THE ZIONIST AGENT - U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein has a huge conflict of interest in the 9-11 litigation, which he presides over. Hellerstein is a Zionist partisan, a dedicated supporter of Israel, while the key defendant in the 9-11 litigation is an Israeli company (ICTS), which is closely tied to the Mossad. Furthermore, Hellerstein's son Joseph is a lawyer in Israel and works for the law firm that represents the Israeli company - ICTS. The Zionist-controlled media has utterly failed to inform the public of this egregious conflict of interest.
The latest shoddy parody of a 9/11 lawsuit was “settled” yesterday in New York, where Judge Alvin Hellerstein ordered American Airlines to pay Cantor Fitzgerald half a billion dollars. The upshot: The right hand of the financial forces behind 9/11 will slip the left hand some chump change with a nod and a wink.
The New World Order financial elite’s death-grip on American government and media is exemplified by its total control of all 9/11 litigation – and of all mainstream news stories “reporting” that litigation.
Virtually all 9/11 litigation has been funneled into the courtroom of Judge Hellerstein, whose many ties to Israel were exposed by Ellen Mariani’s lawsuit last year. (Hellerstein slapped sanctions on Mariani’s attorneys for pointing out the obvious conflict of interest.)
A few of the cases, like Mariani’s, were genuine attempts to get 9/11 justice. But almost all honest cases were weeded out by Hellerstein and his team of coverup criminals before they could be litigated. The vast majority of 9/11 family members were bought off, and the few who resisted, with a few notable exceptions like Mariani, were coerced into silence.
Yesterday Hellerstein ruled that American Airlines was negligent when it allowed boozing, coke-snorting, lap-dancer-dating, pork-chop-relishing “radical Muslim suicide hijackers” commanded by a terminal kidney patient in a cave in Afghanistan to seize planes and use two airliners to conduct high-tech controlled demolitions of three skyscrapers.
Hellerstein failed to insist that Cantor Fitzgerald produce evidence that Arab hijackers boarded the planes. Had he done so, the court would have learned that no such evidence exists. On the contrary, overwhelming evidence proves that there were no Arabs on the flights that were allegedly hijacked on 9/11.
Passenger lists released to the media have no Arab names; not one genuine security video shows any of the alleged hijackers boarding any of the alleged attack planes; and no ticket stubs, airline employee testimony, officially-authenticated passenger lists, or any other actual evidence places any of the alleged 19 hijackers on any of the planes.
DNA evidence supposedly collected from crash sites (but without a legal chain of custody) identifies alleged 9/11 passengers – but pointedly fails to identify even one alleged hijacker! Additionally, a scholarly article published by Europe’s leading academic publishing house cites convincing evidence that at least ten of the alleged hijackers were shown to be alive shortly after 9/11.
Was American Airlines negligent when it allowed imaginary hijackers to perform imaginary hijackings…with imaginary airliners? That’s right: The airliners that supposedly hit the Towers also appear to have been illusory.
A detailed study by Pilots for 9/11 Truth shows that alleged Flight 175, which was clocked at 510 knots when it hit the South Tower, could not realistically have flown even close to that speed near sea level.
Since those who had pre-arranged controlled demolitions of almost unimaginable complexity and technological sophistication could not afford to allow an even 1% chance of an “airliner failing to hit a Tower” thereby ruining the pretext for demolition, they obviously would not have used an actual, fallible airliner with fallible would-be hijackers – especially not an airliner flown at a speed that would have torn it apart.
Some other means of creating the visual images of “crashing airliners exploding into fireballs” must have been used. Yes, it sounds incredible – almost as incredible as the official story. But as Sherlock Holmes reminds us, when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.
Can a “judge” who is an agent of the state of Israel really control all 9/11 litigation – with nary a peep from the mainstream media?
How long can he get away with covering up an attack on America, presiding over phony show-trial “lawsuits,” and sanctioning lawyers who challenge his obvious conflict of interest?
9-11 EXPOSED: Thermite & the Israeli Architects of Terror
Updated December 16, 2013
"I should make clear that, with respect to 9-11, I have certain knowledge of only one fact: that there has been and continues to be a massive cover-up." - Peter Dale Scott, The War Conspiracy: JFK, 9/11, and the Deep Politics of War, 2008
THE WHITE SMOKE and light orange flame seen coming from the area around the plane's entry point on the South Tower are indications of athermate reaction. A thermate reaction produces temperatures exceeding 4,000 degrees F. and would explain the large amount of molten iron that was seen falling from this floor before the tower "collapsed". Thermate (a form of thermite), pre-placed in the secure computer rooms into which the planes crashed, would also explain the extreme heat that forced so many people to jump from the towers. I think we can all agree that in order to rectify our political (and spiritual) predicament, the evil people who engineered this hellish atrocity must be exposed and prosecuted. It is simply unacceptable that they are protected by the on-going cover-up by the government and controlled media.
I came across the following 3-minute video that does an excellent job highlighting the key connections linking Israeli military intelligence to the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11. These connections are described in greater detail in "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9-11", a chapter in Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World.
The material in this chapter of Solving 9-11 was checked for accuracy by an independent fact-checker in Britain, who was commissioned by a European publisher. More than 100 facts presented in this essential chapter were checked and not a single one was found to be inaccurate.
The following "9/11 EXPOSED" video was posted on the Internet in August 2008, before my Bollyn.info site was hijacked and taken down in February 2009.
Scores of people jumped to their deaths from the Twin Towers to escape the intense heat caused by huge thermite reactions that occurred on the floors where the planes crashed. These reactions produced large amounts of molten iron and super-intense heat that literally cooked the people trapped on the floors above.
The video's background photo of a man falling from the tower is very shocking but it should be remembered that he is one of many who jumped on 9-11. These photos are seldom discussed in the mainsteam media because they indicate that the heat was so intense that many people chose to jump to their deaths.
The fact that a large amount of molten iron was seen falling from the 81st floor of the South Tower indicates that the temperature on that floor was about 2,200 degrees F. (1200 C.) - prior to the "collapse". If the bright yellow molten iron seen falling was produced by a massive thermitic reaction, as the large amount of white smoke (aluminum oxide) seen coming from this floor suggests, then the temperatures reached on that floor would have initially exceeded 4,000 degrees F. Thermitic reactions evidently continued to occur and were indicated by puffs of white smoke that were documented in the FEMA study of the towers before they collapsed.
Basic thermite is a chemical mixture of a metal oxide and aluminum powder. To produce iron, ferric (iron) oxide is used, although other metals can be made using other metal oxides. When ignited, Thermite produces very high temperatures (over 4,000 degrees F), along with generousamounts of molten metal.
Heat rises, so the extreme heat would have permeated upwards through the structure creating the effect of a roasting oven for the people trapped on the floors above the crash zone. To get an idea of how hot it was for the people above the pool of molten iron on the 81st floor of the South Tower, I provide this comparison: A very hot sauna is 100 C. while the temperature on the 81st floor was at least twelve times hotter than the hottest sauna.
A large cloud of white smoke accompanied by a light orange flame can be seen coming from the entry point on the South Tower. This is indicative of a large amount of thermate having been detonated. The temperature of such a thermitic reaction would have been greater than 4,000 degrees F.
A large amount of molten iron was seen falling from the 81st floor of the South Tower in the minutes before it "collapsed". This molten metal would have been about 2,200 degrees F, according to Dr. Steven E. Jones and a team of scientists who have examined these photos: "The yellow-white color implies a molten-metal temperature of approximately 1000 -1200 C, above the temperature which the dark-smoke fires in the Towers would likely produce... Molten iron with the characteristics seen in this video is consistent with a thermite-reaction occurring in the Tower, since thermite produces molten iron at yellow-to-white hot temperatures."
Similar clouds of white smoke accompanied the impact of the plane into the North Tower.
Because of the extreme heat released by the thermitic reaction, the people trapped above the crash floors would have felt like they were being cooked in an oven, which is why so many chose to jump to end their torment. These people were trapped because the doors to the roof were locked and there was no way out of the hellish heat – other than to jump. This is, I believe, the real reason why these photos are not discussed in the media.
"Molten metal, White Smoke and the World Trade Center Collapses" by Steven E. Jones, with Jeffrey Farrer, Wesley Lifferth, John Ellsworth, Jared Dodson, and Jacob Stevenson, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, April 7, 2006 www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/Papers/Molten%20metal.doc
"The Architecture of Terror" article was first published on Bollyn.info in July 2008.
JFK and 9-11: Henry Crown and the Cover-Ups of Our Time
November 7, 2013
DALLAS, November 22, 1963 - President John F. Kennedy moments before he was assassinated.
A coup d'etat took place in 1963 and we have been living with the results of it for half a century - with millions of dead across the globe. With the loss of President Kennedy, the U.S. became a perpetual warfare state, and we live every day of our lives with the consequences of that monstrous fact. - Stanford Reconsidered, October 17, 2013
We have not been told the truth about Oswald. - Sen. Richard Russell, former Warren Commissioner
The guilty parties behind a crime reveal themselves when they engage in the cover-up. The hidden-hand of the culprits, for example, can be detected when they, or their agents, interfere with the investigation to prevent the truth from being exposed.
The assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the terror attacks of 9-11 are probably the two events that have most profoundly affected American history during the past half century. The two events have a great deal in common. Both events were investigated by politically appointed commissions which were seriously flawed, and both events led to costly and unnecessary wars that resulted in huge increases in U.S. defense spending.
In both cases, the commissions that investigated the crimes failed to convince the public that they were honest and complete. Both the Warren Commission and the 9-11 Commission are now seen by many as criminal cover-ups that used colossal lies to protect the real culprits and deceive the public about what really happened.
Interfering in both the investigations of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the terror attacks of 9-11, we find agents of Henry Crown and Company, a Zionist family of war profiteers (General Dynamics) from Chicago. Agents associated with Henry Crown and Company played key roles in steering both investigations away from the truth andpromoting the official myth.
ZIONIST MOBSTER Henry Crown of Chicago made a fortune as a procurement agent for the U.S. Army during World War II and went on to take over General Dynamics in 1959. He was also deeply involved in organized crime and smuggling weapons to Israel in violation of U.S. law.
Henry Crown of Chicago controlled the nearly bankrupt General Dynamics (of Fort Worth, Texas) at the time of the JFK assassination.Henry Crown’s personal lawyer, Albert E. Jenner, Jr., served on the Warren Commission where he was tasked with investigating the evidence of a conspiracy behind Lee Harvey Oswald or Jack Ruby.
The article about Jack Ruby on Murderpedia.org explains how Henry Crown's personal lawyer got this crucial position on the Warren Commission:
Tom C. Clark advised newspaper columnist Drew Pearson in 1946 that the FBI had verified the claims of James M. Ragen that financier Henry Crown and the Hilton Hotel chain maintained some financial interest in syndicated racketeering activities in Chicago. Tom C. Clark [then a U.S. Supreme Court Justice] selected Henry Crown's son, John as one of his two Supreme Court law clerks for the 1956 term, and Tom Clark provided one of two recommendations to the Warren Commission to appoint Henry Crown's attorney, Albert E. Jenner, Jr. as a senior assistant investigative counsel responsible for determining whether either Oswald or Ruby acted alone or conspired with others. - “Jack Leon Ruby”by Juan I. Blanco, Murderpedia.org
General Dynamics, which had been acquired by Henry Crown in 1959, was on the brink of bankruptcy in 1962 when it was saved by a $6 billion contract to develop a new fighter (TFX/F-111) for the U.S. military. This was a very crooked deal that General Dynamics won through bribes and corruption. The TFX scandal was disputed and debated in Congress during the year of the assassination. The Vietnam War, which was escalated by Lyndon B. Johnson after the assassination, is the war that saved Henry Crown's General Dynamics from bankruptcy. Kennedy had stated that he wanted to withdraw U.S. troops from Vietnam by the end of 1965.
Likewise, after the terror attacks of 9-11, the Crown family raked in huge profits from the fraudulent "War on Terror" and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. The Crown family, which is the largest shareholder of General Dynamics (GD), saw the value of their stock quadruple, as GD's revenue tripled from $10.4 billion in 2000 to $32.5 billion in 2010.
Immediately after 9-11, people on the Crown payroll played key roles in supporting the official lies about what caused the destruction of the World Trade Center. Zdenek Bazant, a professor at Northwestern University, was the first. Bazant presented a paper – on September 13, 2001 - claiming that the Twin Towers collapsed due to fire-induced weakening of the buildings. Bazant works at a school of engineering at Northwestern University that is heavily funded by the Crown family.
Likewise, W. Gene Corley, another associate of the Crown family, headed the FEMA/ASCE investigation of the Twin Towers. Corley is a concrete specialist who performed a similar service after the Waco massacre, the Oklahoma City bombing, and the bombing of the Pentagon. Corley, now deceased, was associated with the Crown family through his work with the American Concrete Institute (Illinois). He received the Henry Crown award from this institute in 1997 – for his work on the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City. It should be noted that Corley claimed to know nothing about how steel can be tested for evidence of explosives.
"I'M NOT A METALLURGIST" - W. Gene Corley at the World Trade Center. Corley, a concrete specialist from Chicago, told the author that he knew nothing about how to test steel for evidence of explosives.
So, the Crown family of Chicago, the controlling family of General Dynamics, had key people in the official investigations of the JFK murder and 9-11 and made billions of dollars in profits from the wars that followed both events. Most importantly, the agents of the Crown family were key players in the criminal cover-ups by supporting the false version of both crimes.
U.S. history changed drastically as a result of these events and in both cases the cover-up resulted in the nation becoming engaged in long and costly wars from which the Crown family made huge profits from their ownership and control of General Dynamics, a leading defense contractor. We should take note when the people who are involved in covering up a crime then rake in immense profits from the criminal deception.
ARLEN SPECTER served on the Warren Commission and presented the absurd theory that a single bullet passed through President Kennedy’s neck and Governor Connally’s chest and wrist and embedded itself in the Governor’s thigh. The "magic bullet" supposedly passed through 15 layers of clothing, 7 layers of skin, and approximately 15 inches of tissue, struck a necktie knot, removed 4 inches of rib, shattered a radius bone and was found at the hospital in near pristine condition.
"THE MAGIC BULLET" found on a gurney in the hospital had neither blood nor human tissue on it. Yet this bullet became the essential piece of evidence that led the Warren Commission to conclude that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.
Zdenek Bazant and W. Gene Corley were key proponents of the theory that the Twin Towers' collapses were caused by fires that weakened the steel structure, although such steel-framed towers have never collapsed before due to fire. The Bazant-Corley theory, however, cannot explain the source of the energy that caused the complete pulverization of the 220 concrete floors - and everything on them.
MOLTEN IRON BALLS were produced in large amounts during the demolitions of the Twin Towers, another crucial fact which cannot be explained by the fire-induced collapse scenario presented by W. Gene Corley and Zdenek Bazant.
9-11: The New Pearl Harbor by Massimo Mazzucco
October 19, 2013
September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor is a five-hour documentary that summarizes 12 years of public debate on 9-11. While aimed primarily at a general, uninformed audience, the film also contains some new findings that may be of interest to advanced researchers.
September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor is an excellent film resource about 9-11. I highly recommend viewing it from the websitewww.luogocomune.net/site/modules/sections/index.phpand using the index below each of the three DVDs to choose the parts which interest you most. It is really well done and is very helpful in proving that the official version is a blatant pack of lies and that the World Trade Center was pulverized using explosives - an act of mass murder that killed more than 2,753 people.
ARCHITECT OF 9-11 & THE WAR ON TERROR Benjamin Netanyahu met President Barack Obama at the White House on September 30, on the eve of the U.S. government shutdown. As the chief architect of the multi-trillion dollar fraud known as the "War on Terror," thepsychopathic Netanyahu is culpable for defrauding the American people - with the Israeli-engineered terrorism of 9-11.
