The Washington Report has added Solving 9-11 to the AET Book Club catalog.
Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World is now available through the American Educational Trust (AET) Book Club in Washington, D.C. The AET Book Club was created by former U.S. Foreign Service officers to provide quality books about the Middle East and U.S. policies in the region. Solving 9-11 is a new addition to the AET Book Club catalog as of November.
The AET Book Club (www.MiddleEastBooks.com) is a project of the American Educational Trust, a non-profit, non-partisan organization incorporated in 1982 in Washington, D.C., by retired U.S. Foreign Service officers.
The American Educational Trust provides balanced and accurate information concerning U.S. relations with Middle Eastern states. AET promotes U.S.-Middle East understanding with an emphasis on informed debate and supports solutions that are consistent with the charter of the United Nations, international law, the Geneva Conventions, and traditional American support for human rights, self-determination, and fair play.
AET's Foreign Policy Committee has included former U.S. ambassadors, government officials, and members of Congress, including the late Democratic Senator J. William Fulbright and Republican Senator Charles Percy, both former chairmen of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
As part of its educational mission, AET publishes the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, a monthly magazine with the largestcirculation of any Middle East related publication in North America. The Washington Report covers political, cultural, economic, and military issues in the Middle East and the Arab World.
TWO PUNKS FROM CHICAGO - President Barack Obama reacts as Mayor Rahm Emanuel gropes his behind as he arrives in "The Windy City." These criminals certainly do not represent the good people of Chicago or the United States.
Appearance overpowers reality. - Simonides of Ceos, (ca. 500 B.C.)
Democracy leads to anarchy, which is mob rule. - Plato (429-347 BC), Republic, ca. 390 B.C.
It is the foreign element that commits our crimes. There is no native criminal class except Congress. - Mark Twain
As we prepare for the media circus of another sham election in the United States, Americans need to address the severely deviant state of our republic, and the real choices we face as citizens. By real choices I don’t mean our selection at the polls between two of the most unpopular presidential candidates in history, because in reality that decision has already been made and we are not the ones who made it. The choices that I am talking about are the actions we can take to try and restore our republic to a legal system of government.
As Simonides, the Greek poet, noted five centuries before Christ, “appearance overpowers reality.” Creating the appearance of authenticity and legitimacy is the real purpose of the media circus surrounding our elections. Since the candidates are actually not chosen by the voters and because the citizenry has absolutely no oversight over the counting of the votes, the media’s primary role is to give our sham elections the appearance of being authentic and democratic, when in fact they are not. Because so many Americans look to television and the controlled press for the news, the appearance of authenticity is enough to convince most people that we have transparent and democratic elections, when we don’t.
The deception on Election Day is probably the most important function that the controlled media performs for the criminal network that controls our government because it involves the complete disenfranchisement of the citizenry and the theft of our republic, repeated every four years. The fraudulent election process is, after all, the fundamental deception that allows the criminals to run our nation.
Because our elections are fraudulent, the representation is fraudulent. This is to say that we do not really choose the people who represent us, locally, or at the state and federal level. This means that today Americans face the same predicament our forefathers faced in the 1770s: taxation without representation. We are forced to financially contribute to a government that does not represent us.
Having convinced the great majority of the population that the election is authentic and the votes are correctly counted, most people won’t question the legitimacy of the politicians who rule over them. Having accepted the fake election results as legitimate, the public is unlikely to protest the criminal wars and policies that are then started by the criminal gang that has taken power.
Since the fraudulent election of 2000 and the false-flag terror atrocity of 9-11, the deviance of our nation has greatly increased from the accepted standards of a democratic Western society. The severely deviant state of our republic can most easily be seen in the illegal wars of aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq and the extrajudicial killings by drones in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia. These are clearly acts that are both illegal and immoral.
Having dragged our great nation into costly wars and occupations of foreign countries, it is easy for the criminal gang in power to plunder the national treasury and direct huge flows of cash to their fellow criminals. Untold billions of dollars were looted from the U.S. Treasury in this way during the wars of aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq. More was stolen during the bail-out of 2008-09, which occurred during the transition between presidents.
The election of 2012 will be the third presidential election since the false-flag terror atrocity of 9-11. In the eleven years since some 3,000 Americans were murdered in broad daylight in New York City we have yet to see one politician at the federal level demand a high-level criminal investigation of the crimes of 9-11. The Bush-Cheney White House adamantly refused to investigate 9-11 and started two criminal wars based on a blatant pack of lies about who was responsible for the terror attacks. The Obama-Biden White House only perpetuated the lies about 9-11 as it increased the war effort in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
What the American people really want is a return to normalcy. We want to live in a prosperous and peaceful nation that is not engaged in costly and illegal wars halfway around the world. We want a government whose first concern is to improve the standard of living for the American people. It is futile, however, to wish for a return to normalcy until the crimes of 9-11 are properly investigated and the real culprits are prosecuted and punished. As long as the criminal gang behind 9-11 continues to control our media and elections we will be dragged further and further into their criminal deviancy.
In order to restore our constitutional republic there are two fundamental things that need to happen: we need to return to transparent and democratic elections; and we need to have a proper and thorough criminal investigation into the events of 9-11. What we, as individual citizens, can do is demand these things and share our opinion with others. It is certainly not at all outrageous for a citizen of a democratic republic to demand that the counting of the votes be open and transparent. Nor is it unusual to demand that the criminal atrocity that changed America be investigated and prosecuted.
Do not be deceived by the media circus that kicks into high gear next week. Remember the hundreds of innocent Americans who died in the towers and those who plunged to their deaths to escape the hellish heat and demand a proper criminal investigation be conducted into the events of 9-11. Demand that the votes in your local elections be openly counted in front of the citizens and build from there to the county and state elections. It is well known that the most prosperous societies are those that are least corrupt.
The Explosive Power of Nano-Thermite
October 23, 2012
The 30-second video below demonstrates the explosive reaction of a minute quantity of what the chemist calls "homemade super-thermite," composed of "extremely small particle sizes" of a combination of 50 percent ferrocerium, 33 percent copper (II) oxide, and 17 percent sodium nitrate. In this reaction, one-twentieth of a gram (50 milligrams) of the energetic material is ignited. The reaction is both explosive and exothermic, i.e. it releases heat.
This experiment shows that when the components are very small particles and well mixed, the reaction is much faster and more explosive than when larger grain sizes are used. The active thermitic nanocomposite found in the dust of the World Trade Center contained much smaller particles (nano-particles) and was probably much more explosive per gram. The energetic material found in the WTC dust certainly wasn't homemade and it contained aluminum and iron oxide, among other things.
DUST CONTAINED ULTRA-FINE SPHERES OF LEAD
Richard J. Lee did a study of the dust found in the Deutsche Bank building, which was severely damaged during the "WTC Event". Among other things, the Lee study of the WTC dust found large quantities of ultra-fine (i.e. nano-size) spherical particles of lead. These ultra-fine particles of lead are extremely toxic because their small size makes them respirable, and once in the body they are able to penetrate to the nucleus of the human cell. The ultra-fine particles of lead found in the WTC dust were "as much as a million times more respirable than lead in other dust," according to the expert study. This fact is one reason why so many people who were exposed to the dust and smoke from the destroyed towers have succumbed to cancer.
The presence of the ultra-fine spheres of lead in the dust is certainly evidence of extremely high temperatures during the demolition of the towers. They may also be the remains of a novel and highly energetic material that contained a lead oxide. Barium and sulfur are also commonly used in military-grade thermate.
As the Lee study found:
Various metals (most notably iron and lead) were melted during the WTC Event, producing spherical metallic particles… In addition to the spherical iron and aluminosilicate particles, a variety of heavy metal particles including lead, cadmium, vanadium, yttrium, arsenic, bismuth, and barium particles were produced by the pulverizing, melting and/or combustion of the host materials… Many of the materials, such as lead, cadmium, mercury and various organic compounds, vaporized and then condensed during the WTC Event.
The presence of lead oxide on the surface of mineral wool indicate the existence of extremely high temperatures during the collapse which caused metallic lead to volatilize, oxidixe, and finally condense on the surface of the mineral wool… Lead was present as ultra fine spherical particles… The distribution of the lead in the WTC Dust is primarily in the respirable [breathable] fraction… In the Building, lead was found in the ultra fine fraction, and is as much as a million times more respirable than lead in other dust.
MOLYBDENUM SPHERE FOUND IN DUST
The Molybdenum-rich droplet in this micrograph was found in the dust of the pulverized World Trade Center. This spherule was studied by the scientists for the USGS survey of the dust, but it was left it out of the government-funded study, probably because it is evidence of extremely hot temperatures during the demolition of the Twin Towers. Such high temperatures cannot be explained by the version of events provided by the government. In reality, this droplet was probably formed in an exothermic reaction of ultra-fine particles of aluminum with molybdenum trioxide. This is one of the most energetic (hot, explosive) forms of thermite. (Source - "Extremely High Temperatures during the WTC Destruction," Steven E. Jones, et al)
The melting temperature of molybdenum is 4,753 degrees F, or 2,623 degrees C. There is no explanation how molten molybdenum was created during the destruction of the Twin Towers if it was not caused by an extremely intense thermitic reaction involving molybdenum trioxide.
The following video is a simple demonstration of the explosive energy of the aluminothermic reaction of aluminum with cupric oxide (copper). This explosive reaction was done using a small amount of the components in fine granular sizes. If these components had been combined using ultra-fine (nano-size) particles the reaction would have been much more explosive. Other metal oxides react even more violently.
“Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction” by Dr. Steven E. Jones, Dr. Jeffrey Farrer, Dr. Gregory S. Jenkins, Dr. Frank Legge, James Gourley, Kevin Ryan, Daniel Farnsworth, and Dr. Crockett Grabbe, January 2008 http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf
The Smoking Gun of 9-11
October 15, 2012
Smoke rising from the rubble of the World Trade Center, September 16, 2001 (USGS photo)
"WORKING INSIDE THE STACK OF AN INCINERATOR" - FDNY firemen working in the smoke coming from the rubble of the World Trade Center. Intensely hot chemical reactions beneath the pile produced extreme heat for more than three months despite being continuously doused with water. The conditions were "brutal" for people working at 'Ground Zero' without respirators and only slightly less so for those working or living in adjacent buildings, Thomas Cahill, a professor of physics and atmospheric science, told me. "It was like they were working inside the stack of an incinerator," he said. More than 64 members of the FDNY have died since 9-11 as a result of their exposure.
If any question why we died, tell them, because our fathers lied. - Rudyard Kipling, Epitaphs of the War (1914-1918)
Given the scope of the tragedy from last week, I am glad to reassure the people of New York and Washington, D.C. that their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink. - Christie Whitman, EPA Administrator, September 18, 2001
For everyone downtown, being caught in that dust cloud was an enormous exposure, but the rescue and recovery people stayed on site, breathing in a witch's brew of toxic compounds, fibers, concrete dust and metals. - Dr. Michael Crane, Medical Director of the World Trade Center Health Program at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York Daily News, September 7, 2011
THE SMOKING GUN - The whitish smoke coming from the chemical fires that raged beneath the rubble was a "witch's brew" which sickened and killed thousands of first responders and others who worked on or near the pile. This is a subject which government officials and the controlled media have avoided.
HELL ON EARTH - Infrared imaging on September 16, 2001, shows intense hotspots on the surface of the rubble. Yellow is hotter than red in these images. The hotspot labeled A, in the ruins of Larry Silverstein's WTC 7, is 1,340 degrees F (~726 degrees C). The East corner of the South Tower, where tons of molten metal were seen falling before demolition, Point G, shows a surface temperature of 1,376 degrees F (~747 degrees C). This means that a piece of aluminum placed on the pile at these points would melt instantly.
September 2012 marked the passing of the eleventh year since the terror attacks of 9-11 and the destruction of the World Trade Center. To mark the occasion the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health announced a ruling that added about 60 cancers to be covered under the James Zadroga 9-11 Health and Compensation Act. This act is meant to help cover the medical costs for people whose health has been seriously affected by their exposure to the dust and/or toxic smoke that rose from the burning rubble of the World Trade Center.
While this may be welcome news for the two to three thousand people who currently have cancer as a result of having worked on or near the smoking pile, it is too late for the estimated one thousand who have already died. Having written about the extraordinary amount of ultrafine or nanoparticles discovered in the smoke and the extreme temperatures that are required to produce them, I decided to dig into the subject more deeply.
I began with the news articles about the decision to add a host of cancers to the Zadroga Act. What I found was that the focus of the articles was primarily on “the dust” while very little was said about the smoke that rose from the pile for three months after 9-11. An October 2012 search of news articles about the cancers and the Zadroga Act found none that linked the smoke to the cancer risk. On the other hand there were 166 articles that mentioned “the dust”.
THE SMOKING PILE - This photo from October 11, 2001, shows white smoke billowing from beneath the rubble. Thermitic reactions produce aluminum oxide, which is a white smoke. (Stan Honda, AP)
Most of the articles that did include the word “smoke” were those that contained the word in a caption to a photo taken by Stan Honda of the Associated Press. The photo caption reads: Firefighters make their way over the ruins of the World Trade Center through clouds of dust and smoke at ground zero in New York. Hundreds of people are suing New York City over cancer diagnoses they received after working at ground zero.
