Print Contact Articles by Subject The Zionist Criminal Network

The 9/11 Culprits behind the anti-Bollyn protests

September 22, 2016

"Our oppression is not up for debate" - This protestor at Bollyn's event in Brooklyn does not seem to grasp what my presentation is all about. Who is oppressing Jews in America?  Is pointing out Israeli and Zionist involvement in the dual deception of 9/11 and the War on Terror oppressing her? Is it wise for Jews to stand up against 9/11 truth?

When I spoke at the Brooklyn Commons on September 7 there was a small group of protestors who had been organized by a group called Jews for Racial and Economic Justice (JFREJ). This organization had posted an announcement calling for a protest several days prior to the event.


As this poster shows, the JFREJ sought to portray me as a "right-wing conspiracy theorist" and a "raging anti-Semite" to mobilize its members to protest.

Many of the emails that were sent to harass other venues came from Rafael Shimunov, a Jewish immigrant from the Soviet Union, who used very un-American tactics to threaten sponsors and interfere in contracts in New York, Texas, and Denmark. Shimunov just became a member of the board of directors of JFREJ in September 2016. 

Shimunov wrote a posting calling me a hate-monger, entitled "Who is Christopher Bollyn?"

JFREJ is supported by the UJA Federation, where Larry Silverstein was national chairman and is now an honorary member of the board of directors, the Jewish Women's Foundation of New York, where his wife, Klara, is an honorary member of the board, and the Covenant Foundation, which is headed by Susan Crown, daughter of Lester Crown and member of the Henry Crown family which controls General Dynamics and the Aspen Institute. Lester Crown admitted on video that his father bought an entire military aircraft plant in the United States and smuggled it to Israel in violation of U.S. law in the early 1950s. The plant provided by Henry Crown became Israel Aircraft Industries. Larry Silverstein owned the three towers that were demolished on 9/11 taking some 2,700 lives with them. The Crown family is connected to both the JFK murder and 9/11 cover-ups. Susan Crown's maternal grandfather owned the Ambassador Hotel when Bobbie Kennedy was killed there.

Israeli Politician Explains How Criticism of Israel is Stifled in USA and Europe

September 22, 2016

In an interview with American journalist Amy Goodman (2002), the Israeli politician Shulamit Aloni explained how the charge of anti-Semitism is "a trick we use" to suppress criticism of Israel coming from within the United States, and that for criticism coming from Europe "we bring up the Holocaust."

Amy Goodman:  Yours is a voice of criticism we don’t often hear in the United States. Often when there is dissent expressed in the United States against policies of the Israeli government, people here are called anti-semitic. What is your response to that as an Israeli Jew?

Shulamit Aloni:  Well, it’s a trick, we always use it. When from Europe somebody is criticizing Israel, then we bring up the Holocaust. When in this country people are criticizing Israel, then they are anti-Semitic. And the organization is strong, and has a lot of money, and the ties between Israel and the American Jewish establishment are very strong and they are strong in this country, as you know. And they have power, which is OK. They are talented people and they have power and money, and the media and other things, and their attitude is “Israel, my country right or wrong”, identification. And they are not ready to hear criticism. And it’s very easy to blame people who criticize certain acts of the Israeli government as anti-Semitic, and to bring up the Holocaust, and the suffering of the Jewish people, and that is justify everything we do to the Palestinians.  

Exposing the Zionist Hidden Hand Ruling Britain and the United States

This article, which I wrote in December 2007, is now being added to

Exposing the Zionist Hidden Hand Ruling Britain and the United States

For all practical purposes, the United States and Britain are Zionist-occupied nations. Because the American and British people are generally ignorant of what Zionism is, the meaning of this statement is not widely understood or appreciated.

The lack of understanding by the public, however, doesn't change the fact that these once great nations have become Zionist-controlled states. The evidence is clearly seen in the self-destructive foreign policies these nations have pursued for the past 40 years or so.

The Anglo-American "leadership" positions in the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq and their support of the costly Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror" is further proof that Zionists control these nations – as if any were needed.

How did these powerful and independent nations become Zionist controlled? Unlike Palestine, where Eastern European Zionist immigrants used brutal terrorism to ethnically "cleanse" and conquer the land, in Britain and the United States the Zionists gained power gradually through "dumbing down" and effectively disenfranchising the native populations.

In Britain and the United States, the Zionists saved the use of terrorism for later, after they already controlled the media and the levers of power and government.

Americans today still believe they are free because the media tells them so and because they don't see the restraints and are able to move around and buy things. Americans are, indeed, free to work and shop, but they have virtually no real political power whatsoever. A good example is that while an overwhelming majority of the U.S. population is against the war in Iraq, the war and the huge spending bills to support it go on unchallenged by their representatives in Congress. Why don't the Congressmen vote to stop the disastrous war that has consumed hundreds of billions of dollars and taken more than 3,000 American lives?

Most Americans in the "land of the free and the home of the brave" are completely unaware that they have lost the most cherished democratic franchise, i.e. the citizen's fundamental right to vote and count their votes. They think their vote counts and don't have a clue that they lost their democratic franchise years ago. They are unaware of this situation simply because the media has not told them.

"If the media doesn't talk about, it must not be a problem" is the American way of thinking.

For the Zionist-controlled media, the absence of any citizen oversight of the vote-counting process and complete lack of transparency in American elections are simply non-issues, just like many other very important subjects of vital importance to the survival of the republic.

As Johann Wolfgang von Goethe said, "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." This aptly describes the difficult condition Americans face at the beginning of the 21st Century.

Zionists, a marginal minority of Polish and Russian Jewish immigrants, were able to gain control of these great English-speaking nations by obtaining control of two fundamental institutions: the media and academia. This is not to say that they don't control other key institutions, but these two are of essential importance because they largely define the intellectual life of a nation.

Having worked in the media and studied Middle East history at an American university, I know what I am talking about here. History of the Middle East and Europe, and virtually every other subject taught at American universities, is viewed only through the Zionist prism.

For example, when I studied the Middle East at the University of California at Santa Cruz, the head of the department was a professor named Edmund Burke who had studied under the famous British Jew, Bernard Lewis, at Princeton. Burke was always recommending the books of Bernard Lewis, which I avoided like the plague.

Bernard Lewis

American historian Joel Beinin called Lewis "perhaps the most articulate and learned Zionist advocate in the North American Middle East academic community."

"Terry" Burke spent 1990 "on sabbatical" with Lewis at Princeton. He returned to Santa Cruz in the late summer, just before the U.S. invasion of Iraq in January 1991. I remember Burke giving a speech in August or September at the federal building in Santa Cruz as the conflict was heating up. The very first words out of his mouth were "Balkanization," something that amazes me to this day. He was unwilling to explain his choice of words when I called him about a year ago.

Edmund "Terry" Burke of U.C. Santa Cruz

Although my main interest was Israel and Palestine, Burke recommended that I read a book about Yugoslavia. Balkanization, the breaking up of nations into ethnic statelets, is the Zionist plan for the entire Middle East, articulated by Oded Yinon of the Israeli foreign ministry in the early 1980s.

During the many lectures and courses I studied on the Middle East, never did I hear a critical word about Zionism or its brutal history in Eastern Europe and Palestine. This is primarily because the professors of Middle Eastern studies and European history are usually Jewish and strongly inclined to support Zionism.

If a professor were to openly criticize Zionism as the racist and violent ideology that it is, he would probably find himself unemployed in very short order.

I understood this and endeavored to present the anti-Zionist perspective at the university. I brought speakers like Ralph Schoenman, the author of The Hidden History of Zionism (1988), to the campus and led a tour of photojournalists to the West Bank and Gaza Strip shortly after the invasion of Iraq. Despite a great deal of effort and years of experience in the region, Burke did not give me "honors" with my degree, most likely because of my anti-Zionist views.

The media in the United States is controlled in the same way as the universities. The editors and journalists are prevented from investigating and discussing the real history of Zionism because the news outlets are usually owned by people who are themselves dedicated Zionists. The takeover of CNN by Gerald M. Levin of AOL Time Warner marked the fall of the last major non-Zionist media network.

Gerald Levin

Today, all major news outlets in the United States and Britain are strongly Zionist. There were a few good newspapers, such as the Christian Science Monitor, that provided some balance to the pro-Zionist "mainstream" networks, but even they have now fallen.

The result is that the populations of the United States, Britain, and Australia are largely ignorant of Zionism and what it has done in the past in other countries -- and what it is doing now -- in theirs.


Selecting issues and non-issues for coverage is the primary method employed by the Zionist-controlled news networks. Issues get a lot of coverage while non-issues get none.

Here are a few examples of issues and non-issues in the Zionist-controlled media:

• Iran's legal and monitored efforts to develop nuclear energy are an issue; Israel's illegal and secret nuclear arsenal is not.

• Discussion of the alleged role of Muslims in terrorist acts is an issue; solid evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 and the London bombings is not.

• The two-year long fake presidential campaign with a host of Zionist-controlled candidates is an issue; how our electronic "votes" are counted by mysterious "private" foreign companies of unknown ownership is not.

I don't know if any other American journalist and 9-11 researcher has been attacked, TASERed, and had their elbow broken by an undercover tactical squad in front of their family in the United States, but I know that when it happened to me in August 2006 it was very much a non-issue with the controlled media.


The position of foreign minister, or secretary of state in the United States, is a very important position, second only to the president or prime minister. Since foreign policy is the only policy coming out of Washington or London these days, these positions are of crucial importance and speak volumes about who is really controlling the government.

In the United States and Britain we have very strange people with odd backgrounds in these high-level appointed positions. The current British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs is a 42-year-old politician named David Wright Miliband, the son of the Belgian-born Marxist, Adolphe "Ralph" Miliband.

David Milliband

The U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, a 53-year-old former professor, holds the comparable position in the American government.

What is most peculiar -- and telling -- is that the backgrounds, loyalties, and ideologies of these two high-level appointed officials are never discussed in the Zionist-controlled media; clearly this is a non-issue.


It goes without saying that both Miliband and Rice are dedicated Zionists, they are, after all, serving in extremely pro-Zionist governments. But why are their personal and family histories not discussed by the media? Don't the American and British people have a right to know the person who is overseeing the implementation of their national foreign policy?

David Miliband, who only became a Member of Parliament in June 2001, was recently in Basra, Iraq, when the British officially stepped back from their failure and turned over control to Iraqi authorities.

Although Miliband and other British officials have tried to put a good face on the disastrous results of the Anglo-American invasion and occupation, the fact that it has been a complete failure is painfully apparent to all.

As a senior Iraqi military officer told ABC News, "The British legacy in Basra is criminal gangs, a corrupt and infiltrated police force, and borders open to all."

Major-General Jalil Khalaf, the new police commander in Basra, told the Times of London: "They left me militia, they left me gangsters, and they left me all the troubles in the world."

Yousif Nassar, one of Basra’s most famous composers, is also disappointed at what the British did to his city. "The British Forces created chaos and failed to deliver what they promised," he said, as reported by the Times of December 17, 2007.

The Times article was entitled "Crumbling services and violence on the streets, but hope follows British pullout."

"We congratulate all of those who have helped achieve this, most notably British and Coalition military and civilian personnel," Defense Secretary Des Browne and David Miliband said in a joint statement when the pullout was announced. How could these senior British officials congratulate anyone for their achievements in Basra? The Anglo-American occupation of Iraq is nothing but an unmitigated disaster. Perhaps that was the plan all along?

Knowing who David Miliband is and what he represents is key to understanding the real power behind Britain's foreign policy. This is certainly the reason the Zionist-controlled media keeps the British population – and the world – ignorant of the Miliband family's roots – in Brussels.

David Milliband

David Miliband is the son of Ralph Miliband, born Adolphe in Brussels in 1924, and Marion Kozak. Ralph was a well known Marxist political theorist. Ralph, who died in 1994, is buried in Highgate Cemetery close to his idol, Karl Marx.

Miliband and his father, the Marxist Ralph Milliband at his spacious home in a comfortable part of London

David's brother, Edward Samuel Miliband, is also a member of Prime Minister Gordon Brown's cabinet where he has been chairman of the Treasury's Council of Economic Advisers, which directs the UK's long-term economic planning.

Beyond that, the family history gets confusing and misleading, on purpose I'm sure.

The online biography of Adolphe "Ralph" Miliband says he was born in Brussels of Polish-Jewish emigré parents and that both his parents lived in the Jewish quarter of Warsaw, before his father, Samuel "Sam" Miliband, joined the Red Army in the Polish-Soviet or Bolshevik War (February 1919 – March 1921).

Sam Miliband is said to have left Poland after the First World War, which ended in November 1918. He supposedly became a leather worker in Belgium and then returned to Poland to join the Red Army under the command of Leon Trotsky (born Lev Davidovich Bronstein) in 1920.

The commanders who served under Trotsky in the Bolshevik War against Poland were Mikhail Tukhachevsky, Aleksandr Yegorov, Joseph Stalin, and Felix Dzerzhinsky.

Nikolay Bukharin, writing in the Soviet newspaper Pravda, urged the Bolsheviks to carry on beyond Warsaw "right up to London and Paris."

General's Tukhachevsky's order of July 2, 1920 read:  "To the West! Over the corpse of White Poland lies the road to world-wide conflagration. March on Vilno, Minsk, Warsaw! Onward to Berlin over the corpse of Poland!"

Why would a poor leather worker in Belgium give up his work and travel all the way to Poland to fight with the Bolshevik Red Army against the Polish Republic and the West? If this is true, Samuel Miliband must have been a very dedicated communist.

This is, however, most certainly not the whole truth. The family tree of the family of David and Edward Miliband clearly indicates that their grandfather Samuel Miliband was also born, like their father Adolphe, in Brussels in 1865. In this case, Brussels-born Sam must have been an extremely dedicated communist. There is another possible explanation. Perhaps Sam was a Zionist emissary on a mission to bring support and funds to the Red Army in their attempt to conquer Poland. If the family tree is correct that Sam Miliband was born in Brussels, there is something more to the Miliband story.

The Miliband family tree provides the names and dates of birth of Samuel's 11 siblings, his parents, and even his grand-parents, data which supports it as a credible source. Why then has the Zionist-controlled media obscured the Miliband family history and pretended that David's father was born in Warsaw, when his family records indicate he was born in Brussels?

This is information about the Miliband family that the Zionist-controlled media had evidently decided that the public does not need to know. It also suggests that the preferential treatment and promotions that the Milibands have received since coming to Britain have more to do with their high-level connections than with their abilities.

Their connections and loyalties are evidently to the highest levels of the Zionist "Communist" International in Brussels, which is the only reason they are in the positions they are in. Their loyalty is clearly not to the British nation or people.


The same is true of Condoleezza Rice, who was mentored at the University of Denver by the Czechoslovakian Jewish immigrant, Josef Korbel, the father of the previous secretary of state, Marie Jana Korbelova, a.k.a. Madeleine Albright.

Marie Jana Korbelova with her father, Josef Korbel - 1943

One might think that this amazing coincidence would be newsworthy but it has generally been ignored by the controlled media as well. This is probably because the obvious question, "Who is Josef Korbel?" is a question the Zionist-controlled media does not want to address.

Josef Korbel (1909-77) was a Czechoslovakian diplomat in the London-based "government" in exile of Edvard Benes, which took power in Prague after World War II. Korbel was the father of Bill Clinton's Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, and the mentor of George W. Bush's Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice. What a coincidence – or is it?

Condoleezza Rice and Zippy Livni, the Israeli foreign minister.

Livni is the daughter of the former head of operations of the Irgun, a Zionist terror organization.

Korbel was also a thief. Korbel stole paintings which belonged to German industrialist Karl Nebrich, whose property in Prague was confiscated as part of the post-war Benes decrees. Like the more than three million other ethnic Germans from Bohemia, Moravia, and Slovakia, Nebrich and his family were expelled from the country under the postwar decrees, which oddly remain in force to this day.

Would any European nation that banned Jews and confiscated their property be allowed to be a member of the European Union? Why are such racist laws permitted against Germans?

Korbel's stealing of property and art is just the tip of the iceberg. Korbel was involved in the United Nations partition of India and Pakistan and the illegal arming of the Zionist fighters in Palestine until the end of 1948.

When the communists came to power in 1948, Korbel was charged and sentenced and fled to New York where he lived in the cottage house of a very large mansion in Great Neck, New York. He was eventually given a teaching position at the University of Denver.

The Korbel's move to New York is described in Seasons of Her Life, A Biography of Madeleine Albright:

The Korbels settled into a home just outside New York City. One of Joseph Korbel's colleagues at the United Nations had helped the family rent a small gardener's cottage at 149 Station Road in a woodsy section of Great Neck, a prosperous and developing suburban community on Long Island's North Shore.

Korbel clearly played a key role in the Zionist-Israeli weapons pipeline from Czechoslovakia, which was the main supplier and base for the nascent Israeli Air Force. The Zionist air bridge from Czechoslovakia, known as Operation Balak, was the essential weapons supply line and is regarded as one of the Israeli Air Force's most important achievements. Czechoslovakia provided weapons, ammunition, and the first fighter airplanes to the Zionist forces in Palestine.

The would-be Israelis even operated their own airbase and pilot training school in Czechoslovakia. Yugoslavia played an important role as the main transit point for arms shipments going by sea and a refueling stop for the Israeli and Zionist pilots flying fighter aircraft from Czechoslovakia to Palestine – which became the State of Israel after May 1948.

Korbel, an avowed anti-communist and senior member of the Benes government, became the Czech ambassador to Belgrade at this time, although he hated the socialism of Tito. Korbel was the ambassador in Yugoslavia because he was playing another more important role: the key Zionist point man in the illegal weapons transfers to Jewish forces in Palestine. The people, such as Shimon Peres, who were involved in the illegal weapons smuggling to the Haganah and the Irgun terrorist gangs in Palestine have been at the top of the Zionist hierarchy since 1948.

There is, of course, much more to the sordid Milliband, Korbel, and Rice histories. This material is provided simply to illustrate the high-level Zionist connections of the people who shaped and taught the current foreign ministers of Britain and the United States. Because this information is not provided by the controlled media in these two great nations, I am providing this research to help my fellow Americans and British friends realize who is controlling their foreign policy – which is nothing short of disastrous.

Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.
Donate here or by PayPal to

Source: "Exposing the Zionist Hidden Hand Ruling Britain and the United States," Rumor Mill News, Christopher Bollyn, December 20, 2007

The Zionist War on Terror Creates More Terror

December 3, 2015

If there’s one thing the “war on terror” has excelled at, it is creating more war – and if there is a second, it is creating more terror.
"The entire ‘war on terror’ has been a lie – and these charts prove it" 
Rebecca Sumner,, November 28, 2015

The "War on Terror" has created more war – and more terror...
(Graphics: R. Sumner) 

in Iraq...

in Afghanistan...

and in Syria, among other places.

So, in reality, what is the "War on Terror"?  Where did it come from?

AN ISRAELI WAR STRATEGY - The "War on Terror" is a massive Zionist/Israeli fraud that has been based on lies and deception since it was first conceived by Benjamin Netanyahu and his 'institute of terrorism' in Israel in the 1970s. The "War on Terror" deception is the subject of my Solving 9-11 books.

NETANYAHU'S MISSION - From 1976 to 1978, Benjamin Netanyahu worked for the Boston Consulting Group, a firm connected to the Rothschild family.  In 1979, 
with his father, Benzion, Netanyahu co-founded an institute on terrorism.  They then organized an international conference in Jerusalem that emphasized the need for Western nations to fight terror groups (the groups opposed to Israeli occupation) - and the regimes supporting them.  The terrorism data that Netanyahu used to make his case at the conference was exaggerated and fraudulent.  George H.W. Bush spoke at the conference.

from my 2013 article 
"Obama's Trip to Birthplace of War on Terror"

"In the summer of 1979, a group of powerful and influential people joined to launch an international propaganda offensive to promote and exploit the issue of 'international terrorism'," Philip Paull of San Francisco State University wrote in his 1982 thesis on the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism. "The propaganda 'blitz' originated in Jerusalem. The conspiratorial network included present and former members of the Israeli and United States governments...

"This 'anti-terrorist' propaganda campaign was and is being conducted in a style reminiscent of wartime 'psychological warfare' by journalists serving as conduits and spreaders of misinformation originating in Jerusalem," Paull wrote in his thesis...

As Paull demonstrates in his thesis, "the entire notion of 'international terrorism' as promoted by the Jerusalem Conference rests on a faulty, dishonest, and ultimately corrupt information base." This is equally true of the official versions of the terror attacks of 1993 and 2001. They are nothing more than packs of lies designed to place the blame on Arabs and Muslims.

The American people have been the primary target of the vicious 'psychological warfare' waged by the Israeli government. The purpose of the Israeli psychological warfare is to create fear through false-flag terrorism like 9-11 in order to impose the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror". I have done my utmost to provide an antidote to this fear and deception with my book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World.


"The heightened global media coverage of 'international terrorism'", Paull wrote, "was for the most part a result of a deliberate, well-financed, international propaganda campaign initiated by the Israeli government."

The theme of 'international terrorism' "was used to portray the 'Free World', including Israel, as essentially on the defensive before a virtual epidemic of terrorism which treatened the very fabric of civilization," Paull wrote. "But in order to transfigure 'international terrorism' into a political bubonic plague, it was necessary to produce false and misleading 'information', or misinformation." Paull's thesis explains how the Netanyahu institute and the Israeli government used misinformation to "deliberately exploit the emotions of fear and anxiety."

MEET THE MILEIKOWSKY'S - Benjamin Netanyahu and his father, Benzion Mileikowsky from Warsaw, Poland. Benzion was the executive secretary for Vladimir Jabotinsky, the founder of Revisionist Zionism, which calls for the military conquest of all of Palestine and expulsion of the non-Jewish population. His son, Bibi, has furthered these goals. 9-11 was an essential part of the Zionist deception, a terror spectacle designed to change U.S. public opinion and drag the United States military into the Middle East - to fight Israel's enemies. 

NETANYAHU THE ARCHITECT OF TERROR - Netanyahu's first book, International Terrorism: Challenge and Response, is based on the speeches given at the Jerusalem conference in 1979.  Netanyahu has made a career of pushing the Israeli war strategy known as the "War on Terror". It is a strategy of conquest in which the United States and its allies fight wars in the Middle East on behalf of the Zionist state and its war agenda.  Creating a greater state of Israel, a goal of the terrorist groups that created the Likud party in the 1970s, is part of the plan.

This is why Ehud Barak, Netanyahu's former commander in the Sayeret Matkal covert commando force, was ready in the BBC World television studio in London on 9-11 - ready to prompt the world to begin "an operational, concrete, war against terror" before either of the Twin Towers had even collapsed. Co-incidence?  Not a chance.

This is why "Solving 9-11 Ends the War" is the theme of my presentations. This is because when enough people understand that the "War on Terror" is a massive Zionist/Israeli deception that is actually designed to create more war and terrorism, we can put an end to the whole evil madness.  But, we can't end it as long as so many people are deceived and do not understand the real source of the problem. 
Photo: Mike Chickey

Dear Reader,
If you appreciate my articles, 
please support my research and writing. 

Click here to donate 
or donate via PayPal to:


"Despite 14 Years of the US War on Terror, Terror Attacks Have Skyrocketed Since 9/11" by Paul Gottinger, Reader Supported News, September 11, 2015

Mike Chickey, photographs of Bollyn at The Oscars 2015, February 22, 2015 

"Obama's Trip to Birthplace of War on Terror" by Christopher Bollyn, March 19, 2013

"The entire ‘war on terror’ has been a lie – and these charts prove it" by Rebecca Sumner, The Canary, November 28, 2015 

The Paris Attacks - À quoi bon?

November 17, 2015

HOLLANDE AND THE ROTHSCHILD BANKSTERS - François Hollande, seen here with David de Rothschild, appointed a Rothschild banker to manage the French ministry of economy in 2014. What does that say about Hollande's loyalty?

"An act of war was committed by a terrorist army, DAESH [ISIS], a jihadist army, against France… An act of war prepared, planned, from outside, with outside complicity which an investigation will establish."
- French President François Hollande, November 14, 2015

"We need to work to find a political solution. Bashar al-Assad is not the solution, he is the problem."
- French President François Hollande, October 23, 2015

“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.”
- Franklin D. Roosevelt

The Friday the 13th terror attacks in Paris seem to have accomplished exactly what they were meant to.  They have seemingly given the French and the U.S. the right to attack “without mercy” ISIS forces in Syria.  While the strikes are supposedly aimed at ISIS, the country taking the pounding is Syria.

There are basically two ways to view the terror attacks in Paris:  they were, either, as French President François Hollande says, “an act of war… committed by a terrorist army, DAESH, a jihadist army,” – or they were something else. 

The accepted view, promoted by the controlled media and accepted by world leaders, is that they were, exactly as Hollande says, “an act of war” carried out by DAESH (a.k.a. ISIS, ISIL, Islamic State). Based on this interpretation, U.S. A-10 Warthogs and French fighter jets have started bombing DAESH targets in Syria.

À quoi bon?

This raises the obvious question, what’s the point?  Why would any militia carry out an outrageous terror atrocity against a very powerful nation that is well prepared, willing, and ready to wage war against it as a response?

This is a situation strikingly similar to 9-11, in which the predecessor of DAESH, Al Qaida, supposedly attacked the United States, opening the door for the pre-planned invasion of Afghanistan. How convenient.

We should ask:  Do these so-called Islamic groups have a desire to commit mass suicide?  With the French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle approaching Syria and with American A-10 Warthogs poised on the border ready for destroy anything on the ground, why would any Islamic group give such powerful forces a carte blanche reason to attack?

Is this not just a little too neat?

If you agree that this is too neat, there is the alternative view to be considered.  That is that the Paris attacks are something other than what they appear to be and that the desired outcome was achieved by using a fraudulent input.  That is to say that the terror attacks in Paris were, in fact, controlled and carried out by a hidden hand that used deception to produce the desired outcome.  We are, after all, living in an era of massive deception.

Who might that be?

Given the fact that the fraudulent “War on Terror” is an Israeli construct dating back to the 1970s, the first suspect would have to be Israeli intelligence.

Why would they do that?

To advance the Israeli strategy known as the “War on Terror” – and destroy Syria in the process.

How would they do it?

By creating a cell of extremists who are cultivated and prepared to carry out such acts of violence. 

Are there any indications that this is the case?

The fact that the Bataclan theatre was Israeli-owned until September 11, 2015, in one rather obvious clue. There are many others, such as the degree of knowledge held by the planners.  For example, how did the terrorists know that the French president would be at the football game? And why did French SWAT teams wait for more than two hours to take action at the theatre?

Is Hollande part of the deception?

He could be, but I would tend to doubt it.  Hollande is simply “in the pocket” of the Rothschild family and proved it by waging war in Mali on behalf of the Rothschilds and their gold interests in that poor African nation.  In August 2014, Hollande appointed Emmanuel Macron, a Rothschild investment banker to head the French Ministry of Economy.

Hollande is a Rothschild puppet who does what his masters want.  At this point they want him to attack Syria.

ROTHSCHILD PUPPET - François Hollande, seen here with Eric de Rothschild, serves the Rothschild family - not the Republic of France.

How does this affect the situation in Syria?

The Paris attacks bring France into the Syrian conflict, although their military actions in Syria are neither legal nor approved by the government of Syria.  This increases the weight of the anti-Assad coalition vis-à-vis the Russians, who have been asked to intervene in Syria and are fighting in support of the Assad government.

Note:  If you appreciate my articles please support my research and writing.  
Click here to donate or via PayPal to:

Sources and Recommended Reading:

“Bashar al-Assad is Problem, Not Solution in Syria: French President Francois Hollande,”, October 23, 2015

"Hollande replaces critic of austerity with Rothschild banker,", Reuters, August 27, 2014 

"Mali - France Fights for Rothschild Gold," by Christopher Bollyn, January 19, 2013

Suspicions about the Russian Plane Crash

Updated November 13, 2015

Material added from Valentin Vasilescu's article, "Airbus 321 in the Sinaï - Only One Hypothesis Remains" - an excellent analysis by an aviation expert that supports the theory presented here.

"Once again, politicians, intelligence agents and journalists have made up their minds that a bomb triggered the crash of a Russian Airbus A321, though evidence to support this theory is ephemeral."
- Christine Negroni, "Why the rush to judgment in the Metrojet disaster?" 

[Carmi] Gillon suggested that today a terror organization could take over a jet plane and “achieve something like 9-11” without fielding any flesh and blood attackers.
- Carmi Gillon, former head of Israel’s Shin Bet security service, 
“The double-edged sword of cyber warfare,” Times of Israel, June 24, 2015

“Cyberspace enables the attack of another nation state in offensive action, even reaching victory without leaving any fingerprints, even if it is suspected. We are already there; we are not talking about some distant future. We have experienced this in Israel’s day-to-day actions against its enemies.”
- Israel Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon, Ibid., 
Times of Israel, June 24, 2015

Darina Gromova, age 10 months, was on her way home from a holiday in Egypt when the Metrojet plane she was on went down in the Sinai Desert.


The Russian airliner was cruising at 31,000 feet when it lost contact with air traffic controllers, according to Egyptian aviation officials.
- “Officials search for cause of plane crash over Egypt's Sinai,” AP, October 31, 2015

An official in the Egyptian Air traffic control has told local reporters that the last communication with the pilot of the Russian plane was while he was flying at 30 thousand feet. The pilot complained of malfunction in the wireless devices and he asked for an emergency landing at the nearest airport.
- “Russian plane crash,” The Telegraph (UK), October 31, 2015

It remains to be seen how the U.S. and other nations supporting the mercenary forces fighting in Syria will respond to the Russian intervention. Unlike chess, this game has no rules. 
- Christopher Bollyn, “Syria: The Russian Move - Changing the Game,” October 6, 2015

The October 31 crash of the Russian Metrojet passenger aircraft in the Sinai Desert, near the border of Egypt and Israel, raises some well-founded suspicions of foul play being involved in the downing of the plane. Although it is too early to say what caused the crash, there are some clear indications that suggest the plane was remotely sabotaged - via its connection to the Internet.

The Russian aircraft went down south of Al Arish, near the border of Israel, very close to Israel's main cyberwarfare and computer hacking facility, Unit 8200, located on Kibbutz Urim. Cyberwarfare is defined as "actions by a nation-state to penetrate another nation's computers or networks for the purposes of causing damage or disruption." Graphic: The Telegraph

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT 8200 - Israel's main satellite signal intelligence facility is located on Kibbutz Urim, less than 60 miles NNE of the location where the Russian plane went down. Unit 8200, an institution of computer hackers, 
is the largest branch of the IDF and is responsible for the military’s offensive cyber capabilities. The Telegraph reported in 2010, "The Negev desert based Unit 8200 has evolved from the signal intelligence arm of the Israeli military into a respected leader in high technology warfare."

LEGIONS OF HACKERS - The Israeli signal intelligence facility, known as Unit 8200, has "rows of satellite dishes that covertly intercept phone calls, emails and other communications." This Israeli spy facility would have had the ability to monitor and communicate directly with the aircraft's navigation system - without the knowledge of the crew. This was the plot of the pilot episode of "The Lone Gunmen," which depicted a remotely-hijacked passenger aircraft being flown into the World Trade Center. The program aired on FOX TV in March 2001. Arnon Milchan, the Mossad Mogul of Hollywood and Rupert Murdoch's business partner, is thought to be the true author of the evil plot.

The fact that the pilot's last communication, from 30,000 feet, reported a malfunction in the airplane's wireless devices and that he asked for an emergency landing indicates that the airplane may have been in the process of being hacked externally through its satellite wireless connection. It is interesting to note that the report of the "malfunction in the wireless devices" has not been published in a single U.S. newspaper or media outlet.

Secondly, the fact that this was the pilot's last communication is significant. Even if the plane had stalled, as it seems to have done, and fallen from 30,000 feet, the pilot still would have had several minutes to communicate with air traffic controllers in Cairo - unless his communications link had been cut, which appears to be the case. 

Viktor Yung, a director general of Metrojet, said, "from the moment since the events took a tragic turn, the crew became incapacitated," adding, there was not "a single attempt to get in touch (with air traffic control) and report the situation on board."


Egypt's Civil Aviation Authority reported that no Mayday signal was sent from the plane and that communication with the aircraft was normal until the aircraft disappeared from radar. This is a very telling piece of information because it indicates that the normal communication channels with the cockpit crew had been cut before the plane was remotely hijacked and sabotaged.

Last contact with the flight from flight tracking website Flightradar24 shows the aircraft climbing to 30,875 feet, after which it showed erratic altitudes and speed indications. Last altitude recorded was 27,925 feet at a speed of just 62 knots. Apparently, the plane had lost all engine power. The fact that the last altitude recorded by Flightradar24 was 27,925 feet indicates that the plane's ADS-B transponder stopped functioning - or was turned off at that point.

These reports seem to indicate that the plane may have been remotely hijacked by an unauthorized "ground pilot" who hacked into its flight system through its satellite connection to the Internet, something I discuss in "Why Did Crucial Computer Systems Fail?" in my book Solving 9-11.  Remote hijacking is thought to have been the cause of the downing of Egypt Air 990 and Malaysia Airlines 370, which was apparently taken down over the Indian Ocean. 


The Russian aircraft reportedly broke up in flight. This break-up may have occurred as a result of the extreme forces the plane was subjected to as it went through radical dives and climbs in the last thirty seconds before it disappeared from radar.  This scenario is very similar to the crash of Egypt Air 990, which went down exactly 16 years earlier on October 31, 1999, over the Atlantic Ocean, 62 miles south of Nantucket Island with 217 killed.

The radical changes in the plane's vertical speed (i.e. diving and climbing in 
feet per minute) may have caused the plane to break up at a high altitude. On November 4, Egyptian and Russian media report that an “engine explosion” is thought to be the most likely cause of the crash. If that is the case, at what point on the timeline above did the engine explode?  Note: The Russian plane's transponder signals cease abruptly at 28,000 feet while the plane's ground speed is only 62 knots.

The Russian plane's radical climbs caused the aircraft to lost speed and stall, which is exactly what happened to Indonesia AirAsia Flight 8501 (a Malaysian-owned Airbus A320 that fell into the Java Sea) in December 2014. (See: AirAsia Jet Climbed at Rate Beyond Design of Commercial Planes ) 

The tail broke off AirAsia 8501 in the same way that the tail detached from the Russian plane over the Sinai. Both planes were evidently pushed into extreme climbs, far exceeding what they were designed for, which subjected the aircraft to forces that caused them to break up.


"The fin and aft fuselage were about 2.25 km south of the wing/fwd fuselage and south of the last radar position. so looks like that came off first for whatever reason. The photos of the fin/aft fuselage show a clean lateral break at a frame at the top indicating that is where the fracture started and the complicated rupture at the bottom being the final departure from the rest of the aircraft as the back end bent off downwards. That would indicate the failure was due to an excessive download on the horizontal stabiliser or a fatigue failure at the fuselage top adjacent the frame and then pressurisation blew the back end off." 
(Source: Aero Eng Aviator, Plane Talking, November 3, 2015) 

Did the downward force on the tail cause it to break off as a result of the extreme climbs the plane was pushed into?  I
f the pilot was incommunicado, who was putting the plane through such radical moves?

The wreckage suggests that the plane disintegrated at a high altitude. “All signs indicate that the destruction of the aircraft structure occurred in air at a high altitude,” Alexander Neradko, head of the Russian Federal Air Transport Agency, said on November 1. Neradko said debris from the Airbus A321 was scattered across an “elongated ellipsis” of 3 miles in length by 2.5 miles in width.

A plane with a satellite connection to the Internet can be hijacked from the ground by an external hacker breaking into its computer system. 

REMOTE HIJACKING - This connection, which is used on the Airbus 321 and other aircraft, can be exploited by an external hacker to gain access to the aircraft's navigation system. 


Two days after the plane went down, the Russian airline that operated the aircraft said the disaster could not have been caused by a technical fault or human error. Alexander Smirnov, deputy general director of the Kogalymavia airline, said the crash could only have been the result of some other "technical or physical action" which caused it to break up in the air and plummet to the ground.

Smirnov did not specify what that action might have been, saying it was up to the official investigation to determine. The airlines had previously stated that "external factors" were behind the crash. "The plane was in excellent condition," Smirnov told a news conference in Moscow. "We rule out a technical fault and any mistake by the crew," he said.

Smirnov also said there had been no emergency calls from the pilots to services on the ground during the flight.


The "War on Terror" is also a war of deception. Deception by the controlled media is a core element of the fraudlent "War on Terror" in which state-sponsored false-flag terrorism is the primary tactic applied. Because public perception is crucial to maintaining the fraudulent "War on Terror" the controlled media will always omit information that would expose the fraud. 

The BBC, a key player in the deception behind the fraudulent "War on Terror," omits any discussion of the possibility that the Russian plane could have been hijacked remotely using the same technology that the U.S. and Israel use to fly their drones.

A good example of such an omission is the BBC News article published on November 2, 2015, entitled “Sinai plane crash: Four theories,” which listed what they said were "the four theories" that would be examined by the international investigators. The four theories presented by the BBC were: technical fault, human error, shot down by missile, and bomb on board. There is no mention whatsoever by the BBC or other controlled media of the very real possibility that the plane could have been hijacked remotely and flown by an external pilot who caused the destruction of the plane.

This is a blatant omission of the most obvious theory, which is, thus far, supported by the evidence. It is as if the BBC and the controlled media are unaware of drone technology, although the United States and Israel use remotely-controlled drones on a daily basis in the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror." For a remote hacker to hack into an airplane's flight navigation system and take control of the plane from the cockpit crew is to turn a passenger plane into a drone.

For the BBC and the Zionist-controlled media to omit the possible theory that the plane was hijacked remotely using drone technology reveals the key role the media plays in the Zionist-bankster deception being foisted on the American people and the world. The controlled media's omission of the remote hijacking theory is meant to hide that possibility from the public, which suggests that it may very well have been how the plane was brought down.


A week after the disaster, British and U.S. media began reporting that un-named "senior administration officials" were saying they were "99.9 percent certain" that the Russian passenger plane had been brought down with a bomb.

As CNN reported in its article entitled "Russian plane crash: ISIS chatter supports bomb theory, officials say" on November 9, "...intelligence intercepts being used to assess what happened to the jetliner came from Israeli intelligence."

"Once again, politicians, intelligence agents and journalists have made up their minds that a bomb triggered the crash of a Russian Airbus A321, though evidence to support this theory is ephemeral... Everyone seems to have joined in chorus that Metrojet 7K9268 was felled by a bomb except the official investigators," Christine Negroni wrote in her article, "Why the rush to judgment in the Metrojet disaster?" 

The rush to judgment is due to the fact that in the Zionist mega-fraud known as the "War on Terror," a fraud and deception we are deeply engaged in as a nation, the main battle is to control public perception, i.e. the way in which something is regarded, understood, or interpreted - by the public. This is why Israeli intelligence provided the material that convinced the un-named "senior administration officials" that a bomb had brought down the plane.

The battle to control the media/public interpretation of what happened to the plane is why the Israelis provided this dodgy "evidence" to the U.S government and media - and not to the official investigators in Egypt and Russia. To understand where this ploy is supposed to take us, we need to consider the targets and goals in this on-going "War on Terror" deception.

The primary targets of the Metrojet attack are the Russian president and the Russian people. The "bombing" is meant to cause President Putin to pay a high price for his intervention in Syria, which has interrupted the evil game being played by Israel and its allies in that nation.  Another primary target is the Egyptian economy, which depends a great deal on tourism from Russia and Britain.

The main goal of the "bombing" rumor in the media is to boost the terrorist profile of ISIS, a profile that is largely created and controlled by Israeli intelligence. This will give the U.S. and its allies public support for their illegal "bombing" campaigns in Syria, which have done amazingly little to harm ISIS, but have destroyed hundreds of millions of dollars worth of civilian infrastructure.

Another important purpose of Israeli intelligence feeding the "bomb" rumor is to plant a plausible explanation for the crash, which has not yet been explained. The lack of an accepted explanation for the crash was giving too much space for the information like that found in this article to find more readers and gain traction. Furthermore, news reports that Israel was engaged in a massive exercise with its air force, the U.S. and others, just on the other side of the Egyptian-Israeli border from where the plane went down, have added to the speculation that Israel was involved in bringing down the aircraft. 

But the theory, pushed by the Israelis and their allies, that a bomb brought down the plane simply does not fit with the available evidence and leaves one big question completely unanswered:  How and why did the plane go into three steep climbs, putting extreme strains on the aircraft, which evidently caused the tail to break off?


Valentin Vasilescu, a Romanian military expert, published an article on November 12, entitled "Airbus 321 in the Sinaï - only one hypothesis remains" in which he demonstrates the impossibility of the theory of a bomb being the cause of the disaster.

The article begins, "having explored all hypotheses, there is now only one left – that of a failure in the software of the automatic pilot... But the problems in the automatic pilot system may be either an accident or the effect of sabotage by an extremely specialised secret service."

Note:  If you appreciate my articles please support my research and writing.  
Click here to donate or via PayPal to:

Sources and Recommended Reading: 

“AirAsia flight QZ8501: Radar data shows 'unbelievably steep climb' before crash that pushed plane beyond its limits,” The Independent (UK), January 1, 2015

“AirAsia Jet Climbed at Rate Beyond Design of Commercial Planes,”Wall Street Journal, January 20, 2015

"Airbus 321 in the Sinaï - only one hypothesis remains" by Valentin Vasilescu, Voltaire Network, November 12, 2015

Audio file of "Why Did Crucial Computer Systems Fail?" (Chapter 5 ofSolving 9-11, print edition, 2012) 

“Closures of Sinai airspace have broader implications, including for Qantas” by Ben Sandilands, Plane Talking, November 3, 2015

Cobham AVIATOR HGA-7001, Data Sheet, November 1, 2015

"Cobham Counts U.S. Government Customer and Airbus Among Antenna Clients," Satnews Daily, June 17, 2009

“Debris Shows Kogalymavia A321 Disintegrated at High Altitude,” Sputnik News, November 1, 2015

Flightradar24, "How it Works"

"GAO: Newer aircraft vulnerable to hacking," CNN, April 15, 2015

"How Did Spy Software Get Onto FAA Computers?" (Chapter 5 of Solving 9-11) by Christopher Bollyn, January 2008 

Indonesia AirAsia Flight 8501, Wikipedia, November 4, 2015

"In-flight Wi-Fi is 'direct link' to hackers hacking," by Michael Rundle,, April 15, 2015

"Israel’s omniscient ears" (Unit 8200), Ventura Daniel Wiki

“Israel's unit 8200: cyber warfare” by Damien McElroy, The Telegraph(UK), September 30, 2010

"NextGen aircraft cockpit avionics vulnerable to cyber attack from passenger inflight entertainment," by Aimee Turner,, April 15, 2015

“Russian airline sees no technical fault, pilot error in Egypt crash” by Polina Devitt, Reuters, November 3, 2015

“Sinai plane crash: Four theories,” BBC News, November 2, 2015

"Sinai plane crash: 'No SOS call' before disaster," BBC News, October 31, 2015

“Syria: The Russian Move - Changing the Game” by Christopher Bollyn, October 6, 2015

“The double-edged sword of cyber warfare” by Mitch Ginsburg,Times of Israel, June 24, 2015

Urim SIGINT Base, Wikipedia, November 1, 2015

"Was MH370 Hijacked thru Remote Access to its Computer System?" by Christopher Bollyn, April 24, 2014

Ashton Carter - The Rothschild Agent Running the Pentagon

October 30, 2015


The American military has become the enforcer and muscle that the globalists have been using to keep uncooperative nations in line with the international financial system… The three policies that are critical to the goals of the international bankers are free trade, mass immigration, and American interventionism abroad. 
– Brian O’Brien, "What do the Bankers Want?" The Tyranny of the Federal Reserve (2015)

Americans are likely to be confused by the actions being taken by the U.S. military in Syria. Why has the United States waged a covert and illegal war against the government of Syria for more than four years, a war that has resulted in 250,000 deaths and 11 million people forced to leave their homes?  What American national interest is being served by arming and supporting anti-government rebels and mercenary forces trying to overthrow the elected leader of Syria? Who is behind the U.S. military intervention in Syria?


ROTHSCHILD AGENT Ashton Carter, then Deputy Secretary of Defense, arrives in Herat, Afghanistan, 2013.

Ashton Baldwin Carter is the current U.S. Secretary of Defense, since February 17, 2015. Prior to being appointed head of the U.S. military, Carter was Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics from April 2009 to October 2011, with responsibility for procurement of all technology, systems, services, and supplies, bases and infrastructure, energy, and environment, and more than $50 billion annually in R&D. He was then promoted to Deputy Secretary of Defense from October 2011 to December 2013, serving as the chief operating officer of the Department of Defense, overseeing more than $600 billion per year and 2.4 million civilian and military personnel, and managing global 24/7 operations.

ASHTON CARTER, the new Secretary of Defense gives his first speech as Vice President Joe Biden cuddles up to Carter's wife, the former investment banker Stephanie DeLeeuw, February 17, 2015.

Ashton Carter is a hawk. Carter supported the illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003, and is an advocate of preventive wars against North Korea and Iran. In response to the situation in Ukraine, Carter considered proposing deployment of ground-launched cruise missiles in Europe that could pre-emptively destroy Russian weapons. Carter is certainly a hawk, but whose hawk is he?


It is certainly not America's national interest that motivates Ashton Carter. If Carter were truly a supporter of American values and interests he would not have supported the invasion of Iraq in 2003. This war is now recognized as having been a strategic blunder and a war crime, a war of aggression based on false claims and lies. Furthermore, if Carter's actions were based on U.S. national interests would he engage the U.S. military in Syria in an illegal war against the government of that country? It is primarily because of the involvement and support of the U.S. and other outside forces, such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar, that the war in Syria has dragged on for more than four years and caused a massive flow of refugees from the war-torn nation.

Carter and his Saudi partner at the Pentagon, May 2015. The U.S. and Saudi actions against the government in Syria are illegal and immoral, having caused 11 million Syrians to leave their homes. How does this serve U.S. national interests?

Ashton Carter has been cultivated for decades by the Rothschild banking family to serve their interests, which is what he is doing as U.S. Secretary of Defense. After graduating from Yale University in 1976, Carter went to study at Oxford, England, as a Rhodes Scholar for three years. Rhodes Scholarships are awarded by the Rhodes Trust, which is funded by his estate under the administration of Nathan Rothschild.


Carter taught at Harvard University from 1984 and became a professor and associate director of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government in 1988. He served as director of the Belfer Center from 1990 to 1993. Carter is currently a member of the board (on leave) of the Belfer Center. 

Nathaniel Rothschild is on the Advisory Board at the Belfer Center, along with his Russian business partner Oleg Deripaska. Rothschild is a non-executive director of Genel Energy plc, the largest oil producer in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. He is also a non-executive director of Barrick Gold Corporation, the world's largest gold company.

Oleg Deripaska is also the chief executive officer and chairman of United Company RUSAL, the world’s largest producer of aluminium. Deripaska is the president and a director of his holding company, En+, where the chairman of the board is Nathaniel Rothschild.


Ashton Carter (left rear) was a senior partner at Global Technology Partners LLC when he wrote an article in 1998 about "the transforming event" of catastrophic terrorism in America. In 2000, Rothschild North America acquired GTP - with Ashton Carter.

Carter was a Senior Partner at Global Technology Partners LLC, a firm focused on advising investment firms in technology and defense. In 2000, when Carter was a senior partner, GTP LLC was acquired by Rothschild North America. When Rothschild acquired GTP, Gerald Rosenfeld, Chief Executive Officer of Rothschild North America, said, "We believe the combination of Rothschild's global relationships and Global Technology Partner's access to and knowledge of the international defense and aerospace industry will create high level strategic advisory and investment opportunities."

The following year, 2001, the U.S. defense budget doubled from $300 billion to $600 billion per year as a result of the terror attacks of September 11, 2001. The Rothschilds were very well placed to profit from the immense flows of money pouring into the Pentagon.

In 1998, as a senior partner at GTP, Carter co-authored an article with John Deutch and Philip Zelikow entitled "Catastrophic Terrorism: Tackling the New Danger." The first section of the article is subtitled "Imagining the Transforming Event." This article lays out the blueprint for how the authors think the U.S. government should respond to an act of "catastrophic terrorism", which, the authors said, "poses an eminent threat to America's future."


Catastrophic terrorism poses an eminent threat to America's future. But the United States can fight back only if it sets the right goals. 
- "Catastrophic Terrorism: Tackling the New Danger" by Ashton Carter, John Deutch, and Philip Zelikow, Foreign Affairs, November/December 1998

The words 'eminent' and 'imminent' are often confused. Eminent means outstanding; of very high rank or status.  Imminent means immediate; impending; soon to happen. Why did these scholars use the wrong word in this key sentence of their article? Were they confused or were they reluctant to use the word, "imminent," fearing that such uncanny prescience might look suspicious when the "transforming event" of catastrophic terrorism they predicted came to pass two years later?

Amazingly, two of the three authors who wrote the article on catastrophic terrorism went on to play key roles in the interpretation of and response to the events of 9-11. Philip Zelikow was the executive director of the 9-11 Commission, which created the official myth of what happened on September 11, 2001, while Ashton Carter has served in the three highest level positions at the Pentagon for much of the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror."


It is certainly no coincidence that the people who predicted the catastrophic terrorism of 9-11 were appointed to these key positions in this massive and murderous fraud. Nor is it a coincidence that the Rothschild family is connected to all the positions held by Ashton Carter since he graduated from Yale in 1976. 

As Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics from April 2009 to October 2011, Carter was responsible for Pentagon procurement for all technology, systems, services, and supplies, bases and infrastructure - and more than $50 billion annually in R&D. He went on to become Deputy Secretary of Defense, serving as the chief operating officer of the Department of Defense, overseeing more than $600 billion and 2.4 million civilian and military personnel, and managing global 24/7 operations from October 2011 to December 2013.

The U.S. defense budget is the biggest and richest gravy train in the world and for the Rothschilds to have their agents placed in such key positions allows them to profit from the massive defense spending that is now close to six hundred billion dollars per year.


To have one of their agents serving as the Secretary of Defense also gives the Rothschilds the advantage of being able to influence U.S. military policy. In early October, for example, the U.S. dropped 120 tons of weapons and ammunition into the northeastern province of Syria called Al Hasakah. There are only two forces active in Hasakah, the Kurds and Islamic State. The U.S. weapons were dropped in the Kurdish-controlled part, called West Kurdistan. Nathan Rothschild, Carter's associate, is co-founder and director of Genel Energy plc, the largest oil producer in the neighboring Kurdistan Region of Iraq.

The U.S. military intervention in Iraq and Syria have done a great deal to break up these nations into ethnic statelets, like the Kurdish region in the north. Nathan Rothschild will profit from the Balkanization of Iraq and Syria, just as he did when Yugoslavia was broken into pieces. Rothschild and Deripaska took many of the key assets of Montenegro, including its Bay of Kotor, where they have built a yacht harbor and casino enterprise.

THE BAY OF KOTOR - When Yugoslavia was broken into pieces, Nathan Rothschild got a piece of the Bay of Kotor, the pearl of Montenegro, along with other valuable assets.

Porto Montenegro is the Rothschild-owned yacht harbor and resort on the Bay of Kotor.

Apart from his oil company in the Kurdish region of Iraq, Rothschild is also invested in an oil and gas company in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. By waging war against the government of Syria, the Rothschilds hope to break up that nation so they can fully exploit the mineral wealth of the Golan Heights.

The strategy of breaking up the secular Arab states into ethnic statelets has long been the Zionist strategy to divide and conquer the Middle East. This strategy, known as the Oded Yinon plan, was articulated in a paper published in English in 1982. In 2015, we see that it seems to be the Yinon plan the U.S. military is working from, despite what officials say about preserving the territorial integrity of the nations it invades.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Ash Carter, Wikipedia

Nathaniel Rothschild, International Council Member, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs

"Rothschild Forms Strategic Alliance with Global Technology Partners," PRNewswire, May 31, 2000

"Rupert Murdoch and Lord Rothschild: The Oil Barons of Occupied Syria" by Christopher Bollyn, September 2, 2013

"The Zionist Network behind 9-11" by Christopher Bollyn, December 7, 2006  

Ballad of the USS Liberty

October 15, 2015

Video Link -

"The Ballad of the USS Liberty" is a short song video about the Israeli false-flag attack on the U.S. Navy ship off the coast of Egypt in June 1967. The video and comment section beneath the YouTube video are both highly-recommended viewing.

The comment section includes some very interesting comments, such as these from Ward Boston, senior legal counsel for the U.S. Navy’s Court of Inquiry into the murderous Israeli assault on the USS Liberty:

I know from personal conversations I had with Admiral Kidd that President Johnson and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara ordered him to conclude that the attack was a case of "mistaken identity" despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Admiral Kidd told me, after returning from Washington, D.C. that he had been ordered to sit down with two civilians from either the White House or the Defense Department, and rewrite portions of the court’s findings.

Admiral Kidd also told me that he had been ordered to "put the lid" on everything having to do with the attack on the USS LIBERTY. We were never to speak of it and we were to caution everyone else involved that they could never speak of it again.

- Ward Boston, Jr., senior legal counsel for the U.S. Navy’s Court of Inquiry of the Israeli attack on the USS LIBERTY, June 8, 1967. 

9-11 and MH-17: Do Facts Matter?

August 14, 2015

In this and like communities, public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment, nothing can fail; without it, nothing can succeed. Consequently, he who molds public sentiment goes deeper than he who enacts statutes or pronounces decisions. He makes statutes and decisions possible or impossible to be executed.
- Abraham Lincoln, “In the First Debate with Douglas,” 1858

Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control... 
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Protocol XII

It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
- Mark Twain

THE ZIONIST-CONTROLLED PRESS in the West blames Russian President Vladimir Putin for the downing of Malaysia Airline Flight 17 (MH17) over war-torn eastern Ukraine on July 17, 2014, although the evidence indicates that the Boeing 777 was shot down by Ukrainian fighter jets. As with 9-11, in this Zionist-run blame game, the facts about what happened simply don't matter.

FOOLING THE PUBLIC with cartoons and shoddy journalism, the Zionist-controlled press vilifies the Russian president as it supports belligerent and aggressive policies against Russia. The facts, however, prove that the Zionists are, once again, using the media they control to deceive the public and take us to war - so they can profit. So, ask yourself, who is the real enemy: the one who is blamed - or the one blaming him?  Who wants war with Russia?

YELLOW JOURNALISM - "SO IT WAS PUTIN?" Screamed the Daily Express on August 11, 2015, blaming the Russian president without one scrap of evidence to support its wild allegation.

The Daily Express is owned by Richard Desmond, a British Jew of Latvian and Ukrainian parents and a close personal friend of the Rothschild family. Desmond, who left school at age 15, is a leading publisher of pornography and "news" for the British public.  So, who do you think funds his "news" operations - and why do they do it?

"MH17: A Year Without Truth" by Yana Erlashova of Russia Today presents evidence and eyewitness testimony that MH17 was shot down by military fighters, not a BUK missile. The anti-Putin agenda of the Zionist-controlled media in the West, however, blames Russia in this blatant false-flag operation and ignores the facts and evidence.  This video is highly recommended viewing.

The physical evidence and eyewitness testimony indicate that MH17 was shot down by a fighter jet approaching the plane from the rear on its starboard side, whose fire was aimed at the cockpit.

The seats of the captain and co-pilot are riddled with large-calibre bullet holes. The bodies of the captain and co-pilot were not allowed to be viewed by their family members before burial.

Fragments from the cockpit indicate it was struck by large-calibre bullets.

The holes in the cockpit indicate that the flight crew was targeted.

The Zionist-controlled media plays the most important role in informing and constructing the political reality that most people take as real. The only problem with the media construct is that it is false in some of the most essential matters - such as war.  The controlled media, for example, used blatant lies about 9-11 to drag the nation to war in Afghanistan in 2001 and then used lies about Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction to take us to war in Iraq in 2003.  The current lies in the controlled media are aimed at taking us to war with Russia and Iran. If we let the treacherous deceit of the Zionist media moguls to continue they will destroy world peace and our American republic.

When someone lies to you about such important matters as war and peace and tricks you into sacrificing blood and treasure so that they can profit, they are not your friend; they are your enemy. The media outlets, like the New York Times, that used blatant lies to take us to war should be shut down and their owners and editors prosecuted for treason.  More than one million innocent people died as a result of the war that they played a key role in fomenting. Where is the justice?

The way in which the controlled media is treating the downing of MH17 is very similar to how it has handled the false-flag terror atrocity of 9-11.  In both cases, all evidence and eyewitness testimony that contradicted the media "story" was ignored.  Only one version is presented to the public - theirs.  Facts that contradict their version are omitted.


Why is the controlled press lying about MH17?  Why do they ignore the evidence that MH17 was shot down by military fighter jets?  Why has the media lied about 9-11 - for nearly 14 years?  Why has it ignored the abundant evidence of explosives having been used to demolish the Twin Towers?  

The controlled media lies about such things like MH17 and 9-11 in order to sway public opinion to support their agenda, an agenda of war against a targeted nation or group.  We are the public that has to be deceived into supporting their war agenda.  For the past 14 years they have been very successful in their war-mongering propaganda efforts - at our expense.

With their lies about 9-11 they succeeded in kick-starting the Zionist "War on Terror", a war plan promoted by Benjamin Netanyahu since the 1970s.

With their lies about Saddam Hussein and his weapons of mass destruction they were able to wage war against Iraq and destroy the most formidable foe of Israel.

With their lies about the war in the Ukraine and the downing of MH17 they seek to vilify the Russian president and get public opinion to support their anti-Russian policies. Such policies are designed to increase hostility between Russia and the West and could very well lead to war.


So, who is the real enemy in this situation?  It is certainly not Vladimir Putin, but the Zionist-controlled media who is our real enemy.  It is outlets like the New York Times, who lied about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, who should be blamed for starting the war in Iraq in 2003.  The Zionist-controlled media is largely responsible for deceiving the public about what really happened on 9-11, and for using that deception to promote war in Afghanistan and Iraq.

This is the same thing they are doing with their lies about the war in Ukraine, the downing of MH17, and Vladimir Putin. Their deception is aimed at fooling the public into accepting more war and increased defense spending. The enemy is not Russia, or even Vladimir Putin. The enemy is much closer. It is, in fact, already inside the gates; it is the Zionist-controlled media that we bring into our homes and which deceives us every day of the week.  This is the enemy we need to defeat, or it will destroy us.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"How the Malaysian 'Boeing' was shot down," by Colonel Cassad

"The Israeli Photo of MH17 - Who is Yaron Mofaz?" by Christopher Bollyn, Updated August 3, 2014

"The Downing of MH17 - Is Israel Involved?" by Christopher Bollyn, Updated August 13, 2014

"Russian TV Airs MH17 Shoot-Down Images," by Christopher Bollyn, November 14, 2014

Who Dumped MH370 Into the Ocean?

July 31, 2015

The discovery of what appears to be a Boeing 777 wing flap on a beach on Reunion Island suggests that the plane was deliberately taken off course, i.e. remotely hijacked, and crashed in the middle of the Indian Ocean.

Reunion Island lies about 700 km (420 miles) due east of Madagascar (the large island off the east coast of Africa) directly in the path of the South Equatorial current.

ABC News reports today that "U.S. intelligence agencies put together an assessment in the wake of the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 indicating that the plane was deliberately taken off course, according to a source with knowledge of the matter.

"The assessment - made months ago and concerning what most likely happened to the plane - which disappeared in March 2014, also said that the Boeing 777 was also potentially deliberately downed, the source said."

The possibility that MH370 was remotely hijacked was the subject of my article of April 24, 2014, entitled "Was MH370 Hijacked thru Remote Access to its Computer System?"

The article began:

The unexplained disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 raises a question that is seldom discussed in the mainstream media: Was MH370 hijacked by criminals who hacked into the plane’s computerized flight system and took over complete control of the plane, leaving the pilots incommunicado and unable to do anything?

Such a scenario would explain how the plane was abruptly diverted from its flight path to Beijing and why there were no further communications from the cockpit, apart from an attempted mobile phone call from the co-pilot as the plane flew over Penang.

If MH370 was hijacked remotely and dumped in the Indian Ocean, as the evidence seems to suggest, the question remains, who would have carried out such a heinous crime? 

This question brings into sharp focus the fact that Israel had an identical copy of the Malaysia Airlines plane in a hangar in Israel at the time MH370 was hijacked. In a March 2014 article entitled "Are the Israelis Planning Another 9-11 Using the Missing Boeing 777?", I asked why Israel would have a plane identical to the missing Malaysia Airlines plane in storage in Tel Aviv?  Why indeed?

THE ISRAELI TWIN - Why would Israel have a plane identical to the missing Malaysia Airlines plane in storage in Tel Aviv? Especially when the plane in Israel was supposed to have been dismantled in Florida?

Why was this plane, a former Malaysia Airlines plane exactly like the missing Boeing 777, kept in a hangar in Israel for three months before MH370 was remotely hijacked? Did this plane play a role in the crime? Was it the model that was used to practice the remote hijacking of MH370?
See "Why is a Twin of the Missing MH370 in a Hangar in Israel?"

The article went on to suggest that MH370 could have been remotely hijacked by Israeli hackers:

The missing plane is bound to turn up sooner or later. The hijackers - or Israeli computer hackers - didn't pull a fast turn to the west and make professional moves with the plane in order to simply drop it in the Indian Ocean. Or maybe they did.

If something like this did happen to MH370 it is clear that having an identical model of the plane to practice with would be very useful in carrying out such a remote hijacking.

Why would Israel attack a Malaysia Airlines passenger plane?  It could be Israeli retaliation for the ruling against Israel by the Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) War Crimes Commission in November 2013, in which the international tribunal convicted the State of Israel for genocide of the Palestinian people and convicted the former Israeli general Amos Yaron for crimes against humanity and genocide for his involvement in the Sabra and Shatila massacre (1982).

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"Are the Israelis Planning Another 9-11 Using the Missing Boeing 777?" by Christopher Bollyn, Updated March 31, 2014

"MH370: US Intel Assessment Suggested That Plane Deliberately Taken Off Course, Source Says," ABC News, July 31, 2015

"The MH370 Cover-Up: GA Telesis Fabricates Story of Missing Plane's Israeli Twin" by Christopher Bollyn, June 20, 2014

"Was MH370 Hijacked thru Remote Access to its Computer System?" by Christopher Bollyn, April 24, 2014

"Why is a Twin of the Missing MH370 in a Hangar in Israel?" by Christopher Bollyn, April 18, 2014


My research articles are provided as a public service for educational purposes. The articles are made available free of charge. I receive no compensation for my work other than donations. If you would like to support my efforts, please donate by clicking on the Donate tab or via PayPal to

Jeb Bush's Zionist Paymasters: Bloomberg and Rothschild

July 8, 2015

Updated July 16 - added material about Marcus Agius being a senior director of the BBC and one of the trustees of the Bilderberg Group.

John Ellis "Jeb" Bush may wear an American flag on his lapel but his loyalty is to the Zionist financiers who made him rich, most notably the Rothschild family of Britain.


The terror attacks of 9-11 and the subsequent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are immense crimes that have greatly shaped our current political reality.  In spite of the historical importance of these events, for nearly fourteen years the U.S. government and mainstream media have engaged in a conspiracy to promote a blatant cover-up about what happened on September 11, 2001.

While we may want to close the book on the sordid saga of 9-11, and the awful wars that followed, and get on with our lives by pretending that we live in a normal political situation, that would be living in denial. 

We should understand that the 9-11 cover-up is an ongoing crime that has to be maintained by the criminal cabal that is behind it.  The real culprits need to maintain the official deception of what happened on 9-11. They can’t allow the truth about 9-11 to come out, for if it does they’re toast, so they have no alternative but to maintain the cover-up.  As they say, no rest for the wicked.

For the real perpetrators, controlling the executive branch of the government is essential to maintain the 9-11 cover-up. The criminal cabal achieves this by making sure that one of their agents occupies the office of the president of the United States. The president decides who serves at the highest levels of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, so by controlling the president the criminal cabal can prevent its crimes, like 9-11, from being investigated and prosecuted.

