Print Contact Home

Support the Truth about 9/11 and the War on Terror

April 27, 2017

Support Christopher Bollyn's work. 
Donate by PayPal to:
or click here:

"The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from this madness 
is to expose the true source of terrorism." 
- Christopher Bollyn

The War on Terror is an Israeli war strategy in disguise.

9/11 truth is the key to ending the fraudulent War on Terror and Zionist warmongering around the world. It is also the key to the restoration of sanity in world politics. It is the most important political issue of our time.

I am writing a book with the working title, The War on Terror:  An Israeli War Strategy in Disguise. I want to write a short book to help people grasp the essence of the Zionist deception behind the War on Terror. It should be affordable and concise. With the U.S. military currently waging this war on numerous fronts it is of the utmost importance that the American people understand that it is all a huge criminal fraud.

I need your support! 
Donate at:
or by PayPal to

This is the preface that explains why I am writing the book.

Why write a book about the War on Terror?

The War on Terror, which began as a response to the terror attacks of September 11, 2001, is the longest war in U.S. history and probably the least understood. It seems most likely that there is a direct relationship between these aspects of the U.S.-led war that began with the terror atrocity of 9/11.

People who understand the deception of 9/11 are able to easily grasp the fraud behind the so-called War on Terror.

The War on Terror and 9/11 are like two sides of a counterfeit coin. If the American public had a good understanding of the false-flag deception of 9/11, then the fraudulent nature of the War on Terror would be equally clear and resistance to the war would involve increasing numbers of concerned citizens. However, because the two things are joined at the hip, if a person is confused about the origin and nature of the 9/11 atrocity he is bound to be equally confused about the so-called War on Terror.

For fifteen and a half years, the U.S. government and controlled media have pushed an utterly false narrative, a fabrication blaming Osama bin Laden and his band of "Islamic terrorists" for the destruction and huge loss of life on 9/11, without ever actually proving their case. Based on this unproven narrative, which has been parroted by the media without question, President George W. Bush and his cabinet decided to wage war against Afghanistan on 9/11. Presidents Obama and Trump have continued to support this false narrative – and the war it brought us.

Although evidence proving the falseness of the government and media story about 9/11 was readily apparent, by ignoring the evidence the pro-war government and controlled media juggernaut rolled over the facts and those who used them to challenge to government's war policy in the Middle East.  Had the so-called mainstream media functioned properly and simply reported the salient facts and observations that contradicted the official myth, such as the evidence of explosions and the presence of tons of molten metal in the Twin Towers and the dust thereof, and discussed what they meant, the public would have been in a much better position to understand that they were being bamboozled and that 9/11 was a false-flag terror operation designed to be blamed on Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida in order to start the long-planned War on Terror.

The presence of tons of molten iron seen falling from the 81st floor of the South Tower for seven minutes before it was demolished has never been discussed by the mainstream media because it contradicts the official myth.

Since 9/11, the mainstream media, consolidated as it is, has spoken with one voice consistently supporting the official myth about the terror attacks and the War on Terror that followed in their wake. The average person, overwhelmed by the shock and awe of the 9/11 spectacle and conditioned to believe the government and mainstream media, was in no position to question or challenge the official story, which was used to take the nation to war.

President George W. Bush spoke to the nation on September 20, 2001, saying: 

Al-Qaeda is to terror what the mafia is to crime. But its goal is not making money; its goal is remaking the world and imposing its radical beliefs on people everywhere… The terrorists' directive commands them to kill Christians and Jews, to kill all Americans, and make no distinctions among military and civilians, including women and children…  Our war on terror begins with al-Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped, and defeated.

Nine days after 9/11, Bush was preparing the nation for an open-ended War on Terror that was evidently being planned at the Pentagon to overthrow a series of Middle Eastern nations. Years later, General Wesley Clark described how he learned in October 2001 about a memo from the Secretary of Defense's office that called for the U.S. military to "take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran."

General Wesley Clark on the 9/11 Zionist Policy Coup, October 2007
Video Link -

The Pentagon memo to "take out seven countries in five years" raises several questions of the utmost importance.  Firstly, which came first?  The agenda to take out seven countries or the terror attacks of 9/11? And secondly, is this aggressive war agenda in the Middle East really in America's best interest, or is it being waged in someone else's interest?

It may come as a surprise to learn that the War on Terror doctrine goes back decades before 9/11 and is the product of Israeli military intelligence, not the Pentagon. Likewise, it was Ehud Barak, the former head of Israeli military intelligence, who first appeared on the BBC World television network shortly after the planes struck the World Trade Center calling for the U.S. to launch "an operational, concrete, war against terror."

There is simply no disputing the fact that the War on Terror is a Zionist construct, a stratagem of Israeli military intelligence that has been advocated by Benjamin Netanyahu since the late 1970s. Netanyahu and his father, working under Prime Minister Menachem Begin, the self-proclaimed "Father of Terrorism," arranged an international conference on terrorism in Jerusalem in July 1979. The Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism began a "propaganda offensive to promote and exploit the issue of international terrorism," as Philip Paull wrote in his 1982 thesis on the conference.

The Global War on Terror has radically changed the quality of life for Americans, but it has not been a change for the better. With trillions of borrowed dollars spent waging senseless wars in far-flung nations where there is no U.S. national interest, it would be hard to say that there has been any benefit to the American people to compensate for the trillions of dollars spent and thousands of lives wasted.

Benjamin Netanyahu, on the other hand, openly told Israeli students in 2008 that the 9/11 terror attacks had been beneficial for Israel, saying, "We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq."

Well, if the War on Terror is an Israeli stratagem dating back to the 1970s to get the U.S. military to fight Israel's enemies, it seems we have answered the first question about which came first. The terror attacks of 9/11 did not bring us the War on Terror, rather the Israeli War on Terror project brought us 9/11, a false-flag atrocity designed to make the Zionist war agenda "operational".

Secondly, if Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister and leading advocate of the War on Terror doctrine, tells Israelis they are "benefiting" from 9/11 and the "American struggle in Iraq" we have a clear answer to the second question about whose national interest is being served by the fifteen-year old War on Terror, and it is not ours.

Combining these facts about the War on Terror with those presented in my Solving 9-11 set of books, in which I expose the Israeli role in the false-flag terror attacks and subsequent cover-up, it becomes obvious that 9/11 and the War on Terror are both products of Israeli military intelligence and that the terrorism atrocity was carried out to realize the Zionist war agenda.

The Solving 9-11 books explain and document the involvement of Israeli military intelligence in the false-flag terror attacks - and the cover-up.

This analysis, which is based on facts, is diametrically opposed to the interpretation of the War on Terror provided by the government and controlled media, which have deceived us for 15 years.

This is why I am writing a book about the War on Terror.  We have to re-claim our reality. We simply cannot let scoundrels impose an artificial reality and false history upon us. A nation that is deceived into war is not a free nation of free people.  

A deceived nation is an enslaved nation. We cannot thrive if we are burdened with such an evil deception. The War on Terror has destroyed thousands of lives as it has grossly perverted our thinking and plundered our national wealth. It has gone on now for fifteen and a half years and yet there is virtually no resistance to it. I am writing this book to help people understand the deception, because we can only resist the war if we understand what it is - in reality.

9/11 Truth is Anything but Radical

April 23, 2017

"The first signs of America’s transformation after 9/11 were obvious: mass deportations, foreign invasions, legalizing torture, indefinite detention, and the suspension of the laws of war for terror suspects. Some of the grosser violations of democratic norms we only learned about later, like the web of government surveillance…  Shocking policies abroad, like torture at Abu Ghraib and extrajudicial detention at Guantanamo Bay, today are reflected in policies at home, like for-profit prisons, roundups of immigrant children, and SWAT teams that rove through communities with Humvees and body armor. The global war on terror created an obsession with threats and fear — an obsession that has become so routine and institutionalized that it is the new normal."
– "We are the war on terror, and the war on terror is us" by Thanassis Cambanis, Boston Globe, March 23, 2017

"But in many cases, of course, it is perfectly possible to determine who the terrorists are and who stands behind them. If governments have failed to do this, it is more often not for lack of knowledge but for lack of courage and moral clarity."
– Benjamin Netanyahu, Terrorism: How the West Can Win (1986)

The "mainstream media" – a complete misnomer if ever there was one – would have us believe that 9/11 truth is the domain of radical and wacky "conspiracy theorists". These labels, however, are simply more misnomers used by the controlled media to try and marginalize the growing number of people who understand that we have been lied to about what really happened on 9/11.

The 9/11 truth movement is anything but radical. The real radicals are, in fact, the controlled politicians and media who have pushed the lies about 9/11 and the War on Terror for the past fifteen years and counting.

Radical is defined as "in favor of thorough and complete political or social change." Conservative, on the other hand, is defined as "opposed to great or sudden social change."  As the recent article by Thanassis Cambanis in the Boston Globe points out, "America's transformation" with truly radical social changes came in the aftermath of 9/11 as a result of the government accepting and acting on an utterly unproven narrative about what happened on 9/11.

The radicals are the ones who took the U.S. military into Afghanistan, Iraq, and the Global War on Terror without ever presenting any proof to justify going to war.  The fifteen-year-old War on Terror campaign has robbed the U.S. of trillions of dollars, killed and wounded millions of people, and radically changed the way of life in America.

The 9/11 truth movement, which I have been a part of since the beginning, is strongly opposed to the War on Terror because people who grasp the essence of 9/11 truth understand that the War on Terror is based on a fabricated narrative about 9/11 that has been proven to be utterly false. In spite of abundant evidence disproving the false narrative, the controlled politicians and press continue to promote it.  All of the drastic political and social changes that have been imposed on America and the world as a result of the 9/11 deception are based on nothing more than lies and fabrications. What's radical is to support an open-ended war agenda and drastic social changes based on nothing but unproven allegations.

Fifteen years later, we still live in an artificially imposed reality where everything is topsy-turvy, but don't let the professional liars fool you. 9/11 truth is neither marginal nor radical. It is a common-sense peace movement comprised of patriotic Americans who refuse to accept America being hijacked into criminal and costly wars of aggression waged on behalf of a foreign power. 

Behind George Bush and the Vulcans were their deputies and advisers... 

Zionist Neo-Cons pushing the Israeli "War on Terror."

Support Christopher Bollyn's work. 
Donate by PayPal to:
or click here:

"The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from this madness 
is to expose the true source of terrorism." 
- Christopher Bollyn

Netanyahu Indicts Himself as a Terrorist

April 21, 2017

PARIS ATTACK - Terrorist events like the shooting in Paris are "interpreted" for Western media and governments by an Israeli agent named Rita Katz who runs SITE Intelligence Group in Bethesda, Maryland. Isn't it odd that Islamic State is able to wage war against the United States and its coalition of 68 nations, and can direct terror attacks around the world, but is unable to communicate to the Western media without going through an Israeli intelligence agent? This is the manipulation and domination of public opinion that Netanyahu says is "central to the terrorist strategy."

FROM SITE INTELLIGENCE - The Israeli terrorist agenda is to "Frighten the West" into supporting the Israeli war agenda in the Middle East. 

FRIGHTEN THE WEST - Israel's prime minister Moshe Sharett said Shimon Peres "wants to frighten the West into supporting Israel's aims" - in 1955, after the Israeli false-flag terrorism known as the Lavon Affair was exposed in Egypt. 

"In trying to understand international terrorism, we must first recognize that it is not a sporadic phenomenon born of social misery and frustration. It is rooted in the political ambitions and designs of expansionist states and the groups that serve them. Without the support of such states, international terrorism would be impossible... manipulation of public opinion is, in fact, central to the terrorist strategy. For this purpose, access to the media, indeed their domination, is indispensable."
- Benjamin Netanyahu, "Defining Terrorism" in Terrorism: How the West Can Win (1986)

"International terrorism is the use of terrorist violence against a given nation by another state, which uses the terrorists to fight a proxy war as an alternative to conventional war."
- Benjamin Netanyahu, Fighting Terrorism:  How Democracies Can Defeat Domestic and International Terrorists (1995)

The definitions of international terrorism provided by Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu in his books are quite telling. In his books published before 9/11 and the War on Terror, Netanyahu stressed that international terrorism "is the use of terrorist violence against a given nation by another state" ("by another state" is in italics in the book) and that it "is rooted in the political ambitions and designs of expansionist states and the groups that serve them."

So, by Netanyahu's own definition, the U.S., Israel, Saudi Arabia and their allies, who have been funding, arming, and training terrorist proxies to wage war against the government of Syria - are themselves international terrorists.


Netanyahu's earlier definition (1986) says that international terrorism "is rooted in the political ambitions and designs of expansionist states and the groups that serve them." Israel, which lacks any defined boundaries, is the most obvious expansionist state in the world. Netanyahu is the leader of the Likud Party, an expansionist party that aspires to create "Greater Israel" on the land of the neighboring states.

Well, when we consider Israel's role in the war against the government of Syria we can clearly see that Israel is an expansionist state that is occupying Syrian land and that practices international terrorism. These conclusions are based on the Israeli leader's own definition of international terrorism.

THE PROXY WAR AGAINST SYRIA - Senator John McCain visiting the "rebels" in 2013. These are the jihadi mercenary armies the U.S. was funding to overthrow the Assad government in Syria.

The man in the black shirt speaking with Sen. McCain has been identified as Abu Bakr al Baghdadi - the leader of Islamic State!

Support Christopher Bollyn's work. 
Donate by PayPal to:
or click here:

"The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from this madness 
is to expose the true source of terrorism." 
- Christopher Bollyn

Will Israel Survive the War on Terror?

 April 20, 2017

Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, has been calling for the United States to wage the War on Terror since the 1970s. On 9/11, when asked how the terror atrocity would affect U.S.-Israeli relations, Netanyahu said, "It's very good."

"The West can and must defeat defeat the forces of terror before they can spread further. It must unite and fight to win the war against terrorism."
- Benjamin Netanyahu, Terrorism: How the West Can Win, 1986

"The first signs of America’s transformation after 9/11 were obvious: mass deportations, foreign invasions, legalizing torture, indefinite detention, and the suspension of the laws of war for terror suspects. Some of the grosser violations of democratic norms we only learned about later, like the web of government surveillance. Optimists offered comforting analogies to past periods of threat and overreaction, in which after a few years and mistakes, balance was restored.

"But more than 15 years later — nearly a generation — we have not changed back. Shocking policies abroad, like torture at Abu Ghraib and extrajudicial detention at Guantanamo Bay, today are reflected in policies at home, like for-profit prisons, roundups of immigrant children, and SWAT teams that rove through communities with Humvees and body armor. The global war on terror created an obsession with threats and fear — an obsession that has become so routine and institutionalized that it is the new normal."
- "We are the war on terror, and the war on terror is us" by Thanassis Cambanis, Boston Globe, March 23, 2017

Understanding that the War on Terror is a Zionist fraud that has been planned by Israeli military intelligence for decades is essential to make sense of the confusing and unhappy times we live in. As Thanassis Cambanis writes in the Boston Globe, the war on terror has "created an obsession with threats and fear — an obsession that has become so routine and institutionalized that it is the new normal." Our terrorism obsessed new normal resembles nothing more than the grim future depicted in the Israeli film Brazil (1985), produced by Benjamin Netanyahu's friend, the nuclear trigger smuggling Arnon Milchan.

Getting back to a more sane and peaceful normal will simply require a critical mass of Americans understanding that 9/11 was an Israeli false-flag operation that was carried out to kick-start a Zionist war agenda (known as the Yinon Plan) under the guise of waging the War on Terror. The deception of 9/11 and the War on Terror was designed to increase Israeli hegemony in the Middle East by imposing an artificial reality upon our nation(s) and society, but such a massive and blatant fraud cannot go on forever.

The Joint Chiefs of Staff understood in 1948 that Zionist strategy would seek to bring the U.S. military into the region to establish "Jewish military and economic hegemony over the entire Middle East." This is the real strategy behind the U.S. military interventions in the region.

The evil plan of the Israeli masterminds behind the 9/11 atrocity and the War on Terror has resulted in some of their short-term strategic goals being achieved, such as the destruction of Iraq, Libya, and Syria, but what will become of Israel itself when Americans understand that Benjamin Netanyahu and his gang of Rothschild Zionists are behind the 9/11 deception?

The tactics, strategy, and ideology of the War on Terror are certainly all Israeli. The only American role is that of a nation deceived into waging war on behalf of the Zionists. But such a deception cannot be maintained for long making it only a matter of time until the fraudulent War on Terror is understood to be the Zionist crime that it is.  

Support Christopher Bollyn's work. 
Donate by PayPal to:
or click here:

"The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from this madness 
is to expose the true source of terrorism." 
- Christopher Bollyn

Assad: "Terrorists are fighting for Israel"

April 9, 2017

The Zionist (Israeli) master plan behind the War on Terror is to establish "Jewish military and economic hegemony over the entire Middle East." The U.S. Joint Chiefs understood the Zionist agenda very well in 1948 - before Israel became a state. They knew that Israel would be an expansionist state and that "the expansion of 'Eretz Israel' into Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria" was the Zionist plan . They also knew that the Zionists would "seek to involve (the U.S.) in a continuously widening and deepening series of operations intended to secure maximum Jewish objectives." This is exactly what the War on Terror is all about. It is not a War on Terror at all; it is a War of Terror.

In an interview with a European journalist on April 6, Syrian President Bashar al Assad said that the "Terrorists are fighting for Israel." This is a very important point to understand:  the war agenda to destroy Syria is an Israeli (Zionist) agenda; not American (or British, French, etc.).  It is, in fact, the realization of the Yinon Plan from 1982 - the Israeli plan to dominate the Middle East by breaking up the large Arab states, beginning with Iraq and Syria.

"Terrorists are fighting for Israel" 

Assad's comment from the interview:

Question 18: Mr. President, Syria has been subject recently to continuing Israeli aggression. What is the objective behind that? And are you concerned about the possibility of a Syrian-Israeli war? 

President Assad: Concern about a war is unrealistic, because the reality is that we are living this war. But as for calling it a Syrian-Israeli war, you can assume in any case that these terrorists are fighting for Israel. Even if they are not a regular Israeli army, they are still fighting for Israel. And Israel shares the objectives with Turkey, the United States, France, Britain, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other states. They all share the same objective. It is a war that has taken a new form and uses new instruments. Practically, our victory over the terrorists is a victory over all those states put together. That’s why Israel is doing its best to support these terrorists in every place the Syrian Army advances. They attack in one way or another in order to provide support to the terrorists and in order to stall the momentum of the Syrian Arab Army in facing them. 

Support Christopher Bollyn's work. 
Donate by PayPal to:
or click here:

"The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from this madness 
is to expose the true source of terrorism." 
- Christopher Bollyn

Source:  President Bashar al-Assad interview given to Vecernji List, Syrian Arab News Agency, April 6, 2017 

Syria: Why is Trump Helping Al Qaida?

April 7, 2017

BIG MISTAKE - Trump was opposed to attacking Syria without Congressional approval in 2013, but this is exactly what he did today.

President Trump's attack against Syria was done on the pretext that it was in "retaliation" for a chemical gas attack on Khan Shaykhun, a village in Idlib province. The most important fact about this allegation is that it has not been proven that Syrian forces carried out the gas attack.  So, Trump bombed Syria with some 60 Tomahawk cruise missiles based on an unproven allegation and photos coming from the anti-Assad "rebels" who control Idlib province.

The "rebels" who control the area where the gas attack supposedly happened are known as Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, also known as Al Qaida in Syria.  This group was formed on January 28, 2017. Tahrir al-Sham is the largest "rebel" group fighting the elected government of Syria after ISIL (Islamic State). The U.S. considers Tahrir al-Sham to be a "foreign terrorist organization."  

On March 11, 2017, Tahrir al-Sham carried out a terrorist bombing attack in Damascus's Old City, killing 76 people and wounding 120 others. On the same day, the U.S. officially designated Tahrir al-Sham as a terrorist organization, declaring that the group still functioned as al Qaida's Syrian affiliate. (Source: Tahrir al-Sham)

This means that based on unproven allegations, coming from a jihadist group the U.S. considers a "terrorist organization" tied to Al Qaida (which the U.S. blames for the terror atrocity of 9/11), President Trump launched 60 cruise missiles on the government of Syria! 


The timing of the alleged gas attack needs some explanation. It makes no tactical sense for the Assad government to have carried out such an atrocity since Syrian forces have been successfully reclaiming territory held by the "rebels". The U.S. government had also just announced that removing President Assad from power was no longer one of its concerns in Syria.

So, if the gas attack is a false-flag operation to be blamed on Assad why was it done? 

It seems very likely it was carried out in order to change both of these developments:  to reverse the U.S. position regarding Assad staying in power and to prevent the terrorist organization Tahrir al-Sham from losing more territory.  On March 30, it was reported that Syrian forces had reclaimed crucial territory in the northern part of Hama province. This meant that Syrian forces were less than 6 miles from Khan Shaykhun and closing in. (See: Syrian Army turns the tables on Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham in northern Hama: map)

This map from March 30, 2017, shows the territory the Syrian army (red) had reclaimed from Tahrir al-Sham (brown) in the northern part of Hama. Khan Shaykhun is on the main highway, only about 6 miles north of the Syrian forces pressing in from the East. Source: Syrian Army turns the tables on Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham in northern Hama

The area where the "rebels" were losing territory last week to the Syrian army is in the southern part of the area in purple. Khan Shaykhun is in the purple peninsula almost straight south of Idlib.

To understand why President Trump launched military strikes against the Assad government of Syria one needs to understand that the real master plan for Syria is to break the country up into ethnic statelets (i.e. Balkanize). This is the Zionist (Israeli) Likud plan, known as the Yinon Plan (1982), which calls for destroying the military forces of both Syria and Iraq and then breaking them up. The U.S. intervention in Syria and foreign support for the "rebels" are all steps toward realizing this Israeli plan for Syria. To read more about the Zionist master plan for Syria, see yesterday's posting:  Why trust Al Qaida terrorists about the gas attack?


Does this mean that Donald Trump's cruise missiles were fired to help Al Qaida terrorists, the same group he blames for 9/11, who are fighting to overthrow the government of Syria?

Yes, that is exactly what the result of the U.S. military action is. The U.S. is actually waging war against the elected government of Syria, illegally, on behalf of terrorists, which the U.S. designated as terrorists in March 2017! This is a "big mistake" for President Trump (and the U.S.) and proves the veracity of the expression, "The War on Terror is really a War of Terror."

The Russian Foreign Ministry released a statement today that says exactly the same thing:

The United States conducted strikes against Syrian government troops in the early hours of April 7, using chemical weapons attacks in Idlib Province as a pretext. The U.S. opted for a show of force, for military action against a country fighting international terrorism without taking the trouble to get the facts straight... 

Seeking to justify military action Washington has totally distorted what had happened in Idlib. The U.S. could not have failed to grasp the fact that the Syrian government troops did not use chemical weapons there. Damascus simply does not have them, as confirmed a number of times by qualified experts...

As for Idlib, the terrorists operating there used to produce toxic land mines intended for use in Syria and Iraq. These manufacturing facilities were put out of operation in a military operation carried out by the Syrian air force.

The U.S. pretends that it does not understand obvious things, turning a blind eye to the use of chemical weapons in Iraq, officially confirmed by Baghdad. The U.S. refuses to believe the evidence provided by certified documents confirming the use of chemical weapons by terrorists in Aleppo. In doing so, the U.S. is abetting international terrorism and making it stronger. New WMD attacks can be expected.

Russia suspends the Memorandum of Understanding on Prevention of Flight Safety Incidents in the course of operations in Syria signed with the U.S.

We call on the UN Security Council to hold an emergency meeting to discuss the latest developments.
Foreign Ministry statement on U.S. military action in Syria on April 7, 2017

To support Christopher Bollyn's work 
donate by PayPal to:
or click here:

"The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from this madness 
is to expose the true source of terrorism." 
- Christopher Bollyn

Why trust Al Qaida terrorists about the gas attack?

April 6, 2017

This graphic shows Idlib province in purple, meaning it is under "rebel" control. The "rebel" group that controls Idlib province is part of Al Qaida, and was known as Al Nusra Front until July 2016. This group is considered a terrorist organization by the United States, which means that the U.S. government and controlled media are more willing to trust the unproven claims about the gas attack coming from a terrorist organization rather than believe the government of Syria. Why is the controlled media so adamantly opposed to President Assad? 

The propaganda being spread by the controlled media about the alleged gas attack in the Idlib province of Syria is that the Assad government in Damascus bombed with chemical weapons. The fact that this charge is utterly unproven and that it makes absolutely no sense for Assad to do so makes no difference to the warmonger media pushing the Trump administration to take action to overthrow the government of Syria.

This is the controlled media line and woe to those who challenge it, like Congressman Thomas Massie (R-KY), who said on CNN: "Frankly, I don't think Assad would have done that. It does not serve his interests... We might end up making the situation worse if we launch airstrikes. The first casualty of war is the truth, and it's hard to know exactly what's happening in Syria right now."

Exactly right, so why should anyone trust the Al Qaida affiliate that claims that the gas attack was done by Assad?

The alleged chemical gas attack of April 4 supposedly occurred in the Syrian village of Khan Sheikhun, which is located in Idlib province. Idlib is controlled by the Tahrir al-Sham alliance, which is dominated by the Fateh al-Sham Front, formerly known as the Al Qaida affiliated al-Nusra Front. Despite recent attempts to re-brand the group, it remains on the U.S. list of terrorist organizations. This is the group that claims that the gas attack was done by Assad, the elected leader of Syria.

As reported by the BBC, Tahrir al-Sham is Al Qaida's latest incarnation in Syria.


This Al Qaida "rebel" group is in control of the area where the alleged gas attack occurred and is the group blaming the Syrian government for carrying out a highly-illogical gas attack, which the Assad government denies. Until July 2016 this group was known as Jabhat al-Nusra, and has been designated as a "foreign terrorist organization" by the U.S., the United Nations Security Council, and many other countries.

It would, of course, be highly illogical for the Assad government to do such a thing, especially after the U.S. government just announced that the removal of Assad was no longer one of its concerns in Syria.

In a rush to judgement, the U.S. government and the controlled media have been quick to support the anti-government claims made by this Al Qaida group, as if they had proven their claims - which they have not.

This means that the U.S. government and media are supporting unproven claims made by an affiliate of Al Qaida - the very same terrorist group they maintain attacked the U.S. on 9/11 - against the elected government of Syria.

How much sense does that make?  Why is the Zionist-controlled media so trusting of an Al Qaida terrorist group in Syria? And why is the media so adamant about removing Assad from power in Syria?

To understand what is really going on in Syria, one needs to understand the Zionist strategy to control the Middle East by breaking up the Arab states into small ethnic statelets, as was done to Yugoslavia in the 1990s. The "Zionist Plan for the Middle East" (The Yinon Plan, 1982) lays out the Israeli plan for Syria, Iraq, and the rest of the region.

For Syria, this is what the plan says:

The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unqiue areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel's primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi'ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach today.


The "dissolution of Syria" is the Likud plan, i.e. the Yinon Plan, to break up the nation of Syria into small ethnic statelets. This would mean that there would no longer be a state making a claim on the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, which is Syrian territory. It would also remove Syria as a threat to Israel. President Assad has to be removed in order to facilitate the breaking up of Syria. This is the real reason the Zionist-controlled media and politicians are willing to embrace as true any war propaganda that vilifies Assad, and why they are so adamant about him being removed.  

Sources: "The Zionist Plan for the Middle East," Translated and edited by Israel Shahak, 1982

To support Christopher Bollyn's work 
donate by PayPal to:
or click here:

"The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from this madness 
is to expose the true source of terrorism." 
- Christopher Bollyn

Open Letter to Ivanka Trump: End the Fraudulent War on Terror

April 4, 2017

The envelope with my letter to Ivanka Trump. We should all write letters to the White House demanding an end to the fraudulent War on Terror.

Christopher Bollyn
3 Golf Center, Suite 365
Hoffman Estates, IL 60169

Ivanka Trump, Special Assistant to the President
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

April 3, 2017

RE: Ending the Fraudulent War on Terror

Dear Ivanka,

In your new position as Special Assistant to the President you need to be well informed on issues of national security. If your father is to succeed as president he will need advisors who see the big picture, apart from the pressures of special interest groups, in order to be able to craft policies that are truly in the nation's best interest – and terminate those which are not.

The fraudulent War on Terror is clearly a policy that is not in the best interest of the United States and which should be ended as soon as possible. The War on Terror is a fraud based on the lie that Islamic terrorists were behind the 9/11 terror attacks and the destruction of the World Trade Center. At MacDill Air Force Base on February 6, President Trump lent credence to that lie when he said, "Radical Islamic terrorists are determined to strike our homeland as they did on 9/11."

The documented evidence, however, proves without a doubt that the Twin Towers and WTC 7 were demolished by sophisticated explosive materials, including super-thermites created using nanotechnology, not by burning jet fuel or office fires. This means that Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida were wrongly blamed and framed for the terror atrocity in order to bring our nation into the pre-planned War on Terror. Policies based on such utterly false narratives cannot succeed and will fail to deliver peace or prosperity.

For more than fifteen years, under the guise of fighting terrorism, the U.S. has waged disastrous wars across the Middle East at great expense to this nation, not to speak of the cost to those we have attacked. The Costs of War Project at Brown University estimates the War on Terror to have cost $4.8 Trillion since 9/11. These wars are impoverishing America and the costs will burden our nation for generations to come.

The stability and infrastructure of a half-dozen developing nations have been destroyed as a result of the War on Terror: Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, and Yemen. The devastation we have inflicted on these nations has greatly set back their development and regional stability. Europe is currently experiencing the greatest influx of refugees since World War II as a direct result of these artificially imposed conflicts.

Under its "America First Foreign Policy" the White House says: "The Trump Administration is committed to a foreign policy focused on American interests and American national security. Peace through strength will be at the center of that foreign policy. This principle will make possible a stable, more peaceful world with less conflict and more common ground."

It goes on to say that "defeating ISIS and other radical Islamic terror groups will be our highest priority." Bombing "radical Islamic terror groups," however, is the legacy of the previous four administrations and has been an abysmal failure. President Trump's first two months in office have been marred by the high number of civilians killed by U.S. bombs in Yemen, Iraq, and Syria. We need to recognize that we cannot bring peace and stability to the Middle East by dropping more bombs. After 26 years of bombing Iraq and 15 years of bombing Afghanistan that should be obvious to all.

"There is no instance of a nation benefitting from prolonged warfare," Sun Tzu wrote in The Art of War. If President Trump truly wants to make a change for the better he will have to end the fraudulent War on Terror and seek peace through peaceful means. I hope you understand the importance of changing this disastrous policy and will help make that change possible.


Christopher Bollyn
Author of Solving 9/11: The Deception that Changed the World

To support Christopher Bollyn's work 
donate by PayPal to:
or click here:

"The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from this madness 
is to expose the true source of terrorism." 
- Christopher Bollyn

Why are we bombing Mosul?

April 1, 2017

"Whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, if you're an American you ought to be concerned about the strategy of the United States in this region. What is our aim? What is our purpose? Why are we there? Why are Americans dying in this region?  That is the issue."
– General Wesley Clark, Commonwealth Club of California, San Francisco, October 3, 2007

Alia Ali kisses her granddaughter Hawra Hassan, 4, who suffered shrapnel wounds on her face, neck and left eye, along with a broken foot from the March 17 U.S. airstrike on Mosul's Jadidah neighborhood. (Marcus Yam / Los Angeles Times)

The U.S.-led bombing campaign in Mosul in northern Iraq raises some important questions, such as, why are we doing it? The U.S. has been at war continuously with, or in Iraq since January 1991 - now more than 26 years! Twenty-six years of war against one country? What are we there for?

If President Trump has a plan to end the war and get out of Iraq, I would like to hear it. He must know that fighting the fraudulent War on Terror is no path to greatness, as we can see from the previous four administrations. The U.S. presence in Iraq has certainly not benefited the Iraqi people - nor the American people. So, why are we there?

To understand why U.S., Canadian, and British forces are waging war in Iraq it is necessary to understand the master plan, the Zionist plan behind the chaos in the Middle East - the Yinon Plan.

A recent article, "Bombed in their homes, civilians in Mosul blame reckless coalition forces", describes the suffering of civilians in Mosul:

"Not surprisingly, people are furious at so much destruction and question the timing and methods of the operation in Mosul.

"The Dawa'ish [Islamic State militants] were everywhere, and there was absolutely nothing we could do about it," said Mohammed, a resident of the Hay al-Dhubbat district who lost several relatives in a coalition airstrike. "If you challenged them, they would kill you. They ran this city for two and a half years, and they were rarely targeted during all that time... Why now [are they] destroying our homes with our families inside, just to eliminate two or three Dawa'ish on the roof?"
- "Bombed in their homes, civilians in Mosul blame reckless coalition forces," Chicago Tribune, March 31, 2017

The plan may to be to liberate Mosul (and Raqqa in Syria) from ISIS and allow it to be part of the Kurdish independent area in the north. The Israelis have long had a strategic plan for decades to break Iraq into pieces, exactly as was done to Yugoslavia in the 1990s:

THE YINON PLAN: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East

The idea that all the Arab states should be broken down, by Israel, into small units, occurs again and again in Israeli strategic thinking. For example, Ze'ev Schiff, the military correspondent of Ha'aretz (and probably the most knowledgeable in Israel, on this topic) writes about the "best" that can happen for Israeli interests in Iraq: "The dissolution of Iraq into a Shi'ite state, a Sunni state and the separation of the Kurdish part" (Ha'aretz 6/2/1982). Actually, this aspect of the plan is very old.
- Israel Shahak, from the foreword of his translation of "A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties" by Oded Yinon, June 13, 1982

Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north.
– Oded Yinon, "A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties", Kivunim, A Journal for Judaism and Zionism; February 1982

Sources: The Yinon Plan: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East, translated by Israel Shahak, 1982

General Wesley Clark speaking about the "policy coup" of 9/11
Commonwealth Club of California, San Francisco, October 3, 2007
Video Link -

"What happened in 9/11 is that we didn't have a strategy, we didn't have bipartisan agreement, we didn't have American understanding of it, and we had instead a policy coup in this country – a coup – a policy coup. Some hard-nose people took over the direction of American policy and they never bothered to inform the rest of us."
- General Wesley Clark

To support Christopher Bollyn's work 
donate by PayPal to:
or click here:

"The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from this madness 
is to expose the true source of terrorism." 
- Christopher Bollyn

Bollyn Articles in Swiss Magazine

March 31, 2017

I wrote two articles about 9/11 and the fraudulent War on Terror for the popular Swiss magazine Zeiten Schrift, which appear in issue 89/2017. The lead article (in German) is also online at:

The cover of the current Zeiten Schrift issue No. 89/2017

The graphic for the lead article, Wie der „Krieg gegen den Terror“ erfunden wurde.
Online at:


Video of 9/11 Symposium with Bollyn, Gage and Barrett

March 24, 2017

A new and improved video of the Nation of Islam's historic 9/11 truth symposium, "The War on Islam: 9/11 Revisited, Uncovered & Exposed," is now available for viewing online. 

The War on Islam: 9/11 Revisited, Uncovered & Exposed
Video Link -


It's All Good: The Real Reason We Accept the Fraudulent War on Terror

March 21, 2017

After my latest speaking tour, I have decided to write a book about the fraudulent War on Terror, which is really a Zionist/Israeli war agenda in disguise.

Why write a book about the War on Terror?

The War on Terror has destroyed many thousands of lives as it has grossly perverted our thinking and plundered our national wealth. It has gone on now for fifteen and a half years and there is virtually no organized resistance to it. The main reason for writing this book is to help people understand the deception because we can only resist the War on Terror if we understand what it is - in reality.

The wars or "operations" waged under the rubric of the War on Terror since 9/11 are costing U.S. taxpayers $8.36 million per hour, for a total of $1.75 Trillion since 2001. Homeland Security, the domestic front against terrorism, is costing U.S. taxpayers $6.74 million per hour, or nearly $750 billion since 9/11. Together, the foreign and the domestic security operations have cost the U.S. more than $2.5 Trillion (i.e. 2,500 billions). (Source:

This is clearly not sustainable. Rather than rebuilding America and taking care of our people, we are pouring billions of borrowed dollars down the drain and getting absolutely nothing back that will benefit the American people, or the world, in any way. We are squandering money to destroy lives, nations, and infrastructure across the Middle East like the worst of barbarians, and have been doing so at a ferocious rate for 26 years – continuously since Desert Storm in January 1991.

With all the wars, and the millions of displaced refugees trekking about the planet, you might expect there would be a vibrant anti-war movement of concerned citizens demanding an end to the war fighting, but there isn't. Why are Americans not standing up in huge numbers and demanding an end to this utterly self-destructive War on Terror?


The answer is simple. We have been deceived into thinking that the War on Terror is a good thing, a valiant struggle against terrorists who mean to attack us like we were attacked on September 11, 2001. I will use a comment from a reader to a recent post on Facebook to illustrate my point.

I posted something the other day about the 26,171 bombs dropped by the United States in 2016, under a president who had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize when he was elected in 2008. Last year was the fifteenth year of the War on Terror, a year in which the U.S. bombed seven nations, dropping an average of 72 bombs per day.

Most of the bombs were dropped in Iraq and Syria, 12,192 in Syria and 12,095 in Iraq. Afghanistan was bombed 1,337 times and Libya 496. The numbers are based on the percentage of total coalition airstrikes carried out in 2016 by the United States in Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR), the counter-Islamic State campaign. Daily OIR strike data at:

As a response, I had the following exchange with a reader in Idaho:

D.S.:  Well, if it's killing people who are killing innocent people, it's all good.

Bollyn:  This is a very good comment because it reflects the thought that the masterminds behind the War on Terror want us to think. That our war-fighting in the Middle East is all about killing the bad guys in order to bring about good. It is, of course, not why we are fighting in Iraq or Syria. When was the last time the U.S. went to war to stop the killing of innocents?

When Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982 and killed 20,000 innocents, did the U.S. intervene to stop them? When Israel attacks Gaza and kills thousands of innocents, does the U.S. do anything to stop them?

No. So why would the U.S. do something it has never done in Syria or Iraq? We are not waging war in Iraq or Syria to protect innocent lives - that is the propaganda cover story that has worked amazingly well to neutralize any anti-war movement from gaining traction, but I am still trying.

D.S.:  And you think different?  How about you go and give them a big wet sloppy kiss then. When was the last time we went to war to stop the killing of innocents?  Well, when Saddam invaded Kuwait comes to mind, did you forget that?

Bollyn:  We certainly did not go to war against Iraq to save the lives of innocent people - again, that was the propaganda we were given (e.g. the contrived testimony from the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador about the babies being killed). Apart from the thousands we killed in Desert Storm in 1991, we then put sanctions on Iraq that led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of children. You may recall Leslie Stahl's interview with Madeline Albright about the U.S.-imposed sanctions having killed 500,000 Iraqi babies? If not, see below… 

Video Link -

D.S.:  So, in a nut shell, you say we are the villains, and should mind out own business, as all this is trouble in the Middle East we brought on??? I agree, we helped them out in WWII, and then we had the audacity to find oil there, and show them how to pump it out of the ground.  Yep, it's all America's fault.

Bollyn:  No, we are not the villains; we are the deceived. I do agree, however, that we should mind our own business and stay out of these foreign conflicts. 9/11 was a false-flag deception to start the War on Terror, which is an Israeli war agenda to dominate the region by destroying the large Arab states and breaking them into weak ethnic statelets - at war with each other.

To understand how this foreign Zionist agenda was pushed onto our military in the wake of 9/11, the photo below shows the Israeli Chief of Staff, Shaul Mofaz, meeting at the Pentagon with the Zionist Neo-Cons (Wolfowitz, Zakheim, Feith) who made up the Defense Policy Board under President George Bush in January 2002. The list had already been drawn up of the seven Middle Eastern nations that the U.S. would overthrow in the next five years: Iraq, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Lebanon, and Iran. Five of them have already been done.

This is, I repeat, a Zionist/Israeli war agenda disguised as the War on Terror. There is NO real U.S. national interest in this criminal war of aggression - NONE. Our nation has been deceived, perverted, and plundered in order to wage these wars.



9/11 Truth Tour

March 13, 2017

Where has the spirit of Woodstock gone? 

The final event of the winter tour was March 12 in Woodstock, New York, at the Mountain View Studio. Woodstock is famous for the biggest anti-war protest in American history in 1969. How things have changed since then. We are now engaged in the longest war in U.S. history - the war in Afghanistan - and a half dozen other on-going military interventions of dubious legality in Syria, Yemen, Iraq, Somalia, etc., and yet there is no anti-war movement to speak of.

Have we become numb to war, or are we simply deceived?

9/11 Truth is the peace movement today.
To support my efforts to expose the deception of 9/11 and the fraudulent War on Terror,
donate by PayPal to:

Video of Bollyn presentation in Jacksonville, Florida, February 24, 2017
Video URL - 

To support Christopher Bollyn's work 
donate by PayPal to
or click here:

"The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from this madness
is to expose the true source of terrorism."
- Christopher Bollyn

Christopher Bollyn at Ground Zero - World Trade Center, March 25, 2016
Photo by Rudy Dent, Veteran of NYPD and FDNY

A screen shot from the excellent 30-minute video "They Think You're Stupid"
Video URL:

If you have not seen one of my presentations, this excellent video features a 15-minute long segment from one I gave in Seattle this year.
"They Think You're Stupid"
Video URL:

The Importance of 9/11 Truth for World Peace

The following are a few paragraphs from a very articulate supporter in Russia who understands the importance of 9/11 truth and who helped support my tour last winter:


I admire what you do. If we all live 20 years more without a thermo-nuclear war destroying everything, you and few other brave individuals will definitely be appreciated and remembered for what you have done as the world's greatest heroes.

What you do will one day bring the disclosure of 9/11 truth to more people, and if it happens early enough and the perpetrators feel enough pressure to step aside (or be prosecuted), then the total death scenario can be avoided – saving all of us as a result. If the current masterminds of 9/11 remain in control, however, it is only a question of time when they decide on a perfect moment to have a global "re-set" to the system…

When does the information, the knowledge of truth become compelling for an average person living in the western world (and Russians mentally are not very different from it, unfortunately) to act and to seek a minimal next step to be done?  I have no solution for this, and before it emerges, what you and few others are doing about 9/11 truth, is our only chance to survive.

A Letter from Russia, December 5, 2015

Christopher Bollyn speaking in Manchester, N.H.

Disabuse yourself of the dual-deception of 9-11 and the fraudulent "War on Terror."  Your fear is all you have to lose.

Many thanks to those who have donated. I couldn't do it without your help.

Patriotism is supporting your country all the time,
and your government when it deserves it.
- Mark Twain

Understanding the deception behind 9-11 and the "War on Terror" is the only way to free ourselves from fear and to extricate our deceived nation from the false logic of war that has been imposed upon us for the past 15 years.

This is why the general theme of my tour is "Solving 9-11 Ends the War." The current lecture tour is focused on presenting the essential facts and evidence that prove that the "War on Terror" is a massive Zionist fraud that is the reason why the false-flag terror deception of 9-11 was carried out - and covered-up. 

Failure to grasp the essence of the fraud enables those who are behind 9-11 and the "War on Terror" to enslave us and our nation to their destructive agenda of war.

Letter from a supporter:

Dear Christopher,

I'm sending another contribution to help support your ongoing campaign to educate the public about the 9-11 atrocities and the real perpetrators. Your work is so vital in this modern age of deception, and must continue.

May the Lord honor your sacrifice in spreading the truth.

*  *  *

Most Americans know that something is terribly wrong with America, but nobody seems to understand exactly what the problem is. America is very sick but nobody seems to understand the illness. We cannot ignore the problem or pretend it does not exist. The disease that afflicts our nation - and the world - will not cure itself or go away; it will only get worse if we do nothing. We cannot wait or delay our efforts; the disease is acute and deadly.

The 9-11 crime and cover-up, and the deception that has been spun around these events are the most obvious symptoms of the disease that afflicts America. Solving 9-11 is, therefore, absolutely essential to diagnosing the disease and restoring our nation to health and prosperity.

If we investigate and prosecute the people responsible for the 9-11 atrocity and the cover-up we will expose the entire criminal cabal that is wrecking our nation.  This is why solving 9-11 is of vital importance for our nation - and for the world.

This is why I persevere in my investigation of 9-11. My recent article, "The Crypto Jew Behind the NIST Cover-up of 9-11: William Jeffrey (Jaffe)," is a good example of why this website is unique. In this article, I reveal that the director of NIST, when it crafted the false reports about what really destroyed the World Trade Center on 9-11, was a crypto Jew who had years of experience with all of the high-tech devices that were evidently used on 9-11.

Why is this important? Because it shows that my thesis that 9-11 is a massive Zionist Jewish crime is supported by the evidence. The consistency of the evidence with my thesis is 100 percent. William Jeffrey is a high-level agent involved in one of the most egregious criminal cover-ups of our time. This means that he is part of the criminal cabal behind the crime itself.

Today, he is the CEO at SRI International at Stanford University in Menlo Park, California. Isn't in time that 9-11 truth activists at Stanford picket outside SRI and expose William Jeffrey's role in the 9-11 cover-up?

A great deal of time and effort goes into researching and writing the original research articles that appear on this website. If you appreciate the research you find on this website, please donate to support my work. Thank you!

Your support is needed to help spread the truth about 9-11 and expose the deception that changed the world.
To donate by PayPal, please send donation to:
or click on

Bollyn on the Austrian side of the Zugspitze summit, April 10, 2015

ON TOP OF GERMANY - Christopher Bollyn skiing on the Zugspitze, the highest peak in Germany, April 8, 2015

RECHARGING MY BATTERIES - Spring skiing on the Zugspitze glacier

A supporter in Austria wrote to me during Holy Week:

I would like a copy of Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World.  I watched your recent video and read about the harassment you have suffered and am really buying the book to support you…  People like you who have the skills and the courage to find and speak the truth and follow up with action are very rare and must be supported because the stakes today are far too high for neglect... 

All the very best to you and your family.  May the blessings of the Creator be upon you.  Really, bless you for being there for the rest of us.
- C.E. in Vienna, Austria

Paul Findley, the former Congressman from Illinois, wrote:  

Dear Mr. Bollyn:

My compliments on your commentary on 9/11. You may recognize my name as author of They Dare to Speak Out. It is high time a grand jury investigates the origin of that infamy. The evidence is powerful that the buildings came down from controlled demolition, not from attack by aircraft. Keep swinging away. We need you. 

Paul Findley


I need your support to continue my efforts to spread the truth about 9-11. I can't do this on my own - I need your support.

To donate by PayPal, send donation to:
or click on

Christopher Bollyn speaking in Seattle, September 2014
Video Link to watch this speech is at:

A supporter in Geneva, Switzerland, wrote:

Thank you for your effort to expose the massive media coverup of the biggest crime in the history of the US;

Thank you for all you've done to prove Israel was behind most, if not all, the terror attacks that Muslims were being unjustly accused of.

You're more than a truth seeker; you're a truth teller and a truth holder.

A new supporter in Michigan wrote:

I would send a thousand times that if I had it, and I truly appreciate your leadership and courage in this cause. I only just recently developed a knowledge of your work, from some messaging go back and forth among local (SE Michigan, USA) AE911 cohorts. I wanted to use your quote here…

"The false narrative of what happened on 9/11 can no longer be supported or sustained by any reasonable person."

that was offered in one of these messages, and I had forgotten its source. So I located it in your excellent letter to the Pope, and did some browsing to catch up with who you are. Wow! You have really been through the wringer. Hats off a thousand times...

The following comment is from a donor in Canada:

Here is my philosophy on the fundraising. You need not feel uncomfortable about asking for funds. It is not charity in the normal sense of the word. Your supporters are funding a road to the truth. If our society's structures and systems (governments, banks, media, etc.) had not been hijacked by corrupt forces, then your work as an investigative journalist would be completely different. The mainstream would hold you in high esteem, and you would not be forced into exile.

You are a truth seeker and political refugee. Obviously my taxes are not paying for your work. So I'll just redirect my money where it should go - to the source of truth.

Enable the truth. Overcome your fears.
Support a truly independent investigative journalist.
Donate by PayPal at:

SOLVING 9-11 by Christopher Bollyn

"History rather than theory"
- G.H., Davis, California

Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World
or Solving 9-11: The Original Articles
are shipped to U.S. addresses for a donation of $20 (both books for $40).

Donate today by PayPal at:

My Solving 9-11 research and writing is of vital importance for Americans, and indeed all peace-loving people in the world, because understanding what really happened on 9-11 and who is behind it is essential to understanding the serious global problems we face today. To accept the deception of 9-11 is to be enslaved to a lie - a very dangerous lie.

*  *  *  *  *

"Mr. Bollyn, I thank God that there are still people in the world like you."
- S.J., Toronto, Ontario

"If 9/11 were carried out according to the official story, Britain's Home Office would not bother to detain you."
- S.S., Nairobi, Kenya

"To ignore evil is to become an accomplice to it."
- Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King (1929-1968)

Wherefore I do beseech you all, for the love of our Lord God, that you do at all seasons hold by the Truth, and speak it, and embrace it.
- The last words of George Boleyn, May 17, 1536

He who is not angry when there is just cause for anger is immoral.  Why?  Because anger looks to the good of justice.  And if you can live amid injustice without anger, you are immoral as well as unjust.
- St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274)

I just stumbled on to your site on a day when hopelessness and depression abounds ... at least in my heart and mind.

Just wanted to say THANK YOU for standing your ground and telling the truth. And THANK YOU for all your hard work and personal sacrifices.

You are indeed an inspiration. It is people like you who renew my hope in the humanity and in what is noble.

All the best to you and your family.
- H.

Fear not the path of truth for the lack of people walking on it. 
- Robert F. Kennedy

One person can make a difference and every person should try.
- President John F. Kennedy

Reality is an aspect of property.  It must be seized.  And investigative journalism is the noble art of seizing reality back from the powerful.
Julian Assange, The Unauthorized Autobiography, Canongate Books, Ltd. (2011)

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. 
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

Notice the rise of the tide: Turkey, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Morocco, and Palestine. See how Allah is doing wonders - whether the Zionists like it or not. Notice how the tide is rising against Zionism?  Your work is going to become mainstream in the near future. You are a pioneer with thoughts at their infancy. Very soon people will see you were right on from the beginning. Keep up the good work.
- A reader from the Middle East

Christopher Bollyn speaking at the first 9/11 Citizens' Grand Jury in Los Angeles, October 2004

One man is responsible for most of our knowledge of the Zionist connection to 9/11. That man is Christopher Bollyn, a pre-eminent investigative journalist. He wrote his first essay questioning the events of 9/11 on September 18th, 2001, just one week after the attacks.
- A. Scott Piraino, "Q & A with Christopher Bollyn",, 11 September 2011

I am always amazed at the details you manage to uncover, for your articles; they really are some of the best-researched on the Internet.
- Anthony Lawson, 9/11 video producer, Australia, 4 September 2011

How can it be that an American journalist is brutally attacked by undercover police at his home – in front of his 8-year-old daughter and wife, TASERed while restrained in handcuffs and unable to move a finger, with one 200-pound man kneeling on the temple of his head and another on his back, and has his arm broken – and not a single newspaper, television station, or journalist organization is concerned?  This was just the beginning of the price I have paid for my writing about 9/11...
- Christopher Bollyn, "'Israel Did 9/11' - U.S. Military Expert Supports Bollyn Thesis", 3 April 2010

Bollyn and Andreas von Bülow (left) walking at Remagen on the Rhine River in August 2011.

I visited Andreas von Bülow, author of a best-selling book (200,000 copies sold) about the CIA and 9/11, at his home in Bonn in August 2011.  Von Bülow, a former parliamentarian who oversaw operations of German intelligence, was the first political/intelligence expert I interviewed in November 2001 regarding 9/11. 

Andreas von Bülow saw the devastation of Dresden as a child.  His house was the last house on the edge of total destruction.   
"German Intelligence Experts: 9/11 is 'Hollywood' Deception"(12 December 2001)
"German Intelligence Expert Refutes U.S. Version of 9/11" (9 January 2002)

Spiegel magazine, which Andreas told me is very hostile to his work and engages in a campaign of defamation against him, published a piece in English about him for the 10th anniversary of 9/11.  It is"Questioning 9/11 - The Politician Turned Conspiracy Theorist".

*   *   *

Your work is my favorite, most reliable news source. I regularly challenge newspaper salesmen, students, and friends to read it and decide for themselves. Good on you! (Australian expression). 
- W.G. in Australia, 28 July 2011

Great research! Articulated and argued brilliantly well. Thank you and best wishes!
- D.J. in Finland, 3 June 2011

*   *   *

What are you proud of?  I am proud of my support for Christopher Bollyn.  Why?

Mr. Bollyn is the type of person we should all strive to be. An investigative journalist, his moral standards, work ethic and personal integrity will not be compromised.  His research and writing on 9/11 is a gift to all of us who love freedom and love the truth.

Our government, media, and our culture itself has become so infested with lies and liars that most of us are hard pressed to maintain any awareness of reality. Christopher Bollyn gives us a chance to see clearly what has happened to America - information we can use to reformulate our world view and guide our thinking as we attempt to cope. 

I beg everyone to turn off your TV sets and take some time to study the writings of Mr. Bollyn, sharing his message with others as you see fit. 

Thank You

- letter from an American, 13 May 2011

*   *   *   *   *


Some readers send comments.  I received an interesting comment from an Israeli reader who said that my "conspiracy story" is "exactly the truth as written."

I liked your article, it is a nice conspiracy story, but in MY case it was exactly the truth as written.  Nice to remember those old-times, when we did foolish mistakes... I certainly paid for my mistakes, but I am no criminal, just another unlucky Israeli.
- T.S. in Israel, 26 February 2011

Excellent. Excellent. Excellent work.
- J.A. in USA, 7 March 2011

You always have the deepest analysis of events. Keep up the great work. 
- K.B. in California, 11 February 2011

Don't stop!!!
- F.B. in New Jersey, February 2011

"This is Chris Bollyn's website. He is the bravest and most persecuted reporter in America."
Daniel, Silicon Valley, California

There is no better cause, in my opinion, than
- G.V. in the U.S.A.

Your research is superb. Thank you for being willing and able to name names and provide FACTS. 
– G.F. in Texas

"Keep up the great work.  You are truly without peer on 9-11 research."
- M.B. in New Mexico


The best way to find a specific article is to use the List of Articlesindex in the margin on the left.  The index can be sorted by title or date and will bring the reader to the specific article.  There is also a handy print friendly icon in the top right-hand corner of each article selected from the List of Articles.

*   *   *   *   *

Dear Mr. Bollyn:
Whether the events of 9/11 are as you suspect a Mossad operation or not, the population under the current government, will in all likelihood never know. After all, the truth regarding the assassinations of Gaius Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln are still being debated, and even when after many generations hidden truths are discovered as in the 1915 sinking of the RMS Lusitania and the 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor, the general population remembers only the “official version”. Behind all the smoke and mirrors of disinformation one thing however remains clear and that is the pernicious influence of the Zionists in the shaping of American policies, both foreign and domestic. Your lonely struggle and courageous willingness to openly question the influences that have done so much to shape policies since at least 1919 is a heroic effort which I therefore hardily applaud.
- L.A.S.

Il primo ricercatore è Cristopher Bollyn, giornalista investigativo...
(The first researcher is Christopher Bollyn, 
investigative journalist...)
- Paola Coppa, "La stampa indaga sull’11 settembre"
Il Democratico (Italy),  Sept. 11, 2010

Bollyn's research is supported by his readers.  
Please, donate today.

History, facts and truth are all Divine products, and must prevail.
- Charles A. Briggs

My research and analysis of 9-11 is very different from what you will find anywhere in the controlled mainstream media or alternative press.  My 9-11 material will not be discussed in any of the 9-11 conferences or media coverage in the coming week not because it is incorrect or biased in any way.  The only reason my 9-11 writings are not discussed in the media is because they get much too close to the truth, which is something nobody in the media wants to go anywhere near.

The American people are woefully deceived about what really happened on 9-11 and have become enslaved to lies, which is why U.S. troops are killing and being killed in Afghanistan and Iraq.  The population of the United States is burdened by deception primarily because most Americans blindly trust in the cherished notion that they have a "free press".  Trusting what they hear on television, Americans are terribly misinformed by the deception of the controlled media and press.  

The American troops in Afghanistan are not waging war to protect the United States or to defend any American ideal.  They are killing and dying in an evil war of conquest in a place few Americans had ever been prior to October 2001.  Very few Americans understand why U.S. men and women are fighting in Afghanistan.  It has nothing to do with 9-11 and everything to do with constructing a gas pipeline to carry Israeli-owned gas to India and China.

An American soldier in Afghanistan fighting for the Zionist agenda and its state founded on terrorism.

The controlled media is lying through its teeth to the American people just like the C.I.A., the F.B.I., and the so-called "elected" members of Congress and the U.S. government.  Any person or agency who is party to deceiving the American people is clearly not on their side.  These liars are the domestic enemies of the American republic.  To deceive the people into sending their sons, husbands, fathers, and daughters to fight wars of aggression is criminal and treasonous. 

My mission is to simply expose the deception in order to give the American people the information they need to protect themselves and their families.  I need your help to do that.  Please, contribute to  Thank you.