We have seen nothing from Netanyahu but lies and actions which are meant to deceive global public opinion... This is his nature, to lie... Over the past 22 years the Zionist regime has been lying by repeating endlessly that Iran will have the atomic bomb in six months. The continuation of this game, in fact, is based on lying, deception, incitement, and harassment. After all these years, the world must understand the reality of these lies and not allow them to be repeated. - Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif at the United Nations, September 30, 2013
"I cannot bear Netanyahu, he's a liar." - French President Nicolas Sarkozy to Barack Obama during G20 summit in Cannes, November 2011
"We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq." - Benjamin Netanyahu, “Report: Netanyahu says 9/11 terror attacks good for Israel,” Ha’aretz (Israel), April 16, 2008
"It's very good… Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy." - Benjamin Netanyahu to New York Times on 9-11, “A Day of Terror: The Israelis; Spilled Blood is Seen as Bond That Draws Two Nations Closer,” by James Bennet, New York Times, September 12, 2001
With the U.S. government on the verge of a shutdown, how very odd it looked for President Barack Obama to meet Benjamin Netanyahu, the psychopathic Israeli leader who openly exulted on 9-11 about the terror attacks, at the White House. Netanyahu’s exultation at the murderous atrocity of 9-11 was obscene, but genuine. He is, after all, one of the chief architects of the fraudulent “War on Terror,” the Zionist fraud he has pushed since 1976, when he became a director of the Netanyahu Institute on Terrorism, along with his father Benzion from Warsaw. The Netanyahus started a propaganda blitz to promote the fraudulent "War on Terror" on the world stage with their Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism in 1979. George H.W. Bush attended the Netanyahu conference along with other political leaders and journalists.
ZIONIST FANATICS - The late Benzion Mileikowsky and his son Bibi Netanyahu are supporters of the extremist Zionist ideology ofGreater Israel espoused by Vladimir Jabotinsky. Benzion was Jabotinsky's secretary and executive director of the New Zionist Organization of America in New York from 1940–1948. Bibi Netanyahu is the head of the Likud, a party of right-wing extremists created in the 1970s by Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir and other Zionist terrorists from the Irgun and Stern Gang. The party was founded by people who use terrorism to achieve their strategic goals.
The evidence that Israeli intelligence was behind the false-flag terror atrocity of 9-11 is indisputable. The evidence and details of Israeli/Zionist involvement in every aspect of the 9-11 saga can be found in the Solving 9-11 set of books.
Netanyahu could certainly fill in the blanks and explain exactly how Israeli intelligence pulled it off -- if he were arrested and interrogated. This is why I find it so obscene that the U.S. president shakes the hand of this mega-terrorist.
The only proper place for Benjamin Netanyahu and his horde of Likudnik terrorists is in a maximum security jail facing trial for their role in 9-11 and other outrageous crimes. For Netanyahu to be received at the White House and the United Nations is an unbearable insult to those who died on 9-11, and the thousands of people who have suffered and died as a result of the evil deception about what happened on September 11, 2001.
The U.S. National Debt has nearly tripled since 9-11, much of it due to the fraudulent "War on Terror" and increased defense spending.
Prior to 9-11, the Congressional Budget Office had projected a $5.6 trillion surplus for the 2001-2011 period. 9-11 and the wars that followed shot holes in that projection, leaving the U.S. with a debt increase of $6.1 trillion.
Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, is the head of the Likud, a coalition created by the heads of the Zionist terrorist organizations that bombed the King David Hotel in 1946 and massacred entire Palestinian villages in 1948. The father of Obama's first chief-of-staff, Rahm Emanuel, was a member of the most extreme terrorist group, the Stern Gang.
Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister and leader of the Likud, a coalition party of former terrorists, told Israelis that the Zionist state was benefiting "from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq." Note that in Netanyahu's mind the terrorism of 9-11 and the American struggle in Iraq are "one thing". How telling this comment is.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INSTIGATION - The F.B.I. spends more time and money instigating fake terror plots than it does investigating real crimes, such as the terror atrocity of 9-11. The high-level corruption at the Department of Justice explains why there has been no prosecution of the crimes of 9-11.
April 4, 2011 - U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder announces that the alleged "Mastermind of 9/11" and four other terrorists will notface open trial in the United States -- but closed military tribunals in Cuba. Apart from the culprits, who benefits from the government's failure to prosecute the 9-11 crimes?
It is difficult to fathom that in the two largest criminal cases in recent U.S. history, the terror attacks of 9-11 and the economic meltdown of 2008, not one single person has been prosecuted by the federal government. The most disturbing thing about the government’s failure to investigate and prosecute these crimes is that it indicates that the White House and the Department of Justice are controlled by the real culprits behind these mega-crimes.
On the fifth anniversary of the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history, an article on the Washington Postwebsite pointed out that not a single one of the disgraced Wall Street CEOs, whose financial malfeasance and criminal negligence led to the economic meltdown of 2008, had been prosecuted.
“NO SERIOUS EFFORTS AT CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS”
As Neil Irwin wrote:
It's not that the federal government tried to prosecute a bunch of them but lost the cases. There were no serious efforts at criminal prosecutions at all… it's shocking that for a crisis that drove the global economy off a cliff, caused millions of people to lose their homes and generally spread mass human misery to almost every corner of the earth there is no defining prosecution. No man or woman who led one of the firms directly culpable for the catastrophe has been put in a prison-orange jumpsuit…
So, what’s going on? Of the rogues gallery who led the major Wall Street firms to the brink of the abyss, only to have a multi-trillion-dollar taxpayer bailout pull them back, why have none become familiar with our nation’s federal prison system? - Neil Irwin, WashingtonPost.com, September 12, 2013
WHAT’S GOING ON?
What is even more remarkable is that, after twelve years, no one has been prosecuted for 9-11, the most egregious case of mass murder and terrorism in U.S. history. Furthermore, not a single one of the nearly 3,000 wrongful death cases even went to trial, although there were nearly 100 families who refused the government money and held out for a trial with the hope of finding who was responsible for their loss. Every one of the 9-11 wrongful death cases was settled out of court in what I have called a judicial war of attrition.
Who benefits from the fact that there has not been a trial in a U.S. court to determine what really happened on 9-11 and who is responsible? The U.S. military is actually holding the man they say is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), the alleged “mastermind of 9-11” in the Gitmo Gulag, but there is no motion by the Department of Justice to bring him to trial in a U.S. court. Why do years go by and the Attorney General does nothing to prosecute the “mastermind of 9-11”? What’s going on?
The only people who clearly benefit from the government’s failure to prosecute the 9-11 crimes are the criminals behind the atrocity and those who helped hide the truth. The failure of the Department of Justice to prosecute Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the alleged perpetrators of 9-11 protects the real mega-criminals behind the false-flag terrorism that changed America.
MASTERMIND OF 9-11? - We are told that this Gitmo detainee is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the "mastermind of 9-11", although an engineering professor in North Carolina who taught the real KSM told me that he had never seen this person before. So, is this the reason the U.S. Department of Justice is not bringing the "mastermind of 9-11" to trial in the United States? What is the real obstacle preventing any prosecution of the 9-11 crimes?
In any normal democratic nation one would rightly expect that the government would thoroughly investigate and vigorously prosecute those involved, in any way, in such a heinous crime. The fact that the U.S. Department of Justice has done neither indicates that Americans do not live in a normal democratic nation.
While Irwin concludes that “America doesn’t criminalize bad business decisions, even when they lead to business failure,” there is no question that the attacks of 9-11 and the criminal cover-up that followed are prosecutable crimes. These are clear-cut crimes of terrorism and mass murder and must be fully investigated and prosecuted, even when they were committed by officials of the government.
The criminal destruction of evidence from the World Trade Center, for example, is an obvious crime that facilitated the cover-up of what really happened on 9-11. This crime was committed by people at the highest level at the Department of Justice, then headed by Attorney General John Ashcroft.
DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE
Rather than having the F.B.I. collect the evidence from the crime scene at the World Trade Center and putting it through forensic analysis to determine what had caused the explosive collapses of the Twin Towers, the crucial steel evidence was hastily destroyed, under the authority and watchful eye of then Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff. This criminal act was essential to prevent the truth about what caused the murderous destruction of the towers from being discovered.
Michael Chertoff is the Israeli-American dual-national who was responsible for prosecuting the crimes of 9-11. As the person in charge of the criminal division of the Department of Justice, Chertoff was the key person in the 9-11 cover-up because he was the highest federal official responsible for the investigation and prosecution of the crimes of 9-11.
ISRAELI SON OF THE MOSSAD - Asst. Attorney General Michael Chertoff supervised the destruction of evidence from the 9-11 crime scenes. Why is he not prosecuted for destroying the evidence? Why did he shut down the F.B.I. investigation of the Israeli terror suspects so quickly?
Instead of collecting the steel for expert analysis, however, Chertoff allowed it to be “recycled” by turning it over to officials of Mayor Giuliani of New York, who sent it to scrapyards in New Jersey where it was cut into short pieces, mixed with other scrap, and shipped to Asia where it was melted down – far from the prying eyes of investigators.
The destruction of the crucial evidence, such as the structural steel from the World Trade Center, happened because Chertoff wanted the evidence destroyed. It was his official duty, after all, to preserve the evidence and prosecute those responsible for the destruction of the Twin Towers.
Preservation of evidence from a crime scene is the basis of any criminal investigation. The 9-11 evidence was not destroyed due to incompetence; it was intentional. Evidence is only destroyed from such a major crime when its presence poses a serious problem for the official story.
Other pieces of crucial evidence, such as the aircraft parts that were recovered, also appear to have been discarded as scrap. In a proper criminal examination these pieces should have been taken apart in order to identify the aircraft they came from by their numbered and time-tracked parts.
Aircraft parts recovered from the 9-11 crime scenes could identify which plane they came from. Why has this evidence not been presented to the public?
Video footage from cameras that overlooked the Pentagon on 9-11 was confiscated by the F.B.I. and has not been seen by the public in the twelve years since the attacks. If the government story that Arab terrorists flew a hijacked plane into the Pentagon is true, why would this video evidence have been kept from the public for twelve years?
The only logical conclusion is that the video evidence has not been shown to the public because it contradicts the official story. Likewise, the structural steel was destroyed because it was physical evidence that sophisticated explosives were used to demolish the Twin Towers, an act of mass murder which took nearly three thousand lives.
If Chertoff is the mastermind of the 9-11 cover-up, who did he do it for? Who was really responsible for the explosive demolitions of the Twin Towers in which so many people were killed? Who were the main beneficiaries of the 9-11 cover-up, if not the real terrorists behind the atrocity?
In a recent in-depth investigation about the Israeli connections to the 9-11 attacks, Keith Maart reveals new information about the Israeli intelligence operatives who were arrested on 9-11 after having been observed celebrating the attacks on the Twin Towers as they took photos and video footage of the burning towers from across the Hudson River in Union City, New Jersey.
These Israeli agents worked for a fake moving company called Urban Moving Systems (UMS) in Weehawken, New Jersey, which was revealed in March 2002 to have been a Mossad front operation by Marc Perelman in Forward, the Jewish daily of New York:
According to one former high-ranking American intelligence official, who asked not to be named, the FBI came to the conclusion at the end of its investigation that the five Israelis arrested in New Jersey last September were conducting a Mossad surveillance mission and that their employer, Urban Moving Systems of Weehawken, N.J., served as a front.
What is most interesting about the case of these Israeli Mossad agents, who clearly had prior knowledge of the 9-11 attacks, is that the F.B.I. (HQ) suddenly closed its case on these Mossad operatives on September 24, 2001, according to Maart, with a two-sentence memo that said there was no evidence that they had prior knowledge of the attacks.
After being held for about two months, three of the five Israeli operatives were returned to Israel where they appeared on the Yair Lapid show and explained why they had set up cameras and video equipment in the parking lot of “The Doric” ready to film the attacks: “Our purpose was to document the event," one of the three said. So the three Israeli agents admitted that they had set themselves up in the parking lot with new cameras to document the 9-11 event from a high bluff overlooking the World Trade Center.
Given all the evidence that these Israeli Mossad operatives had prior knowledge of the attacks, the real question for Americans is why the U.S. Department of Justice suddenly terminated its investigation after less than two weeks? Why were Israeli terror suspects given a pass and allowed to walk?
Dominik Suter, the head of the Mossad front company UMS, fled the country shortly after the F.B.I. first made contact with him after 9-11. Later, although the F.B.I. had officially shut down its investigation of UMS, Suter’s name was still found on an F.B.I. list of terror suspects.
ISRAELI SUSPECT OF 9-11 TERRORISM (incognito) - Dominik Suter fled to Israel shortly after 9-11. He ran the Mossad front company whose agents were caught "documenting the event" from the parking lot of "The Doric" in Union City, New Jersey. He has returned to the United States seemingly confident that he will never face prosecution. How can he be so sure that he will not be prosecuted? What does he know that we don't?
Mrs. Dominik Suter, Ornit Levinson-Suter, teaches Hebrew in New Jersey.
In July 2002, I wrote about how the F.B.I. responded to my questions about the fact that Dominik Suter’s name was on the F.B.I. list of 9-11 terror suspects:
The Israeli owner of the Mossad "front" company who fled to Israel after his "movers" were caught filming the World Trade Center attacks remains at large although the FBI, which has an office in Tel Aviv, has his name on its terror suspect list.
A leaked "FBI Suspect List" circulated among financial institutions in Italy shows that Dominik Suter, the Israeli owner of Urban Moving Systems who fled in haste to Israel after 9-11, is among those suspected of being behind the terror attacks…
While Dominik Suter's name is on the list, oddly his Israeli nationality is not. Three addresses, two in New Jersey and one in Sherman Oaks, California, are given, as is his Social Security number. The year 1970 is provided for his date of birth. When I asked the FBI about the list, a spokeswoman said, "We're not going to validate your questions by talking about the list. You are not supposed to have it. It is not for public consumption."
Today, Dominik Suter is back in business and listed as an employee of Insightera, an Israeli company based in San Mateo, California. Suter even has a webpage where he says that the accusations against him and UMS are nothing but anti-Semitism.
Dominik Suter works with an Israeli company based in San Mateo, California.
One might ask how he feels so confident that he dares to return to the United States after having been on the F.B.I. list of terror suspects for several years. The answer is simple: Suter and his Israeli partners in crime know that the Department of Justice will not prosecute them for their role in the 9-11 atrocity because it is controlled by the same people who pulled off 9-11.
As long as Zionist criminals control the White House and Department of Justice there will be no federal investigation and prosecution for the crimes of 9-11, but this abnormal situation is not sustainable for the long term. The sooner we remove the criminal element from our government, the sooner we can obtain justice for 9-11.
A plot of this magnitude and audacity could only have been conceived under faultless cover and down to the smallest detail. - Thunderball, Ian Fleming
Ian Fleming (1908–1964) British intelligence officer and author of the James Bond books
The government could rely on the mega-media corporations in whose hands the corrupt Clinton regime concentrated the U.S. media. By supporting rather than investigating the government’s cover story, the media left the majority of Americans, who are sensitive to peer pressure, without any support for their doubts. Effectively, the American Ministry of Propaganda validated the government’s false story. - "Too Many Years Of Lies: From Mossadeq to 9/11" by Paul Craig Roberts
In Dr. Paul Craig Roberts' latest piece, written for the twelfth anniversary of 9-11, he points out that "mega-media corporations" have supported the 9-11 deception "rather than investigating the government's cover story."
The U.S. mass media, in fact, has actively promoted the lies about 9-11 and served as the primary agent in deceiving the American people into two extremely costly and disastrous wars. In doing so, the media has consistently ignored evidence that proves that the official version is a pack of lies, such as the large number of eyewitnesses, including professional journalists, who reported seeing and feeling explosionsbefore and during the demolition of the Twin Towers.