The real criminals, therefore, desperately need to control the White House in order to maintain the 9-11 deception because they are culpable for the false-flag terror atrocity and the two wars of aggression that followed in its wake.  Only by controlling the U.S. president can the criminal gang behind 9-11 and these illegal wars avoid prosecution, which is essential for the survival of their criminal regime.

For the American people and our republic, however, it is of vital importance that we put an end to this criminal regime, which has hijacked our nation – as soon as possible – by investigating and prosecuting those who are truly behind the terror attacks of 9-11.  It is unrealistic to expect our government, which is controlled by this criminal cabal, to investigate 9-11 when it has promoted the cover-up for the past 13 years.  This is why a proper criminal investigation and prosecution of the crimes of 9-11, which is what one would expect in a normal functioning state, would be completely revolutionary in America. Such an investigation and purge would bring down the criminal regime that controls our government.  This is why I say that the revolution begins with 9-11 truth.

The election of 2016 is actually a struggle for the very survival of the American republic.  This is why the presidential election of 2016 began so early, more than two years before the election, with the names of the two leading controlled candidates bubbling up into our political consciousness, courtesy of the controlled press.  The two names that were foisted on the American people:  John Ellis “Jeb” Bush and Hillary Clinton, are, of course, members of two of America’s most prominent criminal families.  The criminal and treasonous character of the Bush and Clinton families should be known to anyone who has followed American politics for the past few decades.

It is absolutely preposterous that either Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton should be president and the idea would be laughable, if the situation weren’t so serious.  These people have virtually no popular support and are only candidates for the highest office in the land because they are vigorously promoted by the moneyed special interest groups that dominate U.S. politics and their controlled press. While there are other candidates in the field, Bush and Clinton are leading in the polls although the first primary is still more than 6 months away.

One might very well wonder why Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton would even run for president.  Neither has a great following or stands for anything that the public is very interested in.  So, why are they running?  

The answer is fairly simple.  Both Bush and Clinton are members of families that are tied to the ruling criminal cabal through their involvement in criminal activity.  They are rewarded with filthy lucre as payment and are expected to do exactly as they are advised because, in reality, they don't have any other option.  While Hillary Clinton and her treachery and Zionist connections are fairly well known, much less is known about Jeb Bush.   

For those of us who seek truth and justice for the crimes of 9-11, and a restoration of lawful government in the United States, we need to understand who is behind Jeb Bush and how that influence would be used to maintain the 9-11 cover-up if he were to occupy the White House.

Firstly, we can be sure that Jeb Bush would not support the criminal prosecution of his brother for conspiring, planning, and waging wars of aggression against Iraq or Afghanistan. Secondly, we can be fairly sure that he would not call for a proper criminal investigation of 9-11, based on his support for Israel, and particularly its extreme right-wing leader, Benjamin Netanyahu, one of the chief suspects of the false-flag terror attacks.

As the New York Times reported in an article entitled “Jeb Bush on the Issues” on June 15, 2015:

Mr. Bush calls himself “an unwavering supporter” of Israel and its prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and distanced himself from recent comments by an adviser, former Secretary of State James A. Baker III, that were critical of Mr. Netanyahu.

Mr. Netanyahu is known for saying that 9-11 was “very good,” on the very day of the attacks, and telling Israeli audiences that Israel has benefitted from 9-11 and America’s struggle in Iraq.  Netanyahu is also a war-monger who tells brazen lies in his efforts to push the United States into waging war against Iran.  Jeb Bush takes the same hard-line position on Iran as Netanyahu, as theNew York Times reports:

He has called the Obama administration’s framework of an agreement with Iran to curb its nuclear program a “horrific deal” and, like fellow Republican contenders, said he would most likely cancel any final agreement reached by the administration should he become president.

To understand why Jeb Bush supports hard-line Zionist extremists like Benjamin Netanyahu, we need to consider what Bush has done since he left the governor’s mansion in Florida. When Bush left public office in 2007, he went to work for Michael Bloomberg and Lehman Brothers, the disgraced investment firm at the epicenter of the financial crisis of 2008-2009.

When the London-based Barclays, a foreign bank controlled by the Rothschild family, announced that it would take over Lehman Brothers – the day after its collapse – Jeb Bush effectively became a highly-paid adviser to the Rothschild-controlled bank.  During the time that Jeb Bush was paid more than $1 million a year at Barclays, the disgraced British bank was run by Marcus Agius, who is married to Katherine de Rothschild, daughter of Edmund Leopold de Rothschild, former head of the Rothschild financial dynasty of England.

Agius is also Senior Independent Director for the Executive Board of the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and was the first non-executive director appointed to the BBC's new Executive Board in December 2006.  He is also one of the three current trustees of the Bilderberg Group.

ROTHSCHILD BANKSTERS FLEECE AMERICA - Marcus Agius, the son-in-law of Edmund Rothschild, was CEO of Barclays bank, which took over Lehman Brothers after its collapse led to the massive taxpayer-funded bailout of 2008-2009. George W. Bush was president and Jeb Bush was a highly-paid adviser at both Lehmans and Barclays, the Rothschild-controlled bank that received $8.5 billion - from the U.S. taxpayer. He is also a senior director of the BBC.

It should be noted that Barclays received about $8.5 billion from the U.S. taxpayer-funded bail-out during the last few months of the administration of George W. Bush, Jeb’s older brother:

AIG disclosed payments of $105.3 billion between September and December 2008. And some of the biggest recipients were European banks. Societe Generale, based in France, was the top foreign recipient at $11.9 billion, Deutsche Bank of Germany got $11.8 billion and Barclays, based in England, was paid $8.5 billion.
Source: "AIG ships billions in bailout abroad" by Eamon Javers, March 15, 2009

When Jeb left public office in 2007 he is reported to have been worth about $1.3 million.  After seven years working for Bloomberg, Lehman, and Barclays, Bush is now worth about $29 million – half of it coming from the Rothschild-controlled Barclays, as Charles Gasparino reported in his recent article, “Jeb Bush’s Big Lehman Brothers Problem”:

Not much is known about what Bush actually did for Lehman—the firm that went belly-up in 2008 and sparked the wider financial crisis, and Barclays, the bank that purchased Lehman out of bankruptcy and continues to work out of its midtown Manhattan headquarters. He began working for the former after his term as Florida governor ended in 2007, and continued working for the latter until the end of 2014, when he decided to run for president.

The two banks were his biggest sources of income in recent years: Bush earned more than $14 million working for Lehman and then Barclays, which based on my understanding of simple math accounted for nearly half of the $29 million he made after he left government.
Source: "Jeb Bush’s Big Lehman Brothers Problem" 

Jeb Bush’s work as an adviser at Lehman Brothers and Barclays puts him squarely in the middle of two of the largest financial crimes in recent history:     

While it seems like less of a political detriment since Bush is an adviser rather than a principal, his Barclays work isn’t without potential controversy. Writes the FT: “Mr Bush, who served as an adviser to Lehman Brothers before its collapse during the financial crisis, has rarely spoken about his work at the British bank, which has been ensnared by scandals such as the manipulation of key benchmark interest rates and the mis-selling of payment protection insurance in recent years.”
Source:  “Jeb Bush Signals Business Wind-Down with Barclays Departure,”, December 18, 2014

For the past four years, Jeb Bush has also served on the board of Michael Bloomberg’s foundation, Bloomberg Philanthropies, which has donated millions of dollars to Bush’s educational foundation:

Four companies and nonprofits that appointed Bush to their boards of directors or advisory boards backed the educational foundation [of Jeb Bush]. One, Bloomberg Philanthropies, was among the most frequent supporters, making seven donations worth between $1.2 million to $2.4 million. Bush served on Bloomberg's board from 2010-14.
Source: "Backers of Bush nonprofit include banks, schools, lottery," AP, July 1, 2015

Rupert Murdoch's media giant News Corp. has also donated generously to Jeb Bush’s educational foundation. Murdoch's News Corp. has reportedly made three contributions, at $500,001 to $1 million apiece.

The fact that Jeb Bush has become quite wealthy since leaving public office in Florida in 2007 is not the important thing for 9-11 truth; it’s more important to understand who made him wealthy.  More than half of his wealth came from the corrupt Rothschild-controlled Barclays bank, while much of the rest came from Michael Bloomberg.

Michael Bloomberg is a leading Zionist agent who oversaw the suppression of 9-11 truth in New York City for 12 years after the false-flag terror attacks.  Bloomberg is very supportive of Benjamin Netanyahu and the ruling right-wing Likud coalition of Israel.

Mayor Bloomberg is very close to Benjamin Netanyahu, suspected of being one of the chief architects of the false-flag terrorism of 9-11 and the fraudulent "War on Terror."

NOTE THE HANDSHAKE - Michael Bloomberg actively supports Netanyahu and his extreme right-wing Likud coalition. As mayor of New York City, Bloomberg served as point-man for the Zionist criminal cabal, suppressing 9-11 truth for 12 years.

The Rothschild family is the original financial and ideological founder of the Zionist state in Palestine. In Britain, the Lord Rothschild is considered the head of British Jewry.  In 1998, senior partners of a wholly-owned Rothschild subsidiary, known as Global Technology Partners, LLC, authored a document entitled “Catastrophic Terrorism”, which was published in Foreign Affairs, the journal of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).  This document discussed the possibility of a catastrophic terror attack on the United States and what should be done if it were to happen.

This article put the idea of a 9-11 type attack into the minds of the American people, and provided a kind of blueprint for how the government should respond when it did.  Less than three years later, the catastrophic event that the authors imagined became real.  Today, the lead author of that article is the U.S. Secretary of Defense, Ashton B. Carter.  Like Jeb Bush, Carter worked for years as a paid agent of the Rothschild family of Britain. (See more on this read "The Zionist Network behind 9-11")

Understanding Jeb Bush’s ties to Michael Bloomberg and the Rothschild family of Britain helps us understand his support of Benjamin Netanyahu and the extreme right-wing Zionist movement he heads in Israel.  These connections reveal how the Zionist financial cabal that is behind the 9-11 cover-up controls our political leaders and why we cannot expect our controlled government to ever investigate 9-11 until this foreign criminal element is purged from the U.S. government. 

Sources and Recommended Reading: 

“AIG ships billions in bailout abroad” by Eamon Javers,, March 15, 2009

“Are there any more skeletons, Mr Agius?”, The Telegraph (UK), July 9, 2012

"Backers of Bush nonprofit include banks, schools, lottery" by Ronnie Greene and Steve Peoples, AP, July 1, 2015

Barclays, Wikipedia, July 8, 2015

Edmund Leopold de Rothschild, Wikipedia, July 8, 2015

“Former Barclays chairman on payroll until March 2014”, The Guardian (UK), November 7, 2013

“Jeb Bush Paid By Bank That Violated Cuba Sanctions”,, December 18, 2014

“Jeb Bush Signals Business Wind-Down with Barclays Departure”,, December 18, 2014

“Jeb Bush's banking career ripe for attack”, CNN, December 18, 2014

“Jeb Bush’s Big Lehman Brothers Problem” by Charles Gasparino,, July 2, 2015

“Jeb Bush’s Rush to Make Money May Be Hurdle”, New York Times, April 20, 2014

“Jeb Bush to resign from Barclays in preparation for 2016 campaign” by Philip Rucker, Washington Post, December 18, 2014

Marcus Agius, Wikipedia, July 8, 2015 

"The Zionist Network behind 9-11,", December 7, 2006

Remembering the London Bombings of 2005

July 8, 2015

Yesterday, the 10th anniversary of the London bombings of 2005, I posted the following on my Facebook page for the Solving 9-11 books. It deserves to be posted here as well.

"OUTRIGHT TERROR... BOLD AND BRILLIANT" is the text that appears on the side of the bus that was exploded right outside Tavistock House South, where two Israeli "transportation security" firms working in London were based.

Fortress GB is an Israeli company doing business in Great Britain. It is on the same floor, in the same building, as International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS U.K.), another Israeli transportation security firm. ICTS UK and Fortress GB are both located on the 1st floor of Tavistock House South, which is exactly where the bus blew up on July 7.

 "Israeli Security Firms in London:  Fortress GB & ICTS"
by Christopher Bollyn, August 16, 2005

Christopher Bollyn has written four articles about the London bombings of July 7, 2005:

“Who is Behind the London Bombings?”
July 22, 2005

“Israeli Security Firms in London: Fortress GB & ICTS”
August 16, 2005…/

“Who's to Blame for the Terror in London?”
August 31, 2006…/

“The Terror Drills That Became Real: 9-11, the London Bombings & the Sinking of Estonia”
March 11, 2008

The Law of the Jungle & the Jews

May 27, 2015

"The Law for the Wolves" is very much like the law for the Jews.

Now this is the law of the jungle, as old and as true as the sky,
And the wolf that shall keep it may prosper, but the wolf that shall break it must die.

As the creeper that girdles the tree trunk, the law runneth forward and back;
For the strength of the pack is the wolf, and the strength of the wolf is the pack.
- “The Law for the Wolves” by Rudyard Kipling (1865–1936)

Having lived on a Zionist kibbutz (Afikim) in the Jordan Valley, I learned as a teenager about Zionism directly from people who had been raised with notions of the Jewish collective and Jewish nationalism.  It did not take long for this observant outsider to realize that Zionism is nothing more than Jewish tribalism, although “the tribe” is not really a tribe in the true sense of the word. The Jews that I met on the kibbutz and in Israel came from every corner of the world and really had nothing in common except their belief that somehow they belonged to the same tribe, or perhaps one of the other lost tribes of Israel.

It is pretty absurd how deep that belief goes. I remember asking my girlfriend’s father, the history teacher on the kibbutz, which tribe he thought he came from. I remember him saying that he thought he came from the tribe of Ben. He was a fair-skinned and red-headed “Jew” named Izi Merimsky whose parents had migrated to Palestine from somewhere in the Pale of Settlement of Western Russia. 

There were, on the other hand, families on the kibbutz from Yemen, Morocco, Argentina, Iraq, India, Poland, and America. They were all very different, but they all seemed to operate on the belief that somehow they were from the same tribe and that loyalty to the tribe was all that mattered. The laws of the state and the kibbutz all reinforced the notion that loyalty to the tribe was the supreme good, while individualism was something of a foreign concept.

I was not a member of the tribe and that made me an outsider, something I understood very clearly from my very first days on the kibbutz. I was an 18-year-old Christian American wandering around the Middle East who had migrated to Palestine and Israel from snowy Tehran, which meant a long journey in the middle of winter across Iran, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, and the occupied West Bank.

To understand Zionism one needs to understand how Zionists view Jews as members of a collective. Collective in this sense means people acting as a group. A good source to understand what is meant by the Jewish collective is the Jewish Agency for Israel, the central organ of the Zionist establishment, which has a webpage for Jewish teachers called, “Activity: Who are the Jews?”

The following are extracts from that webpage in which teachers are encouraged to discuss Jewish identity with their students:

The aim of this activity is to provide space for the students to define the entire Jewish collective of which they are a part…

Write a separate list of the things that the students think would take them out of the collective, and discuss it. Is it, in fact, possible to take yourself out of the Jewish collective? Does conversion take you out? Does being a ‘Jew for Jesus’ take you out? Does acting in a treacherous way against other Jews take you out? Does acting in an immoral way take you out?

Now hand out the following piece for the group’s consideration. It was written in the mid-1870s by Peretz Smolenskin, a pre-Zionist ideologist of Jewish nationalism who had an enormous effect in the Eastern Europe of the late-nineteenth century. We have chosen Smolenskin because he deals directly with the issues that we have mentioned, not because we feel that the students should necessarily accept his position.

His essential argument, presented in this piece, was that the Jews must continue to see themselves as a nation open to Jews of all religious outlooks. Religious observance was a criterion neither for belonging to the Jewish collective nor for being seen to live a Jewish life.

The essential criterion for a Jewish life was acceptance of the nation. Only a Jew who sinned against his/her nation should be seen as outside the collective and not living a Jewish life.

Extracts from Peretz Smolenskin’s “It Is Time to Plant”

The Jewish people has outlived all others because it has always regarded itself as a people - a spiritual nation. Without exception, its sages and writers, its prophets and the authors of its prayers, have always called it a people…

Thinking people understand that this unity is the secret of our strength and vitality. But such unity can only come from a fraternal feeling, from a national sentiment that makes everyone born a Jew declare: I am a son of this people…

No matter what his sins against religion, every Jew belongs to his people as long as he does not betray it…

It seems like being a Jew is a lot like being a wolf. Maybe that is where the name came from. As Rudyard Kipling wrote in “The Law for the Wolves", "…the strength of the pack is the wolf, and the strength of the wolf is the pack." 


"The Law for the Wolves" by Rudyard Kipling, from "Law of the Jungle," Wikipedia, May 27, 2015

“Activity: Who are the Jews?” Jewish Agency for Israel,, May 27, 2015 

The Rabid Zionists behind the Garland Shooting

May 19, 2015


“I’m a proud, fierce Zionist.”
- Pamela Geller (left) with Robert Spencer, the Zionist organizers of the anti-Muslim provocation in Garland, Texas.

The words of David Horowitz, owner of Jihad Watch and employer of Robert Spencer. In 2010, Horowitz spoke at the University of Massachusetts, saying, “The Palestinians are Nazis. Every one of their elected officials are [sic] terrorists.”

"So I say to Israel, stand loud and proud. Give up nothing. Turn over not a pebble. For every rocket fired, drop a MOAB."
- Pamela Geller, May 11, 2008

You know what happened in Garland, Texas. Two jihadists wanted to replicate and ramp up what happened in Paris, by murdering scores of patriotic Americans who were standing in defense of free speech… ISIS issued a death threat against me… They threatened to murder also anyone associated with me, anyone who defends me, and anyone who supports our work. In other words, they’ve declared war against America.
- Pamela Geller, “The ISIS Death Fatwa,”, May 14, 2015

In order to grasp the real significance of the shooting incident in Garland, Texas, on May 3, 2015, one needs to understand that 9-11 was an Israeli/Zionist false-flag terror operation. Only by understanding that 9-11 and the subsequent “War on Terror” are massive Zionist frauds imposed on the American people, and the world, will one be able to make sense of what the Garland incident is really all about. 

The Garland shooting is an extension into the United States of the same Israeli terrorist operation that brought us the Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris and a similar shooting in Denmark. Like the publication of the original anti-Muslim cartoons in a Danish newspaper in 2005, all of these attacks come from the same source. They are Israeli intelligence operations designed to make us think that Muslims are a threat to our freedom of speech. They are like fresh logs thrown onto the "War on Terror" fire that was started with the false-flag terrorism of 9-11.

Understanding that these attacks are truly not of Islamic origin, but are false-flag operations carried out by Israeli intelligence, will enable us to avoid being deceived about the nature of the threat we face. It is not Islam that we have to resist, but Israeli/Zionist terrorists carrying out false-flag terror operations like 9-11. This is the true nature of the evil Zionist deception that we need to expose and root out.

During my recent “Solving 9-11 Ends the War” tour in the United States, I explained that the Paris and Denmark shootings were classic Israeli intelligence operations, nearly identical to those described in The Little Drummer Girl, a 1982 novel by John LeCarré. Written with the help of a former chief of the Mossad, The Little Drummer Girl describes exactly how Israeli intelligence sets up false-flag operations in Europe by laying a trail of false evidence to implicate Palestinians for acts of terrorism carried out by the Mossad. This is exactly what was done with the 19 alleged hijackers of the 9-11 operation.

Because it is the American population which is the primary target of the Mossad deception, we need to understand exactly how it works, who is behind it, and what they are trying to achieve. The real purpose of the Garland incident, like the attacks in Paris and Denmark, is to affect public opinion and bring it in line with the Zionist war agenda. The take-away from the Garland false-flag incident is that Muslims are opposed to our cherished freedom of speech and are, therefore, an anti-democratic element that threatens our democratic societies. 

The idea that Muslims are a threat to our democratic values is, of course, most certainly not the case. I cannot provide all the details about how the two young Muslims from Phoenix were snookered into driving to Dallas in order to sacrifice themselves in this bizarre staged incident, but it seems quite apparent that the whole thing was all a big set-up. One of the two Muslim shooters, Elton Simpson, had long been monitored – and probably played – by the FBI, who actually warned the Garland police to be on the lookout for Simpson several hours before he was shot dead outside the venue. How did the FBI know that Simpson was on his way to the Zionist provocation in Garland?

Immediately after the shootings, the Israel intelligence/propaganda website, SITE Intelligence Group, claimed that ISIS was in contact with the Garland shooters.

Immediately after the shooting, the Israeli intelligence website, SITE Intelligence Group, released a text message, which it said showed that Islamic State (ISIS or ISIL) had been in contact with the Garland shooters. SITE Intelligence Group is an Israeli intelligence outfit, run by the Mossad agent Rita Katz, which provides propaganda and fabricated information to the U.S. media. The U.S. media outlets dutifully accept the Israeli propaganda without question and present it to the public as genuine. By linking ISIS to the Garland shooting the Israelis made it appear as if ISIS is now carrying out attacks within the United States. Make note of the precedent for they will surely refer to it in the future – after the next terror event to be blamed on Muslims or ISIS. This is, after all, how the game is played, but we should know that the game is being played on us – and at our expense.

The Garland event was a clear provocation designed to insult Muslims by presenting offensive cartoons lampooning the Prophet. After the shooting, the mainstream media criticized the organizers of the overtly anti-Muslim event, but avoided discussing their political ideology. What they failed to mention was the fact that the organizers of the Garland event were fanatical and rabid Zionists. National Public Radio, for example, published an article the following day, entitled “5 Things to Know about the Organizers of Muhammad Cartoon Contest” that failed to even mention that the organizers are rabid Zionists who openly call the Palestinians “Nazis”.

Like Geller, Robert Spencer is a rabid Zionist, but the mainstream media carefully avoids mentioning that most salient fact. Why would the media avoid any mention of the Zionist ideology behind the anti-Muslim provocation in Garland?

Pamela Geller, for example, the main spokesman and organizer of the event, calls herself a “fierce Zionist.” Geller has openly advised the Israeli military to “drop a MOAB” on the people of Gaza for every rocket fired from the besieged territory. A MOAB is an acronym for the GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast, a 23,000 pound bomb considered to be the most powerful non-nuclear weapon ever designed. That Geller would call for such a bomb to be dropped on the defenseless refugees of Gaza reveals her seriously psychopathic and genocidal character.

After the Garland shooting, I can’t imagine any responsible American town allowing Pam Geller and her partner Robert Spencer to put on another provocative anti-Muslim event, but it may happen. In any case, what Americans need to understand is that the Garland shooting was a staged event put on by Zionist extremists and Israeli intelligence operatives to deceive us into thinking that Muslims are enemies of our fundamental democratic values. Like the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11, this is yet another Zionist deception that is designed to change how we think about Islam in order to make us more amenable to go along with the disastrous and fraudulent “War on Terror” and “Clash of Civilizations”. 

Understanding that these false-flag terror events are all Zionist deceptions designed to create tension and division among Americans of different faiths and trick us into supporting genocidal wars of aggression in the Middle East should help us avoid being deceived again in the future. Realizing who is truly behind the false-flag terrorism will give us the knowledge we need to resist the Zionist fraud known as the “War on Terror.”


"5 Things To Know About The Organizers Of Muhammad Cartoon Contest," National Public Radio, May 4, 2015

David Horowitz Freedom Center,, May 19, 2015

"FBI Sent Warning to Police About Elton Simpson Before Cartoon Attack," Wall Street Journal, May 7, 2015

"IS Fighter Forwards Alleged Claim of Shooting in Texas,", May 3, 2015

John McCain & The Most Wanted Terrorist in the World

Updated February 18, 2015

Added CBS News photo of man said to be Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS and "the most wanted terrorist in the world."

"The Most Wanted Terrorist in the World" - CBS News has released a photo of the man who became the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) while he served time at a U.S. military prison in Iraq in 2004. In the photo, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is pictured while being in-processed at Camp Bucca in early 2004.  
Source: "Future ISIS leader seen in newly released photo", February 17, 2015, CBS News

NINE YEARS LATER - The man CBS says is "the most wanted terrorist in the world" strongly resembles this man, who met with Sen. John McCain in Syria in May 2013. Did John McCain meet with Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi?  We have a right to know who Sen. McCain met with in Syria.  Why won't McCain's office identify this man?


“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”
- Vladimir Lenin

"You don't contain these people. They're a virus."
- Sen. John McCain on ISIS, August 21, 2014

SO, WHO NEGOTIATES WITH TERRORISTS? Militants from the terrorist group known as Islamic State (IS, ISIL, or ISIS) have reportedly beheaded James Wright Foley, an American journalist held captive in Syria since November 2012.  Ibrahim al-Badri, the founder and so-called "Caliph of the Islamic State" met with Sen. John McCain in May 2013 although the U.S. government had him on a "Most Wanted" list with a $10 million reward for information leading to his capture. Why has John McCain not been prosecuted for meeting with terrorists?  Al-Badri's group was holding Foley when McCain met the terrorist leader in 2013.  James Foley's blood is on John McCain's hands.

Why has Sen. John McCain supported the gang of terrorists who behead innocent American journalists?  Why is a leader from the U.S. Congress meeting with and supporting groups of mad-dog fanatics in the Middle East; the very same groups who we now find ourselves at war with? Why is the U.S. waging war against the militant and extremist groups in the Middle East that it helped create and arm in the first place?

Sen. McCain is now calling for a dramatic increase in U.S. airstrikes against Islamic State targets in Iraq and said the attacks should also extend into Syria. 

McCain said the beheading of journalist James Foley by Islamic State militants should serve as a turning point in how the U.S. deals with the group:  "First of all, you've got to dramatically increase the airstrikes. And those airstrikes have to be devoted to Syria as well," he said.

But it was just last year that Sen. McCain was in Syria meeting with the very people who founded the terror group known as Islamic State in Syria.  Now he is calling for the U.S. military to wage war on them. What kind of sick game is this?

The terrorist group known in the U.S. media as Islamic State (IS) uses atrocities, such as the beheading of the American journalist James W. Foley, to make headlines and get the attention of the world. Americans are likely to be very confused by the fact that U.S. Senator John McCain met with the leader of this bizarre and savage terrorist group in Syria in May 2013. Why would a U.S. Senator meet with a terrorist who is on the U.S. State Department's "Most Wanted" list - with a $10 million bounty on his head? What's going on?

To get a better understanding of why Sen. McCain, the leading supporter of Israel and the Zionist War Agenda in the U.S. Congress, has supported funding and arming the terrorist army known as Islamic State, I recommend reading:

"John McCain, Conductor of the 'Arab Spring' and the Caliph" 
by Thierry Meyssan,

The following text contains extracts (indented paragraphs) from the Meyssan article: 

John McCain in Syria. In the foreground at right is Mouaz Moustafa, director of the Syrian Emergency Task Force and "expert" at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a Zionist think-tank. In the doorway, center, is Mohammad Nour, an al-Qaida kidnapper of 11 pilgrims.

Another photo shows more of the black-shirted man behind John McCain, who is allegedly the terrorist leader of the Islamic State group.

Is this the face of Ibrahim 

Ibrahim al-Badri (a.k.a. Abu Du'a) had a $10 million reward on his head by the U.S. State Department when Sen. John McCain reportedly met with him in May 2013.

Ibrahim al-Badri is the leader, the so-called Caliph of the Islamic State.

A profile view of the man said to be Ibrahim al-Badri meeting with John McCain in May 2013

In May 2013, Senator John McCain made his way illegally to near Idleb in Syria via Turkey to meet with leaders of the "armed opposition". His trip was not made public until his return to Washington.  

This trip was organized by the Syrian Emergency Task Force, which, contrary to its title, is a Zionist organization led by a Palestinian employee of AIPAC.

In photographs released at that time, one noticed the presence of Mohammad Nour, a spokesman for the Northern Storm Brigade (of the Al-Nosra Front, that is to say, al-Qaeda in Syria), who kidnapped and held 11 Lebanese Shiite pilgrims in Azaz. Asked about his proximity to al-Qaeda kidnappers, the Senator claimed not to know Mohammad Nour, who may have snuck into the photo.

Sen. John McCain met with the heads of the "Free Syrian Army" in May 2013. In this photo McCain is seen speaking with the man (in dark shirt) said to be Ibrahim al-Badri, the founder and leader (i.e. "Caliph Ibrahim") of the Islamic State, the terrorist group that then held, and later executed, James Foley. As Meyssan points out in his article about John McCain, Ibrahim al-Badri, known under his nom de guerre as Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, created the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) one month before this meeting. At the time of this meeting with John McCain, al-Badri had been on a U.S. government list of "Most Wanted" terrorists for 19 months, with a reward of $10 million to anyone who would assist in his capture.  So, what's going on here?

If we can see Brigadier General Idriss Salem, head of the Free Syrian Army, one can also see Ibrahim al-Badri (foreground on the left) with whom the senator is talking. Back from the surprise trip, John McCain claimed that all those responsible for the Free Syrian Army were "moderates who can be trusted" (sic).

However, since October 4, 2011, Ibrahim al-Badri (also known as Abu Du’a) was on the list of the five terrorists most wanted by the United States (Rewards for Justice). A premium of up to $10 million was offered to anyone who would assist in his capture. The next day, October 5, 2011, Ibrahim al-Badri was included in the list of the Sanctions Committee of the UN as a member of Al Qaeda.  

In addition, a month before receiving Senator McCain, Ibrahim al-Badri, known under his nom de guerre as Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, created the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) – all the while still belonging to the staff of the very "moderate" Free Syrian Army… 

In no country in the world, regardless of their political system, would one accept that the opposition leader be in direct contact, and publicly friendly, with a very dangerous wanted terrorist.


To see if Sen. John McCain knew the name of the person he was speaking with, I contacted his press office in Washington, D.C. on August 26. The following is the correspondence with his press officer, Julie Tarallo.  As you can see from this correspondence, McCain's office was unable to provide the name of the man in the black shirt seen speaking with John McCain:


From: Christopher Bollyn 
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 11:28 AM
To: Tarallo, Julie (McCain)
Subject: URGENT: Question about Person Speaking with Sen. McCain in Syria

Dear Ms Tarallo,

I have attached the photo of Senator McCain speaking with men associated with the Syrian opposition movement in May 2013.

My question is this: Who is the man in the black shirt in the lower left corner of the photo with whom Sen. McCain is speaking? If you do not know the name of this person how can you say that it is not Ibrahim al-Badri, as Thierry Meyssan has reported it to be?

This is what Thierry Meyssan has written about this person:

If we can see Brigadier General Idriss Salem, head of the Free Syrian Army, one can also see Ibrahim al-Badri (foreground on the left) with whom the senator is talking. Back from the surprise trip, John McCain claimed that all those responsible for the Free Syrian Army were "moderates who can be trusted" (sic).

However, since October 4, 2011, Ibrahim al-Badri (also known as Abu Du’a) was on the list of the five terrorists most wanted by the United States (Rewards for Justice). A premium of up to $10 million was offered to anyone who would assist in his capture. The next day, October 5, 2011, Ibrahim al-Badri was included in the list of the Sanctions Committee of the UN as a member of Al Qaeda. 

In addition, a month before receiving Senator McCain, Ibrahim al-Badri, known under his nom de guerre as Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, created the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) – all the while still belonging to the staff of the very "moderate" Free Syrian Army…

*  *  *

From: "Tarallo, Julie (McCain)" Julie_Tarallo at mccain dot senate dot gov
To: Christopher Bollyn 
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 8:04 PM
Subject: RE: URGENT: Question about Person Speaking with Sen. McCain in Syria

Hi Christopher,

On background, no, this is a fighter in the Northern Storm Brigade, a Free Syrian Army-affiliated group with a long history of fighting against ISIS. The picture was taken during Senator McCain's May 2013 visit to Syria when he met with Free Syrian Army commanders from across the country, including the Northern Storm Brigade. After the meeting, ISIS actually issued a death threat against anyone who met with Senator McCain, as this story points out:

Also, see this Reuters report from October 2013 about Northern Storm fighting against ISIS. It also cites an audio message released by ISIS which attacks Senator McCain as "the American pig":

And to demonstrate how truly absurd this allegation is, ISIS has already stated that Senator McCain is among their main adversaries, as it recently targeted him as “the enemy” and “crusader” in its first propaganda magazine - see story on that here:



*  *  *

From: Christopher Bollyn, Aug 26 at 8:28 PM
To: Tarallo, Julie (McCain)

Dear Julie,

Thank you for your response but I hope you understand that it is not enough to simply say that this person is "a fighter". I mean surely Senator McCain's security detail must have identified and vetted all the people he met during this meeting?

So, what is this person's name? I mean he was photographed talking with Senator McCain on a visit that was surely a dangerous mission, given all the hostility against the senator, as you point out.

Are we to believe that Senator McCain was meeting with fighters from the Syrian opposition who were not identified and checked prior to the meeting? Again, if you can't identify the person by his complete name, how can you say that it is not Ibrahim al Badri, as Thierry Meyssan says? Their faces are certainly quite similar.

With many thanks,

Christopher Bollyn

*  *  *

Re: URGENT: Question about Person Speaking with Sen. McCain in Syria

From:                 Christopher Bollyn
To:             ;
Date:                  Tuesday, August 26, 2014 10:23 PM

Dear Julie,

You wrote and said that the man in the black shirt is "a fighter in the Northern Storm Brigade, a Free Syrian Army-affiliated group with a long history of fighting against ISIS."

I watched a video made by TIME magazine about the Northern Storm Brigade from this website:

The video is here:,32068,2280140412001_2140288,00.html

At 4'45" into the video one of the speakers calls for the re-establishment of the Caliphate, which is what the Islamic State (IS, ISIS, ISIL) is meant to do. I don't see a lot of difference between the two, Northern Storm Brigade and IS, if you see what I mean.

A screen shot from a video made of the Northern Storm group, whose fighters met with John McCain in Syria, shows that the Northern Storm group calls for creating the Caliphate of the Islamic State, which is exactly what IS (ISIS, ISIL) did in 2014. It does not seem that there is any ideological difference between the fighters John McCain met with in May 2013 and the IS group, which reportedly beheaded the American journalist James Foley.

See attached photo from 4'45" of the video with translation of what he is saying.

Many thanks,

Christopher Bollyn

*  *  * 

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (Caliph of the Islamic State), Wikipedia, August 20, 2014

“Congress secretly approves U.S. weapons flow to 'moderate' Syrian rebels” by Mark Hosenball, Reuters, January 27, 2014

"Future ISIS leader seen in newly released photo", CBS News, February 17, 2015

"John McCain Calls For Dramatic Increase In U.S. Airstrikes Against Islamic State," Reuters, August 20, 2014

“John McCain, Conductor of the "Arab Spring" and the Caliph” by Thierry Meyssan,, August 18, 2014

“McCain's Terrorists and Mohammed” by Christopher Bollyn,, June 11, 2013

Mouaz Moustafa, “Our Experts”, The Washington Institute, August 20, 2014

Mouaz Moustafa,, August 20, 2014

Syrian Emergency Task Force, Meet the Staff,, August 20, 2014  

“Terrorist Designation of Ibrahim Awwad Ibrahim Ali al-Badri,” U.S. State Department, October 4, 2011

“Who is Behind the Chaos in Iraq?” by Christopher Bollyn,, June 18, 2014 

Is Netanyahu Behind the Massacre in Tunis?

March 20, 2015

There is nothing more effective for Bibi than lumping together all the Jews in the world and presenting them as a united front against “the threat of radical Islam,” thus conflating Islamic State, Hamas, and Iran. This helps Netanyahu promote a worldview in which there is no national conflict, no occupation, no Palestinian people, and no blatant disregard for human rights. There are only Jews and Muslims.
- “The real reason Bibi wants French Jews to move to Israel” by Orly Noy,, January 11, 2015

In an audio recording distributed online, the Islamic State said the gunmen, both Tunisians, struck “citizens of the Crusader countries” in the attack Wednesday, according to a translation by the SITE Intelligence Group.
- “Security bolstered across Tunisia as rallies decry reach of terrorism” by Erin Cunningham, Washington Post, March 20, 2015

Is Israeli intelligence behind the massacre in Tunis?  Ask yourself, why would Tunisians commit such a monstrous atrocity that harms no one - but Tunisia?  Cui bono? 

The senseless terrorist attack on innocent civilians at the Bardo Museum in Tunis, in fact, bolstered no one except Benjamin Netanyahu, whose duplicity had been utterly exposed the day before the attack - when he was re-elected to head the Zionist state that occupies Palestine.  

The Three Stooges of Mossad's SITE Intelligence Group

No group had even claimed responsibility for the murderous attack on tourists visiting the Bardo National Museum in Tunis until the Israeli website, SITE Intelligence Group, "interpreted" the terrorist attack for the Western media - and blamed Islamic State - the following day. 

The Israeli interpretation, from Mossad's SITE, of the attack in Tunis could have come straight out of one of Netanyahu's books from the 1980s about "Fighting Terrorism."  In Netanyahu's worldview there are no Palestinian national grievances; there is only senseless Islamic terrorism against innocent Westerners - because they are not Islamic.  This is, of course, complete nonsense - coming straight from the bowels of Israeli intelligence in Tel Aviv, and spoon-fed to the Western media by Rita Katz of SITE:

As I have pointed out during my recent speaking tour in the United States, all of the actions of the group known as Islamic State (or ISIL/ISIS) have been interpreted and presented to the Western media through the dodgy Israeli website run by Rita Katz, an Israeli intelligence operative working in the U.S.  

Rita Katz is an Israeli intelligence operative who feeds the Western media with all kinds of nonsense concerning "Islamic State" and other extremist groups.
 In this piece on CNN she actually admitted that SITE Intelligence Group had released the beheading video before ISIS, explaining that she had the video "beforehand."  Now ask yourself, how could Israeli intelligence have a copy of the video - before the terrorists had even released it?

Ask yourself, why would a sophisticated terrorist group capable of conquering large areas of the Middle East and producing professional-quality propaganda videos, not contact Western media outlets on their own?  Why is it that all the videos and information about this bizarre "Islamic" group, which behaves in a most un-Islamic way, come to us through an Israeli website?

Source:  "Bardo National Museum attack,", March 20, 2015 

“Security bolstered across Tunisia as rallies decry reach of terrorism” by Erin Cunningham, Washington Post, March 20, 2015 

“The real reason Bibi wants French Jews to move to Israel,” by Orly Noy,, January 11, 2015 

"Tunisia Attack Comes After Repeated Calls by IS for Violence in the Country," SITE Intelligence Group, March 18, 2015  

UN: Israel Supporting Syrian Rebels

December 8, 2014

SIMPLE LOGIC - Sen. John McCain is the leading supporter of the Zionist war agenda in the U.S. Congress. Here he meets with Islamic insurgents in Syria. If these insurgents were not part of the Zionist war agenda McCain would not support them. 
Source:  "Who is Behind the Chaos in Iraq?"

ZIONIST AGENT - Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) is the most active and outspoken advocate of the Zionist war agenda in the U.S. Congress. Does John McCain work for the international Zionist crime syndicate? 
Source: "John McCain and the Zionist Crime Syndicate"

AGENTS OF A FOREIGN STATE - Senator John McCain (R-AZ), Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Senator Joe Lieberman (D-CT) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) at their meeting on July 7, 2010, in Jerusalem. Ehud Barak is one of the high-level architects of the 9-11 deception that took America to war in Afghanistan and Iraq. 
Source: "John McCain and the Zionist Crime Syndicate"  

United Nations observers on the ground between the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights and Syria have confirmed that Israel is supporting the Syrian rebels in their war to overthrow the Assad regime in Damascus and has been doing so for at least a year and a half.

This report should help people finally understand that Israel is behind the terrorism, carnage, and madness that has been inflicted on the people of Syria for the past few years.  This is the Syrian chapter of the Zionist "War of Terror" that began with the false-flag terrorism of 9-11.

Now that we know who is really behind the madness in Syria, shouldn't we do everything we can to stop it?

The Jerusalem Post reports:

NEW YORK – The Syrian ambassador to the UN has long complained of a Zionist conspiracy working with the Syrian rebels to overthrow President Bashar Assad.

Now, a report from the UN Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) reveals that Israel has been working closely with Syrian rebels in the Golan Heights and have kept close contact over the past 18 months. The report was submitted to the UN Security Council at the beginning of the month.

The documents show that Israel has been doing more than simply treating wounded Syrian civilians in hospitals. This and a few past reports have described transfer of unspecified supplies from Israel to the Syrian rebels, and sightings of IDF soldiers meeting with the Syrian opposition east of the green zone, as well as incidents when Israeli soldiers opened up the fence to allow Syrians through who did not appear to be injured.

Sources and Recommended Reading: 

"New UN report reveals collaboration between Israel and Syrian rebels" by Maya Shwayder, Jerusalem Post, December 7, 2014

"UN reports Israeli support for Syria rebels" by Christa Case Bryant,Christian Science Monitor, December 7, 2014 

“John McCain and the Zionist Crime Syndicate” by Christopher Bollyn, August 27, 2014

"McCain's Terrorists and Mohammed" by Christopher Bollyn, June 11, 2013

“The Islamic State and John McCain” by Christopher Bollyn, August 27, 2014

“Who is Behind the Chaos in Iraq?” by Christopher Bollyn, June 18, 2014 

The Jewish State and Gilad Atzmon

December 3, 2014

Book Review: The Wandering Who? - A Study of Jewish Identity Politics by Gilad Atzmon, Zero Books, 2011

Gilad Atzmon, author of The Wandering Who?

Zionism has failed for various reasons. Zionism could never have prevailed. It has been entangled with an endless list of sins from day one.
- Gilad Atzmon, The Wandering Who?

Gilad Atzmon is a gifted and articulate Israeli dissident who presents a rather grim but realistic prognosis of Zionism and the Jewish state in his book, The Wandering Who? – A Study of Jewish Identity Politics. Atzmon’s critique of Jewish identity politics, Zionism, and Israel is timely reading given the collapse of the Israeli government over a controversial law that would redefine the State of Israel as "the nation-state of the Jewish people.”

The fundamental question about the proposed “Jewish state” law is this: Will it promote peace? Given the violent reaction to the proposal of the bill it seems obvious that it will not solve any of the pressing political problems in Palestine and would only exacerbate the very real tension between Jews and Palestinians in the Holy Land if it were adopted into law.

According to Atzmon, it is precisely the ethno-centric notion that Israel should be “the Jewish state” which prevents it from being a normal and peaceful nation:

Israel is the Jewish state and Jewishness is an ethno-centric ideology driven by exclusiveness, exceptionalism, racial supremacy and a deep inherent inclination toward segregation. For Israel and Israelis to become people like other people, all traces of Jewish ideological superiority must be eliminated first. For the Jewish state to lead a peace initiative, Israel must be de-Zionised – it should first stop being the Jewish State. 

I happened to meet Gilad Atzmon when our paths crossed in Portland, Oregon, in September. I had the chance to talk to him and wanted to ask him if he was related to Menachem Atzmon, the key Israeli defendant in the 9-11 tort litigation. Gilad was quick to answer and said that he is indeed related to Menachem Atzmon.

Menachem Atzmon is a former Likud party co-treasurer who, along with Ehud Olmert was charged with illegal campaign financing in Israel. Although Atzmon had been working with Ehud Olmert, Atzmon was convicted while Olmert was not. Olmert, the former mayor of Jerusalem and prime minister, has since been convicted and sentenced to prison on other charges involving accepting illegal funds.   

Atzmon went on to head an Israeli security company called International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS), which is based in Holland. ICTS happens to be the parent company of Huntleigh USA, the former American company that managed passenger screening operations at Boston’s Logan Airport on 9-11. ICTS was the key defendant in the 9-11 tort litigation but was excused from the process by a decision of the federal judge Alvin K. Hellerstein. It should be noted that there was a blatant conflict of interest in Judge Hellerstein’s management of the 9-11 tort litigation. While Judge Hellerstein was overseeing the tort litigation, his son, Joseph, was living in Israel (on an illegal settlement) and working in a law firm that represented the parent company of ICTS.

Gilad not only confirmed that he was related to Menachem Atzmon, but added that he is also related to Nathan Friedman-Yellin (a.k.a. Nathan Yellin-Mor) the Zionist activist from Grodno who worked closely with Avraham Stern and migrated to Palestine in 1941 to found LEHI, the radical Jewish terrorist group also known as the Stern Gang.

After Stern's death, Yellin-Mor became the political leader of LEHI along with Yitzhak Shamir (operations) and Israel Eldad (propaganda). Yellin-Mor was one of the planners of the assassination in Cairo of Lord Moyne, the British minister of state in the Middle East, in November 1944. Yellin-Mor was also found guilty of “leadership of a terrorist organization” after LEHI assassins murdered the Swedish Count Folke Bernadotte, who was serving as United Nations emissary in Jerusalem in September 1948. Although Yellin-Mor and LEHI member Matityahu “Matty” Shmuelevitz were found guilty on January 25, 1949, and Yellin-Mor was sentenced to 8 years imprisonment, both terrorists were pardoned shortly after the trial.

TERRORIST ASSASSINS Nathan (Friedman) Yellin-Mor (center) and Matty Shmuelevitz (left) in 1949 after being pardoned for involvement in the murder of Count Folke Bernadotte of Sweden, the UN special envoy to Palestine, in September 1948. Yellin-Mor then joined the first Knesset (government) of Israel. Shmuelevitz shares the family name with Rahm Emanuel, Clinton's special advisor, Obama's first chief of staff, and the current mayor of Chicago. Emanuel's father, Benjamin (Auerbach) Emanuel, who was a member of the terrorist LEHI group, married Marsha Smulevitz. There is a resemblance in the face of Matty and Rahm Emanuel. Shmuelevitz went on to serve as director general for prime minister Menachem Begin, the former head of the terrorist Irgun.

Matty Shmuelevitz served as the "director general" of Begin's office.  I would guess that Matty is the man on the far left, standing next to Begin, in this photo from 1983.  At this point the Israeli planning for 9-11 was underway and the stage was being set for the biggest false-flag terror attack in history. If Rahm Emanuel is related to Matty Shmuelevitz, as I suggest, then we can understand the central role Emanuel played in setting the stage during the Clinton administrations, when he served as a special advisor to the president. Why did Rahm Emanuel run the White House under both Clinton and Obama?

So, when Gilad Atzmon says that Zionism has “been entangled with an endless list of sins from day one,” he knows what he is talking about. He does not hide the fact that he was raised in a family that is tied to Jewish terrorism. As he says in the opening lines of his book:

My grandfather was a charismatic, poetic, veteran Zionist terrorist. A former prominent commander in the right-wing Irgun terror organization…

His family's relationship to Zionist terrorism gives Gilad Atzmon’s perspective an authenticity that is lacking in much of the literature about Zionism and Israel. Atzmon is more than just another critical Israeli who grew up during the time of the Six-Day War (1967), the Yom Kippur War (1973), and the invasion of Lebanon (1982) – his ancestors are among the key terrorists behind the creation of the state of Israel and, as we now know, one of his relatives played a key role in the false-flag terrorism of 9-11. 

Atzmon’s insights about Israel and Jewish identity politics come from a dissident who was raised in a family of dedicated Zionists. This is why I think his critique of Zionism is one of the essential books of our time. Most Americans have very little, if any, understanding of what Zionism means in reality although their government is the most important financier and political supporter of the “Jewish state.” This lack of understanding is intentional, of course. The history of Israel is not taught in our universities and our controlled media presents an utterly false image of what Zionism is all about.

If the history of Zionism were taught at our universities, Atzmon’s book would certainly be on the reading list because it is the voice of an honest and articulate Israeli dissident:

As a young Israeli I believed in the Zionist ethos, I regarded myself an inherent part of the Jewish modern revival project. I saw myself as part of Jewish history, and Jewish history as an extension of myself. As a young Israeli growing up in the post-1967 era, I saw myself and the people around me as an evolving collective consciousness, fighting a revolutionary battle for historic justice…

As a young secular Israeli Jew, I believed enthusiastically in the possibility of transformation of the Jewish character into a ‘civilised, authentic humanist collective’. I believed myself to be one. I then grasped, through a long and painful process that Israel wouldn’t bring about a humanist Jew. It was entangled in a colossal sin and it was far too arrogant to save itself from its doomed circumstances.

Although the U.S. government is the primary supporter of the state of Israel and the assembled members of Congress gave twenty-nine standing ovations to its extreme right-wing prime minister, most Americans, Jews and Gentiles alike, function with “an imaginary Israel” in their mind, something that they want to believe in, but which bears no resemblance to reality. As I often say about naïve apologists for Israel: They simply do not understand the nature of the beast. 

This is why I find the following extract from Atzmon’s book to be the most important. It explains in plain English the essence of “the Jewish state”:

One may be left perplexed on learning that just three years after the liberation of Auschwitz (1945) the newly-formed Jewish state ethnically cleansed the vast majority of the indigenous population of Palestine (1948). Just five years after the end of World War Two, the Jewish state brought to life racially-discriminatory return laws in order to prevent the 1948 Palestinian refugees from coming back to their cities, villages, fields and orchards. These laws, still in place today, were not categorically different from the notorious Nazi Nuremberg Laws.

These are the essential facts about “the Jewish state” that need to be taken into consideration when we discuss the state of Israel. The well-written Atzmon critique is contained in a small book of about 200 pages yet he manages to deftly handle all of the main issues of Jewish identity politics and Zionism with intelligence and humor.

There is one point where Atzmon and I do not agree. In several places he says, “I do not believe in Jewish conspiracies; everything is done in the open." I, on the other hand, think that a great deal of Zionist planning is done in secret societies, like the B’nai B’rith, the parent organization of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and Hillel. The Zionist planning of the false-flag terrorism of 9-11, for example, was clearly done behind closed doors in a secret society where oaths of secrecy have been sworn.  Such secret societies exist for a reason and secrecy is the most important aspect of such organizations.

I asked Gilad about this statement and told him that my reading of Zionist history revealed that secret societies like the B'nai Moshe, B'nai B'rith, and others, played key roles in creating the Zionist fervor in Eastern Europe in the late 1800s and beyond. One source in particular, the Encyclopedia of Zionism and Israel, by Raphael Patai, Herzl Press, 1971, has many articles about these secret societies. 

He wrote back agreeing that this “could be an open subject to debate.” 

Sources:  Atzmon, Gilad, The Wandering Who? - A Study of Jewish Identity Politics, Zero Books (UK), 2011  

"Begin's legacy:  'Yehiel, it ends today' - The day that Menachem Begin announced he would resign as prime minister," by Shlomo Nakdimon, Ha'aretz (Israel), February 22, 2012 

"Bollyn meets Gilad Atzmon" by Christopher Bollyn, September 23, 2014

"Gilad Atzmon Confirms Shaul Eisenberg Connection to ICTS" by Christopher Bollyn, November 6, 2014 

The Day the World Changed

November 22, 2014

And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country.
My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.
John F. Kennedy's Inaugural Address
, January 20, 1961

President John F. Kennedy with his son at the White House, October 10, 1963

Why does the murder of President John F. Kennedy still matter? 

It matters because the murder of President Kennedy was not only a conspiracy but a true coup d’état. The powers behind the assassination took control over the government and orchestrated the cover-up.

It matters because a coup d’état that is successfully kept secret in a democratic country means, by default, that the succeeding government is illegitimate.

It matters because the American government is still lying about the Kennedy assassination, which essentially means that the powers that killed John F. Kennedy are still in charge to this very day. Therefore, the Kennedy assassination is NOT just an historical event of a distant past. It is an event that changed the course of history and set the stage for the political situation of today. In short, it has affected all our lives to some extent, but we do not know exactly how or why.

It matters because the mainstream media continues to support, and even endorse, the official version of the Kennedy assassination.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Why the Murder of JFK Still Matters, November 14, 2013

JFK and 9-11: Henry Crown and the Cover-Ups of Our Time, November 7, 2013

The Man Who Shot JFK & the Chicago Connection, Updated November 13, 2013

James Files and the Murder of JFK, November 14, 2013

LBJ & the Zionist Cover-up of the Conspiracy to Kill Kennedy, November 18, 2013

The Crown Family Connections to the Kennedy Assassinations, November 21, 2013

JFK on Secret Societies, May 5, 2012  

The Day Israel Attacked America

November 21, 2014

There's a straight line from JFK's murder on November 22, 1963, 
to the brutal and savage Israeli attack on the USS Liberty
to the 1983 attack on that marine compound in Lebanon, 
to the USS Cole bombing - 
to 9/11.
"Dead In The Water - The Sinking of the USS Liberty"
by Goon Squad, May 2, 2009

There's a straight line from JFK's murder on November 22, 1963 to the brutal and savage Israeli attack on the USS Liberty to the 1983 attack on that marine compound in Lebanon, to the USS Cole bombing -- to 9/11. 
-- "Dead In The Water - The Sinking of the USS Liberty" on Goon Squad, May 2, 2009 - See more at:

Assault on the Liberty by James M. Ennes Jr., (Random House, 1980), is an excellent first-hand account of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty on June 8, 1967.

The USS Liberty on June 9, 1967 - one day after the Israeli attack that killed or wounded more than two-thirds of the 300 men on the ship. 

Among all the books I have read about Israel and Zionist history,Assault on the Liberty by James M. Ennes Jr. is one book that stands out for having made my blood boil just reading it. James Ennes was a lieutenant on the bridge of the USS Liberty on the day of the attack.

Understanding the cold-blooded murderous assault on the USS Liberty by the Israeli Air Force and Navy - and how it was covered up by the U.S. government - is essential to understanding what happened on 9-11.

Al Jazeera recently released an excellent new video on the assault on the USS Liberty, entitled "The Day Israel Attacked America".  This video is highly-recommended viewing.

"The Day Israel Attacked America"
Video Link -

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"America the Target: 9-11 and Israel's History of False Flag Terrorism" by Christopher Bollyn, January 14, 2008

Russian TV Airs MH17 Shoot-Down Images

November 14, 2014

"We're leading in dealing with Ebola in West Africa and in opposing Russia's aggression against Ukraine, which is a threat to the world, as we saw in the appalling shoot-down of MH17."
- President Barack Obama at Queensland University, November 15, 2014

NOVEMBER 14, 2014 (18:00) - Russian TV1 airs satellite images clearly showing a fighter jet firing a missile at Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17, the passenger aircraft that was shot down over Ukraine in July 2014.

As world leaders assembled in Brisbane, Australia, for the G-20 conference, the stage was being set to criticize the Russian leadership for the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH 17 last July.  Vladimir Putin and Russia have been blamed by corrupt western leaders and the controlled media, without any evidence being presented, for somehow being involved in the downing of the passenger plane as it flew over the war-ravaged Donetsk region. It should be noted that these same corrupt western leaders also protect and promote a demonstrably false version of what happened on 9-11.

Now, with perfect timing, Russian TV 1 has broadcast satellite images that apparently show the Malaysian passenger plane being attacked by a fighter jet, which can clearly be seen firing a missile at the plane. If these images are genuine, as they appear to be, they are a "game changer".

As Itar-Tass described the evening news report on TV1:

First, the Boeing came under gun fire and then the cockpit was hit by an air-to-air missile, its right engine and the right wing were hit by a heat-seeking missile.

The evidence certainly seems to indicate that the cockpit of MH17 was attacked by machine gun and/or cannon fire.

This diagram show the location of the fragment seen above.

Yaron Mofaz, a relative of Shaul Mofaz, the former Israeli Chief-of-Staff, took this photo of MH17 at the airport in Amsterdam shortly before it was shot down over Ukraine. Why would a person connected to one of Israel's most senior military officers be taking a photo of the Malaysia Airlines plane before it was shot down?

See:  "The Israeli Photo of MH17 - Who is Yaron Mofaz?"
"The Downing of MH17 - Is Israel Involved?"

The question as to why the Russians would have taken so long to produce this exculpatory evidence is answered in the Itar-Tass report:

MOSCOW, November 14. /TASS/. Russia’s television Channel One said on Friday it had a photo presumably made by a foreign spy satellite in the last seconds of Malaysia’s MH17 flight over Ukraine.

Channel One showed Ivan Andriyevsky, the first vice president of the Russian Union of Engineers, demonstrating a photo sent by a George Beatle, who had introduced himself as an air traffic controller with a 20-year working record.

According to Beatle, the Malaysian Boeing was shot down by a fighter jet that followed it. First, the Boeing came under gun fire and then the cockpit was hit by an air-to-air missile, its right engine and the right wing were hit by a heat-seeking missile.

The e-mail had an enclosed snapshot of a missile launch from under the fighter’s left wing directed right at the Boeing cockpit.

“We see a space shot made from a low orbit. Such photo shots are typically made in air and ground surveillance purposes,” Andriyevsky said. “Coordinates on the photo hint that it was made by an American or a British satellite. We have thoroughly analyzed this photo to find no signs of fake.”

Here is the image that appears to show a fighter jet firing a missile at the passenger aircraft, which was shown in the Russia 1 news piece:

GAME CHANGER - These images will certainly change the discussion at the G-20, which had planned to attack Putin for his support of the rebels in the Donetsk region, who are fighting against the anti-Russian regime that was installed in Kiev by Victoria Nuland (i.e. Mrs. Robert Kagan) of the U.S. State Department. Victoria Nuland's husband and her Kagan in-laws are well known for being the leaders of the PNAC who worked to bring the U.S. into war against Iraq. Since the 2003 war against Iraq was clearly a war of aggression, why are the Kagans and George W. Bush not being prosecuted for conspiring to wage a war of aggression?  It is, after all, the mother of all war crimes.

Sources and Recommended Reading: 

"Russia’s Channel One show satellite photo evidencing MH17 was downed by fighter jet",, November 14, 2014

News Report on Russia's Channel One, November 14, 2014 

"The Downing of MH17 - Is Israel Involved?" by Christopher Bollyn, Updated August 13, 2014

"The Israeli Photo of MH17 - Who is Yaron Mofaz?" by Christopher Bollyn, Updated August 3, 2014

Dr. Mads Gilbert on the Israeli Aggression Against Gaza

October 10, 2014

The Norwegian medical doctor Mads Gilbert worked in the hospitals of Gaza during the Israeli aggression during the summer of 2014. In this excellent 10-minute interview Dr. Gilbert discusses the criminality of the Israeli attacks and what it means to be defined "a terrorist" by the Israeli aggressors and occupiers in Palestine.  This video is highly recommended viewing: 

Dr. Mads Gilbert helping the wounded and dying in Gaza.

John McCain and the Zionist Crime Syndicate

August 27, 2014

By his unwavering support for Tel Aviv regardless of its behavior, John McCain has confirmed that his sympathies lie with those who deceived America to wage a war on behalf of fundamentalists who have long planned to expand the Land of Israel to include Greater Israel. 
- Jeff Gates, Guilt by Association: How Deception and Self-Deceit took America to War, 2008

AGENTS OF A FOREIGN STATE - Senator John McCain (R-AZ), Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Senator Joe Lieberman (D-CT) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) at their meeting on July 7, 2010, in Jerusalem.
Ehud Barak is one of the high-level architects of the 9-11 deception that took America to war in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) is the most active and outspoken advocate of the Zionist war agenda in the U.S. Congress. Does John McCain work for the international Zionist crime syndicate?

Jeff Gates of Tempe, Arizona, is the author of Guilt by Association: How Deception and Self-Deceit took America to War (published before the 2008 election), in which he warned Americans of the treasonous candidate from Arizona. Gates was counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance (1980-1987).

Video Link -
At a town-hall meeting in July 2010, Jeff Gates asked Sen. John McCain about his involvement with the Zionist criminal syndicate and the oligarch Oleg Deripaska. Gates asked McCain about his 2006 meeting with Deripaska at Davos. McCain recalled the meeting and added that it been with a Rothschild.  When Gates asked about the second meeting with Deripaska in 2006 at the Rothschild family fiefdom on the coast of Montenegro, he unfortunately confused Montevideo for Montenegro, which allowed McCain to avoid the question by saying he has never been to Montevideo.

Sen. John McCain is the most active supporter of the Zionist war agenda in the U.S. Congress. In his 2008 book Guilt by Association,Jeff Gates pointed out the McCain family's ties to the cover-up of the murderous Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty in 1967 and other treasonous and criminal activity by the senator from Arizona, who was then the Republican party's candidate for president. To understand why Sen. McCain puts his support for the Zionist crime syndicate ahead of what's best for the American people it is essential to understand who supports John McCain.  The following paragraphs from Guilt by Association make that quite clear: 

Though campaigning for president on his national security credentials, McCain has misdiagnosed issues of profound consequence not only to ordinary Russians but also to Americans systematically defrauded by the same transnational syndicate. With regularity, the candidate has favored those complicit in the criminal network chronicled in this account [i.e.Guilt by Association]…

The consistency with which John McCain has associated with this transnational network raises the sensitive issue whether his candidacy enjoys syndicate support…

According to The Washington Post, McCain campaign manager Rick Davis twice arranged for the candidate to meet with Oleg Deripaska whose links to organized crime are sufficiently compelling that a visa to visit the U.S. was revoked in July 2006. Their first encounter was arranged at the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in January 2006. They met again in Montenegro seven months later during an official U.S. Senate trip to that eastern European country. 

Fields within Fields. On March 20, 2008, after John McCain secured the Republican nomination for president, Nathan Rothschild and his father, Lord Jacob Rothschild, sponsored a fundraiser for McCain in London. A principal adviser to Oleg Deripaska, Nathaniel is a descendent of Nathan Mayer Rothschild who helped finance Britain’s victory over Napoleon at Waterloo. In addition to providing financial advice to the Russian oligarch on the aluminum giant Rusal, Nathaniel Rothschild also advises Indian steel magnates.

CRUISING WITH CRIMINALS - Rick Davis and Sen. John McCain (in cap) board the rented yacht of Italian con man Raffaello Follieri in August 2006 in Kotor Bay, the Rothschild fiefdom in Montenegro. Follieri, then boyfriend of Anne Hathaway, went on to serve a five year federal jail term in the U.S. It was during this trip that McCain met again with Oleg Deripaska and Nathan Rothschild.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Guilt by Association: How Deception and Self-Deceit took America to War by Jeff Gates, (2008)
Introduction available onlin
e at:

Jeff Gates on the Criminal State,, March 4, 2012

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3: 

The Downing of MH17 - Is Israel Involved?

Updated August 13, 2014

He [Pinhas Lavon] inspired and cultivated the negative adventuristic trend in the army and preached the doctrine that not the Arab countries but the Western Powers are the enemy, and the only way to deter them from their plots is through direct actions that will terrorize them. 

[Shimon] Peres shares the same ideology [as Lavon]: he wants to frighten the West into supporting Israel's aims.
- Moshe Sharett, Israel's Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, 1955

The evidence suggests that Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was shot down by a fighter jet at 33,000 feet.  Who could be behind such a dastardly plot?  Is this a false-flag operation with a twist?

We know that members of the Israeli military led the violent overthrow of the elected government of Ukraine in February 2014, and we know that Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was shot down while flying through the air traffic control region of Dnepropetrovsk, where the governor, Igor Kolomoisky, happens to be an Israeli billionaire involved in aviation companies. Furthermore, Yaron Mofaz, a relative of Shaul Mofaz, former chief of staff of the Israeli military, oddly took a photograph of the ill-fated Malaysian plane at the airport in Amsterdam shortly before it was shot down, which he then provided to Reuters.

IGOR KOLOMOISKY (2nd from left) the Israeli governor of Dnepropetrovsk is a prominent supporter of Ukraine's Jewish community and the president of the United Jewish Community of Ukraine.  He owns several airlines as well.  MH17 was in the air traffic control region of Dnepropetrovsk when it was shot down.  For reasons that have not been explained MH17 was diverted from its normal route and instructed to fly across the war zone at a lower altitude of 33,000 feet by air traffic control of Dnepropetrovsk.  33,000 feet, or 10,000 meters, also happens to be the maximum service ceiling of the SU-25 aircraft.  Is this the real reason MH17 was instructed to fly 2,000 feet lower than normal over eastern Ukraine?

Yaron Mofaz, a relative of the former Chief-of-Staff of the Israeli military, took this photo of MH17 before it left Amsterdam on its ill-fated flight over Ukraine.  Mofaz works with a company that owns a similar Malaysia Airlines plane that has been kept in a hanger in Tel Aviv since November 2013.  So, why did he take this photo?

