Print Contact Articles by Subject Political Assassinations

The Peculiar Similarities between 9-11 and the Assassination of RFK

June 5, 2018


Sen. Robert F. Kennedy at the Ambassador Hotel shortly before he was ushered into the pantry where he was shot.


The Zionist-controlled media pretends that the truth about the murder of Robert F. Kennedy is "out of our reach."  Why would they maintain this absurd position?  

"The truth appears to be out of our reach."
- Tony Dokoupil, "Who Killed RFK?" CBS News, May 28, 2018

“In the three years since 9-11, we've begun to understand that it's possible to know what happened without knowing what happened.”
- "The Public Knowledge of 9-11", New York Times, September 11, 2004

The murder of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy (RFK), the leading presidential candidate when he was shot in Los Angeles on June 5, 1968, profoundly changed American history. The RFK murder case, in which a Palestinian immigrant was blamed, has several similarities with the assassination of the senator's brother, President John F. Kennedy in 1963, and the terrorist attacks of 9-11 three decades later. If we examine the peculiar characteristics these crimes have in common, what will it reveal about the culprits? If we find a high degree of commonality linking these political atrocities is it possible to deduce something about the nature of the criminal network behind them? Are we dealing with different criminal networks, or one? Is it domestic or foreign?

These three crimes are similar in several ways. On the general level each crime was in effect a coup that radically changed American political history through violence. The murder of John F. Kennedy abruptly ended a progressive and popular presidency; the assassination of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy prevented JFK's reform-minded crime-fighting brother from becoming president; and the terror attacks of 9-11 ushered in a radical policy coup and a new era focused on waging the fraudulent War on Terror, an Israeli stratagem to rule the Middle East.

Another shared characteristic is that these crimes were all false-flag deceptions in which a fall guy was scapegoated to conceal a more elaborate crime. Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Bishara Sirhan, and Osama bin Laden are the "lone gunmen" blamed for the crimes in the official narratives. In spite of ample evidence clearly disproving the official stories, to this day the mainstream media promotes the false narratives.

In all three cases official investigations were set up to support the false narrative. The agencies involved in the investigations participated in the confiscation and destruction of evidence that challenged their story. Likewise, in each case the controlled media failed to conduct its own investigation and ignored irrefutable evidence that disproves the official story. The media cover-ups have gone on for decades in spite of well-documented evidence, such as the autopsy report of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy which clearly proves he was killed by a second shooter behind him.  How is it that decades go by without the truth coming out in the media; without the evidence being discussed? Who has the power to exercise such control over the media?


The autopsy of Robert Kennedy clearly shows that the fatal shot was fired from directly behind the senator, while Sirhan Sirhan was several feet in front of him.

This means the false narratives are being protected to allow the secret cabal behind these crimes to avoid being exposed and prosecuted. This has been going on for more than fifty years, which means the criminal terrorist network responsible for all three atrocities remains in power and is able to carry out similar crimes whenever it wants – and it does. The cabal behind the murders of the Kennedys and 9-11 is still in power at the highest levels of our government and media. This is why it is extremely important that the criminal network responsible for these heinous crimes be identified. 

"SIRHAN DID NOT KILL MY FATHER."

The fact that Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has spoken out and is calling for an investigation into the assassination of his father fifty years ago is commendable. His doubts about who really murdered his father were published in a Washington Post article on May 26, entitled "Who killed Bobby Kennedy? His son RFK Jr. doesn’t believe it was Sirhan Sirhan."

“There were too many bullets,” Kennedy Jr. said. “You can’t fire 13 shots out of an eight-shot gun.” Furthermore, as the article reported, "Kennedy was shot at point-blank range from behind, including a fatal shot behind his ear. But Sirhan, a 24-year-old Palestinian immigrant, was standing in front of him. Was there a second gunman? The debate rages to this day."

It should be clear that we are not really talking about a raging debate, but rather a media and government cover-up of well-documented facts.  Los Angeles Coroner Thomas Noguchi conducted the official autopsy on the body of Robert Kennedy on the morning of June 6, 1968, and found that the shot that killed RFK “had entered through the mastoid bone, an inch behind the right ear and had traveled upward to sever the branches of the superior cerebral artery.”

Noguchi wrote about the murder in a book entitled Coroner (1983), in which he said, "Until more is precisely known...the existence of a second gunman remains a possibility. Thus, I have never said that Sirhan Sirhan killed Robert Kennedy."

Paul Schrade, a member of the Kennedy entourage, has been trying since 1974 to persuade authorities to reinvestigate the case and identify the second gunman.  Robert Kennedy, Jr. has joined forces with Schrade in calling for a new investigation. "The fact that Robert Kennedy Jr. would say, 'Sirhan did not kill my father,'" Schrade told the Boston Globe, "I think that's very effective."

“Yes, he did shoot me. Yes, he shot four other people and aimed at Kennedy,” Schrade said about Sirhan. “The important thing is he did not shoot Robert Kennedy. Why didn’t they go after the second gunman? They knew about him right away. They didn’t want to know who it was. They wanted a quickie.”

In a statement to the author of “Who Killed Bobby? The Unsolved Murder of Robert F. Kennedy,” before Sirhan's parole hearing in 2016, Schrade said:

The LAPD and LA DA knew two hours after the fatal shooting of Robert Kennedy that he was shot by a second gunman and they had conclusive evidence that Sirhan Bishara Sirhan could not and did not do it. The official record shows that [the prosecution at Sirhan’s trial] never had one witness – and had no physical nor ballistic evidence – to prove Sirhan shot Robert Kennedy.

Evidence locked up for 20 years shows that the LAPD destroyed physical evidence and hid ballistic evidence exonerating Sirhan, and covered up conclusive evidence that a second gunman fatally wounded Robert Kennedy.

In calling for a new investigation into the murder of his father, Robert Kennedy, Jr. is like the relatives of the 9-11 victims who want a proper forensic investigation of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The fact that none of these cases were properly investigated from the beginning is the first shared characteristic; in all three cases there was flagrant tampering and outright destruction of evidence. Who is being protected by the failure to investigate the evidence from these crimes? Who has the power to control and corrupt such investigations? 

Another peculiar similarity is that the Ambassador Hotel, where RFK was killed, and the World Trade Center were both owned by Zionist Jews who had very high-level connections to the state of Israel. In both cases the ownership of the building also appears to have played a key role in the crime. In the case of World Trade Center, having control of the property allowed the terrorists to prepare the buildings for the explosive demolitions that occurred on 9-11. Larry Silverstein, former national director of the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), a major funding operation for Israel, obtained control of the Twin Towers about five weeks before 9-11. For years prior to 9-11, Silverstein had regular weekly phone calls with Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the godfather of the War on Terror, which began as a result of the false-flag terror attacks. What were Netanyahu and Silverstein talking about every Sunday afternoon?


The Ambassador Hotel was owned by J. Myer Schine who was connected to the Jewish Mob and the Henry Crown family.

The Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles was owned by Junius Myer Schine, father-in-law of Lester Crown, son of Henry Crown (born Krinsky), the largest shareholder of General Dynamics, a leading defense contractor. Henry Crown was a high-level Zionist agent who sent an aircraft manufacturing plant to Israel in the early 1950s in violation of U.S. law.  The factory he sent to Israel illegally became the original Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) plant.  The Crown family is also connected to both Kennedy assassinations and the 9-11 cover-up. (See: "JFK and 9-11: Henry Crown and the Cover-Ups of Our Time")

Under Myer Schine's ownership the Ambassador Hotel hosted the gambling operations of Mickey Cohen, the West Coast lieutenant of Jewish mob boss Meyer Lansky. U.S. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy had been involved in the prosecution of Cohen in which he was convicted for tax evasion and sent to Alcatraz in 1961. Who arranged for Kennedy to use the Ambassador Hotel?


The Ambassador Hotel had been Mickey Cohen's base of operations in the late 1940's when he became friends with the Jewish terrorist leader Menachem Begin who was hiding out in Los Angeles after a terrorist bombing in Palestine.

The Jewish gangster Mickey Cohen is not only connected to the Ambassador Hotel and the Santa Anita Racetrack, where Sirhan worked and gambled on the horses. Most notably, Cohen is also closely connected to Menachem Begin, former head of the terrorist gang, the Irgun, who was in position to take advantage of his relationship with Cohen to infiltrate his criminal network, which would include being able to set up Sirhan the Palestinian to be the Manchurian Candidate fall guy in the assassination of Bobby Kennedy.  How neat.

The fact that the hotel was owned by Myer Schine, whose family was closely connected to Israeli intelligence, could explain how Sirhan, an armed stranger, was allowed to loiter in the hotel pantry for thirty minutes while Bobby Kennedy was speaking to a crowd in the adjacent room. Why would Sirhan linger in the pantry if his goal was simply to kill Kennedy? Why wouldn't he pass through the corridor and approach the candidate on the podium from behind? Why wait in the pantry when there was no plan for Kennedy to come that way? Who was choreographing the movements of Sirhan – and Kennedy?


Who was the hidden hand guiding Robert Kennedy into the pantry where Sirhan was waiting?

As the author of "I Was There When Robert F. Kennedy Died" wrote:

Later, after events began to wind down, I remembered the strange incident where Frank Mankiewicz was insistent that Bobby leave through the kitchen, rather than the ballroom. I discreetly asked others who had campaigned with him for a long time if it made any sense that Bobby would leave through the kitchen rather than through his crowd of supporters and they all said RFK preferred to walk through a crowd after a speech. Neither at the time—nor for many years afterward—did I mention the incident that I witnessed, nor did I see any published accounts anywhere explaining why Bobby went through the kitchen.

Frank Mankiewicz, who had previously served as a West Coast director for the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, worked with the Kennedy campaign. Why did Mankiewicz insist that Kennedy go through the pantry, where Sirhan was waiting with a loaded gun?  What kind of hotel security would allow an armed stranger to loiter in the kitchen for a half-hour with a presidential candidate speaking in the next room?

The fact that the Ambassador Hotel and the World Trade Center were owned and controlled by individuals with high-level connections to Israel is very significant. This makes it possible to consider that Israeli agents could have taken advantage of these connections to carry out both false-flag operations. This would explain the use of an apparently mind-controlled Palestinian as the fall guy and the universal reluctance of the mainstream media to look beyond the official story. This would also explain the position of Zionist-controlled media outlets such as CBS News (controlled by Leslie Moonves, the great-nephew of David Ben Gurion, Israel's founding father) and the New York Times that we will never know what happened. They want us to think that the truth is "out of our reach" because if the truth were known it would mean the end of the Zionist project.

Sources and recommended reading:

"JFK and 9-11: Henry Crown and the Cover-Ups of Our Time" Christopher Bollyn, November 7, 2013

  

Why JFK and 9/11 Still Matter

November 23, 2015

There is no doubt now that there was a conspiracy, yet most of us are not very angry about it. The conspiracy to kill the president of the United States was also a conspiracy against the democratic system - and thus a conspiracy against you. I think you should get very angry about that.
- Gaeton Fonzi, House Select Committee on Assassinations researcher, 1977

coup d'etat took place in 1963 and we have been living with the results of it for half a century - with millions of dead across the globe. With the loss of President Kennedy, the U.S. became a perpetual warfare state, and we live every day of our lives with the consequences of that monstrous fact.
- Stanford Reconsidered, October 17, 2013 


Let me ask a simple question about modern American history and politics:  Why does the murder of President John F. Kennedy still matter?


It matters because the murder of President Kennedy was not only a conspiracy, but a coup d’etat. The powers behind the assassination took control of the government and orchestrated the cover-up. 


It matters because a coup d'etat that is successfully kept secret in a democratic country means, by default, that the succeeding government is illegitimate.


It matters because the American government continues to lie about the Kennedy assassination.


It matters because if the government is still lying about the Kennedy assassination, it essentially means that the powers that killed John F. Kennedy are still in charge - to this very day.


Now, let's apply the same logic to a more recent American atrocity:  
Why does 9-11 still matter?


It matters because 9-11 was a "policy coup." There was no proper criminal investigation of the crime; the evidence was destroyed. Rather than an investigation, we got a prepared myth telling us that Osama bin Laden was behind it all. The real powers behind the false-flag terrorism orchestrated the cover-up and changed U.S. policies to suit their global agenda. 


Exploiting an utterly fabricated myth about 9-11, the Zionist Neo-Cons conned the U.S. government into two very costly and disastrous wars in the Middle East. To this day not one of the known conspirators has been prosecuted for their role in waging a criminal war of aggression - the supreme war crime, as defined by the U.S. at the Nuremberg Tribunal.


It matters because for more than 14 years the Bush and Obama administrations have continued to lie about 9-11 and suppressed the truth about what happened on September 11, 2001.


It matters because the mainstream media, which I call the controlled media, has pushed the official myth and the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror" since 9/11.  The controlled media has never addressed the very real evidence and facts that disprove the official myth.


It matters because if the government is lying about 9/11, it means that the powers behind 9/11 control our government to this very day.


Because they speak with the same voice about 9-11 and the "War on Terror," it must be that our media moguls and politicians are controlled by the same people.

Dear Reader,
If you appreciate my articles, 
please support my research and writing. 
Click here to donate 
or donate via PayPal to:  bollyn@bollynbooks.com

Sources:  

"Why does it still matter?" (2003)
www.jfkmurdersolved.com/why.htm 

Bollyn Articles on the JFK Assassination

November 22, 2015

A coup d'etat took place in 1963 and we have been living with the results of it for half a century - with millions of dead across the globe. With the loss of President Kennedy, the U.S. became a perpetual warfare state, and we live every day of our lives with the consequences of that monstrous fact.
- Stanford Reconsidered, October 17, 2013

Why does the murder of President John F. Kennedy still matter?

It matters because the American government continues to lie about the Kennedy assassination. 

It matters because if the government is still lying about the Kennedy assassination, it essentially means that the powers that killed John F. Kennedy are still in charge to this very day.


President John F. Kennedy and his wife in Dallas, November 22, 1963. 


President Kennedy with his son at the White House. 

Why the Murder of JFK Still Matters
November 14, 2013

www.bollyn.com/why-the-murder-of-jfk-still-matters/

Why does the murder of President John F. Kennedy still matter?

It matters because the murder of President Kennedy was not only a conspiracy but a coup d’etat. The powers behind the assassination took control over the government and orchestrated the cover-up.

It matters because a coup d'etat that is successfully kept secret in a democratic country means, by default, that the succeeding government is illegitimate.

It matters because the American government continues to lie about the Kennedy assassination.

It matters because if the government is still lying about the Kennedy assassination, it essentially means that the powers that killed John F. Kennedy are still in charge to this very day.

It matters because the mainstream media continues to support, and even endorse, the official version of the Kennedy assassination.