"The fact that you are giving your book [Solving 9-11] away for free, which I'm sure you worked very hard at, is even all the more impressive.  May your work enlighten everyone."
- R.W., professional flight instructor, USA

I saw your article on 9-11 in the Tehran Times yesterday and I was very impressed with your research. I had read about the Israel connection some time ago but after reading your article it put everything into perspective... [Noam] Chomsky and others have been writing about Israel for many years, but they are unwilling to really get to the heart of their activities like you have.
- Dr. C.J., Grand Junction, Colorado

"You are providing a unique and needed perspective on current events."
- V.G. in Massachusetts

The European press is much more honest than the Zionist-controlled press in the United States about Israel and its egregious act of piracy on May 31, 2010.  Such critical perspectives and information about Israeli state terrorism are not found in the U.S. media. 

Badness always manifests in destruction and corruption, while goodness always manifests in preservation and benefit.
- Socrates (469-399 B.C.) in Plato's Politiea (Republic)

My research and writings are available on this website thanks to the contributions of concerned citizens who donate to my work.  Thousands of people visit my website, read, copy and repost my material.  My recent article "How Ehud Barak Pulled Off 9-11" , for example, is currently found on thousands of websites -- but very few readers contribute.  

The information and original articles found on my website are the result of years of research.  You won't find such accurate and detailed information (and analysis) anywhere else, least of all in the controlled press of the United States.  A recent editorial by veteran American journalist Alex Beam (Newsweek and Boston Globe) explains that the controlled press in the U.S. has a long history of publishing stories that are nothing but lies:

In Luce’s day, a cadre of gorgeous, brilliant women from the Seven Sisters colleges backstopped this modern-day rendering plant as fact-checkers. In the late 1970s, about half the fact-checkers were men, so in addition to pouring vodka I checked facts, a process that left me bleakly cynical about journalistic accuracy. We would publish whole stories that were lies — Francois Mitterrand’s plan to destroy the French economy was a recurring theme — but at least the names were spelled correctly.
“Ye Olde Newsweek” by Alex Beam

HOW TO SUPPORT MY WORK - I am not compensated for my research and do not carry any advertising on my site, but my efforts take time and money.  Support from my readers is what keeps this website going.  If you find my work worthwhile, please donate to today by clicking on the donation button in the left-hand margin or send a donation via PayPal (choose the "personal gift" method) tobollyn at bollynbooks dot com  -- Thank you for your support. 

Bollyn and Professor Steven Jones examine the evidence of Thermite in the destruction of the World Trade Center at B.Y.U. in the spring of 2006.  Jones subsequently found large amounts of super-Thermite in the dust of the pulverized Twin Towers proving that the WTC had been exploded using a extremely advanced nano-composite of Thermite.  This evidence proves that neither Osama Bin Laden nor the Taliban had anything to do with the pre-planned demolition of the three towers on 9-11.  The government explanations for the cause of the three collapses are nothing but fabrications and lies.

In August 2006 I was brutally attacked at my home by three heavily-armed undercover police in an action that was instigated and co-ordinated by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the enforcement arm of the Zionist B'nai B'rith, the secret international order of Jewish Freemasons.  In my case, the ADL influenced the police, the prosecution, the clerk, and the judge.  What chance did I have to obtain justice in such a rigged and corrupt system?  Although noticed by few, the pernicious influence of the ADL and the secret Elders of Zion affects all of us. The banning of all secret societies would have to be one of the basic tenets of any patriotic movement that aspires to "liberty and justice for all."

*   *   *
Each must for himself alone decide what is right and what is wrong, and which course is patriotic and which isn't.  You cannot shirk this and be a man.
- Mark Twain

Who are the thousand--that is to say, who are "the Country"?  In a monarchy, the king and his family are the country; in a republic it is the common voice of the people. Each of you, for himself, by himself and on his own responsibility, must speak. And it is a solemn and weighty responsibility, and not lightly to be flung aside at the bullying of pulpit, press, government, or the empty catchphrases of politicians. 

"Support our Troops" is a high-sounding slogan designed to trick Americans into supporting unjust wars of conquest and occupation, much like the catchphrase "Our Country, right or wrong!" of the Spanish-American War of Mark Twain's time.  There is nothing trivial about the cost of the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq - in treasure and lives.

Iraq Deaths Estimator

Each must for himself alone decide what is right and what is wrong, and which course is patriotic and which isn't.  You cannot shirk this and be a man.  To decide against your convictions is to be an unqualified and inexcusable traitor, both to yourself and to your country, let man label you as they may.  If you alone of all the nation shall decide one way, and that way be the right way according to your convictions of the right, you have done your duty by yourself and by your country - hold up your head! You have nothing to be ashamed of.
- Mark Twain, "Two Fragments from a Suppressed Book Called 'Glances at History' or 'Outlines of History' "

Dying 9/11 First Responder - Avenge Us.

March 2, 2017

Avenge us.

The following text is from the last five minutes of "September 11: The New Pearl Harbor," an excellent video on the 9/11 evidence by Massimo Mazzucco. The "Epilogue" is highly recommended viewing (as is the whole video) and begins at 4:48:00 with the Question for Sen. John McCain and leads to the "Final Question" and "Last Word" at the end of the video at 4:53.

"September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" (FULL)
Video URL - 

From the conclusion of the video (4:49:20):

This brings us to the last question, which is not only for the debunkers, but for anyone who cares about freedom, democracy, and an honest government.

Question: If you were aware of solid evidence disproving the official version and suggesting the involvement of some rogue elements of the government in the terrorist attacks, would it be more unpatriotic and anti-American to ask for a new investigation, or to turn a blind eye to it and pretend such evidence doesn't exist?

Given that the people's trust in institutions is of paramount importance for a nation's well-being, would that trust be better served by denying the evidence of a conspiracy, or by bringing those suspected to accountability in a court of law?

"The Last Word" by David Miller, First Responder

I want to tell you tonight about the people we call heroes and are still in growing numbers living in terrible physical and economic circumstances as they struggle with the carcinogenic effects of the toxic chemical soup ground zero became…

I don't think we're crazy. Conspiracies are only evidence the courts won't hear. We who are still dying from 9/11, who went to the towers and into that pile, now live with those buildings in our lungs, our digestive systems, and our blood. For myself and far too many of us, we search and the effective treatment is going to arrive far too late. I have double metastisizations in both lungs; that's just a reality.

We were also killed on 9/11 - Avenge us.

– David Miller, 9/11 first responder, 2006 (passed away four years later in December 2010)

David Miller - A True Story About 9-11
Video URL - 


Bollyn in Detroit with the Nation of Islam

March 1, 2017

Christopher Bollyn speaking at the plenary session event, "The War on Islam:  9/11 Revisited, Uncovered & Exposed" at the Cobo Center in Detroit on February 18, 2017. The live-stream of this event was watched by more than 60,000 viewers.

"The War on Islam: 9/11 Revisited, Uncovered & Exposed"
A Nation of Islam Saviours' Day Convention 2017 Discussion
Saturday, February 18, 10 a.m. EST · Cobo Convention Center

A historic plenary session, “The War on Islam: 9/11 Revisited, Uncovered & Exposed,” will be held Saturday, February 18, 10 a.m. EST at the downtown Cobo Convention Center. Discussions and evidence concerning the true perpetrators and possible conspirators responsible for the 9/11 catastrophe will be shared during the upcoming Nation of Islam’s Saviours’ Day Convention in Detroit.

The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam have invited credible and concerned 9/11 experts to share their research on this critical issue. Some of their findings and questions are shocking and raise serious questions about whether the full truth about the attacks on the World Trade Center has been revealed. The tragedy of 9/11 has been used to attack civil liberties at home and instigate major wars abroad. Most recently, the Trump administration has used 9/11 to justify a ban on immigration from seven Muslim nations.

Panelists for the plenary session will include investigative journalist Christopher Bollyn; Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth; and Dr. Kevin Barrett, an Islamic Studies scholar and author. They will present actual facts and offer listeners the opportunity to reason with their accounts of what happened and reach their own conclusions about a crime against humanity still causing death and confusion.

Muslims in the Detroit area, in particular, and all people are invited to hear these presentations about the 9/11 tragedy, because many are convinced those responsible were not Muslims at all. Minister Farrakhan, just five days after 9/11, at a September 16, 2001, press conference, said: “... I remember President Johnson made the war in Vietnam the centerpiece of his administration and a great lie was told, that the Congress produced the Tonkin Gulf Resolution that led to 500,000 American soldiers being sent to Vietnam. It’s unfortunate that one of the first casualties in war is the truth.”

Nine years later, in an interview with Al-Jazeera on September 10, 2010, Minister Farrakhan said: “September 11th was very, very strange: 19 Muslims were put before the American public and the world two days after this heinous attack. Qur’ans were found. But before this, the Neo-Cons that were surrounding President Bush, who were the architects of something called a ‘Project For The New American Century,’ said that America needed something like ‘Pearl Harbor’—9/11 was America’s new Pearl Harbor—to summon the American people in their anger and horror over what happened. Now there are too many strange things that we question.”

Questions and answers will be delivered at Saviours’ Day 2017 during “The War on Islam: 9/11 Revisited, Uncovered & Exposed” plenary session, Saturday, February 18, 10 a.m. EST at the Cobo Convention Center, located at 1 Washington Blvd. in Detroit.

#SD17DET #WARONISLAM /Contact: Dr. Wesley Muhammad

This program will be Live Streamed @


The Media Hyenas Attacking President Trump

January 24, 2017

The controlled media is treating President Donald Trump like a pack of hyenas attacking a lion.

Josef Joffe, the Jewish publisher of Die Zeit, actually suggested "Murder in the White House" on German television as a method to remove Donald Trump from power. The American people need to understand who is behind this incitement - and what it means for our republic.

The media's harsh criticism of President Donald Trump needs a bit of explaining. I have never before seen the media act so much like a gang of hyenas against a newly elected president. I am sure that it has never been so bad for an incoming president in all of U.S. history.

Why is the media so vicious? The first point to remember is that the media in the U.S. is consolidated like never before. Something like 90 percent of the media outlets are owned by only six corporations, like Rupert Murdoch's News Corp.  Some of the family-owned companies, like the New York Times, came out early in support of Hillary Clinton, who also had the support of Madame de Rothschild and the international financial gangster George Soros.

What needs to be understood is that this is the same controlled media that supported going to war in Iraq and Afghanistan, and which has been completely silent about what really happened on 9-11. That is to say this is the very same media that is complicit in the 9-11 cover-up and deception.

If the media had not censored eyewitness testimony of explosions and the evidence of molten metal flowing through the towers before, during, and after their explosive demolition - the American people would have understood they were being lied to and set up for a fake and criminal war. The fraudulent war agenda would have been halted in its tracks. Controlling the media was essential to foisting the 9-11 deception and fraudulent War on Terror on the world.

This is what the Trump-hating media has done for us for the past 15 years. They lied to us about 9-11 and lied us into a criminal Zionist war agenda known as the War on Terror. They had no problem with the fact that both invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq were based on huge whopping lies, which they repeated without question to the American people. Their lying about 9-11 continues to this day! They have still not reported on the scientific evidence that at least six percent of the dust of the destroyed Twin Towers is tiny balls of molten iron – discovered in 2003!

The fact that they hate Donald Trump is to be expected. I would worry if they liked him. An honest man would not want to be friends with the media whores who have sold their souls and helped take our nation into illegal wars of aggression in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and elsewhere.

During the women's protest march in Washington, D.C., the day after the inauguration, an American singer named Madonna Louise Ciccone spoke to the crowd and said:  "Yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House."

This is clearly an incitement to violence, whether she meant it or not.  If she were a Muslim she would have probably been arrested on the spot and charged with inciting an act of terrorism. By saying these words she is putting the idea of violence against the president of the United States into the mind of the public.

"Murder in the White House"

In a clear incitement to murder, Josef Joffe, the Jewish publisher-editor (born Poland 1944) of Die Zeit, a weekly German newspaper, suggested "murder in the White House" as a method to remove President Donald Trump from power. His comment aired on German television two days after Trump's inauguration.

Will this German publisher be held accountable for incitement to murder the president of the United States? Having made a comment inciting an act of terror, will Josef Joffe be allowed to enter the United States?

A German reader commented on the anti-Trump atmosphere of the controlled media in Germany: "Even if it was not meant seriously, a flippant remark with such content is very unusual in this context in Germany. His statement builds on and fabricates a hostile atmosphere that is unheard of here."


NIST Employee Speaks Out on WTC-7 Cover-up

January 14, 2017

"Truth is where our healing lies."

A former employee of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has stepped forward and criticized the government agency for ignoring the scientific errors found in its report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) more than eight hours after the September 11, 2001, attacks.

Awareness is growing of the disconnect between the NIST WTC reports and logical reasoning. The level of interest in '15 years later' is a good example. Due to the nature of communication in today's world, that awareness may increase approximately exponentially. Why not NIST blow the whistle on itself now while there is still time? - Truth is where our healing lies.
- Peter Michael Ketcham, former NIST employee

Why Are You Not a 9-11 Truther?

January 13, 2017

I think we can all agree that understanding what really happened on 9-11 is of tremendous importance to the people of the United States, and indeed to the entire world. As the seminal event of the "War on Terror," 9-11 led directly to two wars, in Afghanistan and Iraq, and a whole host of military interventions across the Middle East and beyond. It also brought profound changes at home, changes which have affected many aspects of life in America. All of this, of course, has come at great cost to the American people. Since September 2001, the wars and "homeland security" measures have cost the U.S. about $2.5 trillion.

The TSA airport security inspection is just one of the changes imposed on the public as a result of 9-11.

Because 9-11 is of such historical importance it is essential that we know the truth of what really happened and who is behind the terror attacks. Polls have clearly shown that the American people do not think their government has been truthful about 9-11.

In the first five years after 9-11, the New York Times and CBS News did three polls in which they asked the public:

When it comes to what they knew prior to 9/11 about possible terrorist attacks against the U.S., do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying?

In 2002, 73 percent thought the administration was "mostly lying" or "hiding something". That number went up to 76 percent in 2004, and to 81 percent in October 2006. When they found that only sixteen percent of the population thought the administration was "telling the truth"… they stopped polling.

With four-out-five Americans convinced the Bush administration was "mostly lying" or "hiding something" a new word entered our vocabulary in 2005 - "truther". An informal word, Merriam-Webster defines "truther" as "one who believes that the truth about an important subject or event is being concealed from the public by a powerful conspiracy." By this definition more than 80 percent of the population would be 9-11 truthers.


If you are not a truther, why aren't you? This is a serious question that needs to be asked of anyone and everyone who is not interested in finding the truth about what really happened on 9-11.

Let's be logical. We certainly agree that 9-11 is of the utmost importance so it is not a matter of someone dismissing 9-11 truth as being unimportant. If you are not a truther there can be only two possible reasons why: either you think that the official story is true, or you have doubts about the government narrative but are afraid to let people know what you think.

If you are in the latter category it is a matter of overcoming your fears and standing up for the truth. The best way to do this is to inform yourself about 9-11 so your knowledge gives you the confidence to stand up and defend your position. Don't worry about others being offended. The facts will turn them around too, when they know them.

If, however, you are in the first category and think the official story is true, then it must be a matter of a lack of awareness of some crucial facts and evidence from the scene of the crime. While there are many facts that raise serious doubts about the veracity of the official story of 9-11, there is also compelling evidence that proves it is false.


The evidence of molten iron seen falling from the South Tower and found in large amounts in the rubble and dust is such compelling evidence. The evidence of molten iron simply rules out the possibility that the government story about the destruction of the Twin Towers is true.

Molten metal, presumed to be iron, cascaded from the 81st floor of the South Tower for seven minutes before the explosive demolition of the tower.

The fact that molten metal, presumed to be iron, was present in large quantities on the 81st floor of the South Tower proves that temperatures much higher than those given by the government were reached in the tower prior to and during the explosive demolition. Such high temperatures could not have been caused by burning jet fuel or office fires, a fact that cannot be squared with the government explanation for the collapse of the towers.

The fact that streams and pools of molten iron were seen in the rubble and at the base of the towers is further proof that the government story is false. The documented evidence is incompatible with the government explanation of the collapses. The problem was quite evident in the video of NIST (National Institute of Science and Technology) engineer John L. Gross where he is asked about the evidence of molten iron being found in the rubble – and denies it even existed. The NIST explanation of the collapses of the towers simply cannot be true in the face of documented evidence of molten iron, so Gross had to deny the existence of the evidence.


The scientific evidence that at least six percent of the dust of the demolished towers is comprised of billions of tiny balls of molten iron (i.e. iron-rich spheres, R.J. Lee study of dust) is another fact that contradicts the government explanation. These extremely small iron-rich spheres are not to be confused with the molten iron seen in large amounts. The micro spheres of iron were evidently produced by a highly energetic nano-composite of super-thermite, chips of which were found in the dust by Dr. Steven E. Jones. When the chips of this material were heated to 430 degrees C, they detonated and produced extreme heat and iron-rich micro spheres identical to those found in the dust. The pools of molten iron were, most likely, created by large amounts of conventional thermite pre-placed in the buildings and perhaps on the planes themselves.

The WTC dust contained billions of tiny balls of molten iron that were created during the explosive demolition of the towers.

In any case, the evidence of molten iron and super-thermite proves that the government (i.e. NIST) and media explanation of what caused the destruction of the Twin Towers is false. The fact that John Gross, one of the NIST engineers who wrote the report, denied any knowledge of molten iron indicates that the report is intentionally false and required the omission of documented evidence in order to be able to come to the conclusions it was meant to come to.

This means that the American public has been intentionally lied to about what really caused the destruction of the Twin Towers. The evidence is clear and compelling: the government explanation for what really happened when nearly 2,700 people were killed during the explosive demolition of the World Trade Center is false and cannot be supported by any reasonable person.

So, if you have not been a 9-11 truther because you believed the government story, you will be a truther as soon as you grasp the meaning of the evidence of molten iron discussed in this article. In order to support the false conclusion of his fraudulent report John Gross of NIST had to deny the existence of molten iron in the rubble, something you now know all about.

To support Christopher Bollyn's work for 9-11 truth and justice 
and his upcoming speaking tour: 
Donate by PayPal to
or click here:

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"The Media's Criminal Censorship of the Molten Iron of 9-11" by Christopher Bollyn, January 8, 2017

The Media's Criminal Censorship of the Molten Iron of 9-11

January 8, 2017

Tons of molten metal, presumably iron, fell from the 81st floor of the South Tower for seven minutes before the building was demolished. Although this is obviously a very important piece of forensic evidence pertaining to the murderous destruction of the tower, it has never been discussed by the mainstream media. Why? What does this tell us about the media's role in supporting the fraudulent War on Terror? What does this say about the media's complicity in a conspiracy to wage a war of aggression?

If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you're mis-informed.
― Mark Twain

Most people rely on the mass media to understand important events like 9-11. This means, that to a great extent, the public understanding of what happened on 9-11 is limited to the information provided by the mainstream media. By ignoring essential evidence and omitting important facts about 9-11 the media protected the false narrative that was used to initiate the fraudulent War on Terror and take the nation to war in Afghanistan and Iraq. The media moguls behind this censorship need to be held accountable for their complicity in a conspiracy to wage a war of aggression.

The controlled media was quick to call the 9-11 attacks "an act of war", a decision which effectively precluded a criminal investigation from being carried out.

USA Today reported that 86 percent of the population considered the attacks "acts of war" before any investigation of the evidence. The huge amounts of molten iron disprove the official story of 9-11. So who really carried out these "acts of war" and who put tons of thermitic materials in the Twin Towers?

Protecting the false narrative of 9-11 was essential for the War on Terror agenda to go forward. This required censoring any discussion of evidence that contradicted the false narrative being fed to the public. In the beginning, media censorship became obvious in how certain subjects were treated.  Eyewitness reports of explosions, for example, were reported once, if at all, and never repeated.  The BBC's silent treatment of Stephen Evans' reports of having seen and felt a "series of explosions" in the South Tower before it fell is a good example of this censorship.

Other stories, such as the large number of Israeli terror suspects who were arrested on 9-11 and evidently "tied in" to the atrocity were never discussed in the media more than once, if at all.

One very important aspect of the destruction of the World Trade Center that has been completely omitted by the controlled media is the presence of huge amounts of molten iron seen before, during, and after the explosive demolition of the Twin Towers.  Molten metal was seen in television footage falling from the South Tower before it was destroyed, observed by firemen and professional contractors in the rubble, and found in large quantities in the form of tiny iron spheres in the dust of the demolished towers by independent and government scientists. The tiny iron-rich spheres are, in fact, so commonly found in the dust that their presence is called a signature characteristic of WTC dust, which means it is an identifying characteristic of the dust.

Extremely hot molten metal, presumably iron, was seen cascading from the 81st floor for seven minutes before the tower fell.

A large thermitic reaction was seen one minute earlier occurring in the same place.

A huge cascade of molten metal, presumed to be iron, can be seen falling from the 81st floor of the South Tower for about seven minutes before the tower fell. Firemen reported seeing "molten steel" flowing in the rubble pile "like a volcano" while contractors reported finding pools of molten iron, in the molten state, beneath all three collapsed towers when they reached the bedrock of Manhattan.

Firemen and contractors reported seeing "molten steel" in the rubble.

The demolition of the Twin Towers evidently involved energetic and explosive materials that created billions of tiny balls of iron. Chips of a highly energetic nano-composite of thermite were found in the dust by Dr. Steven E. Jones, a discovery that was documented in a peer-reviewed paper published in 2009. When this thermitic material was heated to 430 degrees C, it detonated and released a great deal of heat and produced tiny balls of iron. This energetic explosive material appears to have been the source of the tiny iron spheres found in the dust.

The bi-layered active thermitic material found in the dust of the World Trade Center by Dr. Steven E. Jones, et al.

When the thermitic material was heated to 430 degrees C it detonated, creating intense heat and tiny iron-rich spheres identical to those found in the dust. Source: "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe", Steven E. Jones, et al.

These "iron-rich spheres" were documented in every study of the dust, both government and private, but never reported by the mainstream media. The R.J. Lee study of the dust in the Deutsche Bank building at the southern edge of the World Trade Center complex found that iron spheres comprised nearly 6 percent of the dust. The U.S. Geological Survey's (U.S.G.S.) Particle Atlas of World Trade Center Dust includes high-quality micrographs of these tiny spheres and chemical analysis of their composition. The U.S.G.S. survey also discovered spheres of molybdenum which were not included in the print version. It should be noted that molybdenum has a very high melting point of 2,623 degrees C, or 4,753 degrees F. These spheres of molten iron and molybdenum are proof that the demolition of the towers was much hotter than the government claims.

The iron-rich spheres found in the U.S.G.S. study of the dust

The first evidence of large amounts of molten metal, presumably iron, was seen falling from the 81st floor of the South Tower seven minutes before it fell. Firemen and contractors working on the pile reported seeing "molten steel" running through the rubble and in pools beneath all three collapsed towers.

The R.J. Lee Group analyzed the dust found in the Deutsche Bank building and published their report on the composition and morphology of the dust in December 2003, in which they reported that iron spheres comprised nearly 6 percent of the dust. The U.S.G.S. published the Particle Atlas of World Trade Center Dust in 2005 in which photographs of the iron spheres were included. In 2006, there were only two copies of the Atlas available in the entire state of California. Fortunately for me, one of them was in the science library at the University of California at Davis, where I was doing research on the dust and smoke of the WTC destruction.

The R.J. Lee study of the dust found iron spheres comprised nearly 6 percent of the dust. That is a very large percentage and can not be explained by the official explanation. 

While 9-11 researchers were aware of these discoveries the general public was not simply because the mainstream media censored any discussion of it. So, why have these fundamental discoveries of forensic evidence pertaining to the destruction of the Twin Towers, in which some 2,700 people were killed, not been reported by the mainstream media?

The evidence of molten iron and other metals had to be omitted from the government and media explanation because its presence completely contradicts the official narrative of 9-11. The government story falls apart when this evidence is presented, so the controlled media has simply omitted any mention of it for the past fifteen years.

This omission was intentional because the evidence of large amounts of molten iron in the towers and rubble destroys the official narrative. This narrative had to be protected because it is the false story the public was sold in order to get public opinion to support waging the Global War on Terror. The evidence of molten iron contradicts that story, so information about it had to be withheld from the public.  

If the media had informed the public of the huge amount of molten iron in the Twin Towers when it was first seen and every time its presence was re-discovered, the entire public understanding of what happened on 9-11 would have been different, and the motivation for waging war in Afghanistan and Iraq would have been completely derailed. The media's betrayal of the American people and the republic in this regard is unforgivable.  The people who conspired to keep this information from the public should be investigated and charged with complicity in a conspiracy to wage a war of aggression, a crime against the peace.

To support Christopher Bollyn's work for 9-11 truth and justice 
and his upcoming speaking tour: 
Donate by PayPal to
or click here:

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe", Steven E. Jones, et al, The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009

Particle Atlas of World Trade Center Dust, by Heather A. Lowers and Gregory P. Meeker, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, 2005

"WTC Dust Signature Report, Composition and Morphology ", R.J. Lee Group, December 2003

"Expert Report - WTC Dust Signature", R.J. Lee Group, May 2004

Our Line in the Sand: Prosecute the Compound Crime of 9-11 and the War on Terror

January 5, 2017

Why Trump Must Investigate the Compound Crime of 9-11 and the War on Terror

As Donald Trump prepares to take office many Americans hope he will steer a new course and extract the United States from the quagmires of Afghanistan, Syria, and Iraq.  Critics of Trump point to the fact that Trump has many Zionist Jews on his staff, saying he will implement Israel-first, rather than America-first, policies in the region.

Zionist Jews in positions of power in the White House has, however, been the case with every president in recent history.  Rahm Emanuel, for example, an Israeli citizen and son of a Jewish terrorist from Yitzhak Shamir's murderous Stern Gang, held highest-level positions in both the Clinton and Obama administrations.

The Israeli agent Rahm Emanuel was the first person appointed by Barack Obama, as White House Chief of Staff. Emanuel had also been senior advisor to Bill Clinton. 

If Trump is loyal to the United States he will refrain from making any moves in the Middle East that will exacerbate tensions between the people of the region and the United States.  Moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem would certainly inflame the region against America and the American people. There is, on the other hand, nothing to gain by moving the embassy to Israeli-occupied Jerusalem.  I would hope that as a businessman Trump would see that moving the embassy is a very bad deal for the United States. Since Trump has promised to move the U.S. Embassy to occupied Jerusalem as one of his first moves as president, it looks like we will soon see which nation he is truly loyal to, the United States or Israel.

LOYAL TO WHOM? Trump has promised to move the U.S. Embassy to Israeli-occupied Jerusalem, a move that would satisfy Zionist extremists but hurt U.S. interests by inflaming tensions in the region.

Another very bad deal for the United States is the global "War on Terror," an Israeli war strategy disguised as a protective effort against fanatical terrorists. If Donald Trump truly wants to make America great again he will have to end this fraudulent war and bring to justice those who took us to war based on lies and fabrications.  The war effort in Afghanistan alone costs Americans about $100 million every day!

Tens of thousands of Americans have been wounded in the wars waged in Afghanistan and Iraq.

About 7,000 U.S. military personnel have died in Iraq and Afghanistan and thousands more died as a result of their wounds.

Bringing to justice those who conspired and waged wars of aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq is something that has to happen if Trump is serious about making America great again and "draining the swamp" in Washington.  The past fifteen years have been disastrous years of deception and war foisted on the nation by well-known politicians and media moguls.  They committed treason against the United States by waging wars of aggression based on nothing but a pack of lies. There needs to be a thorough investigation and prosecution of the politicians and media owners involved in these crimes, an effort which will lead to solving the crime of 9-11.


9-11 was a sophisticated and complex crime of terrorism and mass murder, but it is much more than that.  We would not be discussing it today if it were simply a crime of mass murder that happened fifteen years ago.  We need to understand the real reason the terrorism of 9-11 was carried out.

The 9-11 crime is the worst crime of mass murder in U.S. history, but what makes it even worse is the fact that the truth of the crime has been covered up by the government and controlled media in order to deceive the public into waging criminal wars of aggression against people in the Middle East who had absolutely nothing to do with the terrorism of 9-11. The false-flag terrorism of 9-11 was, after all, only the initiating event of a compound crime that has profoundly changed our American reality as it took us to war in nations around the world. Because these crimes have been carried out by the same organization, dismantling the criminal network and exposing the people behind the compound crime will reveal the true culprits behind the 9-11 atrocity.

The most important aspect of the 9-11 crime was attaching a false narrative to the atrocity blaming Osama bin Laden and his 19 Arab Muslims.  Getting the public to accept this fabricated story was essential to starting the Global War on Terror. This was the primary reason for the terrorism of 9-11.

The public was told that Osama bin Laden and 19 Arabs destroyed the Twin Towers although no evidence was ever presented to prove the government case and the evidence that disproved this was ignored.

Covering up the truth and blocking a criminal investigation was the only way the government and controlled media could succeed in tricking the public into believing the fairy tale about Osama and his band of fanatical Muslims.  We know the names of the people who blocked a criminal investigation and who carried out the cover-up of 9-11.  We also know the names of the people in the government and media who promoted the false narrative and took the nation to war based on nothing but a pack of lies.

Fifteen years after 9-11, it is a waste of time to argue about the minute details of the crime itself. You would have to be a very misinformed person at this point to believe that Osama bin Laden and 19 Arabs destroyed the Twin Towers.  The fact that the dust of the destroyed towers contained billions of tiny drops of molten iron and molybdenum, and that pools of molten iron were found at the base of all three towers that fell on 9-11 is solid proof that the demolition of the towers was caused by energetic materials burning much hotter than burning jet fuel.  The official version cannot account for the evidence, so it simply ignores it. Concerning the events of 9-11 and its global consequences, such willful disregard for the facts and evidence is unacceptable in any state that pretends to be democratic and peace-loving.

Tiny balls of molten iron were formed during the demolition of the Twin Towers, a fact that cannot be explained by the official version of events.

Tons of molten metal, presumed to be iron, fell from the 81st floor of the South Tower for seven minutes prior to the explosive demolition of the tower. The people trapped above this floor were being cooked alive, which is why hundreds chose to jump. The demolition of the Twin Towers killed some 2,700 people. Despite such documented evidence of molten iron the government-funded studies cannot account for its presence, so they simply ignore it.


The publication of a scientific paper in 2009 about the discovery of tiny chips of active thermitic material in the dust of the destroyed towers was the final nail in the coffin of the false narrative of 9-11. Anyone who accepted the official version after the publication of this paper was ignorant of the evidence.  Anyone who actively promoted the false narrative after 2009, however, is guilty of much worse. It is forgivable to be ignorant of the facts, but to promote a false story while ignoring the evidence is to be an agent of deception.

SUPER-THERMITE - The active thermitic material found in the dust of the World Trade Center proves that the government explanation of what happened to the Twin Towers is false, and intentionally false.

We must have a blue-ribbon investigation of the compound crime of 9-11 and the fraudulent War on Terror in order to rectify the wrongs of the past fifteen years and correct the course of the ship of state. Failure to hold treasonous criminals from previous administrations accountable for their serious crimes against humanity only facilitates more crimes being committed in the future. If Donald Trump is serious about rooting out corruption and "draining the swamp" this is where he needs to start.

As concerned citizens we must be steadfast in demanding that the new administration establish a blue-ribbon investigation into the crimes of 9-11 and the War on Terror. We cannot accept exoneration or pardons being given to treasonous criminals who have hijacked our democratic republic and committed the most serious war crimes, including waging wars of aggression.

To support Christopher Bollyn's work for 9-11 truth and justice
and his up-coming speaking tour: 
Donate by PayPal to
or click here:

Israeli Intelligence: ISIS Behind Istanbul Nightclub Attack

January 2, 2017

As I have pointed out during my recent speaking tour in the United States, all of the actions of the group known as Islamic State (or ISIL/ISIS) have been interpreted and presented to the Western media through the dodgy Israeli website run by Rita Katz, an Israeli intelligence operative working in the U.S.
- Christopher Bollyn, 
"Is Netanyahu Behind the Massacre in Tunis?" March 20, 2015

The Israeli propaganda website "SITE Intelligence Group" is the source of the report that ISIS has claimed responsibility for the attack in Istanbul on January 1, 2017. This means that Israeli military intelligence is in fact the real origin of the claim that ISIS is behind the atrocity.

Israeli intelligence agent Rita Katz, the director of SITE Intelligence Group, lives in Bethesda, Maryland, and feeds Israeli propaganda about ISIS to the Western news media. Through Rita Katz, Israeli intelligence provides the proganda and crafts the Middle East narrative on ISIS and the Middle East for U.S. media and politicians. As I reported earlier:

Rita Katz is an Israeli intelligence operative who feeds the Western media with all kinds of nonsense concerning "Islamic State" and other extremist groups. In this piece on CNN she actually admitted that SITE Intelligence Group had released the beheading video before ISIS, explaining that she had the video "beforehand." Now ask yourself, how could Israeli intelligence have a copy of the video - before the terrorists had even released it?

First, in the afternoon (USA time) of January 1, Rita Katz, the director of SITE Intelligence Group, tweeted that while no one had taken responsibility for the Istanbul attack, ISIS had "mounted a massive campaign against Turkey."

Katz tweeted that ISIS leader Baghdadi had called for attacks in Turkey.

Then, in the early hours of January 2, Katz informed the world that ISIS had claimed responsibility for the terror atrocity in Istanbul - and she provided images of the ISIS communique in Arabic and Turkish to prove it.

The ISIS communique in Arabic

The communique in Turkish

Katz informed her media subscribers (e.g. CNN, Bloomberg, FOX News) that ISIS had claimed responsibility for the Istanbul nightclub attack.

Katz went on to say that ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack "after carrying out a massive campaign against Turkey, inciting for attacks in Turkey & its interests." The time stamp appears to be California time, which would have made this about 4:30 a.m. (ET). Katz was working late, in any case.

Katz then went on to intepret the ISIS attack for Twitter readers

Her pinned post at the top of her Tweets about Istanbul shows images of ISIS terrorists with a quote from President Franklin Roosevelt: "... we have learned in the agony of war that great power involves great responsibility." Her message could not be clearer:  The U.S. must wage war on ISIS.

CNN was the first news site to report that ISIS had claimed responsibility for the attack, but their report did not identify the source of the report and CNN said it could not verify the claim. The New York Times and USA Today, like CNN, report the alleged ISIS claim as fact without providing the source. It should be noted that this appears to be the rule rather than the exception since only one U.S. news source mentions SITE Intelligence as being the source. What kind of shoddy journalism is this?

At about 6 a.m. on January 2, Bloomberg reported that the source of the ISIS claim was none other than the Israeli intelligence website, SITE Intelligence Group. As of 1 p.m. on January 2, the Bloomberg report was the only one that identified SITE Intelligence as being the source of the ISIS claim.

The fact that the ISIS claim had come from SITE Intelligence Group was found deep in the Bloomberg report. To understand what this all means, read the article below.

A day and a half after the New Year's shooting attack at a nightclub in Istanbul, the Israeli intelligence/propaganda website "SITE Intelligence Group" headed by Rita Katz in Bethesda, Maryland, announced that ISIS (i.e. Islamic State, ISIL) had claimed responsibility for the attack.

The first media reports that ISIS had claimed responsibility for the attack (i.e. CNN, Mirror, Daily Sabah) did not identify the source of the claim, which was odd, but Bloomberg News did so at about 6 a.m. on January 2 (ET).

This means that ISIS itself does not communicate with CNN, or the BBC, or anyone else in the media, but that the real source of the claim is the Israeli intelligence operative Rita Katz, who informed the media of the ISIS claim about the mass shooting in Istanbul as she has so many times before.

Once again, the blame for the terrorist act is put on ISIS by Israeli intelligence. Most likely the ISIS communiques are actually being crafted by Israeli intelligence (e.g. Unit 8200) and then fed to Rita Katz in Maryland, who then sends the Israeli information/propaganda to her subscribers in the media, like CNN, Bloomberg, FOX News, etc. This is a good example of how the Israeli tail wags the dog.

What appears to be going on with the January 1 attack in Turkey is an Israeli operation to ramp up terror attacks by ISIS before Donald Trump takes office in order to set the stage for increased U.S. military operations in the Middle East. Trump famously said during his campaign that he would "bomb the shit out of ISIS." Israeli intelligence is now setting the stage for this phase of their war agenda, known as the "War on Terror". 

To support Christopher Bollyn's work 
donate by PayPal to
or click here:

Sources and Recommended Reading:  

"Islamic State Claims New Year’s Massacre at Istanbul Nightclub,", by Ercan Ersoy and Selcan Hacaoglu, Updated January 2, 2017, 11:42 AM GMT+1

"Berlin Attack Truck Owned by Israel-Supporting Jewish Man - Rita Katz & the Israeli Interpretation of the Berlin Attack" based on a posting by Christopher Bollyn

"Gaddafi's Ties to Rothschild & Jewish Oligarchy" by Christopher Bollyn, March 26, 2011

"Is Netanyahu Behind the Massacre in Tunis?" by Christopher Bollyn, March 20, 2015

Rita Katz on Twitter,, January 2, 2017

"The Rabid Zionists behind the Garland Shooting" by Christopher Bollyn, May 19, 2015

Are the Accusations of Russian Hacking an Israeli False-Flag Operation?

December 31, 2016

“State-sponsored Russian hacking is a serious threat, and the attempts to penetrate the electric grid through a Vermont utility are the latest example.”
- Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, December 30, 2016

“Vermonters and all Americans should be both alarmed and outraged that one of the world’s leading thugs, Vladimir Putin, has been attempting to hack our electric grid, which we rely upon to support our quality-of-life, economy, health, and safety.”
- Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin, December 30, 2016

"The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from this madness is to expose the true source of terrorism."
- Christopher Bollyn

Today, in yet another claim that Russia is hacking crucial U.S. computer systems, the Washington Post has an article that blames Russia for hacking into an energy utility computer network in Vermont.

See: "Russian operation hacked a Vermont utility, showing risk to U.S. electrical grid security, officials say"

The essence of the news reports that Russia is behind the hacking is that malware code that is "associated" or "linked" with Russia was found on a laptop at the company:

While the Russians did not actively use the code to disrupt operations, according to officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a security matter, the discovery underscores the vulnerabilities of the nation’s electrical grid. And it raises fears in the U.S. government that Russian government hackers are actively trying to penetrate the grid to carry out potential attacks...

Burlington Electric said in a statement that the company detected a malware code used in the Grizzly Steppe operation in a laptop that was not connected to the organization’s grid systems. The firm said it took immediate action to isolate the laptop and alert federal authorities.


While it is certainly possible that Russian hackers are behind the hacking at Burlington Electric, what is far more likely is that a third-party hacker broke into the laptop and left the malware code "associated" with Russia in order for Putin to be blamed. This would mean that the hacking is a false-flag operation meant to be blamed on Russia. Such an operation would be easy for a professional hacker such as Amit Yoran, the Israeli who oversaw cyber-security for the Dept. of Defense prior to 9/11. Israel has an entire branch of military intelligence, Unit 8200, which specializes in hacking into foreign computer networks.

Amit Yoran is an Israeli hacker who made a business out of hacking public utilities like Burlington Electric.

Yoran also worked on security for the Pentagon computers prior to 9/11. He also worked with computer security companies tied to Israeli military intelligence. 
He went on to work for RSA, another Israeli military linked company that provided encryption software for the NSA.

Amit Yoran, who is described in my book Solving 9/11, actually headed a company that hacked into foreign utility companies. Here is the relevant information from "The Architecture of Terror", Chapter 7 of Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World:


"Mr. [Amit] Yoran is chief executive of Riptech, a U.S. company that employs 'ethical hackers' to test vulnerability of networks, including those of utility companies," the Irish Times reported on October 5, 2001. "He [Yoran] says his teams have had success in disrupting utilities' power networks, in Europe particularly," according to the article, which was aptly titled, "Welcome to the Art of Electronic Warfare." The Yorans' company hacked into the computer networks of dozens of energy companies, the Los Angeles Times reported on August 20, 2001:

Riptech Inc., a security company in Alexandria, Va., has tested security for dozens of energy-industry clients. In every case, the firm penetrated Internet-connected corporate networks and often hopped from those networks into supposedly sealed grid-control systems, according to Riptech's president, Amit Yoran…

Riptech "was founded by Elad and Amit Yoran, two Israeli West Point graduates who claim years of security experience, and Tim Belcher, a Desert Storm veteran who serves as the company's chief technology officer," the Washington Times reported on December 11, 2000. "Amit Yoran reportedly helped design the Pentagon's computer security architecture," the Times reported.

Riptech was funded by companies associated with Israeli military intelligence through Amit's brother Elad.

From Solving 9-11, "The Architecture of Terror":

Yoran had been a vice president with Broadview, one of the mysterious funding entities of Riptech, prior to joining Riptech. Elad Yoran was clearly performing two functions for Riptech: funding the company through his position as "vice president at Broadview International," an unknown source of funds that poured millions of dollars into Riptech, and as "executive vice president" of Riptech, the privately-held recipient company he co-founded with his brother in 1998. It is through such secretive "venture capital" funding entities like Broadview and Veritas Venture Partners that the hand of Israeli military intelligence can be clearly seen running the computer network "security" companies they have spawned, like Guardium.

Yoran's link to Guardium is important because this is one of the key links between Israeli military intelligence, Ptech, and 9/11. I wrote more about Yoran and these connections in a 2006 article entitled "The Israeli Code on U.S. Government Computers":

RSA, for example, an older security software company, acquired an Israeli-run security software company, named Cyota, at the end of 2005 for $145 million. In January 2005, Cyota, "the leading provider of online security and anti-fraud solutions for financial institutions" had announced that "security expert" Amit Yoran, had joined the company's board of directors. Prior to becoming a director at Cyota, Yoran, a 34-year old Israeli, had already been the national "Cyber Czar," having served as director of the Department of Homeland Security's National Cyber Security Division. Yoran had been appointed "Cyber Czar" at age 32 by President George W. Bush in September 2003.

Before joining DHS, Yoran had been vice president for worldwide managed security services at Symantec. Prior to that, he had been the founder, president and CEO of Riptech, Inc., an information security management and monitoring firm, which Symantec acquired in 2002 for $145 million.

Yoran and his brother Naftali Elad Yoran are graduates of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. Elad graduated in 1991 and Amit in 1993. Along with their brother Dov, the Yoran brothers are key players in the security software market. Amit has also held critical positions in the U.S. government overseeing computer security for the very systems that apparently failed on 9-11.

Before founding Riptech in 1998, Amit Yoran directed the vulnerability-assessment program within the computer emergency response team at the US Department of Defense. Yoran previously served as an officer in the United States Air Force as the Director of Vulnerability Programs for the Department of Defense's Computer Emergency Response Team and in support of the Assistant Secretary of Defense's Office.

In June 2005, Yoran joined the board of directors of Guardium, Inc., another Mossad-spawned "provider of database security solutions" based in Waltham, Massachusetts. Guardium is linked with Ptech, an apparent Mossad "cut out" computer security company linked with the 9-11 attacks.


Why would Amit Yoran, or any other Israeli (like the military intelligence hackers at Unit 8200) want to frame Putin by leaving code to make it appear that Russia is hacking into U.S. utilities or political parties?

There are several reasons why the Israelis would do something like this:

1. As pay-back for Russia's intervention in Syria, which succeeded in disrupting the Israeli plot to "Balkanize" Syria by breaking the country into smaller units;

2. To disrupt peaceful and harmonious relations between the United States and Russia, which threaten Israeli hegemony over the occupied territories and the Near East. If Russia and the U.S. co-operate and engage together to try to solve the problems in the Middle East, Israel would be forced to make compromises to settle the Palestinian problem - something that Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right government are strongly opposed to.

3.  To vilify Russian president Vladimir Putin in the eyes of the Western public. This is because Putin is an obstacle for the Zionist Neo-Cons who seek to impose their agenda on the world. There is virtually no resistance to this agenda in the West where the media is controlled by corporations that support that agenda. As we see in Syria, Russia under Putin is able to thwart the Zionist Neo-Con war agenda. The Neo-Cons and the powers that control the Western media would also like to see regime change in Russia, so vilification of Putin serves their agenda.

To support Christopher Bollyn's work 
donate by PayPal to
or click here:

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Amit Yoran, Wikipedia, December 31, 2016

Diagram: Network of Israeli individuals and companies which supplied hostile spy software to critical US government computer systems prior to 9/11

"How Israel Spies on Us All through the NSA" by Christopher Bollyn, July 1, 2013

"The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9/11" by Christopher Bollyn, July 25, 2008

"The Israeli Code on U.S. Government Computers" by Christopher Bollyn, June 16, 2006

Same article is at "Israelis Hold Keys to NSA/US Military Computer Networks" by Christopher Bollyn, June 16, 2006

"The Israeli Criminals behind the NSA Spy Scandal" by Christopher Bollyn, June 13, 2013

"Why NSA Spying Never Catches Israelis" by Christopher Bollyn, July 14, 2013



How Will the War on Terror End?

December 18, 2016

The false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 and the War on Terror are the two prongs of a dual deception. Now that this is exposed and understood, how can it go on?

I often wonder how the War on Terror will end. Knowing it is an artificially imposed "reality", I wonder if it will be allowed to just peter out and disappear from the scene, or will it be maintained and increased?  A fraud of this magnitude simply can not be kept up forever.  With the election of Donald Trump, this is a central question facing the new administration and the nation. A new team is coming to town and it is not the same as the old team.

The War on Terror is, after all, a completely artificial war that has been imposed on us through deception.  Since 9-11, this deception has been maintained by phony acts of terrorism and contrived armies of Islamic extremists.  Fifteen years after being given a global mandate by Congress to use force against the terrorists who attacked us, the U.S. is currently waging war in at least a dozen nations under the guise of fighting the War on Terror.

The false-flag terror atrocity of 9-11 was designed and carried out to kick-start the War on Terror, a Zionist war agenda in disguise that had been pushed by Benjamin Netanyahu and Israeli military intelligence since the late 1970s. The crimes of 9-11 were not subjected to a proper criminal investigation because they were not meant to be scrutinized or solved. This means that the worst criminal atrocity in American history has never been investigated as a crime. 

The 9-11 attacks were simply meant to start the War on Terror, so we were given a contrived narrative that Osama bin Laden and his gang of Islamic terrorists attacked the United States because they hate our freedom.  Calling the 9-11 crime an act of war the Bush administration refused to investigate the crime, declared war on terrorism, destroyed the evidence, and promptly invaded Afghanistan.

The Bush administration did not begin a criminal investigation of the terror attacks of 9-11 because an investigation would have exposed that their narrative was utter fiction. An investigation would have revealed that the crime was not truly carried out by Muslims, but was a false-flag attack designed and carried out by Israeli military intelligence in order to be blamed on Muslims and start the long-planned War on Terror.

Exposing the cover story as fictitious would have stopped the Israeli War on Terror in its tracks and put the spotlight on the Zionist masterminds of 9-11.

I have written two letters to Donald Trump in the past year asking if he would call for an investigation of 9-11 as president.  In response, all I have gotten are emails asking for donations and offers to buy Trump paraphernalia – even after he won the election, which I find very odd.

The terrorism of 9-11 and the War on Terror are two parts of the same deception:  a dual deception designed to trick the United States and its allies into fighting a Zionist war agenda in the Middle East. Enslaved to this deception, we have waged war for Israel for the past fifteen years. 

While the War on Terror is an obvious fraud and deception, the wars being fought in its name have very real costs. Tens of thousands of Americans have been killed or injured in these artificial wars, which have cost the U.S. trillions of borrowed dollars. Millions of innocent people have been killed, wounded, and displaced in the countries where these wars have been waged. How much longer can this evil deception go on? How can America survive when it is spending hundreds of millions of dollars a day on unnecessary and illegal wars of aggression?

We have been burdened with this lawless and fraudulent Zionist war agenda since 2001, imposed on us through the deception of 9/11. Regime change and Balkanization are the tactics of the two-pronged modus operandi of the criminal cabal behind this deception, which has been employed on countries from Afghanistan to Libya, Iraq, and Ukraine. Syria is the latest victim of these criminal predators.

All of this is, of course, highly illegal, which is why I ask, how will this all end? How will the culprits manage the climb down? The American people are now well aware of the deception of 9-11 and the War on Terror, and who is behind it.  The question now being asked is:  Will Donald Trump, a friend of Benjamin Netanyahu and hard-core Zionism, bring an end to the War on Terror?

Similar political constellations have led to extreme violence:  Ronald Reagan and Menachem Begin led to the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982, and George W. Bush and Ariel Sharon led to 9-11 and the War on Terror in 2001. Will Donald Trump be able to bring us something better?

Donald Trump has often said that he is opposed to the regime change policies of the Bush and Obama administrations, the modus operandi of the War on Terror:

"Hillary Clinton’s support for violent regime change in Syria has thrown the country into one of the bloodiest civil wars anyone has ever seen – while giving ISIS a launching pad for terrorism against the West."
- Donald Trump, June 22, 2016

"Our current strategy of nation-building and regime change is a proven failure. We have created the vacuums that allow terrorists to grow and thrive."
- Donald Trump, August 15, 2016

Not only has this strategy been a failure - it has been a criminal failure, which means that people like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and George Bush are culpable for some very serious crimes. Apart from being a failure, such criminal activity destroys American prestige and credibility around the world.

If Donald Trump is truly serious about "draining the swamp" in Washington, he should start with a criminal investigation of the Obama and Bush administrations. If Trump were to pardon Obama as Obama pardoned Bush, he would be allowing the presidents who have committed huge crimes during the past 15 years to retire in luxury at taxpayer expense. This is highly destructive to our nation because such blanket pardons enable the criminal cabal to get away with mass murder - and much more. More importantly, we are allowing our great republic to be turned into a rogue state headed by criminals.

To support Christopher Bollyn's work 
donate by PayPal to
or click here:

Will Trump Investigate 9/11?

December 15, 2016

Will President Trump investigate 9/11?

In order to maintain the 9/11 cover-up (and the fraudulent War on Terror) the real masterminds behind the false-flag terror deception need to control the White House. As long as this terrorist cabal controls the White House, the culprits of 9/11 have effective control over both the Department of Justice and the FBI. They have obviously controlled both the Bush and Obama White Houses. The big question facing us is whether they will also have control of the Trump White House.

Will Trump call for a criminal investigation or will he maintain the 9/11 cover-up?

To support Christopher Bollyn's work 
donate by PayPal to
or click here:

How Can We Obtain Justice for 9/11?

December 11, 2016

The fact that in the fifteen years since 9/11 there has been no justice for the nearly 3,000 victims indicates that we do not have a system of justice, but a system of injustice. In this situation, the only remedy is a popular movement that puts pressure on the state to deliver justice.

“Look back through history and you will see that big change comes from movements – not from politicians."
– Philip R. Warth

Americans grow up believing that justice will prevail. This popular notion is based on a widely-held belief that the state investigates crimes properly, enforces the laws fairly, and delivers justice to society. This belief has been fostered in the minds of Americans for decades through popular television crime shows in which some agency of the government investigates unusual and heinous crimes and, in the final climactic scene, exposes the culprits. In the end, justice always prevails, at least in our imagination.

Unfortunately, reality is not like that at all. In fact, you could say that in America we have a system of official injustice. The most blatant example of this official injustice is, of course, 9/11.  Fifteen years after the worst case of mass murder in the United States, the criminal atrocity of 9/11 has gone uninvestigated and unprosecuted.  Not a single one of the relatives of the nearly three thousand victims ever got their day in court.  Every single one of the wrongful death cases from the 9/11 atrocity was settled out of court.

With the supposed killing of Osama bin Laden in Pakistan by the Obama administration, Americans were led to believe that justice prevailed in the end, but this was a scripted fantasy just like the crime shows on television.

What kind of justice should we expect from the state?  Justice is defined as the exercise of authority in maintenance of right; the due allocation of reward of virtue and punishment of vice. In reality, however, we find ourselves living under a system of injustice in which the authority of the state rewards vice and punishes virtue.

The way the 9/11 victims' cases were handled in the federal system is a travesty of justice, an insult to the idea of justice. By not pursuing a criminal investigation of 9/11 the Department of Justice allowed the culprits to get away with mass murder – and much more.  By accepting the false narrative about 9/11 we have empowered and enriched the real terrorists of 9/11. 

So, why has this gross travesty of justice been allowed to pass without criticism or correction? There is, of course, only one logical answer to this question.  The official cover-up of the 9/11 crimes has passed through our system only because the powers behind 9/11 control the U.S. government and our judicial system.

The playing field is completely controlled by the enemy.  This is why it has been so difficult for grassroots groups calling for truth and justice, like I Am the Face of Truth, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, The 9/11 Justice Campaign, and other like-minded groups, to gain traction and obtain real results. I was, for example, on a conference call with a group called Lawyers for 9/11 Truth a few weeks ago in which the discussion was about how a case might be started that could lead to some legal discovery of the 9/11 crime.

Fifteen years later, we have yet to see any justice for the victims of 9/11 coming from our politicians, the media, or our judicial system. So we ask, what will it take to obtain justice for 9/11?  

Clearly, what is needed is a popular movement in which concerned citizens put pressure on the state to investigate and prosecute the crimes of 9/11. As we can see from the successful protest against the oil pipeline at Cannon Ball, North Dakota, a popular movement that is focused and steadfast will prevail in the end. This is what it took to get the government to re-route the oil pipeline and this is what it will take to re-route our nation from a path of aggression based on the 9/11 deception to a path of peace and prosperity. 

To support Christopher Bollyn
donate by PayPal to
or click here:

Q&A and Comment Forum

December 12, 2016

I created this Q&A forum because I get so many good comments and questions through Feedback.  The latest comments come first.  The person who asked about the "Ground Zero" Islamic center "controversy" in New York City sent this kind comment:

Thank you very much for your excellent answer. But then, everything you have written is excellent and well researched.  You are a real hero and an example of courage and honesty.
- from a reader in Geneva, Switzerland

Latest Question: After reading my article "How Can We Obtain Justice for 9/11?" Jimmy Walter asked, "Well written, but is justice merely revenge?"

Bollyn Responds: Jimmy asks, is justice merely revenge? No, Jimmy, not at all. Striving for and supporting 9/11 truth and justice is nothing less than the moral imperative of our time. Some might ask, why? Some will say we have lived quite alright since 9/11. Why is it our moral imperative to support 9/11 truth and justice?

There are two basic reasons why it is. Firstly, because 9/11 is a global deception that was used to impose upon us a false narrative to transform our nation and society and take us into an open-ended and criminal war of aggression known as the War on Terror. After 15 years of waging this criminal war agenda we have killed over 1 million innocent people and destroyed the lives of millions more. By accepting the false narrative of 9/11 foisted on us by the terrorist masterminds themselves we have accepted a false reality, imposed on us through deception.

Secondly, by not investigating and prosecuting the real criminals behind 9/11 we have let them get away with the atrocity of mass murder of 3,000 people on 9/11. By accepting their false narrative we have empowered and enriched the very terrorist masterminds behind this outrageous crime. As Socrates said, criminals who go unpunished become only worse. So, by failing to prosecute the real criminals behind 9/11 we subject ourselves, our children, and our nations to their agenda of war and terrorism -- which can only get worse and more violent.

This is why it is our moral imperative to support 9/11 truth and justice. Nothing could be more important to our survival and the welfare of our nation(s). We have a very real moral obligation to be active in our support of 9/11 truth and justice.

Question:  If Trump is as utterly clueless as he consistently appears to be regarding global affairs – amongst so many other things – he presumably has people around him to feed him the basic dumbed down snippets he blathers and spouts? I wonder who these people are who steer him and how they are able to groom him sufficiently to appear even faintly informed? From all we can see, does he not appear to be a George Bush type of useful idiot? Everyone I know figures surely the election & Brexit were rigged? Kind of unimaginable that they weren't? But clearly not the results we were all expecting to be rigged in favour of the elites and banksters? Very interested to know your thoughts. Thanks for all your amazing work.

Bollyn Responds:  I don't think Donald Trump is clueless at all.  In fact, he seems to be very aware of the fundamental problems facing Americans, as well as quite savvy on global issues.  Trump's position on rebuilding infrastructure and our domestic manufacturing sector is simple economic common sense.  I watched Trump speak in Detroit last summer and he hit all the nails squarely on the head regarding jobs and trade. The fact that he has the 'smarts' of a business man and knows how to make a deal makes him an ideal candidate to straighten out the disastrous "free-trade" agreements like NAFTA, dumped on the American people by Bill Clinton and Rahm Emanuel in Clinton's first year in office.

On foreign policy, Trump is also right on target.  He calls for improving relations with Russia and ending the "regime change" foreign policy of the Bush and Obama administrations, like that applied by Obama in Syria since 2011. Ending the wars in Syria and the Middle East and having good ties with Russia are, once again, simply good common sense.

I don't know who steers Trump, or if anyone does. Nor would I put Trump in the same category as George W. Bush.  Bush, Clinton, and Obama are clearly criminals who have engaged in conspiring and waging wars of aggression and other war crimes.  Hillary Clinton is also guilty of these and other crimes.  Trump, on the other hand, has a clean record.

