel or office fires, a fact that cannot be squared with the government explanation for the collapse of the towers.
The fact that streams and pools of molten iron were seen in the rubble and at the base of the towers is further proof that the government story is false. The documented evidence is incompatible with the government explanation of the collapses. The problem was quite evident in the video of NIST (National Institute of Science and Technology) engineer John L. Gross where he is asked about the evidence of molten iron being found in the rubble – and denies it even existed. The NIST explanation of the collapses of the towers simply cannot be true in the face of documented evidence of molten iron, so Gross had to deny the existence of the evidence.
MICRO SPHERES OF MOLTEN IRON
The scientific evidence that at least six percent of the dust of the demolished towers is comprised of billions of tiny balls of molten iron (i.e. iron-rich spheres, R.J. Lee study of dust) is another fact that contradicts the government explanation. These extremely small iron-rich spheres are not to be confused with the molten iron seen in large amounts. The micro spheres of iron were evidently produced by a highly energetic nano-composite of super-thermite, chips of which were found in the dust by Dr. Steven E. Jones. When the chips of this material were heated to 430 degrees C, they detonated and produced extreme heat and iron-rich micro spheres identical to those found in the dust. The pools of molten iron were, most likely, created by large amounts of conventional thermite pre-placed in the buildings and perhaps on the planes themselves.
The WTC dust contained billions of tiny balls of molten iron that were created during the explosive demolition of the towers.
In any case, the evidence of molten iron and super-thermite proves that the government (i.e. NIST) and media explanation of what caused the destruction of the Twin Towers is false. The fact that John Gross, one of the NIST engineers who wrote the report, denied any knowledge of molten iron indicates that the report is intentionally false and required the omission of documented evidence in order to be able to come to the conclusions it was meant to come to.
This means that the American public has been intentionally lied to about what really caused the destruction of the Twin Towers. The evidence is clear and compelling: the government explanation for what really happened when nearly 2,700 people were killed during the explosive demolition of the World Trade Center is false and cannot be supported by any reasonable person.
So, if you have not been a 9-11 truther because you believed the government story, you will be a truther as soon as you grasp the meaning of the evidence of molten iron discussed in this article. In order to support the false conclusion of his fraudulent report John Gross of NIST had to deny the existence of molten iron in the rubble, something you now know all about.
To support Christopher Bollyn's work for 9-11 truth and justice and his upcoming speaking tour: Donate by PayPal to firstname.lastname@example.org or click here: www.bollyn.com/donate/
Tons of molten metal, presumably iron, fell from the 81st floor of the South Tower for seven minutes before the building was demolished. Although this is obviously a very important piece of forensic evidence pertaining to the murderous destruction of the tower, it has never been discussed by the mainstream media. Why? What does this tell us about the media's role in supporting the fraudulent War on Terror? What does this say about the media's complicity in a conspiracy to wage a war of aggression?
If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you're mis-informed. ― Mark Twain
Most people rely on the mass media to understand important events like 9-11. This means, that to a great extent, the public understanding of what happened on 9-11 is limited to the information provided by the mainstream media. By ignoring essential evidence and omitting important facts about 9-11 the media protected the false narrative that was used to initiate the fraudulent War on Terror and take the nation to war in Afghanistan and Iraq. The media moguls behind this censorship need to be held accountable for their complicity in a conspiracy to wage a war of aggression.
The controlled media was quick to call the 9-11 attacks "an act of war", a decision which effectively precluded a criminal investigation from being carried out.
USA Today reported that 86 percent of the population considered the attacks "acts of war" before any investigation of the evidence. The huge amounts of molten iron disprove the official story of 9-11. So who really carried out these "acts of war" and who put tons of thermitic materials in the Twin Towers?
Protecting the false narrative of 9-11 was essential for the War on Terror agenda to go forward. This required censoring any discussion of evidence that contradicted the false narrative being fed to the public. In the beginning, media censorship became obvious in how certain subjects were treated. Eyewitness reports of explosions, for example, were reported once, if at all, and never repeated. The BBC's silent treatment of Stephen Evans' reports of having seen and felt a "series of explosions" in the South Tower before it fell is a good example of this censorship.
