Donald Trump holds up a signed proclamation recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the occupied Golan Heights alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House, March 25, 2019.
As Donald Trump often reminds people, he is the president of the United States, so why does he spend so much time and effort advancing a radical foreign agenda, namely that of Benjamin Netanyahu, the extreme right-wing leader of the state of Israel?
I don't ask this question because I harbor any animosity for the president but out of serious concern that his actions and policies are serving a hostile and foreign power.
Zionism, the ideology of Jewish nationalism behind the state of Israel, is, after all, a foreign agenda. The fact that there are some 20 million Christian Zionists in the United States does not make Zionism any more American.
Donald Trump claims that his administration puts American interests first, but in the Middle East his actions and policies certainly do not benefit the United States in any meaningful way. Rather, Trump's policies in the region are clearly designed to benefit a foreign nation, and only one nation – Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, openly stated that he directed Trump to impose sanctions on Iran and that he had also requested that the United States recognize the occupied Golan Heights as part of Israel. Although these actions put the U.S. in the position of supporting violations of international law, Trump fulfilled Netanyahu's request on both.
Furthermore, Netanyahu is one of the key masterminds of the fraudulent War on Terror, which is now the longest and most expensive war in U.S. history. He is also deeply involved in the false-flag terrorism of 9/11, which is the event that made his pet project, the War on Terror, become operational. When asked by the New York Times about 9/11 on the day of the attacks, Netanyahu said it was "very good."
What are Americans supposed to think when their president enacts illegal policies to serve the wishes of a foreign leader of such ill repute, especially one who is involved in the worst act of terrorism in U.S. history? President Trump has done everything to please Netanyahu and to advance his extreme Zionist agenda while completely ignoring America's interests in the region. The sanctions against Iran, for example, have brought the United States to the brink of war, a situation that has been created completely by Trump's servitude to the belligerent Benjamin Netanyahu and the Zionist extremists, like Sheldon Adelson, who support him. This raises the question: At what point does Trump's subservience to the Israeli leader rise to the level of treason?
By accepting Israel's illegal annexation of East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights Trump has blatantly disregarded international law.
Trump has cut off funding for the Palestinian refugee agency and is seeking to change the refugee status of millions of Palestinians in order to deprive them of their legal right to return to their homes.
Trump has promoted a bogus peace plan, managed by his son-in-law who is an ardent Zionist, to try and buy the Palestinian nation's surrender to Israeli rule in all of historic Palestine.
During the summer of 2017, in Trump's first year in office, the U.S. military waged "a war of annihilation" against ISIS in two cities, Mosul in Iraq and Raqqa in Syria. "Raqqa is the most destroyed city in modern times in terms of percentage," Donatella Rovera, a crisis investigator in Raqqa for Amnesty International, said. The near total destruction of both cities is said to resemble that of Dresden in 1945.
Raqqa in ruins after the U.S.-led campaign to remove ISIS in the summer of 2017
So, why did the U.S. invade Syria illegally and lead the effort involving 67 nations to destroy Raqqa? What U.S. interest is served by destroying the cities of Raqqa and Mosul?
There is no U.S. interest in destroying Raqqa and Mosul. The devastation of these cities is part of a foreign agenda, an Israeli plan known as the Yinon Plan, named after the Israeli strategist who wrote it in the early 1980s, Oded Yinon. The Yinon Plan specifically calls for the dismemberment of Iraq and Syria, which is exactly the result of the U.S. intervention in these two nations.
The destruction of Mosul, Iraq's second largest city
Although Trump says he is opposed to the war in Syria, U.S. troops remain in the country where, with their Kurdish allies, they control about one-third of the nation in which the U.S. military has no legal right to be in the first place.
Trump appointed an Israeli dual-national, Sigal Mandelker, to manage the Treasury office that designs and applies the punishing sanctions that have been imposed on Iran. Trump has gone so far to say that Iran would face "obliteration" if the brutal economic sanctions were to lead to war.
In Afghanistan, Trump has continued the 18-year-old war and occupation policy of his predecessors in spite of the fact that he said it was "against his instinct" to do so. Trump has suggested on several occasions that he knows who is really behind the terror attacks of 9/11 that started the war in Afghanistan, indicating that he does not believe the official 9/11 myth. But, on this matter of profound importance, he has yet to reveal his thoughts. Why does Trump toy with 9/11 truth while continuing to wage the wars that followed in its wake? Who else but the real culprits, people like Benjamin Netanyahu, benefit from the 9/11 cover up?
If the president is supporting the deception of 9/11 and making policies and waging an extremely costly war based on the pack of lies about who carried out the terror atrocity, you can be sure we are not dealing with an honest character. Trump's motto is "Make America Great Again" but the war in Afghanistan has cost the U.S. some $100 million per day for nearly 18 years. How does the war in Afghanistan make America great? If the money being wasted waging a senseless war in Central Asia were invested on the neglected U.S. infrastructure it would be a step in the right direction, but Trump has not taken that step.
While many Trump supporters believe that he is playing a deeper political game and is secretly working to fight corruption and "drain the swamp," his actions during the first thirty months of his presidency indicate he is simply fulfilling the wishes of his radical Zionist donors, like Sheldon Adelson, a supporter of Netanyahu who has given Trump tens of millions of dollars. Adelson, who has donated at least $25 million to Donald Trump, publically called for the U.S. to drop a nuclear bomb on Iran to compel them to comply with Zionist dictates.
"I would put Adelson at the very top of the list of both access and influence in the Trump administration," Craig Holman of the watchdog group Public Citizen said. "I've never seen anything like it before, and I've been studying money in politics for 40 years."
If we consider the words of Matthew, "by their fruits ye shall know them," we would have to conclude that Trump's actions thus far have primarily been carried out in service to a radical Israeli agenda – not the people of the United States:
Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. - Matthew 7:16-18, King James Version
Trump's Confusing and Fragmented Thoughts on 9/11 and Afghanistan
July 7, 2019
"We went after Iraq, they did not knock down the World Trade Center. It wasn’t the Iraqis that knocked down the World Trade Center, we went after Iraq, we decimated the country, Iran’s taking over, okay. But it wasn’t the Iraqis, you will find out who really knocked down the World Trade Center. Because they have papers in there that are very secret, you may find it’s the Saudis, okay? But you will find out." - Donald Trump, Bluffton, S.C., February 17, 2016
In a televised interview with Tucker Carlson of Fox News on July 1 in Japan, President Donald Trump expressed some rather confused and fragmented thoughts about 9/11 and Afghanistan. Trump repeatedly stated incorrectly that the nearly 18-year-old War on Terror has gone on for 19 years, but more importantly, he once again claimed that his Afghanistan policy is based on the notion that the terrorism of 9/11 came from Afghanistan, which is clearly not the case.
The sophisticated explosives (e.g. super thermite) that destroyed the World Trade Center certainly did not come from Afghanistan. It is important to remember that candidate Trump promised voters that he would reveal who destroyed the WTC if he were elected. Is he just playing with the truth of 9/11?
When Trump said he would reveal who brought the towers down if he were elected, he clearly meant that it was not Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida. Now that he is president, he fails to reveal the guilty party, as he promised. This suggests that he is controlled by those who took down the towers and is covering up the truth to protect them.
The fragmented thoughts of Trump on 9/11, Afghanistan, and the War on Terror do not make sense -- and his policies that are based on the false myth that Muslims are behind 9/11 are a serious cause for concern.
The interview started with Tucker Carlson asking about when U.S. troops will be pulled out of Afghanistan:
Carlson: Two American servicemen killed in Afghanistan this week. How much longer do you think our troops will stay?
Trump: Well, I'll tell you. I've wanted to pull them out. And you know, I have pulled a lot out. We were at 16,000. We're down to about 9,000, which a lot of people don't know. In Syria, as you know, I've pulled most of them out. We've defeated the Caliphate. Now when you say Caliphate and defeat, the Caliphate's land, it's an area we've taken back a hundred percent.
But these people -- ISIS -- they're stone cold crazy. So that doesn't mean somebody is not going to walk into a store and blow up a store, which they do. So I never say defeated them, but they were decimated. And this went on for a long time and other people didn't do what I did. We did it. We did it very effectively.
Our military, there's no military like our military in the world. I don't want to have to use it very often. But we took back the Caliphate. With Afghanistan, it's 19 years and we should not have been there 19 years and if we were, you know, it would be nice to fight to win. But it's just 19 years...
Carlson: Could you see getting out entirely?
I'll tell you the problem is, look, I would like to just get out. The problem is, it just seems to be a lab for terrorists. It seems -- I call it the Harvard of terrorists. When you look at the World Trade Center, they were trained. They didn't --- by the way, they attacked the wrong country. They didn't come from Iraq, all right.
They came from various other countries. But they all formed in Afghanistan, and it's probably because it's at the base of so many countries, but they all formed and it's rough mountains and you get a lot of -- you know, you get a lot of good hiding places. But I would leave very strong intelligence there.
You have to watch because they do -- you know, okay, I'll give you a tough one. If you were in my position and a great looking central casting and we have great generals, a great central casting general walks up to your office, I say, "We're getting out." "Yes, sir. We'll get out. Yes, sir." I'll say, "What do you think of that?" "Sir, I'd rather attack them over there, then attack them in our land." In other words, them coming here.
That's always a very tough decision, you know, with what happened with the World Trade Center, et cetera et cetera. When they say that, you know, no matter how you feel, and you and I feel pretty much very similar. But when you're standing there, and you have some really talented military people saying, "I'd rather attack them over there than have them hit us over here and fight them on our land." It's something you always have to think about.
Now, I would leave and will leave -- we will be leaving. Very strong Intelligence, far more than you would normally think because it's very important, and we can do it that way, too. But we have reduced the forces very substantially in Afghanistan.
Sources: Exclusive Interview: Trump sits down with Tucker Carlson in Japan (from 4:08 to 8:20)
Include mailing address and phone number for the shipping form.
Send notes and/or questions to firstname.lastname@example.org
THE ANALYSIS OF THE 9-11 CRIME AND THE CULPRITS Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World contains my analysis of the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11, identifies the chief suspects, and explains why it was carried out.
THE MOTHER LODE OF INFORMATION Solving 9-11: The Original Articles
contains my original research articles in chronological order from September 2001 thru May 2012.
THE PURPOSE OF THE CRIME The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East
explains the relationship between 9-11 and the fraudulent War on Terror - the longest and most expensive war in U.S. history.
Christopher Bollyn is now on Patreon
June 22, 2019
Be a Patron for $1 per month. Support 9/11 truth! Comment from a new patron:
I only hope other people will see what you are doing and contribute as well... I'm a 9/11 retired firefighter and I saw what happened down there. All lies.. thank you for doing God's work. - C.C.
The purpose of having a Patreon page is to provide some stable and consistent financial support for my efforts to spread awareness of the truth of 9/11 and the fraudulent War on Terror. I am currently working on a book project to preserve my 9/11 research articles written during the past seven years, since Solving 9-11: The Original Articles was published.
It would be a shame for this research to be lost, so I want to preserve the articles in a book. I hope to have the book ready by August and am trying to raise funds for its production - and a speaking tour to follow.
You can be a monthly donor at any amount through Patreon. Currently most of my donors donate five dollars per month.
What is the cause of the extremely high mortality rate among the firemen, policemen, and others who worked on or near "the pile"? This is the crucial question that Jon Stewart and others in the controlled media have ignored since September 2001.
WHY DO THEY IGNORE IT?
Why does the controlled media ignore the obvious cause of the rare cancers and other systemic diseases that have killed so many 9/11 first responders?
The reason why the controlled media - and Jon Stewart - avoid discussing the cause of the rare cancers and other diseases that have killed so many of New York's finest is because they are trying to protect the official myth of what happened on 9/11 -- and its utterly false explanation of what brought down the Twin Towers.
I understand that many people like Jon Stewart because he made them laugh as a comedian on the long-running Daily Show, which he hosted. Stewart is, however, also on the board of directors of the 9/11 Memorial and Museum, a tax-free organization dedicated to supporting and teaching the false account of what happened on 9/11 -- and that is not so funny, to say the least.
Stewart and the controlled media who support the official myth of 9/11 will not go near the subject of what has caused the high mortality among the first responders because understanding the cause of the disease also blows the official 9/11 myth to smithereens, just like the Twin Towers.
Because this subject is so important, and because there is so much confusion about it, I need to be very clear in my explanation. One person asked me if there were many sick first responders from the Pentagon site, which is a good question.
I have not heard about any sick first responders from the Pentagon, although there may be some, and that is because the two sites were very different. The Pentagon site was, of course, much smaller and involved fewer responders, but more importantly, the fire was quickly put out at the Pentagon whereas the "fires" burned beneath the WTC rubble for more than three months.
A bluish smoke, laden with toxic ultra-fine particles, rose from the pile for three months after 9/11.
This is the key: understanding that these "fires" raged for more than three months - beneath the rubble - and that the smoke that was produced by these "fires" was extremely toxic exposes the falseness of the official explanation of what brought down the towers.
These "fires" were not normal fires, but extremely hot chemical reactions that burned beneath the rubble despite being continuously doused with water. We know that these hot-spots were hotter than boiling iron because the smoke that they produced contained nano-size particles of iron and other elements. This was the subject of one of my key research articles about 9/11: "Why Did Iron Boil beneath the Rubble?"
The smoke from "the pile" was extremely toxic because it contained "unprecedented amounts" of extremely small (i.e. nano-size) particles. Because these particles are so small they are able to pass through the protective barriers in the body until they wind up in the nucleus of the human cell, where they do immense damage to our health.
The first responders working on the pile did not have respirators.
The first responders worked on the smoking pile without respirators, which was "like working in the stack of an incinerator," as professor Thomas Cahill told me:
The conditions were "brutal" for people working at Ground Zero without respirators and slightly less so for those working or living in adjacent buildings, Cahill, a professor emeritus of physics and atmospheric science, said. "It was like they were working inside the stack of an incinerator," he said. "The debris pile acted like a chemical factory. It cooked together the components of the buildings and their contents, including enormous numbers of computers, and gave off gases of toxic metals, acids and organics for at least 6 weeks," he said.
The DELTA Group's work revealed the presence of extremely small metallic aerosols in unprecedented amounts in the plumes coming from the burning WTC rubble. Most of the particles in these plumes were in the category of the smallest ultra-fine and nano-particles: from 0.26 to 0.09 microns. The extraordinarily high level of ultra-fine aerosols was one of the most unusual aspects of the data, Cahill said. "Ultra-fine particles require extremely high temperatures," Cahill said, "namely the boiling point of the metal." - Why Did Iron Boil beneath the Rubble? Bollyn, May 2006
The people, like Jon Stewart, who are involved in the 9/11 cover-up cannot discuss the peculiar toxicity of the smoke that has sickened and killed so many people in New York because it would raise questions about what produced this deadly smoke. Pray tell, why did iron boil beneath the rubble? This subject simply cannot be discussed by those protecting the official myth because it demolishes their explanation of what brought down the towers on 9/11.
This is why I have spent so much time trying to explain this matter. It is an urgent matter of public health and scientific integrity, and it completely exposes the pack of lies we have been told about what caused the destruction of the World Trade Center, and that is of the utmost importance.
Jon Stewart and the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund – Is it all a show?
"Accountability doesn’t appear to be something that occurs in this chamber… I'm sorry if I sound angry and undiplomatic, but I am angry, and you should be too." – Jon Stewart before the House Judiciary Committee, June 11, 2019
Jon Stewart (born Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz) became famous as the television comedian who hosted a satirical news program, called The Daily Show on Comedy Central. Recently, Stewart has been in the news speaking before the House Judiciary Committee to discuss reauthorizing the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund. At one point Stewart lashed out at the congressmen telling them: "You should be ashamed of yourselves."
His televised performance before the committee is clearly a dishonest effort by Stewart to claim the moral high ground in the sordid saga of 9/11.
Why do I say Stewart is being dishonest?
It is dishonest because the primary cause of the cancers and mortality among the first responders, the ultra-fine particles in the smoke that rose from the pile, is being ignored. The smoke that the first responders were exposed to for the first three months on the pile was laden with unprecedented amounts of toxic ultra-fine particles (i.e. nano-particles).
Why are the ultra-fine particles in the smoke being ignored by Stewart?
Stewart is not ignoring the extremely toxic nature of the smoke because he doesn't understand the toxicity of ultra-fine particles. That is easy to understand. Ultra-fine particles are particulate matter of nanoscale size (less than 0.1 of a micron in diameter). These extremely small particles are dangerous to our health because of their size, which allows them to pass through the body until they wind up getting lodged in the nucleus of the human cell where they wreak havoc on the human system.
If it is so simple to grasp the toxic nature of the smoke, why is it not being discussed?
Jon Stewart and the other clowns involved in the 9/11 cover-up cannot address the peculiar toxicity of the smoke that rose from the pile because that would require an explanation that they cannot face.
As I explained in my article from May 2006 entitled, "Why Did Iron Boil beneath the Rubble?":
The DELTA Group's work revealed the presence of extremely small metallic aerosols in unprecedented amounts in the plumes coming from the burning WTC rubble. Most of the particles in these plumes were in the category of the smallest ultra-fine and nano-particles: from 0.26 to 0.09 microns. The extraordinarily high level of ultra-fine aerosols was one of the most unusual aspects of the data, [Dr. Thomas] Cahill said. "Ultra-fine particles require extremely high temperatures," Cahill said, "namely the boiling point of the metal."
Stewart and others involved in the cover-up ignore the toxic nature of the smoke because it came from hot-spots hotter than boiling iron, and they don't want to talk about what was creating these extremely hot reactions under the pile.
Why do I say that Jon Stewart is part of the cover-up?
Stewart is on the board of directors of the 9/11 Memorial and Museum, which is an institution to promote the official myth of what happened on 9/11. The chairman of the board of this institution of propaganda is the former mayor, Michael Bloomberg. If Stewart were truly serious about helping those afflicted by the toxic smoke he would spare us the crocodile tears and start asking the questions that need to be heard, like what made so many first responders so sick? But then, if Stewart were serious about 9/11 he would focus his attention on who did it and why it was done.
Bollyn on Iran and the War on Terror, June 15, 2019
The Trump administration and the controlled media are singing in unison blaming Iran for the alleged missile or mine attacks on the Japanese-owned Kokuka Courageous and the Norwegian-owned MV Altair. President Trump said:
“Iran did do it and you know they did it because you saw the boat,” he said, before pointing to the video showing the Iranians removing the unexploded mine. “They're a nation of terror and they've changed a lot since I've been president, I can tell you,” he added.
The unanimity of the media in blaming Iran indicates that they are all reading from the same script and this is a play that does not end well. The controlled media is pushing for war with Iran, just as they did for war with Iraq, based on nothing but lies and fabrications. The very likely possibility that these attacks are false-flag attacks meant to be blamed on Iran does not even enter into the media discussion although such false-flag incidents have been used to take the U.S. into nearly every foreign war we have been involved in. The War on Terror is just the latest case of using false-flag terrorism to take the U.S. to war, in a war that is already the longest and most expensive war in U.S. history.
Understanding the relationship between 9/11 and the War on Terror is the subject of my latest book, The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East. The same controlled media outlets that are pushing for war against Iran today are the same ones who have covered up the truth of 9/11 since the day the towers were exploded with 2,700 people trapped inside them. The government and media have lied to us about 9/11 in order to get public support for the criminal and fraudulent War on Terror.
Behind the War on Terror is a strategic plan crafted by Israeli military intelligence in the 1970s to use terrorism to break up and Balkanize the Middle Eastern states. Iraq and Syria were Israel's first targets on the Eastern Front, according the Yinon Plan published in 1982. Having used the U.S. military to achieve their goals against Iraq and Syria, the Israeli plotters are now trying to force Trump to wage war against Iran by using false-flag terrorism. The attacks on the vessels off the coast of Iran are meant to set the stage for something worse that will compel Trump to attack Iran.
We need to understand that we are being deceived into yet another war in the Middle East and we must not let that happen.
Why did foreign companies manage the 9-11 debris removal?
June 14, 2019
The removal of rubble from the destroyed World Trade Center is portrayed by the media as a heroic and patriotic effort when, in fact, behind the media disguise was a well-planned operation to destroy the evidence from the scene of the crime in which some 2,700 people were murdered. If it was a criminal act to destroy the evidence, we need to identify the people behind the crime.
THE ISRAELI CONNECTION
Howard Safir, the former police commissioner of New York City, is very close with the Israeli intelligence company Verint, which (like Odigo) was part of Comverse, an Israeli operation spun off from Unit 8200 of the Israeli military. Safir, who was police commissioner until 2000, has been on Verint's board of directors since May 2002. Verint is one of the two Israeli companies that James Bamford identified in his article "Shady Companies With Ties to Israel Wiretap the U.S. for the NSA."
As Safir prepared to join the Israeli data company, Richard Sheirer, his long-time deputy and personal aide, wrapped up his work as the commissioner of New York's Office of Emergency Management, the top official responsible for cleaning up the destroyed World Trade Center. Is there a connection between his mentor's work with Israeli intelligence and Sheirer's work on "the pile?" Is this why Sheirer said it was "very valuable to be invisible for the job I do?" Why should it be necessary to be "invisible" if what was being done with the debris from the crime scene was proper?
Former Police Commissioner Howard Safir - Safir's crony, Richard Sheirer, was in charge of the clean-up operation at the World Trade Center. Safir has been on the board of directors of a shady Israeli company called Verint, since May 2002. Is there a connection?
Did they throw away the locked doors from the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire? Did they throw away the gas can used at the Happyland Social Club Fire? Did they cast aside the pressure-regulating valves at the Meridian Plaza Fire? Of course not. But essentially, that's what they're doing at the World Trade Center.
For more than three months, structural steel from the World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap. Crucial evidence that could answer many questions about high-rise building design practices and performance under fire conditions is on the slow boat to China, perhaps never to be seen again in America until you buy your next car.
Such destruction of evidence shows the astounding ignorance of government officials to the value of a thorough, scientific investigation of the largest fire-induced collapse in world history. I have combed through our national standard for fire investigation, NFPA 921, but nowhere in it does one find an exemption allowing the destruction of evidence for buildings over 10 stories tall.
Imagine there is a terrible fire and explosion in a crowded high-rise in the middle of a large American city in which thousands of people are thought to have perished. Before the dead can be even be pulled from the rubble or the cause of the destruction investigated, the city calls in a privately owned foreign company to remove the debris. Would it not seem a bit odd - even criminal - to see a foreign company removing the evidence from the scene before an investigation had even begun?
As Bill Manning, the editor of Fire Engineering wrote at the end of 2001, "I have combed through our national standard for fire investigation, NFPA 921, but nowhere in it does one find an exemption allowing the destruction of evidence for buildings over 10 stories tall."
"Such destruction of evidence," Manning said, "shows the astounding ignorance of government officials to the value of a thorough, scientific investigation of the largest fire-induced collapse in world history."
But was it really "astounding ignorance" that was obstructing "a thorough, scientific investigation of the largest fire-induced collapse in world history" - or was it something even worse? Was the obstruction of an investigation planned and intentional - because an investigation would have revealed that it was explosive demolitions and not fire-induced collapses that destroyed the World Trade Center?
What is even more peculiar is that the companies that were contracted on Day One to remove the rubble of the three demolished towers were all foreign owned. This raises several questions: Why was the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers not called in the first place to manage the World Trade Center and Pentagon sites? Why were foreign companies allowed to destroy the evidence from the crime scenes in which thousands of people had been killed? Who made the decision to hire these companies?
It would be naive to think it is merely coincidence that three foreign-owned companies got the contracts to remove the rubble of the three demolished towers of 9-11, effectively destroying the physical evidence of the worst mass murder in U.S. history. Knowing who was behind the decision to hire these foreign companies is key to understanding the 9-11 cover up.
The WTC debris site was divided between four contracters with the sites of the three demolished towers all going to foreign-owned companies. Amec, from Britain (blue) got the North Tower and Customs House (WTC 6); Bovis, also from Britain (green) got the South Tower area; Turner, owned by Hochtief from Germany (yellow) got WTC 7, and Tully, the only American company (pink) got WTC 4 and 5. This means that the three buildings that were demolished (WTC 1,2, and 7) - crime scenes of the worst mass murder in U.S. history - were all cleaned up by foreign-owned companies.
The layout of the WTC complex prior to 9-11
A map from an engineering presentation showing the companies and their quadrants
This image shows the World Trade Center site viewed from the West.
This organization chart from a NCSEA presentation shows the New York City Dept. of Design and Construction at the top, with Bovis Lend Lease below it and the other contractors below them.
William Langewiesche, a journalist who was given access to the World Trade Center site, wrote a book about the recovery effort entitled American Ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center, in which he says that Michael Burton, the deputy commissioner of the New York City's Dept. of Design and Construction, made the decision who would be involved in removing the debris from the World Trade Center:
Burton understood this early... he and Holden imposed a rough order on the site by dividing it into quadrants, roughly equal zones that he assigned to four large construction companies: Turner, AMEC, Bovis, and Tully. The first three were essentially management teams - multinational corporations in the high-rise construction business, which had little equipment of their own and relied on other contractors to get the work done. (American Ground, p. 68) Faced with the urgent need to get crews and heavy equipment onto the job, he [Michael Burton] bypassed ordinary bidding procedures and made some immediate choices on the basis of personal and corporate reputation, asking AMEC, Bovis, and Turner to send representatives to an initial meeting that afternoon at police headquarters. Holden brought in Tully as well. As it turned out, these were the four companies that ultimately would share the lucrative job of cleaning up, earning profits in the millions... Holden and Burton also brought in the renowned engineering firm of Thornton-Tomasetti. (American Ground, p. 89-90)
Above Burton and Holden at the DDC was Richard Sheirer, the commissioner of New York City's Office of Emergency Management (OEM).
Richard Sheirer, head of the Office of Emergency Management, and Mayor Giuliani
Since September 11, Sheirer has taken charge of the biggest cleanup effort in American history, coordinating 100 federal, state, and local agencies, including FEMA. He’s become, in effect, the CEO of a company with thousands of workers and a budget that could run up to $40 billion – or, if you prefer, the mayor of the hot zone. He calls in the city’s Department of Transportation to patch up the streets and has the Department of Design and Construction hang netting so broken glass won’t fall on workers below. He orders Con Ed and Verizon to rehabilitate buildings without power or phone service, then gets the Department of Environmental Protection and the Department of Design and Construction to make sure they’re safe. If they pass the test, he signs the documents that open them up to the public. “OEM is in charge,” says Mike Byrne, deputy federal coordinating officer of FEMA for this incident. “Sheirer gives the marching orders. So far, we’re blown away by OEM’s performance.”
"One of the things I pride myself on," says Sheirer, "is that, for a short, round guy, I can be pretty invisible. I think it's very valuable to be invisible for the job I do. It's important to me to be prepared, to get in, get it done, and get out. My people understand -- we don't need fanfare. Invisibility enhances our ability to work with everyone because they know we're not looking to take the limelight."
The Jewish Week reported that Sheirer had been named a "Jewish Knight" by the New York Board of Rabbis. Saying it was "correcting what it called an 'oversight'," the Board of Rabbis "named Sheirer a 'Jewish Knight' after Britain lionized Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and then-Police and Fire Commissioners Bernard Kerik and Thomas Von Essen. Sheirer stayed on into the administration of Mayor Bloomberg, to manage the removal of the rubble saying he was doing so "to finish what I started."
SHEIRER - "SAFIR'S CRONY"
Richard Sheirer had come up through the ranks thanks to Howard Safir, who promoted him in both the fire department and later in the police department. As the New York Times obituary for Sheirer said:
He [Sheirer] began working for the Fire Department as a dispatcher in 1967 and rose to deputy commissioner under Commissioner Howard Safir. In 1996, when Mr. Safir became police commissioner, he named Mr. Sheirer his deputy commissioner for administration and chief of staff.
In his book, NYPD Confidential: Power and Corruption in the Country's Greatest Police Force, Leonard Levitt said about Sheirer's relationship with Safir:
Sheirer had been a lowly fire dispatcher before Safir made him his personal aide at the FDNY. Sheirer called Safir "the kindest, bravest, most wonderful human being I've ever met in my life."
Richie Sheirer was, as Levitt says, "Safir's crony."
Howard Safir (born 1942) was appointed Fire Commissioner of the City of New York by Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani on January 1, 1994 and served in that position until he was appointed Police Commissioner of the City of New York by Giuliani on April 15, 1996. He served as Police Commissioner until his resignation on August 18, 2000.
Howard Safir has served as a director on the board of directors of the Israeli data/intelligence company Verint since May 2002.
Verint started as Comverse Technology's Comverse Infosys business unit, which was created in 1999. Verint's initial focus was on the commercial call recording market, which at the time was transitioning from analog tape to digital recorders. In 1999, Comverse Infosys was combined with another division of Comverse focused on security and the communications interception market. In 2002, Comverse Infosys changed its name to Verint Systems Inc. (Source: Verint, Wikipedia)
As James Bamford wrote in a 2012 article for Wired.com:
According to a former Verizon employee briefed on the program, Verint, owned by Comverse Technology, taps the communication lines at Verizon, which I first reported in my book The Shadow Factory in 2008.
What does Safir do for the Israeli owners of Verint as a director? Did Safir play a role in the World Trade Center clean-up through his crony Richie Sheirer?
I created this Q&A forum because I get so many good comments and questions through Feedback. The latest comments come first. The person who asked about the "Ground Zero" Islamic center "controversy" in New York City sent this kind comment:
Thank you very much for your excellent answer. But then, everything you have written is excellent and well researched. You are a real hero and an example of courage and honesty. - from a reader in Geneva, Switzerland
Latest Question: What do you think of the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Truth (link below) and their chances of success regarding their petition for a federal grand jury investigation into the 9/11 crimes, and their lawsuit against the FBI? Do you think Trump (if he has any say) will allow these efforts to go forward honestly and objectively?
Bollyn Responds: I certainly think it is the right thing to do and hope that the grand jury inquiry results in indictments and a trial to determine who destroyed the Twin Towers - killing some 2,600 lives in the process, but my hope is tempered by the fact that the grand jury is under the control of the same court (U.S. Federal Court, Southern District of New York) in which all of the wrongful death cases from 9/11 were settled - out of court. The evidence presented to the grand jury is quite compelling proof that the World Trade Center towers (WTC 1, 2, and 7) were demolished using explosives so I don't see how the grand jury could come to any other conclusion. I don't know what Trump or the Attorney General will do but I think that we should be much more aggressive and make better use of the courts to bring more cases to get some truth and accountability for the crimes of 9/11. There are certainly plenty of victims who could start lawsuits against those who are responsible.
Bollyn Responds: Jimmy asks, is justice merely revenge? No, Jimmy, not at all. Striving for and supporting 9/11 truth and justice is nothing less than the moral imperative of our time. Some might ask, why? Some will say we have lived quite alright since 9/11. Why is it our moral imperative to support 9/11 truth and justice?
There are two basic reasons why it is. Firstly, because 9/11 is a global deception that was used to impose upon us a false narrative to transform our nation and society and take us into an open-ended and criminal war of aggression known as the War on Terror. After 15 years of waging this criminal war agenda we have killed over 1 million innocent people and destroyed the lives of millions more. By accepting the false narrative of 9/11 foisted on us by the terrorist masterminds themselves we have accepted a false reality, imposed on us through deception.
Secondly, by not investigating and prosecuting the real criminals behind 9/11 we have let them get away with the atrocity of mass murder of 3,000 people on 9/11. By accepting their false narrative we have empowered and enriched the very terrorist masterminds behind this outrageous crime. As Socrates said, criminals who go unpunished become only worse. So, by failing to prosecute the real criminals behind 9/11 we subject ourselves, our children, and our nations to their agenda of war and terrorism -- which can only get worse and more violent.
This is why it is our moral imperative to support 9/11 truth and justice. Nothing could be more important to our survival and the welfare of our nation(s). We have a very real moral obligation to be active in our support of 9/11 truth and justice.
Question: If Trump is as utterly clueless as he consistently appears to be regarding global affairs – amongst so many other things – he presumably has people around him to feed him the basic dumbed down snippets he blathers and spouts? I wonder who these people are who steer him and how they are able to groom him sufficiently to appear even faintly informed? From all we can see, does he not appear to be a George Bush type of useful idiot? Everyone I know figures surely the election & Brexit were rigged? Kind of unimaginable that they weren't? But clearly not the results we were all expecting to be rigged in favour of the elites and banksters? Very interested to know your thoughts. Thanks for all your amazing work.
Bollyn Responds:I don't think Donald Trump is clueless at all. In fact, he seems to be very aware of the fundamental problems facing Americans, as well as quite savvy on global issues. Trump's position on rebuilding infrastructure and our domestic manufacturing sector is simple economic common sense. I watched Trump speak in Detroit last summer and he hit all the nails squarely on the head regarding jobs and trade. The fact that he has the 'smarts' of a business man and knows how to make a deal makes him an ideal candidate to straighten out the disastrous "free-trade" agreements like NAFTA, dumped on the American people by Bill Clinton and Rahm Emanuel in Clinton's first year in office.
On foreign policy, Trump is also right on target. He calls for improving relations with Russia and ending the "regime change" foreign policy of the Bush and Obama administrations, like that applied by Obama in Syria since 2011. Ending the wars in Syria and the Middle East and having good ties with Russia are, once again, simply good common sense.
I don't know who steers Trump, or if anyone does. Nor would I put Trump in the same category as George W. Bush. Bush, Clinton, and Obama are clearly criminals who have engaged in conspiring and waging wars of aggression and other war crimes. Hillary Clinton is also guilty of these and other crimes. Trump, on the other hand, has a clean record.
The fact that Hillary Clinton was the chosen candidate of the mainstream media, George Soros, Lady Rothschild, and the New York Times going into Iowa indicated to me that the international criminal cabal had their money on her. Trump does not talk like a politician because he is a New York business man and talks like one. He says what he means, and I hope, he means what he says. We will have to see if he makes the changes he promised he would.
On the day of 9/11, Trump said that he thought that there were bombs that went off in the buildings simultaneously with the plane crashes. This suggests that he is an honest person who may be willing to investigate 9/11 properly. That is certainly what I hope and the reason I sent him two open letters and the Solving 9-11 set of books.
Comment: Mr Bollyn... I have been aware of the deception since 2005. When it turned out there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and the media (after spending several months pounding us with fears of an impending WMD attack) said nothing, I knew there was something very wrong. Within a few weeks of independently researching, I came across a video of building 7 and that's was enough proof of a false flag for me.
Given what I have been learning over a decade and what I thought was extensive (albeit casual) research, I'm shocked that I have only now come across your work. You have been de facto persona non grata in the alternate media it appears. I have thoroughly enjoyed the meticulousness of your research and I am now especially motivated to exercise my critical thinking when getting my information.
I'm a little embarrassed to say that I spent time engaging in the Judy Wood free energy (or buck rogers space gun as you have hilariously put it) and the "Russian Intelligence" nuclear demolition theories. In hindsight, even a little critical thinking would have exposed these as disinformation - as there are no sources or peer reviewed evidence. But hey, if my dumbass now can finally understand the nature of disinformation, maybe it shows that TPTB are finding it harder to be the controlled opposition.
I grew up mostly in Africa and India where the governments consistently screw the citizens pretty much on a daily basis - so maybe I'm predisposed to distrust governments. I have now been in the US for 15 years and it’s painful to see how naive Americans are. Not just naive, but aggressively so - because if there is any discussion outside of the mainstream narrative, there is usually a violent reaction. My dream was to come live in America - but now that I'm here, I'm having second thoughts. Maybe the truth will set Americans free from the intellectual zoo that they trapped in (and I ain't just talking about the Kardashians).
It is rare that I come across a bold, cultured, intelligent, and brave patriot like you who is willing to speak truth (based on researched and verifiable facts) regardless of taboo. I can't imagine how difficult the last 14 years has been for you and your family. I'm grateful for the work you have put in and I hope we will soon see the fruits of your efforts. And it may come soon, since the economy is bad shape - another great recession and Americans may be forced to turn off college sports and finally sit up and take notice of what is going on around them.
Comment: A Letter from Sweden
I attach a contribution to you, for your work on exposing the criminal network plaguing the current world. Your work to expose the criminals that executed the terror and murders on September 11, 2001, is truly outstanding. Your work is very important. You also share information and views on current events that is highly interesting. I hope that slowly the information you have uncovered will spread to more and more people.
- A supporter in Sweden
Bollyn Responds: Thank you. I hope that the process of informing the public about the truth of 9-11 and the fraudulent "War on Terror" goes more quickly than it has. This is why I am going on another speaking tour in America. We can't let the gangsters rule our world.
I admire what you do. If we all live 20 years more without a thermo-nuclear war destroying everything, you and a few other brave individuals will definitely be appreciated and remembered for what you have done as the world's greatest heroes.
What you do will one day bring the disclosure of 9/11 truth to more people, and if it happens early enough and the perpetrators feel enough pressure to step aside (or be prosecuted), then the total death scenario can be avoided – saving all of us as a result. If the current masterminds of 9/11 remain in control, however, it is only a question of time when they decide on a perfect moment to have a global "re-set" to the system.
You say "Solving 9/11 ends the War."
"Solving 9/11" – you and a few others have accomplished this already through years of hard work. The next hurdle is the cognitive barrier, the inability of millions of adults to accept the reality that it actually did happen, and that the authorities in many countries need to be challenged to do something minimally acceptable to restore justice.
To most people, to accept this truth is like dealing with a hypothetical situation to learn that the mom and dad you lived with all these years are actually not your real parents, but rather criminals who pretend to be your parents for some pure financial gain or other benefit, and who feel nothing wrong about killing you at some point if that maximizes their final benefit.
Instead of living a continued comfortable life....what are you going to do now? Go to the police? Move out, find another place to live? Run to neighbors and ask for help? Go and kill the bastards at night? Or maybe ignore the guy trying to tell you this truth as an insane lunatic, and come back to comfortable everyday life.
Completely new thinking, new insights are needed to overcome it.
When does the information, the knowledge of truth become compelling for an average person living in the western world (and Russians mentally are not very different from it, unfortunately) to act and to seek a minimal next step to be done? I have no solution for this, and before it emerges, what you and few others are doing about 9/11 truth, is our only chance to survive.
Thank you for what you do and all the best wishes as well!
- A Supporter and Reader in Russia
Comment: The following comment is from a resident of Colorado who understands the gate-keeping being done by certain members of Colorado for 9-11 Truth, who are opposed to my speaking in Colorado.
The Good Samaritan
Dear Christopher (and Members of Denver 9/11 unTruth),
I thought of a fantastic parable for how the Denver group is treating you.
When they say they support your appearing in Colorado but just not under their sponsorship it seems to me akin to the following scenario:
Imagine the Good Samaritan passing by the half-dead Jew lying on the Jericho road. He leans over to him and says:
“Friend, I truly pity your condition and I would like to help you, but I cannot because I fear the enmity of my friends and neighbors back in Samaria were they to find out that I helped you. So even though I choose not to help you now due to my cowardice, know this: I fully support the right of some other Samaritan with more courage than I to help you recover, for this is what you deserve!”
Thus is the attitude of the Denver 911 unTruth organization to Christopher Bollyn. Hollow rhetoric and false flattery that benefits no one except their own warped sense of pride.
Hoping for much better from the citizens of NiDaVeR [let us reason together] Colorado,
Sincerely, Michael Korn
Comment: Doctor Bob wrote:
ISIS belongs to the gang that has taken control of “our” Government. You may ask why it is that the Government that now controls the U.S. created ISIS and why does it continue to 'nurture' ISIS. The answer is that the Government that now controls OUR COUNTRY needs a 'boogie man' to scare the hell out of the American people, and a whole lot more.
Watch the video below and judge for yourself.
p.s. It is OUR COUNTRY and not “our” Country if we are willing to take the peaceful political actions necessary take it back.
Comment: The following comment is a letter written by a supporter of mine in Fort Collins to a Boulder-based couple involved in Colorado 9-11 Truth. I visited the steering committee of the group at Fran Shure's house in Denver in October 2014 and have been trying to arrange an event in Colorado for the past year but am opposed by certain people in the Colorado group, who have been able to block me because the group operates on a consensus basis:
Dear Marti and Bob,
Thank You for writing.
I am a Messianic Jewish believer in Jesus who lives in Fort Collins.
I have never met Chris Bollyn personally, although I have followed his writings about 9-11 for many years and have been most impressed with his forthrightness and penetrating analysis, as well as his fearlessness.
I lived in Israel for 20 years following my graduation from Harvard in 1980.
I was ultra-Orthodox for much of that time.
I converted to Christianity in the year 2000 under the guidance of South African missionaries I met in Tzfat [Safed] in the Israeli Galilee.
One of my motivations in converting was to break out of the endless cycle of violence and hatred that Orthodox Judaism projects against not only Arabs and other non-Jews but also against secular Jewish Israelis. I was raised as a Reform Jew in California and find it puzzling that Reform Jews support Israel when the Zionist state doesn't even recognize Reform Judaism and grants the Orthodox rabbinate all power.
I am well aware of the brutality of Israeli government officials, the military, and the intelligence agencies. I myself harbored so much animosity towards Arabs that I was deferred from serving in the IDF when I was drafted.
I have been a 911 Truther since 9-12-2001, when the first skeptical information started appearing on the internet on many sites.
(I stopped supporting Counterpunch because its manager, Alexander Cockburn, refused to question the official 911 fairytale. Cockburn would question everything else about the government except for that sacred cow. I never understand why he was so stubborn, but I rejoiced when he died suddenly. A major impediment to disseminating 911 Truth bit the dust.)
Of all 911 Truthers, Chris Bollyn is the only person who delves into the backgrounds of the many actors and demonstrates an overwhelming Zionist connection. He may not have ironclad proof, but his research certainly should suffice to empower a Grand Jury investigation with subpoena powers. That of course has never happened.
Other 911 investigators, like David Ray Griffin and AE911Truth, demolish the credibility of the official investigation, but only Chris Bollyn tracks down the likely perpetrators.
On a personal note, as a Jew who lived in Israel for many years, I understand that Chris's revelations are disturbing. For many Jewish people Israel is a sacred institution, much like the Vatican for Catholics, who also are reluctant to criticize their church when corruption becomes apparent.
It is only the teachings of Jesus that have given me the courage to consider the evidence Chris Bollyn offers without fear. And while I admit that his allegations are very painful, for me the truth is the ultimate value and so in the end I don't care if his findings implicate the government of Israel and its Neocon supporters in America and England.
Jesus taught that The Truth shall set you free, and I firmly believe in this.
No organization, institution, race, religion, nationality or other entity supersedes truth in importance.
And that's why in the end I laud Christopher Bollyn and consider him to be a genuine cultural hero and a gift to humanity.
My prayer for you is that you will allow the Truth to set you free too.
Shalom baShem Yeshua - Peace in the Name of Jesus!
Michael P. Korn
Comment: In an email about the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, Elias Davidsson, a Jew who was born in Palestine prior to the establishment of the state of Israel, stated (citing Peter Hounam's Operation Cyanide):
“In fact Israel attacked the USS Liberty at the request of the U.S.”
This statement by Davidsson suggests that the United States was calling the shots during the Six Day War, including having its own ship sunk, and that the Israelis were simply following orders from the U.S.
I disagree, because this is not what the historical record shows.
To prepare for this answer, I read Operation Cyanide (2002) by Peter Hounam, which was apparently written with financial support of the BBC. Somebody paid Hounam to go to Israel, America, and Russia to interview the people for the book and his BBC program on the sinking of the USS Liberty.
The main thrust of the book is that Hounam tries to give Israel a pass for its murderous assault on the USS Liberty by saying that the Israelis were attacking the Liberty for the U.S., who he suggests, was the real driver behind the Six Day War. I don't think that is the case at all.
Lyndon Johnson was a crypto-Jew Zionist who actually slept with his Zionist whore/Irgun agent (Mathilde Krim) in the White House the night before the Liberty was attacked. Furthermore, Johnson was surrounded by Zionist Jews in his administration.
I have a couple basic questions about Hounam's book:
First, why does Hounam not mention, even once, the Lavon Affair of 1954, when Israeli agents in Egypt bombed British and U.S. institutions to try and turn these nations against Egypt and its rising star, Gamal Abdul Nasser? If you are discussing Israeli false-flag terrorism you really should discuss their recent history of such crimes.
Secondly, although Hounam wants to fix the blame for the attack on the USS Liberty on Lyndon B. Johnson, he gives absolutely no background information on Johnson's role as a Zionist agent in the United States going back to the 1930s. Johnson has a long history of serving the Zionist state and breaking U.S. laws to do so - even as a freshman Congressman.He had big backers and he knew it.
What the record shows is that Lyndon Johnson was a high-level Zionist agent, and that he had been working for the Zionist cause since his first term in the U.S. Congress. Johnson had no problem breaking U.S. law to support Israel and had shipped weapons to Israel in violation of the neutrality act. Earlier, in the 1930s, Johnson had worked with B’nai B’rith in “Operation Texas” to bring hundreds of illegal Jewish immigrants into the U.S. through Galveston.
With that in mind, I think Tim King’s analysis (below) of the agreement between Israel and LBJ regarding the attack on the USS Liberty is closer to reality:
In 2003, journalist Peter Hounam wrote Operation Cyanide: How the Bombing of the USS Liberty Nearly Caused World War III, which proposes a completely different theory regarding the incident. In an attempt to explain why there was no support by U.S. forces as backup, Hounam claims that Israel and U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson had secretly agreed on day four of the Six Day War that the Liberty would be sunk with complete loss of life. The attack would be blamed on Egypt, allowing the U.S. in turn to attack Egypt, thus helping out Israel.
However, according to Hounam's theory, because the Liberty did not sink after two hours, the plan was quickly reversed, Israel apologized for the case of mistaken identity, and a cover-up was put into place.