The fact that Hillary Clinton was the chosen candidate of the mainstream media, George Soros, Lady Rothschild, and the New York Times going into Iowa indicated to me that the international criminal cabal had their money on her. Trump does not talk like a politician because he is a New York business man and talks like one. He says what he means, and I hope, he means what he says. We will have to see if he makes the changes he promised he would.

On the day of 9/11, Trump said that he thought that there were bombs that went off in the buildings simultaneously with the plane crashes.  This suggests that he is an honest person who may be willing to investigate 9/11 properly.  That is certainly what I hope and the reason I sent him two open letters and the Solving 9-11 set of books.

Comment:  Mr Bollyn... I have been aware of the deception since 2005. When it turned out there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and the media (after spending several months pounding us with fears of an impending WMD attack) said nothing, I knew there was something very wrong. Within a few weeks of independently researching, I came across a video of building 7 and that's was enough proof of a false flag for me.

Given what I have been learning over a decade and what I thought was extensive (albeit casual) research, I'm shocked that I have only now come across your work. You have been de facto persona non grata in the alternate media it appears. I have thoroughly enjoyed the meticulousness of your research and I am now especially motivated to exercise my critical thinking when getting my information.

I'm a little embarrassed to say that I spent time engaging in the Judy Wood free energy (or buck rogers space gun as you have hilariously put it) and the "Russian Intelligence" nuclear demolition theories. In hindsight, even a little critical thinking would have exposed these as disinformation - as there are no sources or peer reviewed evidence. But hey, if my dumbass now can finally understand the nature of disinformation, maybe it shows that TPTB are finding it harder to be the controlled opposition. 

I grew up mostly in Africa and India where the governments consistently screw the citizens pretty much on a daily basis - so maybe I'm predisposed to distrust governments. I have now been in the US for 15 years and it’s painful to see how naive Americans are. Not just naive, but aggressively so - because if there is any discussion outside of the mainstream narrative, there is usually a violent reaction. My dream was to come live in America - but now that I'm here, I'm having second thoughts. Maybe the truth will set Americans free from the intellectual zoo that they trapped in (and I ain't just talking about the Kardashians).

It is rare that I come across a bold, cultured, intelligent, and brave patriot like you who is willing to speak truth (based on researched and verifiable facts) regardless of taboo. I can't imagine how difficult the last 14 years has been for you and your family. I'm grateful for the work you have put in and I hope we will soon see the fruits of your efforts. And it may come soon, since the economy is bad shape - another great recession and Americans may be forced to turn off college sports and finally sit up and take notice of what is going on around them.

Comment:  A Letter from Sweden

Dear Christopher,

I attach a contribution to you, for your work on exposing the criminal network plaguing the current world.  Your work to expose the criminals that executed the terror and murders on September 11, 2001, is truly outstanding.  Your work is very important.  You also share information and views on current events that is highly interesting.  I hope that slowly the information you have uncovered will spread to more and more people.

- A supporter in Sweden

Bollyn Responds:  Thank you.  I hope that the process of informing the public about the truth of 9-11 and the fraudulent "War on Terror" goes more quickly than it has.  This is why I am going on another speaking tour in America.  We can't let the gangsters rule our world.

Comment:  Christopher,

I admire what you do. If we all live 20 years more without a thermo-nuclear war destroying everything, you and a few other brave individuals will definitely be appreciated and remembered for what you have done as the world's greatest heroes.

What you do will one day bring the disclosure of 9/11 truth to more people, and if it happens early enough and the perpetrators feel enough pressure to step aside (or be prosecuted), then the total death scenario can be avoided – saving all of us as a result. If the current masterminds of 9/11 remain in control, however, it is only a question of time when they decide on a perfect moment to have a global "re-set" to the system.

You say "Solving 9/11 ends the War."

"Solving 9/11" – you and a few others have accomplished this already through years of hard work. The next hurdle is the cognitive barrier, the inability of millions of adults to accept the reality that it actually did happen, and that the authorities in many countries need to be challenged to do something minimally acceptable to restore justice.

To most people, to accept this truth is like dealing with a hypothetical situation to learn that the mom and dad you lived with all these years are actually not your real parents, but rather criminals who pretend to be your parents for some pure financial gain or other benefit, and who feel nothing wrong about killing you at some point if that maximizes their final benefit.

Instead of living a continued comfortable life....what are you going to do now? Go to the police? Move out, find another place to live? Run to neighbors and ask for help? Go and kill the bastards at night? Or maybe ignore the guy trying to tell you this truth as an insane lunatic, and come back to comfortable everyday life.

Completely new thinking, new insights are needed to overcome it.

When does the information, the knowledge of truth become compelling for an average person living in the western world (and Russians mentally are not very different from it, unfortunately) to act and to seek a minimal next step to be done? I have no solution for this, and before it emerges, what you and few others are doing about 9/11 truth, is our only chance to survive.

Thank you for what you do and all the best wishes as well!

- A Supporter and Reader in Russia

Comment:  The following comment is from a resident of Colorado who understands the gate-keeping being done by certain members of Colorado for 9-11 Truth, who are opposed to my speaking in Colorado.

The Good Samaritan

Dear Christopher (and Members of Denver 9/11 unTruth),

I thought of a fantastic parable for how the Denver group is treating you.

When they say they support your appearing in Colorado but just not under their sponsorship it seems to me akin to the following scenario:

Imagine the Good Samaritan passing by the half-dead Jew lying on the Jericho road. He leans over to him and says:

“Friend, I truly pity your condition and I would like to help you, but I cannot because I fear the enmity of my friends and neighbors back in Samaria were they to find out that I helped you. So even though I choose not to help you now due to my cowardice, know this: I fully support the right of some other Samaritan with more courage than I to help you recover, for this is what you deserve!”

Thus is the attitude of the Denver 911 unTruth organization to Christopher Bollyn. Hollow rhetoric and false flattery that benefits no one except their own warped sense of pride.

Hoping for much better from the citizens of NiDaVeR [let us reason together] Colorado,

Michael Korn

Comment: Doctor Bob wrote:

ISIS belongs to the gang that has taken control of “our” Government. You may ask why it is that the Government that now controls the U.S. created ISIS and why does it continue to 'nurture' ISIS. The answer is that the Government that now controls OUR COUNTRY needs a 'boogie man' to scare the hell out of the American people, and a whole lot more.

Watch the video below and judge for yourself.

p.s. It is OUR COUNTRY and not “our” Country if we are willing to take the peaceful political actions necessary take it back. 

Comment:  The following comment is a letter written by a supporter of mine in Fort Collins to a Boulder-based couple involved in Colorado 9-11 Truth.  I visited the steering committee of the group at Fran Shure's house in Denver in October 2014 and have been trying to arrange an event in Colorado for the past year but am opposed by certain people in the Colorado group, who have been able to block me because the group operates on a consensus basis:

Dear Marti and Bob,

Thank You for writing.

I am a Messianic Jewish believer in Jesus who lives in Fort Collins.

I have never met Chris Bollyn personally, although I have followed his writings about 9-11 for many years and have been most impressed with his forthrightness and penetrating analysis, as well as his fearlessness.

I lived in Israel for 20 years following my graduation from Harvard in 1980.

I was ultra-Orthodox for much of that time.

I converted to Christianity in the year 2000 under the guidance of South African missionaries I met in Tzfat [Safed] in the Israeli Galilee.

One of my motivations in converting was to break out of the endless cycle of violence and hatred that Orthodox Judaism projects against not only Arabs and other non-Jews but also against secular Jewish Israelis. I was raised as a Reform Jew in California and find it puzzling that Reform Jews support Israel when the Zionist state doesn't even recognize Reform Judaism and grants the Orthodox rabbinate all power.

I am well aware of the brutality of Israeli government officials, the military, and the intelligence agencies. I myself harbored so much animosity towards Arabs that I was deferred from serving in the IDF when I was drafted.

I have been a 911 Truther since 9-12-2001, when the first skeptical information started appearing on the internet on many sites.

(I stopped supporting Counterpunch because its manager, Alexander Cockburn, refused to question the official 911 fairytale. Cockburn would question everything else about the government except for that sacred cow. I never understand why he was so stubborn, but I rejoiced when he died suddenly. A major impediment to disseminating 911 Truth bit the dust.)

Of all 911 Truthers, Chris Bollyn is the only person who delves into the backgrounds of the many actors and demonstrates an overwhelming Zionist connection. He may not have ironclad proof, but his research certainly should suffice to empower a Grand Jury investigation with subpoena powers. That of course has never happened.

Other 911 investigators, like David Ray Griffin and AE911Truth, demolish the credibility of the official investigation, but only Chris Bollyn tracks down the likely perpetrators.

On a personal note, as a Jew who lived in Israel for many years, I understand that Chris's revelations are disturbing. For many Jewish people Israel is a sacred institution, much like the Vatican for Catholics, who also are reluctant to criticize their church when corruption becomes apparent.

It is only the teachings of Jesus that have given me the courage to consider the evidence Chris Bollyn offers without fear. And while I admit that his allegations are very painful, for me the truth is the ultimate value and so in the end I don't care if his findings implicate the government of Israel and its Neocon supporters in America and England.

Jesus taught that The Truth shall set you free, and I firmly believe in this.

No organization, institution, race, religion, nationality or other entity supersedes truth in importance.

And that's why in the end I laud Christopher Bollyn and consider him to be a genuine cultural hero and a gift to humanity.

My prayer for you is that you will allow the Truth to set you free too.

Shalom baShem Yeshua - Peace in the Name of Jesus!

Michael P. Korn

Comment:  In an email about the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, Elias Davidsson, a Jew who was born in Palestine prior to the establishment of the state of Israel, stated (citing Peter Hounam's Operation Cyanide):

“In fact Israel attacked the USS Liberty at the request of the U.S.”

This statement by Davidsson suggests that the United States was calling the shots during the Six Day War, including having its own ship sunk, and that the Israelis were simply following orders from the U.S.

I disagree, because this is not what the historical record shows.

To prepare for this answer, I read Operation Cyanide (2002) by Peter Hounam, which was apparently written with financial support of the BBC. Somebody paid Hounam to go to Israel, America, and Russia to interview the people for the book and his BBC program on the sinking of the USS Liberty.

The main thrust of the book is that Hounam tries to give Israel a pass for its murderous assault on the USS Liberty by saying that the Israelis were attacking the Liberty for the U.S., who he suggests, was the real driver behind the Six Day War. I don't think that is the case at all.

Lyndon Johnson was a crypto-Jew Zionist who actually slept with his Zionist whore/Irgun agent (Mathilde Krim) in the White House the night before the Liberty was attacked. Furthermore, Johnson was surrounded by Zionist Jews in his administration.

I have a couple basic questions about Hounam's book:

First, why does Hounam not mention, even once, the Lavon Affair of 1954, when Israeli agents in Egypt bombed British and U.S. institutions to try and turn these nations against Egypt and its rising star, Gamal Abdul Nasser? If you are discussing Israeli false-flag terrorism you really should discuss their recent history of such crimes.

Secondly, although Hounam wants to fix the blame for the attack on the USS Liberty on Lyndon B. Johnson, he gives absolutely no background information on Johnson's role as a Zionist agent in the United States going back to the 1930s. Johnson has a long history of serving the Zionist state and breaking U.S. laws to do so - even as a freshman Congressman. He had big backers and he knew it.

What the record shows is that Lyndon Johnson was a high-level Zionist agent, and that he had been working for the Zionist cause since his first term in the U.S. Congress. Johnson had no problem breaking U.S. law to support Israel and had shipped weapons to Israel in violation of the neutrality act. Earlier, in the 1930s, Johnson had worked with B’nai B’rith in “Operation Texas” to bring hundreds of illegal Jewish immigrants into the U.S. through Galveston.

See: “LBJ & the Zionist Cover-up of the Conspiracy to Kill Kennedy” by Christopher Bollyn, November 18, 2013

With that in mind, I think Tim King’s analysis (below) of the agreement between Israel and LBJ regarding the attack on the USS Liberty is closer to reality:

In 2003, journalist Peter Hounam wrote Operation Cyanide: How the Bombing of the USS Liberty Nearly Caused World War III, which proposes a completely different theory regarding the incident. In an attempt to explain why there was no support by U.S. forces as backup, Hounam claims that Israel and U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson had secretly agreed on day four of the Six Day War that the Liberty would be sunk with complete loss of life. The attack would be blamed on Egypt, allowing the U.S. in turn to attack Egypt, thus helping out Israel.

However, according to Hounam's theory, because the Liberty did not sink after two hours, the plan was quickly reversed, Israel apologized for the case of mistaken identity, and a cover-up was put into place.

If Israel was willing to be that underhanded and drag the hard pressed American forces onto another battle front in the Mideast in 1967, then they were and are no friend of this country, and it appears to be exactly what took place. If U.S. officials were involved, then it is another classic example like 9/11, where American lives were willingly sacrificed by the government to further drive some kind of political agenda. People are so naive to believe "the government would never do that", yet I fear that they are wrong, very wrong.

Knowing that much, it is easy to conclude that Israel, with its huge influence in American politics, would likely take this route again.

Source: “Operation Cyanide and Israel's Role in 9/11” by Tim King,, March 20, 2010

Comment: The following comment by Elias Davidsson was not made to, but is part of an email exchange between people planning a 9-11 truth conference in California. I am posting it here because it is a good analysis of the relationship between the U.S. government and 9-11 truth.

Elias Davidsson wrote:

I have resisted engaging in this discussion. Yet, I believe that the movement is today able to assert certain facts as unassailable and build upon these unassailable facts.  Let me enumerate some of the most important ones:

1.  The U.S. Government opposed an independent investigation of the largest crime on US territory;

2.  The U.S. Government condoned the massive destruction of criminal evidence, and not only the steel beams from the WTC;

3.  The U.S. Government used financial inducement to prevent victims’ families from seeking the truth of the events in the courts;

4.  The U.S. Government promoted military leaders who ostensibly “failed their obligation” to protect the country on 9/11;

5.  The U.S. Government failed to produce a shred of evidence that 19 alleged hijackers boarded any of the four aircraft that allegedly were hijacked on 9/11 (their names don’t appear on any authenticated passenger list; no one sighted them at the airport; no one sighted them boarding the aircraft; no authenticated video recordings present them at the airports; and their bodily remains were not identified.);

6.  The U.S. Government failed to produce evidence that the aircraft designated as flights AA11, UA175, AA77, and UA93 crashed at the given sites (this was admitted in a court case to Aidan Monaghan by the FBI.);

7.  The U.S. Government did not bring a single planner, facilitator, financier or accomplice of the mass-murder of 9/11 to justice.  It even balks in bringing the self-styled “planner” of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohamed, to justice;

By its conduct, the U.S. Government utterly failed its international obligation under human rights law, to carry out a prompt, independent, impartial, thorough, and transparent investigation of the massive violation to the right to life committed under its jurisdiction.  According to international norms, governments bear the obligation not only to protect the right to life of individuals under their jurisdiction, but to investigate properly cases, in which people are murdered, particularly in massive cases, let alone where suspicion exists that state actors may have been involved.

The above assertions are not subject to dispute nor require technical expertise.  They allow any person to accuse of deception, slander, and [of being complicit in] a criminal cover-up, [those] politicians, journalists, authors and judges who claim that Islamic hijackers carried out the mass-murder, or that hijacked aircraft crashed at the known landmarks. 

While focusing on WTC 7 may yield short-term results in terms of public awareness, the focus on the WTC leaves intact the impression that Islamic terrorists nevertheless participated in the attacks.

The above assertions permit citizens to change the defensive posture of the 9/11 truth movement into an offensive posture, which is far more effective.

Elias Davidsson
Kirchen, Germany

Comment:  I have listened to your interview [with John Wells] a few times now, and I wonder why you would describe Papa Bush or Bush Junior as "Useful idiots."  The Zionist elite engineered this attack on America for their political ambitions and greater [Oded] Yinon plan [to Balkanize the Middle East], and they work hand in hand with their willing cohorts like the Bushes and the Cheneys, etc., who have huge investments in the military industrial complex - those who will profit from human suffering. They are by no means useful idiots. They are fully cognizant of what is going on and they are treasonous by choice... because it profits them - a very thin elite group in the top leagues of American power. Those true patriots that refuse to go along with it are suicided, pushed out of their jobs. etc... and left in the dustbin.

Bollyn Responds:  You are right about this, I'm sure. 'Papa Bush', George H.W. Bush, spoke at the closing session of the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism, an event put on by the Netanyahu Institute [founded by Benjamin Netanyahu (Institute director 1978-1980) and his father, Benzion] on July 2-5, 1979. The institute is also called the Jonathan Institute. The Jonathan Institute (founded September 1976) and its American support group, American Friends of the Jonathan Institute (founded 1977) are purely Jewish Zionist operations.



The article about George H.W. Bush and the "Development of the War on Terror" says, "George H.W. Bush spoke on 'The U.S. and the Fight Against International Terrorism' at the seminal 1979 Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism in the company of a number of other intelligence agents and deep politicians. This laid the groundwork for the 'war on terror' which would be rolled out in the wake of the 9/11 attacks."

The title page of the speech given by George H.W. Bush at Benjamin Netanyahu's 1979 Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism.

Bush made clear that the "only reasonable course" to deal with terrorism is "swift and effective retribution", which is what his son, President George W. Bush, did in the wake of 9-11 although his retribution was against a nation that had nothing to do with the 9-11 crime.


The speech by George W. Bush can be read in the book, edited by Benjamin Netanyahu (1981), entitled International Terrorism: Challenge and Response:  Proceedings of the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism Held Under the Auspices of the Jonathan Institute, July 2-5, 1979.  Most of the Bush speech can be read in the online version of the book.

One of the important things to take note of about this conference is that the data about the threat of terrorism was fraudulent. I wrote about the conference in my article, "Obama's Trip to Birthplace of War on Terror"

I wrote:

Today, the state of Israel is ruled by the same ruthless and violent terrorists who gave us 9-11 and the fraudulent "War on Terror." Obama's visit to Israel is, therefore, the visit of the leader of a woefully deceived nation to the foreign power who imposed the evil deception upon it. Having lost an untold number of lives and having wasted trillions of dollars on illegal and unnecessary wars, the Israeli deception has cost America dearly.

While most Americans saw the terror attacks of 9-11 as the beginning of the "War on Terror," the ideological framework of this Zionist fraud was actually born in Jerusalem during an international conference on terrorism held by the Jonathan [Netanyahu] Institute in early July 1979 - twenty-two years before the terror attacks that changed America. What is most important to note is that the same people who created the fraudulent "War on Terror" are currently running the state of Israel.

"In the summer of 1979, a group of powerful and influential people joined to launch an international propaganda offensive to promote and exploit the issue of 'international terrorism'," Philip Paull of San Francisco State University wrote in his 1982 thesis on the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism. "The propaganda 'blitz' originated in Jerusalem. The conspiratorial network included present and former members of the Israeli and United States governments... 

Paull's thesis from 1982 is important because it documents and validates my claim that the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror" actually began in the late 1970s when Menachem Begin and his gang of Irgun terrorists came to power in Israel. 1979, the year of the Jerusalem conference, was the same year that Isser Harel, the founder of Israeli intelligence, told the American Zionist Michael D. Evans that Arab terrorists were planning to attack the tallest buildings in New York City. Harel's comments reveal that Israeli intelligence was already preparing the false-flag terrorism attacks that occurred at the World Trade Center in 1993 and 2001...

As Paull demonstrates in his thesis, "the entire notion of 'international terrorism' as promoted by the Jerusalem Conference rests on a faulty, dishonest, and ultimately corrupt information base." This is equally true of the official versions of the terror attacks of 1993 and 2001. They are nothing more than packs of lies designed to place the blame on Arabs and Muslims.

The American people have been the primary target of the vicious 'psychological warfare' waged by the Israeli government. The purpose of the Israeli psychological warfare is to create fear through false-flag terrorism like 9-11 in order to impose the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror". I have done my utmost to provide an antidote to this fear and deception with my book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World.

This was the time when George H.W. Bush had just served as director of the C.I.A. and when he was being prepared to be the candidate for Vice President with Ronald Reagan. I think that Papa Bush is actually tied in at a higher level than just making money. I think that Bush and the Zionist criminal cabal are connected through criminal acts, including the JFK murder and drug smuggling. Nothing binds people more closely than a crime committed together.


QUARANTINE THE TRUTH - Bollyn had to have a separate event in Oakland last February because Zionist partisans within the leadership of the Northern California 9-11 Truth Alliance prevented him from speaking at their annual 9-11 events. This is actually the ideal solution to avoid friction with those gate-keepers who do everything they can to keep Bollyn from speaking.

On my “Censorship in the 9-11 Truth Movement” article: 

I remember you (Christopher) saying that even the smallest 9-11 group in the smallest town was probably infiltrated.  I guess that applies to the largest group in the biggest city too.
- Kevin Brant

After reading my “Censorship in the 9-11 Truth Movement” article, Sana Saadaoui wrote from Tunisia asking a simple question:  “Why would they do this?”

Bollyn Responds:  Why would they do this? This is a question that must be on the minds of many people who read this post. Why would the 9-11 Truth Alliance not want me to speak at their 9-11 events? To understand why I am not invited to speak at events like the one in San Francisco the other day one needs to realize that 9-11 truth groups are often led by people who really do not want the truth about who carried out the 9-11 atrocity to come out.

As Joe D'Angelo wrote to Allan Rees, station manager and co-founder of No Lies Radio, which streamed the Northern California 9-11 Truth Alliance event live:

I am hearing none of who done it, none of what to do about what next, none of Christopher Bollyn, who does; nothing but stale ole info, which furthers nothing forward. What's up with that? is what I wonder.

What this means is that there must be people in the leadership of the Northern California 9-11 Truth Alliance who pretend to be interested in 9-11 truth, but are dead-set against letting me present the factual material I have put together in my Solving 9-11 books.

These people are acting as gate-keepers and censors, preventing others from hearing what they don't want them to hear.  I have a lot of personal experience with this censorship and have seen many so-called truthers who do everything they can to prevent me from speaking.

What is it about my research that they don't want to hear?


The Solving 9-11 books reveal that the 9-11 false-flag conspiracy was a Zionist/Israeli operation that was designed to look like an Arab-Muslim crime in order to kick-start the Israeli strategy known as the "War on Terror", pushed by Benjamin Netanyahu since the 1970s, in which the USA and Western nations become militarily engaged in the Middle East fighting against anti-Israeli groups and nations that are opposed to Israeli aggression and occupation in the region.

In this way the United States military is protecting the Zionist state by manning the buffer zone that serves as Israel’s first line of defense. The US invasions in the Middle East are usually done with a great deal of Israeli intelligence and guidance.  These invasions have led to the creation of Al Qaida and ISIS and have led to the breaking up of Iraq and Syria into fragmented states - exactly what the Israeli strategy for the region has been since the 1980s (see the Israeli strategic plan to Balkanize the Middle East as written by Oded Yinon).

Who are these gate-keepers in the 9-11 truth movement? It's obvious, at least if you are an insider. They are the people in these 9-11 truth organizations or groups who work to prevent me from speaking. They use their influence on the others in the group to make sure I don’t get invited to speak - or dis-invited if I am. They are often Jewish people who are supportive of Israel (but who pretend to be critical) who simply don't want other people to know that 9-11 was an Israeli-run false-flag terror operation. I have seen it many times before, from coast to coast.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

“Censorship in the 9-11 Truth Movement” by Christopher Bollyn, September 11, 2015

“The Zionist Plan for the Middle East” by Israel Shahak, from Oded Yinon's "A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties," Association of Arab-American University Graduates, Inc., Belmont, Massachusetts, 1982

Questions about Thermite and Super-Thermite:  I would like to ask how is it possible for any explosive, such as the active thermitic nano-composite material found in the dust, to “pulverize” steel and concrete and make the vast majority of the columns and concrete disappear? 

Seismic data of 9/11 shows hardly any S or P waves. In other words, the buildings did not collapse but were pulverized in mid-air.

Is there any explanation to account for the burnt cars seen in and around the streets of the entire World Trade Center complex?

Why weren’t people burned by extremely hot ash and dust?

Your information is interesting but just like you, no one can explain the aforementioned observations just by thermite or thermate.

Bollyn Responds:   These questions obviously come from people who have read some of Judy Wood’s book of 9-11 disinformation, Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11

Judy Wood’s book was published in 2010, one year after Dr. Steven E. Jones and a team of scientists published their 25-page paper on the discovery of a form of super-thermite in the dust of the destroyed World Trade Center towers. The Jones paper, accepted for publication in a scientific journal in February 2009, can be read here:

“Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe”

The publication of the paper about the discovery of super-thermite in the dust effectively destroyed the official version of what happened to the Twin Towers and revealed that the public had been lied to about what had really caused the deaths of more than 2,600 people at the World Trade Center on 9-11.

The explosive bi-layered thermitic material found in the dust. The red layer contains aluminum, iron, oxygen, silicon and carbon. The gray layer contains primarily iron, oxygen, and some carbon.

Judy Wood’s book is a “red herring” disinformation effort designed to mislead the public about the scientific evidence that a form of nano-thermite was used to pulverize the Twin Towers. Wood’s attempted rebuttal, however, fails in every way. 

Firstly, she fails to even explain to the reader what super-thermite is, much less what it can do. This is intentional, of course, because she is responding to a previously published scientific paper, well-known in the 9-11 truth community since early 2009, yet she fails to even introduce the subject she is trying to rebut: the active thermitic material found in the dust.

Secondly, Judy Wood’s book claims that the demolitions of the Twin Towers were “cold” events. This is complete nonsense. There is abundant proof that the demolitions were, in fact, extremely hot events. For more on this subject, read my recent article about the basics of super-thermite:

“The Basics of Super-Thermite & the Destruction of the Twin Towers”

Now, to answer the specific questions: 

Question: How is it possible for any explosive, such as the active thermitic nano-composite material found in the dust, to “pulverize” steel and concrete and make the vast majority of the columns and concrete disappear?

Answer: First of all, the vast majority of the structural steel columns and concrete did not disappear. Most of the steel elements of the building remained near the site, albeit twisted, mangled, severed, and in some spots even vaporized. This is the structural steel that was “recycled” by being cut up into small pieces, mixed with other scrap, and shipped to China, rather than preserved as evidence from the crime scene and examined by experts. This is an egregious example of criminal destruction of evidence and the highest investigative authorities, namely John Ashcroft and Michael Chertoff of the U.S. Department of Justice, are directly culpable of this crime.

The concrete, on the other hand, was pulverized and turned into gigantic clouds of hot dust that rolled across lower Manhattan as each tower was demolished. The concrete did not disappear, however, it was reduced to dust and distributed with explosive force across a large area, where it fell like gray snow.

The active thermitic nano-composite found in the dust, a novel energetic material made using nano-technology, is extremely powerful and releases more energy per gram than any conventional explosive used in demolition. Thermite and super-thermite are very different things and should not be confused, which is what people like Judy Wood do all the time. 

The thermitic nano-composite found in the dust ignites at 430 degrees C., most likely detonates (i.e. burns faster than the speed of sound), produces incredible heat, and creates pure molten metal from the metal oxide it is made from.  The bi-layered material also had an organic compound attached, which is what generated the enormous gas pressure that provided the explosive force seen when the towers fell. The evidence indicates that, along with the super-thermite, other explosives were also used to demolish the towers.

When the super-thermite on each floor was detonated from the top-down, it released enormous amounts of heat and generated the explosive force that pulverized each floor – and everything on it – and thrust the pulverized material with great force outwards from the center of the building. 

Question: Seismic data of 9/11 shows hardly any S or P waves. In other words, the buildings did not collapse but were pulverized in mid-air.

Answer: That is correct. The largest spikes occurred before, or at the very beginning of each demolition, which suggests that powerful explosives in the basements went off first. As we can see in the video footage of each demolition, the towers are pulverized from the top-down. This meant that the concrete and the contents of the buildings were converted into hot clouds of dust and blown away from the building with great force. This material was propelled many blocks from the World Trade Center and fell like snow, in some places more than 6 inches deep.

Question: Is there any explanation to account for the burnt cars seen in and around the streets of the entire World Trade Center complex?

Answer: Yes, the clouds of dust that rolled across lower Manhattan contained billions of tiny balls of molten iron, lead, and other metals – including molybdenum, which has one of the highest melting points of all the elements. When these hot clouds hit the cars parked near the World Trade Center the hot metal particles would damage the cars and could easily cause them to burn or blow up.

Question: Why weren’t people burned by extremely hot ash and dust?

Answer: They were. I have listened to William Rodriquez, the janitor from the North Tower, explain many times how he was the last man out of the tower and how he dove beneath a fire truck that was parked right outside the entrance to the building. When he was hit by the dust, he said it was very hot and that it had burned his leg.

Question: Your information is interesting but just like you, no one, can explain the aforementioned observations just by thermite or thermate.

Answer: Right. Thermite or thermate cannot explain the observations you refer to, but super-thermite can. We need to understand that although thermite and super-thermite are both thermitic reactions, the nano-composites of super-thermite are in a completely different category from thermite. These novel energetic materials are new and not well understood by the general public. They are highly explosive and can release incredible amounts of energy. To try and help people understand what super-thermite is, and what it can do, I wrote my latest article:

“The Basics of Super-Thermite & the Destruction of the Twin Towers” 

Comment from a reader in England:  

Dear Chris,

Thank you so much for your kind and prompt reply. I am greatly honoured and flattered to be in direct contact with you.

I have purchased several copies of your book Solving 911 and distributed it to friends. It is a work of great importance as it helps to reveal the true course of history since "911" and of course who was really responsible for this great crime.

The events of "911" set in motion the so-called "War on Terror" which has 2 main purposes: the fragmentation of the Arab nations of the Middle East (as laid out in the "Yinon" Plan) and the demonisation of Islam - whilst at the same time giving the Governments of Western nations the excuse to impose draconian systems of control over their citizens under the pretext of combatting "terrorism".

I personally believe that the reasons for this great crime are thus complex and opaque and involve both furthering the Zionist cause and Israel's political and military dominance of the energy rich Middle East - and the social and economic consequences of the decreasing availability of cheap energy to the industrialised Western nations.

I very much hope to attend your appearance in Holland and hope that we might be able to meet briefly in person.

Question:   I received the following thought-provoking question about my latest article: “Russian TV Airs MH17 Shoot-Down Images”


I am trying to grasp the latest on MH17, and what your article says…  

This smells like foul play. What would make sense, however, is that the photo is edited (i.e. fake), and the Russians will be blamed for it… The news about the images came from Russia’s Channel One, the primary state television channel (largely owned by the Russian state).

My question is: How could Russia’s state television network be fed false information?

Bollyn Responds:  This is an excellent question about a very important subject: Are the photos that Russia Channel 1 aired on November 14, 2014, of what appears to be a fighter plane shooting at Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 over Ukraine, genuine – or are they fake?

This image shows what appears to be a fighter jet firing a missile at Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 from a distance of about 700 meters (2,300 feet).  The Boeing aircraft is about 209 feet long with a wingspan of 200 feet.  The fighter jet is about 11 times the length of the Boeing away.

Was the photo taken by a Global Hawk, or similar reconnaissance drone, flying thousands of feet above the Boeing?

First, let’s consider the context. We have to take into account that these photographs were aired on Russia’s Channel 1 TV, which is largely owned and controlled by the Russian state. Given that fact, I would say that it is almost 100 percent certain that Russian military intelligence scrutinized these photos before they were shown to Channel One’s 250 million viewers.

So, if they are so obviously fake, as the Western media would want us to believe, then Russian intelligence would look very bad when their falsity is proven – but that has not yet happened.

If these images are indeed proven to be fake, they would then only be proof that they are fake and they were made by somebody. In that case, the fake images of the plane being shot down would not prove or disprove anything about what really happened to MH17. The most important question in that case would then be:  Who made them?

Next, consider that they were aired on Russian TV just as the G-20 conference was beginning in Australia. Once again, if these images are so obviously fake that “web users” are having a field day debunking their authenticity, shouldn’t the satellite image experts in the United States, Britain, and Australia have something to say about them at least as quickly as the “web users”? Why have we not heard anything from the experts?

If these images are fake, and if it is such a simple matter to prove that they are fake, why have the U.S. government and media avoided the subject? During the weekend of the G-20 summit, for example, there was no response about the photos from either the controlled U.S. government or the equally controlled U.S. media. 

Then on Monday morning, November 17, the controlled press came out with some old amateur video footage showing the wreckage of the Malaysia plane shortly after it was shot down, as if to steal the thunder from the new photographs with “new video”, which wasn’t really new at all. During the entire weekend, while the images of the shoot-down were being discussed on the Internet, the U.S. media was virtually silent about the whole matter.

If anonymous “web users” can so easily spot the fakeness of the images, why couldn’t the U.S. media find any people with expertise to do so in three days?

Lastly, there is the fundamental fact that the Obama administration, like most of the Western governments, continues to protect and promote the pack of lies about what happened on 9-11. While the Russian government has not deceived us, our own government has blatantly lied to us about what happened on 9-11 – for more than 13 years.  For the U.S. government to continue to lie to the American people about who and what really caused the death of 3,000 people on 9-11 indicates that it is the United States where regime change is needed - not Russia.

As anyone who has observed the conflict in the Ukraine knows, the regime in Kiev is the side that is telling huge lies and killing its own people.  The U.S. government is also to be blamed for installing an openly anti-Russian government in Kiev in February 2014. 

With these images, a new card has been thrown on the table. If the unelected government in Kiev and their Anglo-American/Zionist backers really want us to believe that the images of the shoot-down of MH17 are fake, then it is their obligation to prove that they are fake.  Would it not be illogical for us to believe people who lie about everything else - especially 9-11?

Comment:   Gordon Duff, “senior editor” of the disinformation website Veterans Today, is clearly working against 9-11 Truth by claiming that nanothermite or super-thermite does not exist. Duff has repeated this outrageous claim many times in his ludicrous attacks against me and Dr. Steven E. Jones, the professor at B.Y.U. who discovered a highly energetic form of nanothermite in the dust of the World Trade Center.

Gordon Duff, the "disinfo toad" of Veterans Today, is working against 9-11 Truth by making the absurd claim that nanothermite does not exist.

The following statements are from emails and posted comments written by Gordon Duff:

Again, I reiterate, nanothermite does not exist. There has been well over a decade to get someone to come forward, to find a factory, to have a driver confess, to have test results leaked, a thousand possibilities and none have materialized…

There is NO evidence of "nanothermite" but there is proof that iron particles capable of creating observed thermal effects when subjected to nuclear explosions did exist.

Nuclear weapons exist. Nanothermite does not. Nobody makes it. It has no purpose.

Find me a factory that made nanothermite. Find who owns it and what customers it made "nanothermite" for. When you do that...which is what should have been done years ago....we can take these hypotheses seriously. I suspect the reason it was not done is simple. It can't be done.

I have gone on for months asking the same questions as have so many others. No one has answered, not Bollyn, not anyone.

Bollyn Responds: There are numerous companies and institutions that can produce superthermite.  Duff says, "find me a factory" that makes nanothermite.  "When you do that", he wrote, "we can take these hypotheses seriously."

One American company that specializes in making superthermites is ALD NanoSolutions, Inc. of Broomfield, Colorado.  The following information about ALD NanoSolutions comes from Plunkett's almanac of companies that work with nanotechnology:

ALD NanoSolutions of Broomfield, Colorado, makes super-thermite.

"ALD NanoSolutions also develops superthermites, which release more energy than conventional explosives and have a faster reaction velocity than conventional thermite explosives."
- Plunkett's Nanotechnology and MEMs Industry Almanac 2008, Jack W. Plunkett, Plunkett Research Ltd., 2008

A company press release shows that ALD NanoSolutions was working with the U.S. Air Force "to fabricate Super-thermite Explosives" in 2002.


Related Questions:   Do you have any concrete evidence for the existence of nanothermite or of its use to demolish the WTC towers?  Can you produce any documentation that states that thermite has a detonation velocity greater than 895 meters per second?

Ian Greenhalgh recently posted a slanderous article meant to discredit me and my research on Veterans Today, a well-known disinformation website run by Gordon Duff, who admits that about half of what he writes is intentionally false information. 

The article, entitled “9/11 Hokum:  Deconstructing Christopher Bollyn and Steve Jones” is written by Donald Jay Fox of Bloomington, Minnesota.  Donald Fox told me that he works for RBC Wealth Management (a division of RBC Capital Markets) in downtown Minneapolis.

RBC Capital Markets is an equity partner with Tamir Fishman, an Israeli venture capital / investment bank.  RBC actually has an ownership interest in Tamir Fishman – the only international bank with an equity investment in an Israeli financial services firm. In 2004, Globes (Israel) reported that RBC owned 30 percent of Tamir Fishman Venture Capital, making it the largest partner in the venture capital arm of Tamir Fishman & Co.

Donald Fox works for RBC Capital Markets, which is a strategic partner in several Israeli "Trojan Horse" technology companies that are involved in massive spying/data collection operations in the United States, e.g. Nice, Amdocs, Comverse, Verint, Check Point, etc.  Several of these companies are closely linked to the Israeli architects of the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11.

I would describe Tamir Fishman as a “Mossad venture capital funding arm,” which is how I refer to these investment banks that raise foreign capital to be invested in Israeli start-up companies.  Ehud Barak, the former Israeli defense minister and chief 9-11 terror suspect, is a partner and adviser to Tamir Fishman, since at least June 2004.  This suggests that Barak has worked with the company for some time.

Because Donald Fox’s article attacks me personally and Dr. Steven E. Jones and even goes so far as to claim that nano-thermite does not even exist – because Gordon Duff says it doesn’t – I contacted the author and Mr. Greenhalgh to ask them what they know about nanoenergetic materials.  Since they don't even think these materials exist they obviously don't know much about them.

We have exchanged a few emails in which they asked the following key questions:

Ian Greenhalgh of Millom, England, asked me: "Do you have any concrete evidence for the existence of nanothermite or of its use to demolish the WTC towers?"

Donald Jay Fox asked me:  "Can you produce any documentation that states that thermite has a detonation velocity greater than 895 meters per second?"

Bollyn Responds:  To both questions, I say, yes, yes, yes! No problem.

To answer the first question, see the attached photographic evidence of the bi-layered nanothermitic compound found in the WTC dust.

SOLID PROOF - Chips of a bi-layered highly energetic nanocomposite of Thermite found in the dust of the destroyed World Trade Center.  This material, when heated to about 420 degrees Celsius, explodes in a thermitic reaction that produces more energy per gram than any of the known explosives used in demolition.  That's why it is called "highly energetic".

To answer the second question about velocities produced by such materials, I provide the following extracts from the AMPTIAC Quarterly special issue on Nanotechnology (Spring 2002) which shows that Nanoenergetic materials can produce velocities up to 1,500 meters per second.  The article refers to MICs, which are defined as:

MICs are nanoscale energetic materials that release large amounts of heat, like thermite.

MIC compounds can be twice as powerful as high explosives and produce velocities of 1,500 meters/second. Note that these materials can be tuned to have incredible reactive power of up to 10 Gigawatts per cubic centimeter (GW/cc). One Gigawatt is one billion watts or about 13,410,221 horsepower. The capacities of large power plants are measured in Gigawatts. Hoover Dam, for example, is a 2 GW facility.

The cover of the AMPTIAC Quarterly special issue on Nanotechnology, Spring 2002

The AMPTIAC article about Nanoenergetics is online at:

The article explains how nanoenergetic compounds have more power and release much more energy per gram than normal eplosives, and how these advanced materials can be used to create more powerful weapons and explosives.

I would suggest that you, and anyone who is interested in the discovery of active thermitic material in the dust of the World Trade Center, read some of the literature on nanoenergetic compounds.  One source is AMPTIAC Quarterly (Vol. 6, No. 1) from Spring 2002 (see cached link below).  AMPTIAC stands for Advanced Materials and Processes Technology Information Analysis Center, which is a DOD sponsored information center.  The article on Nanoenergetics (p. 43) should be of particular interest concerning your questions and general skepticism about nano-thermitics.

See: "Nanoenergetics: An Emerging Technology Area of National Importance"

The following are excerpts from the article on Nanoenergetics:

Work in this field is ongoing and is roughly 10 years old, i.e. from 1992.

"At this point in time, all of the military services and some DOE and academic laboratories have active R&D programs aimed at exploiting the unique properties of nanomaterials that have potential to be used in energetic formulations for advanced explosives and propellant applications."

"Metastable Intermolecular Composites (MICs) are one of the first examples of a category of nanoscale energetic materials which have been studied and evaluated to a considerable degree.  MIC formulations are mixtures of nanoscale powders of reactants that exhibit thermite (high exothermicity) behavior."

"...certain key MIC characteristics are very attractive and quite promising for practical applications.  These include energy output that is 2x that of typical high explosives, the ability to tune the reactive power (10KW/cc to 10 GW/cc), tunable reaction front velocities of 0.1-1500 meters/second, and reaction zone temperature exceeding 3,000K."

To Ian and Donald and Gordon Duff:  These extracts alone should compel you, if you are honest researchers, to reconsider your statements about nano-thermite.  Writing that nano-thermite does not exist simply because Mr. Duff says he doesn't know about it is certainly not going to convince anyone of anything - other than Duff's ignorance about the subject.  The AMPTIAC special issue on Nanotechnology from 2002, on the other hand, confirms that it exists and has been developed and researched since at least the early 1990s. 

I certainly hope this helps clarify things about the reality and potential of nano-thermitic compounds. This is a subject of national importance.

Comment:  Folks,

I am an expat business man, pushing 60 and looking forward to my retirement and hopefully, a few grandkids. I am not a raving tree hugger with paint all over my face or an ageing hippy type.

I have now spent most of my life out of the UK and have lost many of the close ties I had to the old country. The exception to this is my UK family, my football team, and the BBC. The world service has kept me sane in some weird and wonderful places and situations.  ‘Aunty’ has been part of my upbringing providing me with a sense of fairness, truth, and security, similar to a close relative. From Blue Peter to Kate Adie to the football reports, the BBC is where to go to find out what is really going on. The BBC has been one of the rocks of my life.

I am therefore saddened to say that I have progressively lost all faith in anything to do with the BBC after seeing your “Conspiracy Road Trip” and “The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 Ten Years On” programmes concerning the events of 9/11 in the US. These programmes were completely biased to the extent of, in my opinion, being false propaganda.

After filtering out the 9/11 truth nutters and looking at the evidence of respected professionals as well as many believable eye witness accounts, I am looking for some serious argument as to where these people are in error. And all I can find are some condescending programmes that credit some of us with no intelligence. Unless I am missing something, the hard evidence appears to be overwhelming in that we are being seriously lied to by the US government and I am looking to the BBC and other so called responsible news outlets to show me where I am missing something.

The common thread I have found with ALL 9/11 truth debunkers is derision, insult, and ridicule of many serious, dedicated, well-meaning professional people. Glaring untruths and insinuations are predominant.    9/11 debunkers often cherry pick one of the more crazy ideas of the 9/11 ‘nutters’ which are easy to discredit. There is very little or no real credible scientific debunking evidence.

There is NO serious debate concerning hard provable evidence. This is the crime of the century and it is still unsolved. Very credible people are calling for a new investigation into what happened on 9/11. To date, there has been no plausible investigation of any type. If it wasn’t so serious, the official 9/11 report(s) would be considered laughable. It is, in my view, the duty and responsibility of organisations like the BBC to get to the truth and rectify this, especially when so much has occurred directly because of 9/11.

One has to ask why the press fails to report these issues fairly – are they also playing a part in the “real conspiracy”? The BBCs deliberate and obvious distortion of the Barry Jennings story is close to proof of the BBCs involvement. Why do most journalists I know think that “9/11 was an inside job” and yet there is almost no coverage?

So called responsible news outlets complain that the internet is ruining real, responsible, verifiable journalism. I would agree if I saw these news outlets carrying out some real, responsible, verifiable journalism. Who are we to believe, some ‘nutter’ on the internet with no proven credentials or good old aunty BBC? Right now it’s a toss-up between them.

So sadly it is looking like – Farewell to BBC, my old Aunty.   This will leave a huge void in my life. 

Note that I do not criticise the BBC for your very obvious error on 9/11 concerning the Salomon Brothers Building (the 47-story WTC 7). I am not part of any 9/11 truth movement. I am an ordinary Joe Blow who is not stupid and can use common sense and reason to look at hard evidence. At the end of the day, I just want some news organisation to get the answers to some very obvious questions and I can enjoy my retirement in peace.

And my apologies to all the raving tree huggers and ageing hippies out there.

John  O'Donnell, Australia

Bollyn Responds:  John O'Donnell copied me when he sent this letter to a couple dozen senior officers of the BBC and members of parliament. His letter is an excellent commentary about the sad state of the media in the English-speaking world, which is why I am posting it. 

As O'Donnell wrote, One has to ask why the press fails to report these issues fairly – are they also playing a part in the 'real conspiracy'?

Yes, the controlled media is part of the real conspiracy - the one against us.  We must remember that the media's hostility to 9-11 truth is completely intentional and purposeful.  It's not that the media moguls who control the networks can't fathom the truth or don't understand that the evidence proves the falsity of the official 9-11 version.  It's that the media moguls who control the press are actively supporting the 9-11 pack of lies on purpose in order to deceive the public about what happened. Jake Tapper's (CNN) recent tirade against Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth is a good example of how the controlled media attacks 9-11 Truth.  I was personally attacked early on by Fox News and CNN.

So, why would the media lie to the public about 9-11?  If we had a truly free press this would not be the case, but the media outlets in the United States and the English-speaking world are not free at all but rather very tightly controlled.  In the U.S., for example, most of the mainstream media outlets are owned by only 6 companies, like Rupert Murdoch's News Corp.  This means that a very small group of people, including Mr. Murdoch, decide what the public will see and hear, in short, how the public will be informed on all matters great and small.

9-11 is, in fact, the Big Lie of our time and the media is protecting that outrageous lie.  But we must remember that this evil lie is meant to enslave us.  The fact that the mainstream media is working to support the 9-11 lies shows us that the mass media is the main apparatus used to enslave us.  The media moguls and their financial backers are to be blamed and prosecuted for their criminal treason against the people and our republic(s). They are guilty of deceiving the whole world.

Question:  Hi Christopher:

As you probably have seen, Gordon Duff has released a Russian intelligence report on 911 nukes which he believes is authentic:

The report states that a modified W-54 nuclear artillery shell type mini-nuke was used on 911. These devices were secretly handed off to Israel by Bush-Cheney. Israel in turn sold them to NATO countries. When exploded, these devices leave a chemical signature and can be traced. The article by Duff implies that the nano-thermite found in the dust was a bi-product of the gamma ray/ neutron flux acting on the steel to produce iron-oxide.

I was under the impression that the Jones investigation found unexploded red and grey super-thermite chips in the dust of 911. Am I correct in this? The recovery of manufactured chips is not addressed by Duff. Why not?

Frankly, I don't care whether or not nukes were used in 911 but I don't like it when critical information is omitted. Thank you for fact-checking this article and for sharing your findings with your readers.

Bollyn Responds:  More Guff from Gordon Duff

The Gordon Duff article, "Too Classified to Publish:  Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed", edited by Jim W. Dean, is nothing but rank disinformation about what happened on 9-11.  Duff shows his true colors as an agent of disinformation when he writes, "My personal opinion is that this is NOT a disinformation piece but rather represents a significant breakthrough."

Why is Duff doing this?  What is the point of this disinformation piece that is full of flagrant errors?  The obvious purpose is to simply confuse the reader about the importance of the discovery of active thermitic material in the dust of the destroyed World Trade Center.

The so-called "classified" material Duff cites begins by saying that nuclear devices were used on 9-11 and that these devices caused the "melted steel and iron oxide or 'nano-thermite'", which he goes on to say, "is a by-product of the very high gamma ray/Neutron flux induced into the central steel core. The radiation dissolves the steel into iron oxide consuming the carbon and silicone in the steel."

At the end of the Duff/Dean piece of guff, it says:  "The iron oxide found all over the place was what was left of the steel I beams.  This was the so-called Nano Thermite that was found everywhere."

There are so many flagrant errors about what was found in the 9-11 dust in this piece that it can only be described as intentional disinformation by Gordon Duff and Jim Dean at Veterans Today. They are promoting a piece that is so wrong about what was found in the dust that it sounds as if they have not even read the paper by Steven E. Jones and other scientists entitled "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe".

Firstly, the active thermitic material that was found in the dust was a bi-layered material that was created using nano-technology.  It was most certainly not made by any nuclear device.

Secondly, iron oxide (rust) is one of the components of thermite, not one of the products.  A basic thermite reaction creates a great deal of heat, aluminum oxide (a white smoke), and molten iron.  What was found in great quantities in the dust of the World Trade Center was billions of very small molten iron droplets.  Iron oxide and nano-thermite are not the same thing at all, as the Guff piece suggests. 

I will address the errors found in this piece of disinformation in a separate article.  This article is intentional disinformation about what the evidence found in the dust indicates.  Gordon Duff has, once again, shown himself to be an agent of disinformation about the events of 9-11.

Comment:  The following comment came from a supporter who made a generous donation in support of my fundraising effort.  She wrote this in response to my thank-you note for her donation:

Dear Christopher,

You are very welcome.

Here is my philosophy on the fundraising. You need not feel uncomfortable about asking for funds. It is not charity in the normal sense of the word. Your supporters are funding a road to the truth. If our society's structures and systems (governments, banks, media, etc.) had not been hijacked by corrupt forces, then your work as an investigative journalist would be completely different. The mainstream would hold you in high esteem, and you would not be forced into exile.

You are a truth seeker and political refugee. Obviously my taxes are not paying for your work. So I'll just redirect my money where it should go - to the source of truth.

Comment from March 26, 2014:  Why would Israel need a Malaysian airlines Boeing-777-200? 

The thing is that this airplane “lost in Tel Aviv in November 2013″ isn’t just another Boeing 777-200 but it is its absolutely IDENTICAL twin of the currently lost airplane. The one and only visible difference would be its serial number. 

Why would Israel have a virtual twin of the missing Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 in storage in Tel Aviv?
Photo of the twin Boeing 777-2H6(ER) - 28416/155 by Nicholas Young

The information comes from our master-researcher Bluebird on this forum:  

I'm sure you can make good use of it.  

I'm currently reading your book Solving 9-11, and have advertised it here and there. It is a fascinating book, - you have certainly researched 9/11 like no other, - just the info about Israelis in the US aircraft business is worth the whole thing. 

Regarding debris (conspiracy)?

A Malaysian Airlines sister airplane Boeing 777-200 was sold to GA Telesis and was then re-registered and sent to Tel Aviv on 4/11/13 where it was stored until …. ?,N105GT-GA-Telesis-php

Malaysian Air 777 manufacturer serial number 28416 registered as 9M-MRI was sold to GA Telesis on 10/21/2013 and now registered as N105GT. So the image below shows this aircraft still registered as 9M-MRI and stored at Tarbes Lourdes Pyrenees on 04/10/2013, and then on 04/11/2013 it’s re-registered as N105GT and stored at Tel Aviv.  [These latter dates are apparently written day/month/year. CB]

The last time that Malaysian Boeing 777 had been seen was in November 2013 when it was landing in Tel Aviv. Since then that airplane had never been seen again.

GA Telesis has its headquarters in Ft.Lauderdale/Florida.  Déjà vu 9/11?

Blubird – I just did a search for 9M-MRi, apparently it is owned by Malaysian Airways and it is stored away.

Spare parts?

It was stored for dissembling but then was obviously NOT dissembled but it was spotted when flying to Tel Aviv in november 2013.

Since then, the 777 Malaysian Airlines has not been seen.

It looks at least fishy. Why would Israel need a Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777-200 that should have been already dissembled at that time due to the GA Telesis website?

Bollyn Responds:  This information is very important because it indicates that Israel has an identical twin aircraft of the missing Malaysian Boeing 777 in a hanger in Tel Aviv.  This is why I said that the computerized hijacking of the plane may have ended with the plane being dropped in some remote part of the Indian Ocean, like what happened to Egypt Air 990 on October 31, 1999.  The terror masterminds might very well have a sinister plan for the missing plane to seemingly reappear in a false-flag atrocity by using the twin aircraft they have in storage.  Awareness of the twin plane in Tel Aviv could prevent the evil plot from going ahead.

Comment:  I am a Canadian born to German immigrants. Although my father was a blue collar worker, he was a very well read man and was up to date on everything politically happening in the world. After reading information on your site (I am also reading Solving 9-11:  The Original Articles) Paul Craig Roberts site as well as others, I realize now, that my Dad was right all of these years. Growing up I always thought he was obsessed with the Zionists, sympathy for the Palestinian people, how corrupt America had become by the running of the Jews, etc. This all churned inside of him and made him bitter. He'd talk so often about it, I ended up tuning him out. He died in 2008 at the age of 72 and I now wish that I had listened a little more closely to him.

Thank you for staying true to your principles. After reading everything, I am now having trouble sleeping. I don't know how you do it and how all of this doesn't affect you, your marriage day in day out. You are a very strong man with obviously a loving and just as strong a wife.

Our Prime Minister recently returned from a "love in" with Netanyahu in Israel. It honestly scares me, Mr. Harper honestly scares me.

All the best to you Mr. Bollyn.

S.J., Toronto, Ontario

Comment:  Your depiction of the "Chicago Jewish CRIME families" BEHIND the Obama presidency is the most precise information I have yet read about the criminal, treasonous, RADICAL RIGHT-WING policies of the (clearly hijacked) Obama presidency I have yet read, anywhere - MUST READING for ALL Americans.



Your new article [“Russia Under Attack”] - detailing the CRIMINAL, GENOCIDAL links between Victoria Nuland - Obama's 'Viceroy" of the UKRAINE and RUSSIA WARS - and the bloody KAGAN family of PNAC 9-11 treachery, treason, infamy, and the subsequent crimes-against-humanity Iraq war, is also absolutely essential information for any and all Americans.

For the sordid, violent, ruthless dictatorship masquerading as (faux) "democracy" that Ukraine is in for under America's brutal instigation and sabotage, see the puppet Columbia U. 'law' graduate Mikhail SAAKASHVILLI's BRUTAL SUPPRESSION of the peaceful 2005 pro-democracy protests in Georgia, former Soviet Republic.

Whether from the Lenin-Trotsky-KAGANOVICH 'left', or the ROTHSCHILDS/Goldman Sachs/KAGAN right-wing, the results - de facto COMMISSARS with life & death powers over the disenfranchised serfs and peons - are the same. Indeed, I highly recommend the book, THE WOLF OF THE KREMLIN about "Stalin's BUTCHER of the Ukraine" - the very Jewish-raised LAZAR KAGANOVICH - written by his NEW YORK NEPHEW, the also Jewish-raised Stewart Kahan - "Kahan" of course another Americanized spelling of "KAGAN”!

Lazar Kaganovich was a Jewish genocidaire and mass murderer in the Soviet Union under Stalin. A good article on this subject is "Righteous Blood Part XII: The RED CHEKA TERROR Targets Christians"

Comment:  I received the following harsh comment about Jeffrey Prager a few days ago from a person who claims to be his former mother-in-law.  She sent it to me after seeing my article about Jeff Prager at:

Jeffrey Prager in 2007 - Wanted for failure to pay child support in Arizona

Prager in 2013 - 9/11 writer of dubious character in Minnesota

I sent the comment on to Mr. Prager and asked him if the information it contains is true.  Prager has not responded.  I was not going to post the comment unless I could verify that it was essentially truthful.  Today, I have seen the court documents that indicate that the comment is genuine:

Comment: Who is Jeff Prager you ask? You seem to have him pegged, though you have missed his criminal records for repeated drug abuse. I am his EX(thank God)-mother-in-law. It is my grandson for whom he owes child support and is a Dead Beat Dad, never having paid a dime. Again, thank God, the courts saw through his lies and therefore gave sole custody to my daughter and further imposed that Prager must pass 13 random drug tests before he can petition the court to visit his son under court supervision. So, thank God, he has never met his son. You might get a chuckle knowing that the last time he was arrested in AZ for drug abuse he was caught running down the alley in his underwear screaming hysterically. He has also been arrested for mail fraud but escaped prosecution by turning states evidence. He is a lying, cheating, thieving scoundrel who duped my daughter with his lies into marrying him then forged her signature to get on her bank account and cleaned that out. He was arrested for probation violation and falsifying community service records. I believe him to be a sociopath who believes his own lies. He is a dangerous man and has made death threats against my daughter. But I suspect his brain is so scrambled by all the drug abuse that she no longer has anything to fear from him. Of course, the Order of Protection may have helped. It puzzles me that MN would serve Prager those papers but not arrest him for the outstanding warrant for child support. Go figure. Because I still fear him, I prefer to remain anonymous.  

After getting this comment, I found links to the court documents about Prager through a comment on

While we are on the subject of crime: Keep in mind that there seems to be a circle of criminals that pretend to speak the truth about 9/11. Notice the company that they keep. Notice the friends they have. Notice the lies they tell.

Besides his 5 marijuana arrests and federal mail fraud conviction, if you have any information regarding Jeff Prager please contact (602) 876-1053 (602) 876-1053 FREE . Child Support Arrest Warrant issued on 04-25-07.