It is obvious to all but the most obtuse that the Twin Towers were pulverized with explosives on 9-11, yet none of the government-funded studies looked for evidence of explosives. The mass media and government both supported the lie that this is a fire-induced collapse. What is the mechanism that connects the mass media and government in this huge lie?
Here, it needs to be clearly understood that the media outlets did not facilitate the deception because they were askedto by the government - they cover up the truth about 9-11 because they areactive members in the conspiracy and want to deceive the people; to cheat them into sending their sons and daughters into wars of aggression - and then having the public pick up the tab.
One thing is abundantly clear: the intentional deception about 9-11 by the media outlets in the United States makes them an enemy of the people. They are, in fact, Public Enemy No. 1.
So, who is "the media" and why have they supported the 9-11 deception?
In dealing with this question it helps to have read the works of Ian Fleming, the author of the James Bond series of books. In Fleming's books the villain is always a mega-villain who controls a criminal network that seeks global supremacy. This is precisely the kind of villain that we are talking about when we discuss who controls the U.S. government and media. Fleming would understand our predicament completely; he was, in fact, trying to expose the mega-villain for us - until he died at the young age of 55.
We know that the U.S. media is dominated and largely controlled by Zionist Jews. We also know that Zionist Jews exert a huge amount of control and influence over the U.S. Congress and the President of the United States. We are, in fact, living under a Zionist crimocracy - a regime headed by Jewish criminals who seek to control the world.
So, we see that the two main entities that have misled the American people about 9-11 are both controlled by the same group of people - organized Zionist Jews who are loyal to the state of Israel.
Finally, we have my Solving 9-11 books, which explain the role of Israeli intelligence and Zionist agents in the false-flag terrorism of 9-11. The Zionist-controlled press has deceived the American people about a Zionist false-flag terror attack that was used to drag the United States into wars of aggression on behalf of the state of Israel, wars which greatly enrich Zionist-owned companies (e.g. General Dynamics) that manufacture weapons systems and receivetens of billions of dollars from the U.S. Treasury every year.
Ian Fleming understood it all very well. It is, after all, what he was writing about.
I think Dr. Roberts gets it too, but, like Fleming, he doesn't say it out loud. Here is his latest article, "Too Many Years of Lies":
Too Many Years Of Lies: From Mossadeq to 9/11 Paul Craig Roberts
Washington has been at war for 12 years. According to experts such as Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes, these wars have cost Americans approximately $6 trillion, enough to keep Social Security and Medicare sound for years. All there is to show for 12 years of war is fat bank balances for the armament industries and a list of destroyed countries with millions of dead and dislocated people who never lifted a hand against the United States.
The cost paid by American troops and taxpayers is extreme. Secretary of Veteran Affairs Erik Shinseki reported in November 2009 that “more veterans have committed suicide since 2001 than we have lost on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan.” Many thousands of our troops have suffered amputations and traumatic brain injuries. At the Marine Corps War College Jim Lacey calculated that the annual cost of the Afghan war was $1.5 billion for each al-Qaeda member in Afghanistan. Many US and coalition troops paid with their lives for every one al-Qaeda member killed. On no basis has the war ever made sense.
Washington’s wars have destroyed the favorable image of the United States created over the decades of the cold war. No longer the hope of mankind, the US today is viewed as a threat whose government cannot be trusted.
The wars that have left America’s reputation in tatters are the consequence of 9/11. The neoconservatives who advocate America’s hegemony over the world called for “a new Pearl Harbor” that would allow them to launch wars of conquest. Their plan for conquering the Middle East as their starting point was set out in the neoconservative “Project for the New American Century.” It was stated clearly by Commentary editor Norman Podhoretz and also by many neoconservatives.
The neocon argument boils down to a claim that history has chosen “democratic capitalism” and not Karl Marx as the future. To comply with history’s choice, the US must beef up its military and impose the American Way on the entire world.
In other words, as Claes Ryn wrote, the American neoconservatives are the “new Jacobins,” a reference to the French Revolution of 1789 that intended to overthrow aristocratic Europe and replace it with “Liberty, equality, fraternity,” but instead gave Europe a quarter century of war, death, and destruction.
Ideologies are dangerous, because they are immune to facts. Now that the United States is no longer governed by the US Constitution, but by a crazed ideology that has given rise to a domestic police state more complete than that of Communist East Germany and to a warfare state that attacks sovereign countries based on nothing but manufactured lies, we are left with the irony that Russia and China are viewed as constraints on Washington’s ability to inflict evil, death, and destruction on the world.
The two pariah states of the 20th century have become the hope of mankind in the 21st century!
As Oliver Stone and Peter Kuznick prove in their book, The Untold History of the United States, the American government has never deserved its white hat reputation. Washington has been very successful in dressing up its crimes in moralistic language and hiding them in secrecy. It is only decades after events that the truth comes out.
For example, on August 19, 1953, the democratically elected government of Iran was overthrown by a coup instigated by the US government. Sixty years after the event declassified CIA documents detail how the secret CIA operation overthrew a democratic government and imposed Washington’s puppet on the people of Iran.
The declassified documents could not have spelled it out any clearer: “The military coup that overthrew Mossadeq and his National Front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of U.S. foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government.”http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/19/politics/cia-iran-1953-coup
In the 21st century Washington is attempting to repeat its 1953 feat of overthrowing the Iranian government, this time using the faux “green revolution” financed by Washington. When that fails, Washington will rely on military action.
If 60 years is the time that must pass before Washington’s crimes can be acknowledged, the US government will admit the truth about September 11, 2001 on September 11, 2061. In 2013, on this 12th anniversary of 9/11, we only have 48 years to go before Washington admits the truth. Alas, the members of the 9/11 truth movement will not still be alive to receive their vindication.
But just as it has been known for decades that Washington overthrew Mossadeq, we already know that the official story of 9/11 is hogwash.
No evidence exists that supports the government’s 9/11 story. The 9/11 Commission was a political gathering run by a neoconservative White House operative. The Commission members sat and listened to the government’s story and wrote it down. No investigation of any kind was made. One member of the Commission resigned, saying that the fix was in. After the report was published, both co-chairmen of the Commission and the legal counsel wrote books disassociating themselves from the report. The 9/11 Commission was “set up to fail,” they wrote.
NIST’s account of the structural failure of the twin towers is a computer simulation based on assumptions chosen to produce the result. NIST refuses to release its make-believe explanation for expert scrutiny. The reason is obvious. NIST’s explanation of the structural failure of the towers cannot survive scrutiny.
There are many 9/11 Truth organizations whose members are high-rise architects, structural engineers, physicists, chemists and nano-chemists, military and civilian airline pilots, firemen and first responders, former prominent government officials, and 9/11 families. The evidence they have amassed overwhelms the feeble official account.
It has been proven conclusively that World Trade Center Building 7 fell at free fall which can only be achieved by controlled demolition that removes all resistance below to debris falling from above so that no time is lost in overcoming resistance from intact structures. NIST has acknowledged this fact, but has not changed its story.
In other words, still in America today official denial takes precedence over science and known undisputed facts.
On this 12th anniversary of a false flag event, it is unnecessary for me to report the voluminous evidence that conclusively proves that the official story is a lie. You can read it for yourself. It is available online. You can read what the architects and engineers have to say. You can read the scientists’ reports. You can hear from the first responders who were in the WTC towers. You can read the pilots who say that the maneuvers associated with the airliner that allegedly hit the Pentagon are beyond their skills and most certainly were not performed by inexperienced pilots.
Actually, you do not need any of the expert evidence to know that the US government’s story is false. As I have previously pointed out, had a few young Saudi Arabians, the alleged 9/11 hijackers, been capable of outwitting, without support from any government and intelligence service, not only the CIA and FBI, but all sixteen US intelligence services, the intelligence services of Washington’s NATO allies and Israel’s Mossad, the National Security Council, NORAD, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Traffic Control, and defeat Airport Security four times in one hour on the same morning, the White House, Congress, and the media would have been demanding an investigation of how the National Security State could so totally fail.
Instead, the President of the United States and every government office fiercely resisted any investigation. It was only after a year of demands and rising pressure from the 9/11 families that the 9/11 Commission was created to bury the issue.
No one in government was held accountable for the astonishing failure. The national security state was defeated by a few rag tag Muslims with box cutters and a sick old man dying from renal failure while holed up in a cave in Afghanistan, and no heads rolled.
The total absence from the government for demands for an investigation of an event that is the greatest embarrassment to a “superpower” in world history is a complete give-away that 9/11was a false flag event. The government did not want any investigation, because the government’s cover story cannot stand investigation.
The government could rely on the mega-media corporations in whose hands the corrupt Clinton regime concentrated the US media. By supporting rather than investigating the government’s cover story, the media left the majority of Americans, who are sensitive to peer pressure, without any support for their doubts. Effectively, the American Ministry of Propaganda validated the government’s false story.
Common everyday experiences of Americans refute the government’s story. Consider, for example, self-cleaning ovens. How many American homes have them? Thirty million? More? Do you have one?
Do you know what temperature self-cleaning ovens reach? The self-cleaning cycle runs for several hours at 900 degrees Fahrenheit or 482 degrees Celsius. Does your self-cleaning oven melt at 482 degrees Celsius. No, it doesn’t. Does the very thin, one-eighth inch steel soften and your oven collapse? No, it doesn’t.
Keep that in mind while you read this: According to tests performed by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), only 2% of the WTC steel tested by NIST reached temperatures as high as 250 degrees Celsius, about half the temperature reached by your self-cleaning oven. Do you believe that such low temperatures on such small areas of the WTC towers caused the massive, thick, steel columns in the towers to soften and permit the collapse of the buildings? If you do, please explain why your self-cleaning oven doesn’t weaken and collapse.
In Section E.5 of the Executive Summary in this NIST reporthttp://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=101019 it says: “A method was developed using microscopic observations of paint cracking to determine whether steel members had experienced temperatures in excess of 250 degrees C. More than 170 areas were examined . . . Only three locations had a positive result indicating that the steel and paint may have reached temperatures in excess of 250 degrees C.” Analysis of steel “microstructures show no evidence of exposure to temperatures above 600 degrees C for any significant time.”
How did these truths get out? My explanation is that the NIST scientists, resentful of the threat to their jobs and future employment opportunities and chaffing under the order to produce a false report, revealed the coerced deception by including information that their political masters did not understand. By stating unequivocally the actual temperatures, NIST’s scientists put the lie to the coerced report.
The melting point of steel is around 1,500 degrees C. or 2,600 degrees F. Steel can lose strength at lower temperatures, but the NIST scientists reported that only a small part of the steel was even subjected to moderate temperatures less than those obtained by the self-cleaning oven in your home.
If you need to think about this a bit more, obtain a copy of The Making of the Atomic Bomb by Richard Rhodes. Have a look at the streetcar in photo 108. The caption reads: “The Hiroshima fireball instantly raised surface temperatures within a mile of the hypocenter well above 1,000 degrees F.” Is the streetcar a melted lump of steel? No, it is structurally intact, although blackened with burnt paint.
Washington would have you believe that steel that survived intact the atomic bomb would melt from low temperature, short lived, isolated office fires. What do you think of a government that believes that you are that stupid?
Who would support a government that lies every time it opens its mouth?
The three WTC buildings that were destroyed were massive heat sinks. I doubt that the limited, short-lived, low temperature fires in the buildings even warmed the massive steel structures to the touch.
Moreover, not a single steel column melted or deformed from softening. The columns were severed at specific lengths by extremely high temperature charges placed on the columns.
On this 12th anniversary of 9/11, ask yourself if you really want to believe that temperatures half those reached by your self-cleaning oven caused three massive steel structures to crumble into dust.
Then ask yourself why your government thinks you are so totally stupid as to believe such a fairy tale as your government has told you about 9/11.
The level and extent of this [Zionist/Israeli] penetration is unprecedented in history and amounts to an invasion by an un-American and hostile force. - Barbara Honegger, "Behind the Smoke Curtain," January 2013
Barbara Honegger's analysis of the 9-11 bombing of the Pentagon is most compelling. I recommend watching the YouTube video of her "Behind the Smoke Curtain" presentation, which she gave in Seattle last January. It is 3 hours long, but well worth watching.
Honegger, who has high-level credentials as a military and political consultant, completely refutes the notion that a large Boeing airliner struck the Pentagon. Her analysis supports the theory that an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) like a Global Hawk was involved in the attack. She also presents evidence that bombs had been pre-placed in the Pentagon to target certain offices and individuals.
Honegger supports the theory that a Global Hawk was involved in the Pentagon attack.
A piece of the aircraft that hit the Pentagon appears to be made of the same composite material as the wings of a Global Hawk. We need someone who knows how the Global Hawk wing is made to come forward and comment on this important piece of evidence.
A Global Hawk wing made at the Vought Aircraft factory in Dallas, Texas. I have contacted the company to try and get a comment from them on the piece of evidence that fell through the sun roof into a person's car near the Pentagon.
This is what the company that makes the Global Hawk wing assembly says about the construction:
Global Hawk and Triton Wings
Triumph Aerostructures - Vought Integrated Programs Division - Dallas (Jefferson Street) has been on the Global Hawk/Triton program since 2000, responsible for the wing fabrication, assembly, and structural testing. We use commercially available graphite and epoxy materials, including high modulus unidirectional tape, in the fabrication of the Global Hawk composite wing. Source:www.triumphgroup.com/companies/triumph-aerostructures-vipd-dallas-jefferson/capabilities/wings
Toward the end of her presentation Ms Honegger presented the following slide, which shows that she understands that the U.S. government is under the not-so-hidden control of Zionists and the state of Israel. Having sent Ms Honegger a copy of Solving 9-11, I am very encouraged to see that she points out this systemic Zionist corruption to the public. This means that there is a growing awareness among high-level analysts like Barbara Honegger that my analysis that 9-11 was a Zionist and Israeli attack on the United States is correct.
As Honegger says, "The level and extent of this [Zionist/Israeli] penetration is unprecedented in history and amounts to an invasion by an un-American and hostile force." It is high time that this salient fact be recognized and addressed. Zionist and Israeli agents should be removed from any position within the government and military because their loyalty is not to the United States of America, but Israel. A person simply can not be loyal to two nations.
A key slide from Barbara Honegger's analysis of the 9-11 Pentagon bombing
Barbara Honegger's "Behind the Smoke Curtain" presentation:
Although the official version of 9-11 has been proven to be a pack of lies it remains the core dogma of the criminal regime that rules our nation - and our world.
The following article (and video), "9/11 is the Litmus Test," is an excellent piece about the 9/11 deception and the people who support it.
It all comes down to 9/11. Everything that has happened has happened based on a lie. Everyone in government; in the media, in entertainment, in organized religion, in the public eye and in the public who accepts and promotes the official story is either a traitor or a tool. Everyone who does not stand forth and speak truth to power is a coward, a liar and complicit in mass murder. Everyone - everywhere can be measured according to this litmus test.
9/11 is the Litmus Test
By Les Visible February 22, 2008
There is one thing that defines everyone over the course of these early years of this new century. That thing is the 9/11 attack. Everyone in government and every field of endeavor the world over is defined by their position on this event. It is not necessary to know the truth. It is only necessary to know the extent of the lies in order to define any leader in any position anywhere in the world. By what they have said and by what they have not said, one can accurately judge who is an enemy of the peoples of the world. One can accurately determine who is a tool of the psychopaths or one of them.
Think about what you allow yourself to know. Think about what you pass by; ignore, deny and defend ... that defines you. It defines the degree of your personal courage, your relationship to the truth, your values, your principles and what you will pass on to your children and everyone you meet. It tells you in that place where your conscience must once have lived whether you are a hypocrite and a fool or whether something greater still lives within you.
Nineteen men pass through airport security. Eleven of them are stopped and questioned but then allowed to board. Several large passenger planes wind up hijacked and flown at high speed into enormous buildings. None of these men had shown previous capacity to accomplish this feat. These men were armed with box cutters. No jet fighters were scrambled to intercept these planes, although the authorities in charge of such actions knew immediately what was happening. Airport traffic controllers were ordered to destroy all recorded evidence of the event. Some of them physically broke the CD’s and scattered the pieces into different trash containers at the airports.