If Israel was willing to be that underhanded and drag the hard pressed American forces onto another battle front in the Mideast in 1967, then they were and are no friend of this country, and it appears to be exactly what took place. If U.S. officials were involved, then it is another classic example like 9/11, where American lives were willingly sacrificed by the government to further drive some kind of political agenda. People are so naive to believe "the government would never do that", yet I fear that they are wrong, very wrong.
Knowing that much, it is easy to conclude that Israel, with its huge influence in American politics, would likely take this route again.
Comment: The following comment by Elias Davidsson was not made to Bollyn.com, but is part of an email exchange between people planning a 9-11 truth conference in California. I am posting it here because it is a good analysis of the relationship between the U.S. government and 9-11 truth.
Elias Davidsson wrote:
I have resisted engaging in this discussion. Yet, I believe that the movement is today able to assert certain facts as unassailable and build upon these unassailable facts. Let me enumerate some of the most important ones:
1. The U.S. Government opposed an independent investigation of the largest crime on US territory;
2. The U.S. Government condoned the massive destruction of criminal evidence, and not only the steel beams from the WTC;
3. The U.S. Government used financial inducement to prevent victims’ families from seeking the truth of the events in the courts;
4. The U.S. Government promoted military leaders who ostensibly “failed their obligation” to protect the country on 9/11;
5. The U.S. Government failed to produce a shred of evidence that 19 alleged hijackers boarded any of the four aircraft that allegedly were hijacked on 9/11 (their names don’t appear on any authenticated passenger list; no one sighted them at the airport; no one sighted them boarding the aircraft; no authenticated video recordings present them at the airports; and their bodily remains were not identified.);
6. The U.S. Government failed to produce evidence that the aircraft designated as flights AA11, UA175, AA77, and UA93 crashed at the given sites (this was admitted in a court case to Aidan Monaghan by the FBI.);
7. The U.S. Government did not bring a single planner, facilitator, financier or accomplice of the mass-murder of 9/11 to justice. It even balks in bringing the self-styled “planner” of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohamed, to justice;
By its conduct, the U.S. Government utterly failed its international obligation under human rights law, to carry out a prompt, independent, impartial, thorough, and transparent investigation of the massive violation to the right to life committed under its jurisdiction. According to international norms, governments bear the obligation not only to protect the right to life of individuals under their jurisdiction, but to investigate properly cases, in which people are murdered, particularly in massive cases, let alone where suspicion exists that state actors may have been involved.
The above assertions are not subject to dispute nor require technical expertise. They allow any person to accuse of deception, slander, and [of being complicit in] a criminal cover-up, [those] politicians, journalists, authors and judges who claim that Islamic hijackers carried out the mass-murder, or that hijacked aircraft crashed at the known landmarks.
While focusing on WTC 7 may yield short-term results in terms of public awareness, the focus on the WTC leaves intact the impression that Islamic terrorists nevertheless participated in the attacks.
The above assertions permit citizens to change the defensive posture of the 9/11 truth movement into an offensive posture, which is far more effective.
Elias Davidsson Kirchen, Germany
Comment: I have listened to your interview [with John Wells] a few times now, and I wonder why you would describe Papa Bush or Bush Junior as "Useful idiots." The Zionist elite engineered this attack on America for their political ambitions and greater [Oded] Yinon plan [to Balkanize the Middle East], and they work hand in hand with their willing cohorts like the Bushes and the Cheneys, etc., who have huge investments in the military industrial complex - those who will profit from human suffering. They are by no means useful idiots. They are fully cognizant of what is going on and they are treasonous by choice... because it profits them - a very thin elite group in the top leagues of American power. Those true patriots that refuse to go along with it are suicided, pushed out of their jobs. etc... and left in the dustbin.
Bollyn Responds: You are right about this, I'm sure. 'Papa Bush', George H.W. Bush, spoke at the closing session of the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism, an event put on by the Netanyahu Institute [founded by Benjamin Netanyahu (Institute director 1978-1980) and his father, Benzion] on July 2-5, 1979. The institute is also called the Jonathan Institute. The Jonathan Institute (founded September 1976) and its American support group, American Friends of the Jonathan Institute (founded 1977) are purely Jewish Zionist operations.
The Wikispooks.com article about George H.W. Bush and the "Development of the War on Terror" says, "George H.W. Bush spoke on 'The U.S. and the Fight Against International Terrorism' at the seminal 1979 Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism in the company of a number of other intelligence agents and deep politicians. This laid the groundwork for the 'war on terror' which would be rolled out in the wake of the 9/11 attacks."
The title page of the speech given by George H.W. Bush at Benjamin Netanyahu's 1979 Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism.
Bush made clear that the "only reasonable course" to deal with terrorism is "swift and effective retribution", which is what his son, President George W. Bush, did in the wake of 9-11 although his retribution was against a nation that had nothing to do with the 9-11 crime.
Today, the state of Israel is ruled by the same ruthless and violent terrorists who gave us 9-11 and the fraudulent "War on Terror." Obama's visit to Israel is, therefore, the visit of the leader of a woefully deceived nation to the foreign power who imposed the evil deception upon it. Having lost an untold number of lives and having wasted trillions of dollars on illegal and unnecessary wars, the Israeli deception has cost America dearly.
While most Americans saw the terror attacks of 9-11 as the beginning of the "War on Terror," the ideological framework of this Zionist fraud was actually born in Jerusalem during an international conference on terrorism held by the Jonathan [Netanyahu] Institute in early July 1979 - twenty-two years before the terror attacks that changed America. What is most important to note is that the same people who created the fraudulent "War on Terror" are currently running the state of Israel.
"In the summer of 1979, a group of powerful and influential people joined to launch an international propaganda offensive to promote and exploit the issue of 'international terrorism'," Philip Paull of San Francisco State University wrote in his 1982 thesis on the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism. "The propaganda 'blitz' originated in Jerusalem. The conspiratorial network included present and former members of the Israeli and United States governments...
Paull's thesis from 1982 is important because it documents and validates my claim that the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror" actually began in the late 1970s when Menachem Begin and his gang of Irgun terrorists came to power in Israel. 1979, the year of the Jerusalem conference, was the same year that Isser Harel, the founder of Israeli intelligence, told the American Zionist Michael D. Evans that Arab terrorists were planning to attack the tallest buildings in New York City. Harel's comments reveal that Israeli intelligence was already preparing the false-flag terrorism attacks that occurred at the World Trade Center in 1993 and 2001...
As Paull demonstrates in his thesis, "the entire notion of 'international terrorism' as promoted by the Jerusalem Conference rests on a faulty, dishonest, and ultimately corrupt information base." This is equally true of the official versions of the terror attacks of 1993 and 2001. They are nothing more than packs of lies designed to place the blame on Arabs and Muslims.
The American people have been the primary target of the vicious 'psychological warfare' waged by the Israeli government. The purpose of the Israeli psychological warfare is to create fear through false-flag terrorism like 9-11 in order to impose the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror". I have done my utmost to provide an antidote to this fear and deception with my book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World.
This was the time when George H.W. Bush had just served as director of the C.I.A. and when he was being prepared to be the candidate for Vice President with Ronald Reagan. I think that Papa Bush is actually tied in at a higher level than just making money. I think that Bush and the Zionist criminal cabal are connected through criminal acts, including the JFK murder and drug smuggling. Nothing binds people more closely than a crime committed together.
QUARANTINE THE TRUTH - Bollyn had to have a separate event in Oakland last February because Zionist partisans within the leadership of the Northern California 9-11 Truth Alliance prevented him from speaking at their annual 9-11 events. This is actually the ideal solution to avoid friction with those gate-keepers who do everything they can to keep Bollyn from speaking.
I remember you (Christopher) saying that even the smallest 9-11 group in the smallest town was probably infiltrated. I guess that applies to the largest group in the biggest city too. - Kevin Brant
After reading my “Censorship in the 9-11 Truth Movement” article, Sana Saadaoui wrote from Tunisia asking a simple question: “Why would they do this?”
Bollyn Responds: Why would they do this? This is a question that must be on the minds of many people who read this post. Why would the 9-11 Truth Alliance not want me to speak at their 9-11 events? To understand why I am not invited to speak at events like the one in San Francisco the other day one needs to realize that 9-11 truth groups are often led by people who really do not want the truth about who carried out the 9-11 atrocity to come out.
As Joe D'Angelo wrote to Allan Rees, station manager and co-founder of No Lies Radio, which streamed the Northern California 9-11 Truth Alliance event live:
I am hearing none of who done it, none of what to do about what next, none of Christopher Bollyn, who does; nothing but stale ole info, which furthers nothing forward. What's up with that? is what I wonder.
What this means is that there must be people in the leadership of the Northern California 9-11 Truth Alliance who pretend to be interested in 9-11 truth, but are dead-set against letting me present the factual material I have put together in my Solving 9-11 books.
These people are acting as gate-keepers and censors, preventing others from hearing what they don't want them to hear. I have a lot of personal experience with this censorship and have seen many so-called truthers who do everything they can to prevent me from speaking.
What is it about my research that they don't want to hear?
WHO DONE IT?
The Solving 9-11 books reveal that the 9-11 false-flag conspiracy was a Zionist/Israeli operation that was designed to look like an Arab-Muslim crime in order to kick-start the Israeli strategy known as the "War on Terror", pushed by Benjamin Netanyahu since the 1970s, in which the USA and Western nations become militarily engaged in the Middle East fighting against anti-Israeli groups and nations that are opposed to Israeli aggression and occupation in the region.
In this way the United States military is protecting the Zionist state by manning the buffer zone that serves as Israel’s first line of defense. The US invasions in the Middle East are usually done with a great deal of Israeli intelligence and guidance. These invasions have led to the creation of Al Qaida and ISIS and have led to the breaking up of Iraq and Syria into fragmented states - exactly what the Israeli strategy for the region has been since the 1980s (see the Israeli strategic plan to Balkanize the Middle East as written by Oded Yinon).
Who are these gate-keepers in the 9-11 truth movement? It's obvious, at least if you are an insider. They are the people in these 9-11 truth organizations or groups who work to prevent me from speaking. They use their influence on the others in the group to make sure I don’t get invited to speak - or dis-invited if I am. They are often Jewish people who are supportive of Israel (but who pretend to be critical) who simply don't want other people to know that 9-11 was an Israeli-run false-flag terror operation. I have seen it many times before, from coast to coast.
Questions about Thermite and Super-Thermite: I would like to ask how is it possible for any explosive, such as the active thermitic nano-composite material found in the dust, to “pulverize” steel and concrete and make the vast majority of the columns and concrete disappear?
Seismic data of 9/11 shows hardly any S or P waves. In other words, the buildings did not collapse but were pulverized in mid-air.
Is there any explanation to account for the burnt cars seen in and around the streets of the entire World Trade Center complex?
Why weren’t people burned by extremely hot ash and dust?
Your information is interesting but just like you, no one can explain the aforementioned observations just by thermite or thermate.
Bollyn Responds: These questions obviously come from people who have read some of Judy Wood’s book of 9-11 disinformation, Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11.
Judy Wood’s book was published in 2010, one year after Dr. Steven E. Jones and a team of scientists published their 25-page paper on the discovery of a form of super-thermite in the dust of the destroyed World Trade Center towers. The Jones paper, accepted for publication in a scientific journal in February 2009, can be read here:
The publication of the paper about the discovery of super-thermite in the dust effectively destroyed the official version of what happened to the Twin Towers and revealed that the public had been lied to about what had really caused the deaths of more than 2,600 people at the World Trade Center on 9-11.
The explosive bi-layered thermitic material found in the dust. The red layer contains aluminum, iron, oxygen, silicon and carbon. The gray layer contains primarily iron, oxygen, and some carbon.
Judy Wood’s book is a “red herring” disinformation effort designed to mislead the public about the scientific evidence that a form of nano-thermite was used to pulverize the Twin Towers. Wood’s attempted rebuttal, however, fails in every way.
Firstly, she fails to even explain to the reader what super-thermite is, much less what it can do. This is intentional, of course, because she is responding to a previously published scientific paper, well-known in the 9-11 truth community since early 2009, yet she fails to even introduce the subject she is trying to rebut: the active thermitic material found in the dust.
Secondly, Judy Wood’s book claims that the demolitions of the Twin Towers were “cold” events. This is complete nonsense. There is abundant proof that the demolitions were, in fact, extremely hot events. For more on this subject, read my recent article about the basics of super-thermite:
Question: How is it possible for any explosive, such as the active thermitic nano-composite material found in the dust, to “pulverize” steel and concrete and make the vast majority of the columns and concrete disappear?
Answer: First of all, the vast majority of the structural steel columns and concrete did not disappear. Most of the steel elements of the building remained near the site, albeit twisted, mangled, severed, and in some spots even vaporized. This is the structural steel that was “recycled” by being cut up into small pieces, mixed with other scrap, and shipped to China, rather than preserved as evidence from the crime scene and examined by experts. This is an egregious example of criminal destruction of evidence and the highest investigative authorities, namely John Ashcroft and Michael Chertoff of the U.S. Department of Justice, are directly culpable of this crime.
The concrete, on the other hand, was pulverized and turned into gigantic clouds of hot dust that rolled across lower Manhattan as each tower was demolished. The concrete did not disappear, however, it was reduced to dust and distributed with explosive force across a large area, where it fell like gray snow.
The active thermitic nano-composite found in the dust, a novel energetic material made using nano-technology, is extremely powerful and releases more energy per gram than any conventional explosive used in demolition. Thermite and super-thermite are very different things and should not be confused, which is what people like Judy Wood do all the time.
The thermitic nano-composite found in the dust ignites at 430 degrees C., most likely detonates (i.e. burns faster than the speed of sound), produces incredible heat, and creates pure molten metal from the metal oxide it is made from. The bi-layered material also had an organic compound attached, which is what generated the enormous gas pressure that provided the explosive force seen when the towers fell. The evidence indicates that, along with the super-thermite, other explosives were also used to demolish the towers.
When the super-thermite on each floor was detonated from the top-down, it released enormous amounts of heat and generated the explosive force that pulverized each floor – and everything on it – and thrust the pulverized material with great force outwards from the center of the building.
Question: Seismic data of 9/11 shows hardly any S or P waves. In other words, the buildings did not collapse but were pulverized in mid-air.
Answer: That is correct. The largest spikes occurred before, or at the very beginning of each demolition, which suggests that powerful explosives in the basements went off first. As we can see in the video footage of each demolition, the towers are pulverized from the top-down. This meant that the concrete and the contents of the buildings were converted into hot clouds of dust and blown away from the building with great force. This material was propelled many blocks from the World Trade Center and fell like snow, in some places more than 6 inches deep.
Question: Is there any explanation to account for the burnt cars seen in and around the streets of the entire World Trade Center complex?
Answer: Yes, the clouds of dust that rolled across lower Manhattan contained billions of tiny balls of molten iron, lead, and other metals – including molybdenum, which has one of the highest melting points of all the elements. When these hot clouds hit the cars parked near the World Trade Center the hot metal particles would damage the cars and could easily cause them to burn or blow up.
Question: Why weren’t people burned by extremely hot ash and dust?
Answer: They were. I have listened to William Rodriquez, the janitor from the North Tower, explain many times how he was the last man out of the tower and how he dove beneath a fire truck that was parked right outside the entrance to the building. When he was hit by the dust, he said it was very hot and that it had burned his leg.
Question: Your information is interesting but just like you, no one, can explain the aforementioned observations just by thermite or thermate.
Answer: Right. Thermite or thermate cannot explain the observations you refer to, but super-thermite can. We need to understand that although thermite and super-thermite are both thermitic reactions, the nano-composites of super-thermite are in a completely different category from thermite. These novel energetic materials are new and not well understood by the general public. They are highly explosive and can release incredible amounts of energy. To try and help people understand what super-thermite is, and what it can do, I wrote my latest article:
Thank you so much for your kind and prompt reply. I am greatly honoured and flattered to be in direct contact with you.
I have purchased several copies of your book Solving 911 and distributed it to friends. It is a work of great importance as it helps to reveal the true course of history since "911" and of course who was really responsible for this great crime.
The events of "911" set in motion the so-called "War on Terror" which has 2 main purposes: the fragmentation of the Arab nations of the Middle East (as laid out in the "Yinon" Plan) and the demonisation of Islam - whilst at the same time giving the Governments of Western nations the excuse to impose draconian systems of control over their citizens under the pretext of combatting "terrorism".
I personally believe that the reasons for this great crime are thus complex and opaque and involve both furthering the Zionist cause and Israel's political and military dominance of the energy rich Middle East - and the social and economic consequences of the decreasing availability of cheap energy to the industrialised Western nations.
I very much hope to attend your appearance in Holland and hope that we might be able to meet briefly in person.
I am trying to grasp the latest on MH17, and what your article says…
This smells like foul play. What would make sense, however, is that the photo is edited (i.e. fake), and the Russians will be blamed for it… The news about the images came from Russia’s Channel One, the primary state television channel (largely owned by the Russian state).
My question is: How could Russia’s state television network be fed false information?
Bollyn Responds: This is an excellent question about a very important subject: Are the photos that Russia Channel 1 aired on November 14, 2014, of what appears to be a fighter plane shooting at Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 over Ukraine, genuine – or are they fake?
This image shows what appears to be a fighter jet firing a missile at Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 from a distance of about 700 meters (2,300 feet). The Boeing aircraft is about 209 feet long with a wingspan of 200 feet. The fighter jet is about 11 times the length of the Boeing away.
Was the photo taken by a Global Hawk, or similar reconnaissance drone, flying thousands of feet above the Boeing?
First, let’s consider the context. We have to take into account that these photographs were aired on Russia’s Channel 1 TV, which is largely owned and controlled by the Russian state. Given that fact, I would say that it is almost 100 percent certain that Russian military intelligence scrutinized these photos before they were shown to Channel One’s 250 million viewers.
So, if they are so obviously fake, as the Western media would want us to believe, then Russian intelligence would look very bad when their falsity is proven – but that has not yet happened.
If these images are indeed proven to be fake, they would then only be proof that they are fake and they were made by somebody. In that case, the fake images of the plane being shot down would not prove or disprove anything about what really happened to MH17. The most important question in that case would then be: Who made them?
Next, consider that they were aired on Russian TV just as the G-20 conference was beginning in Australia. Once again, if these images are so obviously fake that “web users” are having a field day debunking their authenticity, shouldn’t the satellite image experts in the United States, Britain, and Australia have something to say about them at least as quickly as the “web users”? Why have we not heard anything from the experts?
If these images are fake, and if it is such a simple matter to prove that they are fake, why have the U.S. government and media avoided the subject? During the weekend of the G-20 summit, for example, there was no response about the photos from either the controlled U.S. government or the equally controlled U.S. media.
Then on Monday morning, November 17, the controlled press came out with some old amateur video footage showing the wreckage of the Malaysia plane shortly after it was shot down, as if to steal the thunder from the new photographs with “new video”, which wasn’t really new at all. During the entire weekend, while the images of the shoot-down were being discussed on the Internet, the U.S. media was virtually silent about the whole matter.
If anonymous “web users” can so easily spot the fakeness of the images, why couldn’t the U.S. media find any people with expertise to do so in three days?
Lastly, there is the fundamental fact that the Obama administration, like most of the Western governments, continues to protect and promote the pack of lies about what happened on 9-11. While the Russian government has not deceived us, our own government has blatantly lied to us about what happened on 9-11 – for more than 13 years. For the U.S. government to continue to lie to the American people about who and what really caused the death of 3,000 people on 9-11 indicates that it is the United States where regime change is needed - not Russia.
As anyone who has observed the conflict in the Ukraine knows, the regime in Kiev is the side that is telling huge lies and killing its own people. The U.S. government is also to be blamed for installing an openly anti-Russian government in Kiev in February 2014.
With these images, a new card has been thrown on the table. If the unelected government in Kiev and their Anglo-American/Zionist backers really want us to believe that the images of the shoot-down of MH17 are fake, then it is their obligation to prove that they are fake. Would it not be illogical for us to believe people who lie about everything else - especially 9-11?
Comment: Gordon Duff, “senior editor” of the disinformation website Veterans Today, is clearly working against 9-11 Truth by claiming that nanothermite or super-thermite does not exist. Duff has repeated this outrageous claim many times in his ludicrous attacks against me and Dr. Steven E. Jones, the professor at B.Y.U. who discovered a highly energetic form of nanothermite in the dust of the World Trade Center.
Gordon Duff, the "disinfo toad" of Veterans Today, is working against 9-11 Truth by making the absurd claim that nanothermite does not exist.
The following statements are from emails and posted comments written by Gordon Duff:
Again, I reiterate, nanothermite does not exist. There has been well over a decade to get someone to come forward, to find a factory, to have a driver confess, to have test results leaked, a thousand possibilities and none have materialized…
There is NO evidence of "nanothermite" but there is proof that iron particles capable of creating observed thermal effects when subjected to nuclear explosions did exist.
Nuclear weapons exist. Nanothermite does not. Nobody makes it. It has no purpose.
Find me a factory that made nanothermite. Find who owns it and what customers it made "nanothermite" for. When you do that...which is what should have been done years ago....we can take these hypotheses seriously. I suspect the reason it was not done is simple. It can't be done.
I have gone on for months asking the same questions as have so many others. No one has answered, not Bollyn, not anyone.
Bollyn Responds: There are numerous companies and institutions that can produce superthermite. Duff says, "find me a factory" that makes nanothermite. "When you do that", he wrote, "we can take these hypotheses seriously."
One American company that specializes in making superthermites is ALD NanoSolutions, Inc. of Broomfield, Colorado. The following information about ALD NanoSolutions comes from Plunkett's almanac of companies that work with nanotechnology:
ALD NanoSolutions of Broomfield, Colorado, makes super-thermite.
"ALD NanoSolutions also develops superthermites, which release more energy than conventional explosives and have a faster reaction velocity than conventional thermite explosives." - Plunkett's Nanotechnology and MEMs Industry Almanac 2008, Jack W. Plunkett, Plunkett Research Ltd., 2008
Acompany press releaseshows that ALD NanoSolutions was working with the U.S. Air Force "to fabricate Super-thermite Explosives" in 2002.
Related Questions: Do you have any concrete evidence for the existence of nanothermite or of its use to demolish the WTC towers? Can you produce any documentation that states that thermite has a detonation velocity greater than 895 meters per second?
Ian Greenhalgh recently posted a slanderous article meant to discredit me and my research on Veterans Today, a well-known disinformation website run by Gordon Duff, who admits that about half of what he writes is intentionally false information.
RBC Capital Markets is an equity partner with Tamir Fishman, an Israeli venture capital / investment bank. RBC actually has an ownership interest in Tamir Fishman – the only international bank with an equity investment in an Israeli financial services firm. In 2004, Globes (Israel) reported that RBC owned 30 percent of Tamir Fishman Venture Capital, making it the largest partner in the venture capital arm of Tamir Fishman & Co.
Donald Fox works for RBC Capital Markets, which is a strategic partner in several Israeli "Trojan Horse" technology companies that are involved in massive spying/data collection operations in the United States, e.g. Nice, Amdocs, Comverse, Verint, Check Point, etc. Several of these companies are closely linked to the Israeli architects of the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11.
I would describe Tamir Fishman as a “Mossad venture capital funding arm,” which is how I refer to these investment banks that raise foreign capital to be invested in Israeli start-up companies. Ehud Barak, the former Israeli defense minister and chief 9-11 terror suspect, is a partner and adviser to Tamir Fishman, since at least June 2004. This suggests that Barak has worked with the company for some time.
Because Donald Fox’s article attacks me personally and Dr. Steven E. Jones and even goes so far as to claim that nano-thermite does not even exist – because Gordon Duff says it doesn’t – I contacted the author and Mr. Greenhalgh to ask them what they know about nanoenergetic materials. Since they don't even think these materials exist they obviously don't know much about them.
We have exchanged a few emails in which they asked the following key questions:
Ian Greenhalgh of Millom, England, asked me: "Do you have any concrete evidence for the existence of nanothermite or of its use to demolish the WTC towers?"
Donald Jay Fox asked me: "Can you produce any documentation that states that thermite has a detonation velocity greater than 895 meters per second?"
Bollyn Responds: To both questions, I say, yes, yes, yes! No problem.
To answer the first question, see the attached photographic evidence of the bi-layered nanothermitic compound found in the WTC dust.
SOLID PROOF - Chips of a bi-layered highly energetic nanocomposite of Thermite found in the dust of the destroyed World Trade Center. This material, when heated to about 420 degrees Celsius, explodes in a thermitic reaction that produces more energy per gram than any of the known explosives used in demolition. That's why it is called "highly energetic".
To answer the second question about velocities produced by such materials, I provide the following extracts from the AMPTIAC Quarterly special issue on Nanotechnology (Spring 2002) which shows that Nanoenergetic materials can produce velocities up to 1,500 meters per second. The article refers to MICs, which are defined as:
MICs are nanoscale energetic materials that release large amounts of heat, like thermite.
MIC compounds can be twice as powerful as high explosives and produce velocities of 1,500 meters/second. Note that these materials can be tuned to have incredible reactive power of up to 10 Gigawatts per cubic centimeter (GW/cc). One Gigawatt is one billion watts or about 13,410,221 horsepower. The capacities of large power plants are measured in Gigawatts. Hoover Dam, for example, is a 2 GW facility.
The cover of the AMPTIAC Quarterly special issue on Nanotechnology, Spring 2002
The article explains how nanoenergetic compounds have more power and release much more energy per gram than normal eplosives, and how these advanced materials can be used to create more powerful weapons and explosives.
I would suggest that you, and anyone who is interested in the discovery of active thermitic material in the dust of the World Trade Center, read some of the literature on nanoenergetic compounds. One source is AMPTIAC Quarterly (Vol. 6, No. 1) from Spring 2002 (see cached link below). AMPTIAC stands for Advanced Materials and Processes Technology Information Analysis Center, which is a DOD sponsored information center. The article on Nanoenergetics (p. 43) should be of particular interest concerning your questions and general skepticism about nano-thermitics.
The following are excerpts from the article on Nanoenergetics:
Work in this field is ongoing and is roughly 10 years old, i.e. from 1992.
"At this point in time, all of the military services and some DOE and academic laboratories have active R&D programs aimed at exploiting the unique properties of nanomaterials that have potential to be used in energetic formulations for advanced explosives and propellant applications."
"Metastable Intermolecular Composites (MICs) are one of the first examples of a category of nanoscale energetic materials which have been studied and evaluated to a considerable degree. MIC formulations are mixtures of nanoscale powders of reactants that exhibit thermite (high exothermicity) behavior."
"...certain key MIC characteristics are very attractive and quite promising for practical applications. These include energy output that is 2x that of typical high explosives, the ability to tune the reactive power (10KW/cc to 10 GW/cc), tunable reaction front velocities of 0.1-1500 meters/second, and reaction zone temperature exceeding 3,000K."
To Ian and Donald and Gordon Duff: These extracts alone should compel you, if you are honest researchers, to reconsider your statements about nano-thermite. Writing that nano-thermite does not exist simply because Mr. Duff says he doesn't know about it is certainly not going to convince anyone of anything - other than Duff's ignorance about the subject. The AMPTIAC special issue on Nanotechnology from 2002, on the other hand, confirms that it exists and has been developed and researched since at least the early 1990s.
I certainly hope this helps clarify things about the reality and potential of nano-thermitic compounds. This is a subject of national importance.
I am an expat business man, pushing 60 and looking forward to my retirement and hopefully, a few grandkids. I am not a raving tree hugger with paint all over my face or an ageing hippy type.
I have now spent most of my life out of the UK and have lost many of the close ties I had to the old country. The exception to this is my UK family, my football team, and the BBC. The world service has kept me sane in some weird and wonderful places and situations. ‘Aunty’ has been part of my upbringing providing me with a sense of fairness, truth, and security, similar to a close relative. From Blue Peter to Kate Adie to the football reports, the BBC is where to go to find out what is really going on. The BBC has been one of the rocks of my life.
I am therefore saddened to say that I have progressively lost all faith in anything to do with the BBC after seeing your “Conspiracy Road Trip” and “The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 Ten Years On” programmes concerning the events of 9/11 in the US. These programmes were completely biased to the extent of, in my opinion, being false propaganda.
After filtering out the 9/11 truth nutters and looking at the evidence of respected professionals as well as many believable eye witness accounts, I am looking for some serious argument as to where these people are in error. And all I can find are some condescending programmes that credit some of us with no intelligence. Unless I am missing something, the hard evidence appears to be overwhelming in that we are being seriously lied to by the US government and I am looking to the BBC and other so called responsible news outlets to show me where I am missing something.
The common thread I have found with ALL 9/11 truth debunkers is derision, insult, and ridicule of many serious, dedicated, well-meaning professional people. Glaring untruths and insinuations are predominant. 9/11 debunkers often cherry pick one of the more crazy ideas of the 9/11 ‘nutters’ which are easy to discredit. There is very little or no real credible scientific debunking evidence.
There is NO serious debate concerning hard provable evidence. This is the crime of the century and it is still unsolved. Very credible people are calling for a new investigation into what happened on 9/11. To date, there has been no plausible investigation of any type. If it wasn’t so serious, the official 9/11 report(s) would be considered laughable. It is, in my view, the duty and responsibility of organisations like the BBC to get to the truth and rectify this, especially when so much has occurred directly because of 9/11.
One has to ask why the press fails to report these issues fairly – are they also playing a part in the “real conspiracy”? The BBCs deliberate and obvious distortion of the Barry Jennings story is close to proof of the BBCs involvement. Why do most journalists I know think that “9/11 was an inside job” and yet there is almost no coverage?
So called responsible news outlets complain that the internet is ruining real, responsible, verifiable journalism. I would agree if I saw these news outlets carrying out some real, responsible, verifiable journalism. Who are we to believe, some ‘nutter’ on the internet with no proven credentials or good old aunty BBC? Right now it’s a toss-up between them.
So sadly it is looking like – Farewell to BBC, my old Aunty. This will leave a huge void in my life.
Note that I do not criticise the BBC for your very obvious error on 9/11 concerning the Salomon Brothers Building (the 47-story WTC 7). I am not part of any 9/11 truth movement. I am an ordinary Joe Blow who is not stupid and can use common sense and reason to look at hard evidence. At the end of the day, I just want some news organisation to get the answers to some very obvious questions and I can enjoy my retirement in peace.
And my apologies to all the raving tree huggers and ageing hippies out there.
John O'Donnell, Australia
Bollyn Responds: John O'Donnell copied me when he sent this letter to a couple dozen senior officers of the BBC and members of parliament. His letter is an excellent commentary about the sad state of the media in the English-speaking world, which is why I am posting it.
As O'Donnell wrote, One has to ask why the press fails to report these issues fairly – are they also playing a part in the 'real conspiracy'?
Yes, the controlled media is part of the real conspiracy - the one against us. We must remember that the media's hostility to 9-11 truth is completely intentional and purposeful. It's not that the media moguls who control the networks can't fathom the truth or don't understand that the evidence proves the falsity of the official 9-11 version. It's that the media moguls who control the press are actively supporting the 9-11 pack of lies on purpose in order to deceive the public about what happened. Jake Tapper's (CNN) recent tirade against Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth is a good example of how the controlled media attacks 9-11 Truth. I was personally attacked early on by Fox News and CNN.
So, why would the media lie to the public about 9-11? If we had a truly free press this would not be the case, but the media outlets in the United States and the English-speaking world are not free at all but rather very tightly controlled. In the U.S., for example, most of the mainstream media outlets are owned by only 6 companies, like Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. This means that a very small group of people, including Mr. Murdoch, decide what the public will see and hear, in short, how the public will be informed on all matters great and small.
9-11 is, in fact, the Big Lie of our time and the media is protecting that outrageous lie. But we must remember that this evil lie is meant to enslave us. The fact that the mainstream media is working to support the 9-11 lies shows us that the mass media is the main apparatus used to enslave us. The media moguls and their financial backers are to be blamed and prosecuted for their criminal treason against the people and our republic(s). They are guilty of deceiving the whole world.
Question: Hi Christopher:
As you probably have seen, Gordon Duff has released a Russian intelligence report on 911 nukes which he believes is authentic:
The report states that a modified W-54 nuclear artillery shell type mini-nuke was used on 911. These devices were secretly handed off to Israel by Bush-Cheney. Israel in turn sold them to NATO countries. When exploded, these devices leave a chemical signature and can be traced. The article by Duff implies that the nano-thermite found in the dust was a bi-product of the gamma ray/ neutron flux acting on the steel to produce iron-oxide.
I was under the impression that the Jones investigation found unexploded red and grey super-thermite chips in the dust of 911. Am I correct in this? The recovery of manufactured chips is not addressed by Duff. Why not?
Frankly, I don't care whether or not nukes were used in 911 but I don't like it when critical information is omitted. Thank you for fact-checking this article and for sharing your findings with your readers.
Bollyn Responds: More Guff from Gordon Duff
The Gordon Duff article, "Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed", edited by Jim W. Dean, is nothing but rank disinformation about what happened on 9-11. Duff shows his true colors as an agent of disinformation when he writes, "My personal opinion is that this is NOT a disinformation piece but rather represents a significant breakthrough."
Why is Duff doing this? What is the point of this disinformation piece that is full of flagrant errors? The obvious purpose is to simply confuse the reader about the importance of the discovery of active thermitic material in the dust of the destroyed World Trade Center.
The so-called "classified" material Duff cites begins by saying that nuclear devices were used on 9-11 and that these devices caused the "melted steel and iron oxide or 'nano-thermite'", which he goes on to say, "is a by-product of the very high gamma ray/Neutron flux induced into the central steel core. The radiation dissolves the steel into iron oxide consuming the carbon and silicone in the steel."
At the end of the Duff/Dean piece of guff, it says: "The iron oxide found all over the place was what was left of the steel I beams. This was the so-called Nano Thermite that was found everywhere."
There are so many flagrant errors about what was found in the 9-11 dust in this piece that it can only be described as intentional disinformation by Gordon Duff and Jim Dean at Veterans Today. They are promoting a piece that is so wrong about what was found in the dust that it sounds as if they have not even read the paper by Steven E. Jones and other scientists entitled "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe".
Firstly, the active thermitic material that was found in the dust was a bi-layered material that was created using nano-technology. It was most certainly not made by any nuclear device.
Secondly, iron oxide (rust) is one of the components of thermite, not one of the products. A basic thermite reaction creates a great deal of heat, aluminum oxide (a white smoke), and molten iron. What was found in great quantities in the dust of the World Trade Center was billions of very small molten iron droplets. Iron oxide and nano-thermite are not the same thing at all, as the Guff piece suggests.
I will address the errors found in this piece of disinformation in a separate article. This article is intentional disinformation about what the evidence found in the dust indicates. Gordon Duff has, once again, shown himself to be an agent of disinformation about the events of 9-11.
Comment: The following comment came from a supporter who made a generous donation in support of my fundraising effort. She wrote this in response to my thank-you note for her donation:
You are very welcome.
Here is my philosophy on the fundraising. You need not feel uncomfortable about asking for funds. It is not charity in the normal sense of the word. Your supporters are funding a road to the truth. If our society's structures and systems (governments, banks, media, etc.) had not been hijacked by corrupt forces, then your work as an investigative journalist would be completely different. The mainstream would hold you in high esteem, and you would not be forced into exile.
You are a truth seeker and political refugee. Obviously my taxes are not paying for your work. So I'll just redirect my money where it should go - to the source of truth.
Comment from March 26, 2014: Why would Israel need a Malaysian airlines Boeing-777-200?
The thing is that this airplane “lost in Tel Aviv in November 2013″ isn’t just another Boeing 777-200 but it is its absolutely IDENTICAL twin of the currently lost airplane. The one and only visible difference would be its serial number.
I'm currently reading your book Solving 9-11, and have advertised it here and there. It is a fascinating book, - you have certainly researched 9/11 like no other, - just the info about Israelis in the US aircraft business is worth the whole thing.
Regarding debris (conspiracy)?
A Malaysian Airlines sister airplane Boeing 777-200 was sold to GA Telesis and was then re-registered and sent to Tel Aviv on 4/11/13 where it was stored until …. ?
Malaysian Air 777 manufacturer serial number 28416 registered as 9M-MRI was sold to GA Telesis on 10/21/2013 and now registered as N105GT. So the image below shows this aircraft still registered as 9M-MRI and stored at Tarbes Lourdes Pyrenees on 04/10/2013, and then on 04/11/2013 it’s re-registered as N105GT and stored at Tel Aviv. [These latter dates are apparently written day/month/year. CB]
It looks at least fishy. Why would Israel need a Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777-200 that should have been already dissembled at that time due to the GA Telesis website?
Bollyn Responds: This information is very important because it indicates that Israel has an identical twin aircraft of the missing Malaysian Boeing 777 in a hanger in Tel Aviv. This is why I said that the computerized hijacking of the plane may have ended with the plane being dropped in some remote part of the Indian Ocean, like what happened to Egypt Air 990 on October 31, 1999. The terror masterminds might very well have a sinister plan for the missing plane to seemingly reappear in a false-flag atrocity by using the twin aircraft they have in storage. Awareness of the twin plane in Tel Aviv could prevent the evil plot from going ahead.
Comment: I am a Canadian born to German immigrants. Although my father was a blue collar worker, he was a very well read man and was up to date on everything politically happening in the world. After reading information on your site (I am also reading Solving 9-11: The Original Articles) Paul Craig Roberts site as well as others, I realize now, that my Dad was right all of these years. Growing up I always thought he was obsessed with the Zionists, sympathy for the Palestinian people, how corrupt America had become by the running of the Jews, etc. This all churned inside of him and made him bitter. He'd talk so often about it, I ended up tuning him out. He died in 2008 at the age of 72 and I now wish that I had listened a little more closely to him.
Thank you for staying true to your principles. After reading everything, I am now having trouble sleeping. I don't know how you do it and how all of this doesn't affect you, your marriage day in day out. You are a very strong man with obviously a loving and just as strong a wife.
Our Prime Minister recently returned from a "love in" with Netanyahu in Israel. It honestly scares me, Mr. Harper honestly scares me.
All the best to you Mr. Bollyn.
S.J., Toronto, Ontario
Comment: Your depiction of the "Chicago Jewish CRIME families" BEHIND the Obama presidency is the most precise information I have yet read about the criminal, treasonous, RADICAL RIGHT-WING policies of the (clearly hijacked) Obama presidency I have yet read, anywhere - MUST READING for ALL Americans.
Your new article [“Russia Under Attack”] - detailing the CRIMINAL, GENOCIDAL links between Victoria Nuland - Obama's 'Viceroy" of the UKRAINE and RUSSIA WARS - and the bloody KAGAN family of PNAC 9-11 treachery, treason, infamy, and the subsequent crimes-against-humanity Iraq war, is also absolutely essential information for any and all Americans.
For the sordid, violent, ruthless dictatorship masquerading as (faux) "democracy" that Ukraine is in for under America's brutal instigation and sabotage, see the puppet Columbia U. 'law' graduate Mikhail SAAKASHVILLI's BRUTAL SUPPRESSION of the peaceful 2005 pro-democracy protests in Georgia, former Soviet Republic.
Whether from the Lenin-Trotsky-KAGANOVICH 'left', or the ROTHSCHILDS/Goldman Sachs/KAGAN right-wing, the results - de facto COMMISSARS with life & death powers over the disenfranchised serfs and peons - are the same. Indeed, I highly recommend the book, THE WOLF OF THE KREMLIN about "Stalin's BUTCHER of the Ukraine" - the very Jewish-raised LAZAR KAGANOVICH - written by his NEW YORK NEPHEW, the also Jewish-raised Stewart Kahan - "Kahan" of course another Americanized spelling of "KAGAN”!
Comment: I received the following harsh comment about Jeffrey Prager a few days ago from a person who claims to be his former mother-in-law. She sent it to me after seeing my article about Jeff Prager at: www.bollyn.com/who-is-jeff-prager-2/
Jeffrey Prager in 2007 - Wanted for failure to pay child support in Arizona
Prager in 2013 - 9/11 writer of dubious character in Minnesota
I sent the comment on to Mr. Prager and asked him if the information it contains is true. Prager has not responded. I was not going to post the comment unless I could verify that it was essentially truthful. Today, I have seen the court documents that indicate that the comment is genuine:
Comment: Who is Jeff Prager you ask? You seem to have him pegged, though you have missed his criminal records for repeated drug abuse. I am his EX(thank God)-mother-in-law. It is my grandson for whom he owes child support and is a Dead Beat Dad, never having paid a dime. Again, thank God, the courts saw through his lies and therefore gave sole custody to my daughter and further imposed that Prager must pass 13 random drug tests before he can petition the court to visit his son under court supervision. So, thank God, he has never met his son. You might get a chuckle knowing that the last time he was arrested in AZ for drug abuse he was caught running down the alley in his underwear screaming hysterically. He has also been arrested for mail fraud but escaped prosecution by turning states evidence. He is a lying, cheating, thieving scoundrel who duped my daughter with his lies into marrying him then forged her signature to get on her bank account and cleaned that out. He was arrested for probation violation and falsifying community service records. I believe him to be a sociopath who believes his own lies. He is a dangerous man and has made death threats against my daughter. But I suspect his brain is so scrambled by all the drug abuse that she no longer has anything to fear from him. Of course, the Order of Protection may have helped. It puzzles me that MN would serve Prager those papers but not arrest him for the outstanding warrant for child support. Go figure. Because I still fear him, I prefer to remain anonymous.
After getting this comment, I found links to the court documents about Prager through a comment on Amazon.com:
While we are on the subject of crime: Keep in mind that there seems to be a circle of criminals that pretend to speak the truth about 9/11. Notice the company that they keep. Notice the friends they have. Notice the lies they tell.
Besides his 5 marijuana arrests and federal mail fraud conviction, if you have any information regarding Jeff Prager please contact (602) 876-1053 (602) 876-1053 FREE . Child Support Arrest Warrant issued on 04-25-07. ...
Jeffrey J Prager July 22, 1955 Case Number: S-0700-CR-2000004657 (use CR-2000004657 for case number) NARCOTIC DRUG-POSSESS/USE DRUG PARAPHERNALIA-POSSESS/USE
I have nothing against Jeff Prager as a person, but in June 2011 he laid down this challenge against me saying that I was lying about my 9-11 research:
Maybe Bollyn and the Truth Movement aren't what they appear to be? Did anyone bother to think that the people that perpetrated 911 spent even MORE TIME developing and strategizing how they would deal with public opinion AFTER the event then they did planning the event itself? Perhaps 911 was SO COMPLEX that very few people will ever understand what really happened, WHY and how. I challenge Bollyn. He's lying. - Jeff Prager, June 5, 2011
Prager's problems with the law are important and need to be understood because it may very well be that he is being used by people who have power over him due to these legal issues. If so, Prager has been used in the same way that Darrel B. Smith was used after someone cleared up his narcotics offenses. Smith also attacked me with the intention of discrediting my research. Likewise, the only non-police witness who testified against me at my trial (and committed perjury while doing so) had a son or husband who had similar narcotics offenses pending in the Cook County Court. These compromised people are clearly being used by the state to become agents to work against the 9-11 truth movement. Prager is certainly not alone in this regard; there is a pattern of state corruption behind these agents.
Comment:My father died in 1993 from exposure to DU [depleted uranium] almost immediately after he came back from the Gulf War. His unit was a National Guard Supply Unit that has since been disbanded. I know more men from his unit got sick, but he was one of two men who returned with high levels, according to his doctor.
After he died a Japanese film crew came and did a story on him because they were doing a piece on the effects of the exposure since the US government was testing off the coast of Japan. My family was never compensated for the loss of my father as a result of his service. Sure my mother gets his pension, but she has suffered and we all have from losing my father. I was 17 when he died.
I hope you continue to do your research and expose the government for what and who they are. G.M.
Comment:I just want to tell you that I believe you are one of the best, if not the best researcher there is, who tells the truth about the events of 9-11-01, the Israeli-Zionist cabal, and the JFK assassination, and more... And I want to thank you for all your hard work, integrity, honesty, and bravery. Keep up the good work, and may the almighty Creator keep you safe. Sincerely, D.P.
Comment: A reader wrote to me about my article “Greg Palast is Related to Mossad Chief David Kimche” suggesting that I was being too “harsh” on Palast by suggesting that his obnoxious hostility to Dr. Steven E. Jones and 9-11 truth could be connected to his family’s close connection to Israeli intelligence.
Greg Palast is openly hostile to Dr. Steven E. Jones and 9-11 truth.
The fact is that Greg Palast’s father is a first cousin of David Kimche, the British-born former deputy director of Israel’s Mossad and director general of the foreign ministry under Yitzhak Shamir.
This was the reader's comment in defense of Greg Palast:
Greg Palast started out making a fuss about 9/11, and he stopped because he was going to be out of work if he kept it up. You, of all people, would understand that. It's not honorable, but a LOT of journalists have done the same, some of them top journalists. And, there's a decent excuse for it too: that their other work won't be taken seriously if they don't just go with the company line on that one. It sucks, but it doesn't make them Zionist devils.
Bollyn Responds: The fact that Greg Palast supports the official pack of lies about 9-11 and is openly hostile to 9-11 truth and Dr. Steven E. Jones is a special case because of the Palast family connection to Israeli intelligence and the notorious Zionist terrorist Yitzhak Shamir. Shamir was one of the original planners of the 9-11 false-flag terrorism and David Kimche was close to Shamir from their days together in the Mossad. This is why Foreign Minister Shamir made Kimche director general of the foreign ministry under his command.
For this reason, Greg Palast is different from Noam Chomsky and talking heads in the media who are hostile to 9-11 truth simply because they are paid to be. This would include people like Jon Stewart (born Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz), Bill Maher, and Rachel Maddow, who are all paid millions of dollars a year to be talking heads that support the policies of the criminals who run the Zionist networks they work for. If you don't think the anti-9/11 truth people behind Jon Stewart's show are truly violent criminals, just watch how Rory Albanese, the Daily Show producer, assaulted a 9-11 truth activist on YouTube.