Jeffrey J Prager July 22, 1955
Case Number: S-0700-CR-2000004657 (use CR-2000004657 for case number)

I have nothing against Jeff Prager as a person, but in June 2011 he laid down this challenge against me saying that I was lying about my 9-11 research:

Maybe Bollyn and the Truth Movement aren't what they appear to be? Did anyone bother to think that the people that perpetrated 911 spent even MORE TIME developing and strategizing how they would deal with public opinion AFTER the event then they did planning the event itself? Perhaps 911 was SO COMPLEX that very few people will ever understand what really happened, WHY and how. I challenge Bollyn. He's lying.
- Jeff Prager, June 5, 2011

Prager's problems with the law are important and need to be understood because it may very well be that he is being used by people who have power over him due to these legal issues.  If so, Prager has been used in the same way that Darrel B. Smith was used after someone cleared up his narcotics offenses.  Smith also attacked me with the intention of discrediting my research. Likewise, the only non-police witness who testified against me at my trial (and committed perjury while doing so) had a son or husband who had similar narcotics offenses pending in the Cook County Court.  These compromised people are clearly being used by the state to become agents to work against the 9-11 truth movement.  Prager is certainly not alone in this regard; there is a pattern of state corruption behind these agents.

Comment: My father died in 1993 from exposure to DU [depleted uranium] almost immediately after he came back from the Gulf War. His unit was a National Guard Supply Unit that has since been disbanded. I know more men from his unit got sick, but he was one of two men who returned with high levels, according to his doctor.

After he died a Japanese film crew came and did a story on him because they were doing a piece on the effects of the exposure since the US government was testing off the coast of Japan. My family was never compensated for the loss of my father as a result of his service. Sure my mother gets his pension, but she has suffered and we all have from losing my father. I was 17 when he died.

I hope you continue to do your research and expose the government for what and who they are.

Comment:  I just want to tell you that I believe you are one of the best, if not the best researcher there is, who tells the truth about the events of 9-11-01, the Israeli-Zionist cabal, and the JFK assassination, and more... And I want to thank you for all your hard work, integrity, honesty, and bravery. Keep up the good work, and may the almighty Creator keep you safe.
Sincerely, D.P.

Comment:  A reader wrote to me about my article “Greg Palast is Related to Mossad Chief David Kimche” suggesting that I was being too “harsh” on Palast by suggesting that his obnoxious hostility to Dr. Steven E. Jones and 9-11 truth could be connected to his family’s close connection to Israeli intelligence.

Greg Palast is openly hostile to Dr. Steven E. Jones and 9-11 truth.

The fact is that Greg Palast’s father is a first cousin of David Kimche, the British-born former deputy director of Israel’s Mossad and director general of the foreign ministry under Yitzhak Shamir.

This was the reader's comment in defense of Greg Palast: 

Greg Palast started out making a fuss about 9/11, and he stopped because he was going to be out of work if he kept it up. You, of all people, would understand that. It's not honorable, but a LOT of journalists have done the same, some of them top journalists. And, there's a decent excuse for it too: that their other work won't be taken seriously if they don't just go with the company line on that one. It sucks, but it doesn't make them Zionist devils.

Bollyn Responds:  The fact that Greg Palast supports the official pack of lies about 9-11 and is openly hostile to 9-11 truth and Dr. Steven E. Jones is a special case because of the Palast family connection to Israeli intelligence and the notorious Zionist terrorist Yitzhak Shamir.  Shamir was one of the original planners of the 9-11 false-flag terrorism and David Kimche was close to Shamir from their days together in the Mossad.  This is why Foreign Minister Shamir made Kimche director general of the foreign ministry under his command.

For this reason, Greg Palast is different from Noam Chomsky and talking heads in the media who are hostile to 9-11 truth simply because they are paid to be.  This would include people like Jon Stewart (born Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz), Bill Maher, and Rachel Maddow, who are all paid millions of dollars a year to be talking heads that support the policies of the criminals who run the Zionist networks they work for.  If you don't think the anti-9/11 truth people behind Jon Stewart's show are truly violent criminals, just watch how Rory Albanese, the Daily Show producer, assaulted a 9-11 truth activist on YouTube

Video link -

The controlled media in the United States is primarily owned and controlled by the Zionist Mafia, which censors any discussion of 9-11 truth.  Leslie Moonves, for example, the president and CEO of CBS Corporation, is the great-nephew of Israel's first prime minister, David Ben Gurion. 

This explains why, although well over half the population does not believe the official myth, which has been proven to be false, there is still no discussion of 9-11 truth in the controlled media.  The only logical conclusion is that the organized criminal network that controls the mainstream media is complicit in the 9-11 criminal deception.

The efforts of people like Stewart, Maher, and Maddow, to ridicule and attack 9-11 truth has to be understood for what it is: these jokers are simply following orders from the people who pay them.  While their conduct may not be criminal under the law, it is certainly evil and un-patriotic.  Their loyalties lie elsewhere.

A COUPLE IRRELIGIOUS NEW YORK JEWS - Bill Maher (right, in the Hebrew "Yankees" shirt), who ridicules 9-11 truth, is a godless Zionist Jew and a supporter of the state of Israel.
Larry Charles, his partner in Religulous, a film that mocks religion, is on the left.

Regarding Greg Palast, I would say that I am not being harsh at all.  First, you have to remember why I investigated Palast in the first place. I was originally suspicious of Palast having seen how his focus on vote fraud was clearly off-target from the real problem with elections in America, which is that the citizens do not count their votes in the polling places.  This is the most essential condition of a transparent and democratic election, and is virtually nonexistent in America today with the wide-spread use of electronic voting machines.

But, when Greg Palast rudely attacked Professor Steven Jones and called him a fraud, then I knew that Palast was not speaking for himself, but had clearly been given orders to smear Jones and to attack his critical discovery of nano-thermite in the dust of the WTC.  The discovery of nano-thermite in the dust of the demolished towers destroys the official version as a credible explanation of what happened on 9-11.  This is why Dr. Jones and I were both attacked in 2006.  This is a discovery that was not supposed to happen.

Then, you have to consider that his father's cousin, David Kimche, was an Israeli spymaster and founding father of the Mossad. This is much more than coincidence.


"Kimche joined the Mossad spy agency in the early 1950s, and was in essence one of the organization's founding fathers, among those who designed its doctrine and modus operandi. He was involved in just about every aspect of the Mossad over the course of his service, eventually reaching the position of deputy head of Mossad.

Kimche recruited and operated agents which were sent to infiltrate Arab countries;

Kimche was involved in enhancing cooperation with Mossad's counterparts throughout the world;

Kimche often presented himself as a journalist; and

Kimche was Israel's point man in the Iran-contra affair.

Greg Palast spends a great deal of time in London, where David Kimche was born and where his family lives.  Palast is fully aware of his family's relationship with Israel and the Mossad.  Based on these facts, I can only conclude that Greg Palast is working as an Israeli propagandist/disinfo agent and this is the real reason for his obnoxious hostility to 9-11 truth and Dr. Steven E. Jones, which otherwise makes no sense.

Comment:  I continue to visit your website regularly, and you continue to post the fruits of your research, which manages to maintain its expertise and relevance so admirably; and yet it is difficult to detect little, if any, progress in our struggle for justice.  The power of the corporate media in the U.S. seems overwhelming (as demonstrated in their recent reporting of "Assad gassing his own people!"), although the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth ( seem to be making slight inroads, at least in Canada.

Bollyn Responds:  Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have done great work in bringing 9-11 truth into the mainstream.  This organization presents irrefutable scientific evidence that the official version of what caused the destruction of the World Trade Center is nothing but a pack of lies, but the controlled media in the United States continues to ignore this important evidence.  What's going on?

If we consider the key role played by the controlled media in the 9-11 deception, we can see that the heads of the major media networks are active participants in the 9-11 cover-up.  We can discern that this 9-11 deception network is organized, criminal, and reaches to the highest level of the U.S. government and media.  We can also see that this criminal network is Zionist by ideology and primarily Jewish by ethnicity.  The heads of the major media networks could fit around one large conference table and probably often do.

The 9-11 cover-up is not the only huge crime the privately-owned media is involved in.  It also plays a crucial role in selling the fraudulent elections held in the United States as transparent and democratic when they are, in fact, completely opaque and rigged.

Who are some of the Zionist powers behind the 9-11 deception? There are many, but one of the most obvious is the Henry Crown (formerly Krinsky) family of Chicago, which is the controlling family of General Dynamics, the leading defense contractor.  As I have pointed out in recent articles, the Crown family is connected to people who played key roles in creating the official version of 9-11 early on, namely Zdenek Bazant and W. Gene Corley. The Crowns are also long-time supporters of Barack Obama, since he came to Chicago.

There are two obvious reasons why the war-profiteering Crown family supports the 9-11 deception.  First, because they are ardent supporters of the state of Israel, whose military intelligence played a key role in the false-flag terrorism.  Secondly, the Crown family made huge profits from the fraudulent "War on Terror" and the wars fought in Afghanistan and Iraq.  The Crown family is the largest shareholder of General Dynamics, whose revenue tripled from $10.4 billion in 2000 to $32.5 billion in 2010 - while the value of their stock quadrupled.

Comment:   Dear Christopher, 

I just found your web pages, as was doing some deeper research into who is Greg Palast? I had some suspicions, so I checked him out - and must admit, he had me fooled for some years.

Your deep research work is very impressive. You have my full – moral/ethical/human – support. These days I become angered easy (getting too old to care) and only want to be in the company of genuine truth-tellers, such as yourself.  You are a true hero.

Bollyn Responds:  I had to look in the archives to find what I had written about Greg Palast. I found the original article from August 2007 on and reposted it under the title "Greg Palast’s Attack on 9-11 Truth"

I knew that Palast came from a Zionist family, but digging a little deeper, I found that he is related to one of the founding fathers of the Mossad, the notorious spymaster David Kimche.  The article, "Greg Palast is Related to Mossad Chief David Kimche" explains why Palast, who markets himself as an "investigative journalist," never sees the Israeli elephant in the room.

His real mission as "a journalist" is to distract and divert his readers away from the evidence of Israeli involvment in 9-11, electronic vote fraud, and other mega-crimes. Palast is a working Zionist agent like his sister Geri, who is managing director of the Israel Action Network of the Jewish Federation. One should be aware of Palast's loyalty to the state of Israel when reading his material - he is, after all, acting as an agent of a foreign state.

What is really behind Palast's attack on Dr. Jones?

One has to ask why Palast, a Zionist, attacked Dr. Steven E. Jones so aggressively on INN in 2007 and why Palast is so adamant in his position that there is no evidence of explosives in the demolition of the World Trade Center, when there were over 100 eyewitnesses who reported seeing or feeling explosions? 

If you listen to what Palast says in the INN interview you can see that he fails to make any points with solid logic or facts. He has, in fact, nothing to prove his case. So what compels Palast to take this position in spite of abundant evidence of explosives?

Look at who is behind the attacks on Dr. Jones and ask yourself why he was set up by an organized cabal of Zionist Jews on NPR in September 2006, an organized attack which led to his suspension as a teacher at BYU?  Dr. Jones had, if fact, said nothing about Jews or Israel, but the NPR show had been set up with Jews already lurking in the shadows, like wolves ready to attack.  So, why is it that Zionist Jews refuse to see the evidence of explosives at the World Trade Center, if they are not simply trying to protect Israel from being discovered - as the culprit?

Comment:  I read your piece titled “Too Many Years of Lies & Public Enemy No. 1” (and the included piece by Paul Craig Roberts). I agree with everything there and I like the article.

“Too Many Years of Lies & Public Enemy No. 1” September 12, 2013

I agree with the position that the owners of the media are a great enemy of the U.S. public and that they are part of the “crimocracy” that did 9/11. I think the problem is people just being closed minded and having taken blind psychological/spiritual refuge in the media.

In a related vein, you made a statement some time ago that people have misunderstood their relationship to government in the U.S. I think this statement is maybe more significant than you may think (or more significant than what I recall you indicating). I think this may be perhaps the fundamental problem in the world (or an aspect of it, or at least related to it). 

I think people have taken a kind of spiritual refuge in government/media. Instead of having genuine spiritual faith, instead of having either faith in genuine religion, or at least in their own ability to discern the truth around them and in their ability to reason and think rationally, they have taken a kind of blind faith in government/media. I believe this is a huge and immense problem and that probably it can only be fixed with pain, enough pain and suffering that they finally start to question their beliefs. 

Bollyn Responds:  This is a very good comment about a subject of great importance to all Americans, indeed to all people: When the citizen is aware that the government is lying about what really happened on 9-11 and has deceived the nation in order to wage criminal wars of aggression, how does that awareness change the citizen’s relationship to his government? 

According to a recent report about the events of 9-11, 84 percent of the American population thinks the government is lying about 9-11. So, if you are among the 84 percent who think or believe that the government is lying about 9-11, how does this awareness affect your political posture vis-à-vis the federal government and its agents and agencies?

I commented on this political dilemma in my article and video entitled “Making Sense of 9-11 Disinformation” on July 4, 2013:

Even when we realize that we have been deceived on a massive scale, it’s not easy to accept that the government has lied about 9-11. It’s very uncomfortable for an American to contemplate that their government would engage in a massive criminal cover-up and send thousands of Americans to fight and die in Afghanistan and Iraq based on nothing but a pack of lies.

When you discover that the U.S. government and mass media have indeed lied to us about 9-11, you realize that the whole “War on Terror” construct is nothing but a massive fraud. This means that the Bush and Obama administrations are criminal operations at the highest level of government.

So, you see why 9-11 truth is a very painful subject to contemplate. It means either you believe the lies and support the fraudulent “War on Terror” or you basically divorce yourself from the federal government. This is certainly not an easy choice for any patriotic American.
- “Making Sense of 9-11 Disinformation” by Christopher Bollyn, July 3, 2013

For me, the relationship between the criminal regime in power (“crimocracy”) and a truth-seeking and patriotic citizen is painfully clear. Five years after 9-11, in August 2006, I was attacked by three heavily-armed undercover police (i.e. agents of the state) at my home. I was subsequently charged (i.e. maliciously prosecuted) with having attacked these armed invaders at my home, and in a thoroughly corrupt trial found guilty. 

Realizing that I was being criminalized for my writing about 9-11 and that I was at the mercy of a criminal regime, I left the country. It would have been foolish and reckless to put the welfare of my family in jeopardy by allowing the same Zionist judge who had overseen the blatantly corrupt trial to sentence me for crimes I had not committed. I have lived in exile since June 2007.

Professor Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah, received similar treatment from the Mormon church after he was falsely accused in September 2006 of having made anti-Semitic comments on a local NPR radio program. Jones lost his teaching career as a consequence of having investigated the use of explosives in the demolition of the three towers on 9-11.

While Dr. Jones and I were attacked because of our 9-11 research and writing, every American who thinks the government is lying about 9-11 is really in the same position. When you realize that the government is lying about 9-11, a crime of mass murder and terrorism, it means that the government is controlled by criminals. In such a situation, patriotic truth-seekers become enemies of the state because the crimocracy that controls the government is the enemy of the people and the republic.

Dr. Jones and I have done nothing wrong to deserve the treatment that we received at the hands of those who control the state. Aware that the government was lying to the American people, we have done our best to discover what really happened on 9-11 and expose the deception to our fellow citizens in our deceived and defrauded nation. As outspoken truth-seekers we simply became targets of the criminals who are behind the 9-11 cover-up by the media and government.

Christopher Bollyn and Professor Steven E. Jones at BYU, March 2006

It's not that Dr. Jones and I are criminals (we are not), but that the state is ruled by criminals who attacked us for being patriotic (and very inconvenient) truth-seekers. The 9-11 cover up by the U.S. government is, in fact, treasonous and is the most obvious indication that the government has become the enemy of the people. In such a situation it is our natural obligation and duty as citizens to “throw off” and “abolish” the government, as the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776, says:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

"Regarding 9-11: a massive 84 percent now say the government is lying."
- Daniel Bushell, RT, September 8, 2013 (at 7:05 minutes)
Video Link -

Comment:  U.S. & SYRIA

Can anyone explain why we are now supposed to support the radical Islamists, the very forces who supposedly perpetrated the 9-11 attacks (according to the official fairy tale about the 9-11 Zionist Terror Charade), who are fighting against the Syrian regime of Bashar al Assad?  Why is “Al CIAduh” operating inside Syria our ally when it is our enemy operating in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Assad, like Saddam Hussein before him, is tolerant of Christianity, both Maronite Catholic and Greek Orthodox.  Again, why are we opposing his rule?  Why are we choosing sides in a civil war that has been aggravated by outside intervention by Saudi Arabia, Israel, and other anti-Iranian groups?

This seems to confirm that people who buy into the lie about the 9-11 Zionist Terror Charade will believe anything, even the most logically inconsistent and patently absurd contradictions!

May God have mercy on your deceived and deceiving souls. 

Comment:  I have just sent you a modest little contribution of $50 via PayPal to help further your unique research and publishing effort. I wish it could have been 1,000 times as much because I am convinced that you are one of the very few investigative reporters in the world today that is committed to telling the whole and unvarnished truth about what is happening on the political level to mankind…

Your research conclusively proves the existence of a largely unseen power that has had for decades the means to shape world events from behind the scenes, and my research delves into the philosophical-religious underpinnings of that cabal that motivates it to do what it does - namely, to erase the influence of Jesus Christ from every vestige of every society on the globe in order to prepare the way for the emergence of a "Jewish messiah," who, as I have noted before, will not be the return of Jesus Christ in glory and majesty, but "the man of sin" as foretold in Sacred Scripture.

Whether or not any of us believe this is actually happening or is even possible, what is important is that the Zionists believe in it and hope that under an all-powerful world-Zionist leader and dictatorship, they will become masters of the universe, hence the very reason for Zionism as detailed in "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.”

Last May, our small church sent me on a mission to Europe to investigate what might be done to preclude what's left of the Catholic world from being drawn into this diabolical deception in the making. Should I return there anytime soon, I would very much like to meet you in order to discuss sensitive issues, that as you well know, cannot be mentioned in complete safety, except face to face.

In the meantime, I wish you and your family all the best, and pray for your good health and security during your present exile.

Comment:  Chris,

You're a great journalist who has built up great moral credibility with your pioneering 9-11 research. Your 9-11 research passes technical muster. Your "chinchilla on Mars" posting is a needless, pointless, frivolous distraction that will damage your credibility.

The "chinchilla" is a rock that has features somewhat reminiscent of a chinchilla. It is just like the "Face on Mars" from the 1970's Viking missions, which were, of course, just a configuration of hills. Unless you can show that the "chinchilla" is moving, or otherwise alive, this posting is enormously damaging and will take away from YEARS of hard-won credibility (you were TASED by police and forced to flee the country!) and reduce you to a "giggle-factor".

Please remove the posting, or at least mitigate it by saying that it is probably a rock.

Best Regards, Robert
Robert D. Pickar
1157 W. 10th St
San Pedro, CA 90731

Bollyn Responds:  This comment comes from Robert Daniel Pickar, the son of Kenneth Arnold Pickar. Kenneth Pickar is a visiting professor at Caltech. Caltech runs the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which operates the Mars mission for NASA. I responded to Robert asking him if his father's connections to Caltech, the JPL, and NASA have anything to do with his request.

Robert Pickar responded:

Not only did my father, Kenneth Pickar, NOT ask me to write the email to you, he doesn't know about it, it has NOTHING to do with him, and he will be LIVID with me if he finds out about your post! ... I want this to be a productive conversation, and I believe that you are a decent person, so I ask you, will you remove this entirely slanderous and off-base posting about me and my father? What will it require for you to accept that this is in error and must ethically be removed?

I certainly don't want to slander anyone. I am merely pointing out the fact that the person who asked me to remove the posting about the Mars mission is the son of a professor at the small private research institution that is running the operation. Kenneth Pickar, originally from the Bronx, has had a long career working with companies and institutions that work with NASA. He even worked and taught at the Technion in Haifa, Israel, in the early 1970s. He now lives in the Golden State in a multi-million dollar home in the gated community of Rolling Hills, near Palos Verdes. All of this information comes from his own CV and is not meant be slanderous in any way.

See Ken Pickar's CV here:

Kenneth Arnold Pickar of Caltech

A slide from Ken Pickar's 2010 presentation on Caltech running the Mars mission

Ken Pickar (3rd from left) has close ties to the state of Israel. Here, in December 2006, he visits the Israeli coast with Joseph Shappir, Head of Department of Applied Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Comment:  Hello Chris, 19 year old reader here -
I came across your work a few months ago. I've been listening to your interviews and reading your articles and I want to say, from the bottom of my heart, God bless you man. Seriously. The history that you've managed to unearth is phenomenal and you are EXCEEDINGLY brilliant! Keep up the good work and keep the faith. Even though it may seem like virtually everyone is brainwashed, there are still young kids like me who've come across the truth and are eternally grateful to have people like you around, because almost all of my family and friends think that I've gone off into the deep end and that I'm a "conspiracy theorist." Take care, I wish you the best. (R.D. in New York)


Piper's campaign against Bollyn is a Jewish smear campaign on a man who exposed the Jewish hand behind 9/11.

All human-factor, personal dispositions aside, I submit the following:

In the oceans of extra-curricular text that I have devoured during college and since graduation, I am well equipped to discern what I read.

Based on my experiences with publishers both on and off campus during my college days and with those after graduation in the alternative media, I have a feel for who works for whom.

Sadly, but not surprisingly, many of the "big names" in so-called alternative media have been co-opted by Jewish money (call them the Meyer Lansky Gang if you want).  Predictably and right on time.

All you gotta do is crack, if you can weather the slog, any of Mike Piper's books to see what's happening at the American Free Press (AFP) and Barnes Review.  Piper plugs their Jewish lawyer-owner, Mark Lane, throughout his texts, singing his praises.  I question whether a man named Michael Collins Piper [real name Michael Bernard Piper] actually wrote "books" per se.  He claims to be a journalist, but nothing attributed to his by-lines reads like one.  His books appear to me like a patch-work of assorted ghost-writers.  There is no definitive thread of writer's voice that runs through them and ties them together.  His books lack a signature.  They lack a feel that attributes text to its author. 

In my dealings with Piper, he took care to not write more than a line or two in my direction.  He slipped into a phone call between Mark Glenn and me once.  I got this "drum roll" introduction from Mark Glenn as though Piper was somebody's Kahuna.  Piper was feeling me out for girl'ity and fan'dom I suppose.  He got neither.  Mark Glenn is one of Piper's close friends according to both Glenn and Piper.

For example Piper's much-trumpeted Final Judgment is a quilt of other men's text sewn together loosely by annoying, superfluous words.  Bad writing, pure and simple.  Crappy writing to be frank in some spots.  Puerile in style.  Like a newbie who graduated last week whose daddy owns the big city paper and wants to call Jr. a journalist -- to his cocktail party and golf club.  The lines that smote me as brilliant were enclosed in quotation marks.  Other men wrote them.  Final Judgment reads like a research paper from a high school kid.

No wonder Piper seeks to discredit and smear a journalist like Christopher Bollyn.  What Piper is good at is not writing, but defamation.  How Jewish is that?  What Piper's paymasters fail to cover, envy shall.  Piper's campaign against Bollyn is a Jewish smear campaign on a man who exposed the Jewish hand behind 9/11.  Since Mark Lane (formerly Levin) owns the American Free Press, it would be Lane (Levin) who pulls the strings at AFP.  Hence their feeble attempt to sabotage my work there.  Petherick, fake-named Victor Thorn [real name Scott Makufka], and Mike Piper are puppets and profiteers in my opinion.  They capitalize on the fears and concerns of aging conservatives who read AFP on their porch rockers.  People who don't know how to type and don't own a computer.  Willis Carto is 86 years of age, a WWII veteran.  They are using his good name as a rubber stamp to push the Barnes Review and AFP pabulum rag to old people.

Bollyn Responds:  You are quite right about the deception that is going on at American Free Press and the Liberty Lobby. It is absolutely evil to deceive and fleece patriotic Americans with their fake Liberty Lobby and its newspaper.  (I know how fraudulent it is having worked there for 6 years.) Mike Piper even brags about his Jewish relatives and carries a portfolio from AIPAC.  Ask yourself, why would a patriotic American do that? 

The owner of AFP is Mark Lane, whose original family name was Levin.  His father was a Jewish accountant named Harry Arnold Levin.  Mark Lane is former U.S. Army Intelligence from post-war Germany, where there is a similar controlled opposition newspaper called National Zeitung.  It should be noted that Mark Lane was the primary psy-ops agent/handler who instigated the horrific massacre at Jonestown in Guyana.  

Mark Lane (center), the lawyer who reportedly owns the Liberty Lobby and American Free Press, was the lawyer for the Rev. Jim Jones. Lane was present during the massacre/suicide and is considered to have been the person who instigated it by scaring Jim Jones to the point of desperation.

Now, why would a high-level psy-ops agent like Mark Lane be interested in running American Free Press, which uses the exact same scare tactics?  What's the real connection between Jonestown and AFP?  What's going on?

Jonestown, November 1978

Beware of the tainted Kool-Aid:  read all the sordid details about Mike Piper and Mark Lane in my article:

*  *  *  *  *

It is essential for the survival of the American republic that the high crimes and treason committed by our highest officials be investigated and prosecuted. 

If violence is the salvation of the brutes, 
the salvation of Man is Justice.

- Rev. Charles Wagner, Justice (1905)

Comment:  The entire Dark Cabal needs to immediately be arrested! Enough of this nonsense!! We must repudiate all of this illegal debt. We should look to the Other 1%, the best and brightest, to help us repair the damage that has been done. The worst that humanity has to offer, and only marginally smarter than average, have hoodwinked almost everyone into falling for their crazy scheme to control us. If we do nothing to stop them, they will create Hell on Earth.

For truth and justice - (D.M. from Michigan)

Bollyn Responds:  I agree completely. A criminal regime has clearly ruled the United States since 2000, if not longer. The evidence shows that this crimocracy is complicit in the criminal cover-up of the false-flag terrorism of 9-11, which resulted in the destruction of the evidence and obstruction of justice for the victims. Then, based on a pack of lies about what happened on 9-11 and who was behind it, the ruling criminals took the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia, and other nations to war in Afghanistan and Iraq. It needs to be understood that these wars are criminal in nature because they were started and waged on false allegations, which were known to be false at the time, i.e. lies. Planning or conspiring to engage in such wars, which are known as "wars of aggression," is a "crime against peace" under international law based on the Nuremberg Principles. Principle III of the Nuremberg Principles states: "The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law." Furthermore, it is criminal for President Obama to simply turn the page and close the book on the long list of crimes committed by the previous administration. 

What needs to happen is for all the guilty parties (e.g. George Bush, Dick Cheney, Michael Chertoff, et al) to be charged and investigated for their high crimes committed while in office. Failing to do that will only enable the ruling crimocracy to continue with its criminal agenda, which will indeed result in "Hell on Earth." The only question is how it will be done.

Comment:  I was introduced to the planned destruction of the World Trade Center buildings a few months ago. My first contact with it was through Dr. Steven Jones and a video I found covering the events and the scientific study approach ignoring all but just how did the three buildings come down. After viewing "Explosive Evidence," which aired on Colorado's PBS stations last year, I was convinced - and so very sad over the prospects my government was responsible for this terrible act.

Anyway, as I accumulated more and more information, looked at the stuff out there, rejecting the junk and only considering the plausible, I found myself more and more depressed that 9-11 was actually committed by my government; they murdered 3,000 people in one day, kicked this country into endless war - and it looks as if they may get away with it.

I have contacted as many political types as possible asking for new hearings and such. My life has been altered and not for the best, I must say. The deep and wide gulf that must be traversed, the people involved, the terrible laws enacted to support the tyranny heading our way, the daily barrage aimed at the 2nd Amendment crowd (I am part of that crowd) to disarm us, and the total uphill battle ahead of us to regain our nation is so hard to contemplate. I pray God will help us upright our ship of state, and that He will answer our S.O.S.  (T.P. in Missouri)

Bollyn Responds:  The intellectual quandary that you describe so well is very real and something that all serious 9-11 scholars go through. One has to realize that there is no escaping this quandary, but there is a solution to the problem.  The only real solution is to be liberated from the evil deception that surrounds the events of 9-11. This is why my book, Solving 9-11, has an image of the sun rising over North America. It is, after all, a positive and enlightening thing to be relieved of a deception.

The false-flag terrorism of 9-11 is clearly anathema to any patriotic American, but it is true that some Americans were involved in the crime and the cover-up.  These are 'Americans' like Michael Chertoff and Dov Zakheim who served a foreign power, Israel, while they occupied high-level positions in the U.S. government. George W. Bush and Dick Cheney are also Americans who have utterly betrayed the American people and republic. These people have all committed high crimes and treason against the United States and must be prosecuted for their crimes.

As Dr. Martin Luther King said, "To ignore evil is to become an accomplice to it." The lackadaisical attitude of the Obama administration that we, as a nation, can simply let bygones be bygones with such monstrous crimes as 9-11, its cover-up, and the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq simply indicates that it is part of the same criminal network that is behind these crimes. There is no escaping the fact that we must hold the 9-11 criminals accountable for their crimes. Real justice is the only solution. 

Comment:  Judy Wood and Scientific Reality

Judy Wood claims that the Twin Towers and Building 7 were destroyed by a new, higher technology that the government secretly possesses. What supposedly happens in this higher technology is an event at the molecular level where electrical forces that bind molecules together are somehow reversed so that suddenly they repel each other, and this causes matter to explode into dust. Judy Wood claims that this new technology is potentially very valuable to mankind, because it can provide unlimited cheap energy. That this new, higher technology exists is proven by the fact that the WTC buildings were “dustified,” or suddenly turned into dust in a way that involved no heat, according to Wood.

The claim being made by Wood that an event is happening at a molecular level where molecules are suddenly sent flying away form one another in a heatless explosion is absolutely impossible, given what physicists consider to be knowledge. It would take a huge amount of evidence before the international community of physicists began to believe that such an event as “dustification” has ever actually happened. It would take much more evidence than the observations made of the Twin Towers turning into dust as they fell, even if there were no alternative explanations for these observations.

The Thermite Argument provides a sound explanation for the observations made of the Twin Towers turning into dust as they fell. It is more than probable that nano-thermite was burning and was perhaps also exploding inside the Twin Towers as they fell. This is known with much certainty, and it adequately explains the pulverization of the Twin Towers.

However, even if there were no evidence of thermite, the idea of a material cause that makes matter of every kind, steel as well as plastic and cement, suddenly explode into tiny particles due to a change in operative electrical forces at the molecular level, cannot be given scientific credibility by the observations made of the Twin Towers as they fell—along with all the other empirical evidence cited by Wood, such as a hurricane supposedly inexplicably changing its course. The totality of the evidence cited by Wood, no matter how well it stood up to scrutiny, would not be remotely close to what it would take to give scientific credibility to her far-fetched claim of “dustification.”

What is going on here is obviously disinformation, as Christopher Bollyn has stated. It is a deliberate “spreading of false news” that is meant to obscure the truth of what really happened on 9/11.  (K.B. in California)

Question:  I recently found your site and wanted to thank and congratulate you on your work... you connected more dots on 9/11 than I ever thought possible!

However, as a Canadian, I really must correct you on the appointment of the Canadian Deputy Minister of National Defense, who is appointed by the Minister of Defense, in consultation with the Prime Minister. In practical terms, he is appointed by the PM who appoints the Defense Minister to his Cabinet. Also, the Queen does not rule Canada in any way and has not even been a figurehead for decades (there are some left over ceremonial remnants in our government but absolutely no direct authority... and perhaps this was the source of your confusion).

I must say it does little for your credibility to be so wrong on the very core structure of a country you accuse of involvement in such a heinous crime, but I'm sure it's simply an honest (3rd party?) mistake.

Wishing you the very best, and continued success with your investigations!

M.G. in Toronto

Bollyn Responds:  Thanks for your note.  I am not blaming Canadians for 9-11, but the idea that Canadians and/or Canadian territory were involved in 9-11 is not at all far-fetched.  The key role, as yet unexplained, played by two senior Canadian military officers in the NORAD drill on 9-11 clearly draws Canada and Canadians into the sordid saga. Secondly, there are the awards and titles given to these Canadian officers, Rudy Giuliani, and others by the Queen of England for their service on 9-11? Why, pray tell, did the Queen of England give awards to American politicians and Canadian officers for their service on 9-11? They did nothing right! More to the point, the actions of those who were knighted and honored by the Queen had allowed the attacks to succeed - and these individuals were then rewarded by the Queen of the British Empire. Was this to compensate these poor souls for the treachery they had committed?

About Canada's Deputy Minister of Defence, this is what Wikipedia says:

The Department of National Defence is headed by the Deputy Minister of National Defence... The Deputy Minister is appointed by the Crown (Queen-in-Council) on the advice of the Prime Minister.

This is what Canada's National Defence Act says about the appointment:  

"There shall be a Deputy Minister of National Defence who shall be appointed by the Governor in Council to hold office during pleasure."

The Queen or sovereign is the head of state in Canada. The Governor General of Canada represents the sovereign, and most of the powers and authority of the sovereign have been delegated to the Governor General.  

The prime minister is the head of government in Canada. The government is formally referred to as Her Majesty's Government and is defined by the Canadian constitution as the Queen acting on the advice of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada. This is known as the Queen-in-Council or sometimes the Governor-in-Council, referring to the Governor General of Canada as the Queen's stand-in.

"During pleasure" refers to the legal term "At Her Majesty's pleasure," which according to the Wikipedia article on the subject, means exactly what it says:

At Her Majesty's pleasure is a legal term of art derived from all legitimate authority for government stemming from the Crown. Originating in the United Kingdom, it is now used throughout the Commonwealth realms. In realms where the monarch is represented by a Governor-General, the phrase may be modified to be at the Governor's pleasure, since the governor-general, governor, or lieutenant governor is the Queen's personal representative in the country, state or province.

From these sources it seems pretty clear to me that Canada's Deputy Minister of Defense is indeed appointed by the Crown and serves at Her Majesty's pleasure.

Comment:  The firebombing of Dresden is just one of the horrific war crimes of 1945-1946 carried out by our gallant Allied forces.  General Eisenhower certainly showed his true colors as a war criminal, torturing and starving hundreds of thousands of German prisoners of war, civilians, and refugees.  It was Winston Churchill himself who ordered the bombing of civilian targets early in the war.  It forced Hitler to retaliate by using the "blitz" on London. 

Churchill, Roosevelt, Truman, Stalin, and even Hitler, all had their handlers; they were all controlled by the very same banksters.  Germany was set up to lose WWII. Why did they let the British escape from Dunkirk? Why did Hitler ignore his generals and intelligence officers who knew where D-Day was going to be, and when? Hitler was the puppet who was installed to lead them to defeat. It was Victor Rothschild who handled Churchill, and he went on to become Britain's number one spy for the Soviets, or rather Israel and the Soviets; same thing.  Of course, he was not made public, he was untouchable, as he still is in the "history" books and media.

Victor Rothschild, 3rd Baron Rothschild (1910–1990)

No.  You don't see daredevil, flag-waving heroic films about all this.  When the so-called "good" guys do anything bad, it never appears in print or on the screen.  Our scholarly books and academics only echo all the contrived, manipulated, manufactured, and delivered-to-order history we need to know.  All the great, monumental volumes on Churchill, the pillar of the British Empire, exalted humanitarian - and what a crock!

This is why 9-11 like all the other crimes, will always be hidden from the masses.  Myths, or rather outright lies are created and perpetuated for such events as the Titanic "sinking", JFK assassination, the 7/7 London bombings and on and on.  The masses are too brainwashed, too sedated/medicated, too engaged in just trying to survive in their own lives, to worry or even care about all this.  They're too depressed, too much in debt and way too much humanoid now, to even know just how enslaved and mind controlled they've really become.

We both keep trying to educate, to wake them all up... whether it’s the latest police shootout, school massacre, or other staged piece of terror, I have a hard job myself keeping from going crazy.  Why would the good Lord allow all this to happen; is it all a test?  Anyway Christopher, my own research and that of much more qualified people than me, will clearly show, will prove just how 9/11 played its part in forever advancing the banksters’ evil agenda.  (G.H. in California)

Comment:  Hello Christopher,

In reference to your Romney forecast for president, because of him being the Zionist favorite...

Well, being British, and being even more cynical than you, I believe everything was decided for Obama when the ruling elite put him in the job in the first place. Elections are mere theatre, illusion of choice. The criminal banking cabal, through their Zionist agents, through their willing dupes, their owned politicians, media, and judiciary, always manage to accept whoever the elite choose.

JFK was the last president to question his masters, and any criticism or discussion of his public execution is still, fifty years later, met with the same denial and ridicule as 9-11 and every other world shattering event. Zionists, Freemasons; they're all Satanists, as their kind of evil could only come from secret societies, exclusive clubs, and the "privileged classes," that the masses accept as normal and well meaning.

You and numerous others have well proved why, how, and by whom, 9-11 was carried out. Unfortunately, I feel the masses will never fully accept the truth about the evil that controls their lives, as from childhood, they have been conditioned, brain-washed, to believe in their governments and institutions. To believe the fairy tale history they are taught in school, to believe that good always triumphs over evil, which they are taught in church. Their minds have a built-in block that filters out the real truth. People by nature, as the Tavistock Institute discovered in the 1920's, want to belong, want to be part of the majority, want to comply...

Anyway, like you I suspect, I have chronic insomnia, with all this going on in my mind, and hoping that the masses will wake-up one day. I greatly admire your determination and spirit. However when you see 9-11 as just another part of the centuries old conspiracy that continues to dominate us all, how do you manage to comprehend any hope for the future, and our children, let alone manage to sleep nights?

I pose an impossible question, don't I, Christopher?

When I try to explain to people 9-11 or JFK, I first talk about money. How money is created literally out of thin air by the central (criminal, private) banks. I go on to show that there is no debt, none at all. If governments go back to creating their own currency, like they once did, interest free. Then it’s simply a question of spending within a fixed budget. They wouldn't be beholden to anyone.

With that the case, governments wouldn't be in anyone's pocket. There would be no corruption, and no need for wars or 9-11's. They say that money is the root of all evil... well the City of London banksters, the Rothschilds and their like, created the so-called "intelligence services" to make sure that countries, governments, don't get to control their own money and credit. MI6 created the CIA and Mossad, to get the world into perpetual debt, and to enslave mankind. The intelligence community serves the banksters, and no one else. What’s more, the banksters establish and control all the "think tanks," research foundations, all the so-called endowment trusts, the kind that so graciously fund PBS. The banksters control education, they fund both left and right wing groups, and they always lead the opposition, because they always start it.

Now to get the masses, to get an average intelligence person to understand all this is like asking them to accept aliens from another planet as their real parents. It completely cuts their foundation away, their anchor, their sanity and reasoning. As I've said with your scholarly, intense research and books, you've well shown that 9-11 was a monumental false-flag operation. That 3,000 people and 3 iconic skyscrapers were merely used as props to stage an apocalyptic event that would launch all-out war in the Middle East, and get the world to surrender its freedom and rights, for so-called security. Protection from the "terrorists"... only the terrorists are, and have always been the banksters. No, it's not Rod Serling's Twilight Zone; it's our real world today!

Unfortunately, the youth of today are even more willing to accept all the lies and injustices. I call it a "latte mentality"; indifferent to what's really going on beyond their I-pads and laptops. The banksters have long wanted to break up the family unit, to confuse and to sedate the masses. Drug stores on every other corner, hundreds of mindless TV channels, instant downloads... it's no wonder our young people fall prey to this evil Pied Piper. Of course some are able to resist, to still think for themselves, but they're losing out. As you well know, the 9-11 Truth Movement like everything else, has been well infiltrated by the banksters. The alternative media, like the Occupy Movement, American Civil Liberties Union and so much else, have been well poisoned, but still the voice of hope manages to survive somehow.

Life literally is a Matrix. It is Alice in Wonderland. With so much beauty in the world, with so many good people, with the wonders of nature, I sometimes forget that all this evil is real. But the images of JFK, 9-11, the images of babies exposed to depleted uranium bombs, the images of ever lying politicians and Hollywood celebrities shilling for the banksters... that’s what keeps me so awake!

I've already seen how your site has expanded 9-11, as indeed it should. It remains so far, so criminally monumental in false-flag events, but I fear the worst is yet to come. As with the loyal, dedicated supporters of the USS Liberty, JFK/RFK assassinations, plus all those who question Waco, Oklahoma City, London 7/7 bombings, Princess Diana, and so many other horrific world events, let alone the crimes of just Israel, it's an honour and privilege to have you as a fellow supporter and friend!

Best to you Christopher as always,

Graham Hill 

Comment:  Dear Christopher:  It was a great honor and pleasure for me to get a letter from you - many thanks! I look forward to receiving your two books on 9/11 which I already know will be the definitive works on the subject. While I believe that there is a place for research that delves into the mechanics of how the three towers were brought down (because that explanation exposes the official version as a preposterous lie), the identification of those responsible, and analysis of the agenda that those heinous attacks were intended to advance are infinitely more important goals of the quest for "9/11 truth".

It is my belief that the ultimate purpose of this crime of the century is the destruction of every Arab capital in the world in order to neutralize all opposition to the Zionist bandit state that is ensconced in Palestine, with the destruction of the Al Aqsa Mosque to pave the way for the re-building of the Jerusalem Temple as the final endgame. The latter is to be the staging area for the unveiling of the "Jewish King" under whose direction the Zionists believe they will become the invincible masters of the universe. "Christian" Zionists teach the fantasy that this will signal the "return of the Messiah". But it is not to the loving embrace of Jesus Christ, coming again in glory and majesty, that today's TV evangelicals are leading their clueless followers, but to the murderous clutches of His satanic counterfeit, "the man of sin".

Whether or not one is a believer in the Scriptures, it is nevertheless imperative for everyone to know that the Zionist elites are in anticipation of a religious/political leader whom THEY believe will soon emerge as an omnipotent force enabling the Synagogue of Satan to extend its brutal control over the entire globe. And they, together with their bought-and-paid-for minions in the U.S. government and every other puppet state of the US-EU-British-Israel nexus are willing to obliterate civilization itself to establish what could be accurately described as the one-world dictatorship of Antichrist, presently taking shape before our eyes…

Question:  Dear Chris, I got your e-mail the other day. Thank you. One thing I keep wondering though - why the hell does Google or whoever keep posting stuff to the effect that you're an "agent saboteur" of the Zionists, or that your family has been killed, or something?  What's going on?

Bollyn Responds:  This question comes from a person in Hoffman Estates who has known the Bollyn family all of her life. She doesn’t understand why there is so much vicious slander against me on the Internet.

First, let’s be clear, Google is not responsible for any of the slander. The slander against me all comes from individuals who were associated with me in one way or another during the first five years of my work as an investigative journalist researching what really happened on 9-11. Most of it actually comes from three detractors whose names are known within the “9-11 truth” movement: Eric Hufschmid, Daryl Bradford Smith (a.k.a. Daryl B. Setters), and Michael Collins Piper (a.k.a. Michael Bernard Piper) from American Free Press. These three detractors have obviously been ordered and paid to spread slanderous lies about me: first Smith in 2005, then Piper in 2006, and finally Hufschmid in 2007.

I, on the other hand, have never attacked any of them but actually helped them all a great deal in their endeavors, so why would these people, who are supposedly 9-11 truth-seekers, spend so much time attacking me?

Smith clearly revealed himself as an agent acting on orders to hurt my credibility in the “Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can” telephone call to Eric Hufschmid, which Hufschmid recorded. Piper and Hufschmid attack me relentlessly saying I am a Zionist agent, because they know that my potential supporters are people who are critical of Israel and Zionism who are naturally skeptical and might entertain the notion that I am a disinformation agent. This is the thrust of the slander coming from Michael Piper of American Free Press and Eric Hufschmid, who claims that I have been kidnapped and that my whole family is secretly being held hostage by the Zionists although we appear to be living normal lives in freedom. The disinformation tactic being employed is designed to sow suspicion and doubt in the minds of those who are wavering between supporting me and not supporting me. Spreading suspicion and doubt about a person is as easy as spreading fear, another basic tactic used to stifle dissent and prevent people from taking effective political action.

The reason why these detractors have been employed to slander me is because my analysis of the 9-11 attacks reveals the key players behind the false-flag terror atrocity. Exposing the people behind the murderous deception is damaging to those who are really behind the 9-11 atrocity. With the undercover police attack at my home in August 2006, the faction behind 9-11 tried to criminalize me and put me in Cook County Jail. In conjunction with the police assault they assigned their agents to attack my credibility. This is all part of a campaign to marginalize me and my research.  Their objective is to undermine my support.  The people behind the slander know that people who don't know me may believe some of the lies, so they throw buckets of mud at me and hope that some of it will stick. It doesn't cost them anything to slander me because the people who attack me are already on their payroll.

You, as a friend and neighbor, know that I have not been kidnapped and are probably fairly certain that I am not a Zionist agent. I have been speaking and thinking in the same way for as long as you and I have been talking about these matters. But you have the advantage of actually knowing me. Most of the people who read the vicious slander about me have never even met me. They have no way of knowing if the slander is true or false. Being skeptical to start with, many of the people who come across the anti-Bollyn slander may very well be dissuaded from supporting me because they don't want to support a suspected "Zionist agent."  The attacks against me are a good example of the old saying, if you don't like the message, kill the messenger.

Question:  A while back a reader sent me a very good question asking how the perpetrators of 9-11 can live with their guilt.  I wasn't ready to answer it at the time and am no longer able to locate the original question.  The reader was basically asking how the masterminds of the terror attacks of 9-11 can live with themselves after having committed such atrocities in which thousands of innocent people lost their lives?

Bollyn Responds:  I deal with this subject in my book Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World.  As my thesis is that 9-11 was masterminded and carried out by Zionist extremists such as Benjamin Netanyahu, I will explain and then show how such Zionist terrorists live with the guilt of having killed thousands of people. 

Firstly, Zionism is founded on the notion of Jewish separatism and supremacism. Zionists like Netanyahu have been raised with the chauvinist doctrine that Jews should live apart from others and that only Jewish lives are important. The political ideology of Zionism was merged with the orthodox religion of Jews living in Eastern Europe in the late 19th Century. The Jews of Poland and Russia lived under the rules of the rabbis who taught them that non-Jews were lesser beings, as the Talmud teaches. Such a racist ideology results in its supporters committing crimes against non-Jews.  Zionist crimes against non-Jews are never punished because the community they live in supports the same racist ideology. This is the story of modern Israel and its long history of crimes against the Palestinians and others.

In July 1946, when Palestine was under the British Mandate, Jews from the Zionist terrorist groups the Irgun and the Haganah blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, killing more than 90 people. This terror atrocity, which is actually very similar to 9-11, was ordered by Menachem Begin, then head of the Irgun. Begin went on to become the prime minister of Israel in the 1970s after creating the Likud coalition, which comprised members of his former terrorist organization. Terrorism was the primary tactic employed by the Irgun in Palestine and has been used by Israeli leaders since 1946. Begin's son Benny is a leader of the Likud and is a close associate of Benjamin Netanyahu, who has on at least two occasions openly stated that 9-11 and the fraudulent "War on Terror" were good for Israel.  The Likud party of Zionist terrorists and their sons has dominated Israeli politics since the 1970s.  Netanyahu is the current Likud prime minister of the Zionist state.

What is most telling about how Zionist terrorists feel about their crimes can be seen in how they celebrate them as great deeds. Sixty years after the bombing of the King David Hotel, the terrorists who carried out the terror atrocity held a two-day celebration in which Netanyahu participated. More than anything this celebration shows how Zionist terrorists view their crimes - as great feats carried out for the good of the Zionist state. As I wrote in "America the Target", the third chapter of Solving 9-11:

In July 2006, the former prime minister and leader of the Likud, Benjamin Netanyahu, attended a two-day 60th anniversary celebration of the King David Hotel bombing with former terrorists of the Irgun and Haganah. The event was organized by the Menachem Begin Heritage House, the University of Haifa, and the Association of IZL [Irgun] Fighters. The seminar was held "to mark the 60th anniversary of the bombing of the King David Hotel, Jerusalem, by members of the United Resistance Movement (Haganah and Irgun)," the Jerusalem Post noted in its pre-event notices. The Israeli newspaper specifically noted that members of the Haganah and Irgun had been involved in the terrorist bombing.  
  One of the terrorists even led a tour of the hotel he had bombed. The fact that the American-educated right-wing politician and terror specialist, "Bibi" Netanyahu, had participated in a two-day event celebrating the bombing of the King David Hotel was reported in the Jerusalem Post, and in leading newspapers in Britain, France, and India – but not a single word about the event was printed in the controlled press of the United States, the nation supposedly fighting a "War on Terror."

Question:  Why is it that you publish an article, “Why the Assange Case is Important” when many other well-known political commentators judge Wikileaks to be nothing more than a psy-ops operation or media disinformation? 

Bollyn Responds:  I simply have not seen any evidence that Wikileaks is disinformation whereas some of the "well-known political commentators" you refer to are most certainly disinformation agents.  Furthermore, given the very real danger that Assange would be turned over to the U.S. government by Sweden, I thought it was necessary to show the close relationship between the Swedish foreign minister Carl Bildt and the international crimocracy.  I did post the video of the U.S. helicopter gunship killing a group of innocent Iraqis in 2007 that Wikileaks had leaked.  I did notice in Assange's "Unauthorized Autobiography" that he said he would not publish material pertaining to Israel or Cuba, which I thought was odd.  If Julian Assange and Bradley Manning are part of some high-level plot they are certainly not getting much help from people in high places.  

Question:  WHO are protected by the 9-11 holographic projection and video fakery narrative? Is there an 'inner sanctum' group of psy-ops professionals who think they can insulate themselves by conjuring a narrative that eliminates them from the suspects list?

Or are these narratives just stall and diversion tactics to divert attention, fragment the solidarity of the 9/11 activists, and mislead people away from the evidence that is very damning and which points to a long list of people and agencies which had the motive, the means, and the opportunity?

Bollyn Responds:  
A very good question. I would have to agree that these false narratives are primarily designed to serve as diversion tactics to divert attention and fragment the 9-11 truth movement. The Judy Wood theory that the Twin Towers were pulverized by a directed-energy beam weapon is yet another of these red herrings. The purpose of these false theories is to confuse the population, to distract the activists, and divide the 9-11 truth movement.  This is not unlike the psychological warfare methods that are employed against the enemy population during war.
Recent Comment:  I have two questions for this election year: What happened on 9-11? And, why are we killing people in the Middle East? I chose your book to help me find the answers to the first question. I finished "Solving 9-11" last night. You answered both questions - but that is an understatement. Let's say you crossed every "t" and dotted every "i" in the quest for truth, not only about 9-11 and the illegal wars; you went much further. Here is the sickness at the core of what ails America. Many of us have a strong sense that things have changed in our country, that an unknown force seems to be deteriorating the core of our beliefs, our culture and our individual families. The media ignores the problem or blames inane sources, but seldom does the curtain get pulled back to reveal the true masterminds behind the downfall of our formerly wonderful country.

I see that our beloved country has lost most of the battle already, has been hijacked by foreign interests and our blood is being used to spill the blood of other innocents around the world. Our moral fiber has been so deeply corrupted that it is doubtful that we will rise up to revolt in time. I love the Constitution and I prize my freedom, but there is not much left of either one at this point. At least now I know what is killing us. I pray that there will be enough of a spark alive in American hearts to pull us out of this in time.

Thank you for your courage. Thank you for your thoroughness. Thank you for keeping yourself and your family safe while bringing us this essential message.

God bless and keep you and your family safe.

Question:  Please let me congratulate you for your book [ Solving 9-11:  The Deception that Changed the World ] that I have read attentively.  The thorough investigation of the vast subjects and the clarity of your presentation are outstanding.  I agree with you that the 9-11 crime itself remains un-solved, or at least crucial parts of it.

There are three leading theories:

1.  Al Qaeda did it all and just some rumors were perceived by intelligence agencies.
2.  Al Qaeda did it all but Mossad had precise pre-knowledge.  Others just heard rumors.
3.  Mossad did it all as a "false flag" operation and Al Qaeda and others just heard rumors.

You lean towards theory No. 3, whereas I am a strong believer in theory No. 2.  Why?

Bollyn Responds:  While the letter goes on with 9 reasons why the reader thinks "Al Qaeda did it all but Mossad had precise pre-knowledge," I will explain why I think 9-11 was an Israeli "false-flag" terror operation from A to Z.  There are two key aspects of 9-11 that point to it being an Israeli operation:  the pre-planned demolition of the Twin Towers and the Zionist-controlled cover-up. 

The first point is that the Twin Towers and the 47-story WTC 7 were demolished using very sophisticated explosives.  These are the largest buildings that have ever been demolished in this manner.  One of the sophisticated explosives used to pulverize the 220 acre-sized concrete floors, and everything on them, was an extremely energetic form of Thermite that was made using nanotechnology.  Chips of this bi-layered explosive coating were found in samples of the dust and analyzed by Dr. Steven E. Jones at BYU.  When these chips were heated to about 425 degrees Celsius they exploded with more energy per gram than any known explosive used in demolition.  

There were very few nations that had the capability to produce such an explosive nanotech coating in 2001.  Afghanistan was certainly not one of them.  How could Al Qaeda have produced such a high-tech explosive and applied it to the interior of the Twin Towers?  The evidence of this advanced form of super-thermite disproves the notion that Al Qaeda is responsible for the destruction of the Twin Towers. 

All three towers were under the direct control of Larry Silverstein, a Zionist leader who was on extremely close terms with Benjamin Netanyahu.  Silverstein and Netanyahu are so close that the Israeli leader called Silverstein every Sunday afternoon, New York time.

Secondly, there is the Zionist-managed cover-up of the evidence and truth of what really happened on 9-11.  As I explain in my book, the destruction of the crucial evidence was carried out by Zionist agents.  All that remained of the Twin Towers was dust and steel.  The steel was hastily dispatched to two Jersey City junkyards that were controlled by Zionist partisans.  The junkyards worked round-the-clock to cut the steel into small pieces, mix it with other scrap, and ship it to Asia where it was melted down to prevent it from being examined as evidence from the crime scene. 

Who was the person who allowed this crucial evidence to be destroyed?  The man who headed the Criminal Division of the Dept. of Justice at the time was Michael Chertoff, the Israeli son of one of the first Mossad agents.  Chertoff was responsible for the FBI's collection of the evidence, its "non-investigation" of the crime, and the prosecution of those behind it.  Under his command, all of the crucial evidence was confiscated and destroyed.  There was no investigation and no one has been tried in court for the crimes of 9-11.  If Al Qaeda was responsible for 9-11, why were Zionist agents covering-up for them?

The 9-11 cover-up continued with the judicial obstruction of justice, which was managed by the federal judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, a dedicated partisan of Israel.  Under Hellerstein, the Israeli airport security company that was responsible for passenger screening on 9-11 was dismissed from the tort litigation and every single 9-11 wrongful death case was settled out of court.  Furthermore, the man who is said to be the "Mastermind of 9-11" sits in the U.S. gulag in Guantanamo far from any open legal process in the United States.  If Al Qaeda truly exists, and if this organization really is responsible for the death and destruction on 9-11, why are dedicated Zionist agents loyal to the state of Israel working so hard to protect it?

Question:  For quite a few years I've been wondering how we will ever be successful in exposing these potent truths that would so much move our world in a positive direction - exposing once and for all the tragic use of false false terror. I would love to see the movement address this question of how are we going to achieve a this much needed breakthrough. It seems like while the case to disprove the official story gets more solid the 9/11 Truth movement as a whole is declining.  

Bollyn Responds:  This is a question that must be on the mind of every honest person seeking the truth about 9-11.  We have abundant evidence that the official story is a pack of lies, so when will 9-11 truth make the evening news?  When will CNN, FOX News, and the New York Times report that an advanced form of super-thermite was found in the dust of the World Trade Center?  If this is the breakthrough we are hoping for then our hope has been put in the wrong place.  The controlled media is very much a part of the cover-up and is not about to switch sides and start being honest.  The people who control the media and government have their own agenda and telling the truth about 9-11 is not part of that agenda.  We have to be the media and provide better sources of information for the people.

The publication of the discovery by Dr. Steven E. Jones of active thermitic material in the dust of the World Trade Center is a breakthrough that provided scientific evidence that the towers were destroyed using pre-placed explosives, but this crucial discovery didn't result in the sea change we had hoped for because it was ignored and avoided by the controlled press and the government.  So, it is not the lack of evidence that is the problem, but the inability or unwillingness of the media and our "elected officials" to address that evidence.  Unfortunately, for many people something is not considered real or valid until it is discussed favorably by their favorite news anchor, the person who is their anchor to "reality".

The 9-11 truth movement is really just a loose expression for the thousands of individuals who are working to find the truth about 9-11.  As one might expect many of the people in this movement are actually agents who are trying to sabotage that effort by promoting disinformation.  I am not familiar with any 9-11 truth movement but I have met many individuals who are dedicated to finding the truth.  Many of them have supported me and my work through the years to solve 9-11.  I am very glad to say that this spring my book Solving 9-11 will finally be available in print.   

Question:  If a plane didn't hit the Pentagon, if it wasn't a plane that crashed in that Pennsylvania field, and the planes that hit the Twin Towers were substitutes, the obvious question is: What happened to the real flights with their passengers and crews? Where are those planes and people? That's the only nagging question I have about 9-11. 