Within hours, three of the biggest buildings in the city, buildings designed to absorb the impact of the very planes which hit them, all crumbled into their own footprints at the speed of free fall. It was said that the fire, which burned below the melting point of steel, caused this to happen. No fire in history had previously accomplished such a thing, not once. Previous fires had burned hotter and longer, yet no building fell. Now, three have fallen in one day. Months later the wreckage burned white hot beneath the surface and clear cuts in support beams were photographed.
A passport from one of the hijackers appears on a city street undamaged. Cars are discovered at airports with flight training videos and Korans. Apparently the men who were deeply religious enough to give their lives to attack these buildings thought nothing of leaving their sacred texts behind. Some weeks later, seven of the alleged hijackers are found to be alive in their native countries.
Some days earlier some of these men were observed drinking and having lap dances in a Florida bar. This sort of behavior is not normal for such men as these. Around the same time, the ringleader of these men and some associates were observed by the FBI boarding a gambling boat belonging to Jack Abramoff. These men were tracked to Las Vegas and watched by the FBI, yet they passed through the airport security checkpoints. Even though eleven of them were stopped and questioned they still boarded.
On the day of the event several men were observed videotaping the attack as it happened. They were seen to be dancing and celebrating as well. The police stopped and arrested them. They were found to be Mossad agents. Some time later they were quietly released and returned to their home country with no reasons given. The men videotaping and celebrating had to have known about the attack in advance in order to have been in a position to film it. Members of the Bin Laden family; the man accused of masterminding the attack, were immediately flown out of the country. Bin Laden denied any connection to this attack. Direct evidence of this exists and no evidence of his admitting his involvement exists. All of this is fabrication and hearsay. No one can present such information other than one fabricated video that was proven false by the world’s leading forensic experts in Switzerland. Many insist it is true but no one has such evidence. Go look. Bring it to me.
As a result of this event, major wars have been launched. Over a million people have died with nearly another 5 million displaced. An investigation was launched into the event against the wishes of the president and vice president and rubber stamped with pre-drawn conclusions even though the evidence did not support these conclusions. The wreckage was gathered together and shipped overseas. No one was allowed to investigate it.
In every event... in New York City... in a Pennsylvania field... at The Pentagon... all of the evidence is contradictory. The amount of evidence on every level that directly refutes what we have been told fills thousands of pages. Meanwhile, the administration and the congress belligerently oppose any inquiry into the matter. People in government who have questioned the official story have been fired from their jobs or driven from office by the very party they are a member of. University professors are fired for discussing it. Major web sites composed of experts in their fields, are ignored and censured.
Casual investigation of who benefited and who engineered actions of global impact based on official 9/11 findings ALL lead to the same parties. It is incontrovertibly true that one organization, PNAC, called for an attack on American soil in order to facilitate what followed. Members of this organization held key positions in and around the present administration.
Therefore, here is what you must know, given that the official story is patently absurd. Anyone... anyone who promotes the official story; who accepts the official story, who oppresses those who doubt the official story, who does not question the official story, is involved or too stupid to pat their head and chew gum at the same time. Any presidential candidate who does not dispute the official story is a traitor to their nation and a tool of those who accomplished the attack.
It all comes down to 9/11. Everything that has happened has happened based on a lie. Everyone in government; in the media, in entertainment, in organized religion, in the public eye and in the public who accepts and promotes the official story is either a traitor or a tool. Everyone who does not stand forth and speak truth to power is a coward, a liar and complicit in mass murder. Everyone- everywhere can be measured according to this litmus test.
The government claims that the Twin Towers simply collapsed due to fire although an explosive form of super-thermite was later found in the dust. This photo shows that a great deal of explosive energy was released during the pulverization of the towers.
Are you confused by the different claims and explanations about the events of 9-11? If you are, you are certainly not alone. Whether you are new to the 9-11 truth movement or have been a skeptic since Day One, you have probably been confused more than once by the various claims and counter claims about what really happened.
For the average citizen the subject of 9-11 truth is bound to be confusing.
The U.S. government and mass media have relentlessly pushed their unproven version, which is not supported by the laws of physical science or the evidence. On the other hand, a slew of “9-11 truthers” promote a variety of contrary explanations. Truth seekers find themselves in a land of confusion. What’s one to believe?
The official version clearly fails to answer the most fundamentalquestions about 9-11, such as why the three towers fell. Even though the government’s seriously flawed explanation defies the laws of science it was nonetheless used to change the way we live and to instigate two wars of aggression in which hundreds of thousands of innocent people were killed.
Even when we realize that we have been deceived on a massive scale, it’s not easy to accept that the government has lied about 9-11. It’s very uncomfortable for an American to contemplate that their government would engage in a massive criminal cover-up and send thousands of Americans to fight and die in Afghanistan and Iraq based on nothing but a pack of lies.
When you discover that the U.S. government and mass media have indeed lied to us about 9-11, you realize that the whole “War on Terror” construct is nothing but a massive fraud. This means that the Bush and Obama administrations are criminal operations at the highest level of government.
PARTNERS IN CRIME - The fact that Barack Obama continued the criminal wars and surveillance programs started by George W. Bush indicates that Obama's campaign slogan "Change you can believe in" was a total lie. Five years later, he has not even closed Gitmo, something he could do with the stroke of a pen.
So, you see why 9-11 truth is a very painful subject to contemplate. It means either you believe the lies and support the fraudulent “War on Terror” or you basically divorce yourself from the federal government. This is certainly not an easy choice for any patriotic American.
Even if you have crossed that bridge and understand that the government is lying, the truth of 9-11 is not so easily found on the other side. The truth-seeker trying to make sense of the competing claims and understand who is responsible for 9-11 is likely to find this effort quite perplexing. There are different and contrary theories out there and they can’t all be true. So, how does one make sense of the different explanations?
First, one needs to realize that the 9-11 truth movement is full of disinformation agents whose mission is to confuse people. To understand why there is so much disinformation, we need to think like a perpetrator and understand that the people behind the 9-11 cover-up see the truth movement as an enemy that needs to be neutralized.
For the perpetrators of 9-11, the truth movement is only a serious problem when it gets too close to the truth. Their strategy to neutralize the truth movement employs several tactics: maligning the movement, confusing the issue, and attacking those who expose the truth.
As an investigative journalist who has researched 9-11 a great deal, I have personally seen how these tactics have been applied.
First, skeptics of the official version who raise serious questions about 9-11 are maligned as “conspiracy theorists” and, as George W. Bush told the United Nations, we should “never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th.”
The mainstream media, working hand-in-glove with the Zionist war party, has completely maligned and ignored the 9-11 truth movement. When the BBC interviewed me in June 2005 their firstquestion was, “Why are you the only American journalist who does not believe the official version of 9-11?”
I told them that if that were true it was probably because other journalists who questioned the official version had been fired.
Secondly, competing and contrary theories are promoted to confuse people about what caused the destruction at the World Trade Center.
The evidence indicates that sophisticated forms of super-thermite were used to pulverize the Twin Towers from the top down leaving nothing but steel and dust. In the dust chips of an explosive nano-composite of super-thermite were discovered by Dr. Steven E. Jones and an international team of scientists.
Fragments of the super-thermite explosive found in the dust of the demolished Twin Towers
Because this scientific discovery clearlyexposes the 9-11 deception the perpetrators have attacked it by promoting theories that claim that mini-nuclear bombs or unknown energy beam weapons are responsible for the destruction of the Twin Towers.
While these competing theories are not supported by the evidence they are useful for the perpetrators because they confuse people and create a division in the truth movement that can be exploited to attack the one theory that has been proven – the use of explosives and super-thermite in the demolition.
And thirdly, the perpetrators attack those truth seekers who get too close to the truth. In my opinion, this is why Dr. Steven E. Jones and I were both attacked within a period of three weeks during the summer of 2006. We were both viciously slandered and prosecuted. We lost our jobs and primary sources of income. I was actually brutally attacked by three heavily-armed undercover police at my home and then maliciously prosecuted on charges that I had assaulted them.
We are the only two 9-11 researchers that I know of who have been attacked for our work. The people who promote the competing theories which challenge the super-thermite theory apparently do not face any such threats.
I was, in fact, a working journalist when I was attacked at my home near Chicago yet not a single journalist or organization for the defense of journalists even contacted me about the brutal attack that left me TASERed with a broken elbow. The Chicago newspapers that reported the incident did so without even contacting me to get my side of the story.
The newspaper I wrote for, the supposedly patriotic American Free Press, suddenly fired me 6 weeks after the attack. I was set-up on a radio show and then accused of disloyalty. I was also accused of having filed false stories (although none were specified) and subsequently fired - after the paper had collected funds for my legal defense.
These then are the basic tactics that are used to neutralize the 9-11 truth movement: malign the movement, confuse the issue, and attack those who expose the truth. The strategy of the perpetrators is to use slander and disinformation to sow suspicion and doubt about those who have discovered the truth.
In this way the perpetrators try to marginalize the importance of the most crucial discoveries about 9-11. But it is the perpetrators and their disinformation agents who are fighting a losing battle because while they may temporarily delay their day of reckoning, in the end the truth will prevail.
Mariani 9-11 Case Continues
June 25, 2013
Ellen Mariani’s attorney, Bruce Leichty, filed two motions on June 20, 2013,directed to the Second Circuit Federal Court of Appeals.
It was in Iraq that I really felt that the media, generally, conspired to ignore the truth and the facts on the ground. Not ideas and opinions, but facts on the ground. - Iraq War photographer Gary Knight, April 2012
We live in a dirty and dangerous world. There are some things the general public does not need to know, and shouldn't. I believe democracy flourishes when the government can take legitimate steps to keep its secrets and when the press can decide whether to print what it knows. - Katharine Graham, former owner of the Washington Post in a speech to C.I.A. recruits entitled "Secrecy and the Press," 1988
Most Americans would agree that 9-11 changed the nation, especially the relationship between the citizen and the state. What a person thinks or feels about how America has changed in the 12 years since 9-11 depends very much on what a person believes - andknows - about the events of 9-11.
Roughly half the American population believes the government and media version of what happened on 9-11. If you truly believe what George W. Bush and Barack Obama have said about the terror atrocity then you probably support the things they have done as a result.
This would mean supporting the so-called “War on Terror” with the very costly U.S. invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as the military interventions in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and elsewhere. Defense spending since 2001 has more than doubled, going from $300 billion to more than $700 billion per year.
But, again, if you believe what Bush and Obama have said about the need to fight terrorism, then you probably think these wars and defense spending were necessary.
In the same post-9/11 train that gave us the “War on Terror” came the USA PATRIOT Act, the off-shore military detention facility in Guantanamo, Cuba, intrusive inspections of travelers, and the increased surveillance of the American people, their phone calls, and private communications. Again, if you believe the government story about 9-11 then you probably agree that such things are necessary for our security.
Does torture really make Americans more secure?
If, on the other hand, you are in the other half of the population thatdoes not believe the government version of 9-11 then you are also probably pretty skeptical about the reasons given for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. In this case, you probably also have very serious doubts and reservations about the PATRIOT Act, the full-body scans given to people at U.S. airports, and the massive collection of our phone data and Internet records by the NSA.
Are X-ray scans really necessary?
After all, a person who is skeptical of the government explanation of 9-11 is probably equally skeptical of the need to detain people for years on end in places like Gitmo where more than half the detainees are currently engaged in a hunger strike to protest their illegal detention. Many of these detainees are being force-fed, which is legally considered to be a form of torture.
If you are skeptical about what the government says about 9-11 then you are bound to be equally skeptical of the things the government has done based on its seriously flawed explanation of events.
If you are among the 40 percent of the American population that is not satisfied with the government explanation of 9-11 and believes there has been a cover up by the government, then you would probably agree that the government has intentionally deceived the American people and is involved in a massive fraud of historic proportions. In this case, you probably think that most of the things the government has done as a result of 9-11 are equally fraudulent.
The thing that separates these two groups of people: those who believe the government version and those who don’t, is really how much they know about 9-11. For example, five years after 9-11, in 2006, 43 percent of the American population was unaware that there was a third skyscraper that collapsed on 9-11: Larry Silverstein’s 47-story WTC 7.
Nearly half of population is unaware that the 47-story building known as WTC 7 collapsed into its own footprint in the late afternoon of 9-11. The same percentage believes there is no 9-11 cover-up or that al Qaida or Saddam Hussein carried out the terror attacks.
Likewise, about half the population believes that Saddam Hussein of Iraq was involved in 9-11 although there is no evidence to support this. This means that nearly half the American population really hasvery little understanding of what really happened on 9-11. The same percentage of the population that has no idea of what happened on 9-11 also believes that there has been no cover-up.
On the other hand, the number of people who are aware of the mysterious collapse of WTC 7 is about the same as the number of people who think there has been a cover-up. This means that the more people know about 9-11, the more likely they are to realize that the government has lied about what happened.
This is where my Solving 9-11 books make a real difference. These books contain the facts and information that clearly disprove the government version and reveal the real terrorists behind 9-11 - and their motivation for the attacks.
The Solving 9-11 books
Once you have read the Solving 9-11 books you will no longer be susceptible to the “War on Terror” propaganda because you will understand that 9-11 is a hoax meant to deceive the world. While the truth about 9-11 may be disturbing to some, it is certainly better to know the truth than to be deceived because to believe something that is not true is to be enslaved by a lie.
Something like 85 percent of the American military forces in Iraq believed that they were fighting because of Saddam Hussein’s involvement in 9-11. That is to say that most of the Americans fighting and dying in Iraq were acting on completely false information. Had they known that Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9-11 they may have made other choices about serving in Iraq. The same goes for the people who served in Afghanistan.
Knowing the truth about 9-11 gives you the ability to make better decisions about what you will do in the future. This is just as true for nations as it is for individuals. If the United States, as a nation, is to move ahead and make intelligent choices and policies it has to do so using the truth as its base. To continue to operate and create policies and wage wars based on a pack of lies about 9-11 can only harm the nation.
The sooner the deception of 9-11 is exposed on a large scale the sooner we can return to a normal and sane political state. I think most Americans would prefer the peaceful way of life we enjoyed prior to 9-11.
The Solving 9-11 books expose the deception that is at the heart of the massive fraud that has changed America – and the world. The books contain more than 11 years of research, much of it original, which makes it very hard to present in a short video of 5 or 10 minutes.
What I will try to do going forward is to present certain key elements of my research in a series of short videos. I hope in this way that I can bring the relevant facts and information to more people and hasten the day that we are all free of this awful deception that began on 9-11.
Good Video Summary of Israeli Role in 9-11
May 29, 2013
The following 14-minute video is an excellent summary of the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11. It touches on many of the key points that I explain in greater detail in the Solving 9-11 set of books. Although I am not mentioned in the video, I am the person who uncovered several of the links that it presents.
Israeli Prescience of 9-11 and the Fraudulent War on Terror
Updated May 23, 2013
Added information about Avraham Bendor working for Kroll/Greenberg, the security firm for the World Trade Center from 1993-2001
The "War on Terror" is a massive Zionist fraud based on the deception of 9-11 that will cost the United States more than $4 trillion at current best estimates. Nearly all of that money is borrowed - at interest. Understanding who is behind the "War on Terror" helps to understand who is behind 9-11, and why they carried out the false-flag terror atrocity that changed America.
The "War on Terror" fraud is designed to loot the American republic as it wages war on a constantly moving target. The very same people are behind both the Zionist "War on Terror" and the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11.
ARNON MILCHAN, a senior Israeli operative and nuclear trigger smuggler, made The Medusa Touch in 1978. The climactic scene of the movie is of a Boeing 747 crashing into a skyscraper.