The Man Who Shot JFK & The Chicago Connection
November 13, 2013
www.bollyn.com/the-man-who-shot-jfk-the-chicago-connection-2/

James Earl Files (born January 24, 1942), a prisoner at the Stateville Correctional Center (Illinois), admitted being one of the snipers who killed President Kennedy. The two-minute taped confession of the Chicago gangster James Earl Files in which he confesses that he was one of the gunmen who shot President John F. Kennedy is required viewing to understand this article.  The video can be watched at:  youtu.be/1zcEelhzzUg

James Files and the Murder of JFK
November 14, 2013
www.bollyn.com/james-files-and-the-murder-of-jfk-2/

JFK and 9-11: Henry Crown and the Cover-Ups of Our Time
November 7, 2013
www.bollyn.com/jfk-and-9-11-henry-crown-and-the-cover-ups-of-our-time-3/ 

LBJ & the Zionist Cover-up of the Conspiracy to Kill Kennedy
November 18, 2013
www.bollyn.com/lbj-the-zionist-cover-up-of-the-conspiracy-to-kill-kennedy-2/

The Crown Family Connections to the Kennedy Assassinations
November 21, 2013
www.bollyn.com/the-crown-family-connections-to-the-kennedy-assassinations-3/

The Zionist Criminal Network Behind the Cover-Ups
December 5, 2013
www.bollyn.com/the-zionist-criminal-network-behind-the-cover-ups-2/
 

Note: If you appreciate my articles, 
please support my research and writing. 
Click here to donate 
or donate via PayPal to:  bollyn@bollynbooks.com

 

The Zionist Criminal Network Behind the Cover-Ups

December 5, 2013

Those who are capable of tyranny are capable of perjury to sustain it.
― Lysander Spooner

We now know that one of the Warren Report’s discredited propositions, that Lee Harvey Oswald’s killer, Jack Ruby, “was not involved with Chicago’s criminal element” (WR 785), was the result not of inadequate intelligence but of a deliberate deception of the Warren Commission by the FBI, designed to keep organized crime out of the picture.
 Peter Dale Scott, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK (1993)


DALLAS, NOVEMBER 24, 1963 - Jack Ruby, aka Jacob Leon Rubenstein, a Jewish mobster from Chicago, shoots Lee Harvey Oswald in the Dallas police station. If Ruby was truly acting on his own why did the FBI deceive the Warren Commission to conceal his connections to the Jewish mob? Were they trying to hide the existence of the Jewish crime syndicate or were they covering up its role in the murder of President Kennedy? Who was behind the FBI cover-up?
 

At the end of a recent 60 Minutes (Australia) segment about the downing of TWA Flight 800 in July 1996, the reporter asked Henry F. Hughes, the former senior investigator from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), about the abundant evidence of a government cover-up:    

Question:  Do you think America still cares?

Hughes:  I know the families of 230 dead people and the men on my team care, and we all should care. This was a seminal moment in American history. When you can lie to the public about the deaths of 230 people, you can get away with anything and that ought to scare the hell out of you.

As the NTSB’s senior investigator on the TWA Flight 800 case, Hank Hughes saw how the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had illegally interfered with the NTSB investigation by blocking access to witnesses, intimidating others, and tampering with and stealing evidence.  The FBI, the investigative agency of the Department of Justice, was directed at the time by Louis Freeh, who served under Bill Clinton’s Attorney General, Janet Reno - and her deputies and assistants.


THE SILENCED EYEWITNESSES PROTEST - "The FBI would not let a single one of us testify at the NTSB's public hearing..." 
Hundreds of people witnessed the downing of TWA Flight 800 and more than one hundred reported seeing one or more missiles streaking to the plane before it exploded in mid-air. 


This graphic depicts what Air National Guard pilot Major Frederick Meyer reported seeing when TWA 800 was hit. Why did the FBI prevent eyewitnesses like Major Meyer from testifying at the NTSB's public hearing?

Since the agency that was interfering with the investigation, the FBI, is part of the government, Hughes’ conclusion would be more precise if he had said:  When the government can lie to the public about the deaths of 230 people, the government can get away with anything and that ought to scare the hell out of you.

Government cover-ups like that of the downing of TWA 800 should indeed “scare the hell out of you” because they indicate that the government is controlled by a criminal faction.  This is not to say that there are not good people like Hank Hughes working for the government, but the fact that such cover-ups are able to prevail over the good people and the truth indicates that there is a criminal faction that controls and dominates our system of government.

Criminal cover-ups are certainly not a new development in the United States and the TWA 800 cover-up was not the first. The 9-11 Commission (2003-2004), headed by Philip David Zelikow of Houston, is a more recent example of a flagrant cover-up and amply proves Hank Hughes’ point that the criminal faction running the government “can get away with anything.”

To put an end to this criminal tyranny our first task is to identify the criminal element behind these cover-ups so that we can identify the criminal faction that controls our government. In order to understand who is behind the criminal faction we need to go back to “the mother of all cover-ups,” Lyndon Johnson’s infamous Warren Commission concerning the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The Warren Commission needs to be taken first because it was the cover-up of a de facto coup d’état in which the criminal faction replaced the political leadership of the nation.

THE LONE GUNMEN OF THE WARREN COMMISSION

The Warren Commission was established by President Lyndon B. Johnson on November 29, 1963, supposedly to investigate the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The commission’s report was presented to President Johnson on September 24, 1964.  Its most significant conclusions were that Lee Harvey Oswald had acted alone in killing Kennedy and that Jack Ruby had also acted alone when he killed Oswald two days later.  

The Warren Commission found itself dependent for facts on the FBI and the Justice Department, which had already determined that they would only support the story that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman in the Kennedy assassination and that no one else was involved.   

Likewise, as Peter Dale Scott points out in Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, “the false Warren Commission picture of [Jack] Ruby as a “loner” was clearly an artifact, where one of the hidden forces responsible for generating this false impression lay inside the justice establishment.”

The Justice Department and the FBI were clearly behind the cover-up of Jack Ruby’s close connections to organized crime, particularly to the Jewish mob that he had grown up with in the Lawndale area on Chicago’s West Side:

FBI documents released in 1979 show other instances in which key information was either altered before it reached the Warren Commission, or else withheld altogether. For example, judging from Warren Commission records, the FBI covered up Jack Ruby’s connections to organized crime.

Scott points out the source of the cover-up:  “The House Committee, to its credit, isolated the origins of the false Warren Commission ‘Ruby-as-loner’ myth, which paralleled the Hoover pre-investigation conclusion that ‘Oswald acted alone.’ Both derived from the warped arrangements for the investigation of Ruby and Oswald by the FBI:

Within the General Investigative Division [of the FBI], the probe of Jack Ruby was delegated to the Civil Rights Division on the theory that Ruby violated Oswald’s civil rights by killing him.  While the committee, in its investigation, found that Ruby’s links to various organized crime figures were contained in reports received by the FBI in the weeks following his shooting of Oswald, the Bureau was seriously delinquent in investigating the Ruby-underworld connections…

But why, of all places, was the investigation of Jack Ruby assigned to the Civil Rights Division of the FBI? This bizarre assignment indicateswho was behind the cover-up of Ruby’s connections to organized crime.  The Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice was the domain of Nicholas Katzenbach, the crypto-Jew Deputy Attorney General who had pushed the lone gunman story on J. Edgar Hoover from the beginning.


DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL AND CRYPTO-JEW Nicholas Katzenbach headed the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice. Katzenbach also managed the FBI's "non-investigation" of Jack Ruby, which prevented his connections to the Jewish Supermob of Chicago from being revealed to the Warren Commission - or the public. Katzenbach went on to serve as Attorney General for President Johnson.

"The thing I am concerned about, and so is Katzenbach, is having something issued so we can convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin."
- J. Edgar Hoover (FBI) to White House aide Walter Jenkins, November 24, 1963

"The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he had no confederates who are still at large; and that evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial."
- Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach in a memo to President Johnson's assistant Bill Moyers, November 25, 1963

The investigation of Jack Ruby was evidently assigned to Katzenbach’s department in order to prevent Ruby’s high-level connections to the Jewish mob from being examined and revealed. As Scott points out, “the FBI covered up Jack Ruby’s connections to organized crime. The Commission did not receive an important interview with Luis Kutner, a Chicago lawyer who had just told the press (correctly) about Ruby’s connections to Chicago mobsters Lennie Patrick and Dave Yaras.”


Leonard Patrick 
(aka: Lenny, Joseph Cohen, Pete Peonardi, Leonard Levine, Blinkey)


David Yaras
(aka: David Miller, Yarras, Yaris)

Jack Ruby's sister, Eva Rubinstein Grant, told the Warren Commission that Dave Yarras and Lenny Patrick were two of his closest friends in Chicago, but her testimony was ignored by the Warren Commission.

Patrick and Yaras were Jewish hit-men who Ruby had grown up with in the Lawndale neighborhood. They “supplied muscle for Democratic political boss Jake Arvey’s machine in Chicago’s Jewish 24th Ward,” according to Deep Politics.

According to Kutner, who had accompanied Ruby to a hearing for the Kefauver Senate Rackets Committee in 1950, “Ruby was a syndicate lieutenant who had been sent to Dallas to serve as a liaison for Chicago mobsters.”

Before he moved to Dallas and changed his name to Jack Ruby, Jacob Leon Rubenstein was a regular at the North Lawndale pool room owned by gambling boss Dave “Yiddles" Miller.  “Ruby’s group was known as the Dave Miller gang” and was involved in organized crime, narcotics trafficking, and mobilizing the votes of the Jews.  The Warren Commission knew that Jack Ruby and his brother Hymie were part of Jake Arvey’s political machine, but “went out of its way to disguise the deep politics of the Dave Miller gang,” according to Peter Dale Scott.

Ruby’s longtime acquaintances, Patrick and Yaras, were Jewish syndicate hit-men who shot the former wire service manager James M. Ragen in 1946. Earlier, Ragen had turned to the FBI and was interviewed by the bureau in Chicago.  Ragen's statements to the FBI confirmed that the top echelon of the Chicago mob "led to very high places." According to Ragen’s statements to the FBI, Henry Crown, Jake Arvey, and Walter Annenberg were the Jewish men who controlled the crime syndicate at the top.

Henry Crown (born Krinsky), the businessman, and Jacob Meyer Arvey, the political boss and member of the secret Zionist order of B’nai B’rith, were born one year apart in the mid-1890s in Jewish neighborhoods on Chicago’s West Side. They were close associates and worked together as a team all of their lives.  Apart from their business/political deals, they were both ardent Zionists who were devoted to supporting and arming the state of Israel, even if it meant breaking the law.

In the early 1950s Henry Crown was asked by an agent of the state of Israel to buy an entire aircraft manufacturing plant so that it could be sent to the nascent Jewish state - in violation of U.S. law.  Henry Crown's son Lester told the story during a 2013 gathering of the Aspen Institute.  He laughed at how clever the gun-runner Teddy Kollek had been in obtaining weapons in the United States - illegally.

It was Jack Ruby’s connection to Jake Arvey, Henry Crown, and the Jewish crime syndicate of Chicago that Nicholas Katzenbach and the FBI did not want the Warren Commission to investigate. Their cover-up was assisted by Henry Crown’s personal lawyer, Albert E. Jenner, a Chicago attorney who was appointed to serve on the Warren Commission where he was tasked with investigating the evidence of a conspiracy behind the actions of Lee Harvey Oswald – and Jack Ruby. Was the purpose of the Justice Department cover-up to hide the existence of the Jewish criminal syndicate or to conceal its role in the assassination of President Kennedy - or both?

The Jewish mob from Chicago is called the “Supermob” by Gus Russo, author of the book, Supermob:  How Sidney Korshak and His Criminal Associates Became America’s Hidden Power Brokers.  Russo explains how the Jewish Supermob has been able to protect itself from prosecution:  “thanks to early canny decisions to align itself with key judges and politicians – both local and national – the Supermob rendered its members untouchable.”


NEW YEAR'S DAY 1960 - SEN. LYNDON B. JOHNSON with Chicago Democratic Party boss Jacob Arvey at a party function in Chicago, January 1, 1960, one day after Arvey's partner Henry Crown merged his Chicago company with General Dynamics of Texas.
 Arvey's criminal/political machine was instrumental in getting John F. Kennedy elected - with Vice President Lyndon Johnson attached. Was Kennedy used as a Trojan Horse to get Johnson, an ardent Zionist and probable crypto-Jew, into the White House?

Jake Arvey, Henry Crown, and the Supermob had aligned themselves closely with Lyndon B. Johnson long before he became Vice President with the election of John F. Kennedy in 1960.  Senator Johnson, for example, was the guest of honor at the grand opening of the mob-run Stardust casino in Las Vegas on July 2, 1958.  Johnny Rosselli, named by self-confessed Kennedy assassin James Files as one of the members of his three-man team of assassins in Dallas, was a key player in the Stardust operation. Rosselli claimed he was getting $15,000 to $20,000 per month from the money being skimmed from the Stardust.

According to James Files' testimony, Johnny Rosselli decided not to be a shooter on November 22, 1963, because he had been told that they were to be part of an anti-assassination action - not an assassination.In any case, the Rosselli-Nicoletti-Files team was at the "working level" of the JFK assassination, which is to say that they were being managed by higher-level criminals.

Senator Lyndon Johnson and his confidante Bobby Baker had very close ties to the Jewish mob, according to Michael Newton, author ofMr. Mob: The Life and Crimes of Moe Dalitz:

Lyndon Johnson served as U.S. Senate majority leader from 1955 until he became Vice President in 1961. Two years before that promotion, Johnson was a guest of honor at the Stardust’s grand opening. LBJ confidante Robert “Bobby” Baker forged a close link to the Mob through his involvement in Dominican casinos and through friendship with a cast of characters including Meyer Lansky, Sam Cohen, Ed Levinson, and Miami-Vegas front man Benjamin Sigelbaum.

Most importantly, Lyndon Johnson was an active Zionist agent who had played a key role, as a new congressman, in assisting the B’nai B’rith in their illegal immigration scheme to bring Polish Jews to Texas in the 1930s.  Although he was a member of Congress, Johnson was also reportedly involved in sending weapons to Jewish forces in Palestine in the 1940s - illegally.   

Senator Johnson was closely aligned with Henry Crown, who merged his Chicago company, Material Service Corp., with Texas-based General Dynamics on December 31, 1959.  The following day, January 1, 1960, Senator Johnson attended a Democratic function in Chicago where he sat next to Henry Crown’s senior partner-in-crime, Jake Arvey. 

In 1962, Vice President Johnson played a key role in getting a $6.5 billion contract to produce a military fighter (TFX/F-111) for Henry Crown’s Fort Worth-based General Dynamics, which was on the verge of bankruptcy.  Johnson reportedly received a $100,000 payoff for his help in getting the contract that saved Crown’s new company, asDeep Politics explains:

On November 22, 1963, the day of the assassination, a closed session of the Senate Rules Committee heard sworn testimony from a Baker business associate, Don Reynolds. Reynolds was telling the committee of a big lobbyists' sex party in New York, and also of a suitcase he had seen, full of money which Baker described as a $100,000 payoff to Johnson for his role in securing the Fort Worth TFX contract. His testimony was broken off by the news that the President had been shot.