Other stories, such as the large number of Israeli terror suspects who were arrested on 9-11 and evidently "tied in" to the atrocity were never discussed in the media more than once, if at all.
One very important aspect of the destruction of the World Trade Center that has been completely omitted by the controlled media is the presence of huge amounts of molten iron seen before, during, and after the explosive demolition of the Twin Towers. Molten metal was seen in television footage falling from the South Tower before it was destroyed, observed by firemen and professional contractors in the rubble, and found in large quantities in the form of tiny iron spheres in the dust of the demolished towers by independent and government scientists. The tiny iron-rich spheres are, in fact, so commonly found in the dust that their presence is called a signature characteristic of WTC dust, which means it is an identifying characteristic of the dust.
Extremely hot molten metal, presumably iron, was seen cascading from the 81st floor for seven minutes before the tower fell.
A large thermitic reaction was seen one minute earlier occurring in the same place.
A huge cascade of molten metal, presumed to be iron, can be seen falling from the 81st floor of the South Tower for about seven minutes before the tower fell. Firemen reported seeing "molten steel" flowing in the rubble pile "like a volcano" while contractors reported finding pools of molten iron, in the molten state, beneath all three collapsed towers when they reached the bedrock of Manhattan.
Firemen and contractors reported seeing "molten steel" in the rubble.
The demolition of the Twin Towers evidently involved energetic and explosive materials that created billions of tiny balls of iron. Chips of a highly energetic nano-composite of thermite were found in the dust by Dr. Steven E. Jones, a discovery that was documented in a peer-reviewed paper published in 2009. When this thermitic material was heated to 430 degrees C, it detonated and released a great deal of heat and produced tiny balls of iron. This energetic explosive material appears to have been the source of the tiny iron spheres found in the dust.
The bi-layered active thermitic material found in the dust of the World Trade Center by Dr. Steven E. Jones, et al.
When the thermitic material was heated to 430 degrees C it detonated, creating intense heat and tiny iron-rich spheres identical to those found in the dust. Source: "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe", Steven E. Jones, et al.
These "iron-rich spheres" were documented in every study of the dust, both government and private, but never reported by the mainstream media. The R.J. Lee study of the dust in the Deutsche Bank building at the southern edge of the World Trade Center complex found that iron spheres comprised nearly 6 percent of the dust. The U.S. Geological Survey's (U.S.G.S.) Particle Atlas of World Trade Center Dust includes high-quality micrographs of these tiny spheres and chemical analysis of their composition. The U.S.G.S. survey also discovered spheres of molybdenum which were not included in the print version. It should be noted that molybdenum has a very high melting point of 2,623 degrees C, or 4,753 degrees F. These spheres of molten iron and molybdenum are proof that the demolition of the towers was much hotter than the government claims.
The iron-rich spheres found in the U.S.G.S. study of the dust
The first evidence of large amounts of molten metal, presumably iron, was seen falling from the 81st floor of the South Tower seven minutes before it fell. Firemen and contractors working on the pile reported seeing "molten steel" running through the rubble and in pools beneath all three collapsed towers.
The R.J. Lee Group analyzed the dust found in the Deutsche Bank building and published their report on the composition and morphology of the dust in December 2003, in which they reported that iron spheres comprised nearly 6 percent of the dust. The U.S.G.S. published the Particle Atlas of World Trade Center Dust in 2005 in which photographs of the iron spheres were included. In 2006, there were only two copies of the Atlas available in the entire state of California. Fortunately for me, one of them was in the science library at the University of California at Davis, where I was doing research on the dust and smoke of the WTC destruction.
The R.J. Lee study of the dust found iron spheres comprised nearly 6 percent of the dust. That is a very large percentage and can not be explained by the official explanation.
While 9-11 researchers were aware of these discoveries the general public was not simply because the mainstream media censored any discussion of it. So, why have these fundamental discoveries of forensic evidence pertaining to the destruction of the Twin Towers, in which some 2,700 people were killed, not been reported by the mainstream media?