This is a most peculiar omission that can only be intentional. By omitting any discussion of the smoke the reader is misled into thinking that the huge dust clouds, which resulted from the pulverization of the concrete floors of the Twin Towers, are the major cause of the serious illnesses. The thin bluish smoke, heavily laden with toxic ultrafine particles, which rose from the rubble and was inhaled by many thousands of firemen and other workers on the pile, is not even discussed. Ultrafine particles (i.e. smaller than one-tenth of a micron) have a unique toxicity because their extremely small size allows them to move freely through the body and penetrate the human cell, where they are able to do the most serious damage to the human system.
There is a reason why the controlled media does not discuss the toxicity of these ultrafine particles in the smoke. To discuss these particles would require some explanation about what had created them in the first place. As Dr. Thomas Cahill from the DELTA Group at the University of California at Davis told me in 2006, "Ultra-fine particles require extremely high temperatures, namely the boiling point of the metal."
According to the official version of 9-11, the Twin Towers collapsed due to catastrophic structural failure caused by burning jet fuel and office materials. Because this demonstrably false explanation cannot account for the huge amount of molten metal that accompanied the collapses, it is simply not discussed. The molten metal in the rubble was created by the highly energetic and explosive material that pulverized the Twin Towers. This material is the real smoking gun of 9-11. It was used to destroy the towers and kill nearly 3,000 people on 9-11 and has killed and ruined the lives of thousands more in the past 11 years.
A relative touches a name on the memorial for the FDNY personnel who have died as a result of their exposure to the toxic smoke coming from the rubble pile. Nine names were added in September 2012 bringing the total to 64.
I called the Fire Department of New York (FDNY) and spoke with James Long, director of the office of public information, to ask what the fire department knew about the nature of the fires beneath the rubble. The fire department had doused the smoking rubble continuously with water for several months and applied chemicals without success to try and extinguish the fires. Had the fire department investigated the nature of the fires they had worked so hard to put out? When I asked Mr. Long about the large amounts of molten metal found in the rubble, he denied having any knowledge of it. He claimed to be completely unaware of the video testimony of New York firefighters having seen molten iron flowing “like lava” in the rubble, so I sent him the videos. At this point he stopped responding. He had done his job. He had denied knowing anything about the evidence that cannot be explained by the official version.
For the controlled media and the quislings who hold political power in the governments of New York City and the United States, there is evidently a list of subjects about 9-11 they are not allowed to discuss in any way. At the top of the list of censored subjects we would find the explosive demolition of the Twin Towers and the evidence of molten iron in the towers and the rubble.
PARTNERS IN CRIME - Mayor Michael Bloomberg is a strong supporter of Ehud Barak and the extremist Likud regime ruling Israel. Here he offers support to Defense Minister Barak during Israel's assault on Gaza in December 2008. Barak is one of the chief suspects of the false-flag terrorism of 9-11. Bloomberg is the key Zionist agent behind the 9-11 cover-up in New York City. "Though 9/11 made Michael Bloomberg mayor, he’s sometimes seemed insensitive about its aftereffects on others - he once memorably said he wanted to tell widows they needed to 'suck it up' and move on," New York Magazine reported. Amazing how one holocaust differs from another.
OPERATION CAST LEAD - The Israeli military, under the orders of Ehud Barak, used white phosphorus to kill the people of Gaza during it's Yuletide aggression of 2008. "When Israel’s military actions ended on January 18, some 1,400 Palestinians had been killed. Among the dead were hundreds of unarmed civilians, including about 300 children. Burning was the most common cause of death." (Source: "Operation Cast Lead: It's Zionese for Burning People")
James Long works for the fire department, an agency of the City of New York, which is headed by Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who reportedly said he wanted to tell widows they needed to “suck it up” and move on. James Long works for the Bloomberg administration and has strict guidelines and orders that he has to abide by if he wants to keep his job and pension. If this means he has to lie to the public about what happened on 9-11, he will do so. In this respect he is certainly not the only one.
I have spoken with a number of public officials and experts who should know, but pretend to be completely ignorant of the evidence of molten metal and the extremely high temperatures that occurred during the destruction of the World Trade Center. The energy source that created the molten metal that poured off the 82nd floor of the South Tower before it collapsed evidently remained highly energetic beneath the rubble for 99 days. In spite of abundant evidence of molten metal in the rubble, even Dr. Cahill, who discovered and documented the evidence of vaporized metals in the smoke, refuses to discuss the subject. When I asked Dr. Cahill what could have created the large amount of molten metal, he said there was no thermite in the dust and hung up the phone.
Molten metal poured from the South Tower for seven minutes before the tower was demolished with explosives. This was the location of an intense hot spot in the rubble as seen in the infrared imaging of September 16, 2001, where it is labeled Point G (~1,346 degrees F).
Pools of molten iron were found beneath the rubble weeks after 9-11. New York firefighters and engineers testified having seen molten steel flowing "like lava", but the FDNY and government officials refuse to discuss this evidence.
Tiny solidified droplets were found in the dust of the demolished towers proving that a great deal of molten iron had been produced during the demolitions. (USGS)
A scientific paper written in 2008 by Dr. Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, and others, entitled “Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction” presents evidence to help explain the nature of the intense hot spots in which iron boiled beneath the rubble. This paper discusses the large amount of tiny solidified droplets (spheres) of molten iron and other metals found in the huge dust clouds that rolled across Manhattan on 9-11. These spheres were discovered by scientists who examined the dust for a study done by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). The USGS study did not explain what had caused the large amount of molten spheres but included photographs (i.e. micrographs) of them. The Jones paper includes a micrograph of a similar “molybdenum-rich spherule”, which had been examined for the USGS study but left out of the published report. Molybdenum has an extremely high melting point of 2,623 degrees C or 4,753 degrees F. When molybdenum trioxide is combined with ultrafine aluminum it creates an extremely powerful thermitic explosive - and molten molybdenum. An energetic explosive of this type would explain the presence of tiny molybdenum spheres in the dust.
A solidified molybdenum sphere found in the dust indicates that molten molybdenum was produced during the demolition of the towers. (USGS)
The thermitic material made with aluminum and molybdenum trioxide (top bar) releases more energy per cc than high explosives. The other thermitic composites shown yield even more.
As the paper by Dr. Jones concludes:
The temperatures required for the observed spherule-formation and evaporation of materials observed in the WTC dust are significantly higher than temperatures reachable by the burning of jet fuel and office materials in the WTC buildings. The temperatures required to melt iron (1,538 degrees C) and molybdenum (2,623 degrees C), and to vaporize lead (1,740 degrees C) and aluminosilicates (about 2,760 degrees C), are completely out of reach of the fires in the WTC buildings (maximum 1,100 degrees C)… The data provide strong evidence that chemical reactions which were both violent and highly-exothermic contributed to the destruction of the WTC buildings.
The evidence indicates that novel energetic materials created with military grade nanotechnology were used in the demolition of the three towers that were brought down on 9-11. These materials are made from a variety of metals and elements, traces of which were found in both the smoke and the rubble. The reactions of these materials generated incredible heat prior to and during the demolition and pulverization of the Twin Towers. These thermitic materials cannot be doused with water and do not require the presence of oxygen to react. The material continued to react beneath the rubble causing the unexplained intense hot spots that produced the ultrafine particles that rose in the smoke. These particles are extremely toxic and have caused cancer and other diseases in many of the first responders and others who worked on or near the pile. This nano-structured explosive material pulverized the Twin Towers on 9-11 and has killed many more who have succumbed to the toxic ultrafine particles it produced as it burned beneath the pile. This thermitic material is the real smoking gun of 9-11.
A firefighter walks through the rubble of the World Trade Center. How many more will die as a result of their exposure to the toxic smoke?
Sources and Recommended Reading:
"Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," by Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, and Bradley R. Larsen, The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, 2, pp. 7-31 www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf
"Extremely High Temperatures During the World Trade Center Destruction," by Steven E. Jones, Jeffrey Farrer, Gregory S. Jenkins, Frank Legge, James Gourley, Kevin Ryan, Daniel Farnsworth, and Crockett Grabbe, Journal of 9-11 Studies, 2008 journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp.pdf
Let every eye negotiate for itself And trust no agent; for beauty is a witch. - William Shakespeare, Much Ado About Nothing
In spite of numerous eyewitness reports of explosions prior to and during the demolitions of the Twin Towers, and solid evidence of the explosives used notwithstanding, the government and media continue to deny the facts and tell the public that these were fire-induced collapses of steel framed towers - the first, second, and third such collapses in history. It has never happened before - or since.
In this Western World, which is no more the Western World we used to know, the reality has become a show and it is so much destroyed, ground, and disguised by the mainstream media, political elite, and public laziness or indifference ("They do not know if they are alive", as Solzhenitsyn said when he came to America) that sometimes the Truth comes from the very source of the lies – say the fiction industry, Hollywood.
While shyly celebrating the eleventh anniversary of the so-called attacks of 9/11, and mourning the bizarre assault on its Libyan embassy, the U.S. still fascinates me with its duplicity: it really doesn't know what it does. For while in the reality show, television invites us to believe in whatsoever trash concerning attacks and tumbling towers, in the theatres it admits that everything can be done by the so-called secret services. We are thus torn by the official duplicity, and the Truth becomes a conspiracy theory, like in the Baroque Period.
In a way this duplicity is a weapon that encourages and promotes inertia. I had a French-Russian friend, a famous expert in stay-behind mobs, whose theory was that in our societies the Truth had to be denied to be believed! The false is a moment of the Truth, Hegel once said. Nowadays, Truth is barely a moment of the false of the world we live in. In a dictatorship nobody believes the media; but in a democracy? For my friend Serge de Beketch, indeed, someone who would seek the Truth behind the 9/11 event is considered a conspiracy theorist. Even the engineers and architects who seek to understand the facts are accused and set aside. The military entertainment complex needs this fume to fulfil its deceptive strategy. They tell the Truth not to be believed. It is a tale full of sound and fury, and told by a liar whom nobody trusts...
For instance, you can consider conspiracy theorist and journalist Christopher Bollyn (see his site and book, Solving 9-11) that the Mossad was fully involved in the attacks to motivate America and promote a Western Crusade against the Arab world; and you can be insulted or sued for that; Bollyn and his family had to expatriate. But about the Mossad (it is well-known that movie producer Arnon Milchan is a former intelligence agent who, according to Ha’aretz, helped Israel develop its nuclear arsenal), Hollywood can make the same statement and even in a movie released a few weeks before the attacks of September 11. (September 11 was the date of a famous and important speech by Charles Lindbergh in Des Moines in 1941; it was also the date of the infamous coup against President Salvador Allende of Chile in 1973).
The movie is Operation Swordfish, with John Travolta playing an undercover Mossad agent, who coordinates attacks on American soil to promote Freedom and defend the American way of life (in his proper words). Whom shall I believe: The government's conspiracy theory or Hollywood and Bollyn? The mainstream media of course, who explained poorly how a bunch of ruthless cavemen crashed their invisible planes against the Pentagon and how the huge towers fell down thanks to this cavemen theory! The Taliban guerrillas have such advanced technology...
Want to believe another Truth turned into a "conspiracy theory"?
For instance even in the propagandistic movie The Siege, starring Bruce Willis and Denzel Washington, it is demonstrated that the CIA manipulates and coordinates the attacks of terrorist networks. This movie was shot three years before the 9/11 attacks, in which nobody believes, or so little...
But Hollywood showed us that the attacks come from false-flag terrorists too. See the movie The Long Kiss Goodnight, released in 1996, where the secret agency uses a frozen corpse to help its false-flag script. It is even articulated in this amazing movie (and by Samuel L. Jackson!) that the CIA framed the first attacks on the Twin Towers in 1993! There were only a couple of dead that time. But the military complex and the world of intelligence (!) needed a new enemy after the fall of the Soviet Union! So why not try the Arab world? You just need to blow up a tanker or a plant, put some Muslim corpse in the room, and wait for the Crime Scene Inventors and the mainstream media! You just need to brainwash a bunch of cavemen and you have an army of terrorists!
Why are the western media so stupid? Of course they are paid or threatened. But to understand this interesting question, watch, and watch again Wag the Dog, a masterpiece of wit written by David Mamet and co-starring Robert de Niro and Dustin Hoffman. Here too we have a sex scandal involving a weak president, a false war against a small country, a false-flag terrorist, a Hollywood producer hired to create fume, and the perennial distracted attention of the audiences! For the audiences, like the media, watch the tail – not the dog. Apparently this wonderful movie was never trusted or commented on by political advisers. They don't believe what they see, they just believe what has been said about the event. It is no coincidence that so many courageous Hollywood directors (including Matthieu Kassovitz and David Lynch) and actors (Charlie Sheen, Marion Cotillard, and Willie Nelson) didn't buy the official theory on the infamous attacks. Media and Politics run the show but Hollywood runs the job. And it knows the dark part of the stage.
Last scene of all, that ends this strange eventful history... is, for instance, The Lone Gunmen, a TV series released as a spin-off toThe X-Files. One very interesting aspect of the pilot episode of The Lone Gunmen is the hijacking of an airliner (via remote control of the plane's autopilot system) to crash into the World Trade Center! This, of course, was before the actual 9/11 attack against the World Trade Center. In this case as well the scriptwriters explained for us why this hijacking had been carried out: it was an act of voracity by an arms manufacturer to increase its weapons sales by invoking U.S. retaliation against an extremist dictator... “I'll create the war,” as Randoph Hearst said, the media mogul who inspired Orson Welles. It is well-known today that the U.S. sank some boats in 1898 in Havana in order to declare war on Spain and take all of her colonies...