Yaron Mofaz also happens to be a director of a Mofaz family company that works closely with a company in Florida that owns a former Malaysia Airlines airliner, virtually identical to the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 and MH17. This Malaysian airliner, it just so happens, was sent to Israel in late 2013 where it was parked in a hangar in Tel Aviv. For these and other reasons it is logical that we consider the possibility that the shooting down of MH17 was an Israeli false-flag operation with a twist. Therefore, the real question is not whether Israel was involved, but to what degree was Israel involved in the atrocity? 

A “false-flag operation with a twist” is meant to convey the idea that the downing of MH17 may be a kind of double false-flag operation, i.e. a false-flag within a false-flag. As we know, the United States and its western allies accuse the separatist pro-Russian rebels in eastern Ukraine of downing the passenger airliner with a surface-to-air missile near Donetsk. To this date, however, no evidence has been provided to support this accusation although the United States had a spy satellite over the area where the plane was shot down when it happened. If they have evidence to support their allegation why have they not presented it?

The Russians, on the other hand, have presented evidence to support the scenario that the plane was shot down by a Ukrainian fighter jet, allegedly a Sukhoi SU-25. The SU-25 is a Soviet-era ground-support aircraft which the Israelis have modified and upgraded. The Israeli-modified SU-25 is called the “Scorpion” (the SU-25KM), and features advanced avionics with a modern “glass cockpit”. The “Scorpion” was produced in an Israeli-Georgian joint venture with the Tbilisi Aircraft Manufacturing (TAM) factory that produced the original SU-25. This joint venture project would suggest that the Israelis have a number of the modified SU-25KM planes that could be deployed in a false-flag operation.

ESSENTIAL EVIDENCE - Ukrainian SU-25 Fighter Detected in Close Approach to MH17
Video Link -

The Russians have radar evidence that a Ukrainian SU-25 fighter approached the Malaysia Airlines plane before it disappeared from the radar screen.  The real question is who was flying the fighter(s) that appeared to be Ukrainian planes?  Did they shoot down MH17?

The Israeli-modified SU-25KM is produced by Elbit of Israel and TAM, the original maker of the SU-25

The Elbit logo can be seen on the side of this plane.  Was a plane like this involved in the downing of MH17?

If the plane was shot down by a Ukrainian fighter jet at 33,000 feet and the anti-Kiev rebels have been wrongly blamed then it would be a simple false-flag operation. If, however, this was a false-flag operation in which the plane was shot down by a third-party, by Israelis for example, then we would have what I call a false-flag with a twist.

The Israelis would have several motives to shoot down MH17. Firstly, they may want to punish Malaysia for having set up the Kuala Lampur War Crimes Commission, which found the state of Israel guilty of genocide of the Palestinian people in November 2013. Secondly, they may be seeking to punish Holland for the fact that the largest pension fund in The Netherlands decided earlier this year to withdraw all its investments from Israel’s five largest banks because they have branches in the West Bank and are involved in financing the construction of illegal Jewish settlements on occupied territory.

There are some who might find this line of reasoning to be unfair to Israel, “the Jewish state” and “America’s best friend in the region.” To them, I would simply say: You do not understand the true nature of the Zionist beast. Israel operates like a gangster state that uses murder and intimidation to force nations to submit to its will. The Israelis would think that the downing of MH17 should be considered a message to the governments of Malaysia and The Netherlands and that other nations would be wise to take note of what happens to countries that challenge Israel.

If Israel were a person it would be a psychopathic serial killer on the loose. The psychopath who is a serial killer might appear to be a nice, intelligent, and civilized person – but that is only how he appears. When no one is looking he murders people in cold blood and gets away with it, time after time. The fundamental problem with his worldview is that he believes that he is superior to other people and that their lives are worth nothing. This is exactly how the Jewish supremacists who rule Israel view non-Jews. This is what is taught in Jewish yeshivas where the anti-Christian Talmud is the doctrine and source of all knowledge.

The Zionist state of Israel engages in wars of aggression and commits genocidal war crimes and massacres in plain sight and gets away with it, time after time, decade after decade. Anyone who has studied the history of Zionism and followed the actions of the state of Israel over the decades knows this very well. The historical record is quite clear: the Zionist state was created by terrorism and deception and that is how it operates to this day.  Israel's latest aggression against Gaza in which family homes, schools, hospitals, and mosques have been targeted shows that the Zionist state uses terrorism on a daily basis and has absolutely no respect for the lives of non-Jews.

Zionists have exploited “the Holocaust” myth to gain political power.  Using "the Holocaust" as their shield, the Zionists have forced the international community to give Israel a free pass for its flagrant crimes. As a result, Israel has a permanent "Get Out of Jail" card.  The failure to hold Israel accountable for its many egregious crimes, however, has facilitated the creation of a Frankenstein state that has now turned on those who fostered it. The so-called “Jewish state” has become a monster that commits atrocities in full view of the world – with impunity. Individual states and leaders are now afraid to criticize Israel because they don’t want to endanger their positions – or their nations.

In looking at the possibility of Israeli involvement in the downing of MH17 let’s start with the first question that should be asked about any such atrocity: Do any of the given explanations make sense?

It is quite obvious that it makes no sense whatsoever for the pro-Russian rebels to intentionally shoot down a Malaysian passenger plane. Furthermore, it doesn’t make any sense for the Ukrainians to shoot down the plane either. It is hard to believe that a Ukrainian military pilot would knowingly shoot down a passenger plane and commit an act of mass murder, especially with the awareness that their actions would be seen by radar on the ground in Russia and by satellites above them.

So, who might have shot MH17 down? To answer this question we need to ask another: Who benefits from the atrocity? While it is quite clear that the United States and the western allies are trying to put the blame on the pro-Russia rebels, and by extension on Russia and Vladimir Putin, simply blaming the rebels and Russia without providing any evidence to prove their case suggests that they have no proof.

The anti-Russia faction in the United States and Europe is clearly trying to smear Russia and Putin with the blame. This faction is led by the Zionist Neo-Cons in the Obama administration, people like Victoria Nuland (Kagan), the U.S. Assistant Secretary of State who managed the violent putsch in Kiev in February. It should be noted that Arseniy Yatsenyuk, the person Nuland chose to be prime minister of the unelected government in Ukraine, abruptly resigned on July 24, 2014, one week after the downing of MH17. Was the shooting down of the airliner a bridge too far for Yatsenyuk? It certainly would appear so.

The anti-Russia faction in Washington is the Zionist War Agenda gang that dominates the Obama administration, as well as the governments of Britain, Canada, and the European member states of NATO. The supposed leaders of these nations are really just “administrators” serving their Zionist masters who put them in power. This is why these weak national “leaders” speak in unison, as if reading from the same script, in defending Israel’s genocidal aggression against Gaza – as Israel’s right to self-defense – while condemning Russia and applying sanctions for offenses it has not even committed. 

This is the same group, completely controlled by Zionists, which seeks to exploit the MH17 atrocity to advance its agenda of war and conquest.  Israel took advantage of the media attention on the MH17 atrocity and began its pre-planned ground offensive into Gaza on the day the plane was shot down.  Was this just a coincidence or part of an evil plan?  The number of very significant Israeli connections to the shooting down of MH17 suggests that Israeli intelligence is involved in the crime.

While we cannot say with certainty that Israel was involved in the downing of MH17, we can say that it had both the motive and the capability to do so.  This is certainly more than we can say for the pro-Russian rebels, who have neither.  What is most telling is that the rebels were wrongly blamed for shooting down MH17 from the beginning by the Zionist faction, the very people who have both the motive and capability to carry out such a false-flag atrocity.

Sources and Recommended Reading: 

“America the Target: 9-11 and Israel's History of False Flag Terrorism” by Christopher Bollyn, Solving 9-11, January 14, 2008 

“Evidence Is Now Conclusive: Two Ukrainian Government Fighter-Jets Shot Down Malaysian Airlines MH17. It was Not a ‘Buk’ Surface to Air Missile” by Eric Zuesse,, August 4, 2014 

Ihor Kolomoyskyi, Wikipedia, August 9, 2014

“Largest Dutch pension fund boycotts Israeli banks over settlement ties” by Barak Ravid, Ha’aretz, January 8, 2014 

“MH17 Brought Down by Air-to-Air Missile, Finished Off by 30-mm Cannon, Experts Allege,” RIANovosti, August 6, 2014 

"Su-25KM Scorpion,", November 17, 2007 

“The Hallmarks of Zionist Atrocities: 9/11, Gaza, and Other Crimes” by Christopher Bollyn, August 6, 2014   

“Ukrainian Su-25 fighter detected in close approach to MH17 before crash – Moscow,” (Important video of Russian radar findings), July 21, 2014 

“Upgraded Su-25KM Proposed by Elbit, TAM,”, August 9, 2014 

The Israeli Photo of MH17 - Who is Yaron Mofaz?

Updated August 3, 2014

THE FINAL PHOTO OF MH17 ON ITS 17th BIRTHDAY - An Israeli named Yaron Mofaz took this photo of the Malaysia Airlines plane (MH17) shortly before it was shot down while flying over eastern Ukraine on July 17, 2014. Yaron Mofaz is also connected to GA Telesis, the Israeli-owned airlines company in Florida that owns a similar Malaysia Airlines plane that is parked in a hangar in Tel Aviv. So, why did the Israeli Mofaz take a photo of the plane that was shot down in the Ukraine? 

“There have been two or three pieces of fuselage that have been really pockmarked; it almost looks like machine gun fire; very, very strong machine gun fire that has left these unique marks that we haven’t seen anywhere else.  We have also been asked, for example, have we seen any examples of missile.  Well, no we haven’t.  That’s the answer”.
- Michael Bociurkiw, Canadian investigator with the OSCE, at the crash site of MH17
“Downing of Malaysian Air Flight MH-17 – Smoking ‘Gun’, Not a Missile” by John Esquire,, August 1, 2014

The holes seen in the cockpit wreckage of MH17 indicate the plane was shot down with cannon fire/machine gun fire aimed at the pilots.  Who would have committed such a terror atrocity?  Who were the pilots who shot down the Malaysian passenger airliner at 33,000 feet?  A high-resolution pdf of this piece is available at:

Other pieces of the aircraft show clear signs of machine gun/cannon fire.  The pro-Russian rebels in eastern Ukraine do not have planes that could have shot down the Malaysia Airlines plane.

The graze mark on this wing section leads toward the cockpit. The plane that was Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 was shot down on its 17th birthday, July 17, 2014.  Its first flight was July 17, 1997.

The terrorists who shot down MH17 evidently aimed their guns and cannons on the cockpit in an act of mass murder at 33,000 feet.  We need to find out who was flying the military planes that are responsible for this atrocity and who sent them.  Source of graphic:

There is a great deal of mystery about what caused the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 to come down in eastern Ukraine on July 17, 2014.  One of the mysteries is why an Israeli named Yaron Mofaz took a photo of the plane before it left the airport in Amsterdam and then sold the photo to Reuters who published it shortly after the plane went down.


To confirm that Yaron Mofaz was indeed the name of the photographer, I called Reuters in Amsterdam and London.  Peter Biggs in the London office confirmed that Yaron Mofaz was indeed the real name of the photographer.

There are a some reports on the Internet that say that Yaron Mofaz is the son of the former chief-of-staff of the Israeli military, Shaul Mofaz.  From what I have found that is not the case.  Shaul Mofaz has four children, Maya (34), Yonathan (31), Itamar (27), and Noa (25), so Yaron is not his son, but he is probably related, perhaps as a nephew.

PARTNERS IN CRIME - Lt. General Shaul Mofaz (right) was born Shahrām Mofazzazkār in Iran in 1948 and immigrated to Israel in 1957. Mofaz has served as Chief of Staff of the IDF, Acting Prime Minister, Vice Prime Minister, Minister of Defense, Minister of Transportation, and Minister without portfolio.

CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE IDF- Shaul Mofaz, seen here at a Pentagon meeting in 2002, was the Israeli military commander who gave the Zionist Neo-Cons their marching orders.

CHIEF OF ISRAEL'S SAYERET MATKAL - Mofaz served as chief-of-staff of the Israeli military from 1998-2002, which means that he, as head of the Sayeret Matkal of Ehud Barak and Bibi Netanyahu, must have been involved in the planning of the Israeli false-flag terror attacks of 9-11.

MOFAZ AND EHUD BARAK - The Sayeret Matkal is Israel's secret military commando force, which Netanyahu, Barak, and Mofaz are all former members of.  Several members of the Sayeret Matkal were involved in the events of 9-11.  Mofaz was the supreme commander of the Sayeret Matkal from 1998-2002.

According to Yaron Mofaz's FaceBook page he worked at Israir Airlines, studied at ‎Tel Aviv University, and lives in Ramat HaSharon, near Herzliya, Israel.  There is a gang of the Israeli Mofaz family in New York that runs an aviation related company called Pentagon 2000 Software.  On July 23, 2014, an Irish branch company calledPentagon 2000 Software Erp Limited was set up in Dublin, Ireland. The company's listed directors are Gabriel Mofaz in New York and Yaron Mofaz in Israel., a website about Irish businesses, has the following information about Yaron Mofaz, the director of the Pentagon 2000 company:  he is between 35-39 years of age and lives in Ramat Hsharon (sic), Israel.

The Pentagon 2000 company is a Mofaz family business, as the company website indicates:

The Mofaz family runs Pentagon 2000, an enterprise software company that serves the aviation industry.

BusinessWeek gives the following profile of the Mofaz family's Pentagon 2000 company:

Pentagon 2000 Software, Inc. operates as a vendor of enterprise software systems used in the aerospace, electronics, defense, power systems, metals trading, and high technology industries. It offers aviation software, components trading software, total power systems software, automotive and heavy duty parts software, support and maintenance, implementation planning, procedures manual development, customization and data migration, consulting, customer support, and training. The company was founded in 1986 and is based in New York, New York with additional offices in Estero, Florida; Van Nuys, California; Singapore; Bosques de las Lomas, Mexico; and Zichron Yaacov, Israel.

BusinessWeek also provides the company's address and phone number so I called to get confirmation of the information.  I finally got through to Yossi Mofaz. I told him I was interested in the new branch company they had created in Ireland.  He wondered where I had gotten the information but confirmed that it was correct. He pretended not to know about the photo taken by Yaron Mofaz and suggested that it could be another Yaron Mofaz from Ramat HaSharon. 

Yossi Mofaz

I then asked him if he was related to Shaul Mofaz, and he nervously denied that he was. I then asked if he was related to Avraham Mofaz, the father of Shaul Mofaz, and he asked me where I had gotten all of this information, which indicates to me that he is probably related to both Avraham and Shaul.  The webpage about Avraham Mofaz is, after all, on the Pentagon 2000 website at:

Avraham Mofaz, the father of Shaul Mofaz, was a Freemason in the Grand Lodge of the State of Israel. He passed away at age 80 in November 2001.

Because I knew the answer beforehand, I then asked Yossi Mofaz if his company, Pentagon 2000, had done business with Aviv Tzur and Avborne Heavy Maintenance, Inc. in south Florida.  He confirmed that they did work together so I then asked if they also did business with GA Telesis, another company headed by Aviv Tzur.  Yossi Mofaz confirmed that they did work with GA Telesis, which was the key confirmation I needed. 

The fact that the Mofaz company works with GA Telesis is important because this is the aircraft disassembly company that owned a twin of the Malaysia Airlines plane that disappeared in March 2014.  The GA Telesis twin Boeing 777 was a former Malaysia Airlines aircraft that the company sent to Israel in November 2013 although they had previously said that the aircraft would be disassembled in the United States.

ISRAEL'S SECRET MALAYSIA AIRLINES TWIN IN TEL AVIV - In the summer of 2013, the Israeli-run GA Telesis company of Florida obtained a Malaysia Airlines 777, which was virtually identical to the missing plane(s), and secretly sent the plane to Israel in November 2013. Why did the Israelis need a retired Malaysia Airlines 777 and why was the transfer of this plane to Israel kept secret by the company in Florida?

Yossi then seemed very nervous and asked for my call-back number.  I told him that was not necessary because I had gotten the information that I needed.  He complained that it was not fair that I had his number but he did not have mine.  I told him that his number is listed in BusinessWeek so he should take it up with Michael Bloomberg, who owns BusinessWeek.  Yossi Mofaz warned me that I should not write anything about his company or the company in Ireland.

The information that I have put together in the past few days indicates that Yaron Mofaz, the person who took the last photo of MH17 before it was shot down, is the director of a company that works with the Florida-based company that owns the Israeli twin of the missing Malaysia Airlines planes.  As I told Yossi Mofaz, what a small world.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Airframe Details of 9M-MRD Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777-2H6(ER),, August 2, 2014,9M-MRD-Malaysia-Airlines.php 

“Architects of 9-11 Terrorism Consolidate Political Power in Israel” by Christopher Bollyn, May 11, 2012 

"Are the Israelis Planning Another 9-11 Using the Missing Boeing 777?" by Christopher Bollyn, March 18, 2014

Aviv Tzur, Executive Chairman, GA Telesis Composite Repair Group, LLC,, August 1, 2014

Avraham Mofaz, dedication page with eulogies and Freemasonry videos,, August 1, 2014

Company Overview of Pentagon 2000 Software, Inc., Bloomberg BusinessWeek, August 1, 2014

“Downing of Malaysian Air Flight MH-17 – Smoking ‘Gun’, Not a Missile,” by John Esquire,, August 1, 2014

"Malaysia Airlines MH17: Michael Bociurkiw talks about being first at the crash site," (Video) CBC News, July 29, 2014

"Pentagon 2000SQL Selected by Avborne Heavy Maintenance operations at Miami International Airport to run their MRO and financials operations," Press Release,, September 22, 2005

Pentagon 2000 Software Erp Limited, company profile,, August 1, 2014

“Revelations of German Pilot: Shocking Analysis of the ‘Shooting Down’ of Malaysian MH17. ‘Aircraft Was Not Hit by a Missile’,” By Peter Haisenko,, July 30, 2014 

Shaul Mofaz, Wikipedia, August 1, 2014

"Shaul Mofaz, Netanyahu’s new partner, ordered ‘revenge’ op that killed Palestinian police in 2002" by Alex Kane,, May 8, 2012

"The MH370 Cover-Up: GA Telesis Fabricates Story of Missing Plane's Israeli Twin" by Christopher Bollyn, June 20, 2014

"Why is a Twin of the Missing MH370 in a Hangar in Israel?" by Christopher Bollyn, April 18, 2014

Yaron Mofaz, director profile,, August 1, 2014

The Hallmarks of Zionist Atrocities: 9/11, Gaza, and Other Crimes

August 6, 2014

The devastation of Gaza looks very much like what we saw in New York City on 9-11. An increasing number of people are beginning to realize that the same people are behind both atrocities. One of the hallmarks of a Zionist atrocity is the utter disregard for human life.

What we need to stand up and say is that not only did they attack the USS Liberty –they did 9/11.  They did it. I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at the Headquarters Marine Corps, and I have made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100 percent certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation.  Period … And the Zionists are playing this as truly an all-or-nothing exercise, because if they lose this one, if the American people ever realize what happened, they're done.
– Alan Sabrosky, Ph.D., former Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, March 2010

I'm aware that there's still some who would question or even justify the events of 9/11. But let us be clear: Al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet al Qaeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach. These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with.
– President Barack Obama, Cairo University, Egypt, June 4, 2009

Watch out for false prophets.  They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.  By their fruit you will recognize them.  Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?  Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.  A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit.  Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.  Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.
– Matthew 7:15-20, New International Version (NIV)

THE BITTER FRUIT OF ZION - Gaza under Israeli bombardment - using U.S. made weapons, paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.

Whole families were wiped out when Israeli bombs targeted homes. Many of these families are the rightful owners of homes and land in what is today Israel.

OLD TESTAMENT DESTRUCTION - The Israeli assault on Gaza was genocidal and merciless.  Nearly two thousand people were killed, including hundreds of small children. No one was spared, not even the humble donkeys.

We are living in a time of frightful, and increasingly frequent, Zionist atrocities. In some cases, such as the latest Israeli military aggression against the people of Gaza, the perpetrator of the atrocity is obvious. In other cases, however, such as 9-11, the crisis in the Ukraine, and the mysterious downing of Malaysian airliners, the identity of the real culprits is not so clear. To identify who is behind any given atrocity there is a logical method anyone can use by asking a few simple questions.     

The teaching of Jesus Christ about “A Tree and Its Fruit” is very helpful in understanding the true origin of the terror attacks of 9-11 and other Zionist atrocities. Using this teaching of the tree and fruit to analyze Zionist (i.e. Israeli) terrorism there are two parts of the teaching that we need to keep in mind: firstly, that a bad tree cannot bear good fruit; and secondly, that “by their fruit you will recognize them.”

The idea is that once one comprehends the diabolical nature of Zionism, one will more easily recognize its bitter fruits, i.e. terrorist actions that Zionists are responsible for. Perhaps the most difficult thing for many Americans, raised on a steady diet of television and Hollywood films, is to understand the true nature of Zionism. 

The term Zion refers to the so-called “Jewish state” of Israel and its powerful support network of Zionists in London, New York, Miami, Hollywood, etc. The Rothschild family, for example, is a central pillar in the international Zionist network. It is the Zionist financial network based in London and New York, not the tiny nation of Israel per se, that has the greatest influence over our governments and media.

The reports, videos, and images from the recent Israeli aggression in Gaza have surely opened the eyes of millions of people about the criminal and cruel nature of Zionism and its “Jewish state”. The fact that the Israeli aggression occurred so close to the 13th commemoration of the terror attacks of 9-11 may help more people understand that the same Zionists/Israelis are behind the massacres in Gaza and the holocaust of the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and Shanksville. These are two bitter fruits from the same tree – the tree of Zionism.

THE AMERICAN HOLOCAUST - More than 2,600 people were killed by the explosive demolitions of the Twin Towers on 9-11. A sophisticated and very powerful form of super-thermite was found in the dust of the destroyed towers. The flame temperature of such super-thermite composites is about 4,000 degrees C. (7,232 degrees F.)


There are a few observations that need to be made about any given atrocity in order to determine who is behind it. By asking a few questions we can quickly identify if the crime is of Zionist origin.

Does it make sense in the real world?

The first clue that we may be dealing with a Zionist false-flag atrocity is that such crimes usually do not make sense. The official version of 9-11, for example, that blames Osama Bin Laden and Arab Muslims, makes no sense because it resulted in the disastrous U.S. invasions and occupations of Afghanistan, Iraq, and other Arab and Islamic nations. Such a response was entirely predictable, so why would Arab Muslims do something that would bring such harm to their own people?

Likewise, the hasty U.S. government and media explanation that pro-Russian rebels shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 over eastern Ukraine makes no sense. Why would the rebels, who are fighting against the junta in Kiev, shoot down a Malaysian passenger plane? It simply makes no sense.

In false-flag operations the blame is usually quickly assigned to “the villain” before there is any investigation of the evidence. This is because the real purpose of a false-flag operation is to fix the blame on a targeted foe for a crime they did not commit. The people assigning the blame are most likely associated with the crime.

Does it advance the Zionist agenda?

The next question about such a crime is: Who benefits? Cui bono? Whose agenda is advanced by the atrocity? Does it serve the interests of the state of Israel or the financial empire of the House of Rothschild?

The false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 started a fraudulent “War on Terror”, which greatly increased the indebtedness of the United States. This massive debt benefits the ‘banksters’ and the House of Rothschild. The U.S. defense budget doubled in the wake of 9-11, military spending which has greatly enriched defense contractors at the expense of the American people and the republic.

The crisis in Ukraine and the downing of MH17 have both been used to foment hostility against Russia. Who benefits from a new Cold War with Russia? Defense spending has also increased in NATO member states, by U.S. diktat, to 2 percent of every member nation’s GDP. Who benefits from increased tension with Russia? Who benefits from ousting the elected government of Ukraine and replacing it with a gang of Zionist thugs and oligarchs?

Is the atrocity being reported fairly, completely, and accurately by the media?

No?  A negative answer to this question is one of the clearest indications that we are dealing with a false-flag operation. In the case of 9-11 it was clear from the very beginning that the media was not reporting the whole truth. Eyewitness accounts of explosions, for example, were quickly omitted from the media discussion of the events of 9-11. Journalists, such as Stephen Evans of the BBC, who initially reported witnessing “a series of explosions” at the South Tower on 9-11, soon stopped talking about the things they had seen and heard before the towers fell.

In an obvious effort to protect the false narrative, the controlled media in the United States has avoided any discussion of the scientific evidence that disproves the official myth of 9-11.  The evidence of a highly explosive form of super-thermite found in the dust of the demolished towers, for example, a crucial discovery that was presented in a peer-reviewed paper published in a scientific journal in 2009, has not been investigated or discussed by any mainstream media outlet in the five years since it was published. There can be no explanation other than outright censorship by the owners of the media for such one-sided and incomplete coverage of 9-11.

The discovery of chips of a nano-composite of super-thermite found in the dust of the demolished towers by Steven E. Jones and a team of scientists in 2009 has been avoided by the controlled media for five years.

In the case of the Israeli aggression against Gaza the media fails to explain the intense suffering and deprivation faced by the people of Gaza who have lived for 7 years under an extremely harsh Israeli blockade. The siege of Gaza is actually the longest siege in modern history, more than twice as long as the siege of Leningrad, but the fact that Gaza is blockaded is seldom even mentioned by the mainstream media. Lifting the siege and blockade of Gaza, however, is the main demand being made by the Palestinian side. The tunnels that the Gazans have built are not for terrorism, but for survival. These tunnels are the only way the imprisoned population can reach the outside world and obtain the necessities of life. 

If essential facts about a major historical event like 9-11 or the invasion of Gaza are being avoided by the media it is very likely that there is a Zionist criminal element that needs to be concealed and protected. Why else would the Zionist-controlled media omit such information?

Has the atrocity been properly investigated and prosecuted?

What many people don’t understand about 9-11 is that there was no proper criminal investigation. Although the World Trade Center was the scene of the greatest mass murder in U.S. history, the evidence from the crime scene, such as the structural steel, was treated like scrap; cut up into small pieces, mixed with other scrap metal, and shipped to China to be melted down. The public was given an utterly false story and incited to wage war in Afghanistan while the crucial evidence was being destroyed in two junkyards in New Jersey. The same is true for the FBI ‘non-investigations’ at the Pentagon and Shanksville.

The FBI investigation of the events of 9-11 was being managed by Michael Chertoff, the Assistant Attorney General (Criminal Division), who was the U.S. official who was supposed to collect the evidence, find the guilty parties, and prosecute them. Under Chertoff, however, an Israeli-American dual national, there was no 9-11 investigation and no prosecution. 

In the end there was not a single trial for any of the families who lost loved ones on 9-11. The U.S. District Judge who oversaw the 9-11 litigation was Alvin K. Hellerstein, a dedicated Zionist in New York whose son lives in an illegal Israeli settlement on the occupied West Bank. His son happens to be an Israeli lawyer who works with a law firm that represents ICTS, the key Israeli defendant in the 9-11 tort litigation being managed by his father. This is a glaring conflict of interest on the part of the judge that was never discussed in the U.S. media.

Alvin K. Hellerstein

If a crime like 9-11 is not properly investigated and prosecuted you can be sure there is something to hide. The people who are responsible for the failure to investigate and prosecute are probably associated with the people who carried out the crime.

In the case of Israeli aggression in Gaza, there is very seldom any independent investigation of the many war crimes that are reported in the news. The Israelis have a long history of committing war crimes in every conflict they have been engaged, but there has never been a single Israeli taken to The Hague and prosecuted.

Are the same people involved in similar crimes?

When we look at the Israeli invasion of Gaza and 9-11 we see that the same people are involved at the highest level. Michael Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York, flew to Tel Aviv when the FAA advised U.S. airlines not to fly to Israel during the invasion of Gaza. Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, met Bloomberg at the airport. The FAA ban on flights to Tel Aviv was a painful shock to Israelis and Netanyahu called upon his ally and partner in crime in New York to try and get the ban lifted as quickly as possible. Bloomberg also supported Netanyahu’s criminal aggression in Gaza by saying that the murderous Israeli assault on Gaza was the correct and proper thing to do.

ZIONIST PARTNERS IN CRIME - Michael Bloomberg and Bibi Netanyahu during Israel's aggression against Gaza

Bloomberg and Netanyahu also happen to be two of the highest people involved in the 9-11 crime and cover-up. Bloomberg served as the mayor of New York City for 12 years after 9-11, during which time he oversaw the management of the cover-up. He is also the chairman of the 9-11 museum and memorial in which the official version, the false narrative, is pushed on the public like a product.

PROTECTING THE 9-11 MYTH - Mayor Bloomberg, the Netanyahus, and the Israeli designer of the 9-11 memorial, Michael Arad (far left), view the memorial under construction.

Benjamin Netanyahu is one of the chief architects of the fraudulent “War on Terror” and has promoted the idea in books and speeches since the 1970s through his Netanyahu Institute on Terrorism, which he founded with his father. On September 11, 2001, when Netanyahu was asked by the New York Times what the day’s events meant for him, Netanyahu said the terror attacks were “very good” for U.S.-Israeli relations.

A couple years later, Netanyahu told an Israeli audience: “We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq."

So, when you see the very same people, like Michael Bloomberg and Benjamin Netanyahu, involved in the same things at the highest level, it’s a pretty good indication that these things are connected. 

Finally, does the political leadership in the United States, Canada, Britain, and Australia, all doggedly support the false narrative while ignoring the evidence that exposes the reality of the crime?

If the political leadership continues to promote a false narrative, as President Barack Obama has about the events of 9-11, and ignores the scientific evidence that disproves their version, then it is very clear that the crime is most likely a Zionist false-flag operation. Why else would our leaders try to defend bald-faced lies?

Likewise, although Israel has clearly committed scores of war crimes in Gaza and the U.S. government has criticized Israel for bombing homes, mosques, and schools, Obama provided Israel with more bombs and hundreds of millions of dollars, as if rewarding the “Jewish state” for its crimes.  In doing so Obama repeated the obligatory mantra that every controlled Western leader has been forced to say about the Israeli aggression – that Israel has the right to defend itself, as if that were the real reason for the Zionist state's attack against Gaza.

By asking these questions about 9-11 and other terror atrocities we can use logic to determine who is really behind these crimes that have changed our lives and nations. This method and these questions can be used to solve the unsolved atrocities from the past, such as TWA 800, Egypt Air 990, Pan Am 103, and the mysterious plane crashes of John F. Kennedy, Jr. and Sen. Paul Wellstone. The evidence suggests that the bombings in Bali, Madrid, and London, and even the Munich Olympics massacre of 1972 were probably Zionist false-flag operations. 

For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known.  Therefore whatsoever ye have spoken in darkness shall be heard in the light; and that which ye have spoken in the ear in closets shall be proclaimed upon the housetops.
Luke 12:2-3, King James Version 

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" by Niels Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven Jones, et al., Open Chemical Physics Journal, April 2009

“America the Target: 9-11 and Israel's History of False Flag Terrorism” by Christopher Bollyn, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, January 14, 2008 

"Ignition Studies of Al2Fe2O3 Energetic Nanocomposites" by L. Menon, S. Patibandla, K. Bhargava Ram, S. I. Shkuratov, D. Aurongzeb, and M. Holtz, Department of Physics and Nanotech Center, Texas Tech University, Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 84, No. 23, June 7, 2004 

"Israel Did 9-11 - U.S. Military Expert Supports Bollyn Thesis" by Christopher Bollyn, April 3, 2010 

“The Culprits' War Against 9-11 Truth” by Christopher Bollyn, June 12, 2014 

"The Destruction of the Evidence" by Christopher Bollyn, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, May 19, 2011

Video of Israeli Massacre and Bombing of Ambulances

August 2, 2014

The following video shows what really happens when Israel bombs ambulances, which is a common and long-standing Israeli military practice.  This is, of course, a serious war crime - but Israel carries out such atrocities with impunity. Why is Israel never held accountable for its war crimes?

After an Israeli bomb attack, a crowd of people have gathered in Shujayya, near Gaza City, waiting for emergency medical help.  Three ambulances drive up, then, suddenly, the ambulances and the crowd are hit by one - or more missiles.  Many people are killed and severely wounded in the blast. Although it is very graphic, this video is highly recommended viewing because it shows the true face of the Zionist terror state of Israel. Americans need to realize what it means to support the criminal state of Israel. The planes, missiles, and bombs that Israel uses are made in America and paid for by the U.S. Taxpayer.

How can any human being support such evil?  There is, of course, absolutely NO excuse for such an atrocity.

The following link takes you to an excellent English-language page that has the video and comments from viewers: 

The original YouTube video with Arabic-language titles and comments is here:  

Video Link - 

Gaza is Our Guernica

July 26, 2014

The Israeli terror bombing of Gaza has destroyed hundreds of homes often with entire families being wiped out.
Photo source:
  The Guardian

Americans are made complicit in this atrocity because our nation gives Israel the weapons and political cover that allow it to carry out such crimes with impunity. Why is the United Nations never able to do anything to stop Israel from killing civilians - time after time?

By Christopher Bollyn

We Americans and people of the supposedly democratic West are culpable and complicit in Israel’s terror bombing of the defenseless population of Gaza.  We are made complicit in this latest Israeli massacre by virtue of the fact that our supposedly elected leaders have given the Israelis a green light to bomb the people of Gaza and because our government provides the planes, bombs, and missiles that Israel uses to carry out these atrocities. If the United States were to stop giving Israel political cover and providing “the Jewish State” with free weapons they would not be able to bomb Palestinians with impunity.  This is why the Israeli terror bombing of Gaza is our Guernica, as Joseph E. Fasciani of Victoria, British Columbia, wrote in January 2009 after a similar Israeli massacre of Gazans.

The bombing of Guernica, a historic Basque town in Spain, on April 26, 1937, was an aerial attack by planes of the German Luftwaffe on the orders of the Spanish High Command.  The bombing is considered one of the first raids in the history of modern military aviation on a defenseless civilian population.

The following article is by Joseph E. Fasciani of Victoria, British Columbia.


By Joseph E. Fasciani
January 20, 2009

It is long past time for the world to acknowledge that the destruction of Gaza is the Guernica of our time. All our moral compasses will be set from this point, as to our attitude in this true holocaust. Not one of us is exempt; all will be weighed in the balance of our beliefs and actions.

What do you think an artist is? An imbecile who has only eyes if he is a painter, or ears if he is a musician, or a lyre in every chamber of his heart if he is a poet, or even, if he is a boxer, just his muscles? Far, far from it: at the same time he is also a political being constantly aware of the heartbreaking, passionate, or delightful things that happen in the world, shaping himself completely in their image. How could it be possible to feel no interest in other people, and with a cool indifference to detach yourself from the very life which they bring to you so abundantly? No, painting is not done to decorate apartments. It is an instrument of war.
- Pablo Picasso  

Guernica by Pablo Picasso (1937)

"In 1937 Pablo Picasso painted Guernica, a mural, as the centerpiece for the Spanish Pavilion of the World's Fair in Paris. It is a bitter irony that Guernica, the most lasting monument of the exposition, is the Twentieth century's most enduring symbol of the horrors of war and the inhumane use of technology. It is a portent for the terrors of the next decade. The painting is based on the events of April 27, 1937, when the German air force, in support of the Fascist forces led by Generalissimo Francisco Franco, carried out a bombing raid on the Basque village of Guernica in northern Spain.

"At that time such a massive bombing campaign was unprecedented. The hamlet was pounded with high-explosive and incendiary bombs for over three hours. The non-combatant townspeople including women and children were indiscriminately cut-down as they fled their crumbling buildings. The town of Guernica burned for three days leaving sixteen hundred civilians killed or wounded in its smoldering remains.

"The Fascist planners of the bombing campaign knew that Guernica had no strategic value as a military target, but it was a cultural and religious center for Basque identity. The devastation was intended to terrorize the population and break the spirit of the Basque resistance. In effect it was intended to "shock and awe" the Basques into submission. The bombing of Guernica was a sensation in the world press. The Times of London called it the arch-symbol of Fascist barbarity."

Source:  Picasso's Guernica

That the above description could be applied to the present horrors in Gaza with virtually no differences is condemnation enough for Israel to stand trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Let us substitute Gaza for Guernica and Palestinian for Basque and see the eerie parallels:

The Fascist planners of the bombing campaign knew that Gaza had no strategic value as a military target, but it was a cultural and religious center for Palestinian identity. The devastation was intended to terrorize the population and break the spirit of the Palestinian resistance. In effect it was intended to "shock and awe" the Palestinians into submission.

That this massacre is made by the same people who scream "Holocaust!" about themselves is of course the supreme irony, and – from a Christian point of view – the greatest self-incrimination and sin.  Sin. Well, there's a word!

Our idea of sin derives from the Greek word harmartia, which means to 'miss the mark," something we cannot fault those precision Israeli bombers for. They locate and hit schools, hospitals, children's shelters, and UN aid stations. Any and all humanitarian relief points are now suitable targets.

An Israeli friend of mine told me this was a common joke there twenty years ago:

"Why does Israel need expensive spy satellites?"
"So we can spot Palestinian kids picking up stones to throw at our tanks!"

For me, at nearly 66, it brings to mind all the black and white documentaries I watched as a child, often at rallies and memorials we attended with my father's business partners, Sam Windstrauch and Sam Silberstein, two real Jews who had no interest in Zionism, nor did Albert Einstein, no matter how often he was asked to support "Israel Bond Drives".

Now the murderers are strangely transposed: the old black and white movies of the Nazis destroying Guernica or taking the Warsaw ghetto have morphed into full-color TV journalists documenting Israel's "Defense" Forces [IDF] taking Gaza, exactly as was done sixty years ago.

The formerly abused become present abuser and use the same tactics: enclose the victims, cut off food, water, and fuel; bomb and shell one and all, set them fleeing in vain. Then move in and use all the newest weapons to maximize their deaths at minimal IDF losses. To date, it seems that goal is a kill ration of 100:1 or better, if possible.

As we step into the Ninth Circle of Hell, please note the IDF's weapons and tanks are the best that money can buy, and the USA supplies, in fact, pays for with the billions of dollars of "foreign aid" it generously gives to Israel every year. If the US gave its own citizens as much as it gives to Israel, each man, woman, and child would receive more than US$ 33,000.00 a year. Let me know when you got your check, as I have yet to get mine.

"Is it an irresponsible overstatement to associate the treatment of Palestinians with this criminalized Nazi record of collective atrocity? [Holocaust] I think not."
– Richard Falk, the United Nations Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and international law authority at Princeton University, 2009

This much is certain: all these killers are true to their leaders, such as Bush, who told us that "I listened to the voices...and acted. I am the Decider." Some leader! Some decisions!

Can anyone see Christ in anything that comes out from Bush, or from any Zionazi spokesperson? "For it is not what goes into a man that makes him unclean, but what proceeds from his mouth!" warned Jeshua, 2000 years ago. Nothing's changed.

In the US of A and Canada, self-righteous "Christian" evangelicals aligned with Zionazis defame Him for a fictitious "security" which cannot ever be, for there can never be peace without justice. 

In truth, they are not Christians. They, along with the Zionazis, are the new murderous Pharisees of our era, if we have eyes that truly see, and unstopped ears to hear the screams of agony in Gaza, the Guernica of our time.

Source:  "Gaza Is Our Guernica" by Joseph E. Fasciani, January 20, 2009 

Gaza and 9-11: When Silence Means Complicity

July 21, 2014

While Israel's military aggression against Gaza is an outrageous war crime in which the majority of the casualties are innocent civilians, our political leaders refuse to condemn Israel for its actions. 

ZIONIST QUISLING SUPPORT FOR ISRAELI TERRORISM - One week into Israel's terror bombing of the defenseless population of Gaza, Germany's Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier appeared with Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, saying:  "I have come to Israel with the aim of sending a clear message, namely that Israel’s security is of the greatest importance to us Germans. Under international law, as well as politically and morally, Israel has the right to protect its population against rocket attacks." 

They claim to know God, but by their actions they deny him. They are detestable, disobedient and unfit for doing anything good.
― Titus 1:16

Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits.
― Matthew 7:15-16

Trampling the rights of the Palestinians in the name of our exclusive right to the country, and by dint of a divine decree, is an ineradicable stain on Jewish history. Anyone who becomes entrenched in these views will end up bringing about the international ostracism of all of Israel, and if that happens, it won’t be anti-Semitism.
― Zeev Sternhell, Israeli historian

Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.
― Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom: A Call For the Emancipation of the Generous Energies of a People (1913)

The Israeli terror bombing of Gaza has intentionally targeted homes causing the deaths of 550 and injuring 3,640.

"I WANT MY FATHER" - Whole families have been wiped out when their houses were bombed. This young boy was one of four siblings brought to the hospital wounded, two of them just three years old.

At least 80 percent of the casualties in Gaza are civilians, yet the leaders of the Western world refuse to criticize Israel or hold its leaders accountable for their egregious war crimes. What does this say about our leaders?

The failure of President Barack Obama and other Western leaders to condemn Israel and impose sanctions on “the Jewish State” for its murderous aggression against the defenseless population of the blockaded and besieged Gaza Strip indicates that our political leaders are nothing but subservient quislings serving the Zionist war agenda. Obama’s support for Israel’s criminal aggression in Gaza is identical to his support for the demonstrably false official version of what happened on 9-11. In both cases, Israeli atrocities of mass terrorism are being protected by the Zionist-controlled quislings and mass media. What does Obama’s support for the Zionist lies about Gaza and 9-11 tell us about the real origin of these terror atrocities and the corruption of our government?

During Christmas 2008, in the final days of the administration of George W. Bush, the Israeli military launched a criminal war of aggression against the people of Gaza, which they called Operation Cast Lead. When president-elect Obama was asked about the Israeli crimes he declined to comment saying he was not yet president.  He added that he would have “plenty to say” after his inauguration.  After he was installed as president, however, President Obama maintained his silence and said absolutely nothing about the egregious war crimes committed by Israel in the Gaza Strip.

Today, five-and-a-half-years later, Israel is once again committing war crimes in Gaza in an offensive called Operation Mighty Cliff, and once again President Obama is silent in the face of Israel’s flagrant acts of state terrorism. Israeli forces are bombing houses and using banned weapons, according to reports from doctors who have seen the injuries of the more than 500 killed and thousands of wounded Palestinians.

The overwhelming majority of those killed and wounded are innocent civilians, including many women and children. Using American-made fighter jets paid for by U.S. taxpayers, the Israeli military is dropping American-made bombs on homes often murdering whole families. Rather than condemning the Israeli atrocities in Gaza, Obama has stated that he supports Israel’s right to defend itself, implying that the Israeli massacre of hundreds of Palestinian civilians is somehow morally and legally justified.

Across America, Europe, and Asia, there have been hundreds of protests against the Israeli aggression in the Gaza Strip.  An estimated 100,000 people protested in London on July 19.  Why is it that our political leaders support Israeli aggression while the people in the streets condemn it?

The common people can easily understand that it is morally unjustifiable to bomb defenseless civilians in their homes.  Anyone can grasp that it is immoral to confine millions of people in a narrow strip of land less than 30 miles long and 5 miles wide and to impose a blockade on the entire population for seven years.

Many of the families of the Gaza Strip are displaced Palestinian refugees from areas that were "ethnically cleansed" during previous Israeli wars of conquest.  The very idea that a modern military, armed with advanced fighter jets and precision-guided missiles, would bomb and shell a confined and defenseless population is repulsive to any person with any sense of decency.  So, why do our political leaders support the indefensible Israeli aggression against Gaza?

As I have pointed out in a number of articles, Barack Obama was an unknown politician in Chicago who was created and sponsored by the leading Zionist families of Chicago since 1992.  One of Obama’s first and most important Zionist sponsors was Bettylu Klutznick Saltzman, the daughter of Philip Morris Klutznick, the former president of B’nai B’rith International and the World Jewish Congress, and chairman of the United Jewish Appeal (UJA). Why was Klutznick, the highest-level elder of Zion and head of the international Zionist secret society, fostering an unknown black candidate from Chicago to be president?

SUPER ZIONIST PHILIP KLUTZNICK was Obama's first major political sponsor in Chicago. Klutznick was the president of B'nai B'rith International (1953-59), president of the World Jewish Congress, general chairman of the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), president of the American Friends of the Hebrew University, vice-president of the Jewish Welfare Board, a founder of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, president of the Memorial Foundation for Jewish Culture, and vice president of the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, among other things. Would such a dedicated Zionist sponsor Obama for any reason other than that he should serve his Zionist masters?

The Zionist strategy is obvious:  like a Trojan Horse, Obama’s blackness was exploited to bring a dedicated Zionist agent into the White House. Democrats who saw themselves as progressive voted blindly for Obama primarily because of his race, not because of his political achievements, which were of no significance whatsoever.  Most of the people who voted for Obama were completely unaware that he was really a Zionist agent in disguise.


Bettylu Klutznick made no secret of the fact that she was cultivating Obama to be the first black president of the United States.  In 1992, when Obama was thirty years old, Saltzman told David Axelrod and others, "He will be our first black president.'' Saltzman then commissioned Axelrod to create Obama, the presidential candidate.  Rahm Emanuel, the son of a Zionist terrorist from the murderous Stern Gang and Obama’s first chief-of-staff, was also recruited to train and manage Obama the candidate.  In the key election in 2004 that brought Obama to the U.S. Senate, the opposing candidate withdrew from the race, leaving Obama as the only candidate.

OBAMA THE CANDIDATE was created by David Axelrod, who wrote his speeches and managed his political career.

Rahm Emanuel, first Chief of Staff of the Obama White House,
served in the Israeli army and is the son of a real Zionist terrorist. The late Sherman Skolnick of Chicago called Emanuel the "Acting Deputy Chief for North America of the Mossad -­ Israeli Intelligence." Skolnick reported that Emanuel's father Benjamin had been "part of the Israeli assassin team that murdered Sweden's Count [Folke] Bernadotte" in 1948. Bernadotte was the United Nations envoy who was sent to Palestine to find a solution to the UN Partition Plan that gave Palestinian land to Jews from Poland and Russia.

Philip Klutznick and the Zionist leaders of Chicago (e.g. Lester Crown of General Dynamics and Penny Pritzker of Hyatt hotels) were not sponsoring Obama because they wanted to put a progressive president in the White House.  The Zionist support was purposeful and had one essential purpose:  Obama was being prepared for the presidency so that he would serve his Zionist masters under the guise of being America’s first black president.  These are the basic facts and calculus that we need to take into consideration when analyzing Obama’s actions vis-à-vis Israel and the Zionist agenda.

The fact that Obama is beholden to his Zionist masters is the main reason why, in spite of all the song and dance about trying to achieve a peace deal between the Israelis and the Palestinians, we now have Israel waging war on Gaza and the Palestinian people.  Secretary of State John Kerry could have achieved a peace deal and would have saved a great deal of time and effort if he had simply applied some real pressure on the Israelis to make peace – but he didn’t.  If the U.S. government does not put serious conditions on the Israelis to force them to make peace, they will never achieve peace. It’s that simple.

The fact that President Obama is controlled by the elders of Zion is the real reason why his administration will never condemn Israeli aggression or threaten to apply punitive sanctions on “the Jewish State.”  While Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has bombed Gaza for two weeks in a row, the Obama administration has not uttered one critical word about Israel’s aggression or taken one single step to stop it. While Netanyahu bombs Gaza with impunity the Obama administration threatens to apply sanctions against Russia, which has done nothing that comes close to the state terrorism being carried out by Netanyahu and the Israeli military.

How is it that the United States gives a free pass to the tiny settler nation of Israel to commit aggression, time after time, while Russia is threatened with punitive sanctions and blamed for crimes it has not committed?

Although the facts about what brought down the Malaysia Airlines flight over Ukraine are not yet known, the disaster was exploited by the Israelis to provide cover for their long-planned ground invasion of Gaza, which began on July 17, the same day the Malaysian airliner was shot down.  The downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 appears to be yet another false-flag terror attack designed to increase tension with Russia.  What we do know is that the plane that went down in the Donetsk region of the Ukraine is identical to the missing Malaysia Airlines plane that disappeared in March 2014.  Both of these planes have an Israeli twin that has been sitting in a hanger in Tel Aviv since the end of 2013.

We also know that the conflict in the Ukraine was caused by the meddling of Zionist Neo-Cons like Victoria Kagan Nuland, Assistant Secretary of State.  The civil war in the Ukraine is like a California brush fire that was started by Zionists from the U.S. State Department who now blame Russia for the results, which were completely predictable.  The shooting down of MH17 certainly appears to be a false-flag terror atrocity which is designed to increase the level of tension and hostility between Russia and the West.

GAZA AND 9-11 

Obama’s support for the Israeli aggression against Gaza is similar to his support for the official version of 9-11, which has been proven to be utterly false about what really happened on 9-11 and what caused the destruction of the World Trade Center.   

As I have pointed out in great detail in the Solving 9-11 set of books, the 9-11 atrocity and the criminal cover-up of the evidence were Zionist-controlled operations from beginning to end.  The culprits behind the 9-11 crime and cover-up are all Israeli intelligence agents or Zionist supporters of the far-right Likud Party, which is headed by Benjamin Netanyahu.

The Zionist state of Israel is a false messiah and Benjamin Netanyahu is a false prophet of that false messiah.  While the tiny state of Israel has a powerful hinterland in the Zionist organizations in Britain, the United States, and the West, their power is not great enough to make a false messiah into a real one.  The Zionists may be able to control the president of the United States and other Western leaders but they cannot change the nature of the beast or bring good fruit from a bad tree.

Zionism has shown its true face in the terror atrocity of 9-11 and the criminal aggression against the people of Gaza.  Billions of people around the world now recognize the inherent evil of Zionism and there is simply no way it will ever be able to redeem itself.  Although Zionist quislings like Barack Obama and Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper of Canada stand in support of Israel’s aggression, the ground they are standing on is quickly being washed away by the tsunami of public opinion against the crimes and terrorism of Israel. 

Millions of people around the world have shown that they will no longer allow their leaders to support Israeli crimes.  A protest in Chicago on July 9, 2014. 

Christopher Bollyn's official Facebook page:

Sources and Recommended Reading:

“Are the Israelis Planning Another 9-11 Using the Missing Boeing 777?” by Christopher Bollyn, March 18, 2014

“How Will the False-Flag Kidnapping Scenario End?” by Christopher Bollyn, June 27, 2014

“Is the Israeli Kidnapping Real - or False-Flag?” by Christopher Bollyn, June 22, 2014

“Understanding the Crisis in Ukraine” by Christopher Bollyn, March 3, 2014 

“Who Runs the Obama White House?” by Christopher Bollyn, November 6, 2008

The MH370 Cover-Up: GA Telesis Fabricates Story of Missing Plane's Israeli Twin

June 20, 2014

COVER-UP OF ISRAELI TWIN EXPOSED - GA Telesis, the Florida-based company that owned the Israeli twin of MH370, has been caught fabricating a cover story to explain why this plane (N105GT) was in a hangar in Tel Aviv when its Malaysian twin disappeared.  

THE ISRAELI TWIN OF MH370 - GA Telesis recently crafted a press release, back-dated to October 4, 2013, and inserted it into the archives for 2013.  The Internet archives, however, reveal that this fraudulent press release did not even exist in 2013.  Why would GA Telesis be fabricating press releases to provide a plausible history for this suspicious plane in Tel Aviv if they were not trying to cover their tracks?

In March 2014, I posted a very important terrorism-prevention story that revealed that a near-identical twin of the missing Malaysian plane, that was Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, was sitting in a hangar in Tel Aviv.  

The article, "Are the Israelis Planning Another 9-11 Using the Missing Boeing 777?" pointed out, with photos and documentation, that a plane, very similar to the missing Malaysia Airlines aircraft, that had been obtained by a Florida-based company called GA Telesis for dismantling in the United States, was actually being kept secretly in a hangar in Israel. What, pray tell, was a plane, nearly identical to the missing MH370, doing in an Israeli hangar?

Because this was such a suspicious and ominous development that clearly had the very real potential to become another 9/11-type attack, I delved further into the questions surrounding this mysterious plane in Israel and its relationship with the missing MH370 in a series of articles:

"Why is a Twin of the Missing MH370 in a Hangar in Israel?" 
- April 18, 2014

"Was MH370 Hijacked thru Remote Access to its Computer System?" 
- April 24, 2014

"Was MH370 a U.S./Israeli False Flag Operation?" 
- April 30, 2014

I wrote and called GA Telesis several times to try and get an explanation why they had given the plane a new registration number, N105GT, and then flown it to Israel - months after it had been slated for dismantling in the United States?  The company, however, refused to provide any explanation.  

Now, months later, GA Telesis comes out with a back-dated press release that they slipped into their archives.  It is clear, however, that this is a fabricated press release, crafted long after the Israeli twin was exposed on this website. The fraudulent press release does not appear in the Internet archives of the GA Telesis website from December 1, 2013.  GA Telesis has been caught in a crude attempt trying to create a plausible history for the Israeli twin of MH370. Why would they be posting this after-the-fact press release now if they did not publish it when the plane was actually sent to Israel?

Here is the fabricated press release that was back-dated to October 4, 2013, and slipped into the archives:


The following screen-shot shows how GA Telesis inserted the fabricated press release, dated October 4, 2013, into the archives between one from August 21 and another from October 11:


The Internet archive capture from December 1, 2013, clearly shows that there was no press release dated October 4, 2013, about the Malaysia Airlines twin being sent to Israel - until quite recently, that is:


The fact that GA Telesis created a fraudulent and back-dated press release to try and provide a plausible cover story for the Israeli twin of MH370 shows that they are trying to remove suspicion from a very suspicious plane and chain of events.  It tells me that they are trying to cover their tracks - and have now been caught doing so. 

Understanding the Crisis in Ukraine

Updated May 11, 2014

Added recent video of U.S. Asst. Secretary of State Victoria Nuland (wife of Neo-Con Robert Kagan, founder of the PNAC group that called for a U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2000) being grilled byCongressman Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) about the role of Neo-Nazis in the violent putsch in Kiev in which the elected Ukrainian government was ousted on February 21-22, 2014.  Nuland tries to avoid answering Rohrabacher by saying the majority of the people in the Maidan were "peaceful protestors" - but it was certainly not peaceful protestors who overthrew the elected government in Kiev using fire-bombs and trained snipers. 

Nuland was the U.S. official who was recorded telling the U.S. Ambassador to the Ukraine - more than two weeks before the elected president Viktor Yanukovych was overthrown - who would be the new leaders of the Ukraine.  This is clear and irrefutable evidence that Mrs. Robert Kagan of the U.S. State Department conspired to bring about illegal regime change using violence in the Ukraine, just as her husband and the Kagan family did in Iraq.  The proof can be seen in the transcript of the telephone call in which she names the people who will run the Ukraine, which was posted by the BBC on February 7, 2014. Mrs. Kagan, her husband, and her in-laws all belong in prison - not running U.S. foreign policy.

Video Link -

The following video is of a Palm Sunday press conference with the elected President of the Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych, who was ousted by violent gangs who seized power in Kiev on February 21-22, 2014. The U.S. government was instrumental in the overthrow of the elected government in Kiev and supported the un-elected government that took power through a bloody coup.

"The U.S. has its share of responsibility in starting a civil war in Ukraine," ousted Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych said at a press conference in Russia. "It intrudes and tells Ukraine what to do."
Video Link -

'I think,' said Sidonia, 'that there is no error so vulgar as to believe that revolutions are occasioned by economical causes.’
Coningsby by Benjamin Disraeli (1844)

This political cartoon suggests that the crisis in the Ukraine, which has been fomented by the Neo-Con Kagan family and their Zionist masters, will fail in the Ukraine. Americans should ask why is the United States government pursuing such a destructive and reckless foreign policy, which is clearly detrimental to our national interest?

Sen. John McCain, the leading supporter of the Zionist war agenda in the U.S. Congress, talks to Arseniy Yatsenyuk (left), the new provisional prime minister, who happens to be Jewish, and Oleh Tyahnybok (center) of the "neo-Nazi" Svoboda party, in the Ukraine in December 2013.  Isn't it odd that a Ukrainian Jew and a neo-Nazi should be working so closely together?

Oleh Tyahnybok says a "Moscow-Jewish mafia" rules Ukraine and that "Germans, Kikes and other scum" want to "take away our Ukrainian state." In 2005, Tyahnybok, a trained medical doctor, co-signed an open letter to President Yushchenko calling for a parliamentary investigation into the "criminal activities of organized Jewry in Ukraine."

  A battalion of Patriots of Ukraine paramilitaries tooled up in the midst of the protests.

The far-right mobs were the vanguard of a protest movement that deposed the elected government of Ukraine, but who was directing the mob?

THE ISRAELI PLATOON LEADER "DELTA" - One of the leaders of the Svoboda mob of anti-government protestors is "Delta", an Israeli veteran of the IDF's Givati infantry brigade, according to a report from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (  Delta, an Orthodox Jew in his late 30s, headed a force of 40 men and women, including several fellow IDF veterans, in violent clashes with government forces.  As platoon leader, Delta says he takes orders from activists connected to Svoboda:  “I don’t belong [to Svoboda], but I take orders from their team. They know I’m Israeli, Jewish and an ex-IDF soldier. Delta says he has frustrations related to being an outsider: “Sometimes I tell myself, ‘What are you doing? This is not your army. This isn’t even your country.’”

The crisis in the Ukraine is a very serious matter that pits the United States against Russia. While we don’t know how this crisis will end, we certainly know how it started and who has guided it to this dangerous point.  In order to grasp what is really going on in Kiev, we need to understand who is pulling the strings in the so-called EuroMaidan protests and who has been appointed to head the unelected provisional government of the Ukraine.

I happen to have been reading Douglas Reed’s excellent historical analysis of Zionism, The Controversy of Zion, during the time when the world witnessed a regime change in the Ukraine, a regime change which has been forced on the people of the Ukraine by violent protestors in Kiev, the capital.

The Controversy of Zion is an excellent historical analysis of Zionism.  This book explains the roots and diabolical and destructive goals of Zionism.  It is highly recommended reading.

In the chapter entitled “The Warnings of Disraeli”, I found a most apt quotation for the situation in the Ukraine in a speech Benjamin Disraeli, the first Jewish prime minister of Britain, gave in the House of Commons in 1852:

The influence of the Jews may be traced in the last outbreak of the destructive principle in Europe. An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion and property... the natural equality of men and the abrogation of property are proclaimed by the secret societies which form provisional governments, and men of the Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them.

After violent protestors seized government buildings, President Viktor Yanukovich fled the capital due to fear for his life and his family. This allowed the people guiding the protests in the street to push through appointments for a provisional government, which is headed by Arseniy Yatsenyuk.

While violent protests created a coup situation, Victoria Nuland of the U.S. State Department chose Arseniy Yatsenyuk (right) to be the prime minister of Ukraine.  

As Ben Judah wrote in his 2009 article for ISN Zurich, “Ukraine: The Rise of Yatsenyuk”:

Yatsenyuk has two major issues that will come to a head before the elections. Firstly he is Jewish, which according to political analyst Taras Kuzio, could pose a major problem… Yatsenyuk’s Judaism is not his only identity related political problem. Members of his family were prominent in the Ukrainian nationalist movement, which will doubtless cost him votes in the country’s Russian-speaking east.

What is most disturbing about the regime change that brought Yatsenyuk to power is that he seems to have been put in that position through the actions of Victoria Nuland, an official of the U.S. State Department who is married to Robert Kagan. The Kagan family, Lithuanian Jews of Khazar ancestry, seems to have a permanent fiefdom at the State Department. [Kagan and Kahn are Khazar names that derive from a title of imperial rank in the Mongolian and Turkic languages equal to the status of emperor and someone who rules a khaganate.]

Robert, Fred, and their father, Donald Kagan, were the founders of the Project for a New American Century, which aggressively pushed for war against Iraq during the Clinton and Bush administrations. Rather than being allowed to start new wars, the Kagans should be prosecuted for their roles in the conspiracy to wage a war of aggression against Iraq.  (See:  "Russia Under Attack")

Victoria Nuland Kagan of the U.S. State Department made a media event out of supporting the anti-government protests in Kiev. How would the U.S. government respond to a foreign diplomat taking such actions with protestors in front of the White House? Is this not improper meddling in the internal affairs of a sovereign nation?

To understand the illegal role that Victoria Nuland of the U.S. State Department played in setting up the provisional government in Kiev, just read this extract from her phone call with the U.S. Ambassador to the Ukraine. This phone call preceded the appointment of Yatsenyuk by about two weeks:

Nuland: Good. I don't think Klitsch [Vitali Klitschko] should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary, I don't think it's a good idea.

Pyatt: Yeah. I guess... in terms of him not going into the government, just let him stay out and do his political homework and stuff. I'm just thinking in terms of sort of the process moving ahead we want to keep the moderate democrats together. The problem is going to be Tyahnybok [Oleh Tyahnybok, Svoboda party] and his guys and I'm sure that's part of what [President Viktor] Yanukovych is calculating on all this.

Nuland: [Breaks in] I think Yats [Arseniy Yatsenyuk] is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. He's the... what he needs is Klitsch and Tyahnybok on the outside. He needs to be talking to them four times a week, you know. I just think Klitsch going in... he's going to be at that level working for Yatseniuk, it's just not going to work.

Pyatt: Yeah, no, I think that's right. OK. Good. Do you want us to set up a call with him as the next step?


The coup in Kiev also made Oleksandr Turchynov the acting President of Ukraine. On February 25, Turchynov assumed the duties of the supreme commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. While some American Baptists are reporting that Turchynov is a pastor or an elder at his church, the Word of Life Center in Kiev, they are missing the point. The Word of Life is a Zionist organization posing as a church. It was established by a Swedish Jew named Ulf Ekman, who created a church called “Livets Ord”, which established evangelical churches throughout the former Soviet Union in the early 1990s with the express purpose of finding and funding Jewish emigration to Israel.  

The Word of Life church in Kiev...

and its pastor, the former head of Ukrainian intelligence, Oleksandr Turchynov, who is now the acting president of Ukraine.  Pray tell, what kind of church is this?

As the Wikipedia article about “Livets Ord” says: In conjunction with Christian Zionists in the United States, Livets Ord operates a fund to supply money to Russian Jews who want to move to Israel. The fund, named "Operation Jabotinsky", is named after Russian Vladimir Jabotinsky. 

Vladimir "Ze'ev" Jabotinsky (1880–1940), was a radical (i.e. revisionist) Zionist leader who established a number of Jewish terrorist organizations such as Beitar, Hatzohar, and the Irgun. The Irgun is the terrorist group, headed by Menachem Begin, that bombed the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.  Begin founded the Likud party from the former members of these Zionist terrorist groups in the 1970s.  The fact that “Livets Ord” runs "Operation Jabotinsky" to find Jews in the former Soviet Union to send to Israel indicates that it is working closely with the Mossad, the branch of Israeli intelligence that was originally created to facilitate Jewish emigration to Palestine.

As I discovered in Estonia, a pastor from “Livets Ord” went on to work for U.S. military intelligence (See: “Note from Christopher Bollyn”, March 28, 2009).  This brings me to another aspect of the EuroMaidan protest that reeks of U.S. meddling in the internal politics of the Ukraine.

What I found in Estonia was that the so-called patriotic press was controlled by U.S. military intelligence asset Aleksander Einseln. Einseln was the retired U.S. Army officer from California who went to Estonia in the early 1990s to head the military of the newly-independent Estonia. What I discovered through this contact was that this “patriotic press” outfit controlled by General Einseln had several hundred skin-heads that it could mobilize for mob actions. This indicated that the "skin-head" movement in Estonia was actually a controlled mob that could be called upon by agents of U.S. military intelligence to create mob violence wherever and whenever needed.

Given what I have seen about how the U.S. military intelligence has cultivated hordes of agents in every country of the former Soviet Union through its programs at the Marshall Center in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, I would think that the skin-head situation in the Ukraine is not very different from what I found in Estonia.  Their bosses probably attended the same courses at the Marshall Center.


On February 20, snipers opened fire on the protestors and the police, killing many on both sides with shots to the head.  This is the same kind of false-flag terrorism tactic that has been used by the rebels fighting against the Syrian government.  An atrocity is committed with the intention that it will be blamed on the targeted party, in this case the Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovich.

According to a leaked report from an Estonian diplomat who was in Kiev shortly after the killings, it now appears likely that the snipers were working on behalf of the opposition - not the Yanukovich government. Video evidence taken during the shooting indicates that the protestors were being fired on from the rear, evidently from the multi-story hotel controlled by the Maidan protestors behind them.