The evidence of molten iron and other metals had to be omitted from the government and media explanation because its presence completely contradicts the official narrative of 9-11. The government story falls apart when this evidence is presented, so the controlled media has simply omitted any mention of it for the past fifteen years.
This omission was intentional because the evidence of large amounts of molten iron in the towers and rubble destroys the official narrative. This narrative had to be protected because it is the false story the public was sold in order to get public opinion to support waging the Global War on Terror. The evidence of molten iron contradicts that story, so information about it had to be withheld from the public.
If the media had informed the public of the huge amount of molten iron in the Twin Towers when it was first seen and every time its presence was re-discovered, the entire public understanding of what happened on 9-11 would have been different, and the motivation for waging war in Afghanistan and Iraq would have been completely derailed. The media's betrayal of the American people and the republic in this regard is unforgivable. The people who conspired to keep this information from the public should be investigated and charged with complicity in a conspiracy to wage a war of aggression, a crime against the peace.
To support Christopher Bollyn's work for 9-11 truth and justice and his upcoming speaking tour: Donate by PayPal to email@example.com or click here: www.bollyn.com/donate/
Our Line in the Sand: Prosecute the Compound Crime of 9-11 and the War on Terror
January 5, 2017
Why Trump Must Investigate the Compound Crime of 9-11 and the War on Terror
As Donald Trump prepares to take office many Americans hope he will steer a new course and extract the United States from the quagmires of Afghanistan, Syria, and Iraq. Critics of Trump point to the fact that Trump has many Zionist Jews on his staff, saying he will implement Israel-first, rather than America-first, policies in the region.
Zionist Jews in positions of power in the White House has, however, been the case with every president in recent history. Rahm Emanuel, for example, an Israeli citizen and son of a Jewish terrorist from Yitzhak Shamir's murderous Stern Gang, held highest-level positions in both the Clinton and Obama administrations.
The Israeli agent Rahm Emanuel was the first person appointed by Barack Obama, as White House Chief of Staff. Emanuel had also been senior advisor to Bill Clinton.
If Trump is loyal to the United States he will refrain from making any moves in the Middle East that will exacerbate tensions between the people of the region and the United States. Moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem would certainly inflame the region against America and the American people. There is, on the other hand, nothing to gain by moving the embassy to Israeli-occupied Jerusalem. I would hope that as a businessman Trump would see that moving the embassy is a very bad deal for the United States. Since Trump has promised to move the U.S. Embassy to occupied Jerusalem as one of his first moves as president, it looks like we will soon see which nation he is truly loyal to, the United States or Israel.
LOYAL TO WHOM? Trump has promised to move the U.S. Embassy to Israeli-occupied Jerusalem, a move that would satisfy Zionist extremists but hurt U.S. interests by inflaming tensions in the region.
Another very bad deal for the United States is the global "War on Terror," an Israeli war strategy disguised as a protective effort against fanatical terrorists. If Donald Trump truly wants to make America great again he will have to end this fraudulent war and bring to justice those who took us to war based on lies and fabrications. The war effort in Afghanistan alone costs Americans about $100 million every day!
Tens of thousands of Americans have been wounded in the wars waged in Afghanistan and Iraq.
About 7,000 U.S. military personnel have died in Iraq and Afghanistan and thousands more died as a result of their wounds.
Bringing to justice those who conspired and waged wars of aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq is something that has to happen if Trump is serious about making America great again and "draining the swamp" in Washington. The past fifteen years have been disastrous years of deception and war foisted on the nation by well-known politicians and media moguls. They committed treason against the United States by waging wars of aggression based on nothing but a pack of lies. There needs to be a thorough investigation and prosecution of the politicians and media owners involved in these crimes, an effort which will lead to solving the crime of 9-11.
THE REAL REASON FOR 9-11
9-11 was a sophisticated and complex crime of terrorism and mass murder, but it is much more than that. We would not be discussing it today if it were simply a crime of mass murder that happened fifteen years ago. We need to understand the real reason the terrorism of 9-11 was carried out.