A good Orthodox too, my friend Serge de Beketch stated gravely that the devil must tell the Truth before he acts. It's his part in the deal. The audience doesn't get it and laughs. And that has cost one million dead in Iraq and a three-trillion dollar war. Why are modern audiences so insensitive? Don't they know they are alive? Don't they know the Truth will set them free? Maybe it is because, in this world, Truth is of no use.
For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face. - 1 Corinthians 13:12 (KJV)
Colorado Public Television aired 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out on August 18, 2012.
In August 2012, when Colorado Public Television aired 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out it marked a significant breakthrough for 9-11 truth. For a PBS affiliate to broadcast the 90-minute film produced by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth means that finally, after 11 years, a mainstream media outlet has been willing to address some of the unanswered questions about 9-11.
9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out presents the opinions of numerous architects and engineers concerning the explosive demolitions that occurred at the World Trade Center on 9-11. The film begins by looking at the unexplained symmetrical collapse of WTC 7, the 47-story tower that fell into its footprint at about 5:25 p.m. on 9-11. Fifteen minutes into the film there is an interesting video clip of a team of demolition workers wearing hard hats coming out of Larry Silverstein’s WTC 7. They clearly warn the people to get back saying, “The building is about to blow up.” This evidence indicates that Silverstein is involved in criminal insurance fraud, having collected more than 400 million dollars from his insurance company for a tower that was intentionally destroyed.
WTC 7 mysteriously collapsed in what appears to most observers to have been a controlled demolition. John Wholihan, a firefighter with Rescue 5 from Staten Island was near the building when it collapsed. Wholihan told me that he heard “many explosions” just before the building collapsed neatly within the perimeter of its foundation. Silverstein received some $441 million in insurance money for his destroyed building although the cause of the collapse remains officially unexplained.
9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out was produced by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
The experts who give their opinions in the film are only confirming what eyewitnesses at the World Trade Center have reported from Day One: explosions were observed in and around the Twin Towers before they collapsed. Louie Cacchioli, for example, a veteran firefighter with the NYFD, told People magazine in September 2001 that he had observed bombs going off inside the tower. “I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building,” People reported Cacchioli saying on September 12, 2001.
Likewise, Steve Evans of the BBC reported witnessing a “series of explosions” at the base of the South Tower before it collapsed. His comments about the explosions were aired on BBC World television on 9-11. It soon became clear, however, that this subject was being censored by the mainstream media. I addressed the eyewitness reports of explosions at the World Trade Center in an article entitled “Survivors Witnessed Explosions Inside Twin Towers” in October 2001.
These eyewitness reports of explosions were stifled and censored by the media because they raised serious questions about what really had caused the Twin Towers to fall. If the media were to address the reports of explosions at the World Trade Center it would bring into question what had actually destroyed the towers – and the hundreds of lives within them. This would expose the entire evil deception that has been spun around the 9-11 atrocity.
The demolition of the Twin Towers with hundreds of workers and firefighters still inside was clearly a criminal act of unmitigated evil, and those who helped to cover-up the crime and deceive the public about what really happened are part of that evil conspiracy. While we don’t yet know who placed the explosives in the Twin Towers, we do know the names of the officials under whose watch the crucial evidence was destroyed, the criminal investigation was blocked, and justice was obstructed.
The hasty destruction of the remaining steel beams and aircraft parts, for example, crucial evidence from the World Trade Center, was carried out while Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff was the key federal official responsible for the criminal investigation and prosecution of 9-11. This crucial evidence was destroyed to protect the evil deception by shielding the real terrorists from being discovered. Michael Chertoff is clearly connected to the terrorist network behind 9-11 as his actions protected the real culprits and were essential for the success of the criminal cover-up and false-flag deception. Why else would he have failed to save the crucial evidence for a proper forensic examination?
The 9-11 cover-up obviously involves senior officials from the administrations of George W. Bush and Barack Obama. One of the hardest things for Americans to acknowledge is that their government and cherished “free press” have betrayed them by intentionally concealing the truth about 9-11 and deceiving the nation into waging two extremely costly and disastrous wars in the Middle East. There is, however, no question that this has been the case and that the criminal network behind the 9-11 cover-up intends to maintain the evil deception.
While the film 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out exposes the government and media lies about what happened to the Twin Towers, it does not discuss who is behind the 9-11 terror atrocity, the cover-up, or the deception that was used to usher in the “War on Terror” and two wars of aggression in the Middle East. To understand who is really behind 9-11 one needs to read Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World. Understanding the deception is the first step to liberating oneself from it.
Recommended viewing: "9-11 First Hand Accounts of Explosions"
Carl Cameron asks Ron Paul to reject '9-11 truthers'
“Congressman Paul, many of your supporters call themselves ‘9-11 truthers.’ They believe that the U.S. government was in some way complicit with the 9-11 attacks or covered it up. Are you tonight prepared to either embrace that rhetoric or ask those supporters to abandon it, or divorce themselves from your candidacy?” - Carl Cameron to Ron Paul during Republican debate hosted by Fox News, January 10, 2008
"New York Times Motto," a cartoon by R.J. Matson, makes fun of Judith Miller's false propaganda stories about Iraq's supposed weapons of mass destruction. Miller's articles were instrumental in pushing the U.S. into war with Iraq in 2003. As it turned out, there were no Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. Roll Call, October 19, 2005
“In the three years since 9-11, we've begun to understand that it's possible to know what happened without knowing what happened.” - New York Times, "The Public Knowledge of 9/11", September 11, 2004
Charles Lindbergh speaking at an America First rally, 1941
"National polls showed that when England and France declared war on Germany, in 1939, less than 10 percent of our population favored a similar course for America. But there were various groups of people, here and abroad, whose interests and beliefs necessitated the involvement of the United States in the war… The three most important groups who have been pressing this country toward war are the British, the Jewish, and the Roosevelt administration…
"When hostilities commenced in Europe, in 1939, it was realized by these groups that the American people had no intention of entering the war. They knew it would be worse than useless to ask us for a declaration of war at that time. But they believed that this country could be enticed into the war in very much the same way we were enticed into the last one.
"They planned: first, to prepare the United States for foreign war under the guise of American defense; second, to involve us in the war, step by step, without our realization; third, to create a series of incidents which would force us into the actual conflict. These plans were of course, to be covered and assisted by the full power of their propaganda." - Charles Lindbergh, “Who Are the War Agitators?” from a speech given in Des Moines, Iowa, September 11, 1941
PEACE IS NOT AN OPTION FOR AMERICAN VOTERS
By a ratio of about 5 to 1, Americans want the U.S. military out of Afghanistan, according to a Fox News poll from April 2012. In a similar poll by ABC News and the Washington Post, two-thirds of the population said the war in Afghanistan “has not been worth fighting.” While public opinion is strongly opposed to the continued U.S. military intervention in the Middle East, when the American people go to the polls in November they will only have a choice between two pro-war candidates for president. Although this situation defies the logic of a democratic system of government, this is exactly what happened in 2004 and 2008. If a strong anti-war candidate, like Dr. Ron Paul, were on the ballot he would probably win in a fair election against a pro-war candidate. Since the war in Afghanistan began in 2001, the two major political parties have yet to offer the American people an anti-war candidate. For the voters in the United States of America peace is simply not an option.
In spite of the fact that the war in Afghanistan is so very unpopular, the political establishment and the mainstream media in the United States promote only pro-war candidates. Anti-war candidates like Ron Paul are ignored and ridiculed by the mainstream media. These are the same media networks that promoted the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and who are now supporting U.S. intervention in Syria and Iran. The same media outlets have propagated an unproven explanation about 9-11 while treating skeptics with complete contempt.
During a 2008 Republican presidential debate, Carl Cameron of Fox News put Ron Paul on the spot by asking him to either embrace or reject the “9-11 truthers” who supported his candidacy. The debate was hosted by Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News and Murdoch’s employees asked all the questions. Cameron’s question, which clearly conveyed the bias of his employer, was meant to ridicule the 9-11 truth movement and humiliate Ron Paul. But ask yourself, why is the subject of 9-11 truth taboo with the mainstream media?
The major news networks in the United States have deliberately ignored the unanswered questions about 9-11 and been openly hostile to those who demand answers about the terror attacks that led to the deaths of nearly three thousand people. Because of the media’s failure to investigate 9-11, the public has been left with a very incomplete understanding of what happened. Three years after the most devastating terror attacks in American history, the New York Times summed up its attitude of willful ignorance saying “…we've begun to understand that it's possible to know what happened without knowing what happened.”
In a democratic society with a truly free press, one would expect that every aspect of such a terror atrocity would be investigated by newspapers like the New York Times, but that has not been the case with 9-11. Evidently, the owners and editors of the news networks prevented their employees from investigating the crime of the century. This left the public with an inadequate and unproven version of events that fails to explain what really happened. The scientific evidence clearly disproves the notion that Osama Bin Laden and 19 Arab terrorists destroyed the World Trade Center, so who did?
If the terror attacks were not the work of Al Qaida then they must be a manifestation of a secret powerful organization that remains hidden yet which controls the mass media and the U.S. government from behind the scenes. To identify the real perpetrators of 9-11 we should start by asking why our political leaders and news media avoid any discussion of the realities of 9-11. We need to think very clearly about these observations and find a diagnosis that explains them.
The terror attacks of September 11, 2001, changed the world as they were surely meant to do. The attacks of 9-11 were designed to create a spectacle of terror that would facilitate radical political changes in the United States under the imperative of waging the “War on Terror.” The terror atrocity itself, however, was only the beginning. What was of the utmost importance for those behind the terrorism was that the desired interpretation be propagated immediately by the mass media. For the perpetrators of the terror atrocity, world-wide acceptance of their interpretation of 9-11 was essential to putting their war plan into effect.
What is most peculiar about the government version of 9-11 is that it was propagated by the mass media before the crime itself had even been investigated. A prepared explanation that Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida were behind the attacks and that the United States should respond with a military invasion of Afghanistan was first presented to the global public on BBC World television by the Israeli Ehud Barak only minutes after the explosive demolitions of the Twin Towers. Despite the discovery of an abundance of evidence proving that the World Trade Center was demolished with sophisticated explosives including nano-thermite, the political establishment has never deviated from the initial interpretation first put forth by Ehud Barak and others on 9-11.
With the passage of time we can see that this was all written into the script. The interpretation blaming Bin Laden had been prepared before the terror attacks had been carried out. Despite the fact that nearly three thousand people were murdered on 9-11, there was never any intention of carrying out a proper criminal investigation. Rather than investigating the evidence from the crime scene, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (F.B.I.), an agency of the U.S. Department of Justice under the control of the president, allowed the steel from the World Trade Center to be destroyed before it could be examined. President George W. Bush, who quickly initiated the war in Afghanistan based on wholly unproven allegations, refused to authorize a full-fledged investigation of the crime. More than a year passed before the politically-appointed 9-11 commission was established in November 2002. By that time nearly all of the evidence from the crime scenes had been destroyed.
The failure to properly investigate 9-11 was not the result of incompetence in high places; it was the plan from the beginning. 9-11 is a crime that was not meant to be solved. A criminal investigation would have exposed the lies of the government version and revealed the true perpetrators. Had there been a proper criminal investigation of 9-11 there would not have been a “War on Terror” or the illegal wars in Afghanistan or Iraq. The real villains would have been exposed and removed from their positions of power.
Unfortunately, such a proper criminal investigation of 9-11 has yet to happen. As a result, the American people have been deceived into two disastrous and costly wars and seen their civil liberties severely curtailed based on a pack of lies spun around an unsolved crime. For the real perpetrators of 9-11 – and their war agenda – the cover-up must continue, which means they need to control who becomes president of the United States. This is the real reason why 9-11 truth is a taboo subject within the American political establishment and the controlled media. This is also why they do not embrace Ron Paul’s common sense anti-war position. Although Dr. Paul is not an outspoken skeptic of the official version of 9-11, he is staunchly opposed to the subsequent U.S. military intervention in the Middle East and the corrupt financial and monetary system that profits from the war-mongering.
One needs to take all of these observations into consideration in order to make a logical diagnosis to determine the true cause of the 9-11 disease that afflicts the American body politic. The diagnosis would find that the same faction is responsible for all of the aforementioned symptoms: the terror attacks, the cover-up, and the false interpretation of the 9-11 crimes, as well as the subsequent “War on Terror” and the illegal wars of aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq. The same cabal controls the major media networks and the political establishment in the United States, which is why 9-11 truth is a taboo subject with the media and politicians. This means that the criminal masterminds behind the 9-11 terror attacks belong to the same secret cabal that controls our political parties and fraudulent elections in the United States. This is what is meant by those who say 9-11 was an “inside job.” While this may be difficult to accept, this is the only logical diagnosis that explains all of the symptoms of the 9-11 condition that has so sorely affected the United States.
The following 13-minute video by Mark Dankof raises all of the key questions about 9-11 that I deal with in the Solving 9-11 set of books. This video is from his interview with Robert Sungenis regarding Israeli involvement in the 9-11 attacks.