The controlled media in the United States is primarily owned and controlled by the Zionist Mafia, which censors any discussion of 9-11 truth. Leslie Moonves, for example, the president and CEO of CBS Corporation, is the great-nephew of Israel's first prime minister, David Ben Gurion.
This explains why, although well over half the population does not believe the official myth, which has been proven to be false, there is still no discussion of 9-11 truth in the controlled media. The only logical conclusion is that the organized criminal network that controls the mainstream media is complicit in the 9-11 criminal deception.
The efforts of people like Stewart, Maher, and Maddow, to ridicule and attack 9-11 truth has to be understood for what it is: these jokers are simply following orders from the people who pay them. While their conduct may not be criminal under the law, it is certainly evil and un-patriotic. Their loyalties lie elsewhere.
A COUPLE IRRELIGIOUS NEW YORK JEWS - Bill Maher (right, in the Hebrew "Yankees" shirt), who ridicules 9-11 truth, is a godless Zionist Jew and a supporter of the state of Israel. Larry Charles, his partner in Religulous, a film that mocks religion, is on the left.
Regarding Greg Palast, I would say that I am not being harsh at all. First, you have to remember why I investigated Palast in the first place. I was originally suspicious of Palast having seen how his focus on vote fraud was clearly off-target from the real problem with elections in America, which is that the citizens do not count their votes in the polling places. This is the most essential condition of a transparent and democratic election, and is virtually nonexistent in America today with the wide-spread use of electronic voting machines.
But, when Greg Palast rudely attacked Professor Steven Jones and called him a fraud, then I knew that Palast was not speaking for himself, but had clearly been given orders to smear Jones and to attack his critical discovery of nano-thermite in the dust of the WTC. The discovery of nano-thermite in the dust of the demolished towers destroys the official version as a credible explanation of what happened on 9-11. This is why Dr. Jones and I were both attacked in 2006. This is a discovery that was not supposed to happen.
Then, you have to consider that his father's cousin, David Kimche, was an Israeli spymaster and founding father of the Mossad. This is much more than coincidence.
"Kimche joined the Mossad spy agency in the early 1950s, and was in essence one of the organization's founding fathers, among those who designed its doctrine and modus operandi. He was involved in just about every aspect of the Mossad over the course of his service, eventually reaching the position of deputy head of Mossad.
Kimche recruited and operated agents which were sent to infiltrate Arab countries;
Kimche was involved in enhancing cooperation with Mossad's counterparts throughout the world;
Kimche often presented himself as a journalist; and
Kimche was Israel's point man in the Iran-contra affair.
Greg Palast spends a great deal of time in London, where David Kimche was born and where his family lives. Palast is fully aware of his family's relationship with Israel and the Mossad. Based on these facts, I can only conclude that Greg Palast is working as an Israeli propagandist/disinfo agent and this is the real reason for his obnoxious hostility to 9-11 truth and Dr. Steven E. Jones, which otherwise makes no sense.
Comment:I continue to visit your website regularly, and you continue to post the fruits of your research, which manages to maintain its expertise and relevance so admirably; and yet it is difficult to detect little, if any, progress in our struggle for justice. The power of the corporate media in the U.S. seems overwhelming (as demonstrated in their recent reporting of "Assad gassing his own people!"), although the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (www.ae911truth.org/) seem to be making slight inroads, at least in Canada.
Bollyn Responds: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have done great work in bringing 9-11 truth into the mainstream. This organization presents irrefutable scientific evidence that the official version of what caused the destruction of the World Trade Center is nothing but a pack of lies, but the controlled media in the United States continues to ignore this important evidence. What's going on?
If we consider the key role played by the controlled media in the 9-11 deception, we can see that the heads of the major media networks are active participants in the 9-11 cover-up. We can discern that this 9-11 deception network is organized, criminal, and reaches to the highest level of the U.S. government and media. We can also see that this criminal network is Zionist by ideology and primarily Jewish by ethnicity. The heads of the major media networks could fit around one large conference table and probably often do.
The 9-11 cover-up is not the only huge crime the privately-owned media is involved in. It also plays a crucial role in selling the fraudulent elections held in the United States as transparent and democratic when they are, in fact, completely opaque and rigged.
Who are some of the Zionist powers behind the 9-11 deception? There are many, but one of the most obvious is the Henry Crown (formerly Krinsky) family of Chicago, which is the controlling family of General Dynamics, the leading defense contractor. As I have pointed out in recent articles, the Crown family is connected to people who played key roles in creating the official version of 9-11 early on, namely Zdenek Bazant and W. Gene Corley. The Crowns are also long-time supporters of Barack Obama, since he came to Chicago.
There are two obvious reasons why the war-profiteering Crown family supports the 9-11 deception. First, because they are ardent supporters of the state of Israel, whose military intelligence played a key role in the false-flag terrorism. Secondly, the Crown family made huge profits from the fraudulent "War on Terror" and the wars fought in Afghanistan and Iraq. The Crown family is the largest shareholder of General Dynamics, whose revenue tripled from $10.4 billion in 2000 to $32.5 billion in 2010 - while the value of their stock quadrupled.
Comment: Dear Christopher,
I just found your web pages, as was doing some deeper research into who is Greg Palast? I had some suspicions, so I checked him out - and must admit, he had me fooled for some years.
Your deep research work is very impressive. You have my full – moral/ethical/human – support. These days I become angered easy (getting too old to care) and only want to be in the company of genuine truth-tellers, such as yourself. You are a true hero.
Bollyn Responds:I had to look in the archives to find what I had written about Greg Palast. I found the original article from August 2007 on RumorMillNews.com and reposted it under the title "Greg Palast’s Attack on 9-11 Truth".
I knew that Palast came from a Zionist family, but digging a little deeper, I found that he is related to one of the founding fathers of the Mossad, the notorious spymaster David Kimche. The article, "Greg Palast is Related to Mossad Chief David Kimche" explains why Palast, who markets himself as an "investigative journalist," never sees the Israeli elephant in the room.
His real mission as "a journalist" is to distract and divert his readers away from the evidence of Israeli involvment in 9-11, electronic vote fraud, and other mega-crimes. Palast is a working Zionist agent like his sister Geri, who is managing director of the Israel Action Network of the Jewish Federation. One should be aware of Palast's loyalty to the state of Israel when reading his material - he is, after all, acting as an agent of a foreign state.
What is really behind Palast's attack on Dr. Jones?
One has to ask why Palast, a Zionist, attacked Dr. Steven E. Jones so aggressively on INN in 2007 and why Palast is so adamant in his position that there is no evidence of explosives in the demolition of the World Trade Center, when there were over 100 eyewitnesses who reported seeing or feeling explosions?
If you listen to what Palast says in the INN interview you can see that he fails to make any points with solid logic or facts. He has, in fact, nothing to prove his case. So what compels Palast to take this position in spite of abundant evidence of explosives?
Look at who is behind the attacks on Dr. Jones and ask yourself why he was set up by an organized cabal of Zionist Jews on NPR in September 2006, an organized attack which led to his suspension as a teacher at BYU? Dr. Jones had, if fact, said nothing about Jews or Israel, but the NPR show had been set up with Jews already lurking in the shadows, like wolves ready to attack. So, why is it that Zionist Jews refuse to see the evidence of explosives at the World Trade Center, if they are not simply trying to protect Israel from being discovered - as the culprit?
Comment: I read your piece titled “Too Many Years of Lies & Public Enemy No. 1” (and the included piece by Paul Craig Roberts). I agree with everything there and I like the article.
I agree with the position that the owners of the media are a great enemy of the U.S. public and that they are part of the “crimocracy” that did 9/11. I think the problem is people just being closed minded and having taken blind psychological/spiritual refuge in the media.
In a related vein, you made a statement some time ago that people have misunderstood their relationship to government in the U.S. I think this statement is maybe more significant than you may think (or more significant than what I recall you indicating). I think this may be perhaps the fundamental problem in the world (or an aspect of it, or at least related to it).
I think people have taken a kind of spiritual refuge in government/media. Instead of having genuine spiritual faith, instead of having either faith in genuine religion, or at least in their own ability to discern the truth around them and in their ability to reason and think rationally, they have taken a kind of blind faith in government/media. I believe this is a huge and immense problem and that probably it can only be fixed with pain, enough pain and suffering that they finally start to question their beliefs.
Bollyn Responds:This is a very good comment about a subject of great importance to all Americans, indeed to all people: When the citizen is aware that the government is lying about what really happened on 9-11 and has deceived the nation in order to wage criminal wars of aggression, how does that awareness change the citizen’s relationship to his government?
According to a recent report about the events of 9-11, 84 percent of the American population thinks the government is lying about 9-11. So, if you are among the 84 percent who think or believe that the government is lying about 9-11, how does this awareness affect your political posture vis-à-vis the federal government and its agents and agencies?
I commented on this political dilemma in my article and video entitled “Making Sense of 9-11 Disinformation” on July 4, 2013:
Even when we realize that we have been deceived on a massive scale, it’s not easy to accept that the government has lied about 9-11. It’s very uncomfortable for an American to contemplate that their government would engage in a massive criminal cover-up and send thousands of Americans to fight and die in Afghanistan and Iraq based on nothing but a pack of lies.
When you discover that the U.S. government and mass media have indeed lied to us about 9-11, you realize that the whole “War on Terror” construct is nothing but a massive fraud. This means that the Bush and Obama administrations are criminal operations at the highest level of government.
So, you see why 9-11 truth is a very painful subject to contemplate. It means either you believe the lies and support the fraudulent “War on Terror” or you basically divorce yourself from the federal government. This is certainly not an easy choice for any patriotic American. - “Making Sense of 9-11 Disinformation” by Christopher Bollyn, July 3, 2013 http://www.bollyn.com/14214/
For me, the relationship between the criminal regime in power (“crimocracy”) and a truth-seeking and patriotic citizen is painfully clear. Five years after 9-11, in August 2006, I was attacked by three heavily-armed undercover police (i.e. agents of the state) at my home. I was subsequently charged (i.e. maliciously prosecuted) with having attacked these armed invaders at my home, and in a thoroughly corrupt trial found guilty.
Realizing that I was being criminalized for my writing about 9-11 and that I was at the mercy of a criminal regime, I left the country. It would have been foolish and reckless to put the welfare of my family in jeopardy by allowing the same Zionist judge who had overseen the blatantly corrupt trial to sentence me for crimes I had not committed. I have lived in exile since June 2007.
Professor Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah, received similar treatment from the Mormon church after he was falsely accused in September 2006 of having made anti-Semitic comments on a local NPR radio program. Jones lost his teaching career as a consequence of having investigated the use of explosives in the demolition of the three towers on 9-11.
While Dr. Jones and I were attacked because of our 9-11 research and writing, every American who thinks the government is lying about 9-11 is really in the same position. When you realize that the government is lying about 9-11, a crime of mass murder and terrorism, it means that the government is controlled by criminals. In such a situation, patriotic truth-seekers become enemies of the state because the crimocracy that controls the government is the enemy of the people and the republic.
Dr. Jones and I have done nothing wrong to deserve the treatment that we received at the hands of those who control the state. Aware that the government was lying to the American people, we have done our best to discover what really happened on 9-11 and expose the deception to our fellow citizens in our deceived and defrauded nation. As outspoken truth-seekers we simply became targets of the criminals who are behind the 9-11 cover-up by the media and government.
Christopher Bollyn and Professor Steven E. Jones at BYU, March 2006
It's not that Dr. Jones and I are criminals (we are not), but that the state is ruled by criminals who attacked us for being patriotic (and very inconvenient) truth-seekers. The 9-11 cover up by the U.S. government is, in fact, treasonous and is the most obvious indication that the government has become the enemy of the people. In such a situation it is our natural obligation and duty as citizens to “throw off” and “abolish” the government, as the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776, says:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
"Regarding 9-11: a massive 84 percent now say the government is lying." - Daniel Bushell, RT, September 8, 2013 (at 7:05 minutes) Video Link - youtu.be/UOSa1M7Are4
Comment: U.S. & SYRIA
Can anyone explain why we are now supposed to support the radical Islamists, the very forces who supposedly perpetrated the 9-11 attacks (according to the official fairy tale about the 9-11 Zionist Terror Charade), who are fighting against the Syrian regime of Bashar al Assad? Why is “Al CIAduh” operating inside Syria our ally when it is our enemy operating in Iraq and Afghanistan?
Assad, like Saddam Hussein before him, is tolerant of Christianity, both Maronite Catholic and Greek Orthodox. Again, why are we opposing his rule?Why are we choosing sides in a civil war that has been aggravated by outside intervention by Saudi Arabia, Israel, and other anti-Iranian groups?
This seems to confirm that people who buy into the lie about the 9-11 Zionist Terror Charade will believe anything, even the most logically inconsistent and patently absurd contradictions!
May God have mercy on your deceived and deceiving souls.
Comment: I have just sent you a modest little contribution of $50 via PayPal to help further your unique research and publishing effort. I wish it could have been 1,000 times as much because I am convinced that you are one of the very few investigative reporters in the world today that is committed to telling the whole and unvarnished truth about what is happening on the political level to mankind…
Your research conclusively proves the existence of a largely unseen power that has had for decades the means to shape world events from behind the scenes, and my research delves into the philosophical-religious underpinnings of that cabal that motivates it to do what it does - namely, to erase the influence of Jesus Christ from every vestige of every society on the globe in order to prepare the way for the emergence of a "Jewish messiah," who, as I have noted before, will not be the return of Jesus Christ in glory and majesty, but "the man of sin" as foretold in Sacred Scripture.
Whether or not any of us believe this is actually happening or is even possible, what is important is that the Zionists believe in it and hope that under an all-powerful world-Zionist leader and dictatorship, they will become masters of the universe, hence the very reason for Zionism as detailed in "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.”
Last May, our small church sent me on a mission to Europe to investigate what might be done to preclude what's left of the Catholic world from being drawn into this diabolical deception in the making. Should I return there anytime soon, I would very much like to meet you in order to discuss sensitive issues, that as you well know, cannot be mentioned in complete safety, except face to face.
In the meantime, I wish you and your family all the best, and pray for your good health and security during your present exile.
You're a great journalist who has built up great moral credibility with your pioneering 9-11 research. Your 9-11 research passes technical muster. Your "chinchilla on Mars" posting is a needless, pointless, frivolous distraction that will damage your credibility.
The "chinchilla" is a rock that has features somewhat reminiscent of a chinchilla. It is just like the "Face on Mars" from the 1970's Viking missions, which were, of course, just a configuration of hills. Unless you can show that the "chinchilla" is moving, or otherwise alive, this posting is enormously damaging and will take away from YEARS of hard-won credibility (you were TASED by police and forced to flee the country!) and reduce you to a "giggle-factor".
Please remove the posting, or at least mitigate it by saying that it is probably a rock.
Best Regards, Robert Robert D. Pickar 1157 W. 10th St San Pedro, CA 90731
Bollyn Responds: This comment comes from Robert Daniel Pickar, the son of Kenneth Arnold Pickar. Kenneth Pickar is a visiting professor at Caltech. Caltech runs the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which operates the Mars mission for NASA. I responded to Robert asking him if his father's connections to Caltech, the JPL, and NASA have anything to do with his request.
Robert Pickar responded:
Not only did my father, Kenneth Pickar, NOT ask me to write the email to you, he doesn't know about it, it has NOTHING to do with him, and he will be LIVID with me if he finds out about your post!... I want this to be a productive conversation, and I believe that you are a decent person, so I ask you, will you remove this entirely slanderous and off-base posting about me and my father? What will it require for you to accept that this is in error and must ethically be removed?
I certainly don't want to slander anyone. I am merely pointing out the fact that the person who asked me to remove the posting about the Mars mission is the son of a professor at the small private research institution that is running the operation. Kenneth Pickar, originally from the Bronx, has had a long career working with companies and institutions that work with NASA. He even worked and taught at the Technion in Haifa, Israel, in the early 1970s. He now lives in the Golden State in a multi-million dollar home in the gated community of Rolling Hills, near Palos Verdes. All of this information comes from his own CV and is not meant be slanderous in any way.
Ken Pickar (3rd from left) has close ties to the state of Israel. Here, in December 2006, he visits the Israeli coast with Joseph Shappir, Head of Department of Applied Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Comment: Hello Chris, 19 year old reader here - I came across your work a few months ago. I've been listening to your interviews and reading your articles and I want to say, from the bottom of my heart, God bless you man. Seriously. The history that you've managed to unearth is phenomenal and you are EXCEEDINGLY brilliant! Keep up the good work and keep the faith. Even though it may seem like virtually everyone is brainwashed, there are still young kids like me who've come across the truth and are eternally grateful to have people like you around, because almost all of my family and friends think that I've gone off into the deep end and that I'm a "conspiracy theorist." Take care, I wish you the best. (R.D. in New York)
Piper's campaign against Bollyn is a Jewish smear campaign on a man who exposed the Jewish hand behind 9/11.
All human-factor, personal dispositions aside, I submit the following:
In the oceans of extra-curricular text that I have devoured during college and since graduation, I am well equipped to discern what I read.
Based on my experiences with publishers both on and off campus during my college days and with those after graduation in the alternative media, I have a feel for who works for whom.
Sadly, but not surprisingly, many of the "big names" in so-called alternative media have been co-opted by Jewish money (call them the Meyer Lansky Gang if you want). Predictably and right on time.
All you gotta do is crack, if you can weather the slog, any of Mike Piper's books to see what's happening at the American Free Press (AFP) and Barnes Review. Piper plugs their Jewish lawyer-owner, Mark Lane, throughout his texts, singing his praises. I question whether a man named Michael Collins Piper [real name Michael Bernard Piper] actually wrote "books" per se. He claims to be a journalist, but nothing attributed to his by-lines reads like one. His books appear to me like a patch-work of assorted ghost-writers. There is no definitive thread of writer's voice that runs through them and ties them together. His books lack a signature. They lack a feel that attributes text to its author.
In my dealings with Piper, he took care to not write more than a line or two in my direction. He slipped into a phone call between Mark Glenn and me once. I got this "drum roll" introduction from Mark Glenn as though Piper was somebody's Kahuna. Piper was feeling me out for girl'ity and fan'dom I suppose. He got neither. Mark Glenn is one of Piper's close friends according to both Glenn and Piper.
For example Piper's much-trumpeted Final Judgment is a quilt of other men's text sewn together loosely by annoying, superfluous words. Bad writing, pure and simple. Crappy writing to be frank in some spots. Puerile in style. Like a newbie who graduated last week whose daddy owns the big city paper and wants to call Jr. a journalist -- to his cocktail party and golf club. The lines that smote me as brilliant were enclosed in quotation marks. Other men wrote them. Final Judgment reads like a research paper from a high school kid.
No wonder Piper seeks to discredit and smear a journalist like Christopher Bollyn. What Piper is good at is not writing, but defamation. How Jewish is that? What Piper's paymasters fail to cover, envy shall. Piper's campaign against Bollyn is a Jewish smear campaign on a man who exposed the Jewish hand behind 9/11. Since Mark Lane (formerly Levin) owns the American Free Press, it would be Lane (Levin) who pulls the strings at AFP. Hence their feeble attempt to sabotage my work there. Petherick, fake-named Victor Thorn [real name Scott Makufka], and Mike Piper are puppets and profiteers in my opinion. They capitalize on the fears and concerns of aging conservatives who read AFP on their porch rockers. People who don't know how to type and don't own a computer. Willis Carto is 86 years of age, a WWII veteran. They are using his good name as a rubber stamp to push the Barnes Review and AFP pabulum rag to old people.
Bollyn Responds: You are quite right about the deception that is going on at American Free Press and the Liberty Lobby. It is absolutely evil to deceive and fleece patriotic Americans with their fake Liberty Lobby and its newspaper. (I know how fraudulent it is having worked there for 6 years.) Mike Piper even brags about his Jewish relatives and carries a portfolio from AIPAC. Ask yourself, why would a patriotic American do that?
The owner of AFP is Mark Lane, whose original family name was Levin. His father was a Jewish accountant named Harry Arnold Levin. Mark Lane is former U.S. Army Intelligence from post-war Germany, where there is a similar controlled opposition newspaper called National Zeitung. It should be noted that Mark Lane was the primary psy-ops agent/handler who instigated the horrific massacre at Jonestown in Guyana.
Mark Lane (center), the lawyer who reportedly owns the Liberty Lobby and American Free Press, was the lawyer for the Rev. Jim Jones. Lane was present during the massacre/suicide and is considered to have been the person who instigated it by scaring Jim Jones to the point of desperation.
Now, why would a high-level psy-ops agent like Mark Lane be interested in running American Free Press, which uses the exact same scare tactics? What's the real connection between Jonestown and AFP? What's going on?
It is essential for the survival of the American republic that the high crimes and treason committed by our highest officials be investigated and prosecuted.
If violence is the salvation of the brutes, the salvation of Man is Justice. - Rev. Charles Wagner, Justice (1905)
Comment: The entire Dark Cabal needs to immediately be arrested! Enough of this nonsense!! We must repudiate all of this illegal debt. We should look to the Other 1%, the best and brightest, to help us repair the damage that has been done. The worst that humanity has to offer, and only marginally smarter than average, have hoodwinked almost everyone into falling for their crazy scheme to control us. If we do nothing to stop them, they will create Hell on Earth.
For truth and justice - (D.M. from Michigan)
Bollyn Responds: I agree completely. A criminal regime has clearly ruled the United States since 2000, if not longer. The evidence shows that this crimocracy is complicit in the criminal cover-up of the false-flag terrorism of 9-11, which resulted in the destruction of the evidence and obstruction of justice for the victims. Then, based on a pack of lies about what happened on 9-11 and who was behind it, the ruling criminals took the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia, and other nations to war in Afghanistan and Iraq. It needs to be understood that these wars are criminal in nature because they were started and waged on false allegations, which were known to be false at the time, i.e. lies. Planning or conspiring to engage in such wars, which are known as "wars of aggression," is a "crime against peace" under international law based on the Nuremberg Principles. Principle III of the Nuremberg Principles states: "The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law." Furthermore, it is criminal for President Obama to simply turn the page and close the book on the long list of crimes committed by the previous administration.
What needs to happen is for all the guilty parties (e.g. George Bush, Dick Cheney, Michael Chertoff, et al) to be charged and investigated for their high crimes committed while in office. Failing to do that will only enable the ruling crimocracy to continue with its criminal agenda, which will indeed result in "Hell on Earth." The only question is how it will be done.
Comment: I was introduced to the planned destruction of the World Trade Center buildings a few months ago. My first contact with it was through Dr. Steven Jones and a video I found covering the events and the scientific study approach ignoring all but just how did the three buildings come down. After viewing "Explosive Evidence," which aired on Colorado's PBS stations last year, I was convinced - and so very sad over the prospects my government was responsible for this terrible act.
Anyway, as I accumulated more and more information, looked at the stuff out there, rejecting the junk and only considering the plausible, I found myself more and more depressed that 9-11 was actually committed by my government; they murdered 3,000 people in one day, kicked this country into endless war - and it looks as if they may get away with it.
I have contacted as many political types as possible asking for new hearings and such. My life has been altered and not for the best, I must say. The deep and wide gulf that must be traversed, the people involved, the terrible laws enacted to support the tyranny heading our way, the daily barrage aimed at the 2nd Amendment crowd (I am part of that crowd) to disarm us, and the total uphill battle ahead of us to regain our nation is so hard to contemplate. I pray God will help us upright our ship of state, and that He will answer our S.O.S. (T.P. in Missouri)
Bollyn Responds: The intellectual quandary that you describe so well is very real and something that all serious 9-11 scholars go through. One has to realize that there is no escaping this quandary, but there is a solution to the problem. The only real solution is to be liberated from the evil deception that surrounds the events of 9-11. This is why my book, Solving 9-11, has an image of the sun rising over North America. It is, after all, a positive and enlightening thing to be relieved of a deception.
The false-flag terrorism of 9-11 is clearly anathema to any patriotic American, but it is true that some Americans were involved in the crime and the cover-up. These are 'Americans' like Michael Chertoff and Dov Zakheim who served a foreign power, Israel, while they occupied high-level positions in the U.S. government. George W. Bush and Dick Cheney are also Americans who have utterly betrayed the American people and republic. These people have all committed high crimes and treason against the United States and must be prosecuted for their crimes.
As Dr. Martin Luther King said, "To ignore evil is to become an accomplice to it." The lackadaisical attitude of the Obama administration that we, as a nation, can simply let bygones be bygones with such monstrous crimes as 9-11, its cover-up, and the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq simply indicates that it is part of the same criminal network that is behind these crimes. There is no escaping the fact that we must hold the 9-11 criminals accountable for their crimes. Real justice is the only solution.
Comment: Judy Wood and Scientific Reality
Judy Wood claims that the Twin Towers and Building 7 were destroyed by a new, higher technology that the government secretly possesses. What supposedly happens in this higher technology is an event at the molecular level where electrical forces that bind molecules together are somehow reversed so that suddenly they repel each other, and this causes matter to explode into dust. Judy Wood claims that this new technology is potentially very valuable to mankind, because it can provide unlimited cheap energy. That this new, higher technology exists is proven by the fact that the WTC buildings were “dustified,” or suddenly turned into dust in a way that involved no heat, according to Wood.
The claim being made by Wood that an event is happening at a molecular level where molecules are suddenly sent flying away form one another in a heatless explosion is absolutely impossible, given what physicists consider to be knowledge. It would take a huge amount of evidence before the international community of physicists began to believe that such an event as “dustification” has ever actually happened. It would take much more evidence than the observations made of the Twin Towers turning into dust as they fell, even if there were no alternative explanations for these observations.
The Thermite Argument provides a sound explanation for the observations made of the Twin Towers turning into dust as they fell. It is more than probable that nano-thermite was burning and was perhaps also exploding inside the Twin Towers as they fell. This is known with much certainty, and it adequately explains the pulverization of the Twin Towers.
However, even if there were no evidence of thermite, the idea of a material cause that makes matter of every kind, steel as well as plastic and cement, suddenly explode into tiny particles due to a change in operative electrical forces at the molecular level, cannot be given scientific credibility by the observations made of the Twin Towers as they fell—along with all the other empirical evidence cited by Wood, such as a hurricane supposedly inexplicably changing its course. The totality of the evidence cited by Wood, no matter how well it stood up to scrutiny, would not be remotely close to what it would take to give scientific credibility to her far-fetched claim of “dustification.”
What is going on here is obviously disinformation, as Christopher Bollyn has stated. It is a deliberate “spreading of false news” that is meant to obscure the truth of what really happened on 9/11. (K.B. in California)
Question: I recently found your site and wanted to thank and congratulate you on your work... you connected more dots on 9/11 than I ever thought possible!
However, as a Canadian, I really must correct you on the appointment of the Canadian Deputy Minister of National Defense, who is appointed by the Minister of Defense, in consultation with the Prime Minister. In practical terms, he is appointed by the PM who appoints the Defense Minister to his Cabinet. Also, the Queen does not rule Canada in any way and has not even been a figurehead for decades (there are some left over ceremonial remnants in our government but absolutely no direct authority... and perhaps this was the source of your confusion).
I must say it does little for your credibility to be so wrong on the very core structure of a country you accuse of involvement in such a heinous crime, but I'm sure it's simply an honest (3rd party?) mistake.
Wishing you the very best, and continued success with your investigations!
M.G. in Toronto
Bollyn Responds:Thanks for your note. I am not blaming Canadians for 9-11, but the idea that Canadians and/or Canadian territory were involved in 9-11 is not at all far-fetched. The key role, as yet unexplained, played by two senior Canadian military officers in the NORAD drill on 9-11 clearly draws Canada and Canadians into the sordid saga. Secondly, there are the awards and titles given to these Canadian officers, Rudy Giuliani, and others by the Queen of England for their service on 9-11? Why, pray tell, did the Queen of England give awards to American politicians and Canadian officers for their service on 9-11? They did nothing right! More to the point, the actions of those who were knighted and honored by the Queen had allowed the attacks to succeed - and these individuals were then rewarded by the Queen of the British Empire. Was this to compensate these poor souls for the treachery they had committed?
About Canada's Deputy Minister of Defence, this is what Wikipedia says:
The Department of National Defence is headed by the Deputy Minister of National Defence... The Deputy Minister is appointed by the Crown (Queen-in-Council) on the advice of the Prime Minister.
This is what Canada's National Defence Act says about the appointment:
"There shall be a Deputy Minister of National Defence who shall be appointed by the Governor in Council to hold office during pleasure."
The Queen or sovereign is the head of state in Canada. The Governor General of Canada represents the sovereign, and most of the powers and authority of the sovereign have been delegated to the Governor General.
The prime minister is the head of government in Canada. The government is formally referred to as Her Majesty's Government and is defined by the Canadian constitution as the Queen acting on the advice of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada. This is known as the Queen-in-Council or sometimes the Governor-in-Council, referring to the Governor General of Canada as the Queen's stand-in.
"During pleasure" refers to the legal term "At Her Majesty's pleasure," which according to the Wikipedia article on the subject, means exactly what it says:
At Her Majesty's pleasure is a legal term of art derived from all legitimate authority for government stemming from the Crown. Originating in the United Kingdom, it is now used throughout the Commonwealth realms. In realms where the monarch is represented by a Governor-General, the phrase may be modified to be at the Governor's pleasure, since the governor-general, governor, or lieutenant governor is the Queen's personal representative in the country, state or province.
From these sources it seems pretty clear to me that Canada's Deputy Minister of Defense is indeed appointed by the Crown and serves at Her Majesty's pleasure.
Comment: The firebombing of Dresden is just one of the horrific war crimes of 1945-1946 carried out by our gallant Allied forces. General Eisenhower certainly showed his true colors as a war criminal, torturing and starving hundreds of thousands of German prisoners of war, civilians, and refugees. It was Winston Churchill himself who ordered the bombing of civilian targets early in the war. It forced Hitler to retaliate by using the "blitz" on London.
Churchill, Roosevelt, Truman, Stalin, and even Hitler, all had their handlers; they were all controlled by the very same banksters. Germany was set up to lose WWII. Why did they let the British escape from Dunkirk? Why did Hitler ignore his generals and intelligence officers who knew where D-Day was going to be, and when? Hitler was the puppet who was installed to lead them to defeat. It was Victor Rothschild who handled Churchill, and he went on to become Britain's number one spy for the Soviets, or rather Israel and the Soviets; same thing. Of course, he was not made public, he was untouchable, as he still is in the "history" books and media.
Victor Rothschild, 3rd Baron Rothschild (1910–1990)
No. You don't see daredevil, flag-waving heroic films about all this. When the so-called "good" guys do anything bad, it never appears in print or on the screen. Our scholarly books and academics only echo all the contrived, manipulated, manufactured, and delivered-to-order history we need to know. All the great, monumental volumes on Churchill, the pillar of the British Empire, exalted humanitarian - and what a crock!
This is why 9-11 like all the other crimes, will always be hidden from the masses. Myths, or rather outright lies are created and perpetuated for such events as the Titanic "sinking", JFK assassination, the 7/7 London bombings and on and on. The masses are too brainwashed, too sedated/medicated, too engaged in just trying to survive in their own lives, to worry or even care about all this. They're too depressed, too much in debt and way too much humanoid now, to even know just how enslaved and mind controlled they've really become.
We both keep trying to educate, to wake them all up... whether it’s the latest police shootout, school massacre, or other staged piece of terror, I have a hard job myself keeping from going crazy. Why would the good Lord allow all this to happen; is it all a test? Anyway Christopher, my own research and that of much more qualified people than me, will clearly show, will prove just how 9/11 played its part in forever advancing the banksters’ evil agenda. (G.H. in California)
Comment: Hello Christopher,
In reference to your Romney forecast for president, because of him being the Zionist favorite...
Well, being British, and being even more cynical than you, I believe everything was decided for Obama when the ruling elite put him in the job in the first place. Elections are mere theatre, illusion of choice. The criminal banking cabal, through their Zionist agents, through their willing dupes, their owned politicians, media, and judiciary, always manage to accept whoever the elite choose.
JFK was the last president to question his masters, and any criticism or discussion of his public execution is still, fifty years later, met with the same denial and ridicule as 9-11 and every other world shattering event. Zionists, Freemasons; they're all Satanists, as their kind of evil could only come from secret societies, exclusive clubs, and the "privileged classes," that the masses accept as normal and well meaning.
You and numerous others have well proved why, how, and by whom, 9-11 was carried out. Unfortunately, I feel the masses will never fully accept the truth about the evil that controls their lives, as from childhood, they have been conditioned, brain-washed, to believe in their governments and institutions. To believe the fairy tale history they are taught in school, to believe that good always triumphs over evil, which they are taught in church. Their minds have a built-in block that filters out the real truth. People by nature, as the Tavistock Institute discovered in the 1920's, want to belong, want to be part of the majority, want to comply...
Anyway, like you I suspect, I have chronic insomnia, with all this going on in my mind, and hoping that the masses will wake-up one day. I greatly admire your determination and spirit. However when you see 9-11 as just another part of the centuries old conspiracy that continues to dominate us all, how do you manage to comprehend any hope for the future, and our children, let alone manage to sleep nights?
I pose an impossible question, don't I, Christopher?
When I try to explain to people 9-11 or JFK, I first talk about money. How money is created literally out of thin air by the central (criminal, private) banks. I go on to show that there is no debt, none at all. If governments go back to creating their own currency, like they once did, interest free. Then it’s simply a question of spending within a fixed budget. They wouldn't be beholden to anyone.
With that the case, governments wouldn't be in anyone's pocket. There would be no corruption, and no need for wars or 9-11's. They say that money is the root of all evil... well the City of London banksters, the Rothschilds and their like, created the so-called "intelligence services" to make sure that countries, governments, don't get to control their own money and credit. MI6 created the CIA and Mossad, to get the world into perpetual debt, and to enslave mankind. The intelligence community serves the banksters, and no one else. What’s more, the banksters establish and control all the "think tanks," research foundations, all the so-called endowment trusts, the kind that so graciously fund PBS. The banksters control education, they fund both left and right wing groups, and they always lead the opposition, because they always start it.
Now to get the masses, to get an average intelligence person to understand all this is like asking them to accept aliens from another planet as their real parents. It completely cuts their foundation away, their anchor, their sanity and reasoning. As I've said with your scholarly, intense research and books, you've well shown that 9-11 was a monumental false-flag operation. That 3,000 people and 3 iconic skyscrapers were merely used as props to stage an apocalyptic event that would launch all-out war in the Middle East, and get the world to surrender its freedom and rights, for so-called security. Protection from the "terrorists"... only the terrorists are, and have always been the banksters. No, it's not Rod Serling's Twilight Zone; it's our real world today!
Unfortunately, the youth of today are even more willing to accept all the lies and injustices. I call it a "latte mentality"; indifferent to what's really going on beyond their I-pads and laptops. The banksters have long wanted to break up the family unit, to confuse and to sedate the masses. Drug stores on every other corner, hundreds of mindless TV channels, instant downloads... it's no wonder our young people fall prey to this evil Pied Piper. Of course some are able to resist, to still think for themselves, but they're losing out. As you well know, the 9-11 Truth Movement like everything else, has been well infiltrated by the banksters. The alternative media, like the Occupy Movement, American Civil Liberties Union and so much else, have been well poisoned, but still the voice of hope manages to survive somehow.
Life literally is a Matrix. It is Alice in Wonderland. With so much beauty in the world, with so many good people, with the wonders of nature, I sometimes forget that all this evil is real. But the images of JFK, 9-11, the images of babies exposed to depleted uranium bombs, the images of ever lying politicians and Hollywood celebrities shilling for the banksters... that’s what keeps me so awake!
I've already seen how your site has expanded 9-11, as indeed it should. It remains so far, so criminally monumental in false-flag events, but I fear the worst is yet to come. As with the loyal, dedicated supporters of the USS Liberty, JFK/RFK assassinations, plus all those who question Waco, Oklahoma City, London 7/7 bombings, Princess Diana, and so many other horrific world events, let alone the crimes of just Israel, it's an honour and privilege to have you as a fellow supporter and friend!
Best to you Christopher as always,
Comment: Dear Christopher: It was a great honor and pleasure for me to get a letter from you - many thanks! I look forward to receiving your two books on 9/11 which I already know will be the definitive works on the subject. While I believe that there is a place for research that delves into the mechanics of how the three towers were brought down (because that explanation exposes the official version as a preposterous lie), the identification of those responsible, and analysis of the agenda that those heinous attacks were intended to advance are infinitely more important goals of the quest for "9/11 truth".
It is my belief that the ultimate purpose of this crime of the century is the destruction of every Arab capital in the world in order to neutralize all opposition to the Zionist bandit state that is ensconced in Palestine, with the destruction of the Al Aqsa Mosque to pave the way for the re-building of the Jerusalem Temple as the final endgame. The latter is to be the staging area for the unveiling of the "Jewish King" under whose direction the Zionists believe they will become the invincible masters of the universe. "Christian" Zionists teach the fantasy that this will signal the "return of the Messiah". But it is not to the loving embrace of Jesus Christ, coming again in glory and majesty, that today's TV evangelicals are leading their clueless followers, but to the murderous clutches of His satanic counterfeit, "the man of sin".
Whether or not one is a believer in the Scriptures, it is nevertheless imperative for everyone to know that the Zionist elites are in anticipation of a religious/political leader whom THEY believe will soon emerge as an omnipotent force enabling the Synagogue of Satan to extend its brutal control over the entire globe. And they, together with their bought-and-paid-for minions in the U.S. government and every other puppet state of the US-EU-British-Israel nexus are willing to obliterate civilization itself to establish what could be accurately described as the one-world dictatorship of Antichrist, presently taking shape before our eyes…
Question: Dear Chris, I got your e-mail the other day. Thank you. One thing I keep wondering though - why the hell does Google or whoever keep posting stuff to the effect that you're an "agent saboteur" of the Zionists, or that your family has been killed, or something? What's going on?
Bollyn Responds: This question comes from a person in Hoffman Estates who has known the Bollyn family all of her life. She doesn’t understand why there is so much vicious slander against me on the Internet.
First, let’s be clear, Google is not responsible for any of the slander. The slander against me all comes from individuals who were associated with me in one way or another during the first five years of my work as an investigative journalist researching what really happened on 9-11. Most of it actually comes from three detractors whose names are known within the “9-11 truth” movement: Eric Hufschmid, Daryl Bradford Smith (a.k.a. Daryl B. Setters), and Michael Collins Piper (a.k.a. Michael Bernard Piper) from American Free Press. These three detractors have obviously been ordered and paid to spread slanderous lies about me: first Smith in 2005, then Piper in 2006, and finally Hufschmid in 2007.
I, on the other hand, have never attacked any of them but actually helped them all a great deal in their endeavors, so why would these people, who are supposedly 9-11 truth-seekers, spend so much time attacking me?
Smith clearly revealed himself as an agent acting on orders to hurt my credibility in the “Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can” telephone call to Eric Hufschmid, which Hufschmid recorded. Piper and Hufschmid attack me relentlessly saying I am a Zionist agent, because they know that my potential supporters are people who are critical of Israel and Zionism who are naturally skeptical and might entertain the notion that I am a disinformation agent. This is the thrust of the slander coming from Michael Piper of American Free Press and Eric Hufschmid, who claims that I have been kidnapped and that my whole family is secretly being held hostage by the Zionists although we appear to be living normal lives in freedom. The disinformation tactic being employed is designed to sow suspicion and doubt in the minds of those who are wavering between supporting me and not supporting me. Spreading suspicion and doubt about a person is as easy as spreading fear, another basic tactic used to stifle dissent and prevent people from taking effective political action.
The reason why these detractors have been employed to slander me is because my analysis of the 9-11 attacks reveals the key players behind the false-flag terror atrocity. Exposing the people behind the murderous deception is damaging to those who are really behind the 9-11 atrocity. With the undercover police attack at my home in August 2006, the faction behind 9-11 tried to criminalize me and put me in Cook County Jail. In conjunction with the police assault they assigned their agents to attack my credibility. This is all part of a campaign to marginalize me and my research. Their objective is to undermine my support. The people behind the slander know that people who don't know me may believe some of the lies, so they throw buckets of mud at me and hope that some of it will stick. It doesn't cost them anything to slander me because the people who attack me are already on their payroll.
You, as a friend and neighbor, know that I have not been kidnapped and are probably fairly certain that I am not a Zionist agent. I have been speaking and thinking in the same way for as long as you and I have been talking about these matters. But you have the advantage of actually knowing me. Most of the people who read the vicious slander about me have never even met me. They have no way of knowing if the slander is true or false. Being skeptical to start with, many of the people who come across the anti-Bollyn slander may very well be dissuaded from supporting me because they don't want to support a suspected "Zionist agent." The attacks against me are a good example of the old saying, if you don't like the message, kill the messenger.
Question:A while back a reader sent me a very good question asking how the perpetrators of 9-11 can live with their guilt. I wasn't ready to answer it at the time and am no longer able to locate the original question. The reader was basically asking how the masterminds of the terror attacks of 9-11 can live with themselves after having committed such atrocities in which thousands of innocent people lost their lives?
Bollyn Responds: I deal with this subject in my book Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World. As my thesis is that 9-11 was masterminded and carried out by Zionist extremists such as Benjamin Netanyahu, I will explain and then show how such Zionist terrorists live with the guilt of having killed thousands of people.
Firstly, Zionism is founded on the notion of Jewish separatism and supremacism. Zionists like Netanyahu have been raised with the chauvinist doctrine that Jews should live apart from others and that only Jewish lives are important. The political ideology of Zionism was merged with the orthodox religion of Jews living in Eastern Europe in the late 19th Century. The Jews of Poland and Russia lived under the rules of the rabbis who taught them that non-Jews were lesser beings, as the Talmud teaches. Such a racist ideology results in its supporters committing crimes against non-Jews. Zionist crimes against non-Jews are never punished because the community they live in supports the same racist ideology. This is the story of modern Israel and its long history of crimes against the Palestinians and others.
In July 1946, when Palestine was under the British Mandate, Jews from the Zionist terrorist groups the Irgun and the Haganah blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, killing more than 90 people. This terror atrocity, which is actually very similar to 9-11, was ordered by Menachem Begin, then head of the Irgun. Begin went on to become the prime minister of Israel in the 1970s after creating the Likud coalition, which comprised members of his former terrorist organization. Terrorism was the primary tactic employed by the Irgun in Palestine and has been used by Israeli leaders since 1946. Begin's son Benny is a leader of the Likud and is a close associate of Benjamin Netanyahu, who has on at least two occasions openly stated that 9-11 and the fraudulent "War on Terror" were good for Israel. The Likud party of Zionist terrorists and their sons has dominated Israeli politics since the 1970s. Netanyahu is the current Likud prime minister of the Zionist state.
What is most telling about how Zionist terrorists feel about their crimes can be seen in how they celebrate them as great deeds. Sixty years after the bombing of the King David Hotel, the terrorists who carried out the terror atrocity held a two-day celebration in which Netanyahu participated. More than anything this celebration shows how Zionist terrorists view their crimes - as great feats carried out for the good of the Zionist state. As I wrote in "America the Target", the third chapter of Solving 9-11:
In July 2006, the former prime minister and leader of the Likud, Benjamin Netanyahu, attended a two-day 60th anniversary celebration of the King David Hotel bombing with former terrorists of the Irgun and Haganah. The event was organized by the Menachem Begin Heritage House, the University of Haifa, and the Association of IZL [Irgun] Fighters. The seminar was held "to mark the 60th anniversary of the bombing of the King David Hotel, Jerusalem, by members of the United Resistance Movement (Haganah and Irgun)," the Jerusalem Post noted in its pre-event notices. The Israeli newspaper specifically noted that members of the Haganah and Irgun had been involved in the terrorist bombing. One of the terrorists even led a tour of the hotel he had bombed. The fact that the American-educated right-wing politician and terror specialist, "Bibi" Netanyahu, had participated in a two-day event celebrating the bombing of the King David Hotel was reported in the Jerusalem Post, and in leading newspapers in Britain, France, and India – but not a single word about the event was printed in the controlled press of the United States, the nation supposedly fighting a "War on Terror."
Question: Why is it that you publish an article, “Why the Assange Case is Important” when many other well-known political commentators judge Wikileaks to be nothing more than a psy-ops operation or media disinformation?
Bollyn Responds: I simply have not seen any evidence that Wikileaks is disinformation whereas some of the "well-known political commentators" you refer to are most certainly disinformation agents. Furthermore, given the very real danger that Assange would be turned over to the U.S. government by Sweden, I thought it was necessary to show the close relationship between the Swedish foreign minister Carl Bildt and the international crimocracy. I did post the video of the U.S. helicopter gunship killing a group of innocent Iraqis in 2007 that Wikileaks had leaked. I did notice in Assange's "Unauthorized Autobiography" that he said he would not publish material pertaining to Israel or Cuba, which I thought was odd. If Julian Assange and Bradley Manning are part of some high-level plot they are certainly not getting much help from people in high places.
Question: WHO are protected by the 9-11 holographic projection and video fakery narrative? Is there an 'inner sanctum' group of psy-ops professionals who think they can insulate themselves by conjuring a narrative that eliminates them from the suspects list?
Or are these narratives just stall and diversion tactics to divert attention, fragment the solidarity of the 9/11 activists, and mislead people away from the evidence that is very damning and which points to a long list of people and agencies which had the motive, the means, and the opportunity?
Bollyn Responds: A very good question. I would have to agree that these false narratives are primarily designed to serve as diversion tactics to divert attention and fragment the 9-11 truth movement. The Judy Wood theory that the Twin Towers were pulverized by a directed-energy beam weapon is yet another of these red herrings. The purpose of these false theories is to confuse the population, to distract the activists, and divide the 9-11 truth movement. This is not unlike the psychological warfare methods that are employed against the enemy population during war.