"Maidan - Inconvenient truth: shooting in the back"
Video Link -

In an intercepted phone call between Estonian Foreign Affairs Minister Urmas Paet and EU Foreign Affairs chief Catherine Ashton, Paet, who had just been in the Ukraine, can be heard telling Ashton that it was not Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich who was behind the sniper killings of people in the Maidan, “but it was somebody from the new coalition.” This exchange can be heard from about 8:15 to 9:15 in the video that contains the entire phone call between Paet and Ashton.

Urmas Paet:  What was quite disturbing, this same Olga told as well that all the evidence shows that the people who were killed by snipers from both sides, among policemen and then people from the streets, that they were the same snipers killing people from both sides.

Ashton:  Well, yeah…that’s, that’s terrible.

Paet:  She then also showed me some photos she said that as a medical doctor she can say that it is the same handwriting, the same type of bullets, and it’s really disturbing that now the new coalition, that they don’t want to investigate what exactly happened. So there is now stronger and stronger understanding that behind the snipers, it was not Yanukovych, but it was somebody from the new coalition.

The whole telephone conversation can be heard here:

Sources and Recommended Reading:   

“Anonymous Ukraine Klitschko e-mails and Nuland/Pyatt dialogue prove US-backed coup” by John Robles,, February 25, 2014 

“In Kiev, an Israeli army vet led a street-fighting unit” by Cnaan Liphshiz, Jewish Telegraphic Agency, February 28, 2014

"Khagandefinition, Wikipedia, March 4, 2014

“Kiev snipers were Opposition hitmen” by Vladimir Radyuhin,, March 5, 2014 

“Kiev snipers shooting from building controlled by Maidan forces – Ex-Ukraine security chief,”, March 13, 2014

“Mercenaries took part in Maidan violence – Ex-Ukraine security chief,” interview with Aleksandr Yakimenko, the former head of Ukraine’s security service,, March 13, 2014 

"Livets Ord" (Word of Life), Wikipedia, March 3, 2014 

"Maidan - Inconvenient Truth: Shooting in the Back",

"Marshall Center – Creating Agents for the Empire",, by Christopher Bollyn, March 26, 2004 

"Neo-Nazis and far-right protesters in Ukraine",, Jim Clarke, January 23, 2014

“Note From Christopher Bollyn”,, March 28, 2009

"Russia Under Attack" by Christopher Bollyn, February 15, 2014

“Ukraine: The Rise of Yatsenyuk” by Ben Judah, ISN Security Watch, Zurich, August 5, 2009

“Ukraine crisis: Transcript of leaked Nuland-Pyatt call,” BBC News, February 7, 2014 

"Ukraine on brink of civil war after blood was spilt in east – Yanukovich",, April 13, 2014 

“Ukraine crisis: Transcript of leaked Nuland-Pyatt call” with analysis by Jonathan Marcus,, February 7, 2014

"Ze'ev Jabotinsky", Wikipedia, March 5, 2014  

Was MH370 a U.S./Israeli False Flag Operation?

April 30, 2014

A former Malaysia Airlines plane (9M-MRI), a near identical twin of the missing MH370, has been sitting in a hanger in Tel Aviv since last December.  Keith Maart, an American researcher and writer, examines the U.S. military and Israeli connections of the company that owns this plane and speculates on what might have happened to the missing MH370.
Photo by Lesyek Grzechynia, 

MH370: Evidence Suggests a Naval Intelligence/Israeli
False Flag Operation was Exposed Before Execution of an Attack 

By Keith Maart
April 25, 2014

On March 26, 2014, investigative journalist Christopher Bollyn broke what has probably been the most important story to date on the missing Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 (MH370). With the befuddled and clueless mainstream media (MSM) parroting what the government was telling them and some theorizing anything from black holes to alien abduction, Bollyn reported that there was a Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 identical to MH370, which had been stored in a hangar in Tel Aviv since November 2013.[1] For those knowledgeable of Israel’s long history of false-flag attacks, the implications of such a long shot “coincidence” were alarming and frightening.    

In October 2013 a Ft. Lauderdale, Florida-based company, GA Telesis (“GAT”), acquired a 15-year-old Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 (“GAT’s Malaysian 777”) from Kuwaiti-based ALAFCO Leasing (lessor to Malaysian Airlines). GAT’s Malaysian 777 was flown to the relatively small and seasonal Tarbes Lourdes Airport in France’s Pyrenees mountains around October 4, 2013.[2]  This movement of the plane coincidently occurred a week after President Obama announced that the U.S. would seek diplomatic solutions with Iran regarding its nuclear program. While the plane was at Tarbes Lourdes, the Malaysian Airlines name on the plane was apparently painted over, although the signatory red and blue stripes on the fuselage remained. 

The actual sale and transfer of the plane to GAT appears to have occurred on October 21, 2013, as a new registration number in GA Telesis’ name was obtained at this time.[3] Although GAT’s primary business is the scrapping and subsequent sales of plane parts, the fact that they re-registered this plane suggests that they did not intend to scrap it. Although GAT usually issues press releases when they acquire jumbo jets and state their intentions for the planes, no GAT press release was issued for this plane. In addition, no other information was found discussing this significant jet sale or GAT’s intended use of the plane.    

A scrapping of this plane would be questionable for a couple of reasons. Firstly, in August 2012, Malaysian Airlines stated it had no plans to retire or add any Boeing 777s to its fleet.[4] Secondly, Telesis was ostensibly planning on scrapping an expensive jet that still had some 10-plus years of expected average life remaining.[5] Indeed, two other Boeing jets that Telesis announced it was dismantling in July 2013 were about 22 and 27 years old.[6]Moreover, holding an expensive jumbo jet in storage for about 6 months and not doing anything with it does not make any economic sense. 

Around November 4, 2013, GAT’s Malaysian 777 was flown to Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv, Israel, and reportedly has been there ever since.[7] On April 2, 2014, this author contacted Rebecca Longo, the Vice President of Aircraft Systems Group at GA Telesis, and asked her if GAT had a Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 sitting in Israel. Ms. Longo confirmed that the jet was in Israel and awaiting disassembly. When I asked Ms. Longo why the plane was in Israel and why they would scrap such a young plane, she suggested that I talk to the CEO of GAT, Abdol Moabery. This author tried to call Abdol Moabery several times during the week of April 21, 2014, but he never replied. 

Clarifying Note:  A GAT press release of July 10, 2013, stated that another apparent Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 had begun to be disassembled by GAT in the USA.[8] The alleged serial number of this plane was MSN 24818, while the serial number of the plane purchased in October 2013 was MSN 24816. However, various public records do not show that plane 24818 was ever transferred from Malaysian Airlines to GAT.[9] Besides GAT’s press release, no other information was found that confirms GAT acquired this plane. Thus, the Malaysian Airlines 777 mentioned in GAT’s July 2013 press release (24818) does not appear to be the one acquired in October 2013 and discussed above (24816). Flight MH370’s serial number was MSN 24820. 

Evidence Suggests GA Telesis is an Apparent Front Company in an Attempted False Flag Operation  

Abdol Moabery is the founder and CEO of GA Telesis. He started the company in early 2002 at the age of 34 after apparently just 7 questionable years in the aviation business.[10] I say “questionable” because all that is known about Moabery before he founded GAT is contained in a few sentences of a brief autobiography that can be found in several places on the Internet.[11] There are many open questions about Moabery’s past and evidence suggests he may be associated with U.S. Naval Intelligence and that GAT is an intelligence front company. Coincidently, Moabery and the Israeli Vice Chairman of a GAT subsidiary that can retrofit planes, Aviv Tzur, were aviation executives in the immediate area where 3 of the 4 alleged 9/11 hijacker cells were located.   

According to Moabery’s Internet biography, before starting GAT, he served in the U.S. Navy and Navy Reserves, was Director of Marketing and Sales at C-S Aviation Services, and was then Executive Vice President of Aviation Systems International.  Moabery does not provide the dates for his Navy service and prior two jobs, and provides very little additional information about them. 

No information was found on Moabery’s naval career, for example, which units he served in and for how long he served. However, background checks show that Moabery lived in Jacksonville, FL, and Warrenton, VA. Jacksonville hosts a large and strategic U.S. Naval Air Station and an intelligence unit called the U.S. Navy Information Dominance Corps (NIDC). NIDC includes enlisted and civilian professionals who possess skills in information-intensive fields. It also receives extensive training in information, intelligence, counter-intelligence, networks, and space, and its mission is to deliver full-spectrum cyber information warfare and intelligence training to achieve decision superiority.[12] 

Moabery’s potential involvement in NIDC (including as a reservist) or other military intelligence units would be somewhat hypothetical if not for the fact he also apparently lived in Warrenton, VA. Warrenton houses the Warrenton Training Center (WTC) which is a large classified government communication complex that has served many roles, most notably as a CIA signals intelligence facility, numbers station, and communications laboratory. WTC also has a communications and signals intelligence training school for various federal agencies including the CIA, NSA, Department of Defense and Department of State.[13] Since Moabery does not disclose anything about his Navy career, a possible military intelligence background cannot be discounted.    

An April 25, 2014, GAT press release states that they hired Dale Karraker as new Director of Government and Defense Programs. Coincidently, Karraker began his career as Cryptologic Technician for the U.S. Navy and most recently Country Manager for a gas turbine company (Chromalloy, Inc.) in Saudi Arabia.[14] A Navy Cryptologic Technician performs a wide range of tasks in support of the national intelligence-gathering with an emphasis on cryptology and signal intelligence and generally maintains security clearance.[15] Given Moabery’s apparent station in Warrenton, he may have had a similar Navy intelligence background as Karraker.   

Moabery’s first listed job as Director of Marketing and Sales of C-S Aviation appears to be a huge leap of responsibility given his previous Navy experience and questionable college education.[16] C-S Aviation is a George Soros Company, and Moabery was allegedly responsible for the sales and marketing of a fleet of commercial aircraft. Moabery’s next job was EVP of Aviation Systems International (Boca Raton, Florida), where his responsibilities allegedly included oversight and management of all operations. ASI was a privately held company that was in involved in the jet scrapping and parts supply business. ASI went bankrupt in 2004. This author found no evidence confirming that Moabery worked for either of the aforementioned companies.   

Oddly, the only company besides GAT where Moabery’s name came up in an Internet search is one that he does not list on his on-line biography. Per a January 2008 New York Times article, Moabery invited ex-New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani to invest in and promote a closely-held start-up company (Skywatch LLC) that Moabery was a partner in along with Raytheon, a large U.S. military contractor. Moabery tried soliciting Giuliani to Skywatch more than two years earlier, and according to the Times, Moabery left the company in December 2006, but remained a shareholder in its parent company. Skywatch’s main product was the Eagle-300, an electronic monitoring device to detect illegal aliens at border fences.[17] The full extent of Moabery’s relationship with Raytheon is not known, as are many things in his alleged professional life. 

GAT is a privately held company and it is not known who all of its owners are, or who supplied the money to start the company in 2002. With apparently 7 years work experience, it is unlikely that Moabery had the equity funds or the experience to obtain bank financing for his new business. GAT’s primary business of jumbo jet scrapping and parts supply (“parts out business”) is a capital intensive business that would require relatively substantial start-up money and bank financing. Being privately held, GAT does not report its financial results and it is not known what units generate the most business. GAT reports about a half dozen different divisions and one of GAT’s groups is its Defense and Government Systems Division. 

There is little public information relating to GAT’s government and defense contracts, but GAT lists on its website a half-dozen military aircraft that it supports and states that its defense division provides security and surveillance products and consulting and partnering services. GAT allegedly provides plane maintenance services for defense and government customers. In April 2013, GAT entered into several agreements with Boeing Defense Services for inventory management on several planes Boeing provides to the military.[18] The full extent of GAT’s and Moabery’s military relationships is unknown.      

In 2011, GAT acquired assets and certain liabilities of Ultimate Aircraft Composites (UAC), a Florida based Israeli-run company that specializes in the repair of aircraft. Per a GAT press release in January 2011, UAC is capable of supporting the repair and manufacture of a plane’s structural and composite components including flight control services and nacelle systems (parts separate from fuselage, including engines, fuel system, etc.). UAC had several contracts for the repair of structural military components for various government and military agencies. Per GAT, “The addition of military component capability to our existing range of commercial and regional aircraft will allow us to complete the circle of complex composite and structural repair services.”[19] Given UAC’s Israeli management, it is very likely that UAC had contracts with the Israeli government.           

UAC became a GAT subsidiary named GA Telesis Composite Repair Group and several of UAC’s Israeli executives became officers and board members of GAT’s new subsidiary. UAC’s Chief Executive Officer, Aviv Tzur, was made Executive Chairman and is one of three board members of GAT’s Composite Group. Tzur is Chairman of the Florida Region Israeli-American Chamber of Commerce and Christopher Bollyn confirmed that Tzur and other officers and board members of GAT’s Composite Group are Israeli citizens.[20] When Bollyn spoke to Tzur and told him that people who answered the phone at GAT’s Composite Group did not know who he was, Tzur told Bollyn that “only the guys at the top” would know about his position with the company.[21] 

Finally, there appears to be a relatively significant disconnect between GAT’s alleged operations and what some public records show. GAT’s press releases over the last several years suggest that they have scrapped about two dozen planes.[22] However, fleet history shows that GAT has only scrapped one plane and has sold the overwhelming majority of planes that it has acquired.[23] This discrepancy could indicate a front company whose operations are not what they state. Coincidently, GAT usually provides a quarterly summary of its acquisitions and operations within two to three months after each quarter, but a summary for the fourth quarter of 2013 has not been provided nearly 4 months later. 

Both GAT and Abdol Moabery have a number of appearances and characteristics of fronts for U.S. intelligence, and Aviv Tzur’s addition to the company in 2011 provides a clear connection to the Israeli government and military. Without these individuals and institutions providing evidence and answers to the many critical questions about them, their possible involvement in what appears to be an exposed false flag operation cannot be ignored. 

MH370 Apparently Flown to Diego Garcia: Navy Intelligence’s Part in the Exposed False Flag Operation 

Despite weak, questionable, and conflicting evidence, the general consensus in the mainstream media is that MH370 appears to have followed a primarily southerly route and crashed somewhere in the southern Indian Ocean (over 1,000 km SW of Perth, Australia) after running out of fuel. This theory is primarily based on alleged satellite data from a British satellite telecommunications company named Inmarsat. There are significant questions about the reliability of Inmarsat’s findings, not the least of which is that no other satellite data has confirmed them and that the company has extensive military contracts. No evidence from any source has been found to confirm Inmarsat’s findings.     

The investigation into MH370’s disappearance has been filled with incompetence, cover-ups, and disinformation. The scope of this paper is not to rebut the questionable and conflicting evidence, but to show that the evidence suggests that the plane may have been flown to a strategic U.S. naval and satellite communication facility in the central Indian Ocean. On a small island named Diego Garcia, 450 miles from the Maldives, there is a U.S. naval base with a runway that can accommodate jumbo jets. There is nothing else on Diego Garcia except for the U.S. Navy base and its satellite communications facility. 

Around sunrise, at 6:15 a.m. on March 8, 2014, (9:15 a.m. Malaysia time), several residents on the Maldives island of Huvadhoo reported seeing a very low-flying jumbo jet. The residents provided good detail and described the aircraft as white with red stripes, which is very similar to the colors of MH370. According to some residents, the plane was flying so low they could see the doors on the plane. The residents stated that they sometimes see small seaplanes around the island, but this was the first time they ever saw a jumbo jet. People were coming out of their houses to see what was causing the tremendous noise. The eyewitnesses say that the airplane was traveling in a south-easterly direction toward Addu, the last and most southern island in the Maldives.[24] 

There are several important facts and observations that need to be made at this point: 

1.  Huvadhoo residents would have been the first (the sighting happened around sunrise) and last to see the plane before it reached Diego Garcia, which is south of Huvadhoo. Although there was one more Maldives island (Addu Island, about 50 miles straight south of Huvadhoo) before Diego Garcia, the plane was reportedly traveling in a south-easterly direction, apparently in order to avoid Addu Island.  

2.  If the plane was flying so low that some people could see the plane’s doors and it was very loud, then it was probably flying no more than 500 feet above sea level. At this flying height, the plane was flying low enough to avoid conventional radar. 

3.  The time the plane was spotted was about 8.5 hours from take-off and it had flown roughly 2,200 miles, averaging approximately 250 miles per hour. (From Kuala Lumpur to the original destination of Beijing was 2,700 miles.) Although the plane had more drag at the lower altitude and would have gotten worse fuel mileage, the much slower than normal speed would have compensated for the greater air resistance.[25] 

4.  From the point where the plane was spotted, there was another 500 miles to Diego Garcia, or approximately two hours at its then current speed.  

The day after the sightings were reported in the Maldives media, the acting Malaysian transport minister stated that the Maldives reports were “not true,” based on a conversation between the heads of Malaysia’s and Maldives’ Defense Forces. Maldives National Defence Force stated there was no trace that MH370 had been picked up on their radar.[26] Of course not, the plane was apparently flying at around 500 feet and all other tracking devices have been intentionally turned off. The finding of the sightings being “not true” implies that the residents deliberately lied and no evidence or support was provided for this fact. Indeed, if the residents who spotted the plane were found to be intentionally lying in one of the most high profile international investigations in years, then it would likely be a crime and there’s no evidence they were charged with one. What would be the eyewitnesses’ motivation to tell such an alleged blatant lie?  

As reported in the mainstream media, the head pilot of MH370, Capt. Zaharie Ahmed Shah, had a “sophisticated” self-built flight simulator in his house. Despite the FBI saying that they found nothing unusual on the simulator, several media organizations reported that Shah had Diego Garcia programmed into his simulator which suggests that he practiced flights to that remote island.[27] As a glance at Google Maps reveals, the closest easily-sighted amount of land to a direct path between the last-known location of MH370 and Diego Garcia is the Maldives, so it would make sense (especially if fuel was tight and navigation was uncertain) to aim for the Maldives en route to Diego Garcia. 

A major Malaysian news organization reported that investigators found that Diego Garcia, and its runway, was among the top-five locations programmed in Shah’s simulator, along with Male, Maldives.[28] The only thing on Diego Garcia is the U.S. Navy and commercial flights do not go to Diego Garcia. Given that Shah appears to have flown the plane at about 500 feet above sea level, practicing on a simulator would have been very helpful. 

Diego Garcia is owned by the British government and is leased to the U.S. government. U.S. navy operations on the island include a large ship and submarine base, an air base, a communications and “space tracking” facility, and a logistics anchorage for regional operations, including for the Middle East. Diego Garcia was used as the launching pad for U.S. bombers in both the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, and as a logistics supply hub. 

Diego Garcia also happens to be the place where the U.S. has several hundred “bunker-buster” bombs stored in event of a possible attack on Iran. The Scotland Herald reported in 2010 that a Florida-based shipping company (Superior Maritime Services) entered into a contract with the U.S. government to ship 387 “Blu” bombs used for blasting hardened or underground structures.[29] Thus, Diego Garcia might well be a logical staging area for a false-flag operation against Iran. Coincidentally, Superior Maritime Services does lots of military work and is located in the same Florida County (Broward) as GA Telesis.   

With the bunker buster bombs stored at Diego Garcia, it’s probable that there is an Israeli presence there that is involved in the planning and preparation of a possible attack on Iran. It’s likely that there has been military coordination between the U.S. and Israel and it would make sense that Diego Garcia would be used given its state of the art satellite systems (to identify Iran’s potential nuclear sites) and its probable use as a launch pad for possible bombing strikes against Iran. 

Another significant unanswered question is why didn’t Diego Garcia’s sophisticated satellite systems pick up any data on MH370 given it allegedly flew within about one thousand miles of the base and allegedly crashed about 2,000 miles from Diego Garcia. There’s speculation that U.S. military and intelligence did have the means to monitor MH370’s flight. Diego Garcia’s military satellite systems would almost certainly have had the capability to pick up the same “pings” that Inmarsat’s satellite allegedly picked up.   

The Feeble Framing of Iran and the Exposed “Plan A” of the Attempted False Flag Operation 

For about the last decade, Israel and U.S. neocon hawks have been trying to convince the world that Iran is six months away from producing a nuclear bomb, and the dire consequences if they’re not stopped. Israel’s cited source for this evidence is their vaunted intelligence services, which have been proven wrong time and time again. Realizing that President Obama and the rest of the world is sick and tired of their “crying wolf,” Israel and certain neocon related elements within the U.S. military and intelligence apparatus are clearly getting desperate for action which now appears to be in the form of a joint false-flag operation to implicate Iran. 

The Iranian connection to MH370 was established quickly when two Iranian men were found to have boarded the flight using stolen passports. Although many American media organizations floated the theory that the Iranian men could have been party to a terrorism plot, most mainstream media organizations have not promoted it as likely theory. Fox News and its owner Rupert Murdoch, however, have been aggressively promoting this theory along with Israeli media outlets. These false-flag actors are clearly trying to set the stage that Iran is most likely behind MH370’s disappearance and that the Iranians are planning to use the plane in some sort of terrorism attack. 

One of the first signs that the fix was in on Iran, is when the Daily Mail (UK) noticed the obviously photo-shopped picture of the two Iranian passengers on Flight MH370. On March 24, 2014, the Daily Mail pointed out that both Iranian men had the exact same green pants, brown shoes, and leg positions in their photos.[30] In a very strange excuse, the Malaysian police said the image of one man had been accidently placed on top of the other when they were photocopied. The pilot’s apparent complicity in the diversion of the plane to Diego Garcia and the flagrant errors and cover-ups attempted by the Malaysian government may indicate that certain individuals in Malaysia may have been recruited into the likely U.S./Israeli covert operation.   

There are several different ways that a false-flag attack involving two identical Malaysian Airlines 777’s could have been undertaken, but now that the plan has been exposed we will probably never know what was actually being planned. However, one possible scenario is that GAT’s Malaysian 777 in Tel Aviv was undergoing retrofitting for the operation that probably included such things as automated flight systems, Iranian/Russian parts, explosives, etc. The Malaysian Airlines name would be painted back on the plane and it would then be used in another 9/11-type attack. MH370 would be disassembled at Diego Garcia and identifying parts would be placed at the crash site of the substitute plane suggesting that it was MH370 that the Iranians had retrofitted for the operation. 

Naval intelligence’s fingerprints are all over MH370’s disappearance, from its likely flight path to Diego Garcia to Abdol Moabery’s possible involvement in the Navy Intelligence. The fact that GAT had an identical Malaysian Airlines 777 sitting in a hangar in Tel Aviv is another long-shot coincidence that is too hard to ignore. U.S. and Israeli intelligence do not think inside the box and they were apparently up to some of their old tricks in the case of MH370. With hundreds of one-ton bunker buster bombs sitting in Diego Garcia waiting to be used, the temptation to use them and attack the second most significant oil-rich country in the world was apparently too much for the U.S. military and Israel to resist. Now that Plan A has been foiled, we’ll now have to wait to see what Plan B has in store.    

References and Endnotes

 [1] Christopher Bollyn, “Are the Israelis Planning Another 9-11 Using the Missing Boeing 777?”, March 18, 2014, updated through March 30, 2014 

[2] N105GT GA Telesis Boeing 777-2H6(ER) MSN 24816,,N105GT-GA-Telesis-php is an aviation internet site that tracks jet ownership and movement. The plane sale was probably under contract between GAT and ALAFCO when the plane was flown to France around October 4, 2013.

 [3] Ibid.

 [4] Malaysia Airlines’ Boeing 777, Sunn Aero,, August 2012

 [5] Helen Jiang, “Key Findings on Airplane Economic Life,” Boeing, March, 2013

The subject paper concluded that the average useful life of a Boeing jet is 27 years. 

[6] A July 2013 GAT press release noted that a Boeing 757 and Boeing 767 were being scrapped at that time and the ages of these planes were approximately 22 and 27 years (see Endnote 8 for Press Release). The evidence of age at scrapping is as follows:

Boeing 757 MSN:,N542UA-United-Airlines.php

Boeing 767 MSN:,N325AA-American-Airlines.php

 [7] N105GT GA Telesis Boeing 777-2H6(ER) MSN 24816,, Ibid.

 [9] Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777-2H6(ER) MSN 24818,,9M-MRK-Malaysia_Airlines.php

[10] Moabery does not include a college education on most of his internet biographies, however, a 2011 article in a local Florida newspaper stated that Moabery graduated from Florida Atlantic University in 1994 (degree and major were not stated). Moabery turned 27 that year and he started GAT when he was 34, suggesting that he worked about seven years before founding the company.        

 [11] Biography of Abdol Moabery, Florida Atlantic University Fall 2011 Executive Forum Lecture Series

Other biographies of Abdol Moabery can be found on various websites. However, they are all similar to this biography except for minor variations. 

 [12] US Navy Information Dominance Corps,

Although NIDC was formerly started in 2009, the predecessor operations and functions were most likely in existence before that time.  

[13] Warrenton Training Center, 

 [14] GA Telesis Press Release, GA Telesis Announces Dale Karraker as Director of Government and Defense Programs, April 25, 2014

 [15] Cryptologic Technician,

 [16] See Endnote 10

 [17] Russ Buettner, “Giuliani Had Ties to Company Trying to Sell Border Technology,” The New York Times, January 18, 2008

 [18] GA Telesis Awarded Several Boeing Defense Service Agreements, GA Telesis Press Release, April 17, 2013
http://www.gatelesis .com/ga-telesis-awarded-boeing-defense-services-agreements/  

 [19] GA Telesis Acquires Additional Composite MRO Facility and Re-brands it as GA Telesis Composite Repair Group, GA Telesis Press Release, January 29, 2013

 [20] Israeli-American Chamber of Commerce – Florida Region. Officers

 [21] Chris Bollyn, “Why is a Twin of the Missing MH370 in a Hangar in Israel?”, April 18, 2014 

[22] GA Telesis Press Releases, GA Teleisis Website

 [23] GA Telesis Fleet Details and History, 

[24] Farah Ahmed and Ahmed Naif, “Maldives Island Residents Report Sighting of Low Flying Jet,” Haveeru Daily, March 18, 2014

 [25] Kuala Lumpur to Diego Garcia is approximately 2,000 miles, but additional mileage was assumed.

[26] “Missing MH370: Maldives Probe Reports of Possible MH370 Sightings,”, March 19, 2014

 [27] “Flight MH370 Facts,” CNN News, March 20, 2014 

 [28] “MH370: Diego Garcia Runway Found in Captain Zaharie’s Flight Simulator,’ Astro Awani , March 18, 2014

 [29] Rob Edwards, “Final Destination Iran?”, The Scotland Herald, March 15, 2010

 [30] Ian Drury and Candace Sutton, ‘Why did Somebody Doctor Photo of Men Who Took Flight MH370” The Daily Mail (UK), March 23, 2014 

Was MH370 Hijacked thru Remote Access to its Computer System?

April 24, 2014 

John Byers:  You said they intend to bring this down in the middle of New York City?
Bert Byers:  (Nods "yes")
John Byers:  What if there is no bomb?
Bert Byers:  Well how are they going to bring it down?
John Byers:  The same way a dead man can drive a car.
- Dialogue between passengers on a plane that has been remotely hijacked and is being flown into the World Trade Center, "The Lone Gunmen" (pilot episode), Fox TV, March 4, 2001

Was the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 hijacked by remote access to its vulnerable computer systems?  The evidence suggests this is the most probable explanation, although it is not discussed in the mainstream media.

The unexplained disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 raises a question that is seldom discussed in the mainstream media: Was MH370 hijacked by criminals who hacked into the plane’s computerized flight system and took over complete control of the plane, leaving the pilots incommunicado and unable to do anything?

Such a scenario would explain how the plane was abruptly diverted from its flight path to Beijing and why there were no further communications from the cockpit, apart from an attempted mobile phone call from the co-pilot as the plane flew over Penang.  This makes no sense unless we consider that the normal communication channels between the plane and the ground had been disabled and the plane was being flown by unknown pilots who had gained access to the plane's computer system from a remote location, either on the ground or from another plane.  This would explain why the co-pilot made a “desperate” attempt to communicate with the ground using his mobile phone. The attempted call was not completed because the plane soon flew out of range of the Penang transmitting station, but it is an important clue to what happened to the plane. The pilots were not the criminals; they were the victims of a computer hijacking that took over control of their plane.

There is a fundamental problem with modern cars and planes: their computerized systems can be hacked into by a remote “super-user” who can take complete control of the vehicle or aircraft leaving the driver or pilot utterly helpless. In this way a modern car or plane can be remotely hijacked and destroyed. 

The ability to hijack cars and planes and turn them them into remotely-controlled drones by removing the control from the driver or pilot was the subject of the pilot episode of “The Lone Gunmen”, which aired on Rupert Murdoch’s FOX Network on March 4, 2001. This 44-minute program is well worth watching because it shows a great deal of prescience in how this technology could be used in an attack on the World Trade Center using passenger aircraft, which is what happens during the climax in the final minutes of the show.

Video Link -

CNN has also done a short report on the capability of ground-based pilots to take over control of an aircraft so that the pilots are completely prevented from doing anything to regain control the plane. In the CNN piece this technology is presented solely as a tool to prevent a hijacker from taking control of the plane from the cockpit. The idea that this technology could be used to hijack a plane by a remote pilot is not even mentioned in the CNN piece. Why would they ignore this obvious danger?

Video Link -


The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recently addressed the computer vulnerability of the Boeing 777 aircraft to external threats that could hijack a plane like the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 using remote access to its computer flight system. In a ruling published in the Federal Register on November 18, 2013, the FAA put into effect “special conditions” to address the vulnerability of the computer systems on various Boeing 777 aircraft, including the type that was Malaysia Airlines MH370.

The following excerpts are from the FAA ruling, entitled “Special Conditions: Boeing Model 777-200, -300, and -300ER Series Airplanes; Aircraft Electronic System Security Protection From Unauthorized External Access”:

These special conditions are issued for the Boeing Model 777-200, -300, and-300ER series airplanes. These airplanes, as modified by The Boeing Company, will have novel or unusual design features associated with the architecture and connectivity capabilities of the airplane's onboard network computer systems, which may allow access to or by external computer systems and networks…

Connectivity to, or access by, external systems and networks may result in security vulnerabilities to the airplane's onboard network system. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature.

The Model 777-200, -300, and -300ER series airplanes have fly-by-wire controls, software-configurable avionics, and fiber-optic avionics networks.

The proposed architecture is novel or unusual for commercial transport airplanes by enabling connection to previously isolated data networks connected to systems that perform functions required for the safe operation of the airplane. This proposed data network and design integration may result in security vulnerabilities from intentional or unintentional corruption of data and systems critical to the safety and maintenance of the airplane.

The architecture and network configuration in the Boeing Model 777-200, -300, and-300ER series airplanes may enable increased connectivity to, or access by, external airplane sources, airline operations, and maintenance systems to the aircraft control functions and airline information services. The aircraft control functions and airline information services perform functions required for the safe operation and maintenance of the airplane. Previously these domains had very limited connectivity with external sources. The architecture and network configuration may allow the exploitation of network security vulnerabilities resulting in intentional or unintentional destruction, disruption, degradation, or exploitation of data, systems, and networks critical to the safety and maintenance of the airplane.

The existing regulations and guidance material did not anticipate these types of airplane system architectures. Furthermore, 14 CFR regulations and current system safety assessment policy and techniques do not address potential security vulnerabilities, which could be exploited by unauthorized access to airplane systems, data buses, and servers. Therefore, these special conditions are issued to ensure that the security (i.e., confidentiality, integrity, and availability) of airplane systems is not compromised by unauthorized wired or wireless electronic connections.

Because the vulnerability of the Boeing 777 computer system goes right to the question of what happened to MH370, I contacted the author of the ruling, Jeffrey E. Duven of the FAA’s Aircraft Certification Service in Renton, Washington, and asked him the following questions:

The document uses the verb will, suggesting that this is a problem for the future. Is this vulnerability not a problem for all Boeing 777s of the 200 and 300 ER categories?

Could this vulnerability have been a factor in the hijacking of the missing Malaysia Airlines MH370, which the New York Times described as a computer hijacking in which the codes had been changed?

What is the legal status of the FAA rule regarding these problems on the Boeing 777 aircraft?

Duven told me to contact Allen Kenitzer, a public affairs specialist with the FAA. Kenitzer responded to my questions with a written statement:

We apply special conditions when the existing standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for new or novel design features. With the evolution of network technology, the FAA has been issuing special conditions to establish the appropriate standards to protect aircraft systems and networks from intentional, or unintentional, unauthorized access. The more recent special conditions issued for the 777 are not unique in this regard. We have not issued these special conditions as the result of any known vulnerabilities but rather to address new, recently-certified design features.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"Special Conditions: Boeing Model 777-200, -300, and -300ER Series Airplanes; Aircraft Electronic System Security Protection From Unauthorized External Access", Federal Aviation Administration, November 18, 2013  

Why is a Twin of the Missing MH370 in a Hangar in Israel?

April 18, 2014

In a previous article entitled "Are the Israelis Planning Another 9-11 Using the Missing Boeing 777?"I presented the evidence that an identical twin of the missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 has been in storage in a hangar at Tel Aviv's airport since November 2013.  The article is very important because it explains that it is possible for Israel to use the plane as a doppelganger of the missing MH370 in a false-flag terror operation.  The aircraft stored in Israel is a former Malaysia Airlines plane and is the only aircraft owned by Florida-based GA Telesis.  Why is GA Telesis keeping the only plane in its fleet in a hangar in Israel?  What is the Fort Lauderdale company's connection to Israel?

Why has this plane, a former Malaysia Airlines plane exactly like the missing MH370, been kept in Israel by GA Telesis, a supposedly Florida-based company? This photo is from an Israeli planespotter forum that identifies the plane as GA Telesis N105GT at Tel Aviv airport on December 2, 2013.

GA Telesis only has one plane in its fleet, a Boeing 777 with a registration number N105GT. Why did GA Telesis give the plane a new registration number if it was scheduled for dismantling? 

HIDING THE NEW REGISTRATION - Why was the plane that "entered the GA Telesis disassembly line in the USA" in July 2013 then sent to Israel in November? This photo of the GA Telesis plane leaving France for Israel on November 4, 2013, shows the new GA Telesis registration, N105GT, which is painted in black on the red band behind the rear door. 

The new GA Telesis registration is very hard to read, unlike the usual white letters on red that it had when it was a Malaysia Airlines plane. Why are they trying to hide the registration of this plane? Source: Flickr, F-GOTPA, November 4, 2013, Aéroport Tarbes-Lourdes-Pyrénées, GA Telesis: Boeing 777-2H6(ER): N105GT: MSN 28416/155.

In trying to get answers to these questions I contacted Rebecca Longo, vice president of marketing of the GA Telesis company in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.  I sent her the following email: 

Rebecca C. Longo
GA Telesis, LLC
1850 NW 49th Street
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309

Dear Ms Longo,

I am a journalist who would like to ask a couple questions about a plane that belongs to your company, or did so until quite recently: N105GT GA Telesis Boeing 777.

This is a former Malaysia Airlines plane that was reported to have been scheduled for dismantling in Fort Lauderdale, as per the GA Telesis press release of July 10, 2013, which bears your name at the bottom.

Your press release has the MSN of this plane as 28418? Is that the correct MSN?


My questions are about the status of this plane today. Is this the same plane that is described in the following webpage of This plane has the MSN 28416. Are these two different planes or is one of the MSN numbers incorrect? The Operator History has this plane listed as operated by GA Telesis but stored in Tel Aviv since November 4, 2013.


Why was the GA Telesis plane scheduled for dismantling in the United States given a new registration number (N105GT) and then flown to Tel Aviv?  What is the status of this plane today?

With many thanks for your prompt consideration of my questions.

Christopher Bollyn

After a week of sending emails and making numerous phone calls to GA Telesis, I still have not received a response about why the company's only plane is being kept, or dismantled, in Tel Aviv. 


In January 2011, GA Telesis acquired an Israeli-run company called Ultimate Aircraft Composites, LLC.  Aviv Tzur, an Israeli, was the executive chairman of Ultimate Aircraft Composites and remained in that position in the company that was re-named GA Telesis Composite Repair Group, LLC, a subsidiary of GA Telesis.

Aviv Tzur is also the vice chairman and treasurer of the Israel-American Chamber of Commerce, Florida Region.  He has worked with Israeli aircraft companies in south Florida since the 1990s. One of his companies specialized in converting passenger planes into cargo planes, like the planes that were used on 9-11 are thought to have been.

Aviv Tzur, Yoel Saraf, and Michael Navon, are the only directors of GA Telesis Composite Repair Group, LLC, according to company information from Businessweek.  Tzur and Saraf are certainly Israeli; Navon probably is also.

I called Aviv Tzur to ask about the plane being kept in Israel.  When I told him that GA Telesis had a plane identical to the missing Malaysia Airlines plane in a hangar in Tel Aviv, he laughed and told me that I should ask GA Telesis.  I told him that the people who answered the phone at GA Telesis Composite Repair Group, LLC, did not recognize his name when I called although he is listed as executive chairman of the company.  He told me that only the guys at the top would know about his position with the company, which I find odd.  Tzur has several companies that are all registered at the same address as GA Telesis Composite Repair Group at 3420 NW 53rd St. in Fort Lauderdale.

Aviv Tzur is listed as Executive Chairman and member of the board of GA Telesis Composite Repair Group, LLC, but the telephone receptionist said he had never heard of Tzur or his Israeli buddies, Saraf and Navon.  What kind of company is this?  Source:

As I have pointed out in the Solving 9-11 books, in false-front business operations it is often the unseen Israeli component of what appears to be an American company that is actually controlling the company.  This appears to be the case with Aviv Tzur at GA Telesis and would explain why the only plane in their fleet, a twin of the missing MH370, is in a hangar in Tel Aviv - and why no one at the company wants to talk about it.

If GA Telesis has a valid business reason for sending the only plane in its fleet to Israel, why is it so reluctant to provide an explanation?  Why did Aviv Tzur laugh when I told him that a plane identical to the missing Malaysia Airlines MH370 is in a hangar in Tel Aviv?  Is there a diabolic plan to use the plane as a doppelganger of the missing Malaysia Airlines plane in a false-flag terror operation?  If there were such a plan, the exposure of the GA Telesis' twin plane in a hangar in Tel Aviv may have prevented it from being carried out. 

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Aviv Tzur, Israel American Chamber of Commerce,, April 17, 2014

Aviv Tzur, profile,, April 17, 2014

Board Members of GA Telesis Composite Repair Group, LLC,, April 17, 2014  

Company Overview of GA Telesis Composite Repair Group, LLC,, April 18, 2014

GA Telesis current fleet information

"The Planes of 9-11" by Christopher Bollyn, from Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World 

Are the Israelis Planning Another 9-11 Using the Missing Boeing 777?

Updated March 31, 2014

THE ISRAELI TWIN - Why would Israel have a plane identical to the missing Malaysia Airlines plane in storage in Tel Aviv?  The plane in this photo is Boeing 777 2H6(ER) first flown in July 1998, Construction No. 28416* (Original Reg. No. 9M-MRI), an identical twin of the missing plane, which was given a new registration number (N105GT) and flown to Israel in November 2013.

EN ROUTE TO ISRAEL, NOVEMBER 4, 2013 - The former Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777-2H6(ER) (now a GA Telesis plane with new registration as N105GT) departs the Aéroport Tarbes-Lourdes-Pyrénées en route to Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion Airport, November 4, 2013.

DECEMBER 2013 - What are the Israelis doing with this retired Malaysia Airlines plane in a hanger in Tel Aviv?  Could it be part of a false-flag terror plot in the making?  Where is this plane today?  Note - The link to this photo is still active on an Israeli forum dated December 2, 2013.  The original posting is at the top (with JPG tag) at: 

THE MISSING PLANE - A photo by Bernhard Ebner of the missing Malaysia Airlines plane in Amsterdam, May 5, 2013.  This plane, a Boeing 777-2H6(ER) with Construction No. 28420, Reg. No. 9M-MRO, was first flown on May 14, 2002, and delivered to Malaysia Airlines on May 31, 2002.  It is thought to have crashed into the southern Indian Ocean on March 8, 2014.

Source for Israeli Twin Plane Data:,N105GT-GA-Telesis-php

Source for Missing Plane Data:,9M-MRO-Malaysia-Airlines.php

See more at:

Update - According to reports from plane-spotters, Israel has an identical Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777-200 in storage in Tel Aviv since November 2013.  The only visible difference between the missing plane and the one in Tel Aviv would be its serial number.  What do the Israelis have planned with the twin Malaysia Airlines plane?

By using the twin aircraft they have in storage, the terror masterminds may have a sinister plan for the missing plane to seemingly reappear in a false-flag atrocity.  Public awareness of the twin plane in Tel Aviv, therefore, could prevent the evil plot from going ahead.  

For more on the identical Malaysia plane in Tel Aviv see the latest entry, dated March 26, 2014, on my Q&A and Comment page.

Notes:  The Malaysia Air 777 with Boeing serial number 28416 and registered as 9M-MRI was sold to GA Telesis, LLC of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on October 21, 2013, and is now registered as N105GT. The aircraft was stored at Tarbes Lourdes Pyrenees on October 4, 2013, and then on November 4, 2013, it was re-registered as N105GT and stored at Tel Aviv.  

*MSN 28416 OR 28418? - According to a press release from GA Telesis dated July 10, 2013, the Fort Lauderdale-based company announced that it had started the dismantling process "in the USA" for three Boeing aircraft, including one 777-200ER (TRENT 800) (MSN 28418) ex-Malaysia Airlines, the plane that was given a new registration number and flown to Tel Aviv. 


Abdol Moabery serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of GA Telesis, LLC. Previously, Mr. Moabery served as Executive Vice President of Aviation Systems International, Inc., and as Director of Marketing and Sales at C-S Aviation Services, Inc. Both of Moabery's former companies were owned by George Soros. Therefore it is not unlikely that Soros owns a good part of GA Telesis, too.

C-S Aviation Services:

Aviation Systems International, Inc. 

This information is very important because it fits neatly into the terror scenario presented by Israeli El Al "security expert" Issac Yeffet shortly after the Malaysian plane went missing.  Yeffet suggested the missing plane had been hijacked to Iran and was being prepared for a terror attack.  For the Israelis to have an identical plane in a hanger in Tel Aviv reveals why Yeffet presented such a scenario.  He appears to have been setting the stage for a false-flag attack like 9-11, perhaps in Israel. If such an attack were to occur in Israel all the evidence would be in the hands of Israeli intelligence giving them complete control of the interpretation or narrative of the terror event.


"What happened to this aircraft, nobody knows. My guess is based upon the stolen passports, and I believe Iran was involved. They hijacked the aircraft and they landed it in a place that nobody can see or find it.”
- Issac Yeffet, former El Al security expert to Times of Israel, March 17, 2014

World seems transfixed by 777 disappearance. Maybe no crash but stolen, effectively hidden, perhaps in Northern Pakistan, like Bin Laden
- Rupert Murdoch on Twitter, March 15, 2014

It is not Iranians, but Israeli agents and Zionist propagandists like Rupert Murdoch who are the real authors of false-flag terror plots involving airliners being flown into hi-rise towers.  Arnon Milchan, for example, the Israeli Mossad operative-cum-film producer, made the Medusa Touch film in 1978, in which a 9-11 type attack is the climax of the film. Is there a nefarious plot in the works to use the missing Malaysian plane for such an attack?

The making of Milchan's Medusa Touch involved constructing models to simulate an aircraft striking a skyscraper.

With no trace of Beijing-bound flight MH370 after nine days, one of several theories that has emerged is that the plane was hijacked to Iran, where it could be turned into a massive and devastating weapon. Two Iranian passengers are known to have been aboard, travelling on false passports. While Israeli officials did not confirm any suspicions regarding Iran, experts said it is not a stretch to point the finger at Israel's Middle East nemesis.

“My guess is based upon the stolen passports, and I believe Iran was involved [in the disappearance of the plane],” Issac Yeffet, formerly a global security expert for Israel’s national airline El Al told today’s Times of Israel. “They hijacked the aircraft and they landed it in a place that nobody can see or find it.” 
- "Missing jet, Iranian threats, prompt Israel to tighten air security" by Paul Alster, March 17, 2014

The disappearance of the Malaysian Boeing 777 looks like something from a Batman movie plot - or a bad Israeli screenplay by Arnon Milchan and his business partner Rupert Murdoch. The missing plane is bound to turn up sooner or later. The hijackers - or Israeli computer hackers - didn't pull a fast turn to the west and make professional moves with the plane in order to simply drop it in the Indian Ocean.  Or maybe they did. In any case, all of the events going on with the missing Boeing and the Ukrainian crisis look like the making of a perfect storm - or perhaps another false-flag terror spectacle like 9-11.

An Israel-based reporter named Paul Alster has an article on Murdoch's giving an Israeli prognosis about the missing Malaysian Boeing 777. The article is important because it suggests that the Israelis may be setting the stage for a false-flag event using the missing plane as a flying bomb. 

The article indicates that the Israelis may be projecting a planned terror scenario and are planting the idea in the public mind. The following article has comments from an Israeli El Al "security expert" that are very similar to comments tweeted by Rupert Murdoch the day before. Isn't it interesting that Rupert Murdoch and an Israeli airline security expert imagine the exact same fate for the missing Boeing?  


Obama should call Chinese President following today's incident and say "we both have the problem of Muslim terrorism. Can we work together?"
3:50 AM - 2 Mar 2014

777 crash confirms jihadists turning to make trouble for China. Chance for US to make common cause, befriend China while Russia bullies.
4:15 PM - 9 Mar 2014

World seems transfixed by 777 disappearance. Maybe no crash but stolen, effectively hidden, perhaps in Northern Pakistan, like Bin Laden. 
2:23 AM - 15 Mar 2014

777. Still think this a reminder that US and China should be working more closely on Muslim extremist threat.
2:26 AM - 15 Mar 2014

The Israeli comments in the article imagine a terror scenario like that described by Murdoch.  It is important to note that the Israeli El Al "security expert" comes from the exact same groups (ICTS, El Al security, Menachem Atzmon, the Shin Bet and assorted Mossadniks), who projected the ideation of 9-11 (Murdoch’s "Lone Gunmen" pilot episode in 2000 and Arnon Milchan's Medusa Touch film in 1978) - and who were involved in the false-flag attacks of 9-11. 

This is exactly what the evidence I present in my Solving 9-11 books reveals about Israeli involvement in the false-flag terrorism of 9-11.  The fact that the same people are now projecting the ideation that the Boeing 777 has been hijacked (perhaps by computer like in the "Lone Gunmen") and will be used in a terror attack needs to be taken very seriously.

The game is on. We need to be aware of the very real possibility that the plane may resurface, used as a weapon of terror.  If so, the attack would probably be designed to be a false-flag provocation that can be used to initiate aggression against a targeted foe – such as the Islamic Republic of Iran.  If enough people understand the evil game of deception the Israelis are up to, they won't be able to pull off another major terror spectacle - and get away with it.  

Here is the article by Paul Alster from

Missing jet, Iranian threats, prompt Israel to tighten air security
By Paul Alster, March 17, 2014

HAIFA, Israel – Top Israeli defense officials have hurriedly put in place a confidential list of secret security measures in light of the baffling disappearance of a Malaysia Airlines jumbo jet that experts fear could become a weapon of mass destruction if in the wrong hands. 

With no trace of Beijing-bound flight MH370 after nine days, one of several theories that has emerged is that the plane was hijacked to Iran, where it could be turned into a massive and devastating weapon. Two Iranian passengers are known to have been aboard, travelling on false passports. While Israeli officials did not confirm any suspicions regarding Iran, experts said it is not a stretch to point the finger at Israel's Middle East nemesis.     

“My guess is based upon the stolen passports, and I believe Iran was involved [in the disappearance of the plane],” Issac Yeffet, formerly a global security expert for Israel’s national airline El Al told today’s Times of Israel. “They hijacked the aircraft and they landed it in a place that nobody can see or find it.” 

As the search continued to widen fruitlessly, Israeli security officials and aviation authorities, who have long feared a 9/11-style attack, conducted a security assessment and rapidly implemented a series of security measures. The only one reported publicly is that Israeli air traffic controllers will demand that incoming aircraft identify themselves earlier than has so far been the case, sources told 

IDF officials aim to ensure an unthinkable repetition of the Twin Towers attack doesn’t happen in Tel Aviv, where the skyscraping triple Azrieli Towers rise high above the city. There's good reason to believe the three-tower commercial-residential-office complex is a coveted target of the Islamic Republic. 

In a recent video simulation broadcast by Iranian state TV after the initial agreement with the international community on a reduction in Iran’s nuclear capability was signed, the Azrieli Towers were shown being blown up by Iranian missiles. 

The Israeli media has speculated that if Iran played a part in the disappearance of the plane, it is all but certain the regime would not have been directly involved. It would likely instead act through a third party, using one of the many international terror organizations Iran sponsors and maintaining plausible deniability. Tehran would not want to jeopardize the easing of international sanctions and other gains made recently at the Geneva negotiations with the US and the P5+1. 

The recent interception of a boatload of Iranian M-302 missiles headed for Israel’s enemies in the Gaza Strip or Sinai Peninsula has given rise to further speculation in Israel that Iran might be considering all manner of means to strike back after such an embarrassing and damaging loss. 

“This would never have happened on an Israeli plane,” Yeffet said. “An El Al aircraft was hijacked for the first and last time in 1968. Since then, there has not been a single flight where security did not check every single name.” 

Yeffet believes that the time consuming and often-criticized profiling of every passenger at Israeli airports would have picked up the Iranians travelling on false papers. 

Most flights to and from Israel require check-in three hours before the advertised flight time and passengers are often faced with many questions (some personal) that some people take exception to. The fact remains though that the Israeli method seems to work and has, thus far, proved watertight. 

“More security costs more money,” Menachem Yarden, a retired El Al pilot with more than 37 years experience told Fox “Few companies these days are making money because of increased costs and relatively low ticket prices. Especially in the U.S., spending more money on security and telling people to come 3 hours before the flight – even if their flight time is just one hour – it’s crazy. No-one would fly.” 

Asked if air marshals - allegedly placed on every El Al plane - might have made a difference to flight MH370 if, as some believe, it has been hijacked, Yarden said, “As El Al pilots we didn’t know all the security measures [put in place]. Security is a separate matter [to piloting] and the fewer people that know about it, the more secure it is.” 

Yarden said it is possible such a huge aircraft could have flown thousands of miles undetected. 

“Yes. It is possible to fly as low as the pilot is able,” Yarden confirmed. “When you switch off the transponder no civil controller can see you. In 9/11 the pilots switched off the transponders and no one saw them. It is not like military radar which sends electromagnetic pulses that receives back the echo via antenna.” 

“In this extraordinary case any theory might be the right theory,” Yarden concluded. “No one knows what’s happened.” 


"Ex-El Al expert: Iran likely involved in MH 370" by Debra Kamin, Times of Israel, March 16, 2014

"GA Telesis Continues to Provide Best-In-Class Component Support via Disassembly of Boeing 777-200ER, 767-200ER and 757-200ER," GA Telesis press release, July 10, 2013

"Is This a Secretly Taken Photo of the Plane Stored in Tel Aviv?", March 28, 2014

“Missing jet, Iranian threats, prompt Israel to tighten air security” by Paul Alster,, March 17, 2014 

Israel Won't Stop Spying on the U.S.

May 8, 2014

Israel is stealing our trade and tech secrets, Newsweek reports this week.  This is certainly nothing new, but what will the U.S. government do to stop Israel from stealing our technology?  That's the question.

OUR ALLY? Israel is the most active nation engaged in stealing U.S. trade and tech secrets. With friends like that, who needs enemies? (Photo - Newsweek)

Excerpts from "Israel Won’t Stop Spying on the U.S." in Newsweek:

Israel’s espionage activities in America are unrivaled and unseemly, counterspies have told members of the House Judiciary and Foreign Affairs committees, going far beyond activities by other close allies, such as Germany, France, the U.K. and Japan. A congressional staffer familiar with a briefing last January called the testimony 'very sobering… alarming… even terrifying' ...

After denying for over a decade that Pollard was its paid agent, Israel apologized and promised not to spy on U.S. soil again. Since then, more Israeli spies have been arrested and convicted by U.S. courts...

As Paul Pillar, the CIA’s former national intelligence officer for the Near East and South Asia, told Newsweek, old habits are hard to break: Zionists were dispatching spies to America before there even was an Israel, to gather money and materials for the cause and later the fledgling state. Key components for Israel’s nuclear bombs were clandestinely obtained here. “They’ve found creative and inventive ways,” Pillar said, to get what they want.

“If we give them free rein to send people over here, how are we going to stop that?” the former congressional aide asked. “They’re incredibly aggressive. They’re aggressive in all aspects of their relationship with the United States. Why would their intelligence relationship with us be any different?”
"Israel Won’t Stop Spying on the U.S." by Jeff Stein, Newsweek, May 6, 2014


"Israel Won’t Stop Spying on the U.S." by Jeff Stein, Newsweek, May 6, 2014

Obama's War with Russia

Updated May 8, 2014

 Russia believes that the crisis, which originated in Ukraine and is now actively developing in accordance with the worst-case scenario, is to be blamed on those who organized the coup in Kiev on 22-23 February and still do not care to disarm the right-wing and nationalist elements.
- Russian President Vladimir Putin, May 7, 2014

The Ukraine is divided between Russian speakers in the North, East, and South, and Ukrainian speakers in the middle and the West. Why on Earth would the Obama administration support a violent putsch in Kiev and install an anti-Russian cabal if the goal is to preserve the Ukraine as an un-divided nation?  Is "Balkanization" the real plan?  To foment ethnic conflict and a civil war that will divide the state - and start a new Cold War with Russia?  Who benefits from such a reckless policy?

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry with the un-elected actingprime minister and president of the Ukraine.  These leaders, who were chosen by the U.S. State Department, are Ukrainian nationalists who are opposed to Russian even being an official language in the Ukraine, where half the population is Russian speaking.  Imagine supporting an anti-French government in Canada.  This is a clear provocation against half of the Ukraine.  What kind of state do these people imagine the Ukraine becoming?

While the U.S. government and controlled media constantly blame Russian President Vladimir Putin for the civil war in the Ukraine, it is no secret that the real culprit behind the instability and conflict is Barack Obama, and the people behind him.  Having installed an intolerant anti-Russian regime in Kiev, Obama is fomenting a dangerous conflict with Russia.  The Russian leadership is acting prudently and trying to stabilize a dangerous situation that has been created by U.S. Neo-Con meddling in the Ukraine.  Do Americans and Europeans really want another Cold War with Russia?  Why is Obama playing such a dangerous game that cannot possibly lead to anything good?

The German newspaper Bild am Sonntag reported on May 4 that dozens of FBI and CIA specialists, both agencies under the president, are advising the provisional un-elected government in Kiev:

Dozens of specialists from the US Central Intelligence Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation are advising the Ukrainian government, a German newspaper reported Sunday.

Citing unnamed German security sources, Bild am Sonntag said the CIA and FBI agents were helping Kiev end the rebellion in the east of Ukraine and set up a functioning security structure.

This means that Obama and his advisors are hell-bent on taking the United States and its European allies into a new Cold War with Russia.  The Obama administration was behind the violentputsch in Kiev in the last week of February in which the elected government was ousted and scores of people were killed.  U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland (wife of Neo-Con Robert Kagan) actually chose the unelected rulers who are now making decisions in Kiev. 

THE ZIONIST Victoria Nuland Kagan is the wife of Neo-Con Robert Kagan.  The Kagan family was the driving force behind the PNAC document that called for the U.S. invasion/occupation of Iraq in 2000.  The Kagan document said that a new "Pearl Harbor" would facilitate their Zionist war agenda - and we got 9/11 one year later.

Obama is also supported by the Crown family of Chicago, the controlling family of General Dynamics, one of the largest defense contractors in the United States. The conflict in the Ukraine has already led to new weapons contracts.  U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel recently told the NATO allies that they must increase defense spending to 2 percent of their GDP.  Currently, only "a handful of NATO's 28 members" meet the 2 percent requirement.  Is increased defense spending a motivating factor behind the Obama policy?

It was certainly obvious that installing an anti-Russian regime in Kiev would cause a civil war in the Ukraine, where half the nation is Russian speaking.  This means that the Obama administration is willing to sacrifice Ukrainians and their state in order to instigate a new Cold War with Russia.  Obama (and his criminal Neo-Con/Zionist war agenda) needs to be stopped before he starts a world war.

Sources:  "CIA, FBI agents 'advising Ukraine government': report", AFP, May 4, 2014

"Agenten von CIA & FBI beraten Kiew", Bild am Sonntag, May 4, 2014 

"Hagel urges NATO members to raise defense budgets in response to Russian threats," by Karen DeYoung, Washington Post, May 2, 2014

"Understanding the Crisis in Ukraine" by Christopher Bollyn, April 14, 2014

Douglas Reed and the Zionist War Agenda

March 15, 2014

Douglas Reed's book about Zionism helps explain the Zionist war agenda and the man-made crises in Ukraine, Palestine, Gaza, Egypt, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Iran.  Who or what is behind these problems and how do we get dragged into all of them? 

Douglas Reed finished The Controversy of Zion in 1956 after the Israeli-French-British aggression against Egypt. Reed’s observations and analysis of Zionism are absolutely correct, which is why The Controversy of Zion is worthwhile reading in 2014. Reed understood very well the racist and destructive nature of Zionism and its Talmudic roots. Anyone who really wants to understand Zionism should read Reed’s book, which sheds much-needed light on the Zionist war agenda in 2014. 

When we examine the current political crises we can see how Zionists have fomented the dangerous tensions that exist between the West, Russia, and Iran. Douglas Reed’s analysis in The Controversy of Zion helps explain the real source of the problems. The indented paragraphs are extracts from The Controversy of Zion.

The real danger of Zionism lay in its power to divide the nations of the world against each other and to bring them into collision, in which catastrophe the great masses of mankind would be involved in the proportion of a hundred or a thousand to every Jew. (p. 513)

If we look at the current dispute between the United States and Russia caused by the recent coup d’état in the Ukraine, we find that the crisis in Kiev was fostered and led by the arch-Zionist Victoria Nuland from the U.S. State Department (married to Neo-con Robert Kagan of the PNAC) with military support from Israeli soldiers who led armed battalions in the deadly attack that ousted the elected government of the Ukraine. You might ask, why did Israeli soldiers, aliens who are not Ukrainian citizens, spearhead the attacks in Kiev? Why were Israelis, in cahoots with Victoria Nuland, attacking the elected government of the Ukraine?

ZIONIST REGIME CHANGE - U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland poses with 
Ukrainian opposition leaders Oleh Tyahnybok (left), Vitaly Klitschko (second right) and Arseny Yatsenyuk (right) in Kiev, February 6, 2014. In a leaked phone call Nuland can be heard telling the U.S. Ambassador to the Ukraine that Yatsenyuk, who happens to be Jewish, should be the prime minister of the Ukraine.  Yatsenyuk then became the prime minister after the elected government was ousted in a violent coup in Kiev.

Nuland, a senior U.S. diplomat, was engaged in supporting the anti-government protest and brought food to the protesters.

Israelis, such as "Delta" seen here, acted as leaders in the violent armed opposition that ousted the elected government of the Ukraine. Why were Israelis, who are not even Ukrainians, leading the armed opposition forces in Kiev?

The Zionist planners behind Victoria Nuland’s actions in Kiev certainly knew that ousting the elected government of the Ukraine and replacing it by one that is hostile to Moscow would cause great tension between Russia and the West. Evidently, that was the plan; as Reed said about the real danger of Zionism: to divide the nations of the world against each other and bring them into collision.

Likewise with Iran we find that Israelis and Zionists are the true masterminds of the tension that has created great hostility between Iran and the West for so many years. So, why is Israel acting as the global agent provocateur in creating tension and strife? 

As Douglas Reed explains:

In May 1955, U.S. Secretary of State, Mr. John Foster Dulles, visited the country [Israel] which was wrecking American foreign policy, as it had wrecked that of England. After his experience with the “rebuke,” so swiftly swallowed, he must have realized that he was dealing with the most powerful force in the world, supreme in his country, of which “Israel” was but the instrument used to divide and rule others. (p. 535)

The state of Israel was “the instrument used to divide and rule others”, Reed wrote, indicating that it was controlled by “the most powerful force in the world” that was “supreme in his country”, i.e. the United States.

This is the same conclusion that I came to about the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11. Israelis played key roles in the terror attacks but they were supported by the major Zionist powers of Britain, Canada, and the United States. The Israeli operation of 9-11 led to two major wars and the introduction of the utterly fraudulent Zeitgeist known as the “War on Terror”.

In May, 1953, Mr. Winston Churchill, then British Prime Minister, said that he “looked forward to the fulfillment of Zionist aspirations.” If the West, as these words implied, was secretly harnessed to the unqualified “fulfillment of Zionist aspirations,” that could only mean a greater war than the West had yet endured, in which its armies would play the parts of pawns in a ruinous game, for the purpose of dividing the Christian peoples, crushing the Muslim ones, setting up the Zionist empire, and thereafter acting as its janissaries. (p. 516)

“Pawns in a ruinous game” aptly describes the role of the Western militaries involved in the disastrous wars of aggression in Iraq and Afghanistan. There were, of course, no valid reasons why the United States went to war in Afghanistan or Iraq, but we were lied to and deceived by the media into war by Zionist agents embedded in the government, for “the fulfillment of Zionist aspirations.”

Israel has been at war with other states in the Middle East since it was created in 1948. Because the United States has allied itself with Israel, the enemies of the Zionist state have become our enemies and its wars have become our wars. This is why the United States finds itself always siding with dictators and forces of repression against the people of the Middle East.

I was by chance (February, 1956) in South Carolina, and only by that chance, and the local newspaper, learned of a comment in similar vein, apparently inspired from a similar, Olympian source, about the third war. Mr. Randolph Churchill, Sir Winston's son, was at that time visiting his family's friend Mr. Bernard Baruch, whose residence is the Barony of Little Hobcaw in South Carolina. On emerging from his interview with this authority Mr. Randolph Churchill stated (Associated Press, Feb. 8, 1956) that “the tense Middle East situation could explode into armed conflict at any moment. But I don't think civilization is going to stumble into the next war … World War III, if it comes, will be coldly calculated and planned rather than accidental.” (p. 518)

The Zionist war agenda, articulated by people like Benjamin Netanyahu, calls for the United States, Britain, Canada, and the rest of the West to engage in war against Iran. The Western allies have already imposed punishing sanctions on Iran although Iran has committed no offense against any of them. Now the Zionists are fomenting war between Russia and the Ukraine, two Christian nations, with the West siding with an unelected Jewish-led government that seized power in a bloody coup – sponsored by the West. 

During the writing of the book I have had small expectation, for the reasons I have given, that it would be published when it was ready; at this stage of “the Jewish century” that seems unlikely. If it does not appear now, I believe it will still be valid in five, ten or more years, and I expect it to be published one day or another because I anticipate the collapse, sooner or later, of the virtual law of heresy which has prevented open discussion of “the Jewish question” during the past three decades. Some day the subject will be freely debated again and something of what this book records will then be relevant. (p. 492)

Douglas Reed’s book is an essential book about Zionism. To read it is to complete a course on the history of Zionism, from the time of the Old Testament through 1956. It explains how this racist and violent ideology, based on the anti-Christian values of the Talmud, has gained near-complete control over our governments, mass media, and nations. If we hope to free ourselves and our nations from its grasp, we need to understand Zionism and since we have to educate ourselves on this subject, The Controversy of Zion is a great place to start.

Sources:  The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed, Bridger House Publishers, Inc., Hayden, Idaho (2012)
Online at:

"Understanding the Crisis in Ukraine" by Christopher Bollyn, March 3, 2014

Netanyahu Kills Peace Talks with Palestinians

March 11, 2014

Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, now demands that the Palestinians recognize Israel as "a Jewish state" and give up their legal and inalienable right to return to their homes and villages. Netanyahu is setting these demands as preconditions because he knows they will kill any hope for a negotiated settlement with the Palestinians.  How will President Obama respond to the Israeli leader's rejection of peace with the Palestinians?

On March 11, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ruled out any deal with the Palestinians unless they recognize Israel as "a Jewish state" and give up their refugees' right of return. This means that Netanyahu has decided to kill any hope for the negotiations with the Palestinians by setting conditions he knows the Palestinian side simply cannot accept. What does this mean for the Obama administration’s efforts to find a negotiated settlement to the Israeli-Palestinian problem? It means the so-called “peace process” pushed by Secretary of State John Kerry is dead in the water unless the United States government puts real pressure on the Israelis.