The material in the video is based on Sungenis' comprehensive review of Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World. (Note: The video has a few minor 'typos'. When Dankof discusses the 5 Israeli terror suspects arrested on 9-11, he says they appeared on Israeli television in November 2011. He means 2001.)
Twin Failures of the Department of Justice: 9-11 and the Trillion Dollar Bailout
Updated August 16, 2012 Added video links about the federal non-investigation of Goldman Sachs
ZIONIST AGENT AND U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL Eric H. Holder has utterly failed to prosecute any of the financial criminals behind the trillion dollar bailout of 2008-2009. Holder also shut down the federal prosecution of the 'Mastermind of 9/11', blocking any chance for an open trial for the men accused of planning the terror attacks that changed America. Earlier, Holder was instrumental in getting Bill Clinton's last minute pardon of the Israeli Mossadnik Marc Rich. All of these actions were done to protect the Zionist criminal network behind 9/11.
This video clip (URL - http://youtu.be/YkWAP9V9_vE ) reveals the tip of the iceberg of the government (and media) corruption behind the failure to investigate and prosecute Goldman Sachs and other financial institutions for criminal conduct leading up to the 2008-2009 bailout. If it looks like someone is talking intoMaria Bartiromo's ear, telling her to stifle Bill Black, it could very well be her husband Jonathan Steinberg, son of Saul Steinberg, the Jewish billionaire corporate raider.
Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-NY) then chairman of the House Oversight Committee, who is seen blocking Rep. Darrell Issa's request to subpoena the Bank of America in the video, overrode his own subpoena in an investigation of Countrywide Financial Corp. to exclude records showing that he and other House members got VIP discounted loans from the company, according to an AP article of August 15, 2012, entitled “Oversight panel's ex-chairman excluded House members' loans in subpoena for VIP mortgage files”.
Through its egregious failure to investigate and prosecute 9-11 and the financial crimes behind the trillion dollar bailout of 2008-2009, the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) has shown itself to be utterly corrupt. This is, of course, much more than a case of a single corrupt department. It is rather a very clear indication that the government of the United States is actually controlled by a criminal cabal, hence my use of the term "crimocracy" to describe the U.S. government since 2000. (It was my discovery of the criminal element running U.S. elections while doing research for my article "The Death of Democracy or May the Best Hacker Win" that led me to this conclusion in the fall of 2000.)
I would, however, object to the word "unprecedented" in the title of this study. The failure of the Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute the financial crooks behind the trillion dollar bailout has a precedent. The precedent is the Department's complete failure to investigate and prosecute the crimes of 9-11, which certainly must rank as one of the most conspicuous and egregious crimes in American history.
As I explain in detail in the final chapters ofSolving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, the destruction of the evidence of 9-11 and the failure to investigate and prosecute those behind the false-flag terrorism were the most crucial (and prosecutable) parts of the 9-11 cover-up. The return address for the 9-11 cover-up is the Department of Justice, namely Michael Chertoff, then Assistant Attorney General responsible for the Criminal Division. Chertoff, an Israeli national, was responsible for the collection of evidence and investigation of the crimes of 9-11. Chertoff was, of course, also responsible for the federal prosecution of those found to be behind the terror attacks. Under Chertoff, however, there was no proper criminal investigation of the 9-11 crimes; there was no prosecution.
Michael Chertoff (left), an Israeli whose mother was a Mossad agent, was Assistant Attorney General under John Ashcroft. Chertoff was head of the criminal division of the U.S. Department of Justice. He was responsible for collecting the evidence from the crime scene and prosecuting those behind the terror attacks of 9-11. Under Chertoff's leadership the evidence was carefully collected - and quickly destroyed.
The federal investigation of 9-11, headed by Chertoff, resulted only in the quick confiscation and hasty destruction of the crucial evidence and what can only be described as a "non-investigation" of the crime. The destruction of the evidence was obviously the main focus and purpose of Michael Chertoff, a son of the Mossad. To this day, no one has been prosecuted for the terror attacks that changed America. The alleged "Mastermind of 9-11" remains in Cuba, in the Gitmo Gulag, far from any proper legal process in a U.S. court.
These twin failures of the Department of Justice are, of course, closely related. The very same people are responsible for both 9-11 and the financial crimes that led to the government bailout of 2008-2009. I would simply point to the fact that the first plane of 9-11 flew directly into the secure computer room of a company belonging to Maurice Greenberg. Greenberg's insurance company A.I.G. also happened to be the crooked company in the middle of the bailout. It was through Greenberg's A.I.G. that the criminal banks of Wall Street, like Goldman Sachs, were bailed out with billions of dollars stolen from the U.S. taxpayer.
Sources and Recommended Reading:
Bollyn, Christopher, "Taxpayers Forced To Bailout Zionist Gangsters: The Financial Crisis On Wall Street & the Gang of Zionists Behind 9-11," Rense.com, September 21, 2008 http://rense.com/general83/bdc.htm
Widow's Motion Exposes 9-11 Judge's Ties to Israeli Defendant ICTS
May 2, 2012 Added link to Mariani Motion that exposes ties between 9/11 judge and Israeli defendant in tort litigation.
This bastard judicial system is so corrupt. - 9/11 widow Ellen Mariani
Ellen Mariani, the 9-11 widow who filed the first wrongful death lawsuit, is the last one standing in what can only be described as a judicial war of attrition against the 9-11 relatives. Mariani is still fighting for justice and accountability. She is the last 9-11 relative standing who has not settled out of court. On April 19, Mariani filed a motion in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that brings out Judge Hellerstein's conflict of interest in managing the 9-11 tort litigation in which the key defendant was the Israeli company International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS) NV.
Hellerstein has a clear conflict of interest in the 9-11 tort litigation because his son is a lawyer with Amit, Pollak & Matalon, the law firm that works for and is closely connected with Cukierman & Company, the parent company of ICTS. Cukierman & Co. is headed by Roger Cukierman and his son Edouard. Previously, Roger was CEO of the Edmond de Rothschild Group and chairman of the Israel General Bank. He has also served as the chairman of several venture capital funds established by the Rothschild Group. One of these funds, the Catalyst Fund, is run by Boaz Harel, a managing partner of private equity at Cukierman & Co. - and the head of ICTS at the time of 9-11. The Rothschild/Cukierman Catalyst Fund is also invested in a company called Cyalume, which is run by several of the SCP Partners of Ehud Barak. The Israeli Mossad corporate network may seem large but it always involves the same small group of people at the top. Many of the names are easily recognized by a researcher who is familiar with the Zionist criminal network. One of the head people of the Catalyst Fund and Cyalume, for example, is Yair Shamir, the son of the well-known terrorist-cum-prime minister Yitzhak Shamir.
Judge Hellerstein's son, Joseph, works for a firm that represents and works with the company that owns one of the key defendants in the 9-11 tort litigation. This presents an obvious (and probably criminal) conflict of interest that cannot be ignored or allowed. The Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges has a checklist for financial and other conflicts of interest that is very helpful in understanding Hellerstein's conflict(s) of interest in the 9-11 tort litigation. Judge Hellerstein's conflicts of interest can be seen in his connection(s) to Stroock, Stroock & Lavan (who represented Silverstein when he acquired the World Trade Center) and through his son, whose Israeli law firm (Amit, Pollak, Matalon & Co.) works closely with (and represents) Cukierman & Co., the parent firm and employer of Boaz Harel and ICTS, key defendants in the 9-11 tort litigation.
The Mariani motion opens by bringing attention to "newly-discovered documentation of facts which create a reasonable doubt as to the impartiality of the District Court judge" - Alvin K. Hellerstein.
The Mariani motion notes the crucial role the Israeli security firm played in the 9-11 case:
The Mariani motion points out Judge Hellerstein's family connections to the Israeli defendants ICTS and Boeing:
Point 8 in the Mariani motion explains the relationships between the Israeli funds and companies involved in the 9-11 attacks. In my article about this Zionist network I explain that the Rothschild family is the financier behind the Catalyst Fund:
Ellen Mariani's motion of April 19, 2012, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, www.pacer.gov (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) The complete motion can be found here.
Mitt Romney and the 9-11 Cover-Up
July 31, 2012
The $100 million that Adelson pledged to donate to Romney in order to get Obama out of the White House is the oil in the wheels of Romney's election campaign. - “In Jerusalem speech, it was Romney's voice but Netanyahu's words,” by Barak Ravid, Ha’aretz, July 30, 2012
Mitt Romney arrives in Tel Aviv on July 28 for a private off-the-record fundraiser with his hard-core Zionist supporters and meetings with the Israeli officials who are the prime suspects of the false-flag terrorism of 9-11.
Sheldon Adelson, the Zionist casino gangster and ally of Benjamin Netanyahu, who is bankrolling the Romney presidential bid with $100 million of his dirty dollars. Ian Fleming knew the type well and wrote about their criminal behavior in the James Bond books. Photo: Why Is Sheldon Adelson Donating Millions to Romney?
Romney met on July 29 with Benjamin Netanyahu, the nuclear weapons smuggler and terrorist leader who stated that 9-11 was "very good" for Israel - on the day of the attacks - and again 7 years later. Netanyahu is clearly quite satisfied with the terror attacks that changed America.
Romney also met with the senior Zionist terrorist, Shimon Peres. Peres is the architect of Israel's illegal nuclear arsenal and a veteran terror mastermind.
Romney performed the obligatory ritual for the cult of the Temple Mount.
"If I will be president, there will be no confrontations between our nations before international institutions. There will be no public denouncing of Israel by the U.S. in the UN. Israel's friendly and unfriendly neighbors will know we stand with you." - Mitt Romney to Ha'aretz (Israel), July 27, 2012
When you watch the video of Romney meeting Netanyahu on July 29 the "leading" GOP candidate to be Commander-in-Chief of the United States looks absolutely craven and weak. Romney dutifully repeats "Jerusalem, the capital of Israel " like a pathetic puppet who has been trained to repeat his lines. Romney has obviously been paid a great deal to ignore the fact that international law and U.S. policy consider Jerusalem to be an occupied city that has been seized by force.
On Monday, July 30, Mitt Romney, the leading Republican candidate in the U.S. presidential election, held a fund-raising breakfast for donors and pulled in more than one million dollars - at $50,000 per couple - in Israel. Fundraising in a foreign state; shouldn't that be illegal? The Washington Postreported that Romney was likely to get a very warm welcome in the Zionist state where his old friend Benjamin Netanyahu is the prime minister.
ZIONIST GANGSTER ADELSON PLEDGES $100 MILLION TO ROMNEY WHITE HOUSE BID
The hardline Zionist casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, like a mega criminal out of a James Bond story, is bankrolling the Romney campaign. Ha'aretz reported on July 30 that Adelson has pledged $100 million to fund Romney into the White House. Romney was seated next to Adelson at today's million dollar breakfast fundraiser in Jerusalem. Adelson has personally given Romney a least $10 million of his sleazy dirty casino dollars. Why are gangsters serving a foreign state allowed to buy U.S. presidents? (Photo: "Sugar Daddy Woes: The Federal Investigation of Sheldon Adelson")
Las Vegas casino owner Sheldon Adelson, an ally of Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu, sat next to Romney at the breakfast fundraiser in Jerusalem. Adelson backed Newt Gingrich in the Republican primary, but is now bankrolling Romney who has received more than $10 million from Adelson through his "Superpac". Romney is clearly obliged and dedicated to serving a foreign agenda - that of the Zionist extremists from the Likud, a coalition of Zionist terrorists put together by Menachem Begin in the 1970s comprising the former members of the notorious Irgun and Stern gangs. These are the terrorists who blew up the King David Hotel in July 1946 and killed Folke Bernadotte, the U.N. mediator in Palestine in 1948. The founders of the Likud brought terrorism to Palestine in the 1940s - and have employed terrorism as their primary tactic for more than 66 years. Make no mistake about it; these are the very same people who are behind the false-flag terrorism of 9-11.
Folke Bernadotte was murdered by Yitzhak Shamir and other terrorists from the Stern Gang. Shamir was one of the founding terrorists of the Likud, the same faction which rules Israel today. "The UN’s representative was a fine person who wanted to do his best for all mankind. So the Zionists killed him." - Brian Cloughley
Benjamin Netanyahu is the hard-line extremist from the Likud party of old Zionist terrorists who said that the terror attacks of 9-11 were "very good" for U.S.-Israeli relations. Netanyahu said this to the New York Times on 9-11, before the dust had even settled on Wall Street. At the time, the number of dead was thought to be more than 20,000. "Very good", Netanyahu said.
Later in April 2008, Netanyahu told an Israeli audience at Bar-Ilan University why 9-11 was good for Israel. "We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq." (See Ha'aretz - “Netanyahu says 9/11 terror attacks good for Israel”)
Consider this: Mitt Romney's closest friend in the Middle East is the prime minister of Israel who thinks 9-11 was "very good" - and that the "American struggle in Iraq" is a benefit for Israel. Netanyahu was also involved in criminal smuggling of nuclear weapons technology from the United States. So, Netanyahu is a nuclear weapons smuggler who engages in terror atrocities against the United States. Netanyahu may be Romney's friend but he is certainly no friend of the American people.
Benjamin Netanyahu and Mitt Romney are old friends from their days at the Boston Consulting Group in the mid-1970s. Romney revealed a fundamental weakness during a December 2011 debate in which the question of Palestine came up: “Before I made a statement of that nature, I’d get on the phone to my friend Bibi Netanyahu and say: ‘Would it help if I say this? What would you like me to do?’”
"WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO DO?"
Even Martin S. Indyk, the Zionist from AIPAC who served as the United States ambassador to Israel in the Clinton administration, said that whether intentional or not, Romney’s statement that he would ask Netanyahu what he should do implied that Romney would “subcontract Middle East policy to Israel.”
To understand what the Romney-Netanyahu relationship means for Americans, we need to understand one fundamental political reality that is completely ignored by the controlled media: the 9-11 cover-up is the linchpin that holds the wheels on the Zionist crimocracy running America. For the real perpetrators of 9-11 the cover-up most go on. The criminal-political regime (i.e. crimocracy) controlling America has to maintain the 9-11 cover-up to survive. Continuing the cover-up requires, first and foremost, controlling the president of the United States to prevent a proper criminal investigation from being conducted. This is why solving 9-11 through a rigorous and thorough criminal investigation and bringing the perpetrators to justice is of the utmost importance for the future of the American republic and its citizens. Nothing is as important as solving 9-11.
The Zionist war agenda was advanced during the Obama administration and the 9-11 cover-up has been maintained. The war effort in Afghanistan has continued and increased and the Gitmo Gulag where the supposed "Mastermind of 9-11" is being held is still in operation. The TAPI pipeline, designed to bring Israeli-owned gas from Turkmenistan to India and China, after pacifying Afghanistan, is still in the plans as thelocal and gas trade press reports.
President Obama has failed to meet any of the promises he made to the hopeful Americans who voted for him in 2008. Although there are hard-core and naive Democrats who will vote for Obama in 2012, with his failure to deliver on his fundamental campaign promises and the extremely lousy U.S. economy Barack Hussein Obama II (or whatever his name really is) is very likely to be a one-term president. The stage is clearly being set for a GOP victory in November.
"LESSER OF TWO EVILS"
Mitt Romney reminds me of the actor in one of those movies about how a president is made in the United States. Unfortunately, that's exactly what he is. What is most significant about Romney is not the man himself, but the people behind him. Looking at Romney's team of senior advisers one can see that the Romney team is the 9-11 false-flag terrorism team. Romney is being presented to American voters as the "lesser of two evils," but the Romney team comprises the same criminals who brought us 9-11.
Romney's adviser on intelligence and counter-terrorism is none other than Michael Chertoff, the former Assistant Attorney General responsible for the prosecution of the 9-11 attacks, who allowed the crucial evidence to be destroyed and failed to prosecute anyone for the attacks that changed America. Chertoff was the federal official who supervised the FBI and who played the key role in the non-investigation and cover-up of 9-11. He is, without a doubt, a criminal and traitor who should be arrested for having allowed the steel from the World Trade Center to be destroyed - before it could be examined by forensic experts. If Romney becomes president, Chertoff will be back in the Oval Office when he rightly belongs in a federal prison.
Michael Chertoff, as head of the criminal division of the Department of Justice, oversaw the FBI investigation of 9-11 and the collection of evidence. Chertoff, an Israeli national, was the key federal official responsible for prosecuting the crimes of 9-11. Rather than carrying out a proper criminal investigation, Chertoff allowed the crucial evidence to be destroyed. He is the son of one of the first Mossad agents and one of Mitt Romney's senior advisers - on terrorism and intelligence.
The Romney team includes other people involved at the highest level of the 9-11 attacks, most notably Dov Zakheim and his son, Roger Zakheim. Dov Zakheim served as the comptroller of the Pentagon budget when something like $2 trillion went missing - an astounding loss which was reported to the American people on September 10, 2001, by Donald Rumsfeld.
The fact that Michael Chertoff and Dov Zakheim are senior advisers on the Romney team needs to be seen in the light of the persistent 9-11 cover-up. In order for the Zionist war agenda, which was put into effect with 9-11, to go on and increase it is necessary for the people who brought us 9-11 to be protected - and be returned to power. This is why it appears very likely to me that the ruthless Zionist terrorists who brought us 9-11 will put Romney in the White House in November.
Sources and Recommended Reading:
Two articles on the Zionist terrorists who murdered Folke Bernadotte -
Nobody believes the offical story about what happened on 9-11. You are in very good company if you think the government and media have conspired to deceive the public about the terror attacks that changed America: 9-11 skeptics are the overwhelming majority of the population.
Nearly 90 percent of Germans do not believe the U.S. government explanation of what happened on September 11, 2001…
The question: The 9-11 attacks changed the world: the United States invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, and the rights of citizens were massively slashed. Do you believe the U.S. government is telling the truth about 9-11? (89.5 percent of the German population says "Nein" - No.)
Skepticism about the official account has increased since 2001. In 2006, a New York Times/CBS News poll revealed only 16 percent of Americans thought the government was telling the truth about 9-11 and the intelligence prior to the attacks. The 2006 poll found that 81 percent of the American population thought the government was lying about 9-11: 53 percent said they were "mostly telling the truth but hiding something" while 28 percent said they are "mostly lying."
In 2004, a Zogby poll showed that just over half of New Yorkers believed there was a cover up. The poll, taken in August 2004, found that 49 percent of New York City residents believe individuals within the U.S. government "knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act."
In May of 2006, another Zogby poll indicated approximately half of all Americans did not believe the official version.
The following paragraphs are extracts from a July 19 article entitled "Conspiracy Theorists Deserve an Apology" by Saman Mohammadi. It is a very clear-minded piece about the importance of 9-11 truth-tellers.
Mohammadi writes that the world should apologize to 9/11 truth-tellers. I would be happy if the world recognized the importance of exposing the 9-11 deception and ending the criminal wars of aggression in the Middle East. It is of the utmost importance and in the vital interest of our nation(s) that we liberate ourselves from the evil deception about 9/11.
Conspiracy Theorists Deserve an Apology by Saman Mohammadi The reason why there is so much hate and scorn for 9/11 truth activists is because they are right and consistent. The destruction of the 9/11 myth and war on terror ideology is unbearable for the children who are emotionally, spiritually, and psychologically attached to the U.S. government and the Israeli government. They are under the delusion that these evil governments actually care about them, their security, and their future.
The mature men and women of America and the West are waking up and confronting the lies of 9/11 and 7/7. And this political awakening is not unique to America and Western civilization. There is a global political and spiritual awakening happening. All totalitarian regimes in the world will fail in hijacking history and they will fall into ruin. The state terrorists in Washington, London, and Tel Aviv have already lost the battle for history and the souls of mankind.
Who is trying to stop World War III and wake the West up from its sleep? Progressives? No. Liberals? No. Conservatives? No. Christians? No. Journalists? No. They all believe in the official 9/11 deception, which is the ideological foundation that justifies USrael's aggressive wars in the Middle East.
9/11 truth-tellers, the "conspiracy theorists," have tried to wake up humanity in order to stop the USraeli government from starting the catastrophe of world war three. And for their efforts they have been slandered and smeared in the press. But the 9/11 truth movement still continues to grow by the day.
There is a simple reason why the rise of 9/11 truth cannot be contained by the USraeli government, and it is this: the age of slandering and smearing is over. Belittling people by calling them mentally ill conspiracy theorists and truthers is not working anymore. We embrace these terms. We are proud of being called conspiracy theorists because it means we're thinking.
The following video is an excellent example of how the U.S. government investigation of 9-11 was actually an intentional "non-investigation" that refused to take into consideration any of the evidence of Thermite and explosives that were evidently involved in the demolition of the World Trade Center. The NIST official in this video, Dr. John L. Gross, is clearly complicit in the government cover-up of 9-11.
Dr. John L. Gross is a research structural engineer at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Dr. John L. Gross was awarded the Department of Commerce Gold Medal in 2005 and Special Act Award in 2008 for his role in the “non-investigation” of the collapses of the Twin Towers, an act of explosive demolition which took nearly three thousand lives.
According to his webpage at NIST, Dr. Gross can be reached at (301) 975-6068 or by email at email@example.com
9-11 Defendant's Ties to Judge Ignored by U.S. Court of Appeals
July 12, 2012
This bastard judicial system is so corrupt. - 9/11 widow Ellen Mariani
U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein handled all 9-11 wrongful death lawsuits and tort litigation. Hellerstein, however, has a conflict of interest in the 9-11 litigation: his son is an Israeli lawyer whose law firm works with the Rothschild-funded Mossad "passenger screening" company responsible for the 9-11 terror attacks. This hidden connection explains why Judge Hellerstein worked so hard to protect the Israeli culprits of the false-flag terrorism of 9-11 by preventing a trial for the victims. (NYT photo)
Ellen Mariani, the 9-11 widow who filed the first wrongful death lawsuit related to the terror attacks of September 11, 2001, filed a motion earlier this year with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York seeking to introduce materials into the court record regarding the evident conflict of interest concerning U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, who handled all the 9-11 tort litigation lawsuits. The conflict of interest stems from the fact that the judge's son Joseph lives in Israel where he works as a lawyer for the law firm representing the parent company of ICTS, the key defendant in the 9-11 litigation in Hellerstein's court.
In a summary order handed down by a two-judge panel on June 26, Mariani's motion to supplement the record was denied. The judges concluded that the documents that Mariani's motion sought to introduce "do not reasonably call the district judge's impartiality into question."
To understand the importance of Mariani's motion and the court of appeals decision, we need to understand that one of the key defendants in the 9-11 litigation was the Israeli-owned Huntleigh company that was responsible for passenger screening at the Boston airport on 9-11. This is the company that allowed the knife-wielding terrorists to board the two planes that smashed into the World Trade Center, at least according to the official explanation of events. If 9-11 was a false-flag terror attack, on the other hand, then the Israeli-owned ICTS and its passenger screeing company are part of the terror atrocity and the judge is protecting the true culprits of 9-11.
Judge Hellerstein's decisions in the 9-11 tort litigation effectively protected the Israeli defendants who owned Huntleigh USA by preventing any 9-11 case from going to trial. All of the wrongful death lawsuits were settled out of court. The problem is that Hellerstein's son Joseph works for the Israeli law firm that represents the parent company of ICTS and Huntleigh USA. That presents an obvious conflict of interest, but the Circuit Court judges Peter W. Hall and Susan L. Carney ignored the evidence and may even try to punish Mariani for having brought the motion to the court.
The summary order of Peter W. Hall and Susan L. Carney rejected the evidence of Judge Hellerstein's conflict of interest saying the documented connection was nothing more than "personal slurs" against the judge and his family.
To understand why the court of appeals refused to accept documents that show that Judge Hellerstein is connected through his son to the Israeli defendant in the tort litigation, we need to understand who controls the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Let's start with the chief judge for the court, Dennis G. Jacobs.
Judge Jacobs (front row left with hand icon) participated in a "legal mission to Israel" in 2007...
where he was a "scholar-in-residence" at Hebrew University and met with Israeli politicians and "senior terrorism experts".
That Dennis G. Jacobs would participate in a "legal mission to Israel" with American Friends of the Hebrew University to discuss the "War on Terror" and government powers, visit an Israeli military base, and meet with a "senior terrorism expert," all suggest that Judge Jacobs is an active supporter of both Hebrew University and the state of Israel.
The three-judge panel who decided on the Mariani motion became a two-judge panel when Barrington D. Parker, Jr. recused himself from the panel. The two remaining judges were Peter Welles Hall and Susan Laura Carney.
Susan L. Carney, former legal counsel at Yale University, is married to Lincoln W. Caplan, a member of the New York Times editorial board and a son of the Zionist secret society, the B'nai B'rith.
Lincoln Caplan comes from a leading B'nai B'rith family from New Haven and covers the Supreme Court and judicial matters for the New York Times. Both of his parents, Lewis Caplan and Jane Spector, came from B'nai B'rith families of the Horeb Lodge of New Haven.
The decision to deny the Mariani motion and the harsh words in the summary order and the threats of sanctions against her and her lawyer suggest that there is a hidden hand controlling the judges. That is to say that the decision was made before the panel even saw her motion. Why was Mariani's motion dismissed as "frivolous conduct" when she is simply trying to show that the judge handling the 9-11 tort litigation has an obvious conflict of interest?
While little is known about Judge Peter W. Hall, Susan L. Carney is married to Lincoln Caplan, a member of the New York Times editorial board. Caplan's father, Lewis, and Russian-born grandfather Jacob Caplan were both members and leaders of the Zionist secret society, the B'nai B'rith. Jacob Caplan was president of the Horeb Lodge of New Haven and later president of the larger regional district for the secret society.
The B'nai B'rith, founded in New York in 1843, is a secret Jewish order like Freemasonry, which allows only Zionist Jews to be members. While it describes itself as a "service" organization, this description masks the fact that it is a highly secretive Masonic-like organization dedicated to supporting the Zionist agenda and the state of Israel. The New York Times has long been a B'nai B'rith controlled newspaper owned by one of the founding families of Lodge 1 of the B'nai B'rith. The New York Times has also played a key part of the 9-11 cover-up by ignoring the evidence that the Twin Towers were destroyed using explosives and nanothermite. As a son of the secretive B'nai B'rith (probably a member in good standing) and a member of the editorial board of the New York Times, Lincoln Caplan is also part of the 9-11 cover-up.