Recent Comment: I have two questions for this election year: What happened on 9-11? And, why are we killing people in the Middle East? I chose your book to help me find the answers to the first question. I finished "Solving 9-11" last night. You answered both questions - but that is an understatement. Let's say you crossed every "t" and dotted every "i" in the quest for truth, not only about 9-11 and the illegal wars; you went much further. Here is the sickness at the core of what ails America. Many of us have a strong sense that things have changed in our country, that an unknown force seems to be deteriorating the core of our beliefs, our culture and our individual families. The media ignores the problem or blames inane sources, but seldom does the curtain get pulled back to reveal the true masterminds behind the downfall of our formerly wonderful country.
I see that our beloved country has lost most of the battle already, has been hijacked by foreign interests and our blood is being used to spill the blood of other innocents around the world. Our moral fiber has been so deeply corrupted that it is doubtful that we will rise up to revolt in time. I love the Constitution and I prize my freedom, but there is not much left of either one at this point. At least now I know what is killing us. I pray that there will be enough of a spark alive in American hearts to pull us out of this in time.
Thank you for your courage. Thank you for your thoroughness. Thank you for keeping yourself and your family safe while bringing us this essential message.
God bless and keep you and your family safe.
Question:Please let me congratulate you for your book [ Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World ] that I have read attentively. The thorough investigation of the vast subjects and the clarity of your presentation are outstanding. I agree with you that the 9-11 crime itself remains un-solved, or at least crucial parts of it.
There are three leading theories:
1. Al Qaeda did it all and just some rumors were perceived by intelligence agencies. 2. Al Qaeda did it all but Mossad had precise pre-knowledge. Others just heard rumors. 3. Mossad did it all as a "false flag" operation and Al Qaeda and others just heard rumors.
You lean towards theory No. 3, whereas I am a strong believer in theory No. 2. Why?
Bollyn Responds:While the letter goes on with 9 reasons why the reader thinks "Al Qaeda did it all but Mossad had precise pre-knowledge," I will explain why I think 9-11 was an Israeli "false-flag" terror operation from A to Z. There are two key aspects of 9-11 that point to it being an Israeli operation: the pre-planned demolition of the Twin Towers and the Zionist-controlled cover-up.
The first point is that the Twin Towers and the 47-story WTC 7 were demolished using very sophisticated explosives. These are the largest buildings that have ever been demolished in this manner. One of the sophisticated explosives used to pulverize the 220 acre-sized concrete floors, and everything on them, was an extremely energetic form of Thermite that was made using nanotechnology. Chips of this bi-layered explosive coating were found in samples of the dust and analyzed by Dr. Steven E. Jones at BYU. When these chips were heated to about 425 degrees Celsius they exploded with more energy per gram than any known explosive used in demolition.
There were very few nations that had the capability to produce such an explosive nanotech coating in 2001. Afghanistan was certainly not one of them. How could Al Qaeda have produced such a high-tech explosive and applied it to the interior of the Twin Towers? The evidence of this advanced form of super-thermite disproves the notion that Al Qaeda is responsible for the destruction of the Twin Towers.
All three towers were under the direct control of Larry Silverstein, a Zionist leader who was on extremely close terms with Benjamin Netanyahu. Silverstein and Netanyahu are so close that the Israeli leader called Silverstein every Sunday afternoon, New York time.
Secondly, there is the Zionist-managed cover-up of the evidence and truth of what really happened on 9-11. As I explain in my book, the destruction of the crucial evidence was carried out by Zionist agents. All that remained of the Twin Towers was dust and steel. The steel was hastily dispatched to two Jersey City junkyards that were controlled by Zionist partisans. The junkyards worked round-the-clock to cut the steel into small pieces, mix it with other scrap, and ship it to Asia where it was melted down to prevent it from being examined as evidence from the crime scene.
Who was the person who allowed this crucial evidence to be destroyed? The man who headed the Criminal Division of the Dept. of Justice at the time was Michael Chertoff, the Israeli son of one of the first Mossad agents. Chertoff was responsible for the FBI's collection of the evidence, its "non-investigation" of the crime, and the prosecution of those behind it. Under his command, all of the crucial evidence was confiscated and destroyed. There was no investigation and no one has been tried in court for the crimes of 9-11. If Al Qaeda was responsible for 9-11, why were Zionist agents covering-up for them?
The 9-11 cover-up continued with the judicial obstruction of justice, which was managed by the federal judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, a dedicated partisan of Israel. Under Hellerstein, the Israeli airport security company that was responsible for passenger screening on 9-11 was dismissed from the tort litigation and every single 9-11 wrongful death case was settled out of court. Furthermore, the man who is said to be the "Mastermind of 9-11" sits in the U.S. gulag in Guantanamo far from any open legal process in the United States. If Al Qaeda truly exists, and if this organization really is responsible for the death and destruction on 9-11, why are dedicated Zionist agents loyal to the state of Israel working so hard to protect it?
Question: For quite a few years I've been wondering how we will ever be successful in exposing these potent truths that would so much move our world in a positive direction - exposing once and for all the tragic use of false false terror. I would love to see the movement address this question of how are we going to achieve a this much needed breakthrough. It seems like while the case to disprove the official story gets more solid the 9/11 Truth movement as a whole is declining.
Bollyn Responds: This is a question that must be on the mind of every honest person seeking the truth about 9-11. We have abundant evidence that the official story is a pack of lies, so when will 9-11 truth make the evening news? When will CNN, FOX News, and the New York Times report that an advanced form of super-thermite was found in the dust of the World Trade Center? If this is the breakthrough we are hoping for then our hope has been put in the wrong place. The controlled media is very much a part of the cover-up and is not about to switch sides and start being honest. The people who control the media and government have their own agenda and telling the truth about 9-11 is not part of that agenda. We have to be the media and provide better sources of information for the people.
The publication of the discovery by Dr. Steven E. Jones of active thermitic material in the dust of the World Trade Center is a breakthrough that provided scientific evidence that the towers were destroyed using pre-placed explosives, but this crucial discovery didn't result in the sea change we had hoped for because it was ignored and avoided by the controlled press and the government. So, it is not the lack of evidence that is the problem, but the inability or unwillingness of the media and our "elected officials" to address that evidence. Unfortunately, for many people something is not considered real or valid until it is discussed favorably by their favorite news anchor, the person who is their anchor to "reality".
The 9-11 truth movement is really just a loose expression for the thousands of individuals who are working to find the truth about 9-11. As one might expect many of the people in this movement are actually agents who are trying to sabotage that effort by promoting disinformation. I am not familiar with any 9-11 truth movement but I have met many individuals who are dedicated to finding the truth. Many of them have supported me and my work through the years to solve 9-11. I am very glad to say that this spring my book Solving 9-11 will finally be available in print.
Question: If a plane didn't hit the Pentagon, if it wasn't a plane that crashed in that Pennsylvania field, and the planes that hit the Twin Towers were substitutes, the obvious question is: What happened to the real flights with their passengers and crews? Where are those planes and people? That's the only nagging question I have about 9-11.
Bollyn Responds: This is probably the most commonly asked question about 9-11, and happens to be a very timely one in light of the recently released Pentagon report about the Air Force mortuary at Dover AFB where, it turns out, unidentified human remains from Shanksville and the Pentagon wound up being disposed of in a landfill. I have written about the deception that evidently occurred at Shanksville in an article entitled The Shanksville Deception of 9-11. Although I cannot say for certain what happened to the passengers and crews from the Boston flights of 9-11, I can say what I think may have happened based on the evidence.
Wallace Miller, the coroner of Somerset County, is protesting the Pentagon report that says that human remains from Shanksville were taken to Dover AFB. He also claims that all the remains from Flight 93 were identified. This can only be explained by the fact that Miller was not part of the recovery effort from the large debris field that was about 100 meters in the woods. Miller had previously told the press that he stopped being a coroner after about 20 minutes at the crater in the reclaimed mine because there were no body parts to be seen. This is probably true because it was from the large debris field around the cabin of Barry Hoover that the human remains that were taken to Dover AFB were found. Now, ask yourself, why would the FBI not allow the local coroner, who had legal responsibility for the crime scene, to be part of the recovery effort from the debris field? What was in the debris field that had to be hidden from the county coroner?
The local coroner and other authorities were probably kept away from the real debris field because the number of individuals on the plane that was evidently shot down over Shanksville is much larger than the 44 who are said to have been on Flight 93. The local coroner could simply not be allowed to see the real debris field. I think what may have happened was a sleight-of-hand trick in which the Boston passengers were put together on another flight out of Boston that landed at Cleveland airport, as Flight 93 reportedly did. These people were then put on the plane that was shot down over Shanksville. This would explain the unidentified human remains from Shanksville and why the real debris field in the woods was kept secret.
Question: What are the characteristics of a False Front?
Bollyn Responds: A false front is used to give a false impression of a company or organization. It is like the false fronts seen on old buildings in the western United States. These were built on the front of the building to make them look bigger and more grand than they really were. In reading through the text of my book Solving 9-11, which will be published this spring, I discuss several false front operations that were involved in the 9-11 plot. These false front operations were all Israeli intelligence operations that were set up to give a false impression about what the company was and who was running it. The three companies that we know were false front operations of Israeli intelligence are: Urban Moving Systems (UMS), Ptech, and Next Graphics. Ptech and Next Graphics maintained false fronts as Arab Muslim-owned companies which concealed the agents of Israeli intelligence who operated through them. UMS pretended to be a moving company while it really acted as a logistics center for the Israeli terrorists involved in the bombing of the World Trade Center. In any case an intelligence operation of this type puts up a false facade which is very obvious but also very superficial. The Arab-owned front at Next Graphics, for example, was overdone but it fooled people into thinking it was a Palestinian-owned company. In such an operation one will find people who don't fit with the image if one looks behind the facade. The people at UMS were not really interested in being movers, and it showed. At Ptech and Next Graphics there were Israelis working where one would certainly not expect to find them. At Ptech it was Michael Goff, the Jewish lawyer, who pulled all the strings in setting up the company in 1994 that revealed the falseness of the Arab-owned front. Goff went on to work for the Mossad-backed company Guardium. Ptech software was running on all the crucial computer systems of the FAA that failed on 9-11.
The same holds true for all such operations, such as false front nationalist, patriotic, or radical websites and publications. If the people who run the operation do not seem like they fit, it may be that the operation is a false front scam.
Question: What is your take on Israel and Iran? I think it is all bluster from all sides to stir up support at home. I can't see them really starting a pre-emptive war in an election year. I can't see the U.S. military going willingly into that hornet's nest.
Bollyn Responds:One needs to realize that the Zionist planners behind the false-flag terrorism of 9/11 (and the cover-up) are playing for keeps. These people are not crazy; they are evil. They planned 9/11 decades in advance and their evil game is meant to go on for decades. War with Iran is the key part of the game. Having U.S. troops based in Afghanistan and in the nations around Iran is part of the plan. The U.S. military does what it is ordered to do. I don’t think many U.S. soldiers willingly go to Iraq or Afghanistan.
The fact of the matter is that the war against Iran is already underway. The punitive sanctions against Iran, dictated by the Zionist war lobby, are a tactic of economic warfare. The Zionist establishment has been pushing hard for war with Iran for several years. The anti-Iranian sanctions and propaganda are very similar to what organized Jewry did when it declared war on Germany in 1933. Although it took 6 more years for the war to begin, it finally came to all-out war with millions killed and much of Europe destroyed.
The Israelis are evidently carrying out terror attacks and assassinations in Iran, as they do across the region, and I think these efforts will continue and increase. I don’t think the Israelis will carry out an attack on their own, but I do think they will do everything they can to try to provoke a war between the United States and Iran. A false-flag attack on a U.S. vessel in the Persian Gulf, for example, could draw the U.S. into war with the Islamic Republic. In this way a war with Iran could start at any time given the fact that the U.S. has so many troops and equipment based in the region. Iran is virtually surrounded by U.S. forces. What better time to start a war? I have no confidence that President Obama would resist the call for a war. The Republican candidates, except Ron Paul, are all supported with Zionist money and espouse very hawkish positions on Iran.
Latest Comment: RON PAUL & 9/11 Truth - Imagine, not a single American politician of any real significance, not a single one will speak about the truth of 9/11. That fact, in and of itself, should speak volumes, volumes about the utterly dire situation this country is in. Even Ron Paul can't come close to speaking of this Israeli white elephant... Lew Rockwell won't go near 9/11 either... It seems like affirming Israel's key part with 9/11 is akin to denying the "Holocaust."
Bollyn Responds: Ron Paul can't talk about what really happened on 9/11. In the high stakes political arena that Ron Paul is in to openly question what happened on 9/11 would be the fastest way to derail his campaign and he knows it. Why should he do that? One need only look at what happened to me to realize that it is career suicide to discuss the truth about 9/11. As the assassination of Senator Paul Wellstone clearly shows, questioning what happened on 9/11 and challenging the crimocracy ruling Washington can be fatal for any politician.
This is not to say that Ron Paul really believes that Osama Bin Laden and his band of 20 terrorists carried out 9/11. In Liberty Defined, Paul's 2011 book on 50 essential issues, he calls the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan "useless, stupid, and senseless." That certainly does not sound like a person who believes the pack of lies about 9/11. In the book Paul also has a short but very interesting chapter entitled "Noble Lie", which begins like this:
The noble lie is anything but noble. The idea is mostly associated with government, for good reason. Government lies to us to manipulate public opinion to bring about certain results, like war and wealth redistribution. - Ron Paul, "Noble Lie", Liberty Defined 2011
Comment:People like you and I are working towards fixing serious problems. A lot of the people who have caused these problems are being compensated via taxpayers' funds. So how much more do people like you and I deserve to be compensated for exposing these problems so that they can be solved?
Bollyn Responds:This is an excellent comment because it goes directly to the question of what is the value of the truth in an era of lies? Should one even expect any compensation for bringing the truth to the public?
I can report that during the fall of 2011, the 10th anniversary of 9/11, donations from readers averaged less than $10 per day. Obviously, if Bollyn.com were a business I would have had to close up shop a long time ago. I cover the bulk of my costs and maintain my website out of my own pocket and have done so for years. Bollyn.com is not a business, but a mission. I cannot be indifferent to the false-flag terrorism of 9/11 that resulted in the mass murder of thousands of my fellow citizens. I cannot abide wars of aggression and conquest based on these lies. I do what I can to bring the truth out in order to liberate my nation from the twin yoke of deception and slavery.
"The people who have caused these problems", on the other hand, are well compensated with taxpayer money. Money is, after all, the name of the game. Rob the people through their taxes and make a fortune. The billionaire Crown family from Chicago, for example, has long owned a large share of General Dynamics, the major defense contractor. The Zionist Crown family, who bankrolled Barack Obama's presidential campaign, profits directly from increased defense spending and war. In this way the average American taxpayer has "given" much more money to the Crown family (or any other defense contractor) than they would ever even consider giving to a truth-telling website like Bollyn.com. But, of course, they were never given the choice.
This is also true of many of the leading so-called "alternative news" websites and publications. These are actually funded and controlled by the same agencies that control the mainstream news outlets. Controlling public opinion is a very high priority in a nation like the United States and billions of taxpayer dollars are spent every year in this effort. As Andreas von Buelow told me in 2001, "Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation." And who do you think pays for all that? The taxpayer actually funds the agencies who deceive him on a daily basis.
When you see a well-funded website that claims to be giving you the truth, ask yourself how is it funded, and by whom? Is there any transparency in the financing of the operation? I am a one-man operation and I am fortunate to have the support of a few concerned and generous citizens. I am motivated to maintain Bollyn.com solely by my desire to see truth and justice prevail. I will continue my work as long as I can -- and so long as God wills it.
Comment: It was so nice to log on to your page and see a call for paper ballots. I've been saying it ever since 2004, and to be honest, never gave it thought before that - I thought the hanging chad thing was a bit foolish, and I was glad, at that time, that Bush was elected since Gore was ready to slam Kyoto down our throats. But with the exit polls at 2004 being so far off, I knew that the machines were rigged, and having done a little programming myself, I could understand how easy it would be to hijack votes on a touchscreen voting system. So yes, to get back to government of, for, and by [the people], we definitely need to return to accountable balloting. Let's pray it makes some inroads in the psyche of the under-educated in this country.
Bollyn Responds: You are absolutely right about the need to return to paper ballots - if we are to remove the criminal network that controls our nation. If we don't have proper and transparent elections in which the votes are openly counted by citizens in front of other citizens, we don't have democratic elections. It's that simple. As Thomas Paine wrote in 1803, "...to have the representation real, the election must be real; and that where the election is a fiction, the representation is a fiction also. Like will always produce like." My article about "Restoring Democracy to America" has photos and explains how a proper democratic election should be done; this one was in France.
Comment: Farha Khaled wrote to me, saying, "Whether Fjordman is an Israeli agent or not, doesn’t negate the fact that Zionist right wingers are in alliance with these Nazi type characters. Geert Wilder is funded by Daniel Pipes' organisation, the Middle East Forum (MEF), and Pipes is not an Israeli. These extremists tend to do their worst in the USA or in alliance with the USA rather than in Israel."
Bollyn Responds: While it is true that Daniel Pipes is not an Israeli, his organization Middle East Forum is directed by a Major in Israeli military intelligence named Efraim Karsh.
Efraim Karsh is director of the Middle East Forum, editor of the Middle East Quarterly, and Professor of Middle East and Mediterranean Studies at King's College London. Born and raised in Israel, Karsh served for seven years as an intelligence officer in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), where he attained the rank of major.
I point this out because it is important to understand that the Zionist criminal network in the United States works hand-in-glove with the Israelis and has done so since the 1940s - before the creation of the State of Israel. When I say Zionist criminal network I am not using hyperbole. I am referring to the Jewish Zionist gangsters who have long controlled whole sections of the U.S. economy, such as the media, Hollywood, New York City and Washington, D.C. The Israelis usually handle the operations side while the American Zionists act as financiers and front men, as Pipes does in MEF. This is the same combination that carried out 9/11.
Question: "Aren't you going to print your book on 9/11?" a supporter asked the other day.
Another supporter wrote today: "I just finished listening to your interview on No Lies Radio and felt compelled once again to donate to your excellent and important work. I have read your book as you have gone along, but I like to have copies in the house and would rather not have to download and read from my computer."
Bollyn Responds: Yes. I certainly want to bring my book out in print, but there are a couple obstacles that need to be surmounted. I have decided that it would be best to self publish it on a print-to-order basis due to the sensitive subject of my book. A mainstream publisher simply won't touch a book that links Zionism with 9/11. In order to have the book printed I need to have the material laid out in "print ready" format - ready to go to the printer. For this I need help from a person who really knows how to lay out a book using the software used in the trade.
I was encouraged that one of the supporters who asked about my book offered to proof-read the text. She also said she knows a person who can do the book lay out. This is all that is needed. When this is done I can offer my book Solving 9/11 in book form. I certainly hope this can happen soon.
Latest Comment: A reader writes about being affected by exposure to Depleted Uranium (D.U.)
Dustin Brim, 21, of Daytona Beach, Florida, in Iraq in February 2004. Within two months of this photo, Dustin would be severely afflicted with massive cancerous tumors that would prevent him from breathing and eating normally. Within seven months he would succumb to lymphoma at Walter Reed Hospital, age 22, an unnecessary and tragic death from depleted uranium poisoning.
My husband and I were in charge of rolling stock coming onto the Kwajalein Atoll 13 years ago that had been bought very cheap by the Army for either depo or re-furb from the Gulf War to use on the atolls in the Marshall Islands. We were employees of Raytheon - and as civilian contractors, we were thrilled to have a jobs in the pacific -- on off-days we scuba dived and enjoyed the various islands in the region.
Our jobs were - I was the custodian of all rolling stock in the region and my husband was the equipment inspector.
At work we were more exposed (my husband Richard, in particular) to this uranium and tungsten poisoned pieces of junk left over from the Gulf War than any other employees. The Army managed a quick and clever move with much of the equipment that was poisoning over there - - they simply put it on ships and shipped it to out of the way bases away from CONUS for either destruction (which means we just threw it in the ocean around the Marshall Islands or our mechanics worked on the equipment to make it usable for contractors and military personnel at these bases.
No notice of the dangers. No protection in any way. No nothing. We were poisoned.
Today we are in the process of a slow death of gastro distress, having treatment only with pallative care with tincture of opium and pain killers. The doctors are puzzled and after spending every dime we have on UCLA specialists, etc. we are back in Clark County, Nevada with our family doctor who prescribes the only thing she can: pain killers. We are dying and we know it.
The article referenced above struck such a serious chord in my heart. It's heart breaking what has happened and is still happening to those troups in the military who haven't got a chance in hell of survival. DU is the new scourge of the human race. And, NO ONE IS DOING ANYTHING ABOUT IT. It's sick and the system is sick. As Henry Kissinger was once quoted, "the military are just human fodder."
If I thought you knew of something that could help us, I would ask, but I know better. We haven't much future left. And, there is no on one who will help.
Take care - please spread the word. If you need help, let me know. Thanks so much.
Bollyn Responds: I have written a series of articles about the serious health damage caused by exposure to depleted uranium. The whole series of six articles based on original research can be read here: http://www.bollyn.com/depleted-uranium
After speaking with the person who wrote this comment to me, I discovered that she has a webpage dedicated to the uranium poisoning she and her husband are suffering from: http://pattiredd.com/poisoning.htm
Comment: It is very depressing to see how the presidential candidates are servants of Israel (See Governor Rick Perry’s opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, “The U.S. Must Support Israel at the U.N.” (16 September 2011). Hopefully somebody knowledgeable could counter each of the deceiving paragraphs of that article, which I think was not even written by Perry, but by Zionists endorsed by him. Thanks for all your efforts and may God guide you and protect you and your family.
I agree with the comment that the Perry piece was probably written by his Zionist handlers. While Perry’s pro-Israel piece is chock full of lies and distortions, what I found most disturbing was this dangerous lie: “Iran pursues nuclear weapons its leaders vow to use to annihilate Israel.”
For a leading American presidential candidate to state such a provocative and dangerous lie in a published article is alarming. The sentence actually contains two lies: that Iran is developing nuclear weapons and that Iran’s leaders plan to use these weapons to annihilate Israel. Both are nothing but fabrications that are being used in the Zionist propaganda campaign to push the United States into a war with Iran, which is why these lies are so dangerous.
As the evidence from 9/11 shows, the Zionist fifth column used terrorism and deception to drag the United States into a series of wars and confrontations in the Middle East. The illegal and unnecessary conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq have bankrupted the U.S. treasury and destroyed the lives of countless Americans and others. At least one-fifth of the current U.S. national debt is due directly to these two utterly wasteful wars of occupation in which there is certainly no real American interest. Iran is obviously the nation being targeted for the next phase of the Zionist war agenda. For an American presidential candidate to support the continuation of this criminal war agenda is treasonous.
Rick Perry has shown himself to be a Zionist-controlled politician. Benjamin D’Israeli, the Jewish Prime Minister of Britain who made Great Britain half-owner of the Suez Canel with borrowed money from the Rothschild family, explained the hidden power behind governments: “Governments do not govern, but merely control the machinery of government, being themselves controlled by the hidden hand.”
The hidden hand that controls Rick Perry is the same that controlled Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama – it is the hand of Zionist banksters like the Rothschilds and the state of Israel, which they created for their own benefit.
"Governments do not govern, but merely control the machinery of government, being themselves controlled by the hidden hand." — Benjamin Disraeli, Britain's first Jewish Prime Minister (1868, 1874-1880)
In the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries, the Rothschilds made a high art out of deliberately provoking wars and revolutions. This furthered the Jewish Messianic goal of destroying the Gentile nations and supplanting them with universal Jewish rule. It also enabled the Rothschilds to further the Jewish Messianic goal of concentrating the wealth of the world in Jewish hands. By the 1870s, the Rothschilds had accumulated at least $3,400,000,000.00. [USD non-adjusted] - "The Rothschilds", Chicago Tribune, 27 December 1875
Question: There is a Toronto Hearing on 9/11 being held very shortly. Presumably this represents the key figures regarding 9/11 (see http://torontohearings.org/). I am wondering if you are participating, and what your standing is with them? Are you completely ostracized by the "mainstream" 911rs?
Bollyn Responds: Yes, I am aware of the Toronto Hearings conference about 9/11. I was not invited, which is not unusual. My analysis of Israeli involvement in 9/11 is strictly taboo in such forums. Canada is, after all, a partner in the War on Terrorism.
It should be remembered that Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert (then Mayor of Jerusalem) was in Toronto on September 9, 2001 – the day before he went to New York City -- on September 10, 2001. Will this be discussed in Toronto this weekend? Why was Olmert in Canada on the eve of 9/11 and with whom did he meet? Why has Olmert’s visit to Canada and New York City on the eve of 9/11 been kept secret?
I suspect Olmert remained in New York City on his secret mission until the afternoon of 9/11. I also suspect that Mayor Olmert was on the Israeli El Al flight that was allowed to leave New York in the afternoon. The men who commanded the NORAD exercise on 9/11 were both Canadians. The pilot episode of the Lone Gunmen (made by Rupert Murdoch’s FOX TV) in which remotely hijacked planes were flown into the WTC was made in Vancouver in 2000.
The Zionist mafia is very strong in Canada. The Bronfman family has a great deal of power in Canada, the U.S., and Israel. What we need is a real criminal investigation and charges brought against those who carried out the crimes of 9/11 and those who have covered it up. Who put the thermite and explosives in the towers, for starters? Why is Michael Chertoff not being prosecuted for supervising the destruction of the evidence? He was, after all, the Assistant Attorney General at the Department of Justice, the federal official responsible for gathering and preserving the evidence and investigating the crimes in order to prosecute those behind it. Why has he been treated with kid gloves? This man should be arrested.
These are the things that have to be done if we are to rectify the problem and remove the Zionist crimocracy that rules Washington, New York, and Chicago. This is the revolution that has to happen. Failure to investigate and prosecute those who are really behind 9/11 is not an option because not to do so would mean to surrender ourselves and our nation to the crimocracy. That is simply not acceptable because the crimocracy will destroy our nation and our freedom.
Question: Kevin Barrett sent me an email asking, "Rupert Murdoch: Key figure in 9/11 and the 9/11 wars?"
Steve Bell's cartoon from The Guardiandepicts Murdoch as a man who takes orders. Who would be giving Rupert Murdoch orders? Who controls the biggest Zionist media mogul?
Rupert Murdoch, Zionist propagandist, with Shimon Peres, master of Israeli terrorism.
Murdoch's 20th Century Fox (News Corp.) distributed blatantly anti-Muslim propaganda films like The Siege(1998) which were clearly designed to prepare the public mindset for the false-flag terrorism of 9/11. Lawrence Wright, one of the writers of the film, claimed that The Siege was the most-rented film in the aftermath of 9/11.
The Lone Gunmen"Pilot" episode in which a passenger airliner is hijacked by an external computer program and flown into the World Trade Center was another Murdoch production. The "Pilot" episode, which bore an uncanny resemblance to the 9/11 attacks, aired on Murdoch-owned FOX TV on March 4, 2001. Arnon Milchan, Murdoch's Israeli business partner and senior Mossad agent in Hollywood, was most likely the real author of the plot for "Pilot".
MOSSAD'S MAN IN THE MIDDLE - Murdoch's business partner Arnon Milchan is a close friend of Israel's president Shimon Peres (left), Defense Minister Ehud Barak, and Likud Party leader Binyamin Netanyahu (right).
KILLING THE MESSENGER - Sean Hoare, the key whistleblower behind the scandal at News of the The World was found dead the day before Rebekah Brooks, Rupert and James Murdoch faced questions about the phone hacking.
Bollyn Responds: Kevin, why do you use a question mark? Murdoch is obviously "the key figure" in spreading the 9/11 deception propaganda to the public. The current Murdoch scandal about phone hacking is just the tip of the iceberg, of course. When Ed Miliband of the Labour Party calls for the break-up of News Corp., you know there are much bigger fish to be fried. Rupert Murdoch has evidently served his purpose - the global deception of 9/11 - but his son of an Estonian mother will certainly not do for the Zionist masters behind Murdoch. This is exactly what I had in mind when I wrote this last year:
"The global Murdoch media empire was created with Rothschild funding and exists to spread Zionist propaganda among the English-speaking populations of the world. Murdoch's son James is in line to take over at the helm of their media empire although it is quite likely that the empire will not survive very long after Rupert Murdoch passes away." - "Eric Hufschmid and Rupert Murdoch - Agents of Deception", October 21, 2010
Latest Comment: Thank you for writing Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World(and not charging for it as well). I will do my best "to promote the hell out of it!" My nephew, Leonard J. Snyder Jr., who worked in the South Tower, was murdered that day. Needless to say, that lit a match under me to make certain the 9/11 criminals would eventually be tried and hanged. (And I am still hopeful by the way.)
Bollyn Responds: I am very glad to hear from the relatives and families of the 9/11 victims. The 9/11 relatives have certainly been treated extremely badly in the court of Alvin K. Hellerstein and there is only one family left in the litigation process -- although there has been no 9/11 trial after nearly 10 years! I have done what I could to help the relatives by showing them the prejudice and conflict of interest that exists in the Zionist-controlled court of Judge Hellerstein. As one might have expected from a judge who is a Zionist partisan, the key Israeli Mossad defendant, International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS NV), has been excused from the tort litigation. This is the Israeli "airport security" company that controlled passenger screening operations at Boston's Logan Airport -- and while they are responsible for allegedly allowing knife-wielding terrorists onto the planes on 9/11, they have been excused. Go figure.
There are two things that need to be noted about the disgraceful travesty of justice that the 9/11 victims have suffered for 10 years. First, in cases like 9/11 the relatives must be organized and make sure that the lawyers that represent them are honest and dedicated only to their cause. This is, of course, very difficult for grieving relatives to do, but it is absolutely essential to prevent them from being medicated into madness and abused by those behind the crime and cover-up, who are very well organized. Having observed the 16-year-old Estonia litigation process through my wife, I have seen how dishonest lawyers act as agents of the other side and rob the relatives of every hope for justice and accountability for their loss. The 9/11 relatives have been treated in the exact same way: given a cash payment and told to get over it and forget about the truth.
Officials and professionals who looked into investigating the Estonia sinking of 1994 were told in no uncertain terms - "hands off" - looking for the truth will get you killed, which is what very nearly happened to us in Estonia in November 2008. In America, where people supposedly enjoy the rights of free speech, my research and writing about 9/11 (as a professional journalist) resulted in a brutal and heavily-armed undercover police assault at my home, followed by malicious prosecution, which forced me to go into exile.
Secondly, in both cases (9/11 and Estonia) it is always possible to bring murder charges against those behind the atrocities. There is no statute of limitations on heinous crimes like mass murder, which is what the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 and the sinking of Estonia were. Justice, after all, will only be served when the people behind these crimes are put on trial for murder.
T. Mark Hightower of San Jose is a new member on the 9/11 Scholars Forum who challenges the explosiveness of the nanocomposite of super-thermite found in the dust of the World Trade Center...
Hightower says Dr. Jones should be "upfront and truthful", but is himself anything but upfront and truthful about the salient fact that he works for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Federal Government's largest scientific agency. Hightower can be reached at email@example.com where he has worked for 20 years at NASA's Ames Research Center at Moffett Field. Hightower's father also worked at Ames from 1963-1988. Hightower says he does not represent NASA in these matters, so why does he conceal the fact that he works for the U.S. government? It is well known that U.S. government employees like Hightower are not allowed to take public positions on controversial subjects like 9/11 -- unless they are told to.
Daniel Saul Goldin, a Zionist Jew from the Bronx, was head of NASA on 9/11 and unexpectedly announced his resignation one month later. I called NASA's Glenn Research Center at Cleveland Airport to ask about the passengers that were taken to the NASA facility on 9/11. "No one was brought here," said a puzzled spokesperson, who was among those evacuated on 9/11. Mary Ethridge, a journalist with the Akron Beacon Journal, however, stood by the paper's report that the passengers had been interviewed by the FBI in the evacuated NASA facility. What was NASA up to with the passengers on 9/11? See "The Hollywood Fantasy of Flight 93: The Hidden Role of NASA and the FBI in Cleveland"
Hightower's Message to Bollyn Subject: High Explosive Nanothermite More Bark Than Bite? No Contenders for The Nanothermite Challenge
Christopher, I just wanted to bring you up to date on my groundbreaking and controversial nanothermite research. I am at your disposal to answer any questions that you might have about this work.
Cordially, T. Mark Hightower San Jose, CA
Bollyn Responds: I wrote back to Mr. Hightower on 9 July 2011 saying that I would be willing to debate the subject of the nanocomposite of super-thermite found in the dust of the pulverized World Trade Center. Like Andrew Johnson, Hightower questions the explosiveness of the active thermitic material found by Dr. Steven E. Jones in the dust, fragments which were described in this peer-reviewed paper. What Mr. Hightower and others like him ignore is the fact that there was an organic layer to the nanocomposite thermitic material. This is the component that is thought to have created the explosive gas pressure. (See page 21 of the paper.)
Timothy Mark Hightower has written to me before, but since I don't know him personally, I began by asking a few basic questions as I assumed he is the person profiled here:
The profile says that T. Mark Hightower works in "Defense and Space". I looked into some papers Hightower has written for NASA and assumed he is the same T. Mark Hightower who works for NASA's Ames Research Center at Moffett Field:
News Report of 9/11 by: 9News Staff Web produced by: Liz Foreman 9/11/01 11:43:57 AM
A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White. White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated. United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did not say how many people were aboard the flight. United said it was also "deeply concerned" about another flight, Flight 175, a Boeing 767, which was bound from Boston to Los Angeles. On behalf of the airline CEO James Goodwin said: "The thoughts of everyone at United are with the passengers and crew of these flights. Our prayers are also with everyone on the ground who may have been involved. "United is working with all the relevant authorities, including the FBI, to obtain further information on these flights," he said.
Hightower confirmed that his father, William Donald Hightower worked at Ames from 1963 through 1988. If I consider his "nanothermite challenge" worth discussing, I will do so on another page.
Question: Do you have access or know how to gain access to the archives of www.judicial-inc.biz?
When John F. Kennedy, Jr. and his girlfriend died in the plane crash, JFK, Jr was also buried at sea by the U.S. military. I don't remember the media ever explaining why the U.S. Navy would bury JFK, Jr. at sea because JFK, Jr. wasn't a military or government official. I don't know if the Kennedy family asked for JFK, Jr. to be buried at sea.
But burial at sea - real deep - is one sure way of hiding evidence. Maybe JFK, Jr. and his girlfriend didn't die in a plane crash. After all, people can survive plane crashes. When it happened, I read that JFK, Jr. was murdered to prevent him from running against Hillary Clinton for the New York Senate and to simply keep him out of politics completely.
Bollyn Responds: This is a very interesting comment that I received after the mysterious burial at sea of the person said to be Osama Bin Laden. It should be noted that the location where Osama Bin Laden was said to have been killed is hundreds of miles from the sea. Why was he so hastily buried at sea? And why was John F. Kennedy, Jr. also buried at sea very quickly after his body was found?
There is an article from the Washington Post of 23 July 1999 about the burial, which occurred in the morning of July 22, less than 24 hours after the bodies were recovered from the sea floor. It should be noted that the bodies of Kennedy and the Bessette sisters were cremated. Their plane went down on July 16 and their bodies were recovered 5 days later on July 21. I recall hearing that their bodies and the inside of the cockpit had been charred and blackened. This would certainly explain the need to cremate the bodies -- to hide the real cause of the "crash".
There are two obvious reasons why the Zionist criminal network running the Clinton White House and New York would have wanted to get rid of John Kennedy Jr. First, there is the fact that he had political aspirations and would have won any race for the U.S. Senate against Hillary Clinton or any other candidate. Secondly, he was a publisher of a popular magazine, George, that they could not control. If Kennedy were still alive in 2001 he would have been a powerful voice for 9/11 truth. Like you, I suspect he was murdered.
Kourosh Ziabari: What’s your precise stance on the 9/11 attacks? Do you believe that the U.S. officials had foreknowledge of the incident? Do you think that it was an inside job or a false flag operation? Have you traced any sign of the Israel’s involvement in the attacks?
Kevin Barrett: To know means to believe based on sufficient evidence. So I know, not just believe, that 9/11 was a false-flag attack, that many individuals at or near the top of the US Executive Branch, military, and intelligence apparatus were complicit in the attack, and that the state of Israel and its American agents were heavily involved. This is the inescapable conclusion of anyone who reads David Ray Griffin’s books on the subject, alongside Bollyn’s Solving 9/11, with an open mind.
Question: "[Robert A.] Kelman was general manager of Hugo Neu, the company who managed the destruction of 250,000 tons of steel from the World Trade Center by sending it to Asian smelters." Thank you for your article, especially your focus on the removal of steel evidence. One point I have never seen mentioned is that these tons of materials were shipped out within a few weeks of 9/11. Shipping this huge amount of steel would take months of planning - transporting it from the WTC site to ships, reserving the ships, setting up receiving stations in Asia, etc. How was this gargantuan task accomplished so quickly? I hope your book covers this; no one has researched this aspect of the hoax.
Bollyn Responds: My latest article, "The 9/11 Cover Up - The Destruction of the Steel Evidence", deals with this fundamental aspect of the cover up, which I have been researching and writing about for the past nine months. It is important to understand that the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center was an intrinsic part of the crime in that it was required to protect the fraud from being exposed and revealing who was really behind the explosive demolition of the Twin Towers. The people who were responsible for the destruction of this crucial evidence are partners in crime with those who planned and executed the false-flag terrorism of 9/11.
Comment: I am an admirer of yours and thought you should see this video. In my opinion, Japan could have been prevented if humans could have cleaned out the rat's nest of 9/11 in time...as you've worked so hard to do.
Bollyn Responds: Thank you for this link. I don't know if the Stuxnet worm played a role in the nuclear disaster in Japan, but I do believe that Stuxnet is very similar to the malicious code (see Ptech, etc.) that infected and affected the efficiency of critical U.S. computer systems on 9/11. Stuxnet has been described as having been able to make the Iranian centrifuges run amok while the computer monitors indicated that all was well. This is exactly the kind of deception that happened on 9/11 when critical NORAD and FAA computer systems failed to notice the errant aircraft and respond properly to the threats. In a 15 January 2011 article entitled "Israeli Test on Worm Called Crucial in Iran Nuclear Delay" the New York Times reported that Stuxnet was tested at the Israeli nuclear facility at Dimona in the Negev. The paper reported that Israel had built an elaborate test facility at their secret and illegal nuclear weapons site that contained a replica array of the Iranian uranium enrichment plant, adding that such a test site would have been necessary for the design of the attack software. Richard Falkenrath, a principal at the Chertoff Group (headed by the high-level Israeli agent Michael Chertoff), actually appeared on Bloomberg television saying that he believed that Israel was behind Stuxnet. It should be noted that there was a very similar, but less well known computer crime involved in the 9/11 terror attacks, in which the Mossad and the Israeli nuclear facility at Dimona were also involved. To understand how Israeli intelligence was able to gain control of the U.S. military computer systems I recommend reading my chapter on "The Architecture of Terror", especially the part about the Israeli Amit Yoran, the former cyber-security czar of the Pentagon.
Question: I have received a couple questions about the conflict in Libya. The first comment thinks I am wrong about the Libyan issue, but is not specific. The second asks if the revolts in the region are authentic - or artificial. Because they pertain to the same issue, I have put them together for this question:
Comment from Britain - I think you are wrong on the Libyan issue. I am puzzled why you are taking a line that is essentially in agreement with the corporate-controlled propaganda.
The "rebellion" is the result of the global elites harnessing the Libyan inter tribal East/West dissension for their own agenda. The long term goal is likely the Islamisation of the Middle East and North Africa to present the Israel/US/EU axis powers with a strong enemy to justify homeland oppression.
Question from U.S.A. - I was just reading your articles on Libya. I was absolutely sad as can be today, could not stop crying since I know that innocent men, women, children and babies will be murdered by the attack, not to mention the DU [depleted uranium] that will contaminate the air, water, and soil in Libya forever.
Up until all the uprisings in Iraq, Afghanistan, Iraq again, Pakistan, and now Libya we did not seem to have a problem with the Middle East. As a matter of fact, their countries were quiet for several years.
I know millions of buckerooooos for oil and natural gas were the real reasons for most of the invasions in the beginning.
Now we still have an international monetary crisis, a meltdown coming around the corner, probably a treasury bill crisis by summer. So, don't you think that all these invasions into the Middle East at this point are started by NGOs or gov ops within the countries to keep the war machine going, for that is the only area, besides the drug companies, that prop up the US from going under?
Bollyn Responds: Firstly, I don't think that the revolts across the Middle East have been artificially created by outside forces. The nations of the Middle East may have been "stable" from an American or Israeli perspective, but they have certainly not been quiet and peaceful during the past forty years. I have spent time in some of them, such as Syria, Egypt, Tunisia, Iran, Jordan, and Palestine/Israel. All of them are police states where the populace chafes under draconian emergency regulations that have been in place for decades. They are certainly not happy places, but the most oppressive, by far, are the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories, where the people suffer the most extreme cruelty dished out by sadistic and heavily-armed Israeli military forces supported by the United States. The innocent people of Gaza, for example, are killed by Israeli forces on a daily basis. My experience in Israeli-occupied Palestine has been a very big part of my political awakening.
All the countries that are currently experiencing revolts have restive populations that have suffered, more or less quietly, many years under police states and brutal dictatorships supported by the United States. Revolts and protests across the region were smashed with extreme brutality (e.g. Jordan, Iraq, and Libya) and dissenters were arrested, tortured, and killed. What is happening today is like a regional awakening, an Arab Intifadah (shaking off of oppression) across the Middle East. The Palestinian Intifadah has inspired Arab youth across the region. What we are seeing is a political catharsis that will result in great changes in some countries and smaller changes in others, but every regime in the region is challenged by the Intifadah and will have to change; it is inevitable. My article on the revolt in Tunisia was originally named "The Egg is Cracked" because, like a broken egg, there was no way of going back to the old shell once the revolution reached critical mass in Tunis. The people in the Arab-speaking countries are bound together culturally. It is almost as if there were an uprising against federal corruption in Colorado and California. Other states would certainly join the revolt; some would do better, some worse.
The revolts in the Arab world could lead to uprisings in the United States and Israel when information comes out about how the United States and Israel have managed criminal affairs in these nations. The populations of the United States and Israel both suffer under similar national security state structures in which the military and secret services (C.I.A. and Mossad) work against the best interests of their respective nations and people. The C.I.A.'s criminal role in the 9/11 deception and their covert wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan clearly reveal to all that the clandestine agency is a terrorist and disinformation agency working against the interest of the American people and our republic. Imagine what crimes that would be exposed if the offices of the C.I.A. were taken over in a revolt against the crimocracy ruling Washington? This is what is happening across the Middle East and all kinds of secrets are likely to be revealed in the process, as they were after the revolution in Iran.
Finally, I don't think I have said anything incorrect about Libya. I think the 42-year-old Gaddafi regime has been working with the Rothschild family and Israel, which is where I began on this subject. Gaddafi has been toyed with and the Western democracies and Russia sold weapons to him, although he is said to have been behind terror bombings over Lockerbie, Scotland, and in Germany. Gaddafi also reportedly gave $500 million to Allen Stanford's financial scam, which is closely tied to the Mossad, shortly before the Stanford "bank" collapsed -- owing some $8 billion to investors. Gaddafi is clearly linked to the Zionist criminal network.
When the people of Benghazi and ancient Cyrenaica (Eastern Libya) revolted against Gaddafi they began a civil conflict that was bound to get very ugly if the Western democracies did not intervene. The people who stood up against Gaddafi have been calling for intervention from the beginning. The Western nations and Russia had armed Gaddafi with the weapons he was now turning on his unarmed civilian population in Benghazi, Misurata, Ras Lanuf, and Brega. Those nations who armed Gaddafi have a moral responsibility to keep him from killing his own people with those weapons. Had the West intervened to stop Gaddafi more quickly and effectively, lives would have been saved on both sides, that's for sure.
I think that Gaddafi may very well have funded Nicolas Sarkozy's presidential campaign, which could explain Sarkozy's particular ire against Gaddafi. I think that stopping Gaddafi from killing his own people is a good and necessary thing. I would not be surprised if the French and Americans are actually targeting Gaddafi personally. He knows too much for them to let him live - and talk about it. Gaddafi has failed the Libyan people. His "green revolution" did not bring democracy and progress, as he promised. With the billions of dollars Gaddafi made from the 1.5 million barrels of oil he sold every day he could have created a very prosperous and progressive nation of 6 million people, but he refused to allow the people to rule and insisted on being the mercurial tyrant of Tripoli. It is long past time for him and his sons to leave, and give the power to the people of Libya. The Libyan people deserve better leaders and can certainly have a democratic form of government. Islam is the religion of the majority of the people in the Middle East. I don't see any reason why Islamic parties should not be part of their democracies. Americans and Europeans have Christian parties and Israel is virtually ruled by the orthodox rabbis, so why shouldn't Islam play its role in Middle Eastern democracies?
Question:With all the prima facie evidence that you have assembled, along with evidence from other people, it's obvious that another 9/11 investigation should be held. Alternatively, it's obvious that there is enough evidence to simply indict certain people even without another investigation. But, of course, the idea of the U.S. government investigating itself is absurd and Zionism is so powerful that proceeding to the next step will be very difficult. So, do you have any suggestions on how the 9/11 criminals could eventually be brought to justice? I think the 9/11 Truth Movement could benefit from some direction or goals on what to do next, what to work towards. Without such goals, I fear that many people will just give up hope that justice will be served and the movement will wither and die.
Bollyn Responds: This is a good question, but a very difficult one to answer. As an investigative journalist who has invested a lot of time and energy on 9/11 truth I would like to begin with a few observations.