SMUGGLER OF NUCLEAR TRIGGERS Arnon Milchan (center) is close friends of Israel's president Shimon Peres (left), the godfather of Israel's nuclear arsenal, and prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu (right). Netanyahu worked for Milchan during the time the triggers were smuggled to his company in Israel.
In Confidential, an Israeli biography of Arnon Milchan, he is described as "Israel's LAKAM agent Number One." The Israeli authors reveal that Milchan and Peres are "strategic partners" and "holders of some of Israel's most significant secrets." Chief among these secrets would certainly be how Israeli agents carried out 9/11 to kick-start the "war on terror." LAKAM is an acronym for Bureau of Scientific Relations, an Israeli intelligence agency then headed by spy-master Rafi Eitan (1981-1986). It collected scientific and technical intelligence abroad, particularly for Israel's nuclear program. It was reorganized in 1986 following the arrest of Jonathan Pollard.
Milchan's film was made in Britain and involved creating models of an airliner crashing into a building. One year later, in 1979, Isser Harel, the former head of Israeli intelligence, predicted that terrorists would strike America by attacking the tallest building in New York City. Five years later, two of Harel's senior agents obtained the security contract for the World Trade Center. If they are not the architects of the terrorism, why were senior Israeli agents so engaged in predicting and depicting the 9-11 attacks?
The Boston Marathon bombing is a bizarre case of terrorism for which no organization claimed responsibility. Although the FBI says that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, a 19-year-old Chechen Muslim immigrant, has admitted being involved, the confession was obtained before he had been read his Miranda rights. This is similar to the U.S. government claim that a Guantanamo detainee named Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has confessed to being the “mastermind of 9-11.” Confessions like these, obtained through torture or coercion, are not valid evidence.
There are significant contradictions with the FBI account linking the Tsarnaev brothers to the crime. The day after the bombing, for example, Richard DesLauriers, FBI special agent in charge of the investigation, said “both of the explosives were placed in a dark-colored nylon bag or backpack.” Video footage from the marathon, however, shows Dzhokhar carrying a light-colored backpack.
Like 9-11, the most suspicious thing about the Boston bombing is the lack of a logical motive. Terrorism is defined as the use of violence in the pursuit of political aims. With 9-11 and the Boston bombing there is no rational reason why anyone would commit such atrocities, except one: to blame the heinous crime on a targeted group. This suggests that 9-11 and the Boston bombing are cases of false-flag terrorism.
FAKE TERROR PLOTS
The FBI has set up many fake terror plots since 9-11. In an October 2011 article entitled “Government-Generated Plots,” Andrew P. Napolitano, a former Superior Court Judge (NJ), explained: “If you ask the leadership of the FBI… it will tell you that it has foiled about seventeen plots to kill Americans during the past ten years… The seventeen that were interrupted by the feds were created by them… They all have a common and reprehensible thread. They were planned, plotted, controlled, and carried out by the federal government itself.”
The first bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993 was apparently a similar operation with involvement by the FBI. In setting up the "terrorists" the FBI used Emad Salem, a former Egyptian army officer, who served as a highly-paid informant to help entrap the individuals charged with the crime.
After 9-11, the FBI, under the supervision of Asst. Attorney General Michael Chertoff, allowed crucial evidence from the crime scene, such as the structural steel, to be destroyed without being examined. Rather than properly investigating the crime the government blamed Osama Bin Laden without presenting evidence to prove its case. Bin Laden was convicted in the court of public opinion, which swung in favor of waging the “war on terror” and invading both Afghanistan and Iraq.
The FBI had extensive contact with the older Tsarnaev, Tamarlan, according to his mother. Zubeidat Tsarnaeva said her son had been under constant FBI surveillance for years: “He was controlled by FBI like for five – three, five years. They knew what my son was doing. They knew what actions and what the sites on Internet he was going. They used to come home, they used to come and talk to me. They used to tell me, you know, that they’re controlling his – they were telling me that he is a really extremist leader and they are afraid of him.”
The FBI contact with Tamarlan has led many to suspect that the Tsarnaev brothers have been framed. Given the history of government-generated plots there is good reason for such suspicion. But why is the FBI working to entrap Muslims? What purpose do these fake terror plots serve?
9-11 and the “war on terror” have profoundly changed the way Americans live and how they view the world. The question is, do Americans face a real and genuine threat of terrorism or is it all a hoax designed to instill fear and manipulate public opinion to support U.S. military interventions in the Muslim world?
THE ISRAELI REACTION TO 9-11
On 9-11, Ehud Barak, the former Israeli prime minister, called for “an operational, concrete war against terror” on BBC World television – before the towers even fell. On the day of the attacks, James Bennet of the New York Times asked Benjamin Netanyahu what the terror atrocity meant for relations between the United States and Israel. Netanyahu replied, "It's very good… Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy."
To understand the Israeli reaction to 9-11 we need to view the terror spectacle as an essential part of a pre-planned Zionist construct known as the “war on terror.” Netanyahu’s odd remark makes sense when we consider that 9-11 is the keystone of a strategy that Netanyahu has been pushing since 1979.
While most Americans view 9-11 as the beginning of the "war on terror," 9-11 is really the final piece of a Zionist strategy that was in development for more than two decades. The “war on terror” construct was born at an international conference organized by the Jonathan [Netanyahu] Institute in Jerusalem in July 1979.
Menachem Begin, the former Irgun leader who ordered the 1946 bombing of the King David Hotel, became prime minister in 1977. Two years later, Begin headed the committee that arranged the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism, an event designed “to launch an international propaganda offensive to promote and exploit the issue of 'international terrorism'," according to Philip Paull’s 1982 thesis “International Terrorism”: The Propaganda War.
"The propaganda 'blitz' originated in Jerusalem,” Paull wrote. “The conspiratorial network included present and former members of the Israeli and United States governments,” including George H.W. Bush, along with “seven hundred invited foreign journalists, influential friends of Israel, and top-ranking members of the Israeli military, diplomatic, and intelligence establishment.”
“Using the Jerusalem Conference as a fulcrum, the Jonathan Institute fabricated and helped spread misinformation about the worldwide terrorist threat," Paull wrote. The Netanyahu institute was founded by Benjamin Netanyahu and his father, Benzion, the founding chairman. Benzion Netanyahu articulated the purpose of the conference in his opening speech: “This conference was called to serve as the beginning of a new process - the purpose of rallying the democracies of the world to a struggle against terrorism and the dangers it represents.”
"This 'anti-terrorist' propaganda campaign was and is being conducted in a style reminiscent of wartime 'psychological warfare' by journalists serving as conduits and spreaders of misinformation originating in Jerusalem," Paull wrote. Spreading the propaganda from the Netanyahu institute began immediately in the mass media. Five days after the conference, the International Herald Tribune declared in its lead editorial, “The Issue is Terrorism.” Echoing his father’s call for a global war on terrorism, Benjamin Netanyahu wrote a series of books with titles like Fighting Terrorism and Terrorism: How the West Can Win.
ISRAELI PRESCIENCE OF 9-11
While Benjamin Netanyahu was pushing the propaganda campaign, a former head of Israeli intelligence was predicting a 9-11 type attack that would compel the United States to join Israel’s pre-planned “war on terror.”
In 1980, Isser Harel, the veteran Israeli intelligence chief, predicted a terror attack like 9-11 to Michael D. Evans, an American Zionist activist. As Evans wrote, “My last question was would terrorism ever come to America. ‘You have the power to fight it,’ he said, ‘but not the will. They have the will, but not the power. All of that will change in time. Yes, I fear it will come to New York and your tallest building, which is a symbol of your fertility.’”
Arnon Milchan, a senior Mossad operative who was later involved in the smuggling of nuclear trigger devices, made a film in 1978 that depicted how such an attack might occur. In Milchan’s Medusa Touchan airliner flies into a high-rise building exploding in a ball of fire. In 2000, Rupert Murdoch, Milchan’s business partner, made The Lone Gunmen, a television film in which a remotely-controlled airliner was flown into the World Trade Center. To film the sequence of the plane flying toward the World Trade Center Murdoch's crew actually used a helicopter to fly the approach to the Twin Towers in 2000. It would be very interesting to know who was involved in the filming of this scene which became real six months after the film aired in March 2001. I would suspect that this filming was actually part of the final planning for the 9-11 attacks.
Milchan is called "LAKAM Agent No. 1" in a recent Israeli biography. LAKAM is an acronym for Bureau of Scientific Relations, an Israeli intelligence agency that collected scientific and technical intelligence abroad, particularly for Israel's nuclear program. In the 1980s, when Milchan was involved with Benjamin Netanyahu in the illegal smuggling of nuclear triggers, LAKAM was being run by the Israeli spy-master Rafi Eitan.
The coincidence of the Netanyahu conference, Isser Harel’s uncanny prediction of what was to occur on 9-11, and Arnon Milchan’s film depicting the terror spectacle that befell the World Trade Center indicates that such an attack was being discussed and visualized at the highest level of Israeli intelligence in the late 1970s. The fact that veteran Mossad officers who had worked with Isser Harel for decades obtained the security contract for the World Trade Center in 1987 suggests there was a conspiracy afoot to make the Israeli ideation of 9-11 become reality.
As I describe in Solving 9-11 (“The Architecture of Terror”), two veteran Israeli intelligence agents, Peter Zvi Malkin and Avraham Bendor (a.k.a. Shalom) had obtained the security contract for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the agency that owned the World Trade Center) for a company called Atwell Security of Tel Aviv. Atwell Security was a company owned by Shaul Eisenberg, the China-based Mossad operative.
Zvi Malkin and Avraham Bendor had worked under Rafi Eitan and Isser Harel, the chief of the Mossad, on the kidnapping of Adolf Eichmann in Argentina in 1960. Two years later, as Harel began a covert campaign to kill German rocket scientists, he drafted operational units from the Shin Bet, headed by Zvi Malkin and Rafi Eitan, and one from the Mossad, headed by Yitzhak Shamir. In Operation Damocles, which began in August 1962, the Israeli agents working under Harel used letter bombs and kidnappings to kill German scientists and others.
Avraham Bendor (Shalom) and Rafi Eitan worked together on numerous criminal operations in the United States, including the 9-11 false-flag terror attacks.
Rafi Eitan and Bendor were involved in the theft of a large amount of weapons-grade uranium in the United States in 1968. They traveled with two other Israeli agents to a nuclear plant in Apollo, Penn., from where large amounts of weapons-grade uranium disappeared and were diverted to Israel. This smuggling of weapons-grade uranium from the United States would have directly involved Shimon Peres, the godfather of Israel’s nuclear arsenal.
Later, in 1985, the same group of agents was implicated in the smuggling of more than 800 nuclear triggers (krytrons) to Israel, using Arnon Milchan (the Mossad film maker) as the main connection and conduit for the smuggling. Benjamin Netanyahu worked for Milchan’s company at the time. In the same year the Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard was discovered working under Rafi Eitan. Eitan has always considered the United States to be an enemy of Israel: "I failed in the Pollard affair, just as I failed in other intelligence operations beyond enemy lines," Eitan said in an interview withYediot Aharonot in June 1997.
In all of these operations, including the attempt to obtain the security contract for the World Trade Center, the same small group of veteran Israeli terrorists/criminals is involved: Yitzhak Shamir, Shimon Peres, Isser Harel, Rafi Eitan, Peter Zvi Malkin, Avraham Bendor (Shalom), Shaul Eisenberg, Arnon Milchan, and Benjamin Netanyahu. Malkin and Bendor had officially retired when they tried to get the security contract, which was cancelled only after it was discovered that Bendor was using a false name and had been involved in the murder of Palestinians in 1984 while working as the head of Shin Bet under Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir.
After failing to secure the Atwell security contract for the World Trade Center, Shalom then went to work for Kroll Associates and Maurice Greenberg after being forced to resign as head of the Shin Bet in 1986 due to a scandalous murders two years earlier of Palestinians by Shin Bet agents. Kroll then obtained the security contract for the World Trade Center in 1993 and was responsible for security until 9-11.
Understanding the intellectual origins of the 9-11 plot and how it was essential to the realization of the Israeli strategy known as the “war on terror” helps to clarify the real motive for the crime that changed the world. Identifying the Israeli intelligence agents involved in the ideation and preparation of the 9-11 terror attacks exposes a small group of veteran Zionist criminals who have employed terrorism as a tool since the 1940s.
Judge's Son Worked for Defendant in 9-11 Litigation
May 22, 2013
“In the three years since 9-11, we've begun to understand that it's possible to know what happened without knowing what happened.” - New York Times, "The Public Knowledge of 9/11," September 11, 2004
For the past twelve years, the New York Times has utterly failed to investigate the events of 9-11. As the leading newspaper of New York City, the Times has actually played a key role in the 9-11 cover-up by concealing important facts and evidence that disprove the official version of events. Three years after the attacks the editorial board of the paper articulated its intention not to investigate 9-11 and to keep the public ignorant of what really happened saying, "we've begun to understand that it's possible to know what happenedwithout knowing what happened.”
The New York Times has maintained its position of ignoring the facts of 9-11 for 12 years. Its latest contribution to the 9-11 cover-up is a May 15 article entitled "Court Penalizes a Lawyer Over Slurs in a 9/11 Filing," written by Benjamin Weiser. This is an article about sanctions against 9-11 widow Ellen Mariani and her lawyer for their motion to the court. What the Times doesn't say with even one word is what the motions are about.
Benjamin Weiser is a veteran court reporter and certainly knows that the reader deserves to know what Mariani's motions were about, but there is nothing in the article to inform the reader of the essence of her motions.
Rather, Weiser emphasizes the "anti-Semitic" tone of the motion:
In its ruling on Wednesday, the panel cited Ms. Mariani’s second appeal, calling it frivolous because it persisted in making arguments that had been clearly rejected. But the judges, Peter W. Hall and Susan L. Carney, also noted that the appeal briefs featured “an escalating series of ad hominem attacks on opposing counsel and bombastic challenges to the integrity” of Judge [Alvin] Hellerstein.
They cited one brief which they said “consisted of little more than a series of offensive insinuations, unmistakably anti-Semitic, about Judge Hellerstein, his family members, their professional work and some of their personal charitable activities.”
THE REAL ISSUE
The essence of the Mariani motion deals with the appearance of a conflict of interest on the part of U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, the judge who handled all of the 9-11 litigation. There are other conflicts of interest presented in Mariani's motion, but I will focus here on the one concerning Judge Hellerstein.
Judge Hellerstein's son, Joseph Z. Hellerstein, has lived in Israel since 2001 where he works as a lawyer. As a lawyer, Joseph Hellerstein worked for a company called B.O.S. Better Online Systems Ltd.
This detail from Joseph Hellerstein's legal CV shows that hepersonally worked on a financial deal with B.O.S., an Israeli company owned by the same people who were key defendants in the 9-11 tort litigation, Boaz Harel and Edouard Cukierman.
At the time that he worked for B.O.S. the owners and directors of the company were the same men (Boaz Harel and Edouard Cukierman) who owned and controlled ICTS NV, the Israeli airport security/passenger screening company that was a key defendant in the 9-11 litigation. ICTS NV owned Huntleigh USA, which was directly responsible for passenger screening operations at Boston's Logan Airport on 9-11. In a proper 9-11 trial ICTS would have to answer questions such as how the terrorist hijackers got on the planes without being on the passenger lists. Thanks to Judge Hellerstein there was no trial for the 9-11 victims so ICTS will not have to answer any of the hard questions about what they did at Boston airport on 9-11.
Edouard Cukierman, Yair Shamir, and Boaz Harel are the key people behind Cukierman & Co., Catalyst Investments, B.O.S., and ICTS. Joseph Hellerstein was working directly for these men while they were defendants in the 9-11 litigation being managed by his father. Judge Hellerstein actually dismissed ICTS from the 9-11 litigation although the Israeli-owned company was responsible for passenger screening operations on 9-11. Yair Shamir is the son of the notorious Zionist terrorist/criminal leader, Yitzhak Shamir.