These two connections go a long way in explaining why the Mariani motion was denied. It was not denied because it lacked merit or failed to prove Judge Hellerstein's conflict of interest. It was denied simply because it was being considered in a court that is anything but impartial when the subject being considered concerns the state of Israel. The chief judge of the court is an active supporter of the Zionist state and one of the judges who considered the motion is married to the state of Israel through her husband and his family's long-standing support for the secret society that is behind the Zionist enterprise.
The 9-11 victims have been robbed of justice and the guilty parties have been protected. It was highly unlikely that the same corrupt court system that put Judge Hellerstein in charge of the 9-11 litigation would accept any evidence showing that he had a conflict of interest in the process. What the denial of the Mariani motion demonstrates most clearly is that justice for the crimes of 9-11 is not to be expected from the corrupt federal courts of New York.
"Don’t make us emotional weaklings; face the facts." - Paul Craig Roberts on 9/11, July 4, 2012
Paul Craig Roberts is a former Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury and Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal.
"Can Americans Escape the Deception?" is Dr. Paul Craig Roberts excellent Independence Day article about the false-flag deception of 9/11 in which he implores Americans: “Please, whatever you do, don’t make us emotional weaklings; face the facts.”
The crimes against humanity, the dismantling of the U.S. Constitution and the lawlessness both domestic and international that define 21st Century America are the results of September 11, 2001.
Washington’s account of 9/11 is the wildest conspiracy theory known to mankind. The absurdity of Washington’s account is as follows: A few Saudi Arabians without any government’s backing or that of any intelligence service outwitted not only the CIA and the FBI but all 16 US intelligence agencies, even the Defense Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency, together with the intelligence agencies of all of Washington’s NATO allies and Israel’s Mossad, which has infiltrated every radical Muslim group.
These humble Saudis of no known distinction or powers also simultaneously outwitted the National Security Council, NORAD, the Pentagon, Air Traffic Control, and caused Airport Security to fail four times in one hour on the same morning.
In other words, every part of America’s defenses failed at the same moment…
“FACE THE FACTS”
In a real investigation, the 9/11 evidence would not have been illegally destroyed, and the investigation would have been conducted by experts, not by government agencies assigned a cover-up and by political hacks. The NIST report is abject nonsense. It explains nothing. It is a fabricated computer simulation of a non-event. The co-chairmen and legal counsel of the 9/11 Commission later wrote books in which they stated that information was withheld from the commission, the military lied to the commission, and the commission “was set up to fail.” Yet, these astounding admissions by the leaders of the 9/11 Commission had no impact on Congress, the presstitute media, or the public. All heads were in the sand. Please, whatever you do, don’t make us emotional weaklings; face the facts.
More than one hundred firefighters, police, first responders, and building maintenance personnel report hearing and experiencing scores of explosions in the twin towers, including powerful explosions in the sub-basements prior to the collapse of the towers.
Distinguished scientists, authors of many peer-reviewed scientific papers, report finding unreacted nano-thermite in the dust from the towers, tested it for its explosive and high-heat producing ability, and reported the unequivocal results.
Seventeen hundred architects and engineers have testified in a petition to Congress that the three World Trade Center buildings were not brought down by fire and airplanes and have demanded a real scientific investigation of the cause of the buildings’ destruction.
Yet, we are left with the paradox that scientific opinion based on careful examination of the remaining evidence has been designated by the ignorant and unwashed as a “conspiracy theory,” while Washington’s absurd conspiracy theory stands as the truth of the event.
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth headed by high-rise architect Richard Gage has driven the final nail in the coffin of Washington’s concocted conspiracy theory with its new film: “9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out,” and they do speak out. Scores of top level demolition experts and experts on the design, engineering, and construction of high rise steel structures provide the scientific, architectural, and engineering reasons that the three World Trade Center buildings came down only with the assistance of explosives that were placed and timed to remove the powerful structural support and permit the sudden collapse of the buildings. As the buildings were engineered and constructed according to known and tested principles that absolutely prevent rapid collapse, fire and structural damage that two of the three skyscrapers suffered from airliners could not possibly have caused the sudden disintegration of the three buildings…
“A GESTAPO POLICE STATE”
America’s descent into a Gestapo police state could be arrested, perhaps, if Americans were not so ignorant of science or were capable of even realizing that what they see with their own eyes when they watch videos of the twin towers’ destruction is buildings blowing up, not buildings falling down from structural damage. Building 7’s destruction is the total and complete picture of controlled demolition…
“ARE AMERICANS DOOMED TO EXPIRE IN THE MATRIX?”
Washington’s “wars of liberation” are wars of world hegemony and wars of massive profits for the military/security complex. The combination of power and money that are the motives for Washington’s concocted wars are hidden motives, wrapped in the flag, patriotic sentiments, and fear of dark-skinned demonized Muslims.
Can Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth or any truth break through and liberate Americans from the artificial reality created by government liars and a corruptpresstitute media, or are Americans doomed to expire in the Matrix that has been created for them?
Note about the author: Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury and Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal, has held numerous university appointments and is Contributing Editor to Gerald Celente’s Trends Journal.
I liked your article, it is a nice conspiracy story, but in my case it was exactly the truth as written. Nice to remember those old-times, when we did foolish mistakes... I certainly paid for my mistakes, but I am no criminal, just another unlucky Israeli. - Israeli agent Tamir David Sasson commenting on Bollyn article “Is Israeli Intelligence behind Terrorism in America?” in email to Bollyn.com, February 26, 2011
Israelis Tamir David Sasson and Daniel Henry Levy were detained at Kings Bay Naval Submarine Base in Georgia in May 2004. The Kings Bay base is the home port for 10 of the nation's 18 submarines armed with nuclear missiles.
Tamir David Sasson, an Israeli terror suspect who was arrested when he tried to gain access to the Kings Bay Naval Submarine Base in May 2004 wrote to Bollyn.com in February 2011 and commented on my article“Is Israeli Intelligence behind Terrorism in America?”. Most significantly, Sasson did not object to anything I had written in the article saying that the article is "exactly the truth as written." The article is included in the recently published bookSolving 9-11: The Original Articles.
Most likely, the real reason the two-man team of Israeli military agents tried to enter the base with their moving truck was to monitor the response by base security. Having infiltrated the U.S. Navy computer network, Israeli military intelligence would be able to see exactly how the Navy responded to the security threat. Such information would be essential for the planning and execution of a false-flag terror incident involving the base.
The following are parts of my article concerning Sasson:
A second team of Israeli military agents posing as "movers" tried to enter the U.S. Naval Submarine Base at Kings Bay, Georgia on May 21. When an inspection of their rented moving truck revealed evidence of explosives, the base, home to 8 Trident submarines, was shut down for more than three hours, according to base spokesman Ed Buczek.
When the two Israeli soldiers posing as movers tried to access the base without proper identification an inspection team was called out to check their rental truck. Dogs trained to detect explosives and drugs "hit on something in the cab of the truck," Buczek told me. The evidence of "potential explosives" led to an immediate lockdown of the base and the St. Mary's police department closed off the area around the base and called in a bomb squad. "Guards closed access to the base and notified the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service," Buczek said.
Buczek said the two were driving a Budget rental truck and were working for an Atlanta-based moving company called Advantage. Advantage Moving and Storage in Norcross, Georgia was blocking calls from unknown callers on May 26. Like hundreds of other "moving companies" in the United States, Advantage is probably Israeli-owned and operated.
It was a "textbook scenario" reaction to an obvious security threat to the base and national security, Buczek said. "We saw something wasn't right." When the Israeli intruders were turned over to federal officials, however, their criminal activity was handled with what can only be described as indifference. The fact that Israeli military agents operate moving companies across the United States is a security problem, which apparently does not concern the Department of Homeland Security. Israel's military foreign intelligence agency, Mossad, has a network of transportation and logistics companies that spans the United States...
Like some 60 other Israelis apprehended in the aftermath of 9-11, the two young Israeli movers who tried to access Kings Bay Naval Submarine Base, Tamir D. Sason, 24, and Daniel Levy, 23, were simply turned over to federal immigration officers. Although the truck had tested positive for explosives and a thorough criminal investigation should have been conducted, the two were simply turned over to immigration authorities because one of them was carrying an expired passport. The two were reportedly being held for deportation.
I spoke with Marc Raimondi, spokesman at the Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) in Washington. Raimondi said that both Sason and Levy "will be deported," although he did not know their current location or status. Raimondi said ICE had taken custody of the two individuals and simply checked their names against immigration and criminal data bases. Because nothing was found in the data bases, Raimondi said, their only crime was that they had worked illegally on visitor visas. There was no further investigation of their activities.
"Perhaps the conspiracy theory has merit," Raimondi said when asked why Israeli agents involved in criminal activities were simply being deported on visa violations. When asked if DHS was concerned about the network of Israeli-owned moving companies in the United States, some with proven ties to Israeli intelligence, Raimondi was unable to answer. He said he was unable to carry on the conversation and that the agency welcomes any information that could be helpful in the "war on terror."
Video: Pilots Agree - Flight 77 Did Not Hit Pentagon
June 20, 2012
9/11 is the most important event of our lifetime… No question it was the beginning of the end of America as we knew it. We should not be discussing ANYTHING until the perpetrators of this crime are arrested and tried for treason and mass murder. We will never rebuild this country until this is done… Trying to move forward without successful prosecution of these criminals is like trying to build a house on a rotten foundation. - A.F. in Florida to Bollyn.com
The following is an excellent video presentation by professional pilots and others who agree on the evidence or lack thereof: Flight 77 did NOT hit the Pentagon. The 9-11 story is a fabricated pack of lies.
Ptech Logo is the Star of David
May 12, 2012
I just watched a short video about the CBS News coverage of the FBI raid of Ptech in December 2002 and immediately noticed that the Ptech company logo is actually a partially hidden "Star of David", the hexagram that is the symbol of the State of Israel.
Ptech was a Mossad false-front operation through which it pretended to be an Arab-Muslim owned business (tied to Saudi sponsors of Al Qaida, no less), when in fact it was an Israeli military intelligence operation engaged in getting sophisticated enterprise spy software onto U.S. government computers. This access was essential to the 9-11 plot because it allowed the Israelis to have real-time access to all the information on the government and military computer systems.
It is typical for Israeli intelligence operations to hide in plain sight, which is what we see with the Ptech logo.
The Ptech logo becomes the symbol of the state of Israel when the dark lines that break the visible triangle are extended and connected to form the second triangle, which is not seen.
By extending the dark lines (of the unseen triangle) that cross the triangle in the Ptech logo, and weaving them under the visible triangle, one gets the interlocked hexagram of the state of Israel. This is purely intentional.
The new Likud-Kadima coalition government is much more than a rearrangement of political parties in the Israeli government. The new government is a "monster new coalition"that gives the senior architects of terrorism greater political power in the Zionist state. The new coalition government of the far-right Likud with Ariel Sharon's Kadima (Forward) party will allow the real masterminds of the 9-11 terror plot to move ahead with the false-flag terror strategy they put into effect with the September 2001 attacks in New York and Washington.
Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his new deputy Shaul Mofaz are old comrades from the Sayeret Matkal and senior architects of the terrorism of 9-11.
Shaul Mofaz was the Chief of the General Staff, or Commander-in-Chief of the Israeli military from 1998 to 2002. Here Mofaz meets with Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz (left), Dov Zakheim, Douglas J. Feith, and other Zionist agents at the Pentagon on Jan. 18, 2002.
Defense Minister Ehud Barak, left, with chairman of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, Shaul Mofaz, in March 2012. Barak, a former commander of the Sayeret Matkal, and Mofaz, head of the secret intelligence force from 1998-2002, have worked together on covert military operations for decades. Now they have created a "monster coalition" and taken control of the Israeli government.
The Likud-Kadima coalition government brings together two parties that are headed by former comrades from the Sayeret Matkal, the secret elite force that serves directly under the Israeli Chief of the General Staff. The person who was intensely involved in the effort to bring these two parties together to form a "grand coalition" was Ehud Barak, the Israeli defense minister and former commander of the Sayeret Matkal. Barak is the prime suspect of masterminding the terror attacks of 9-11.
The coalition brings three comrades from the "counter-terrorist" Sayeret Matkal into the three highest political positions in the state of Israel. This is really a grand coalition of three senior terrorists who masterminded and carried out the attacks of 9-11: Ehud Barak, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Shaul Mofaz. The Sayeret Matkal coalition was only possible after Mofaz took over the reins of the Kadima party in March 2012 from Tzipi Livni. Mofaz, who was born in Tehran as Shahram Mofazzakar, was the Commander-in-Chief of the Israeli military and head of the Sayeret Matkal when the false-flag terror attacks were carried out in 2001. He also oversaw the brutal Israeli response to the Palestinian intifada and the massacre of Palestinian refugees in the camp of Jenin in April 2002.
What does this mean for Israel and the hopes for peace in the Middle East? With such masterminds of terror in control of the Israeli government the prognosis is very grim indeed. These architects of terror are now in position to advance the criminal agenda that they put into effect with the mass murder of 3,000 people on 9-11.
Iran Bashing, Terrorism, and Who Chose The Chosen People, Anyway?
April 1, 2012
Anthony Lawson’s latest video “Iran Bashing, Terrorism and Who Chose The Chosen People, Anyway?” is excellent. It is certainly very timely and important viewing. One of the subjects of the video is Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister who is desperately striving to start a war between Iran and the United States. Such a war would be a great disaster for the United States, Iran, and the whole world.