"They (the Palestinians) say they will never recognize a Jewish state and that they will never give up on the right of return," Netanyahu said in remarks broadcast on Israeli public radio.

"I want to make clear that I will not accept an agreement that does not cancel the (refugees') right of return and which does not include Palestinian recognition of the Jewish state," he said in an address to the ruling right-wing Likud-Beitenu faction.

The Palestinians cannot accept either condition because to do so would mean that they are giving up their legitimate claim to their homes and land, from which they were removed by Zionist terrorism and massacres in the late 1940s. Netanyahu and the political leaders of Israel today are, in many cases, the sons and daughters of the Jewish terrorists who carried out terror atrocities against the Palestinians in 1948, most notably the massacre of the Palestinian villagers of Deir Yassin, carried out on April 9, 1948, by terrorists from the Irgun Zevai Leumi and Lohamei Herut Israel (LEHI/Stern Gang). 

At the time of the Deir Yassin massacre, the Irgun was headed by Menachem Begin, who went on to create the Likud party, comprised of former Irgun and LEHI terrorists, which Benjamin Netanyahu heads today. Begin’s son, Benny, was a leading figure in the Likud party until 2013. Mayor of Chicago Rahm Emanuel’s father, Benjamin, was a member of the terrorist Stern Gang. Netanyahu’s father was executive secretary for Ze’ev Jabotinsky, the father of the Irgun. The Deir Yassin massacre is just one of many atrocities carried out by these Zionist terrorist gangs but it is important because it played a seminal role in the Palestinian exodus by terrorizing many Palestinians to flee in fear for their lives.

How will the Obama administration respond to Netanyahu’s thrust and twist of the dagger into the “peace process”? Probably with nothing more than a whimper. The Obama White House, for example, has done absolutely nothing about Israel’s egregious war crimes against the people of Gaza or the illegal building of Jewish settlements on occupied territory. So, why should we expect President Obama to do anything to challenge the Netanyahu regime when it plunges the dagger into the peace process?

To comprehend why the Obama administration will not challenge the outrageous and criminal behavior of the Israeli government, we need to understand the absolute power the Zionist criminal network has over U.S. politics. I think the following extract from The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed’s opus, written in 1956, does an excellent job of explaining how the American republic has been subjugated by "the Jewish power":

The real danger of Zionism lay in its power to divide the nations of the world against each other and to bring them into collision, in which catastrophe the great masses of mankind would be involved in the proportion of a hundred or a thousand to every Jew.

To depict this obvious possibility was heresy in the 1950's, and the non-Jewish protests remained unpublished while the Jewish ones were ineffective. In 1953 the New York Jewish journal, Commentary, thus was able to announce that the foreseeable catastrophe had been brought another step nearer in the following terms: “Israel's survival and strengthening have become a firm element of United States foreign policy and no electoral result or change will affect this.”

Here, once more, is the cryptic reference to a power superior to all presidents, prime ministers and parties to which I earlier drew attention. It is what Mr. Leopold Amery, one of the British Ministers responsible for Palestine in the inter-war period, once said: The policy is set and cannot change. The inner secret of the whole affair is contained in these menacing statements, in which the note of authority and superior knowledge is clear. They are cryptic, but specific and categorical, and express certainty that the West cannot and will not withdraw its hand from the Zionist ambition in any circumstances.

Certainty must rest on something firmer than threats, or even the ability, to sway “the Jewish vote” and the public press this way or that. The tone is that of taskmasters who know the galley-slaves must do their bidding because they are chained and cannot escape. The New York Times, which I judge to speak with authority for “the Jewish power” in the world, has often alluded to this secret compact, or capitulation, or whatever its nature is: for instance, “In essence, the political support the state of Israel has in the United States makes any settlement antagonistic to Israeli interests impossible for a United States administration to contemplate” (1956). If this merely alludes to control of the election-machine, it means that the process of parliamentary government through “free elections” has been completely falsified. In my opinion, that is the case in the West in this century.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"Israel PM says no deal unless Palestinians recognise Jewish state" by Hazel Ward, L'Agence France-Presse, March 11, 2014

The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed, Bridger House Publishers, Inc., Hayden, Idaho (2012)
Online at:

U.S. Elections and Computer Vote Fraud, a series of articles by Christopher Bollyn

"Who Controls Our Elections?" by Christopher Bollyn, January 2, 2008

"Why the New York Times is Anti-American" by Christopher Bollyn, January 9, 2013

The Furry Moving Rocks of Mars

Updated February 21, 2014

The furry rodent seen scampering between the rocks is from a photo taken by the Caltech-JPL NASA mission to Mars. The JPL people insist that this is a rock, not a squirrel.  Is this furry critter telling us that we are being deceived about NASA's multi-billion dollar mission to Mars?

The "moving rocks" of Mars refers to the "jelly donut" (in right frame) which suddenly appears in the "after" photo taken by the JPL Mars rover.  Did someone drop something?  Like, maybe a clue to the deceived?

For those who are interested in NASA's JPL Martian fraud, you will find the following video to be interesting.  Remember, deception is the name of their game:

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"Are there Chinchillas on Mars?" by Christopher Bollyn, June 3, 2013

After I posted the "Are there Chinchillas on Mars?" article, Robert D. Pickar, the son of one of the heads of the Caltech/JPL Mars mission wrote to me, asking me to remove it.  This led to the following posting in my Q&A and Comment page:


You're a great journalist who has built up great moral credibility with your pioneering 9-11 research. Your 9-11 research passes technical muster. Your "chinchilla on Mars" posting is a needless, pointless, frivolous distraction that will damage your credibility.

The "chinchilla" is a rock that has features somewhat reminiscent of a chinchilla. It is just like the "Face on Mars" from the 1970's Viking missions, which were, of course, just a configuration of hills. Unless you can show that the "chinchilla" is moving, or otherwise alive, this posting is enormously damaging and will take away from YEARS of hard-won credibility (you were TASED by police and forced to flee the country!) and reduce you to a "giggle-factor".

Please remove the posting, or at least mitigate it by saying that it is probably a rock.

Best Regards, Robert
Robert D. Pickar
1157 W. 10th St
San Pedro, CA 90731

Bollyn Responds:  This comment comes from Robert Daniel Pickar, the son of Kenneth Arnold Pickar. Kenneth Pickar is a visiting professor at Caltech. Caltech runs the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which operates the Mars mission for NASA. I responded to Robert asking him if his father's connections to Caltech, the JPL, and NASA have anything to do with his request.

Robert Pickar responded:

Not only did my father, Kenneth Pickar, NOT ask me to write the email to you, he doesn't know about it, it has NOTHING to do with him, and he will be LIVID with me if he finds out about your post! ... I want this to be a productive conversation, and I believe that you are a decent person, so I ask you, will you remove this entirely slanderous and off-base posting about me and my father? What will it require for you to accept that this is in error and must ethically be removed?

I certainly don't want to slander anyone. I am merely pointing out the fact that the person who asked me to remove the posting about the Mars mission is the son of a professor at the small private research institution that is running the operation. Kenneth Pickar, originally from the Bronx, has had a long career working with companies and institutions that work with NASA. He even worked and taught at the Technion in Haifa, Israel, in the early 1970s. He now lives in the Golden State in a multi-million dollar home in the gated community of Rolling Hills, near Palos Verdes. All of this information comes from his own CV and is not meant be slanderous in any way.

See Ken Pickar's CV here:

Kenneth Arnold Pickar of Caltech

A slide from Ken Pickar's 2010 presentation on Caltech running the Mars mission

Ken Pickar (3rd from left) has close ties to the state of Israel. Here, in December 2006, he visits the Israeli coast with Joseph Shappir, Head of Department of Applied Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Russia Under Attack

February 15, 2014

Victoria Nuland (formerly Nudelman), the Assistant Secretary of State who is pushing the Ukrainian "revolution", is the wife of Robert Kagan, the founder of the Project for the New American Century.  Her grandfather, Meyer Nudelman, an Orthodox Jewish immigrant from Lithuania, suffered from tertiary syphilis which caused "terrifying rages" and strange behavior.  ''Here was an Orthodox Jewish man, and everybody associated syphilis with a completely different kind of life,'' his son, Dr. Sherwin Nuland said in an interview with the New York Times.  Victoria Nuland's mother is the British-born Rhona L. Goulston.

Robert Kagan aggressively promoted the criminal conspiracy that the U.S. should invade Iraq and that "a new Pearl Harbor" would sway public opinion to allow this to occur - one year before 9-11.  

Robert Kagan's brother Fred, seen here on a tour of Basra with his wife and U.S. military leaders, was also on the PNAC board and advised the Pentagon on how to carry out the surge in Iraq, which the Kagans supported.

Donald Kagan, the Lithuanian-born father of Robert and Fred, was also on the PNAC board.  So, why is the Kagan family running our reckless foreign policy rather than being tried for conspiring to wage wars of aggression?  Who funds the war-mongering think-tanks they create and run?  As we know from the work of the late Eustace Mullins, the House of Rothschild has long used the think-tanks it creates and controls to dictate policies to the U.S. government.

The neoconservative Victoria Nuland sits in her State Department office happily choosing the members of the next Ukrainian government. Is this US official oblivious to the risk that Washington’s meddling in the internal affairs of Ukraine and Russia could be triggering nuclear war? Are President Obama and Congress aware that there is an Assistant Secretary of State who is provoking armageddon?

Insouciant Americans are paying no attention and have no idea that a handful of neoconservative ideologues are pushing the world toward destruction.
- Paul Craig Roberts, "Russia Under Attack"

Paul Craig Roberts latest article "Russia Under Attack" is a well-informed piece about the Neo-con war against Russia and their dangerous strategy to Balkanize the states of the former Soviet Union, such as the Ukraine.

The following is an extract from the beginning of the article:

In a number of my articles I have explained that the Soviet Union served as a constraint on US power. The Soviet collapse unleashed the neoconservative drive for US world hegemony. Russia under Putin, China, and Iran are the only constraints on the neoconservative agenda. 

Russia’s nuclear missiles and military technology make Russia the strongest military obstacle to US hegemony. To neutralize Russia, Washington broke the Reagan-Gorbachev agreements and expanded NATO into former constituent parts of the Soviet Empire and now intends to bring former constituent parts of Russia herself--Georgia and Ukraine--into NATO. Washington withdrew from the treaty that banned anti-ballistic missiles and has established anti-ballistic missile bases on Russia’s frontier. Washington changed its nuclear war doctrine to permit nuclear first strike.

All of this is aimed at degrading Russia’s deterrent, thereby reducing the ability of Russia to resist Washington’s will.

The Russian government (and also the government of Ukraine) foolishly permitted large numbers of US funded NGOs to operate as Washington’s agents under cover of “human rights organizations,” “building democracy,” etc. The “pussy riot” event was an operation designed to put Putin and Russia in a bad light. (The women were useful dupes.) The Western media attacks on the Sochi Olympics are part of the ridiculing and demonizing of Putin and Russia. Washington is determined that Putin and Russia will not be permitted any appearance of success in any area, whether diplomacy, sports, or human rights. 

The American media is a Ministry of Propaganda for the government and the corporations and helps Washington paint Russia in bad colors. Stephen F. Cohen accurately describes US media coverage of Russia as a “tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles.” 

As a holdover from the Cold War, the US media retains the image of a free press that can be trusted. In truth, there is no free press in America (except for Internet sites). See for example: During the later years of the Clinton regime, the US government permitted 5 large conglomerates to concentrate the varied, dispersed and somewhat independent media.The value of these large mega-companies depends on their federal broadcast licenses.Therefore, the media dares not go against the government on any important issue. In addition, the media conglomerates are no longer run by journalists but by corporate advertising executives and former government officials, with an eye not on facts but on advertising revenues and access to government “sources.” 

Washington is using the media to prepare the American people for confrontation with Russia and to influence Russians and other peoples in the world against Putin. Washington would love to see a weaker or more pliable Russian leader than Putin.

The complete article by Paul Craig Roberts can be read on his website at:

Sources:  "AT HOME WITH -- DR. SHERWIN NULAND; Vanquishing A Troubled Legacy" by Alex Witchel, New York Times, February 27, 2003 

The World Order:  Our Secret Rulers, by Eustace Mullins, Ezra Pound Institute of Civilization, Staunton, Virginia, 2nd edition, 1992

The Mystery of the Dead Bankers

February 19, 2014

Banker Body Count Rises to 8 - "8th international banker to die in a month jumps off building in China" by John Vibes of, February 18, 2014

William Kaye, an expert in the global gold market, told King World News that what the world has just witnessed is not the suicide of five bankers, but rather five bankers that were killed because of their knowledge, and therefore the threat that they would expose the criminal activity of major banks. 

Extract from:  Are Bankers Being Killed Because They Know Too Much?

Kaye:  It appears to be tied in with investigations that are going on with respect to the fixing of the gold price in London, and more importantly with manipulation and fixing of various FOREX spreads for the benefit and the profit of these same banks.

So the banks need to be seen for what they are: These banks have admitted to what are clear felonies, and have gotten off so far with simply paying billions of dollars in fines. Those fines go out the front door, but in the back door comes money from their central banks. So, in essence, they are feeling no pain, while their top officials continue to rake in enormous amounts of money in bonuses and pay.

So the banks will continue to rape and pillage the public as long as they are allowed to. Imagine Tony Soprano in charge of manipulating markets, and with the support of the central banks calling in his people and saying, ‘We have a new game plan: Let’s fix every market that we can get our hands on -- gold, silver, energy, and FOREX. Let’s fix everything that we possibly can for our own profit until they run us out of town.’

Now, since the banks have hijacked the governments, they are not being run out of town. They basically hold Washington and other governments hostage.

For the complete interview, use the link at the bottom.

Part 2: "The Vampire Squid, JP Morgan, Dead Bankers & Criminal Acts"

Source: "Are Bankers Being Killed Because They Know Too Much?" King World News, February 14, 2014

Complete Snowden Interview

Updated February 7, 2014


I think it tells a story, and that’s, no matter how deeply an individual is embedded in the government, no matter how faithful to the government they are, no matter how strongly they believe in the causes of their government, as I did during the Iraq war, people can learn, people can discover the line between appropriate government behavior and actual wrongdoing. And, I think it became clear to me that that line had been crossed.
- Edward Snowden in interview with German television network ARD, January 26, 2014

Edward Snowden was interviewed by the German ARD television network on January 26.  Because the video may be blocked on some servers, I have posted the full transcript below. 

The Peoples' Voice has the video of the interview at:

Video Link -

EDWARD SNOWDEN - "I’m still alive, and I don’t lose sleep because I’ve done what I feel I needed to do. It was the right thing to do. And, I’m not going to be afraid." 

Full transcript of Edward Snowden interview for ARD, January 26, 2014:

Interviewer: Mr. Snowden, did you sleep well the last couple of nights? Because, I was reading that you asked for a kind of police protection. Are there any threats?

Snowden: There are significant threats but I sleep very well. There was an article that came out in an online outlet called BuzzFeed where they interviewed officials from the Pentagon, from the National Security Agency and they gave them anonymity to be able to say what they wanted, and what they told the reporter was that they wanted to murder me. These individuals, and these are acting government officials, they said they would be happy, they would love to put a bullet in my head, to poison me as I was returning from the grocery store, and have me die in the shower.

Interviewer: But, fortunately, you are still alive with us.

Snowden: Right, but I’m still alive, and I don’t lose sleep because I’ve done what I feel I needed to do. It was the right thing to do. And, I’m not going to be afraid.

Interviewer: “The greatest fear I have,” and I quote you, “regarding these disclosures is nothing will change.” That was one of your greatest concerns at the time, but in the meantime there is a vivid discussion about the situation with the NSA. Not only in America but also in Germany and in Brazil, and President Obama was forced to go public and to justify what the NSA was doing on legal grounds.

Snowden: What we saw initially in response to the revelations was sort of a circling of the wagons of government around the National Security Agency. Instead of circling around the public and protecting their rights, the political class circled around the security state and protected their rights. What’s interesting is, though that was the initially response, since then we’ve seen a softening. We’ve seen the President acknowledge that when he first said “we’ve drawn the right balance, there are no abuses,” we’ve seen him and his officials admit that there have been abuses. There have been thousands of violations of the National Security Agency and other agencies, authorities, every single year.

Interviewer: Is the speech of Obama recently the beginning of a serious regulation?

Snowden: It was clear from the President’s speech that he wanted to make minor changes to preserve authorities that we don’t need. The President created a review board from officials that were personal friends, from national security insiders, former Deputy of the CIA, people who had every incentive to be soft on these programs and to see them in the best possible light. But what they found was that these programs have no value, they’ve never stopped a terrorist attack in the United States, and they have marginal utility at best for other things. The only thing that the Section 215 phone meta-data program, actually it’s a broader meta-data program of bulk collection, bulk collection means mass surveillance, program was in stopping or detecting a $8,500 wire transfer from a cab driver in California. And, it’s this kind of review, where insiders go “we don’t need these programs, these programs don’t make us safe. They take a tremendous amount of resources to run, and they offer us no value.” They go “we can modify these.” The National Security agency operates under the President’s executive authority alone. He can end, or modify, or direct a change in their policies at any time.

Interviewer: For the first time President Obama did concede that the NSA collects and stores trillions of data.

Snowden: Every time you pick up the phone, dial a number, write an email, make a purchase, travel on the bus carrying a cell phone, swipe a card somewhere, you leave a trace. And, the government has decided that it’s a good idea to collect it all. Everything. Even if you’ve never been suspected of any crime. Traditionally the government would identify a suspect, they would go to a judge, they would say we suspect he’s committed this crime, they would get a warrant and then they would be able to use the totality of their powers in pursuit of the investigation. Nowadays what we see is they want to apply the totality of their powers in advance, prior to an investigation.

Interviewer: You started this debate. Edward Snowden is, in the meantime, a household name for the whistleblower in the age of the internet. You were working until last summer for the NSA, and during this time you collected, secretly, thousands of confidential documents. What was the decisive moment, or was there a long period of time, or something happening? Why did you do this?

Snowden: I would say sort of the breaking point is seeing the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, directly lie under oath to Congress. There’s no saving an intelligence community that believes it can lie to the public and the legislators who need to be able to trust it and regulate its actions. Seeing that, for me, really meant for me there was no going back. Beyond that, it was the creeping realization that no one else was going to do this. The public had a right to know about these programs. The public had a right to know that which the government is doing in its name, and that which the government is doing against the public, but neither of these things we were allowed to discuss, we were allowed no, even the wider body of our elected representatives were prohibited from knowing or discussing these programs, and that’s a dangerous thing. The only review we had was from a secret court, the FISA Court, which is a sort of rubber stamp authority.

When you are on the inside and you go into work every day and you sit down at the desk and you realize the power you have, you can wiretap the President of the United States, you can wiretap a Federal Judge, and, if you do it carefully no one will ever know because the only way the NSA discovers abuses are from self-reporting.

Interviewer: We’re not talking only of the NSA as far as this is concerned. There is a multilateral agreement for cooperation among the services and this alliance of intelligence operations is known as The Five Eyes. What agencies and countries belong to this alliance, and what is its purpose?

Snowden: The Five Eyes alliance is sort of an artifact of the post-World War II era where the Anglophone countries are the major powers banded together to sort of cooperate and share the costs of intelligence gathering infrastructure.

So we have the UK’s GCHQ, we have the US NSA, we have Canada’s C-Sec, we have the Australian Signals Intelligence Directorate and we have New Zealand’s DSD. What the result of this was, over decades and decades, what sort of a supra-national intelligence organization that doesn’t answer to the laws of its own countries.

Interviewer: In many countries, as in America too, the agencies like the NSA are not allowed to spy within their own borders on their own people. So, the Brits for example, they can spy on everybody but the Brits. But, the NSA can conduct surveillance in England. So, in the very end they could exchange their data and it would be, they would be, strictly following the law.

Snowden: If you ask the governments about this directly they would deny it and point to policy agreements between the members of the Five Eyes saying that they won’t spy on each other’s citizens. But, there are a couple of key points there. One is that the way they define spying is not the collection of data. The GCHQ is collecting an incredible amount of data on British citizens, just as the National Security Agency is gathering an enormous amount of data on US citizens. What they are saying is that they will not then target people within that data. They won’t look for UK citizens or British citizens. In addition, the policy agreements between them that say British won’t target US citizens, US won’t target British citizens, are not legally binding. The actual memorandums of agreement state specifically on that that they are not intended to put a legal restriction on any government. They're policy agreements that can be deviated from or broken at any time. So if they want to spy on a British citizen, they can spy on a British citizen, and then they can even share that data with the British government that is itself forbidden from spying on UK citizens. So there is a sort of a trading dynamic there, but it’s not, it’s not open, it’s more of a nudge and wink. And, beyond that, the key is to remember the surveillance and the abuse doesn’t occur when people look at the data, it occurs when people gather the data in the first place.

Interviewer: How narrow is the cooperation of the German Secret Service BND with the NSA and the Five Eyes?

Snowden: I would describe it as intimate. As a matter of fact, the first way I described it in our written interview, was that the German Services and the US Services are in bed together. They not only share information, the reporting of results from intelligence, but they actually share the tools and the infrastructure. They work together against joint targets in services. And, there’s a lot of danger in this. One of the major programs that face abuse in the National Security Agency is what’s called “XKeyscore.” It’s a front end search engine that allows them to look through all of the records they collect worldwide every day.

Interviewer: What could you do if you would sit so to speak in their place with this kind of instrument?

Snowden: You could read anyone’s email in the world. Anybody you got an email address for, any website you can watch traffic to and from it, any computer that an individual sits at, you can watch it, any laptop that you’re tracking, you can follow it as it moves from place to place throughout the world. It’s a one stop shop for access to the NSA’s information. And what’s more, you can tag individuals using “XKeyscore.” Where, let’s say I saw you once and I thought what you were doing was interesting, or you just have access that’s interesting to me. Let’s say you work at a major German corporation, and I want access to that network. I can track your username on a website, on a form somewhere, I can track your real name, I can track associations with your friends, and I can build what’s called a fingerprint, which is network activity unique to you, which means anywhere you go in the world, anywhere you try to sort of hide your online presence, hide your identity, the NSA can find you. And, anyone who’s allowed to use this, or who the NSA shares their software with, can do the same thing. Germany is one of the countries that have access to “XKeyscore.”

Interviewer: This sounds rather frightening. The question is, does the BND deliver data of Germans to the NSA?

Snowden: Whether the BND does it directly, or knowingly, the NSA gets German data. Whether it’s provided, I can’t speak to until it’s been reported, because it would be classified. And, I prefer that journalists make the distinctions, and the decisions, about what is public interest and what should be published. However, it’s no secret that every country in the world has the data of their citizens in the NSA. Millions and millions and millions of data connections, from Germans going about their daily lives, talking on their cell phones, sending SMS messages, visiting websites, buying things online, all of this ends up at the NSA. And, it’s reasonable to suspect that the BND may be aware of it in some capacity. Now, whether or not they actively provide the information, I should not say.

Interviewer: The BND basically argues if we do this, we do this accidentally actually, and our filter didn’t work.

Snowden: Right. So, the kind of things that they’re discussing there are two things. They’re talking about filtering of ingest, which means when the NSA puts a secret server in a German telecommunications provider, or they hack a German router and they divert the traffic in a manner that lets them search through things, they’re saying “if I see what I think is a German talking to another German I’ll drop it.” But, how do you know? You could say “well, these people are speaking the German language, this IP address seems to be from a German company to another German company,” but that’s not accurate, and they wouldn’t dump all of that traffic because they’ll get people who are targets of interest, who are actively in Germany using German communications. So, realistically, what’s happening is when they say “there’s no spying on Germans,” they don’t mean that German data isn’t being gathered, they don’t mean that records aren’t being taken or stolen. What they mean is that they’re not intentionally searching for German citizens. And, that’s sort of a fingers crossed behind the back promise, it’s not reliable.

Interviewer: What about other European countries, like Norway and Sweden for example, because we have a lot of, I think, underwater cables going through the Baltic Sea.

Snowden: So, this is sort of an expansion of the same idea. If the NSA isn’t collecting information on German citizens in Germany, are they as soon as it leaves German borders? And, the answer is “yes.” Any single communication that transits the internet, the NSA may intercept at multiple points. They might see it in Germany, they might see it in Sweden, they might see it in Norway or Finland, they might see it in Britain, and they might see it in the United States. Any single one of these places that a German communication crosses, it’ll be ingested and added to the database.

Interviewer: So, let’s come to our southern European neighbors then. What about Italy? What about France? What about Spain?

Snowden: It’s the same deal worldwide.

Interviewer: Does the NSA spy on Siemens? On Mercedes? On other successful German companies, for example, to prevail, to have the advantage of knowing what is going on in a scientific and economic world?

Snowden: I don’t want to preempt the editorial decisions of journalists.

Interviewer: Ok.

Snowden: But, what I will say is there’s no question that the US is engaged in economic spying. If there’s information at Siemens that they think would be beneficial to the national interests, not the national security of the United States, they’ll go after that information, and they’ll take it.

Interviewer: There is this old saying “you do whatever you can do.” So, the NSA is doing whatever is technically possible.

Snowden: This is something that the President touched on last year, where he said that just because we can do something, and this was in relation to tapping Angela Merkel’s phone. Just because we can do something, doesn’t mean that we should. And, that’s exactly what’s happened. The technological capabilities that have been provided, because of sort of weak security standards in internet protocols and cellular communications networks, have meant that intelligence services can create systems that see everything.

Interviewer: Nothing annoyed the German government more than the fact that the NSA taped the private phone of the German Chancellor Merkel over the last 10 years, obviously. Suddenly this invisible surveillance was connected with a known face and was not connected with a kind of watery, shady terrorist background. Obama now promised to stop snooping on Merkel, which raises the question “did the NSA tape already previous governments, including the previous chancellors, and when did they do that? And, how long did they do this for?”

Snowden: This is a particularly difficult question for me to answer, because there’s information that I very strongly believe is in the public interest. However, as I’ve said before, I prefer for journalists to make those decisions in advance, review the material themselves, and decide whether or not the public value of this information outweighs the sort of reputational cost to the officials that ordered the surveillance. What I can say is we know Angela Merkel was monitored by the National Security Agency. The question is how reasonable is it to assume that she is the only German official that was monitored? How reasonable is it to believe that she’s the only prominent German face who the National Security Agency was watching? I would suggest it seems unreasonable that if anyone was concerned about the intentions of German leadership, that they would only watch Merkel and not her aides, not other prominent officials, not heads of ministries, or even local government officials.

Interviewer: How does a young man from Elizabeth City in North Carolina, 30 years old, get in such a position in such a sensitive area?

Snowden: That’s a very difficult question to answer. In general, I would say it highlights the dangers of privatizing government functions. I worked previously as an actual staff officer, a government employee for the Central Intelligence Agency, but I’ve also served much more frequently as a contractor in a private capacity. What that means is, you have private for-profit companies doing inherently governmental work, like targeted espionage, surveillance, compromising foreign systems. And, anyone who has the skills, who can convince a private company that they have the qualifications to do so, will be empowered by the government to do that, and there’s very little oversight. There’s very little review.

Interviewer: Have you been one of these classical computer kids sitting red eyed during the nights in the age of 12, 15, and your father was knocking on your door and saying “switch off the light, it’s too late now?” Did you get your computer skills from that side? Or, when did you get your first computer?

Snowden: (laughter) Right, right. I definitely have had a, shall we say, a deep informal education in computers and electronic technology. They’ve always been fascinating and interesting to me. (laughter) The characterization of having your parents telling you to go to bed, I would say is fair.

Interviewer: If one looks to the little public data of your life, one discovers that you, obviously, wanted to join in May 2004, the Special Forces to fight in Iraq. What did motivate you at the time? You know, Special Forces, looking at you in the very moment, means grim fighting, and it means probably killing. And, did you ever get to Iraq?

Snowden: No, I didn’t get to Iraq. One of the interesting things about the Special Forces is that they’re not actually intended for direct combat. They’re what’s referred to as “a force multiplier.” They’re inserted behind enemy lines. It’s a squad that has a number of different specialties in it, and they teach and enable the local population to resist, or to support, US forces in a way that allows the local population a chance to help determine their own destiny. And, I felt that was an inherently noble thing at the time. In hindsight, some of the reasons that we went into Iraq were not well founded. And, I think did a disservice to everyone involved.

Interviewer: What happened to your adventure then? Did you stay long with them? Or, what happened to you?

Snowden: No, I broke my legs when I was in training and was discharged.

Interviewer: So it was a short adventure in other words?

Snowden: It was a short adventure.

Interviewer: In 2007 the CIA stationed you with a diplomatic cover in Geneva, in Switzerland. Why did you join the CIA by the way?

Snowden: I don’t think I can actually answer that one.

Interviewer: OK, if it’s what you have been doing there, forget it. But why did you join the CIA?

Snowden: In many ways I think it’s a continuation of trying to do everything I could to prosecute the public good in the most effective way. And, it’s in line with the rest of my government service where I tried to use my technical skills in the most difficult positions I could find in the world, and the CIA offered that.

Interviewer: If we go back, Special Forces, CIA, NSA, it’s not actually in the description of a human rights activist, or somebody who becomes a whistleblower after this. What happens to you?

Snowden: I think it tells a story, and that’s, no matter how deeply an individual is embedded in the government, no matter how faithful to the government they are, no matter how strongly they believe in the causes of their government, as I did during the Iraq war, people can learn, people can discover the line between appropriate government behavior and actual wrongdoing. And, I think it became clear to me that that line had been crossed.

Interviewer: You worked for the NSA through a private contractor with the name Booz Allen Hamilton, one of the big ones in the business. What is the advantage for the US Government, or the CIA, to work through a private contractor, to outsource a central government function?

Snowden: The contracting culture of the national security community in the United States is a complex topic. It’s driven by a number of interests between primarily limiting the number of direct government employees at the same time as keeping lobbying groups in Congress, typically from very well-funded businesses such as Booz Allen Hamilton. The problem there is you end up in a situation where government policies are being influenced by private corporations who have interests that are completely divorced from the public good in mind. The result of that is what we saw at Booz Allen Hamilton, where you have private individuals who have access to, what the government alleges were millions and millions of records that they could walk out the door with at any time with no accountability, no oversight, no auditing, the government didn’t even know they were gone.

Interviewer: At the very end you ended up in Russia. Many of the intelligence communities suspect you made a deal, classified material for Asylum here in Russia.

Snowden: The Chief of the Task Force investigating me, as recently as December, said that their investigation had turned up no evidence, or indications at all, that I had any outside help, or contact, or had made a deal of any kind to accomplish my mission. I worked alone. I didn’t need anybody’s help. I don’t have any ties to foreign governments. I’m not a spy for Russia, or China, or any other country for that matter. If I am a traitor, who did I betray? I gave all of my information to the American public, to American journalists, who are reporting on American issues. If they see that as treason, I think people really need to consider who do they think they’re working for. The public is supposed to be their boss, not their enemy. Beyond that, as far as my personal safety, I’ll never be fully safe until these systems have changed.

Interviewer: After your revelations, none of the European countries really offered you asylum. Where did you apply in Europe for asylum?

Snowden: I can’t remember the list of countries with any specificity because there were many of them. But, France, Germany were definitely in there, as was the UK. A number of European countries, all of whom, unfortunately, felt that doing the right thing was less important than supporting US political concerns.

Interviewer: One reaction to the NSA snooping is in the very moment that countries like Germany are thinking to create national internets, an attempt to force internet companies to keep their data in their own country. Does this work?

Snowden: It’s not going to stop the NSA. Let’s put it that way. The NSA goes where the data is. If the NSA can pull text messages out of telecommunication networks in China, they can probably manage to get Facebook messages out of Germany. Ultimately, the solution to that is not to try to stick everything in a walled garden, although that does raise the level of sophistication and complexity of taking the information. It’s also much better simply to secure the information internationally against everyone, rather than playing ‘let’s move the data.’ Moving the data isn’t fixing the problem. Securing the data is the problem.

Interviewer: President Obama, in the very moment, obviously doesn’t care too much about the message of the leak. And, together with the NSA, they do care very much more about catching the messenger in that context. Obama asked the Russian president several times to extradite you. But Putin did not. It looks that you will stay to the rest of your life, probably in Russia. How do you feel about Russia in that context, and is there a solution to this problem.

Snowden: I think it’s becoming increasingly clear that these leaks didn’t cause harm, in fact, they served the public good. Because of that, I think it will be very difficult to maintain sort of an ongoing campaign of persecution against someone who the public agrees serve the public interest.

Interviewer: The New York Times wrote a very long comment, and demanded clemency for you. The headline “Edward Snowden Whistleblower,” and I quote from that, “the public learned in great detail how the agency has extended its mandate and abused its authority.” And, the New York Times closes, “President Obama should tell his aides to begin finding a way to end Mr. Snowden’s vilification, and give him an incentive to return home.” Did you get a call in between from the White House?

Snowden: I’ve never received a call from the White House, and I am not waiting by the phone. But, I would welcome the opportunity to talk about how we can bring this to a conclusion that serves the interest of all parties. I think it’s clear there are times where what is lawful is distinct from what is rightful. There are times throughout history and it doesn’t take long for, either an American, or a German, to think about times in the history of their country where the law provided the government to do things which were not right.

Interviewer: President Obama, obviously, is in the very moment not quite convinced of that, because he said to you are charged with three felonies. And, I quote, “if you, Edward Snowden, believe in what you did, you should go back to America, appear before the court with a lawyer and make your case.” Is this the solution?

Snowden: It’s interesting because he mentions three felonies. What he doesn’t say is that the crimes that he’s charged me with are crimes that don’t allow me to make my case. They don’t allow me to defend myself in an open court to the public and convince a jury that what I did was to their benefit. The Espionage Act was never intended, it’s from 1918, it was never intended to prosecute journalistic sources, people who are informing the newspapers about information that’s of public interest. It was intended for people who are selling documents in secret to foreign governments, who are bombing bridges, who are sabotaging communications, not people who are serving the public good. So, it’s, I would say, illustrative that the president would choose to say someone should face the music when he knows the music is a show trial.

The public needs to know the kinds of things a government does in its name, or the "consent of the governed" is meaningless... The consent of the governed is not consent if it is not informed. - Edward Snowden 

The Facts about Bollyn's Detention in Britain

January 17, 2014

On January 5, Ken O'Keefe, an articulate American human rights activist known for his bravery during the murderous Israeli military assault on the Mavi Marmara, invited me to be on hisMiddle East Show on People's Voice TV. 

Ken O'Keefe was a participant in the humanitarian aid flotilla to Gaza in May 2010.

O'Keefe was beaten bloody by the Israelis who seized him during their murderous assault on the Mavi Marmara - in international waters - in the early hours of May 31, 2010, as the humanitarian aid flotilla approached Gaza. The Israelis killed 9 of the human rights activists, including a young American, who were trying to bring humanitarian aid to the besieged population of Gaza.

I had helped Ken with the final editing of his script for the show, which is about the false-flag terrorism of 9-11, and gladly accepted his invitation to be on the show, which was scheduled to be produced in the Wembley studio of People's Voice TV on January 12, 2014. 

The People’s Voice is a free global internet television station which began broadcasting on November 25, 2013. 

I booked my flight from Sweden to Heathrow (London) on British Airways.  Ken invited me to stay at his flat in London and said he would meet me at the airport.  He had planned to film a second interview with me on Wednesday, January 15, so I planned to arrive at Heathrow on Saturday morning, January 11, and leave on Wednesday afternoon.

U.S. citizens do not require visas to visit Britain and are not required to present evidence that they have hotel reservations, so I was confident that my visit would be smooth and worthwhile.  When I went to my gate for the flight to London I passed through Swedish passport control and was reminded that Britain is not a member of the Shengen Area, which is virtually all of Western Europe. When traveling between nations in the Shengen Zone there are no passport controls so it is unusual to have to present your passport on national borders in Europe.

The British Airways flight to Heathrow arrived shortly after noon, at 12:20 p.m., and the weather was sunny and warm for January.  As an American, I went to the passport control line for all nations outside of the European Union.  It was 1:05 p.m. when I was interviewed by the U.K. Border Force immigration officer.

I presented my passport and landing card, which I had filled out during the flight.  On the line where I was asked where I would be staying, I wrote Ken O'Keefe, Paddington, London.  The night before flying I had called Ken.  He told me that he would not be able to meet me at the airport and that I should take the train to Paddington Station and find a cafe to wait for an hour until he could meet me and take me to his place.

The immigration officer, a woman of non-English background, looked at her computer screen, then at my passport, and then commented that I had "a big hat."  I told her that I had come from Sweden where it is cold and rainy.  She asked me to take my hat off so she could see my face in full.  I raised my hat and then asked if I could put it back on my head.  She then asked me an odd question about why I needed to wear my hat.  I told her that if I didn't wear it on my head then I would have to carry it in my hand.

She then asked me what was the purpose of my visit.  I told her that I was coming to meet a friend and to do a bit of family research.  I explained that I had been invited to participate in an interview with Ken O'Keefe and that I would be staying with him at his home.  She then asked me how long I had known O'Keefe and I said that I had first been in contact with him in 2010.  I explained that the invitation had been extended by email.  She asked to see the emails and told me to open up my laptop to show them.  I asked if she had an outlet for power because my battery is dead. 

I answered all of her questions completely and honestly.  She wanted to know O'Keefe's complete address and since I don't know his address, I gave her his phone number so she could call him.  After a few more minutes of questions, she handed me a piece of paper and told me that I was being detained.  I was told to wait at the chairs facing the immigration control booths. 

The slip of paper, which says U.K. Border Agency at the top, simply says:  "I am detaining you" and "I have also detained your passport, identity card, or travel document."  Under "Reasons for detention" a box is checked that says "I have further enquiries to make and more questions to ask you."

I waited and the hours passed.  After about three hours a man came and introduced himself as an officer of the Metro police.  He said that he knew Ken O'Keefe and he knew my books.  He asked me about my address in Sweden and explained that his obligation is to protect the national security of his country.  He said his name was David.

I continued to wait and was glad when an immigration officer came and asked me if I would like something to drink.  She brought me a tiny cup of tea and a package of cookies.  At this point I was quite famished.  She said her name was Isabel.

After another hour or so, she reappeared with another female officer and asked me to bring my baggage and follow her.  She took me to a back room with a table and chairs.  She asked me to put my bags on the table.  I only had a small carry-on and my laptop.  She and the other officer went through every thing in my bags and on my person.  They removed every piece of paper from my wallet and made photo-copies of everything, even the entries on my new calendar.  They had even photo-copied a card with an angel on it that a friend had sent in 1997.  The card, which my wife had put in my bag, said, "God's angels are watching over you."

Then they took me to an adjacent room and took a complete set of fingerprints and a photo for their pink file, which seemed to have a dozen pages of material by this point.

I was then taken to a detention cell, which was run by Tascor, a privately-owned company. This was a prison-type room that had a pay phone on the wall.  I had one British Pound coin, which my wife had found just before I left Sweden.  I used this coin to call Ken and informed him that I was detained at Heathrow airport.  Ken called my wife and told her about my situation.  She was then able to reach me by using the public phone's number.

At about 8 p.m., after seven hours of detention, I was taken to another room where I was interrogated by the immigration officer named Isabel.  She explained that she had to write the entire interrogation down and that I had to sign each page as we went along.  During this interrogation she asked me if I had any convictions in Sweden.  I said no.  Then she asked me if I had any convictions in America and I said that I had two misdemeanor convictions from the undercover police attack I suffered at my home in August 2006.

I was then taken back to the detention cell.  After an hour Isabel came to the cell with a piece a paper.  She told me that it had been decided that I would not be allowed to enter Britain and that I would be deported (i.e. "removed") to Sweden on the first plane the following day, BA790 to Gothenburg at 7:35 on January 12.  She asked me if that was "O.K." with me. 

The "Notice of Refusal of Leave to Enter" says this: 

You have asked for leave to enter the United Kingdom as a visitor until 15th January 2014, but from information available to me, it seems right to me to refuse you leave to enter in the grounds [sic] that exclusion from the United Kingdom is conducive to the public good.  This is due to the fact that by your own admission you have an outstanding warrant for your arrest in the USA since 2007. You have further admitted that you left the USA prior to sentencing and have not returned since time.

This indicates that it took UK Border Force eight hours to come up with a reason to deny me entry to the U.K.  The interrogation, in which I had provided these details, had only occurred after seven hours of detention.  Likewise, the authorities had only called O'Keefe at about 3 p.m., according to his recollection, which means that where I was to be staying was not the real reason for my detention.

I tried to sleep on the chairs but it was very uncomfortable and the lights were left on.  I was monitored the entire time by two Tascor employees who sat at a desk behind a large window that allowed them to watch me.  The minutes passed very slowly.

After midnight I was woken by a Tascor employee who said that I was to be moved to another detention cell.  This involved being taken out into the cold night and driven to another facility.  The new cell was smaller and less comfortable.  There was no bed and I tried to sleep on the chairs as I had in the previous cell.  Another detainee, an Albanian, was brought into the cell and with all the talking and making of coffees from the machine in front of me, I did not get any sleep at all.

Finally, at 5 a.m. I was taken to the bathroom and given a towel and some soap.  I showered and dressed and waited in the cell for the 6 a.m. transport to the plane.  I was kneeling on the floor saying a prayer when the Tascor guard entered the cell and asked me if I was alright.  I told her that I was praying. She told me that I would soon be taken to the plane.

At 6 a.m. two Tascor employees took me and my baggage in a police-type van to the British Airways ticket counter where my travel documents were issued.  Due to the early hour, I was the only person there.  I talked with the driver who accompanied me as he seemed interested in what I had to say.  

Finally, at about 7 a.m. I was driven to the aircraft.  The van drove right up to the steps leading up to the plane.  I said good-bye to the two Tascor employees and entered the plane.  I was met by the purser and I asked him for a window seat.  He gave me a window seat in the rear of the plane.  I was the only person, apart from the crew, on the plane.

At the rear of the plane were two British Airways stewards, a man and a woman.  They said good morning and asked how I was doing.  I told them that I had been in detention for 16 hours and that I was very hungry.  They were interested and asked what had happened.  I explained the basics.  The man then said that he had just read about a 9-11 activist who was married to a South American woman. 

I knew he was talking about Kurt Sonnenfeld, the FEMA videographer who had discovered that the vault beneath WTC Building 6, the U.S. Customs House, had been cleaned out the night before 9-11.  Sonnenfeld is currently living in Argentina.

They brought me some orange juice and a croissant sandwich right away. At about 7:30 a.m. the passengers were allowed on the plane and we left for Sweden.  I watched the sun rise over the English landscape as we headed East for the flight over the North Sea.

Just before we began the approach to Gothenburg, the steward handed me a plastic bag and said "Celebrate your escape."  I looked inside and found two small bottles of champagne, a very kind gesture that brought a tear to my eye.

It had been an emotional day for me and my emotions were just under the surface.  I had first noticed this when the plane had passed over the Tower of London on the way to London.  Tears had come to my eyes when I thought of the murders of George and Queen Anne Boleyn in May 1536.  In my family there have been several Annes and the children have always been told that they are related to Anne Boleyn.  Since my Bollyn ancestors came to the U.S. from Switzerland I have been trying to find out more about this branch of my family.

When I arrived in Gothenburg, I was the last one in the passport control line.  I went up to the window and presented my passport.  The immigration lady clearly saw something on her screen that alerted her about my status.  She called her colleague over and they stared at the screen for a minute before turning to me.  The man asked me, "Why were you refused entry to Britain?"

I said he would have to ask the British authorities about that because I did not know why.  After a couple minutes the lady stamped my passport and I was allowed to pass. 

The Zionist Criminal Network Behind the Cover-Ups

December 5, 2013

Those who are capable of tyranny are capable of perjury to sustain it.
― Lysander Spooner

We now know that one of the Warren Report’s discredited propositions, that Lee Harvey Oswald’s killer, Jack Ruby, “was not involved with Chicago’s criminal element” (WR 785), was the result not of inadequate intelligence but of a deliberate deception of the Warren Commission by the FBI, designed to keep organized crime out of the picture.
 Peter Dale Scott, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK (1993)

DALLAS, NOVEMBER 24, 1963 - Jack Ruby, aka Jacob Leon Rubenstein, a Jewish mobster from Chicago, shoots Lee Harvey Oswald in the Dallas police station. If Ruby was truly acting on his own why did the FBI deceive the Warren Commission to conceal his connections to the Jewish mob? Were they trying to hide the existence of the Jewish crime syndicate or were they covering up its role in the murder of President Kennedy? Who was behind the FBI cover-up?

At the end of a recent 60 Minutes (Australia) segment about the downing of TWA Flight 800 in July 1996, the reporter asked Henry F. Hughes, the former senior investigator from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), about the abundant evidence of a government cover-up:    

Question:  Do you think America still cares?

Hughes:  I know the families of 230 dead people and the men on my team care, and we all should care. This was a seminal moment in American history. When you can lie to the public about the deaths of 230 people, you can get away with anything and that ought to scare the hell out of you.

As the NTSB’s senior investigator on the TWA Flight 800 case, Hank Hughes saw how the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had illegally interfered with the NTSB investigation by blocking access to witnesses, intimidating others, and tampering with and stealing evidence.  The FBI, the investigative agency of the Department of Justice, was directed at the time by Louis Freeh, who served under Bill Clinton’s Attorney General, Janet Reno - and her deputies and assistants.

THE SILENCED EYEWITNESSES PROTEST - "The FBI would not let a single one of us testify at the NTSB's public hearing..." 
Hundreds of people witnessed the downing of TWA Flight 800 and more than one hundred reported seeing one or more missiles streaking to the plane before it exploded in mid-air. 

This graphic depicts what Air National Guard pilot Major Frederick Meyer reported seeing when TWA 800 was hit. Why did the FBI prevent eyewitnesses like Major Meyer from testifying at the NTSB's public hearing?

Since the agency that was interfering with the investigation, the FBI, is part of the government, Hughes’ conclusion would be more precise if he had said:  When the government can lie to the public about the deaths of 230 people, the government can get away with anything and that ought to scare the hell out of you.

Government cover-ups like that of the downing of TWA 800 should indeed “scare the hell out of you” because they indicate that the government is controlled by a criminal faction.  This is not to say that there are not good people like Hank Hughes working for the government, but the fact that such cover-ups are able to prevail over the good people and the truth indicates that there is a criminal faction that controls and dominates our system of government.

Criminal cover-ups are certainly not a new development in the United States and the TWA 800 cover-up was not the first. The 9-11 Commission (2003-2004), headed by Philip David Zelikow of Houston, is a more recent example of a flagrant cover-up and amply proves Hank Hughes’ point that the criminal faction running the government “can get away with anything.”

To put an end to this criminal tyranny our first task is to identify the criminal element behind these cover-ups so that we can identify the criminal faction that controls our government. In order to understand who is behind the criminal faction we need to go back to “the mother of all cover-ups,” Lyndon Johnson’s infamous Warren Commission concerning the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The Warren Commission needs to be taken first because it was the cover-up of a de facto coup d’état in which the criminal faction replaced the political leadership of the nation.


The Warren Commission was established by President Lyndon B. Johnson on November 29, 1963, supposedly to investigate the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The commission’s report was presented to President Johnson on September 24, 1964.  Its most significant conclusions were that Lee Harvey Oswald had acted alone in killing Kennedy and that Jack Ruby had also acted alone when he killed Oswald two days later.  

The Warren Commission found itself dependent for facts on the FBI and the Justice Department, which had already determined that they would only support the story that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman in the Kennedy assassination and that no one else was involved.   

Likewise, as Peter Dale Scott points out in Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, “the false Warren Commission picture of [Jack] Ruby as a “loner” was clearly an artifact, where one of the hidden forces responsible for generating this false impression lay inside the justice establishment.”

The Justice Department and the FBI were clearly behind the cover-up of Jack Ruby’s close connections to organized crime, particularly to the Jewish mob that he had grown up with in the Lawndale area on Chicago’s West Side:

FBI documents released in 1979 show other instances in which key information was either altered before it reached the Warren Commission, or else withheld altogether. For example, judging from Warren Commission records, the FBI covered up Jack Ruby’s connections to organized crime.

Scott points out the source of the cover-up:  “The House Committee, to its credit, isolated the origins of the false Warren Commission ‘Ruby-as-loner’ myth, which paralleled the Hoover pre-investigation conclusion that ‘Oswald acted alone.’ Both derived from the warped arrangements for the investigation of Ruby and Oswald by the FBI:

Within the General Investigative Division [of the FBI], the probe of Jack Ruby was delegated to the Civil Rights Division on the theory that Ruby violated Oswald’s civil rights by killing him.  While the committee, in its investigation, found that Ruby’s links to various organized crime figures were contained in reports received by the FBI in the weeks following his shooting of Oswald, the Bureau was seriously delinquent in investigating the Ruby-underworld connections…

But why, of all places, was the investigation of Jack Ruby assigned to the Civil Rights Division of the FBI? This bizarre assignment indicateswho was behind the cover-up of Ruby’s connections to organized crime.  The Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice was the domain of Nicholas Katzenbach, the crypto-Jew Deputy Attorney General who had pushed the lone gunman story on J. Edgar Hoover from the beginning.

DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL AND CRYPTO-JEW Nicholas Katzenbach headed the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice. Katzenbach also managed the FBI's "non-investigation" of Jack Ruby, which prevented his connections to the Jewish Supermob of Chicago from being revealed to the Warren Commission - or the public. Katzenbach went on to serve as Attorney General for President Johnson.

"The thing I am concerned about, and so is Katzenbach, is having something issued so we can convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin."
- J. Edgar Hoover (FBI) to White House aide Walter Jenkins, November 24, 1963

"The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he had no confederates who are still at large; and that evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial."
- Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach in a memo to President Johnson's assistant Bill Moyers, November 25, 1963

The investigation of Jack Ruby was evidently assigned to Katzenbach’s department in order to prevent Ruby’s high-level connections to the Jewish mob from being examined and revealed. As Scott points out, “the FBI covered up Jack Ruby’s connections to organized crime. The Commission did not receive an important interview with Luis Kutner, a Chicago lawyer who had just told the press (correctly) about Ruby’s connections to Chicago mobsters Lennie Patrick and Dave Yaras.”

Leonard Patrick 
(aka: Lenny, Joseph Cohen, Pete Peonardi, Leonard Levine, Blinkey)

David Yaras
(aka: David Miller, Yarras, Yaris)

Jack Ruby's sister, Eva Rubinstein Grant, told the Warren Commission that Dave Yarras and Lenny Patrick were two of his closest friends in Chicago, but her testimony was ignored by the Warren Commission.

Patrick and Yaras were Jewish hit-men who Ruby had grown up with in the Lawndale neighborhood. They “supplied muscle for Democratic political boss Jake Arvey’s machine in Chicago’s Jewish 24th Ward,” according to Deep Politics.

According to Kutner, who had accompanied Ruby to a hearing for the Kefauver Senate Rackets Committee in 1950, “Ruby was a syndicate lieutenant who had been sent to Dallas to serve as a liaison for Chicago mobsters.”

Before he moved to Dallas and changed his name to Jack Ruby, Jacob Leon Rubenstein was a regular at the North Lawndale pool room owned by gambling boss Dave “Yiddles" Miller.  “Ruby’s group was known as the Dave Miller gang” and was involved in organized crime, narcotics trafficking, and mobilizing the votes of the Jews.  The Warren Commission knew that Jack Ruby and his brother Hymie were part of Jake Arvey’s political machine, but “went out of its way to disguise the deep politics of the Dave Miller gang,” according to Peter Dale Scott.

Ruby’s longtime acquaintances, Patrick and Yaras, were Jewish syndicate hit-men who shot the former wire service manager James M. Ragen in 1946. Earlier, Ragen had turned to the FBI and was interviewed by the bureau in Chicago.  Ragen's statements to the FBI confirmed that the top echelon of the Chicago mob "led to very high places." According to Ragen’s statements to the FBI, Henry Crown, Jake Arvey, and Walter Annenberg were the Jewish men who controlled the crime syndicate at the top.

Henry Crown (born Krinsky), the businessman, and Jacob Meyer Arvey, the political boss and member of the secret Zionist order of B’nai B’rith, were born one year apart in the mid-1890s in Jewish neighborhoods on Chicago’s West Side. They were close associates and worked together as a team all of their lives.  Apart from their business/political deals, they were both ardent Zionists who were devoted to supporting and arming the state of Israel, even if it meant breaking the law.

In the early 1950s Henry Crown was asked by an agent of the state of Israel to buy an entire aircraft manufacturing plant so that it could be sent to the nascent Jewish state - in violation of U.S. law.  Henry Crown's son Lester told the story during a 2013 gathering of the Aspen Institute.  He laughed at how clever the gun-runner Teddy Kollek had been in obtaining weapons in the United States - illegally.

It was Jack Ruby’s connection to Jake Arvey, Henry Crown, and the Jewish crime syndicate of Chicago that Nicholas Katzenbach and the FBI did not want the Warren Commission to investigate. Their cover-up was assisted by Henry Crown’s personal lawyer, Albert E. Jenner, a Chicago attorney who was appointed to serve on the Warren Commission where he was tasked with investigating the evidence of a conspiracy behind the actions of Lee Harvey Oswald – and Jack Ruby. Was the purpose of the Justice Department cover-up to hide the existence of the Jewish criminal syndicate or to conceal its role in the assassination of President Kennedy - or both?

The Jewish mob from Chicago is called the “Supermob” by Gus Russo, author of the book, Supermob:  How Sidney Korshak and His Criminal Associates Became America’s Hidden Power Brokers.  Russo explains how the Jewish Supermob has been able to protect itself from prosecution:  “thanks to early canny decisions to align itself with key judges and politicians – both local and national – the Supermob rendered its members untouchable.”

NEW YEAR'S DAY 1960 - SEN. LYNDON B. JOHNSON with Chicago Democratic Party boss Jacob Arvey at a party function in Chicago, January 1, 1960, one day after Arvey's partner Henry Crown merged his Chicago company with General Dynamics of Texas.
 Arvey's criminal/political machine was instrumental in getting John F. Kennedy elected - with Vice President Lyndon Johnson attached. Was Kennedy used as a Trojan Horse to get Johnson, an ardent Zionist and probable crypto-Jew, into the White House?

Jake Arvey, Henry Crown, and the Supermob had aligned themselves closely with Lyndon B. Johnson long before he became Vice President with the election of John F. Kennedy in 1960.  Senator Johnson, for example, was the guest of honor at the grand opening of the mob-run Stardust casino in Las Vegas on July 2, 1958.  Johnny Rosselli, named by self-confessed Kennedy assassin James Files as one of the members of his three-man team of assassins in Dallas, was a key player in the Stardust operation. Rosselli claimed he was getting $15,000 to $20,000 per month from the money being skimmed from the Stardust.

According to James Files' testimony, Johnny Rosselli decided not to be a shooter on November 22, 1963, because he had been told that they were to be part of an anti-assassination action - not an assassination.In any case, the Rosselli-Nicoletti-Files team was at the "working level" of the JFK assassination, which is to say that they were being managed by higher-level criminals.

Senator Lyndon Johnson and his confidante Bobby Baker had very close ties to the Jewish mob, according to Michael Newton, author ofMr. Mob: The Life and Crimes of Moe Dalitz:

Lyndon Johnson served as U.S. Senate majority leader from 1955 until he became Vice President in 1961. Two years before that promotion, Johnson was a guest of honor at the Stardust’s grand opening. LBJ confidante Robert “Bobby” Baker forged a close link to the Mob through his involvement in Dominican casinos and through friendship with a cast of characters including Meyer Lansky, Sam Cohen, Ed Levinson, and Miami-Vegas front man Benjamin Sigelbaum.

Most importantly, Lyndon Johnson was an active Zionist agent who had played a key role, as a new congressman, in assisting the B’nai B’rith in their illegal immigration scheme to bring Polish Jews to Texas in the 1930s.  Although he was a member of Congress, Johnson was also reportedly involved in sending weapons to Jewish forces in Palestine in the 1940s - illegally.   

Senator Johnson was closely aligned with Henry Crown, who merged his Chicago company, Material Service Corp., with Texas-based General Dynamics on December 31, 1959.  The following day, January 1, 1960, Senator Johnson attended a Democratic function in Chicago where he sat next to Henry Crown’s senior partner-in-crime, Jake Arvey. 

In 1962, Vice President Johnson played a key role in getting a $6.5 billion contract to produce a military fighter (TFX/F-111) for Henry Crown’s Fort Worth-based General Dynamics, which was on the verge of bankruptcy.  Johnson reportedly received a $100,000 payoff for his help in getting the contract that saved Crown’s new company, asDeep Politics explains:

On November 22, 1963, the day of the assassination, a closed session of the Senate Rules Committee heard sworn testimony from a Baker business associate, Don Reynolds. Reynolds was telling the committee of a big lobbyists' sex party in New York, and also of a suitcase he had seen, full of money which Baker described as a $100,000 payoff to Johnson for his role in securing the Fort Worth TFX contract. His testimony was broken off by the news that the President had been shot.

Jack Ruby’s murder to silence Lee Harvey Oswald was the linchpin in the cover-up of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.  Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach at the Department of Justice and J. Edgar Hoover were evidently part of a criminal conspiracy to portray Oswald as a lone gunman from the outset.  They also conspired to conceal Jack Ruby’s connections to Jake Arvey and the Jewish mob of Chicago. Their cover-up required a massive falsification of the evidence.

Katzenbach, a crypto-Jew who also had close ties to the international order of Zionist Freemasons, the B'nai B'rith, played the same key role in the JFK cover-up at the Department of Justice as the Israeli-American Michael Chertoff played during the FBI's "non-investigation" of 9-11.  Assistant Attorney General Chertoff was supposed to prosecute the crimes of 9-11, but instead of leading a proper criminal investigation he authorized the destruction of the crucial evidence.

Albert E. Jenner, personal lawyer for Henry Crown (and other Jewish mobsters), served on the Warren Commission where he facilitated the cover-up of Jack Ruby’s connections to the Jewish-Zionist mob of Chicago, an organization headed by Henry Crown and Jake Arvey. Why was it so important to conceal Ruby’s ties to the Supermob from Chicago if they were not involved in the assassinations of President Kennedy and Lee Harvey Oswald?

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "New TWA 800 Film Reveals FBI/CIA Lies,", July 2, 2013

Demaris, Ovid, Captive City: Chicago in Chains, Lyle Stuart, Inc., 1969

Franklin, Roger, The Defender: The Story of General Dynamics, Harper & Row, 1986

Henry F. Hughes on TWA Flight 800, Senior Aviation Accident Investigator, NTSB, 60 Minutes, Australia, September 20, 2013 or

Newton, Michael, Mr. Mob: The Life and Crimes of Moe Dalitz, McFarland, 2009

Russo, Gus, Supermob: How Sidney Korshak and His Criminal Associates Became America's Hidden Power Brokers, Bloomsbury, 2006

Scott, Peter Dale, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, University of California Press, 1993

Related articles: 

Barker, Michael, “The Philanthropic-Zionist Complex,” June 8, 2010

Hodges, Dave, “If John Kennedy Had Lived,” November 22, 2013 

The Crown Family Connections to the Kennedy Assassinations

November 21, 2013

SENATOR ROBERT F. KENNEDY was the leading Democratic candidate in the 1968 presidential contest. Kennedy called for ending the war in Vietnam and ran on a platform of racial and economic justice, non-aggression in foreign policy, decentralization of power and social improvement. Had he won the presidency he would have re-opened the investigation into the murder of his brother, President John F. Kennedy. After winning the California primary, Kennedy made his final victory speech at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles on June 5, 1968.

As he exited through the hotel pantry, Senator Kennedy was shot from behind at close range. Thomas Noguchi, the Chief Medical Examiner for Los Angeles, conducted the autopsy and concluded that the fatal shot had not been fired by Sirhan Sirhan, but had come from a gun very close to the back of Kennedy's head and penetrated his skull behind the right ear at an upward angle. The fatal shot came from a distance of no more than one to three inches away (3 - 7.5 cm). Sirhan Sirhan, however, the alleged assassin, had been standing several feet in front of Kennedy.

WHO SET THE STAGE?  How could Sirhan Sirhan, or his handlers, possibly know that Senator Kennedy would be coming through the hotel kitchen? How did they have access to the hotel kitchen? Where was hotel security? Who was controlling the hotel?

THE AMBASSADOR HOTEL where Bobby Kennedy was shot in June 1968 was owned by Myer Schine, who was connected to Mickey Cohen, the West Coast crime boss who hated Bobby Kennedy.

MYER SCHINE had close relations with organized crime and owned a network of hotels in Florida and across America that earned money by hosting illegal casinos and gambling operations.

MICKEY COHEN - The West Coast crime boss (born Meyer Cohen) ran an illegal casino from Myer Schine's Ambassador Hotel in the late 1940s. He started out with Bugsy Siegel and was allied with Meyer Lansky and Frank Costello by the early 1940s. At age thirty-four, Cohen took over when Siegel was murdered in 1947. Cohen's plan for total control included a newspaper, a wire-tapper, and the state's attorney general. Illiterate, he hired a tutor to learn to read and write. He became involved with major Hollywood figures and top politicians. Frank Sinatra, Robert Mitchum, Dean Martin, Jerry Lewis, and Sammy Davis Jr. were just a few of the stars that bowed to the new boss, according to his biography. One of his specialties was blackmailing movie stars with secrets, often of a sexual nature. Most importantly, U.S. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy prosecuted Cohen in 1961. Cohen was sentenced to 15 years in Alcatraz. Kennedy's successful crackdown on organized crime made him Cohen's "great enemy."

MENACHEM BEGIN the head of the terrorist Irgun in 1943-48, fled Palestine following his organization’s bombing of a Jerusalem hotel, which killed 15 people in January 1948. While hiding in Los Angeles, Begin met Mickey Cohen and other undesirables. Cohen and other Jewish gangsters, such as Meyer Lansky, provided Begin's terrorist Irgun with weapons and money. Begin's terrorist gang rebranded itself as the Likud in the 1970s and has ruled the state of Israel since.

MYER SCHINE'S GRANDSON - James Schine Crown is president of Henry Crown and Company, a family-owned company. Crown is lead director of the defense contractor General Dynamics and is a director of JPMorgan Chase.  The Crown family was connected to the Warren Commission and profited greatly from the Vietnam War.

MRS. LESTER CROWN is Renee Schine, the daughter of Myer Schine.

AN INTERESTING COINCIDENCE was that Renee Schine (bottom row) returned from Europe on the Queen Mary in August 1948 with Jacqueline Bouvier (top row) in 1948.  I called Mrs. Crown to ask if she remembered Jackie and got a very odd response.  She pretended to be someone else, but when I said what I was calling about, she said it was not true.  How odd, I thought. Why would any person venture to say such a thing if she were not, in fact, Renee Schine Crown?  My questions to Lester Crown went unanswered. When they answer the phone at Henry Crown & Co. they don't answer the phone by identifying themselves; they answer by giving the phone number: 312.....  How odd.

MYER SCHINE also owned the Gulf Stream Hotel on Miami Beach where FBI chief J. Edgar Hoover and Clyde Tolson enjoyed their annual Christmas holidays - on the house. 

MIAMI 1937 - J. Edgar Hoover playing backgammon with Clyde Tolson. So, what did the Schines get in return for their free hospitality? Protection from federal prosecution?

The Henry Crown (formerly Krinsky) family of Chicago is connected to the cover-ups of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the terror attacks of 9-11, as I describe in my article "JFK and 9-11: Henry Crown and the Cover-Ups of Our Time."

Most amazingly, the Crown family is also connected to the 1968 assassination of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy. 

Bobby Kennedy was killed in the Ambassador Hotel, which was owned by Myer Schine, the father of Renee Schine and father-in-law of Lester Crown. Schine also owned the Gulf Stream Hotel on Miami Beach where J. Edgar Hoover spent his winter holidays - free of charge.

The Crown family of Chicago, the controlling family of the huge defense contractor General Dynamics, is connected to all kinds of things, but for the same family of war profiteers to be connected to the assassinations of both John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy, and the terror attacks of 9-11, is either a remarkable coincidence or an indication of involvement in these mega-crimes.