This conflict of interest is covered in the Code of Conduct for United States Judges (published at www.uscourts.gov) which states [see Canon 3(C)(1)(d)(ii)]:
A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances in which … the judge or the judge’s spouse, or a person related to either within the third degree of relationship, or the spouse of such a person is … acting as a lawyer in the proceeding…
Joseph Z. Hellerstein worked at two law firms in Israel since 2001.
Hellerstein now has his own law firm in Israel.
Hellerstein's legal CV indicates that he worked for B.O.S. (point 9), an Israeli company that was owned and controlled by the same people who were the key defendants in the 9-11 tort litigation being managed by his father in New York City.
Ezra Harel, the brother of Boaz Harel, owned a controlling interest in ICTS at the time of the 9-11 terrorist attacks. He owned 65 percent of ICTS when he supposedly died of a heart attack at the age of 53 in 2003. The Ezra Harel Family Estate retained majority ownership of ICTS as of 2004. Boaz Harel was a member of the supervisory board of ICTS from January 1, 1996, to November 12, 2001, and he was chairman of that board from March 2004 to August 2004.
Boaz Harel is also president and Managing Partner at Cukierman and Company. He was also a Member of the Board of Directors of Better Online Solutions (“BOS”), an Israeli company, from May 2003 to February 2004.
Mr. Boaz Harel is the President and Senior Partner at Catalyst Investments L.P. ... Mr. Harel was a Co-Managing Director of Leedan International Holdings B.V. From December 1993 to December 1997, he served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Leedan Business Enterprise Ltd. Mr. Harel worked in Leedan’s New York office from June 1996 to January 2001.
In 1990, he co-founded Mashik- Research & Systems for Business Development Ltd. Mr. Harel also served as Consultant to ICTS International N.V.
Mr. Harel served as the Chairman of ICTS USA (1994), Inc. He also served as the Chairman and Member of the Supervisory Board of ICTS International N.V. from March 2004 to August 2004. Prior to this, Mr. Harel was a Member of the Supervisory Board of ICTS from January 1, 1996 to November 12, 2001.
From May 2003 to February 2004, he was a Member of the Board of Directors of BOS - Better Online Solutions Ltd. and also a Member of the Board of Directors of its subsidiary, Boscom Ltd.
These connections clearly show that Joseph Hellerstein was working for people who were defendants in the 9-11 tort litigation at the time his father was managing that process. There is no question that this relationship presents a conflict of interest on the part of Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein in the 9-11 litigation in which not a single victim's case ever went to trial. The New York Times, however, does not want the public to know about the Zionist connections to 9-11 and the cover-up so it ignores them completely and calls the Mariani motion that addresses them "anti-Semitic."
It should be noted that Judge Susan Laura Carney, who ruled to punish the victim for pointing out the blatant conflict of interest, is married to Lincoln Caplan, a member of the editorial board of theNew York Times. Lincoln Caplan is a son of the B'nai B'rith, the Jewish (Zionist) order of Freemasons that controls the Anti-Defamation League and Hillel. Both of Caplan's grandfathers were members of the Horeb Lodge of New Haven. The New York Times is also owned by a leading family of Jewish Freemasons belonging to the B'nai B'rith. The B'nai B'rith is an exclusive secret society only for Jews to which many lawyers and judges belong. Such secret societies breed corruption and conspiracies because the members have sworn an oath of secrecy and loyalty to support and protect other members of the order. The B'nai B'rith is also exclusively Zionist in its ideology.
Updated May 3, 2013 Added weight of piece (255 lbs) and comments on NYPD rope story
The discovery of a piece of a 'landing gear' from a Boeing 767 in a narrow space between two buildings near the World Trade Center is a mystery. What aircraft is the piece from and how did it get there are two of the first questions that need to be answered.
The 4 to 5 foot long piece of landing gear with rope strung through it was found in an 18-inch wide alley between 51 Park Place and 50 Murray Street. The location of the piece and the rope suggest that the piece was lowered into place from above.
The location of the landing gear is about 4 blocks Northeast of the South Tower.
A landing gear from the airplane that struck the South Tower supposedly landed on a building on Park Place although photographs of the part in situ (as it was found) and the damage to the building have not been seen. The alley where the piece was found runs crosswise to the trajectory of the landing gear.
A piece of landing gear on display at the New York State Museum in Albany. This piece is said to have been found in the basement of a building on Park Place although no photographs of the piece showing it as it was found have been shown to the public. This means that the piece crashed through at least 5 floors before landing in the basement. Why would the photographs of the damaged building and piece in situ be withheld?
The white-hot burning piece seen here is thought to have hit the building on Park Place. The fact that it is burning white-hot and leaving a dark trail indicates that it is burning at an extremely hot temperature. This object has the characteristics of burning uranium and may be the warhead from the missile that was carried in a pod beneath the plane. It was apparently fired just before impact to open up the building and detonate the explosives that had been placed on the floor. Is the piece of landing gear on display in Albany really this object? Why would it be burning white-hot? For more on this read my article "The 'Huge Bullet Hole' in the South Tower and Analysis of Missile Evidence."
The discovery of a piece of Boeing landing gear in an empty space between two buildings near the World Trade Center raises a number of questions. The suspicion that the piece had been planted was raised in the earliest reports of the discovery. The New York police have admitted that it may very well have been lowered into the space:
"We are also looking at the possibility that it was lowered by a rope," said Police Commissioner Ray Kelly. "We are not ruling it out...there’s a rope that is intertwined in the part itself." NBC New York reports that Kelly noted that "there were no marks on the buildings indicating the piece hit the walls on the way down. 'It would have had to fall down at a certain angle,' [he] said."
It should be noted that this piece is probably quite heavy and dense and would have been traveling with a great deal of inertia behind it. The alley that it was found in is roughly perpendicular to the direction the piece would have been flying if it came from the plane that struck the South Tower. This means that it would have had to hit the back wall of the Murray Street building to lose its forward momentum, which would have most likely broken the wall. As Police Commissioner Kelly says, "there were no marks on the buildings."
There are a number of questions that need to be answered about this piece of landing gear:
What aircraft did it come from? Are there any time-tracked numbered parts that would identify the aircraft it is from?
How did it get into the tight space between the building without leaving significant damage and marks as it came flying into the building with great momentum?
Who will take charge of the investigation? The New York Police Department or the F.B.I.?
Will this discovery result in the F.B.I. releasing the photographs of the 9-11 damage that occurred to buildings on Park Place? What objects from the aircraft caused the damage and where are the photographs of them?
According to the Newsday article, the aircraft part has been identified as part of a wing flap control system. Boeing officials said the piece was part of a flap actuation support structure from a Boeing 767.
Newsday reported that the NYPD "clarified" why a piece of rope was found on the flap support. When police first responded to reports of the wreckage last week they used the rope to move it to look for a serial number or other identifiers, officials said. The piece reportedly weighs 255 pounds (about 116 kg). How could a NYPD police officer even think that he could move such a massive piece? Would that not be tampering with evidence at a crime scene? Is this just a convenient cover story to explain the presence of the rope?
Question: How is it that the police commissioner did not know this story about the rope when he made his comments to the press? He told the press, "We are also looking at the possibility that it was lowered by a rope."
The Newsday article, like others before it, says it is impossible to say for certain from which plane the 5-foot-tall piece came from. Videos of the south tower being hit during the attack showed a fiery explosion and an ejection of debris that appeared to go a few blocks north of Ground Zero.
Question: Which plane? 51 Park Place is several hundred meters from the Twin Towers. The location of the piece on Park Place is about 450 meters (1,476 feet) from the nearest wall of the former South Tower and about 350 meters (1,148 feet) from the North Tower. It is, therefore, highly unlikely, if not impossible, that this piece came from the plane that struck the North Tower. It did not bounce back from the building 1,000 feet nor was it thrown that far by the explosive demolition of the tower. If this piece came from either plane it must have come from the plane that struck the South Tower.
The Newsday article concluded saying that once sifting is completed the NYPD's emergency services unit will remove the flap support and keep it at the department's property storage facility, said spokesman Paul Browne.
Question: Will there not be a complete forensic examination of this piece to determine which aircraft it came from? If not, why not? Why have the time-tracked parts on the other pieces of aircraft found near the World Trade Center not been shown to the public? Are we to assume that the time-tracked parts have not been examined to determine which aircraft they were installed on and when?
On C-SPAN, Senator John McCain (R-AZ) claimed to be ignorant of the well-documented free-fall collapse of the 47-story WTC 7 building on 9-11. It is simply unacceptable for a U.S. senator like John McCain to plead ignorance about the essential facts of what happened on September 11, 2001.
The Black Ops Murder of the Philip Marshall Family
February 25, 2013
Philip Marshall is a retired United Airlines pilot, he’s written a couple of books about 9/11, most recently The Big Bamboozle. He was a former associate of the CIA/DEA informant Barry Seal, the notorious CIA cocaine smuggler, and if you think Phillip Marshall killed himself and his two children as the police are trying to claim; well, I don’t know…you need to go back to school. - Kevin Barrett ininterviewwith Wayne Madsen, February 19, 2013
Former National Security Agency officer Wayne Madsen went to the scene of the crime in Murphys, California, and is “100 percent certain” that 9/11 investigator and author Philip Marshall and his two children were killed in a black ops hit. Madsen’s conclusion is that the cover story – an alleged murder/suicide – is transparently absurd. Madsen explained his findings in an interview with Kevin Barrett on February 19. The Madsen interview can be heard at:
The Madsen interview sheds some light on the connections between the Colombian drug smuggling network and 9-11. The Colombian drug network involved the Israeli military along with the Bush and Clinton families. More on the Israeli/Colombian connections with 9-11 can be found in "The Planes of 9-11", the second chapter of Solving 9-11.
Philip Marshall and his children, Macaila (14) and Alex (17), and their dog, were murdered at their home in Murphys, California, in what certainly appears to be another black ops murder/suicide like the killing of Jason Todd Ready and his family in Gilbert, Arizona, on May 2, 2012. In such cases the dead victim is blamed for the murders although no evidence is presented to support the charge. In the Ready case the local police were prevented from entering the house/crime scene until they obtained a warrant. The search and seizure warrant was only signed at 10:46 that night, many hours after the mass killing, giving the federal agents on the scene: the Joint Terrorism Task Force, FBI, and ATF, plenty of time to clean up.
Philip Marshall was a former pilot who had inside information having worked with the DEA and CIA. He had worked as a pilot for Adler Berriman "Barry" Seal, one of the biggest drug smugglers in U.S. history. Marshall had written three books and was writing his fourth when he was killed. His latest book is The Big Bamboozle: 9-11 and the War on Terror(2012).
Adler Berriman "Barry" Seal (July 16, 1939 – February 19, 1986) was a drug smuggler and aircraft pilot who flew covert flights for the Central Intelligence Agency and the Medellín Cartel. He became a government informant and was murdered outside his halfway house in Baton Rouge.
The Marshall house (Point A) at 1259 Sandalwood Drive in Murphys is located on a slope at the very edge of the Forest Meadows subdivision. There is no perimeter fence and the rear of the house was easily accessible from the wilderness area behind it. This may be how the killers gained access to the Marshall house on the night of January 31 without being noticed by the neighbors.
Judy Wood's Blatant Misrepresentation of 9-11 Facts
February 21, 2013
Judy Wood was on the John Moore Radio Show on February 20, 2013. I listened to the 42-minute long show, which is archived on YouTube and can be listened to here:
There are three fundamental aspects of the 9-11 evidence that Ms Wood completely and intentionally misrepresents:
1. The amount of steel left in the rubble;
2. The nature of the active thermitic material found in the dust;
3. The temperature of the dust.
About the steel that remained at Ground Zero, Wood dismisses it saying there were only "some pieces of steel here and there." Later, when asked by Moore about the steel that was shipped to China, Wood replies, "What steel?"
She then adds that the trucks leaving the site were not carrying steel, but dirt, which she claims was being trucked in to Ground Zero, and out again. There was, according to Ms Wood, "very little debris" left at the World Trade Center. This is all pure nonsense, of course, as is her digression about Hurricane Erin being "just off the coast of Manhattan."
THE TRACK OF HURRICANE ERIN (2001) - Erin, a tropical storm/hurricane, did not even come close to Manhattan. It passed Bermuda and moved away from the strong high pressure zone over the Eastern United States.
There were, in fact, hundreds of thousands of tons of steel left in the rubble pile, which was huge. The basements of the Twin Towers were 7 levels deep. One junkyard alone processed 250,000 tons of steel from the rubble. The photographs from the site clearly disprove Wood's statement about there only being "some pieces of steel here and there."
Dust and steel was all that was left, according to one of the contractors who received steel from the World Trade Center.
Secondly, Ms Wood misrepresents the nature of the thermitic material that was found in the dust. Dr. Steven E. Jones of BYU discovered fragments and chips of a bi-layered active (i.e. explosive) thermitic coating in which the ultrafine particles of aluminum and iron oxide were combined in a nano-scale thermitic compound, like super-thermite.
Furthermore, Wood wrongly compares the reaction of the nanocomposite of thermitic material with a typical thermite reaction. The nature of the reaction is very different when the material is mixed at the nanoscale. She and Pete Santilli ask where are the white sparks? There were visible thermite reactions on 9-11, but the explosive super-thermite coating would not have reacted like "a sparkler", as Ms Wood expects.
A THERMITE REACTION certainly appears to be occurring at this corner of the South Tower, shortly before collapse, where a very bright white spot on the end of a fallen column is producing a whitish smoke. (Source - The White Flames of Thermite)
2 The aluminum and iron oxide found in the active thermitic material were combined in a bi-layered coating that exploded when heated to 430 degrees C. The ultrafine particles of aluminum and iron oxide in this explosive material were part of a highly energetic sol-gel coating.
It was not, as Ms Wood said, bits of aluminum and iron oxide sitting in the dust by themselves. The ultrafine particles in the chips found by Dr. Jones had been mixed and combined in a sol-gel thermitic coating - and were found in that condition. When heat (about 430 degrees C) was applied to these fragments or chips they exploded in an explosive exothermic reaction that released more energy per mass than the other leading explosives used in demolition.
Thirdly, Ms Wood challenged a caller who described the dust clouds of 9-11 being "pyroclastic". The word pyroclast is derived from the Greek words for "fire" and "broken in pieces". Eyewitnesses to the demolition of the towers, such as William Rodriguez, who was beneath a fire truck when the dust hit him, said the dust was very hot.
Judy Wood, however, misrepresents the dust as being cool. Later, she says "the process wasn't high heat." The USGS survey of the dust, however, shows that the dust contained a very large amount of iron in the form of tiny droplets of molten iron, known as iron-rich spheres. These droplets could have only been formed by the extreme heat energy released during the demolition of the Twin Towers. The heat was so great that parts of some steel beams or columns showed evidence of having beenvaporized. The thermitic material itself would have contributed super-intense heat and molten iron to the equation. The iron spheres found in the dust had been in the molten state only seconds before they flowed in the pyroclastic clouds that rolled through Lower Manhattan. Wood's statement that the process was not "high heat" is clearly proven false by the evidence.
An iron-rich sphere from the USGS survey of the dust. The dust clouds that accompanied the demolition of the World Trade Center were indeed "pyroclastic" since they contained a large amount of molten metal that was very hot.
Judy Wood's misrepresentation of the evidence is intentional and seems to be designed for one purpose: to confuse the public about the nature of the thermitic material found in the dust and how it caused the pulverization of the 220 concrete floor slabs and the steel pans that held them.
Wood says that a new word, "dustification", is necessary to explain what happened to the World Trade Center when it was demolished. I prefer the old word "pulverize", which means to reduce to powder or dust. This is, after all, exactly what the active thermitic coating did to the concrete floors of the World Trade Center - and everything on them.