Firstly, there is no actual 9/11 Truth Movement in the sense that there is an organized body of persons dedicated to finding the truth of what really happened. While there are loose-knit truth groups organized around various occupations, such as Pilots for 9/11 Truth, the so-called truth movement is really just a nebulous grouping comprised of many honest and concerned individuals and a large number of disinformation agents. The disinformation agents are the most active people and have infiltrated the movement in order to steer the course of the discussion to avoid the truth. Most of these groups are (like the media) actually controlled by such agents, which is why they steer far away from me and my research.
Secondly, there was no 9/11 investigation in the first place. There was what I call "a non-investigation", managed by Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice, in which the crucial evidence was confiscated and destroyed. Furthermore, there is absolutely no political will in the United States to solve 9/11 - or to even address the unanswered questions about what really happened. For a politician to discuss 9/11 as an unsolved crime is to touch the third rail and commit career suicide. The same is true for a journalist, as my fate as a journalist illustrates. The only political leader to have even addressed 9/11 as an unsolved crime on a global scale is President Ahmadinejad of Iran and he was unduly criticized and vilified as a result. For people in the political class it is absolutely taboo to stray from the blatantly false and anti-Muslim fairy tale about 9/11, a pack of lies that has been used to initiate the draconian measures of the domestic "War on Terror" and kick-start two illegal wars in the Middle East. Trillions of dollars are at stake and people in high-places have committed numerous crimes that would put them in prison for life - or worse.
One has to understand that those obstructing 9/11 truth are part of the crime and the cover-up. While presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama are clearly involved in the cover-up, as are the New York Times and CNN, it is the unseen network of criminal financiers behind the U.S. government and media who are really calling the shots. These are the same people who control the State of Israel and its intelligence agencies from behind the scenes. My discovery that Marc Rich, the Israeli criminal metal trader behind a $10 billion scam, created the international trading network that disposed of the steel from the World Trade Center helps to identify the network of Zionist financiers behind 9/11. The connections between Marc Rich, the Mossad, and the families of George W. Bush and Bill Clinton are well known and documented. The final chapter of my book will discuss this in greater detail.
A. Craig Copetas book on Marc Rich explains how Rich made $10 billion in illegal trading deals. Rich, an Israeli with close ties to the Mossad, created the network that disposed of the steel from the World Trade Center. The two Belgian Jews who ran the international trading division for the Hugo Neu scrap business of New Jersey are Israeli citizens, although one of them, Nathan Fruchter, runs his business from New York.
This is why I am not optimistic that there will be an investigation of 9/11 in the United States anytime soon. It would probably require a real revolution to oust the financial regime behind the government before the U.S. government would be able to really investigate and expose what happened on 9/11. This is not to say that we will not know who was behind 9/11, only that the truth will not be accepted by those in power.
THE INDIVIDUAL vs THE INSTITUTION
To understand why it is so difficult for 9/11 truth seekers to investigate and prosecute the real criminals behind the false-flag terrorism we need to understand that this is an asymetrical struggle between individual truth seekers and very powerful non-democratic institutions. The main institutions that are opposed to 9/11 truth are Zionist-controlled entities such as the Anti-Defamation League (and its parent organization of Jewish Freemasons - the B'nai B'rith), the State of Israel (and its military intelligence agencies), the New York Times, CNN, the BBC, the Department of Justice (and F.B.I.), the C.I.A., and the President of the United States, to name but a few.
The fact that these Zionist-controlled institutions are hierarchical in nature and linked to their foreign counterparts in institutional relationships, such as NATO, means that a few Zionists at the top of the pyramid can prevent discussion of 9/11 truth throughout the whole network. It is not that there aren't any journalists who would love to investigate 9/11. It is that they are not allowed to do so in the controlled news outfits they work for.
Norman Rockwell's Freedom of Speech (1943)
I grew up in Norman Rockwell's America with a strong belief in our inalienable rights and the freedom of speech, a freedom I was known to exercise frequently. My 9/11 research and journalism are a result of my belief as an American that I have the right to express my thoughts without fear of reprisal. The brutal assault I suffered by undercover police at my home in August 2006 and the malicious prosecution that followed showed me that there are corrupt officials in my hometown (virtually all of them) that were willing to violate my constitutional rights (a federal crime) and commit perjury in court in order to play their role in a conspiracy to try to silence me. As a consequence, I lost my job as a journalist and we had to leave our home but I have not lost my belief in the freedom of speech. I know that the truth will prevail and in time we will know who committed the false-flag terrorism of 9/11. We will see that those who attacked me and tortured me with a TASER as they broke my arm in front of my wife and 8-year-old daughter were actually taking orders and committing crimes for those who are behind the 9/11 cover up.
Question: I am sure you know this creep Mike Harari (who is said to be behind the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11). But what do you make of this from Veterans Today?
Dimitri Khalezov...has revealed from first-hand knowledge that Mike Harari organized the 9-11 massacre...His explanation is devastating in its simplicity. The conversion of three steel-built skyscrapers to fine powder is only possible with nuclear explosions underneath them. Thermite, nano-thermite and thermate may well have been used by the killers to cut beams and girders but they would not have turned concrete to powder, or steel for that matter.
Bollyn Responds: Mike Harari is certainly in that group of senior Mossad terrorists who are involved as high-level managers of the 9/11 attacks. This is the group of Israelis that was involved in Iran-Contra and drug smuggling operations from the 1970s. This is the link to the Bush and Clinton families, and why Marc Rich was involved in the destruction of the steel from the WTC.
I do not agree that the pulverization of the concrete was done by a nuclear device. The evidence indicates that a very large amount of highly explosive nano-composite thermite was used to demolish the Twin Towers. In my opinion, the nano-thermite had probably been applied as a spray coating to the floor pans and is what caused the pulverization of the 220 concrete floors and their floors pans. The evidence indicates that the floors were exploded from the top down - one-by-one at the speed of a falling object. How would a nuclear device do that?
Question:I was curious to know if you have completed the final chapter in your 9/11 book? It is a fantastic read. Hope all is well.
Bollyn Responds: Thank you. No, the final and hopefully conclusive chapter of my book, Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World, is not yet completed but I hope to have it finished in the coming month. This final chapter has an interesting history and much of the information that will be in this chapter has already been published in articles on this website. It grew out of research I did about Lenny Charles Labanco's I.N.N. conference on 9/11 that happened last September. I wrote a critical piece about this conference in an article entitled "The Zionist Gang Behind New York's 9/11 Conference".
What I discovered was that Labanco is associated with Joseph Shereshevsky, an orthodox Jew who was involved in the massive WexTrust financial securities fraud with his wife, the former Elka Peck of Norfolk, Virginia. The Peck family owned an iron scrap yard next to the U.S. Navy yard, which happened to be their main source of scrap metal. The Peck business, however, was sold to Sims, which happens to be one of the two companies involved in the criminal destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center. I knew there was a connection but it took a lot more digging to find out what it was.
I tried to talk to the key people involved in the destruction of the steel from the WTC without much luck. A crucial discovery was that Marc Rich sent two Mossadniks who worked for him to create an international trading department at Hugo Neu, one of the two New Jersey scrap dealers who were involved in the removal and destruction of the WTC steel. As the late Sherman Skolnick said: "Marc Rich the commodity bandit and 'spook' was so interwoven with the White House of George Bush The Elder and later, Bill Clinton, you could not hardly tell whether the White House dirty tricks department was in Washington or Zug, Switzerland, one of Rich's outposts."
Skolnick went on to ask, "Is it true that Rahm Emanuel, for six years having been on and off Clinton White House Senior Advisor, has been, in effect, Deputy Director for North America, of the Mossad, Israel's spy agency? And was Rahm an instrumental part of Marc Rich's dirty, bloody business for the American C.I.A.?"
While this is not all, these are the key players in exploiting the 9/11 deception to wage war in the Middle East and rob the American people. The Bush team controlled the White House, the Israelis pulled off the false-flag terrorism, and Marc Rich organized the clean-up crew. Rahm Emanuel was Mossad's point man in the Clinton White House when the stage was being set for 9/11.
What binds all of these people and entities together? As Skolnick wrote: "In October, 1980, meeting in a Paris suburb with fully authorized and ratified representatives of the Iranian dictator, the Elder Bush agreed to supply Iran weapons, to be trans-shipped through Israel, for Iran's war with Iraq. To keep high the price of oil, the Rockefellers and the oil-soaked British Royal Family, instigated the war in September, 1980, with Iraq and Iran being major oil pumpers; each sought to destroy the other's oil facilities... During the Iranian oil embargo, Marc Rich made hundreds of millions of dollars by treasonously circumventing the U.S.-led restrictions. Rich did this with firms largely owned by the George Bush Family jointly with Richard Cheney and their confederates."
Iran-Contra is just part of the criminal business that these people are engaged in together. Drug smuggling into the United States is another part. Plundering the wealth of the former Soviet Union is another. The list goes on and on. These are the key people and agencies behind the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11, but who controls them? That is what my final chapter will discuss.
Question: Christopher! What is anything written by David Duke doing on your website?
Bollyn Responds:This question came from a reader shortly after I posted a piece about David Duke's excellent 10-minute video entitled "Hollywood Basterds". Shortly before I received this question, I got this note about the video:"Just finished listening to David Duke on your site. Wow, he certainly tells it like it is."
Firstly, I should say that I posted David Duke's video about the Weinstein film Inglourious Basterds (and other Jewish porn and perversity) because I completely agree with the reader that David Duke "tells it like it is." I have personally known Duke since April 2005, when we visited him at his home in the New Orleans area. We enjoyed our visit immensely and remember eating the best oysters in the world with him in New Orleans. David Duke is well known and respected among the people of New Orleans, which was very clear by the way he was received everywhere we went. My daughter was very fond of his little Torri and remembers being scolded for feeding popcorn to Duke's little Maltese when we were at the movies. I recall reading Duke's book Jewish Supremacism and writing a book review. David did a three-part interview with me on his Townhall Radio show in which we discussed a range of issues. In 2006, when I was attacked and TASERed at my home by undercover police who broke my right elbow, Duke posted an article under the heading "Christopher Bollyn Abused by ADL-Brainwashed Police", which is exactly what they were.
Then there is the fact that I absolutely detest the racist and perverted film Inglourious Basterds and anyone associated with it. I simply can not understand how any self-respecting nation can allow a film that celebrates gratuitous and racist violence to be shown to its youth. Unfortunately, my son saw the film in August 2009 when a classmate's mother treated a bunch of her son's new classmates to the movies. When I discovered how perverted and racist (anti-German) the film was, I discussed the film with my son. He speaks fluent German, loves Germany, and knows a lot about the real history of the Second World War having lived in Berlin and visited many German cities, including a long spell in Dresden. Last night he watched David Duke's 10-minute video and I could tell from his comments that he now understands the evil behind this disgusting and despicable film.
I noticed this apt comment beneath Duke's video on YouTube: "The German people have got to be the most unfairly vilified people in history. The Palestinians would be next. Is it any surprise that both groups are vilified by the same secretive group? Germany had no choice but to fight. They are now rising again and I say God bless ‘em."
Inglourious Basterds has Eli Roth killing Germans with a baseball bat, which was actually just one of the brutal methods used by Polish Jews to kill tens of thousands of innocent German prisoners held in Jewish death camps after the war. An Eye for an Eye: The Untold Story of Jewish Revenge Against Germans in 1945is an eye-opening book by John Sacks (Basic Books, New York, 1993) that tells the real story of Jewish atrocities against Germans.
Salomon (Solomon or Shlomo) Morel (Garbów, November 15, 1919 – February 14, 2007, Tel Aviv) In 1993, soon after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Morel was indicted by Poland's Institute of National Remembrance for war crimes and crimes against humanity, including the "revenge killing" of 1,500 prisoners. Morel fled to Israel and was granted sanctuary under the Law of Return. Poland repeatedly demanded his extradition, but Israel refused to comply, citing a lack of evidence.
"Morel brought Jewish and Polish guards -- sometimes drunken -- into barrack 7 of accused Nazis or Hitler youth. It was called either the Deutsches Haus or the “brown barracks.” Morel had them sing Nazi songs and then he began to beat them. Depending upon his mood, he would use his bare hands, a wooden stool, a pistol butt or a truncheon. The guards beat the Germans with clubs. Morel asked, “How many blows do you want?” If the answer was unsatisfactory, it was fifty blows. It was reported that the “ritual of the organized tormenting of prisoners took place virtually every night…” When using the wooden stool, Morel would beat prisoners until the stool broke apart. The corpses were left on the floor. At dawn, they were taken in a horse-drawn cart to a cemetery by the Rawa river where they were dumped into a mass grave."
Question: If the Jews can create such a complex matrix then they must be really very smart. It would, of course, require lots of brains apart from lots of money to pull off such a veil [of deception] over the whole world. But is it also because they (the orthodox Zionist Jews) have a complete lack of ethics? By the way, I’m a Hindu from India and I don't think ALL JEWS are bad.
Bollyn Responds: The day I received this question I read the end-of-the-year issue of Newsweek that contains interviews with people in the news. The very first interview in this Zionist-owned magazine (owned by Sidney Mortimor Harman, husband of Rep. Jane Harman) is with David Axelrod, the campaign manager who made Obama president and who now serves as his "senior advisor". Axelrod, who calls Chicago home, is the son of a New York Jewish communist writer-cum-advertising strategist and a Jewish psychoanalyst who hanged himself when his son studied at the University of Chicago. David Axelrod is the man who shapes the policies coming out of the Obama White House.
David Axelrod was commissioned by powerful Zionists to make Obama president and now serves as his senior advisor. The second photo in the interview is of the key people who actually run the Obama administration: Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel with Senior Advisor David Axelrod, Nancy-Ann DeParle, director of the White House Office for Health Reform, and Philip Michael Schiliro, Assistant for Legislative Affairs. The photo is titled "Discussing the health care vote in the U.S. House of Representatives in the Oval Office" and dated Nov. 7, 2009.(Official White House Photo by Pete Souza, No. 25 of 88 photos)
The photo of the three men who manage the Obama administration huddled around the president's desk says a great deal about the powers that control the Obama White House. Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel is an Israeli national whose father is a former Zionist terrorist in the Irgun. David Axelrod is the son of a Jewish communist writer who wrote for a magazine that was designed to push the United States into war against Germany. The third man at the desk is Philip Michael Schiliro, the president's assistant on legislation and the key person in getting Democrats in Congress to support the huge bailout bill that was passed in the beginning of the Obama administration.
Philip Michael Schiliro received very strong support from the Jewish community when he ran for office in the early 1990s as this list of donors indicates.
Phil Schiliro was chief of staff for Rep. Henry Waxman of California before he joined the Obama White House. Schiliro worked for Waxman, a Congressman with a "strong Jewish identity", for many years.
Phil Schiliro is a very interesting name in Obama's administration, the current government of the Zionist crimocracy that rules the United States. The Schiliro clan is a family that has a long history of involvement in organized crime. One member of the family, Lewis Dennis Schiliro, actually ran the FBI office in New York City during the 1990s - overseeing such key investigations as the first bombing of the World Trade Center, other terrorism and financial crime cases, TWA Flight 800, Egypt Air 990, etc. Another member of the family, 30-year-old Joseph Schiliro from East Meadow, Long Island, was busted in January 2010 for being part of a network of drug dealers that dealt $1 million of "Special-K" (Ketamine, an animal tranquilizer) every month. Are these Schiliros all related? I would venture to guess that they are.
Lewis Dennis Schiliro ran the FBI bureau in New York in the 1990s.
Lewis Dennis Schiliro and Phil Schiliro grew up on the same part of Long Island, East Meadow and Baldwin respectively (5 miles apart from each other), and both have mothers named Jean and fathers named Joseph. I have not yet determined if they are related, but I suspect they are. There were, after all, only 55 people named Schiliro in the United States in 1930 and most of them were directly related to each other. This is a very important question because Lewis Schiliro became a senior vice president at Maurice Greenberg's A.I.G. insurance shortly after he left the FBI in 2000 and Phil Schiliro was instrumental in getting Congress to pass the legislation that provided hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars to bailout criminal banks and enterprises like A.I.G. - the largest direct recipient of the bailout. Furthermore, the FBI is the most important part of the 9/11 cover-up and Lewis Schiliro has actively contributed to that effort. In the New Year I will return to the Schiliro connection to 9/11 and the bailout of A.I.G.
Now back to the question at hand:
If the Jews can create such a complex matrix then they must be really very smart. It would, of course, require lots of brains apart from lots of money to pull off such a veil [of deception] over the whole world. But is it also because they (the orthodox Zionist Jews) have a complete lack of ethics?
The discussion of this photo and the men who manage the Obama White House is not a digression, but is meant to serve as an illustration to help understand my response to this question. Americans in the 21st Century are not very political nor are they politically organized in any meaningful way. Millions of Americans voted for Barack Obama simply because he symbolized "change", which most people thought was a good idea. They thought he was a black man from Chicago, although he is not from Chicago and he is as much white as he is black. Most people do not look any deeper than the images they see on television. Very few are aware of the fact that Obama is a Zionist-controlled puppet, a modern-day "golem", whose only agenda is to fulfill the wishes of his Jewish Zionist masters.
The Zionist-controlled media does not even discuss the fact that Rahm Emanuel's father is a real terrorist who moved to the United States in the 1950s. The chief of staff of the Obama White House is the son of a living Zionist terrorist. How much sense does that make for an administration that is waging its "War on Terror" in Afghanistan and Pakistan? Such omissions by the controlled press are of course completely intentional. Keeping the Obama fairy tale alive requires keeping the people in the dark about Obama's Zionist handlers.
Candidate and President Obama has been managed by David Axelrod since 1992 at the behest of the late Philip Morris Klutznick, the former head of the International Order of B'nai B'rith - the secret society of the Elders of Zion. See "The Axelrod Factor - Why Obama Fails to Deliver"
Jews are certainly as smart and as wealthy as any other ethnic group but these are not the only things that make up Jewish political power. The real essence of Jewish political power is that they operate as a collective, which is to say that they work together as an organized team. Wealthy Jews like the Rothschilds create and finance Zionist organizations - including secret societies - to increase their power and control. Zionist Jews have a virtual monopoly over the U.S. media. Jews dominate the political parties and media in the United States - including third party movements and alternative media outlets. Ownership of the media and Zionist secret societies like the International Order of B'nai B'rith are huge force multipliers for Zionist Jews. No other ethnic group in the United States operates as a collective as effectively as the Jews. In a nation of politically unorganized people, a well-organized and well-financed collective force (with powerful secret societies) like the Zionist Jews can slice its way through like a warm knife going through butter. It's that simple, but there is much more.
As a student of Middle Eastern history and U.S. politics, I have pondered this question for many years, as have many others before me. To understand the Jewish posture vis-a-vis the rest of the world I suggest reading how Tacitus and Gibbon, two classical historians, described the hostility of the "unsocial" Jewish religion and how Jews regard the rest of mankind:
Moses, wishing to secure for the future his authority over the nation, gave them a novel form of worship, opposed to all that is practiced by other men. Things sacred with us, with them have no sanctity, while they allow what with us is forbidden…This worship, however introduced, is upheld by its antiquity; all their other customs, which are at once perverse and disgusting, owe their strength to their very badness. The most degraded out of other races, scorning their national beliefs, brought to them their contributions and presents. This augmented the wealth of the Jews, as also did the fact, that among themselves they are inflexibly honest and ever ready to shew compassion, though they regard the rest of mankind with all the hatred of enemies. - Tacitus, The Histories, 110 A.D.
From the reign of Nero to that of Antoninus Pius, the Jews discovered a fierce impatience of the dominion of Rome, which repeatedly broke out in the most furious massacres and insurrections. Humanity is shocked at the recital of the horrid cruelties which they committed in the cities of Egypt, of Cyprus, and of Cyrene, where they dwelt in treacherous friendship with the unsuspecting natives, and we are tempted to applaud the severe retaliation which was exercised by the arms of the legions against a race of fanatics whose dire and credulous superstition seemed to render them the implacable enemies not only of the Roman government, but of human kind. - Edward Gibbon, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (1776)
The Roman historian Tacitus said the Jews "regard the rest of mankind with all the hatred of enemies" and Edward Gibbon (who called their religion "unsocial") said they are "a race of fanatics whose dire and credulous superstition seemed to render them the implacable enemies not only of the Roman government, but of human kind."
The hostility that orthodox Jews harbor for non-Jews is key to understanding the Jewish predicament: the Jews see themselves as a people apart from others, a separate nation, and their first loyalty and obligation is to their tribe. Orthodox Jews are raised with the idea that Jews are superior to other people. This sense of Jewish supremacism and hostility toward other people is the reason the Jewish religion is seen as unsocial by Gibbon and others. Like Hinduism, the Jewish religion is a set of rules of conduct for a specific ethnic group. Christianity and Islam, on the other hand, are faith-based universal religions which embrace all of mankind.
The criminal network behind the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 is comprised of senior agents of Israeli intelligence and their Zionist cohort in the United States, which I have shown and documented in my book Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World. Nearly all of the key people in this network are either dedicated Israeli intelligence agents or orthodox Jewish Zionists. Former U.S. Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff and U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, key agents in the 9/11 cover-up, are both orthodox Jewish Zionists. Chertoff and Hellerstein are certainly fully aware of their huge crimes against the American people, but their religious duties to the Jewish people - their "community" - mean much more to them. Their religious ethics dictate that they serve only Jews. Orthodox Jews like Chertoff and Hellerstein consider non-Jews as animals and slaves. To cause the death of a non-Jew is not considered a sin or a punishable crime among orthodox Jews. This is not merely hyperbole on my part. To understand how orthodox Jews really view non-Jews, I strongly recommend reading Israel Shahak's book, Jewish History, Jewish Religion - The Weight of Three Thousand Years. I met Israel Shahak in the 1990s in Chicago and was very impressed with the man and his writing.
"A Jew who murders a Gentile is guilty only of a sin against the laws of Heaven, not punishable by a court. To cause indirectly the death of a Gentile is no sin at all."
"According to the Talmud, Jesus was executed by a proper rabbinical court for idolatry, inciting other Jews to idolatry, and contempt of rabbinical authority. All classical Jewish sources which mention his execution are quite happy to take responsibility for it; in the talmudic account the Romans are not even mentioned."
Question: I have received two questions about Mark Lane and American Free Press (AFP). Since they both pertain to the Liberty Lobby and its publications, I will answer them together:
Question No. 1- Subject: Mark Lane: CIA agent
I'm familiar with these charges by Bollyn. His problem is that Lane has been proven correct about Lee Oswald and if Piper indeed works for Lane, then how does Bollyn explain the most important book on the JFK killing, Final Judgment, which is the only book to nail the Israelis for being part of the assassination? That's where Bollyn's thesis falls down. My main problem with Lane is with his presence at Jonestown, but I have read nothing definitive about it other than his being the lawyer for Jones. Lane's probably lucky he wasn't killed, too, which is why I suppose he disappeared for a while. I suspect it was a CIA mass murder of an experimental population. I'm not ready to accept Bollyn's version without more than just his being a Jewish lawyer who successfully defended Liberty Lobby from a CIA lawsuit, which is not a bad thing.
Question No. 2– From an AFP insider named George K.
I am working now at the AFP office and keep bumping onto all kinds of unreasonable hysteria around...Paul (Tudor) Angel, Chris Petherick and Mike Piper presenting me with all kinds of s....t that I am not really looking for. What is going on here? It feels like I stepped into a hole loaded with sneaks. I feel something far deeper than the usual "don't take my job or I kill you" garbage. Paul Angel keeps screwing my articles, he is steering the whole of the AFP toward the left...Willis is unable to control them...Is this new or just an old story? What did actually happen around you, why did they want you out so bad?
Bollyn Responds:These questions pertain to my former employer, the Liberty Lobby, and its publications, American Free Press (the erstwhile Spotlight) and the Barnes Review. Having worked for the Liberty Lobby from June 2000 until October 2006, I have some insight into the organization and the people behind it. Let me begin with a few facts and observations.
I am an honest and hard-working investigative journalist who worked for the Liberty Lobby’s publications from June 2000 until October 6, 2006. While working for the Spotlight and American Free Press, I did a great deal of original research on 9/11, depleted uranium weapons, school shootings, and electronic vote fraud, among other things.
The basic question asked by George, "Why did they want you out so bad?" can be answered in a few words. I was assaulted by undercover police and ousted from American Free Press because my 9/11 research was revealing too much about who had carried out the false-flag terror attacks - and how they had done it. My scientific research (with Dr. Steven E. Jones and Dr. Thomas Cahill) about Thermite being used to pulverize the World Trade Center seems to have been the proximate cause of the undercover police assault and subsequent attacks against me. The people who were behind ousting me are the same people I had worked with for 6 years. These are the same people who run AFP today. They didn't seem at all interested in my research about Thermite and 9/11 - quite the contrary. Earlier, Chris Petherick had told me not to be so critical of the war in Iraq, saying that some of our readers liked the war!
In mid-August 2006 I was assaulted at my home (on private property) by a heavily armed three-man squad of undercover police who TASERed me (while I was handcuffed and held down by two armed men) and broke my right elbow. Willis A. Carto of American Free Press began collecting money for a “legal defense fund” and encouraged me to take Mark Lane as my lawyer. When I spoke to Lane on the phone, he told me that I would have to trust him completely and admitted that he was a Zionist. I decided to look for another lawyer.
After undercover police assaulted me at my home AFP raised money for my legal defense, but they fired me and kept the money instead. Instead of making a case out of the outrageous fact that a working journalist had been attacked at his home in America, AFP ousted me and began a campaign of slander against me.
Shortly after the attack, Mike Piper of AFP began attacking me and insisted that I not be allowed to speak at the Labor Day conference in Washington. In early October 2006 I was fired from AFP by Chris Petherick who claimed that I had been disloyal to the paper and filed false stories. He never provided any evidence to support these claims. Carto disposed of the money raised for my legal fund and I was purged from American Free Press in the same way that Stalin would purge someone from the Communist Party - and the memory of the Soviet Union. I have been subjected to a vicious campaign of slander from Mike Piper and his cronies ever since.
While it may be difficult for an outsider to make sense of all of this, as a person who worked for the Liberty Lobby for more than 6 years and who was then ousted and slandered by the people I had worked with, I have some insight into this odd outfit that calls itself a “populist” newspaper.
Although Liberty Lobby claims to reveal the hidden forces that secretly control the world, it never discloses just who runs this self-described "populist institution," or how. Even the name is deceitful. Liberty Lobby does almost no lobbying. In fact, Liberty Lobby is essentially a fraud. Although it claims to be directed by its "Board of Policy," it is actually run from behind the scenes by Willis A. Carto -- a shadowy 72-year-old whom a California court has found to be a crook and a liar.
Weber is right. I should know, I was the lobbyist for the Liberty Lobby. I was the “Congressional Liaison” when I began working at the Liberty Lobby, which meant that I was to visit the offices of members of Congress on behalf of the lobby and write articles about legislation. There was, however, no structure or instructions for this position whatsoever and I was free to pursue whatever issue I chose. I never received any guidance or met anyone who represented the membership or Board of Policy of the Liberty Lobby except for Willis Carto, whose office was adjacent to mine. There was a door in the wall between our offices and it was always open, except when Carto had meetings with Mark Lane and the accountant, a man named Blayne Hutzel, who wore a Masonic ring.
The offices we worked in were dismal and dirty, far below standard for any organization calling itself a newspaper. I found it impossible to work in such conditions and asked Mr. Carto if I could freshen up my office with some cleaning and a new coat of paint. He refused, saying that if I fixed up my office the others would also want their offices cleaned up.
In the fall of 2000, after about five months on the job, I was suddenly given a new contract that made me an independent contractor. Mr. Carto gave me this contract to sign while Mark Lane stood in the next room. This new arrangement meant that I lost all insurance benefits and was paid to submit articles. I was responsible for managing my own taxes. Hutzel told me that I should get a "good tax man". This arrangement, which I knew nothing about prior to seeing the contract in front of me, allowed me to work from home but meant a significant reduction in compensation. Later, between 2004 and 2006, Carto reduced my salary even further, twice, in cuts of 10 percent each. He also wanted me to come back to Washington and be the lobbyist for the Lobby. I didn't understand this because I thought our main activity was the newspaper business. I was under the impression that AFP was created to be a real newspaper and not a newsletter of the Liberty Lobby.
Furthermore, I did not understand how they were unable to grow the paper in post-9/11 America. Whenever I passed Union Station in Washington I would check to see if there were papers in the boxes, and there were not. I spoke to the employee who was supposed to distribute the papers to the boxes and found that he was not doing it. The paid circulation was only about 20,000, according to the person who managed the subscription data base. The paper was clearly not growing and there was no movement in that direction coming from the employees, who seemed to lack any enthusiasm or patriotic zeal.
In January 2006, shortly after I had spoken about the evidence of Thermite at the World Trade Center at theAxis for Peace forumin Brussels, I was suddenly called back from Germany to go on a crazy mission to Venezuela. This hare-brained scheme originated with Carto and Piper, but Piper did not want to do it - so he put it on me. I was supposed to go to Venezuela and arrange a meeting with Hugo Chavez. I was to get Chavez to buy subscriptions to the newspaper for every member of Congress or somehow get him to make a significant donation to the Liberty Lobby. Nothing had been done to prepare for such a mission and very little was explained to me, but the whole thing was dropped on my shoulders. Nobody had even made contact with the Embassy of Venezuela in Washington. I could see that the chances for success were slim, but was willing to give it a shot. The day I left for Venezuela, Carto told me that I would get ten percent of whatever I could get from Chavez. Nothing was put down in writing.
Christopher Bollyn converses with former prime minister and president of Lebanon, Salim El Hoss, at the Axis for Peace conference in Brussels in November 2005. It was at this high-profile international conference that Bollyn discussed the scientific evidence of Thermite in the destruction of the World Trade Center. He was called back to Washington shortly thereafter and sent on a wild goose chase to Venezuela.
I did not get to see Hugo Chavez, but turned over a package of materials to the Ministry of Information in Caracas when I realized that we (I had invited William Rodriguez and Jimmy Walter to come along) would not have a chance to speak to the president directly. I returned to Washington and headed for Utah to interview Dr. Steven E. Jones on the evidence of Thermite at the World Trade Center.
Unable to meet President Hugo Chavez directly, I presented his Ministry of Information with the material I had brought from Washington.
Although I have written about a number of sensitive subjects, it seems like my articles and discussion of Thermite in the World Trade Center were too hot for the people who controlled American Free Press. Having left Chicago because of intrusive FBI surveillance in the summer of 2005, we were reluctant to stay in our own home. Feeling vulnerable in our home, we visited 9/11 relatives and researchers in the western United States and stayed in safe places. AFP had limited me to one thousand dollars in expenses per month, but I was able to keep my costs down by staying with people who supported 9/11 truth.
I was in Davis, California, in June 2006 when Petherick suddenly cut off my expenses completely telling me that I would no longer have any funds for travel, phone calls, or any expenses at all. This happened the day after I had merged the scientific research of Dr. Steven E. Jones with that of Dr. Thomas Cahill at U.C. Davis. The research of these two men confirmed that some form of Thermite had been used to destroy the Twin Towers. Cahill's data from the smoke particles rising from the pile of rubble from October through December 2001 proved that the fires that raged beneath the pile were hotter than the boiling point of iron!
Dr. Thomas Cahill's Davis DRUM found that the bluish smoke that rose from the pile contained large amounts of nano-sized particles that can only be produced by fires hotter than the boiling point of the element involved. The fires that raged beneath the pile were certainly no ordinary fires.
We now had scientific proof that we were dealing with extremely advanced Thermitic explosives. The fact that I was being squeezed by my employers at AFP at the same time I was making scientific breakthroughs on the evidence of Thermite suggests the two are related. When AFP cut off my expenses completely they knew I would have to return to my home, where undercover police were waiting to attack.
In the science library at U.C. Davis I was able to photocopy the most important articles from the USGS survey of the dust from the World Trade Center. The photographs of iron spheroids in the dust were solid evidence that the demolition of the Twin Towers had resulted in large amounts of molten iron. This was proof that Thermite had been involved in the pulverization of the World Trade Center. This was big.
I brought this material back to Dr. Jones in Provo, who had asked me to find out whatever I could about the dust. He was very glad to get this material. I bid him a fond farewell in June and warned him of the dangers we faced. Within three months we were both fired from our jobs.
Bollyn discussing the evidence of Thermite with Dr. Steven E. Jones at BYU in the spring of 2006
After being fired from American Free Press in October 2006, I learned that Mark Lane is the real owner of the Liberty Lobby and its assets, and has been since 1994. This information came from L.T. Patterson of Cincinnati, owner of the newsletter Criminal Politics. Patterson had been sued by Mark Lane in an attempt to shut down his newspaper and discovered that Lane owned the Liberty Lobby during the legal process. Mark Lane served in U.S. Army intelligence in Germany at the end of the war. Army intelligence became the CIA after the war. Lane played a key role in the Jonestown massacre by pushing the fear button on Jim Jones, which instigated the massacre. Lane is the controlling agent of American Free Press, which pushes the fear button of patriotic Americans every week. Lane was also involved in the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War, where he worked closely with Jane Fonda. Later, Fonda married Ted Turner and convinced him to sell CNN to Zionist Jews in New York. This completed the Zionist monopoly of the mass media in the United States.
The point of Zionists owning media is to control how people think about things. Lane owns AFP in order to control the patriotic movement that is attached to it. His control is meant to keep it from being effective as a political organizer. It's that simple. The books by Lane and Piper are meant to give them credibility. In order to attract bees you have to offer honey. If Carto, Lane, and Piper are serious about taking on the Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith why don't they sue the ADL for branding AFP as an anti-Semitic newspaper?
The information about Lane owning the Liberty Lobby came as a surprise, but made complete sense and fit with what I had observed at the Liberty Lobby. There was absolutely no transparency about the finances at the lobby. I remember in 2000-2001 seeing 4 women opening the mail with donations in Blayne Hutzel’s office. Elisabeth Carto and her sister were the ones who ran the daily counting of the donations that came in the mail. I never understood where all that money went because it certainly was not being spent on the employees or the operation, which all ran on a shoe-string budget. Jerry Myers told me that the Cartos had secret bank accounts in Switzerland and Austria.
There were certainly many shell companies controlled by Willis Carto. My paychecks, for example, came from an entity called the Committee to Expose Bunk. None of this was ever explained. Myers, an old hand at the lobby, told me a lot of the sordid history about the lobby and I knew it was a very secretive and dodgy operation, but I was glad to be able to write articles about things that mattered and see them in print in the nation's capital.
It always bothered me that the distribution of the paper was very poor. The paper was not easily available even in downtown Washington, D.C. It was not even sold in the newspaper shop across the street from the Liberty Lobby. There was clearly a problem with the way the paper was being run.
The main people on the production side of the paper were Paul Tudor Angel and Chris Petherick. Petherick was the editor and Angel did the layout. Chris Petherick was a self-proclaimed Satanist who wore a metal stud in his tongue and threw knives in the wall of the office. I never understood how he wound up being the editor of a populist and supposedly patriotic newspaper. He didn’t seem to fit.
I was invited to visit Paul Angel’s new house in Virginia toward the end of my career at AFP. He had bought a newly built house about 45 minutes south of Washington on the Interstate. He had married a Panamanian girl who worked at Lockheed and we were invited to see the new house and his baby girl. I was surprised when his wife said, “You don’t believe the stuff that’s in that paper, do you?”
Paul chipped in saying that I was one of the paper’s main writers, but I could see that his wife dismissed AFP as nonsense, which made me wonder why Paul worked so hard for Willis Carto and the Liberty Lobby. During the party, I spoke with Paul’s mother, Alice Jones Angel. She mentioned that Paul’s father had died some years earlier.
Paul’s father was a chiropractor based in Silver Spring, Maryland, named Dr. Harold H. Angel who was a governor of Optimist International. Harold Angel died in 1972 when Paul was about 12. Paul was still living with his mother when I started at the paper in 2000, and she drove him to the office. Alice Angel died in February 2009. She had worked at the Department of Health and Human Services.
Paul has two sisters, Alison P. Angel and Laura Angel-Hanratty. Alison had a career at the U.S. Information Agency and Laura is married to Dennis P. Hanratty, Security Manager of the Department of Defense and member of the board of the Defense and Intelligence Council of ASIS International, an agency that is closely tied to the U.S. Intelligence community. I suspect that Angel's family ties to the military and intelligence community are why Paul Angel is the driving force behind the production of American Free Press. I remember how he and Petherick refused to print my articles that discussed the role of Prozac and similar drugs in school shootings and sedating the 9/11 relatives. "Nice try" is all Paul Angel wrote back when I submitted a story about Prozac-crazed school shooters in America. Both Petherick and Angel told me that they did drugs when I began at the Liberty Lobby in 2000, but they did not mean marijuana.
The people behind American Free Press are there simply to control the patriotic movement. They are skimming the cream off of the movement and have done nothing to make it an effective opposition movement. Jerry Myers told me that the Liberty Lobby had paid Mark Lane some five million dollars in legal fees.
Mark Weber was correct in his analysis of 1998:
Carto has few personal friends, but perhaps his closest is Mark Lane, an East coast Jewish attorney who often represents Carto and Liberty Lobby in court. Lane has a long record of support for liberal and leftist figures, including Martin Luther King and Jim Jones (of Jonestown fame). According to legal documents filed by Liberty Lobby in May 1998, Liberty Lobby pays Lane an annual retainer of $92,500.
In spite of the millions of dollars it's controlled over the years, Liberty Lobby has no measurable impact on the political life of the nation's capitol. This is hardly surprising, however. Given the unethical way it's run, Liberty Lobby is inherently incapable of achieving its stated goals, not least because it cannot hold the support of persons of integrity and discernment.
Willis Carto has been bilking well-meaning but credulous Americans for decades, and doubtless many naive people on his "sucker list" will continue to respond generously to urgent appeals for money signed by Ryan or other stooges. Still, and as ever more people learn the facts about how Liberty Lobby really works, and of Carto's long record of scams, the day of reckoning for him and his empire may be coming at last.
Question:How do you compare Camp Bucca to a concentration camp? No one was executed there. People were given more medical care than they had anywhere else in their country, including kidney transplants. Personally, I ensure that people held in the area I was responsible for were given education by local Iraqis: reading, writing, some basic social studies. With the exception of those transferred to Iraqi run prisons, all of the people were released. I completely understand the unpopular war, and the hindsight view of many things, but to compare Camp Bucca to a concentration camp, it's not even a stretch. Please reconsider your analogy. - W. K.
Bollyn Responds: When I received this comment, I immediately posted a "Note on usage" at the bottom of the article about the Iraq War Logs about the meaning of the term "concentration camp." There is much more to this comment than the question about the meaning of the term and I am in contact with W.K. to discuss these things. I don't want anyone to think that I was using hyperbole in calling Camp Bucca a "modern day concentration camp". I was not. Having visited Dachau, Auschwitz, and Buchenwald, I know what I am talking about when I use the term. This is how the term is defined in the Oxford dictionary at our home:
concentration camp - a type of prison, often consisting of a number of buildings inside a fence, where political prisoners are kept in extremely bad conditions Source - Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, 7th Edition, Oxford University Press, 2005
The following photos and text are taken from the end of my article on the Iraq War Logs, which were leaked to the media by WikiLeaks on October 22, 2010:
Camp Bucca, Iraq - This photo from May 2008 shows a barbed wire corridor inside the U.S. "detention center" near the Kuwait-Iraq border. According to U.S. figures, the camp held 19,070 detainees at the time. The camp is named after Ronald Bucca, a NYC Fire Marshal who died on 9/11, although neither Iraq nor the camp detainees had anything to do with the false-flag terrorism of 9/11. Naming the camp after a victim of 9/11 is part of the deception of the U.S. military.
Camp Bucca is a modern day concentration camp in an illegal war of aggression. Will the people behind this criminal war face a Nuremberg Trial?
Gen. David H. Petraeus described a concentration camp when he talked about Camp Bucca in 2007:
"When I took command of Multinational Force-Iraq in February 2007, we still had Camp Bucca with 17,000 detainees at that time and it grew larger," said Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, commander, International Security Assistance Force and commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan. "We still had all of the detainees in huge enclosures. It was just fenced-in enclosures of about 800 to 900 detainees per enclosure. Obviously, we have come a long way since then."
Aconcentration campis defined by Merriam Webster as a camp where persons (as prisoners of war, political prisoners, or refugees) are detained or confined. The Holocaust Encyclopedia has the following definition, which correctly describes U.S. camps like Camp Bucca:
The term concentration camp refers to a camp in which people are detained or confined, usually under harsh conditions and without regard to legal norms of arrest and imprisonment that are acceptable in a constitutional democracy. In Nazi Germany between 1933 and 1945, concentration camps (Konzentrationslager; KL or KZ) were an integral feature of the regime.
Christopher Bollyn and son (left) with the archivist at the Nuremberg Document Center.
Question:We have all read about Barack Obama's intention to build an Islamic center near Ground Zero. This project does appear very suspicious. What, in your opinion, are the real motives behind such a controversial project?
Kuwaiti Feisal Abdul Rauf and his proposed Park51 project are supported by the Zionist media mogul Rupert Murdoch, whose company published Rauf's book. For nine years Murdoch's News Corp. media empire has pushed the evil lie that Muslims were behind the terrorism of 9-11 and promoted the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror" with its wars of aggression and occupation - against Islamic nations and movements.
Bollyn Responds: BUILDING A MONUMENT TO A FALSEHOOD - This is a sophisticated propaganda ploy by the Rothschild/Zionist-controlled U.S. government and media, designed to underline and cement in the public mind the blatant falsehood that Muslims were responsible for the terror attacks of 9-11. This project is founded on the false premise of Muslim guilt and is meant to create a permanent monument to the falsehood that 9-11 was carried out by Islamic terrorists. The people behind this project are the high-level Rothschild agents involved in the Zionist false-flag terrorism and cover-up of 9-11, including New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Rupert Murdoch, whose sprawling media empire has pushed the lies about 9-11and the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
High-level Zionist agents Mayor Bloomberg and Rupert Murdoch of News Corp. are key sponsors of Park51 - a monument to the immensely evil media lie that Moslems were behind 9-11.
The Park51 project, based on the false premise that Muslims were behind the false flag terrorism of 9-11, is supported by extremely wealthy Arab leaders such as Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal of Saudi Arabia, who is the second largest shareholder of Murdoch's News Corp. Any Moslem who supports a monument to such a hateful and anti-Muslim falsehood is a traitor to his faith -- and the truth.
The political support from the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton for this monument reveals it to be a nefarious Zionist plot to hijack the discussion about 9-11 by distracting the public from the real evidence and stirring up anti-Muslim feelings as the ninth anniversary nears. The recent knife attack on the Moslem taxi driver in Manhattan is the kind of reaction such evil plots produce.
ENSLAVED BY LIES
The college student accused of slashing the taxi driver simply because he was a Muslim was quickly moved to a psychiatric ward, which is really where anyone belongs who still believes the Zionist fairy tale that Moslems from Afghanistan were behind 9-11. The government/media version that Osama Bin Laden and 19 Arabs were behind 9-11 remains utterly unproven and flies in the face of evidence of the extremely advanced form of super-thermite that was used to pulverize the Twin Towers. Bin Laden certainly did not produce or apply the coating of nano-composite super-thermite to the interior surfaces of the World Trade Center towers. So, who did? Answer that question and we will solve the crime of 9-11.
The Twin Towers were pulverized by an extremely advanced explosive coating of super-thermite, made with nanotechnology. How obvious does it have to be before people realize they have been deceived? To accept a lie is to be enslaved by it. The suffering and death brought about by the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are the evil results of being enslaved to the lie that Moslems carried out 9-11.
The Israeli government's plan to destroy two mosques on the West Bank is a similar action of the same strategy, which is meant to cause violence and increase tension and hostility against Islam. The Israeli announcement of the outrageous plan to destroy the mosques, which are on Palestinian administered territory in the West Bank, is clearly designed to scuttle - with violence - the planned peace talks in September. Why else would they even consider taking such a unnecessary, self-defeating, and provocative action at this crucial time, especially during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan?
Question: Do you have any articles about Dov Zakheim?
Bollyn Responds: In several articles I have written about Dov Solomon Zakheim, the orthodox Jewish rabbi who was appointed by George W. Bush to oversee the Pentagon budget prior to and after 9-11. I wrote one a few years ago that focused on him specifically. That article is entitled “9/11 and the Elders of Zion” and can be read at: http://islamic-intelligence.blogspot.com/2008/05/9-11-and-elders-of-zion.html
I will be writing another article about the Zionist agent Zakheim, which will discuss his long relationship with the Rothschild family and the state of Israel. Zakheim, who is clearly a foreign agent and devoted Zionist with strong links to the Rothschild family, was a member of the Board of Deputies of British Jews in 1971—1972, and a member of the Chief Rabbi's Chaplaincy Board of England, 1971—1972. He then went on to become assistant to the managing director of the U.K. branch of Tibor Rosenbaum’s International Credit Bank Geneva, 1974-75. This was a criminal enterprise.
James Casbolt, a former agent of MI6, wrote this about the Mossad-linked bank where Zakheim began his career:
Tibor Rosenbaum, a MOSSAD agent and head of the Geneva based Banque du Credit International. This bank was the forerunner to the notorious Bank of Credit and Commerce international (BCCI) which is a major intelligence drug money laundering bank. 'Life' magazine exposed Rosenbaum's bank as a money launderer for the Meyer Lanksky American organised crime family and Tibor Rosenbaum funded and supported 'Permindex' the MI6 assassination unit which was at the heart of the John F. Kennedy assassination. Source: "MI6 Are The Lords of the Global Drug Trade", by James Casbolt (Former MI6 Agent c. 2006) http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=4540
When Rosenbaum’s criminal bank (where Zakheim worked) was exposed in the mainstream media in 1975 (e.g. TIME magazine), Zakheim, an agent of the Rothschilds, was brought to Washington and began his new career as an associate analyst of National Security and International Affairs with the Congressional Budget Office. Who did a background check on Dov Zakheim? Zakheim’s most peculiar move from being a senior executive in a criminal Mossad banking enterprise to a position with the U.S. government happened under the reign of Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, the Rothschild's senior agent in the U.S. government.