Henry Crown became the largest shareholder of Texas-based General Dynamics when he merged his sand and gravel (and cement) company, Material Service Corp., with the nearly bankrupt defense contractor in 1959.  Crown's new company was in dire straits financially until 1962 when it was rescued by a $7 billion contract to produce a new fighter jet for the military. This became known as the TFX/F-111 scandal. In 1963 General Dynamics came under congressional investigation to determine exactly how Henry Crown had finagled this huge Texas deal.

Peter Dale Scott, the author of Deep Politics and the Death of JFK (1993), explains how Lyndon Johnson was tied into this crooked deal:

According to President Kennedy's secretary, Evelyn Lincoln, Bobby Kennedy was also investigating Bobby Baker for tax evasion and fraud. This had reached the point where the President himself discussed the Baker investigation with his secretary, and allegedly told her that his running mate in 1964 would not be Lyndon Johnson. The date of this discussion was November 19, 1963, the day before the President left for Texas.

A Senate Rules Committee investigation into the Bobby Baker scandal was indeed moving rapidly to implicate Lyndon Johnson, and on a matter concerning a concurrent scandal and investigation. This was the award of a $7-billion contract for a fighter plane, the TFX, to a General Dynamics plant in Fort Worth. Navy Secretary Fred Korth, a former bank president and a Johnson man, had been forced to resign in October 1963, after reporters discovered that his bank, the Continental National Bank of Fort Worth, was the principal money source for the General Dynamics plant.

On November 22, 1963, the day of the assassination, a closed session of the Senate Rules Committee heard sworn testimony from a Baker business associate, Don Reynolds. Reynolds was telling the committee of a big lobbyists' sex party in New York, and also of a suitcase he had seen, full of money which Baker described as a $100,000 payoff to Johnson for his role in securing the Fort Worth TFX contract. His testimony was broken off by the news that the President had been shot.

This bit of history indicates that Vice President Lyndon Johnson was involved in a criminal way in the crooked TFX deal that gave Henry Crown's new company the largest military aircraft contract in U.S. history. As the recipient of a $100,000 payoff, Johnson would have been in a position in which he could be blackmailed by Henry Crown.

Henry Crown's personal lawyer, Albert E. Jenner, who also served as a director of General Dynamics, was appointed by Lyndon Johnson to the Warren Commission where he was tasked with investigating the evidence of a conspiracy behind Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby. He found none.

J. Edgar Hoover, the head of the FBI, personally directed the FBI investigation into the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The House Select Committee on Assassinations issued a report in 1979 critical of the FBI investigation and the Warren Commission. The report criticized the FBI's reluctance to thoroughly investigate the possibility of a conspiracy to assassinate the President.

The United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) was established in 1976 to investigate the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. The Committee's final report concluded that Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy.

J. Edgar Hoover, however, was in a compromised position, as Deep Politics reveals:

All of these anti-Communist politicians, but J. Edgar Hoover above all, exposed themselves to political blackmail by visiting the Del Charro in the company of mobsters.  Hoover even had a special detail of FBI agents to ensure that mobsters would not come up to him in public at the racetrack. But his love of horse racing and gambling meant that his holidays recurringly exposed him to the milieu of organized crime, whether at the Del Charro or (his other annual freeloading holiday) the Gulf Stream Hotel owned by the family of the McCarthy staffer G. David Schine.

J. EDGAR HOOVER enjoyed free annual holidays at the Gulf Stream Hotel Apartments and Cottages on Miami Beach which was owned by Myer Schine.  Hoover and Clyde Tolson, seen here, had adjacent cottages.


In 1986, when the Ambassador Hotel was put up for sale, the Los Angeles Times reported on the Crown connection:

Chicago businessman Lester Crown is making no promises that the hotel will be spared the wrecker's ball. "I think that will be the determination of the purchaser," said Crown, who is supervising the sale for the Schine family, which has owned the hotel since 1946.

Crown is overseeing the sale as part of the gradual liquidation of the theater and hotel empire of J. Myer Schine, who died in 1971. Crown, 60, is married to one of Schine's children and himself runs a family empire that, according to a recent Business Week magazine estimate, is probably worth at least $1.5 billion.

In keeping with the Ambassador's unorthodox history, announcement of the sale was made not by the hotel or the Schines but by Los Angeles City Councilman John Ferraro. The councilman is pushing hard, with the support of historical groups, to keep the hotel alive. His district includes the mid-Wilshire area, where the hotel is located. The hotel, set well back from Wilshire Boulevard, is surrounded by spacious gardens that are a throwback to more leisurely days.

As the Times notes, it was odd that the sale of the hotel was not announced by Lester Crown or the Schine family, but by a city councilman.  Did Lester Crown want to hide the fact that he was the person selling the hotel?  The Wikipedia article about the  Ambassador Hotel  does not even mention that the hotel had been owned since 1946 by Myer Schine. In fact, it doesn't mention any owner at all. What a telling omission.

Knowing who owned the hotel where Bobby Kennedy was killed is important, because it was the place, the stage, where a very significant political assassination was carried out.  The owner of the hotel where the crime occurred would have been in the position to manage the whole operation and control the most important factors that contributed to the murder. This is the same relationship that Larry Silverstein, the lease-holder of the World Trade Center, has to the events of 9-11.  He owned and controlled the place where the crime was committed. How can the fact that the Ambassador Hotel was owned by a family closely tied to organized crime not be relevant to the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy? 


"Ambassador Hotel Struggling to Survive" by Tom Furlong, Los Angeles Times, May 18, 1986

"Ambassador Hotel,", November 21, 2013

"Incomplete Justice - Part One: At the Ambassador Hotel" by Larry Hancock, May 19, 2008

"JFK and 9-11: Henry Crown and the Cover-Ups of Our Time" by Christopher Bollyn, November 7, 2013

"Mickey Cohen,", November 21, 2013 

Newton, Michael, Mr. Mob: The Life and Crimes of Moe Dalitz, McFarland, 2009 

Scott, Peter Dale, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, University of California Press, 1993

"The Ugly Fall of the Schine Empire" by Judy Marcoux, April 22, 2012

LBJ & the Zionist Cover-up of the Conspiracy to Kill Kennedy

November 18, 2013

- Bob Schieffer lying about Lee Harvey Oswald's role in the assassination of JFK, "Face the Nation," November 17, 2013

"The thing I am concerned about, and so is [Deputy Attorney General] Katzenbach, is having something issued so we can convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin."
- J. Edgar Hoover (FBI) to White House aide Walter Jenkins, November 24, 1963

"The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he had no confederates who are still at large; and that evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial."
- Deputy Attorney General 
Nicholas Katzenbach in a memo to President Johnson's assistant Bill Moyers, November 25, 1963 (See note on Katzenbach's Jewish ethnicity at bottom.)

"There is one sanctuary where the Warren Report is still stubbornly upheld and where its manifold critics can expect their own rough treatment: in the towers of the media elite."
- David Talbot, “The Mother of All Coverups,”, September 15, 2004

IN THE FIRST MINUTE of "Face the Nation" Bob Schieffer of CBS News repeats the fundamental lie of the murder of President John F. Kennedy. 

Bob Schieffer of the CBS News program "Face the Nation" began the show of November 17, which was dedicated to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, with the fundamental lie about the political murder that changed America:

From here on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository in Dallas, fifty years ago this week, a lone gunman pointed a $21 dollar mail-order rifle through this window and shot and killed the president of the United States while his motorcade was passing below.  It was an easy shot.

Schieffer is lying about the Kennedy assassination and he knows he is lying. Expert marksmen have tried to make the three shots Oswald is said to have made from the 6th Floor of the School Book Depository and found that there is nothing "easy" about it. 

Schieffer is from Fort Worth, Texas, and his younger brother Tom Schieffer is a former business partner of George W. Bush.  Schieffer was a co-owner of the Texas Rangers baseball club with George W. Bush and he went on to serve as the U.S. Ambassador to Australia during his first term and Ambassador to Japan during his second.


CBS News is a good example of a Zionist-controlled media outlet. The president and chief executive officer of CBS Corporation is Leslie Roy Moonves, a great-nephew of David Ben-Gurion, the founding father and first Prime Minister of Israel.  For Americans this would be like being related to George Washington.

MRS. BEN GURION - Russian-born Paula Moonvess Ben Gurion (center) is the great-aunt of Leslie Moonves, the CEO of CBS Corp. The photo of David Ben Gurion, Israel's first prime minister and defense minister, and his wife is from the first Israel Defense Forces parade in July 1948.

LESLIE MOONVES oversees all operations of CBS Corp., including the CBS television network, the CW, CBS television stations, studios, and distribution, Showtime, CBS Radio, CBS Records, CBS Outdoor, Simon & Schuster, CBS Interactive, CBS Consumer Products, CBS Home Entertainment, CBS Outernet and CBS Films.

So Bob Schieffer is associated with the Bush family through his brother and works for a television network that is run by an ardent Zionist who is related to the founding father of the state of Israel.  Although a clear majority of Americans (at least 60 percent) believe that a conspiracy was behind the Kennedy assassination, Shieffer begins the memorial week by telling the nation that President Kennedy was killed by a lone gunman with what he says "was an easy shot." 

So, why does the controlled media in the United States refuse to face the evidence that Kennedy was hit from several different angles, and by at least two gunmen who were positioned in front of the motorcade and that the assassination was, therefore, clearly a conspiracy?

The wounds to President Kennedy's head indicate that he was shot from several different angles.  One fatal shot to the head evidently came from the picket fence by the trees (seen here in the middle of the photo) on the other side of the bridge from the "grassy knoll" where James Files shot Kennedy in his right temple.

SECOND FATAL HEAD SHOT - While James Files was standing behind the fence by the trees on the left side of this photo, another assassin was shooting from the other side of the railroad overpass. President Kennedy was evidently hit by two bullets from this direction, one in the throat and another that exited from the back of his skull.


To understand why the Zionist-controlled media refuses to address the abundant evidence of a conspiracy and insists on pushing the blatant lie that Kennedy was killed by a lone assassin, the following logic about the assassination needs to be grasped:

Why does the murder of President John F. Kennedy still matter?

It matters because the murder of President Kennedy was not only a conspiracy but a coup d’etat. The powers behind the assassination took control over the government and orchestrated the cover-up.

It matters because a coup d'etat that is successfully kept secret in a democratic country means, by default, that the succeeding government is illegitimate.

It matters because the American government continues to lie about the Kennedy assassination.

It matters because if the government is still lying about the Kennedy assassination, it essentially means that the powers that killed John F. Kennedy are still in charge to this very day.

It matters because the mainstream media continues to support, and even endorse, the official version of the Kennedy assassination.


Using the same logic that I apply to the 9-11 cover-up we can conclude that the people involved in the JFK cover-up are part of the criminal network behind the assassination.  So, why would the Zionist-controlled media engage in a cover-up and who are they doing it for? It doesn't make any sense that the Zionist elite that controls the U.S. media would cover up the JFK conspiracy for the Mafia, the CIA, or the anti-Castro Cubans.  The Zionist-controlled media is, most likely, covering up the conspiracy in order to protect the Zionist criminals who masterminded the assassination of President Kennedy.

The cover-up of the conspiracy to kill President Kennedy began immediately after the murder in Dallas and was clearly orchestrated at the highest level, as Kevin Costner, playing Jim Garrison, said about the role of the Mafia in the film JFK:

"I don't doubt their involvement, Bill, but at a lower level. Could the Mob change the parade route, Bill? Or eliminate the protection for the President? Could the Mob send Oswald to Russia and get him back? Could the Mob get the FBI, the CIA, and the Dallas Police to make a mess of the investigation? Could the Mob get the Warren Commission appointed to cover it up? Could the Mob wreck the autopsy? Could the Mob influence the national media to go to sleep...This was a military-style ambush from start to finish ... a coup d'état with Lyndon Johnson waiting in the wings."
— Kevin Costner as Jim Garrison in the film JFK


President Johnson had been involved in illegal Zionist activities since the 1930s and had a "special relationship" with Israeli president Levi Eshkol, seen here at Johnson's ranch in 1966.

Lyndon B. Johnson, who became the president on the day Kennedy died, was an ardent Zionist and devoted supporter of the state of Israel.  His aunt Jessie Johnson Hatcher, who was a major influence on Lyndon, was a member of the Zionist Organization of America. While it seems very likely that his family was in fact Jewish (i.e.Crypto-Jews), there is absolutely no question that Lyndon Johnson was a high-level Zionist who had been involved for decades with the Jewish Freemasonic organization, the International Order of the B'nai B'rith, in the illegal immigration of Jews from Poland to Galveston. The smuggling operation of Jews to Texas in which LBJ was involved from 1937 is known as "Operation Texas".

The B'nai B'rith was behind the plan to bring Jews from Poland to Texas.  Lyndon Johnson, as a new congressman, was a key player in this operation and broke the law to facilitate the illegal immigration scheme.

Historians have revealed that Johnson, while serving as a young congressman in 1938 and 1939, arranged for visas to be supplied to Jews in Warsaw, and oversaw the apparently illegal immigration of hundreds of Jews through the port of Galveston, Texas. In this operation Johnson was working with the Zionist elders of the B'nai B'rith, not through normal government offices.

When he became a Congressman in 1937, Lyndon Johnson began using legal and sometimes illegal methods to smuggle "hundreds of Jews into Texas, using Galveston as the entry port. Enough money could buy false passports and fake visas in Cuba, Mexico and other Latin American countries.... Johnson smuggled boatloads and planeloads of Jews into Texas. He hid them in the Texas National Youth Administration... Johnson saved at least four or five hundred Jews, possibly more," according to historian James M. Smallwood.

James Smallwood said, "It is correct that Johnson did not risk his life, but he committed illegal acts to save the Jews. It can be proved that LBJ saved some 42 from the Nazis. Indirect evidence says he probably saved about 400. From my research, I agree with the larger number. However, there are problems, since much of what went on was illegal and Johnson knew better than to leave a paper trail." 

According to Louis Gomolak's thesis, "Prologue: LBJ's Foreign Affairs Background, 1908-1948," Johnson and his friend Jim Lovy raised a very "substantial sum for arms for Jewish underground fighters in Palestine." One source cited by the historian reports that "[Jim] Novy and Johnson had been secretly shipping heavy crates labeled 'Texas Grapefruit' - but containing arms - to Jewish underground 'freedom fighters' in Palestine."

Lyndon Johnson's illegal activities in support of the Zionist forces in Palestine is something he had in common with Col. Henry Crown, the Zionist Jew from Chicago who became the largest shareholder of General Dynamics (of Fort Worth) in 1959.  Henry Crown had purchased an entire aircraft manufacturing plant, probably in Texas in the early 1950s, which was crated up and shipped to Israel in violation of U.S. law. 

From the earliest days of his political career Lyndon Johnson was clearly working with and for the B'nai B'rith and the Zionist mobsters who were bringing Polish Jews to Texas and later sending U.S. weapons - illegally - to Zionist forces in Palestine. Johnson's history as a high-level Zionist agent needs to be taken into consideration when looking at his role in the cover-up of the evidence of a conspiracy to kill President Kennedy and the cover-up of the murderous Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in 1967. 

President Lyndon Johnson was the official in the highest position to mastermind the JFK cover-up and the person who appointed the Warren Commission.  It is important to realize that Johnson was an active and dedicated Zionist agent who set the stage for the assassination as Vice President and then masterminded the cover-up as the new president.  

Lyndon Johnson and the Zionist-controlled media have covered-up the truth of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy because it was a crime that was carried out by the Zionist criminal network, which took power in the coup d'etat in Dallas in November 1963 and which has been in power ever since. The role of the Zionist-controlled media is to keep the population from realizing that a criminal regime of Zionist agents controls their government.

Note on Nicholas D. Katzenbach -

Nicholas D. Katzenbach and Lyndon B. Johnson
Katzenbach was Assistant Attorney General, 1961-1962; Deputy Attorney General, 1962-1964; Acting and later U.S. Attorney General, 1964-1966; Under Secretary of State, 1966-1969

Deputy Attorney General Nicholas D. Katzenbach wrote the controversial November 25, 1963, memo that certainly appears to be discussing a government cover-up.  Katzenbach went on to serve as Attorney General and Undersecretary of State under President Lyndon Johnson. Although Katzenbach is described as an Episcopalian, he was listed as a Jew by the National Jewish Welfare Board during World War II:

Source: U.S., WWII Jewish Servicemen Cards, 1942-1947


"Lyndon Johnson - A Friend in Deed," by Lenny Ben-David, Jerusalem Post, September 10, 2008

"Operation Texas: LBJ and the Rescue of European Jews from Hitler," by Jim Moore, The Gilmer Mirror, 2010 

"So you think you’re a Crypto-Jew?" by Amy Klein, May 18, 2009

The Man Who Shot JFK & The Chicago Connection

Updated November 13, 2013

I SHOT JFK - James Earl Files (born January 24, 1942), a prisoner at the Stateville Correctional Center (Illinois), admitted being one of the snipers who killed President Kennedy.

REMINGTON FIREBALL XP-100 with scope, the weapon Files says he used.
Photo from

Source:  "Jim Garrison on the JFK Assassination"
Watch this 3-Minute Video -

The two-minute taped confession of the Chicago gangster James Earl Files in which he confesses that he was one of the gunmen who shot President John F. Kennedy is required viewing to understand this article.  

The video can be watched at:

The testimony in this video is compelling evidence because, if true, it proves that members of the Chicago Outfit, such asSam Giancana, who were partners-in-crime with Sidney and Marshall Korshak, Henry Crown, Jacob Arvey, and the Zionist Mob of Chicago, were involved in the JFK assassination.  The question remains:  Who were the architectural planners of the assassination?  

In the video, Files refers to two other Chicago gunmen that he knew were involved in the assassination of President Kennedy:  John Roselli and Charles Nicoletti.


Sidney Korshak, the lawyer for the Chicago Outfit, defended high-level mobsters like Al Capone, Frank Nitti, Sam Giancana, Tony Accardo, and Moe Dalitz. The Korshak family is married into the Crown family of Chicago.  Charles "Corky" Goodman, vice chairman of Henry Crown and Company (the family-owned company behind General Dynamics) and son-in-law of Irving Crown, is married to Margie Korshak, the daughter of the former Chicago political boss and city treasurer, Marshall Korshak, who had also served as director of the Illinois Department of Revenue and director of revenue for Chicago.

TIGHT WITH THE MOB - Margie Korshak (left) with Michelle Obama

THE MONEY MAN - Former City Treasurer Marshall Korshak (born Morris Korshak) shares a joke with then Mayor of Chicago Harold Washington at the Palmer House hotel. 
(Photo: James Mayo, Chicago Tribune, March 30, 1984)

While Marshall Korshak oversaw the revenues of Illinois and Chicago, his brother Sidney was a notorious lawyer and counselor (consigliere) to the national crime syndicate and "was close to Giancana and Roselli," according to Supermob: How Sidney Korshak and His Criminal Associates Became America's Hidden Power Brokers by Gus Russo. 

Tom Hagen, the character played by Robert Duvall, is the consigliere to the Corleone family in The Godfather films. The character is based on Sidney Korshak, the real-life Zionist Jewish consigliere, who served as an advisor in the production of the films.

TOM HAGEN - A "German-Irish" lawyer (left, played by Robert Duvall) in The Godfather was a film portrayal of Sidney Korshak, a Russian Jew from Chicago.

SIDNEY KORSHAK was the real-life consigliere for the Mob. If Sam Giancana was involved in the murder of President Kennedy - Sidney Korshak would have been involved in the planning of the crime.  Korshak was the key person connecting the national crime syndicate to the Zionist Mob, Hollywood, Las Vegas -- and the state of Israel.

The close connection between Sidney Korshak with Sam Giancana and John Roselli would suggest that the Zionist lawyer Sidney Korshak was involved at the higest level in the planning and execution of the assassination of President Kennedy. Korshak's connection to Henry Crown explains the Chicago Outfit's connection to Dallas (and Lyndon Johnson), where Crown's newly acquired company General Dynamics had just finagled a $6.5 billion contract to develop the TFX/F-111 fighter jet.

The Zionist connection to the Kennedy assassination would have to have been at the highest level in order to explain how Arlen Specter, a member of B'nai B'rith, the secret Zionist order of Freemasons, came to fill the crucial role of promoting the absurd "magic bullet" theory, a fabrication that was essential to support the conclusion of the Warren Commission that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. 

Specter, the son of a Jewish junk peddler from the Ukraine and a newly-minted lawyer from Philadelphia in 1963, was not promoting this outrageous fabrication to protect Italian mobsters from Chicago.  It is important to understand whoSpecter was serving with his lie about the magic bullet because it reveals the culprits behind the assassination.

On August 9, 1976, Roselli's body was found in a 55-gallon steel fuel drum floating near Miami. Roselli had been strangled and shot, and his legs were sawn off. It is believed that Roselli was murdered for revealing too much about the Kennedy assassination during his Senate testimony.

On March 29, 1977, Nicoletti received three .38 caliber slugs to the back of his head while waiting in his Oldsmobile in the parking lot of the Golden Horns Restaurant in suburban Northlake, Illinois. Nicoletti was due to appear before the House Select Committee on Assassinations at the time of his death.

In June of 1993, Don Irving, a veteran attorney with over 25 years experience with high profile cases, cross-examined James E. Files for seven hours and reported that he found no inconsistencies in Mr. Files' confession:

Mr. Files is serving a 50-year term for the attempted murder of two police officers.  His FBI rap sheet indicates a life filled with violent crimes.  Agent Shelton informed investigator West and attorney Irving that the FBI had previously gathered information from an informant that Mr. Files has knowledge of the events that occurred in Dealey Plaza on November 22nd, 1963.

Agent Shelton verified that Mr. Files was an associate and driver/bodyguard for one Charles Nicoletti, a known Mafia hitman from Chicago.  Agent Shelton further states that he had long suspected that Chicago mob members Sam Giancana, Charles Nicoletti and John Roselli were involved in the assassination of John F. Kennedy, but that he had no hard evidence to support his beliefs.

On August the 16th and 17th, 1992, after an extensive search to locate the prisoner, investigator West spent several hours each day questioning James E. Files.  During the August 17th, 1992, meeting, Mr. Files confessed that he was involved in the JFK assassination.  Mr. Files confessed that he was present in Dealey Plaza and that Charles Nicoletti and John Roselli were also present in Dealey Plaza.

Mr. Files further confessed that he had been recruited and worked for the CIA in the early 1960s, later becoming a driver for Charles Nicoletti of the Chicago Mafia...

We shared the confession of James E. Files with criminal attorney Don Irving, who agreed to visit Files in an effort to cross-examine Mr. Files to ascertain his validity.  In June of 1993, Attorney Irving, a veteran of over 25 years of high profile cases, spent almost seven hours with James E. Files at the Joliet Prison.  Mr. Irving reported that he found no inconsistencies in Mr. Files confession.

Source:  ARRB Public Hearing, Dallas, November 18, 1994, pp. 29-30

James Crown: The Israeli Connection in the Madoff Scam

Updated October 26, 2013

The New York Times reports that JP Morgan enabled Madoff to steal untold billions of dollars, while the bank made "at least" $500,000,000 in the process.  The bank will pay a penalty, but will the criminal "banksters" at JP Morgan be prosecuted for enabling the scam?

“Every Israeli prime minister, every Israeli president knows the Crown family.”
- Steven Nasatir, President, Jewish United Fund/Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

“I am saying that the banks and funds were complicit in one form or another and my information to Picard when he was here established this.”
- Bernard Madoff, "From jail, Madoff says others knew," New York Times, February 15, 2011

KEY ZIONIST AGENT IN THE MADOFF RIP-OFF AT JP MORGAN - James S. Crown, a long-standing director of PEC Israel Economic Corporation, a subsidiary of Israel Discount Bank (IDB Holding), happens to be the director at JP Morgan who oversees the bank's "Risk Policy Committee."

"AND THE PEOPLE WHO ENABLED HIM" - JP Morgan made "at least" $500,000,000 on the Madoff scheme, which the bankers knew was a scam. James Crown certainly knows where Madoff's missing billions went. Will James Crown face criminal prosecution? That's the real question.


James Schine Crown is the key director at JP Morgan, since 2004, who facilitated the Madoff Ponzi scheme. Crown is also a long-standing director of an Israeli bank that is deeply involved in 9-11 and the massive financial scams that have robbed the American public and plundered the U.S. Treasury. So, Mr. Crown, where did Madoff's missing billions disappear to?

Crown's grandfather, Henry, was a Jewish gangster from Chicago who became a major weapons smuggler to the Zionist forces in Palestine.  Henry Crown provided the nascent Jewish state with its first aircraft manufacturing plant - smuggled out of the United States to Israel in violation of U.S. law in the early 1950s.  Henry Crown's personal lawyer was later appointed to the Warren Commission to investigate evidence of a conspiracy behind Lee Harvey Oswald or Jack Ruby. He found no conspiracy.

In an interview with Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic during the Aspen Ideas Festival in July 2013 Lester Crown revealed that his father, Henry Crown, had worked as an Israeli agent by providing Israel with an American aircraft plant in violation of U.S. law in the early 1950s. Here he laughs about what a clever weapons smuggler Teddy Kollek was. 
Source: "Perspectives on the United States and Israel" (from 16:00 minutes)
Video Link - 

Henry Crown went on to merge his Chicago-based Material Service Corp. with Texas-based General Dynamics in 1959. Henry Crown and General Dynamics then finagled, under very dubious circumstances, a $7 billion contract to develop the TFX (Tactical Experimental Fighter) aircraft - with the help of Lyndon B. Johnson. The TFX scandal was raging during the months before the Kennedy assassination in Dallas (See: JFK on TFX ). Henry Crown's lawyer, Albert E. Jenner, was a director of General Dynamics.

November 22, 1963 - President John F. Kennedy moments before he was assassinated. Henry Crown's lawyer investigated the evidence of a conspiracy for the Warren Commission - and found none.

Likewise, agents associated with Henry Crown and Company were the first to investigate and explain what happened to the Twin Towers on 9-11. They did not find any evidence of explosives, which they did not even look for, and said the explosive collapses had been caused by fire. How is it that a Zionist Mob family from Chicago finds itself involved in all the mega-crimes of our times?


The federal criminal investigation of JP Morgan Chase and the role America’s largest bank played in the Bernard Madoff Ponzi scheme reveals the key role played by James S. Crown, president of Henry Crown and Co., in the multi-billion dollar scam.

James Crown is grandson of Henry Crown (born Krinsky), a Zionist Jew from Chicago who started out in the sand, gravel, and concrete business and made a fortune during World War II as a chief of procurement for the U.S. Army. 

It is worth noting that James Crown is also a director of the PEC Israel Economic Corporation, which is a subsidiary of Israel Discount Bank (IDB Holding). The IDB company is deeply involved in 9-11 and the massive financial rip-offs that surfaced in 2008. Crown has been a director of this Israeli financial company since 1985. As a long-standing member of the board of PEC Israel Economic Corp. Crown serves as a high-level agent of the state of Israel. He has also served as a director of General Dynamics, one of the largest defense contractors in the United States, since 1987.

Shortly after the war, Henry Crown was involved in smuggling illegal weapons technology to the state of Israel – in violation of U.S. law. Last summer, Henry’s son, Lester Crown, revealed during a gathering in Aspen, Colorado, that his father had provided the state of Israel with an entire aircraft manufacturing plant in the early 1950s, which he had been asked to buy for the Zionist state, presumably by Teddy Kollek and Shimon Peres, the Israelis who ran the illegal weapons (and nuclear) smuggling operations at the time.

Crown went on to take over General Dynamics in 1959 by merging his Material Service Corporation with the defense contractor. The Crown family has controlled General Dynamics since the mid-1960s and has made immense profits from supplying weapons and war materiel to the U.S. government.

Henry Crown was well known to be involved in organized crime at the highest levels in Chicago, which is why it seemed odd that his personal lawyer, Albert E. Jenner, was appointed to serve on the Warren Commission. Jenner’s task was to investigate the evidence of a conspiracy behind Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby.


Zdenek Bazant of Northwestern University and the late W. Gene Corley of CTL Group are two people, associated with Henry Crown and Co., who played key roles in the cover-up of 9-11.  Bazant, a Czech immigrant, wrote a paper that was published two days after 9-11 that provided a seemingly plausible explanation for how the Twin Towers collapsed due to burning jet fuel. It is very odd that an engineering professor would write a paper about how the Twin Towers collapsed without viewing any of the evidence from the scene. Bazant works for the McCormick School of Engineering at Northwestern, a school - and a private university - that are both largely funded by the Crown family.

"I'M NOT A METALLURGIST" - Gene Corley (kneeling), a concrete specialist, headed the structural investigation of the Twin Towers although steel was virtually all that remained at the site. Corley admitted to the author that he knew nothing about how to test steel for evidence of explosives. Previously, Corley headed the investigation of the Oklahoma City bombing, a flawed study which earned him the Henry Crown Award in 1997.

W. Gene Corley was a concrete specialist who worked with the American Concrete Institute and received the Henry Crown Award in 1997 for his work on the investigation of the bombed-out Murrah Building in Oklahoma City. Corley went on to head a similar investigation of the bombed-out World Trade Center although he did not even look for evidence of explosives and admitted that he knew nothing about tests that could be done on steel to determine if it had been exposed to explosives. “I am not a metallurgist,” he told me, although virtually all that remained at Ground Zero was twisted and mangled pieces of steel.

To give the reader some idea of the Crown family connection to organized crime, I offer this extract from an article written in 1995 by the muck-raking journalist from Chicago, the late Sherman Skolnick:

The Crowns and the Pritzkers are interlocked criminals. The Crown flagship, set up in 1919, was Material Service Corp. Over the years, they got big-city paving and cement contracts by bribing Chicago city officials! From that, they branched out into being war mongers. The Crowns have been major owners of bloody war-contractor General Dynamics. The Crowns escaped going to prison for bribing Pentagon brass. How? By bribing federal officials!

Once-president of Material Service, Lester Crown escaped jail in 1976 in a concrete industry scandal by bribing federal prosecutors in Chicago who used him only as a government witness. In the past, Lester was a director of the Vatican dope money laundry, Continental Bank.

To try to get the stink off themselves, the Crowns donate part of their loot to Northwestern University, which has a building named after them. They might as well call it "The Al Capone Center".


To understand the Crown family connection to Madoff one needs to know a bit more than what is being told in the controlled press. The key connection is that James Crown has been a director of JP Morgan during the time that the bank had serious doubts about the Madoff fund. More specifically, James Crown headed the committees that should have known about the scam and taken action to protect investors. 

Crown serves as the chairman of JP Morgan’s “Risk Policy Committee” and previously served as chairman of the bank’s “Public Responsibility Committee.”

The mission of the two board committees that Crown headed as a bank director are, according to the JP Morgan website, the following:

The purpose of the Risk Policy Committee ("DRPC") is to assist the Board in its oversight of management's exercise of its responsibility to:

·Assess and manage the Firm's credit risk, market risk, structural interest rate risk, investment risk, liquidity risk, fiduciary risk and model risk.

·Ensure that there is in place an effective system reasonably designed to evaluate and control such risk throughout the Firm.

·Manage capital and liquidity planning and analysis.

The purpose of the Public Responsibility Committee is to:

·Provide oversight and review of the Firm's positions and practices on public responsibility matters such as community investment, fair lending, sustainability, consumer practices and other public policy issues that reflect the Firm's values and character and impact the Firm's reputation among all of its stakeholders. 

·Provide guidance on these matters to management and the Board as appropriate.

James Crown was the director at JP Morgan who headed the two committees that had the obligation and authority to investigate the Madoff scam to protect the bank and its investors. Keep this in mind as you read the following report about the bank’s relationship to Madoff:

Federal authorities are preparing to take action in a criminal investigation of JP Morgan Chase, suspecting that the bank turned a blind eye to Bernard L. Madoff’s Ponzi scheme, according to the New York Times report of October 23, 2013. The following indented paragraphs are extracts from the article:

The investigation, led by the F.B.I. and the United States attorney’s office in Manhattan, centers on whether JPMorgan failed to alert federal authorities to Mr. Madoff’s conduct. JPMorgan served as Mr. Madoff’s primary bank for more than two decades, giving it a unique window onto his practices…

Irving H. Picard — the trustee seeking to recover money for Mr. Madoff’s victims — also sued JPMorgan in 2010 for $6.4 billion, saying the bank allowed “fraudulent transfers” and accusing it of “aiding and abetting” Mr. Madoff’s fraud…

The tentative $13 billion settlement in the mortgage case would resolve an array of state and federal investigations into the bank’s sale of trouble mortgage investments. The bank, authorities suspect, sold mortgage securities in the run-up to the financial crisis without fully warning investors of the risks.

JPMorgan is also grappling with an investigation into the bank’s decision to hire the sons and daughters of senior Chinese government officials. And Mr. Bharara’s office is examining whether some of the bank’s trading in the energy markets amounted to manipulation.

The Madoff case is particularly thorny. Any action would link the bank to the most notorious financial criminal in more than a generation. Mr. Madoff orchestrated a Ponzi scheme lasting decades that wiped out an estimated $17 billion in cash for his investors. Paper losses reached more than $64 billion.

Mr. Madoff is serving a 150-year sentence in a federal prison in North Carolina after pleading guilty in March 2009. In a 2011 interview from prison, Mr. Madoff told The New York Times that the banks he did business with “had to know.”

Mr. Madoff’s ties to JPMorgan trace to 1986, when it became his primary banker. Over the course of that relationship, Mr. Picard claims, JPMorgan “made at least half a billion dollars in fees and profits” from the relationship.

The bank, according to Mr. Picard’s lawsuit, generated handsome sums by allowing Mr. Madoff’s brokerage firm to “funnel billions of dollars” through its account with JPMorgan, “disregarding its own anti-money laundering duties.”

The bank, starting around 2006, also pursued derivatives deals linked to Mr. Madoff’s so-called feeder-fund investors, the hedge funds that invested their clients’ money with him.

About that time, concerns began to circulate within JPMorgan.

“I do have a few concerns and questions,” one JPMorgan employee wrote in February 2006 after studying some of Mr. Madoff’s trading records, according to an e-mail cited in the lawsuit. “All trades are generated by Madoff’s black box.”

But JPMorgan’s derivatives deals, which allowed investors to collect returns tied to the profits of the feeder funds, took off anyway. By June 2007, JPMorgan’s “Equity Exotics” unit had sold more than $130 million worth of the deals to investors, Mr. Picard’s lawsuit said.

That month, JPMorgan employees sought approval to push the total to $1.32 billion, according to the lawsuit.

On June 15, 2007, when a JPMorgan committee met to ponder the proposal, new suspicions emerged about Mr. Madoff. A senior risk management officer at the bank e-mailed colleagues to report that another bank executive “just told me that there is a well-known cloud over the head of Madoff and that his returns are speculated to be part of a Ponzi scheme.” The senior officer added that “I think we owe it to ourselves to investigate further.”

But according to Mr. Picard, the bank’s further research amounted to a phone call with Mr. Madoff and “a Google search with no follow-up.”

Similar concerns were enough to deter JPMorgan’s own private bank from doing business with Mr. Madoff. In an e-mail, a JPMorgan wealth management executive remarked that Mr. Madoff’s “Oz-like signals” were “too difficult to ignore.”

After Mr. Madoff’s arrest in December 2008, Mr. Picard said, a flurry of JPMorgan e-mails captured the lack of surprise at the bank.

One employee, referring to the agenda for the June 2007 meeting, wrote, “Perhaps best this never sees the light of day again!!”

Sources and Recommended Reading:

JPMorgan Faces Possible Penalty in Madoff Case, New York Times, October 23, 2013   

Albert E. Jenner, Jr.,, October 25, 2013,_Jr.

“Albert E. Jenner Jr., 81, A Legend In Legal Circles” by James Warren, Chicago Tribune, September 19, 1988  

Charter of the Public Responsibility Committee,, October 25, 2013

“Chicago's Elders of Zion and Obama's War for Profit” by Christopher Bollyn, October 14, 2011 

“Chicago Thuggery: The Jewish Mob & Obama” by Christopher Bollyn, October 16, 2013 

Henry Crown & Company,, October 25, 2013

James S. Crown, Executive Profile,, October 25, 2013 

Members of the Board,, October 25, 2013 

PEC Israel Economic Corp.,, October 25, 2013

Palestine Economic Corporation,, October 25, 2013

PEC Israel Economic Corporation document, May 23, 1995

PEC Israel Economic Corporation document, March 22, 1994

Risk Policy Committee,, October 25, 2013

Sherman Skolnick, Conspiracy Nation, Vol. 5, No. 89, August 1995

“The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9/11” by Christopher Bollyn, Chapter VII of Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World 

“The Ordeal of Lester Crown” by Bob Tamarkin, New York Times, December 7, 1986 

“The Zionist Mega-Scams of 9/11, Bernard Madoff & Allen Stanford” by Christopher Bollyn, March 7, 2011 

War Is A Racket, by Major General Smedley Butler, 1935

Chicago Thuggery: The Jewish Mob & Obama

October 16, 2013

This is Chicago thuggery. The president is trying to inflict the most amount of pain and suffering. This is not some bureaucratic mistake. This is Chicago thuggery. You try to make people hurt so they don’t resist what you tell them to do in the future.

- Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX), “Lawmaker says barricade of WWII memorial is 'Chicago thuggery'” by Todd Starnes,, October 4, 2013

In a move that was clearly meant to punish the public, the Obama administration blocked public access to open memorials in Washington. These memorials are otherwise fully accessible to the public. Obama actually wasted taxpayer funds to set up these barriers.


The government shutdown over Obama Care has brought the term "Chicago thuggery" into fashion to describe the actions of the Obama administration.  A number of political writers are using the same term when writing about the shutdown, such as Joe Messina:

These budget games have been played for years. These fights over who knows best have been played for years. But Mafia-style thuggery like this should be left in Chicago, New York, Miami or Boston. I presume they are used to it and know how to deal with it.

The fact that the Obama administration uses thuggery should not be a surprise, given the fact that Obama is a puppet of the Jewish mob of Chicago, which cultivated him since he came to the Windy City and eventually brought him to power in the White House. Obama the Candidate was created by the leading Zionist families of Chicago:  the Klutznicks, the Pritzgers, and the Crowns. He was created to serve their interests; not those of the people.

The Obama Care mandate is nothing but another huge transfer of wealth from the people to the financial elite who own the insurance companies.  The owners of the insurance companies will be the recipients of the immense sums of money the people are forced to fork over - not for medical care, mind you, but for insurance.

Obama Care is another massive transfer of wealth, just like the "bailout of the banksters" that Obama put through during his first days in office.  These transfers of wealth are institutional robbery, which is what one should expect when criminals take power in any nation.

Barack Obama is serving the Jewish criminal organization that brought him to power, especially those who have fostered and cultivated him since he came to Chicago.  One of the families that is at the top of the "Chicago Outfit" is the family of Henry Crown, who rose from selling sand and gravel to becoming the owner of the Empire State Building and the weapons manufacturer General Dynamics.

Henry Crown was reportedly one of the crime bosses who controlled the mob:


In 1946, fearing for his life, Chicago organized crime leader James M. Ragen contacted Clark through newspaper columnist Drew Pearson to obtain the protection of federal agents in exchange for information.  A dozen FBI agents were sent to Chicago to interrogate Ragen. After checking and confirming the details of mob activity provided by Ragen, Tom Clark withdrew Ragen's FBI protection for lack of federal jurisdiction to prosecute the suspects Ragen named.  Almost immediately, Ragen was seriously wounded by gunfire. Several suspects were arrested but no one was prosecuted due to the disappearance of some witnesses and the lack of cooperation of others. Ragen's condition was improving after the shooting, but he died suddenly in the hospital of mercury poisoning… Tom Clark had told Drew Pearson that Ragen stated that Henry Crown, the Hilton Hotels chain, and Walter Annenberg controlled the mob.,_Jr.

There is an old saying that behind every fortune is a great crime and this is certainly true of the Crown family.  Henry Crown (1896-1990) was allowed (thanks to the mayor of Chicago) to enlist in the U.S. military at age 45 and was put in charge of procurement of materials for the U.S. Army in the Great Lakes region.  Crown's family business was called Material Services Corp.  In this way, Henry Crown made millions of dollars for himself and saw that the real money was to be made by ripping off the government, which is what he proceeded to do with General Dynamics. General Dynamics was nearly bankrupt when Crown took over the company and its fortunes improved greatly with the outrageous profits it made during the Vietnam War era. By the 1980s it was the largest defense contractor in the United States. Today, the company receives more than $16 billion in defense contracts per year.

The Crown family is an ardent Zionist family that is close to the leadership of Israel and the Zionist movement.  The Crown family also owns the ski resort of Aspen and runs the Aspen Institute. 

Last summer, Lester Crown, the son of Henry Crown, discussed his family's close relationship with the state of Israel during an event in Aspen. What is most interesting in this video is that Crown reveals that his father provided the state of Israel with an aircraft manufacturing plant in the 1950s, which he had bought in the United States - and which was sent to Israel in violation of U.S. law.

We’ve been involved in everything we’ve been asked to do [for Israel]. Going back originally, I remember Dad coming home one day and saying that he was asked by– I don’t know who from the State – this would be I guess in the early 50s. That North American Aviation and one other company and I don’t know what the name of it is, merged, and because they merged, one of them’s factory was going out of business. And he was to go and buy the equipment for plane-manufacturing from – and not to ask, and no questions were to be asked.

He went and he bought all of the equipment from the plant. It ended up being shipped to Israel. Because you know at that time, there was a complete embargo from the United States, and what little they got –- well, most of what they got were smuggled in. Most of them were illegal, all the arms. That’s what Teddy Kollek did. That was his job before he became a mayor [of Jerusalem]. He was a master smuggler. And he was good. Oh was he good! [laughter]

Original Source: 

The fact that Henry Crown was involved in such a large weapons transfer indicates that he was involved at the highest level with the illegal weapons smuggling to Israel. This would have put him in contact with Teddy Kollek, which explains his close relationship with Kollek in later years. 

The final paragraphs in this article are from "America the Target: 9-11 and Israel's History of False Flag Terrorism" - a chapter in Solving 9-11The Deception that Changed the World.

When the war of 1947-1948 ended, Peres "assumed the position of Director of the Defense Ministry's procurement delegation in the United States," according to his biography.  As director of arms procurement in the United States, Peres was responsible for organizing illegal arms smuggling.  Transfers of weapons and planes to Zionist forces violated the U.S. Neutrality Act.  Much of the Haganah arms smuggling activity was run from an office above the "syndicate-owned" Copacabana Club in New York City, where Peres and Teddy Kollek, the Hungarian-born son of the director of the Rothschild bank in Vienna, worked closely with the "crime syndicate" headed by the leading Jewish gangsters of the time.

After World War II, Kollek had been sent to New York, where he worked as the Haganah representative and head of its weapons purchasing team in New York.  Kollek worked from an office above the Copacabana nightclub in the Haganah's Hotel Fourteen to arm the Zionist forces in British-occupied Palestine.

Ben Gurion and Haganah gun-runner Teddy Kollek

Also deeply involved in this criminal arms smuggling activities were the American Jews, Adolph "Al" Schwimmer and Hank Greenspun.  Greenspun, the Las Vegas-based publicist for mobster Benjamin "Bugsy" Siegel, was eventually pardoned for his crimes by President Bill Clinton, a close friend of the Greenspun family.  In 1951, at the request of Ben Gurion, Schwimmer and Peres founded Bedek, the military's aviation firm that became Israel's largest company, Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI).

Adolph W. Schwimmer, Zionist arms smuggler, and Ben Gurion

Will Congress Betray America for Israel?

Updated September 8, 2013

JUDAS ISCARIOT - Will the members of the U.S. Congress stand up for America - or will they betray their nation for a few pieces of silver?

The Israel lobby is squeezing every member of Congress to vote for war against Syria.

U.S. officials have not presented any evidence to the public of scientific samples or intelligence information proving that sarin gas was used, or that the Syrian government used it.
- "Direct link between Assad and gas attack elusive for U.S." by Mark Hosenball, Reuters, September 7, 2013

The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations has joined the Israeli lobby AIPAC in an all-out public campaign for a U.S. war on Syria… Yet, is it really wise for Jewish organizations to put a Jewish stamp on a campaign to drag America into another war that a majority of their countrymen do not want to fight?
- “Just Whose War Is This?” by Patrick J. Buchanan, September 6, 2013

From the reign of Nero to that of Antoninus Pius, the Jews discovered a fierce impatience of the dominion of Rome, which repeatedly broke out in the most furious massacres and insurrections. Humanity is shocked at the recital of the horrid cruelties which they committed in the cities of Egypt, of Cyprus, and of Cyrene, where they dwelt in treacherous friendship with the unsuspecting natives; and we are tempted to applaud the severe retaliation which was exercised by the arms of the legions against a race of fanatics whose dire and credulous superstition seemed to render them the implacable enemies not only of the Roman government, but of human kind.
- Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Edward Gibbon, 1776

Twelve years after 9-11, we face a very similar situation to the one we faced in the fall of 2001 after the terror atrocities at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The United States is, once again, preparing to attack (i.e. aggress) a war-torn nation in the Middle East based on specious claims and unproven allegations of involvement by the government of that nation in a moral outrage.

The fact that the same tactic of deception that was used after 9-11 to invade Afghanistan and Iraq is being employed, once again, by the very same people, to drag the United States into yet another ill-advised war in the Middle East strongly validates my thesis that 9-11 was a false-flag terror operation, designed and carried out by Israeli military intelligence and Zionist fifth columnists (i.e. sayanim) to bring the U.S. military into the region to support Israeli hegemony and advance the extremist Zionist notion of Greater Israel.

A war against Syria is not in America’s national interest any more than the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were. All things considered, the idea of any U.S. military action in Syria is an extremely ill-advised adventure.  There is absolutely nothing good that could come from the U.S. getting into a war with Syria and it would put the United States on war footing against Iran and Russia, Syria’s main allies in the region. Syria has a mutual defense pact with Iran that would make a war with Syria a regional war from the start. This is how the World Wars of the 1900s began.


THE GODFATHER OF THE FRAUDULENT "WAR ON TERROR" - Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has been pushing the United States to wage war against Iran for years.  He is one of the Israeli architects of the fraudulent "War on Terror," which he has promoted since the late 1970s. A U.S. attack on Syria would result in war with Iran because the two countries have a mutual defense pact.  This is how World Wars begin.

The state of Israel is the only nation that actively pushes the idea of the United States going to war against Syria and Iran. Israel is headed by Benjamin Netanyahu, a Zionist fanatic from a political party founded by terrorists, (i.e. Likud). This is not hyperbole; the Likud coalition was founded in the 1970s by some of the most ruthless terrorists of all time, e.g. Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir.

Today, the Likud party is headed by the sons and daughters of the people who used terrorism and massacres to carry out their racist policy of ethnic cleansing of Palestine of its native population in the 1940s. Netanyahu and his colleagues in the Likud party are Zionist fanatics of the most extreme sort who dream of creating a state of Greater Israel from the Nile to the Euphrates. Terrorism is still their preferred tactic to achieve their strategic goals.

Netanyahu has called for military action to be taken against Iran from the podium of the United Nations.

Netanyahu actually told the New York Times on 9-11 that the terror atrocity was “very good” for U.S.-Israeli relations. Later, in April 2008, at an Israeli religious college, Netanyahu said: "We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq." 

The struggle in Iraq took the lives of more than 5,000 Americans and many times that number of wounded and killed Iraqis as we funded and participated in the barbaric and criminal destruction of the most advanced nation in the Middle East.

In spite of Netanyahu’s obscene comments about 9-11 being “very good” and how Israel was benefiting from “the American struggle in Iraq,” he received 29 standing ovations during a May 2011 speech to the U.S. Congress. How can it be that a Zionist fanatic who openly espouses such un-American views can receive 29 standing ovations from the U.S. Congress?

LIKE TRAINED SEALS the U.S. Congress gave 29 standing ovations to the Zionist extremist leader who said the terror attacks of 9-11 were "very good".  Go figure. 

This is the fundamental question we need to keep in mind as the members of Congress deliberate on their crucial vote to either support or reject President Obama’s plan to engage the U.S. military against Syria.  The standing ovations for Netanyahu in Congress are a reflection of the power of the Israel lobby at work. The members of Congress who applauded this Zionist fanatic are traitors who have betrayed their nation for a couple pieces of silver.  

At this crucial point, with the peace of the world hanging in the balance, how will the U.S. Congress vote? Will the members of Congress stand up for America - or will they betray their country and sell their souls for Greater Israel?

Rupert Murdoch and Lord Rothschild: The Oil Barons of Occupied Syria

Updated September 2, 2013

UNETHICAL JOURNALISM - FOX News supports military action against the Assad government of Syria but does not inform its viewers that the network's owner, Rupert Murdoch, is part-owner of an oil exploration company illegally exploiting the resources of Israeli-occupied Syria.

Rupert Murdoch and Lord Jacob Rothschild are major shareholders in Genie Energy, an Israeli-run company which has been granted the rights to explore for oil and gas in the southern half of the occupied Golan Heights (from the line beneath the words "Israeli occupied" down).

Efraim “Effie” Eitam is the Chairman of Genie Israel Holdings, Ltd., the holding company that oversees Genie Oil & Gas activities in Israel. Eitam is a Brigadier General (reserves) in the Israeli army and served as minister of housing and construction under Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. In an interview with Ha’aretz in 2002, Eitam called Palestinian citizens of Israel a "ticking bomb" and a "cancer". In 2004, Eitam called the Palestinians "dark forces" and told The New Yorker, "We will have to kill them all." This is the chairman of the company in which Rupert Murdoch and Lord Rothschild are major shareholders.

Millions of Americans get their news from FOX News, the Wall Street Journal, or through some other news outlet owned by Rupert Murdoch.  FOX News and Murdoch-owned news outlets generally support U.S. military action against Syria, but they do not inform their viewers and readers that Mr. Murdoch has a vested interest in war with Syria.  Rupert Murdoch is part-owner of an Israeli-American company that has been granted the rights to explore for oil on the Golan Heights – Israeli-occupied Syrian land.  It is highly unethical for FOX News not to disclose this information to its viewers.

Israel has granted oil exploration rights inside Syria, in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, to Genie Energy. Rupert Murdoch and Lord Jacob Rothschild are major shareholders of Genie Energy – which also has interests in shale gas in the United States and shale oil in Israel.  Dick Cheney is also on the company’s advisory board.

It is illegal under international law for Israel to grant oil exploration rights on occupied territory, as Craig Murray wrote in his February 2013 article "Israel Grants Oil Rights in Syria to Murdoch and Rothschild": 

For Israel to seek to exploit mineral reserves in the occupied Golan Heights is plainly illegal in international law. Japan was successfully sued by Singapore before the International Court of Justice for exploitation of Singapore’s oil resources during the Second World War. The argument has been made in international law that an occupying power is entitled to operate oil wells which were previously functioning and operated by the sovereign power, in whose position the occupying power now stands. But there is absolutely no disagreement in the authorities and case law that the drilling of new wells – let alone fracking – by an occupying power is illegal.

The fact that Jacob Rothschild and Rupert Murdoch are invested in oil exploration efforts in occupied Syria suggests that they support the overthrow of the Assad government in Damascus in order to weaken Syria and divide the nation in much the same way as Yugoslavia was dismembered in the 1990s. 


Effi Eitam, Wikipedia, September 2, 2013

"Israel Grants Oil Rights in Syria to Murdoch and Rothschild" by Craig Murray, February 21, 2013

“Business and Financial Leaders Lord Rothschild and Rupert Murdoch Invest in Genie Oil & Gas,” IDT Corp. Press Release, November 15, 2010

Management of Genie Oil and Gas

Strategic Advisory Board of Genie Oil and Gas 

The Criminal State of Israel and Its Role in Terrorism

Updated August 25, 2013

The facts confirm that Israel and its collaborators in the U.S. are serial provocateurs and key architects of the terrorism against which Tel Aviv seeks America's military and diplomatic protection and the financial support of U.S. taxpayers...

To solve this transnational criminality requires multilateral engagement to remedy the perils that this syndicate now poses to world peace...

The strategy deployed to date reflects a profound misunderstanding of the game theory dynamics that deceived the U.S. to wage war in the Middle East for Greater Israel. 
- Jeff Gates, Guilt by Association, 2008

Guilt by Association (2008) explains how the Israelis apply game theory to deceive the United States into waging wars in the Middle East.

A friend and supporter recently gave me a copy of Jeff Gates' book, Guilt by Association:  How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War.  I was immediately struck by one of its opening paragraphs, which hits the nail squarely on the head:

Six decades ago, an enclave of Jewish elites and extremists induced Harry Truman, a Christian Zionist president, to recognize Zionism as a sovereign entity in the Middle East. Rather than operate as a loyal ally, that enclave has proven to be an enemy. The consistency of Israel's behavior since its founding in 1948 confirms how organized crime expanded to global scale behind the facade of a sovereign state.

I finished the book as the United States prepared its military forces to attack Syria, based on unproven allegations that the Syrian regime was responsible for the use of chemical weapons that killed several hundred people near Damascus during the past week.  Once again, it now seems very likely that the United States will use its military to attack a Middle Eastern nation based on spurious allegations.

The following extracts from the book are well worth reading and remembering as we find ourselves on the brink of another war of aggression in the Middle East:

Only now has it become apparent that a state based on fundamentalist Judaism is neither a democracy nor a hapless victim but an apartheid state, an aggressor, and a serial agent provocateur.  Israel's expansionist goals could only be achieved by way of deception...

The systemic nature of this criminality suggests that Americans alone can no longer secure their country - the corruption is too imbedded and elected officials are too intimidated by the Israel lobby.  To solve this transnational criminality requires multilateral engagement to remedy the perils that this syndicate now poses to world peace...

The strategy deployed to date reflects a profound misunderstanding of the game theory dynamics that deceived the U.S. to wage war in the Middle East for Greater Israel.  The global community is mistrustful of our words, extremists have been emboldened, and our allies feel less secure.  It is not Iran but Israel that must be restrained to protect U.S. national security and to repair the worldwide damage done by the "Washington" consensus.

In order to grasp the role that Israel played in the false-flag terrorism of 9-11 and the illegal wars that followed in its aftermath, it is essential to understand that Israel is, in fact, a criminal state that was created and is ruled by an organization of Zionist criminals, and that it is actually an enemy of the United States - and humanity.

The following videos are based on Gates' book and are highly recommended viewing:

Criminal State - Part 1 of 3: A Closer Look at Israel's Role in Terrorism

Criminal State - Part 2 of 3: A Closer Look at Israel's Role in Terrorism

Criminal State - Part 3 of 3: A Closer Look at Israel's Role in Terrorism

Source:  Guilt by Association:  How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War by Jeff Gates, State Street Publications, Santa Barbara, California, 2008

A German Viewpoint of 9-11 and the Zionist Threat

August 14, 2013

A German viewpoint about why the crimes of 9-11 must be properly investigated and the guilty parties brought to justice to prevent a disaster for humanity on a global scale.

Don't Ruin the Party on the Titanic – Talk of Icebergs is Prohibited
by Alfred Schaefer


We seem to have a little problem in the neighborhood. The situation we face is like a two-horse race, and whichever horse wins will have an enormous impact on the future of the human race.

The two horses I am referring to are racing at full speed to the Zionist finish line. 

Zionism is a racist and supremacist ideology. Supremacist ideologies do not last forever. Recent examples are the white apartheid South Africa with their "Coloreds," and the German Nazi regime with their Untermenschen. Zionists have theirGoyim (Hebrew word for non-Jews; Gentiles). The Palestinians, Americans, and the vast majority of the human race areGoyim and are viewed by Zionists in the same way that the Nazis viewed Untermenschen a few decades earlier.

The Israeli Wall that separates Jews from Palestinians is the most obvious symbol of the apartheid of Zionism. 

The apartheid regime of South Africa recognized the futility and injustice of their situation and peacefully dismantled the system themselves, leading to a relatively peaceful coexistence between the whites and the coloreds. The German Nazis, on the other hand, believed in their own supremacy and invincibility over the Untermenschen and carried on to the bitter end.  As history has proven, this was a delusion, and now, after a great deal of death and destruction, the Germans live peacefully with the former Untermenschen.

Which path the Zionists choose to follow is not clear. This is the two-horse race:

Horse Number One (The South African apartheid model)

The Zionist regime and its supremacist ideology are dismantled by the Jews themselves. The Zionists apologize for their crimes against the Goyim and ask for forgiveness. The Gentile Goyim that I am referring to consist primarily of the Palestinians, Americans adversely affected by 9-11 or the USS Liberty episode, and countless other peoples and events. Offering restitution (Wiedergutmachung) for the victims could have a positive effect and calm things down.

Horse number Two (The Nazi German model)

The Zionist regime continues on the present trajectory; Israel plays the world for a sucker, does nothing, and waits for the Goyim to stop Zionism. If the Untermenschen managed to stop the Nazis, the Goyim can stop the Zionists, with or without their 400 nuclear devices. The Gentiles are at least as capable as the Untermenschen.

The most desirable outcome is for Horse Number One to win the race. We would all be winners if this were to be the outcome.

If, however, Horse Number Two wins, the Jews will certainly lose, as will an untold number of Gentiles. In fact, if Horse Number Two prevails, we may, for the first time in hundreds of years, see a significant decline in the population of Homo sapiens on this planet.

The level of the population decline depends on the process with which Zionism is brought to an end. Four hundred nuclear devices and their modern delivery systems are an important part of this equation. It was most fortunate for humanity that the Nazis did not have four hundred nuclear devices.

We all know the fate of the Titanic. It was the world’s most luxurious, modern, and unsinkable ocean liner. What was considered inconceivable at that time sealed the fate of each and every person on the ship.

On the Titanic’s maiden voyage in April 1912, any discussion of potential hazards was not only undesirable but forbidden. Such talk was prohibited because it would damper the spirits and party atmosphere prevailing amongst the passengers. Yet, had the evidence of the dangers facing the Titanic been discussed in an honest way, a slight change of course is all it would have taken to avoid the tragic fate that befell everyone on the ship. Nobody escaped this fate. Many people died. For those who did survive, the sinking of the Titanic was a life-changing event.  Looking back, it is unbelievable how such obvious dangers could have been ignored to the extent that the “accident” was even possible.

Today, over 100 years later, we find ourselves in a very similar situation as the passengers on the Titanic. We are faced with a choice that we cannot ignore. We can blindly continue on the present trajectory, or we can acknowledge the dangers of doing so and demand a sensible change of course. 

ABOUT 9-11

Remember the words of George W. Bush:

This act will not stand; we will find those who did it; we will smoke them out of their holes; we will get them running and we'll bring them to justice. We will not only deal with those who dare attack America, we will deal with those who harbor them and feed them and house them.

Little did we know that George W. Bush was on the side of the perpetrators. But how could we have known, having been stunned into a state of shock and awe. And with flag-waving patriotism flooding the land, who would dare to challenge or question the official government version of the unfolding nightmare?

It took some time but the official government version of 9-11 has now been proven false, except to those who also believe the earth is flat.

We have witnessed similar criminal cover-ups since the assassination of J.F. Kennedy in November 1963 and the murderous attack on the USS Liberty in June 1967. The same methods have been employed to stifle and silence all scientific investigations of the crimes of 9-11. To denigrate those who dare to bring forward facts and evidence as “crazies” or conspiracy theorists does not reduce the gravity of the crime itself. To do so only makes matters worse for the detractor himself for he is bound to be seen as being complicit in the cover-up.

During the Six-Day War of 1967, one of the most daring acts of Zionist treachery was the Israeli military attack on theUSS Liberty, an un-armed vessel of the U.S. Navy. During Israel's assault on Egypt, the Liberty, an American surveillance ship, was monitoring the progress of the war while cruising in international waters off the coast of Israel.

The USS Liberty after the murderous Israeli assault on June 8, 1967, which killed 34 Americans. (Photo - USS LibertyMemorial website)

Realizing that the Liberty was capable of discovering and recording Israeli war crimes, Israeli leaders decided to 'get rid' of the evidence. Israeli planes and torpedo boats then attacked the Liberty with the clear intent of sinking it. If the ship had been sunk and the evidence destroyed, Israel would have blamed Egypt for the attack. The Zionist-controlled news media in America would have then used the lie to turn U.S. public opinion against Egypt.

Israel, however, failed in its wicked act of treachery against its ally, the United States. Fortunately, the brave crew of theLiberty was able to keep the ship afloat, but the Israeli attackers killed 34 and wounded 171 crew members.

Israel claimed the attack was a case of mistaken identity although the evidence and reports from survivors clearly prove that the Israelis knew the Liberty was an American vessel. The attack was not only intentional; it was meant to sink the ship with all hands lost.

The disturbing facts about the attack on the USS Liberty were omitted by the Zionist-controlled news media in the United States. The American people were fed the lie that Israel had accidentally fired on an American ship, and that the whole incident was simply a tragic case of mistaken identity. The official investigation was subdued and the matter quickly forgotten.

The cover-up of the assault on the Liberty could not have succeeded had the news media properly reported the facts surrounding the attack. The cover-up of the Israeli attack on the Liberty is a good example of how the Zionist-controlled news media distorts or withholds important information about Israeli war crimes.

Israel's war of 1967 was in fact a war of conquest, i.e. a war of aggression, which is clearly seen by its subsequent and continuous development of illegal settlements on the territories it occupied during the war.

Like the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, the U.S. government cannot keep the facts of what really happened on 9-11 suppressed forever. When a critical mass of the population becomes aware of the Zionist role in the 9-11 atrocity, the window of opportunity for an orderly trial in a court of law will be closed. The outraged public may turn to mob justice.

The Internet is a game changer. There is growing public awareness that the mainstream media is controlled, which renders it increasingly irrelevant. The truth about 9-11 cannot be hidden from the public in the way that the Israeli attack on the Liberty was.  Neither of these events can be brushed aside.

Since the official version of 9-11 has now been proven false, a large and growing number of people as well as a highly respected organization of architects and engineers are demanding an independent investigation to determine how the World Trade Center towers came down.

Why has the government lied about every aspect of 9-11?  The collapse of Larry Silverstein’s 47-story WTC 7 is the key that opens the door to this crime of high treason.

Silverstein, the leaseholder of the World Trade Center, needs to be arrested and prosecuted for his role in the $7 billion dollar insurance scam. Core members of "crime tanks" such as PNAC (Project for the New American Century) need to be investigated and prosecuted for the roles they played in planning the “new Pearl Harbor” and the wars of aggression it led to. A proper criminal investigation should determine the guilt or innocence of all the parties involved in this massive crime.

Instead of investing to renovate and detoxify the buildings, Silverstein helped destroy them with military drones, explosives, and super-thermite. Many New Yorkers are expected to die in the coming years as they succumb to illnesses caused by their exposure to asbestos and the toxic particles in the smoke from the burning rubble of the World Trade Center.


"…Germany’s support for Israel’s security is part of our national ethos, our raison d’être."
- German Chancellor Angela Merkel, “Germany Cannot Be Neutral on Israel, Angela Merkel Says,”, August 9, 2013

One of the German Dolphin class submarines being built for Israel in a shipyard in Kiel.  Several German subs, which are capable of launching nuclear-armed missiles, have already been delivered to Israel; more are being built. (Photo fromSpiegel article "Secret Cooperation: Israel Deploys Nuclear Weapons on German-Built Submarines")

It is time we started connecting the dots. Having connected the dots we see before us a Rorschach, rife with demons we fear to name.

Germany is run by a Zionist stooge.  The German Chancellor Angela Merkel is well versed in subservience to the master. That was how they operated in the former East Germany, where she grew up, subservient to their Soviet masters. Chancellor Merkel recently said that Germany’s “reason for existence” (raison d’être) is to serve the security needs of Israel. Today, in the West, such subservience to Zionist masters is the norm.

Merkel’s behavior is similar to Obama’s statements of being “in lockstep” with, and providing “ironclad” support for Israel. These are the words of obedient slaves, not the leaders of sovereign nations. With such groveling statements Merkel and Obama guarantee a constant flow of favorable reviews in the Zionist-controlled press and we, as good citizens, accept our fate and don’t think of rebellion.

What can we do? How can we stop the delivery of more ultra-modern submarines that Germany is providing the Zionist state of Israel? The sole purpose of these stealthy submarines is to serve as a platform from which to deliver nuclear-tipped cruise missiles. These submarines and nuclear missiles allow Israel to hold anybody to ransom.  

