Print Contact Home Why trust Al Qaida terrorists about the gas attack?

Why trust Al Qaida terrorists about the gas attack?

April 6, 2017


This graphic shows Idlib province in purple, meaning it is under "rebel" control. The "rebel" group that controls Idlib province is part of Al Qaida, and was known as Al Nusra Front until July 2016. This group is considered a terrorist organization by the United States, which means that the U.S. government and controlled media are more willing to trust the unproven claims about the gas attack coming from a terrorist organization rather than believe the government of Syria. Why is the controlled media so adamantly opposed to President Assad? 

The propaganda being spread by the controlled media about the alleged gas attack in the Idlib province of Syria is that the Assad government in Damascus bombed with chemical weapons. The fact that this charge is utterly unproven and that it makes absolutely no sense for Assad to do so makes no difference to the warmonger media pushing the Trump administration to take action to overthrow the government of Syria.

This is the controlled media line and woe to those who challenge it, like Congressman Thomas Massie (R-KY), who said on CNN: "Frankly, I don't think Assad would have done that. It does not serve his interests... We might end up making the situation worse if we launch airstrikes. The first casualty of war is the truth, and it's hard to know exactly what's happening in Syria right now."

Exactly right, so why should anyone trust the Al Qaida affiliate that claims that the gas attack was done by Assad?

The alleged chemical gas attack of April 4 supposedly occurred in the Syrian village of Khan Sheikhun, which is located in Idlib province. Idlib is controlled by the Tahrir al-Sham alliance, which is dominated by the Fateh al-Sham Front, formerly known as the Al Qaida affiliated al-Nusra Front. Despite recent attempts to re-brand the group, it remains on the U.S. list of terrorist organizations. This is the group that claims that the gas attack was done by Assad, the elected leader of Syria.

As reported by the BBC, Tahrir al-Sham is Al Qaida's latest incarnation in Syria.

See: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-38934206

This Al Qaida "rebel" group is in control of the area where the alleged gas attack occurred and is the group blaming the Syrian government for carrying out a highly-illogical gas attack, which the Assad government denies. Until July 2016 this group was known as Jabhat al-Nusra, and has been designated as a "foreign terrorist organization" by the U.S., the United Nations Security Council, and many other countries.

It would, of course, be highly illogical for the Assad government to do such a thing, especially after the U.S. government just announced that the removal of Assad was no longer one of its concerns in Syria.

In a rush to judgement, the U.S. government and the controlled media have been quick to support the anti-government claims made by this Al Qaida group, as if they had proven their claims - which they have not.

This means that the U.S. government and media are supporting unproven claims made by an affiliate of Al Qaida - the very same terrorist group they maintain attacked the U.S. on 9/11 - against the elected government of Syria.

How much sense does that make?  Why is the Zionist-controlled media so trusting of an Al Qaida terrorist group in Syria? And why is the media so adamant about removing Assad from power in Syria?

To understand what is really going on in Syria, one needs to understand the Zionist strategy to control the Middle East by breaking up the Arab states into small ethnic statelets, as was done to Yugoslavia in the 1990s. The "Zionist Plan for the Middle East" (The Yinon Plan, 1982) lays out the Israeli plan for Syria, Iraq, and the rest of the region.

For Syria, this is what the plan says:

The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unqiue areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel's primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi'ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach today.

THE DISSOLUTION OF SYRIA

The "dissolution of Syria" is the Likud plan, i.e. the Yinon Plan, to break up the nation of Syria into small ethnic statelets. This would mean that there would no longer be a state making a claim on the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, which is Syrian territory. It would also remove Syria as a threat to Israel. President Assad has to be removed in order to facilitate the breaking up of Syria. This is the real reason the Zionist-controlled media and politicians are willing to embrace as true any war propaganda that vilifies Assad, and why they are so adamant about him being removed.  

Sources: "The Zionist Plan for the Middle East," Translated and edited by Israel Shahak, 1982
www.informationclearinghouse.info/pdf/The%20Zionist%20Plan%20for%20the%20Middle%20East.pdf

To support Christopher Bollyn's work 
donate by PayPal to:  bollyn@bollynbooks.com
or click here:  
www.bollyn.com/donate/

"The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from this madness 
is to expose the true source of terrorism." 
- Christopher Bollyn
 


©2017 Christopher Bollyn | Sitemap | christopher at bollyn dot com