Bollyn Responds:  This is probably the most commonly asked question about 9-11, and happens to be a very timely one in light of the recently released Pentagon report about the Air Force mortuary at Dover AFB where, it turns out, unidentified human remains from Shanksville and the Pentagon wound up being disposed of in a landfill.  I have written about the deception that evidently occurred at Shanksville in an article entitled The Shanksville Deception of 9-11.  Although I cannot say for certain what happened to the passengers and crews from the Boston flights of 9-11, I can say what I think may have happened based on the evidence. 

Wallace Miller, the coroner of Somerset County, is protesting the Pentagon report that says that human remains from Shanksville were taken to Dover AFB.  He also claims that all the remains from Flight 93 were identified.  This can only be explained by the fact that Miller was not part of the recovery effort from the large debris field that was about 100 meters in the woods.  Miller had previously told the press that he stopped being a coroner after about 20 minutes at the crater in the reclaimed mine because there were no body parts to be seen.  This is probably true because it was from the large debris field around the cabin of Barry Hoover that the human remains that were taken to Dover AFB were found.  Now, ask yourself, why would the FBI not allow the local coroner, who had legal responsibility for the crime scene, to be part of the recovery effort from the debris field?  What was in the debris field that had to be hidden from the county coroner?

The local coroner and other authorities were probably kept away from the real debris field because the number of individuals on the plane that was evidently shot down over Shanksville is much larger than the 44 who are said to have been on Flight 93.  The local coroner could simply not be allowed to see the real debris field.  I think what may have happened was a sleight-of-hand trick in which the Boston passengers were put together on another flight out of Boston that landed at Cleveland airport, as Flight 93 reportedly did.  These people were then put on the plane that was shot down over Shanksville.  This would explain the unidentified human remains from Shanksville and why the real debris field in the woods was kept secret.

To understand the details of the 9-11 deception at Shanksville, I recommend reading my articles:  The Hollywood Fantasy of Flight 93, Was Flight 93 Shot Down?, Eyewitnesses Saw Military Aircraft at Scene of Flight 93, and The Shanksville Deception of 9-11.

Question:  What are the characteristics of a False Front?

Bollyn Responds:  A false front is used to give a false impression of a company or organization.  It is like the false fronts seen on old buildings in the western United States.  These were built on the front of the building to make them look bigger and more grand than they really were.  In reading through the text of my book Solving 9-11, which will be published this spring, I discuss several false front operations that were involved in the 9-11 plot.  These false front operations were all Israeli intelligence operations that were set up to give a false impression about what the company was and who was running it.  The three companies that we know were false front operations of Israeli intelligence are: Urban Moving Systems (UMS), Ptech, and Next Graphics.  
Ptech and Next Graphics maintained false fronts as Arab Muslim-owned companies which concealed the agents of Israeli intelligence who operated through them.  UMS pretended to be a moving company while it really acted as a logistics center for the Israeli terrorists involved in the bombing of the World Trade Center.  In any case an intelligence operation of this type puts up a false facade which is very obvious but also very superficial.  The Arab-owned front at Next Graphics, for example, was overdone but it fooled people into thinking it was a Palestinian-owned company.  In such an operation one will find people who don't fit with the image if one looks behind the facade.  The people at UMS were not really interested in being movers, and it showed.  At Ptech and Next Graphics there were Israelis working where one would certainly not expect to find them.  At Ptech it was Michael Goff, the Jewish lawyer, who pulled all the strings in setting up the company in 1994 that revealed the falseness of the Arab-owned front.  Goff went on to work for the Mossad-backed company Guardium.  Ptech software was running on all the crucial computer systems of the FAA that failed on 9-11.


The same holds true for all such operations, such as false front nationalist, patriotic, or radical websites and publications.  If the people who run the operation do not seem like they fit, it may be that the operation is a false front scam. 

Question: What is your take on Israel and Iran? I think it is all bluster from all sides to stir up support at home. I can't see them really starting a pre-emptive war in an election year. I can't see the U.S. military going willingly into that hornet's nest.

Bollyn Responds: One needs to realize that the Zionist planners behind the false-flag terrorism of 9/11 (and the cover-up) are playing for keeps. These people are not crazy; they are evil. They planned 9/11 decades in advance and their evil game is meant to go on for decades. War with Iran is the key part of the game. Having U.S. troops based in Afghanistan and in the nations around Iran is part of the plan. The U.S. military does what it is ordered to do. I don’t think many U.S. soldiers willingly go to Iraq or Afghanistan.

The U.S. is headed for war against Iran if its belligerent policies are not changed. 
Graphic:  "Iran: Der Krieg rückt näher!"

The fact of the matter is that the war against Iran is already underway. The punitive sanctions against Iran, dictated by the Zionist war lobby, are a tactic of economic warfare. The Zionist establishment has been pushing hard for war with Iran for several years. The anti-Iranian sanctions and propaganda are very similar to what organized Jewry did when it declared war on Germany in 1933. Although it took 6 more years for the war to begin, it finally came to all-out war with millions killed and much of Europe destroyed.

The Israelis are evidently carrying out terror attacks and assassinations in Iran, as they do across the region, and I think these efforts will continue and increase. I don’t think the Israelis will carry out an attack on their own, but I do think they will do everything they can to try to provoke a war between the United States and Iran. A false-flag attack on a U.S. vessel in the Persian Gulf, for example, could draw the U.S. into war with the Islamic Republic. In this way a war with Iran could start at any time given the fact that the U.S. has so many troops and equipment based in the region. Iran is virtually surrounded by U.S. forces. What better time to start a war? I have no confidence that President Obama would resist the call for a war. The Republican candidates, except Ron Paul, are all supported with Zionist money and espouse very hawkish positions on Iran.

I have written about the urgent need to solve 9/11 in order to avoid war with Iran.
See -

Latest Comment:  RON PAUL & 9/11 Truth - Imagine, not a single American politician of any real significance, not a single one will speak about the truth of 9/11.  That fact, in and of itself, should speak volumes, volumes about the utterly dire situation this country is in.  Even Ron Paul can't come close to speaking of this Israeli white elephant... Lew Rockwell won't go near 9/11 either...  It seems like affirming Israel's key part with 9/11 is akin to denying the "Holocaust." 

Bollyn Responds: Ron Paul can't talk about what really happened on 9/11. In the high stakes political arena that Ron Paul is in to openly question what happened on 9/11 would be the fastest way to derail his campaign and he knows it. Why should he do that? One need only look at what happened to me to realize that it is career suicide to discuss the truth about 9/11.  As the assassination of Senator Paul Wellstone clearly shows, questioning what happened on 9/11 and challenging the crimocracy ruling Washington can be fatal for any politician.
This is not to say that Ron Paul really believes that Osama Bin Laden and his band of 20 terrorists carried out 9/11.  In Liberty Defined, Paul's 2011 book on 50 essential issues, he calls the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan "useless, stupid, and senseless."  That certainly does not sound like a person who believes the pack of lies about 9/11.  In the book Paul also has a short but very interesting chapter entitled "Noble Lie", which begins like this:

The noble lie is anything but noble. The idea is mostly associated with government, for good reason. Government lies to us to manipulate public opinion to bring about certain results, like war and wealth redistribution.
- Ron Paul, "Noble Lie", Liberty Defined 2011

Comment: People like you and I are working towards fixing serious problems. A lot of the people who have caused these problems are being compensated via taxpayers' funds. So how much more do people like you and I deserve to be compensated for exposing these problems so that they can be solved?

Bollyn Responds: This is an excellent comment because it goes directly to the question of what is the value of the truth in an era of lies? Should one even expect any compensation for bringing the truth to the public?

I can report that during the fall of 2011, the 10th anniversary of 9/11, donations from readers averaged less than $10 per day. Obviously, if were a business I would have had to close up shop a long time ago. I cover the bulk of my costs and maintain my website out of my own pocket and have done so for years. is not a business, but a mission. I cannot be indifferent to the false-flag terrorism of 9/11 that resulted in the mass murder of thousands of my fellow citizens. I cannot abide wars of aggression and conquest based on these lies. I do what I can to bring the truth out in order to liberate my nation from the twin yoke of deception and slavery.  

"The people who have caused these problems", on the other hand, are well compensated with taxpayer money. Money is, after all, the name of the game. Rob the people through their taxes and make a fortune. The billionaire Crown family from Chicago, for example, has long owned a large share of General Dynamics, the major defense contractor. The Zionist Crown family, who bankrolled Barack Obama's presidential campaign, profits directly from increased defense spending and war. In this way the average American taxpayer has "given" much more money to the Crown family (or any other defense contractor) than they would ever even consider giving to a truth-telling website like But, of course, they were never given the choice.

This is also true of many of the leading so-called "alternative news" websites and publications. These are actually funded and controlled by the same agencies that control the mainstream news outlets. Controlling public opinion is a very high priority in a nation like the United States and billions of taxpayer dollars are spent every year in this effort. As Andreas von Buelow told me in 2001, "Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation." And who do you think pays for all that? The taxpayer actually funds the agencies who deceive him on a daily basis. 

When you see a well-funded website that claims to be giving you the truth, ask yourself how is it funded, and by whom?  Is there any transparency in the financing of the operation?  I am a one-man operation and I am fortunate to have the support of a few concerned and generous citizens.  I am motivated to maintain solely by my desire to see truth and justice prevail.  I will continue my work as long as I can -- and so long as God wills it.

Comment:  It was so nice to log on to your page and see a call for paper ballots. I've been saying it ever since 2004, and to be honest, never gave it thought before that - I thought the hanging chad thing was a bit foolish, and I was glad, at that time, that Bush was elected since Gore was ready to slam Kyoto down our throats.  But with the exit polls at 2004 being so far off, I knew that the machines were rigged, and having done a little programming myself, I could understand how easy it would be to hijack votes on a touchscreen voting system.  So yes, to get back to government of, for, and by [the people], we definitely need to return to accountable balloting. Let's pray it makes some inroads in the psyche of the under-educated in this country.

Bollyn Responds:  You are absolutely right about the need to return to paper ballots - if we are to remove the criminal network that controls our nation. If we don't have proper and transparent elections in which the votes are openly counted by citizens in front of other citizens, we don't have democratic elections. It's that simple. As Thomas Paine wrote in 1803, " have the representation real, the election must be real; and that where the election is a fiction, the representation is a fiction also. Like will always produce like." My article about "Restoring Democracy to America" has photos and explains how a proper democratic election should be done; this one was in France.


Comment:  Farha Khaled wrote to me, saying, "Whether Fjordman is an Israeli agent or not, doesn’t negate the fact that Zionist right wingers are in alliance with these Nazi type characters. Geert Wilder is funded by Daniel Pipes' organisation, the Middle East Forum (MEF), and Pipes is not an Israeli. These extremists tend to do their worst in the USA or in alliance with the USA rather than in Israel." 

Bollyn Responds:  While it is true that Daniel Pipes is not an Israeli, his organization Middle East Forum is directed by a Major in Israeli military intelligence named Efraim Karsh

Efraim Karsh is director of the Middle East Forum, editor of the Middle East Quarterly, and Professor of Middle East and Mediterranean Studies at King's College London. Born and raised in Israel, Karsh served for seven years as an intelligence officer in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), where he attained the rank of major.

I point this out because it is important to understand that the Zionist criminal network in the United States works hand-in-glove with the Israelis and has done so since the 1940s - before the creation of the State of Israel.  When I say Zionist criminal network I am not using hyperbole.  I am referring to the Jewish Zionist gangsters who have long controlled whole sections of the U.S. economy, such as the media, Hollywood, New York City and Washington, D.C.  The Israelis usually handle the operations side while the American Zionists act as financiers and front men, as Pipes does in MEF.  This is the same combination that carried out 9/11.

Question:  "Aren't you going to print your book on 9/11?" a supporter asked the other day. 

Another supporter wrote today:  "I just finished listening to your interview on No Lies Radio and felt compelled once again to donate to your excellent and important work. I have read your book as you have gone along, but I like to have copies in the house and would rather not have to download and read from my computer."

Bollyn Responds:  Yes.  I certainly want to bring my book out in print, but there are a couple obstacles that need to be surmounted.  I have decided that it would be best to self publish it on a print-to-order basis due to the sensitive subject of my book.  A mainstream publisher simply won't touch a book that links Zionism with 9/11.  In order to have the book printed I need to have the material laid out in "print ready" format - ready to go to the printer.  For this I need help from a person who really knows how to lay out a book using the software used in the trade.

I was encouraged that one of the supporters who asked about my book offered to proof-read the text.  She also said she knows a person who can do the book lay out.  This is all that is needed.  When this is done I can offer my book Solving 9/11 in book form.  I certainly hope this can happen soon.

Latest Comment:  A reader writes about being affected by exposure to Depleted Uranium (D.U.)

Dustin Brim, 21, of Daytona Beach, Florida, in Iraq in February 2004. Within two months of this photo, Dustin would be severely afflicted with massive cancerous tumors that would prevent him from breathing and eating normally. Within seven months he would succumb to lymphoma at Walter Reed Hospital, age 22, an unnecessary and tragic death from depleted uranium poisoning.

The letter from the reader begins...

After reading this: - the light began to dawn in my heart and head.

My husband and I were in charge of rolling stock coming onto the Kwajalein Atoll 13 years ago that had been bought very cheap by the Army for either depo or re-furb from the Gulf War to use on the atolls in the Marshall Islands. We were employees of Raytheon - and as civilian contractors, we were thrilled to have a jobs in the pacific -- on off-days we scuba dived and enjoyed the various islands in the region.

Our jobs were - I was the custodian of all rolling stock in the region and my husband was the equipment inspector.

At work we were more exposed (my husband Richard, in particular) to this uranium and tungsten poisoned pieces of junk left over from the Gulf War than any other employees. The Army managed a quick and clever move with much of the equipment that was poisoning over there - - they simply put it on ships and shipped it to out of the way bases away from CONUS for either destruction (which means we just threw it in the ocean around the Marshall Islands or our mechanics worked on the equipment to make it usable for contractors and military personnel at these bases.

No notice of the dangers. No protection in any way. No nothing. We were poisoned.

Today we are in the process of a slow death of gastro distress, having treatment only with pallative care with tincture of opium and pain killers. The doctors are puzzled and after spending every dime we have on UCLA specialists, etc. we are back in Clark County, Nevada with our family doctor who prescribes the only thing she can: pain killers. We are dying and we know it.

The article referenced above struck such a serious chord in my heart. It's heart breaking what has happened and is still happening to those troups in the military who haven't got a chance in hell of survival. DU is the new scourge of the human race. And, NO ONE IS DOING ANYTHING ABOUT IT. It's sick and the system is sick. As Henry Kissinger was once quoted, "the military are just human fodder."

If I thought you knew of something that could help us, I would ask, but I know better. We haven't much future left. And, there is no on one who will help.

Take care - please spread the word. If you need help, let me know.  Thanks so much.

Bollyn Responds:  I have written a series of articles about the serious health damage caused by exposure to depleted uranium.  The whole series of six articles based on original research can be read here:

After speaking with the person who wrote this comment to me, I discovered that she has a webpage dedicated to the uranium poisoning she and her husband are suffering from:

Comment:  It is very depressing to see how the presidential candidates are servants of Israel (See Governor Rick Perry’s opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, “The U.S. Must Support Israel at the U.N.” (16 September 2011).  Hopefully somebody knowledgeable could counter each of the deceiving paragraphs of that article, which I think was not even written by Perry, but by Zionists endorsed by him. Thanks for all your efforts and may God guide you and protect you and your family.

Governor Perry receives an award from the Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce, a private Zionist business organization Perry established in September 2007.  A glance at the board members of Perry's group of Israeli supporters reveals the heads of two of Mossad's biggest intelligence gathering companies in the United States:  Amdocs and Elbit.  Elbit (a military subsidiary of Elron) is directly involved in stealing presidential elections in the United States through its control of the tally of the Iowa caucus.  So, who do you think will win Iowa?  It's usually NOT the front runner.  See "ELRON - VOXEO: The Israeli Defense Firm That Tallies the Iowa Caucus" and "Elbit - The Hellerstein Connection to 9-11"

Bollyn Responds: The Perry piece, “The U.S. Must Support Israel at the U.N.” was actually published the previous day in the Jerusalem Post under the rubric, “Comment: The Palestinians’ illegitimate UN gambit” on 15 September 2011.

I agree with the comment that the Perry piece was probably written by his Zionist handlers. While Perry’s pro-Israel piece is chock full of lies and distortions, what I found most disturbing was this dangerous lie: “Iran pursues nuclear weapons its leaders vow to use to annihilate Israel.”

For a leading American presidential candidate to state such a provocative and dangerous lie in a published article is alarming. The sentence actually contains two lies: that Iran is developing nuclear weapons and that Iran’s leaders plan to use these weapons to annihilate Israel. Both are nothing but fabrications that are being used in the Zionist propaganda campaign to push the United States into a war with Iran, which is why these lies are so dangerous.

As the evidence from 9/11 shows, the Zionist fifth column used terrorism and deception to drag the United States into a series of wars and confrontations in the Middle East. The illegal and unnecessary conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq have bankrupted the U.S. treasury and destroyed the lives of countless Americans and others. At least one-fifth of the current U.S. national debt is due directly to these two utterly wasteful wars of occupation in which there is certainly no real American interest. Iran is obviously the nation being targeted for the next phase of the Zionist war agenda. For an American presidential candidate to support the continuation of this criminal war agenda is treasonous.

Rick Perry has shown himself to be a Zionist-controlled politician. Benjamin D’Israeli, the Jewish Prime Minister of Britain who made Great Britain half-owner of the Suez Canel with borrowed money from the Rothschild family, explained the hidden power behind governments: “Governments do not govern, but merely control the machinery of government, being themselves controlled by the hidden hand.”

The hidden hand that controls Rick Perry is the same that controlled Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama – it is the hand of Zionist banksters like the Rothschilds and the state of Israel, which they created for their own benefit.

"Governments do not govern, but merely control the machinery of government, being themselves controlled by the hidden hand."
— Benjamin Disraeli, Britain's first Jewish Prime Minister (1868, 1874-1880)

In the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries, the Rothschilds made a high art out of deliberately provoking wars and revolutions. This furthered the Jewish Messianic goal of destroying the Gentile nations and supplanting them with universal Jewish rule. It also enabled the Rothschilds to further the Jewish Messianic goal of concentrating the wealth of the world in Jewish hands. By the 1870s, the Rothschilds had accumulated at least $3,400,000,000.00. [USD non-adjusted]
- "The Rothschilds", Chicago Tribune, 27 December 1875

Question:  There is a Toronto Hearing on 9/11 being held very shortly. Presumably this represents the key figures regarding 9/11 (see  I am wondering if you are participating, and what your standing is with them? Are you completely ostracized by the "mainstream" 911rs? 

Bollyn Responds:  Yes, I am aware of the Toronto Hearings conference about 9/11. I was not invited, which is not unusual.  My analysis of Israeli involvement in 9/11 is strictly taboo in such forums. Canada is, after all, a partner in the War on Terrorism.

It should be remembered that Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert (then Mayor of Jerusalem) was in Toronto on September 9, 2001 – the day before he went to New York City -- on September 10, 2001. Will this be discussed in Toronto this weekend?  Why was Olmert in Canada on the eve of 9/11 and with whom did he meet?  Why has Olmert’s visit to Canada and New York City on the eve of 9/11 been kept secret?

I suspect Olmert remained in New York City on his secret mission until the afternoon of 9/11. I also suspect that Mayor Olmert was on the Israeli El Al flight that was allowed to leave New York in the afternoon. The men who commanded the NORAD exercise on 9/11 were both Canadians. The pilot episode of the Lone Gunmen (made by Rupert Murdoch’s FOX TV) in which remotely hijacked planes were flown into the WTC was made in Vancouver in 2000.

The Zionist mafia is very strong in Canada. The Bronfman family has a great deal of power in Canada, the U.S., and Israel. What we need is a real criminal investigation and charges brought against those who carried out the crimes of 9/11 and those who have covered it up. Who put the thermite and explosives in the towers, for starters?  Why is Michael Chertoff not being prosecuted for supervising the destruction of the evidence?  He was, after all, the Assistant Attorney General at the Department of Justice, the federal official responsible for gathering and preserving the evidence and investigating the crimes in order to prosecute those behind it. Why has he been treated with kid gloves?  This man should be arrested.

These are the things that have to be done if we are to rectify the problem and remove the Zionist crimocracy that rules Washington, New York, and Chicago. This is the revolution that has to happen. Failure to investigate and prosecute those who are really behind 9/11 is not an option because not to do so would mean to surrender ourselves and our nation to the crimocracy.  That is simply not acceptable because the crimocracy will destroy our nation and our freedom. 

Question:  Kevin Barrett sent me an email asking, "Rupert Murdoch: Key figure in 9/11 and the 9/11 wars?" 

Steve Bell's cartoon from The Guardian depicts Murdoch as a man who takes orders.  Who would be giving Rupert Murdoch orders?  Who controls the biggest Zionist media mogul?

Rupert Murdoch, Zionist propagandist, with Shimon Peres, master of Israeli terrorism.

Murdoch's 20th Century Fox (News Corp.) distributed blatantly anti-Muslim propaganda films like The Siege (1998) which were clearly designed to prepare the public mindset for the false-flag terrorism of 9/11.  Lawrence Wright, one of the writers of the film, claimed that The Siege was the most-rented film in the aftermath of 9/11.

The Lone Gunmen "Pilot" episode in which a passenger airliner is hijacked by an external computer program and flown into the World Trade Center was another Murdoch production.  The "Pilot" episode, which bore an uncanny resemblance to the 9/11 attacks, aired on Murdoch-owned FOX TV on March 4, 2001.  Arnon Milchan, Murdoch's Israeli business partner and senior Mossad agent in Hollywood, was most likely the real author of the plot for "Pilot".

MOSSAD'S MAN IN THE MIDDLE - Murdoch's business partner Arnon Milchan is a close friend of Israel's president Shimon Peres (left), Defense Minister Ehud Barak, and Likud Party leader Binyamin Netanyahu (right). 

KILLING THE MESSENGER - Sean Hoare, the key whistleblower behind the scandal at News of the The World was found dead the day before Rebekah Brooks, Rupert and James Murdoch faced questions about the phone hacking.

Bollyn Responds:  Kevin, why do you use a question mark?  Murdoch is obviously "the key figure" in spreading the 9/11 deception propaganda to the public. The current Murdoch scandal about phone hacking is just the tip of the iceberg, of course.  When Ed Miliband of the Labour Party calls for the break-up of News Corp., you know there are much bigger fish to be fried.  Rupert Murdoch has evidently served his purpose - the global deception of 9/11 - but his son of an Estonian mother will certainly not do for the Zionist masters behind Murdoch. This is exactly what I had in mind when I wrote this last year:

"The global Murdoch media empire was created with Rothschild funding and exists to spread Zionist propaganda among the English-speaking populations of the world. Murdoch's son James is in line to take over at the helm of their media empire although it is quite likely that the empire will not survive very long after Rupert Murdoch passes away."
- "Eric Hufschmid and Rupert Murdoch - Agents of Deception", October 21, 2010

Latest Comment:  Thank you for writing Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World (and not charging for it as well).  I will do my best "to promote the hell out of it!"  My nephew, Leonard J. Snyder Jr., who worked in the South Tower, was murdered that day.  Needless to say, that lit a match under me to make certain the 9/11 criminals would eventually be tried and hanged. (And I am still hopeful by the way.)

Leonard J. Snyder, Jr.

Bollyn Responds:  I am very glad to hear from the relatives and families of the 9/11 victims.  The 9/11 relatives have certainly been treated extremely badly in the court of Alvin K. Hellerstein and there is only one family left in the litigation process -- although there has been no 9/11 trial after nearly 10 years!  I have done what I could to help the relatives by showing them the prejudice and conflict of interest that exists in the Zionist-controlled court of Judge Hellerstein.  As one might have expected from a judge who is a Zionist partisan, the key Israeli Mossad defendant, International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS NV), has been excused from the tort litigation.  This is the Israeli "airport security" company that controlled passenger screening operations at Boston's Logan Airport -- and while they are responsible for allegedly allowing knife-wielding terrorists onto the planes on 9/11, they have been excused.  Go figure. 

There are two things that need to be noted about the disgraceful travesty of justice that the 9/11 victims have suffered for 10 years.  First, in cases like 9/11 the relatives must be organized and make sure that the lawyers that represent them are honest and dedicated only to their cause.  This is, of course, very difficult for grieving relatives to do, but it is absolutely essential to prevent them from being medicated into madness and abused by those behind the crime and cover-up, who are very well organized.  Having observed the 16-year-old Estonia litigation process through my wife, I have seen how dishonest lawyers act as agents of the other side and rob the relatives of every hope for justice and accountability for their loss.  The 9/11 relatives have been treated in the exact same way:  given a cash payment and told to get over it and forget about the truth.  

Officials and professionals who looked into investigating the Estonia sinking of 1994 were told in no uncertain terms - "hands off" - looking for the truth will get you killed, which is what very nearly happened to us in Estonia in November 2008.  In America, where people supposedly enjoy the rights of free speech, my research and writing about 9/11 (as a professional journalist) resulted in a brutal and heavily-armed undercover police assault at my home, followed by malicious prosecution, which forced me to go into exile.

Secondly, in both cases (9/11 and Estonia) it is always possible to bring murder charges against those behind the atrocities.  There is no statute of limitations on heinous crimes like mass murder, which is what the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 and the sinking of Estonia were.  Justice, after all, will only be served when the people behind these crimes are put on trial for murder.

Latest Question:  The Nanothermite Challenge from: T Mark Hightower tmhightower at prodigy dot net

T. Mark Hightower of San Jose is a new member on the 9/11 Scholars Forum who challenges the explosiveness of the nanocomposite of super-thermite found in the dust of the World Trade Center...

 Hightower says Dr. Jones should be "upfront and truthful", but is himself anything but upfront and truthful about the salient fact that he works for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Federal Government's largest scientific agency.  Hightower can be reached at where he has worked for 20 years at NASA's Ames Research Center at Moffett Field.  Hightower's father also worked at Ames from 1963-1988.  Hightower says he does not represent NASA in these matters, so why does he conceal the fact that he works for the U.S. government?  It is well known that U.S. government employees like Hightower are not allowed to take public positions on controversial subjects like 9/11 -- unless they are told to.

Daniel Saul Goldin, a Zionist Jew from the Bronx, was head of NASA on 9/11 and unexpectedly announced his resignation one month later. I called NASA's Glenn Research Center at Cleveland Airport to ask about the passengers that were taken to the NASA facility on 9/11.  "No one was brought here," said a puzzled spokesperson, who was among those evacuated on 9/11. Mary Ethridge, a journalist with the Akron Beacon Journal, however, stood by the paper's report that the passengers had been interviewed by the FBI in the evacuated NASA facility.  What was NASA up to with the passengers on 9/11?  See "The Hollywood Fantasy of Flight 93: The Hidden Role of NASA and the FBI in Cleveland"

Hightower's Message to Bollyn
Subject: High Explosive Nanothermite More Bark Than Bite?  No Contenders for The Nanothermite Challenge

Christopher, I just wanted to bring you up to date on my groundbreaking and controversial nanothermite research. I am at your disposal to answer any questions that you might have about this work.

Cordially, T. Mark Hightower
San Jose, CA 

Bollyn Responds:  I wrote back to Mr. Hightower on 9 July 2011 saying that I would be willing to debate the subject of the nanocomposite of super-thermite found in the dust of the pulverized World Trade Center. Like Andrew Johnson, Hightower questions the explosiveness of the active thermitic material found by Dr. Steven E. Jones in the dust, fragments which were described in this peer-reviewed paper.  What Mr. Hightower and others like him ignore is the fact that there was an organic layer to the nanocomposite thermitic material.  This is the component that is thought to have created the explosive gas pressure.  (See page 21 of the paper.)

Timothy Mark Hightower has written to me before, but since I don't know him personally, I began by asking a few basic questions as I assumed he is the person profiled here:

The profile says that T. Mark Hightower works in "Defense and Space".  I looked into some papers Hightower has written for NASA and assumed he is the same T. Mark Hightower who works for NASA's Ames Research Center at Moffett Field:

I wrote to Mr. Hightower, "If you would start by confirming that this is your employer and background, we can begin the exchange."  He responded with an email that he asked me to keep confidential in which he confirmed that he is the same T. Mark Hightower that has worked at NASA's Ames Research Center for 20 years.  This is important because NASA is part of the U.S. government and played a key role on 9/11.  See "The Hollywood Fantasy of Flight 93: The Hidden Role of NASA and the FBI in Cleveland" , "The Double Zionist connection why NASA-Cleveland chosen for UAL93 landing-hiding site", and the following: 

News Report of 9/11 by: 9News Staff
Web produced by: Liz Foreman
9/11/01 11:43:57 AM

A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White.  White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated.  United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did not say how many people were aboard the flight.  United said it was also "deeply concerned" about another flight, Flight 175, a Boeing 767, which was bound from Boston to Los Angeles.  On behalf of the airline CEO James Goodwin said: "The thoughts of everyone at United are with the passengers and crew of these flights. Our prayers are also with everyone on the ground who may have been involved.  "United is working with all the relevant authorities, including the FBI, to obtain further information on these flights," he said.

Hightower confirmed that his father, William Donald Hightower worked at Ames from 1963 through 1988.  If I consider his "nanothermite challenge" worth discussing, I will do so on another page.

Question:  Do you have access or know how to gain access to the archives of

Bollyn Responds:  There is a good mirror site for at:

The first link on this page takes you to an index of pages, which come up in their complete form with photos and music:

Comment on burial at sea of John F. Kennedy, Jr.:  

John F. Kennedy, Jr. (1960-1999)

When John F. Kennedy, Jr. and his girlfriend died in the plane crash, JFK, Jr was also buried at sea by the U.S. military. I don't remember the media ever explaining why the U.S. Navy would bury JFK, Jr. at sea because JFK, Jr. wasn't a military or government official. I don't know if the Kennedy family asked for JFK, Jr. to be buried at sea.

But burial at sea - real deep - is one sure way of hiding evidence. Maybe JFK, Jr. and his girlfriend didn't die in a plane crash. After all, people can survive plane crashes. When it happened, I read that JFK, Jr. was murdered to prevent him from running against Hillary Clinton for the New York Senate and to simply keep him out of politics completely.

Bollyn Responds:  This is a very interesting comment that I received after the mysterious burial at sea of the person said to be Osama Bin Laden.  It should be noted that the location where Osama Bin Laden was said to have been killed is hundreds of miles from the sea.  Why was he so hastily buried at sea?  And why was John F. Kennedy, Jr. also buried at sea very quickly after his body was found?

There is an article from the Washington Post of 23 July 1999 about the burial, which occurred in the morning of July 22, less than 24 hours after the bodies were recovered from the sea floor.  It should be noted that the bodies of Kennedy and the Bessette sisters were cremated.  Their plane went down on July 16 and their bodies were recovered 5 days later on July 21.  I recall hearing that their bodies and the inside of the cockpit had been charred and blackened.  This would certainly explain the need to cremate the bodies -- to hide the real cause of the "crash".

There are two obvious reasons why the Zionist criminal network running the Clinton White House and New York would have wanted to get rid of John Kennedy Jr.  First, there is the fact that he had political aspirations and would have won any race for the U.S. Senate against Hillary Clinton or any other candidate.  Secondly, he was a publisher of a popular magazine, George, that they could not control.  If Kennedy were still alive in 2001 he would have been a powerful voice for 9/11 truth.  Like you, I suspect he was murdered.  

Key 9/11 Question asked of Kevin Barrett in interview by Kourosh Ziabari

Kourosh Ziabari: What’s your precise stance on the 9/11 attacks?  Do you believe that the U.S. officials had foreknowledge of the incident?  Do you think that it was an inside job or a false flag operation?  Have you traced any sign of the Israel’s involvement in the attacks?

Kevin Barrett: To know means to believe based on sufficient evidence. So I know, not just believe, that 9/11 was a false-flag attack, that many individuals at or near the top of the US Executive Branch, military, and intelligence apparatus were complicit in the attack, and that the state of Israel and its American agents were heavily involved. This is the inescapable conclusion of anyone who reads David Ray Griffin’s books on the subject, alongside Bollyn’s Solving 9/11 , with an open mind. 

Source: Kevin Barrett interview with Kourosh Ziabari, 18 April 2011

Question:  "[Robert A.] Kelman was general manager of Hugo Neu, the company who managed the destruction of 250,000 tons of steel from the World Trade Center by sending it to Asian smelters."  Thank you for your article, especially your focus on the removal of steel evidence.  One point I have never seen mentioned is that these tons of materials were shipped out within a few weeks of 9/11. Shipping this huge amount of steel would take months of planning - transporting it from the WTC site to ships, reserving the ships, setting up receiving stations in Asia, etc. How was this gargantuan task accomplished so quickly?  I hope your book covers this; no one has researched this aspect of the hoax.

Bollyn Responds:  My latest article, "The 9/11 Cover Up - The Destruction of the Steel Evidence", deals with this fundamental aspect of the cover up, which I have been researching and writing about for the past nine months.  It is important to understand that the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center was an intrinsic part of the crime in that it was required to protect the fraud from being exposed and revealing who was really behind the explosive demolition of the Twin Towers.  The people who were responsible for the destruction of this crucial evidence are partners in crime with those who planned and executed the false-flag terrorism of 9/11. 

Comment:  I am an admirer of yours and thought you should see this video.  In my opinion, Japan could have been prevented if humans could have cleaned out the rat's nest of 9/11 in you've worked so hard to do.


Bollyn Responds:  Thank you for this link. I don't know if the Stuxnet worm played a role in the nuclear disaster in Japan, but I do believe that Stuxnet is very similar to the malicious code (see Ptech, etc.) that infected and affected the efficiency of critical U.S. computer systems on 9/11.  Stuxnet has been described as having been able to make the Iranian centrifuges run amok while the computer monitors indicated that all was well.  This is exactly the kind of deception that happened on 9/11 when critical NORAD and FAA computer systems failed to notice the errant aircraft and respond properly to the threats.  In a 15 January 2011 article entitled "Israeli Test on Worm Called Crucial in Iran Nuclear Delay" the New York Times reported that Stuxnet was tested at the Israeli nuclear facility at Dimona in the Negev.  The paper reported that Israel had built an elaborate test facility at their secret and illegal nuclear weapons site that contained a replica array of the Iranian uranium enrichment plant, adding that such a test site would have been necessary for the design of the attack software. Richard Falkenrath, a principal at the Chertoff Group (headed by the high-level Israeli agent Michael Chertoff), actually appeared on Bloomberg television saying that he believed that Israel was behind Stuxnet.  It should be noted that there was a very similar, but less well known computer crime involved in the 9/11 terror attacks, in which the Mossad and the Israeli nuclear facility at Dimona were also involved.  To understand how Israeli intelligence was able to gain control of the U.S. military computer systems I recommend reading my chapter on "The Architecture of Terror", especially the part about the Israeli Amit Yoran, the former cyber-security czar of the Pentagon.

Question:  I have received a couple questions about the conflict in Libya.  The first comment thinks I am wrong about the Libyan issue, but is not specific.  The second asks if the revolts in the region are authentic - or artificial.  Because they pertain to the same issue, I have put them together for this question:

Comment from Britain - I think you are wrong on the Libyan issue. I am puzzled why you are taking a line that is essentially in agreement with the corporate-controlled propaganda.

The "rebellion" is the result of the global elites harnessing the Libyan inter tribal East/West dissension for their own agenda. The long term goal is likely the Islamisation of the Middle East and North Africa to present the Israel/US/EU axis powers with a strong enemy to justify homeland oppression.

Question from U.S.A. - I was just reading your articles on Libya. I was absolutely sad as can be today, could not stop crying since I know that innocent men, women, children and babies will be murdered by the attack, not to mention the DU [depleted uranium] that will contaminate the air, water, and soil in Libya forever.

Up until all the uprisings in Iraq, Afghanistan, Iraq again, Pakistan, and now Libya we did not seem to have a problem with the Middle East. As a matter of fact, their countries were quiet for several years.

I know millions of buckerooooos for oil and natural gas were the real reasons for most of the invasions in the beginning.

Now we still have an international monetary crisis, a meltdown coming around the corner, probably a treasury bill crisis by summer. So, don't you think that all these invasions into the Middle East at this point are started by NGOs or gov ops within the countries to keep the war machine going, for that is the only area, besides the drug companies, that prop up the US from going under?

Bollyn Responds:  Firstly, I don't think that the revolts across the Middle East have been artificially created by outside forces. The nations of the Middle East may have been "stable" from an American or Israeli perspective, but they have certainly not been quiet and peaceful during the past forty years.  I have spent time in some of them, such as Syria, Egypt, Tunisia, Iran, Jordan, and Palestine/Israel.  All of them are police states where the populace chafes under draconian emergency regulations that have been in place for decades.  They are certainly not happy places, but the most oppressive, by far, are the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories, where the people suffer the most extreme cruelty dished out by sadistic and heavily-armed Israeli military forces supported by the United States.  The innocent people of Gaza, for example, are killed by Israeli forces on a daily basis.  My experience in Israeli-occupied Palestine has been a very big part of my political awakening.  

All the countries that are currently experiencing revolts have restive populations that have suffered, more or less quietly, many years under police states and brutal dictatorships supported by the United States.  Revolts and protests across the region were smashed with extreme brutality (e.g. Jordan, Iraq, and Libya) and dissenters were arrested, tortured, and killed.  What is happening today is like a regional awakening, an Arab Intifadah (shaking off of oppression) across the Middle East.  The Palestinian Intifadah has inspired Arab youth across the region.  What we are seeing is a political catharsis that will result in great changes in some countries and smaller changes in others, but every regime in the region is challenged by the Intifadah and will have to change; it is inevitable.  My article on the revolt in Tunisia was originally named "The Egg is Cracked" because, like a broken egg, there was no way of going back to the old shell once the revolution reached critical mass in Tunis.  The people in the Arab-speaking countries are bound together culturally.  It is almost as if there were an uprising against federal corruption in Colorado and California. Other states would certainly join the revolt; some would do better, some worse.

The revolts in the Arab world could lead to uprisings in the United States and Israel when information comes out about how the United States and Israel have managed criminal affairs in these nations.  The populations of the United States and Israel both suffer under similar national security state structures in which the military and secret services (C.I.A. and Mossad) work against the best interests of their respective nations and people.  The C.I.A.'s criminal role in the 9/11 deception and their covert wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan clearly reveal to all that the clandestine agency is a terrorist and disinformation agency working against the interest of the American people and our republic.  Imagine what crimes that would be exposed if the offices of the C.I.A. were taken over in a revolt against the crimocracy ruling Washington?  This is what is happening across the Middle East and all kinds of secrets are likely to be revealed in the process, as they were after the revolution in Iran.

Finally, I don't think I have said anything incorrect about Libya.  I think the 42-year-old Gaddafi regime has been working with the Rothschild family and Israel, which is where I began on this subject.  Gaddafi has been toyed with and the Western democracies and Russia sold weapons to him, although he is said to have been behind terror bombings over Lockerbie, Scotland, and in Germany.  Gaddafi also reportedly gave $500 million to Allen Stanford's financial scam, which is closely tied to the Mossad, shortly before the Stanford "bank" collapsed -- owing some $8 billion to investors.  Gaddafi is clearly linked to the Zionist criminal network. 

When the people of Benghazi and ancient Cyrenaica (Eastern Libya) revolted against Gaddafi they began a civil conflict that was bound to get very ugly if the Western democracies did not intervene.  The people who stood up against Gaddafi have been calling for intervention from the beginning.  The Western nations and Russia had armed Gaddafi with the weapons he was now turning on his unarmed civilian population in Benghazi, Misurata, Ras Lanuf, and Brega.  Those nations who armed Gaddafi have a moral responsibility to keep him from killing his own people with those weapons.  Had the West intervened to stop Gaddafi more quickly and effectively, lives would have been saved on both sides, that's for sure. 

I think that Gaddafi may very well have funded Nicolas Sarkozy's presidential campaign, which could explain Sarkozy's particular ire against Gaddafi.  I think that stopping Gaddafi from killing his own people is a good and necessary thing.  I would not be surprised if the French and Americans are actually targeting Gaddafi personally.  He knows too much for them to let him live - and talk about it.  Gaddafi has failed the Libyan people.  His "green revolution" did not bring democracy and progress, as he promised.  With the billions of dollars Gaddafi made from the 1.5 million barrels of oil he sold every day he could have created a very prosperous and progressive nation of 6 million people, but he refused to allow the people to rule and insisted on being the mercurial tyrant of Tripoli.  It is long past time for him and his sons to leave, and give the power to the people of Libya.  The Libyan people deserve better leaders and can certainly have a democratic form of government.  Islam is the religion of the majority of the people in the Middle East.  I don't see any reason why Islamic parties should not be part of their democracies.  Americans and Europeans have Christian parties and Israel is virtually ruled by the orthodox rabbis, so why shouldn't Islam play its role in Middle Eastern democracies? 

Question:  With all the prima facie evidence that you have assembled, along with evidence from other people, it's obvious that another 9/11 investigation should be held. Alternatively, it's obvious that there is enough evidence to simply indict certain people even without another investigation. But, of course, the idea of the U.S. government investigating itself is absurd and Zionism is so powerful that proceeding to the next step will be very difficult. So, do you have any suggestions on how the 9/11 criminals could eventually be brought to justice? I think the 9/11 Truth Movement could benefit from some direction or goals on what to do next, what to work towards. Without such goals, I fear that many people will just give up hope that justice will be served and the movement will wither and die.

Bollyn Responds:  This is a good question, but a very difficult one to answer.  As an investigative journalist who has invested a lot of time and energy on 9/11 truth I would like to begin with a few observations. 

Firstly, there is no actual 9/11 Truth Movement in the sense that there is an organized body of persons dedicated to finding the truth of what really happened.  While there are loose-knit truth groups organized around various occupations, such as Pilots for 9/11 Truth, the so-called truth movement is really just a nebulous grouping comprised of many honest and concerned individuals and a large number of disinformation agents.  The disinformation agents are the most active people and have infiltrated the movement in order to steer the course of the discussion to avoid the truth.  Most of these groups are (like the media) actually controlled by such agents, which is why they steer far away from me and my research.

Secondly, there was no 9/11 investigation in the first place.  There was what I call "a non-investigation", managed by Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice, in which the crucial evidence was confiscated and destroyed.  Furthermore, there is absolutely no political will in the United States to solve 9/11 - or to even address the unanswered questions about what really happened.  For a politician to discuss 9/11 as an unsolved crime is to touch the third rail and commit career suicide.  The same is true for a journalist, as my fate as a journalist illustrates.  The only political leader to have even addressed 9/11 as an unsolved crime on a global scale is President Ahmadinejad of Iran and he was unduly criticized and vilified as a result.  For people in the political class it is absolutely taboo to stray from the blatantly false and anti-Muslim fairy tale about 9/11, a pack of lies that has been used to initiate the draconian measures of the domestic "War on Terror" and kick-start two illegal wars in the Middle East.  Trillions of dollars are at stake and people in high-places have committed numerous crimes that would put them in prison for life - or worse.

One has to understand that those obstructing 9/11 truth are part of the crime and the cover-up.  While presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama are clearly involved in the cover-up, as are the New York Times and CNN, it is the unseen network of criminal financiers behind the U.S. government and media who are really calling the shots.  These are the same people who control the State of Israel and its intelligence agencies from behind the scenes.  My discovery that Marc Rich, the Israeli criminal metal trader behind a $10 billion scam, created the international trading network that disposed of the steel from the World Trade Center helps to identify the network of Zionist financiers behind 9/11.  The connections between Marc Rich, the Mossad, and the families of George W. Bush and Bill Clinton are well known and documented.  The final chapter of my book will discuss this in greater detail.

A. Craig Copetas book on Marc Rich explains how Rich made $10 billion in illegal trading deals.  Rich, an Israeli with close ties to the Mossad, created the network that disposed of the steel from the World Trade Center.  The two Belgian Jews who ran the international trading division for the Hugo Neu scrap business of New Jersey are Israeli citizens, although one of them, Nathan Fruchter, runs his business from New York.

This is why I am not optimistic that there will be an investigation of 9/11 in the United States anytime soon.  It would probably require a real revolution to oust the financial regime behind the government before the U.S. government would be able to really investigate and expose what happened on 9/11.  This is not to say that we will not know who was behind 9/11, only that the truth will not be accepted by those in power.


To understand why it is so difficult for 9/11 truth seekers to investigate and prosecute the real criminals behind the false-flag terrorism we need to understand that this is an asymetrical struggle between individual truth seekers and very powerful non-democratic institutions.  The main institutions that are opposed to 9/11 truth are Zionist-controlled entities such as the Anti-Defamation League (and its parent organization of Jewish Freemasons - the B'nai B'rith), the State of Israel (and its military intelligence agencies), the New York Times, CNN, the BBC, the Department of Justice (and F.B.I.), the C.I.A., and the President of the United States, to name but a few.

The fact that these Zionist-controlled institutions are hierarchical in nature and linked to their foreign counterparts in institutional relationships, such as NATO, means that a few Zionists at the top of the pyramid can prevent discussion of 9/11 truth throughout the whole network.  It is not that there aren't any journalists who would love to investigate 9/11.  It is that they are not allowed to do so in the controlled news outfits they work for. 

Norman Rockwell's Freedom of Speech (1943)

I grew up in Norman Rockwell's America with a strong belief in our inalienable rights and the freedom of speech, a freedom I was known to exercise frequently.  My 9/11 research and journalism are a result of my belief as an American that I have the right to express my thoughts without fear of reprisal.  The brutal assault I suffered by undercover police at my home in August 2006 and the malicious prosecution that followed showed me that there are corrupt officials in my hometown (virtually all of them) that were willing to violate my constitutional rights (a federal crime) and commit perjury in court in order to play their role in a conspiracy to try to silence me.  As a consequence, I lost my job as a journalist and we had to leave our home but I have not lost my belief in the freedom of speech.  I know that the truth will prevail and in time we will know who committed the false-flag terrorism of 9/11.  We will see that those who attacked me and tortured me with a TASER as they broke my arm in front of my wife and 8-year-old daughter were actually taking orders and committing crimes for those who are behind the 9/11 cover up.      

Question:  I am sure you know this creep Mike Harari (who is said to be behind the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11). But what do you make of this from Veterans Today?

Dimitri Khalezov...has revealed from first-hand knowledge that Mike Harari organized the 9-11 massacre...His explanation is devastating in its simplicity. The conversion of three steel-built skyscrapers to fine powder is only possible with nuclear explosions underneath them. Thermite, nano-thermite and thermate may well have been used by the killers to cut beams and girders but they would not have turned concrete to powder, or steel for that matter.

Bollyn Responds:  Mike Harari is certainly in that group of senior Mossad terrorists who are involved as high-level managers of the 9/11 attacks. This is the group of Israelis that was involved in Iran-Contra and drug smuggling operations from the 1970s.  This is the link to the Bush and Clinton families, and why Marc Rich was involved in the destruction of the steel from the WTC.  

I do not agree that the pulverization of the concrete was done by a nuclear device.  The evidence indicates that a very large amount of highly explosive nano-composite thermite was used to demolish the Twin Towers.  In my opinion, the nano-thermite had probably been applied as a spray coating to the floor pans and is what caused the pulverization of the 220 concrete floors and their floors pans. The evidence indicates that the floors were exploded from the top down - one-by-one at the speed of a falling object.  How would a nuclear device do that?

Question:  I was curious to know if you have completed the final chapter in your 9/11 book?  It is a fantastic read.  Hope all is well.

Bollyn Responds:  Thank you.  No, the final and hopefully conclusive chapter of my book, Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World, is not yet completed but I hope to have it finished in the coming month.  This final chapter has an interesting history and much of the information that will be in this chapter has already been published in articles on this website.  It grew out of research I did about Lenny Charles Labanco's I.N.N. conference on 9/11 that happened last September.  I wrote a critical piece about this conference in an article entitled "The Zionist Gang Behind New York's 9/11 Conference"

What I discovered was that Labanco is associated with Joseph Shereshevsky, an orthodox Jew who was involved in the massive WexTrust financial securities fraud with his wife, the former Elka Peck of Norfolk, Virginia.  The Peck family owned an iron scrap yard next to the U.S. Navy yard, which happened to be their main source of scrap metal.  The Peck business, however, was sold to Sims, which happens to be one of the two companies involved in the criminal destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center.  I knew there was a connection but it took a lot more digging to find out what it was. 

I tried to talk to the key people involved in the destruction of the steel from the WTC without much luck.  A crucial discovery was that Marc Rich sent two Mossadniks who worked for him to create an international trading department at Hugo Neu, one of the two New Jersey scrap dealers who were involved in the removal and destruction of the WTC steel.  As the late Sherman Skolnick said:
  "Marc Rich the commodity bandit and 'spook' was so interwoven with the White House of George Bush The Elder and later, Bill Clinton, you could not hardly tell whether the White House dirty tricks department was in Washington or Zug, Switzerland, one of Rich's outposts." 

Skolnick went on to ask, "Is it true that Rahm Emanuel, for six years having been on and off Clinton White House Senior Advisor, has been, in effect, Deputy Director for North America, of the Mossad, Israel's spy agency? And was Rahm an instrumental part of Marc Rich's dirty, bloody business for the American C.I.A.?"

While this is not all, these are the key players in exploiting the 9/11 deception to wage war in the Middle East and rob the American people.  The Bush team controlled the White House, the Israelis pulled off the false-flag terrorism, and Marc Rich organized the clean-up crew.  Rahm Emanuel was Mossad's point man in the Clinton White House when the stage was being set for 9/11.  

What binds all of these people and entities together?  As Skolnick wrote:  "In October, 1980, meeting in a Paris suburb with fully authorized and ratified representatives of the Iranian dictator, the Elder Bush agreed to supply Iran weapons, to be trans-shipped through Israel, for Iran's war with Iraq. To keep high the price of oil, the Rockefellers and the oil-soaked British Royal Family, instigated the war in September, 1980, with Iraq and Iran being major oil pumpers; each sought to destroy the other's oil facilities... During the Iranian oil embargo, Marc Rich made hundreds of millions of dollars by treasonously circumventing the U.S.-led restrictions. Rich did this with firms largely owned by the George Bush Family jointly with Richard Cheney and their confederates." 

Iran-Contra is just part of the criminal business that these people are engaged in together.  Drug smuggling into the United States is another part.  Plundering the wealth of the former Soviet Union is another.  The list goes on and on.  These are the key people and agencies behind the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11, but who controls them?  That is what my final chapter will discuss. 

Question:  Christopher!  What is anything written by David Duke doing on your website?

Bollyn Responds:  This question came from a reader shortly after I posted a piece about David Duke's excellent 10-minute video entitled "Hollywood Basterds".   Shortly before I received this question, I got this note about the video:  "Just finished listening to David Duke on your site. Wow, he certainly tells it like it is."

Firstly, I should say that I posted David Duke's video about the Weinstein film Inglourious Basterds (and other Jewish porn and perversity) because I completely agree with the reader that David Duke "tells it like it is."  I have personally known Duke since April 2005, when we visited him at his home in the New Orleans area.  We enjoyed our visit immensely and remember eating the best oysters in the world with him in New Orleans.  David Duke is well known and respected among the people of New Orleans, which was very clear by the way he was received everywhere we went.  My daughter was very fond of his little Torri and remembers being scolded for feeding popcorn to Duke's little Maltese when we were at the movies.  I recall reading Duke's book Jewish Supremacism and writing a book review.  David did a three-part interview with me on his Townhall Radio show in which we discussed a range of issues.  In 2006, when I was attacked and TASERed at my home by undercover police who broke my right elbow, Duke posted an article under the heading "Christopher Bollyn Abused by ADL-Brainwashed Police", which is exactly what they were.

Then there is the fact that I absolutely detest the racist and perverted film Inglourious Basterds and anyone associated with it.  I simply can not understand how any self-respecting nation can allow a film that celebrates gratuitous and racist violence to be shown to its youth.  Unfortunately, my son saw the film in August 2009 when a classmate's mother treated a bunch of her son's new classmates to the movies.  When I discovered how perverted and racist (anti-German) the film was, I discussed the film with my son.  He speaks fluent German, loves Germany, and knows a lot about the real history of the Second World War having lived in Berlin and visited many German cities, including a long spell in Dresden.  Last night he watched David Duke's 10-minute video and I could tell from his comments that he now understands the evil behind this disgusting and despicable film. 

I noticed this apt comment beneath Duke's video on YouTube:  "The German people have got to be the most unfairly vilified people in history. The Palestinians would be next. Is it any surprise that both groups are vilified by the same secretive group? Germany had no choice but to fight. They are now rising again and I say God bless ‘em."

Inglourious Basterds has Eli Roth killing Germans with a baseball bat, which was actually just one of the brutal methods used by Polish Jews to kill tens of thousands of innocent German prisoners held in Jewish death camps after the war.  An Eye for an Eye: The Untold Story of Jewish Revenge Against Germans in 1945 is an eye-opening book by John Sacks (Basic Books, New York, 1993) that tells the real story of Jewish atrocities against Germans.

One of the Polish Jews who tortured and killed hundreds of innocent Germans was Solomon "Shlomo" Morel, who has lived in Israel since 1993 to avoid prosecution for war crimes. The following extract is from Solomon Morel: A Jewish Death Camp Commandant in Stalinist Poland

Salomon (Solomon or Shlomo) Morel (Garbów, November 15, 1919 – February 14, 2007, Tel Aviv) In 1993, soon after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Morel was indicted by Poland's Institute of National Remembrance for war crimes and crimes against humanity, including the "revenge killing" of 1,500 prisoners. Morel fled to Israel and was granted sanctuary under the Law of Return. Poland repeatedly demanded his extradition, but Israel refused to comply, citing a lack of evidence.

"Morel brought Jewish and Polish guards -- sometimes drunken -- into barrack 7 of accused Nazis or Hitler youth. It was called either the Deutsches Haus or the “brown barracks.” Morel had them sing Nazi songs and then he began to beat them. Depending upon his mood, he would use his bare hands, a wooden stool, a pistol butt or a truncheon. The guards beat the Germans with clubs. Morel asked, “How many blows do you want?” If the answer was unsatisfactory, it was fifty blows. It was reported that the “ritual of the organized tormenting of prisoners took place virtually every night…” When using the wooden stool, Morel would beat prisoners until the stool broke apart. The corpses were left on the floor. At dawn, they were taken in a horse-drawn cart to a cemetery by the Rawa river where they were dumped into a mass grave."

Question:  If the Jews can create such a complex matrix then they must be really very smart. It would, of course, require lots of brains apart from lots of money to pull off such a veil [of deception] over the whole world. But is it also because they (the orthodox Zionist Jews) have a complete lack of ethics? By the way, I’m a Hindu from India and I don't think ALL JEWS are bad. 

Bollyn Responds:  The day I received this question I read the end-of-the-year issue of Newsweek that contains interviews with people in the news.  The very first interview in this Zionist-owned magazine (owned by Sidney Mortimor Harman, husband of Rep. Jane Harman) is with David Axelrod, the campaign manager who made Obama president and who now serves as his "senior advisor".  Axelrod, who calls Chicago home, is the son of a New York Jewish communist writer-cum-advertising strategist and a Jewish psychoanalyst who hanged himself when his son studied at the University of Chicago.  David Axelrod is the man who shapes the policies coming out of the Obama White House.

David Axelrod was commissioned by powerful Zionists to make Obama president and now serves as his senior advisor.

The second photo in the interview is of the key people who actually run the Obama administration: Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel with Senior Advisor David Axelrod, Nancy-Ann DeParle, director of the White House Office for Health Reform, and Philip Michael Schiliro, Assistant for Legislative Affairs.  The photo is titled "Discussing the health care vote in the U.S. House of Representatives in the Oval Office" and dated Nov. 7, 2009.  (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza, No. 25 of 88 photos)

The photo of the three men who manage the Obama administration huddled around the president's desk says a great deal about the powers that control the Obama White House.  Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel is an Israeli national whose father is a former Zionist terrorist in the Irgun.  David Axelrod is the son of a Jewish communist writer who wrote for a magazine that was designed to push the United States into war against Germany.  The third man at the desk is Philip Michael Schiliro, the president's assistant on legislation and the key person in getting Democrats in Congress to support the huge bailout bill that was passed in the beginning of the Obama administration.

Philip Michael Schiliro received very strong support from the Jewish community when he ran for office in the early 1990s as this list of donors indicates.

Phil Schiliro was chief of staff for Rep. Henry Waxman of California before he joined the Obama White House.  Schiliro worked for Waxman, a Congressman with a "strong Jewish identity", for many years.

Phil Schiliro is a very interesting name in Obama's administration, the current government of the Zionist crimocracy that rules the United States.  The Schiliro clan is a family that has a long history of involvement in organized crime.  One member of the family, Lewis Dennis Schiliro, actually ran the FBI office in New York City during the 1990s - overseeing such key investigations as the first bombing of the World Trade Center, other terrorism and financial crime cases, TWA Flight 800, Egypt Air 990, etc.  Another member of the family, 30-year-old Joseph Schiliro from East Meadow, Long Island, was busted in January 2010 for being part of a network of drug dealers that dealt $1 million of "Special-K" (Ketamine, an animal tranquilizer) every month.  Are these Schiliros all related?  I would venture to guess that they are.