On an individual level, we need to understand what has happened and not allow ourselves to be lied to by the media, politicians, or any person or institution. Confront them with questions and facts and demand that they explain why they are lying. 

Humanity will be judged harshly if this Zionist game is allowed to go ahead. The delivery of the remaining German submarines must be delayed until after the crime of 9-11 has been clarified by an independent investigation as so many people are demanding. Think about it, the same people who brought us 9-11 want these submarines. 

Sources and Recommended Reading:

“Architects and Engineers:  Solving the Mystery of World Trade Center Building 7,” Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

“9/11:  Israel did it,” 

“CIA Insider Tells 911 truth. Time to Re-examine Your World-view, America!” YouTube, March 28, 2012

“Germany Cannot Be Neutral on Israel, Angela Merkel Says,”, August 9, 2013  

"Israel Celebrates Successful 9/11 Operation on Purim Holiday” by Kevin Barrett, March 1, 2013

“Israel did 9/11 - All the Proof in the World,”, October 8, 2010 

“Psychologists Explain 9/11 Denial Despite Hard Scientific Evidence,”, December 21, 2011

“Secret Cooperation: Israel Deploys Nuclear Weapons on German-Built Submarines,” Spiegel, June 3, 2012

USS Liberty Memorial website, James M. Ennes, Jr.

David Icke on Rothschild Zionism

July 25, 2013

In the following video, David Icke does an excellent job explaining the fundamental relationship of the Rothschild dynasty and their secret societies to the Zionist state of Israel.  This is a very important aspect of Zionism that very few are willing to talk openly about as Icke does here. 

If anyone doubts the essence of what David Icke discusses in this video, I would suggest getting a hold of the two volume set of The Encylopedia of Zionism and Israel and reading the articles about the Rothschilds and those on the secret societies of the B'nai B'rith and the B'ne Moshe. 

These articles explain how the Rothschilds funded secret societies to foment Zionist fervor in the Pale of Settlement and how the political ideology of Zionism was grafted onto orthodox Judaism in Poland.  The articles on the first Rothschild settlements in Palestine are also essential reading.

Video Link - 

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"9/11 & Nine Years of Deception and War," by Christopher Bollyn, August 9, 2010

Why NSA Spying Never Catches Israelis

July 14, 2013

At the center of the NSA scandal is a gang of Israeli high-tech criminals which is connected to the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11. These connections underline the involvement of the same Israeli criminals to both 9-11 and the NSA's secret program to collect and store our personal information and conversations, which came about mainly as a consequence of 9-11.
“The Israeli Criminals Behind the NSA Spy Scandal” 
by Christopher Bollyn, June 13, 2013

The Israelis have a huge appetite for intercept information and they used their Jewish Lobby political muscle to get their contractors inside many of their friendly country counterintelligence operations, especially communications. In the U.S., Michael Chertoff literally hardwired them with full promotion and protection from Bush and Cheney...

How many Israeli Intel networks have the Western countries broken up since 911? The answer is zero. The Zionists have compromised these Western nations in a variety of ways… You cannot involve the Israelis in anything and have any security. The two are mutually exclusive.
 “NSA spying never catches Israelis - Why not?” 
by Jim W. Dean, Press TV, July 11, 2013

Video Link -

Sources and Recommended Reading:

“NSA spying never catches Israelis - Why not?” by Jim W. Dean, Press TV, July 11, 2013 

“How Israel Spies on Us All through the NSA” by Christopher Bollyn,, July 1, 2013

"The Israeli Criminals Behind the NSA Spy Scandal" by Christopher Bollyn,, June 13, 2013

How Israel Spies on Us All through the NSA

July 1, 2013

The very same Israeli agents who had prior knowledge of the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 - and who owned the electronic messaging system that was used to warn Israelis to avoid the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 - are behind the NSA's illegal and secret tapping of our phone calls. Is this just a coincidence or is it the conspicuous tip of Israel's criminal operations in the United States?

The latest revelations from Edward Snowden that the NSA is spying on the European Union is Der Spiegel's current cover story.

"If it is true that EU representations in Brussels and Washington were indeed tapped by the American Secret Service, it can hardly be explained with the argument of fighting terrorism."
- German Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger

A current report in Der Spiegel says that the National Security Agency (NSA) has bugged European Union (EU) offices and gained access to its internal computer networks. It also reports that the U.S. spy agency taps half a billion phone calls, emails, and text messages in Germany in a typical month.

"If the media reports are correct, this brings to memory actions among enemies during the Cold War. It goes beyond any imagination that our friends in the United States view the Europeans as enemies," German Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger said. As the German justice minister said, such spying “can hardly be explained with the argument of fighting terrorism.”

To understand how and why the NSA spies on Europeans and Americans I recommend reading The Shadow Factory:  The Ultra-Secret NSA from 9/11 to the Eavesdropping on America (2008) by James Bamford. The chapter that I found most interesting was “Wiretappers” in which Bamford discusses the Israeli connections to the NSA. This chapter describes how two Israeli companies are at the center of the illegal tapping of our phone calls and email and focuses on Jacob “Kobi” Alexander, the Israeli criminal behind one of them.

It is amazing that patriotic Americans like Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden are hounded to the end of the Earth and prosecuted for their whistle-blowing actions to shed light on illegal activity, while the Israeli criminals, like Kobi Alexander, who are actually behind the criminal activity, are allowed to flee with their ill-gotten gains.

Kobi Alexander, the Israeli criminal behind Verint, is tied to the terror attacks of 9-11. Why did the FBI allow him to send $57 million of stolen money to Israel and flee from justice while he was under investigation in June 2006? How does one wire $57 million to a foreign bank without the federal government knowing?

Alexander, wanted by the FBI for a long list of serious crimes, was the former head of Verint, the Israeli company behind the snooping at Verizon. He was also part owner of Odigo, the Israeli text messaging company that was used to send warning messages to Israelis telling them to avoid the World Trade Center on 9-11. Alexander’s father, Zvi, who helped him acquire tens of millions of dollars illegally, is a former business partner of the late Marc Rich, the senior Mossad operative who sent two of his Belgian-Israeli agents to New York City to manage the shipping of steel from the World Trade Center to Asia - where it was destroyed.

What is most telling about the bizarre relationship between Israel and the NSA (and FBI) is that those who expose the criminal activity are treated as criminals while the foreign intelligence service that is spying on Americans is completely ignored. The fact that Israeli intelligence has secret access to all our private communications means that it is able to use blackmail and other methods to control our politicians. Such criminal tactics may explain why criticism of Israel is so rare in Washington, D.C.

It is important to understand how the Israeli connection to the NSA gives the Israeli secret service access to all of the data that comes through the massive collection of our private phone calls and email. The Israeli hardware and software at the center of this spying give the Israelis access to all of this data in the same way that having an Israeli security company working at our airports gives them the keys to the back-doors.

As James Bamford wrote in a 2012 article for

According to a former Verizon employee briefed on the program, Verint, owned by Comverse Technology, taps the communication lines at Verizon, which I first reported in my book The Shadow Factory in 2008… At AT&T the wiretapping rooms are powered by software and hardware from Narus, now owned by Boeing, a discovery made by AT&T whistleblower Mark Klein in 2004… What is especially troubling is that both companies have had extensive ties to Israel, as well as links to that country’s intelligence service, a country with a long and aggressive history of spying on the U.S.

In fact, according to Binney, the advanced analytical and data mining software the NSA had developed for both its worldwide and international eavesdropping operations was secretly passed to Israel by a mid-level employee, apparently with close connections to the country. The employee, a technical director in the Operations Directorate, “who was a very strong supporter of Israel,” said Binney, “gave, unbeknownst to us, he gave the software that we had, doing these fast rates, to the Israelis.”

… But Binney now suspects that Israeli intelligence in turn passed the technology on to Israeli companies who operate in countries around the world, including the U.S. In return, the companies could act as extensions of Israeli intelligence and pass critical military, economic and diplomatic information back to them. “And then five years later, four or five years later, you see a Narus device,” he said. “I think there’s a connection there, we don’t know for sure.”
- James Bamford, “Shady Companies with Ties to Israel Wiretap the U.S. for the NSA,”, April 3, 2012

The following extracts are from the chapter “Wiretappers” from The Shadow Factory, Bamford’s 2008 book. The chapter explains how the Israelis have access to the stored data that has been collected by the NSA and describes some of the things they can do with it, such as using our digital voice-print to find all of our recorded telephone calls:

While such tools as DCS-1000 [Carnivore] and CIPAV are used on a small number of select targets, Verint and Narus are superintrusive – conducting mass surveillance on both international and domestic communications 24/7. What is especially troubling, but little known, is that both companies have extensive ties to a foreign country, Israel, as well as links to that country’s intelligence service – a service with a long history of aggressive spying against the U.S.

Equally troubling, the founder and former chairman of one of the companies is now a fugitive, wanted by the FBI on nearly three dozen charges of fraud, theft, lying, bribery, money laundering, and other crimes. Although there has long been Congressional oversight of the telecom industry, there is virtually no oversight of the companies hired to do the bugging.

Verint was founded by a former Israeli intelligence officer, Jacob Alexander, who often goes by the nickname “Kobi.” His father, Zvi Alexander, was a wealthy Israeli oil baron and an international wheeler-dealer who ended up running the country’s state-owned oil company. To win drilling franchises, he would make political payments to African cabinet ministers, often in partnership with the U.S. tax cheat Marc Rich, who became a fugitive and was given sanctuary in Israel. (p. 238)

Thus, by 2004, a large percentage of America’s – and the world’s – voice and data communications were passing through wiretaps built, installed, and maintained by a small, secretive Israeli company run by former Israeli military and intelligence officers. Even more unnerving is the fact that Verint can automatically access the mega-terabytes of stored and real-time data secretly and remotely from anywhere, including Israel. (p. 241)

While Verint can provide mass interception of data and phone calls, one of its Israeli spinoffs, PerSay, can go one step further and offer “advanced voice mining.” The company, based in Tel Aviv, employs a system “that efficiently searches for a target’s voice within a large volume of intercepted calls, regardless of the conversation content or method of communication.” Thus, with remote access to the internal and international voice and data communications of  over one hundred countries around the world, including the United States, Verint’s headquarters in Tel Aviv has a capability rivaled only by the NSA’s, if not greater, especially when coupled with PerSay’s voice-mining capability. (p. 242)

The agency responsible for worldwide eavesdropping in Israel is the hypersecret Unit 8200, that country’s NSA… Having both trained alumni of the organization and sophisticated eavesdropping equipment developed by Unit 8200 in foreign countries would be an enormous intelligence windfall, should Israel be able to harness it. Retired Brigadier General Hanan Gefen, a former commander of Unit 8200, noted his former organization’s influence on Comverse, which owns Verint, as well as the other Israeli companies that dominate the U.S. eavesdropping and surveillance market. (p. 243)

Nevertheless, despite the fact that many of the NSA’s and the Pentagon’s sensitive communications – like those of the rest of the country – travel across the tapping equipment of Verint and Narus, their links to Israel seem to have slipped below the radar. (p. 244)

Thus, virtually the entire American telecommunications system is bugged by two Israeli-formed companies with possible ties to Israel’s eavesdropping agency – with no oversight by Congress.

Also troubling are Verint’s extremely close ties to the FBI’s central wiretapping office, known as the CALEA Implementation Section (CIS). (p. 246) 

Unknown to the public, an entire national telecom network was channeled through a powerful foreign-made bug controlled by a corrupt foreign-based company with close links to a foreign electronic spy agency. As of 2008, the bug was still there and the only thing that had changed was a reshuffling of the company’s top management. (p. 252)

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"How the NSA Targets Germany and Europe," Der Spiegel, July 1, 2013

“Shady Companies with Ties to Israel Wiretap the U.S. for the NSA” by James Bamford,, April 3, 2012

"The Israeli Criminals Behind the NSA Spy Scandal" by Christopher Bollyn,, June 13, 2013

The Shadow Factory: The Ultra-Secret NSA from 9/11 to the Eavesdropping on America by James Bamford, Doubleday, 2008

The Israeli Criminals Behind the NSA Spy Scandal

June 13, 2013

At the center of the NSA scandal is a gang of Israeli high-tech criminals which is connected to the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11. These connections underline the involvement of the same Israeli criminals to both 9-11 and the NSA's secret program to collect and store our personal information and conversations, which came about mainly as a consequence of 9-11.

Two Israeli companies, Narus and Verint, are involved in the National Security Agency (NSA) spy scandal in which copies of our phone calls and email data are sent to secret rooms at NSA buildings across the country. These Israeli companies are closely connected to Unit 8200, the electronic espionage unit of the Israeli military. (Narus was acquired by Boeing in 2010.)

Jacob "Kobi" Alexander 
The founder and former chairman of Verint is wanted by the FBI for a long list of crimes. He is veteran Israeli intelligence officer.

Jacob "Kobi" Alexander, the former head of Comverse, the parent company of Verint, is a wanted criminal who has fled U.S. justice to Africa and probably subsequently to Israel. It is important to note that Kobi Alexander and Comverse were closely connected to Odigo, the Israeli messaging system that was used to warn Israelis to stay away from the World Trade Center on 9-11. 

Furthermore, the NSA has used Israeli encryption software from RSA Security, Inc. since 2006, which means that Israelis hold the encryption keys to the entire NSA computer network. The Israelis obviously have easy access to everything at the NSA.

The following video clip is of James Bamford discussing the two Israeli companies, Narus and Verint, who are involved in the massive collection of our telephone and Internet data. Bamford was on "Democracy Now!" on October 14, 2008, discussing the role of these Israeli companies, who are closely tied to Israeli intelligence.

To have access to personal phone calls and emails allows Israeli intelligence to blackmail and control people, like General David Petraeus, who was forced to resign from his position as director of the C.I.A. after an extra-marital affair was revealed by unknown agents who had access to his personal email. 

James Bamford on Democracy Now! - October 14, 2008
Video Link -

Bamford wrote an article entitled "Shady Companies With Ties to Israel Wiretap the U.S. for the NSA" for in April 2012 in which he discussed the Israeli companies and the criminals who ran them:

In addition to constructing the Stellar Wind center, and then running the operation, secretive contractors with questionable histories and little oversight were also used to do the actual bugging of the entire U.S. telecommunications network.

According to a former Verizon employee briefed on the program, Verint, owned by Comverse Technology, taps the communication lines at Verizon, which I first reported in my book The Shadow Factory in 2008. Verint did not return a call seeking comment, while Verizon said it does not comment on such matters.

At AT&T the wiretapping rooms are powered by software and hardware from Narus, now owned by Boeing, a discovery made by AT&T whistleblower Mark Klein in 2004. Narus did not return a call seeking comment.

What is especially troubling is that both companies have had extensive ties to Israel, as well as links to that country’s intelligence service, a country with a long and aggressive history of spying on the U.S.

In fact, according to Binney, the advanced analytical and data mining software the NSA had developed for both its worldwide and international eavesdropping operations was secretly passed to Israel by a mid-level employee, apparently with close connections to the country. The employee, a technical director in the Operations Directorate, “who was a very strong supporter of Israel,” said Binney, “gave, unbeknownst to us, he gave the software that we had, doing these fast rates, to the Israelis.”

Several of the top people involved in these Israeli wiretapping companies are if fact criminals who are currently wanted for serious crimes committed in the United States, as Bamford explains in the 2012 article:

Like Narus, Verint was founded in Israel by Israelis, including Jacob “Kobi” Alexander, a former Israeli intelligence officer. Some 800 employees work for Verint, including 350 who are based in Israel, primarily working in research and development and operations, according to the Jerusalem Post. Among its products is STAR-GATE, which according to the company’s sales literature, lets “service providers … access communications on virtually any type of network, retain communication data for as long as required, and query and deliver content and data …” and was “[d]esigned to manage vast numbers of targets, concurrent sessions, call data records, and communications.”

In a rare and candid admission to Forbes, Retired Brig. Gen. Hanan Gefen, a former commander of the highly secret Unit 8200, Israel’s NSA, noted his former organization’s influence on Comverse, which owns Verint, as well as other Israeli companies that dominate the U.S. eavesdropping and surveillance market. “Take NICE, Comverse and Check Point for example, three of the largest high-tech companies, which were all directly influenced by 8200 technology,” said Gefen. “Check Point was founded by Unit alumni. Comverse’s main product, the Logger, is based on the Unit’s technology.”

According to a former chief of Unit 8200, both the veterans of the group and much of the high-tech intelligence equipment they developed are now employed in high-tech firms around the world. “Cautious estimates indicate that in the past few years,” he told a reporter for the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz in 2000, “Unit 8200 veterans have set up some 30 to 40 high-tech companies, including 5 to 10 that were floated on Wall Street.” Referred to only as “Brigadier General B,” he added, “This correlation between serving in the intelligence Unit 8200 and starting successful high-tech companies is not coincidental: Many of the technologies in use around the world and developed in Israel were originally military technologies and were developed and improved by Unit veterans.”

Equally troubling is the issue of corruption. Kobi Alexander, the founder and former chairman of Verint, is now a fugitive, wanted by the FBI on nearly three dozen charges of fraud, theft, lying, bribery, money laundering and other crimes. And two of his top associates at Comverse, Chief Financial Officer David Kreinberg and former General Counsel William F. Sorin, were also indicted in the scheme and later pleaded guilty, with both serving time in prison and paying millions of dollars in fines and penalties.

When asked about these contractors, the NSA declined to “verify the allegations made.”

Kobi Alexander is also closely connected to the 9-11 criminal atrocity. Alexander and Comverse are connected to the Israeli Odigo messaging company through which warnings were sent to the Israelis who were expected to be at work at the World Trade Center on 9-11. As I explained in an article entitled "Why was Kobi Alexander Allowed to Flee? The Israeli Fugitive, Odigo, and the Forewarning of 9/11" in August 2006:

The case of the Israeli criminal Kobi Alexander is like the proverbial "tip of the iceberg." While Alexander's crimes, through which he became immensely wealthy, are now evident, they are but a very small piece of a much larger Zionist criminal network – connected to the 9/11 terror attacks – which remains hidden beneath the surface. 

Alexander, former head of the Israel-based Comverse Technology, was, until his crimes were discovered, one of the highest paid executives in the United States.

In the year 2000, for example, he reportedly earned some $102.5 million, with $93 million coming from the "exercise of options." We now know that most of Alexander's money was made through the fraudulent "exercise of options."

Comverse Technology, the U.S.-based "parent company" of an older and much bigger Israel-based company with the same name, is the owner of the Verint, Ulticom, Starhome, Mercom and Startel companies. The key positions in these companies are all held by Israeli nationals.

Alexander, was recently allowed to flee the United States after he and two other former Comverse executives were charged with securities, mail and wire fraud by U.S. prosecutors in Brooklyn, New York. A warrant has been issued for his arrest...

While Alexander is obviously connected with Israel's military intelligence apparatus and George Soros through the mutually owned investment fund ComSor, what is not widely reported is his company's close links with Odigo, the Israeli-run instant messaging company that received – and conveyed – urgent warning messages about the imminent terror attacks on the World Trade Center, several hours before the first plane hit...

Shortly after 9-11, Odigo was completely taken over by Comverse Technology, which had been part owner of Odigo since early 2000, if not earlier. Shortly after 9/11, five executives from Comverse were reported to have profited by more than $267 million from "insider trading."

Avner Ronen, the "founder" of Odigo, was Vice President of Business Development of Comverse Technology in October 2005. This indicates that Ronen and Alexander, both Israeli military officers with computer backgrounds, have been close business partners since early 2000.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"Israelis Hold Keys to NSA/US Military Computer Networks," by Christopher Bollyn, June 16, 2006, also published as "Israeli Code on U.S. Government Computers" in Solving 9-11: The Original Articles, p. 157

"Narus knows what you are doing on the network" by Om Malik, Forbes, August 11, 1999

"Shady Companies With Ties to Israel Wiretap the U.S. for the NSA" by James Bamford,, April 3, 2012

"Why was Kobi Alexander Allowed to Flee? The Israeli Fugitive, Odigo, and the Forewarning of 9/11" by Christopher Bollyn, August 24, 2006, also published as "The Israeli Fugitive and the Forewarning of 9-11" in Solving 9-11: The Original Articles, p. 162 

Edward Snowden - Whistleblower Who Exposed PRISM

Updated June 12, 2013

I'm neither traitor nor hero. I'm an American.
- Edward Snowden, South China Morning Post, June 12, 2013

Allowing the U.S. government to intimidate its people with threats of retaliation for revealing wrongdoing is contrary to the public interest.
- Edward Snowden, "27 Edward Snowden Quotes About U.S. Government Spying That Should Send A Chill Up Your Spine" by Michael Snyder, June 11, 2013

The NSA, FBI and CIA have, with the new digital technology, surveillance powers over our own citizens that the Stasi – the secret police in the former "democratic republic" of East Germany – could scarcely have dreamed of. Snowden reveals that the so-called intelligence community has become the United Stasi of America.

- Daniel Ellsberg, "Edward Snowden: saving us from the United Stasi of America" June 10, 2013

I don't want to live in a society that does these sort of things … I do not want to live in a world where everything I do and say is recorded. That is not something I am willing to support or live under.
- Edward Snowden, "Edward Snowden, NSA files source: 'If they want to get you, in time they will'," The Guardian, June 10, 2013


Edward Snowden, a 29-year old former systems administrator who worked with the NSA, the CIA, and Booz Allen Hamilton, stood up in a 12-minute video made on June 6 in Hong Kong to explain why he exposed the massive NSA surveillance program known as PRISM, which he describes as "the architecture of oppression." Contrary to what the Obama administration claims, the NSA surveillance program "targets the communications of everyone," Snowden says.


Snowden disclosed the NSA's secret surveillance program because he said "the public needs to decide whether these programs and policies are right or wrong." His greatest fear, he said, is that nothing will change and that this loss of privacy will continue and worsen in the "American surveillance state." The massive surveillance of the American people by their own government creates a political condition he described as "turn-key tyranny."

Video Link -


Edward Snowden, "27 Edward Snowden Quotes About U.S. Government Spying That Should Send A Chill Up Your Spine" by Michael Snyder, June 11, 2013

"Edward Snowden revealed as NSA surveillance leak whistleblower" by Tom McCarthy,, Sunday 9 June 2013 

"Edward Snowden, NSA files source: 'If they want to get you, in time they will'," The Guardian, June 10, 2013

Are there Chinchillas on Mars?

Updated June 3, 2013

A PHOTO FROM MARS - Is this photo proof that there is life on Mars?  What do you see, a squirrel or a rock? Note the light fur around the eye and shadows under the head and the contours of the body. After spending untold billions to find evidence of life and water on Mars, why is NASA not excited about this photo from Mars? Why is the son of one of the managers of the Mars mission asking me to remove this posting?

Your "Chinchilla on Mars" posting is a needless, pointless, frivolous distraction that will damage your credibility... The "chinchilla" is a rock that has features somewhat reminiscent of a chinchilla... Please remove the posting, or at least mitigate it by saying that it is probably a rock.
- Robert D. Pickar, San Pedro, California

(NB!  Pickar's father, Kenneth A. Pickar, is a professor at Caltech, the private institution that runs the Mars mission, and is on the President's Advisory Board for the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the agency which is managing the mission.)

Kenneth Arnold Pickar of Caltech
Pickar, who has close ties to Israel and worked at the Technion in the 1970s, is on the President's Advisory Board of JPL, the agency running the Mars mission.

A slide from Ken Pickar's 2010 presentation on Caltech and the Mars mission. The terrestrial rodent found in the "Mars photo" raises the obvious question: Is the Mars mission really on Mars, or is it a massive scam?

The most popular science story on on May 29 was an article entitled "'Mars rat' spied by NASA's Curiosity rover." The Fox News article is about a photograph taken on September 28, 2012, by NASA's rover that is supposedly roaming around on the surface of Mars.  The photograph clearly shows what appears to be chinchilla-like rodent between a couple rocks. The people who are running the mission to Mars should be ecstatic about finding evidence of life on the Red Planet. Instead of telling the world about the discovery of a rodent on Mars, NASA and the JPL are clearly trying to avoid discussing this photo. This raises the question, is the NASA rover really on Mars or is it simply roaming around the Atacama Desert in Chile, or some other Mars-like terrain on planet Earth? Having spent untold billions of taxpayer dollars on its mission to Mars, is NASA duping us about the whole thing? Just where did this chinchilla come from?

There are plenty of deserts, like this one in Nevada, that resemble the barren and rocky terrain seen in the Mars mission. Is the Mars mission a billion-dollar hoax?

After getting a comment asking me to remove the posting, I looked more closely into the nature of the rodent seen in the photograph. The person who asked me to remove the posting is Robert D. Pickar of San Pedro. His father, Kenneth Arnold Pickar of Rolling Hills (a gated enclave of Palos Verdes), is a visiting professor at Caltech. Caltech runs the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), which is managing the Mars mission. Kenneth Pickar, who has been at Caltech since 1998, is on the President's Advisory Board for the JPL.

The JPL is a Federally funded research and development center managed and operated by Caltech under a contract from NASA. In fiscal year 2012, the JPL's budget was nearly $1.5 billion (On average, Caltech, a tiny private institution in Pasadena, receives about $1.74 billion per year, more than $783,000 per student from the U.S. taxpayer.) If the highly-paid people who run the Mars mission are so concerned about my chinchilla posting I had better make sure I have my rodents straight.

While I agree with the criticism that the animal may not be a chinchilla, it certainly does not look like a rock. The little fellow looks furry and has eyes and ears and a tail. It actually looks more like a white-tailed antelope squirrel than a chinchilla. The white-tailed antelope squirrel is a species of rodents commonly found in the deserts of California and Nevada. The first photograph below is from the Mars mission.

EXTRATERRESTRIAL RODENT - The desert rodent seen in the Mars photo, which I originally called a chinchilla, actually looks more like a white-tailed antelope squirrel, native to the deserts of California. (Note the painted blue rocks.)

The white-tailed antelope squirrel carries his tail up on his back, which is what the rodent in the photo seems to be doing. Is the Caltech mission to Mars actually happening in a desert in the American Southwest?


Kenneth Pickar's CV, 2005

Kenneth Pickar's presentation on Caltech and its mission to Mars, Monash University, Australia, 2010

"'Mars rat' spied by NASA's Curiosity rover,", May 29, 2013

Original full size photo, NASA, September 28, 2012

White-tailed Antelope Squirrel,, May 31, 2013

U.S. Aid to Israel Doesn't Make Sense

March 28, 2013

$8 million a day to Israel just doesn’t make sense!

American taxpayers have given more money to Israel than to any other nation, despite the fact that Israel is one of the smallest and richest countries on earth.

Thanks to special interest lobbying, which, until now, has largely gone unopposed, Israel receives $3 billion American tax dollars each year. This comes to a whopping $8.2 million per day. But that is not all. Special arrangements that benefit Israel combined with aid paid out to other countries on its behalf cost Americans nearly $7 million more each day and thousands of jobs…

The Staggering Cost of Israel to Americans

Israel has a population of approximately 7.8 million… It is among the world's most affluent nations, with a per capita income similar to that of the European Union.

Israel's unemployment rate of 5.6% - lower than America's 9.1%, and Israel's net trade, earnings, and payments is ranked 48th in the world while the United States sits at a dismal 198th.

Yet Israel receives approximately 10% of America's foreign aid budget every year. The U.S. has, in fact, given more aid to Israel than it has to all the countries of sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean combined—which have a total population of over a billion people. And foreign aid is just one component of the staggering cost of our alliance with Israel.

Read more from “The Staggering Cost of Israel to Americans” at:



Stop the Blank Check

The Staggering Cost of Israel to Americans

Why Americans Should Care About the Holy Land Foundation Case

January 24, 2013

The current issue of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs has an excellent special report entitled "Why All Americans Should Care About the Holy Land Foundation Case."  The article explains how a Zionist-rigged trial used anonymous "expert" witnesses in violation of the U.S. Constitution to convict the five directors of the charitable fund who raised money to build schools and hospitals in Palestine.

This article reveals how our judicial system has become corrupt and who is behind this corruption.  This is the same corruption that has obstructed justice for the 9-11 victims - and protected the guilty - by preventing a trial to find those responsible for the crime that changed America.

The following is the beginning of the article.  The whole article can be found here:  

In 2008, five directors of the Holy Land Foundation, formerly the largest Muslim charity in the U.S., were convicted on charges of material support for terrorism—essentially for feeding the poor and for building schools and hospitals in Palestine. Although none of the defendants were accused of violence or even encouraging violence, some of them received sentences of up to 65 years, and are incarcerated in mostly Muslim isolation prisons. 

At their first trial in 2007, the government conceded that no foundation money had gone to any terrorist organizations; rather, some money went to the same zakat (charity) committees in Palestine that the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the U.N., the Red Crescent and many NGOs used to distribute aid to the Palestinian community during the same period. The zakat committees were not designated as terrorist organizations, and no practical way existed to distribute aid except through these committees, which is why other charities and the U.S. government itself used them. The first trial ended with a hung jury, without a single conviction on any count, and with some outright acquittals. 

At the second trial, the government called an "anonymous expert" to testify that some of these zakat committees were "controlled" in part by Hamas—a designated terrorist organization but also, since January 2006, Palestine's lawfully elected government. The U.S. government claimed that channeling the foundation's charitable activities through these "controlled" committees helped raise the prestige of Hamas and thus constituted material support for terrorism. 

A known expert can be cross-examined by the defense and shown to be ignorant about the subject, but an "anonymous expert" cannot be challenged because he is unknown—he could be a man off the street, or the prosecutor's brother. By definition, an expert must have a public identity that establishes the claimed expertise. The 6th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to confront (cross-examine) the witnesses against the defendant. Anonymous expert witnesses violate this fundamental principle. Yet on the basis of this anonymous "expert" opinion, all the defendants were convicted at the second trial. On Oct. 29, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the Holy Land Five's appeals, and let stand the criminalizing of charitable intent using the opinion of an anonymous expert to do so. 

Source:  "Why All Americans Should Care About the Holy Land Foundation Case," by Stephen Downs, Esq. and Kathy Manley, Esq.,Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, Vol. XXXII, No. 1, January/February 2013

Why the New York Times is Anti-American

January 9, 2013 

"My conclusion is simple. Nepotism works."
- Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, (1926 -2012), publisher of the New York Times, “a tightly held family operation since 1896.”

“In the three years since 9-11, we've begun to understand that it's possible to know what happened without knowing what happened.”
New York Times, "The Public Knowledge of 9/11," September 11, 2004

On December 30, 2012, the New York Times published a disturbing anti-American editorial entitled “Let’s Give Up on the Constitution,” written by Louis Michael Seidman, a professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University.  As it was surely intended to do, the editorial caused a great deal of consternation among patriotic Americans.

Louis Michael Seidman, a scion of the B'nai B'rith, penned the editorial trashing the U.S. Constitution.

Seidman’s piece claims that “obedience to the Constitution” with its “downright evil provisions” is responsible for the “broken” American system of government:

As the nation teeters at the edge of fiscal chaos, observers are reaching the conclusion that the American system of government is broken. But almost no one blames the culprit:  our insistence on obedience to the Constitution, with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions.

It is, however, not obedience but disobedience to the Constitution, exactly like that promoted by Seidman, that is behind the “broken” state of our system of government.  The most egregious examples of this Constitutional disobedience are the continuous violations of Article I, Section 8, in which the powers of Congress are specified: 

The Congress shall have Power…

To coin money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin… and

To declare War…

For the past century Congress has completely abdicated its power to coin money by allowing U.S. currency to be issued by a cartel of privately-owned banks known as the Federal Reserve System. Secondly, the U.S. has waged numerous wars around the world during the past 65 years not one of which was declared by Congress.  These two blatant violations of the Constitution are responsible for most of the financial problems currently faced by the U.S. government. 

A constitution is a body of fundamental principles according to which a state is governed.  To say we should “give up on the Constitution” is to say we should give up on the American system of government.  For alternatives to the American system, Seidman points to nations like Britain and New Zealand, nations which have no constitution.   The revolutionary difference of the American system is that in the United States the people are sovereign while in Britain and New Zealand it is the Queen of England who is sovereign.  The American Revolution was fought over that difference. 

The revolutionary concept of American popular sovereignty is contained in the first three words of the Constitution:  We The People.  As Benjamin Franklin said, "In free governments, the rulers are the servants and the people their superiors and sovereigns."

The revolutionary concept of popular sovereignty is enshrined in the first three words of the Constitution.

So why would the New York Times publish an anti-American editorial that calls for giving up the Constitution and the system of government it provides?  To understand this we need to understand what the New York Times is, and who it really represents.   

The editor of the editorial page of the New York Times is Andrew Rosenthal, who oversees the paper's opinion pages. The editorial department of the paper is completely separate from the news operations and Mr. Rosenthal answers directly to the publisher, Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr.

The New York Times is a family-owned newspaper, controlled by the Sulzberger family.  The paper is owned by The New York Times Company, which publishes 18 other newspapers, including theInternational Herald Tribune and The Boston Globe.  Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr. is the chairman of the company and his family has controlled the paper since 1896.

The Sulzberger family is a Jewish family from Baden, in southern Germany.  The Sulzbergers are closely tied to the Rothschild family, which comes from the same part of Germany.  Ferdinand Sulzberger, for example, was the first of the Sulzbergers from Baden to immigrate to America.  Before coming to America, Sulzberger studied business in a mercantile firm in Frankfurt, the home of the Rothschild family.  He probably worked with the Rothschilds.  Subsequently, after making a fortune in America with his meat packing business, Sulzberger’s daughter Lily married Victor Sydney Rothschild, the eldest son of Victor Henry Rothschild.  The two fathers served on the board of trustees of Temple Beth-El on Fifth Avenue in New York City.

One of the most significant connections between the Sulzberger and Rothschild families is that they both belong to the leadership level of the Jewish Zionist secret society known as the International Order of B’nai B’rith.  Louis Michael Seidman’s grandfather was a president of the Victory Lodge 1481 of B’nai B’rith.   The younger generations of these families are surely members of the same secret society – but keep it secret.

The Sulzberger and Rothschild families have long conspired together to change the world to suit their agenda.  Some of their global plans have been published in the pages of the New York Times, which has served as their media megaphone for the past century.  In 1907, for example, the paper carried an article entitled “Will People the West with the Russian Jews.”

The Sulzberger and Rothschild families work together to advance their global agenda.  Their project in 1907 to populate the American West with Russian Jews is just one example.

In the article, Cyrus L. Sulzberger (of the family that controls the NYT) announced that he was heading a project to bring large numbers of Russian Jews directly to Galveston, Texas.  The project to populate the American West with Russian Jews was funded by Jacob H. Schiff and the Rothschild family.  It is interesting to note that the emigration project was not a U.S. government initiative but was first conceived and announced in London, where the treasurer for the operation was Leopold de Rothschild.  The B’nai B’rith and these same Zionist families had operated similar Jewish emigration programs in Eastern Europe for decades.

Understanding that the Sulzberger family controlling the New York Times is closely connected to the Rothschilds, the leading family of British Zionists, may help explain why they published the Seidman piece trashing the U.S. Constitution.  This connection also explains why the New York Times published an editorial on the third anniversary of 9-11, which said, “…we've begun to understand that it's possible to know what happened without knowing what happened.”

The New York Times, which should have conducted its own investigation, actually played a key role in the cover-up of the truth of 9-11.  Three years later the paper told its readers that they did not need to know what happened on 9-11. Why would the leading newspaper in the city in which 3,000 people were killed on 9-11 say such a thing?

The Sulzberger-owned paper published that editorial for the same reason it published the propaganda pieces by Judith Miller, whichfalsely claimed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction:  to advance the rapacious agenda of the Rothschild family and their Zionist state of Israel.  

The state of Israel serves as the operational arm and iron fist of the British Zionist movement, which is headed by the Rothschild family.  The Balfour Declaration in 1917, for example, which first promised Britain’s support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people,” was addressed to Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild, after all.

For the Sulzberger and Rothschild families the United States is a nation they seek to control and dominate.  The terrorism of 9-11 was a false-flag operation that they sponsored and controlled through their strategic asset, the state of Israel.  The Zionist-controlled media was then deployed to deceive the public about what really happened.  The strategic goal was to change American public opinion and bring the U.S. military into the Middle East to seize valuable assets and protect their beleaguered Zionist state.  Undermining the United States by attacking the U.S. Constitution is simply part of their agenda.  Understanding who is behind this evil agenda is essential to stopping it.  

Sources and Recommended Reading:

“Let’s Give Up on the Constitution,” by Louis Michael Seidman, New York Times, December 30, 2012 

Sulzberger, Jewish Encyclopedia (1906)

“Will People the West with the Russian Jews,” New York Times, January 5, 1907   

Miliband & Trotsky in New York

December 29, 2012

For all practical purposes, the United States and Britain are Zionist-occupied nations. Because the American and British people are generally ignorant of what Zionism is, the meaning of this statement is not widely understood or appreciated. The lack of understanding by the public, however, doesn't change the fact that these once great nations have become Zionist-controlled states. The evidence is clearly seen in the self-destructive foreign policies these nations have pursued for the past 40 years or so. 
"Exposing the Zionist Hidden Hand that Rules Britain and the United States," by Christopher Bollyn, December 20, 2007

Five years ago, in response to my article "Exposing the Zionist Hidden Hand Ruling Britain and the United States," I posted another article entitled "Did Miliband & Trotsky Come to New York in 1905?" on  To this day the article has been read by more than 30,000 readers.  In order to give this article a proper place of its own I am posting it here.

Did Miliband & Trotsky Come to New York in 1905?  

Trotsky and Miliband:  Two "Hebrew" Tailors from Russia Arrive in New York – 1905

Caveat Lector - While based on historical documents, this article contains some speculation on the author's part.

The Miliband family of David and Edward Miliband is originally from Warsaw and is clearly a Jewish family with strongly pronounced Zionist-Marxist ties.

With David Miliband serving as the current foreign minister for Great Britain and his brother Edward holding a similar high position in the British government with control over the British treasury, the Miliband family history is important for all British citizens. Because of Britain's interventionist global foreign policy, the loyalties and decisions of David Miliband affect the whole world.

David Miliband with the "Likudnik" Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert. Olmert is a Betar boy and the son of the Irgun terrorist, Mordechai Olmert. The current Israeli prime minister was in New York City on a secret mission on 9-11. The fact that this Israeli politician with long ties to Zionist terrorism was secretly in New York City on the day of the worst terror disaster in modern times is evidently of no interest to the controlled media. It is, however, of great interest to me and I will be discussing the specific Israelis who Olmert met with in New York on September 10, 2001 and their ties to the Florida-based "hijackers" and fake art students.


The Miliband family of Warsaw established a branch in the United States in the late 1800s and early 1900s. There is a Samuel Miliband, for example, born in 1870, who came to New York and who shares the same name as the grandfather of David and Edward Miliband. The Sam Miliband in New York changed his name to Samuel Miller and got a U.S. passport in that name in 1923. This Sam Miliband also disappeared in 1920, although this Miliband said that he had gone to Baltimore for three years – not to Russia to fight in the Bolshevik Red Army of Trotsky and Stalin.

It is interesting to note that an "Elie" Miliband, a 40-year-old "Hebrew" tailor from Warsaw (Russia) came to the United States on the S.S. Philadelphia sailing from Southhampton and arriving in New York on January 28, 1905, with a person who appears to be the Jewish revolutionary known as "Leon Trotsky" traveling under an alias, Irska Bronstein.

The designation as "Hebrew" indicates that Miliband and Bronstein were Zionists who identified themselves, incorrectly most likely, as Hebrew. The ideological differences between members of the Jewish Bund at the time centered on emigration of Russian Jews to Palestine the use of Yiddish or the re-constituted "Hebrew" – which is actually a Slavic language form with the use of Hebrew words.

A person who may very well be "Leon Trotsky" is the first name on the list, two names before Elie Miliband. The first-listed traveler is using the clearly fraudulent name "Irska" Bronstein. Irska claims to be a 25-year-old "Hebrew" tailor of Russian origin coming from London.

It should be noted that "Trotsky" was very clever and often traveled with forged documents. His real name was Lev Davidovich Bronstein and his biographies indicate that in the early years of the 20th Century he had lived in London where he was a principal of the Russian socialist magazine named Iskra (Spark) with people like Vladimir Lenin.

Lev D. Bronstein, a.k.a. Leon Trotsky, ca. 1905

Iskra was a political newspaper of Russian socialist emigrants established as the official organ of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party. The first edition was published in Leipzig in 1900. Subsequent editions were published in Munich, London, and Geneva.

One might ask how Russian socialist emigrants raised the funds to produce a newspaper in 4 different cities?

One might also reasonably ask why Jewish emigrants from Russia, living in the cities of London, Geneva, and New York, would concern themselves with overthrowing the Czar of Russia. Does this not look very similar to the exile groups of Iraqis in London and Washington, e.g. Ahmed Chalabi and his Iraqi National Congress, who concerned themselves with overthrowing Saddam Hussein?

Initially Iskra was managed by Lenin. In 1903, after the split of the RSDLP, Lenin left the staff, the newspaper was seized by Mensheviks and was published under the control of Plekhanov until 1905. The average circulation was 8,000.

ISKRA - The paper of Lenin and Trotsky; but who paid the bills?

There were differences between the Russian-Jewish socialists. One group, known as "economists," argued that the party should focus on helping industrial workers improve their lot in life.

Another group argued that overthrowing the monarchy (in Russia – not Britain) was more important and that a well organized and disciplined revolutionary party was essential. This group was led by the London-based newspaper Iskra, which was founded in 1900. Trotsky sided with the Iskra position. One might ask why this London-based group did not also call for the overthrow of the British monarchy?

Trotsky was one of the senior writers of Iskra, whose motto was "From a spark a fire will flare up," the well-known communist motto.

The person who traveled under the name Irska Bronstein was obviously using an alias. Irska is not a Russian name; there is no such name. Irska is clearly a play on the word "Iskra," the newspaper Bronstein, a.k.a. Trotsky, was a director of.

I have not yet found any documented evidence to contradict the possibility that Trotsky was in New York in January 1905. Trotsky does not reappear in Russia until much later in the year, when he arrives in St. Petersburg in October or November and is arrested in December. I could be completely wrong on this. Irska Bronstein may not be Trotsky and may really be Irska Bronstein, but there are no other records for anyone with such a name.

About Trotsky in early 1905, Anatol Lunacharsky, a party member, wrote about his appearance at a party conference in Geneva in the spring of 1905:

I first met him at a comparatively late stage, in 1905, after the events of January. He had arrived, I forget where from, in Geneva and he and I were due to speak at a big meeting summoned as a result of this catastrophe.

Trotsky was among the Menshevik leaders. The Third (Bolshevik) Congress was held in London in May 1905 while the Mensheviks held their conference at the same time in Geneva, which suggests that Lunacharsky first met Trotsky in May 1905.

If this Irska Bronstein was indeed Trotsky, it would show the New York connection with Trotsky began earlier than previously thought. It would also suggest an earlier connection between Trotsky and the Miliband family and their foreign-based movement to overthrow the Czar and destroy Russia.

The Russian Czar Nicholas II and family

Miliband and Bronstein probably had more in common than thread and needles.

Irska Trotsky was detained and held for a day or so until his cousin, Abraham or Abram Bronstein in New London, Conn. sent him the funds he needed to travel on to Connecticut. (Elie Mileband or Miliband was also detained, although for other reasons.)

Although I could very well be wrong about this Miliband link with Leon Trotsky, I thought this information about the Miliband family was very interesting and deserved to be posted. 

When is a Massacre not a Massacre?

December 19, 2012

WHITE PHOSPHORUS ON THE U.N. SCHOOL - The Israeli military used a banned weapon, white phosphorus, on the U.N. school in Beit Lahia (Gaza) on January 17, 2009.  Some 1,600 people had sought shelter in the U.N. school.  President-elect Obama was completely silent about the Gaza Massacre.  Obama doesn't criticize Israeli war crimes and atrocities; he gives them more bombs.  One should ask, who does Obama really represent?


Four years ago, on December 27, the third day of Christmas, the Israeli military began its criminal assault on the defenseless population of the occupied Gaza Strip.  The Israeli military called its 22-day assault "Operation Cast Lead."  Others simply call it the Gaza Massacre. 

A massacre it surely was with numerous war crimes and atrocities, perpetrated mainly by the Israeli military, which has vastly superior firepower, thanks to the advanced weapons and technology supplied by the U.S. government - and paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.

The Palestinians suffered some 1,417 killed and 5,303 injured during the Gaza Massacre.  At least 926 of the Palestinians killed (66 percent) were civilians.  The Israelis, on the other hand, lost 10 soldiers and 3 civilians.  Four of the soldiers died from "friendly fire." 

The Israeli bombing began at 11:30 a.m. on December 27 with a wave of airstrikes in which American-made F-16 fighter jets and Apache attack helicopters simultaneously struck 100 targets within 220 seconds.  The Israeli attack began precisely at the time between school shifts, when the greatest number of Palestinian school children were on their way to or from school.  Israeli critics have pointed out that this timing was purely intentional.

Israel's criminal attacks on school children and their schools continued throughout the three-week assault with schools being targeted with mortar shells and the hellish banned weapon - white phosphorus.  One school, run by the United Nations, was actually targeted with white phosphorus shells only a few days before the inauguration of Barack Obama. 

THE SLAUGHTER AT AL FAKHURA SCHOOL - Israeli forces shelled the U.N.-operated school on January 6, 2009, killing 42 people.  The Daily Mail (UK) reported:  “The slaughter at Al Fakhora school in the Jabalya refugee camp was the worst single incident since the offensive was launched 11 days ago. Some 350 people were sheltering in the school and many local residents were in the immediate area, thinking it would be safe, when the shells exploded in mid-afternoon.  Many of the victims were left lying in the street in pools of blood and the nearby hospital was overwhelmed. Photographer Majed Hamdan said: 'I saw parents slapping their faces in grief, screaming, some collapsed to the floor. They knew their children were dead.' ”


The Guardian (UK) reported in January 2009 that the Israeli military was carrying out the systematic destruction of schools and centers of education in the Gaza Strip. “In the current offensive, Israel began attacking Gaza's educational institutions immediately,” the Guardianreported on January, 10, 2009. “On only the second and third day of air attacks last week, Israeli planes wreaked severe damage in direct strikes on Gaza's Islamic University. The main buildings were devastated, destroying administrative records, and, of course, ending studies. The Ministry of Education has been hit twice by direct hits from the air.” 

THE BOMBING OF THE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL - On January 3, 2009, the Israeli air force destroyed the American International School, the first international school in Gaza, with American-made bombs dropped from American-made fighter jets - all paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.  Obama's response to the Israeli war crimes in Gaza?  Give them more bombs, and bigger ones.

The Israeli bombing of the American International School
Video Link -

President-elect Obama refrained from criticizing the Israeli military assault at the time, but said he would have "plenty to say" - after the inauguration.  After the inauguration, however, President Obama said nothing about the many Israeli atrocities committed during the Gaza Massacre.

Four years later, in November 2012, the Israeli military once again attacked the defenseless population of Gaza, the week after Obama won a second term.  Once again, the Israeli military used American-made planes to launch American-made bombs on the civilian population of Gaza, killing some 170 people, mostly civilians, and injuring 971.  Once again, Obama was completely silent about the use of American-made weapons on the civilian population of Gaza.

The day before the school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, I was shocked to read in Business Insider that the U.S. Department of Defense plans to provide the Israel Air Force with 10,000 new bombs — more than half of which are bunker-busters.  The cost of the new bombs for Israel was reported to be $647 million - paid for with the thousands of millions of taxpayer dollars provided to Israel every year by the U.S. Congress.

The Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz reported that the U.S. bomb deal would serve to "renew the inventory of the Israel Defense Forces following the massive bombings in Gaza during Operation Pillar of Defense."

It should be noted that both Israeli military assaults (2008/09 and 2012) on Gaza were headed by Ehud Barak, a terror mastermind and war criminal who is one of the key suspects of the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11.  For the Obama administration to provide more weapons to a party that is known to use them to commit atrocities and war crimes - is criminal.

Compare the difference in how Obama treats the Gaza Massacre and the school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut.  Both were clearly crimes of mass murder, but the Israeli perpetrators have been rewarded - with more guns and bombs.  How much sense does that make?

Adam Lanza, the alleged shooter in Newtown, was not allowed under Connecticut law to possess or carry weapons.  That is to say that if an alert citizen had notified the Newtown police that a suspicious armed person wearing body armor was driving around town on December 14... things might have turned out differently.  (This is what I did when I saw a suspicious vehicle with armed men around my house in August 2006.)

In any case, 20-year-old Adam Lanza, under the law, was not allowed to carry weapons in Connecticut and had been turned away when he tried to buy a rifle a couple days before the shooting.  This is correct.  The law worked.  He apparently then turned to his mother's arsenal at home for the firepower he wanted to carry out the massacre.  All the weapons he allegedly used on that terrible day were illegal for him to possess or carry under the law.

On the other hand, under Obama, Ehud Barak and the criminals who rule Israel get away with mass murder, time and again.  Not only does the United States government protect these criminals in important places like the United Nations, the Obama administration even provides them with more bombs and weapons so they can carry out their next massacre.  How much sense does that make?


“Gaza's darkest day: 40 die as Israel bombs 'safe haven' UN school,” by David Williams, Daily Mail (UK), January 7, 2009


“In Gaza, the schools are dying too,” by Ed Vulliamy and Ameera Ahmad, The Guardian, January 10, 2009 

“Israel Is Set To Receive 5,000 US Bunker Buster Bombs After Delaying Its Attack On Iran,” by Michael Kelley,, December 13, 2012 

Netanyahu's Smuggling of Nuclear Triggers

December 8, 2012

Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, was personally involved in a criminal smuggling operation to obtain nuclear triggers for Israel's nuclear weapons.  This cartoon by Carlos Latuff depicts the hypocrisy of Netanyahu - the nuclear criminal - at the United Nations.

Russia Today has an excellent video report on Benjamin Netanyahu's documented role in the criminal smuggling of nuclear triggers from the United States to Israel.  If Netanyahu played an active role in the criminal smuggling, this makes him a nuclear criminal.  Since both the Israeli president, Shimon Peres, and prime minister Netanyahu have been involved in such criminal activity for decades to create a nuclear arsenal this makes the Israeli government one run by criminals at the top.  These are the same people who are behind the false-flag terrorism of 9-11.  When will they be prosecuted for their crimes against the United States - and humanity?


Sources and Recommended Reading:
“Arnon Milchan – ‘Mr. Israel’ and 9/11,” by Christopher Bollyn, October 4, 2011 

Israel at the U.N. - Who is Ron Prosor?

December 4, 2012

Sixty-five years after the United Nations passed a resolution to carve Palestine into pieces and give the best parts to the minority population of Zionist immigrants from Russia and Poland, the national rights of the Palestinian people were formally recognized by the same international organization that created the state of Israel.  Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, rejected the U.N. decision granting the Palestinian Authority non-member observer status and reacted by declaring that Israel would build 3,000 homes in occupied East Jerusalem.

"All settlement construction is illegal under international law and constitutes an obstacle to peace," the European Union's foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton said in a statement, repeating what all nations have said since the 1970s when Israel began building illegal settlements on occupied Palestinian land.  Several nations called their ambassadors home from Israel and summoned the Israeli ambassador to express their disapproval, but there is no indication that any serious and meaningful actions are planned to punish the Israeli regime or to compel them to refrain from their on-going illegal settlement activity.  The European Union, for example, is Israel's largest trading partner and if the E.U. were to threaten to boycott Israeli products the regime in Jerusalem would have to modify its outrageous behavior.  The last European to call for a boycott of Israel was Anna Lindh, the Swedish foreign minister who was stabbed under very suspicious circumstances in Stockholm and died on September 11, 2003.

To punish the Palestinians, however, the Israelis announced that they would withhold some $120 million of tax revenue they have collected from the Palestinian people.  Yasser Abed Rabbo, a senior Palestinian official, said Israel was guilty of "piracy and theft" by refusing to hand over the funds.

Pirates and thieves would certainly describe the nature of the current Israeli regime and one has to wonder how any thinking observer would not have recognized this fact as painfully obvious many years ago.  The dastardly criminal nature of the Israeli leadership has to be understood in order to make sense of the policies and actions taken by the state of Israel.  When a person or an organization are judged to be criminal we have to take that determination into account and treat them as criminals.  To ignore their criminal behavior and to continue to have normal relations with criminals makes us complicit in their crimes.  With that in mind, let's look at Ron Prosor, Israel's ambassador to the United Nations.

SIXTY-FIVE YEARS LATER - "No decision by the UN can break the 4,000 year-old bond between the people of Israel and the land of Israel," Israeli Ambassador Ron Prosor, said on November 29, 2012.  Prosor spoke on the 65th anniversary of the woefully ill-advised and unfair UN Partition Plan for Palestine, which gave more than half of Palestine to Zionist settlers - like his family who immigrated from Germany in 1933.  So, who is Ron Prosor?  Why is he Israel's ambassador to the UN?  And what is his connection to the "land of Israel?"

THE U.N. PARTITION PLAN OF 1947 CREATED ISRAEL - On November 29, 2012, the UN General Assembly voted by a huge majority to recognize Palestine (within the 1967 borders) as a non-member state with observer status.  This vote occurred exactly sixty-five years after the United Nations created the state of Israel by giving the minority Zionist settlers more than half the land of Palestine.  This ill-advised plan led to the murder of the UN envoy to Palestine, Swedish Count Folke Bernadotte, by Yitzhak Shamir and other terrorists.  Armed Zionist gangs then went on the offensive and seized nearly all of historic Palestine by using terrorism to expel the native population.  Some 500 Palestinian towns and villages were ethnically cleansed in 1948.  The dispossessed Palestinian population is the crux issue of the Palestinian problem.  These refugees, now in the millions, have the legal and natural right to return to their homes and villages, which are now occupied by Israeli settlers.

WHO IS RON PROSOR? - Prosor is described as a career diplomat who served under a previous Likud government as director-general of the Foreign Ministry. (Photo - "Durch Hitler Geboren," Der Spiegel, 1994)

SON OF URI PROSOR (a.k.a. Uri Proskauer) - Ron Prosor's father is the German-born Uri Proskauer (right).  His grandfather, Berthold Proskauer (left) was a German patriot and officer who wanted nothing to do with Zionism.  Under pressure from his wife, Berthold quit the German army and took his family to Palestine in 1933, where he was very unhappy.  He refused to learn Hebrew and longed for Germany.  Like many German Jews, Berthold did not consider Palestine as a home, but as a compulsory and unnatural place of exile. (Source - "Durch Hitler Geboren," Der Spiegel, 1994)

PROSKAUER'S MASSADA - Ron Prosor's father, Uri Proskauer, served in the Israeli navy in 1948, when its primary mission was illegal weapons smuggling.  In November 1949, Proskauer and seven partners from the navy started a shipping company named "Ophir" and bought their first ship, the Mercur, in Denmark.  The vessel was registered in the Israeli Consulate in Copenhagen under the nameMassada.  Four months later, on March 28th, Massada sank off the coast of Italy due to the incompetence of its Israeli officers.  Six lives were lost.  The Massada sinking was Israel's first maritime disaster.  (Source - Massada, National Maritime Museum of Israel)

WORKING FOR A TERRORIST - In Israel, the appointment of ambassadors is the prerogative of the foreign minister.  Ron Prosor's father, Uri, served as a senior Israeli diplomat in Austria (1982-1986) under foreign minister Yitzhak Shamir, the notorious Zionist terrorist and assassin.  

WANTED FOR MURDER AND TERRORISM - Yitzhak Shamir was no minor terrorist; he was a wanted Zionist terrorist with a price on his head.  He plotted the assassinations of Lord Moyne, a British minister, and U.N. negotiator Count Folke Bernadotte, in Jerusalem in 1948.  "Shamir was proud of his involvement in planning the assassination of the British official Walter Edward Guinness, Lord Moyne, in Cairo in November, 1944," according to Shamir's obituaryin the Times of Israel. Shamir is also thought to be one of the senior architects of the 9-11 false-flag terrorism plot, which was first developed by Israeli terrorists in the 1970s when they came to power under Menachem Begin's Likud banner.

GONE TO JAMAICA - When Yitzhak Shamir became prime minister, Uri Prosor was sent from Vienna to Kingston, Jamaica, where he served as Israel's ambassador in the 1990s.  Why would an Israeli diplomat whose career started with weapons smuggling operations in the 1940s be posted in Jamaica in the 1990s?  Was Uri Prosor involved in Israel's smuggling of drugs to America through the "Caribbean Corridor?"  

ISRAEL ARMS THE DRUG CARTEL - That the state of Israel has supported and worked with the drug mafia in Colombia for decades is a well known fact.  In 2005, for example, the U.S. government demanded that Israel clarify how five U.S.-made helicopters sold to the Israeli military in the mid-70s had found their way into the hands of a Colombian drug cartel.  Why has Israeli support for the Colombian drug cartel been tolerated for so long?  Is the drug network in the Caribbean an Israeli-run enterprise?  How does this activity benefit the Jewish people?  (Source - “IDF choppers in service of drug cartel"

THE MIAMI CONNECTION - Oddly, Uri Prosor maintained a P.O. Box address in Hialeah, Florida, while he was stationed in Jamaica.  He also had an address at 240 Biscayne Blvd., next to the Port of Miami, where the cruise ships come in and make their deliveries.

What is most telling is who Uri Prosor shared the mailbox in Hialeah with.  One of his partners was none other than the notorious smuggler Felix Przedborski, a personal friend of Menachem Begin.

WHO IS FELIX PRZEDBORSKI? - Felix Przedborski is a Jewish mafia boss (born Zgierz, Poland, 1930) with Belgian and Costa Rican passports. In the 1990s, while Uri Prosor was Israeli ambassador to Jamaica, Przedborski was involved in the multi-billion dollar trafficking of diamonds, arms, narcotics, and nuclear material, and had considerable influence over the politicians in Belgium and the European Union.  About Przedborski and his Nebula outfit a Belgian police report from 1994 concluded:  "Our conclusion would be that, since over 20 years, some economical forces, some of which are of the mafia-type being linked to the political power and organized crime structures, have reached the 4th level of money laundering, in other words: Absolute Power."  (Source - Atlas File, Gendarmerie Liège, November 21, 1994) 

GOOD NEIGHBORS - Felix Przedborski has an apartment in Bal Harbour, Florida, at 9999 Collins Avenue, where Marilyn Arison (center), widow of Ted Arison also lives.  Arison, born Theodore Arisohn in Tel Aviv, created Carnival Cruise Lines in 1972.  Cruise ships are often used for drug smuggling.  Are the connections linking the Zionist terrorist mastermind Shamir with Uri Prosor, Felix Przedborski, and the Arison family the tip of the Israeli smuggling network in the United States?  These are telltale links connecting the criminals running the state of Israel today with the notorious Zionist terrorists of the 1940s.  This is the same criminal cabal at the center of the false-flag terrorism of 9-11 that called for an invasion of Afghanistan before the smoke had cleared at the World Trade Center.  The fact that occupied Afghanistan became the leading producer of opium after the invasion of 2001 is certainly no coincidence.  Drug smuggling is, after all, big business with huge profits.

THE ZIONISTS' SINKING SHIP - The Zionist criminal network is looking more and more like the Arison-owned Costa Concordia,which, like Massada, sank as a result of sheer incompetence and arrogance off the coast of Italy in 2012.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

“Atlas File,” Liège police report (Belgium), November 21, 1994

"Durch Hitler Geboren," by Rafael Seligmann, Der Spiegel, October 24, 1994

“IDF choppers in service of drug cartel,” Itamar Eichner, Ynet News (Israel), September 11, 2005

The Problem with Israel

October 17, 2012

And then you've got the Israeli army, which I like to refer to as one of the most... one of the best-trained, best-equipped, best-fed terrorist organizations in the world.  And, yes, they have generals and they have nice uniforms, but their entire purpose... their entire purpose is terrorism. 

Zionism, just like racism, has to go.  The Zionist state has to be replaced with democracy, equal rights.
- Miko Peled, son of a famous Israeli general, speaking in Seattle, October 1, 2012

The real problem with Israel is that most Americans really don't understand what this state that they are supporting with billions of taxdollars every year is all about.  This is mainly because Israel is completely misrepresented by the controlled media as being "our only democratic ally" in the Middle East.  Most Christians mix mythology with reality and confuse the modern state of Israel with the Biblical Israel they hear so much about in their churches.  Students, academics, and journalists are ignorant of Zionism and the brutal history of the modern state of Israel because it is a censored history that is not taught, even at our best universities.  Our craven and venal politicians are completely unable to resist the power and influence of the Israeli lobby because to do so would be political suicide.

Along comes Miko Peled, an Israeli whose father was one of the first generals of the Zionist state, who played a part in the crucial wars and campaigns of ethnic cleansing that created the state of Israel.  Miko Peled was born and raised in Israel and went through the intense Zionist indoctrination that all Israelis go through.  As he says, his first struggle was to break through the Zionist mindset and to see Palestinians as human beings with the same God-given rights as Jews.  It was not until he was 39 years old that Peled, an Israeli from Jerusalem, first met with Palestinians after his 13-year-old niece had been killed in a terror bombing. 

Peled is quite unlike other Israelis that most Americans will ever see or hear because he is an intelligent and articulate person who has broken out of the Zionist deception and is now bravely speaking out about Israel.  In doing so he disabuses Americans of the persistent myths and half-truths about Israel as he explains in plain English the unpleasant truth about the Zionist state.  This is the truth that Americans, both Jews and Gentiles alike, need to hear and it is well worth the time to listen to the following 45-minute speech that Peled gave in a church in Seattle on October 1, 2012.  With hundreds of thousands of Americans stationed in the Middle East and with "our ally", the extremist Israeli regime, constantly fomenting war and terrorism, it is high time that Americans understand what Israel is really all about.

Video Link -

The Deceiving of America and Here Comes Evil

October 9, 2012

As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood... But I don't care if Americans think we're running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government.  I just care that we get to keep running them.
- Joel Stein,
 "How Jewish is Hollywood?" Los Angeles Times, December 19, 2008

Dr. Lasha Darkmoon takes up the matter of Jewish dominance of the U.S. media and government in a recent article entitled "Here Comes Evil".  The following extract is from the beginning of the article.

By the pricking of my thumbs,
Something wicked this way comes.
— Macbeth, iv.i. 44

In a few weeks’ time, Americans will face the grim prospect of choosing a new government, either headed by the same president or by a new one. Why a grim prospect? Because the choice is between an aggressive war criminal and a draft dodging, chickenhawk warmonger, both of them puppets of organized Jewry. No matter who you vote for, you end up with dystopia. You end up with wickedness in high places.

It’s only a matter of time before the masses are shaken from their slumber and realize that the world that awaits them is a world under the dominion of evil.

Our government is now controlled by a criminal cabal. Our country is a loony bin where the crazies are in charge. Our cities are crime factories. Our banks are run by bandits who steal from the poor. Our schools are production lines for the manufacture of morons. Our places of work are venues of legalized exploitation and servitude. Our news is horror fiction. Our courts are coin-operated machines that crank out injustice. Our laws are dirty jokes. Our heroes are villains. Our celebrities are abominations. Our politicians are psychopaths at large. We live in an America where torture has now been normalized and murder is legal—an Orwellian world too terrifying even for Orwell’s imagination.

Here are some facts that will help to persuade you that the American Dream has morphed into a nightmare—that the country we now live in is a police state masquerading as a democracy.

"Our government is now controlled by a criminal cabal," Dr. Darkmoon writes, concluding that "the country we now live in is a police state masquerading as a democracy."  I agree completely with her grim analysis, so the crucial question facing me and millions of other concerned Americans is how do we rectify this dismal situation and regain our democratic republic?

First, we need to understand how the criminal cabal gained control of our government.  Why is it that our elected politicians, who do so little for the American people, are ready and willing to sell the farm to serve special interests, such as the Israeli lobby and the crooked bankers?  Why do the members of Congress support disastrous and costly wars in the Middle East?  Why do the highest elected officials of the U.S. government and the city of New York, people like President Barack Obama and Mayor Michael Bloomberg, continue to lie to the public about 9-11 in the face of solid scientific evidence that clearly exposes their lies? 