The 9-11 crime is the worst crime of mass murder in U.S. history, but what makes it even worse is the fact that the truth of the crime has been covered up by the government and controlled media in order to deceive the public into waging criminal wars of aggression against people in the Middle East who had absolutely nothing to do with the terrorism of 9-11. The false-flag terrorism of 9-11 was, after all, only the initiating event of a compound crime that has profoundly changed our American reality as it took us to war in nations around the world. Because these crimes have been carried out by the same organization, dismantling the criminal network and exposing the people behind the compound crime will reveal the true culprits behind the 9-11 atrocity.
The most important aspect of the 9-11 crime was attaching a false narrative to the atrocity blaming Osama bin Laden and his 19 Arab Muslims. Getting the public to accept this fabricated story was essential to starting the Global War on Terror. This was the primary reason for the terrorism of 9-11.
The public was told that Osama bin Laden and 19 Arabs destroyed the Twin Towers although no evidence was ever presented to prove the government case and the evidence that disproved this was ignored.
Covering up the truth and blocking a criminal investigation was the only way the government and controlled media could succeed in tricking the public into believing the fairy tale about Osama and his band of fanatical Muslims. We know the names of the people who blocked a criminal investigation and who carried out the cover-up of 9-11. We also know the names of the people in the government and media who promoted the false narrative and took the nation to war based on nothing but a pack of lies.
Fifteen years after 9-11, it is a waste of time to argue about the minute details of the crime itself. You would have to be a very misinformed person at this point to believe that Osama bin Laden and 19 Arabs destroyed the Twin Towers. The fact that the dust of the destroyed towers contained billions of tiny drops of molten iron and molybdenum, and that pools of molten iron were found at the base of all three towers that fell on 9-11 is solid proof that the demolition of the towers was caused by energetic materials burning much hotter than burning jet fuel. The official version cannot account for the evidence, so it simply ignores it. Concerning the events of 9-11 and its global consequences, such willful disregard for the facts and evidence is unacceptable in any state that pretends to be democratic and peace-loving.
Tiny balls of molten iron were formed during the demolition of the Twin Towers, a fact that cannot be explained by the official version of events.
Tons of molten metal, presumed to be iron, fell from the 81st floor of the South Tower for seven minutes prior to the explosive demolition of the tower. The people trapped above this floor were being cooked alive, which is why hundreds chose to jump. The demolition of the Twin Towers killed some 2,700 people. Despite such documented evidence of molten iron the government-funded studies cannot account for its presence, so they simply ignore it.
OUR LINE IN THE SAND
The publication of a scientific paper in 2009 about the discovery of tiny chips of active thermitic material in the dust of the destroyed towers was the final nail in the coffin of the false narrative of 9-11. Anyone who accepted the official version after the publication of this paper was ignorant of the evidence. Anyone who actively promoted the false narrative after 2009, however, is guilty of much worse. It is forgivable to be ignorant of the facts, but to promote a false story while ignoring the evidence is to be an agent of deception.
SUPER-THERMITE - The active thermitic material found in the dust of the World Trade Center proves that the government explanation of what happened to the Twin Towers is false, and intentionally false.
We must have a blue-ribbon investigation of the compound crime of 9-11 and the fraudulent War on Terror in order to rectify the wrongs of the past fifteen years and correct the course of the ship of state. Failure to hold treasonous criminals from previous administrations accountable for their serious crimes against humanity only facilitates more crimes being committed in the future. If Donald Trump is serious about rooting out corruption and "draining the swamp" this is where he needs to start.
As concerned citizens we must be steadfast in demanding that the new administration establish a blue-ribbon investigation into the crimes of 9-11 and the War on Terror. We cannot accept exoneration or pardons being given to treasonous criminals who have hijacked our democratic republic and committed the most serious war crimes, including waging wars of aggression.
To support Christopher Bollyn's work for 9-11 truth and justice and his up-coming speaking tour: Donate by PayPal to firstname.lastname@example.org