Jack Ruby’s murder to silence Lee Harvey Oswald was the linchpin in the cover-up of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.  Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach at the Department of Justice and J. Edgar Hoover were evidently part of a criminal conspiracy to portray Oswald as a lone gunman from the outset.  They also conspired to conceal Jack Ruby’s connections to Jake Arvey and the Jewish mob of Chicago. Their cover-up required a massive falsification of the evidence.

Katzenbach, a crypto-Jew who also had close ties to the international order of Zionist Freemasons, the B'nai B'rith, played the same key role in the JFK cover-up at the Department of Justice as the Israeli-American Michael Chertoff played during the FBI's "non-investigation" of 9-11.  Assistant Attorney General Chertoff was supposed to prosecute the crimes of 9-11, but instead of leading a proper criminal investigation he authorized the destruction of the crucial evidence.

Albert E. Jenner, personal lawyer for Henry Crown (and other Jewish mobsters), served on the Warren Commission where he facilitated the cover-up of Jack Ruby’s connections to the Jewish-Zionist mob of Chicago, an organization headed by Henry Crown and Jake Arvey. Why was it so important to conceal Ruby’s ties to the Supermob from Chicago if they were not involved in the assassinations of President Kennedy and Lee Harvey Oswald?

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "New TWA 800 Film Reveals FBI/CIA Lies," Bollyn.com, July 2, 2013
http://www.bollyn.com/new-twa-800-film-reveals-fbicia-lies/

Demaris, Ovid, Captive City: Chicago in Chains, Lyle Stuart, Inc., 1969

Franklin, Roger, The Defender: The Story of General Dynamics, Harper & Row, 1986

Henry F. Hughes on TWA Flight 800, Senior Aviation Accident Investigator, NTSB, 60 Minutes, Australia, September 20, 2013
http://sixtyminutes.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8726602 orhttp://flight800doc.com/

Newton, Michael, Mr. Mob: The Life and Crimes of Moe Dalitz, McFarland, 2009

Russo, Gus, Supermob: How Sidney Korshak and His Criminal Associates Became America's Hidden Power Brokers, Bloomsbury, 2006

Scott, Peter Dale, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, University of California Press, 1993

Related articles: 

Barker, Michael, “The Philanthropic-Zionist Complex,” June 8, 2010
http://louisproyect.org/2010/06/08/guest-post-the-philanthropic-zionist-complex/

Hodges, Dave, “If John Kennedy Had Lived,” November 22, 2013

http://thecommonsenseshow.com/2013/11/22/if-john-kennedy-had-lived/ 

The Crown Family Connections to the Kennedy Assassinations

November 21, 2013


SENATOR ROBERT F. KENNEDY was the leading Democratic candidate in the 1968 presidential contest. Kennedy called for ending the war in Vietnam and ran on a platform of racial and economic justice, non-aggression in foreign policy, decentralization of power and social improvement. Had he won the presidency he would have re-opened the investigation into the murder of his brother, President John F. Kennedy. After winning the California primary, Kennedy made his final victory speech at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles on June 5, 1968.


As he exited through the hotel pantry, Senator Kennedy was shot from behind at close range. Thomas Noguchi, the Chief Medical Examiner for Los Angeles, conducted the autopsy and concluded that the fatal shot had not been fired by Sirhan Sirhan, but had come from a gun very close to the back of Kennedy's head and penetrated his skull behind the right ear at an upward angle. The fatal shot came from a distance of no more than one to three inches away (3 - 7.5 cm). Sirhan Sirhan, however, the alleged assassin, had been standing several feet in front of Kennedy.


WHO SET THE STAGE?  How could Sirhan Sirhan, or his handlers, possibly know that Senator Kennedy would be coming through the hotel kitchen? How did they have access to the hotel kitchen? Where was hotel security? Who was controlling the hotel?


THE AMBASSADOR HOTEL where Bobby Kennedy was shot in June 1968 was owned by Myer Schine, who was connected to Mickey Cohen, the West Coast crime boss who hated Bobby Kennedy.


MYER SCHINE had close relations with organized crime and owned a network of hotels in Florida and across America that earned money by hosting illegal casinos and gambling operations.


MICKEY COHEN - The West Coast crime boss (born Meyer Cohen) ran an illegal casino from Myer Schine's Ambassador Hotel in the late 1940s. He started out with Bugsy Siegel and was allied with Meyer Lansky and Frank Costello by the early 1940s. At age thirty-four, Cohen took over when Siegel was murdered in 1947. Cohen's plan for total control included a newspaper, a wire-tapper, and the state's attorney general. Illiterate, he hired a tutor to learn to read and write. He became involved with major Hollywood figures and top politicians. Frank Sinatra, Robert Mitchum, Dean Martin, Jerry Lewis, and Sammy Davis Jr. were just a few of the stars that bowed to the new boss, according to his biography. One of his specialties was blackmailing movie stars with secrets, often of a sexual nature. Most importantly, U.S. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy prosecuted Cohen in 1961. Cohen was sentenced to 15 years in Alcatraz. Kennedy's successful crackdown on organized crime made him Cohen's "great enemy."


MENACHEM BEGIN the head of the terrorist Irgun in 1943-48, fled Palestine following his organization’s bombing of a Jerusalem hotel, which killed 15 people in January 1948. While hiding in Los Angeles, Begin met Mickey Cohen and other undesirables. Cohen and other Jewish gangsters, such as Meyer Lansky, provided Begin's terrorist Irgun with weapons and money. Begin's terrorist gang rebranded itself as the Likud in the 1970s and has ruled the state of Israel since.


MYER SCHINE'S GRANDSON - James Schine Crown is president of Henry Crown and Company, a family-owned company. Crown is lead director of the defense contractor General Dynamics and is a director of JPMorgan Chase.  The Crown family was connected to the Warren Commission and profited greatly from the Vietnam War.


MRS. LESTER CROWN is Renee Schine, the daughter of Myer Schine.


AN INTERESTING COINCIDENCE was that Renee Schine (bottom row) returned from Europe on the Queen Mary in August 1948 with Jacqueline Bouvier (top row) in 1948.  I called Mrs. Crown to ask if she remembered Jackie and got a very odd response.  She pretended to be someone else, but when I said what I was calling about, she said it was not true.  How odd, I thought. Why would any person venture to say such a thing if she were not, in fact, Renee Schine Crown?  My questions to Lester Crown went unanswered. When they answer the phone at Henry Crown & Co. they don't answer the phone by identifying themselves; they answer by giving the phone number: 312.....  How odd.


MYER SCHINE also owned the Gulf Stream Hotel on Miami Beach where FBI chief J. Edgar Hoover and Clyde Tolson enjoyed their annual Christmas holidays - on the house. 


MIAMI 1937 - J. Edgar Hoover playing backgammon with Clyde Tolson. So, what did the Schines get in return for their free hospitality? Protection from federal prosecution?

The Henry Crown (formerly Krinsky) family of Chicago is connected to the cover-ups of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the terror attacks of 9-11, as I describe in my article "JFK and 9-11: Henry Crown and the Cover-Ups of Our Time." 

Most amazingly, the Crown family is also connected to the 1968 assassination of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy. 

Bobby Kennedy was killed in the Ambassador Hotel, which was owned by Myer Schine, the father of Renee Schine and father-in-law of Lester Crown. Schine also owned the Gulf Stream Hotel on Miami Beach where J. Edgar Hoover spent his winter holidays - free of charge.

The Crown family of Chicago, the controlling family of the huge defense contractor General Dynamics, is connected to all kinds of things, but for the same family of war profiteers to be connected to the assassinations of both John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy, and the terror attacks of 9-11, is either a remarkable coincidence or an indication of involvement in these mega-crimes.

LBJ & THE TFX SCANDAL

Henry Crown became the largest shareholder of Texas-based General Dynamics when he merged his sand and gravel (and cement) company, Material Service Corp., with the nearly bankrupt defense contractor in 1959.  Crown's new company was in dire straits financially until 1962 when it was rescued by a $7 billion contract to produce a new fighter jet for the military. This became known as the TFX/F-111 scandal. In 1963 General Dynamics came under congressional investigation to determine exactly how Henry Crown had finagled this huge Texas deal.

Peter Dale Scott, the author of Deep Politics and the Death of JFK(1993), explains how Lyndon Johnson was tied into this crooked deal:

According to President Kennedy's secretary, Evelyn Lincoln, Bobby Kennedy was also investigating Bobby Baker for tax evasion and fraud. This had reached the point where the President himself discussed the Baker investigation with his secretary, and allegedly told her that his running mate in 1964 would not be Lyndon Johnson. The date of this discussion was November 19, 1963, the day before the President left for Texas.

A Senate Rules Committee investigation into the Bobby Baker scandal was indeed moving rapidly to implicate Lyndon Johnson, and on a matter concerning a concurrent scandal and investigation. This was the award of a $7-billion contract for a fighter plane, the TFX, to a General Dynamics plant in Fort Worth. Navy Secretary Fred Korth, a former bank president and a Johnson man, had been forced to resign in October 1963, after reporters discovered that his bank, the Continental National Bank of Fort Worth, was the principal money source for the General Dynamics plant.

On November 22, 1963, the day of the assassination, a closed session of the Senate Rules Committee heard sworn testimony from a Baker business associate, Don Reynolds. Reynolds was telling the committee of a big lobbyists' sex party in New York, and also of a suitcase he had seen, full of money which Baker described as a $100,000 payoff to Johnson for his role in securing the Fort Worth TFX contract. His testimony was broken off by the news that the President had been shot.

This bit of history indicates that Vice President Lyndon Johnson was involved in a criminal way in the crooked TFX deal that gave Henry Crown's new company the largest military aircraft contract in U.S. history. As the recipient of a $100,000 payoff, Johnson would have been in a position in which he could be blackmailed by Henry Crown.

Henry Crown's personal lawyer, Albert E. Jenner, who also served as a director of General Dynamics, was appointed by Lyndon Johnson to the Warren Commission where he was tasked with investigating the evidence of a conspiracy behind Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby. He found none.

J. Edgar Hoover, the head of the FBI, personally directed the FBI investigation into the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The House Select Committee on Assassinations issued a report in 1979 critical of the FBI investigation and the Warren Commission. The report criticized the FBI's reluctance to thoroughly investigate the possibility of a conspiracy to assassinate the President.

The United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) was established in 1976 to investigate the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. The Committee's final report concluded that Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy.

J. Edgar Hoover, however, was in a compromised position, as Deep Politics reveals:

All of these anti-Communist politicians, but J. Edgar Hoover above all, exposed themselves to political blackmail by visiting the Del Charro in the company of mobsters.  Hoover even had a special detail of FBI agents to ensure that mobsters would not come up to him in public at the racetrack. But his love of horse racing and gambling meant that his holidays recurringly exposed him to the milieu of organized crime, whether at the Del Charro or (his other annual freeloading holiday) the Gulf Stream Hotel owned by the family of the McCarthy staffer G. David Schine.


J. EDGAR HOOVER enjoyed free annual holidays at the Gulf Stream Hotel Apartments and Cottages on Miami Beach which was owned by Myer Schine.  Hoover and Clyde Tolson, seen here, had adjacent cottages.

AMBASSADOR HOTEL

In 1986, when the Ambassador Hotel was put up for sale, the Los Angeles Times reported on the Crown connection:

Chicago businessman Lester Crown is making no promises that the hotel will be spared the wrecker's ball. "I think that will be the determination of the purchaser," said Crown, who is supervising the sale for the Schine family, which has owned the hotel since 1946.

Crown is overseeing the sale as part of the gradual liquidation of the theater and hotel empire of J. Myer Schine, who died in 1971. Crown, 60, is married to one of Schine's children and himself runs a family empire that, according to a recent Business Week magazine estimate, is probably worth at least $1.5 billion.

In keeping with the Ambassador's unorthodox history, announcement of the sale was made not by the hotel or the Schines but by Los Angeles City Councilman John Ferraro. The councilman is pushing hard, with the support of historical groups, to keep the hotel alive. His district includes the mid-Wilshire area, where the hotel is located. The hotel, set well back from Wilshire Boulevard, is surrounded by spacious gardens that are a throwback to more leisurely days.

As the Times notes, it was odd that the sale of the hotel was not announced by Lester Crown or the Schine family, but by a city councilman.  Did Lester Crown want to hide the fact that he was the person selling the hotel?  The Wikipedia article about the Ambassador Hotel does not even mention that the hotel had been owned since 1946 by Myer Schine. In fact, it doesn't mention any owner at all. What a telling omission.

Knowing who owned the hotel where Bobby Kennedy was killed is important, because it was the place, the stage, where a very significant political assassination was carried out.  The owner of the hotel where the crime occurred would have been in the position to manage the whole operation and control the most important factors that contributed to the murder. This is the same relationship that Larry Silverstein, the lease-holder of the World Trade Center, has to the events of 9-11.  He owned and controlled the place where the crime was committed. How can the fact that the Ambassador Hotel was owned by a family closely tied to organized crime not be relevant to the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy? 

Sources:

"Ambassador Hotel Struggling to Survive" by Tom Furlong, Los Angeles Times, May 18, 1986
articles.latimes.com/1986-05-18/business/fi-21071_1_ambassador-hotel

"Ambassador Hotel," Wikipedia.com, November 21, 2013
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambassador_Hotel_%28Los_Angeles%29

"Incomplete Justice - Part One: At the Ambassador Hotel" by Larry Hancock, May 19, 2008
www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.php/Essay_-_Incomplete_Justice_-_At_the_Ambassador_Hotel

"JFK and 9-11: Henry Crown and the Cover-Ups of Our Time" by Christopher Bollyn, November 7, 2013
www.bollyn.com/jfk-and-9-11-henry-crown-and-the-cover-ups-of-our-time-3/

"Mickey Cohen," Biography.com, November 21, 2013
www.biography.com/people/mickey-cohen-329432 

Newton, Michael, Mr. Mob: The Life and Crimes of Moe Dalitz, McFarland, 2009 

Scott, Peter Dale, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, University of California Press, 1993

"The Ugly Fall of the Schine Empire" by Judy Marcoux, April 22, 2012
rickmorrisonregionalreport.com/2012/04/22/special-guest-post-the-ugly-fall-of-the-schine-empire/

LBJ & the Zionist Cover-up of the Conspiracy to Kill Kennedy

November 18, 2013

"IT WAS AN EASY SHOT."
- Bob Schieffer lying about Lee Harvey Oswald's role in the assassination of JFK, "Face the Nation," November 17, 2013

"The thing I am concerned about, and so is [Deputy Attorney General] Katzenbach, is having something issued so we can convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin."
- J. Edgar Hoover (FBI) to White House aide Walter Jenkins, November 24, 1963

"The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he had no confederates who are still at large; and that evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial."
- Deputy Attorney General 
Nicholas Katzenbach in a memo to President Johnson's assistant Bill Moyers, November 25, 1963 (See note on Katzenbach's Jewish ethnicity at bottom.)