Question with Follow-up Comment: Why do you speak of American soldiers with sympathy in your articles? They are all cold-blooded killers and terrorist occupiers who have murdered millions of innocent Iraqis, Afghanis, Yemenis, Pakistanis, etc. U.S. soldiers are cowardly skum who deserve to be loathed, scorned and cursed in their graves.
Bollyn Responds: I have sympathy for those who are deceived and that certainly includes most of the American soldiers serving in these criminal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They have all been misled and deceived. Do we blame the honest and patriotic young man who has been deceived or do we blame the billionaire master of deception who has tricked the nation into war? Who am I to pass judgment on a person who has been deceived? I am doing my best, as I have since September 2001, to expose the evil deception behind 9-11 and the criminal wars that we have been taken into as a result. I have met many Americans and Europeans who have been tricked into these wars and naturally I really feel very sorry for them and their families because they either don't know or can't control what they are doing. Many joined the military out of patriotism, like Pat Tillman, or because their parents wanted them to, like the late Dustin Brim of Daytona. Most, of course, simply signed up because they needed the money.
Pat Tillman turned down a $3.6 million football contract to join the Army Rangers and join the "War on Terror" in Afghanistan, where he was killed by friendly fire in 2004. Like so many others, he was deceived that the terrorists behind 9-11 had come from that poor and remote Central Asian nation. Unfortunately, this evil deception continues.
Dustin Brim was a fine 19-year-old from Daytona. His mother thought the Army would be good for him. She was promised that he would not be sent into combat. He worked with damaged tanks and vehicles in Iraq, most of which were contaminated with depleted uranium. He had no protection against this extremely toxic poison and quickly contracted cancer. He died age 21.
At a restaurant in Iowa we talked with our waitress who had refused to go back to Iraq after the army had made her drive trucks up and down "suicide alley" - after they had coaxed her to sign up with a $10,000 bonus. She had been promised that she would have a safe secretarial job but soon found herself driving in fuel convoys on the most treacherous highway in Iraq. They had lied to her and when she came home for a visit, she refused to go back. The army wanted the $10,000 back.
Many of the U.S. soldiers are actually from National Guard units, which are not meant for foreign service. Whether they are drafted or sign up, once these people are sent off to the war, they no longer have a choice. Their bodies and minds belong to those who command them. I recall seeing on CNN how the U.S. troops had a talking to before going into Falluja on their revenge mission. Their commander told them that the people of Falluja were evil and deserved to be killed in the same way that Ilya Ehrenburg told the Soviet troops to kill without mercy the German civilians they came across as they wiped out some 2.1 million innocent Baltic and Eastern Germans at the end of World War II.
I know men who have committed mass murder. Two that come to mind were young men during the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982, twenty eight years ago. One was a young Israeli from Kibbutz Afikim in the Jordan Valley, where I worked as a lifeguard at the pool. I had known this fellow since he was about 13. His family had migrated to Israel from Argentina and he was a big and friendly boy, at least until he was forced to fight in Lebanon. Later, he confessed to me about the murders he had committed of whole families in Lebanon during the war. He had been a member of a tank crew and as they drove through Lebanon families would come out of their homes with white flags. He had been commanded to fire at them, which he did. He was very tormented by these unjustified killings and he needed to tell me what he had done. I felt sorry for him.
More recently, I met a fellow who was involved in the massacre of Palestinians in the refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila. Again, without asking, this person told me what he had done. When he showed me his scars on his arms and told me that he had been in Sabra and Shatila, I was quite shocked. These massacres are among the most horrific war crimes committed by Israel during my life. This man was only 15 years old when he murdered many innocent people. He is a Maronite Christian who joined the Phalange (with Elie Hobeika's unit) when he was a 13-year-old boy. At that tender age, he was given military training in Israel at Nahariya in 1980. When the Phalange leader Bachir Gemayel was murdered on September 14, 1982, Ariel Sharon sent the Phalange into the Palestinian camps of West Beirut, which the Israeli forces had completely surrounded. The Phalangists, with assistance and support from Israeli forces, massacred with knives thousands of defenseless refugees during a period of three days. The 15-year-old had been deceived by Ariel Sharon and the Israeli Mossad that the Palestinians were responsible for the Gemayel murder. The Israeli military had trained this 13-year-old boy to kill and then used him to murder innocent Palestinians, a crime he will be burdened with forever.
Samuel Maoz, an Israeli veteran of the Israeli invasion of Lebanon of 1982, was a 20-year-old soldier (Israel has obligatory military service) when Israeli forces, under the command of defense minister Ariel Sharon, invaded. Maoz made a film about his experience as a gunner in an Israeli tank, killing hundreds of innocent civilians for no reason. This is a modern example of wrongful killing, a crime that Socrates says is the worst offense one can commit. To kill innocent people inflicts the greater harm and pain on the person who commits such killings. As Socrates has taught the world (via Plato) since about 400 years before Christ, a person who commits such injustice causes more harm to himself than he does to the sufferers of his crime. Unfortunately, this fundamental lesson is not taught to American school children -- or to Israelis. As a result, many wind up as soldiers committing wrongful killings and as a consequence suffer the eternal torment that such actions bring.
Very much like the young Israeli kibbutznik I knew, Maoz was a gunner in a tank crew and at 6:15 a.m. on the morning of June 6, 1982, he killed a man for the first time in his life. “The rest of the people I killed in the war are just a blur,” he told the Jewish Week. “But not the first one.” Maoz remembers an officer telling him that when he went into Lebanon, there would be people on the balconies of the apartment buildings. “You can’t open the option of morality,” he says. “He told me, ‘On 50 percent of those balconies you’ll have soldiers with anti-tank missiles. The other half will be ordinary families.’ You see, there are no good guys or bad guys -- you need to kill to stay alive.”
Steven Erlanger of the New York Times wrote a piece about the Maoz film entitled Lebanon, which is about his actions and crimes committed during the war. For Maoz, now 48, the sense of responsibility for killing remains strong. “There is no escape from it,” he said softly. “In the end you were there, and your finger pulled the trigger…you see the result, and you can’t say you’re not responsible. Maybe in court you’re not guilty. But you can’t cleanse yourself from this guilt.” Twenty-eight years later, Maoz said that what he did during the war remains the first thing he thinks about in the morning and the last before going to sleep. “I wish it were that simple, just to have nightmares,” he said. “That would be a nice deal to buy.”
Reader Follow-up Comment:You mentioned how a 15-year old was trained to kill in preparation of Sabra and Shatila massacre that took place in 1982. How can someone be "deceived" to kill women and children and unarmed civilians? ...when someone already has foreknowledge that there are civilians and yet carries out orders to kill knowingly then they're criminals - straight and simply. They're not deceived, they are killers and there's no excuse for them. If we use your logic then why not feel pity for Sharon or Ben Netanyahu and say they were deceived by their parents or his community, or relatives, or whoever it was for indoctrinating the Zionist ideology into his head to make him who he is today. I'm not saying that they're aren't people deceived into entering a war, but the example of the 15-year old involved in the Sabra and Shatila massacre was a very poor one.
Bollyn Responds: This is a good point. First, this boy was only 13 when he was trained by Israelis in Israel. His Phalangist unit was given military training for three months in Nahariya. He was not trained to massacre Palestinians with knives, which is what he and his unit did in Sabra and Shatila. The Israelis cultivated Maronite hatred against the Palestinians with the murder of Bachir Gemayel, as well as previous massacres and killings. Elie Hobeika, the leader of the boy's militia unit, had secret information on what had really gone on in the camps and was ready to tell it to a court in Brussels when he was blown up in a huge car bomb in Lebanon. Of course the actions of the boy were criminal, but I consider the real criminals to be the ones who train 13-year-old Lebanese boys and arrange such massacres in the first place and that responsibility falls squarely on the Israeli military leadership, which was the occupying power controlling access to the camps.
Question: My question is: Why would Jews want to bring down the World Trade Center? I understand the Jew Silverstein wanting it for the insurance money, but why would the nation of Israel want it? Why would Zionists want it? Was it because they knew it would get the U.S. military to start killing Muslims? How much control do Zionists have over the U.S. government and its policies? Is Rockefeller a Zionist? David Rockefeller was a Baptist, and I don't know of any that are Jews. Zionists, perhaps? Why would Baptist bankers, the Mossad, and Zionist Jews all be working so closely together? That seems like a somewhat strange alliance. Bush's brother was in charge of security at the World Trade Center and turned off the cameras the weekend before the attacks. Are the Bushes Zionists too?
Bollyn Responds: This is an excellent set of questions that frames the subject of my next article, which has the working title "The False Flag Terror of 9/11 and Nine Years of Deception." The media and government deception about 9/11 is massive and clearly very well concerted, but who is really behind the whole thing? Who has that much power and influence over the U.S. government, the Israeli government, and the mass media, to carry out such a global deception? Who wields the power behind the Zionist state? And who does the state of Israel really serve? Who are the real Elders of Zion?
These are the questions that will be dealt with in the next article, which will probably become the concluding chapter of my book, Solving 9-11. In the meantime, I will provide these comments and links to give some insights into the subject:
"There is a much larger group behind these [9/11 attacks] which is the international banking cartel which controls trillions of dollars and which has an interest in controlling countries in the Middle East which are not under their control." - Professor Steven E. Jones on KUER (Salt Lake City's NPR affiliate), September 5, 2006
I have been reading many articles on the 9-11 atrocity and other major world events. I am a 46-year-old Ashkenazi Jew from London, England. I believe the Rothschilds and the banking conspiracy are behind EVERYTHING. When I bring the subject up with my peers and family, I am told it is anti-Semitic nonsense, probably paid for by the Saudi Arabians. - Letter to Bollyn.com, April 2010
The Rothschilds are the ultimate financiers of the state of Israel (along with the U.S. Treasury), the Likud terror gang, and the Mossad. The Rothschilds are also the ultimate owners of the Federal Reserve System and through JP Morgan, of BP. A BP oil tanker was the first to be filled with stolen Iraqi oil under the U.S.-led occupation, headed by Jerry Bremer of Kissinger Associates. During the entire time that Bremer controlled the "sales" of Iraqi oil there was no accounting of how much oil was being loaded onto tankers. See "Ownership of the Federal Reserve" at http://land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/federal_reserve.shtml
The current cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is more than $1 trillion, i.e. more than one thousand billion dollars. This works out to more than $9,000 per American household or $7,650 per U.S. taxpayer. See - http://costofwar.com/ Who benefits from the massive U.S. government debt?
THE ELDERS OF ZION - THE ROTHSCHILDS AND B'NAI B'RITH
The B'nai B'rith, as the oligarchy's agents-in-place in America, has functioned as the clearinghouse for British subversion against the American republic. Therefore, the story of the B'nai B'rith, its Isis-cult roots, its 136-year record of treason against the United States, is essential to understanding who and what our enemy is, how it operates, and how we will destroy it...
Financing for the British colonization scheme was arranged by Queen Victoria's "favorite Jew" Sir Moses Montefiore, who, along with his brother-in-law Nathaniel Rothschild, used their financial conduits in the United States as a major feature of the plan. The Montefiore Society, the North American Relief Society for Poor Jews in Palestine, the Widows' and Orphan Fund, plus dozens of other benevolent societies, provided the funds to establish a "Jewish homeland"…
The point to be understood about these early developments in the U.S. is twofold. First, the British had to create the conditions for imposing upon American Jews the belief that the American notion of progress and assimilation could not be allowed to occur. Therefore the need for a "separate" Jewish organization based on the mythos of Zion, on the return to the "promised land of Palestine," had to be infused into American Jewish thinking as the only chance Jews had for true salvation…At the time [Samuel] Morse wrote , the B'nai B'rith was a British intelligence cult dedicated to the destruction of the American Republic. It was an arm of British intelligence with that chartered purpose at the time of its founding in 1843, and remains so to this day…
B'nai B'rith emerged in 1842 as the American extension of the "Jewish" Rite of Freemasonry in America. According to the history of B'nai B'rith by Edward Grusd, "the mastermind" behind the early growth of this Jewish Masonic order was Baruch Rothschild, relative of the original Meyer Amshel Rothschild who founded the family banking dynasty in 18th century Germany.
Baruch Rothschild, from Bavaria, was trustee of account No. 10,744, a bank account for the Zion Widow and Orphan Society, which was the B'nai B'rith. The B'nai B'rith was created by the Rothschild family.
Rothschild was sent into the B'nai B'rith shortly after its founding to launch a ''membership drive" because, as he himself put it, "the members were not all equally well educated and of far different mental capacities." In short, B'nai B'rith was not for just any Jew. Through Rothschild's building job, it was to become an intelligence executive body, whose leaders would subsequently play controlling roles in other British networks, directing the Abolitionist-Slaveholder confrontations of the 1840s and 1850s, the Secession of the South that produced the Civil War, the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, and numerous post-war destabilizations of the American Republic. - “B'nai B'rith, British Weapon Against America”, by Paul Goldstein, The Campaigner, December 1978 http://wlym.com/campaigner/7812.pdf
Question: Recently, the editor of Uncensored magazine (New Zealand) sent me an e-copy of your e-bookSolving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World. Wow! I thought I knew a lot, but your book reveals/exposes so much more and connects all the dots! So far, I've only read the first 50 pages and I must say, it is certainly one of the best books on this topic. I can't wait to read more... I will certainly be telling everyone I know about your book and website, which I spent hours reading the other day. Excellent! I could see the years and depth of research that has gone into your work. Good on you!
Question - Is a hard copy of your book available? If so, where and how much? A few people I know have been asking.
Bollyn Responds: No. My book has not been published, so the only way to get a hard copy is to print the book out from my website. This is the easiest way to get the information to the widest audience anywhere in the world for the least cost. I provide the information, the reader provides the paper and printer. The complete book (in its current edition) and the nine years of background articles I have written about 9-11 can all be printed out free of charge by clicking on the online book section of Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World. There is an easily printed pdf version of the book or you can go to the Table of Contents and select the individual chapters and articles by clicking on the bold blue titles. There are about 150 articles from 2001 through 2009 that can be accessed through the table of contents or the archives found in the left-hand margin.
Question: I have read your essay about The Coming American Revolution, which includes the following statement: "Armed resistance, on the other hand, such as that of the Hezbollah in south Lebanon, is the legally and morally justified resistance to an armed invasion. The Intifadah of Palestine is fully justified as the legal resistance to the illegal occupation of Palestinian land. These resistance movements are defensive, essential, and legal and I certainly would not condemn them."
Christopher, I agree with most of what you write, but I don't see how you can allow the use of violence for armed resistance (Palestine, Iraq, and Afghanistan) and disallow it for armed rebellion (in the USA or UK). If the people of Palestine, Iraq, and Afghanistan have the right to fight for their freedom by whatever means necessary, why shouldn't the people of the USA have the same right? Surely not because we have 'elected' our representatives. Your own critique of voting machines and elitist control of the political parties, the political process, and the media, demonstrates that the institution of government in the USA is not representative or consensual.
9/11 demonstrated unequivocally that the elitist rulers of the USA have no respect for the lives of US citizens. The claim to authority by the US government over US citizens was certainly broken on 9/11. Why shouldn't an American have the same right to fight for their freedom as the people of Palestine, Iraq, and Afghanistan have?
Bollyn Responds: The statement about legally and morally justified resistance to an armed invasion is actually from my Statement on the Importance of Non-Violence. In "The Coming American Revolution" I wrote this about violence and revolutions:
Revolutions are usually associated with violence, but they don't have to be. Since 1990, half the nations of Europe and Asia have gone through peaceful revolutions that replaced the former dictatorships of the once mighty Soviet Union. The apartheid regime of South Africa also came to an end without violence. The revolution to restore the sovereignty of the American people certainly need not be violent, and really should not be.
This is an excellent question and most appropriate for July 4, when we celebrate the signing of the Declaration of Independence, which articulates the fundamental political philosophy of the American Revolution. I am in complete agreement with the signers of July 4, 1776:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.
Ben Franklin, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson working on the Declaration of Independence
I think the American form of government, as enshrined in the Constitution, is a truly excellent system of government. The U.S. Constitution has been adopted by other nations. Switzerland, for example, used the U.S. Constitution as their model and it has worked very well. The primary difference is that in Switzerland the legislative branch has more power than the executive branch. They did not want an all-powerful president, which I think was a wise decision. In the United States, the executive branch has far too much power having taken over powers that rightfully belong with the people's representatives. The right to declare war, for example, belongs to the U.S. Congress - not the president.
There are many reasons why I am opposed to the use of violence in the struggle to reclaim our lost sovereignty in the United States of America. Firstly, because it is neither called for nor would it be effective. Americans have lost their sovereignty because they have not been vigilant or engaged. If one compares the Swiss system to ours it is clear that the citizens of Switzerland are much more involved in the running of their confederation. If we were to liken our two states to gardens we could say that the Swiss garden is carefully maintained, watered, and weeded. The American garden, on the other hand, has been neglected and has become terribly overgrown with noxious weeds that have taken over and suffocated the beautiful flowers and bushes that were planted by the original gardeners 234 years ago.
The American system gives citizens the power to choose their representatives. The just powers of our government come only with the consent of the governed. This is how our democratic franchise is supposed to work. The fundamental problem with the American republic today is that this representation has become a fiction because our elections are fraudulent. Our presidents and Congressmen do not represent the American people but are beholden to the people who put them in power, i.e. the people who own and control the electronic voting machine systems used across the United States. These people have stolen our sovereignty but maintain the fiction that the American people still elect their representatives. Anyone who has been involved in U.S. elections knows that the whole two-party system is rigged, from the control of the parties and selection of candidates to the counting of votes. Both political parties are owned by big money and special interest groups.
The most effective way to restore the stolen sovereignty to the American people is to restore integrity and transparency to our elections. The only way to get our nation back is to return to hand-counted paper ballots in every polling place across the United States. The American people can do this without violence.
Very well-written article. They accept no rules but the ones they choose to accept. However, what I'm wondering now is why can't they even understand why the rest of the more-sane world is viewing them as sociopaths?? Unless, of course, they actually are sociopaths as well as pathological liars.
Bollyn Responds: This is an excellent question that goes directly to the serious antisocial personality disorder of the "Jewish state" of Israel. The world is a society of nations, and like individuals, nations have personalities. The state of Israel, a racial/tribal state in which orthodox rabbis have a great deal of influence over laws and policies, clearly has an antisocial personality disorder. The question is: Do Israelis not understand that the rest of the world views their state as sociopathic? This question raises another: If Israel is a sociopathic state, how did it become sociopathic?
A sociopath is a psychopath with strongly antisocial tendencies. In the 1800s this personality disorder was called "moral insanity." By 1900 it had changed to "psychopathic personality" and is now called "antisocial personality disorder."
Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD or APD) is defined by the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) as "a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others."
The state of Israel has a long history of showing "disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others" and consistently displays the following behaviors, which are common features of sociopathic people:
Sociopaths never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behavior as permissible. They may appear to be charming, but are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims.
They have no problem lying and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. They can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities.
They have a deep seated rage, which is split off and repressed, at their core. They do not see others around them as people, but only as targets and opportunities. Instead of friends, they have victims and accomplices who end up as victims. The end always justifies the means and they let nothing stand in their way.
When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises.
They are unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others' feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them.
They believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing, and entitled to every wish. They show no sense of personal boundaries and have no concern for their impact on others. They may even state that their goal is to rule the world. Their goal is the enslavement of their victim(s) and they seek to exercise despotic control over every aspect of the victim's life.
The sociopath does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed. A sociopath does not perceive that anything is wrong with them.
There is a disregard for and violation of the right's of others, those right's considered normal by the local culture (or international law). ASPD is indicated by at least three of the following. I have indicated those behaviors which Israel displays consistently:
A. Repeated acts that could lead to arrest. (Israel often violates international law, e.g. war crimes in Gaza and Lebanon, and the recent piracy and murders committed against the Freedom Flotilla.)
B. Conning for pleasure or profit, repeated lying, or the use of aliases. (Israel is constantly conning the U.S. government and always lies about its actions. Israelis often use aliases, even committing Mossad murders using stolen identities of foreigners visiting Israel.)
C. Failure to plan ahead or being impulsive. (Israel is often taking actions that backfire. Are such blunders really intentional?)
D. Repeated assaults on others. (Israel has attacked all of its neighbors and nations far away. Nearly all of its assaults have been illegal under international law.)
E. Reckless when it comes to their or others safety. (The aggressive and illegal actions of the Israeli state put all Israelis and Jews at risk. They claim to be acting on behalf of the Jewish people but their reckless actions increase the dangers for all Jews, even those who have nothing to do with Israel.)
F. Poor work behavior or failure to honor financial obligations. (Israel never actually repays its loans from the U.S. These loans are all eventually rolled onto the U.S. taxpayer, who winds up footing the Israeli bill.)
G. Rationalizing the pain they inflict on others. (Israel always rationalizes the pain and suffering they inflict on the Palestinian and Lebanese. Israel even blames the Freedom Flotilla for the deaths of the nine people killed by Israeli Defense Forces – on the high seas.)
If one considers the behavior of the state of Israel, as expressed through the actions and words of its leaders, especially since the late-1970s when the extreme right-wing Likud Party came to power, one can easily see that Israel – as a state – displays all the symptoms of antisocial personality disorder. It should be remembered that the Likud Party of prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu is the political party of the former Irgun terrorists, headed by such notorious Zionist terrorists as Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir. A political party founded by mass murderers and terrorists certainly must be seen as having antisocial tendencies.
Although many clinicians use the terms psychopath and sociopath interchangeably, a sociopath's criminal behavior is shaped by social forces and is the result of a dysfunctional environment, according to psychopath expert Robert Hare in his book Without Conscience.
The Israeli state acts without conscience or respect for international law or the norms of civilized society. This is why I call Israeli behavior "amoral" rather than "immoral". Israelis do not act according to the moral standards of the civilized world but follow a completely different set of rules based on the Talmud, which apply only to them. The Talmudic laws that guide the behavior of orthodox Jews (and Israelis) turn the Ten Commandments on their head and discriminate between Jews and non-Jews, who are seen as less-than-human beasts. (See Israel Shahak's excellent book Jewish History, Jewish Religion online.) It is important to note that the key people involved in the 9-11 crime and cover-up are all Israelis, orthodox Jews, and rabbis (e.g. Alvin K. Hellerstein, Michael Chertoff, and Dov Zakheim).
Orthodox Judaism as defined by the rabbis (i.e. Talmudic teaching) is the basis of the "antisocial religion," which is the origin of the "social forces" and "dysfunctional environment" behind the antisocial personality disorder of the state of Israel. Orthodox Jewish children are raised with a supremacist worldview that Jews are superior to all other people and that non-Jews exist only to serve Jews. This sociopathic doctrine of Jewish supremacism is taught to all Israeli children, even those from non-religious families. The discrimination against non-Jews is reinforced by the language of the Jews, which calls a non-Jewish woman a "shiksa" and a non-Jewish man a "shegetz". The Hebrew root word of both is "shegua", which means something so foul that it cannot be touched.
Tacitus, the Roman senator and historian of the 1st Century, described the antisocial behavior of the Jews, which were part of the Roman Empire of his time: "Among the Jews all things are profane that we hold sacred; on the other hand they regard as permissible what seems to us immoral."
The antisocial essence of the Jewish religion is caused by "the hatred" (i.e. "the deep seated rage" of sociopaths) with which they confront the "rest of the world", as Tacitus wrote:
The other practices of the Jews are sinister and revolting, and have entrenched themselves by their very wickedness. Wretches of the most abandoned kind who had no use for the religion of their fathers took to contributing dues and free-will offerings to swell the Jewish exchequer; and other reasons for their increasing wealth may be found in their stubborn loyalty and ready benevolence towards brother Jews. But the rest of the world they confront with the hatred reserved for enemies.
Question: How do you prove if a person has been exposed to Depleted Uranium (DU) and what can a person do about the health problems it causes, such as brittle teeth? Does the Veterans Administration (VA) have a policy to help and compensate veterans? I am a retired Army officer, my son was in Iraq with the first group that went in. He was there for 13 months. His job included evacuation of blown out damaged and destroyed armor vehicles, artillery, and tanks from the battle field along with moving troops in and out the front lines. He has a series of health issues that I believe are a result of his time in Iraq (including brittle teeth since he returned) and it is taking a toll. I find it hard for the VA not to acknowledge there is a problem when there is so much documentation and research on the subject. Something needs to be done to help veterans like my son with this.
Bollyn Responds: This is a very relevant question because there are currently more than 800,000 disabled vets from the Gulf War Era (300,000 from Desert Storm in 1991 and 500,000 from Operation Iraqi Freedom since 2003). I have written a series of articles about the very real health damage caused by the use of depleted uranium. These articles are ground-breaking in that they explain the extreme danger of what is called "the particle effect," which is caused by exposure to nano-size particles of DU.
To see if there had been any changes in the position of the military regarding DU exposure, I turned first to the VA website where I found that they still deny the existence of any health problems among vets related to depleted uranium:
DU is a health hazard if it enters the body, such as through embedded fragments, contaminated wounds, and inhalation or ingestion. Simply riding in a vehicle with DU weapons or DU shielding will not expose a service member to significant amounts of DU or external radiation. The potential for health effects from internal exposure is related to the amount of DU that enters a person’s body.
So far no health problems associated with DU exposure have been found in Veterans exposed to DU. Researchers and clinicians continue to monitor the health of these Veterans. Go to the Department of Defense's Depleted Uranium (DU) Library* to learn about results of medical and scientific research and other DU topics.
Although the VA claims it has found "no health problems" from DU exposure, the following section on VA Benefits certainly says otherwise: "Veterans who were exposed to depleted uranium during military service may be eligible for health care benefits." The VA also says it provides "disability compensation benefits for disabilities that VA determines are associated with depleted uranium exposure."
Why would veterans exposed to DU be eligible for health care and disability benefits if the VA claims there are "no health problems associated with DU exposure"? This makes no sense.
I then contacted Doug Rokke, a U.S. Army (ret.) expert on the effects of DU. In previous interviews Rokke had informed me that he suffered from brittle teeth as a result of his exposure to DU. I asked Rokke about the problem with brittle teeth among vets.
This is a "severe" problem, Rokke said. He lost all of his teeth due to DU. "They disintegrate," he said. This he said is caused by DU's effect on phosphorus and calcium. Asked about the VA claim that "no health problems" have been found related to DU exposure, Rokke said, "They lie through their teeth." They know all about the serious health problems caused by DU but are unwilling to acknowledge the connection.
Comment from a relative of a 9-11 victim: I am so shocked and horrified by the information I am reading here. My dear cousin Tom was the co-pilot on American Airlines Flight 11 and I believe he was one of the first to die that day. Reading that the government of Israel had advance knowledge of this, that the so-called movers were actually Israeli operatives exposes Israel in a light I had never before imagined, yet I cannot disregard. The tragic death of this husband and father, as well as all the other innocent lives lost that day, is brutally compounded by the complicity of one of this nation's allies.
Bollyn Responds: This poignant comment from a relative describes our common 9-11 predicament very well. The evidence of Israeli (and Zionist agents) involvement in the terror atrocity cannot be disregarded. The events of 9-11 (and the subsequent cover-up of the truth) are of much greater historical importance than simply being the seminal events of the fraudulent "War on Terror." The false-flag terror atrocity of 9-11 is the harbinger of a revolutionary change in world history. The role of our corrupt political systems and the controlled media in the cover-up of what really happened on 9-11, and the growing awareness of this evil deception, presents us with a pregnant political situation which can only be called pre-revolutionary. The official version of 9-11 has been proven to be nothing but a pack of treasonous lies. The political status quo, in which the Zionist-controlled political establishment exploits blatant lies about 9-11 to carry out illegal wars of aggression and impose draconian "homeland security" policies on the American population is neither acceptable nor tenable in the long run. The tremors that precede the upheaval can already be felt. Question: I just wish that you had footnoted your writings. I would love to believe you, but without sources backing up your facts, it makes it difficult.
Bollyn Responds: This skeptical reader raises a very good point. In my articles written as a professional journalist (2000- October 2006) I always provided the sources of the information in the text. Since 2007, when I began writing my book Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World, I mention the sources in the text (as a journalist should) and give the details and location of the material at the end. By providing the documents and sources of the information I try to make it easy for the reader to check the veracity of the information found in my articles and see it in its full context. I am certainly not asking for anyone to "believe" anything I write. One publisher sent my chapter on the Architecture of Terror to an independent and professional fact checker in Britain. The fact checker was actually opposed to my hypothesis that Israel was involved in the terrorism of 9-11 and examined more than 100 points or facts that I present in this key chapter. Every one of them was found to be correct. As Professor Steven E. Jones would say, "The data doesn't lie."
Question: We met in the summer of 2005 when you brought William Rodriquez [9-11 survivor from the World Trade Center] to speak at the Schaumburg Library [Illinois]. You mention in your notice to Eric Hufschmid that you categorize him with Mike Piper and Darrel Bradford Smith – why? You also referred to Victor Thorn who seems to have lifted some of your ideas about Zionist involvement in 9/11. Are Piper and Smith disinformation agents?
I have Piper's Final Judgment. I think your research is impeccable and felt badly when you "left" AFP. Your online 9/11 book is amazing. I hope that you and your family are happy and secure. I have noted that people who divulge too much truth, like Sterling, Peggy Seagrave, and yourself receive similar treatment and have to flee.
Bollyn Responds:This is a good question about a subject that I don't usually delve into, but which certainly deserves to be discussed because it concerns the role of the Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) as the source of much of the deception and evil that afflicts our world today.
The people you ask about: Hufschmid, Piper, Smith, and Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Victor Thorn), are four detractors who have spent years attacking me and waging a vicious campaign of slander and libel against me and my family.What these agents of deception have done is spread lies and calumnies about me, my wife and children in an effort to discredit me and damage my credibility and reputation. Smith revealed how this vicious slander campaign works in a taped telephone conversation with Eric Hufschmid. I have written about this in an article entitled "Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can", which is exactly what Smith told Hufschmid to do. Why would Smith want to "slam" me, an honest journalist and leading 9-11 researcher?
While Hufschmid has not attacked me as maliciously as the others, he has made the ridiculous claim since the summer of 2007 that I have been kidnapped by the Mossad. Using this bizarre claim (which he stubbornly maintains despite abundant proof to the contrary) he says that my writing is "bait" approved by Israeli intelligence. Although he employs a different method, Hufschmid's slander against me has achieved the same result. He has successfully sown suspicion about my credibility and drawn attention to me as a person while completely marginalizing my 9-11 research, which he has ignored since 2007.
To understand what this slander campaign is really all about, and who is behind it, we need to employ some Socratic dialectic. We will start by asking a simple question: Are these people attacking me as a defensive tactic because I have attacked them or treated them badly?
No. I have not wronged any of these people and not even discussed them until after they began attacking me. As a matter of fact, I have helped all of them a great deal. I helped Piper, for example, with his RBN radio show when I filled in for him for several weeks in a row, while on the road with my family in the West during the summer of 2006. This required a great deal of time and effort on my part - with absolutely no compensation. Does Piper do his daily show from free?
I also helped Piper by appearing several times as a guest on his show, as I did for Hufschmid and Smith's "French Connection" show. While I agreed to be interviewed by Piper, Hufschmid, and Smith, I have always worked as an independent journalist (for Spotlight and AFP from 2000 until October 2006) and was never affiliated with any of them in any way. I have been interviewed by many people. Being interviewed by a person or having my material posted on somebody's website does not indicate any deeper association than that. The attempts to link me with Hufschmid and Smith are part of an intel trap to discredit my work by connecting me with them. Piper always introduced me with fulsome praise, calling me "America's best journalist, bar none." Piper, Hufschmid, and Smith have, as a matter of fact, all greatly relied on and gained from the original 9-11 research I have done. None of them can say that they have suffered because of knowing me. So why do they attack me?
Christopher Bollyn (left) and Darrel Setters (a.k.a. Darrel Bradford Smith) at Smith's home in central France, the morning after Thanksgiving 2005
Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) wrote a book about Israel’s role in the 9-11 attacks (that I have not read), which must contain a great deal of my research. Thorn’s book was published by American Free Press, where I worked from 2000 until October 2006.
Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Victor Thorn)
Although I was the first journalist to write about the Israeli role in the 9-11 attacks and have done far more research (for eight years) than any other writer on the subject, AFP was never interested in doing a book about 9-11 with me. This is an intelligence tactic called “stealing the thunder.” If AFP were truly interested in exposing the Israeli role in 9-11, why have they not asked to publish my ground-breaking book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World?
So, what have I done to deserve being subjected to the vicious and concerted campaign of calumny, slander, and libel? What is it that I have done that bothers them so much that they spend time attacking me?
This is easy. Apart from raising my family, for the past eight years my only vocation has been to research and write about the false-flag terrorism of 9-11. As an investigative journalist I have led the way in investigating the role of Israeli intelligence and Zionist agents in the United States in the terror attacks of 9-11.
If my 9-11 research and writing is the reason these detractors are attacking me with slander and libel, who are they doing it for?
It stands to reason that these four are working as agents of an agency that is interested in my research being discredited and marginalized. Because my thesis is that the state of Israel and Zionists in the U.S. are behind 9-11, these must be the same entities behind the anti-Bollyn slander campaign. This makes sense because well-known Zionist entities such as Rupert Murdoch’s FOX News, CNN, and the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz have all tried to smear me as an anti-Semite.
Are these four detractors connected with a Zionist agency or the state of Israel?
Eric Hufschmid’s father, with whom he works closely, is the father of the wife of Rupert Murdoch’s son James, heir apparent of the Murdoch media empire. Smith is a former narcotics user who has several felony convictions that were suddenly cleared up immediately before he began his career with “The French Connection” in early 2005.
Piper and Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) work for a newspaper called American Free Press, where I worked as an independent contractor (since the fall of 2001) after being hired in the spring of 2000. AFP claims to be an employee-owned newspaper, which is a deception meant to fool readers. AFP has no assets to own. Everything of value associated with the Liberty Lobby and American Free Press is held by a host of shell companies with names like “The Committee to Expose Bunk”, which issued my paychecks, for example. Michael Piper is one of the people allowed to sign checks from these entities.
The person who is the mastermind of the shell game involving the assets of the Liberty Lobby is Mark Lane, the Jewish lawyer who played a crucial role in the massacre at Jonestown, Guyana.
Mark Lane (center) was present at Jonestown during the massacre. He is considered to have played a key role in provoking the massacre by playing on the fears of Jim Jones. This photo with Jones (left) was taken shortly before the mass suicide/massacre. How odd that Lane became the lawyer, and then owner of the Liberty Lobby several years later.
Lane has been the lawyer of the Liberty Lobby since the mid-1980s and received some $5 million in legal fees, according to a veteran Liberty Lobby insider. Lane, who served in U.S. Army Intelligence in Germany at the end of the war, acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1993 or 1994, according to L.T. Patterson (owner of Criminal Politics), who discovered this fact during a court process in which Lane was suing Patterson.
Who does Lane work for?
Lane must work for the C.I.A. Having worked for Army Intelligence in the mid-1940s, it stands to reason that Lane became one of the head honchos in the Jewish intelligence cabal in Army Intelligence that became the C.I.A. in 1949. This would explain Lane’s role in his writings on the Warren Report, the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War, Jonestown, and the so-called patriot movement at the Liberty Lobby.
But isn’t the C.I.A. working to protect the nation and the people of the United States?
Obviously not. The C.I.A. was criticized for being asleep at the switch on 9-11, but it is really much worse than that. The C.I.A. actually works against the interests of the republic and the American people. The C.I.A. is obviously deeply involved in the commission of the terrorism crime of 9-11. Rather than preventing 9-11 or finding the culprits of the atrocity, the C.I.A. has been exploiting the 9-11 deception to wage war using drone warfare in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Asked about the C.I.A. attacks in Pakistan, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton responded as if she had no legal authority or control over the C.I.A., which was a remarkably candid response from a U.S. Secretary of State. Her response indicated that the C.I.A. is a rogue agency that acts outside the control of the U.S. administration. How can that be?
What is the C.I.A.’s interest in Afghanistan and Pakistan?
The C.I.A. is clearly not interested in solving 9-11 or finding the culprits. We know that the Twin Towers were demolished using an advanced form of super-thermite (produced using nano-technology) and that the official version that Osama Bin Laden carried out 9-11 from a cave in Afghanistan is nothing but a pack of lies. The C.I.A. is involved in Afghanistan because that’s where most of the world’s opium is produced. George H.W. Bush, the former director of the C.I.A., was also a director of the Eli Lilly Company, the pharmaceutical giant that manufactures Prozac. Bush was also one of the first students at Israel’s Yonatan [Netanyahu] Institute of terrorism in 1979. Since the production of opium has skyrocketed since the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, we can assume that opium production is one of the purposes of the war and occupation. Prior to the invasion of 2001, the Taliban regime, which the U.S. is fighting against, had succeeded in eradicating nearly all opium production in Afghanistan.
This explains why American Free Press was so strongly opposed to my articles about the dangerous effects of Prozac and similar drugs. When Ellen Mariani, a 9-11 widow, told me that the grieving relatives had been sent to Red Cross doctors who had prescribed Prozac – the editor at AFP cut it out of the story. My subsequent articles about serotonin-affecting drugs and school shootings were rejected out-of-hand. This was clearly a subject that the American Free Press did not want to take up.
One has to remember what Andreas von Bülow said about intelligence agencies in December 2001: ”Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation.” The first target of the deception and disinformation of the C.I.A. is the people of the United States. This is a rogue agency that must be disbanded if the American republic is to survive. The C.I.A. is no sacred cow, some sacrosanct institution that can be allowed to carry out its own agenda, wage war, and maintain secret prisons, all in the name of our democratic American republic. The C.I.A. is a rogue agency that is obviously an enemy of American democracy. The United States of America cannot survive as a democratic republic with the C.I.A. operating as the shadow government. The C.I.A. is nothing but a band of organized criminals operating under the guise of the United States. By dissolving the C.I.A. we would obtain answers to many of the crimes committed in the past 60 years.
Question: I am making an appeal that you repost the following important articles on your website or link to them somewhere. They are increasingly getting harder to find on the Internet. Many sites just link back to your site and yet they are no longer available at Bollyn.com Some people are just beginning to wake up – they really need to hear what happened and understand the nature and character of Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith. I hope to see this information on your site again soon.
Bollyn Responds: I have recently received quite a few questions about my detractors, namely Michael Piper, Daryl B. Smith, and Eric Hufschmid. I have reposted these articles under the section entitledThe Cure for Disinfo. As the former German intelligence chief Andreas von Buelow told me in December 2001, “Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation.” Marion Fulk, the retired scientist of the Manhattan Project and Livermore Lab, used to tell me that the government “has buildings full of agents” to do their dirty work. When we would go to a restaurant in Livermore after a day spent studying the effects of depleted uranium, there would be several agents tailing us and listening to our conversation. My detractors and those who slander and libel me are working for such people. The truth is coming out and we can all see who has been working for the truth and who has not. The functions of Michael Piper and sticky fly-paper operations like American Free Press are a bit more complicated and something I will take up in the next question.
Marion Fulk (left) and Christopher Bollyn at Fulk’s home in Livermore, California
Question of April 14:In human history, are you aware of examples in which the entire population of a country believed in a lie for years, then discovered the lie? Does recognition of truth happen rapidly? What is the usual outcome? What do you predict Mr. Bollyn?
The Katyn Massacre Memorial
Bollyn Responds:Big lies are really not that unusual, especially when massacres are involved. History is littered with them. The Katyn Massacre comes to mind. The recent crash of the plane of the Polish president and 96 others has brought this extremely painful “Big Lie” back into the spotlight. The Katyn Massacre was the mass murder of some 22,000 Polish nationals by the Soviet secret police, a massacre which had been approved by the entire Soviet Politburo, including Joseph Stalin, Britain’s ally in its “unnecessary war” against Germany. Nazi Germany announced the discovery of mass graves in the Katyn Forest in 1943 and was immediately blamed - without a single stitch of evidence - by the Allies and Western media for the atrocity. Hitler actually called for an investigation into the killings, although it was not until 1990 that the Soviet Union officially acknowledged and condemned the perpetration of the killings by the Soviet NKVD, and the subsequent cover-up.
The Ground Zero Cross
The massacre and terror atrocity of 9-11 are very similar to the Katyn Massacre. The blame was wrongly placed on Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida – without any evidence - in order to usher in the pre-planned “War on Terror” with an illegal invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, and subsequently Iraq. The crucial evidence of the crime of 9-11 was quickly destroyed and a politically controlled non-investigation managed under the direction of Michael Chertoff, a dedicated agent of the actual culprits – Israeli intelligence and their Zionist quislings in the United States.
Michael Chertoff was the key person responsible for the destruction of the evidence of 9-11 – and the cover-up. Chertoff, the son of an Israeli Mossad agent named Livia Eisen, is an Israeli by birth.
The Zionist-controlled media ignored the evidence of Israeli involvement and pushed the official version, which is really nothing more than a pack of lies. Nothing good will ever come from such evil deceit, and nothing good has come from the lies surrounding 9-11. For more than 8 years the world has been deceived about what really happened on 11 September 2001 and why we are engaged in the War on Terror - but the truth is coming out. The dam of lies and deceit is breaking and it is no longer possible to hold back the Truth. The culprits and those who have assisted the cover-up are becoming very uncomfortable. The liars and rats of the 9-11 deception will be washed away by the flood waters of Truth.
The Dedication of the Cross
Comment of April 9:Dear Mr Bollyn. I am one of your fans. I thought you would like this article, in case you did not read it yet. I wonder if Mr. Wilkerson [Col. Lawrence B.] might be one of many “whistle blowers” who come to light in coming weeks and months?
George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld covered up that hundreds of innocent men were sent to the Guantánamo Bay prison camp because they feared that releasing them would harm the push for war in Iraq and the broader War on Terror, according to a new document obtained by The Times.
Donald Rumsfeld believed that releasing the innocent detainees would harm the Administration, according to a signed declaration by a top aide to Colin Powell.
The accusations were made by Lawrence Wilkerson, a top aide to Colin Powell, the former Republican Secretary of State, in a signed declaration to support a lawsuit filed by a Guantánamo detainee. It is the first time that such allegations have been made by a senior member of the Bush Administration.
Colonel Wilkerson, who was General Powell’s chief of staff when he ran the State Department, was most critical of Mr Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld. He claimed that the former Vice-President and Defence Secretary knew that the majority of the initial 742 detainees sent to Guantánamo in 2002 were innocent but believed that it was “politically impossible to release them”.
Who said never again? Guantanamo is a real concentration camp in our time. Children as young as 12 and 13 and elderly as old as 92 or 93 were taken to Gitmo. Why are the people behind this outrageous crime being protected from prosecution? When will President Obama close the Gitmo Gulag and begin an investigation of the abuses committed there? Why delay what has to be done?
Answer:Yes, there will certainly be others coming forward who will expose the lies and deception of 9-11 and the Zionist fraud known as the “War on Terror.” The real question is when and what kind of legal action will follow to investigate and punish those who are really behind 9-11 and the subsequent ”War on Terror” that has destroyed so many lives? I recommend Andy Worthington’s article of April 14. “Wilkerson Demolishes Bush, Cheney, And Rumsfeld’s Lies About Guantanamo” in The Public Record:
For Col. Wilkerson, who remains “extremely concerned that the Armed Forces of the United States, where I spent 31 years of my professional life, were deeply involved in these tragic mistakes,” the need for accountability has a particularly personal meaning, but for the rest of us, it should be no less important that torture was used to justify an illegal war, that it infected the U.S. military, that those who authorized it remain free to continue spreading their poisonous lies (in Dick Cheney’s case, at least), and that men continue to languish in Guantánamo as a result of it — and also as a result of the Obama administration’s unwillingness, or refusal to confront the very facts that Col. Wilkerson has disclosed.
Wilkerson’s signed statement (pdf) of March 24, 2010 is here.
Question of April 6:Dear Mr. Bollyn: I have been reading many articles on the 9-11 atrocity and other major world events. I am a 46-year-old Ashkenazi Jew from London, England. I believe the Rothschilds and the banking conspiracy are behind EVERYTHING. When I bring the subject up with my peers and family, I am told it is anti-Semitic nonsense, probably paid for by the Saudi Arabians. If there is no actual proof, and the Rothschilds are so powerful, please help me to understand why so much data is available on the Internet. Am I missing something? Surely the Rothschilds would be able to prevent this data surfacing under libel or slander laws, or anti-defamation. Thank you. I look forward to your reply.
Answer:Yes, the Rothschilds are behind much of what goes on – especially when it concerns the outlaw state of Israel. The Rothschild family was the prime mover and financier of the Zionist project to settle Russian and Polish Jews in Palestine. The 1917 Balfour Declaration which promised British support for a home for world Jewry in Palestine was addressed to Lord Rothschild (Lionel Walter, 2nd Baron Rothschild 1868-1937), head of the English branch of the Jewish banking family – and unofficial head of British Jewry. The Balfour Declaration gave great impetus to the Zionist movement that eventually resulted in the state of Israel. The Rothschild bankers were obviously calling the shots in Britain in 1917. Lionel’s father, the 1st Baron Rothschild, was able in 1875 to give £4,000,000 to Britain’s first Jewish prime minister, D’Israeli (later Disraeli), to become the principal stockholder in the Suez Canal Company.
Prior to World War I Zionism represented only a minority of Jews, mostly from Russia, but led by Austrian and German Jews. By 1914 there were about 90,000 Jews in Palestine; 13,000 settlers lived in 43 Jewish agricultural settlements, many of them supported by the French Jew Baron Edmond de Rothschild.