Lewis Dennis Schiliro ran the FBI bureau in New York in the 1990s.

Lewis Dennis Schiliro and Phil Schiliro grew up on the same part of Long Island, East Meadow and Baldwin respectively (5 miles apart from each other), and both have mothers named Jean and fathers named Joseph.  I have not yet determined if they are related, but I suspect they are.  There were, after all, only 55 people named Schiliro in the United States in 1930 and most of them were directly related to each other.  This is a very important question because Lewis Schiliro became a senior vice president at Maurice Greenberg's A.I.G. insurance shortly after he left the FBI in 2000 and Phil Schiliro was instrumental in getting Congress to pass the legislation that provided hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars to bailout criminal banks and enterprises like A.I.G. - the largest direct recipient of the bailout.  Furthermore, the FBI is the most important part of the 9/11 cover-up and Lewis Schiliro has actively contributed to that effort.  In the New Year I will return to the Schiliro connection to 9/11 and the bailout of A.I.G. 

Now back to the question at hand:

If the Jews can create such a complex matrix then they must be really very smart. It would, of course, require lots of brains apart from lots of money to pull off such a veil [of deception] over the whole world. But is it also because they (the orthodox Zionist Jews) have a complete lack of ethics?

The discussion of this photo and the men who manage the Obama White House is not a digression, but is meant to serve as an illustration to help understand my response to this question.  Americans in the 21st Century are not very political nor are they politically organized in any meaningful way.  Millions of Americans voted for Barack Obama simply because he symbolized "change", which most people thought was a good idea.  They thought he was a black man from Chicago, although he is not from Chicago and he is as much white as he is black.  Most people do not look any deeper than the images they see on television.  Very few are aware of the fact that Obama is a Zionist-controlled puppet, a modern-day "golem", whose only agenda is to fulfill the wishes of his Jewish Zionist masters. 

The Zionist-controlled media does not even discuss the fact that Rahm Emanuel's father is a real terrorist who moved to the United States in the 1950s.  The chief of staff of the Obama White House is the son of a living Zionist terrorist.  How much sense does that make for an administration that is waging its "War on Terror" in Afghanistan and Pakistan?  Such omissions by the controlled press are of course completely intentional.  Keeping the Obama fairy tale alive requires keeping the people in the dark about Obama's Zionist handlers.

Candidate and President Obama has been managed by David Axelrod since 1992 at the behest of the late Philip Morris Klutznick, the former head of the International Order of B'nai B'rith - the secret society of the Elders of Zion.  See "The Axelrod Factor - Why Obama Fails to Deliver"

Jews are certainly as smart and as wealthy as any other ethnic group but these are not the only things that make up Jewish political power.  The real essence of Jewish political power is that they operate as a collective, which is to say that they work together as an organized team.  Wealthy Jews like the Rothschilds create and finance Zionist organizations - including secret societies - to increase their power and control.  Zionist Jews have a virtual monopoly over the U.S. media.  Jews dominate the political parties and media in the United States - including third party movements and alternative media outlets.  Ownership of the media and Zionist secret societies like the International Order of B'nai B'rith are huge force multipliers for Zionist Jews.  No other ethnic group in the United States operates as a collective as effectively as the Jews.  In a nation of politically unorganized people, a well-organized and well-financed collective force (with powerful secret societies) like the Zionist Jews can slice its way through like a warm knife going through butter.  It's that simple, but there is much more.

As a student of Middle Eastern history and U.S. politics, I have pondered this question for many years, as have many others before me.  To understand the Jewish posture vis-a-vis the rest of the world I suggest reading how Tacitus and Gibbon, two classical historians, described the hostility of the "unsocial" Jewish religion and how Jews regard the rest of mankind:

Moses, wishing to secure for the future his authority over the nation, gave them a novel form of worship, opposed to all that is practiced by other men. Things sacred with us, with them have no sanctity, while they allow what with us is forbidden…This worship, however introduced, is upheld by its antiquity; all their other customs, which are at once perverse and disgusting, owe their strength to their very badness. The most degraded out of other races, scorning their national beliefs, brought to them their contributions and presents. This augmented the wealth of the Jews, as also did the fact, that among themselves they are inflexibly honest and ever ready to shew compassion, though they regard the rest of mankind with all the hatred of enemies.
- Tacitus, The Histories, 110 A.D.

From the reign of Nero to that of Antoninus Pius, the Jews discovered a fierce impatience of the dominion of Rome, which repeatedly broke out in the most furious massacres and insurrections. Humanity is shocked at the recital of the horrid cruelties which they committed in the cities of Egypt, of Cyprus, and of Cyrene, where they dwelt in treacherous friendship with the unsuspecting natives, and we are tempted to applaud the severe retaliation which was exercised by the arms of the legions against a race of fanatics whose dire and credulous superstition seemed to render them the implacable enemies not only of the Roman government, but of human kind.
- Edward Gibbon, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (1776)

The Roman historian Tacitus said the Jews "regard the rest of mankind with all the hatred of enemies" and Edward Gibbon (who called their religion "unsocial") said they are "a race of fanatics whose dire and credulous superstition seemed to render them the implacable enemies not only of the Roman government, but of human kind."

The hostility that orthodox Jews harbor for non-Jews is key to understanding the Jewish predicament:  the Jews see themselves as a people apart from others, a separate nation, and their first loyalty and obligation is to their tribe.  Orthodox Jews are raised with the idea that Jews are superior to other people.  This sense of Jewish supremacism and hostility toward other people is the reason the Jewish religion is seen as unsocial by Gibbon and others.  Like Hinduism, the Jewish religion is a set of rules of conduct for a specific ethnic group.  Christianity and Islam, on the other hand, are faith-based universal religions which embrace all of mankind. 

The criminal network behind the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 is comprised of senior agents of Israeli intelligence and their Zionist cohort in the United States, which I have shown and documented in my book Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World.  Nearly all of the key people in this network are either dedicated Israeli intelligence agents or orthodox Jewish Zionists.  Former U.S. Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff and U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, key agents in the 9/11 cover-up, are both orthodox Jewish Zionists.  Chertoff and Hellerstein are certainly fully aware of their huge crimes against the American people, but their religious duties to the Jewish people - their "community" - mean much more to them.  Their religious ethics dictate that they serve only Jews.  Orthodox Jews like Chertoff and Hellerstein consider non-Jews as animals and slaves.  To cause the death of a non-Jew is not considered a sin or a punishable crime among orthodox Jews.  This is not merely hyperbole on my part.  To understand how orthodox Jews really view non-Jews, I strongly recommend reading Israel Shahak's book, Jewish History, Jewish Religion - The Weight of Three Thousand Years.  I met Israel Shahak in the 1990s in Chicago and was very impressed with the man and his writing.

Jewish History, Jewish Religion - The Weight of Three Thousand Years

"A Jew who murders a Gentile is guilty only of a sin against the laws of Heaven, not punishable by a court. To cause indirectly the death of a Gentile is no sin at all."

"According to the Talmud, Jesus was executed by a proper rabbinical court for idolatry, inciting other Jews to idolatry, and contempt of rabbinical authority. All classical Jewish sources which mention his execution are quite happy to take responsibility for it; in the talmudic account the Romans are not even mentioned."

- Professor Israel Shahak, "The Laws Against Non-Jews"

Question:  I have received two questions about Mark Lane and American Free Press (AFP). Since they both pertain to the Liberty Lobby and its publications, I will answer them together:

Question No. 1 - Subject: Mark Lane: CIA agent

I'm familiar with these charges by Bollyn. His problem is that Lane has been proven correct about Lee Oswald and if Piper indeed works for Lane, then how does Bollyn explain the most important book on the JFK killing, Final Judgment, which is the only book to nail the Israelis for being part of the assassination? That's where Bollyn's thesis falls down. My main problem with Lane is with his presence at Jonestown, but I have read nothing definitive about it other than his being the lawyer for Jones. Lane's probably lucky he wasn't killed, too, which is why I suppose he disappeared for a while. I suspect it was a CIA mass murder of an experimental population. I'm not ready to accept Bollyn's version without more than just his being a Jewish lawyer who successfully defended Liberty Lobby from a CIA lawsuit, which is not a bad thing.

Question No. 2 – From an AFP insider named George K.

I am working now at the AFP office and keep bumping onto all kinds of unreasonable hysteria around...Paul (Tudor) Angel, Chris Petherick and Mike Piper presenting me with all kinds of s....t that I am not really looking for. What is going on here? It feels like I stepped into a hole loaded with sneaks. I feel something far deeper than the usual "don't take my job or I kill you" garbage. Paul Angel keeps screwing my articles, he is steering the whole of the AFP toward the left...Willis is unable to control them...Is this new or just an old story? What did actually happen around you, why did they want you out so bad?

Bollyn Responds: These questions pertain to my former employer, the Liberty Lobby, and its publications, American Free Press (the erstwhile Spotlight) and the Barnes Review. Having worked for the Liberty Lobby from June 2000 until October 2006, I have some insight into the organization and the people behind it. Let me begin with a few facts and observations.

I am an honest and hard-working investigative journalist who worked for the Liberty Lobby’s publications from June 2000 until October 6, 2006.  While working for the Spotlight and American Free Press, I did a great deal of original research on 9/11, depleted uranium weapons, school shootings, and electronic vote fraud, among other things.  

The basic question asked by George, "Why did they want you out so bad?" can be answered in a few words.  I was assaulted by undercover police and ousted from American Free Press because my 9/11 research was revealing too much about who had carried out the false-flag terror attacks - and how they had done it.  My scientific research (with Dr. Steven E. Jones and Dr. Thomas Cahill) about Thermite being used to pulverize the World Trade Center seems to have been the proximate cause of the undercover police assault and subsequent attacks against me. The people who were behind ousting me are the same people I had worked with for 6 years.  These are the same people who run AFP today.  They didn't seem at all interested in my research about Thermite and 9/11 - quite the contrary.  Earlier, Chris Petherick had told me not to be so critical of the war in Iraq, saying that some of our readers liked the war!

In mid-August 2006 I was assaulted at my home (on private property) by a heavily armed three-man squad of undercover police who TASERed me (while I was handcuffed and held down by two armed men) and broke my right elbow. Willis A. Carto of American Free Press began collecting money for a “legal defense fund” and encouraged me to take Mark Lane as my lawyer. When I spoke to Lane on the phone, he told me that I would have to trust him completely and admitted that he was a Zionist. I decided to look for another lawyer.

After undercover police assaulted me at my home AFP raised money for my legal defense, but they fired me and kept the money instead.  Instead of making a case out of the outrageous fact that a working journalist had been attacked at his home in America, AFP ousted me and began a campaign of slander against me.

Shortly after the attack, Mike Piper of AFP began attacking me and insisted that I not be allowed to speak at the Labor Day conference in Washington. In early October 2006 I was fired from AFP by Chris Petherick who claimed that I had been disloyal to the paper and filed false stories. He never provided any evidence to support these claims. Carto disposed of the money raised for my legal fund and I was purged from American Free Press in the same way that Stalin would purge someone from the Communist Party - and the memory of the Soviet Union.  I have been subjected to a vicious campaign of slander from Mike Piper and his cronies ever since.

While it may be difficult for an outsider to make sense of all of this, as a person who worked for the Liberty Lobby for more than 6 years and who was then ousted and slandered by the people I had worked with, I have some insight into this odd outfit that calls itself a “populist” newspaper.

Mark Weber wrote about Willis Carto and the Liberty Lobby in August 1998:

Although Liberty Lobby claims to reveal the hidden forces that secretly control the world, it never discloses just who runs this self-described "populist institution," or how. Even the name is deceitful. Liberty Lobby does almost no lobbying. In fact, Liberty Lobby is essentially a fraud. Although it claims to be directed by its "Board of Policy," it is actually run from behind the scenes by Willis A. Carto -- a shadowy 72-year-old whom a California court has found to be a crook and a liar.

Weber is right. I should know, I was the lobbyist for the Liberty Lobby. I was the “Congressional Liaison” when I began working at the Liberty Lobby, which meant that I was to visit the offices of members of Congress on behalf of the lobby and write articles about legislation. There was, however, no structure or instructions for this position whatsoever and I was free to pursue whatever issue I chose. I never received any guidance or met anyone who represented the membership or Board of Policy of the Liberty Lobby except for Willis Carto, whose office was adjacent to mine. There was a door in the wall between our offices and it was always open, except when Carto had meetings with Mark Lane and the accountant, a man named Blayne Hutzel, who wore a Masonic ring.

The offices we worked in were dismal and dirty, far below standard for any organization calling itself a newspaper. I found it impossible to work in such conditions and asked Mr. Carto if I could freshen up my office with some cleaning and a new coat of paint. He refused, saying that if I fixed up my office the others would also want their offices cleaned up.

In the fall of 2000, after about five months on the job, I was suddenly given a new contract that made me an independent contractor. Mr. Carto gave me this contract to sign while Mark Lane stood in the next room. This new arrangement meant that I lost all insurance benefits and was paid to submit articles.  I was responsible for managing my own taxes.  Hutzel told me that I should get a "good tax man".  This arrangement, which I knew nothing about prior to seeing the contract in front of me, allowed me to work from home but meant a significant reduction in compensation.  Later, between 2004 and 2006, Carto reduced my salary even further, twice, in cuts of 10 percent each.  He also wanted me to come back to Washington and be the lobbyist for the Lobby.  I didn't understand this because I thought our main activity was the newspaper business.  I was under the impression that AFP was created to be a real newspaper and not a newsletter of the Liberty Lobby.

Furthermore, I did not understand how they were unable to grow the paper in post-9/11 America.  Whenever I passed Union Station in Washington I would check to see if there were papers in the boxes, and there were not.  I spoke to the employee who was supposed to distribute the papers to the boxes and found that he was not doing it.  The paid circulation was only about 20,000, according to the person who managed the subscription data base.  The paper was clearly not growing and there was no movement in that direction coming from the employees, who seemed to lack any enthusiasm or patriotic zeal.

In January 2006, shortly after I had spoken about the evidence of Thermite at the World Trade Center at the Axis for Peace forum in Brussels, I was suddenly called back from Germany to go on a crazy mission to Venezuela.  This hare-brained scheme originated with Carto and Piper, but Piper did not want to do it - so he put it on me.  I was supposed to go to Venezuela and arrange a meeting with Hugo Chavez.  I was to get Chavez to buy subscriptions to the newspaper for every member of Congress or somehow get him to make a significant donation to the Liberty Lobby.  Nothing had been done to prepare for such a mission and very little was explained to me, but the whole thing was dropped on my shoulders.  Nobody had even made contact with the Embassy of Venezuela in Washington.  I could see that the chances for success were slim, but was willing to give it a shot.  The day I left for Venezuela, Carto told me that I would get ten percent of whatever I could get from Chavez.  Nothing was put down in writing. 

Christopher Bollyn converses with former prime minister and president of Lebanon, Salim El Hoss, at the Axis for Peace conference in Brussels in November 2005.  It was at this high-profile international conference that Bollyn discussed the scientific evidence of Thermite in the destruction of the World Trade Center.  He was called back to Washington shortly thereafter and sent on a wild goose chase to Venezuela.

I did not get to see Hugo Chavez, but turned over a package of materials to the Ministry of Information in Caracas when I realized that we (I had invited William Rodriguez and Jimmy Walter to come along) would not have a chance to speak to the president directly.  I returned to Washington and headed for Utah to interview Dr. Steven E. Jones on the evidence of Thermite at the World Trade Center.

Unable to meet President Hugo Chavez directly, I presented his Ministry of Information with the material I had brought from Washington.

Although I have written about a number of sensitive subjects, it seems like my articles and discussion of Thermite in the World Trade Center were too hot for the people who controlled American Free Press.  Having left Chicago because of intrusive FBI surveillance in the summer of 2005, we were reluctant to stay in our own home.  Feeling vulnerable in our home, we visited 9/11 relatives and researchers in the western United States and stayed in safe places.  AFP had limited me to one thousand dollars in expenses per month, but I was able to keep my costs down by staying with people who supported 9/11 truth.

I was in Davis, California, in June 2006 when Petherick suddenly cut off my expenses completely telling me that I would no longer have any funds for travel, phone calls, or any expenses at all.  This happened the day after I had merged the scientific research of Dr. Steven E. Jones with that of Dr. Thomas Cahill at U.C. Davis.  The research of these two men confirmed that some form of Thermite had been used to destroy the Twin Towers.  Cahill's data from the smoke particles rising from the pile of rubble from October through December 2001 proved that the fires that raged beneath the pile were hotter than the boiling point of iron

Dr. Thomas Cahill's Davis DRUM found that the bluish smoke that rose from the pile contained large amounts of nano-sized particles that can only be produced by fires hotter than the boiling point of the element involved.  The fires that raged beneath the pile were certainly no ordinary fires.

We now had scientific proof that we were dealing with extremely advanced Thermitic explosives.  The fact that I was being squeezed by my employers at AFP at the same time I was making scientific breakthroughs on the evidence of Thermite suggests the two are related.   When AFP cut off my expenses completely they knew I would have to return to my home, where undercover police were waiting to attack.

In the science library at U.C. Davis I was able to photocopy the most important articles from the USGS survey of the dust from the World Trade Center.  The photographs of iron spheroids in the dust were solid evidence that the demolition of the Twin Towers had resulted in
large amounts of molten iron.  This was proof that Thermite had been involved in the pulverization of the World Trade Center.  This was big. 

I brought this material back to Dr. Jones in Provo, who had asked me to find out whatever I could about the dust.  He was very glad to get this material.  I bid him a fond farewell in June and warned him of the dangers we faced.  Within three months we were both fired from our jobs.

Bollyn discussing the evidence of Thermite with Dr. Steven E. Jones at BYU in the spring of 2006

After being fired from American Free Press in October 2006, I learned that Mark Lane is the real owner of the Liberty Lobby and its assets, and has been since 1994. This information came from L.T. Patterson of Cincinnati, owner of the newsletter Criminal Politics. Patterson had been sued by Mark Lane in an attempt to shut down his newspaper and discovered that Lane owned the Liberty Lobby during the legal process. Mark Lane served in U.S. Army intelligence in Germany at the end of the war.  Army intelligence became the CIA after the war.  Lane played a key role in the Jonestown massacre by pushing the fear button on Jim Jones, which instigated the massacre.  Lane is the controlling agent of American Free Press, which pushes the fear button of patriotic Americans every week. Lane was also involved in the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War, where he worked closely with Jane Fonda.  Later, Fonda married Ted Turner and convinced him to sell CNN to Zionist Jews in New York.  This completed the Zionist monopoly of the mass media in the United States.

The point of Zionists owning media is to control how people think about things.  Lane owns AFP in order to control the patriotic movement that is attached to it.  His control is meant to keep it from being effective as a political organizer.  It's that simple.  The books by Lane and Piper are meant to give them credibility.  In order to attract bees you have to offer honey.  If Carto, Lane, and Piper are serious about taking on the Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith why don't they sue the ADL for branding AFP as an anti-Semitic newspaper?

The information about Lane owning the Liberty Lobby came as a surprise, but made complete sense and fit with what I had observed at the Liberty Lobby. There was absolutely no transparency about the finances at the lobby.  I remember in 2000-2001 seeing 4 women opening the mail with donations in Blayne Hutzel’s office. Elisabeth Carto and her sister were the ones who ran the daily counting of the donations that came in the mail.  I never understood where all that money went because it certainly was not being spent on the employees or the operation, which all ran on a shoe-string budget.  Jerry Myers told me that the Cartos had secret bank accounts in Switzerland and Austria.

There were certainly many shell companies controlled by Willis Carto. My paychecks, for example, came from an entity called the Committee to Expose Bunk. None of this was ever explained. Myers, an old hand at the lobby, told me a lot of the sordid history about the lobby and I knew it was a very secretive and dodgy operation, but I was glad to be able to write articles about things that mattered and see them in print in the nation's capital.

It always bothered me that the distribution of the paper was very poor. The paper was not easily available even in downtown Washington, D.C. It was not even sold in the newspaper shop across the street from the Liberty Lobby. There was clearly a problem with the way the paper was being run.

The main people on the production side of the paper were Paul Tudor Angel and Chris Petherick. Petherick was the editor and Angel did the layout. Chris Petherick was a self-proclaimed Satanist who wore a metal stud in his tongue and threw knives in the wall of the office. I never understood how he wound up being the editor of a populist and supposedly patriotic newspaper. He didn’t seem to fit.

I was invited to visit Paul Angel’s new house in Virginia toward the end of my career at AFP. He had bought a newly built house about 45 minutes south of Washington on the Interstate. He had married a Panamanian girl who worked at Lockheed and we were invited to see the new house and his baby girl. I was surprised when his wife said, “You don’t believe the stuff that’s in that paper, do you?”

Paul chipped in saying that I was one of the paper’s main writers, but I could see that his wife dismissed AFP as nonsense, which made me wonder why Paul worked so hard for Willis Carto and the Liberty Lobby. During the party, I spoke with Paul’s mother, Alice Jones Angel. She mentioned that Paul’s father had died some years earlier.

Paul’s father was a chiropractor based in Silver Spring, Maryland, named Dr. Harold H. Angel who was a governor of Optimist International. Harold Angel died in 1972 when Paul was about 12. Paul was still living with his mother when I started at the paper in 2000, and she drove him to the office. Alice Angel died in February 2009. She had worked at the Department of Health and Human Services.

Paul has two sisters, Alison P. Angel and Laura Angel-Hanratty. Alison had a career at the U.S. Information Agency and Laura is married to Dennis P. Hanratty, Security Manager of the Department of Defense and member of the board of the Defense and Intelligence Council of ASIS International, an agency that is closely tied to the U.S. Intelligence community. I suspect that Angel's family ties to the military and intelligence community are why Paul Angel is the driving force behind the production of American Free Press. I remember how he and Petherick refused to print my articles that discussed the role of Prozac and similar drugs in school shootings and sedating the 9/11 relatives.  "Nice try" is all Paul Angel wrote back when I submitted a story about Prozac-crazed school shooters in America.  Both Petherick and Angel told me that they did drugs when I began at the Liberty Lobby in 2000, but they did not mean marijuana.

The people behind American Free Press are there simply to control the patriotic movement. They are skimming the cream off of the movement and have done nothing to make it an effective opposition movement. Jerry Myers told me that the Liberty Lobby had paid Mark Lane some five million dollars in legal fees.

Mark Weber was correct in his analysis of 1998:

Carto has few personal friends, but perhaps his closest is Mark Lane, an East coast Jewish attorney who often represents Carto and Liberty Lobby in court. Lane has a long record of support for liberal and leftist figures, including Martin Luther King and Jim Jones (of Jonestown fame). According to legal documents filed by Liberty Lobby in May 1998, Liberty Lobby pays Lane an annual retainer of $92,500.

In spite of the millions of dollars it's controlled over the years, Liberty Lobby has no measurable impact on the political life of the nation's capitol. This is hardly surprising, however. Given the unethical way it's run, Liberty Lobby is inherently incapable of achieving its stated goals, not least because it cannot hold the support of persons of integrity and discernment.

Willis Carto has been bilking well-meaning but credulous Americans for decades, and doubtless many naive people on his "sucker list" will continue to respond generously to urgent appeals for money signed by Ryan or other stooges. Still, and as ever more people learn the facts about how Liberty Lobby really works, and of Carto's long record of scams, the day of reckoning for him and his empire may be coming at last.

Question:  How do you compare Camp Bucca to a concentration camp?  No one was executed there.  People were given more medical care than they had anywhere else in their country, including kidney transplants.  Personally, I ensure that people held in the area I was responsible for were given education by local Iraqis:  reading, writing, some basic social studies.  With the exception of those transferred to Iraqi run prisons, all of the people were released.  I completely understand the unpopular war, and the hindsight view of many things, but to compare Camp Bucca to a concentration camp, it's not even a stretch.  Please reconsider your analogy. - W. K.

Bollyn Responds: When I received this comment, I immediately posted a "Note on usage" at the bottom of the article about the Iraq War Logs about the meaning of the term "concentration camp."  There is much more to this comment than the question about the meaning of the term and I am in contact with W.K. to discuss these things.  I don't want anyone to think that I was using hyperbole in calling Camp Bucca a "modern day concentration camp".  I was not.  Having visited Dachau, Auschwitz, and Buchenwald, I know what I am talking about when I use the term.  This is how the term is defined in the Oxford dictionary at our home:

concentration camp - a type of prison, often consisting of a number of buildings inside a fence, where political prisoners are kept in extremely bad conditions
Source - Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, 7th Edition, Oxford University Press, 2005

The following photos and text are taken from the end of my article on the Iraq War Logs, which were leaked to the media by WikiLeaks on October 22, 2010:

Camp Bucca, Iraq - This photo from May 2008 shows a barbed wire corridor inside the U.S.  "detention center" near the Kuwait-Iraq border. According to U.S. figures, the camp held 19,070 detainees at the time.  The camp is named after Ronald Bucca, a NYC Fire Marshal who died on 9/11, although neither Iraq nor the camp detainees had anything to do with the false-flag terrorism of 9/11.   Naming the camp after a victim of 9/11 is part of the deception of the U.S. military.

Camp Bucca is a modern day concentration camp in an illegal war of aggression.  Will the people behind this criminal war face a Nuremberg Trial?

Gen. David H. Petraeus described a concentration camp when he talked about Camp Bucca in 2007: 

"When I took command of Multinational Force-Iraq in February 2007, we still had Camp Bucca with 17,000 detainees at that time and it grew larger," said Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, commander, International Security Assistance Force and commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan. "We still had all of the detainees in huge enclosures. It was just fenced-in enclosures of about 800 to 900 detainees per enclosure. Obviously, we have come a long way since then."

Source: "Petraeus Discusses Future of Afghan Detainees" by U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer Maria Yager, Parwan Province, Afghanistan, September 30, 2010

A concentration camp is defined by Merriam Webster as a camp where persons (as prisoners of war, political prisoners, or refugees) are detained or confined.  The Holocaust Encyclopedia has the following definition, which correctly describes U.S. camps like Camp Bucca:

The term concentration camp refers to a camp in which people are detained or confined, usually under harsh conditions and without regard to legal norms of arrest and imprisonment that are acceptable in a constitutional democracy. In Nazi Germany between 1933 and 1945, concentration camps (Konzentrationslager; KL or KZ) were an integral feature of the regime.

Source: "Concentration Camps", Holocaust Encyclopedia, U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum

Christopher Bollyn and son (left) with the archivist at the Nuremberg Document Center. 

Question:   We have all read about Barack Obama's intention to build an Islamic center near Ground Zero.  This project does appear very suspicious.  What, in your opinion, are the real motives behind such a controversial project?

Kuwaiti Feisal Abdul Rauf and his proposed Park51 project are supported by the Zionist media mogul Rupert Murdoch, whose company published Rauf's book.  For nine years Murdoch's News Corp. media empire has pushed the evil lie that Muslims were behind the terrorism of 9-11 and promoted the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror" with its wars of aggression and occupation - against Islamic nations and movements.

Bollyn Responds:  BUILDING A MONUMENT TO A FALSEHOOD - This is a sophisticated propaganda ploy by the Rothschild/Zionist-controlled U.S. government and media, designed to underline and cement in the public mind the blatant falsehood that Muslims were responsible for the terror attacks of 9-11.  This project is founded on the false premise of Muslim guilt and is meant to create a permanent monument to the falsehood that 9-11 was carried out by Islamic terrorists.  The people behind this project are the high-level Rothschild agents involved in the Zionist false-flag terrorism and cover-up of 9-11, including New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Rupert Murdoch, whose sprawling media empire has pushed the lies about 9-11and the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. 

High-level Zionist agents Mayor Bloomberg and Rupert Murdoch of News Corp. are key sponsors of Park51 - a monument to the immensely evil media lie that Moslems were behind 9-11.

The Park51 project, based on the false premise that Muslims were behind the false flag terrorism of 9-11, is supported by extremely wealthy Arab leaders such as Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal of Saudi Arabia, who is the second largest shareholder of Murdoch's News Corp.  Any Moslem who supports a monument to such a hateful and anti-Muslim falsehood is a traitor to his faith -- and the truth.

The political support from the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton for this monument reveals it to be a nefarious Zionist plot to hijack the discussion about 9-11 by distracting the public from the real evidence and stirring up anti-Muslim feelings as the ninth anniversary nears.  The recent knife attack on the Moslem taxi driver in Manhattan is the kind of reaction such evil plots produce. 


The college student accused of slashing the taxi driver simply because he was a Muslim was quickly moved to a psychiatric ward, which is really where anyone belongs who still believes the Zionist fairy tale that Moslems from Afghanistan were behind 9-11.  The government/media version that Osama Bin Laden and 19 Arabs were behind 9-11 remains utterly unproven and flies in the face of evidence of the extremely advanced form of super-thermite that was used to pulverize the Twin Towers.  Bin Laden certainly did not produce or apply the coating of nano-composite super-thermite to the interior surfaces of the World Trade Center towers.  So, who did?  Answer that question and we will solve the crime of 9-11.

The Twin Towers were pulverized by an extremely advanced explosive coating of super-thermite, made with nanotechnology.  How obvious does it have to be before people realize they have been deceived?  To accept a lie is to be enslaved by it.  The suffering and death brought about by the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are the evil results of being enslaved to the lie that Moslems carried out 9-11.

The Israeli government's plan to destroy two mosques on the West Bank is a similar action of the same strategy, which is meant to cause violence and increase tension and hostility against Islam.  The Israeli announcement of the outrageous plan to destroy the mosques, which are on Palestinian administered territory in the West Bank, is clearly designed to scuttle - with violence - the planned peace talks in September.  Why else would they even consider taking such a unnecessary, self-defeating, and provocative action at this crucial time, especially during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan?

Question:  Do you have any articles about Dov Zakheim? 

Bollyn Responds:  In several articles I have written about Dov Solomon Zakheim, the orthodox Jewish rabbi who was appointed by George W. Bush to oversee the Pentagon budget prior to and after 9-11.  I wrote one a few years ago that focused on him specifically. That article is entitled “9/11 and the Elders of Zion” and can be read at:  

I will be writing another article about the Zionist agent Zakheim, which will discuss his long relationship with the Rothschild family and the state of Israel. Zakheim, who is clearly a foreign agent and devoted Zionist with strong links to the Rothschild family, was a member of the Board of Deputies of British Jews in 1971—1972, and a member of the Chief Rabbi's Chaplaincy Board of England, 1971—1972. He then went on to become assistant to the managing director of the U.K. branch of Tibor Rosenbaum’s International Credit Bank Geneva, 1974-75.  This was a criminal enterprise.  

James Casbolt, a former agent of MI6, wrote this about the Mossad-linked bank where Zakheim began his career: 

Tibor Rosenbaum, a MOSSAD agent and head of the Geneva based Banque du Credit International. This bank was the forerunner to the notorious Bank of Credit and Commerce international (BCCI) which is a major intelligence drug money laundering bank. 'Life' magazine exposed Rosenbaum's bank as a money launderer for the Meyer Lanksky American organised crime family and Tibor Rosenbaum funded and supported 'Permindex' the MI6 assassination unit which was at the heart of the John F. Kennedy assassination.   Source: "MI6 Are The Lords of the Global Drug Trade", by James Casbolt (Former MI6 Agent c. 2006)  

When Rosenbaum’s criminal bank (where Zakheim worked) was exposed in the mainstream media in 1975 (e.g. TIME magazine), Zakheim, an agent of the Rothschilds, was brought to Washington and began his new career as an associate analyst of National Security and International Affairs with the Congressional Budget Office.  Who did a background check on Dov Zakheim?  Zakheim’s most peculiar move from being a senior executive in a criminal Mossad banking enterprise to a position with the U.S. government happened under the reign of Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, the Rothschild's senior agent in the U.S. government.

Question with Follow-up Comment:  Why do you speak of American soldiers with sympathy in your articles? They are all cold-blooded killers and terrorist occupiers who have murdered millions of innocent Iraqis, Afghanis, Yemenis, Pakistanis, etc. U.S. soldiers are cowardly skum who deserve to be loathed, scorned and cursed in their graves.

Bollyn Responds:  I have sympathy for those who are deceived and that certainly includes most of the American soldiers serving in these criminal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  They have all been misled and deceived.  Do we blame the honest and patriotic young man who has been deceived or do we blame the billionaire master of deception who has tricked the nation into war?  Who am I to pass judgment on a person who has been deceived?   I am doing my best, as I have since September 2001, to expose the evil deception behind 9-11 and the criminal wars that we have been taken into as a result.  I have met many Americans and Europeans who have been tricked into these wars and naturally I really feel very sorry for them and their families because they either don't know or can't control what they are doing.  Many joined the military out of patriotism, like Pat Tillman, or because their parents wanted them to, like the late Dustin Brim of Daytona.  Most, of course, simply signed up because they needed the money.

Pat Tillman turned down a $3.6 million football contract to join the Army Rangers and join the "War on Terror" in Afghanistan, where he was killed by friendly fire in 2004.  Like so many others, he was deceived that the terrorists behind 9-11 had come from that poor and remote Central Asian nation.  Unfortunately, this evil deception continues.

Dustin Brim was a fine 19-year-old from Daytona.  His mother thought the Army would be good for him.  She was promised that he would not be sent into combat.  He worked with damaged tanks and vehicles in Iraq, most of which were contaminated with depleted uranium.  He had no protection against this extremely toxic poison and quickly contracted cancer.  He died age 21.

At a restaurant in Iowa we talked with our waitress who had refused to go back to Iraq after the army had made her drive trucks up and down "suicide alley" - after they had coaxed her to sign up with a $10,000 bonus.  She had been promised that she would have a safe secretarial job but soon found herself driving in fuel convoys on the most treacherous highway in Iraq.  They had lied to her and when she came home for a visit, she refused to go back.  The army wanted the $10,000 back.

Many of the U.S. soldiers are actually from National Guard units, which are not meant for foreign service.  Whether they are drafted or sign up, once these people are sent off to the war, they no longer have a choice.  Their bodies and minds belong to those who command them.  I recall seeing on CNN how the U.S. troops had a talking to before going into Falluja on their revenge mission.  Their commander told them that the people of Falluja were evil and deserved to be killed in the same way that Ilya Ehrenburg told the Soviet troops to kill without mercy the German civilians they came across as they wiped out some 2.1 million innocent Baltic and Eastern Germans at the end of World War II.

I know men who have committed mass murder.  Two that come to mind were young men during the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982, twenty eight years ago.  One was a young Israeli from Kibbutz Afikim in the Jordan Valley, where I worked as a lifeguard at the pool.  I had known this fellow since he was about 13.  His family had migrated to Israel from Argentina and he was a big and friendly boy, at least until he was forced to fight in Lebanon.  Later, he confessed to me about the murders he had committed of whole families in Lebanon during the war.  He had been a member of a tank crew and as they drove through Lebanon families would come out of their homes with white flags.  He had been commanded to fire at them, which he did.  He was very tormented by these unjustified killings and he needed to tell me what he had done.  I felt sorry for him.

More recently, I met a fellow who was involved in the massacre of Palestinians in the refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila.  Again, without asking, this person told me what he had done.  When he showed me his scars on his arms and told me that he had been in Sabra and Shatila, I was quite shocked.  These massacres are among the most horrific war crimes committed by Israel during my life.  This man was only 15 years old when he murdered many innocent people.  He is a Maronite Christian who joined the Phalange (with Elie Hobeika's unit) when he was a 13-year-old boy.  At that tender age, he was given military training in Israel at Nahariya in 1980.  When the Phalange leader Bachir Gemayel was murdered on September 14, 1982, Ariel Sharon sent the Phalange into the Palestinian camps of West Beirut, which the Israeli forces had completely surrounded.  The Phalangists, with assistance and support from Israeli forces, massacred with knives thousands of defenseless refugees during a period of three days.  The 15-year-old had been deceived by Ariel Sharon and the Israeli Mossad that the Palestinians were responsible for the Gemayel murder.  The Israeli military had trained this 13-year-old boy to kill and then used him to murder innocent Palestinians, a crime he will be burdened with forever.

Samuel Maoz, an Israeli veteran of the Israeli invasion of Lebanon of 1982, was a 20-year-old soldier (Israel has obligatory military service) when Israeli forces, under the command of defense minister Ariel Sharon, invaded. Maoz made a film about his experience as a gunner in an Israeli tank, killing hundreds of innocent civilians for no reason. This is a modern example of wrongful killing, a crime that Socrates says is the worst offense one can commit. To kill innocent people inflicts the greater harm and pain on the person who commits such killings. As Socrates has taught the world (via Plato) since about 400 years before Christ, a person who commits such injustice causes more harm to himself than he does to the sufferers of his crime. Unfortunately, this fundamental lesson is not taught to American school children -- or to Israelis. As a result, many wind up as soldiers committing wrongful killings and as a consequence suffer the eternal torment that such actions bring.  

Very much like the young Israeli kibbutznik I knew, Maoz was a gunner in a tank crew and at 6:15 a.m. on the morning of June 6, 1982, he killed a man for the first time in his life. “The rest of the people I killed in the war are just a blur,” he told the Jewish Week. “But not the first one.”  Maoz remembers an officer telling him that when he went into Lebanon, there would be people on the balconies of the apartment buildings. “You can’t open the option of morality,” he says. “He told me, ‘On 50 percent of those balconies you’ll have soldiers with anti-tank missiles. The other half will be ordinary families.’ You see, there are no good guys or bad guys -- you need to kill to stay alive.” 

Steven Erlanger of the New York Times wrote a piece about the Maoz film entitled Lebanon, which is about his actions and crimes committed during the war. For Maoz, now 48, the sense of responsibility for killing remains strong. “There is no escape from it,” he said softly. “In the end you were there, and your finger pulled the trigger…you see the result, and you can’t say you’re not responsible. Maybe in court you’re not guilty. But you can’t cleanse yourself from this guilt.”  Twenty-eight years later, Maoz said that what he did during the war remains the first thing he thinks about in the morning and the last before going to sleep. “I wish it were that simple, just to have nightmares,” he said. “That would be a nice deal to buy.”
Reader Follow-up Comment: You mentioned how a 15-year old was trained to kill in preparation of  Sabra and Shatila massacre that took place in 1982. How can someone be "deceived" to kill women and children and unarmed civilians?  ...when someone already has foreknowledge that there are civilians and yet carries out orders to kill knowingly then they're criminals - straight and simply. They're not deceived, they are killers and there's no excuse for them. If we use your logic then why not feel pity for Sharon or Ben Netanyahu and say they were deceived by their parents or his community, or relatives, or whoever it was for indoctrinating the Zionist ideology into his head to make him who he is today.  I'm not saying that they're aren't people deceived into entering a war, but the example of the 15-year old involved in the Sabra and Shatila massacre was a very poor one.

Bollyn Responds:  This is a good point.  First, this boy was only 13 when he was trained by Israelis in Israel.  His Phalangist unit was given military training for three months in Nahariya.  He was not trained to massacre Palestinians with knives, which is what he and his unit did in Sabra and Shatila.  The Israelis cultivated Maronite hatred against the Palestinians with the murder of Bachir Gemayel, as well as previous massacres and killings.  Elie Hobeika, the leader of the boy's militia unit, had secret information on what had really gone on in the camps and was ready to tell it to a court in Brussels when he was blown up in a huge car bomb in Lebanon.  Of course the actions of the boy were criminal, but I consider the real criminals to be the ones who train 13-year-old Lebanese boys and arrange such massacres in the first place and that responsibility falls squarely on the Israeli military leadership, which was the occupying power controlling access to the camps.

Question:  My question is:  Why would Jews want to bring down the World Trade Center?  I understand the Jew Silverstein wanting it for the insurance money, but why would the nation of Israel want it?  Why would Zionists want it?  Was it because they knew it would get the U.S. military to start killing Muslims?  How much control do Zionists have over the U.S. government and its policies?  Is Rockefeller a Zionist?  David Rockefeller was a Baptist, and I don't know of any that are Jews.  Zionists, perhaps?  Why would Baptist bankers, the Mossad, and Zionist Jews all be working so closely together?  That seems like a somewhat strange alliance.  Bush's brother was in charge of security at the World Trade Center and turned off the cameras the weekend before the attacks.  Are the Bushes Zionists too?

Bollyn Responds: This is an excellent set of questions that frames the subject of my next article, which has the working title "The False Flag Terror of 9/11 and Nine Years of Deception."  The media and government deception about 9/11 is massive and clearly very well concerted, but who is really behind the whole thing?  Who has that much power and influence over the U.S. government, the Israeli government, and the mass media, to carry out such a global deception?  Who wields the power behind the Zionist state?  And who does the state of Israel really serve?  Who are the real Elders of Zion?

These are the questions that will be dealt with in the next article, which will probably become the concluding chapter of my book, Solving 9-11.  In the meantime, I will provide these comments and links to give some insights into the subject:

"There is a much larger group behind these [9/11 attacks] which is the international banking cartel which controls trillions of dollars and which has an interest in controlling countries in the Middle East which are not under their control."
- Professor Steven E. Jones on KUER (Salt Lake City's NPR affiliate), September 5, 2006

I have been reading many articles on the 9-11 atrocity and other major world events. I am a 46-year-old Ashkenazi Jew from London, England.  I believe the Rothschilds and the banking conspiracy are behind EVERYTHING. When I bring the subject up with my peers and family, I am told it is anti-Semitic nonsense, probably paid for by the Saudi Arabians.
- Letter to, April 2010

The Rothschilds are the ultimate financiers of the state of Israel (along with the U.S. Treasury), the Likud terror gang, and the Mossad.  The Rothschilds are also the ultimate owners of the Federal Reserve System and through JP Morgan, of BP.  A BP oil tanker was the first to be filled with stolen Iraqi oil under the U.S.-led occupation, headed by Jerry Bremer of Kissinger Associates.  During the entire time that Bremer controlled the "sales" of Iraqi oil there was no accounting of how much oil was being loaded onto tankers.  See "Ownership of the Federal Reserve" at

The current cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is more than $1 trillion, i.e. more than one thousand billion dollars.  This works out to more than $9,000 per American household or $7,650 per U.S. taxpayer.  See -  Who benefits from the massive U.S. government debt? 


The following extracts are taken from Paul Goldstein's 1978 article entitled, “B'nai B'rith, British Weapon Against America”:

The B'nai B'rith, as the oligarchy's agents-in-place in America, has functioned as the clearinghouse for British subversion against the American republic. Therefore, the story of the B'nai B'rith, its Isis-cult roots, its 136-year record of treason against the United States, is essential to understanding who and what our enemy is, how it operates, and how we will destroy it...

Financing for the British colonization scheme was arranged by Queen Victoria's "favorite Jew" Sir Moses Montefiore, who, along with his brother-in-law Nathaniel Rothschild, used their financial conduits in the United States as a major feature of the plan. The Montefiore Society, the North American Relief Society for Poor Jews in Palestine, the Widows' and Orphan Fund, plus dozens of other benevolent societies, provided the funds to establish a "Jewish homeland"…

The point to be understood about these early developments in the U.S. is twofold. First, the British had to create the conditions for imposing upon American Jews the belief that the American notion of progress and assimilation could not be allowed to occur. Therefore the need for a "separate" Jewish organization based on the mythos of Zion, on the return to the "promised land of Palestine," had to be infused into American Jewish thinking as the only chance Jews had for true salvation…At the time [Samuel] Morse wrote [1860], the B'nai B'rith was a British intelligence cult dedicated to the destruction of the American Republic. It was an arm of British intelligence with that chartered purpose at the time of its founding in 1843, and remains so to this day…

B'nai B'rith emerged in 1842 as the American extension of the "Jewish" Rite of Freemasonry in America.  According to the history of B'nai B'rith by Edward Grusd, "the mastermind" behind the early growth of this Jewish Masonic order was Baruch Rothschild, relative of the original Meyer Amshel Rothschild who founded the family banking dynasty in 18th century Germany.

Baruch Rothschild, from Bavaria, was trustee of account No. 10,744, a bank account for the Zion Widow and Orphan Society, which was the B'nai B'rith.  The B'nai B'rith was created by the Rothschild family.

Rothschild was sent into the B'nai B'rith shortly after its founding to launch a ''membership drive" because, as he himself put it, "the members were not all equally well educated and of far different mental capacities." In short, B'nai B'rith was not for just any Jew. Through Rothschild's building job, it was to become an intelligence executive body, whose leaders would subsequently play controlling roles in other British networks, directing the Abolitionist-Slaveholder confrontations of the 1840s and 1850s, the Secession of the South that produced the Civil War, the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, and numerous post-war destabilizations of the American Republic. - “B'nai B'rith, British Weapon Against America”, by Paul Goldstein, The Campaigner, December 1978

Question:  Recently, the editor of Uncensored magazine (New Zealand) sent me an e-copy of your e-book Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World.  Wow!  I thought I knew a lot, but your book reveals/exposes so much more and connects all the dots!  So far, I've only read the first 50 pages and I must say, it is certainly one of the best books on this topic.  I can't wait to read more... I will certainly be telling everyone I know about your book and website, which I spent hours reading the other day.  Excellent!  I could see the years and depth of research that has gone into your work.  Good on you!

Question -  Is a hard copy of your book available?  If so, where and how much?  A few people I know have been asking.

Bollyn Responds:  No.  My book has not been published, so the only way to get a hard copy is to print the book out from my website.  This is the easiest way to get the information to the widest audience anywhere in the world for the least cost.  I provide the information, the reader provides the paper and printer. The complete book (in its current edition) and the nine years of background articles I have written about 9-11 can all be printed out free of charge by clicking on the online book section of Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World.  There is an easily printed pdf version of the book or you can go to the Table of Contents and select the individual chapters and articles by clicking on the bold blue titles.  There are about 150 articles from 2001 through 2009 that can be accessed through the table of contents or the archives found in the left-hand margin.

Question:  I have read your essay about The Coming American Revolution, which includes the following statement: "Armed resistance, on the other hand, such as that of the Hezbollah in south Lebanon, is the legally and morally justified resistance to an armed invasion. The Intifadah of Palestine is fully justified as the legal resistance to the illegal occupation of Palestinian land. These resistance movements are defensive, essential, and legal and I certainly would not condemn them." 

Christopher, I agree with most of what you write, but I don't see how you can allow the use of violence for armed resistance (Palestine, Iraq, and Afghanistan) and disallow it for armed rebellion (in the USA or UK). If the people of Palestine, Iraq, and Afghanistan have the right to fight for their freedom by whatever means necessary, why shouldn't the people of the USA have the same right? Surely not because we have 'elected' our representatives. Your own critique of voting machines and elitist control of the political parties, the political process, and the media, demonstrates that the institution of government in the USA is not representative or consensual.  

9/11 demonstrated unequivocally that the elitist rulers of the USA have no respect for the lives of US citizens. The claim to authority by the US government over US citizens was certainly broken on 9/11. Why shouldn't an American have the same right to fight for their freedom as the people of Palestine, Iraq, and Afghanistan have?

Bollyn Responds: The statement about legally and morally justified resistance to an armed invasion is actually from my Statement on the Importance of Non-Violence.  In "The Coming American Revolution" I wrote this about violence and revolutions:

Revolutions are usually associated with violence, but they don't have to be.  Since 1990, half the nations of Europe and Asia have gone through peaceful revolutions that replaced the former dictatorships of the once mighty Soviet Union.  The apartheid regime of South Africa also came to an end without violence.  The revolution to restore the sovereignty of the American people certainly need not be violent, and really should not be.

This is an excellent question and most appropriate for July 4, when we celebrate the signing of the Declaration of Independence, which articulates the fundamental political philosophy of the American Revolution.  I am in complete agreement with the signers of July 4, 1776:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.

Ben Franklin, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson working on the Declaration of Independence

I think the American form of government, as enshrined in the Constitution, is a truly excellent system of government.  The U.S. Constitution has been adopted by other nations.  Switzerland, for example, used the U.S. Constitution as their model and it has worked very well.  The primary difference is that in Switzerland the legislative branch has more power than the executive branch.  They did not want an all-powerful president, which I think was a wise decision.  In the United States, the executive branch has far too much power having taken over powers that rightfully belong with the people's representatives.  The right to declare war, for example, belongs to the U.S. Congress - not the president.

There are many reasons why I am opposed to the use of violence in the struggle to reclaim our lost sovereignty in the United States of America.  Firstly, because it is neither called for nor would it be effective.  Americans have lost their sovereignty because they have not been vigilant or engaged.  If one compares the Swiss system to ours it is clear that the citizens of Switzerland are much more involved in the running of their confederation.  If we were to liken our two states to gardens we could say that the Swiss garden is carefully maintained, watered, and weeded.  The American garden, on the other hand, has been neglected and has become terribly overgrown with noxious weeds that have taken over and suffocated the beautiful flowers and bushes that were planted by the original gardeners 234 years ago. 

The American system gives citizens the power to choose their representatives.  The just powers of our government come only with the consent of the governed.  This is how our democratic franchise is supposed to work
.  The fundamental problem with the American republic today is that this representation has become a fiction because our elections are fraudulent.  Our presidents and Congressmen do not represent the American people but are beholden to the people who put them in power, i.e.  the people who own and control the electronic voting machine systems used across the United States.  These people have stolen our sovereignty but maintain the fiction that the American people still elect their representatives.  Anyone who has been involved in U.S. elections knows that the whole two-party system is rigged, from the control of the parties and selection of candidates to the counting of votes.  Both political parties are owned by big money and special interest groups.

The most effective way to restore the stolen sovereignty to the American people is to restore integrity and transparency to our elections.  The only way to get our nation back is to return to hand-counted paper ballots in every polling place across the United States.  The American people can do this without violence.

Question:  RE:  “Why Do Jews Commit Massacres?” 

Very well-written article. They accept no rules but the ones they choose to accept.  However, what I'm wondering now is why can't they even understand why the rest of the more-sane world is viewing them as sociopaths??  Unless, of course, they actually are sociopaths as well as pathological liars

Bollyn Responds: 
This is an excellent question that goes directly to the serious antisocial personality disorder of the "Jewish state" of Israel.  The world is a society of nations, and like individuals, nations have personalities.  The state of Israel, a racial/tribal state in which orthodox rabbis have a great deal of influence over laws and policies, clearly has an antisocial personality disorder.  The question is:  Do Israelis not understand that the rest of the world views their state as sociopathic?  This question raises another:  If Israel is a sociopathic state, how did it become sociopathic?

To understand what is meant by sociopaths and sociopathic disorder I recommend reading Profile of the Sociopath at

A sociopath is a psychopath with strongly antisocial tendencies.  In the 1800s this personality disorder was called "moral insanity." By 1900 it had changed to "psychopathic personality" and is now called "antisocial personality disorder."

Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD or APD) is defined by the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) as "a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others." 

The state of
Israel has a long history of showing "disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others" and consistently displays the following behaviors, which are common features of sociopathic people:

Sociopaths never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behavior as permissible. They may appear to be charming, but are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims.

They have no problem lying and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. They can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities.

They have a deep seated rage, which is split off and repressed, at their core. They do not see others around them as people, but only as targets and opportunities. Instead of friends, they have victims and accomplices who end up as victims. The end always justifies the means and they let nothing stand in their way.

When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises.

They are unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others' feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them.

They believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing, and entitled to every wish.  They show no sense of personal boundaries and have no concern for their impact on others.  They may even state that their goal is to rule the world.  Their goal is the enslavement of their victim(s) and they seek to exercise despotic control over every aspect of the victim's life.

The sociopath does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed.  A sociopath does not perceive that anything is wrong with them.

There is a disregard for and violation of the right's of others, those right's considered normal by the local culture (or international law).  ASPD is indicated by at least three of the following.  I have indicated those behaviors which Israel displays consistently:

    A. Repeated acts that could lead to arrest.  (Israel often violates international law, e.g. war crimes in Gaza and Lebanon, and the recent piracy and murders committed against the Freedom Flotilla.)

    B. Conning for pleasure or profit, repeated lying, or the use of aliases.  (Israel is constantly conning the U.S. government and always lies about its actions.  Israelis often use aliases, even committing Mossad murders using stolen identities of foreigners visiting Israel.)

    C. Failure to plan ahead or being impulsive.  (Israel is often taking actions that backfire.  Are such blunders really intentional?)

    D. Repeated assaults on others.  (Israel has attacked all of its neighbors and nations far away.  Nearly all of its assaults have been illegal under international law.)

    E. Reckless when it comes to their or others safety.  (The aggressive and illegal actions of the Israeli state put all Israelis and Jews at risk.  They claim to be acting on behalf of the Jewish people but their reckless actions increase the dangers for all Jews, even those who have nothing to do with Israel.)

    F. Poor work behavior or failure to honor financial obligations.  (Israel never actually repays its loans from the U.S.  These loans are all eventually rolled onto the U.S. taxpayer, who winds up footing the Israeli bill.)

    G. Rationalizing the pain they inflict on others.  (Israel always rationalizes the pain and suffering they inflict on the Palestinian and Lebanese.  Israel even blames the Freedom Flotilla for the deaths of the nine people killed by Israeli Defense Forces – on the high seas.)

If one considers the behavior of the state of Israel, as expressed through the actions and words of its leaders, especially since the late-1970s when the extreme right-wing Likud Party came to power, one can easily see that Israel – as a state – displays all the symptoms of antisocial personality disorder.  It should be remembered that the Likud Party of prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu is the political party of the former Irgun terrorists, headed by such notorious Zionist terrorists as Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir.  A political party founded by mass murderers and terrorists certainly must be seen as having antisocial tendencies.

Although many clinicians use the terms psychopath and sociopath interchangeably, a sociopath's criminal behavior is shaped by social forces and is the result of a dysfunctional environment, according to psychopath expert Robert Hare in his book Without Conscience


The Israeli state acts without conscience or respect for international law or the norms of civilized society.  This is why I call Israeli behavior "amoral" rather than "immoral".  Israelis do not act according to the moral standards of the civilized world but follow a completely different set of rules based on the Talmud, which apply only to them.  The Talmudic laws that guide the behavior of orthodox Jews (and Israelis) turn the Ten Commandments on their head and discriminate between Jews and non-Jews, who are seen as less-than-human beasts.  (See Israel Shahak's excellent book Jewish History, Jewish Religion online.)  It is important to note that the key people involved in the 9-11 crime and cover-up are all Israelis, orthodox Jews, and rabbis (e.g. Alvin K. Hellerstein, Michael Chertoff, and Dov Zakheim).

Orthodox Judaism as defined by the rabbis (i.e. Talmudic teaching) is the basis of the "antisocial religion," which is the origin of the "social forces" and "dysfunctional environment" behind the antisocial personality disorder of the state of Israel.  Orthodox Jewish children are raised with a supremacist worldview that Jews are superior to all other people and that non-Jews exist only to serve Jews.  This sociopathic doctrine of Jewish supremacism is taught to all Israeli children, even those from non-religious families.  The discrimination against non-Jews is reinforced by the language of the Jews, which calls a non-Jewish woman a "shiksa" and a non-Jewish man a "shegetz".  The Hebrew root word of both is "shegua", which means something so foul that it cannot be touched.

Tacitus, the Roman senator and historian of the 1st Century, described the antisocial behavior of the Jews, which were part of the Roman Empire of his time:  "Among the Jews all things are profane that we hold sacred; on the other hand they regard as permissible what seems to us immoral."

The antisocial essence of the Jewish religion is caused by "the hatred" (i.e. "the deep seated rage" of sociopaths) with which they confront the "rest of the world", as Tacitus wrote:

The other practices of the Jews are sinister and revolting, and have entrenched themselves by their very wickedness. Wretches of the most abandoned kind who had no use for the religion of their fathers took to contributing dues and free-will offerings to swell the Jewish exchequer; and other reasons for their increasing wealth may be found in their stubborn loyalty and ready benevolence towards brother Jews. But the rest of the world they confront with the hatred reserved for enemies.

Question:  How do you prove if a person has been exposed to Depleted Uranium (DU) and what can a person do about the health problems it causes, such as brittle teeth? Does the Veterans Administration (VA) have a policy to help and compensate veterans?  I am a retired Army officer, my son was in Iraq with the first group that went in. He was there for 13 months. His job included evacuation of blown out damaged and destroyed armor vehicles, artillery, and tanks from the battle field along with moving troops in and out the front lines. He has a series of health issues that I believe are a result of his time in Iraq (including brittle teeth since he returned) and it is taking a toll. I find it hard for the VA not to acknowledge there is a problem when there is so much documentation and research on the subject. Something needs to be done to help veterans like my son with this.

Bollyn Responds:  This is a very relevant question because there are currently more than 800,000 disabled vets from the Gulf War Era (300,000 from Desert Storm in 1991 and 500,000 from Operation Iraqi Freedom since 2003).   I have written a series of articles about the very real health damage caused by the use of depleted uranium.  These articles are ground-breaking in that they explain the extreme danger of what is called "the particle effect," which is caused by exposure to nano-size particles of DU. 

To see if there had been any changes in the position of the military regarding DU exposure, I turned first to the VA website where I found that they still deny the existence of any health problems among vets related to depleted uranium: 

Health Problems Associated with Depleted Uranium  

DU is a health hazard if it enters the body, such as through embedded fragments, contaminated wounds, and inhalation or ingestion. Simply riding in a vehicle with DU weapons or DU shielding will not expose a service member to significant amounts of DU or external radiation.   The potential for health effects from internal exposure is related to the amount of DU that enters a person’s body.