"There is one sanctuary where the Warren Report is still stubbornly upheld and where its manifold critics can expect their own rough treatment: in the towers of the media elite."
- David Talbot, “The Mother of All Coverups,” Salon.com, September 15, 2004


IN THE FIRST MINUTE of "Face the Nation" Bob Schieffer of CBS News repeats the fundamental lie of the murder of President John F. Kennedy. 

Bob Schieffer of the CBS News program "Face the Nation" began the show of November 17, which was dedicated to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, with the fundamental lie about the political murder that changed America:

From here on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository in Dallas, fifty years ago this week, a lone gunman pointed a $21 dollar mail-order rifle through this window and shot and killed the president of the United States while his motorcade was passing below.  It was an easy shot.

Schieffer is lying about the Kennedy assassination and he knows he is lying. Expert marksmen have tried to make the three shots Oswald is said to have made from the 6th Floor of the School Book Depository and found that there is nothing "easy" about it. 

Schieffer is from Fort Worth, Texas, and his younger brother Tom Schieffer is a former business partner of George W. Bush.  Schieffer was a co-owner of the Texas Rangers baseball club with George W. Bush and he went on to serve as the U.S. Ambassador to Australia during his first term and Ambassador to Japan during his second.

ZIONIST CONTROLLED CBS NEWS

CBS News is a good example of a Zionist-controlled media outlet. The president and chief executive officer of CBS Corporation is Leslie Roy Moonves, a great-nephew of David Ben-Gurion, the founding father and first Prime Minister of Israel.  For Americans this would be like being related to George Washington.


MRS. BEN GURION - Russian-born Paula Moonvess Ben Gurion (center) is the great-aunt of Leslie Moonves, the CEO of CBS Corp. The photo of David Ben Gurion, Israel's first prime minister and defense minister, and his wife is from the first Israel Defense Forces parade in July 1948.


LESLIE MOONVES oversees all operations of CBS Corp., including the CBS television network, the CW, CBS television stations, studios, and distribution, Showtime, CBS Radio, CBS Records, CBS Outdoor, Simon & Schuster, CBS Interactive, CBS Consumer Products, CBS Home Entertainment, CBS Outernet and CBS Films.

So Bob Schieffer is associated with the Bush family through his brother and works for a television network that is run by an ardent Zionist who is related to the founding father of the state of Israel.  Although a clear majority of Americans (at least 60 percent) believe that a conspiracy was behind the Kennedy assassination, Shieffer begins the memorial week by telling the nation that President Kennedy was killed by a lone gunman with what he says "was an easy shot." 

So, why does the controlled media in the United States refuse to face the evidence that Kennedy was hit from several different angles, and by at least two gunmen who were positioned in front of the motorcade and that the assassination was, therefore, clearly a conspiracy?


The wounds to President Kennedy's head indicate that he was shot from several different angles.  One fatal shot to the head evidently came from the picket fence by the trees (seen here in the middle of the photo) on the other side of the bridge from the "grassy knoll" where James Files shot Kennedy in his right temple.


SECOND FATAL HEAD SHOT - While James Files was standing behind the fence by the trees on the left side of this photo, another assassin was shooting from the other side of the railroad overpass. President Kennedy was evidently hit by two bullets from this direction, one in the throat and another that exited from the back of his skull.

FIFTY YEARS OF CRIMINAL POLITICS

To understand why the Zionist-controlled media refuses to address the abundant evidence of a conspiracy and insists on pushing the blatant lie that Kennedy was killed by a lone assassin, the following logic about the assassination needs to be grasped:

Why does the murder of President John F. Kennedy still matter?

It matters because the murder of President Kennedy was not only a conspiracy but a coup d’etat. The powers behind the assassination took control over the government and orchestrated the cover-up.

It matters because a coup d'etat that is successfully kept secret in a democratic country means, by default, that the succeeding government is illegitimate.

It matters because the American government continues to lie about the Kennedy assassination.

It matters because if the government is still lying about the Kennedy assassination, it essentially means that the powers that killed John F. Kennedy are still in charge to this very day.

It matters because the mainstream media continues to support, and even endorse, the official version of the Kennedy assassination.

Source: www.jfkmurdersolved.com/why.htm

Using the same logic that I apply to the 9-11 cover-up we can conclude that the people involved in the JFK cover-up are part of the criminal network behind the assassination.  So, why would the Zionist-controlled media engage in a cover-up and who are they doing it for? It doesn't make any sense that the Zionist elite that controls the U.S. media would cover up the JFK conspiracy for the Mafia, the CIA, or the anti-Castro Cubans.  The Zionist-controlled media is, most likely, covering up the conspiracy in order to protect the Zionist criminals who masterminded the assassination of President Kennedy.

The cover-up of the conspiracy to kill President Kennedy began immediately after the murder in Dallas and was clearly orchestrated at the highest level, as Kevin Costner, playing Jim Garrison, said about the role of the Mafia in the film JFK:

"I don't doubt their involvement, Bill, but at a lower level. Could the Mob change the parade route, Bill? Or eliminate the protection for the President? Could the Mob send Oswald to Russia and get him back? Could the Mob get the FBI, the CIA, and the Dallas Police to make a mess of the investigation? Could the Mob get the Warren Commission appointed to cover it up? Could the Mob wreck the autopsy? Could the Mob influence the national media to go to sleep...This was a military-style ambush from start to finish ... a coup d'état with Lyndon Johnson waiting in the wings."
— Kevin Costner as Jim Garrison in the film JFK

THE ZIONIST AGENT LBJ


President Johnson had been involved in illegal Zionist activities since the 1930s and had a "special relationship" with Israeli president Levi Eshkol, seen here at Johnson's ranch in 1966.

Lyndon B. Johnson, who became the president on the day Kennedy died, was an ardent Zionist and devoted supporter of the state of Israel.  His aunt Jessie Johnson Hatcher, who was a major influence on Lyndon, was a member of the Zionist Organization of America. While it seems very likely that his family was in fact Jewish (i.e.Crypto-Jews), there is absolutely no question that Lyndon Johnson was a high-level Zionist who had been involved for decades with the Jewish Freemasonic organization, the International Order of the B'nai B'rith, in the illegal immigration of Jews from Poland to Galveston. The smuggling operation of Jews to Texas in which LBJ was involved from 1937 is known as "Operation Texas".


The B'nai B'rith was behind the plan to bring Jews from Poland to Texas.  Lyndon Johnson, as a new congressman, was a key player in this operation and broke the law to facilitate the illegal immigration scheme.

Historians have revealed that Johnson, while serving as a young congressman in 1938 and 1939, arranged for visas to be supplied to Jews in Warsaw, and oversaw the apparently illegal immigration of hundreds of Jews through the port of Galveston, Texas. In this operation Johnson was working with the Zionist elders of the B'nai B'rith, not through normal government offices.

When he became a Congressman in 1937, Lyndon Johnson began using legal and sometimes illegal methods to smuggle "hundreds of Jews into Texas, using Galveston as the entry port. Enough money could buy false passports and fake visas in Cuba, Mexico and other Latin American countries.... Johnson smuggled boatloads and planeloads of Jews into Texas. He hid them in the Texas National Youth Administration... Johnson saved at least four or five hundred Jews, possibly more," according to historian James M. Smallwood.

James Smallwood said, "It is correct that Johnson did not risk his life, but he committed illegal acts to save the Jews. It can be proved that LBJ saved some 42 from the Nazis. Indirect evidence says he probably saved about 400. From my research, I agree with the larger number. However, there are problems, since much of what went on was illegal and Johnson knew better than to leave a paper trail." 

According to Louis Gomolak's thesis, "Prologue: LBJ's Foreign Affairs Background, 1908-1948," Johnson and his friend Jim Lovy raised a very "substantial sum for arms for Jewish underground fighters in Palestine." One source cited by the historian reports that "[Jim] Novy and Johnson had been secretly shipping heavy crates labeled 'Texas Grapefruit' - but containing arms - to Jewish underground 'freedom fighters' in Palestine."

Lyndon Johnson's illegal activities in support of the Zionist forces in Palestine is something he had in common with Col. Henry Crown, the Zionist Jew from Chicago who became the largest shareholder of General Dynamics (of Fort Worth) in 1959.  Henry Crown had purchased an entire aircraft manufacturing plant, probably in Texas in the early 1950s, which was crated up and shipped to Israel in violation of U.S. law. 

From the earliest days of his political career Lyndon Johnson was clearly working with and for the B'nai B'rith and the Zionist mobsters who were bringing Polish Jews to Texas and later sending U.S. weapons - illegally - to Zionist forces in Palestine. Johnson's history as a high-level Zionist agent needs to be taken into consideration when looking at his role in the cover-up of the evidence of a conspiracy to kill President Kennedy and the cover-up of the murderous Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in 1967. 

President Lyndon Johnson was the official in the highest position to mastermind the JFK cover-up and the person who appointed the Warren Commission.  It is important to realize that Johnson was an active and dedicated Zionist agent who set the stage for the assassination as Vice President and then masterminded the cover-up as the new president.  

Lyndon Johnson and the Zionist-controlled media have covered-up the truth of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy because it was a crime that was carried out by the Zionist criminal network, which took power in the coup d'etat in Dallas in November 1963 and which has been in power ever since. The role of the Zionist-controlled media is to keep the population from realizing that a criminal regime of Zionist agents controls their government.

Note on Nicholas D. Katzenbach -


THE WARM EMBRACE OF FELLOW CRYPTO-JEWS 
Nicholas D. Katzenbach and Lyndon B. Johnson
Katzenbach was Assistant Attorney General, 1961-1962; Deputy Attorney General, 1962-1964; Acting and later U.S. Attorney General, 1964-1966; Under Secretary of State, 1966-1969

Deputy Attorney General Nicholas D. Katzenbach wrote the controversial November 25, 1963, memo that certainly appears to be discussing a government cover-up.  Katzenbach went on to serve as Attorney General and Undersecretary of State under President Lyndon Johnson. Although Katzenbach is described as an Episcopalian, he was listed as a Jew by the National Jewish Welfare Board during World War II:




Source: Ancestry.com. U.S., WWII Jewish Servicemen Cards, 1942-1947

Sources:

"Lyndon Johnson - A Friend in Deed," by Lenny Ben-David, Jerusalem Post, September 10, 2008
lennybendavid.com/2008/09/things-you-never-knew-about-lbj.html

"Operation Texas: LBJ and the Rescue of European Jews from Hitler," by Jim Moore, The Gilmer Mirror, 2010
gilmermirror.com/bookmark/9863949-Operation-Texas-LBJ-and-the-Rescue-of-European-Jews-from-Hitler 

"So you think you’re a Crypto-Jew?" by Amy Klein, May 18, 2009
www.jta.org/2009/05/18/life-religion/so-you-think-youre-a-crypto-jew

Why the Murder of JFK Still Matters

November 14, 2013

Our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children's future. And we are all mortal.
- John F. Kennedy


President John F. Kennedy with his son at the White House, October 10, 1963

Why does the murder of President John F. Kennedy still matter?

It matters because the murder of President Kennedy was not only a conspiracy but a coup d’etat. The powers behind the assassination took control over the government and orchestrated the cover-up.

It matters because a coup d'etat that is successfully kept secret in a democratic country means, by default, that the succeeding government is illegitimate.

It matters because the American government continues to lie about the Kennedy assassination.

It matters because if the government is still lying about the Kennedy assassination, it essentially means that the powers that killed John F. Kennedy are still in charge to this very day.

It matters because the mainstream media continues to support, and even endorse, the official version of the Kennedy assassination.

Source: www.jfkmurdersolved.com/why.htm


John F. Kennedy salutes as his father's coffin passes on his 3rd birthday, November 25, 1963

 
The assassinations that changed our lives - and America:  
Abraham, Martin, John & Bobby

James Files and the Murder of JFK

November 14, 2013


Files on JFK is a DVD produced by Wim Dankbaar of
www.jfkmurdersolved.com/index1.htm

On November 9, I posted an article, entitled "The Man Who Shot JFK & The Chicago Connection", about the testimony of James Files, a prisoner in Illinois, who admitted on camera in 1994 to having been one of the shooters during the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.  Files, born James Sutton in Alabama, grew up in Melrose Park, a suburb on Chicago's West Side that is notorious for its Mafia connections.

Files admitted in great detail how he shot President Kennedy from behind the picket fence on the grassy knoll.  Files says he used a Remington Fireball to shoot the president in his right temple.  I find the Files testimony quite convincing.  It just smacks of being a truthful confession.  Furthermore, Files' testimony stands up to the scrutiny of experts who have examined his statements and cross examined him.

It is very interesting that Files says that his group had been sent to Dallas with the understanding that they were part of a counter-assassination operation and for this reason one of his team, John Roselli, refused to be a shooter, when it became a team of assassins.


James Earl Files admits being the shooter on the grassy knoll.


Files says he shot Kennedy from behind this picket fence.


Files says he used a Remington Fireball to shoot the president in his right temple.


The Files confession is the subject of a new video by Wim Dankbaar.

The next day, I was accused of being a "sophisticated intelligence agent" by Lisa Pease, a woman in Los Angeles who writes about the Kennedy assassination.  After smearing me on her Facebook page as an "intelligence agent", Pease dismissed my article about James Files as "crap".  This is a common tactic used by real agents to discredit truthful information by sowing suspicion about the person who presents it.

I contacted the Dutch researcher Wim Dankbaar, of www.jfkmurdersolved.com, who kindly sent me a link to his hour-long video about the James Files testimony:  I Killed JFK - The Confession of the Grassy Knoll Shooter.  It is a very well done video and makes a very compelling case that Files is telling the truth.

I then wrote to Lisa Pease on her Facebook page asking her why she did not believe that Files was telling the truth.  I wrote:

Lisa - Can you tell me why you think that James Files is not telling the truth when he says that he was one of the gunmen in Dealey Plaza?

See - http://www.bollyn.com/the-man-who-admitted-shooting-jfk/

I would be interested in knowing what makes you think that he is lying. When I listen to his testimony it sounds and looks truthful and during 7 hours of cross examination an experienced lawyer found no inconsistency in his testimony. What inconsistency do you find in the testimony of James E. Files (formerly James Sutton)? You can write to me directly at bollyn.books@yahoo.com - I am using my wife's Facebook account.

Today, I looked to see if Lisa Pease had responded to my questions and found that the whole discussion of me and the James Files testimony had been removed.  I have also been blocked from any future comments on her Facebook page.

The Man Who Shot JFK & The Chicago Connection

Updated November 13, 2013


I SHOT JFK - James Earl Files (born January 24, 1942), a prisoner at the Stateville Correctional Center (Illinois), admitted being one of the snipers who killed President Kennedy.


REMINGTON FIREBALL XP-100 with scope, the weapon Files says he used.
Photo from www.jfkmurdersolved.com/fireball1.htm

Source:  "Jim Garrison on the JFK Assassination"
Watch this 3-Minute Video - 
youtu.be/1zcEelhzzUg

The two-minute taped confession of the Chicago gangster James Earl Files in which he confesses that he was one of the gunmen who shot President John F. Kennedy is required viewing to understand this article.  