Netanyahu is the Israeli politician who told the New York Times that the terror attacks, in which tens of thousands were thought to have been killed, were “very good” for U.S.-Israeli relations -- on September 11, 2001.
Netanyahu is the leader of the Likud, the party of Zionist extremists created by the former terrorist leader Menachem Begin.
Netanyahu, it should be noted, is considered one of the senior architects of the false-flag terrorism of 9-11, according to the thesis I explain in Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World. Netanyahu is a Zionist fanatic of the most dangerous kind and should be arrested and prosecuted for serious crimes, including his role in the planning of 9-11.
That Benjamin Netanyahu is a liar and a cheat is certainly not news to anyone who follows the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Joe Lockhart, spokesman for the Clinton administration, said exactly that - in plain English:
"Netanyahu was one of the single most obnoxious individuals you're likely to come into – just a liar and a cheat. He would open his mouth and you would have no confidence that anything that came out of it was the truth." - Former Clinton White House Spokesman Joe Lockhart in The Truth about Camp David: The untold story about the collapse of the Middle East peace process by Clayton E. Swisher, Nation Books, 2004 (p. 8)
French President Nicolas Sarkozy said the same:
"I can't stand him, he's a liar," said Sarkozy. "You're fed up with him - I have to deal with him every day!" replied Obama. - French President Nicolas Sarkozy venting his frustration with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in what was supposed to be a private conversation with Barack Obama. “Sarkozy overheard telling Obama: Netanyahu's a liar,” by Jessica Phelan, November 8, 2011
Lawson’s video points out that the corrupt politicians in the U.S. Congress, bribed and bought with Zionist funds, gave "Netanyahu the Liar" 29 standing ovations when he addressed a joint session of Congress in May 2011. History will show that these craven and venal politicians were applauding a dangerous sociopath and terrorist. They were giving standing ovations to one of the most deceptive mass murderers of our time.
One of the characteristics of a sociopath is that he is a pathological liar. One of the central lies of Netanyahu’s dangerous worldview is that he has a biblical claim to Palestine, as he told the United Nations on September 23, 2011:
We believe that the Palestinians should be neither the citizens of Israel nor its subjects. They should live in a free state of their own. But they should be ready, like us, for compromise. And we will know that they're ready for compromise and for peace when they start taking Israel's security requirements seriously and when they stop denying our historical connection to our ancient homeland.
I often hear them accuse Israel of Judaizing Jerusalem. That's like accusing America of Americanizing Washington, or the British of Anglicizing London. You know why we're called "Jews"? Because we come from Judea.
In my office in Jerusalem, there's a -- there's an ancient seal. It's a signet ring of a Jewish official from the time of the Bible. The seal was found right next to the Western Wall, and it dates back 2,700 years, to the time of King Hezekiah. Now, there's a name of the Jewish official inscribed on the ring in Hebrew. His name was Netanyahu. That's my last name. My first name, Benjamin, dates back a thousand years earlier to Benjamin -- Binyamin -- the son of Jacob, who was also known as Israel. Jacob and his 12 sons roamed these same hills of Judea and Samaria 4,000 years ago, and there's been a continuous Jewish presence in the land ever since. - Benjamin Netanyahu speech at the United Nations, September 23, 2011 http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/netanyahus-un-speech_594122.html?page=1
Netanyahu told the United Nations that his vision is that Palestinians should be neither citizens nor subjects of Israel, which is to say that he wants Israel to be a Jewish-only state in Palestine -- without Palestinians. Who could support such a falsely-constructed tribal/racist state in the 21st Century? Although Netanyahu's vision violates the basic priciples of American democracy, the assembled members of Congress seem to think he is wonderful.
The most revealing lie is what he says about the name Netanyahu and his relationship to that name. The point is that although Netanyahu may be his last name, it was certainly not the name of his father from Poland, who was born Ben-Zion Mileikowsky in Warsaw to the Zionist writer and activist Nathan Mileikowsky. The Mileikowsky family migrated to Palestine, where it was a common practice for the Zionist immigrants to adopt a Hebrew name. Like most of the ruling families of Israel, the Mileikowsky family is from Poland, not from Palestine. The fundamental Zionist lie is that the Jews of Poland and Russia have a legitimate claim to Palestine. They do not. Like Jacob in the Bible, they are using deceit to claim something to which they have no right.
As an article from 2009 says about the family name:
In the beginning, the prime minister's father, Ben-Zion Netanyahu, emigrated from Lithuania to Palestine before the birth of the Jewish state in 1948. His family name was Milikovsky, but like many Israelis, the family chose a Hebrew name. They chose Netanyahu, which in Hebrew means "God's gift."
Some cynics quip that the name says much about how members of the family see themselves.
9-11 and Alvin Krongard - Israel's Agent at the CIA
March 27, 2012
To the embarrassment of investigators, it has also emerged that the firm used to buy many of the "put" options [related to 9-11] - where a trader, in effect, bets on a share price fall - on United Airlines stock was headed until 1998 by "Buzzy" Krongard, now executive director of the CIA. Until 1997, Mr Krongard was chairman of Alex Brown Inc, America's oldest investment banking firm. Alex Brown was acquired by Bankers Trust, which in turn was bought by Deutsche Bank. His last post before resigning to take his senior role in the CIA was to head Bankers Trust - Alex Brown's private client business, dealing with the accounts and investments of wealthy customers around the world. - Chris Blackhurst, “Mystery of Terror 'Insider Dealers'”, The Independent (UK), October 14, 2001
A single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda purchased 95 percent of the UAL puts on September 6  as part of a strategy that also included buying 115,000 shares of American on September 10. Similarly, much of the seemingly suspicious trading on September 10 was traced to a specific U.S.-based options trading newsletter…which recommended these trades. - 9/11 Commission Report, W.W. Norton, 2004, footnote on p. 499
Alvin Bernard "Buzzy" Krongard was Executive Director of the C.I.A. from March 2001 until November 2004. Previously he had served as a consultant to C.I.A. Directors George J. Tenet (1997-2004) and Robert James Woolsey, Jr. (1993-1995).
The informed insider trading of stock options carried out by people with prior knowledge of the terror attacks of 9-11 is once again in the news. Max Keiser of the Keiser Report recently interviewed Lars Schall, a German journalist who has written extensively on the "terror traders" of 9-11. In the center of the discussion of the informed trading done by people who evidently knew the attacks were coming stands one very conspicuous individual, A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard, then Executive Director of the C.I.A.. Krongard would be considered a "person of interest" in any proper criminal investigation of 9-11 or the insider trading that preceded it.
Krongard has been suspected of being connected to the suspicious trading since October 2001. In one of my first articles about 9-11, "The Profiteers of 9-11", I wrote the following:
Investigations into the unusually high number of "put" options, betting that the price of United Airlines (UAL) and American Airlines shares would fall, have revealed that Alex Brown Inc., an investment banking firm, purchased many of these option contracts. Alex Brown Inc. was, until 1998, managed by the man who is now the executive director of the Central Intelligence Agency, A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard. Krongard, 64, former head of Baltimore-based Alex Brown, America's oldest investment bank, joined the CIA three years ago as a counselor to Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet. Krongard switched careers shortly after helping engineer the $2.5 billion merger of Alex Brown and Bankers Trust New York Corp., gaining $71 million in Bankers Trust stock in the process.
President Bush appointed Krongard executive director of the Central Intelligence Agency on March 26. From February 1998 until March 2001, Krongard served as counselor to the director of central intelligence. Until 1997 Krongard was chairman of the investment bank A.B. Brown, having previously worked in various capacities at Alex Brown. Krongard was quoted on the relationship between Wall Street and the CIA in a Washington Post article. If you go back to the CIA's origins during World War II in the Office of Strategic Services, Krongard told the Post, "the whole OSS was really nothing but Wall Street bankers and lawyers."
WHO IS BUZZY KRONGARD?
The hypothesis of my book Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World is that the terror attacks were a false-flag operation planned and carried out by Israeli military intelligence with the assistance and support of Zionist agents in high positions in the U.S. government. These Zionist agents would include people like Dov Zakheim at the Pentagon and Michael Chertoff, then Assistant Attorney General, who was responsible for the federal investigation and prosecution of the crimes of 9-11. In this position Chertoff managed the federal "non-investigation" of 9-11 in which the crucial evidence was confiscated and destroyed without being properly examined.
My hypothesis is not that 9-11 was an "inside" job, but that it was an Israeli-planned false-flag operation. The Israeli operation was facilitated by highly-placed Zionist agents within the U.S. government, military, and intelligence spheres. If Buzzy Krongard is a suspect in the crimes of 9-11, the question that needs to be answered is: Was Krongard acting as an agent for Israeli military intelligence at Alex Brown and the C.I.A.? The evidence indicates that he served as an agent for Israel in both positions.
Alvin Bernard Krongard, born 1936, is the son of Raphael Harris Krongard and Rita Keyser Krongard. Both his mother and father were born in Baltimore to Jewish immigrant families from Poland/Russia. His first wife, Patricia Lion, was also Jewish. While Krongard's Jewish roots are never mentioned in the various articles about him, his Jewish ethnicity clearly plays the key role in his efforts to support Israeli enterprises in the United States. When a high-level person like Krongard conceals his Jewish roots while actively serving the state of Israel it indicates that he is seeking to hide his true identity and loyalty to a foreign state. For such a person to be the administrative chief of the Central Intelligence Agency says a great deal about the degree of Israeli penetration of the U.S. intelligence community.
Alvin Bernard Krongard at Princeton, 1957
Krongard's paternal grandparents immigrated from Lowicz, Poland, to the United States in 1904. The family name and first names were changed. Krongaard is a Scandinavian name that his grandfather took after they arrived in the United States. Krongaard means land or property of the "crown". The immigration records indicate that his grandfather Morris Krongard did not enter the U.S. under that name.
Krongard's mother, Rita (Rebecca) Keyser, was born in Baltimore to Abraham and Ethel Keyser, Russian Jewish immigrants who had also arrived in the U.S. in 1904. She was raised in Washington, where she attended high school and graduated from Strayer Business College. She worked as a legal secretary for a Washington maritime lawyer before her marriage to Raphael Harris Krongard in 1931. The Krongard's lived in Ashburton, Maryland, and had three children: Alvin, Howard Joel, and a daughter, Marilyn, who died in 1946.
Alvin Krongard graduated from Princeton and went on to serve on "active duty" in the U.S. Marine Corps in the Mediterranean from 1958-1961. Although the details are not given it seems likely that he served in Lebanon where the U.S. Marines were sent in 1958. He returned to the United States and married Patricia Lion. He worked at her family business, Lion Brothers, from 1961-1969. After a two year stint at Bache/Stern Brothers Boyce he joined the Baltimore investment bank of Alex Brown in 1971. After twenty years, Buzzy Krongard became C.E.O. of Alex Brown in July 1991.
ALEX BROWN AND ISRAEL
As C.E.O. of America's oldest investment bank, Krongard was well placed to assist companies spawned by Israeli military intelligence. Under Krongard, Alex Brown became a leading U.S. partner for these Israeli companies. In May 1996 Krongard and Mayo A. Shattuck went to Israel on a three-day trip during which they met with then prime minister Shimon Peres. As theBaltimore Sun reported shortly before their trip to Israel:
A. B. Krongard, Alex. Brown's chairman and chief executive, and Mayo A. Shattuck III, president and chief operating officer, are to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres and Dov Lautman, the prime minister's special emissary for economic development...
"Obviously, this is a trip of some significance," Mr. Shattuck said. "We want to be perceived as the premiere underwriter and adviser for high-tech and health care companies in Israel. The time has come to build stronger affiliations at the senior management level."
The meeting with Mr. Peres was arranged through Giza Group, one of Israel's leading private investment banking firms, Mr. Shattuck said.
When Alex. Brown officials meet with Mr. Peres, they expect to talk about how the company can link Israeli firms to U.S. capital markets, Mr. Shattuck said.
Alex. Brown, which had $809 million in revenues in 1995, is known worldwide for its expertise in taking high-tech and health care companies public. Last year, it managed 64 initial public offerings, tops in the United States.
R. William Burgess Jr., head of Alex. Brown's technology investment banking group, compared Israel to Silicon Valley in California and Route 128 in Boston, which have spawned some of the world's largest high-tech companies.
"My hope would be to do several initial public offerings a year for Israeli companies and several mergers and acquisitions," said Mr. Burgess, who will also make the trip.
Alex. Brown has been doing business with companies in Israel for at least five years.
In 1996, Alex Brown was serving as the financial advisor for Scitex, an Israeli company connected to military intelligence. Yair Shamir, the son of Yitzhak Shamir, the Zionist terrorist who killed Folke Bernadotte before becoming prime minister, was general manager of Scitex. Krongard's three-day visit to Israel and meeting with the prime minister was arranged by the Giza Group, a Tel Aviv-based investment banking firm.
At the time of Krongard's visit, Aviv Boim was a vice president of Giza Ltd. Boim remained at Giza for two more months, until August 1996, and then joined Krongard's company as an associate of Alex Brown from August 1996 to February 1998. Aviv Boim worked with Alex Brown's technology group in London, where he managed initial public offerings, mergers, and acquisitions concerning Israeli companies.