The problem is really quite simple to explain but rather more difficult to solve.  It should be clear to most intelligent observers that our political parties are both dominated by Jewish Zionists who control the candidates and the political agenda.  Both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are beholden to the Zionist Jews who finance and control their political careers.  The Zionist dominance of our political system is the reason why the candidates for the presidency are willing to bend over backwards to show their support for Israel.  This is also why, after 21 years of war in the Middle East, we have yet to see a presidential nominee from either party who truly opposes the war, as most Americans do.  The state of Israel and the Zionist war agenda are clearly sacred cows in the U.S. political establishment.

On top of this rigged system of politics we have a fraudulent system of voting in which the citizenry is prevented from authenticating the results.  For the election to be authentic the citizens must be allowed to participate and observe the open and transparent counting of the votes.  The use of privately-owned and operated electronic voting machines has removed the citizen from the most essential aspect of a democratic election:  the counting of the votes.  This has made a sham of our elections and our democratic franchise.

As Thomas Paine wrote in 1803:  " have the representation real, the election must be real; and that where the election is a fiction, the representation is a fiction also. Like will always produce like.

We don't have real representative government in America because we don't have real democratic elections.  It's that simple.  This is not a difficult concept to understand, nor is it a difficult problem to solve.  There are many nations around the world that have open and transparent elections all the time in which the results are properly authenticated by the citizenry.

The reason this fundamental problem is not well understood by the public is because the controlled media deceives Americans into thinking that we have truly democratic elections - when in fact we don't.  Because the media ignores the obvious problems with our fraudulent system of voting the public gets the impression that we truly have democratic elections, which is what most people want to believe anyway.  The conspirators behind this massive deception are the same bosses of the Zionist-owned media who have ignored the evidence of explosive demolitions of the Twin Towers and WTC 7, while telling us for 11 years that Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida were behind the murderous destruction on 9-11.  These are the very same people running the Zionist-controlled media who lied to the American people about Iraq's non-existent weapons of mass destruction in 2003, and who are now pushing for war against Iran.

We don't have to be enslaved to the Zionist media moguls and their evil agenda of war and conquest.  It is certainly possible to restore the integrity of the American republic, but it won't be easy.  The first thing is to understand that the Zionist-controlled media circus is in the business of deceiving Americans in order to control our nation and plunder our wealth.  Realizing the media deception behind the lies of 9-11 and our fraudulent elections is the essential first step to saving our nation.  


“Here Comes Evil,” by Dr. Lasha Darkmoon, October 5, 2012

“How Jewish is Hollywood?” by Joel Stein, Los Angeles Times, December 19, 2008,0,4676183.column

Israeli Lobbyist Confirms 9-11 Conspiracy Theories

October 1, 2012

Patrick Clawson, Director of Research at the Washington Institute of Near East Policy, a pro-Israeli think tank, publicly stated that another false-flag attack might be needed to drag the U.S. into a war with Iran. 

Israeli Lobbyist Confirms 9/11 Conspiracy Theories, While Israeli PM Draws Ridicule At the UN

By Saman Mohammadi

The global 9/11 truth and justice movement was vindicated again when Patrick Clawson, the Director of Research at the Washington Institute of Near East Policy (WINEP), publicly suggested that the United States and Israel stage a false flag provocation in the Persian Gulf to justify U.S. military action and switch the war against Iran to another gear.

This two-minute video reveals the Zionist thinking behind using a false-flag event to start a war with Iran.  Video Link -

If Clawson's suggestion is acted upon, it won't be the first time that Israeli and American leaders slaughtered sacrificial lambs in a false flag operation and used the event to deceive their shell-shocked nations into war. Both the USS Liberty cover-up and the false flag September 11 events demonstrate the willingness of Israeli and U.S. administrations to dance with the devil.

For the full context of Clawson's remarks, watch the complete video titled, "How to Build U.S.-Israeli Coordination on Preventing an Iranian Nuclear Breakout."

Clawson's comments are hardly surprising. 9/11 truth-tellers have been saying for years that the same governments who pulled off the 9/11 deception will again resort to the tactic of a covert false flag operation to get the world to support a U.S.-Israeli war against Iran.

But the truth is that the United States is already at war with Iran. I reported back in April that the aim of U.S. sanctions against Iran is to provoke an Iranian “Pearl Harbor”, thereby mobilizing American public opinion for an all-out American-Western-Israeli war against Iran.

Clawson is not a demonic outlier; he is only publicly acknowledging what is covert U.S. policy. The FDR administration pulled Japan into the same trap through sanctions and covert warfare that the Bush and Obama administrations have laid out for Iran.

If the sanctions don't provoke an Iranian response, which goes against the history of the use of sanctions in this way, then the U.S., or more likely Israel, will stage a false-flag event and use it to blame Iran. Clawson's admission merely confirms our original suspicions and adds weight to our predictions that there will be a new US-Israeli false flag to start a new war.

According to many analysts, the likely American victim in the Persian Gulf will be the USS Enterprise. Of course, it may never happen. If there are level-headed and peace-minded people in and around the U.S. military like former Navy Adviser Gwenyth Todd then the American people and the Iranian people will be saved from a catastrophic and pointless war with each other.

But it is stupid to hope for the best. Staying vigilant is key because a new false flag can happen any day, either in the United States, Europe, or the Persian Gulf.

Traditionally, the false-flag card was the "secret card" that was played very close to the Zionist/Globalist chest, but arrogant characters like Clawson mistakenly believe that people aren't paying attention so why hold back?  This thinking shows a level of arrogance that is very dangerous for the powers-that-be in the United States and Israel.

There are more rational people within the U.S. establishment like Zbigniew Brzezinski who are aware that there is a massive global political awakening and know that an illegitimate attack against Iran is a fool's errand.  Speaking to The Real News about a potentially disastrous US-Iran war in January 2010, Brzezinski said:

The Chinese are getting more involved in Iranian economy 'cause they need energy, and they're not going to be particularly grateful if we produce a conflict in the region. And that will also affect them. And what consequences that might have for the world economy is hard to predict. All I'm saying is don't trifle with the silly notion, oh, we'll just bomb them and the problem is solved. It's a false analogy, and historically it's one fundamental lesson we shouldn't forget: Stalin and the Soviet Union was more of a threat than Iran ever will be, and yet we deterred it. Mao Zedong talked of a nuclear war which might kill 300 million people, and so what [inaudible] we didn't have a war with the Chinese. Why should we act like crazies in dealing with Iran?

A third world war will destroy America, Israel, and Iran, and make way for a one world order through a violent birth. Only individuals with a disturbed imagination believe that massive political and social change can only be produced violently and catastrophically. If America and Iran restore ties, the situation in the Middle East would improve dramatically, especially on the Israel-Palestine front.

But we cannot depend on governments to improve anything. There must be a creation of a united and global peace movement based on the efforts of the global 9/11 truth and justice movement. And it must begin in America because its gifted people hold the most important key to world peace, which is their non-compliance with the hijacked U.S. government and U.S. media.

The failing and collapsing U.S. state-corporate media cannot compete in an environment where different voices and different opinions can be heard. The global alternative media is alert, expanding, and ready to knock down any new deception at a moment's notice.

Radio host Alex Jones and Emmy award-winning journalist Amber Lyon recently discussed the increasing value of the global alternative media and how it is changing global political conversations. "As journalists," said Lyon, "we cannot pick and choose when or when not to tell the truth. We always have to be truth-seekers and trying to expose the truth on every level."

The rapid online response to Clawson's repulsive statements has been extraordinary and is another sign that American public opinion will not be hijacked so easily the next time a false flag occurs that pushes America into another unnecessary war. It shows us that any new false flag event will be rightly interpreted as an act by the terrorist states in Israel and the U.S., thus negating its function:  mobilizing public opinion in America and the West for another war in the Middle East.

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley wrote the following about Clawson's false flag suggestion in his article, "False Flag: Leading Analyst at Pro-Israeli Think Tank Publicly Discusses How U.S. Can Be Forced Into War With Iran":

It is the callous disconnect that is most chilling in these remarks. Thousands of U.S. soldiers have died or have been crippled for life in these wars that have left the country near bankruptcy (and increasingly hostile “allies” in Afghanistan and Iraq). Those casualties and costs, however, appear immaterial in the discussion of supporting Israel in a war against Iran.

Clawson displays a horrifying indifference to the suffering of American soldiers, and ordinary people in the Middle East.  Many commentators have noted Clawson's unmanly characteristics. He is one of those "girlie men" that Schwarzenegger mocked at the Republican National Convention in 2004. Washington is full of such men. They have lost touch with what being a man means. To them, dropping bombs on innocent villagers in a foreign country from a shack in Nevada is a demonstration of toughness.

Clawson and others like him in the U.S.-Israeli establishment who believe that the murder of innocent people is a necessary evil don't recognize the natural boundaries of right and wrong. The morality of decisions does not enter their calculations, and this is their greatest mistake.

II. Netanyahu Draws Ridicule at the UN

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was ridiculed after he delivered his first grade level speech at the United Nations on Thursday, September 27, for bringing a kindergarten bomb chart to a serious international meeting. Another reason he was not taken seriously is because he does not have any moral authority. Neither does President Obama, by the way, but at least he has the grace to express himself on an international stage in a thoughtful and respectable manner. Netanyahu lacks grace, moral authority, and thoughtfulness.

A video capturing a young Benjamin Netanyahu in the United States in the 1970s shows a crazy side of him that seems to be a permanent feature. His rigid sense of rightness, demonstrated in the video, is scary. He can't tolerate different opinions and views. He is a classic case of an authoritarian personality.

I'm surprised that an intellectual nation like Israel elected this man who only uses emotion to get his points across and throws logic aside. Then again, it's not really surprising. Germany, the most intellectual nation in Europe, elected the demagogue Hitler. The comparison is apt, because as Dr. Steve Pieczenik said on the Alex Jones show on September 16, Netanyahu is "the Hitler of the 21st century."

Any country, no matter how civilized, can be mentally captured for a period of time in its history and become a victim of emotion-based, fear-mongering rhetoric. America, Israel, England, Germany, Russia, Iran, France, the country and time doesn't matter. We're all humans - emotional creatures who can be easily manipulated, easily led to war, and easily hoodwinked by men in power.

The difference between Hitler and Netanyahu is that Hitler had stage presence, whereas Netanyahu is an international laughing stock. This will turn out to be a good thing not only for the people of Israel, Iran, and America, but for the whole world.

Original Article (with hyperlinks): 
Mohammadi, Saman, “Israeli Lobbyist Confirms 9/11 Conspiracy Theories, While Israeli PM Draws Ridicule At the UN”, The Excavator, September 29, 2012 

American Democracy - The Funeral

September 8, 2012

Anthony Lawson has created a new video that focuses on the enslavement of the American political establishment to the Zionist agenda and the state of Israel.  This 6-minute video is highly recommended viewing.

Video URL -

The Criminal Justice System and 9-11

August 3, 2012

Mobbed-up US “justice” system hands down 9/11 injustice
by Dr. Kevin Barrett
August 1, 2012

This following is an extract from Kevin Barrett’s article “Mobbed-up US “justice” system hands down 9/11 injustice”

Sadly, the US federal courts are dominated by the same crime mob. A long series of federal court decisions, including several involving 9/11, have made a mockery of justice, blaming the victims and blessing the perpetrators with a disregard for logic and evidence that makes the courtroom scene in Alice and Wonderland seem a model of judicial probity.

The latest example comes to us thanks to the Zionist-run New York Daily News: On Monday, Manhattan Federal Magistrate Judge Frank Maas “awarded 9/11 relatives $6 billion in their suit targeting Al Qaeda and silent partner Iran for complicity in the heinous plot that killed nearly 3,000 people.”

Iran?  Despite a decade of Zionist propaganda, virtually nobody in the world is crazy enough to imagine that Iran would collaborate with anti-Shia al-CIA-duh extremists on anything, least of all 9/11.  The judge might as well blame a conspiracy between Elvis Presley and Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer.


Source:  “Mobbed-up US “justice” system hands down 9/11 injustice” by Dr. Kevin Barrett,, August 1, 1012

Zionist Terrorists Tried to Kill President Truman in 1947

August 20, 2012

On December 1, 1972, the Tri City Herald of Washington state published an AP story about how the Stern Gang of Zionist terrorists led by the late Yitzhak Shamir tried to assassinate President Harry Truman with letter bombs in 1947.  This very important, but neglected piece of history is the subject of a very interesting article by David Martin, entitled “'Jews' Tried to Kill Truman in 1947."

This is a very significant piece of history because it reveals how the Zionist terrorist faction that became the Likud party in the 1970s had actually tried to assassinate the President of the United States to achieve their territorial goals.  It needs to be understood that these are the very same Zionist extremists who planned and perpetrated the terror atrocity of 9-11.  Had these Zionist terrorists been arrested and put out of business for their earlier crimes, 9-11 would never have happened.

Yitzhak Shamir, the head of the terrorist organization that sent the letter bombs to President Truman became the prime minister of Israel in the 1980s and was the leader of the Zionist state when the Israeli false-flag terror plans to destroy the World Trade Center were put into action.  Shamir was also behind the assassinations of Lord Moyne, British minister for Middle East affairs, and of the UN mediator for Palestine, Count Folke Bernadotte. Shamir was also implicated in the bombing of the King David Hotel, in July 1946. Shamir was a well-known terrorist with whom the United States did business, rather than arrest. The false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 are the results of allowing ruthless terrorists like Shamir to come to power.

The Zionist assassin and terror chief Yitzhak Shamir (left) meets with Casper Weinberger at the Pentagon on October 15, 1982.  The United States government willfully ignored Shamir's long history of murder and terrorism - and this collusion with terrorists has cost the American people dearly.

Atwell Security of Tel Aviv, a company created by Shaul Eisenberg and a group of senior Mossadniks, got the security contract for the World Trade Center and the Port Authority in 1987.  Had the Israeli security contract for the WTC gone ahead, the false-flag terrorism of 2001 would, most likely, have occurred many years earlier.  The contract with Atwell Security of Tel Aviv was only cancelled when the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey discovered the Zionist criminal/terrorist element behind Atwell.  The saga of Atwell Security and the World Trade Center is discussed in greater detail in the chapter of Solving 9-11 entitled "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9-11."

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Martin, David, “‘Jews’ Tried to Kill Truman in 1947,”, May 17, 2012

Bollyn, Christopher, “The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9-11,” July 2008

Bollyn, “Calling Shaul Eisenberg,” October 25, 2010

The War Criminals in Our Midst

August 2, 2012

The Neoconservative War Criminals In Our Midst
by Paul Craig Roberts
August 1, 2012

A short extract from another excellent article by Paul Craig Roberts:

At the Nuremberg Trials of the defeated Germans after World War II, the US government established the principle that naked aggression – the American way in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Pakistan, and Yemen – is a war crime. Therefore, there is a very strong precedent for the State Department to round up those neoconservatives who are fomenting more war crimes.

But don’t expect it to happen. Today, war criminals run the State Department and the entire U.S. Government. They are elected to the presidency, the House, and the Senate, and appointed to the federal courts as judges. American soldiers, such as Bradley Manning, who behave as the State Department expects German soldiers to have behaved, are not honored, but are thrown into dungeons and tortured while a court martial case is concocted against them.

Hypocrisy is Washington’s hallmark, and all but the most delusional are now accustomed to their rulers speaking one way and behaving in the opposite. It is now part of the American character to regard ourselves as members of the “virtuous nation,” “the indispensable people,” while our rulers commit war crimes around the globe.

Source: “The Neoconservative War Criminals In Our Midst” by Paul Craig Roberts, August 1, 2012

Failure to Enforce the Rule of Law Destroys Economies

August 1, 2012

Punishment is justice for the unjust.
- Saint Augustine (354 – 430)

The Main Driver of GDP Growth: A Strong Rule of Law
by George Washington
July 30, 2012

Economist Woody Brock says that a nation's GDP growth is based mainly on whether or not it follows the rule of law.  Economist and investment adviser John Mauldin notes:

I had dinner with Dr. Woody Brock this evening in Rockport. We were discussing this issue and he mentioned that he had done a study based on analysis by an institution that looks at all sorts of “fuzzy” data, like how easy it is to start a business in a country, corporate taxes and business structures, levels of free trade and free markets, and the legal system. It turned out that the trait that was most positively correlated with GDP growth was strength of the rule of law. It is also one of the major factors that Niall Ferguson cites in his book Civilization as a reason for the ascendency of the West in the last 500 years, and a factor that helps explain why China is rising again as it emerges from chaos.

One of the very real problems we face is the growing feeling that the system is rigged against regular people in favor of “the bankers” or the 1%. And if we are honest with ourselves, we have to admit there is reason for that feeling. Things like LIBOR are structured with a very real potential for manipulation. When the facts come out, there is just one more reason not to trust the system. And if there is no trust, there is no system.

Dr. Brock is not alone. Economists have thoroughly documented that failure to enforce the rule of law leads to a loss of trust ... which destroys economies. This is true whether it is in the West, in Nigeria, or any other country.


Economic historian Niall Ferguson notes:

The World Economic Forum’s annual Global Competitiveness Index and, in particular, the Executive Opinion Survey on which it’s partly based ... includes 15 measures of the rule of law, ranging from the protection of private property rights to the policing of corruption and the control of organised crime.

It’s an astonishing yet scarcely acknowledged fact that on no fewer than 15 out of 15, the United States now fares markedly worse than Hong Kong. In the Heritage Foundation’s Freedom Index, too, the U.S. ranks 21st in the world in terms of freedom from corruption, a considerable distance behind Hong Kong and Singapore.  [Transparency International puts the U.S. at 24th.]

Perhaps the most compelling evidence of all comes from the World Bank’s Indicators on World Governance, which suggest that, since 1996, the United States has suffered a decline in the quality of its governance in three different dimensions: government effectiveness, regulatory quality, and the control of corruption.

Compared with Germany or Hong Kong, the U.S. is manifestly slipping behind.

Indeed - as we've extensively documented - the rule of law is now as weak in the U.S. and UK as many countries which we would consider "rogue nations".   

This is a sudden change. As famed Peruvian economist Hernando de Soto notes: “In a few short decades the West undercut 150 years of legal reforms that made the global economy possible.”


Of course, the repeal of the basic laws which enforced the rule of law among financial players is a part of the problem. Virtually everyone - other than those currently working for the big banks or on their payroll - is calling for reinstatement of the separation between banks and speculative gambling.

Free market libertarians - like everyone else - are demanding prosecution of criminal fraud using basic fraud laws. Yet the government has made it official policy not to prosecute fraud.

People have lost trust in the system, because government corruption is as widespread as Wall Street corruption ... and those in power in D.C. have the same sociopathic traits as those they supposedly regulate on Wall Street.

And as Professor Ferguson notes, draconian national security laws are one of the main things undermining the rule of law:

We must pose the familiar question about how far our civil liberties have been eroded by the national security state – a process that in fact dates back almost a hundred years to the outbreak of the First World War and the passage of the 1914 Defence of the Realm Act. Recent debates about the protracted detention of terrorist suspects are in no way new. Somehow it’s always a choice between habeas corpus and hundreds of corpses.

Of course, many of this decades' national security measures have not been taken to keep us safe in the "post-9/11 world":  many of them started before 9/11.

And America has been in a continuous declared state of national emergency since 9/11, and we are in a literally never-ending state of perpetual war. In fact, government has blown terrorism fears way out of proportion for political purposes, and "national security" powers have been used in many ways to exempt big Wall Street players from the rule of law rather than to do anything to protect us.

Is it any wonder that we're still in an economic crisis?

Source: “The Main Driver of GDP Growth: A Strong Rule of Law,” by George Washington,, July 30, 2012 (Original article with links and notes)

The Missing Jewish Millionaire's Connection to Israeli Intelligence

July 3, 2012

The strange disappearance of Guma L. Aguiar of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, sounds very much like a modern-day Huck Finn escape, which is actually a ploy frequently used by Israeli criminals.  The Israeli gangsters don't really die, they just take on a new life in Israel.  Since there is no evidence that Guam Aguiar is dead, he should be considered a missing person, one who is probably living in Israel.

Guma Aguiar actually lived in Israel much of the time and owns a home there.

“Without a trace: the strange disappearing act of Guma Aguiar” is the title of a June 30 Miami Herald article, which described Aguiar’s disappearance:

On June 19, Aguiar, 35 — anguished over his tenuous marriage, locked in a vicious court battle with his uncle and struggling to hold onto his sanity — vanished.  

He took his 31-foot fishing boat out to sea from Port Everglades in choppy seas and inclement weather. More than five hours later, the boat ran aground on Fort Lauderdale beach. Its engine was running, its lights were on, but no one was aboard.

It’s not clear whether Aguiar was swallowed by the sea, staged his disappearance, was kidnapped or murdered.

Guma Aguiar's home in Fort Lauderdale

A map showing Aguiar's home and the location on the beach where his boat was found.  There are literally hundreds of boats between his house and the beach that Aguiar could have escaped on.

In an article on the legal wrangling between Aguiar’s wife and his mother over his estimated $100 million estate in south Florida, the Daily Mail (UK) reported:

Thirty-five-year old Guma Aguiar's body has so far not been recovered, nor is there any evidence that he is deceased. 

Jamie Aquiar's attorney even suggested in court that her husband could have staged his own disappearance to escape his financial, marital and legal problems.

While the controlled “mainstream” media focus on the legal battles for his estate and Aguiar’s “demons”, referring to his bi-polar disorder, they completely leave out a very important component about Guma Aguiar’s family:  His high-level connection to Israeli intelligence through his uncle and business partner.

Emma Kaplan Aguiar, mother of the missing millionaire, seems more concerned about taking control of her son's estate - away from his wife and children - than finding him.

Guma Aguiar made his money, hundreds of millions of dollars, with his uncle Thomas S. Kaplan when they sold their 50 percent interest (Leor Energy) in a large gas field in Texas for some $2.5 billion.  Thomas Kaplan is the brother of Aguiar’s mother, Emma Kaplan Aguiar.  Thomas Kaplan’s wife and business partner is Dafna (or Dafne, Daphne) Recanati, the daughter of the notorious Israeli millionaire Leon Recanati.  The failure by the mainstream media to point out the Recanati connection to the missing Jewish millionaire is surely intentional.  The Recanati family is one of the wealthiest families in Israel and owns a global shipping company known as OSG. Getting Guma Aguiar onto an OSG ship or an Israeli vessel off the coast of Florida would not be difficult for someone with family ties to the Recanatis.  The Recanati family is a well-funded arm of Israeli intelligence. 

Leon Recanati is well-known to be one of Israel’s tycoons, deeply involved for decades in one of Israel’s most corrupt banks, the Israel Discount Bank (IDB).  Recanati is also a Major (reserves) in the Intelligence Corps of the Israeli military.  From 1986 until 2003, Recanati ran IDB Holdings.  The IDB has a long record of money laundering and is closely tied to the Madoff scam and other major financial crimes committed in the United States.  Recanati is closely connected to the Crown family of Chicago, owners of General Dynamics and generous sponsors of both Barak Obama and Mitt Romney.

Charles H. Goodman, for example, Vice President of Henry Crown and Company from 1973 to 2002 and Vice Chairman of Henry Crown and Company since 2002 has been a Director of General Dynamics Corp. since 1991. Goodman is also the Chairman of the Leon Recanati School of Business at Tel Aviv University.

Guma Aguiar has invested millions of dollars in Zionist organizations and Israeli football clubs, including Betar (the Likud club) and publicly expressed the desire to live permanently in Israel.  He had even given some $8 million to an Israeli organization calledNefesh B'Nefesh whose primary mission is to get Jews from the United States and western nations to migrate to Israel.  He reportedly lived in Israel more than half the year and had lived in Israel for three years in a row in the past decade.  Until evidence of Aguiar’s death is presented, it should be considered very likely that he is still alive, and living in Israel.

Is Guma Aguiar still dancing in Israel? 

Sources and Recommended Reading:

“Apparent death of U.S. philanthropist leaves Israeli sports club in an imbroglio,” by David Marouani, Haaretz (Israel), June 26, 2012

“Bollyn's Update on Madoff's Guilty Plea of March 12, 2009,”

“Chicago's Elders of Zion and Obama's War for Profit,” by Christopher Bollyn, October 14, 2011

Guma Aguiar videos, Religion and State in Israel

Leon Recanati, Biography, Jewish Virtual Library, July 3, 2012

Leon Y. Recanati, Executive Profile, BusinessWeek, July 3, 2012

“The Orthodox Jewish Criminal Network in the United States,” by Christopher Bollyn, July 27, 2009

“The Zionist Gang that Bankrupted General Motors,” by Christopher Bollyn, June 16, 2009 

“Without a trace: the strange disappearing act of Guma Aguiar,” by Julie K. Brown, Miami Herald, June 30, 2012

John McCain and the Israeli Attack on the USS Liberty

July 4, 2012

On the 4th of July, we remember the USS Liberty.

It's just a matter of time before U.S. tires of Israel

March 4, 2012

It's high time to stop the madmen of Israel.

The well-known Israeli journalist Gideon Levy wrote an editorial in today's Haaretz newspaper in which he discusses the bizarre relationship between the United States and Israel on the eve of Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to the White House.

"Never before has a small country dictated to a superpower; never before has the chirp of the cricket sounded like a roar; never has the elephant resembled the ant - and vice versa," Levy wrote.  

About the Israeli demand for the United States to wage war against Iran, Levy wrote:  "When he goes to the White House on Monday he will make a new demand: Either you or we (attack Iran), putting the leader of the free world in a tight spot. Obama does not want to ensnare his country in another war or in an energy crisis, but when Netanyahu hath demanded, who will not fear?"

I agree with Levy but would add to his analysis.  Benjamin Netanyahu and his military partner in crime Ehud Barak are complete madmen and liars.  They are pushing for war against Iran because that has been their game plan all along, going back to the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11, which they are responsible for.  Netanyahu and Barak are extremely dangerous criminals who should be arrested and charged with mass murder and terrorism.  They need to be stopped before they kill more people. 

The following is the complete article by Gideon Levy:

It's just a matter of time before U.S. tires of Israel 

Israel doesn't know when to stop, and it could pay dearly as a result.

By Gideon Levy 

An elephant and an ant will meet in Washington on Monday for a critical summit. But wait, who here is the elephant and who the ant? Who is the superpower and who the patronage state?

A new chapter is being written in the history of nations. Never before has a small country dictated to a superpower; never before has the chirp of the cricket sounded like a roar; never has the elephant resembled the ant - and vice versa.  No Roman province dared tell Julius Caesar what to do, no tribe ever dreamed of forcing Genghis Khan to act in accordance with its own tribal interests. Only Israel does this. On Monday, when Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu meet at the White House, it will be hard to tell which one is the real leader of the world.

For the past few years the Israeli cricket has been chirping "Iran," and the world responds with a muffled echo. It isn't that Iran is only an Israeli problem, but North Korea could endanger Japan just as much as Iran endangers Israel - and the world has not come running to Japan's side. Netanyahu's Israel has dictated the global agenda as no small state has ever done before, just as its international standing is at its nadir and its dependence on the United States at a zenith.

To the miracles of the rebirth of the Hebrew language after two millennia, the establishment of a thriving country of immigrants in the Land of Israel in such a short span of time and the invention of the kibbutz, we must now add another, much more deserving of a place on the list of the seven wonders of the world than the statue of Christ the Redeemer in Rio de Janeiro, than the Roman Colosseum or the Great Wall of China: Israel's wondrous power in the face of the United States. There is no rational explanation.

Israel features in the American presidential campaign as no other foreign country does, with the candidates vying for the sobriquet of "biggest Israel-lover" to the point where it often seems to be the main issue. Rich Jews like Sheldon Adelson donate enormous war chests to candidates for the sole purpose of buying their support for Israel, while the president of the United States, who won with a message of change, was forced to fold up, at lightning speed, the flag of planting peace in the Middle East simply because Israel said "No." If last week a British member of the House of Lords was forced to resign from Parliament after daring to criticize Israel, in the United States she would never have even considered making her views known.

Israel is teaching the world a lesson in international relations: Size doesn't matter. When it comes to foreign policy Europe toes the U.S. line much more than tiny Israel does. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also taught the world that it's possible to tell the American president "No," bluntly and explicitly, and not only remain alive but even to gain in strength. So Obama begged for an extension of the settlement construction freeze - so what? Netanyahu will take care of it: He took the issue off the agenda.

When he goes to the White House on Monday he will make a new demand: Either you or we (attack Iran ), putting the leader of the free world in a tight spot. Obama does not want to ensnare his country in another war or in an energy crisis, but when Netanyahu hath demanded, who will not fear?

This would appear to be a good thing, a reason to marvel at the prime minister. A cat may look at a king, but it doesn't always end well. One day, perhaps, even in brainwashed America the questions may begin: another war? Is it right to put more American soldiers in harm's way for an interest that is more Israeli than it is American? And perhaps we should also make demands from the small protege?

For now, Obama may be unable to prohibit Israel from a military adventure in Iran without offering serious quid pro quo. After all, we are talking about the prime minister of Israel. But one day the rope could snap and the whole thing could blow up in the face of power-drunk Israel: Israel doesn't know when to stop, and it could pay dearly as a result.

Source:  "It's just a matter of time before U.S. tires of Israel" by Gideon Levy, Haaretz, March 4, 2012  

Israeli TV Ad Spoofs Mossad Terror Attacks

February 3, 2012

An Israeli TV ad promoting the cable network HOT makes fun of a Mossad terror attack in which Israeli agents inadvertently blow up an Iranian nuclear plant by pushing a button on a computer tablet. 

When the Mossad agent shows the various features of the computer tablet to the other Israeli agents, one accidently pushes a button which causes the nuclear plant in the background to explode. To this, the character then says, "What? Another mysterious explosion in Iran?" 

The Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz has an article on the ad and Iran's reaction to it here:

The commercial reveals the Israeli attitude about Mossad terror attacks in foreign nations.  No other nation would produce a similar commercial in which their secret service blows up a nuclear plant in another nation.  It's unthinkable.  The Israelis, however, think it's funny.

The ad has several of the key elements of the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11.  It features Israeli agents and Mossad operatives working undercover and using disguises, just like the 5 dancing Israelis who were arrested on 9/11 in New Jersey.  These Mossadniks use computers to detonate pre-placed explosives to destroy an important asset.  This is exactly what happened to the Twin Towers on 9/11.  There is certainly nothing funny about Israeli terrorism.   Just ask the 10,000 American children who lost their father or mother on 9/11.  


"Iran mulls ban of Samsung over Israeli commercial depicting attack on nuclear plant", Ha'aretz, 3 February 2012

Israeli False-Flag Terror Op Targets USA - Mossad Poses as CIA

Updated January 17, 2012

Added video on Jundallah terrorism and comment about Webster Tarpley's pro-Israel bias

“Israel is playing with fire. It gets us involved in their covert war, whether we want to be involved or not." 
- General Joseph P. Hoar (USMC Ret.), former Commander in Chief of United States Central Command, 
about the Israeli false-flag operation framing the CIA and US in terror attacks inside Iran

"Israel is supposed to be working with us, not against us," Foreign Policy quoted an intelligence officer as saying. "If they want to shed blood, it would help a lot if it was their blood and not ours. You know, they're supposed to be a strategic asset. Well, guess what? There are a lot of people now, important people, who just don't think that's true." 
'Israeli Mossad agents posed as CIA spies to recruit terrorists to fight against Iran' Ha'aretz, 13 January 2012

MOSSAD FALSE FLAG TERRORISM - Jundallah is a Pakistan-based terrorist organization that has bombed Shiite mosques in Iran.  Israel's Mossad is behind the Jundallah terrorism and the Israeli agents who recruit the terrorists have done so while pretending to be American CIA agents.

Israeli Mossadniks posing as CIA agents provided the Jundallah with bombs, money, and weapons to carry out terror attacks in Iran.

“The Americans (Israelis?) said Iran was going its own way and they said our problem at the present is Iran… not al-Qaeda and not the Taliban, but the main problem is Iran. We don’t have a military plan against Iran. Attacking Iran is very difficult for us (Israel). They promised to help us and they said that they would co-operate with us, free our prisoners and would give us (Jundallah) military equipment, bombs, machine guns, and they would give us a base.”
- Abdolmalek Rigi, founder and former leader of Jundullah, on Iranian TV

FALSE FLAG - A series of CIA memos describes how Israeli Mossad agents posed as American spies to recruit members of the terrorist organization Jundallah to fight their covert war against Iran.

Buried deep in the archives of America's intelligence services are a series of memos, written during the last years of President George W. Bush's administration, that describe how Israeli Mossad officers recruited operatives belonging to the terrorist group Jundallah by passing themselves off as American agents. According to two U.S. intelligence officials, the Israelis, flush with American dollars and toting U.S. passports, posed as CIA officers in recruiting Jundallah operatives -- what is commonly referred to as a "false flag" operation. 
“False Flag” by Mark Perry, Foreign Policy, 13 January 2012

When we looked back at all the things that had happened we felt that two things were unclear. First, if they are from NATO, why did they not meet with us in Afghanistan where they have bases and where they can contact us in a much more easy and secure manner. The second issue was that the first time they informed us that NATO forces wanted to meet with us we thought they were going to speak about eastern parts of Iran, because NATO forces are stationed in Afghanistan. But they insisted that we should transfer our operations from the eastern border region to the capital. We thought that this was very strange. When we thought about it we came to the conclusion that they are either Americans acting under NATO cover -- or Israelis.
- Abdolmalek Rigi (1983 – 2010), founder of Jundallah in interview with Press TV (Iran)

Extracts from the article 'Israeli Mossad agents posed as CIA spies to recruit terrorists to fight against Iran' in Ha'aretz (Israel), 13 January 2012:

Israeli Mossad agents posed as CIA officers in order to recruit members of a Pakistani terror group to carry out assassinations and attacks against the regime in Iran, Foreign Policy revealed on Friday, quoting U.S. intelligence memos. Foreign Policy's Mark Perry reported that the Mossad operation was carried out in 2007-2008, behind the back of the U.S. government, and infuriated then U.S. President George W. Bush.

According to a currently serving U.S. intelligence officer, Perry reports, when Bush was briefed on the information he "went absolutely ballistic."

Perry quotes a number of American intelligence officials and claims that the Mossad agents used American dollars and U.S. passports to pose as CIA spies to try to recruit members of Jundallah, a Pakistan-based Sunni extremist organization that has carried out a series of attacks in Iran and assassinations of government officials.

According to the report, Israel's recruitment attempts took place mostly in London, right under the nose of U.S. intelligence officials. "It's amazing what the Israelis thought they could get away with," Foreign Policy quoted an intelligence officer as saying. "Their recruitment activities were nearly in the open. They apparently didn't give a damn what we thought."

"The report sparked White House concerns that Israel's program was putting Americans at risk," the intelligence officer told Perry. "There's no question that the U.S. has cooperated with Israel in intelligence-gathering operations against the Iranians, but this was different. No matter what anyone thinks, we're not in the business of assassinating Iranian officials or killing Iranian civilians."

The intelligence officer said that the Bush administration continued to deal with the affair until the end of his term. He noted that Israel's operation jeopardized the U.S. administration's fragile relationship with Pakistan, which was under immense pressure from Iran to crack down on Jundallah. 

According to the intelligence officer, a senior administration official vowed to "take the gloves off" with Israel, but ultimately the U.S. did nothing.

"Israel is supposed to be working with us, not against us," Foreign Policy quoted an intelligence officer as saying. "If they want to shed blood, it would help a lot if it was their blood and not ours. You know, they're supposed to be a strategic asset. Well, guess what? There are a lot of people now, important people, who just don't think that's true."

The following video by Russia Today features a 2010 interview with Webster Tarpley about the Iranian capture of Abdolmalek Rigi, the founder and former commander-in-chief of the terrorist group Jundallah.  As one might expect, Tarpley does not even mention Israel or Israelis as he blames the CIA and NATO for being behind the terror attacks of Jundallah (basing his claims on Seymour Hersh and ABC News, no less).  This is typical Tarpley, who protects the Zionist state by consistently ignoring evidence of Israeli involvement in acts of false-flag terrorism - like 9/11.  To understand what's behind Tarpley's pro-Israel bias, see my article "Webster Tarpley's Disinfo" from January 2010.

Video URL -

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"False Flag: A series of CIA memos describes how Israeli Mossad agents posed as American spies to recruit members of the terrorist organization Jundallah to fight their covert war against Iran", by Mark Perry, 13 January 2012

"Israeli Mossad agents posed as CIA spies to recruit terrorists to fight against Iran", by Barak Ravid,Ha'aretz (Israel), 13 January 2012

"Jundullah, Terrorism, the US & Iran", Sina, 20 December 2010 

"Mossad covert operations jeopardise Pak-US ties", The Nation (Pakistan), 15 January 2012 

Chicago's Jewish Mob vs Blagojevich

Updated December 10, 2011

“It’s just grossly unfair and wrong what happened to Rod yesterday.”
- Robert Blagojevich on the Zionist Judge James Zagel's 14-year sentence given to his brother, former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich

“...Rahm Emanuel called Blagojevich [shortly after the 2008 election] to suggest a plan just “between you and I” that would allow Emanuel to handpick a temporary congressional successor… Emanuel was a defense witness during the second Blagojevich trial. The mayor testified for less than three minutes and was never asked about his request for the political favor.”
“Rahm Emanuel on Blagojevich’s sentence”Chicago Sun-Times, 8 December 2011

There can be no doubt that Rod Blagojevich, the former governor of Illinois of Serbian descent, has been been given an extremely harsh sentence of 14 years for corruption.  Although Blagojevich is not without blame, he certainly did not hurt or kill anyone and it is hard to see why Blagojevich should be given such a stiff sentence for doing something that is very common in the politics of Chicago and Washington, D.C.  As governor, Blagojevich was simply caught talking about a quid pro quo to appoint someone to fill Barack Obama's vacant senate seat.  Obama and the Clintons, on the other hand, have become multi-millionaires by accepting money from rich Zionists in exchange for appointing hundreds of chosen people to positions of power and crafting national policies to suit their donors.  Who has done the greater harm to the nation?

Bill Clinton has received more than $10 million from Haim Saban (right), an Israeli agent.  What was Clinton's quid pro quo for the Israelis? Clinton pushed through the disastrous NAFTA bill and managed the Balkanization of Yugoslavia by waging war by executive order against Serbia to make Kosovo a NATO-run statelet.  Here the venal and treasonous Clinton poses with his mega donor Saban, Shimon Peres, and Ted Koppel at the Saban Forum in Jerusalem 2006. 

A little Mossad money goes a long way when placed in the right hands. It certainly bought a lot of clout with Obama's secretary of state, a middle class girl from the Chicago suburb of Park Ridge.  As a presidential candidate, Clinton stated that she would "obliterate" Iran if it were to attack Israel and as secretary of state she laughed about the murder of Moammar Gadhafi saying, "We came, we saw, he died."  Saban, the Israeli agent and Clinton benefactor, seen here with Hillary Clinton and Mrs. Saban, also happens to be a close friend and partner-in-crime of Ehud Barak, one of the Israeli masterminds of 9/11. (Source: "Afghanistan - Obama's War for Israel")

THE ISRAELI HANDLER OF THE CLINTON AND OBAMA ADMINISTRATIONS - Clinton's special advisor and Obama's first chief of staff turned mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, the son of a Zionist terrorist, single-handedly pushed the economically destructive NAFTA bill through Congress.  Here Obama's chief of staff exchanges secrets with Benjamin Netanyahu during a 2010 visit to Israel.  Emanuel spent much of his youth in Israel and served in the Israeli army.

THE JEWISH GANGSTER FROM WILMETTE - Rahm Emanuel in 1977 as a student at New Trier West.  The Emanuel and Zagel families are both from the Jewish community of Wilmette and the North Shore.  There can be little doubt that Judge Zagel is a friend of the Emanuel family.  When Jews like Emanuel talk about "the community" what they mean is the community of their fellow Jews.

To understand why Rod Blagojevich is being thrown into prison for at least the next 12 years, it needs to be understood that Blagojevich is a victim of Chicago's Jewish mafia, the same gang of Zionists that controls the Obama administration.  It is also necessary to know that the judge who handed down the overly harsh sentence, James Block Zagel, is a high-level member of the Zionist mob of Chicago and that he comes from the same Jewish community of Wilmette and the North Shore as Rahm Emanuel.  The Blagojevich trial and sentencing has nothing to do with justice; its the Jewish mob ganging up on a political foe.  

Don't expect to find this essential information in the Zionist-controlled press of Chicago or from Wikipedia.  The Wikipedia article on Judge Zagel does not even mention that he is Jewish, much less that his Uncle Abe was a notorious Jewish gambler and gangster who was part owner of the Tropicana in Las Vegas.  Zagel also serves on the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that decides whether to issue warrants for electronic eavesdropping on terrorism suspects. 

U.S. District Judge James Block Zagel, a Zionist Jew from a family of Jewish mobsters, threw the book at Rod Blagojevich and sentenced the former governor, who has two young daughters, to 14 years in prison.  This is not justice.

Rahm Emanuel (right), the current mayor of Chicago, is deeply involved in the scandal that led to the demise of Rod Blagojevich, yet his testimony was only three minutes long.  Evidence that would have directly implicated Emanuel and other members of the Obama administration was not allowed to be seen or heard in the retrial of Blagojevich.  Emanuel was clearly being protected while Blagojevich was sacrificed.

Elliott Riebman, the son of Hyman Riebman, the Zionist Jewish Cook County judge who oversaw the corrupt judicial process against Christopher Bollyn, was a defense attorney for Rod Blagojevich.  Here Riebman (right), with his fellow Blagojevich defense attorney Aaron Goldstein, is seen leaving court.  Rod Blagojevich was trapped by the Zionist mob of Chicago in a Jewish judicial circus. 

Judge James B. Zagel is a highly-connected member of the Jewish mob of Chicago whose family is from the same North Shore Jewish community as Rahm Emanuel, facts that are not reported in the Zionist-controlled press.  The fact that Zagel's Uncle Abe was a notorious gambler who corrupted professional football in the 1960s seems to have been forgotten.

Judge James B. Zagel is "the son of Samuel S. Zagel (1905–1999), a native of Warsaw, Poland who had immigrated to Chicago in 1915, and Ethel Samuels Zagel (1911–1986)", according to Wikepedia.  What Wikepedia does not tell you is that James B. Zagel is a member of the Jewish community of Chicago.  Such omissions are purely intentional.

 James B. Zagel 
(Source: Chicago Tribune 2010)

It is through his mother's family, the Samuels family, that we see the judge's close connection to the Jewish mafia of Chicago.  Ethel Samuels older brother Abe was a notorious gambler who was part-owner of the Tropicana Casino of Las Vegas since the early 1960s.  He invested $180,000 in the Tropicana in 1963. 

U.S. District Judge James Zagel is a trustee of the Abe Samuels Family Trust fund, which certainly contributed a great deal to his wealth.  Judge wrote a semi-autobiographical book in 2002 about a federal district judge in Chicago who is also involved in a life of crime, including robbing the Federal Reserve.  Zagel's book is entitled Money to Burn

Abe Samuels, the uncle of Judge James B. Zagel, was a member of the Jewish mafia of Chicago who was involved in a football corruption scandal in the early 1960s.

The businessman referred to in this clipping was Abe Samuels, the uncle of Judge James B. Zagel.

Abe Samuels' connections to the Chicago mob and pro football are mentioned (p. 172) in Rozelle: Czar of the NFL, by Jeff Davis.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Associated Press, "Rahm Emanuel, Blagojevich traded favors according to emails", 21 June 2010

"Blagojevich on Trial", Chicago Tribune, documents

Blagojevich trial judge Zagel regarded as smart, unflappable by Jeff Coen and Bob Secter, Chicago Tribune, 18 May 2010

Bollyn, Christopher, "Afghanistan - Obama's War for Israel", 6 July 2010

Bollyn, "The Nexus Linking 9/11 and the Financial Crisis", Chapter XII of Solving 9/11, 2 March 2009

Davis, Jeff, Rozelle: Czar of the NFL, McGraw-Hill Professional, 2007 (p. 172)

How Clinton Waged War Through Executive Order, Compiled by Cliff Kincaid

Huffington Post, "Rahm Emanuel Asked Rod Blagojevich To Appoint Forrest Claypool To His Congressional Seat", 9 June 2011

Kessler, Mike, “Mayor of Chicago overcomes Wilmette roots”, Chicago Tribune, 23 February 2011

Obituary of Abe Samuels, Chicago Tribune, 27 February 1995

Obituary of Ethel Samuels Zagel, Chicago Tribune, 8 October 1986 

Spielman, Fran, “Rahm Emanuel on Blagojevich’s sentence: ‘My thoughts are with Patti and the kids’”,Chicago Sun-Times, 8 December 2011

Wikipedia article on Judge James B. Zagel, accessed 9 December 2011

Zagel Family History

Zomnir, Wende, "Living in the Past", Chicago Reader, 29 September 1994 

Homeless American Families Living in Cars

December 2, 2011

The "60 Minutes" television show has done excellent work reporting on the plight of homeless American families. The latest report from November 27, "Hard Times Generation: Families living in cars" focuses on homeless families in Central Florida that live in their cars. Here the bright and articulate Metzger children who live in a van with their father are interviewed by Scott Pelly. The 14-minute video report is highly recommended viewing.

Video Link -

"Every time I see like a teenager or any other kid fighting with their parents or arguing with them, and like not doing what they're told it really hurts me. Because they could be in my shoes, and of course I don't want them to be in my shoes. But they need to learn to appreciate what they have and who they have in their life. Because it may be the last day they might have it."
- Arielle Metzger, 15

Einstein's Letter Warning of Israeli Terrorism

Updated May 25, 2011

MISLED AND CRIMINAL PEOPLE - Albert Einstein's letter to the Fighters for the Freedom of Israel, commonly known as the Stern Gang or LEHI (Lohmey Heruth Israel).  The Stern Gang, which Rahm Emanuel's father was a member of, "were believers in unrestricted and indiscriminate terror", Arthur Koestler wrote in "The Rise of Terrorism."  Einstein, a devoted Zionist, strongly opposed the Zionist terrorist gangs that later became the Mossad, Israel's foreign intelligence agency, and Likud, the extremist right-wing party that rules Israel.  Benjamin Netanyahu and the current leaders of Israel are second generation members of these terrorist gangs as is Rahm Emanuel, Obama's political advisor and first Chief of Staff.
Source: Deir Yassin Remembered 

Albert Einstein, the famous scientist and a well known Zionist, openly warned American Jews in 1948 that the Herut party of Menachem Begin was "no ordinary political party."  Begin's party bore "the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party for whom terrorism (against Jews, Arabs, and British alike), and misrepresentation are means, and a 'Leader State' is the goal."  Begin, the former leader of the terrorist Irgun, later created the Likud party by merging Herut with other right-wing parties in 1973.  The terrorist leader then became the first Likudnik prime minister of Israel in 1977 when his party won the election.  Begin's Likud party has dominated Israeli politics for the past 34 years but has never changed its stripes; it is still a terrorist organization.  Begin's gang of terrorists and their sons and daughters are, in fact, the highest level architects of the false flag terrorism of 9/11, a terror atrocity they had planned since the 1970s.

Albert Einstein in New Jersey (1948)

In December 1948, Albert Einstein and 26 other Jewish intellectuals wrote a letter to the New York Times warning of Menachem Begin's Herut party, which became the Likud Party, saying it was "closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties."  Begin was visiting New York at the time raising funds and support for his "terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization."

Menachem Begin in New York, 1948.  In 1952 Begin was behind a bomb plot to kill the German chancellor Konrad Adenauer.

The letter was written to warn the people of the United States to prevent them from supporting a party of terrorists, saying, "the American public must be informed as to the record and objectives of Mr. Begin and his movement....It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character; from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future."

Begin's Irgun terrorists blew up the King David Hotel in July 1946, killing 91...

and the Twin Towers on 9/11, killing nearly 3,000.

Michael D. Evans is a Zionist Jew who poses as a Christian missionary. Here Evans meets with Menachem Begin, the former terrorist head of the Irgun who ordered the bombing of the King David Hotel. Evans was told by Mossad chief Isser Harel of the plan to bomb the World Trade Center in 1980, about the time of this photo.  Osama Bin Laden was only 20 years old when Begin became prime minister of Israel. 
See:  "America the Target: 9-11 and Israel's History of False Flag Terrorism"

Begin's party of Zionist terrorists became the Likud party, which is run today by the sons and daughters of the Irgun.  The father of Clinton's right-hand man and Obama's chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, for example, was a partisan in Begin's terrorist organization before coming to the United States in the 1950s.  These are the Zionist terrorists behind the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11, which were already being planned by Menachem Begin and his Irgun terrorists in the late 1970s when they came to power in Israel.

Benny Begin (top) and Benjamin Netanyahu are the sons of leaders of the terrorist organization of Menachem Begin.  These are the people who control the right-wing Israeli government today.  The warning of the Einstein letter is just as valid and urgent today as it was in 1948.

Albert Einstein's letter follows:


Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the "Freedom Party" (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.

The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United States is obviously calculated to give the impression of American support for his party in the coming Israeli elections, and to cement political ties with conservative Zionist elements in the United States. Several Americans of national repute have lent their names to welcome his visit. It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughout the world, if correctly informed as to Mr. Begin's political record and perspectives, could add their names and support to the movement he represents.

Before irreparable damage is done by way of financial contributions, public manifestations in Begin's behalf, and the creation in Palestine of the impression that a large segment of America supports Fascist elements in Israel, the American public must be informed as to the record and objectives of Mr. Begin and his movement.

The public avowals of Begin's party are no guide whatever to its actual character. Today they speak of freedom, democracy and anti-imperialism, whereas until recently they openly preached the doctrine of the Fascist state. It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character; from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future.

Attack on Arab Village

A shocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin. This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had taken no part in the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who wanted to use the village as their base. On April 9 (THE NEW YORK TIMES), terrorist bands attacked this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in the fighting, killed most of its inhabitants (240 men, women, and children) and kept a few of them alive to parade as captives through the streets of Jerusalem. Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and the Jewish Agency sent a telegram of apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan. But the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of this massacre, publicized it widely, and invited all the foreign correspondents present in the country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc at Deir Yassin.

The Deir Yassin incident exemplifies the character and actions of the Freedom Party.

Within the Jewish community they have preached an admixture of ultranationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority. Like other Fascist parties they have been used to break strikes, and have themselves pressed for the destruction of free trade unions. In their stead they have proposed corporate unions on the Italian Fascist model.

During the last years of sporadic anti-British violence, the IZL and Stern groups inaugurated a reign of terror in the Palestine Jewish community. Teachers were beaten up for speaking against them, adults were shot for not letting their children join them. By gangster methods, beatings, window-smashing, and wide-spread robberies, the terrorists intimidated the population and exacted a heavy tribute.

The people of the Freedom Party have had no part in the constructive achievements in Palestine. They have reclaimed no land, built no settlements, and only detracted from the Jewish defense activity. Their much-publicized immigration endeavors were minute, and devoted mainly to bringing in Fascist compatriots.

Discrepancies Seen

The discrepancies between the bold claims now being made by Begin and his party, and their record of past performance in Palestine bear the imprint of no ordinary political party. This is the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party for whom terrorism (against Jews, Arabs, and British alike), and misrepresentation are means, and a "Leader State" is the goal.

In the light of the foregoing considerations, it is imperative that the truth about Mr. Begin and his movement be made known in this country. It is all the more tragic that the top leadership of American Zionism has refused to campaign against Begin's efforts, or even to expose to its own constituents the dangers to Israel from support to Begin.

The undersigned therefore take this means of publicly presenting a few salient facts concerning Begin and his party; and of urging all concerned not to support this latest manifestation of fascism.


New York, Dec. 2, 1948


Albert Einstein Letter to The New York Times. 4 December 1948 

Bollyn, Christopher, "Who Runs the Obama White House?", 6 November 2008

Bollyn, "Son of a Zionist Terrorist - Rahm Emanuel's Dirty Secret", 17 November 2006

Koestler, Arthur, The Rise of Terrorism," Promise and Fulfilment: Palestine 1917-1949, Macmillan & Co., London 1949 

What you don't know about the Bilderberg Group

May 19, 2011

George Soros and Carl Bildt were photographed by Christopher Bollyn during the 2000 Bilderberg conference in Belgium. 

The idea that the Bilderberg Group is behind the creation of a mysterious future World Government has been spreading for years. Having had access to the archives of this very secret club, Thierry Meyssan shows that this belief leads in a false direction, serving to mask the true identity and function of the Group. In reality, the Bilderberg Group is a creation of NATO. It aims to influence key leaders on a global scale and, through them, to manipulate public opinion to get it to embrace the ideas and actions of the Northern Atlantic Alliance.
- "What you don’t know about the Bilderberg Group" by Thierry Meyssan

Thierry Meyssan's article about the Bilderberg Group is highly recommended.  Having covered several Bilderberg conferences, I find his article on this group to be very enlightening and logical.  The article can be read at: 

Free America from Zionist Occupation - Shut AIPAC Down

May 17, 2011

The AIPAC lobby is the Israeli machine for controlling the U.S. Congress...

and the president.  Candidate Obama addresses the Israeli lobby in 2007 as he will, once again, this weekend.  See "Obama appeals to Zionists for reelection"

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton addresses the 2010 AIPAC Policy Conference 

Anthony Lawson has produced an excellent video about AIPAC, the Israeli lobby that exercises a great deal of control over the members of the U.S. Congress.  This is highly recommended viewing because it explains exactly how the Zionist lobby is able to control the U.S. government with money provided by the U.S. taxpayer.  It is due to the Zionist control over American politicians that the partisans and political mercenaries of Israel have succeeded in hiding the truth about 9/11, fleecing the U.S. Treasury, and dragging the U.S. into disastrous and costly wars in the Middle East.  It is high time for Americans to take America back and end the Zionist occupation of the U.S. Congress!

The AIPAC circus is coming to Washington, D.C., 22-24 May 2011.  It should be clear to all that what AIPAC does should be prohibited by law.  Members of Congress should be banned from accepting money from organizations serving a foreign nation.  People who are loyal to foreign states should be prevented from holding office in the United States.  Is it not obvious to all that a judge, who is a dedicated partisan of Israel, should not be allowed to preside over litigation in which one of the key defendants is an Israeli company connected to Israeli intelligence? 

Despite Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein's glaring conflict of interest, this is exactly what has happened with the 9/11 tort litigation heard in his court in Manhattan.  Israel (through its intelligence agency the Mossad) is a defendant in the 9/11 litigation and the judge handling that litigation is a devoted supporter of the state of Israel.  That's a clear conflict of interest.

The New York Times (owned by a founding family of the B'nai B'rith) and other Zionist-controlled media outlets in New York have not found Hellerstein's serious conflict of interest worth discussing.  And people wonder why there has not been a trial for the 9/11 victims' families after nearly 10 years, and why the only family to get a trial will have only 50 hours to present their case.  It needs to be stressed that the Bavis family case will be the ONLY 9/11 trial to determine who was responsible for the attacks that killed 3,000. 

The recent Holocaust case of John Demjanjuk in Germany took one and a half years, but Judge Hellerstein has set a most unusual and arbitrary time limit of one month for the entire trial to find those guilty for 9/11!  Will Americans allow justice for the victims of 9/11 to be hijacked by a Zionist agent devoted to the state of Israel? 

Zionists should be banned from holding any public office in the United States.  They should be seen as agents dedicated to a foreign state.  A citizen simply cannot be loyal to two nations. 

See:  "9/11 Litigation Update - Justice Denied - One Case Left"
"Judge Hellerstein's Unethical Connection to Key Defendant in 9-11 Lawsuit"

AIPAC 101 — What Every American Should Know from Anthony Lawson on Vimeo.

AIPAC 101 — What Every American Should Know

AIPAC 101 — What Every American Should Know 

Tchenguiz Brothers Arrested in Iceland Bank Scam

March 9, 2011

In a long-awaited move, the Tchenguiz brothers, Robert and Vincent, have been arrested in connection with the Kaupthing investigation and the bankrupting of Iceland.   The Serious Fraud Office has been investigating the collapse of the Icelandic bank since last year.  I assume that the Serious Fraud Office has read my in-depth articles on the Tchenguiz/Israeli role in the Icelandic scam.  The Tchenguiz financial scam is controlled by their father Victor - from Israel.

Robert and Vincent Tchenguiz are the frontmen of an Israeli-run scam.

IS THE PARTY OVER? - The Tchenguiz kids, Vincent, Lisa, and Robert are well known for living high on other people's money. As The Observer noted in 2003: "The [Iranian Jewish] community is also legendary when it comes to shopping and partying. One reason that Victor Tchenguiz was long supposed to be the brains behind Rotch was that his Ferrari-driving sons didn't seem to spend much time at their desks."

Kaupthing Bank was the biggest of three Icelandic banks that collapsed in 2008, owing creditors more than $50 billion. Before it collapsed, Kaupthing Bank’s profit had grown fifty-fold over five years as it took on more debt to expand abroad.

Kaupthing Bank had a large operation in Britain and helped finance many corporate takeovers for clients, including the Tchenguiz brothers.  Robert Tchenguiz was one of Kaupthing’s biggest borrowers. He also sat on the board of Exista, an Icelandic holding company that was Kaupthing’s biggest shareholder.

The Guardian reports today: 

Nine people, including property tycoons Robert and Vincent Tchenguiz, were arrested on Wednesday over the collapse of the Icelandic bank Kaupthing.  More than 130 police swooped on two business properties and eight residential addresses in a series of dawn raids, arresting seven men aged between 42 to 54. They are now being interviewed at police stations in central London. Two further arrests were made in Reykjavik.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"British Fraud Office Arrests 7 in Inquiry of Icelandic Banks" by Julia Werdigier, New York Times, 9 March 2011 

"Tchenguiz brothers arrested in Kaupthing investigation" by Simon Bowers, The Guardian, 9 March 2011
"The Israeli Role in the Plundering of Iceland" (Part 1), by Christopher Bollyn, May 22, 2010
"Iceland - The Hallmarks of an Israeli Operation" (Part 2), by Christopher Bollyn, June 16, 2010

The Zionist Mega-Scams of 9/11, Bernard Madoff & Allen Stanford

March 7, 2011

The people who are preventing the discovery of the facts in such cases are actually complicit in covering-up crimes of mass murder.  Logically, there can be no reason for dedicated Zionists to obstruct the investigation of 9-11 other than to conceal the evidence of Israeli and Zionist involvement in the crimes.
- Christopher Bollyn,
"The Planes of 9-11", Solving 9/11

'Do you really think that criminals are clever, good people, Thrasymachus?'

'Yes, if their criminality is able to manifest in a perfect form and they are capable of dominating countries and nations.'
- Plato's Republic, ca. 360 B.C.

Jose Padilla's lawsuit against Donald Rumsfeld and Robert Gates for the gross injustice and torture he suffered in a Navy brig in South Carolina was 
thrown out by Richard Gergel, a Jewish Zionist judge appointed to the bench by President Obama.  Gergel ruled that Padilla, an American citizen from Chicago, had no right to sue for constitutional violations. 

White House announcement of Richard Gergel's (right) appointment to the federal bench in 2009 noted that he had served as President of the Columbia Hebrew Benevolent Society, one of the oldest Zionist/Rothschild secret societies in America.  This is just the latest example of how highly-placed agents of Zionist secret societies, devoted to foreign interests, manage and control the fraudulent "War on Terror".  The mega-scams against the American people:  9/11, Bernard Madoff, and Allen Stanford are all completely controlled by Zionist agents in order to protect the guilty.  Understanding the true nature of these Zionist-controlled scams is the first step to solving these crimes. (Photo - Getty Images, 15 April 2010)

“I am saying that the banks and funds were complicit in one form or another and my information to Picard when he was here established this.”
- Bernard Madoff, "From jail, Madoff says others knew", 
New York Times 15 February 2011

Irving H. Picard, the court-appointed trustee of the Madoff case, is a Zionist Jew who happens to be married to Sharon Madoff (a.k.a. Medoff) of Worcester, Massachusetts.  Is this just a coincidence or are they related? 

The false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 and the multi-billion dollar financial scams of Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford are, like peas in a pod, three mega-scams that have been carried out by Israeli intelligence and high-level Zionist agents in the United States - against the American people.  The people behind these crimes are from the same foreign criminal network described in greater detail in "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9-11" (Chapter VII of Solving 9/11). 

Key individuals of this network are involved in all three mega-crimes, e.g. Joseph Ciechanover.  The very same Israeli/Rothschild funding entities, such as Israel Discount Bank, the Challenge Fund, and the Catalyst Fund are involved in all three crimes.  The cover-ups of all three crimes have been tightly controlled by Zionist investigators, trustees, and judges in order to protect their fellow Zionist Jews.  Understanding the Zionist control of these crimes and cover-ups helps us understand the nature of the crimocracy that controls the United States. 

Joseph Ciechanover, 77, former chairman of the board of Israel Discount Bank and El Al Israel Airlines, is one of the key individuals connected to three Zionist mega-crimes in the United States:  the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 and the financial scams of Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford. (Photo - Moti Kimche in

The investigations of 9/11 and the huge financial scams of the past decade are strikingly similar in their appalling lack of success.  To be honest, the government investigation of the terror attacks of 9/11 is more aptly defined as a "non-investigation" because the most crucial evidence from the crime scene was confiscated and destroyed by the officials who were responsible for leading the investigation.  Likewise, the investigations of the immense financial scams of Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford have utterly failed to identify the key players involved in the scams or to locate where the missing billions went. 


As Floyd Norris of the New York Times wrote recently about the cost of following the Madoff trail:

Financial frauds tend to follow predictable paths after they are uncovered.  At first, there is outrage and a determination to find and punish the villains.  But passions fade and investigations run into ambiguities. 

The cost of following the Madoff trail "has risen to unthinkable levels", Norris wrote.  "Through the end of last year, the trustee appointed by the Securities Investor Protection Corp. [Irving H. Picard] had spent $228.3 million.  And that does not count the money that has gone to the victims.  Baker Hostetler, the law firm representing the trustee [where Picard is a partner], received most of the money."

The false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 and the financial scams of Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford share one noteworthy similarity:  While Israeli Mossadniks and high-level Zionist agents are key suspects or defendants in all three cases, the investigations are all under the control of Zionist Jews.  When we consider that these faulty investigations are Zionist-controlled endeavors, we can understand why they have failed to investigate and expose the Zionist elements of these mega-crimes.  The primary reason for these Zionist-controlled investigations is to protect the real criminals. 

Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff, the son of an Israeli Mossad agent, supervised the non-investigation of 9-11 and authorized the confiscation and destruction of crucial evidence, such as videos from the Pentagon and the steel of the World Trade Center.


Larry Doyle of, a well known Wall Street veteran, raises good questions in his article of 7 February 2011 entitled “Questions Left Unanswered”.

Will the American public ever truly learn what happened inside Bernard Madoff's operations?  What about Allen Stanford?  His trial has been postponed for two years.  Do we really think Stanford will ever stand trial?  Will we ever learn the nature of this scam?  Was Stanford acting on behalf of the Department of Justice in operating his Caribbean based operation?  Was the U.S. Government, that is the Department of Justice, effectively complicit in Stanford's scheme?  Will we ever know?

Will we ever know what happened inside the mega-scams of Madoff and Stanford?  Mr. Doyle's question sounds very much like the key question about 9/11:  Will we ever know what really happened? 

To answer that question we need to identify who is actually preventing us from finding the truth about who is behind these huge crimes.  While such investigations are what a free press is supposed to be engaged in, we won't hear about it on CNN or FOX News and we certainly won't read about it in the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal.  The Zionist-controlled press is not in the business of investigating or exposing the Zionist criminal network; its real mission is to protect it. 

In an age of monstrous Zionist crimes like 9/11, the $20 billion Madoff scam, and the immense plundering of the U.S. Treasury (and others, such as the State of California and
Iceland) the Zionist-controlled media is a dog that won't hunt.  Subjects that the media should be investigating are left completely untouched.  The controlled press has no need of investigative journalists.   

As an independent investigative journalist, I have written a great deal about the numerous connections linking the criminals of the huge financial frauds that surfaced in 2008-2009 with the Zionist terror network behind the false-flag terrorism of 9/11.  Unfortunately, many of these articles were removed from the Internet when my previous website