The video can be watched at:  youtu.be/1zcEelhzzUg

The testimony in this video is compelling evidence because, if true, it proves that members of the Chicago Outfit, such asSam Giancana, who were partners-in-crime with Sidney and Marshall Korshak, Henry Crown, Jacob Arvey, and the Zionist Mob of Chicago, were involved in the JFK assassination.  The question remains:  Who were the architectural planners of the assassination?  

In the video, Files refers to two other Chicago gunmen that he knew were involved in the assassination of President Kennedy:  John Roselli and Charles Nicoletti.

THE KORSHAK FAMILY

Sidney Korshak, the lawyer for the Chicago Outfit, defended high-level mobsters like Al Capone, Frank Nitti, Sam Giancana, Tony Accardo, and Moe Dalitz. The Korshak family is married into the Crown family of Chicago.  Charles "Corky" Goodman, vice chairman of Henry Crown and Company (the family-owned company behind General Dynamics) and son-in-law of Irving Crown, is married to Margie Korshak, the daughter of the former Chicago political boss and city treasurer, Marshall Korshak, who had also served as director of the Illinois Department of Revenue and director of revenue for Chicago.


TIGHT WITH THE MOB - Margie Korshak (left) with Michelle Obama


THE MONEY MAN - Former City Treasurer Marshall Korshak (born Morris Korshak) shares a joke with then Mayor of Chicago Harold Washington at the Palmer House hotel. 
(Photo: James Mayo, Chicago Tribune, March 30, 1984)

While Marshall Korshak oversaw the revenues of Illinois and Chicago, his brother Sidney was a notorious lawyer and counselor (consigliere) to the national crime syndicate and "was close to Giancana and Roselli," according to Supermob: How Sidney Korshak and His Criminal Associates Became America's Hidden Power Brokers by Gus Russo. 

Tom Hagen, the character played by Robert Duvall, is the consigliere to the Corleone family in The Godfather films. The character is based on Sidney Korshak, the real-life Zionist Jewish consigliere, who served as an advisor in the production of the films.


TOM HAGEN - A "German-Irish" lawyer (left, played by Robert Duvall) in The Godfather was a film portrayal of Sidney Korshak, a Russian Jew from Chicago.


SIDNEY KORSHAK was the real-life consigliere for the Mob. If Sam Giancana was involved in the murder of President Kennedy - Sidney Korshak would have been involved in the planning of the crime.  Korshak was the key person connecting the national crime syndicate to the Zionist Mob, Hollywood, Las Vegas -- and the state of Israel.

The close connection between Sidney Korshak with Sam Giancana and John Roselli would suggest that the Zionist lawyer Sidney Korshak was involved at the higest level in the planning and execution of the assassination of President Kennedy. Korshak's connection to Henry Crown explains the Chicago Outfit's connection to Dallas (and Lyndon Johnson), where Crown's newly acquired company General Dynamics had just finagled a $6.5 billion contract to develop the TFX/F-111 fighter jet.

The Zionist connection to the Kennedy assassination would have to have been at the highest level in order to explain how Arlen Specter, a member of B'nai B'rith, the secret Zionist order of Freemasons, came to fill the crucial role of promoting the absurd "magic bullet" theory, a fabrication that was essential to support the conclusion of the Warren Commission that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. 

Specter, the son of a Jewish junk peddler from the Ukraine and a newly-minted lawyer from Philadelphia in 1963, was not promoting this outrageous fabrication to protect Italian mobsters from Chicago.  It is important to understand who Specter was serving with his lie about the magic bullet because it reveals the culprits behind the assassination.

On August 9, 1976, Roselli's body was found in a 55-gallon steel fuel drum floating near Miami. Roselli had been strangled and shot, and his legs were sawn off. It is believed that Roselli was murdered for revealing too much about the Kennedy assassination during his Senate testimony.

On March 29, 1977, Nicoletti received three .38 caliber slugs to the back of his head while waiting in his Oldsmobile in the parking lot of the Golden Horns Restaurant in suburban Northlake, Illinois. Nicoletti was due to appear before the House Select Committee on Assassinations at the time of his death.

In June of 1993, Don Irving, a veteran attorney with over 25 years experience with high profile cases, cross-examined James E. Files for seven hours and reported that he found no inconsistencies in Mr. Files' confession:

Mr. Files is serving a 50-year term for the attempted murder of two police officers.  His FBI rap sheet indicates a life filled with violent crimes.  Agent Shelton informed investigator West and attorney Irving that the FBI had previously gathered information from an informant that Mr. Files has knowledge of the events that occurred in Dealey Plaza on November 22nd, 1963.

Agent Shelton verified that Mr. Files was an associate and driver/bodyguard for one Charles Nicoletti, a known Mafia hitman from Chicago.  Agent Shelton further states that he had long suspected that Chicago mob members Sam Giancana, Charles Nicoletti and John Roselli were involved in the assassination of John F. Kennedy, but that he had no hard evidence to support his beliefs.

On August the 16th and 17th, 1992, after an extensive search to locate the prisoner, investigator West spent several hours each day questioning James E. Files.  During the August 17th, 1992, meeting, Mr. Files confessed that he was involved in the JFK assassination.  Mr. Files confessed that he was present in Dealey Plaza and that Charles Nicoletti and John Roselli were also present in Dealey Plaza.

Mr. Files further confessed that he had been recruited and worked for the CIA in the early 1960s, later becoming a driver for Charles Nicoletti of the Chicago Mafia...

We shared the confession of James E. Files with criminal attorney Don Irving, who agreed to visit Files in an effort to cross-examine Mr. Files to ascertain his validity.  In June of 1993, Attorney Irving, a veteran of over 25 years of high profile cases, spent almost seven hours with James E. Files at the Joliet Prison.  Mr. Irving reported that he found no inconsistencies in Mr. Files confession.

Source:  ARRB Public Hearing, Dallas, November 18, 1994, pp. 29-30

JFK and 9-11: Henry Crown and the Cover-Ups of Our Time

November 7, 2013 


DALLAS, November 22, 1963 - President John F. Kennedy moments before he was assassinated.

A coup d'etat took place in 1963 and we have been living with the results of it for half a century - with millions of dead across the globe.  With the loss of President Kennedy, the U.S. became a perpetual warfare state, and we live every day of our lives with the consequences of that monstrous fact.
- Stanford Reconsidered, October 17, 2013

We have not been told the truth about Oswald.
- Sen. Richard Russell, former Warren Commissioner

The guilty parties behind a crime reveal themselves when they engage in the cover-up.  The hidden-hand of the culprits, for example, can be detected when they, or their agents, interfere with the investigation to prevent the truth from being exposed. 

The assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the terror attacks of 9-11 are probably the two events that have most profoundly affected American history during the past half century.  The two events have a great deal in common.  Both events were investigated by politically appointed commissions which were seriously flawed, and both events led to costly and unnecessary wars that resulted in huge increases in U.S. defense spending.

In both cases, the commissions that investigated the crimes failed to convince the public that they were honest and complete.  Both the Warren Commission and the 9-11 Commission are now seen by many as criminal cover-ups that used colossal lies to protect the real culprits and deceive the public about what really happened. 

Interfering in both the investigations of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the terror attacks of 9-11, we find agents of Henry Crown and Company, a Zionist family of war profiteers (General Dynamics) from Chicago.  Agents associated with Henry Crown and Company played key roles in steering both investigations away from the truth - and promoting a false myth.


ZIONIST MOBSTER Henry Crown of Chicago made a fortune as a procurement agent for the U.S. Army during World War II and went on to take over General Dynamics in 1959. He was also deeply involved in organized crime and smuggling weapons to Israel in violation of U.S. law.

Henry Crown of Chicago controlled the nearly bankrupt General Dynamics (of Fort Worth, Texas) at the time of the JFK assassination. Henry Crown’s personal lawyer, Albert E. Jenner, Jr., served on the Warren Commission where he was tasked with investigating the evidence of a conspiracy behind Lee Harvey Oswald or Jack Ruby.

The article about Jack Ruby on Murderpedia.org explains how Henry Crown's personal lawyer got this crucial position on the Warren Commission:

Tom C. Clark advised newspaper columnist Drew Pearson in 1946 that the FBI had verified the claims of James M. Ragen that financier Henry Crown and the Hilton Hotel chain maintained some financial interest in syndicated racketeering activities in Chicago. Tom C. Clark [then a U.S. Supreme Court Justice] selected Henry Crown's son, John as one of his two Supreme Court law clerks for the 1956 term, and Tom Clark provided one of two recommendations to the Warren Commission to appoint Henry Crown's attorney, Albert E. Jenner, Jr. as a senior assistant investigative counsel responsible for determining whether either Oswald or Ruby acted alone or conspired with others.
“Jack Leon Ruby” by Juan I. Blanco, Murderpedia.org

General Dynamics, which had been acquired by Henry Crown in 1959, was on the brink of bankruptcy in 1962 when it was saved by a $6 billion contract to develop a new fighter (TFX/F-111) for the U.S. military.  This was a very crooked deal that General Dynamics won through bribes and corruption.  The TFX scandal was disputed and debated in Congress during the year of the assassination.  The Vietnam War, which was escalated by Lyndon B. Johnson after the assassination, is the war that saved Henry Crown's General Dynamics from bankruptcy.  Kennedy had stated that he wanted to withdraw U.S. troops from Vietnam by the end of 1965.

Likewise, after the terror attacks of 9-11, the Crown family raked in huge profits from the fraudulent "War on Terror" and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.  The Crown family, which is the largest shareholder of General Dynamics (GD), saw the value of their stock quadruple, as GD's revenue tripled from $10.4 billion in 2000 to $32.5 billion in 2010. 

Immediately after 9-11, people on the Crown payroll played key roles in supporting the official lies about what caused the destruction of the World Trade Center.  Zdenek Bazant, a professor at Northwestern University, was the first.  Bazant presented a paper – on September 13, 2001 - claiming that the Twin Towers collapsed due to fire-induced weakening of the buildings. Bazant works at a school of engineering at Northwestern University that is heavily funded by the Crown family.

Likewise, W. Gene Corley, another associate of the Crown family, headed the FEMA/ASCE investigation of the Twin Towers. Corley is a concrete specialist who performed a similar service after the Waco massacre, the Oklahoma City bombing, and the bombing of the Pentagon. Corley, now deceased, was associated with the Crown family through his work with the American Concrete Institute (Illinois). He received the Henry Crown award from this institute in 1997 – for his work on the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City. It should be noted that Corley claimed to know nothing about how steel can be tested for evidence of explosives.


 
"I'M NOT A METALLURGIST" - W. Gene Corley at the World Trade Center.  Corley, a concrete specialist from Chicago, told the author that he knew nothing about how to test steel for evidence of explosives. 

So, the Crown family of Chicago, the controlling family of General Dynamics, had key people in the official investigations of the JFK murder and 9-11 and made billions of dollars in profits from the wars that followed both events. Most importantly, the agents of the Crown family were key players in the criminal cover-ups by supporting the false version of both crimes.

U.S. history changed drastically as a result of these events and in both cases the cover-up resulted in the nation becoming engaged in long and costly wars from which the Crown family made huge profits from their ownership and control of General Dynamics, a leading defense contractor.  We should take note when the people who are involved in covering up a crime then rake in immense profits from the criminal deception.


ARLEN SPECTER served on the Warren Commission and presented the absurd theory that a single bullet passed through President Kennedy’s neck and Governor Connally’s chest and wrist and embedded itself in the Governor’s thigh. The "magic bullet" supposedly passed through 15 layers of clothing, 7 layers of skin, and approximately 15 inches of tissue, struck a necktie knot, removed 4 inches of rib, shattered a radius bone and was found at the hospital in near pristine condition.


"THE MAGIC BULLET" found on a gurney in the hospital had neither blood nor human tissue on it. Yet this bullet became the essential piece of evidence that led the Warren Commission to conclude that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.


Zdenek Bazant and W. Gene Corley were key proponents of the theory that the Twin Towers' collapses were caused by fires that weakened the steel structure, although such steel-framed towers have never collapsed before due to fire.  The Bazant-Corley theory, however, cannot explain the source of the energy that caused the complete pulverization of the 220 concrete floors - and everything on them.


MOLTEN IRON BALLS were produced in large amounts during the demolitions of the Twin Towers, another crucial fact which cannot be explained by the fire-induced collapse scenario presented by W. Gene Corley and Zdenek Bazant.  

Did Israel Murder Arafat with Polonium-210?

October 17, 2013


Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat (1929 – 2004)
"So Israel has form on Arafat and, as a nuclear power, it was able to acquire polonium-210. Could one of its agents have applied a lethal dose to Arafat’s toothbrush, so it was absorbed through the gums?"

From the Daily Mail:

Did Mossad kill Arafat with radioactive poison on his toothbrush? 
Israeli operatives may have given Palestinian leader lethal radioactive dose

At first they thought it must have been something he’d eaten. About two hours after having supper, at 11.30 p.m. on the evening of October 11, 2004, Yasser Arafat felt sick…

On November 3, he fell into a coma, and in the early hours of November 11 he died of internal bleeding in the brain.

For nearly a decade, the true cause of death of a man regarded by some as the world’s most evil terrorist has remained a mystery, amid accusations from his family and supporters that he was poisoned.

This week, however, the world came a step closer to finding out the truth.

Two years ago, Arafat’s widow and daughter demanded a French judicial inquiry into his death. Since then Swiss scientists have investigated his belongings for traces of poison.

And they have announced the results in the medical journal The Lancet:  they found traces of a highly toxic radioactive material, polonium-210, on his headwear, underpants and toothbrush.

In the article, coyly titled ‘Improving forensic investigation for polonium poisoning’, the team say they took samples of blood, sweat and urine from Arafat’s clothes and found they contained significantly higher than expected levels of polonium-210.

‘These findings support the possibility of Arafat’s poisoning with polonium-210,’ the report baldly states. It is a conclusion that tallies with another investigation of Arafat’s belongings, which was published in May last year.

The authors of both reports stress that their findings are not definitive, but they certainly point to an assassination...

Did the Palestinian leader suffer the same fate [as Russian intelligence agent Alexander Litvinenko]?  And if so, who were the killers?

To most people the answer seems obvious — Israel, or to be specific, the Israeli Institute for Intelligence and Special Operations, better known as Mossad.