The Rothschilds are able to control governments by being primary lenders of money to national banks, like the Federal Reserve. In the past 40 years the United States has gone from being the largest creditor nation to becoming the largest debtor nation. This is how the U.S. has lost its independence and much of its felicity. The greater the debt, the greater the control gained by the international bankers like the Rothschilds. (to be continued…)
Question of April 2:I just listened to Dr. Sabrosky’s broadcast. He was pretty convincing although I felt he was a little short on details. He seemed to place a great deal of his case on the fall of WTC 7, but never once did he say anything about Larry Silverstein and only one very brief mention of nano-thermite. 9-11 was such a complicated operation and required the cooperation of many people. I’m sure you have told us before, but why was it necessary to bring down WTC 7? The fall of WTC 7 is so obviously controlled demolition, why would those responsible take the risk of exposing their crime by demolishing 7 in this way? There had to have been something in that building that was so important to make it worth their great risk to demolish it. Or did they simply feel so confident that they could do this in plain sight and have complete confidence in their control of our government and media?
Answer:The demolition of WTC 7 is the event that revealed to Dr. Alan Sabrosky and Dr. Steven Jones (and many others) that the official version of 9-11 is a pack of lies. Destroying WTC 7 was obviously crucial to the whole false-flag terror operation. There are two main explanations for this. First, it may have housed equipment and personnel that played a role in the destruction of the WTC towers, for example in the specially fortified bunker on the 22nd or 23rd floor.
Secondly, it housed the offices of federal agencies involved in investigations of serious financial crimes. The destruction of the evidence would have been crucial in both cases. The vault beneath WTC 6 held much of the evidence for the federal agencies in WTC 7 and this vault was evidently cleaned out the night before 9-11, according to Kurt Sonnenfeld, the FEMA photographer who looked into it. The Zionist perpetrators have complete confidence that they could get away with this because of their control of our government and media, as you say, but the real key was having control of the buildings prior to 9-11 and having Michael Chertoff in the key position to control the destruction of the evidence and non-investigation of the crime.
WTC 7 was owned by Larry Silverstein and had been built with Israeli contractors in the mid-1980s, when the Zionist plan for the destruction of the WTC had already been developed. The main strategic reason for the Israeli false-flag terror of 9-11 was to usher in the “War on Terror” and bring the U.S. military into the Middle East on a permanent basis – to protect Israel’s hegemony in the region. See: “America the Target: 9-11 and Israel’s History of False Flag Terrorism” http://www.bollyn.com/america-the-target-9-11-and-the-history-of-false-flag-terrorism
Question of March 26:In a recent radio interview, Dr. Alan Sabrosky (a former director of the US Military War College, General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research, among other highly impressive credentials) stated that top American military brass know Israel did 9/11. A four part series of this interview is on Youtube. Dr. Sabrosky stated that in recent weeks he has brought this to the attention of many high level military contacts, who now realize Israel’s role in 9/11. Do you believe it’s true that top military officers are just now beginning to realize what you’ve been saying, and if so, what might be the outcome?
Dr. Alan Sabrosky discusses increasing awareness in the U.S. military that Israel is behind 9-11 and disastrous war policies in Iraq and Afghanistan.
IT IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT CERTAIN that 9-11 was a Mossad operation – period. - Dr. Alan Sabrosky
If these Americans and those like them ever fully understand just how much of their suffering – and the suffering we have inflicted on others – is properly laid on the doorsteps of Israel and its advocates in America, they will sweep aside those in politics, the press and the pulpits alike whose lies and disloyalty brought this about and concealed it from them. They may well leave Israel looking like Carthage after the Romans finished with it. It will be Israel’s own great fault. - Alan Sabrosky, “Treason, Betrayal and Deceit: 9/11 and Beyond”, Sept. 10, 2009
Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a ten-year U.S. Marine Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College.
Answer:In the video clip, Dr. Alan Sabrosky (who says that he has Jewish ancestors) claims he has informed people at the highest levels of the U.S. military that Israeli Mossad criminals are behind 9-11. He says that most of the people in the U.S. military brass were not aware of Israel’s role in 9-11 and are truly shocked and enraged when they realize that the U.S. has been duped and deceived by Israeli intelligence. I don’t doubt that for a minute. I believe that the 9-11 deception was not understood by the people at the top. This is why the title of my book isSolving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World.
Had the deception of the false-flag terror atrocity been widely understood in the military, I certainly would not have been attacked, maliciously prosecuted, and tried in a corrupt Chicago court in 2007 with virtually no support from the U.S. military and other institutions. Articles about the conspiracy behind the brutal police attack and my trial can be found in The Bollyn Trial section.
There has, however, been a very significant and noticeable sea change in how the U.S. and British governments and media treat Israel during the past few weeks and I think that Dr. Sabrosky’s revelations may be connected with that change. I am very encouraged by this development, to say the least.
Question of March 17:Just today, Wayne Madsen has disclosed another very important link in the chain of evidence: he reports that an El Al 747 departed from JFK for Tel Aviv at 4:11 p.m. on 9/11/2001 and it was full. Would you please pause for a moment to contemplate the evidentiary significance of confirming the complete list of passengers who embarked for Tel Aviv on that unauthorized flight?
Answer:I would expect that Ehud Olmert and many of the Israelis who were behind the terrorism of 9-11 were on this plane. As I pointed out in December 2007, Ehud Olmert, the Likudnik mayor of Jerusalem and deputy prime minister of Israel, was in New York City on the eve of 9-11. The fact that this high level Israeli politician was in New York City on September 10, 2001 has been kept secret. I would assume that this visit has been kept secret because it involved the false-flag terror attacks of the following day. I suspect that Olmert was in New York City during the attacks. It would, of course, be very interesting to get the passenger list. I will see what I can do.
Question and Comment:With the information that is now available, why has the insurance company that paid off on Lucky Larry’s [Silverstein] fraudulent World Trade Center terrorism claim not made some kind of effort to get their money back? Hope you can provide some insight on this. I would also like to comment on my view of the state of the world. Obviously things were not “hunky dory” prior to 9-11, but since that fateful day, the criminal network has been given a blank check to do anything. The American populace seems asleep, thinking only of shopping, sports, money – just making it through their own lives.
Answer:This is a very good question. Much of the money that has been paid out in 9-11 claims has actually come from U.S. taxpayer funds. I had read that the insurance companies were actually reimbursed in this way, but have not seen the documentation. The recently litigated payout to the first responders came from a $1 billion FEMA fund, for example. I will try to check if the WTC insurers were also compensated with U.S. taxpayer money.
One thing that needs to be understood about the ownership of the WTC towers is that agents of the state of Israel became the de facto owners of the WTC when Silverstein took control of the towers in late July 2001. “Sources in the Port Authority intimated that even though they were still in the vicinity, Silverstein was in control,” Haaretz reported in its 2001 article, “Up in smoke”. Through the Silverstein takeover, which was supervised by Lewis Eisenberg of the Port Authority, agents of Israeli intelligence gained access and complete control of the WTC property that was the target of their carefully planned terrorist attack.
Lewis Eisenberg at the scene of the crime – Eisenberg, a partner at Goldman Sachs, was the head of the Port Authority (the owner of the World Trade Center) in 2001 and was the key person who facilitated the property falling into the hands of Larry Silverstein.
The Silverstein takeover was essential to the Israeli’s evil plan because in order to carry out such a sophisticated false-flag terror operation with complete security, owning the property was a requirement. Here are the three principal agents of the takeover:
Larry Silverstein, former owner of Runway 69, a Queens strip club, is a close friend and business partner of Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak. Silverstein has been close to Netanyahu since he served as Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations. “For years they kept in close touch. Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein,” Haaretz reported. “It made no difference what the subject was or where Netanyahu was, he would always call, Silverstein told an Israeli acquaintance. A recent article on Voltairenet.org claims that Silverstein was treasurer of Netanyahu’s terrorism school, the mysterious Jonathan Institute and of his electoral campaigns. I have not seen that before and will look to see if it is true. A good article on Silverstein’s friendship and business connections to Netanyahu and Barak is “Up in Smoke” from the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz. (American Friends of the Jonathan Institute was established in Washington, D.C. in March 1977 and in New York City in care of Feder & Gopin in June 1977, two years before its first conference.) Silverstein was accused, along with Bill Clinton and Colin Powell, of being involved in drug smuggling and other crimes in a 1997 lawsuit Harry P. Miller v. Larry Silverstein, et al.
The crucial question about 9-11 that needs to be answered is who made the super-Thermite that demolished the concrete of the World Trade Center, and who applied it to the interior surfaces, probably the undersides of the 220 floor pans? The evidence indicates that 9-11 was an Israeli-engineered act of false-flag terrorism, which would mean that Israel probably produced the nano-composite of Thermite. The Nuclear Research Center Negev, which is where Israel produces its nuclear weapons, has long been involved in development of super-Thermite. Lloyd Goldman’s close connection to Ben Gurion University means that getting super-Thermite from the NRCN into the Twin Towers would practically be an in-house operation. Goldman is poised to take over the World Trade Center project when Silverstein, who is nearly 80, retires. See – “Meet the Other Trade Center Builder”, Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008
Frank Lowy is the third key partner in the World Trade Center takeover. Born in 1930 into a family of modest means in Slovakia (then Czecho-Slovakia), Lowy spent the war years in Budapest, then moved to Palestine where he fought in the underground for the Zionist army, the Haganah. By 17, he was in an elite commando unit of the Israeli Army, fighting behind enemy lines in the War of Independence. In 2006 he established Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies, which incorporates the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies.
Bollyn Responds:I have not read the whole article but can clearly see by the style and content that it is written by Michael Bernard Piper (a.k.a. Michael Collins Piper) of American Free Press. This is obviously more of his nonsensical lies and slander. One needs to understand that Piper is paid to attack me on behalf of the Zionist Jew Mark Lane and the controlled opposition/flypaper outfit Lane runs out of the Liberty Lobby.
If there was a fire in the HVAC unit on the roof of the building of the former I.B.M. Global Network Services (sold to AT&T a year before I left the company in May 2000), how should I know about it and what does it have to do with me? I was living in Germany where I had been since November 2001. How should I know about a minor fire in Schaumburg, Illinois? The main point of the article is to attack my credibility by calling me a liar, a Judas Goat, and an “intelligence operative”.
The detailed information about Piper and his show indicates that the source of the article is Piper, and he is lying throughout. He is the Judas Goat who is projecting his sins on me in an effort to sow suspicion about my work and motives. When Piper says that he “allowed” me to stand in and host his show during the summer of 2006 he is using the wrong word. I was asked to do this and tried to avoid it because it was an extra obligation that I would have difficulty doing as I was on the road in the western United States.
The real question is why does Piper, who lavished fulsome praise on me everytime he had me on his show in 2006 about being “America’s best journalist, bar none”, spend so much time and effort attacking me? Piper has obviously been tasked to do everything he can to sow suspicion about me and try to discredit my research and writing. He reveals how he tries to damage my credibility in these lines:
If Bollyn really were an honest truth teller and genuine investigative journalist, he would not be lying like this. And if a supposedly honest journalist is known to be lying about some matters of fact, how can his word be trusted on anything? Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.
It is interesting that Piper and Eric Hufschmid are doing the exact same thing, albeit in different ways. Hufschmid claims that I have been kidnapped and that my articles are being written by the Mossad, while Piper calls me a liar and intelligence operative. Both of them want to sow suspicion, which once planted in a reader’s mind, is very difficult to remove. But, what have I done to deserve this treatment?
Answer:I have investigated and revealed too much about what really happened on 9-11.
This is the same reason I was treated by the undercover police in Hoffman Estates as I was, and prosecuted as I was. It is interesting to note that Piper takes the word of the corrupt police of Chicagoland as gospel truth. My statement that the water had been turned off in the cell and that I was told “drink from the toilet” is supposedly disproven by the fact that there is a photo of a Hoffman Estates jail cell with a sink and toilet.
It should be noted that Piper sent me a very nasty email in December 2001 as we prepared to go to Moscow for a 9-11 conference. I thought at the time that it couldn’t possibly be from Piper and that someone must have hacked into his mailbox, but I now realize that this is exactly how he operates. He acts like he has a license to lie. He has never been a friend of mine.
Question of March 5:Is Barbara Olson back from the dead? An anonymous person sent me a photo of Barbara Olson (said to have died on 9-11) side-by-side with an image of Lady Booth, the wife of Theodore Olson, former U.S. Solicitor General. There is no doubt that these two women look nearly identical. The question is whether the Barbara Olson (born Barbara Kay Bracher in Houston on December 27, 1955) is the same person as Lady Evelyn Booth (born in Louisville, Kentucky, on October 26, 1960) – or do they simply look very similar? While it is certainly possible with plastic surgery and the theft of an identity that this could happen, it is also possible that Ted simply chose a new wife that looked very much like his previous wife.
The similarity between the two wives of Ted Olson is remarkable. Is Lady Booth really Barb Olson after plastic surgery? The face on the right seems to have had cosmetic surgery.
Barbara Olson’s ear, seen here, can be compared with those of Lady Booth. Are they similar?
Lady Booth Olson
This is an interesting question, which I will look into. What is very interesting about Barbara Bracher is that she earned her Juris Doctor at Yeshiva University in New York City. Yeshiva University is a private Jewish school which is very Jewish. Why would a young Catholic girl, who had worked for H.B.O. and Stacy Keach in Hollywood, choose to study law at Yeshiva University? It is possible that Barb Olson has Jewish roots and that this is why she chose Yeshiva University. Another odd thing about Barbara Bracher is that she lived in McLean, Virginia in the early 1990s which makes one wonder if she was working for the C.I.A.
While Barbara Olson had very close connections to orthodox Jews and Zionism, her husband actually worked to protect the crimes of the state of Israel when he defended the Israeli spy, Jonathan Jay Pollard. How did he get that case - and why did he take it? Ted and Barbara Olson’s ties to Israeli intelligence need to be taken into consideration when pondering their roles in the false flag terror of 9-11.
As a partner of the law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Theodore Olson served as lead counsel for George W. Bush in Bush v. Gore before the U.S. Supreme Courth, which secured Bush’s election as President of the United States. Bush then appointed Olson as United States Solicitor General which he was from, 2001-2004. At Yeshiva University, Ted Olson recalled that Barbara Bracher had been the person who officially kicked the Palestinian office out of the United States:
In her third year of law school [Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University], Barbara somehow managed to finesse herself into an internship in the Department of Justice in Washington. And, as a very brassy and gutsy intern, she managed to be the only employee of the government of the United States willing, feisty, and fearless enough to personally serve the papers on the PLO mission to the United Nations in New York announcing that it was being expelled from this country—because they were terrorists. How proud Barbara was to tell that story to her friends at Cardozo!
Question of March 2:Have you heard that it is very possible that Dr. Steven Jones and his nano-thermite theory could very well be misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement down a false path? Dr. Judy Wood theorizes that a Directed Energy Weapon was used to turn the steel into dust. Her theory is very compelling, and this could very well explain why Steven Jones has gotten so far with his nano-thermite theory.
Answer:Yes, I have heard about that theory. I was probably the first person to have written about this “theory” of a directed energy beam being involved in 9-11 after having an interview with a “former” spy from East Germany, who admitted to having worked with the Mossad. See: http://www.bollyn.com/mossad-in-germany-and-9-11-disinfo
The evidence, however, of nano-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center is solid proof that this advanced nano-composite explosive was used to pulverize the towers. This is not to say that other explosives were not used, such as cutter charges on the central columns or huge bombs in the basements of the towers. As Dr. Jones would say, the data doesn’t lie. The theory of an energy weapon being used to demolish the towers is not supported by the evidence. I consider it to be a kind of red herring theory meant to distract people from the evidence of explosives and super thermite.
Question of February 26:It’s been at least a week with no postings on your website? Are you OK? Inquiring minds want to know…
Bollyn Responds:Yes, I am fine. I have been busy doing the final editing of the first 14 chapters of my book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World. I did this and printed out the chapters for a supporter in Canada who requested a copy of the book. This took some time away from the article that I am working on, which is about Kenneth Feinberg, the Special Master of the 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund. It will come as no surprise that Kenneth Feinberg is a high-level agent of the Israeli government and the Mossad. This article involved quite a bit of research but I hope to have it published in the coming days.
9-11 Special Master Kenneth Feinberg and his wife Diane “Dede” Shaff Feinberg are high-level agents of the state of Israel.
Feinberg and his law firm was given an open account from the U.S. Treasury and doled out billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars – without any oversight or accountability - to the families of 9-11 victims to keep them from seeking justice and discovery through the courts. Some 98 percent of the 9-11 families took the money from the fund. Who got how much and who all got paid in the process is a closely guarded secret. Why? The 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund is U.S. taxpayer money after all. We have every right to see how it was disbursed.
Alvin K. Hellerstein: Orthodox Jew and devoted Zionist
The same law that created the 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund also stipulated that all 9-11 related lawsuits would go through the U.S. District Court of Manhattan, where Alvin K. Hellerstein, an orthodox Jew and devoted supporter of Israel has prevented any case from going to trial. Nearly every single lawsuit concerning a victim of 9-11 has been settled out of court. Thanks to the efforts of the dedicated Zionist team headed by Kenneth Feinberg and Alvin Hellerstein it is very unlikely that there will ever be a 9-11 trial for the worst terror crime in U.S. history. What kind of justice is that? Who are they protecting?
Comment: I am reading your book, Solving 9/11. Your quote attributed to Menachem Begin “We are the master race” supposedly delivered at a meeting of the Knesset seems far fetched. Did you check the source of that quote? I did a little checking and read that it was invented by Texe Marrs. Do you have any sources for the quote? Thanks, your work is fascinating.
Bollyn Responds: The addition of the Begin quote was a recent change. Since the quote cannot be sourced, I have removed it. The text now uses the Begin quote from Kapeliouk’s article: “[The Palestinians] are beasts walking on two legs.” – Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, “Begin and the ‘Beasts,”‘ New Statesman, June 25, 1982.
Comment from a Gulf War Vet:
Hello, I am not sure if this goes to Mr. Bollyn or not but I am giving it a shot. I was reading your August 15, 2004 article on depleted uranium and Gulf War Vets. I was a combat engineer during the Gulf War and I wanted to support your article. I am 39 years old and have spent my days since the war in college and now I teach school. I am a non-smoker and live a simple life. In December I was diagnosed with kidney cancer and it spread a bit to the lymphnods. The surgery was hell and now I face a life with cancer. Well thanks for your time and thanks so much for your article on this subject. I am filing a claim with the VA.
My research on “depleted” uranium weapons was aided immensely by Marion Fulk of Livermore, California (left). Marion spent most of his working life as a scientist in the employ of the U.S. government, from the Manhattan Project to Livermore Lab. Now retired, Fulk said he wanted to help inform the public of the long-term damage to human health caused by the use of uranium-tipped weapons.
Question:Do you post or send articles to Rense and Jones? Did look, can’t find much recent.
Answer:Websites that post my material or links to my articles do so of their own choosing. Two very good sites that re-post my material are RebelNews.org and TruthSeeker.co.uk. Here is the link to some of my material on RebelNews.org and here is the link to my material on TruthSeeker.co.UK: http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/columnist.asp?ID=6
Question: Can’t even say in words how much I appreciate such extremely rare honest reporting in these dangerous times! Suggestion: Times are tough–can you add a $5 button to the array of PayPal buttons for donations, since even $10 might be too out of reach for some?
Answer:Yes, I will do that.
Comment:Re the black box on Flight 77 shows “cabin doors not open” means nothing since there was no evidence that a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon. There was no released video of Pentagon crash. No recognizable Boeing 757 parts, the penetration of the walls was too deep and too narrow for a 757, no wing or engine marks on building, etc. So, why do you think this story is special? Just curious?
Bollyn’s Response:You are quite right. There is no evidence that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon nor do I think that one did crash into the building. We don’t know where this black box of Flight 77 really came from but the story is about an independent investigation of the data on the box that is said to be from Flight 77. It is just another small piece of the puzzle showing the massive deception of 9-11.
Bollyn Responds:I was not invited to the 9-11 event being put on by Lenny Charles, owner of INN World News. Judging from the invited speakers and panel subjects, I seriously doubt if his 9-11 event at the Walker Stage will discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement, which is the basis of my thesis about the false flag terror that precipitated the Zionist “War on Terror” and the invasion of Afghanistan.
Having spoken with Mr. Charles on September 3, I am even more inclined to believe that the question of “Who did it?” will not be delved into. The Orthodox Jewish and Israeli gangsters (e.g. Joseph “Yossi” Shereshevsky, Amnon Cohen, and Avi Benamu) behind the WexTrust Securities scam are the Jewish criminals who financed the current (secret) owners of INN’s 56 Walker St. building. Why are the Israeli partners in the WexTrust fraud being protected by the court and media? Although the Israelis involved in the WexTrust scam are kept concealed and protected, this is clearly the real reason why Lenny Charles is reluctant to discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11. The Israeli connection is specifically meant NOT to be on the agenda. That’s what controlled media means. Even the alternative media is controlled. Who controls Lenny? (The answer to this crucial question is shocking and will be subject of my next article.)
Lenny Charles (right) of INN World Report
Lenny Charles of INN is the front man for the mystery owner of 56 Walker Street. Who might that be and why is his identity kept secret?
I don’t know much about Lenny Charles. He said in a 2009 video interview that he is from New Jersey and that he was educated at the El Paso campus of the University of Texas, which is an unusual place for a kid from New Jersey. Lenny says he was a jazz musician for 25 years before starting INN World News, which is based in a high-rent building in Manhattan’s Tribeca neighborhood. How does Lenny manage it? Charles is also listed as representing a company called SKG Media How does Lenny Charles and his 56 Walker Street job fit in with all of this gang, which is clearly involved in criminal fraud? and as the contact person for Walker Stage, located at 56 Walker Street in Manhattan. SKG is often used to refer to the media moguls Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg, and David Geffen, but are they the money behind Lenny Charles and INN? Walker Stage is a nightclub owned by 56 Walker LLC, whoever that might be. A search for the owner turns up a host of legal cases that involve 56 Walker LLC and people named Avroham and Joseph Shereshevsky and a sprawling octopus company called Wextrust, which has many holding companies such as WexTrust Capital LLC, doing business in Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan in Israel and operating mining operations in Africa.
Joseph Shereshevsky (left, son of the rabbi Chaim Shereshevsky of Brooklyn) a Norfolk resident and former COO of WexTrust Capital and Steven Byers, the company’s founder and CEO, were each hit with fraud and conspiracy charges. When he was arrested for his part in the $100 million pyramid scheme in August 2008, Shereshevsky held a one-way plane ticket to Israel. After they were busted, Byers made a $500 donation to Barack Obama on August 23, 2008. (Courtesy of www.vosizneias.com)
In August 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged WexTrust Capital and its affiliates with fraud, alleging that the company ran a Ponzi scheme that raised at least $255 million by targeting members of the Orthodox Jewish community. The S.E.C. said WexTrust’s principals, Steven Byers and Joseph Shereshevsky, deceived at least 1,196 investors since 2002. The defendants diverted at least $100 million to unauthorized purposes, according to the S.E.C.’s complaint. The SEC charge against WexTrust, a Chicago-based company, can be read here. An interactive time line of the case is here.
Question:I found it interesting that your ancestors are related to Anne Boleyn. Aren’t you spelling your name wrong?
THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL – Queen Elizabeth I, the most famous queen in English history, is known for fostering the English Enlightenment and defeating the Spanish Armada. Elizabeth was the daughter of Anne Boleyn, the most persistently maligned of English queens. The Boleyn family has suffered a vicious and relentless campaign of defamation for nearly 500 years. Prior to the religious reforms initiated by the Boleyn family, the Vatican owned a third of all the land of England.
Bollyn Responds:The Bollyn (Boleyn) name is originally from West Flanders. The ancestors of Queen Anne Boleyn came from the area around Calais in Boulonnais, which was then English territory across the channel from Dover. Anne’s great-grandfather, Geoffrey, was a wealthy mercer (importer of fine fabrics) who became the Lord Mayor of London in 1457. There were no strict rules for spelling in English at the time. Anne’s father spelled the name Bullen. In the historical literature about Anne Boleyn there are at least 30 different spellings of the name. Anne, who was well educated and multi-lingual having lived in Flanders and France as a child, seems to be the one who made the “Boleyn” spelling stick. “La petite Boulain” is how the Archduchess Margaret of Austria described the 12-year-old Anne, who served as a maid of honor in the court of Burgundy at Mechelen. The Boulain spelling captures the long “ay” sound in the second syllable, which is actually the correct pronunciation of the name, at least in Flemish or Dutch.
Our family has spelled the name Bollyn since at least 1860 in St. Louis, which is as far back as I have documented. Some time before that the family of Henry Bollyn immigrated to the United States from Switzerland. Henry’s first daughter was named Anne, but she died in Kentucky at the tender age of 10 months. A year or two later he was blessed with another daughter, which he also named Anne. My father and grandfather were named Albert Bollyn, which happens to be the same name as a Belgian held in the Nazi concentration camp of Dachau from 1944-1945. I don’t know much about this Albert Bollyn but I suppose he was probably arrested for resisting tyranny. It runs in the family.
Question:Do you receive the American Free Press (AFP) newspaper? There are two copies in September 2010 that try to convey that they are right on top of the 9/11 issue, which makes me annoyed, as you are the one who has done all the serious research.
Bollyn Responds:This question came from a person who has been reading my work for a long time. No, I don’t read AFP, which is a newspaper I wrote for from 2000 until October 2006. The newspaper is run by Willis Carto and his lawyer friend Mark Lane. According to information gleaned during a lawsuit in which Lane was suing L.T. Patterson of Criminal Politics, Mark Lane acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1994. This indicates that AFP is nothing but an asset of the C.I.A., which runs it as a controlled opposition mouthpiece.
Mark Lane is an old Army intelligence agent from WWII in Germany. Lane played a key role in the Jonestown massacre, which he witnessed and is said to have instigated by using fear tactics on the paranoid Rev. Jim Jones. This is similar to what AFP does to its readers.
Lane’s relationship with AFP explains the paper’s bizarre actions I observed as I got closer to the truth about 9/11.
AFP is now publishing articles about 9/11 that suggest that there were no planes on 9/11 (see “Absence of Real Photo Evidence Leads to Video Fakery Speculation”, October 11, 2010). In an article from September 20, 2010, Makufka asks whether “mini-nukes” were used to bring down the WTC. These “disinfo” articles are written by Scott R. Makufka who writes under the name “Victor Thorn”.
Makufka and his girlfriend Lisa Giuliani teamed up with Michael Piper after I was attacked by undercover police. They sought to impugn my credibility and claim my research as their own in a concerted Zionist effort to marginalize my work, and have me prosecuted and thrown in jail.
Scott Makufka and Lisa Giuliani were part of the anti-Bollyn disinfo hit squad, along with Michael Piper. Why would AFP turn on its own reporter after 6 years of good reporting?
It is very clear from the evidence that Boeing airplanes hit the Twin Towers, the only question is exactly which planes they were. Photographs reveal that more durable parts, such as landing gear and engines from the aircraft, landed on the streets of Manhattan.
This engine from the aircraft that struck the South Tower landed on Murray Street. The parts of this engine are all marked with specific numbers that would identify precisely which aircraft they belonged to. Why haven’t they been shown to the public? Why the secrecy about exactly which jet engine this is?
Every time-tracked part of the aircraft is numbered, such as this piece.
This landing gear would also contain time-tracked parts with specific serial numbers which would precisely identify the aircraft that struck the tower.
All of these aircraft parts were collected by the F.B.I., which was under the command of Michael Chertoff, the Assistant Attorney General…
...who authorized for the aircraft evidence to be taken to the dump at Fresh Kills…
...where they were treated like garbage – not as crucial primary evidence from the scene of a mass murder.
Why would Michael Chertoff, an Israeli national and the son of an Israeli Mossad agent, allow such critical criminal evidence to be treated like garbage? Why wasn’t this engine taken to a high-tech FBI crime scene lab (like we see on television) and its time-tracked parts compared with the maintenance records for the planes said to have been involved? There is only one logical answer to these questions: the aircraft parts were not examined and shown to the public because they are not from the planes that are said to have hit the Twin Towers. The FBI and U.S. military only solve such crimes on TV shows, not in real life. That’s part of the deception.
Question: Thanks for your sincere response. I greatly respect and sympathize with you. I don’t know how Americans, and people of other countries around the world, have lost their ability to think critically. Even among my own family, they are focused on college football, pro golf, or some other distraction. The phony “right wing” commentators like Glenn Beck, et al, don’t help either…
As for your case, and the “criminal” case brought against you, the most amazing thing is that other journalists do not come to your aid. The same can be said of firefighters re: 911, why don’t they organize and make demands for a new investigation!!?! Pilots too. Sometimes it really makes me re-think my own beliefs.
Bollyn Responds:The way my case was handled by the media in the United States speaks volumes about the controlled press. I was, after all, known to be a working journalist when a three-man squad of undercover police broke my arm and tortured me with a TASER at my home – in front of my daughter – in August 2006.
Shocked and saddened – Christopher Bollyn with his children in Schaumburg after the police assault. Bollyn’s 8-year-old daughter had seen three heavily-armed undercover police torture her father with a TASER as they held him down in handcuffs after an unprovoked assault that left him with a broken elbow. Bollyn was subsequently charged with attacking the unidentified armed men who had invaded his home and threatened his family. But, of course.
The fact that I was a journalist (for more than six years) with a national newspaper based in Washington, D.C. was carefully omitted in all the media reports about the bizarre and brutal police incident. I was sometimes referred to as a “blogger” – but never as a journalist. This is because the controlled media has always sought to marginalize my work. The fact that I had been interviewed – as a journalist - by FOX News and the BBC in London, and spoken about 9/11 in the capital cities of Europe and the United States meant nothing to the Chicago Tribune and the local paper, the Daily Herald. This was, of course, no simple oversight. These papers know very well who I am. I had been a candidate for mayor in Hoffman Estates in 2001. I have corresponded with these papers for years and was interviewed by an editorial board of two journalists and an editor in the offices of the Daily Herald prior to the special election in 2001. After the police attack at my house, the Chicago Tribune even hired an outside ghost writer from TIME magazine in order to smear me properly.
There are two main reasons for the controlled media’s slanted reporting of my case: Firstly, to marginalize my 9/11 research and writing, and secondly, to minimize the signficance of the undercover police action against me at my home (i.e. on my property). It certainly doesn’t look right (or very American) for three heavily-armed undercover police to TASER and break the arm of an American journalist working to find the truth about what really happened on September 11, 2001 – in front of his 8-year-old daughter and wife. The truth could not be told in my case. It’s that simple. The nine-month process in the Cook County Court was equally bizarre and corrupt.
Your comments about American media distractions are very apt. As a child, I grew up in a house with no television. The only TV shows I saw were those I watched at a neighbor’s house. I remember watching “Bozo’s Circus” and “The Mickey Mouse Club”. My favorite shows were “The Adventures of Superman” and “The Rifleman” with Chuck Connors.
Chuck Connors as “The Rifleman”
These shows were all basic morality plays in which the good guys fought against corruption, crime, and evil – and always won. Because we did not have a TV, my time spent watching television was very limited in comparison to my friends. My mother told us that the average American child watched something like six hours a day, something I found incredible. But Americans really do spend many hours consuming television on a daily basis, most of which is nothing but staged fantasy and propaganda posing as news. This is a huge problem because television shapes and informs the sense of reality for most Americans and what they watch these days isn’t nearly as good as “The Rifleman” was. The same holds true for the demise of American music. When I was young the music we identified with was generally much more optimistic than what kids hear these days.
Towers "had help" coming down: Chief Engineer at Ground Zero
June 3, 2019
Engineer Martin Seigel was a supervisor at Ground Zero with Bovis Lend Lease during the post-9/11 rescue and recovery operation at the World Trade Center from 12 September 2001 until 11 July 2002. From Day One, Seigel said, he knew the towers "had help" coming down. (Photo: Aftermath by Joel Meyerowitz)
I contacted Martin Seigel (pronounced as Siegel) in my effort to find out more about a large and mysterious final load that was allegedly taken from the World Trade Center to a hazardous material disposal site near Niagara Falls in the summer of 2002. Having had no luck with the receiving side, I decided to contact the supply side. Seigel had worked with Bovis Lend Lease, one of the foreign companies awarded contracts to remove the rubble from the destroyed World Trade Center after 9/11. Of the four companies that were awarded contracts to clean up the World Trade Center only one was actually an American company, Tully Construction of Flushing, New York.
The WTC debris site was divided between four contracters. Amec (blue) got the North Tower and Customs House, Bovis (green) got the South Tower, Turner (yellow) got WTC 7, and Tully (pink) got WTC 4 and 5. This means that the three buildings that were demolished (WTC 1,2, and 7) - crime scenes of the worst mass murder in U.S. history - were all cleaned up by foreign-owned companies.
Seigel had worked on the pile for nearly a year, until July 2002, as a supervisor for Bovis Lend Lease, the foreign company that oversaw the entire clean-up effort from January 2002. He said he did not know anything about the mysterious load, but when I asked him if he believed the official version about the collapse of the World Trade Center, I was astounded to hear him say, "The buildings had help coming down."
Asked if other engineers working on the WTC site shared his opinion that the towers "had help" being brought down, Seigel said, "definitely". Most of the people on the site, he said, "felt that was the case."
I asked Seigel when he had realized that the towers had not simply collapsed, but had been blown up. He said that already on the first day a Port Authority "cop" had shared important information with him that indicated an explosive demolition, but that he could not share this information with me because it had been given in confidence.
He also pointed to the fact that a large steel section, weighing some "ten tons," from one of the towers had been thrown hundreds of feet into the American Express building (World Financial Center 3) at an angle perpendicular to the path of the plane.
Large steel sections of the North Tower were thrown into the American Express building (WFC 3) with great velocity, hundreds of feet away. This is proof that the towers did not simply fall due to a gravity collapse.
Seigel said that the "puffs of smoke" that were seen being shot out of the towers below the level of collapse indicated an explosive demolition.
Asked about the pools of molten metal found in the rubble, Seigel said they were found at "different levels" and that he had seen such pools "three to four feet in diameter."
Seigel also said that he had seen molten glass or crystal, attached to a chandelier, in the rubble. Both glass and crystal have higher melting temperatures than steel, or iron.
9-11: The Lauder/Rothschild Connection
May 26, 2019
The Rothschilds, the founding family of the Zionist state of Israel, are closely linked to various aspects of the 9-11 terror atrocity. The Solving 9-11 books present some of these connections, which are usually one step removed and not easily seen. The Lauder/Rothschild connection, on the other hand, is one that is both obvious and central to the 9-11 operation.
Lord Jacob Rothschild with Ronald Lauder, president of the World Jewish Congress, after receiving the WJC Theodor Herzl Award on behalf of his family, on November 7, 2018 (Photo credit: Shahar Azran/WJC)
The 9-11 terror crime required a great deal of setting up, preparation which included the privatization of the World Trade Center, state-owned property of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. For the culprits, obtaining control of the Twin Towers was necessary so that demolition teams could access the buildings in order to place explosive materials. This would have been impossible had the towers remained in the hands of the Port Authority.
The privatization of the World Trade Center involved Ronald Lauder, a high-level Zionist with close ties to the Rothschild family, one of whom served at the highest level of Israel's Military Intelligence Directorate.
Ronald Lauder headed the two commissions under Governor George Pataki that pushed for the privatization of the World Trade Center: the New York State Commission of Privatization and the New York State Research Council on Privatization. Lauder was the driving force behind the effort to privatize the World Trade Center, which resulted in Larry Silverstein, a fellow Zionist, getting the 99-year lease of the Twin Towers in July 2001.
Ronald S. Lauder is the President of the World Jewish Congress.
David de Rothschild is chairman of the governing board of the World Jewish Congress. He is also the Executive Chairman of the Rothschild Group.
David de Rothschild (left) is chairman of the board of the WJC; Ronald Lauder (third from left) is president of the WJC. Jacob Rothschild (second from left) received an award from the WJC, November 2018. (Source: WJC)
Ronald Lauder established the Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy and Strategy at the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya, Israel, in 1999.
Major General Daniel Rothschild, (IDF ret.), is head of the Institute for Policy and Strategy (IPS) at the Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy and Strategy at the Interdisciplinary Center (IDC). He is also the chairman of the annual Herzliya Conference series and a member of the advisory board of the Central Bank of Israel.
Danny Rothschild, head of the Institute for Policy and Strategy (IPS) at the Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy and Strategy at the Mossad school, the Interdisciplinary Center (IDC).
In 1984, Rothschild was appointed assistant to the IDF Chief of Staff. He was promoted to the rank of Brigadier General in 1985 and appointed commander of the IDF Units in Southern Lebanon.
Rothschild later served as deputy director of the Military Intelligence Directorate, the central, overarching military intelligence body of the Israel Defense Forces. Rothschild was director of the Research Department, where he was responsible for national strategic (political and military) research and analysis, including before and during the first Gulf War.
In 1991 Rothschild was promoted to the rank of Major General (Aluf) and was appointed Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories, a position he held until his retirement in 1995.
“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” ― Voltaire (1694 – 1778)
Written in the 1700s, Voltaire's simple statement that those who can deceive us into believing lies can make us commit evil is a most apt description of our current political reality. These twelve words sum up precisely what has happened to America since 9/11: Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Because it so perfectly describes our post-9/11 predicament, Voltaire's comment deserves to be presented within the context it was written:
Certainly anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices. If you do not use the intelligence with which God endowed your mind to resist believing impossibilities, you will not be able to use the sense of injustice which God planted in your heart to resist a command to do evil. ― Les Philosophes. The Philosophers of the Enlightenment and Modern Democracy, Norman Lewis Torrey, Capricorn Books, 1960)
What makes the Voltaire comment so appropriate in describing our post-9/11 reality is that it points out very clearly that those who have deceived us did so with every intention of making us commit atrocities – or injustices – such as the fraudulent War on Terror. Those who have not used their intelligence to resist the 9/11 deception have allowed themselves to become agents of evil by enabling it to continue. The only power a deception has, after all, is the power of those who believe it.
On the other hand, those who have deceived us are guilty of very serious and prosecutable crimes, including the highest war crime: planning and conspiring to wage a war of aggression. Since the day it happened we have been fed a pack of lies about 9/11 in order to get us to accept illegal wars of aggression waged under the pretext of fighting terrorism. This is the subject of my latest book, The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East.
The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East reveals the Zionist's strategic plan behind 9/11 and the U.S. military interventions that have followed. Available for a $20 donation by PayPal to firstname.lastname@example.org
The absurdity we have collectively been made to believe is that Osama bin Laden and a band of nineteen Muslims are responsible for the death and destruction of 9/11. This is the central lie of our time, which, in spite of abundant evidence exposing its falseness, has been pushed and supported by the government and controlled media since September 11, 2001. While we may not know every detail about how the 9/11 atrocity was carried out, we know full well that we have been deceived purposefully about what really happened. We also know who is behind the government and media lies that have been pushed on the public from the beginning. Many of the culprits in this massive deception are identified in my book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World. A criminal investigation in which media moguls and government officials are held accountable for lying us into war would quickly unravel the mystery and expose the secret network behind this massive fraud.
Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World explains who is behind the terror atrocity - and why it was done. Available for a $20 donation by PayPal to email@example.com
The 9/11 lie is the keystone of the fraudulent War on Terror, a string of unjust military operations we have been tricked into accepting in the aftermath of the terror attacks. The congressional authorization passed in the aftermath of 9/11 giving the president carte blanche freedom to use military force has been exploited since 2001 to carry out military operations in dozens of countries against people that had absolutely no connection to the terror attacks in New York City or Washington.
President Trump said that the post-9/11 wars and military interventions have cost the U.S. seven trillion dollars and given us nothing in return, but for his part he has yet to pull U.S. forces out of any of these costly wars after more than two years in office. During Trump's first year in office the U.S. and its sixty-some allies virtually destroyed two cities: Raqqa in Syria and Mosul in Iraq – in the name of fighting ISIS terrorists.
Mosul, the second-largest city in Iraq, was devastated by U.S. shelling and bombing in the summer of 2017.
The Trump White House is currently threatening to expand the War on Terror by waging a war of aggression against Iran after having branded its military as a terrorist organization. Although there is no real U.S. interest in waging war against Iran there is always the possibility that a false-flag attack carried out by Israel or Saudi Arabia could lead to war. There have already been reports from Rupert Murdoch's media outlets blaming Iran, without any evidence, for four sabotaged ships and a mortar shell fired into the Green Zone in Iraq.
After being deceived into fighting costly and unnecessary wars in the Middle East since 1990, one would think that Americans would be protesting the pointless wars that have robbed the nation of so much of its prosperity. If we are to ever realize our hopes for peace and prosperity we will need to remember who has deceived us into perpetual war by covering-up the truth of what happened on 9/11 – and hold them accountable.
Southern California protest for 9/11 truth (2007) Photo: Mike Chickey
Norwegian Interview with Bollyn and Amundsen
May 19, 2019
Christopher Bollyn and Petter Amundsen - May 19 Radio Program from Oslo
An excellent interview done today with Petter Amundsen and Kay Erikssen in Oslo. (The first 18 minutes are all Norwegian, but after I join the program the interview is all in English.)
Christopher Bollyn is a true example of genuine journalism. He recently visited the Netherlands, where he gave this powerful presentation at an event “On the Wings of False Flags,” organized by WantToKnow.nl. In this presentation Christopher exposes who is behind the attacks on 9/11, which was falsely blamed on Muslims, and why this was done. His research is based on hard facts and the result of painstaking research and ongoing commitment to serve the Truth, and dedication to keep real journalism alive. He addressed the devastating and escalating consequences of the attacks on 11 September 2001 (9/11) and its subsequent never-ending and fraudulent war on terror.
The recent burning of the Notre Dame in Paris, the attacks in Sri Lanka, Christchurch (New Zealand), and all the Zionist/Masonic instigated regime change wars of aggression that cause unimaginable suffering are all coming from the same source. As long as the attacks on 11 September 2001 are being ignored in the political arena and the controlled mainstream media outlets, we will see further deterioration of the human condition escalating in an engineered Clash of Civilizations as part of some religious Messianic agenda. Fear-based ignorance of the root causes of the current problems, while focusing on the symptoms will not make the problems go away; it will make things worse.
I gave a presentation on the Iran crisis with Adam Green of Know More News on May 15. The presentation is entitled "Terrorists Targeting Iran | Christopher Bollyn" and can be seen by clicking on the image below.
Netanyahu's Terrorist Party and 9/11
May 1, 2019
Benjamin Netanyahu is the protégé of the terrorist and assassin Yitzhak Shamir and successor as head of the political party he ran with Menachem Begin. Shamir ordered the murder of Folke Bernadotte, the UN envoy to Palestine, in 1948. Photo of Netanyahu and Shamir from 1986.
The terror atrocity of 9/11 did not simply fall out of the clear blue sky. It was meticulously planned over decades and carried out to achieve a specific goal. The main purpose of the terror attacks was to start the War on Terror – the longest and most expensive war in U.S. history.
9/11 and the War on Terror are linked plots that were designed to trick us into accepting the open-ended wars we have been engaged in since September 2001. As I explain in my book The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East, both plots were hatched by Israeli military intelligence to bring the U.S. military into the Middle East to wage war against the enemies of the Zionist state.
Israeli military intelligence operates within the political framework of the state of Israel. This means that the 9/11 plot had to be approved at the highest political level in Israel since the late 1970s when the first Israeli movie depicting a plane-into-building attack was made by Arnon Milchan, a senior Israeli intelligence agent. Milchan's first film, The Medusa Touch, was made in 1978 and featured a Boeing 747 being flown into the PanAm building in New York City.
Arnon Milchan's first film in 1978 featured a 747 crashing into the PanAm Building.
Milchan with then defense minister Ezer Weizman, 1978
One year later, in 1979, the founding chief of Israeli intelligence predicted that Arabs would attack the tallest building in New York. Isser Harel made this prediction to Michael Evans, an American Zionist activist.
In July 1979, Menachem Begin, the former chief of the terrorist Irgun who became prime minister in 1977, organized a conference on "international terrorism" in Jerusalem that was described as a "propaganda offensive" meant to initiate a global war on terror. The three-day conference was hosted by an organization called the Yonatan [Netanyahu] Institute, headed by Benjamin Netanyahu and his father, Benzion. George H.W. Bush was one of the speakers on the final day.
These three events: Milchan's movie, Harel's prediction, and the conference on international terrorism, indicate that Israeli planning for 9/11 and the War on Terror began when the notorious terrorist Menachem Begin came to power in 1977. Begin had been involved in terror atrocities in Palestine in the 1940s as the leader of the Irgun. He had organized the bombing of the King David Hotel in 1946 and the massacre of the entire village of Deir Yassin in 1948.
Menachem Begin is the most notorious terrorist in Israeli history and the founder of the political party that rules Israel today. Photo: Begin and the bombed King David Hotel, 1946.
When Israel became a state Begin created a political party from the Irgun and called it Herut (Freedom); Albert Einstein called it "the terrorist party" and warned Americans of what it would bring in the future if it was not stopped.
Herut was a one-issue party intent on expanding Israel's borders and refused to recognize the legitimacy of the Kingdom of Jordan, claiming Israel's right to the whole of Eretz Israel (the "Land of Israel"). In his first year in office Begin invaded Lebanon with the intention of occupying the southern part of the country up to the Litani River.
On October 10, 1983, Yitzhak Shamir, the former head of terrorist Stern Gang (LEHI), became prime minister. Less than two weeks later a truck bomb devastated the U.S. Marine barracks at the Beirut airport, killing 241. A simultaneous attack on French troops resulted in 58 French military personnel being killed. The Israeli military had run a terrorist bombing network using car and truck bombs in Lebanon since 1979 when the U.S. and French troops were killed early on a Sunday morning.