Sources and Recommended Reading:
"The White Flames of Thermite" by Christopher Bollyn, April 21, 2006
DENIED: 9-11 Widow's Petition to U.S. Supreme Court
Updated February 19, 2013
The petition of 9-11 widow Ellen Mariani to the U.S. Supreme Court has been denied.
I received the following notice today:
2/19/2013 -- The Ellen Mariani Legal Defense Fund has been informed by Bruce Leichty, Ellen Mariani's attorney, that the Supreme Court has denied the petition of Ellen Mariani as of 2/19/2013. No explanation has been received to date, nor would it be customary any explanation to be provided. The docket entry shows that Justice Alito did not take part in the consideration of the petition, meaning that Justice Sotomayor apparently did take part, despite Mrs. Mariani's disclosure that Justice Sotomayor had been part of a panel at the 2nd Circuit sitting on a motion relating to the case.
As of this time, there has still been no ruling from the Second Circuit on whether sanctions will be imposed on Mrs. Mariani and Mr. Leichty.
Mrs. Mariani and Mr. Leichty convey their sincere thanks to the Committee members and particularly Vincent Gillespie, Secretary-Treasurer, for their support, without which this attempt could not have been made. We are extremely gratified by the many expressions of support, both financially and otherwise, we received from backers of the Legal Defense Fund.
The cause of 9/11 truth continues, despite this significant setback. May the groundswell increase in other ways. Please keep Mrs. Mariani in your thoughts as she and her attorney now must face what will be acrimonious personal attacks and an assault on Mrs. Mariani's recovery rights in New Hampshire probate court.
BACKGROUND TO MARIANI APPEAL Ellen Mariani’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court has been filed. The petition can be read by clicking here. The U.S. Supreme Court docket can be reviewed by clicking here. The first response from the court is scheduled to occur on Christmas Eve, December 24, 2012. MARIANI APPEAL TO U.S. SUPREME COURT - The Ellen Mariani Legal Defense Fund Committee raised the funds needed to file the Mariani petition with the United States Supreme Court.
A government “compensation fund” would pay off most families of 9/11 victims, preventing them from ever suing anyone for what happened to their loved ones.
And those who didn’t take the money would be pressured into accepting out-of-court settlements. Everyone would be kept quiet with gag orders and non-disclosure clauses, and the truth about 9/11 would never come out in a courtroom. Brilliant.
And it worked perfectly – except for Ellen Mariani.
The widow of Louis Neil Mariani, a passenger on Flight 175, which is alleged to have flown into the south tower of the World Trade Center, has been fighting to get to the truth about what happened to her husband that day.
Most have taken the money and gone away. Mariani is the last family member still fighting in the courts...
A press release about her plan to get a Supreme Court review can be read here.
Mariani lost her husband, Neil Mariani, on 9-11. She was the first 9-11 relative to file a wrongful death lawsuit. All of the 9-11 wrongful death cases were settled out of court. Not a single 9-11 family who wanted to have a trial to determine who was accountable for their loss had their day in court. Every case was settled in out-of-court agreements that left every 9-11 relative gagged. Nobody can talk about anything.
Mariani, an outspoken fighter for 9-11 truth, was removed from her own lawsuit by lawyers who were actually working for the airlines she was trying to sue. Mariani is now trying to take her case to the U.S. Supreme Court. Mariani's case shows how the judge, Alvin K. Hellerstein, and her lawyers had blatant conflicts of interest and colluded against her.
Is this United Airlines Flight 175 - or is it a drone?
There is a great deal of disinformation about the terror attacks of 9-11. Disinformation is a tool of the enemy of truth. The purpose of disinformation is to confuse the public about what really happened by injecting red herrings into the discussion in the same way that false, i.e. non-existent, aircraft confused air traffic controllers on 9-11. The false aircraft were inserted into the radar screens as part of a NORAD drill with Canada. Because the drill also involved fake hijackings, during the crucial first minutes of the attacks the air traffic controllers were confused about what was real and what was fake.
In the same way, the 9-11 truthseeker can be as confused as the air traffic controllers because it is difficult to discern the truthful theory from the fictitious. When people are made to choose between competing theories which they cannot prove for themselves they become unsure of what they know and often give up their active quest for the truth. This is, after all, what disinformation is meant to do.
One of the red herrings that has confused the 9-11 discussion is the notion that there were no planes that hit the World Trade Center on 9-11. In spite of a great deal of evidence that planes did hit the towers, this false argument has been pushed by disinformation agents for years. They argue that the images of the planes were either inserted into the video footage or were holographic images projected into space.
The truth is that thousands of people saw the planes hitting the towers and the second plane was photographed by several news networks. Furthermore, several parts of the planes went through the buildings and landed several blocks away. An aircraft engine from the South Tower landed on Murray Street while a piece of landing gear from the North Tower landed on the corner of Rector and West Streets.
Part of an unidentified aircraft engine fell on Murray Street.
Part of the landing gear from the plane that struck the North Tower landed near the corner of West and Rector Streets.
The aircraft parts that landed on the streets of Lower Manhattan are solid evidence of the aircraft that struck the towers. The problem is that the F.B.I. did not examine the individual numbered components of the engine and landing gear in order to prove to the public that the parts came from the aircraft that are said to have hit the towers, namely American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175.
There can only be one explanation why the F.B.I. did not use the time-tracked parts of the engine and landing gear to identify the aircraft they came from: they are not from the planes that are said to have hit the towers.
ATTACK OF THE DRONES
So, if the planes that hit the Twin Towers were not Flight 11 and Flight 175, what were they? As Dave von Kleist pointed out in his video In Plane Site,the plane that hit the South Tower looked very much like a Boeing 767 refueling tanker that had a missile pod attached below the fuselage. If this was in fact a specially modified Boeing 767 tanker, it was probably a remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) being flown by a ground pilot in the same way that U.S. Predator drones are flown by pilots halfway around the world.
TIME's recent cover story points out that the Predator drone is "the brainchild of a former Israeli Air Force engineer" but fails to mention that Boeing aircraft can also be flown remotely.
In 1984, NASA engineers flew this Boeing 720 using a ground pilot in a crash test.
If a Boeing 720 could be flown remotely in 1984 the same technology could have been used to fly un-manned 767s into the Twin Towers in 2001.
If the planes that struck the World Trade Center were indeed 767 tanker drones, the questions that need to be answered are:
Who could have made them and where were they made?
Who flew them and where were they being flown from?
Where were they launched from on 9-11?
As I point out in "The Planes of 9-11", the second chapter of Solving 9-11, the Israeli military had a company with facilities in the United States for converting 767 tanker aircraft. The Israelis also had advanced drone technology they had originally gotten from the United States:
After the Vietnam War, the United States reduced spending on RPAs [Remotely Piloted Aircraft] and UAVs [Unmanned Aerial Vehicle] and defense in general. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, there were practically no major Air Force RPA or UAV programs.A turning point came in the early 1980s as Israel successfully deployed a number of different unmanned systems that had been developed in the 1970s.The watershed moment came in the Bekaa Valley in Lebanon in 1982.In a carefully planned and coordinated operation, Israeli forces used unmanned systems to provide intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) and to activate Syrian air defense systems, allowing manned aircraft and surface-to-surface missiles to destroy the air defenses.
After the Bekaa Valley campaign, the United States began to purchase Israeli unmanned systems, such as the Pioneer, and to develop new systems.
"Israel is one of the first states to develop and use remotely piloted vehicles and unmanned aerial vehicles," according to the authors of The Diffusion of Military Technology and Ideas(Stanford University Press, 2003). "Israeli firms remain the world leaders in this technology..."
While we know that the Israelis had the capability to produce 767 tanker drones in the United States in 2001, so did NASA and the U.S. Department of Defense. The Israelis, however, are the more likely culprits because the Israelis and their Zionist supporters are found at every crucial point of the 9-11 operation and subsequent cover-up. The consistency of Israeli involvement in 9-11 strongly suggests that it was an Israeli-engineered false-flag terror operation.
Furthermore, in the unlikely scenario that the 767 drones were made and flown by Americans, it would be very hard to maintain operational secrecy. The evidence indicates that the terror attacks of 9-11 were not an "inside job" but rather a well-planned terror operation carried out by foreigners that had gotten inside the American system.
While the footprints of the Israelis are all over 9-11 they are not the only foreigners who are involved. British and Canadians are also deeply involved in the events of 9-11. British engineering companies AMEC and Bovis Lend Lease were key players in the clean up effort at the World Trade Center and AMEC was the contractor who had renovated the section of the Pentagon that was hit on 9-11.
CANADIAN COMMANDERS AT NORAD
While the NORAD war games confused the air traffic controllers on 9-11, deep under Cheyenne Mountain in Colorado the NORAD commanders on 9-11 were both Canadians, as I pointed out in my 2003 article "Cover-Up: The 9-11 Commission":
However, rather than getting approval from Rumsfeld, two Canadian officers, serving as NORAD directors on the morning of 9-11, approved the fighters’ launch according to the Aviation Week article. Capt. Michael H. Jellinek, a British-born Canadian officer was serving as NORAD command director and another Canadian, Maj. Gen. Eric A. Findley was NORAD’s director of operations. Findley, positioned at NORAD headquarters in Colorado’s Cheyenne Mountain Air Force Station for the Vigilant Guardian exercise “quickly approved the fighters’ launch,” according to the article. While NORAD has been faulted for its failures on 9-11, it should be noted that it was the Canadian officer Jellinek who was NORAD’s “director of plans, requirements and readiness” on Sept. 11, 2001.
The British-born Canadian Jew Michael Jellinek was commanding NORAD operations in Cheyenne Mountain on 9-11. Jellinek's father Erich, from Vienna, wound up fighting with the British in World War II and serving on the War Crimes Investigative Division.
There are two possible answers to the question about where the 767 drones were launched from on 9-11. Either they were launched from a secret location in the northeastern section of the United States or they flew in from a Canadian base, perhaps one of the defunct bases that was reactivated for the mission. This is not to say that this was a Canadian-designed attack on the United States but that the territory of Canada was used by the real terrorists of 9-11.
This map shows the active Canadian bases along the border of New York and New England. There are also many defunct bases that are not shown.
Here it needs to be noted that Canada is not a independent republic like the United States. Canada is a sovereign state ruled by the Queen of England. The Canadian defense department, for example, is headed by a Deputy Minister of National Defense, who is appointed by the Queen. This is the same queen who gave awards to Commanders Jellinek and Findley for their actions on 9-11. While their actions did nothing to mitigate the horror of 9-11, Findley and Jellinek were given awards by the Queen of England. How much sense does that make? Were they rewarded for allowing the attacks to succeed?
To put this into its proper historical context one needs to remember that 200 years ago the United States and Britain were at war and that British Canada was a big part of the fight. It was during the war of 1812-1814 that British forces burned down the U.S. Capitol. Canada remained under the British crown as it is today. The British elite have never been big supporters of American independence as the snide comments from Piers Morgan about the U.S. Constitution reveal.
The symbol of 1 Wing HQ based in Kingston, Ontario, shows that Canadian forces are under the British Crown. The 1 Wing base at Kingston is the closest to New York City, a mere 274 miles (442 km) by plane.
In doing research for an article about the Canadian connection to 9-11, I tried to contact Jellinek and Findley. Jellinek is the son of a Jew from Vienna named Erich Jellinek who wound up fighting with the British in World War II. I was not able to reach Jellinek for this article but did get through to Eric Findley in Wilmot, Nova Scotia. He said that I caught him "flat-footed" when I got him on the phone so I offered to send him questions by email, which he agreed to. The following is our email exchange:
From: Christopher Bollyn Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2013 Subject: Note from Bollyn
Dear Mr. Findley,
I am an American journalist working on an article about the Canadian connection to 9-11. I would like to ask you a few questions about your role as director of combat operations at NORAD on 9-11. I will send them to you tomorrow.
From: Christopher Bollyn To: Eric Findley Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2013 Subject: Questions from Bollyn
Dear Mr. Findley,
There are many questions about what happened on 9-11 and what role the war games and drills being played had on the failure to intercept the attack planes.
As director of combat operations, you might be able to shed some light on these matters.
Was your role at NORAD on 9-11 the first time you had played such a high-level role in a NORAD exercise?
In retrospect, was there anything that you could have done differently that might have changed the outcome? For example, is there anything you might have done that could have hastened the military response and facilitated an interception by fighter aircraft? Why did fighter aircraft fail to intercept any of the attacking planes?
Was the plane said to be Flight 93 shot down over Shanksville?
Do you think the Vigilant Guardian drill and/or other exercises confused the scene and prevented a quick and effective response by the U.S. and/or Canadian aircraft?
Do you think that the aircraft that hit the Twin Towers may have been remote controlled 767 drones that were painted to look like civilian aircraft?
Were Canadian military bases actively involved in the NORAD drills on 9-11?
Thank you for your consideration of these questions.
From: Christopher Bollyn To: Eric Findley Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 Subject: Question from Bollyn
Dear Mr. Findley,
I hope you received my first email. My questions are for an article about the Canadian connection to 9-11.
Could you tell me who was the Deputy Minister of National Defence in Canada when you served during the NORAD drill on September 11, 2001? Was it Jim Judd? To whom did you report to?
If the planes that attacked the Twin Towers were drone aircraft (RPA), which is certainly a possible explanation given the available evidence, then the key question to be answered is: where were they launched from and who prepared them?
If the planes were, in fact, 767 RPA aircraft, there are really only two possibilities where they could have come from: either the drones were prepared and launched in the United States or they were launched from a base/airport in Canada. New York and New England have long borders with Canada, after all.
Would you agree that if the attack planes were RPA Boeing aircraft drones that they could have been launched from Canada? This is not to say that they were drones or that they were launched from Canada, but if they were drones, is it not possible that they originated in Canada?
Thank you for your consideration of these sticky questions, but they are questions that have to be answered.
Findley responded on February 7:
Re: Question from Bollyn From: Eric Findley Mr. Bollyn,
I have reviewed the questions from this and a previous e-mail. I am not answering these questions. Please do not contact me by any means.
Eric Findley doesn't want to talk about his role at NORAD on 9-11.
Eric Findley may not want to talk to me about his actions on 9-11 and how the NORAD drill confused air traffic controllers and delayed the military response to the attacks, but he cannot simply retire to Nova Scotia and remain silent. Three thousand people died on 9-11 and the NORAD drill and its commanders clearly played a crucial role in the events of that day. Findley, Jellinek, and others were involved in military operations that facilitated the terror attacks of 9-11 and they have an obligation to the victims and their families, and to history, to explain what they did, and what they should have done to thwart the attacks.
The Thermite Argument
January 28, 2013
Kendra Blewitt of San Francisco sent me "The Thermite Argument," an excellent essaywhich explains very well the evidence of Thermite in the demolition of the World Trade Center. As Blewitt wrote:
In my opinion the thermite argument is so strong that it serves as a sort of litmus test as to who is real and who is working for the perpetrators... The thermite argument is what they fear, because it is so strong.
The hot dust of the demolished Twin Towers contained large amounts of active thermitic material and tiny droplets of molten iron, a by-product of a thermitic reaction. This evidence proves that a highly sophisticated form of super-thermite was used to pulverize the towers, an act of mass murder that killed several thousand people.
The Thermite Argument by Kendra Blewitt
It is not just probable opinion that three World Trade Center buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. It is a rock-solid empirical truth that this happened.
There are a number of strong arguments that explosives brought down the WTC buildings, not fire as claimed:
(a) Steel framed buildings have been in existence for a hundred years and not on one single occasion in all that time has fire caused such a building to collapse.
(b) The buildings fell much faster than they would have if the official "pancake" theory were true. They fell at close to freefall acceleration, which could only happen if there was no resistance from below as the mass above came down floor by floor; and this is what you would expect from controlled demolition, whereas the pancake theory cannot account for this.
(c) The buildings collapsed neatly into their own footprints, which would be unlikely by the "pancake" theory.