Source: "Did Mossad kill Arafat with radioactive poison on his toothbrush? Israeli operatives may have given Palestinian leader lethal radioactive dose" by Guy Walters, Daily Mail (UK), October 15, 2013
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2462132/Did-Mossad-kill-Arafat-radioactive-poison-toothbrush.html 

The Black Ops Murder of the Philip Marshall Family

February 25, 2013

Philip Marshall is a retired United Airlines pilot, he’s written a couple of books about 9/11, most recently The Big BamboozleHe was a former associate of the CIA/DEA informant Barry Seal, the notorious CIA cocaine smuggler, and if you think Phillip Marshall killed himself and his two children as the police are trying to claim; well, I don’t know…you need to go back to school.
- Kevin Barrett in interview with Wayne Madsen, February 19, 2013

Former National Security Agency officer Wayne Madsen went to the scene of the crime in Murphys, California, and is “100 percent certain” that 9/11 investigator and author Philip Marshall and his two children were killed in a black ops hit. Madsen’s conclusion is that the cover story – an alleged murder/suicide – is transparently absurd. Madsen explained his findings in an interview with Kevin Barrett on February 19. The Madsen interview can be heard at: 

http://noliesradio.org/archives/57581

The Madsen interview sheds some light on the connections between the Colombian drug smuggling network and 9-11.  The Colombian drug network involved the Israeli military along with the Bush and Clinton families.  More on the Israeli/Colombian connections with 9-11 can be found in "The Planes of 9-11", the second chapter of Solving 9-11.

The Madsen interview can be read on Barrett's website at:  
“100 Percent Certain”: 9/11 Author was Killed in Black Ops Hit


Philip Marshall and his children, Macaila (14) and Alex (17), and their dog, were murdered at their home in Murphys, California, in what certainly appears to be another black ops murder/suicide like the killing of Jason Todd Ready and his family in Gilbert, Arizona, on May 2, 2012. In such cases the dead victim is blamed for the murders although no evidence is presented to support the charge. In the Ready case the local police were prevented from entering the house/crime scene until they obtained a warrant. The search and seizure warrant was only signed at 10:46 that night, many hours after the mass killing, giving the federal agents on the scene: the Joint Terrorism Task Force, FBI, and ATF, plenty of time to clean up.


Philip Marshall was a former pilot who had inside information having worked with the DEA and CIA.  He had worked as a pilot for Adler Berriman "Barry" Seal, one of the biggest drug smugglers in U.S. history. Marshall had written three books and was writing his fourth when he was killed. His latest book is The Big Bamboozle: 9-11 and the War on Terror (2012).


Adler Berriman "Barry" Seal (July 16, 1939 – February 19, 1986) was a drug smuggler and aircraft pilot who flew covert flights for the Central Intelligence Agency and the Medellín Cartel. He became a government informant and was murdered outside his halfway house in Baton Rouge.


The Marshall house (Point A) at 1259 Sandalwood Drive in Murphys is located on a slope at the very edge of the Forest Meadows subdivision.  There is no perimeter fence and the rear of the house was easily accessible from the wilderness area behind it. This may be how the killers gained access to the Marshall house on the night of January 31 without being noticed by the neighbors.

JFK on Secret Societies

May 5, 2012

The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it.
- President John F. Kennedy  

Fjordman Back at the Gates of Vienna

Updated November 4, 2011

Whether Fjordman is an Israeli agent or not, doesn’t negate the fact that Zionist right wingers are in alliance with these Nazi type characters. Geert Wilder is funded by Daniel Pipes' organisation, the Middle East Forum, and Pipes is not an Israeli. These extremists tend to do their worst in the USA or in alliance with the USA rather than in Israel.
- Farha Khaled to Christopher Bollyn, 2 November 2011 (Bollyn response in Q&A)


Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen, a.k.a. Fjordman, is the Zionist ideologue who inspired the Oslo massacre in July 2011.

After the Oslo terror bombing and subsequent mass murder of scores of young Norwegian political activists at an island camp on 22 July 2011, I wrote about the "Fjordman", the devoted Zionist who was one of the key people fomenting the anti-Islamic fear and hatred in the killer, Anders Behring Breivik:

Later, after the mass murder of 69 young people from the youth organization of Norway's labor party (Arbeidernes Ungdomsfylking or AUF), Fjordman described the AUF youngsters under attack as a "gang of anti-Israel, pro-Palestine young socialists".

On August 5, the Norwegian media revealed the identity of Fjordman, the rabid anti-Islamic blogger who is said to have inspired the terror atrocity of 22 July 2011. Fjordman was named as Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen, from Ålesund on Norway's west coast. What kind of Norwegian could harbor such animosity for his fellow Norwegians? Would Jensen get off so lightly calling for war against any other religious group? What would happen if Jensen had called for the expulsion of Jews and the destruction of their synagogues, as he and his ilk do against the Muslims? Why are Zionist extremists like Jensen not prosecuted for their anti-Muslim hate speech?
- "Is Fjordman an Israeli Agent?" 10 August 2011


BOYCOTT ISRAEL - Norway's foreign minister Jonas Gahr Støre visited the AUF camp shortly before the massacre. Were these young Norwegian political activists targeted for taking a stand against militant Zionism?

A writer named Farha Khaled has written a recent article titled "Fjordman Back at Gates of Vienna whose Tipsters Include Caroline Glick", which reveals much more about the Zionist propaganda network behind the anti-Islamic websites that inspired the massacre in Norway. One of the propagandists, for example, is Caroline Glick, a Chicago-born editor of the Jerusalem Post. I recommend reading Farha Khaled's article, which does a excellent job exposing the Zionist agenda behind the propaganda.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Khaled, Farha, "Fjordman Back at Gates of Vienna whose Tipsters Include Caroline Glick", FarhaKhaled.blogspot.com, 22 October 2011
http://farhakhaled.blogspot.com/2011/10/caroline-glick-cited-as-one-of-israeli.html

Bollyn, Christopher, "Is Fjordman an Israeli Agent?", 10 August 2011
http://www.bollyn.com/who-is-peder-jensen-aka-fjordman

Mossad Killer of Nuclear Scientist on Trial in Iran

August 24, 2011


An Iranian kick boxer, Majid Jamali-Fashi, has confessed to being trained by Israeli intelligence to use a motorcycle bomb to kill Iranian nuclear scientist Masoud Ali-Mohammadi in January 2010.

A man accused by Iran of carrying out an assassination "sponsored and designed by Israel" has pleaded guilty to the murder of an Iranian nuclear scientist.

The young man, identified as Majid Jamali-Fashi, said he was hired by Israel and trained at a military base outside Tel Aviv before being dispatched to Iran as a part of network ordered to kill Masoud Ali-Mohammadi, a particle physicist at Tehran University.

Jamali-Fashi, a 26-year-old kick boxer, admitted in court that the bomb attack that targeted Mohammadi was part of a Mossad operation to assassinate Iranian nuclear scientists. Fashi said he was paid $120,000 for his part in the assassinations.

Sources:

"Mossad's killer of Iran N-scientist tried", Press TV (Iran), 24 August 2011
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/195479.html

"Kick boxer assassin says Mossad behind Iran scientist murder, opposition skeptical", Al Arabiya News, 24 August 2011
http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2011/08/24/163854.html

"Iranian man pleads guilty to nuclear scientist’s killing", JTA (Israel), 23 August 2011
http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/08/23/3089086/iranian-man-pleads-guilty-to-scientists-assassination

"Man pleads guilty to assassinating Iranian nuclear scientist", Guardian (UK), 23 August 2011 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/23/iran-nuclear-scientist-assassination-trial

Is Fjordman an Israeli Agent?

August 10, 2011


BOYCOTT ISRAEL - Norway's foreign minister Jonas Gahr Støre got the message when he visited the AUF camp shortly before these young people were massacred by Anders Breivik.  Although it is not at all uncommon to see such signs in Scandinavia, high-level politicians have met similar fates after calling for a European boycott of Israel.  Were these young Norwegian political activists targeted for taking a stand against militant Zionism?


Sweden's Foreign Minister Anna Lindh called upon the European Union to sever ties with Israel in protest against Israeli practices in April 2002...


A well known supporter of Palestinians' human and political rights, Lindh was brutally murdered in Stockholm on 11 September 2003.  I wrote an article entitled "The Strange Death of Anna Lindh" shortly after her murder.  

We can only begin to heal our self-inflicted civilizational wounds if we embrace the Jewish component of our cultural identity.
- Fjordman, "Why Europeans Should Support Israel"

We demand that all financial support to the Palestinian Authority should cease immediately. It is proven beyond any doubt that this has in the past been used to finance campaigns of Jihad terrorism against Jews in Israel and against Christians in territories under PA control. A public statement in support of Israel against Muslim aggression should be issued, and the money that has previously been awarded to Palestinians should be allocated partly to Israel's defense, partly to establish a Global Infidel Defense Fund with the stated goal of disseminating information about Muslim persecution of non-Muslims worldwide.
- Fjordman a.k.a. Peder Jensen, "Native Revolt: A European Declaration of Independence"

Fjordman is the nom de plume of the previously anonymous pro-Israel and anti-Islamic blogger who inspired the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik.  Two days after Breivik's killing spree, in which scores of young people were massacred, the Norwegian press reported that Fjordman was "an important ideological inspiration" for the mass murderer. 

Breivik cites Fjordman extensively in his manifesto.  The Norwegian mass murderer and terrorist also named Fjordman as his favourite author with similar views.  One idea of Fjordman’s that Breivik quoted was that Christians should meet “Islamization” by arming themselves. One of Fjordman's articles, titled
“Native Revolt: A European Declaration of Independence,” states that if the demands of the anti-Islamic movement are not met, they would “have no choice but to realize that our leaders have betrayed us” and that they will “take the necessary steps in order to protect our own security and national survival.”  This is Breivik's basic rationale for his murderous actions on July 22. 

Shortly after the bombing of Oslo, Fjordman wrote on his "Gates of Vienna" blog that Jens Stoltenberg, the Norwegian prime minister, who was the primary target of the bomb, was a "pathetic sucker for Islam".  Later, after the mass murder of 69 young people from the youth organization of Norway's labor party (Arbeidernes Ungdomsfylking or AUF), Fjordman described the AUF youngsters under attack as a "gang of anti-Israel, pro-Palestine young socialists"

On August 5, the Norwegian media revealed the identity of Fjordman, the rabid anti-Islamic blogger who is said to have inspired the terror atrocity of 22 July 2011.  Fjordman was named as Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen, from Ålesund on Norway's west coast.  What kind of Norwegian could harbor such animosity for his fellow Norwegians?  Would Jensen get off so lightly calling for war against any other religious group?  What would happen if Jensen had called for the expulsion of Jews and the destruction of their synagogues, as he and his ilk do against the Muslims?  Why are Zionist extremists like Jensen not prosecuted for their anti-Muslim hate speech? 

Why has the U.S. Ambassador to Norway, Barry B. White, a Jewish Zionist at the highest level, not spoken out against the hateful anti-Muslim rhetoric swirling about Oslo?  Barry White, one of Barack Obama’s top fundraisers, received the American Jewish Committee of New England’s Award for Community Service in 2005.  The AJC is an organization that is closely tied to Israeli intelligence. 

Is there perhaps a connection between Breivik's terrorism and the U.S. "anti-terrorism" spying outfit that was run by the U.S. Embassy "in deepest secrecy" in Norway for the past 10 years?  If the U.S. has kept hundreds of Norwegians under surveillance, were Jensen and Breivik on their lists?  They were certainly on the Norwegian police lists.  What was the U.S. anti-terrorism operation in Norway really up to for the past 10 years?  We can certainly all agree that whatever this U.S. "anti-terrorism" unit was meant to accomplish to make the U.S. and Norway safe from terrorism - it failed completely.  A complete investigation of this illegal "anti-terrorism" outfit run by the U.S. Embassy is long overdue.  July 22  (7/22) was Norway's 9/11, and as numerologists will note, both dates add up to 11 - and 11 means Israel.
 

 
Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen, a.k.a. Fjordman, has gone into hiding.

Peder Jensen is the Zionist extremist/anti-Islamic blogger known as Fjordman.  One of his articles from 2007 is entitled "Why Europeans Should Support Israel".  Jensen's outspoken support for Israel and Zionism and his non-Nordic appearance (and his father's) have led some to speculate that he may be partly Ashkenazi Jewish.


Steinar Nøstvold Jensen, Peder's father, was active in Norway's communist party.

While Peder Jensen may very well have Jewish ancestors, there are other factors in his life that suggest that Jensen is a Zionist agent with close connections to the state of Israel.  It is probably Jensen's Zionist connection that is the true source of the hateful anti-Islamic propaganda that is said to have inspired the July 22 massacre in Norway.  Almost all such anti-Islamic propaganda efforts worldwide have the same return address - Israeli intelligence.   

Jensen reportedly studied Arabic at the American University in Cairo, Egypt, in 2001.  This is highly unusual for a Norwegian.  Although he studied Arabic in the most populous nation in the Middle East, Jensen seems to have very little understanding of Muslims.  Jensen claims to have abruptly changed his opinion about Muslims after having seen Egyptians celebrating the 9/11 terror attacks by eating cake.  It should be noted that Israel used fraudulent methods to try to portray Palestinians as celebrating the terror attacks of 9/11.  Furthermore, five Israelis connected to Israeli intelligence were actually arrested on 9/11 in New Jersey after having been seen videotaping themselves celebrating with the burning towers in the background.

In early 2002, Jensen went to Palestine and took a position with the 
Temporary International Presence in Hebron, which I find very suspicious.  This international observer mission in Hebron, which communicates with the Israeli army, is supposed to monitor the situation in the Israeli-occupied town on the West Bank.  Jensen, who says that he turned against Islam after 9/11, remained in this position in Hebron until mid-2003.  Why would a person who is strongly opposed to Islam want to serve as a monitor in an Israeli-occupied Islamic city?  Was there another reason for Jensen to be in Israeli occupied territory?  Was he recruited by Israeli intelligence during his stay in Israel?  There is obviously some very important information missing from Peder Jensen's biography.


Hebron, the burial site of Abraham...


is today a place of strife between Jewish settlers and the native Palestinians.

Jensen's year and a half in Israel and Palestine would have allowed him to spend a great deal of time with Israelis, especially with those in military intelligence.  He would have probably spent his free time in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, mingling with Israelis who shared his anti-Islamic views.  His working relationship with the Israeli military and his stated disgust with Islam would have made him a perfect candidate to become a Zionist agent spreading anti-Islamic propaganda in Europe.  Did Peder Jensen become a Zionist agent during his sojourn in Palestine?  This is a crucial question about this agent provocateur that certainly needs to be looked into by the Norwegian authorities. 

Øyvind Strømmen, a leading investigator of the far right in Norway, said that Peder Jensen “is responsible for spreading an ideology where violence is a natural, logical conclusion of his reasoning.”  Now that Norway has tasted the bitter fruit of Jensen's hateful ideology, will this Zionist agent be charged with inciting hatred? 