So far no health problems associated with DU exposure have been found in Veterans exposed to DU. Researchers and clinicians continue to monitor the health of these Veterans. Go to the Department of Defense's Depleted Uranium (DU) Library* to learn about results of medical and scientific research and other DU topics.


Although the VA claims it has found "no health problems" from DU exposure, the following section on VA Benefits certainly says otherwise:  "Veterans who were exposed to depleted uranium during military service may be eligible for health care benefits."  The VA also says it provides "disability compensation benefits for disabilities that VA determines are associated with depleted uranium exposure." 

Why would veterans exposed to DU be eligible for health care  and disability benefits if the VA claims there are "no health problems associated with DU exposure"?  This makes no sense.

I then contacted Doug Rokke, a U.S. Army (ret.) expert on the effects of DU. In previous interviews Rokke had informed me that he suffered from brittle teeth as a result of his exposure to DU. I asked Rokke about the problem with brittle teeth among vets. 

This is a "severe" problem, Rokke said. He lost all of his teeth due to DU. "They disintegrate," he said. This he said is caused by DU's effect on phosphorus and calcium.  Asked about the VA claim that "no health problems" have been found related to DU exposure, Rokke said, "They lie through their teeth." They know all about the serious health problems caused by DU but are unwilling to acknowledge the connection. 

Comment from a relative of a 9-11 victim:  I am so shocked and horrified by the information I am reading here. My dear cousin Tom was the co-pilot on American Airlines Flight 11 and I believe he was one of the first to die that day.  Reading that the government of Israel had advance knowledge of this, that the so-called movers were actually Israeli operatives exposes Israel in a light I had never before imagined, yet I cannot disregard. The tragic death of this husband and father, as well as all the other innocent lives lost that day, is brutally compounded by the complicity of one of this nation's allies.

Bollyn Responds:  This poignant comment from a relative describes our common 9-11 predicament very well.  The evidence of Israeli (and Zionist agents) involvement in the terror atrocity cannot be disregarded.  The events of 9-11 (and the subsequent cover-up of the truth) are of much greater historical importance than simply being the seminal events of the fraudulent "War on Terror."  The false-flag terror atrocity of 9-11 is the harbinger of a revolutionary change in world history.  The role of our corrupt political systems and the controlled media in the cover-up of what really happened on 9-11, and the growing awareness of this evil deception, presents us with a pregnant political situation which can only be called pre-revolutionary.  The official version of 9-11 has been proven to be nothing but a pack of treasonous lies.  The political status quo, in which the Zionist-controlled political establishment exploits blatant lies about 9-11 to carry out illegal wars of aggression and impose draconian "homeland security" policies on the American population is neither acceptable nor tenable in the long run.  The tremors that precede the upheaval can already be felt.

Question:  I just wish that you had footnoted your writings.  I would love to believe you, but without sources backing up your facts, it makes it difficult.

Bollyn Responds:  This skeptical reader raises a very good point.  In my articles written as a professional journalist (2000- October 2006) I always provided the sources of the information in the text.  Since 2007, when I began writing my book Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World, I mention the sources in the text (as a journalist should) and give the details and location of the material at the end.  By providing the documents and sources of the information I try to make it easy for the reader to check the veracity of the information found in my articles and see it in its full context.  I am certainly not asking for anyone to "believe" anything I write.  One publisher sent my chapter on the Architecture of Terror to an independent and professional fact checker in Britain.  The fact checker was actually opposed to my hypothesis that Israel was involved in the terrorism of 9-11 and examined more than 100 points or facts that I present in this key chapter.  Every one of them was found to be correct.  As Professor Steven E. Jones would say, "The data doesn't lie." 

Question:  We met in the summer of 2005 when you brought William Rodriquez [9-11 survivor from the World Trade Center] to speak at the Schaumburg Library [Illinois]. You mention in your notice to Eric Hufschmid that you categorize him with Mike Piper and Darrel Bradford Smith – why?  You also referred to Victor Thorn who seems to have lifted some of your ideas about Zionist involvement in 9/11.  Are Piper and Smith disinformation agents? 

I have Piper's Final Judgment.  I think your research is impeccable and felt badly when you "left" AFP. Your online 9/11 book is amazing. I hope that you and your family are happy and secure. I have noted that people who divulge too much truth, like Sterling, Peggy Seagrave, and yourself receive similar treatment and have to flee.

Bollyn Responds: This is a good question about a subject that I don't usually delve into, but which certainly deserves to be discussed because it concerns the role of the Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) as the source of much of the deception and evil that afflicts our world today. 

The people you ask about:  Hufschmid, Piper, Smith, and Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Victor Thorn), are four detractors who have spent years attacking me and waging a vicious campaign of slander and libel against me and my family.
   What these agents of deception have done is spread lies and calumnies about me, my wife and children in an effort to discredit me and damage my credibility and reputation. Smith revealed how this vicious slander campaign works in a taped telephone conversation with Eric Hufschmid. I have written about this in an article entitled "Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can", which is exactly what Smith told Hufschmid to do. Why would Smith want to "slam" me, an honest journalist and leading 9-11 researcher?   


While Hufschmid has not attacked me as maliciously as the others, he has made the ridiculous claim since the summer of 2007 that I have been kidnapped by the Mossad. Using this bizarre claim (which he stubbornly maintains despite abundant proof to the contrary) he says that my writing is "bait" approved by Israeli intelligence. Although he employs a different method, Hufschmid's slander against me has achieved the same result. He has successfully sown suspicion about my credibility and drawn attention to me as a person while completely marginalizing my 9-11 research, which he has ignored since 2007.    

To understand what this slander campaign is really all about, and who is behind it, we need to employ some Socratic dialectic. We will start by asking a simple question: Are these people attacking me as a defensive tactic because I have attacked them or treated them badly?  

No. I have not wronged any of these people and not even discussed them until after they began attacking me. As a matter of fact, I have helped all of them a great deal. I helped Piper, for example, with his RBN radio show when I filled in for him for several weeks in a row, while on the road with my family in the West during the summer of 2006. This required a great deal of time and effort on my part - with absolutely no compensation. Does Piper do his daily show from free?   

I also helped Piper by appearing several times as a guest on his show, as I did for Hufschmid and Smith's "French Connection" show. While I agreed to be interviewed by Piper, Hufschmid, and Smith, I have always worked as an independent journalist (for Spotlight and AFP from 2000 until October 2006) and was never affiliated with any of them in any way.  I have been interviewed by many people.  Being interviewed by a person or having my material posted on somebody's website does not indicate any deeper association than that.  The attempts to link me with Hufschmid and Smith are part of an intel trap to discredit my work by connecting me with them.  Piper always introduced me with fulsome praise, calling me "America's best journalist, bar none." Piper, Hufschmid, and Smith have, as a matter of fact, all greatly relied on and gained from the original 9-11 research I have done. None of them can say that they have suffered because of knowing me. So why do they attack me?

Christopher Bollyn (left) and Darrel Setters (a.k.a. Darrel Bradford Smith) at Smith's home in central France, the morning after Thanksgiving 2005

Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) wrote a book about Israel’s role in the 9-11 attacks (that I have not read), which must contain a great deal of my research. Thorn’s book was published by American Free Press, where I worked from 2000 until October 2006. 

Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Victor Thorn)
Although I was the first journalist to write about the Israeli role in the 9-11 attacks and have done far more research (for eight years) than any other writer on the subject, AFP was never interested in doing a book about 9-11 with me. This is an intelligence tactic called “stealing the thunder.” If AFP were truly interested in exposing the Israeli role in 9-11, why have they not asked to publish my ground-breaking book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World?
So, what have I done to deserve being subjected to the vicious and concerted campaign of calumny, slander, and libel? What is it that I have done that bothers them so much that they spend time attacking me?

This is easy. Apart from raising my family, for the past eight years my only vocation has been to research and write about the false-flag terrorism of 9-11. As an investigative journalist I have led the way in investigating the role of Israeli intelligence and Zionist agents in the United States in the terror attacks of 9-11.

If my 9-11 research and writing is the reason these detractors are attacking me with slander and libel, who are they doing it for?

It stands to reason that these four are working as agents of an agency that is interested in my research being discredited and marginalized. Because my thesis is that the state of Israel and Zionists in the U.S. are behind 9-11, these must be the same entities behind the anti-Bollyn slander campaign. This makes sense because well-known Zionist entities such as Rupert Murdoch’s FOX News, CNN, and the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz have all tried to smear me as an anti-Semite.

Are these four detractors connected with a Zionist agency or the state of Israel?

Eric Hufschmid’s father, with whom he works closely, is the father of the wife of Rupert Murdoch’s son James, heir apparent of the Murdoch media empire. Smith is a former narcotics user who has several felony convictions that were suddenly cleared up immediately before he began his career with “The French Connection” in early 2005.

Piper and Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) work for a newspaper called American Free Press, where I worked as an independent contractor (since the fall of 2001) after being hired in the spring of 2000. AFP claims to be an employee-owned newspaper, which is a deception meant to fool readers. AFP has no assets to own. Everything of value associated with the Liberty Lobby and American Free Press is held by a host of shell companies with names like “The Committee to Expose Bunk”, which issued my paychecks, for example. Michael Piper is one of the people allowed to sign checks from these entities.

The person who is the mastermind of the shell game involving the assets of the Liberty Lobby is Mark Lane, the Jewish lawyer who played a crucial role in the massacre at Jonestown, Guyana. 

Mark Lane (center) was present at Jonestown during the massacre.  He is considered to have played a key role in provoking the massacre by playing on the fears of Jim Jones.  This photo with Jones (left) was taken shortly before the mass suicide/massacre.  How odd that Lane became the lawyer, and then owner of the Liberty Lobby several years later.

Lane has been the lawyer of the Liberty Lobby since the mid-1980s and received some $5 million in legal fees, according to a veteran Liberty Lobby insider. Lane, who served in U.S. Army Intelligence in Germany at the end of the war, acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1993 or 1994, according to L.T. Patterson (owner of Criminal Politics), who discovered this fact during a court process in which Lane was suing Patterson.

Who does Lane work for?

Lane must work for the C.I.A. Having worked for Army Intelligence in the mid-1940s, it stands to reason that Lane became one of the head honchos in the Jewish intelligence cabal in Army Intelligence that became the C.I.A. in 1949. This would explain Lane’s role in his writings on the Warren Report, the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War, Jonestown, and the so-called patriot movement at the Liberty Lobby.

But isn’t the C.I.A. working to protect the nation and the people of the United States?

Obviously not. The C.I.A. was criticized for being asleep at the switch on 9-11, but it is really much worse than that. The C.I.A. actually works against the interests of the republic and the American people. The C.I.A. is obviously deeply involved in the commission of the terrorism crime of 9-11. Rather than preventing 9-11 or finding the culprits of the atrocity, the C.I.A. has been exploiting the 9-11 deception to wage war using drone warfare in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Asked about the C.I.A. attacks in Pakistan, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton responded as if she had no legal authority or control over the C.I.A., which was a remarkably candid response from a U.S. Secretary of State. Her response indicated that the C.I.A. is a rogue agency that acts outside the control of the U.S. administration. How can that be?

What is the C.I.A.’s interest in Afghanistan and Pakistan?

The C.I.A. is clearly not interested in solving 9-11 or finding the culprits. We know that the Twin Towers were demolished using an advanced form of super-thermite (produced using nano-technology) and that the official version that Osama Bin Laden carried out 9-11 from a cave in Afghanistan is nothing but a pack of lies. The C.I.A. is involved in Afghanistan because that’s where most of the world’s opium is produced. George H.W. Bush, the former director of the C.I.A., was also a director of the Eli Lilly Company, the pharmaceutical giant that manufactures Prozac. Bush was also one of the first students at Israel’s Yonatan [Netanyahu] Institute of terrorism in 1979. Since the production of opium has skyrocketed since the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, we can assume that opium production is one of the purposes of the war and occupation. Prior to the invasion of 2001, the Taliban regime, which the U.S. is fighting against, had succeeded in eradicating nearly all opium production in Afghanistan.

This explains why American Free Press was so strongly opposed to my articles about the dangerous effects of Prozac and similar drugs. When Ellen Mariani, a 9-11 widow, told me that the grieving relatives had been sent to Red Cross doctors who had prescribed Prozac – the editor at AFP cut it out of the story. My subsequent articles about serotonin-affecting drugs and school shootings were rejected out-of-hand. This was clearly a subject that the American Free Press did not want to take up.

One has to remember what Andreas von Bülow said about intelligence agencies in December 2001: ”Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation.” The first target of the deception and disinformation of the C.I.A. is the people of the United States. This is a rogue agency that must be disbanded if the American republic is to survive. The C.I.A. is no sacred cow, some sacrosanct institution that can be allowed to carry out its own agenda, wage war, and maintain secret prisons, all in the name of our democratic American republic. The C.I.A. is a rogue agency that is obviously an enemy of American democracy. The United States of America cannot survive as a democratic republic with the C.I.A. operating as the shadow government. The C.I.A. is nothing but a band of organized criminals operating under the guise of the United States. By dissolving the C.I.A. we would obtain answers to many of the crimes committed in the past 60 years.

Question:  I am making an appeal that you repost the following important articles on your website or link to them somewhere. They are increasingly getting harder to find on the Internet. Many sites just link back to your site and yet they are no longer available at Some people are just beginning to wake up – they really need to hear what happened and understand the nature and character of Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith. I hope to see this information on your site again soon.
Bollyn Responds:  I have recently received quite a few questions about my detractors, namely Michael Piper, Daryl B. Smith, and Eric Hufschmid.  I have reposted these articles under the section entitled The Cure for DisinfoAs the former German intelligence chief Andreas von Buelow told me in December 2001, “Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation.”  Marion Fulk, the retired scientist of the Manhattan Project and Livermore Lab, used to tell me that the government “has buildings full of agents” to do their dirty work.  When we would go to a restaurant in Livermore after a day spent studying the effects of depleted uranium, there would be several agents tailing us and listening to our conversation.  My detractors and those who slander and libel me are working for such people.  The truth is coming out and we can all see who has been working for the truth and who has not.  The functions of Michael Piper and sticky fly-paper operations like American Free Press are a bit more complicated and something I will take up in the next question.

Marion Fulk (left) and Christopher Bollyn at Fulk’s home in Livermore, California
Question of April 14:  In human history, are you aware of examples in which the entire population of a country believed in a lie for years, then discovered the lie?  Does recognition of truth happen rapidly?  What is the usual outcome?  What do you predict Mr. Bollyn?

The Katyn Massacre Memorial

Bollyn Responds:  Big lies are really not that unusual, especially when massacres are involved. History is littered with them.  The Katyn Massacre comes to mind. The recent crash of the plane of the Polish president and 96 others has brought this extremely painful “Big Lie” back into the spotlight.  The Katyn Massacre was the mass murder of some 22,000 Polish nationals by the Soviet secret police, a massacre which had been approved by the entire Soviet Politburo, including Joseph Stalin, Britain’s ally in its “unnecessary war” against Germany. Nazi Germany announced the discovery of mass graves in the Katyn Forest in 1943 and was immediately blamed - without a single stitch of evidence - by the Allies and Western media for the atrocity.  Hitler actually called for an investigation into the killings, although it was not until 1990 that the Soviet Union officially acknowledged and condemned the perpetration of the killings by the Soviet NKVD, and the subsequent cover-up.

The Ground Zero Cross
The massacre and terror atrocity of 9-11 are very similar to the Katyn Massacre.  The blame was wrongly placed on Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida – without any evidence - in order to usher in the pre-planned “War on Terror” with an illegal invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, and subsequently Iraq.  The crucial evidence of the crime of 9-11 was quickly destroyed and a politically controlled non-investigation managed under the direction of Michael Chertoff, a dedicated agent of the actual culprits – Israeli intelligence and their Zionist quislings in the United States. 

Michael Chertoff was the key person responsible for the destruction of the evidence of 9-11 – and the cover-up.  Chertoff, the son of an Israeli Mossad agent named Livia Eisen, is an Israeli by birth. 
The Zionist-controlled media ignored the evidence of Israeli involvement and pushed the official version, which is really nothing more than a pack of lies.  Nothing good will ever come from such evil deceit, and nothing good has come from the lies surrounding 9-11.   For more than 8 years the world has been deceived about what really happened on 11 September 2001 and why we are engaged in the War on Terror - but the truth is coming out.  The dam of lies and deceit is breaking and it is no longer possible to hold back the Truth.  The culprits and those who have assisted the cover-up are becoming very uncomfortable.  The liars and rats of the 9-11 deception will be washed away by the flood waters of Truth.

The Dedication of the Cross
Comment of April 9:  Dear Mr Bollyn. I am one of your fans. I thought you would like this article, in case you did not read it yet. I wonder if Mr. Wilkerson [Col. Lawrence B.] might be one of many “whistle blowers” who come to light in coming weeks and months? 

George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld covered up that hundreds of innocent men were sent to the Guantánamo Bay prison camp because they feared that releasing them would harm the push for war in Iraq and the broader War on Terror, according to a new document obtained by The Times.

Donald Rumsfeld believed that releasing the innocent detainees would harm the Administration, according to a signed declaration by a top aide to Colin Powell.

The accusations were made by Lawrence Wilkerson, a top aide to Colin Powell, the former Republican Secretary of State, in a signed declaration to support a lawsuit filed by a Guantánamo detainee. It is the first time that such allegations have been made by a senior member of the Bush Administration.
Colonel Wilkerson, who was General Powell’s chief of staff when he ran the State Department, was most critical of Mr Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld. He claimed that the former Vice-President and Defence Secretary knew that the majority of the initial 742 detainees sent to Guantánamo in 2002 were innocent but believed that it was “politically impossible to release them”.

Who said never again?  Guantanamo is a real concentration camp in our time.  Children as young as 12 and 13 and elderly as old as 92 or 93 were taken to Gitmo.  Why are the people behind this outrageous crime being protected from prosecution?  When will President Obama close the Gitmo Gulag and begin an investigation of the abuses committed there?  Why delay what has to be done?
Answer:  Yes, there will certainly be others coming forward who will expose the lies and deception of 9-11 and the Zionist fraud known as the “War on Terror.”  The real question is when and what kind of legal action will follow to investigate and punish those who are really behind 9-11 and the subsequent ”War on Terror” that has destroyed so many lives?  I recommend Andy Worthington’s article of April 14. “Wilkerson Demolishes Bush, Cheney, And Rumsfeld’s Lies About Guantanamo” in The Public Record:

For Col. Wilkerson, who remains “extremely concerned that the Armed Forces of the United States, where I spent 31 years of my professional life, were deeply involved in these tragic mistakes,” the need for accountability has a particularly personal meaning, but for the rest of us, it should be no less important that torture was used to justify an illegal war, that it infected the U.S. military, that those who authorized it remain free to continue spreading their poisonous lies (in Dick Cheney’s case, at least), and that men continue to languish in Guantánamo as a result of it — and also as a result of the Obama administration’s unwillingness, or refusal to confront the very facts that Col. Wilkerson has disclosed.

Worthington’s article is at:

Wilkerson’s signed statement (pdf) of March 24, 2010 is here.

Question of April 6:  Dear Mr. Bollyn:  I have been reading many articles on the 9-11 atrocity and other major world events. I am a 46-year-old Ashkenazi Jew from London, England.  I believe the Rothschilds and the banking conspiracy are behind EVERYTHING. When I bring the subject up with my peers and family, I am told it is anti-Semitic nonsense, probably paid for by the Saudi Arabians.  If there is no actual proof, and the Rothschilds are so powerful, please help me to understand why so much data is available on the Internet.  Am I missing something?  Surely the Rothschilds would be able to prevent this data surfacing under libel or slander laws, or anti-defamation.  Thank you. I look forward to your reply.

Answer:  Yes, the Rothschilds are behind much of what goes on – especially when it concerns the outlaw state of Israel.  The Rothschild family was the prime mover and financier of the Zionist project to settle Russian and Polish Jews in Palestine.  The 1917 Balfour Declaration which promised British support for a home for world Jewry in Palestine was addressed to Lord Rothschild (Lionel Walter, 2nd Baron Rothschild 1868-1937), head of the English branch of the Jewish banking family – and unofficial head of British Jewry.  The Balfour Declaration gave great impetus to the Zionist movement that eventually resulted in the state of Israel.  The Rothschild bankers were obviously calling the shots in Britain in 1917.  Lionel’s father, the 1st Baron Rothschild, was able in 1875 to give £4,000,000 to Britain’s first Jewish prime minister, D’Israeli (later Disraeli), to become the principal stockholder in the Suez Canal Company.
Prior to World War I Zionism represented only a minority of Jews, mostly from Russia, but led by Austrian and German Jews.  By 1914 there were about 90,000 Jews in Palestine; 13,000 settlers lived in 43 Jewish agricultural settlements, many of them supported by the French Jew Baron Edmond de Rothschild.

The Rothschilds are able to control governments by being primary lenders of money to national banks, like the Federal Reserve.  In the past 40 years the United States has gone from being the largest creditor nation to becoming the largest debtor nation.  This is how the U.S. has lost its independence and much of its felicity.  The greater the debt, the greater the control gained by the international bankers like the Rothschilds. (to be continued…)

Question of April 2:  I just listened to Dr. Sabrosky’s broadcast. He was pretty convincing although I felt he was a little short on details. He seemed to place a great deal of his case on the fall of WTC 7, but never once did he say anything about Larry Silverstein and only one very brief mention of nano-thermite.  9-11 was such a complicated operation and required the cooperation of many people.  I’m sure you have told us before, but why was it necessary to bring down WTC 7?  The fall of WTC 7 is so obviously controlled demolition, why would those responsible take the risk of exposing their crime by demolishing 7 in this way? There had to have been something in that building that was so important to make it worth their great risk to demolish it. Or did they simply feel so confident that they could do this in plain sight and have complete confidence in their control of our government and media?

Answer:  The demolition of WTC 7 is the event that revealed to Dr. Alan Sabrosky and Dr. Steven Jones (and many others) that the official version of 9-11 is a pack of lies.  Destroying WTC 7 was obviously crucial to the whole false-flag terror operation.  There are two main explanations for this.  First, it may have housed equipment and personnel that played a role in the destruction of the WTC towers, for example in the specially fortified bunker on the 22nd or 23rd floor. 

Secondly, it housed the offices of federal agencies involved in investigations of serious financial crimes.  The destruction of the evidence would have been crucial in both cases.  The vault beneath WTC 6 held much of the evidence for the federal agencies in WTC 7 and this vault was evidently cleaned out the night before 9-11, according to Kurt Sonnenfeld, the FEMA photographer who looked into it.  The Zionist perpetrators have complete confidence that they could get away with this because of their control of our government and media, as you say, but the real key was having control of the buildings prior to 9-11 and having Michael Chertoff in the key position to control the destruction of the evidence and non-investigation of the crime.

WTC 7 was owned by Larry Silverstein and had been built with Israeli contractors in the mid-1980s, when the Zionist plan for the destruction of the WTC had already been developed.  The main strategic reason for the Israeli false-flag terror of 9-11 was to usher in the “War on Terror” and bring the U.S. military into the Middle East on a permanent basis – to protect Israel’s hegemony in the region.  See: “America the Target: 9-11 and Israel’s History of False Flag Terrorism”

Question of March 26:  In a recent radio interview, Dr. Alan Sabrosky (a former director of the US Military War College, General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research, among other highly impressive credentials) stated that top American military brass know Israel did 9/11. A four part series of this interview is on Youtube. Dr. Sabrosky stated that in recent weeks he has brought this to the attention of many high level military contacts, who now realize Israel’s role in 9/11. Do you believe it’s true that top military officers are just now beginning to realize what you’ve been saying, and if so, what might be the outcome?
Dr. Alan Sabrosky discusses increasing awareness in the U.S. military that Israel is behind 9-11 and disastrous war policies in Iraq and Afghanistan.

IT IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT CERTAIN that 9-11 was a Mossad operation – period.
- Dr. Alan Sabrosky

If these Americans and those like them ever fully understand just how much of their suffering – and the suffering we have inflicted on others – is properly laid on the doorsteps of Israel and its advocates in America, they will sweep aside those in politics, the press and the pulpits alike whose lies and disloyalty brought this about and concealed it from them. They may well leave Israel looking like Carthage after the Romans finished with it. It will be Israel’s own great fault.
-  Alan Sabrosky, “Treason, Betrayal and Deceit: 9/11 and Beyond”, Sept. 10, 2009

Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a ten-year U.S. Marine Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College.

Answer:  In the video clip, Dr. Alan Sabrosky (who says that he has Jewish ancestors) claims he has informed people at the highest levels of the U.S. military that Israeli Mossad criminals are behind 9-11.  He says that most of the people in the U.S. military brass were not aware of Israel’s role in 9-11 and are truly shocked and enraged when they realize that the U.S. has been duped and deceived by Israeli intelligence.  I don’t doubt that for a minute.  I believe that the 9-11 deception was not understood by the people at the top.  This is why the title of my book is Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World.

Had the deception of the false-flag terror atrocity been widely understood in the military, I certainly would not have been attacked, maliciously prosecuted, and tried in a corrupt Chicago court in 2007 with virtually no support from the U.S. military and other institutions.  Articles about the conspiracy behind the brutal police attack and my trial can be found in The Bollyn Trial section.

There has, however, been a very significant and noticeable sea change in how the U.S. and British governments and media treat Israel during the past few weeks and I think that Dr. Sabrosky’s revelations may be connected with that change.  I am very encouraged by this development, to say the least.

Question of March 17:  Just today, Wayne Madsen has disclosed another very important link in the chain of evidence: he reports that an El Al 747 departed from JFK for Tel Aviv at 4:11 p.m. on 9/11/2001 and it was full.  Would you please pause for a moment to contemplate the evidentiary significance of confirming the complete list of passengers who embarked for Tel Aviv on that unauthorized flight?

Answer: I would expect that Ehud Olmert and many of the Israelis who were behind the terrorism of 9-11 were on this plane.  As I pointed out in December 2007, Ehud Olmert, the Likudnik mayor of Jerusalem and deputy prime minister of Israel, was in New York City on the eve of 9-11.  The fact that this high level Israeli politician was in New York City on September 10, 2001 has been kept secret.  I would assume that this visit has been kept secret because it involved the false-flag terror attacks of the following day.  I suspect that Olmert was in New York City during the attacks.  It would, of course, be very interesting to get the passenger list.  I will see what I can do. 

Question and Comment:  With the information that is now available, why has the insurance company that paid off on Lucky Larry’s [Silverstein] fraudulent World Trade Center terrorism claim not made some kind of effort to get their money back?  Hope you can provide some insight on this. I would also like to comment on my view of the state of the world.  Obviously things were not “hunky dory” prior to 9-11, but since that fateful day, the criminal network has been given a blank check to do anything.  The American populace seems asleep, thinking only of shopping, sports, money – just making it through their own lives.

Answer:  This is a very good question.  Much of the money that has been paid out in 9-11 claims has actually come from U.S. taxpayer funds.  I had read that the insurance companies were actually reimbursed in this way, but have not seen the documentation.  The recently litigated payout to the first responders came from a $1 billion FEMA fund, for example.  I will try to check if the WTC insurers were also compensated with U.S. taxpayer money. 

One thing that needs to be understood about the ownership of the WTC towers is that agents of the state of Israel became the de facto owners of the WTC when Silverstein took control of the towers in late July 2001.  “Sources in the Port Authority intimated that even though they were still in the vicinity, Silverstein was in control,” Haaretz reported in its 2001 article, “Up in smoke”.  Through the Silverstein takeover, which was supervised by Lewis Eisenberg of the Port Authority, agents of Israeli intelligence gained access and complete control of the WTC property that was the target of their carefully planned terrorist attack. 

Lewis Eisenberg at the scene of the crime – Eisenberg, a partner at Goldman Sachs, was the head of the Port Authority (the owner of the World Trade Center) in 2001 and was the key person who facilitated the property falling into the hands of Larry Silverstein.

The Silverstein takeover was essential to the Israeli’s evil plan because in order to carry out such a sophisticated false-flag terror operation with complete security, owning the property was a requirement.  Here are the three principal agents of the takeover:

Larry Silverstein

Larry Silverstein, former owner of Runway 69, a Queens strip club, is a close friend and business partner of Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak.  Silverstein has been close to Netanyahu since he served as Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations.  “For years they kept in close touch.  Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein,” Haaretz reported.  “It made no difference what the subject was or where Netanyahu was, he would always call, Silverstein told an Israeli acquaintance.  A recent article on claims that Silverstein was treasurer of Netanyahu’s terrorism school, the mysterious Jonathan Institute and of his electoral campaigns.  I have not seen that before and will look to see if it is true.  A good article on Silverstein’s friendship and business connections to Netanyahu and Barak is “Up in Smoke” from the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz.  (American Friends of the Jonathan Institute was established in Washington, D.C. in March 1977 and in New York City in care of Feder & Gopin in June 1977, two years before its first conference.)  Silverstein was accused, along with Bill Clinton and Colin Powell, of being involved in drug smuggling and other crimes in a 1997 lawsuit Harry P. Miller v. Larry Silverstein, et al.

Lloyd M. Goldman

Lloyd Goldman is Silverstein’s behind-the-scenes equity partner on the World Trade Center lease, was chairman of the finance committee of the American Associates of Ben Gurion University in 2000 and is currently national vice president.  Ben Gurion University is affiliated with Israel’s Nuclear Research Center – Negev (NRCN), which is involved in developing nano-composite energetic materials like the super-Thermite which was found in the dust of the pulverized Twin Towers. 

The crucial question about 9-11 that needs to be answered is who made the super-Thermite that demolished the concrete of the World Trade Center, and who applied it to the interior surfaces, probably the undersides of the 220 floor pans?  The evidence indicates that 9-11 was an Israeli-engineered act of false-flag terrorism, which would mean that Israel probably produced the nano-composite of Thermite.  The Nuclear Research Center Negev, which is where Israel produces its nuclear weapons, has long been involved in development of super-Thermite.  Lloyd Goldman’s close connection to Ben Gurion University means that getting super-Thermite from the NRCN into the Twin Towers would practically be an in-house operation.  Goldman is poised to take over the World Trade Center project when Silverstein, who is nearly 80, retires.  See –
“Meet the Other Trade Center Builder”, Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008

Frank Lowy

Frank Lowy is the third key partner in the World Trade Center takeover.  Born in 1930 into a family of modest means in Slovakia (then Czecho-Slovakia), Lowy spent the war years in Budapest, then moved to Palestine where he fought in the underground for the Zionist army, the Haganah. By 17, he was in an elite commando unit of the Israeli Army, fighting behind enemy lines in the War of Independence. In 2006 he established Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies, which incorporates the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies.

Comment of March 8:  Chris, just wanted you to see this article….dang, I don’t understand people lying about you this way, just wanted you to see it, thank you, and keep up the good work, N.

Bollyn Responds: 
I have not read the whole article but can clearly see by the style and content that it is written by Michael Bernard Piper (a.k.a. Michael Collins Piper) of American Free Press.  This is obviously more of his nonsensical lies and slander.  One needs to understand that Piper is paid to attack me on behalf of the Zionist Jew Mark Lane and the controlled opposition/flypaper outfit Lane runs out of the Liberty Lobby. 

If there was a fire in the HVAC unit on the roof of the building of the former I.B.M. Global Network Services (sold to AT&T a year before I left the company in May 2000), how should I know about it and what does it have to do with me?  I was living in Germany where I had been since November 2001.  How should I know about a minor fire in Schaumburg, Illinois?  The main point of the article is to attack my credibility by calling me a liar, a Judas Goat, and an “intelligence operative”. 

The detailed information about Piper and his show indicates that the source of the article is Piper, and he is lying throughout.  He is the Judas Goat who is projecting his sins on me in an effort to sow suspicion about my work and motives.  When Piper says that he “allowed” me to stand in and host his show during the summer of 2006 he is using the wrong word.  I was asked to do this and tried to avoid it because it was an extra obligation that I would have difficulty doing as I was on the road in the western United States.

The real question is why does Piper, who lavished fulsome praise on me everytime he had me on his show in 2006 about being “America’s best journalist, bar none”, spend so much time and effort attacking me?  Piper has obviously been tasked to do everything he can to sow suspicion about me and try to discredit my research and writing.  He reveals how he tries to damage my credibility in these lines:

If Bollyn really were an honest truth teller and genuine investigative journalist, he would not be lying like this. And if a supposedly honest journalist is known to be lying about some matters of fact, how can his word be trusted on anything? Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.
It is interesting that Piper and Eric Hufschmid are doing the exact same thing, albeit in different ways.  Hufschmid claims that I have been kidnapped and that my articles are being written by the Mossad, while Piper calls me a liar and intelligence operative.  Both of them want to sow suspicion, which once planted in a reader’s mind, is very difficult to remove.  But, what have I done to deserve this treatment?

Answer:  I have investigated and revealed too much about what really happened on 9-11.
This is the same reason I was treated by the undercover police in Hoffman Estates as I was, and prosecuted as I was.  It is interesting to note that Piper takes the word of the corrupt police of Chicagoland as gospel truth.  My statement that the water had been turned off in the cell and that I was told “drink from the toilet” is supposedly disproven by the fact that there is a photo of a Hoffman Estates jail cell with a sink and toilet.

Michael Piper

It should be noted that Piper sent me a very nasty email in December 2001 as we prepared to go to Moscow for a 9-11 conference.  I thought at the time that it couldn’t possibly be from Piper and that someone must have hacked into his mailbox, but I now realize that this is exactly how he operates.  He acts like he has a license to lie.  He has never been a friend of mine.

Question of March 5:  Is Barbara Olson back from the dead?  An anonymous person sent me a photo of Barbara Olson (said to have died on 9-11) side-by-side with an image of Lady Booth, the wife of Theodore Olson, former U.S. Solicitor General.  There is no doubt that these two women look nearly identical.  The question is whether the Barbara Olson (born Barbara Kay Bracher in Houston on December 27, 1955) is the same person as Lady Evelyn Booth (born in Louisville, Kentucky, on October 26, 1960) – or do they simply look very similar?  While it is certainly possible with plastic surgery and the theft of an identity that this could happen, it is also possible that Ted simply chose a new wife that looked very much like his previous wife.

The similarity between the two wives of Ted Olson is remarkable.  Is Lady Booth really Barb Olson after plastic surgery?  The face on the right seems to have had cosmetic surgery.

Barbara Olson’s ear, seen here, can be compared with those of Lady Booth.  Are they similar?

Lady Booth Olson

This is an interesting question, which I will look into.  What is very interesting about Barbara Bracher is that she earned her Juris Doctor at Yeshiva University in New York City.  Yeshiva University is a private Jewish school which is very Jewish.  Why would a young Catholic girl, who had worked for H.B.O. and Stacy Keach in Hollywood, choose to study law at Yeshiva University?  It is possible that Barb Olson has Jewish roots and that this is why she chose Yeshiva University.  Another odd thing about Barbara Bracher is that she lived in McLean, Virginia in the early 1990s which makes one wonder if she was working for the C.I.A. 

While Barbara Olson had very close connections to orthodox Jews and Zionism, her husband actually worked to protect the crimes of the state of Israel when he defended the Israeli spy, Jonathan Jay Pollard.  How did he get that case - and why did he take it?  Ted and Barbara Olson’s ties to Israeli intelligence need to be taken into consideration when pondering their roles in the false flag terror of 9-11.

As a partner of the law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Theodore Olson served as lead counsel for George W. Bush in Bush v. Gore before the U.S. Supreme Courth, which secured Bush’s election as President of the United States. Bush then appointed Olson as United States Solicitor General which he was from, 2001-2004.  At Yeshiva University, Ted Olson recalled that Barbara Bracher had been the person who officially kicked the Palestinian office out of the United States:

In her third year of law school [Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University], Barbara somehow managed to finesse herself into an internship in the Department of Justice in Washington. And, as a very brassy and gutsy intern, she managed to be the only employee of the government of the United States willing, feisty, and fearless enough to personally serve the papers on the PLO mission to the United Nations in New York announcing that it was being expelled from this country—because they were terrorists. How proud Barbara was to tell that story to her friends at Cardozo!

Question of March 2:  Have you heard that it is very possible that Dr. Steven Jones and his nano-thermite theory could very well be misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement down a false path?  Dr. Judy Wood theorizes that a Directed Energy Weapon was used to turn the steel into dust. Her theory is very compelling, and this could very well explain why Steven Jones has gotten so far with his nano-thermite theory.

Answer: Yes, I have heard about that theory.  I was probably the first person to have written about this “theory” of a directed energy beam being involved in 9-11 after having an interview with a “former” spy from East Germany, who admitted to having worked with the Mossad.  See:

The evidence, however, of nano-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center is solid proof that this advanced nano-composite explosive was used to pulverize the towers.  This is not to say that other explosives were not used, such as cutter charges on the central columns or huge bombs in the basements of the towers.  As Dr. Jones would say, the data doesn’t lie.  The theory of an energy weapon being used to demolish the towers is not supported by the evidence.  I consider it to be a kind of red herring theory meant to distract people from the evidence of explosives and super thermite.

Question of February 26:  It’s been at least a week with no postings on your website?  Are you OK?  Inquiring minds want to know…

Bollyn Responds:  Yes, I am fine.  I have been busy doing the final editing of the first 14 chapters of my book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World.  I did this and printed out the chapters for a supporter in Canada who requested a copy of the book.  This took some time away from the article that I am working on, which is about Kenneth Feinberg, the Special Master of the 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund.  It will come as no surprise that Kenneth Feinberg is a high-level agent of the Israeli government and the Mossad.  This article involved quite a bit of research but I hope to have it published in the coming days.

9-11 Special Master Kenneth Feinberg and his wife Diane “Dede” Shaff Feinberg are high-level agents of the state of Israel.

Feinberg and his law firm was given an open account from the U.S. Treasury and doled out billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars – without any oversight or accountability - to the families of 9-11 victims to keep them from seeking justice and discovery through the courts.  Some 98 percent of the 9-11 families took the money from the fund.  Who got how much and who all got paid in the process is a closely guarded secret.  Why?  The 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund is U.S. taxpayer money after all.  We have every right to see how it was disbursed.

Alvin K. Hellerstein: Orthodox Jew and devoted Zionist

The same law that created the 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund also stipulated that all 9-11 related lawsuits would go through the U.S. District Court of Manhattan, where Alvin K. Hellerstein, an orthodox Jew and devoted supporter of Israel has prevented any case from going to trial.  Nearly every single lawsuit concerning a victim of 9-11 has been settled out of court.  Thanks to the efforts of the dedicated Zionist team headed by Kenneth Feinberg and Alvin Hellerstein it is very unlikely that there will ever be a 9-11 trial for the worst terror crime in U.S. history.  What kind of justice is that?  Who are they protecting?

Comment:  I am reading your book, Solving 9/11. Your quote attributed to Menachem Begin “We are the master race” supposedly delivered at a meeting of the Knesset seems far fetched. Did you check the source of that quote? I did a little checking and read that it was invented by Texe Marrs. Do you have any sources for the quote? Thanks, your work is fascinating.

Bollyn Responds: The addition of the Begin quote was a recent change.  Since the quote cannot be sourced, I have removed it. The text now uses the Begin quote from Kapeliouk’s article: “[The Palestinians] are beasts walking on two legs.” – Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, “Begin and the ‘Beasts,”‘ New Statesman, June 25, 1982. 

Comment from a Gulf War Vet: 
Hello, I am not sure if this goes to Mr. Bollyn or not but I am giving it a shot.  I was reading your August 15, 2004 article on depleted uranium and Gulf War Vets. I was a combat engineer during the Gulf War and I wanted to support your article.  I am 39 years old and have spent my days since the war in college and now I teach school. I am a non-smoker and live a simple life.  In December I was diagnosed with kidney cancer and it spread a bit to the lymphnods.  The surgery was hell and now I face a life with cancer.  Well thanks for your time and thanks so much for your article on this subject. I am filing a claim with the VA.

Bollyn’s Response:  This vet is suffering from the effects of D.U. exposure, as are many others.  This is an extremely dangerous weapon that should be banned.  My four-part series on depleted uranium can be read here:

Marion Fulk and Christopher Bollyn

My research on “depleted” uranium weapons was aided immensely by Marion Fulk of Livermore, California (left).  Marion spent most of his working life as a scientist in the employ of the U.S. government, from the Manhattan Project to Livermore Lab.  Now retired, Fulk said he wanted to help inform the public of the long-term damage to human health caused by the use of uranium-tipped weapons.

Question:  Do you post or send articles to Rense and Jones?  Did look, can’t find much recent.

Answer:  Websites that post my material or links to my articles do so of their own choosing.  Two very good sites that re-post my material are and  Here is the link to some of my material on and here is the link to my material on

Question:  Can’t even say in words how much I appreciate such extremely rare honest reporting in these dangerous times!  Suggestion: Times are tough–can you add a $5 button to the array of PayPal buttons for donations, since even $10 might be too out of reach for some?

Answer:  Yes, I will do that.

Comment:  Re the black box on Flight 77 shows “cabin doors not open” means nothing since there was no evidence that a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon. There was no released video of Pentagon crash. No recognizable Boeing 757 parts, the penetration of the walls was too deep and too narrow for a 757, no wing or engine marks on building, etc.  So, why do you think this story is special?  Just curious?

Bollyn’s Response:  You are quite right.  There is no evidence that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon nor do I think that one did crash into the building.  We don’t know where this black box of Flight 77 really came from but the story is about an independent investigation of the data on the box that is said to be from Flight 77.  It is just another small piece of the puzzle showing the massive deception of 9-11.

Question:  My friend sent me this link about an upcoming 9-11 conference in Manhattan. I wish you were on it. Lenny Charles is putting it together.

Bollyn Responds:  I was not invited to the 9-11 event being put on by Lenny Charles, owner of INN World News.  Judging from the invited speakers and panel subjects, I seriously doubt if his 9-11 event at the Walker Stage will discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement, which is the basis of my thesis about the false flag terror that precipitated the Zionist “War on Terror” and the invasion of Afghanistan. 

Having spoken with Mr. Charles on September 3, I am even more inclined to believe that the question of “Who did it?” will not be delved into.  The Orthodox Jewish and Israeli gangsters (e.g. Joseph “Yossi” Shereshevsky,
Amnon Cohen, and Avi Benamu) behind the WexTrust Securities scam are the Jewish criminals who financed the current (secret) owners of INN’s 56 Walker St. building.  Why are the Israeli partners in the WexTrust fraud being protected by the court and media?  Although the Israelis involved in the WexTrust scam are kept concealed and protected, this is clearly the real reason why Lenny Charles is reluctant to discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11.  The Israeli connection is specifically meant NOT to be on the agenda.  That’s what controlled media means.  Even the alternative media is controlled.  Who controls Lenny? (The answer to this crucial question is shocking and will be subject of my next article.)

Lenny Charles (right) of INN World Report

Lenny Charles of INN is the front man for the mystery owner of 56 Walker Street.  Who might that be and why is his identity kept secret?

I don’t know much about Lenny Charles.  He said in a 2009 video interview that he is from New Jersey and that he was educated at the El Paso campus of the University of Texas, which is an unusual place for a kid from New Jersey.  Lenny says he was a jazz musician for 25 years before starting INN World News, which is based in a high-rent building in Manhattan’s Tribeca neighborhood.  How does Lenny manage it?  Charles is also listed as representing a company called SKG Media  How does Lenny Charles and his 56 Walker Street job fit in with all of this gang, which is clearly involved in criminal fraud? and as the contact person for Walker Stage, located at 56 Walker Street in Manhattan.  SKG is often used to refer to the media moguls Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg, and David Geffen, but are they the money behind Lenny Charles and INN?  Walker Stage is a nightclub owned by 56 Walker LLC, whoever that might be.  A search for the owner turns up a host of legal cases that involve 56 Walker LLC and people named Avroham and Joseph Shereshevsky and a sprawling octopus company called Wextrust, which has many holding companies such as WexTrust Capital LLC, doing business in Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan in Israel and operating mining operations in Africa.

For the details of INN’s connections to Zionist money, read: “The Zionist Gang Behind New York’s 9/11 Conference” by Christopher Bollyn

Joseph Shereshevsky (left, son of the rabbi Chaim Shereshevsky of Brooklyn) a Norfolk resident and former COO of WexTrust Capital and Steven Byers, the company’s founder and CEO, were each hit with fraud and conspiracy charges.  When he was arrested for his part in the $100 million pyramid scheme in August 2008, Shereshevsky held a one-way plane ticket to Israel.  After they were busted, Byers made a $500 donation to Barack Obama on August 23, 2008. (Courtesy of

In August 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged WexTrust Capital and its affiliates with fraud, alleging that the company ran a Ponzi scheme that raised at least $255 million by targeting members of the Orthodox Jewish community.  The S.E.C. said WexTrust’s principals, Steven Byers and Joseph Shereshevsky, deceived at least 1,196 investors since 2002. The defendants diverted at least $100 million to unauthorized purposes, according to the S.E.C.’s complaint.  The SEC charge against WexTrust, a Chicago-based company, can be read here.  An interactive time line of the case is here.
Question:  I found it interesting that your ancestors are related to Anne Boleyn. Aren’t you spelling your name wrong?

THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL – Queen Elizabeth I, the most famous queen in English history, is known for fostering the English Enlightenment and defeating the Spanish Armada.  Elizabeth was the daughter of Anne Boleyn, the most persistently maligned of English queens.  The Boleyn family has suffered a vicious and relentless campaign of defamation for nearly 500 years.  Prior to the religious reforms initiated by the Boleyn family, the Vatican owned a third of all the land of England.

Bollyn Responds:  The Bollyn (Boleyn) name is originally from West Flanders.  The ancestors of Queen Anne Boleyn came from the area around Calais in Boulonnais, which was then English territory across the channel from Dover.  Anne’s great-grandfather, Geoffrey, was a wealthy mercer (importer of fine fabrics) who became the Lord Mayor of London in 1457.  There were no strict rules for spelling in English at the time.  Anne’s father spelled the name Bullen.  In the historical literature about Anne Boleyn there are at least 30 different spellings of the name.  Anne, who was well educated and multi-lingual having lived in Flanders and France as a child, seems to be the one who made the “Boleyn” spelling stick.  “La petite Boulain” is how the Archduchess Margaret of Austria described the 12-year-old Anne, who served as a maid of honor in the court of Burgundy at Mechelen.  The Boulain spelling captures the long “ay” sound in the second syllable, which is actually the correct pronunciation of the name, at least in Flemish or Dutch.

Our family has spelled the name Bollyn since at least 1860 in St. Louis, which is as far back as I have documented.  Some time before that the family of Henry Bollyn immigrated to the United States from Switzerland.  Henry’s first daughter was named Anne, but she died in Kentucky at the tender age of 10 months.  A year or two later he was blessed with another daughter, which he also named Anne.  My father and grandfather were named Albert Bollyn, which happens to be the same name as a Belgian held in the Nazi concentration camp of Dachau from 1944-1945.  I don’t know much about this Albert Bollyn but I suppose he was probably arrested for resisting tyranny.  It runs in the family.

Question:  Do you receive the American Free Press (AFP) newspaper? There are two copies in September 2010 that try to convey that they are right on top of the 9/11 issue, which makes me annoyed, as you are the one who has done all the serious research.

Bollyn Responds:  This question came from a person who has been reading my work for a long time.  No, I don’t read AFP, which is a newspaper I wrote for from 2000 until October 2006.  The newspaper is run by Willis Carto and his lawyer friend Mark Lane.  According to information gleaned during a lawsuit in which Lane was suing L.T. Patterson of Criminal Politics, Mark Lane acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1994.  This indicates that AFP is nothing but an asset of the C.I.A., which runs it as a controlled opposition mouthpiece. 

Mark Lane is an old Army intelligence agent from WWII in Germany.  Lane played a key role in the Jonestown massacre, which he witnessed and is said to have instigated by using fear tactics on the paranoid Rev. Jim Jones.  This is similar to what AFP does to its readers.
Lane’s relationship with AFP explains the paper’s bizarre actions I observed as I got closer to the truth about 9/11. 

AFP is now publishing articles about 9/11 that suggest that there were no planes on 9/11 (see “Absence of Real Photo Evidence Leads to Video Fakery Speculation”, October 11, 2010).  In an article from September 20, 2010, Makufka asks whether “mini-nukes” were used to bring down the WTC.   These “disinfo” articles are written by Scott R. Makufka who writes under the name “Victor Thorn”.

Makufka and his girlfriend Lisa Giuliani teamed up with Michael Piper after I was attacked by undercover police.  They sought to impugn my credibility and claim my research as their own in a concerted Zionist effort to marginalize my work, and have me prosecuted and thrown in jail.

Scott Makufka and Lisa Giuliani were part of the anti-Bollyn disinfo hit squad, along with Michael Piper.  Why would AFP turn on its own reporter after 6 years of good reporting?

It is very clear from the evidence that Boeing airplanes hit the Twin Towers, the only question is exactly which planes they were.  Photographs reveal that more durable parts, such as landing gear and engines from the aircraft, landed on the streets of Manhattan.

This engine from the aircraft that struck the South Tower landed on Murray Street.  The parts of this engine are all marked with specific numbers that would identify precisely which aircraft they belonged to.  Why haven’t they been shown to the public?  Why the secrecy about exactly which jet engine this is?

Every time-tracked part of the aircraft is numbered, such as this piece.

This landing gear would also contain time-tracked parts with specific serial numbers which would precisely identify the aircraft that struck the tower.

All of these aircraft parts were collected by the F.B.I., which was under the command of Michael Chertoff, the Assistant Attorney General…

...who authorized for the aircraft evidence to be taken to the dump at Fresh Kills…

...where they were treated like garbage – not as crucial primary evidence from the scene of a mass murder. 

Why would Michael Chertoff, an Israeli national and the son of an Israeli Mossad agent, allow such critical criminal evidence to be treated like garbage?  Why wasn’t this engine taken to a high-tech FBI crime scene lab (like we see on television) and its time-tracked parts compared with the maintenance records for the planes said to have been involved?  There is only one logical answer to these questions:  the aircraft parts were not examined and shown to the public because they are not from the planes that are said to have hit the Twin Towers.  The FBI and U.S. military only solve such crimes on TV shows, not in real life.  That’s part of the deception.

Question: Thanks for your sincere response. I greatly respect and sympathize with you. I don’t know how Americans, and people of other countries around the world, have lost their ability to think critically. Even among my own family, they are focused on college football, pro golf, or some other distraction. The phony “right wing” commentators like Glenn Beck, et al, don’t help either…

As for your case, and the “criminal” case brought against you, the most amazing thing is that other journalists do not come to your aid. The same can be said of firefighters re: 911, why don’t they organize and make demands for a new investigation!!?! Pilots too. Sometimes it really makes me re-think my own beliefs.

Bollyn Responds:  The way my case was handled by the media in the United States speaks volumes about the controlled press.  I was, after all, known to be a working journalist when a three-man squad of undercover police broke my arm and tortured me with a TASER at my home – in front of my daughter – in August 2006. 

Shocked and saddened – Christopher Bollyn with his children in Schaumburg after the police assault.  Bollyn’s 8-year-old daughter had seen three heavily-armed undercover police torture her father with a TASER as they held him down in handcuffs after an unprovoked assault that left him with a broken elbow.  Bollyn was subsequently charged with attacking the unidentified armed men who had invaded his home and threatened his family.  But, of course.

The fact that I was a journalist (for more than six years) with a national newspaper based in Washington, D.C. was carefully omitted in all the media reports about the bizarre and brutal police incident.  I was sometimes referred to as a “blogger” – but never as a journalist.  This is because the controlled media has always sought to marginalize my work.  The fact that I had been interviewed – as a journalist - by FOX News and the BBC in London, and spoken about 9/11 in the capital cities of Europe and the United States meant nothing to the Chicago Tribune and the local paper, the Daily Herald.  This was, of course, no simple oversight.  These papers know very well who I am.  I had been a candidate for mayor in Hoffman Estates in 2001.  I have corresponded with these papers for years and was interviewed by an editorial board of two journalists and an editor in the offices of the Daily Herald prior to the special election in 2001.  After the police attack at my house, the Chicago Tribune even hired an outside ghost writer from TIME magazine in order to smear me properly.

There are two main reasons for the controlled media’s slanted reporting of my case:  Firstly, to marginalize my 9/11 research and writing, and secondly, to minimize the signficance of the undercover police action against me at my home (i.e. on my property).  It certainly doesn’t look right (or very American) for three heavily-armed undercover police to TASER and break the arm of an American journalist working to find the truth about what really happened on September 11, 2001 – in front of his 8-year-old daughter and wife.  The truth could not be told in my case.  It’s that simple.  The nine-month process in the Cook County Court was equally bizarre and corrupt.

Your comments about American media distractions are very apt.  As a child, I grew up in a house with no television.  The only TV shows I saw were those I watched at a neighbor’s house.  I remember watching “Bozo’s Circus” and “The Mickey Mouse Club”.  My favorite shows were “The Adventures of Superman” and “The Rifleman” with Chuck Connors.

Chuck Connors as “The Rifleman”

These shows were all basic morality plays in which the good guys fought against corruption, crime, and evil – and always won.  Because we did not have a TV, my time spent watching television was very limited in comparison to my friends.  My mother told us that the average American child watched something like six hours a day, something I found incredible.  But Americans really do spend many hours consuming television on a daily basis, most of which is nothing but staged fantasy and propaganda posing as news.  This is a huge problem because television shapes and informs the sense of reality for most Americans and what they watch these days isn’t nearly as good as “The Rifleman” was.  The same holds true for the demise of American music.  When I was young the music we identified with was generally much more optimistic than what kids hear these days.   


The Legacy of Pearl Harbor

December 7, 2016

The Japanese surprise attack at Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941, killed 2,403 Americans and left 1,178 wounded. The attack was not a surprise to some people in the president's circle that day.

The U.S. Congress voted to go to war the next day.

My mother's oldest brother, Arthur F. Johnson (second from left, seated) was senior officer aboard the USS Mugford, a destroyer he commanded to go to sea when the attacks began. 

USS Mugford

The senior officers of the USS Mugford. My Uncle Art is third from the right, standing behind Lt. Cdr. Arleigh A. Burke's left shoulder.

Seventy-five years ago, the United States entered World War II after the Japanese attack at Pearl Harbor.  As President Franklin D. Roosevelt said the following day, "Yesterday, December 7, 1941, a date which will live in infamy, the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan."  

Within an hour of Roosevelt's seven-minute speech, Congress passed a declaration of war against Japan bringing the U.S. into World War II.  Although the warfighting ended four years later, the war is technically not over because there is still no peace treaty between the U.S. and Germany, seventy-one years later.

Some might say, what difference does that make?  Well, if your ancestral land and property was occupied by the Soviet Union, like that of the people of Königsberg and other Baltic Germans, you might appreciate the need for a formal peace treaty ending the war.  It was agreed during the Potsdam Conference of July 1945 that the Soviet Union could occupy Königsberg and the surrounding area until a peace treaty was signed with Germany.  That peace treaty has yet to be signed. Until that happens, Germany will remain a less-than-sovereign nation without a constitution in which the laws imposed by the occupying power remain in effect.

The entire German population of Königsberg and East Prussia was expelled or murdered by the Red Army. The territory of East Prussia is Russian-occupied to this day. The status of East Prussia is yet to be settled with a peace treaty ending the war.

At Potsdam, Britain and the United States also agreed to the forced expulsion by the Soviet Union of more than fifteen million Germans from their ancestral homelands in East Prussia, Pomerania, Silesia, East Brandenburg, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and Yugoslavia.  During the brutal ethnic cleansing of these lands more than two million ethnic Germans were murdered by the Red Army. 

The point is that Pearl Harbor started a war that is still not over, seventy-five years later.

Sixty years after Pearl Harbor, the sudden and deliberate attacks of 9/11 brought the United States into a new war, the fraudulent War on Terror, which is still not over fifteen years later.  In the same way that Pearl Harbor changed the world and affected the lives of an entire generation of Americans, the attacks of 9/11 have profoundly changed our world.

The false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 were meant to compel U.S. politicians and public opinion to support the global War on Terror.

With the election of Donald Trump to the presidency of the United States we can expect some changes in how the U.S. manages the War on Terror.  Trump may decrease the warfighting effort in places where the U.S. is waging war under the rubric of the War on Terror, or he may increase the effort.  It is, however, unlikely that Trump will completely end the War on Terror, although that is a possibility.

The reason why it seems unlikely that President Trump will stop the war completely is because the War on Terror is a Zionist war agenda in disguise that is meant to go on and on.  The people behind this fraudulent war have been greatly enriched and empowered by fear and warfighting, and they employ terrorism and deception to keep it going.  Using false-flag terrorism, like the terror attacks of 9/11, the masterminds behind the deception force political leaders to respond in ways that benefit the real culprits. Since 9/11, for example, "Homeland Security" has cost taxpayers in the United States more than $715 billion, more than $6.74 million every hour.  Think about that next time you stand in a long line at the airport waiting to pass through security.

The War on Terror is a disguised Zionist (i.e. Israeli) war agenda prepared in the late 1970s by the Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin, Benzion Netanyahu and his son Benjamin, and the heads of Israeli military intelligence. The War on Terror construct was rolled out in "a propaganda offensive" at the Netanyahu Institute in Jerusalem in July 1979. 