Israel was behind eighteen terror bombs in Lebanon in one month!
Caspar Weinberger meeting with the notorious terrorist Yitzhak Shamir in 1982. Ronald Reagan had stated that the U.S. would not negotiate with terrorists. There was no doubt in anyone's mind that Shamir was a terrorist.
During Shamir's first term as prime minister from October 10, 1983 until September 13, 1984, Israeli military intelligence began arming and training "Arab jihadis" in Pakistan including Osama bin Laden. The Hezb-e-Islami fighters led by Gulbuddin Hekmatyar were provided with arms paid for by the CIA and Saudi Arabia and delivered by Israelis from the weapons taken from the battlefields of Lebanon. What was odd about this arrangement is that the U.S. was funding the training and arming of the least effective and most anti-Western of the militia waging jihad against the Red Army in Afghanistan. The so-called Afghan Arabs, trained by Israel in the arts of terrorism, became Al Qaida in 1994.
What had the U.S., Saudi Arabia, and Israel accomplished by arming and training the Hezb-e-Islami fighters? They had created the virtual enemy for the War on Terror. This effort began under the leadership of the former terrorist leader – Yitzhak Shamir, and was arranged by Ehud Barak, then director of AMAN, Israeli military intelligence.
Yitzhak Shamir and Isser Harel were very close. Harel had brought Irgun and LEHI terrorists into the Mossad. Under Harel, Shamir became Mossad's chief of European Operations, a job he held for 10 years, from 1955 to 1965.
Shamir and Isser Harel at Shamir's wedding in 1944.
During Shamir's second term (October 20, 1986 – July 13, 1992) two of Isser Harel's senior Mossad agents obtained the anti-terrorism security contract for the World Trade Center in New York. In 1987, Zvi Malkin and Avraham Shalom Bendor obtained the contract for a company called Atwell Security of Tel Aviv. The company was created by Shaul Eisenberg, the mega Mossad agent of Asia, specifically for the World Trade Center. When it was discovered that Shalom Bendor was using a false name and had a criminal past the Port Authority cancelled the contract. The details of this can be found in the chapter entitled "The Architecture of Terror" in Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World.
This little history shows that the 9/11 plot and the War on Terror were introduced when the arch-terrorist Menachem Begin came to power in 1977 and that these plots were advanced during the term of his fellow terrorist, Yitzhak Shamir. Furthermore, it shows the close connection between Isser Harel, who predicted the 9/11 attacks in 1979, with Shamir – and that Harel's senior agents went into action in 1987 to make that prediction become real.
Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir are two of the most notorious terrorists in Israeli history and were the leaders of the Herut party from 1948 until 1988, when Herut became the Likud party. Since 1977, the Likud party has ruled Israel with only five years of non-Likud leadership. Benjamin Netanyahu, the protégé of Begin and Shamir, has been leader of the Likud party since 1993 and has served as prime minister since March of 2009.
The ideation and development of the 9/11 and War on Terror plots began under the leadership of "the terrorist party" of Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir in the late 1970s and has continued ever since, with only one significant non-Likud leader during that time – Yitzhak Rabin (1992-1995), who was assassinated. Understanding that Benjamin Netanyahu, the current Israeli leader, is the political successor of the terrorist chiefs Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, and knowing what their party has always stood for is essential for making sense of 9/11, the fraudulent War on Terror, and the current state of affairs in the world today.
Yitzhak Shamir mentored Netanyahu to advance the agenda of Herut (Likud): terrorism and expanding the territory of Eretz Israel.
Likud: The Terrorist Party of Israel
April 29, 2019
THE FATHER OF TERRORISM
The Likud Party of Benjamin Netanyahu is "the terrorist party" of Menachem Begin that Albert Einstein warned Americans about in 1948. Maybe it's time to heed his warning.
“The red light had come on, under the lens. Without preamble, I turned my shoulder to the camera, stared straight into Begin’s eyes, and asked: "How does it feel, in the light of all that’s going on, to be the father of terrorism in the Middle East?”
“In the Middle East?” he bellowed, in his thick, cartoon accent. "In all the world!" - Russell Warren Howe, January 1974
This spring's spate of bizarre incidents and attacks at religious institutions has been extremely unsettling. After the recent shooting at the Chabad of Poway synagogue, Rabbi David Castiglione of the nearby Temple Adat Shalom told the Los Angeles Times, “I am so completely fed up with the state of the world at this point. I am completely mystified.”
People are bound to be mystified by such senseless acts of violence, which often seem to be done for no reason. Who is behind the coordinated terror attacks on Easter Sunday in Sri Lanka? Why would Sri Lankan Muslims endanger their own community by attacking Catholic churches and hotels? Who benefits from this atrocity?
Likewise, who benefits from the shootings in Christchurch and Poway? Are these simple hate crimes or are they acts of terror? Could they be both?
TERROR IS THEATRE
Now in the eighteenth year of the War on Terror, it is essential to understand that acts of terror are done for a purpose. As the Mossad agent says in The Little Drummer Girl, a book about Israeli false-flag terrorism by John Le Carré: "Terror is theatre. Theatre's a con trick. Do you know what that means? Con trick? You've been deceived."
The ultimate purpose of false-flag terrorism, like the 9/11 atrocity, is to affect public opinion and change the way the target audience thinks about the entity that is blamed. As terrorism expert Brian Michael Jenkins wrote, "Terrorism is aimed at the people watching, not at the actual victims. Terrorism is theater."
The purpose of the 9/11 terror attacks, for example, was to get public opinion behind the pre-planned War on Terror. This is the subject of my latest book, The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East.
The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East (2017) A historical analysis of the Israeli origin of the War on Terror and the strategic plan to Balkanize the Middle East under the pretext of fighting terrorism. Available from Amazon.
To recognize the source of the terror will enable us to understand the agenda behind it. As I explain in The War on Terror, the 9/11 plot and the War on Terror doctrine are both creations of Israeli military intelligence from the late 1970s. Both concepts were brought by Israeli agents onto the global stage shortly after the notorious Zionist terrorist Menachem Begin came to power in Israel in 1977.
Terrorism is an inherent part of Zionism. Israel was created through terrorism and "the terrorist party" headed by well-known terrorists has always been part of the Israeli government. Menachem Begin's Herut party, which has been part of the Israeli government since 1948, was the successor to the terrorist organization he headed, the Irgun.
Menachem Begin (with mustache) and other members of Herut at the first meeting of the Knesset, February 1949
Under Begin's leadership, the Irgun bombed the King David Hotel in July 1946 and massacred the entire village of Deir Yassin on April 9, 1948. Although the Irgun was recognized as a terrorist organization by the United Nations, the governments of the United States and Britain, the New York Times, the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry, the 1946 Zionist Congress, and the Jewish Agency, the Irgun terrorists were never blocked from being part of the government of Israel. There have been two leaders of the Herut: Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir. Both notorious terrorists, Begin and Shamir served as prime ministers of the state of Israel.
Yitzhak Shamir, a notorious terrorist and assassin, was a mentor to Benjamin Netanyahu who took the reins of "the terrorist party" in 1993.
"THE TERRORIST PARTY"
In a letter to the New York Times signed by twenty-eight Jewish notables, dated December 4, 1948, Albert Einstein tried to warn Americans of Begin's Herut party, which he called "the terrorist party":
Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the “Freedom Party” (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.
The letter warned of the terrorism that Begin's party could be expected to bring in the future:
It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character; from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future.
Einstein pointed out that Americans needed to be aware of the "terrorist party" of Begin:
The discrepancies between the bold claims now being made by Begin and his party, and their record of past performance in Palestine bear the imprint of no ordinary political party. This is the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party for whom terrorism (against Jews, Arabs, and British alike), and misrepresentation are means, and a “Leader State” is the goal.
In the light of the foregoing considerations, it is imperative that the truth about Mr. Begin and his movement be made known in this country. It is all the more tragic that the top leadership of American Zionism has refused to campaign against Begin’s efforts, or even to expose to its own constituents the dangers to Israel from support to Begin.
Herut was a one-issue party intent on expanding Israel's borders, according to The Birth of Israel, 1945–1949: Ben-Gurion and His Critics, by Joseph Heller. When Begin came to power in 1977 he immediately began planning to occupy southern Lebanon and invaded that country in March 1978. From 1979 through 1983, the Israeli military operated a terrorist bombing network in Lebanon headed by IDF chief of staff Rafael Eitan, which used car and truck bombs to create chaos in Lebanon, according to Rise and Kill First: The Secret History of Israel's Targeted Assassinations by Ronen Bergman (2018).
The "terrorist party" that Einstein warned Americans of in 1948 went on to become the ruling party of Israel. Herut (later renamed Likud) has been the dominant party of Israel since 1977. As the leader of the party in the Likud alliance, Menachem Begin became prime minister of Israel in June 1977. In 1988, Herut merged and became the Likud Party, a political party that has been headed by Benjamin Netanyahu since 1993.
Although Menachem Begin's party has changed names and leaders, the Likud remains "the terrorist party" and continues to use terrorism to achieve its goals. This can be seen by its support for terrorists in Syria during the past eight years and its role in training the Afghan Arabs in Pakistan starting in 1983. The Afghan Arabs trained by Israeli military intelligence (under Ehud Barak) in Pakistan included Osama bin Laden - and became Al Qaida in 1994. This is the same group that was blamed for the terror attacks of 9/11 by Ehud Barak on BBC television on the day of the atrocity. Barak's interpretation of 9/11 called for the United States to begin the War on Terror, an Israeli strategy that was first introduced in 1979 at the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism - hosted by the Netanyahu Institute.
On 9/11, Ehud Barak was in the London studios of the BBC and Sky News ready to blame Osama bin Laden and call for a war against terror. As head of Israeli military intelligence in 1983, Barak had provided the weapons and training for bin Laden and the Afghan Arabs in Pakistan, who later became "Al Qaida."
Video Interview: Christopher Bollyn, 9/11 and the Clash of Civilizations
April 22, 2019
Former KLM pilot and whistle-blower Willem Felderhof interviews Christopher Bollyn about 9/11 and the "clash of civilizations" at Schiphol Airport in Holland on the second day of Easter, one day after the terrorist massacre in Sri Lanka and one week after the fire at Notre Dame cathedral.
A reader in the US sent me a letter with a question: how should we organize and move forward in order to get justice for 9/11?
"I should make clear that, with respect to 9-11, I have certain knowledge of only one fact: that there has been and continues to be a massive cover-up." ― Peter Dale Scott, The War Conspiracy: JFK, 9/11, and the Deep Politics of War, 2008
"There is no reason why good cannot triumph as often as evil. The triumph of anything is a matter of organization. If there are such things as angels, I hope that they are organized along the lines of the Mafia." ― Kurt Vonnegut, The Sirens of Titan
I recently received a letter with a crucial question that is on the minds of many people in the 9/11 truth movement.
Here is the question with its essential context:
Dear Mr. Bollyn,
I enjoy your videos, and I consider you the most well-informed individual on the entirety of the various facets of the 9/11 conspiracy and involvement of various groups with differing agendas.
I am a concerned citizen, with no other qualifications beyond the fact that I am a patriot. I have grave concerns that as time passes, the involved parties are becoming further and further from being brought to justice. There have been various efforts to re-open an investigation, but ballot initiatives in NYC have failed…
I find it discouraging that every single effort to date, despite the evidence and expertise of various independent investigators, has failed...
I'm hoping you might have formed some ideas of how to proceed, beyond posting videos or selling books. How would such a project be spearheaded, and organized? I am of humble means, but would like to do what I can to help. The scale of these lies, the wars, and thousands of deaths as a result, are staggering and maddening. Every time I see these criminals on TV, smugly living their lives of privilege without a care, I want to reach through the screen...
The question being asked is this: How do we proceed in our efforts to get a real criminal investigation of 9/11 and bring those responsible to justice? To bring a criminal to justice means, in this case, to have them arrested and tried in a court of law.
First of all, we need to understand why we are still asking for an investigation of 9/11 – more than seventeen years after the crime was carried out.
We are demanding an investigation of 9/11 for one simple reason; because there has never been a proper investigation of the crime. In more than seventeen years, no one has been prosecuted for the many crimes that were committed in connection with the terror atrocity and the cover-up that followed.
Understanding how this happened is essential to grasping the legal situation. The evil masterminds behind 9/11 planned "a new Pearl Harbor," an act of terrorism so extreme and shocking that it would be defined as an "act of war." This is exactly what President George W. Bush did. By declaring the terror attacks to be an "act of war" at the outset he precluded the need for a criminal investigation and opened the door for the wholesale destruction of criminal evidence, which began immediately. This is the root of the massive obstruction of justice around the 9/11 case.
Federal law on the destruction of evidence (18 U.S. Code § 1519) states:
Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
HOLD THE CRIMINALS ACCOUNTABLE
The destruction of evidence from the 9/11 crime scenes are crimes committed against the nation. There are several key people involved in the Bush administration conspiracy to destroy the evidence and cover-up the crimes of 9/11. Michael Chertoff, the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division under John Ashcroft, was the official at the Department of Justice responsible for the federal investigation and any criminal prosecution for 9/11. The FBI, the investigative sub-agency that served Chertoff, had a new director in September 2001 – Robert S. Mueller III. Under President George H.W. Bush, Mueller had served as Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division from 1990-1993. President Bush, Chertoff, and Mueller, should all be held accountable for the destruction of evidence.
Another key player in the obstruction of justice related to 9/11 is Alvin K. Hellerstein, the Senior Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Hellerstein presided over the 9/11 tort litigation in which all 96 families who had held out for a trial – were settled out of court.
Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff and Judge Alvin Hellerstein are obviously central players in the 9/11 conspiracy because they were in positions of power that allowed them to facilitate the criminal cover-up. Their actions in these official positions, in which they were paid by federal funds, were essential to concealing the truth about what happened on 9/11 and amount to criminal misfeasance, malfeasance, or nonfeasance while in office.
Chertoff and Hellerstein are also both dedicated Zionists with primary family members who worked with or for Israeli intelligence. Chertoff's mother was an agent of the Mossad and Hellerstein's son worked as a lawyer in Israel for the parent company of ICTS, the Israeli company that was responsible for passenger screening operations at Boston's Logan Airport, and other airports, on 9/11. ICTS was a defendant in the 9/11 tort litigation being managed by Judge Hellerstein, until he excused them, which presents an obvious conflict of interest.
Chertoff oversaw the non-investigation of 9/11, the release of Israeli terror suspects, and the destruction of evidence from the crime scenes. Hellerstein then obstructed justice for the relatives, excused the Israeli defendants (ICTS), and prevented a trial from taking place. If Osama bin Laden and 19 Arabs were truly responsible for the 9/11 atrocity, why did dedicated supporters of Israel go to such lengths, and violate federal law, to prevent the truth of 9/11 from coming out?
While there is no evidence that Osama bin Laden and 19 Arabs destroyed the World Trade Center, there is solid evidence that someone else did. Larry Silverstein, the owner of the 47-story WTC 7 and leaseholder of the Twin Towers, is on record having ordered for his building to be "pulled" on 9/11, a term that means to demolish a building. Later, he gave a speech in Israel in which he admitted in plain English that he began the planning for the rebuilding of WTC 7 in April 2000 – fifteen months before the original building was demolished! No wonder people do not believe the official version of 9/11.
The actions of Chertoff, Hellerstein, and Silverstein all support the thesis that 9/11 was an Israeli-engineered false-flag operation designed to be blamed on Muslims in order to kick-start the War on Terror, an Israeli stratagem to bring the U.S. military into the Middle East to wage war against Israel's enemies. As laid out in Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, the key players in the 9/11 operation and subsequent cover-up are all Israeli or dedicated supporters of the Zionist state.
So, with this understanding, how should we proceed in our effort to have the "involved parties" brought to justice for 9/11? The first thing is to understand the nature of the deception we face and confront it, whenever it raises its head. As more people become aware of the utterly evil deception of 9/11, the base of support for truth becomes stronger. The second thing that needs to happen is litigation to obtain legal discovery and accountability for the crimes of 9/11.
We need to remember that the people behind the 9/11 deception are not all powerful; that's another deception. There are many people who could be sued for their roles in this massive crime. There are thousands of sick people in New York City, for example, who are ill as a result of being exposed to the toxic pile of rubble at the World Trade Center. Those people who have not yet settled their cases (thereby waiving their right to litigate) could bring civil suits against those responsible for their sickness. Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg, for example, the former mayors of New York City, could be held accountable, as could George W. Bush and members of his administration.
If just one of these sick people were able to hold out and get a trial – and bring forth the scientific evidence that the smoke contained large amounts of extremely toxic nano-particles, it would prove that the hot spots beneath the rubble were hotter than boiling iron, debunking the official story about how the towers collapsed.
Christine Todd Whitman, administrator for the Environmental Protection Agency under President Bush, stated that the "air was safe to breathe" in New York City on September 18, 2001, an official statement which lacked scientific backing and was criminally negligent. Thousands of people died as a result because they believed what Whitman said about the air quality in New York City. While Whitman has been legally protected to this point there is no reason why this whole matter should not be taken up again in light of the tens of thousands of New Yorkers whose lives have been affected by their exposure to the toxic smoke.
THE NEED TO ORGANIZE
How can we hope to be effective if we are not organized? As Kurt Vonnegut wrote: "There is no reason why good cannot triumph as often as evil. The triumph of anything is a matter of organization."
The culprits of 9/11 have succeeded in their criminal activity because they are well organized. The relatives and victims, on the other hand, are not organized, which is why there have been so few victories for 9/11 truth.
The most effective 9/11 truth groups are the ones that are well organized. As an individual, I simply cannot be as effective as I could be if I were part of an organization. This is why I am thinking about creating an organization dedicated to 9/11 truth.
These are my thoughts on how we can move forward with 9/11 truth.
* * * * *
The complete letter is below:
Dear Mr. Bollyn,
I enjoy your videos, and I consider you the most well-informed individual on the entirety of the various facets of the 9/11 conspiracy and involvement of various groups with differing agendas.
I am a concerned citizen, with no other qualifications beyond the fact that I am a patriot. I have grave concerns that as time passes, the involved parties are becoming further and further from being brought to justice. There have been various efforts to re-open an investigation, but ballot initiatives in NYC have failed, and I no longer hear much from Pilots for 9/11 Truth, or Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Ed Asner is getting on in years, and General Stubblebine passed away two years ago. Another actor, Daniel Sunjata, was briefly involved, but has dropped off the radar. I have considered trying to write Al Franken, because of his extraordinary admission that he received the "jew call," and the implications of such, but have not as yet tried to reach out. If he could be persuaded, I think his involvement could be important.
I find it discouraging that every single effort to date, despite the evidence and expertise of various independent investigators, has failed. There is another YouTuber who seems pretty good at self-producing/editing his videos -- AlienScientist -- perhaps an independent movie could be part of an informational campaign to garner more support?
I'm hoping you might have formed some ideas of how to proceed, beyond posting videos or selling books. How would such a project be spearheaded, and organized? I am of humble means, but would like to do what I can to help. The scale of these lies, the wars, and thousands of deaths as a result, are staggering and maddening. Every time I see these criminals on TV, smugly living their lives of privilege without a care, I want to reach through the screen...
Is Gordon Duff and "Veterans Today" Disinfo?
March 13, 2019
Gordon Duff admits in this video, from about 5:15, that he and Veterans Today publish false information as an obligation. FaceBook did not like my posting of this video and deleted it. Video URL: www.youtube.com/watch
Is Gordon Duff and Veterans Today Disinfo?
In Duff's own words:
"About thirty percent of what is on Veterans Today is patently false. About forty percent of what I write is at least purposely partially false, because if I didn't write false information, I wouldn't be alive. I simply have to do that."
- Gordon Duff, Senior Editor of "Veterans Today" website, with Mike Harris, October 12, 2012 (from about 1:10 to 1:11 in the False Information Controversy taped conversation below)
ASBESTOS ABATEMENT OR DEMOLITION PREP? LVI Services, a company that provides "total turnkey demolition services," did extensive asbestos abatement work in the World Trade Center prior to 9-11, according to Engineering News-Record. This photo from the LVI Services website depicts LVI workers doing asbestos abatement on a surface very similar to the corrugated steel floor pans that held the 4-inch thick concrete floors of the Twin Towers. Oddly, Burton Fried, then head of LVI, in an interview with the author, denied that his company had done the work in the Twin Towers.
LVI Services, a company that provided "total turnkey demolition services," did extensive asbestos abatement work in the World Trade Center prior to 9-11. It also did about $3 million in R&D work for the U.S. Army in 2000. Having written about this in 2013, I was prompted me to post this update after finding that the documentation about LVI's contract with the Army no longer appears when searching the FedSpending.org website:
Immediately after 9-11, a leading engineering magazine in the United States reported that LVI Services, a company that does demolition set-up work, had done extensive asbestos abatement work in the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center. The following is a brief job description that involved the removal of asbestos floor tiles and other materials from the Twin Towers. Was this the job that LVI had carried out at the World Trade Center?
Contract WTC-115.310 - The World Trade Center Removal and Disposal of Vinyl Asbestos Floor Tiles and Other Incidental Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Via Work Order Estimate Range: $1,000,000 annually Bids due Tuesday, October 17, 2000. (Offered by the Port Authority on September 12, 2000)
Two days after 9-11, Engineering News-Record (ENR) reported that an asbestos abatement and demolition company called LVI had done extensive asbestos abatement work in the World Trade Center:
AMEC Inc., Turner Corp. and Bovis Lend Lease were set to assume "lead roles" in the cleanup effort, says Lee Benish, AMEC vice president. "From the very beginning, we've been deeply involved with the city department of emergency services," he says. "They're sorting through who will be doing what." LVI Services Inc., New York City, which has done extensive asbestos abatement work on the towers in the past, is involved in similar work now as well as other cleanup efforts.
In 2000, LVI did about $3 million in R&D work for the U.S. Army, the largest part of the company's military contract of $3.2 million. Fedspending.org records show that LVI did Applied Research and Exploratory Development (R&D) work for nearly $3 million that year. Neither Burton Fried, then head of LVI, nor the company spokesman were willing to discuss the work LVI had done for the U.S. Army.
Read: "Tracking the 9-11 Insiders to their Rothschild Roots"
9-11 happened. And what happened in 9-11 is we didn’t have a strategy, we didn’t have bipartisan agreement, we didn’t have American understanding of it and we had instead a policy coup in this country; a coup – a policy coup. Some hard-nosed people took over the direction of American policy and they never bothered to inform the rest of us. - Gen. Wesley Clark, October 3, 2007
In the aftermath of 9-11, Gen. Wesley Clark learned that people behind the policy coup planned to "take out" seven Middle Eastern countries in five years.
The "hard-nosed people" who took over the direction of American foreign policy post-9/11 was a cabal headed by dedicated Zionists, Paul Wolfowitz, Dov Zakheim, and Douglas Feith, seen here meeting with Israeli Chief of Staff Shaul Mofaz at the Pentagon, January 18, 2002. Fellow Zionist Neo-Con Richard Perle was chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board from 2001 to 2003, before resigning due to conflict of interests. Perle had served on the advisory board since 1987.
We should take Gen. Wesley Clark very seriously when he says that 9-11 resulted in a "policy coup" in the United States. Gen. Clark should know. He was Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO from 1997 to 2000.
A coup is "a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government" in which the ship of state is hijacked. Clark's "policy coup" means that the "direction of American policy" was hijacked and taken over by "some hard-nosed people" in the immediate aftermath of the terror atrocity of 9-11.
9-11 truth is an effort to regain control of our American republic by exposing the lies about who is really behind the terror attacks. The only way to remove the hijackers from the U.S. ship of state and rectify the policy coup is for a significant percentage of the public to stand up for 9-11 truth – and resist the lies about the terrorism that changed the world. Many people know that the government and media narrative about 9-11 is false but they are afraid to openly support the truth, a cowardly position which is both wrong and unpatriotic.
The evil masterminds behind 9-11 crafted the false narrative, an interpretation to go with their false-flag terror atrocity in order to carry out the policy coup and achieve certain goals. The false narrative is the "official" explanation that the media has presented to the public since Day One. It should be noted that the false interpretation we were given was not of American origin. As Wesley Clark said, "we didn’t have American understanding of it." Clark was saying that a foreign state interpreted 9-11 for us, although he was not so bold as to identify that state. From public statements, however, by its military and political leaders we can see that the foreign state that interpreted 9-11 for us was the Zionist state of Israel.
Ehud Barak gave the Israeli military interpretation of 9-11 on the biggest British television networks before the towers had all fallen on 9-11. He called for the U.S. to launch a global War on Terror, an Israeli stratagem promoted by Benjamin Netanyahu since the 1970s.
Ehud Barak, the former prime minister and defense minister of Israel, was the highest level Israeli to interpret 9-11, something he did on the BBC World and Sky television networks in London before the towers had finished falling in New York City. Barak's Israeli interpretation that Muslim fanatics were behind the attacks was seen around the world and his call for the initiation of the Zionist-designed "War on Terror" became, without question, the official narrative of 9-11 in spite of abundant evidence disproving his assertions.
Seventeen years later, the Israeli fraud known as the War on Terror drags on with the United States slogging away at great cost in a war that never ends. Last year the War on Terror resulted in the U.S. reportedly bombing nine nations across the Middle East and Africa. The cost of the post 9-11 wars is currently estimated at between $5.9 and $7 trillion (A trillion is a thousand billions or a million millions). President Trump said that despite costing the U.S. $7 trillion, the wars in the Middle East have achieved "nothing" for the American people.
This is clearly not a sustainable course. The choice is stark and simple: either we regain control of our national policy or we suffer the fate the hijackers have planned for us. To regain control of our national policy means correcting our political course with policies in our national interest and holding the policy coup hijackers accountable. To allow the people behind the policy coup to continue their devastation is to enable the 9-11 culprits and their cronies to get away with their crimes of terrorism – and to ruin our nation. This is why it is absolutely crucial and in our best interest as individuals and patriotic citizens to boldly stand up and resist the lies about 9-11 and the fraudulent War on Terror it brought us.
For a better understanding of 9-11 and the fraudulent War on Terror read The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East. Available for a $20 donation, or get the complete set: the Solving 9-11 set of two books and The War on Terror for $50. Donate via bollyn.com or by PayPal to firstname.lastname@example.org
Chuck Baldwin Praises Bollyn's War On Terror Book
July 19, 2018
Updated with "What If Everything We’ve Been Told Is A Lie?" by Chuck Baldwin
If you don’t read any other book this year, read Christopher Bollyn’s The War On Terror. - Chuck Baldwin
Pastor Chuck Baldwin on The War On Terror: The Plot To Rule The Middle East :
"I am VERY excited about a new book written by Christopher Bollyn entitled The War On Terror. I have read and reread it; and I believe this is one of the most important books written in recent memory. The book connects the dots between the 9/11 attacks and America’s perpetual “War on Terror.” This book needs to be read by every single American. If it was read and taken to heart by enough people, this book could literally change the course of history and save our republic. The full title of the book is The War On Terror: The Plot To Rule The Middle East. - Chuck Baldwin, "Trump’s SCOTUS Pick: More Of The Same" 12 July 2018
What If Everything We’ve Been Told Is A Lie?
by Chuck Baldwin, 19 July 2018
What if everything we’ve been told about 9/11 is a lie? What if it wasn’t 19 Muslim terrorist hijackers that flew those planes into the Twin Towers and Pentagon? What if the Muslims had nothing whatsoever to do with the attacks on 9/11? What if everything we’ve been told about the reasons we invaded two sovereign nations (Afghanistan and Iraq) is a lie? What if the 17-year-old, never-ending “War on Terror” in the Middle East is a lie? What if our young soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines who have given their lives in America’s “War on Terror” died for a lie? What if G.W. Bush, Barack Obama and Donald Trump have been nothing but controlled toadies for an international global conspiracy that hatched the attacks of 9/11 as nothing more than a means to institute a perpetual “War on Terror” for purposes that have nothing to do with America’s national security? Would the American people want to know? Would the truth even matter to them?
The sad reality is that the vast majority of Americans who would read the above paragraph would totally dismiss every question I raised as being unrealistic and impossible—or even nutty. Why is that? Have they studied and researched the questions? No. Have they given any serious thought to the questions? No. They have simply swallowed the government/mainstream media version of these events hook, line and sinker.
It is totally amazing to me that the same people who say they don’t believe the mainstream media (MSM) and government (Deep State) versions of current events—which is why they voted for and love Donald Trump—have absolutely no reservations about accepting the official story that the 9/11 attacks were the work of jihadist Muslims and that America’s “War on Terror” is completely legitimate. These “always Trumpers” are dead set in their minds that America is at war with Islam; that Trump’s bombings of Syria were because President Assad is an evil, maniacal monster who gassed his own people; and that Trump’s expansion of the war in Afghanistan is totally in the interests of America’s national security.
BUT WHAT IF ALL OF IT IS A BIG, FAT LIE?
What if the Muslims had NOTHING to do with 9/11?
What if Bashar al-Assad did NOT gas his own people?
What if America’s “War on Terror” is a completely false, manufactured, made-up deception?
What if America’s military forces are mostly fighting for foreign agendas and NOT for America’s national security or even our national interests?
What if America’s war in Afghanistan is a fraud?
What if the entire “War on Terror” is a fraud?
The Trump robots have bought into America’s “War on Terror” as much as Obama’s robots and Bush’s robots did. Bush was elected twice, largely on the basis of America’s “War on Terror.” Obama campaigned against the “War on Terror” and then expanded it during his two terms in office. Trump campaigned against the “War on Terror” and then immediately expanded it beyond what Obama had done. In fact, Trump is on a pace to expand the “War on Terror” beyond the combined military aggressions of both Bush and Obama.
But who cares? Who even notices?
America is engaged in a global “War on Terror.” Just ask G.W. Bush, Barack Obama, Donald Trump, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX News, The Washington Post, the New York Times and the vast majority of America’s pastors and preachers. They all tell us the same thing seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day. Liberals scream against Trump, and conservatives scream against Maxine Waters; but both sides come together to support America’s never-ending “War on Terror.”
But what if it’s ALL a lie? What if Obama and Trump, the right and the left, the MSM and the conservative media are all reading from the same script? What if they are all (wittingly or unwittingly) in cahoots in perpetuating the biggest scam in world history? And why is almost everyone afraid to even broach the question?
Left or right, liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican, secular or Christian, no one dares to question the official story about the 9/11 attacks or the “War on Terror.” And those who do question it are themselves attacked unmercifully by the right and the left, conservatives and liberals, Christians and secularists, Sean Hannity and Chris Matthews. Why is that? Why is it that FOX News and CNN, Donald Trump and Barack Obama, Chuck Schumer and Ted Cruz equally promote the same cockamamie story about 9/11 and the “War on Terror?”
Why? Why? Why?
Tell me again how Donald Trump is so different from Barack Obama. Tell me again how Ted Cruz is so different from Chuck Schumer. They all continue to perpetuate the lies about 9/11. They all continue to escalate America’s never-ending “War on Terror.” They are all puppets of a global conspiracy to advance the agenda of war profiteers and nation builders. The left-right, conservative-liberal, Trump-Obama paradigm is one big giant SCAM. At the end of the day, the “War on Terror” goes on, bombs keep falling on people in the Middle East who had absolutely NOTHING to do with 9/11 and the money keeps flowing into the coffers of the international bankers and war merchants.
All of the above is why I am enthusiastically promoting Christopher Bollyn’s new blockbuster book The War on Terror.
Of course, Bollyn is one of the world’s foremost researchers and investigators into the attacks on 9/11. He has written extensively on the subject. But unlike most other 9/11 investigators, Bollyn continued to trace the tracks of the attacks on 9/11. And those tracks led him to discover that the 9/11 attacks were NOT “the event” but that they were merely the trigger for “the event.” “What was the event?” you ask. America’s perpetual “War on Terror.”
As a result, Mr. Bollyn published his findings that the attacks on 9/11 were NOT perpetrated by Muslim extremists but by a very elaborate and well financed international conspiracy that had been in the planning for several decades. Bollyn’s research names names, places and dates and exposes the truth behind not just 9/11 (many have done that) but behind America’s “War on Terror” that resulted from the attacks on 9/11.
IT’S TIME FOR THE TRUTH TO COME OUT!
And Christopher Bollyn’s investigative research brings out the truth like nothing I’ve read to date. His research connects the dots and destroys the myths.
Mr. Bollyn’s research is published in a book entitled: The War On Terror: The Plot To Rule The Middle East. I mean it when I say that if enough people read this book, it could change the course of history and save our republic.
This is written on the book’s back cover:
The government and media have misled us about 9/11 in order to compel public opinion to support the War on Terror.
Why have we gone along with it? Do we accept endless war as normal? Are we numb to the suffering caused by our military interventions?
No. We have simply been propagandized into submission. We have been deceived into thinking that the War on Terror is a good thing, a valiant struggle against terrorists who intend to attack us as we were on 9/11.
Behind the War on Terror is a strategic plan crafted decades in advance to redraw the map of the Middle East. 9/11 was a false-flag operation blamed on Muslims in order to start the military operations for that strategic plan. Recognizing the origin of the plan is crucial to understanding the deception that has changed our world.
Folks, 9/11 was a deception. The “War on Terror” is a deception. The phony left-right paradigm is a deception. FOX News is as much a deception as CNN. The “always Trump” group is as much a deception as the “never Trump” group. America has been in the throes of a great deception since September 11, 2001. And this deception is being perpetrated by Republicans and Democrats and conservatives and liberals alike.
I do not know Christopher Bollyn. I’ve never met him. But I thank God he had the intellectual honesty and moral courage to write this book. I urge readers to get this explosive new book. If you don’t read any other book this year, read Mr. Bollyn’s investigative masterpiece The War On Terror: The Plot To Rule The Middle East.
Again, I am enthusiastically recommending this book to my readers, and I make no apologies for doing so. The truth contained in this research MUST get out, and I am determined to do all I can to help make that possible.
I am confident that after you read this book, you will want to buy copies for your friends and relatives. The book is under 200 pages long and is not difficult reading. However, the facts and details Bollyn covers are profound and powerful. I have read the book three times so far and I’m not finished.
Frankly, Bollyn’s book made so many things make sense for me. His book dovetails and tracks with much of my research on other topics. Truly, his book helped me get a much fuller understanding of the “big picture.”
What if everything we’ve been told about 9/11 and the “War on Terror” is a lie?
The War On Terror: The Plot To Rule The Middle East is available for a $20 donation by PayPal to email@example.com
The complete set of all three books: the two Solving 9-11 books, "The Deception that Changed the World" and "The Original Articles," and The War On Terror: The Plot To Rule The Middle East, is available for a $50 donation by PayPal to firstname.lastname@example.org
Please include your mailing address and contact phone number with your payment. Thank you!
Are the California Fires Cyber Terrorism?
November 12, 2018
Wildfire Fallout: California Utility PG&E Stock Plummets
Did Foreign Hackers Sabotage California Power Lines?
Smoke from the wildfire near Malibu Photo by Grant Denham
If you look for the origin and the cause of the Camp Fire that destroyed the town of Paradise, California, and the ongoing fires near Los Angeles you will find that in both cases the fires began in places where there had been unexplained malfunctions along transmission lines just before the fire was reported.
The question has to be asked: Were these fires caused by hackers attacking the utility grids in an act of cyber warfare?
The following is an extract from today's article, "PG&E trading halted as stock plummets most in 16 years on wildfire fallout"
The wildfires in northern and southern California have sent shares of the state’s two largest utility owners falling the most since the power crisis more than a decade ago.
Trading in PG&E Corp. was briefly halted Monday after shares plummeted more than 37 percent. The stock has fallen as much as 48 percent in two days of trading since the Camp Fire broke out north of San Francisco last week...
Investors are concerned about utility liabilities associated with the fires. Authorities are investigating electrical equipment as one of several possible causes of the so-called Camp Fire, about 150 miles (240 kilometers) northeast of San Francisco. A PG&E transmission line in the area went offline 15 minutes before the blaze was first reported, and the company reported finding a damaged transmission tower near where investigators say the fire began.
Edison’s Southern California Edison utility said late Friday a power outage occurred near the suspected starting point of one of the fires near Los Angeles and that a sensor detected a disturbance in its equipment two minutes before the blaze was reported. The company said there had been no determination of origin or cause and that it will cooperate with the investigation.
The wildfires have destroyed more than 6,700 structures and could cost the state, insurers and homeowners at least $19 billion in damages, according to an estimate by Enki Research.
Source: "PG&E trading halted as stock plummets most in 16 years on wildfire fallout," by Joe Ryan, Bloomberg, Nov. 12, 2018
WHO MIGHT BE ENGAGED IN SUCH CYBER TERRORISM?
Unit 8200 of the Israeli military would have to be at the top of the list of suspects behind any false-flag hacking operation. Unit 8200 is the largest unit of the Israeli army and its specialty is hacking into computer networks.
Israelis like Amit Yoran have made a career out of hacking into energy and utility networks, as I explained in Chapter VII of Solving 9/11, "The Architecture of Terror." The following extracts explain who Amit Yoran is and how his company Riptech hacked into energy company networks around the world...
Amit Yoran is an Israeli hacker who made a career out of hacking public utilities. Before 9/11, he served as a Network Security Manager at the Department of Defense and was responsible for maintaining operations of the Pentagon's network. Yoran also served as an officer in the United States Air Force [as the Director of Vulnerability Programs for Dept. of Defense's Computer Emergency Response Team].
AMIT YORAN'S "ETHICAL HACKERS"
"Mr. [Amit] Yoran is chief executive of Riptech, a U.S. company that employs 'ethical hackers' to test vulnerability of networks, including those of utility companies," the Irish Times reported on October 5, 2001. "He [Yoran] says his teams have had success in disrupting utilities' power networks, in Europe particularly," according to the article, which was aptly titled, "Welcome to the Art of Electronic Warfare." The Yorans' company hacked into the computer networks of dozens of energy companies, the Los Angeles Times reported on August 20, 2001:
Riptech Inc., a security company in Alexandria, Va., has tested security for dozens of energy-industry clients. In every case, the firm penetrated Internet-connected corporate networks and often hopped from those networks into supposedly sealed grid-control systems, according to Riptech's president, Amit Yoran.
A hacker in the "grid-control systems" of a energy company could easily cause a malfunction that could cause a fire. This is a possibility that needs to be taken into consideration in the investigation of these wildfires that are reported to have been ignited by malfunctions in the power grid.
See more at:
"Hacking U.S. Energy Grid: Is Israel setting Russia up?" Bollyn.com, March 16, 2018
Tons of molten metal poured from the East Corner of the South Tower for seven minutes before the building was demolished. The evidence of molten metal produced during the demolition of the Twin Towers is one of the crucial aspects of the crime that the controlled media has not addressed - in 17 years!
Several of the alleged hijackers of 9/11 turned up "alive and well" - after the crime in which they supposedly perished. Why would the U.S. media - a supposedly free press - not investigate these claims? Would a truly free press accept a story with such glaring holes?
A video image of the plane striking the South Tower shows a white-hot hole caused by a projectile fired from beneath the aircraft just before impact. Why would the media ignore such an important piece of evidence? Is this what an honest news outlet would do?
A burning white-hot piece of the projectile was seen coming from the building with great momentum. The dark oxides it produced are indicative of a burning uranium warhead. Why has the news media ignored this evidence?
Last Monday, President Trump tweeted:
"There is great anger in our Country caused in part by inaccurate, and even fraudulent, reporting of the news. The Fake News Media, the true Enemy of the People, must stop the open & obvious hostility & report the news accurately & fairly."
The next day, CNN's Editor-at-large, Chris Cillizza, responded:
"Who, exactly, is the fake news? What outlets are the enemy of the people?"
While White House spokesperson Sarah Sanders chose not to name any of the "Fake News Media" outlets when asked, I can offer some some help on this matter.
Since the terror atrocity of 9/11 occurred seventeen years ago there has not been a single mass media outlet that has honestly addressed the evidence of that horrific crime. Furthermore, there has not been a single media outlet that has exposed the lies about the fraudulent War on Terror which followed in its wake, a war which is now the longest and most expensive in U.S. history.
Simply put: Any major media outlet in the U.S. that has not, in seventeen years, addressed the crucial evidence of 9/11, such as the evidence of explosives and molten metal, cannot honestly be called a real news outlet. Using this criteria we should re-phrase the question and ask: Who, exactly, is real news among the mass media outlets?
Support Bollyn.com Donate by PayPal - email@example.com The complete set of three books available for $50 The Solving 9-11 set of two books plus The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East
The Key Zionist Control Points of 9/11
July 30, 2018
People often ask: What are the key points that show that 9/11 was an Israeli Zionist operation? There are, in fact, so many points connecting Israel to 9/11 that it is impossible to answer this question in a few words, so I put together these slides to show the six major Zionist elements of control in the 9/11 false-flag operation.
Note - The hexagram symbol known as the Star of David has been the symbol of Zionism since 1897. Before the Christian era the pagan symbol was also known as the Star of Remphan, an Egyptian deity associated with child sacrifice.
For more information on how 9/11 was carried out to trick us into endless war, read my book The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East. Available for $20 (includes shipping and handling). Order thru PayPal to firstname.lastname@example.org - include mailing address and phone number for the shipping form.
Why is Trump Putting the Screws to Iran?
May 22, 2018
The new U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu
President Donald Trump with Benjamin Netanyahu
If you ask most of the governments and most of the leaders in the Middle East what is the principle barrier to peace, what is the greatest threat to security, they would say three things: Iran, Iran and Iran. - Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel, May 21, 2018
We are witnessing today a new phenomenon: the capricious assertiveness of the American administration. Looking at the latest decisions of President Trump some could even think, ‘With friends like that, who needs enemies?’ - Donald Tusk, President of the European Council, May 16, 2018
One week after President Donald Trump withdrew from the multi-lateral nuclear deal with Iran, the President of the European Council Donald Tusk described the U.S. administration as "capricious".
Capricious is defined as "changing according to no discernible rules; unpredictable." However, when it comes to how the Trump administration deals with Iran there is nothing unpredictable about it. In dealing with Iran, Donald Trump is simply acting according to the well-known dictates and demands coming from Israel's right-wing leader, Benjamin Netanyahu.
THE WAR AGENDA MEMO OF 2001
Ten years ago, General Wesley Clark revealed the Zionist Neo-Con plan to "take out" Iran and six other Middle Eastern nations that was contained in a Pentagon memo that circulated at the highest level of the Defense Department shortly after 9/11: "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran," Clark said.
Now, having taken on the first six nations, it seems that Trump has decided to ignore the pleas of the Europeans and to put the screws to Iran to satisfy Netanyahu. The European Union, however, is one of Iran's largest trading partners and is unwilling to trash the nuclear deal that allows European companies to trade with the large and wealthy nation.
On May 21, Trump's new Secretary of State Mike Pompeo threatened Iran with the "strongest sanctions in history" if it did not comply with 12 demands he listed in a speech given at the Heritage Foundation, "After the Deal: The New Iran Strategy."
Pompeo said the United States would only lift its sanctions on Iran if Tehran submitted to the new demands, which seems highly unlikely given the extreme nature of the demands.
REGIME CHANGE BY FINANCIAL PRESSURE
"We will apply unprecedented financial pressure on the Iranian regime," Pompeo said.
"This sting of sanctions will be painful if the regime does not change its course from the unacceptable and unproductive path it has chosen to one that rejoins the league of nations. These will indeed end up being the strongest sanctions in history when we are complete. The regime has been fighting all over the Middle East for years. After our sanctions come in force, it will be battling to keep its economy alive. Iran will be forced to make a choice: either fight to keep its economy off life support at home or keep squandering precious wealth on fights abroad. It will not have the resources to do both," Pompeo said.
Donald Trump recently complained that the U.S. had wasted $7 trillion in 17 years of waging war in the Middle East and gotten nothing for it. Yesterday, his new Secretary of State focused his criticism on Iran for wasting its wealth. Pompeo said the U.S. will "advocate tirelessly for the Iranian people. The regime must improve how it treats its citizens. It must protect the human rights of every Iranian. It must cease wasting Iran’s wealth abroad."
On May 10, the Washington Free Beacon reported: "The Trump administration is examining a new plan to help Iranians fighting the hardline regime in Iran following America's exit from the landmark nuclear deal and re-imposition of harsh economic sanctions that could topple a regime already beset by protests and a crashing economy."
A "three-page white paper being circulated among National Security Council officials in the White House," which the Free Beacon has a copy of, "offers a strategy by which the Trump administration can actively work to assist an already aggravated Iranian public topple the hardline ruling regime through a democratization strategy that focuses on driving a deeper wedge between the Iranian people and the ruling regime."
So the "New Iran Strategy" sounds a lot like the old Syria strategy, which the U.S. has applied with disastrous results since 2012. In 2012, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wrote an email entitled "New Iran and Syria 2.doc":
The best way to help Israel deal with Iran's growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad… Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel's security, it would also ease Israel's understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly.
During previous periods of sanctions and embargoes against Iran it was, in fact, Israelis and their agents like Marc Rich who profited by secretly trading with Iran. After the Iranian Revolution in 1979, Marc Rich bought oil from Iran despite the American embargo. Due to his special relationship with Ayatollah Khomeini, Iran became Rich's most important supplier of crude oil for more than 15 years, selling Iranian oil to Israel through a secret pipeline.
There is clearly no U.S. or European interest in waging economic war against a nation of 80 million people with a new regime of extremely oppressive sanctions. This policy is meant to foment civil strife in Iran with the intent of overthrowing the government. Trump's "New Iran Strategy" is certainly not being implemented for the benefit of the Iranian people, but solely to advance Israel's strategic plan to dominate the Middle East.
"After the Deal: A New Iran Strategy," Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, the Heritage Foundation, Washington, DC, May 21, 2018
"White House Examining Plan to Help Iranian People Oppose Regime," FreeBecon.com, Adam Kredo, May 10, 2018
"New Iran and Syria 2.doc," Hillary Clinton email, 2012