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "Anders Breivik and the Zionist 'War on Terror'", 1 August 2011
http://www.bollyn.com/anders-breivik-and-the-zionist-war-on-terror 

Bollyn, Christopher, "The Strange Death of Anna Lindh", 26 September 2003
http://www.bollyn.com/anna-lindh-2

Bollyn, Christopher, "Algeria Bombing - 11 Means Israel", 12 December 2007
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=115030

‘Fjordman’ raises anonymity issues, Views and News from Norway, 8 August 2011
http://www.newsinenglish.no/2011/08/08/fjordman-raises-anonymity-issues/ 

"Officials howling over US Embassy’s secret surveillance in Norway", 4 November 2010
http://www.newsinenglish.no/2010/11/04/officials-howling-over-us-embassys-secret-surveillance-in-norway/

New Revelations on Hariri Assassination

November 30, 2010

The truth ultimately seeps through. The Israeli drone videos released by the Hezbollah expose Israel’s involvement in the crime preparations. The facts revealed by Odnako point to the use of a sophisticated German weapon. The puzzle is nearly complete.
-Thierry Meyssan, 29 November 2010

Thierry Meyssan of Voltaire.org has published an excellent article with new revelations on the 2005 assassination of Rafik Hariri in Beirut.  These revelations support my early analysis that the Lebanese leader was killed by an Israeli missile fired from a drone.  Meyssan's latest article, "Revelations on Rafik Hariri's Assassination", reveals important new details about the weapon, the crime, and the cover-up. 


Hezbollah intercepted and released videos from Israeli drones surveying Rafik Hariri’s movements and the scene of the crime.


The evidence, such as the crater, indicates that Rafik Hariri was killed by a missile.


Detlev Mehlis, President of the UN Investigation Commission violated all the rules of the criminal procedure, fabricated evidence, and used false witnesses to exonerate Germany and accuse Syria.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"Revelations on Rafik Hariri’s assassination" by Thierry Meyssan, November 29, 2010
http://www.voltairenet.org/article167553.html#article167553

"Syria Wrongly Blamed for Hariri Murder" by Christopher Bollyn, September 9, 2010
http://www.bollyn.com/syria-wrongly-blamed-for-hariri-murder 

BBC News, "Lebanon PM Hariri withdraws accusation against Syria", September 6, 2010
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11200278

Bollyn, Christopher, "Did Israel Kill Rafik Hariri With A Guided Bomb?", February 18, 2005
http://www.facts-are-facts.com/news/sne-28205-hariri.ihtml
http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Bollyn-Hariri-Feb2005.html

Bollyn, Christopher, "Micro-Nuke Theory is Disinformation", February 19, 2005
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/65265

Bollyn, Christopher, "Missile or Car Bomb? - Reading the Smoke Signals", February 20, 2005
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/65370

Bollyn, Christopher, "Micronuke Nonsense and the Ugly Facts", February 20, 2005
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/65371

Bollyn, Christopher, "U.N. Investigators Broach Theory that Hariri was Killed by a Missile", November 21, 2006
http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Bollyn-Hariri-Nov2006.html

Cattori, Silvia, "The Assassination of Rafik Hariri: A Biased Investigation", September 15, 2006
http://www.voltairenet.org/article143460.html

Mroueh, Wassim, "Berri praises Hariri's honesty regarding Syria", Daily Star (Lebanon), September 9, 2010
http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=1&categ_id=2&article_id=119138#ixzz0z1sMQ4sG

Israeli Murders of Al-Nemnem and Rafik Hariri

November 7, 2010


Palestinians carry the coffin of Mohammed Jamil al-Nemnem during his funeral in Gaza City.

The Israeli military's murder of the Palestinian resistance fighter Mohammed Al-Nemnem on November 3 in Gaza City is very similar to the targeted killing of the Lebanese leader Rafik Hariri in February 2005.  Al-Nemnem, a 27-year-old leader of the Army of Islam, was killed in an Israeli missile airstrike on his car in the Gaza Strip, which is exactly how I believe Hariri was killed.

On November 4, the International Herald Tribune report of the murder of Al-Nemnem was placed directly above a report about the U.N.'s Hariri tribunal.  I was struck by the placement of these related articles.  While the murder of Hariri is not yet solved, I have always been of the opinion that he was killed in the same way that Al-Nemnem was killed.  The only difference is that Hariri (and 20 other Lebanese) was killed with an air-launched missile that carried a larger explosive payload with a delayed fuse, which caused a crater in the street.  The method of the two murders is exactly the same - a missile fired at a targeted car from an airborne drone.  It is the preferred method of murder being used by the U.S. CIA on a daily basis in Pakistan.


The destroyed car of Al-Nemnem in Gaza City on November 3, 2010

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christoher, "Syria Wrongly Blamed for Hariri Murder", September 9, 2010
http://www.bollyn.com/syria-wrongly-blamed-for-hariri-murder

"Israel military says airstrike kills Gaza militant", by Ibrahim Barzak, Associated Press, November 3, 2010
http://www.kansascity.com/2010/11/03/2386645/hamas-says-car-explodes-in-gaza.html

"Israeli army claims responsibility for Gaza assassination", Xinhua, November 4, 2010
http://world.globaltimes.cn/mid-east/2010-11/589402.html

"IDF Implies, Then Retracts That U.S. Approved Gaza Hit", November 4, 2010
http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/tag/nemnem/
 

Syria Wrongly Blamed for Hariri Murder

September 9, 2010


The dynamic and popular Lebanese leader Rafik Hariri, who did so much to rebuild Beirut, was murdered in a mysterious bombing on February 14, 2005.  With no evidence to support the accusation, the Zionist-controlled media blamed Syria for the killing - a very strong indication that this was yet another Israeli false-flag terror attack/targeted killing.

I have reported since shortly after the assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri that there was absolutely no evidence that the popular leader had been killed by Syria, which was wrongly blamed by the Zionist-controlled U.S. media and government.  Rather, as I wrote in February 2005, the Hariri murder had all the hallmarks of an Israeli targeted killing designed to be blamed on Syria - a false flag terror attack, just like 9-11.  My analysis has now been validated by Hariri's son, Saad Hariri, the current prime minister of Lebanon. 

Saad Hariri, the Lebanese prime minister, has recently come forth and said he was wrong to accuse Syria of assassinating his father.  Saad Hariri told the Asharq al-Awsat newspaper that the charge against Syria had been politically motivated, adding that an international inquiry into his father's killing had been misled by false testimony.  So who is really behind the murder and false accusations?  Was the Hariri murder yet one more Israeli targeted killing?


The crater caused by the blast that killed Hariri appears to have been caused by an explosion beneath the surface.

Hariri said he made a mistake when he accused Syria of involvement in his father’s murder and condemned false witnesses for misleading probes and “politicizing the murder.”  Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri described Hariri’s remarks as “a window to truth and an important window especially regarding false witnesses.”

In the interview, Hariri said: "At a certain stage we made mistakes and accused Syria of assassinating the martyred premier. This was a political accusation, and this political accusation has finished."  Syria has always denied involvement in the assassination of Hariri.  Israeli intelligence is suspected as being behind the murder of Hariri, which appears to been a false-flag terror attack designed to be blamed on Syria.


The smoke from the blast shows a light sandy colored plume at the top. It is sand colored because the detonation evidently occurred in the sand beneath the street of Hariri's motorcade. The first thing that was thrown up into the air was the sand in which the detonation occurred.

Sources and Recommended Reading: 

BBC News, "Lebanon PM Hariri withdraws accusation against Syria", September 6, 2010
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11200278

Bollyn, Christopher, "Did Israel Kill Rafik Hariri With A Guided Bomb?", February 18, 2005
http://www.facts-are-facts.com/news/sne-28205-hariri.ihtml
http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Bollyn-Hariri-Feb2005.html

Bollyn, Christopher, "Micro-Nuke Theory is Disinformation", February 19, 2005
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/65265

Bollyn, Christopher, "Missile or Car Bomb? - Reading the Smoke Signals", February 20, 2005
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/65370

Bollyn, Christopher, "Micronuke Nonsense and the Ugly Facts", February 20, 2005
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/65371

Bollyn, Christopher, "U.N. Investigators Broach Theory that Hariri was Killed by a Missile", November 21, 2006
http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Bollyn-Hariri-Nov2006.html

Cattori, Silvia, "The Assassination of Rafik Hariri: A Biased Investigation", September 15, 2006
http://www.voltairenet.org/article143460.html

Mroueh, Wassim, "Berri praises Hariri's honesty regarding Syria", Daily Star (Lebanon), September 9, 2010
http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=1&categ_id=2&article_id=119138#ixzz0z1sMQ4sG

The Strange Death of Anna Lindh

Sweden’s popular foreign minister Anna Lindh is the third high-ranking Swedish political opponent of Zionism to have been murdered since 1948, which raises the question: Was Lindh assassinated because of her outspoken opposition to Israel’s occupation of Palestine?


Anna Lindh was expected to become Sweden's next prime minister before she was brutally murdered on 11 September 2003, as her obituary noted.


Lindh was pro-Palestinian and had called for a European boycott of Israel.

DID MOSSAD ASSASSINATE ANNA LINDH?

When Sweden’s foreign minister Anna Lindh was brutally stabbed by an unknown assailant while shopping in an upscale Stockholm department store, it marked the third murder in 55 years of a high-level Swedish opponent of Zionist aggression in Palestine.

While the controlled press was quick to point out an unidentified suspect, later released, with alleged ties to “neo-Nazis,” it has virtually ignored the historical precedents that suggest that the killing of Lindh may have been an assassination aimed at silencing an influential political opponent of the Zionist extremists who control the Israeli government and wield great influence in Washington.

Anna Lindh’s Sweden “has had more of an impact on Palestinian history than closer or greater powers throughout the world,” Hanan Ashrawi, the Palestinian professor and negotiator, wrote after the murder.

The death of Lindh and the late UN representative in Baghdad, Sergio Vieira de Mello, represents the loss of “two voices who called with determination for salvaging the UN’s role in Iraq and for implementing its resolutions in Palestine,” Bouthaina Shaaban, a minister in the new Syrian government, wrote in The Daily Star (Lebanon).

Shaaban noted that Lindh had:

• Called upon the European Union, on April 3, 2002, to sever ties with Israel in protest against Israeli practices;

• Called on US President George W. Bush to deny Sharon unconditional support, as this would inflame the Middle East;

• Stressed that the only solution in the Middle East rested in ending the Israeli occupation (otherwise everybody would become a hostage to the conflict);

• Played an important role in shaping the EU’s decision to adopt a policy toward Palestinian President Yasser Arafat different from that of the U.S.;

• Confirmed the importance of Arafat as a partner in the peace process, rejecting Washington’s claims that he supported terrorism;

• Stood firmly against the war on Iraq;

• And warned of the dangers of changing another country’s regime without the support of international law.

Regarding weapons of mass destruction, Lindh called for the creation of a Middle East free of such weapons, including Israel. Lindh strongly opposed the Anglo-American aggression and occupation of Iraq.

A GLOBAL LOSS

Sweden’s effect on the Middle East “has been consistently constructive, positive, and human with a deep-seated tradition of fairness, justice, and peaceful intervention,” Ashrawi wrote, “Unfortunately, three such Swedish champions had met with violent and untimely deaths, each a tragedy unto itself, but a national and global loss in the larger scheme of things.”

On the ill-fated day Lindh had gone with a friend to Nordiska Kompaniet (NK) a few blocks from the parliament building on Sept. 10 to buy an outfit for an upcoming televised debate on the European common currency, the Euro. Lindh’s image had appeared on posters in Sweden for the “yes” campaign she supported.

Although there was no recognizable leader for the “no” side, opinion polls before the Sept. 14 referendum showed 53 percent of Swedish women remained opposed to the Euro, with only 29 percent in favor.

When Lindh died on Thursday, Sept. 11, after more than 6 hours of surgery, Sweden’s prime minister called off campaigning for the Sunday referendum on the Euro. With the “no” vote strongly ahead of the “yes” vote there was some speculation and wishful thinking that Lindh’s murder would boost the “yes” side.

SWEDEN REJECTS EURO

The Euro referendum went ahead and with more than 80 percent of the Swedish electorate having cast ballots, the “no” side won by a large margin of 14 percent: 56 percent opposed and 42 percent in favor.

The un-elected president of the European Commission, Romano Prodi, clearly at a loss for words in an interview with CNN after the vote, pooh-poohed the very idea of using a referendum to decide whether a nation should adopt the Euro. The Swedish results, Prodi said, were “worse than I expected.”

Charles Hodgson of CNN reminded Prodi that in every nation where the people had decided on the Euro in a referendum, it had been rejected.

Sweden’s rejection of the Euro, however, clearly does not bode well for the Euro in other European nations that have retained their fiscal sovereignty, primarily Great Britain and Denmark, where similar referenda will be held in the future.

MURDER IN BROAD DAYLIGHT

Lindh was shopping without bodyguards at the upscale NK department store, when she was savagely stabbed in the stomach, chest and arm, just before 4 p.m.

Hanna Sundberg, an eyewitness, told The Associated Press that she saw a man chase Lindh up an escalator from the ground floor to the first upper level into a store called Filippa K.

"She fell on the floor and the man was stabbing her in the stomach," she said. "She laid on the floor and it looked as if a tall man, wearing a peaked cap, was hitting her," she told AP. "But when he ran away, he threw away a knife."

Sundberg ran to Lindh, who said: "God, he has stabbed me in the stomach!"

Another witness, Anna Lekander, who had been in the boutique, where there were “only a handful of shoppers at the time,” said she had not noticed that Lindh was there as well.

Lekander said nothing about a man chasing Lindh up the escalator.

Lekander told the BBC that she had learned from others who were present that Lindh had entered the shop together with a friend, seemingly with "no bodyguards or anything.”

Soon after leaving the shop, Lekander heard people shouting from inside, "Catch him, catch him”.

"It happened very quickly, I could see people running and I went back into the shop," Lekander said.

"I could see a person lying on the floor, but I didn't know it was her,” Lekander said. "There was blood everywhere.”

The attacker fled down the escalator and was able to flee without any resistance from security guards. Police were reported to be searching for a man wearing a camouflage jacket.

Lindh was initially reported to be serious condition but her injuries were said not to be “life-threatening” as she underwent six hours of surgery at the Karolinska Hospital. Doctors said she suffered extensive damage to her liver and had internal bleeding.

A company named Hufvudstaden owns NK, a 100-year-old department store founded by Josef E. Sachs. AFP asked Michael Lorenz, owner of Duty Security, which provides security for NK, about the number and location of guards at the time Lindh was murdered. Lorenz would not say how many guards were on duty or what kind of security detail his firm provided at the exits of NK.

Lorenz also refused to answer questions about how an assailant could attack a prominent Swedish politician in broad daylight in a department store with numerous closed-circuit video cameras and security guards and flee without encountering any resistance or security personnel in pursuit.

PALESTINIAN SUPPORTER

Ylva Anna Maria Lindh was a rising star in Sweden’s ruling Social Democrat Party (SDP). At age 46, Lindh was an intelligent and articulate politician with more than 20 years experience in government. An outspoken and attractive foreign minister, Lindh was expected to be Sweden’s next prime minister. She has two young sons, 8 and 13.

As Sweden’s foreign minister since 1998, Lindh’s “main objectives were to encourage dialogue between the rich and the poor worlds, and to support the independence of the Palestinian and Kurdish peoples,” according to Olle Svenning, London correspondent of the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet and personal friend of Lindh.