On October 2, 1996, the Baltimore Sun reported that Krongard was "still bullish on Israel." Krongard had addressed the Maryland/Israel Development Center the previous day. "There is great market demand for Israel's products," Krongard said. "Israel has the brain power. Its human capital is exceptional."
The Maryland/Israel Development Center was started in 1992 as a nonprofit group to form business partnerships between Maryland and Israeli companies. The article noted that just the week prior to his speech at the Maryland/Israel Development Center, Krongard and Alex Brown had taken the Israeli company Orckit Communications Ltd. public. "Tel Aviv-based Orckit makes systems that enable telephone companies to provide high-speed voice and digital transmission," the Sun reported. Yair Shamir was a director of Orckit.
ORCKIT AND UNIT 8200 OF ISRAELI MILITARY INTELLIGENCE
Orckit is a company that was created by the former commander of Unit 8200, the signal intelligence branch of the Israeli military, as Efi Landau reported in Globes (Israel).
Even Orckit’s win in the large tender of the US telephone company GTE, one of the eight largest telephone companies in the world, did not persuade company president Yitzhak Tamir to grant an open, on the record, press interview. However, cracks can be seen in the shrouds hiding the company from the media, contributing perhaps to the recognition that the company’s most precious asset is its workers, and it cannot hurt if more is known about them.
Orckit was established in 1990 by Military Intelligence electronic unit 8200 graduates Eric Paneth and Yitzhak Tamir. The unit has provided Israeli high-tech a significant proportion of its engineers and managers. Paneth was commander of the unit, replacing Zohar Zisappel, chairman of the RAD-Bynet group.
Orckit (and Tikcro) are not your usual companies. These are typical Israeli military "dual-use" companies. They have hidden military and intelligence functions but are presented as normal commercial enterprises. With companies like Orckit, Buzzy Krongard and his team at Alex Beam certainly must have been aware that they were investing in companies closely tied to the Israeli military.
In February 1998 Buzzy Krongard joined the C.I.A. as a consultant to director George Tenet. In a bizarre move, Krongard left his $4 million a year job as head of Bankers Trust (BT). He had just completed the BT merger with Alex Brown in the fall of 1997 and suddenly he was leaving. Aviv Boim also left BT Alex Brown in February and joined Orckit as Chief Financial Officer. The merger between Bankers Trust and Alex Brown, the first between a bank and a securities brokerage since the Depression, however, went sour shortly after Krongard left the company. The newly merged company reported a record loss in 1998 and was soon taken over by Deutsche Bank. Mayo Shattuck stayed on at Alex Brown but resigned suddenly the day after 9-11.
While it is clear that Krongard jumped ship because he knew that the BT Alex Brown merger would soon fail, why did he go to work for the C.I.A.? What we do know is that Krongard had worked closely with computer companies spawned by Israeli military intelligence. After he joined the C.I.A. as counselor to the director, Krongard soon became engaged in setting up the C.I.A. venture capital firm called In-Q-It (In-Q-Tel) that was supposed to keep the agency abreast of computer technology. How much Israeli software do you think found its way onto the C.I.A. computer network under Buzzy Krongard's reign?
In October 1999, the Washington Post reported on the genesis of In-Q-Tel:
A lot of people wondered what CIA Director George J. Tenet had in mind a year and a half ago when he brought in Wall Street heavyweight A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard to serve as his "counselor." Now they know-- part of the story.
The man who helped underwrite Microsoft and AOL as head of Alex Brown & Co. has done it again, helping Tenet & Co. start up a CIA venture capital firm called In-Q-It that's supposed to keep the agency abreast of computer technology.
But Krongard's influence at Langley extends well beyond this foray into Silicon Valley. "George will say, 'Make this happen,' " said Krongard, 61, explaining in a telephone interview exactly what it is he does for the director of central intelligence.
"The idea is for In-Q-It to fund promising technologies..."
"The idea for the venture-capital fund was hatched in conversations between the new CIA director, George Tenet, and a former investment banker named A. B. "Buzzy" Krongard, who joined the agency in February 1998 as counselor to the director.
The director of the C.I.A. is often little more than a mannequin who gives a name and a face to the agency while the day-to-day operations are managed by the executive director like Krongard. George Tenet is similar to Leon Panetta. Both are sons of immigrants who owned diners, one in Little Neck, New York, the other in Monterey, California. What is it about Tenet and Panetta that made them suitable to be directors of the C.I.A.? They are clearly not leaders of men or strong thinkers. Could it be that they were men who were known to be weak and amenable, and who could easily be controlled by people like Krongard?
Krongard became the Executive Director of the C.I.A. in March 2001 and remained at that position for more than three years, until November 2004. He was responsible for getting C.I.A. security contracts for Blackwater in Afghanistan and Iraq. Later, his brother Howard (a.k.a. "Cookie"), as Inspector General of the State Department, denied knowing that Buzzy sat on the board of Blackwater during Congressional hearings into his obstruction of the investigation of contract fraud and crimes carried out by Blackwater. The Congressional investigation did not result in any criminal charges being laid against either of the Krongard brothers.
"Krongard exhibited the requisite secretiveness when asked to explain his interest in intelligence and how he came to land a job in [George J. Tenet]'s inner circle," the Washington Post reported on March 17, 2001, the day after he was named Executive Director of the C.I.A. "If you go back to the CIA's origins during World War II in the Office of Strategic Services, he explained, "the whole OSS was really nothing but Wall Street bankers and lawyers."
Krongard was the chief operating officer, the day-to-day administrative leader of the C.I.A. from March 2001 until November 2004. In this position he was certainly aware of the plane-into-building drill planned for September 11, 2001 at the National Reconnaissance Office, a sub-agency of the C.I.A. Although Krongard is probably not an architectural level planner of the terrorism of 9-11, the evidence indicates that he served as a highly-placed manager who served as an important conduit linking Israeli military intelligence with the C.I.A.
Alvin Krongard, his second wife Cheryl, and Jim Kimsey. Cheryl Gruetzmacher was raised in Iowa and married Edward S. Gordon in May 1992.
The Krongard house sits on a 80 acre wooded estate off 1400 W Seminary Avenue in Lutherville, just north of Baltimore, Maryland.
Howard Joel Krongard, Alvin's brother, as Inspector General at the State Department, blocked investigations of massive fraud by military contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan. At Congressional hearings, Howard feigned ignorance that his brother was a director of Blackwater, one of the key contracts being examined. Buzzy had awarded the C.I.A. contract to Blackwater.
The FBI took control of the crash scene. [Wallace] Miller had charge of a provisional morgue six miles away. Across the county, at Seven Springs Mountain Resort, he would meet with families of most of the victims. - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, October 15, 2001
Miller was among the very first to arrive after 10:06 on the magnificently sunny morning of September 11. He was stunned at how small the smoking crater looked, he says, "like someone took a scrap truck, dug a 10-foot ditch and dumped all this trash into it." Once he was able to absorb the scene, Miller says, "I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies there. It became like a giant funeral service." - Washington Post, May 12, 2002
"I wouldn't know how there would be any possibility how any remains would get to Dover… As far as I know, nothing else left here except the DNA samples." - Wallace Miller, Coroner of Somerset County to AP, February 28, 2012
Jim Svonavec, whose company worked at the site and provided excavation equipment, told me that the recovery of the engine "at least 1,800 feet into the woods," was done solely by FBI agents using his equipment. - Christopher Bollyn, "Controlled Press Ignores Questions about 9-11", September 17, 2004
When the Pentagon released the report about the mortuary at Dover Air Force Base on February 28, in which it said that unidentified human remains from Shanksville and the Pentagon were disposed of by cremation and deposited in a landfill, it was sure to raise an uproar of protest.
During the probe of the mortuary, which has a long history of disposing of human remains improperly, a 2002 memo surfaced that stated that remains from the attack on the Pentagon and the crash of Flight 93 near Shanksville had been dumped in a landfill. This is what the Pentagon report said (p. 11) about the human remains from the 9-11 crime scenes:
Prior to 2008, portions of remains that could neither be tested nor identified ...were cremated under contract at a civilian crematory and returned to DPM [Dover Port Mortuary]. This policy began shortly after September 11, 2001, when several portions of remains from the Pentagon attack and the Shanksville, Pennsylvania, crash site could not be tested or identified.
These cremated portions were then placed in sealed containers that were provided to a biomedical waste disposal contractor. Per the biomedical waste contract at that time, the contractor then transported these containers and incinerated them. The assumption on the part of DPM was that after final incineration nothing remained. A DPM management query found that there was some residual material following incineration and that the contractor was disposing of it in a landfill. The landfill disposition was not disclosed in the contractual disposal agreement.
When I read last November how the Dover mortuary had disposed of the bodies of 274 U.S. servicemen by dumping their bodies in a landfill, I suspected that the unethical and criminal practices at the Dover mortuary had probably begun with the remains of the 9-11 victims that had been taken there in 2001.
Wallace "Wally" Miller, the coroner of Somerset County, disputes the report's finding that human remains were taken from Shanksville to Dover AFB. "I wouldn't know how there would be any possibility how any remains would get to Dover," Miller told the AP on February 28. "As far as I know, nothing else left here except the DNA samples." The key qualifying phrase here is "as far as I know." As the county coroner, Miller had legal responsibility for the crash scene but that is not the way it worked out in reality, and Miller knows that very well. I have met Wally Miller and raised the matter about the reports that remains had been taken to Dover with him in 2006 or earlier.
Clearly this is a matter that must be investigated. It is a matter of how the evidence from 9-11 was handled - and destroyed. This matter cannot simply be left to claims and counter-claims in the press about what did or did not happen to the remains from Shanksville. The 9-11 victims' relatives and Miller obviously want to believe that everything was done properly, but was it? We need to have a complete accounting of who really recovered the remains in Shanksville and where they were sent. Where are the records? Who were the people involved?
When I first met Miller at his funeral home, I learned that the FBI had asked him to go along with their demand that they take control of the crash scene, as the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported on October 15, 2001. It was thanks to some local workmen who were painting his porch that this information was divulged to me and my wife as we interviewed Miller. They prompted Miller saying, "Tell them what the FBI told you." The FBI had asked Miller if he was going to be a "team player" or something along those lines, and go along with the FBI taking control of the crash scene.
So, that's how it occurred. The FBI took complete control of the real crash scene, which was in the woods beyond the crater. There were no remains in the reclaimed mine, where the crater had been blasted, because nothing really crashed there, except an air-to-ground missile. The debris that was seen in the crater was junk that had been buried in the reclaimed mine, reportedly old Coca-Cola machines. The aircraft debris field was located several hundred meters in the woods, especially around the property of the Hoover family. This was the closed area in which only FBI personnel was allowed.
The FBI was using heavy equipment lent to them by Jim Svonavec, the owner of the reclaimed mine, who told me in 2004 that even his company personnel were not allowed to be in the debris recovery area, which he said was at least 1,800 feet into the woods. These reports indicate that the real debris field extended over a very large area of the woods in which only FBI personnel was allowed. Even the people who owned the property and lived there, such as Barry Hoover, were not allowed to enter the area. Meanwhile, Wallace Miller, the coroner, was kept busy six miles away manning the provisional morgue. How much oversight could Wally Miller have of the recovery of human remains if he was 6 miles away?
WHO DESTROYED THE EVIDENCE?
Wally is a nice fellow, but he thinks that everybody plays by the rules. He doesn't think about destroying evidence, especially when that evidence is human remains. He allowed the federal authorities to take control of the crime scene that was his responsibility and jurisdiction under the laws of the state of Pennsylvania. I had read that human remains had been taken from Shanksville to Dover AFB for identifying. I read that the identifying process at Dover was being done by several FBI agents working at the mortuary. I called Miller sometime before May 2006 and asked him about the ethics of his having signed death certificates for bodies that had been identified by others at Dover AFB. He got angry at me for having asked this direct question, but he cannot say that he has not heard that such things could have occurred.
What one needs to take into consideration is that the debris field contained the human remains and evidence of mass murder. It was not a crash that brought down Flight 93; it was a missile. The FBI needed to have complete control over the crash scene in order to hide the evidence of this mass murder from the public - and Wally Miller. There would be several things that needed to be hidden: the evidence of the missile and exploded plane, and the number and condition of the bodies.
What the FBI did at Shanksville is the same thing it did at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon: it hid evidence that it did not want to be divulged and destroyed evidence that did not fit the pre-scripted story. That human remains from the Shanksville crime scene were thrown away by FBI agents working at the Dover mortuary is just another grim example of how the FBI destroyed evidence from 9-11. Who were these FBI people working at the Dover mortuary and who was controlling them? This should certainly not be difficult to find out for a military or police investigation team. When they say that their records only go back to 2003, I don't believe it. This is only an attempt to erase the issue and claim that it cannot be investigated.
What needs to be done is a full-throttle investigation of the FBI personnel who were involved in the recovery of human remains in Shanksville and exactly who was working with these remains at Dover AFB and wherever else they may have been sent. FBI personnel were responsible for the destruction of a great deal of evidence from 9-11, such as the steel from the Twin Towers. This all happened under the command of Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff, who was responsible for collecting the evidence and prosecuting the criminals behind 9-11, and his superior, Attorney General John Ashcroft. These two men, the director of the FBI, and all the agents involved in the criminal destruction of evidence need to be arrested and charged with having been part of a conspiracy to destroy evidence and obstruct justice.