(d) Heavy beams of steel that weighed tons were sent flying perpendicular to the two tallest buildings at speeds of 50 mph, which the "pancake" theory cannot explain.
(e) Eyewitnesses heard explosions. Reliable eyewitnesses such as firemen heard these explosions.
(f) "Squibs" can be seen on film taken of the two tallest buildings as they fell. (Squibs are solid particles shooting out of the building like puffs of smoke.) Controlled demolitions often produce such squibs, however they are hard to explain by the pancake theory.
(g) Evidence was destroyed contrary to both law and common sense when the steel support beams found in the rubble were hastily sent to Asia to be melted down as scrap metal. If explosives had been used, an examination of these steel beams from the rubble would have been able to prove it, meanwhile it was important for firemen to know what had happened so that in the future they would know whether it was dangerous to enter tall steel buildings in order to put out fires. It is hard to see why these steel beams were hastily shipped to Asia to be melted down unless it was to destroy the evidence they contained.
Each of the above is a good argument, and the fact that there are so many good arguments makes each one of them stronger. However there is an argument that is stronger than the sum total of all of these, namely the thermite argument. The thermite argument is completely irrefutable.
The active thermitic material found in the dust of the World Trade Center releases more energy per gram than any other explosive used in demolition.
The thermite argument is like a three-in-one Trinity. The three that are one are: (a) the discovery of high-tech “nano thermite” in the dust of the rubble, (b) the discovery of tiny spheres of iron in the dust of the rubble, (c) molten metal and extremely high temperatures that existed in the rubble for weeks after the event.
Before I quote from Niels Harrit’s article that was published in a scientific journal in 2009, entitledActiveThermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, I will discuss the meaning of the tiny spheres of iron that were found in the dust samples, also the meaning of the high temperatures of the rubble that lasted for weeks.
The significance of the tiny spheres of iron is that when the most common type of thermite burns it creates pure iron as a by-product. This happens because common thermite is a "sand" of small particles of iron oxide mixed with small particles of pure aluminum, and what happens in the “fire” is the aluminum steals the oxygen atom from the iron oxide and the result is aluminum oxide, plus enormous energy in the form of heat, plus pure iron.
The iron oxide/aluminum thermite fire burns so hot that the pure iron that is produced is actually turned into a vapor! It is only a vapor momentarily because the much colder air it is immersed in cools it way down almost instantly—it is a vapor only for a brief moment, then it cools further to become a liquid for a brief moment, then it cools even more and assumes the solid state. During the brief moment when the hot iron is a liquid, the phenomenon of surface tension (an electrical force) gives it a spherical shape—like in the case of a raindrop, where water vapor assumes the liquid state due to cooling, and surface tension gives it a spherical shape, which subsequently becomes a raindrop shape as it falls with velocity though the resisting air.
The dust from the destroyed World Trade Center contains a large amount of iron spheres, like the one seen in a micrograph from the USGS survey of the dust.
These tiny spheres of iron were numerous in the dust of the 9/11 debris; and these iron “microspheres” are to be expected from a thermite reaction, and the official pancake theory cannot explain them—in fact nothing can explain these iron microspheres except a thermite fire.
The significance of the high temperatures of the rubble that went on for weeks, on the other hand, along with eyewitness accounts of molten metal at the bottom of the rubble heap, can be explained by the hypothesis that the rubble contained large amounts of unburned thermite, and this was still burning inside the rubble. There is no other good explanation for the source of heat—certainly the official pancake theory caused by jet fuel fire, along with common office fires, cannot explain these high temperatures that lasted for weeks.
Now I will present the third part of this Trinity argument. Below is the conclusion of a published scientific paper by Niels Harrit, Steven Jones and others. (Harrit is a chemistry professor at Copenhagen University and is a distinguished scientist who has more than 50 publications in high quality scientific journals.)
We have discovered red/gray chips in significant numbers in the dust associated with the World Trade Center destruction. We have applied SEM/XEDS and other methods to characterize the small-scale structure and chemical signature of these chips, especially of their red component. The red material is most interesting and has the following characteristics:
1. It is composed of aluminum, iron, oxygen, silicone and carbon. Lesser amounts of other potentially reactive elements are sometimes present, such as potassium, sulfur, lead, barium and copper.
2. The primary elements (Al, Fe, O, Si, C) are typically all present in particles on the scale of tens to hundreds of nanometers, and detailed XEDS mappings shows intimate mixing.
3. On treatment with methyl ethyl ketone solvent, some segregation of components occurred. Elemental aluminum became sufficiently concentrated to be clearly identified in the pre-ignition material.
4. Iron oxide appears in faceted grains roughly 100nm across whereas the aluminum appears in thin plate-like structures. The small size of the iron oxide particles qualifies the material to be characterized as nano-thermite or super-thermite.
5. Analysis shows that iron and oxygen are present with a ratio consistent with Fe2O3. The red material in all four WTC dust samples was similar in this way. Iron oxide was found in the pre-ignition material whereas elemental iron was not.
6. From the presence of elemental aluminum and iron oxide in the red material, we conclude that it contains the ingredients of thermite.
7. As measured using DSC, the material ignites and reacts vigorously at a temperature of approximately 430 degrees C, with a rather narrow exotherm, matching fairly closely an independent observation on a known super-thermite sample. The low temperature of ignition and the presence of iron oxide grains less than 120 nm show that the material is not conventional thermite (which ignites at temperatures above 900 degrees C) but very likely a form of super-thermite.
8. After igniting several red/gray chips in a DCS run to 700 degrees C, we found numerous iron-rich spheres and spheroids in the residue, indicating that a very high temperature reaction had occurred, since the iron-rich product clearly must have been molten to form these shapes. In several spheres, elemental iron was verified since the iron content significantly exceeded the oxygen content. We conclude that a high temperature reduction-oxidation reaction has occurred in the heated chips, namely, the thermite reaction.
9. The spheroids produced by the DSC test and by the flame test have an XECS signature (Al, Fe, O, Si, C) which is depleted in carbon and aluminum relative to the original red material. This chemical signature strikingly matches the chemical signature of the spheroids produced by igniting commercial thermite, and also matches the signatures of many microspheres found in the WTC dust.
10. The carbon content of the red material indicates that an organic substance is present. This would be expected for super-thermite formulations in order to produce high gas pressures upon ignition and thus make them explosive. The nature of the organic material in these chips merits further exploration. We note that it is likely also an energetic material, in that the total energy release sometimes observed in DSC tests exceeds the theoretical maximum energy of the classical thermite reaction.
Based on these observations we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.
In case someone objects that the samples of WTC dust had been “doctored,” there are two answers: (a) Conventional thermite could have been purchased by almost anyone at that time but nano-thermite was only made in government laboratories in 2001, and it would have been virtually impossible for “conspiracy theorists” to obtain it, (b) There is extremely strong evidence for high temperatures and molten metal in the rubble heap that went on for weeks, and this implies a thermite fire.
Aside from these material considerations there is the question of the moral character of the four individuals who provided the dust samples. One of the four was an artist, Janette MacKinlay, who at the time lived in an apartment in Manhattan that was in very close vicinity to the World Trade Center. The samples she supplied came from dust that had poured in through a window that broke during the event and filled her apartment with a thick layer of dust. MacKinlay collected a quantity of this dust and subsequently used it in her art displays. She had been doing this for several years when she heard that Professor Jones of BYU wanted WTC dust samples for analysis. Was MacKinlay, a person well known in art circles, morally capable of involvement in a plot intended to slander people with the accusation of mass murder?
In conclusion, there is no doubt whatsoever that the WTC buildings were brought down by the science of controlled demolition. Nano-thermite (along with conventional explosives, very likely) had been installed in the buildings before the supposedly hijacked jetliners flew into them and exploded in a jet fuel fire. It was this thermite that had been planted inside the buildings along with other explosives that may have been employed that caused the three buildings to spectacularly crash down to the ground with huge clouds of powdered material filling the air while 3,000 people were trapped inside two of these buildings. It was this and not a weakening of the steel support beams due to heat from burning jet fuel along with regular office fires (or fire alone in the case of Building 7) which is the claim that is official.
That it was planted thermite along with possible other planted explosives that caused the three WTC buildings to collapse, and which caused the deaths of 3,000 people who were trapped inside the two tall towers, is not speculation. This is rock-solid empirical truth.
"Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" by Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, and Bradley R. Larsen, The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, Vol. 2, pp. 7-31 http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm
Tracking the 9-11 Insiders to their Rothschild Roots
January 3, 2013
ASBESTOS ABATEMENT OR DEMOLITION? - LVI Services, a company that provides "total turnkey demolition services," did extensive asbestos abatement work in the World Trade Center prior to 9-11, according to Engineering News-Record. This photo from the LVI Services website depicts LVI workers doing asbestos abatement on a surface very similar to the corrugated steel floor pans that held the 4-inch thick concrete floors of the Twin Towers. Oddly, Burton Fried, then head of LVI, in an interview with the author, denied that his company had done the work in the Twin Towers.
Workers like these would have been needed to apply the explosive coating of nano-thermite to the undersides of the floorpans and other surfaces of the Twin Towers. The workers that prepared the surfaces for demolition would not have known they were applying an explosive coating and were probably told that it was a rust-proofing primer or something of that sort. In such an operation there is deception on every level. Even Burton Fried may have been duped.
The nano-thermitic material found in the dust samples releasedmore energy per gram than any other known explosive used in demolition and detonated at the unusually low temperature of 430 degrees Celsius. This material is thought to have been responsible for the complete pulverization of the 220 concrete floors and the steel pans that held them.
Immediately after 9-11, a leading engineering magazine in the United States reported that LVI Services, a company that does demolition set-up work, had done extensive asbestos abatement work in the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center. The following is a brief job description that involved the removal of asbestos floor tiles and other materials from the Twin Towers. Was this the job that LVI had carried out at the World Trade Center?
Contract WTC-115.310 - The World Trade Center Removal and Disposal of Vinyl Asbestos Floor Tiles and Other Incidental Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Via Work Order Estimate Range: $1,000,000 annually Bids due Tuesday, October 17, 2000. (Offered by the Port Authority on September 12, 2000)
As I pointed out in my 2009 article "Who Put Super Thermite in the World Trade Center":
Two days after 9-11, Engineering News-Record (ENR) reported that an asbestos abatement and demolition company called LVI had done extensive asbestos abatement work in the World Trade Center:
AMEC Inc., Turner Corp. and Bovis Lend Lease were set to assume "lead roles" in the cleanup effort, says Lee Benish, AMEC vice president. "From the very beginning, we've been deeply involved with the city department of emergency services," he says. "They're sorting through who will be doing what." LVI Services Inc., New York City, which has done extensive asbestos abatement work on the towers in the past, is involved in similar work now as well as other cleanup efforts.
In 2000, LVI did about $3 million in R&D work for the U.S. Army, the largest part of the company's military contract of $3.2 million. Fedspending.org records show that LVI did Applied Research and Exploratory Development (R&D) work for nearly $3 million that year. Neither Burton Fried, then head of LVI, nor the company spokesman were willing to discuss the work LVI had done for the U.S. Army.
In 2011, LVI was taken over and Burton Fried, age 71, was ousted. Fried tried to sue the new management of the company claiming that he had been the victim of age discrimination. The court ruled against Fried and in favor of the new management and this ruling was upheld in an appeal in 2012.
THE FOOD CHAIN OF 9-11 INSIDERS
It is interesting to note that LVI Services, a suspect in the 9-11 crime, was taken over by companies that have other 9-11 insiders as directors. Apollo Investment Corp., for example, one of the companies that took over LVI, has Alvin "Buzzy" Krongard on the board of directors of its management company, Apollo Global Management, LLC. Apollo was founded in 1990 by former Drexel Burnham Lambert "banker" Leon David Black and two of his partners from DBL.
On July 31, 2004, Alvin Bernard Krongard married Cheryl Gordon (née Cheryl Gruetzmacher). Cheryl Gordon was, at that time, a senior executive for Apollo Management.
Although I was unable to reach Burton Fried for this article, I did get through to "Buzzy" Krongard, the executive director of the C.I.A. from March 2001 to September 2004. I began by asking Krongard why Apollo had taken over LVI services and ousted Burton Fried. Krongard said that this decision had been made before he joined the board of Apollo, although he could not give the date he had joined the board. He then asked his wife if she remembered the date but they were unable to recall the year. Finally, he simply said he had joined the board when the company went public. It must not have been very long ago because, according to the court documents from October 2011 (Burton T. Fried vs LVI Services, Inc.), Fried worked for LVI until November 30, 2010.
Krongard confirmed that as executive director he had been the "chief operating officer" of the C.I.A. during and after 9-11, and that in that role he had overseen the C.I.A.'s transition to a covert war-fighting agency with the power to launch Hellfire missile strikes from drones. He also said that the C.I.A. is an agency that carries out covert operations for the executive branch and takes its directives from the White House.
The new president and C.E.O. of LVI services is Scott E. State.State is the former chairman and CEO of MACTEC, Inc., an Atlanta-based engineering, environmental, and construction services firm that was recently taken over by another 9-11 insider, AMEC. AMEC is the British engineering company - closely tied to BP's (formerly British Petroleum) oil extraction operations and the financier N.M. Rothschild & Sons - that played a key role in the 9-11 clean-up.
AMEC also happens to be the London-based company that did the construction work on the section of the Pentagon that was destroyed in the 9-11 attack. AMEC, which earned huge amounts of money on both sides of the 9-11 atrocity was then headed by Sir Peter Mason, Knight of the British Empire, who was the company's CEO from 1996 to 2006.
THE ROTHSCHILD CONNECTION TO AMEC
AMEC is very closely connected to the Rothschild money-lending/"bankster" family. It should be noted that the Rothschild family of Britain is the key founder and sponsor of the Zionist state of Israel. Among other reasons for creating the state of Israel, the Rothschilds wanted to have a Jewish state that they controlled next to the Suez Canal, a strategic conduit which was essential to their global trading operations and for which they had provided funds to the British government. In order to populate their Zionist enclave the Rothschilds created secret societies in Eastern Europe to spread the Zionist ideology among the Jewish communities.
During the period that Mason was CEO of AMEC, Jock Green-Armytage, a director and non-executive director of NM Rothschild & Sons Limited, and director of Rothschild's asset management business in the 1990s, became chairman of AMEC. Green-Armytage had served as a non-executive director at AMEC since 1996 and was both chairman of its audit committee and its senior non-executive director when he was appointed chairman in 2004.
Since January 2003, Sir Peter Mason has served the British Empire as a "Senior Independent Director" of BAE Systems, Inc. London-basedBAE Systems is one of the largest defense firms in the United States and the world. It might come as a surprise to see that Michael Chertoff, the former U.S. Assistant Attorney General is the Chairman and Secretary of the board of directors of BAE Systems, Inc., the American branch of BAE. Another member of the BAE board is former congressman Lee Hamilton, the vice chairman of the extremely incomplete and flawed 9-11 commission report.
Michael Chertoff, the U.S. government official who oversaw the destruction of the crucial evidence and the non-investigation of the 9-11 crimes, is now chairman of the board of directors of Britain's BAE Systems, Inc., one of the largest defense contractors for the Pentagon. Is there a connection?
Lee Hamilton and Anthony Zinni are also on the BAE Systems, Inc. board. What a small world.
Another odd relationship with BAE Systems concerns Webster Tarpley. Tarpley's wife and daughter worked forGene S. Sachs, the "preferred agent" of BAE Systems North America in 2010 and probably still do. Mr. Sachs had completed more than 275 assignments for BAE in twenty states of the United States between 2005 and 2010.When listening or reading Tarpley's comments on 9-11 or the Middle East one should keep in mind his family connections to BAE Systems.These connections are anything but coincidental. It is certainly not unusual to see so many key players in the 9-11 false-flag terror atrocity and cover-up belonging to the board of Britain's BAE Systems. It brings to mind the old saying, "Nothing binds people more closely than a crime committed together."