Lindh was an outspoken critic of Israel’s prime minister Ariel Sharon and his brutal policies affecting the millions of Palestinians living under Israeli occupation: "Our stand is firm and clear,” the foreign minister said in an October 2001 interview :

• "Israeli settlements on the West Bank must go;

• there must be a Palestinian state;


• Israel must vacate occupied areas on the West Bank and Gaza Strip; and

• end all extra-territorial executions and attacks on Palestinians.

• This should be done immediately.”

Asked if she expected anything from a dialogue with the Israeli government led by Sharon, whose “record of war crimes” was described as “being without parallel in post-War history,” Lindh replied, “I agree. It makes no sense to have a dialogue with Sharon’s government. There will be no talks with him from our side.”

In June 2002, the youth wing of Lindh’s Social Democrat Party pressed charges against Sharon of war crimes and violation of international law. At the time Lindh said she understood there was "both bitterness and anger because the Israeli government is guilty of violating international law."

"Sometimes the Israeli-Palestinian conflict makes me so angry that I kick the wastepaper bin in my office or throw things around," Lindh said. She had described Sharon as a “maniac” and said on Swedish television that she would not buy Israeli goods and fruits sold in Swedish markets.

At a meeting of European Union member states in April 2002, Lindh had called for the EU to cut relations with Israel to protest the repressive practices of Israeli occupation forces against the Palestinians.

A frequent critic of Sharon, Lindh said in May 2002 that her goal was that "Israeli citizens will turn against the military policies of Sharon."

“Israel's government,” she said, “has chosen a course of action that risks placing the country outside of the rest of the world community.”

Lindh criticized U.S. President George W. Bush for ignoring the Palestinian President Yasser Arafat, saying U.S. policies rewarded “Sharon's violence.”

“I am very worried about this American debate,” Lindh said on Swedish radio. “I think this discussion equating Arafat with terrorists is both inappropriate and stupid. It is a very dangerous policy.”

“It contradicts the entire peace process... and can only lead to outright war in the Middle East,” she said.

At a gathering of European foreign ministers in Riva del Garda, Italy, days before she was killed, Lindh had blamed the U.S. and Israel for the collapse of the “Roadmap” peace plan and resignation of Palestinian prime minister Mahmoud Abbas.

Lindh said Abbas had been given “the kiss of death” when the Bush Administration and Israel had decided to deal only with him and sideline Palestinian president Yasser Arafat.

“Of course Arafat's unwillingness to give Abu Mazen (Abbas) increased power was decisive, but Abu Mazen's position would have been much stronger if Israel had also contributed to the peace process," Lindh told Swedish radio at the meeting in Italy. Lindh said Israel had continued building illegal Jewish settlements, erecting a wall separating Israel and the Palestinian territories, and assassinating leaders of Hamas.

Lindh’s principled and unequivocal position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was like that of the late Swedish prime minister Olof Palme, who was assassinated in Stockholm in 1986, and Count Folke Bernadotte, the United Nation’s Mediator on Palestine, who was brutally murdered by a Zionist terror gang near Jerusalem in 1948.

The assassination of Bernadotte, “at the hands of the Israeli terrorist organization… began a lethal Swedish connection with Palestine,” Ashrawi wrote. “Palestine lost its first Swedish champion,” Ashrawi wrote, when Bernadotte “was brutally murdered, shot at point blank, by three Jewish Stern Gang members in Jerusalem.”

In 1986, then Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme was shot as he walked home from the cinema with his wife. As Ashrawi noted, Palme had sought recognition for the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and a validation for the peaceful resolution of the conflict through ending the 1967 Israeli occupation of Palestinian and other Arab lands. Palme’s politics were based on international legality and UN resolutions, and “a deeply-felt commitment to fairness and human decency,” Ashrawi wrote.

Ulf Dahlsten, Palme's personal secretary in 1986, said that Lindh was the most important Swedish political figure since the late prime minister. In her speeches against the war in Iraq and in support of the Palestinians, Lindh was seen as Palme's natural heir. There have long been rumors in intelligence circles that Lindh was the daughter of Palme.

American Free Press [Bollyn] asked Ninni Jonzon, news editor of Göteborgs-Posten, if there was any discussion in the Swedish media comparing Lindh’s murder with the political assassination of Bernadotte, or the unsolved murder of Palme. “Absolutely not,” Jonzon said. Asked why, she replied, “I don’t know.”

ASSASSINATION OF BERNADOTTE

As UN mediator, Bernadotte had the mandate to "promote a peaceful adjustment of the future situation in Palestine" and to mediate beyond the terms of the Nov. 29, 1947 Partition Plan, in which the U.N. General Assembly had voted to partition Palestine into Arab and Jewish states.

The Partition Plan, which gave the Zionists more than half of Palestine, led to war between Arab and Zionist forces after Israel proclaimed its establishment on May 14, 1948. Bernadotte's first action had been to arrange a truce, which lasted from June 11 to July 9.

Bernadotte put forward a proposal for solving the conflict, which suggested that Jerusalem be placed under Jordanian rule, since all the area around the city was designated for the Palestinian Arab state.

The U.N. partition plan had declared Jerusalem an international city that was to be ruled by neither Arab nor Jew. But Jewish terrorist groups, headed by the Polish immigrants Yitzhak Shamir and Menachem Begin, who both later served as Israeli prime ministers, rejected partition and claimed all of Palestine and Jordan for the Jewish state. These Jewish extremists saw Bernadotte as an enemy - an obstacle to their agenda - that had to be removed.

While no one was ever charged for the murders of Palme or Bernadotte, three Zionist terrorists have been named in Israeli and western documents as being behind the planning and murder of Bernadotte. Chief among them is Yitzhak Shamir (born Yezernitsky), who headed a Zionist terrorist organization during the British occupation of Palestine known as LEHI, or the Stern Gang.

New York Times columnist C.L. Sulzberger reported meeting two of Shamir’s Stern Gang members on July 24, 1948. The Stern Gang terrorists said: "We intend to kill Bernadotte and any other uniformed United Nations observers who come to Jerusalem." Asked why, "They replied that their organization was determined to seize all of Jerusalem for the state of Israel and would brook no interference by any national or international body."

Shamir, also reportedly sent two agents to Egypt to assassinate the British minister Lord Moyne, “because he was an enemy of the Jews and the Zionists.”

Shamir, however, never faced justice for the murder of Bernadotte and went on to serve as Paris bureau chief the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad (1955–65), member of the Israeli parliament (1973–96), and as prime minister of Israel (1983–84 and 1986–92).

According to Michael Collins Piper, author of Final Judgment, Shamir is also suspected of having played a key role in the assassination of U.S. president John F. Kennedy by arranging a French-based hit squad of assassins that killed the president, a foe of Israel's Ben Gurion and strong opponent of Israel's nuclear ambitions.

Original Source:

Bollyn, Christopher, "The Strange Death of Anna Lindh", 26 September 2003 (published in American Free Press)

Rafik Hariri

 

Did Israel Kill Rafik Hariri With A Guided Bomb?


By Christopher Bollyn
18 Frebruary 2005

The U.S. media is indulging in war mongering "yellow journalism" by repeating baseless allegations that Syria is behind the "car bombing" of a popular Lebanese nationalist, while the evidence suggests that the assassination was carried out using a guided missile launched from a plane - a precision penetration bomb - a "targeted killing" technique perfected by Israel.The U.S. media is indulging in war mongering "yellow journalism" by repeating baseless allegations that Syria is behind the "car bombing" of a popular Lebanese nationalist, while the evidence suggests that the assassination was carried out using a guided missile launched from a plane - a precision penetration bomb - a "targeted killing" technique perfected by Israel.

http://www.zeitenschrift.net/news/sne-28205-hariri.ihtml


 

Who Killed Lebanon's Rafik Hariri?

 

 

By Christopher Bollyn
21 November 2006

The evidence from the crime scene indicated the possibility that an air-launched missile had targeted Hariri's car and left a large crater in the road.  "The evidence," I wrote shortly after the murder, "indicates that the Hariri bombing may have been a missile attack from the air."

Hariri may have been killed, I said, by the well-known Israeli method of "targeted killing," which the Israeli military has perfected and used to assassinate scores of Palestinian resistance leaders.  A 1,000 lb. precision-guided bomb with delayed fusing, for example, could have been used to target Hariri's vehicle and would fit the available evidence.  It would also explain the huge crater seen in the roadway.

Penetrating bombs with delayed fusing appear to have been used in some of the larger false flag terror attacks in Iraq as well as in the massive bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia in 1996.

In these events the shape and size of the crater provides crucial forensic evidence that should be examined to determine the type of bomb – or missile that was used.

The forensic evidence from these attacks, however, is seldom explained or scrutinized by the controlled media, which dutifully labels any bombing in the Middle East as having been done by a "suicide bomber" or a car bomb.

The latest UN Commissioner's report about the Hariri assassination by Serge Brammertz, the former national prosecutor of Belgium, mentions for the first time the aerial missile theory as a possible explanation:  "A new hypothesis relating to an aerial delivery means as a method of causing the explosion, advanced to the Commission recently, is being examined for its validity," the fifth report of the International Independent Investigation Commission (IIIC) said.

Here is the latest UN report on Hariri "investigation":
http://www.al-bab.com/Arab/docs/lebanon/brammertz3.htm 

If the "aerial delivery theory" were to be pursued, investigated, and proven to be correct, it would reduce the number of possible culprits and exclude the Syrian government as a suspect.  The only nations that could carry out an aerial attack are those having highly advanced air forces and access to the most advanced precision-guided missiles.  In that were the case, the prime suspects in the Hariri murder would have to include the United States and Israel.  Israel would have to be at the top of the list.

The other hypothesis being examined by the commission is the "large car bomb" theory, which proposes that a Mitsubishi van carrying some 1,800 kg of explosives was responsible for the blast that killed Hariri and 22 others in the area.

THE EVIDENCE

The real question facing investigators is which of these two hypotheses is supported by the evidence.  Key evidence from the crime scene is found in and around the large crater in the road that was excavated by the blast is about 40 feet across by 10 feet deep.

The latest report from Brammertz, dated 25 September 2006, discusses the amounts of explosives and says that a previous report "suggested that the amount used to produce a crater of the size" would be "approximately 500 kg [1,100 lbs.] of TNT equivalent, if the IED [improvised explosive device] was placed at 1.7 m [about 6 feet] under the ground; or 1,200 kg [2,640 lbs.] of TNT equivalent if placed just above the ground; or 1,800 kg [3,960 lbs.] of TNT equivalent if the IED was approximately 0.80 m [31 inches] above the ground."

It should be noted that the 1,800 kg estimate given in the Brammertz report for the size of the car bomb is ridiculously low.  A Russian study of surface explosions in different media indicates that a minimum of 5 to 10 metric tons of TNT would have been required to create the crater.  A metric ton is 1,000 kg or 2,200 lbs.  The actual size of the amount of explosives required to create such a crater, 5,000 to 10,000 kg, suggests that the UN investigators car bomb theory is extremely unlikely.

Keith A. Holsapple, an expert on craters at the University of Washington, examined the photographs of the Beirut crater for my initial research into the murder of Hariri. "There is no doubt," Holsapple said, "at least a several ton bomb would be required if it were delivered by a vehicle and detonated above the surface."

"If a penetrator weapon was used," Holsapple said, "the weight would be on the order of 1 ton, to within a factor of two." A penetrator weapon is an aerial bomb, such as a bunker-buster type, which is a guided weapon that is designed to penetrate the surface before exploding.

There are several other clues seen at the crater that argue against or disprove the truck bomb theory.  The first is that the crater appears to have been excavated rather than pressed down.  This would suggest that the explosion occurred at some depth below the surface and created the crater by blasting the sand beneath the road upwards.

A photograph taken of the plume rising from the explosion would seem to corroborate this theory.  It shows a light sandy colored plume at the top, which indicates that the detonation occurred in the sand under the street of Hariri's motorcade. The first thing that was thrown up into the air was the sand in which the detonation occurred.

Photographs of the crater also show that pipes from below the street have been thrown upwards.  This evidence supports the theory that the crater was caused by a detonation below the road.

Then there is the damaged car which is seen standing next to the crater.  If a truck bomb with several tons of explosives had created the massive crater, it seems highly unlikely that there would have been very much left of this car or that it would still be standing at the crater's edge.

The UN investigation also has a serious credibility problem because it appears to be more political than anything else.  Jürgen Cain Külbel, a former East German criminal investigator turned journalist exposed the fraudulent UN "investigators" in an interview with Silvia Cattori for Voltairenet: 

Of course, none of them considers the idea of examining whether or not Mossad [Israeli military intelligence] could be the wirepuller behind Hariri’s murder. It doesn’t belong to the order placed by their employers. They have to fulfill only the one demand: send Syria to the pillory.
http://www.voltairenet.org/article143460.html

Detlev Mehlis, the German who lead the 1986 "La Belle" discotheque bombing investigation was the first UN Commissioner on the Hariri case.  Mehlis worked closely with Israeli intelligence on the Hariri case; a case in which Israeli intelligence should be considered as a prime suspect.

"During the 'La Belle' case," Külbel said, "he [Mehlis] was over there [USA] in 1996 to get something. Or on ski trips with members of the CIA, high up in Aspen, Colorado? Mehlis is obviously the tool of the secret services. Without them he might not or he could not botch up within these sensitive areas of dirty policy. That is as safe as the Amen in the church. Do you believe the great powers are so foolish as to waste their time with 'honest' examiners, driven by a naive urge for the truth?

"Back to his connections to Israeli Secret service: Mehlis started his "work" with UNIIIC (the Hariri commission) in May 2005. A few weeks later, on 20 July, the French newspaper Le Figaro asked him: "Why have you asked for assistance from Israel and Jordan?" Mehlis answered: "It is known that the Israelis possess good security equipment, especially technological. We have asked them to give us data related to the assassination. They gave us good information."

"Later, in his first report on October 19, 2005, he said in the preface, paragraph 19: 'it is to be regretted that no Member State did relay such useful information to the Commission.' Mehlis does not tell the truth. Even the Israeli press wrote that Israeli intelligence agents had met with his team in Europe.

"But let me make one remark about Israel," Külbel said, "Ibrahim Gambari, Under Secretary General for Political Affairs at the UN, actually said at the end of August 2005 that Mr. Mehlis had created 'a good working relationship with Israel and Jordan,' not, however, with Syria. A real joke, given all those Mossad networks exposed this year in Lebanon, which for years had spread car bombings, murder, and terror. But nobody at the United Nations cares about this in the context of the Hariri matter. One has to ask oneself: what is this lot with headquarters in New York good for, anyway?

Sam Hamod, an expert on Middle Eastern affairs, wrote at the time of the Hariri assassination:  "We must do as they do in other criminal cases, look at who had the most to gain from the assassination of Prime Minister Hariri. The Lebanese had a lot to lose, as did the Syrians.

"No matter where else you look, no one else had anything to gain except Israel and the U.S.," Hamod said. "America quickly pointed the finger at Syria, as did Israel, which was tantamount to convicting themselves because they are the only two countries that would gain by creating unrest in Lebanon."


©2024 Christopher Bollyn | Sitemap | christopher at bollyn dot com