Israeli military intelligence was also directly involved in creating "the enemy" for the War on Terror.  Under the leadership of Ehud Barak, Israeli military intelligence agents trained the virulently anti-Western Islamist militia of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar in the arts of terrorism in Pakistan in the early 1980s.  This is the same group that the Afghan-Arab leader Osama bin Laden was associated with in Pakistan, before the creation of Al Qaida.  Bin Laden's first trainer, Ali Mohamed, was a Hebrew-speaking Egyptian. Ehud Barak was the first person to blame Osama bin Laden for the 9/11 attacks, which he did from the London TV studio of BBC World before the first tower had even fallen.

Ehud Barak, the head of Israeli military intelligence, was responsible for training Osama bin Laden in the 1980s. On 9/11, Barak was the first to blame bin Laden for the attacks, telling the world that it was time "to launch an operational, concrete, war against terror" - before either tower had fallen.

The War on Terror ideology was actively promoted by Zionist media outlets and political think tanks following the Jerusalem conference in 1979.  One of the Zionist think tanks promoting the global war agenda was the "Project for the New American Century" (PNAC), headed by Donald Kagan and his sons, Robert and Fred, along with William Kristol.  In 2000, these men produced a paper that called for the U.S. to invade and occupy Iraq, among other things.  The transformation process for the U.S. military envisioned by the Zionist Neo-Cons at PNAC was likely to be a long one, "absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."

Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was the driving force behind the war in Iraq. One year before 9/11 they called for a "new Pearl Harbor" to hasten the transformation of the U.S. military into the aggressive force they envisioned in the Middle East - waging war on behalf of the State of Israel.

One year later, 9/11 was the event that kick-started the War on Terror.  Having prepared the stage for twenty-two years, the War on Terror project was like a giant bonfire pyramid that had been built and was ready for the match to light it. 9/11 was that match.

9/11 was designed to be the spark that started the War on Terror.

This is the main reason 9/11 was not investigated as a crime.  A proper criminal investigation would have exposed the deception behind the false-flag terrorism and the War on Terror.  The War on Terror requires that the controlled media and political class maintain the deception of 9/11 and other acts of false-flag terrorism.  This is why it is highly unlikely that any politician will simply end the fraudulent War on Terror. That would be revolutionary.  Most politicians are too much under the influence of those who benefit from the on-going wars to slam the door shut on the biggest fraud in the world.

A popular movement is what is needed to end the War on Terror and that will only happen when enough people stand up and say that they refuse to accept the lies about 9/11. As long as the political class and the public accept the lies about 9/11 and the false narrative of the War on Terror, the culprits behind the terrorism are strengthened.  The only way to weaken the power of the terrorist masterminds over our society and nations is to expose the deception and the people behind it.  This is the essence of my Solving 9-11 books and the purpose of my work. 

Solving 9-11:  The Deception that Changed the World is available for a $20 donation. The 
Solving 9-11 set, including The Original Articles, costs $40 when ordered together. To order or donate click on

Bollyn Event in Lucerne, Switzerland

December 2, 2016

Christopher Bollyn gave a presentation in Lucerne on Friday, November 25:

"The Dual Deception of 9/11 and the Phantom War on Terror"

The International Church of Lucerne 
Zähringerstrasse 7, 6003 Luzern 
25 November 2016 - 19:00-22:00

Free Admission - Donations Appreciated

Reservations are suggested - to reserve seats please go to:

Book-signing with complimentary Apéro will follow the presentation.

Video - "They Think You're Stupid" with Bollyn Letter to President-Elect Trump

November 13, 2016

"They Think You're Stupid" Video -

"They Think You're Stupid" is an excellent 33-minute video about the deception of 9/11 and the failure of political Establishment to resist the lies that have hijacked our history and enslaved our nation(s) to the Zionist war agenda known as the Global War on Terror. The video concludes with a 15-minute segment from my presentation at a public library in Seattle this year (segment begins at 15:50).

A screen shot from "The Think You're Stupid"

I have also sent the Solving 9-11 set of books to President-elect Donald Trump, along with the following open letter urging him to start a criminal investigation into the events of 9/11:

If you would like to support my efforts to liberate our nation(s) from the dual deception of 9/11 and the fraudulent War on Terror, click here or send a donation by Paypal to: 

Bollyn's Open Letter to President-elect Trump

November 11, 2016

How can we go forward as a nation, crafting policies and waging war based on nothing but a pack of lies about what happened on 9/11? How can we make America great again if we allow our nation to be governed by lies?
- Christopher Bollyn to President-elect Donald J. Trump, November 11, 2016

Christopher Bollyn at Ground Zero, March 2016
Photo by Rudy Dent, Veteran NYPD and FDNY

I am sending the Solving 9-11 set of books and the following open letter to President-elect Donald Trump urging him to initiate a criminal investigation into the events of 9/11.

Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
Trump Tower
725 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10022

November 11, 2016

Dear President-elect Trump,

My name is Christopher Bollyn. I am the author of Solving 9/11: The Deception that Changed the World. During my recent speaking tour across the United States, I was often asked about your position on 9/11 truth. The American people know that the government and media have covered-up the truth about 9/11. As president, many Americans hope you will help find the truth by carrying out a fully-fledged criminal investigation to determine who is really responsible for the terror atrocity that changed our nation.

The events of 9/11 profoundly changed this country and brought us the “War on Terror” with costly and disastrous wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

How can we go forward as a nation, crafting policies and waging war based on nothing but a pack of lies about what happened on 9/11?  How can we make America great again if we allow our nation to be governed by lies?

The 9/11 Commission members have gone on record saying that the government officials lied to the commission. John Farmer, for example, senior counsel to the commission, wrote: "What government and military officials told Congress, the Commission, the media, and the public about who knew what when was almost entirely, and inexplicably, untrue."

The American people are demanding a proper criminal investigation into the events of 9/11 to determine who is truly responsible for the terror atrocity that changed the world. We have every right to expect that from our government.

President Trump, will you initiate a proper criminal investigation into the events of 9/11?


Christopher Bollyn 

Bollyn's Copenhagen Speech Now Online

November 11, 2016

Christopher Bollyn speaking at the Open Mind Conference in Copenhagen on September 17, 2016.

The video of my presentation at the Open Mind Conference in Copenhagen on September 17, 2016, is now online. The GaiaTV video is entitled "The Dual-Deception of 9/11 and the Fraudulent War on Terror” and is available below for viewing and on YouTube at:

Video URL:


The Computer Crimes of 9/11: How Critical U.S. Airport Computers Were Compromised with Israeli Spyware

November 7, 2016 

Israeli Transtech Control "Airfield Management" software provided by a senior Israeli spymaster was running on the computer systems of many of the airports and U.S. Air Force bases involved in the events of 9/11. 

"The deathly precision" and "magnitude of planning" behind the 9-11 attacks would have needed "years of planning."  Such a sophisticated operation would require the "fixed frame" of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a "loose group" of terrorists like the one allegedly led by Mohammed Atta while he studied in Hamburg. 
- Eckart Werthebach, former president of German intelligence service to Christopher Bollyn, December 2001

"It's really a big breakthrough to have a company from Israel controlling so many airports."
- Simcha Ohrenstein of Transtech Control Ltd., "Israeli firm keeps airports safe," Jerusalem Post, June 18, 2004

"Trojan horse espionage is part of the way of life of companies in Israel.  It’s a culture of spying."
- "Israeli Trojan Horse," CounterPunch, September 27, 2008  

When former German intelligence chief Eckhart Werthebach told me in 2001 that the 9/11 terror attacks would have needed “years of planning" and required the “fixed frame" of a state intelligence organization, it raised two obvious questions:  Which state intelligence organization would plan and carry-out such a false-flag terror atrocity? And why?

Solving 9-11 is unique in the 9/11 literature in that it identifies the network behind the false-flag terror attacks and explains their motive. (Photo by Mike Chickey)

As the evidence I present in the Solving 9-11 set of books reveals, Israeli military intelligence is the prime suspect of being the state-run organization behind the atrocity that ushered in the fraudulent War on Terror. The men who have controlled Israeli military intelligence since the inception of the War on Terror ideology would, therefore, be chief among the suspected masterminds of the false-flag terrorism of 9/11.

Major General Shlomo Gazit is one of the suspected masterminds. As former director of Israeli military intelligence (DMI, 1974-79) Gazit restructured the signal intelligence and cyber-espionage agency he oversaw in the wake of the 1973 Yom Kippur War. Following his term as DMI, Gazit went on to participate in the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism, the propaganda offensive that launched the War on Terror in July 1979.

Shlomo Gazit (1926– )
 Born in Istanbul, Turkey, Gazit immigrated to Palestine in 1933. During the early 1960s, Gazit was representative of Military Intelligence (MI) in Paris. After returning to Israel in 1964 (after JFK assassination), Gazit headed the Research Department of MI until 1967. Following the Six-Day War he became the first coordinator of Israeli government operations in the occupied territories. After the Yom Kippur War, Gazit was director of MI from 1974 to 1979.

Seven years later, Gazit, the man who had reformed the super-secret agency that creates Israeli spyware, started a company that provided Israeli control software to scores of U.S. airports and Air Force bases. Gazit is the key person who connected Israel's military spyware with some of the airports involved in the events of 9/11.


The War on Terror ideology was rolled out onto the world stage in a well-planned propaganda offensive in July 1979, headed by Menachem Begin, the notorious Zionist terrorist.  Begin's propaganda event was hosted by the Jonathan (Netanyahu) Institute, an organization set up by Benjamin Netanyahu and his father for the purpose of promoting the War on Terror ideology.

Benjamin Netanyahu and his father Benzion, born Mileikowsky in Warsaw, Poland, arranged the Jerusalem Conference with Menachem Begin in 1979 that heralded the beginning of the propaganda offensive behind the War on Terror.

"The conference organizers expect the event to initiate a major anti-terrorist offensive," Ian Black wrote in the Jerusalem Post after the first day of the conference.

"The use of the military term 'offensive' is accurate," Philip Paull wrote in his 1982 thesis "International Terrorism":  The Propaganda War.  "Four former chiefs of Israeli military intelligence participated in the conference:  Gen. Chaim Herzog, Maj. Gen. Meir Amit, Lt. Gen. Aharon Yariv, and Maj. Gen. Shlomo Gazit."

The fact that the four former chiefs of Israel's Directorate of Military Intelligence attended the three-day conference indicates they were involved in the planning and preparation of this "propaganda offensive."

Shlomo Gazit had just concluded a five-year term as DMI in February 1979. Israel’s DMI oversees Aman, an independent military intelligence body of the Israel Defense Forces which has its own special commando forces and field-reconnaissance unit, the Sayeret Matkal, and its own intelligence collection agency, Unit 8200.


Unit 8200, the central military intelligence agency and largest unit of the Israeli Defense Force, is responsible for collecting signal intelligence and code decryption.

In 1974, after Israel was caught off guard by invasions from Egypt and Syria in 1973, Shlomo Gazit was assigned to reform the intelligence agency, which he renamed Unit 8200. One of Gazit’s reforms made the spy agency completely departmentalized, so that various teams in the unit wouldn’t know what other teams were doing.

"While Israel’s Mossad spy agency is as legendary as 8200 is anonymous, '90 percent of the intelligence material in Israel is coming from 8200,' says Yair Cohen, who served 33 years in 8200 – the last five (from 2001-2005) as its commander.'There isn’t a major operation, from the Mossad or any intelligence security agency, that 8200 is not involved in.'" Richard Behar reported in "Inside Israel's Secret Startup Machine" in Forbes.

Yair Cohen was the commander of Unit 8200 when 9/11 occurred. 
Cohen is head of intelligence and cyber solutions at Elbit Systems Ltd., an Israeli company with a history of involvement in U.S. elections. 

Unit 8200 is comparable in function to the National Security Agency in the United States, an agency whose data collection Unit 8200 seems to have complete access to.

Robert David Steele, a former CIA case officer, told Christopher Ketcham, author of "An Israeli Trojan Horse," that "Israeli penetration of the entire US telecommunications system means that NSA's warrantless wiretapping actually means Israeli warrantless wiretapping."

Ketcham explains how that is: 

Since the late 1990s, federal agents have reported systemic communications security breaches at the Department of Justice, FBI, DEA, the State Department, and the White House.  Several of the alleged breaches, these agents say, can be traced to two hi-tech communications companies, Verint Inc. (formerly Comverse Infosys), and Amdocs Ltd., that respectively provide major wiretap and phone billing/record-keeping software contracts for the U.S. government.   Together, Verint and Amdocs form part of the backbone of the government’s domestic intelligence surveillance technology. Both companies are based in Israel – having arisen to prominence from that country’s cornering of the information technology market – and are heavily funded by the Israeli government, with connections to the Israeli military and Israeli intelligence.

(Verint HQ is only 500 meters from Transtech Control HQ on Maskit Street in Herzliya. CB)


The Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism in July 1979 is the event that marks the birth of the fraudulent War on Terror. Philip Paull, who studied the propaganda offensive that began with the conference concluded, "The entire notion of 'international terrorism' as promoted by the Jerusalem Conference rests on a faulty, dishonest, and ultimately corrupt information base."

The fact that Menachem Begin, the prime minister and founder of the Likud party, headed the committee that organized the conference and that four former directors of Israeli military intelligence participated, indicates that this deceptive propaganda offensive to push the War on Terror stratagem had been planned at the highest level of the Israeli government and military intelligence.

"The Father of Terrorism" Menachem Begin was the Israeli prime minister who arranged the 1979 propaganda offensive behind the War on Terror. 
 Since 1979, Benjamin Netanyahu has been the leading advocate of the War on Terror.

It is also clear that the Jerusalem conference was just the beginning of the Zionist war agenda that we know as the Global War on Terror. In the years following the conference, Benjamin Netanyahu produced a series of books in which he called for the United States and its allies to deploy their militaries in the Middle East to wage war against "terrorist" groups and the nations that host them.

The Israeli plan to make the War on Terror operational called for an act of catastrophic terrorism to occur in the United States. A spectacular act of terrorism would be needed to sway political and public opinion behind supporting a massive U.S. military intervention in the Middle East.

Images of the aircraft said to be United Airlines Flight 175 impacting the South Tower

As we can see from The Medusa Touch, a 1978 film made by Arnon Milchan, a senior Israeli intelligent agent, the idea of crashing large passenger aircraft into high-rise towers was evidently running through the minds of the Israeli terrorism planners prior to the Jerusalem conference.

Israeli intelligence agent Arnon Milchan's first film featured a passenger aircraft flying into a high-rise tower - in 1978.

The fact that the Israeli plan was to attack the tallest towers in New York City was then leaked by Isser Harel, the former spymaster and head of the Mossad, in comments he made in 1980 to Michael Evans, an American Zionist.

With the understanding that an Israeli plan was in the works to launch the War on Terror by using aircraft to attack high-rise towers in New York City, it is very interesting to look at what Shlomo Gazit did after he retired as director of Israeli military intelligence in 1979.

After leaving his position as DMI, Shlomo Gazit moved to Boston, where he was a visiting fellow at Harvard's Center for International Affairs for one year. As The Harvard Crimson reported in October 1979, "Major General Shlomo Gazit says he left his post as head of Israeli Military Intelligence to come to Harvard because 'I felt tired and felt in urgent need for recharging my batteries.'"

Gazit left Harvard in 1980 and returned to Israel, where he became president of Ben Gurion University from 1981-1985. He also served as the director-general of the Jewish Agency from 1985-1988 and as a senior research fellow at the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies at Tel Aviv University from 1988.

What is most interesting is that in 1986, Shlomo Gazit co-founded (with Simcha Ohrenstein) a company called Transtech Control Ltd., which develops and markets control and monitoring software systems for airports. Transtech offers products for airfield visual navigation aids and airfield operational elements. The company provides software and services to airports worldwide. Transtech’s headquarters and R&D facilities are located in Herzliya, Israel. Gazit is the chief technology officer for the company, responsible for research and development of the software the company provides. Transtech Control Ltd. owns two subsidiaries: Transtech Airport Solutions Inc., in Windsor, Connecticut, which oversees customer technical support, sales, and marketing; and Calsys, located in Ashkelon, Israel, which develops the distributed airport radar.

As the Jerusalem Post reported on Transtech in 2004:

When Transtech Control was founded by Ohrenstein and Shlomo Gazit (the company's CTO) in 1986, most people told them that a small Israeli company had no chance to break into the extremely conservative US airport control market. Even today, the industry is dominated by just a few giants. Ohrenstein and Gazit ignored their critics, however, and today - 15 years on - Transtech's control systems can be found in 120 airports across the world, including Beijing and JFK, San Francisco, Denver and LA.

"It's really a big breakthrough to have a company from Israel controlling so many airports," says Ohrenstein, 53. "We've become a world leader in this niche."

As Chief Technology Officer and the Vice President for Research & Development, Gazit is the person who connected the agency that produces spyware Israeli software to the computer networks at scores of airports across the United States, including critical U.S. military bases, in 2001.              

Transtech’s client list in 2003 (the earliest list available online) shows that the Israeli control software was being used at dozens of U.S. airports, civilian and military.  Among the airports listed in 2003 are a few noteworthy ones:  Newark, Holloman Air Force Base (AFB), Tinker AFB, Hill AFB, Davis Monthan AFB, Fort Hood Airport, Edwards AFB, Seymour Johnson AFB, Otis AFB, Little Rock AFB, Fort Knox, Pope AFB, Johnstown Airport, Altus AFB, Fort Bliss, Westover AFB, and Pease AFB.

The fact that the Transtech control software running on the computer networks of these airports came from an Israeli spymaster who had managed the military intelligence agency that creates spyware leads me to think that the software he provided had secret spyware functions which were exploited on 9/11.

As a 2005 FBI report states: "Israel has an active program to gather proprietary information within the United States. These collection activities are primarily directed at obtaining information on military systems and advanced computing applications that can be used in Israel’s sizable armaments industry."  A key Israeli method, warns the FBI report, is computer intrusion.

What better way to gain access to a computer network than to have your own spyware running on it?


Historical Dictionary of Israeli Intelligence by Ephraim Kahana, Scarecrow Press, 2006

"Inside Israel's Secret Startup Machine" by Richard Behar, Forbes, May 31, 2016

"International Terrorism":  The Propaganda War by Philip Paull, Master's Thesis, San Francisco State University, May 1982

"Israeli Trojan Horse" by Christopher Ketcham, Counterpunch, September 27, 2008

Shlomo Gazit, Institute for National Security Studies

"Shlomo Gazit Strongly Supports Israeli Presence on West Bank," The Harvard Crimson, October 3, 1979

Transtech Control Ltd. Selected Client List, screen capture, March 6, 2003

Zionism - The Root Cause of the Wars in the Middle East

November 1, 2016

The Palestinian refugee population of the Yarmouk Camp near Damascus, Syria, was targeted by the U.S.-armed militia known as ISIS. Allowing the displaced Palestinians to return to their homeland is the key issue that needs to be solved in order to bring peace to the Middle East. The wars that are being waged across the Middle East are caused by the Zionist maximalists who refuse to accept that the Palestinian problem has to be solved with justice for the Palestinian people. 

The world is in turmoil. People live in fear of nuclear war like they did during the worst days of the Cold War.  Europe is flooded with refugees and wars of terrorism rage across the Middle East.  People wonder if there is something they can do to alleviate the strife and turmoil that afflicts our world today – and lessen the chances of a nuclear war. 

The good news is, yes, there is in fact something everyone can do – once we understand the real source of the wars and conflicts our nations are engaged in.

The people of America and Europe are greatly disturbed and generally confused by the wars and turmoil raging in the Middle East, Ukraine, and Africa.  One of the most obvious consequences of the wars in the Middle East is the massive flow of refugees and migrants coming into Europe, a flow of desperate humans coming in numbers that have not been seen since the Second World War.

The flood of refugees coming into Europe was created by the illegal wars of aggression being waged in Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria.

As NATO aggressively sends military forces and missiles to the states that border Russia, the controlled media wages a blatant fear-mongering campaign against the people of Scandinavia and Eastern Europe scaring them with propaganda stories that threaten the population with the idea of a Russian invasion.

The Jewish-owned (Bonniers AB) Expressen tabloid wages psychological warfare against the Swedish population, pushing anti-Russian propaganda on a daily basis.

This issue claims that Russia has plans to release nuclear weapons over Sweden.

What is peculiar about the nations that feel most threatened by a Russian invasion is that they themselves are proud members of the U.S.-led coalition that illegally invaded Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya during the fifteen-year-old War on Terror. The fact that these invasions, like the U.S. intervention in Syria, fall into the category of illegal wars of aggression is never discussed in the controlled media that promotes the fear of a Russian invasion.

Sweden, for example, just announced that it would double its military forces fighting in the Kurdish part of northern Iraq, where the Rothschild family owns the largest oil company. Why is Sweden, who has a long history of neutrality, engaged in an illegal war of aggression in Iraq?

The Americans and Europeans are confused and perplexed about these matters because the controlled media does not give them the information or analysis they need to make sense of the wars their nations are engaged in.

A good example comes from a current news story from Reuters about Syria, and Russia’s military support for the Syrian government:

Russia backs Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in Syria's civil war, and its military operation in Syria, now in its second year, has shored up Assad's position. That has put Moscow on a collision course with Washington and its allies who want Assad removed from office.
– “Russia says resumption of Syria peace talks delayed indefinitely,” Reuters, November 1, 2016


So, Reuters tells us that Moscow is “on a collision course with Washington and its allies who want Assad removed from office,” but gives no explanation why Washington wants Assad removed from power. The Western reader is left to assume that removing the Syrian leader from power must be a good thing and that there must be good reasons to do so, because, of course, Washington and its allies would only want something that is good. Furthermore, removing Assad from power must be worth risking war with Russia otherwise why would the U.S. pursue a policy that carries such risks?

There is, however, nothing good at all about the U.S.-led effort to overthrow the government of Syria. The reality is that the war that has devastated much of Syria during the past five years is not a true civil war at all, but is in fact an illegal war being waged by armies of mercenary terrorists who have been funded and trained by the U.S. (C.I.A.) and some of its allies in the region on behalf of the Israelis, who are the real masterminds behind the War on Terror and the U.S.-led invasions of Iraq and Syria.

A screen shot from a video showing a long convoy of ISIS fighters coming into Syria from Iraq - with a U.S. Apache helicopter bringing up the rear.
"US Apache helicopter escorts ISIS convoy into Syria" 
Video URL:

Americans have been led to believe that the U.S. is trying to overthrow the elected leader of Syria because he is waging war on his own people, which is simply not true. The Syrian government is waging war against armies of foreign terrorists who are funded and trained by the U.S. government, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar, with help from Jordan, Turkey, Israel, and some European allies. These foreign-funded terrorists base themselves in civilian areas, like Eastern Aleppo, and then use the civilian population as human shields.

There are numerous reports documenting the use of the civilian population of Eastern Aleppo as human shields by the terrorist groups supported by the U.S. administration.

There is, however, no valid U.S. national interest to justify President Obama’s war against the government of Syria. The U.S. has spent more than one billion dollars per year since 2011 to wage war against the government of Syria because it is in Israel’s interest, not ours.

As then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wrote in 2012, the “best way to help Israel” is to “use force” in Syria to overthrow the government. Her email clearly reveals that as Secretary of State, Clinton was working to oust the Syrian government because it was in Israel’s interests — not America’s.

A leaked Clinton email from 2012 reveals that the U.S.-led war in Syria is being waged because it is "the best way to help Israel."

Likewise, a simple diagnosis of all of the wars currently being waged by the United States in the Middle East reveals that they are all part of an Israeli strategy known as the Yinon Plan to dominate the region by Balkanizing the large Arab states and breaking them up along ethnic and religious fault-lines. This is what has been done in Iraq, Libya, Lebanon, and Sudan, and what is currently being done in Syria.

The Israeli plan to dominate the Middle East by breaking up the Arab states into ethnic statelets is known as the Yinon Plan (1982).

A diagnosis to identify the real cause of the wars in the Middle East reveals that the Zionist plan to dominate the region is behind the U.S.-led wars that have been waged in the region since the false-flag terror attacks of September 11, 2001.

As my research into the false-flag attacks of 9/11 shows, Israeli military intelligence and Zionist agents were behind the attacks and cover-up, as well as the false narrative that was used to take the United States to war. The 9/11 attacks were, in fact, a well-planned and sophisticated false-flag operation that was designed to kick-start the Global War on Terror, an Israeli war agenda that was rolled out onto the world stage at the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism in July 1979 – at the Jonathan (Netanyahu) Institute.

The purpose of the Jerusalem Conference was to start a global propaganda “offensive” to blame the Soviet Union for “training, funding, and equipping” international terrorism. The masterminds of this offensive were the Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin, the “Father of Terrorism,” and the heads of Israeli military intelligence.

Menachem Begin, the founder of the Likud Party that currently rules Israel, considered himself to be "The Father of Terrorism" - in all of the world.

For Begin and his military intelligence planners it was “most important” to “maintain anti-Soviet hostility in Washington” because this tension between the super-powers prevented a settlement from being imposed on Israel and the Palestinians, “a development the Begin administration wished to avoid at all costs.”

Menachem Begin’s right-wing political party of Jewish terrorists (Likud) is still in power today, as it has been for most of the past four decades, and Israeli military intelligence is still using the same anti-Russia strategy to prevent a super-power settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The fact that Victoria Nuland (Mrs. Robert Kagan), the Asst. Secretary of State for Eurasia, played a key role in organizing and funding the coup d’état that overthrew the elected government in Ukraine is a key point to understand the anti-Russian posture being assumed by the U.S. government and its allies.

Asst. Secretary of State Victoria Nuland played a key role in fomenting the violent overthrow of the Ukrainian government.

Nuland then chose Arseniy Yatsenyuk, an anti-Russian politician, to be the next 
prime minister. This was a choice that was certain to cause civil strife in a nation with a large Russian minority population. Crimea, for example, is more than 90 percent Russian-speaking.

Victoria Nuland is also a Zionist of the most extreme kind. This is not merely a coincidence.

Victoria Nuland (Kagan) is a member of the Zionist Neo-Con family that brought us the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), the war against Yugoslavia in the 1990s, and the invasion of Iraq in 2003.  The Kagan family, along with the rest of the Zionist Neo-Cons, is at the center of the anti-Russian policy being pursued by the United States and its European allies. As with Syria, there is absolutely no valid U.S. national interest in having hostile relations with Russia. It is rather in the best interest of the United States and the European nations to have friendly relations with Russia.

So, when we diagnose the most serious political problems afflicting the Western world today we find that these problems are all caused by the Zionist state of Israel and its allies and supporters in the United States and Europe. The mainstream media won’t tell you that but that is what we find when an honest diagnosis of these problems is done.

When we understand that Zionism and the State of Israel is behind:

- the false-flag terrorism of 9/11, the cover-up, and the fraudulent War on Terror;

- the miserable plight of millions of Palestinian refugees;

- the wars of terrorism in the Middle East (e.g. Syria, Iraq), and;

- the rabid anti-Russia politics and fear-mongering...

then the real cause of these problems is understood and the solution becomes quite clear.

While our politicians are forced to support the Zionist state, we are not. Anyone who understands that the Likud party of Jewish terrorists and the intransigent policies of the State of Israel are causing these problems, and still supports Israel - is clearly part of the problem.

Understanding that the Zionist State of Israel is the cause of the wars being waged across the Middle East enables us to see through the disinformation being provided by our governments and the controlled media. Only with a clear understanding of the root cause of these wars will the public be able to create a popular movement to take the political actions required to rectify these problems which are becoming more urgent every day.

This bumper sticker is made by Henry Herskovitz who has maintained a vigil in front of his former synagogue, Beth Israel, in Ann Arbor, Michigan, for more than a decade, to raise Jewish awareness of the grave injustice the Zionist state of Israel represents and its corruption of Jewish values in America.

The world needs more righteous Jews like Henry Herskovitz of Ann Arbor.

Who is behind Hillary Clinton’s Hostility for Russia and Why it Matters

October 27, 2016

The Jerusalem conference (Netanyahu Institute, 1979) also helped to revive the anti-Soviet alliance between Israel and the United States by charging the Soviets with responsibility for "funding, training, and equipping international terrorism." This new charge helped keep the United States and the Soviet Union at each other's throats, thus preventing them from agreeing on a diplomatic solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict in the Middle East.
- "International Terrorism":  The Propaganda War, Philip Paull, 1982

Palestinian refugees in Yarmouk camp near Damascus, Syria, have been victims of the U.S.-led war of terror imposed on Syria since 2011.

Criminality Exposed - Then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wrote in 2012 that "the best way to help Israel" is to "use force" to overthrow the government in Syria. What nation was she working for, anyway?

Concerning matters of war and peace, the relationship between the United States and Russia is certainly the most important foreign policy issue facing American voters in the upcoming U.S. presidential election. Because the two leading presidential candidates have such different positions on Russia, the outcome of the U.S. election will have profound consequences for the entire world.

Hillary Clinton, the Democratic candidate, is openly hostile to Russia and advocates reckless policies, such as no-fly zones over Syria, which could lead to a military conflict between the two super-powers.

Donald Trump, the Republican, on the other hand, offers a much more common-sense and friendly approach to Russia. Compared to Clinton, Trump’s positive posture vis-à-vis Russia is certainly one of the most important reasons why Americans concerned about world peace will cast their votes for him.

The last thing Americans need or want is hostility with Russia, so why is Hillary Clinton fomenting the one thing that nobody wants? And, why is the controlled media in the United States supporting Clinton and the reckless anti-Russian policies she advocates?

The answer is fairly obvious:  Clinton is advocating anti-Russian policies because that is what she has been told to do by the people who control her, which would seem to be the same people who control the media.

There are two things about Russia that the controlled media in the United States constantly misrepresent to the American public:  the Russian annexation of the Crimea and the Russian intervention in Syria.

The controlled media portrays the Russian annexation of the Crimean peninsula as illegal and aggression, while it clearly is neither.  The media, in fact, turns the matter completely around.  What happened in the Ukraine is that the U.S. State Department, under the leadership of Asst. Secretary of State Victoria Nuland (Mrs. Robert Kagan) financed and arranged the violent coup d’état that overthrew the elected government in Kiev, in effect stealing the whole nation of Ukraine. This is the crime that changed Ukraine from being an ally of Russia to becoming a client state of the U.S.

The population of Crimea, which is overwhelmingly Russian-speaking, voted not to join the U.S.-installed government in Kiev and chose to re-join Russia. This was a given that could have easily been predicted. To say that this was aggression on the part of Russia is absolutely false, but that remains the core lie about Russia the controlled media repeats constantly.

The situation is the same with the Russian intervention in Syria.  The Russians were asked by the legal and elected government of Syria to assist in the struggle to put down the terrorist “rebels” that have been armed, trained, and funded by the United States, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Jordan, and Israel since 2011.

The legal situation in Syria is actually very simple:  the Russian intervention in Syria is legal; the U.S. intervention is not. In Syria, the U.S. and its allies are blatantly violating international law and committing war crimes on a daily basis. U.S. taxpayer dollars are funding the terrorist extremists seeking to overthrow the democratically elected leader, Bashar al Assad.

Hillary Clinton was U.S. Secretary of State from January 2009 until February 2013. Victoria Nuland (Kagan) was Clinton’s spokesperson at the State Department from May 2011 through the remainder of Clinton’s term in office. This means that Clinton and Nuland-Kagan saw eye-to-eye and were reading from the same script regarding U.S. foreign policy.

Victoria Nuland is the wife of Robert Kagan, one of the founders of The Project for the New American Century (PNAC), the Zionist and Neo-Con organization that lobbied for the war in Yugoslavia and the invasion of Iraq. The Kagans have been a driving force for criminal military interventions since the 1990s and seem to have a permanent family fiefdom at the State Department.

As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton supported the illegal U.S. involvement in Syria, writing that “the best way to help Israel” is to use force to overthrow the elected government in Damascus. Since 2011, the Obama administration has authorized and funded the C.I.A. to work to that end in Syria.

The Russian intervention in Syria threatens to bring to an end the U.S.-led criminal terrorist activity in Syria and leave the coalition of the killing exposed for the criminals that they are. This is the only reason the conflict in Syria drags on and on. The Obama administration and its allies cannot accept defeat in Syria because it would result in the tables in the Middle East being turned completely around against them.

But, why are the Zionist Neo-Cons and the Clinton gang stirring up fear and hostility against Russia?

To understand why Clinton is so hostile to Russia it is worth recalling the U.S. election in 1980 in which Ronald Reagan was elected. During his first press conference in January 1981, Alexander Haig, the new Secretary of State, announced a new focus for U.S. foreign policy, saying “international terrorism will take the place of human rights” and went on to blame the Soviet Union for “training, funding, and equipping” international terrorism.

Haig’s charges against the Soviet Union were very serious, just as Clinton’s are against Russia, but in both cases they are utterly spurious and false.  So, why did such high-level officials make such allegations in the first place?

The Reagan administration was profoundly influenced by Claire Sterling’s 1981 book The Terror Network:  The Secret of International Terrorism, which was often cited by Haig and others to support the administration’s charges about Soviet support for international terrorism.

Philip Paull, author of the thesis “International Terrorism:  The Propaganda War” (1982) analyzed Sterling’s sources and references in her book and found “a trail of deception and misinformation was laid bare.”

Paull found that Sterling’s misquotes were “exact replicas of the misquotes published by the Jonathan (Netanyahu) Institute" in conjunction with the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism arranged by Menachem Begin, Benjamin Netanyahu and his father Benzion, and the chiefs of Israeli military intelligence in July 1979.

“There, a coalition had been organized, and a consensus achieved, that would put international terrorism at the top of the Reagan administration’s foreign policy agenda when it assumed office in January 1981,” Paull wrote, adding, “It appeared that Washington’s concern about Soviet support for international terrorism in the winter of 1981 had been created in Jerusalem in the summer of 1979.”

Paull’s thesis proves “that the heightened global media coverage of ‘international terrorism’ during 1980-81 was for the most part a result of a deliberate, well-financed, international propaganda campaign initiated by the Israeli government, and carried out by its overseas allies.”

“This ‘anti-terrorist’ propaganda campaign was and is being conducted in a style reminiscent of wartime ‘psychological warfare’ by journalists serving as conduits and spreaders of misinformation originating in Jerusalem,” Paull found.

Paull explains why Menachem Begin and his faction of Zionist terrorists in the Likud coalition needed to connect the Soviet Union to international terrorism:

The Jackson group (Sen. Henry M. Jackson), virtually an Israeli lobby in the United States, used the Israelis to support the anti-Soviet campaign in Washington…

The Israeli conference organizers, in turn, could use Jackson and the Commentary group around Podhoretz to help prevent a pro-Arab tilt in Washington, keep United States armaments flowing to Israel, and most important, maintain anti-Soviet hostility in Washington.  Relaxation of superpower hostility could trigger a thaw in U.S.-Soviet relations, and a settlement in the Middle East which would include the Palestinians would then be conceivable. This was a development the Begin administration wished to avoid at all costs.

So, Menachem Begin and the Likud party of Zionist terrorists were behind the propaganda offensive launched in Jerusalem in 1979 at the Netanyahu Institute to smear the Palestinians as terrorists and the Soviet Union as being behind 'international terrorism'. This message became the new political theme and was vigorously pushed in controlled media outlets around the world.

As Claire Sterling wrote in “Terrorism:  Tracing the Network,” published in the New York Times Magazine in March 1981:

There is massive proof that the Soviet Union and its surrogates over the last decade, have provided the weapons, training and sanctuary for a worldwide terror network aimed at destabilization of Western democratic society.

As Paull proves in his thesis about the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism, Sterling’s false claims “rested on a body of misinformation originating in Jerusalem.”

Today, thirty-seven years later, we are facing the same misinformation campaign and the same game of blaming Russia in order to create hostility and tension between the world’s leading super-powers. It is essential to understand that this propaganda comes from the same source now as it came from then – Israeli military intelligence under the political leadership of the Likud faction, now headed by Benjamin Netanyahu.

It is important for U.S. voters to understand that the anti-Russian rhetoric coming from Hillary Clinton and the controlled media is extremely dangerous and harmful to the cause of peace.  It is in the best interest of the United States (and Europe) to have positive and friendly relations with Russia and there is no reason why we should not enjoy peaceful relations.

The criminals behind the anti-Russian policies and rhetoric are the real terrorists who seek to overthrow nations around the world, enslave their people, and steal their wealth. They have done so with Hillary Clinton in power leading the way in places like Iraq, Libya, and Syria – and seek to do the same to Russia. Her record in these interventions is clear - she has been involved in war crimes at the highest level.

By preventing peaceful relations between Russia and the West and by fomenting tension between the super-powers, the criminal lunatics behind Hillary Clinton seek to increase their control over Palestine and the Middle East by keeping the world in a constant state of fear and violence. This is why Hillary Clinton poses such a serious threat to world peace.

Source:  "International Terrorism":  The Propaganda War, Philip Paull, Thesis for M.A. International Relations, San Francisco State Univ., May 1982

Ari Fleischer and 9/11 - Israel's Point Man in the White House

October 18, 2016

9/11 is a most peculiar event in U.S. history. Although the terror atrocity profoundly changed the nation and the world, it remains an unsolved crime that is not even studied or analyzed as a subject at American universities and schools. Rather, most academic institutions in the United States simply accept the now disproven government/media version of events and try to make sense of our recent history working from an utterly false understanding of what really happened.

So, why do American colleges not offer courses of study devoted to analyzing the events of 9/11 and its consequences? Why is the event that changed our history not a subject of research at U.S. universities?

To my mind the answer is obvious. If college students across the nation were to investigate the events of 9/11 it would open the whole subject of what really happened to discussion and analysis, something the government and media have avoided for fifteen years. If it were a field of research at American universities, one of those avoided subjects of 9/11 that would have to be dealt with would be the Israeli connection to 9/11 and the fraudulent War on Terror.

ON 9/11 Israeli commando leader Ehud Barak blamed Osama bin Laden and called for the U.S. to begin an operational War on Terror.

On 9/11, the first person to blame Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida for the atrocity was Ehud Barak, the former Israeli chief-of-staff and commander of Israel's covert commando force, the Sayeret Matkal.  Barak laid the blame on Osama bin Laden during an interview on BBC World, the largest English speaking television network in the world, which ensured that the English-speaking world was given the culprit's interpretation that what they were seeing was an act of Islamic terrorism - before the towers even fell, or more accurately, were demolished with explosives and super-thermite.

Although Barak's analysis was presented to the world before any evidence from the crime could even be examined, his seemingly impromptu analysis stuck and became the official version. The Israeli version was adopted by President George W. Bush and presented to the world by the U.S. president on 9/11.  But, how did George Bush know what to say about 9/11 when nothing was known about who was behind the atrocity? How did Bush's comments fit so neatly into the Israeli military's position, as articulated by Ehud Barak?

The reason why George Bush accepted the Israeli interpretation of 9/11 is because his spokesman was Lawrence Ari Fleischer, who had very close ties to Israel. Not only was Fleischer a dedicated Zionist, his older brother was the president of an Israeli-owned company, owned and controlled by Israeli air force veterans, one of whom was a business partner in a company with Ehud Barak. So, by simply talking with his brother on the phone, Ari Fleischer would be in contact with an Israeli network, based in New Jersey, that included Ehud Barak.

The following photographs and captions explain the relationship between Ari Fleischer in the White House and Ehud Barak, a prime suspect of being a master planner of the 9/11 atrocity.

September 11, 2001 - President George W. Bush was visiting the Emma E. Brooker Elementary School in Sarasota, Florida, when news of the attack on the World Trade Center broke. While still at the school, Bush and his Press Secretary Ari Fleischer began preparing the president's address to the nation. But how, at that early stage, did they know what to say?

Fleischer seemed oddly calm, in spite of the terror atrocity, as he helped the president craft his comments to the nation. How did Fleischer know what the president should say when virtually nothing was known about who was behind the crime? Bush seems concerned and troubled, but not Fleischer.

At 8:30 p.m., the president addressed the nation from the White House. In his speech, he set the tone for the wars to come in Afghanistan and Iraq. “I’ve directed the full resources for our intelligence and law enforcement communities to find those responsible and bring them to justice,” the president said. “We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them.”

DEVOTED TO ANTI-GENTILE RACISM - Ari Fleischer is very tight with Chabad and his 
Lubavitch rabbi in Washington, D.C, Levi Shemtov.  Fleischer was the co-president of Chabad's Capitol Jewish Forum and received the Young Leadership Award from the American Friends of Lubavitch in October, 2001, one month after 9/11. Chabad is reportedly a criminal organization with ties to Mossad. Chabad (Lubavitch) is an openly racist Orthodox Jewish and Zionist organization that teaches Jewish supremacism. Chabad doctrine says that Jews are God's chosen people and that non-Jews (gentiles) are "satanic".  The Great Rebbe of Chabad [Menachem Mendel Schneerson] taught his followers that Jewish people are an extension of God and Gentiles are destined to serve the Jews:

"Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres,
while the Jewish soul stems from holiness."

"A Jew was not created as a means for some [other] purpose;
he himself is the purpose, since the substance of all [divine] emanations was created only to serve the Jews."

Quotes from Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson from Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel, by Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky

While Ari Fleischer served as White House spokesman from 2001 through 2003, his brother worked for a company headed by Israeli military intelligence agents.

Ari Fleischer's older brother Michael Paul Fleischer has been president of the Israeli-owned Bogen Communication International, Inc. of Ramsey, New Jersey, since 1997. Bogen's product line includes sound processing equipment. Through its European operations (Speech Design GmbH, a German company with subsidiaries in Switzerland and Israel) it develops, manufactures, and distributes voicemail systems as well as unified messaging digital voice-processing systems. In 1996, a manufacturing subsidiary, Speech Design (Israel) Ltd., began production of some of Speech Design's product line in Israel.

The Israeli-owned Bogen Communications specializes in voicemail systems.

BOGEN'S NEW BOSS - The Israeli Air Force veteran Yoav Stern became Bogen's Co-chief Executive Officer and Co-president of Bogen Communications International Inc. in 1995 when it was acquired by the Israeli-owned company, European Gateway Acquisition Corp., where Stern was Co-chief Executive Officer. Stern served in the Israeli Air Force for ten years as a pilot, Avionics Systems Officer, Commander of Operational Training Unit, and Deputy Squadron Commander. Stern was involved in management and operations of highly advanced avionics and aerospace technologies. He spent 20 years in reserve services in the Israeli Air Force.

Yaron Eitan was Chairman of Bogen Communications as well as President and Chief Executive Officer of its parent company, Geotek Communications. Bogen Communications develops, manufactures, and markets telephone voicemail systems as well as unified messaging digital voice-processing systems.  In 1998, Eitan founded Selway Partners, a technology-sector holding company, which was sold to SCP Partners in 2002, at which time Eitan became one of the partners of SCP Partners. Eitan served in the Israeli Defense Forces for six years, where he reached the rank of Major.

EHUD BARAK the former Israeli prime minister, defense minister, and chief-of-staff, joined the Pennsylvania-based SCP Partners in 2001. Barak was an SCP partner from 2001 until his nomination to become Minister of Defense and Deputy Prime Minister of Israel in June 2007.

So, you can see that Ehud Barak came to the United States in early 2001 and joined SCP Partners, where Yaron Eitan was a key player, becoming a partner in 2002. Among other things, the SCP Partner firm was involved with companies that made nano-aluminum, one of the ingredients of super-thermite. 

Yaron Eitan was involved in different Israeli business ventures in the United States, one of them being Bogen Communications, a provider of voicemail systems. He was chairman of Bogen in 1997, when Ari Fleischer's older brother, Michael, was made president of the company. Three years later, Ari Fleischer became spokesman for President George W. Bush, where he served for about two-and-a-half years, from the time Bush entered the White House through the events of 9/11 and the illegal U.S. invasion of Iraq in early 2003.  By the summer of 2003, shortly after Bush gave his "Mission Accomplished" speech, Ari Fleischer was ready to leave his position at the Bush White House. Fleischer's job as Israel's point man "interpreting" 9/11 and the fraudulent War on Terror was done. 

THE SPOILS OF WAR - The Israeli agent Michael P. Fleischer went on to serve as the head of Private Sector Development in occupied Iraq.


Bogen Communications International, Inc. History,

European Gateway Acquisition Corp. Shareholders Vote to Approve Acquisition of Speech Design Gmbh and Bogen Communications, Inc., Business Wire, August 8, 1995

"Exclusive: New Photos Show Bush’s Response To 9/11 Attacks," PBS, May 6, 2016

Geotek Communications Inc. History, 

“Ehud Barak - Architect of 9-11,”, September 11, 2009

“How Ehud Barak Pulled Off 9-11,”, May 5, 2010 

“Obama is Obliged to Arrest Ehud Barak - 9-11 Mastermind and War Criminal,”, April 25, 2010


Bollyn Responds to Charges of Anti-Semitism

October 7, 2016

I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22 percent of Americans now believe "the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews," down from nearly 50 percent in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood… But I don't care if Americans think we're running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.
- Joel Stein, 
“Who runs Hollywood? C'mon,” Los Angeles Times, December 19, 2008


J'accuse! - Sander Hicks accuses me of being anti-Semitic.

J'accuse! - Sander Hicks, a New York-based critic of my research, attacked me in an email to a group of NY 9-11 activists:

If anyone said that the Albanians control the media and contributed to the moral decline of a society, or if anyone said that the Catholics did that, then that person would be taken to account for making a broad generalization about an entire religion or an entire ethnicity.

Broad racial generalizations are inherently unfair. Because they are inherently unscientific.

And this generalization is exactly what Christopher Bollyn said about the Jews. He said that they control the media and that their nature is to contribute to a moral decline of a society. It's a huge blockage and it will prevent people from reading whatever else of value he has to contribute. You'll have to take my word for it. Just look at how his events were shut down in New York. And look at how that smears 9/11 truth. I'm not talking about stuff in theory I'm talking about what has happened. It's defamatory to our movement --it has caused damages.

Other people on this email list have contacted me personally. They say that it's insane that people cannot read that quotation and not think that he is being anything but anti-Semitic.

It's not up to me to disprove his racist generalization. It seems false on its face. If he wants to make an assertion it's up to him to prove it. I'm organizing people in New York to get justice for 911. What are you guys doing? You're defending something that's indefensible. It's pathetic and it's weak and it's amoral.

What I find sharply hypocritical is that Bollyn does all this in the name of "Christian values."


I have been asked to comment on a paragraph I wrote for the first edition of “The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9-11.” This material ultimately became Chapter VII of my book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World.

This particular chapter was sent to an independent fact-checker in England who, unbeknownst to me, examined 105 statements and found them to be 100 percent correct.

Sander Hicks, a New York-based critic of my work who calls me an anti-Semite, sent me the paragraph he thought was proof of my so-called "anti-Semitism". In email to others he said, “I supplied the quote from Bollyn's book that displays racism, hate and Anti-Semitism.”


The paragraph that Hicks' uses to accuse me is not even in my book, Solving 9-11.

First, I should point out that Hicks is quite wrong to say this quote is from my book. The paragraph he provided is not even in the book. The paragraph in question was written in 2008 as part of the on-line research, which was the first-draft material for the book:

As an American raised with traditional Christian values, I realized that the culture I had grown up in was under attack and being reduced to a sub-culture. Through the Jewish-controlled media, a distinctly foreign and anti-Christian culture of pornography, perversion, and violence was being pushed. The producers of this "new culture" were primarily Jews of Eastern European origin. Through their control of the mass media, film, radio, and television networks, a diet of perverse entertainment and un-American values was being force-fed to the unsuspecting American people...

The paragraph that was published in the book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World (2012), reads like this:

As an American raised with traditional Christian values, I came to realize that the culture I had grown up in was under attack and was being reduced to a subculture. Through the media, a distinctly foreign and anti-Christian culture of pornography, perversion, and violence was being promoted. A diet of perverse entertainment and un-American values was being pushed onto the unsuspecting American population through the mass media.

The fact of the matter is that the quote that Sander Hicks says “displays racism, hate and Anti-Semitism” is not even in the book. Looking at the paragraph that was actually published in the book it is clear that Hicks is quite wrong about it being any of the things he says it is.

This is what I wrote to Sander Hicks:

Sander, all the points I make in that paragraph are easily proven. They are, in fact, so well-known that they are agreed upon by anyone who has looked into the subject. You may not believe it, but I would ask you to simply examine each point and you will see that I have not lied or exaggerated about anything.

As the author of the draft version that I wrote in 2008, I am of course ready to defend what I wrote. To do so, it is necessary to provide the paragraph in its proper context:

After spending several years in Europe, Israel, and the Middle East, I returned to the United States in the late 1970s and found the discourse in the media about Zionism to be extremely one-sided and distorted. Zionism, a racist ideology if ever there was one, was grossly misrepresented in the U.S. mass media as being a progressive and democratic movement of national liberation, while the state of Israel was depicted as being a kosher slice of America in the Middle East. It was very clear that the people providing the distorted view of the Middle East were themselves Jews devoted to a very un-American political and racial agenda called Zionism, the violent and chauvinistic nationalism of Eastern European Jews who have occupied Palestine since 1948.

Honest and unbiased coverage of Israel and the Middle East became increasingly difficult to find in the U.S. during the 1980s and 1990s. The sale of Ted Turner's progressive Cable News Network (CNN) to Gerald Levine of AOL Time Warner and the transformation of the informative Christian Science Monitor marked the end of the last independent and unbiased news outlets covering the Middle East. An ethnic minority group with a foreign agenda – Zionism – had gained monopoly control over the U.S. mass media. The Jewish monopoly of the U.S. media coincided with the United States being drawn more deeply into the Arab-Israeli conflict as the primary supporter, financier, and political ally of the Zionists. This combination has been extremely detrimental for America and disastrous for the people of the region, as the criminal Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982 clearly showed.

Aware of the increasing prevalence and dominance of Zionist Jews in the political, financial, and academic sectors, I came to the conclusion that I was living in Jewish times. As an American raised with traditional Christian values, I realized that the culture I had grown up in was under attack and being reduced to a sub-culture. Through the Jewish-controlled media, a distinctly foreign and anti-Christian culture of pornography, perversion, and violence was being pushed. The producers of this "new culture" were primarily Jews of Eastern European origin. Through their control of the mass media, film, radio, and television networks, a diet of perverse entertainment and un-American values was being force-fed to the unsuspecting American population.

The part that Hicks says “displays racism, hate and Anti-Semitism” is the last four sentences of the final paragraph, so let’s look at what they say:

As an American raised with traditional Christian values, I realized that the culture I had grown up in was under attack and being reduced to a sub-culture.

Bollyn:  I grew up in the Episcopalian church where I served many years as an acolyte. I was also an Eagle Scout and earned the God and Country Award. I observed that the Christian values that were essential guidelines of the culture I grew up in were very much under attack when I came back to the United States in the late 1970s after about three years spent in Europe and the Middle East.

Through the Jewish-controlled media, a distinctly foreign and anti-Christian culture of pornography, perversion, and violence was being pushed.

Bollyn:  The fact that an “anti-Christian culture of pornography, perversion, and violence was being pushed” is obvious to anyone who is familiar with American culture of the 1980s and 90s. The offensive phrase therefore must be that this was being pushed by the “Jewish-controlled media.”

It is an easily proven fact that the U.S. mainstream media is “Jewish-controlled.” Some of the sources which have documented this fact are:

“Who runs Hollywood? C'mon,” Joel Stein, Los Angeles Times, December 19, 2008

“Helen Thomas on the Zionist-Controlled Media & Israel,”, January 21, 2011…/

“How Jews Control the American Media” by Brother Nathanael Kapner, Real Jew News, 2008

“Oliver Stone: Jewish Control of the Media Is Preventing Free Holocaust Debate,” Ha’aretz, July 26, 2010…/oliver-stone-jewish-control-of-the…

“Seven Jewish Americans Control Most US Media” by John Whitley,, 2003

“The Jewish Secret Society That Controls the U.S. Media” by Christopher Bollyn,, December 1, 2009…/

The producers of this "new culture" were primarily Jews of Eastern European origin.

Bollyn:  Again, an examination of who controls the media in the United States will show that this is the fact. CBS News is a good example to illustrate this fact: Leslie Moonves, the great-nephew of David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister of Israel, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of CBS Corp.

Through their control of the mass media, film, radio, and television networks, a diet of perverse entertainment and un-American values was being force-fed to the unsuspecting American population.

Bollyn:  The mass media has consistently pushed “a diet of perverse entertainment and un-American values.” One could write volumes on this subject, but as an example of how this works I sent the following to Sander Hicks:

“Who Murdered Black Music?” by Mike King:


Spanish-language TV on Bollyn Event at National Press Club

September 24, 2016

"Israelis planned 9-11 terrorist attacks in the U.S."

Washington, D.C. - The Spanish-language television network HispanTV covered Bollyn's event in the Winners' Room at the National Press Club on September 6, 2016, in Washington, D.C. and produced this excellent three-minute news report.

Video URL -


The 9/11 Culprits behind the anti-Bollyn protests

September 22, 2016

"Our oppression is not up for debate" - This protestor at Bollyn's event in Brooklyn does not seem to grasp what my presentation is all about. Who is oppressing Jews in America?  Is pointing out Israeli and Zionist involvement in the dual deception of 9/11 and the War on Terror oppressing her? Is it wise for Jews to stand up against 9/11 truth?

When I spoke at the Brooklyn Commons on September 7 there was a small group of protestors who had been organized by a group called Jews for Racial and Economic Justice (JFREJ). This organization had posted an announcement calling for a protest several days prior to the event.


As this poster shows, the JFREJ sought to portray me as a "right-wing conspiracy theorist" and a "raging anti-Semite" to mobilize its members to protest.

Many of the emails that were sent to harass other venues came from Rafael Shimunov, a Jewish immigrant from the Soviet Union, who used very un-American tactics to threaten sponsors and interfere in contracts in New York, Texas, and Denmark. Shimunov just became a member of the board of directors of JFREJ in September 2016.

Shimunov wrote a posting calling me a hate-monger, entitled "Who is Christopher Bollyn?"

JFREJ is supported by the UJA Federation, where Larry Silverstein was national chairman and is now an honorary member of the board of directors, the Jewish Women's Foundation of New York, where his wife, Klara, is an honorary member of the board, and the Covenant Foundation, which is headed by Susan Crown, daughter of Lester Crown and member of the Henry Crown family which controls General Dynamics and the Aspen Institute. Lester Crown admitted on video that his father bought an entire military aircraft plant in the United States and smuggled it to Israel in violation of U.S. law in the early 1950s. The plant provided by Henry Crown became Israel Aircraft Industries. Larry Silverstein owned the three towers that were demolished on 9/11 taking some 2,700 lives with them. The Crown family is connected to both the JFK murder and 9/11 cover-ups. Susan Crown's maternal grandfather owned the Ambassador Hotel when Bobbie Kennedy was killed there.

Israeli Politician Explains How Criticism of Israel is Stifled in USA and Europe

September 22, 2016

In an interview with American journalist Amy Goodman (2002), the Israeli politician Shulamit Aloni explained how the charge of anti-Semitism is "a trick we use" to suppress criticism of Israel coming from within the United States, and that for criticism coming from Europe "we bring up the Holocaust."

Amy Goodman:  Yours is a voice of criticism we don’t often hear in the United States. Often when there is dissent expressed in the United States against policies of the Israeli government, people here are called anti-semitic. What is your response to that as an Israeli Jew?

Shulamit Aloni:  Well, it’s a trick, we always use it. When from Europe somebody is criticizing Israel, then we bring up the Holocaust. When in this country people are criticizing Israel, then they are anti-Semitic. And the organization is strong, and has a lot of money, and the ties between Israel and the American Jewish establishment are very strong and they are strong in this country, as you know. And they have power, which is OK. They are talented people and they have power and money, and the media and other things, and their attitude is “Israel, my country right or wrong”, identification. And they are not ready to hear criticism. And it’s very easy to blame people who criticize certain acts of the Israeli government as anti-Semitic, and to bring up the Holocaust, and the suffering of the Jewish people, and that is justify everything we do to the Palestinians.


Open Mind Conference 2016

September 20, 2016

Christopher Bollyn speaking at the Open Mind Conference in Copenhagen, Denmark. The presentation is online at:

Christopher Bollyn and Danish supporters after the presentation.

Frank Rasmussen introduces Christopher Bollyn.

Chris feeding apples to Apache at Bjarne's place.

Bollyn leaving Denmark with the fabled castle of Elsinore (Helsingör) in the background. (Photos by Helje)



Video - Bollyn's 9/11 Presentation at Austin TruthFest

September 19, 2016

AUSTIN, Texas - A video of my 9/11 presentation at the Austin TruthFest 2016 is now online. The YouTube video will soon have complete French subtitles under the cc tab for closed captioning.

Video URL - 

9/11 Tour - Overflow Crowd at National Press Club Presentation

September 7, 2016 
Overflow Crowd at Washington Event;
New York and Hartford venues cave to Zionist Threats

THE WINNERS' ROOM at the National Press Club was the venue for the overflow crowd that attended Bollyn's presentation, "The Dual Deception of 9/11 and the War on Terror" in Washington, D.C.

Another view of the Winners' Room.  The event was bumped up to the National Press Club after the planned venue, Busboys and Poets, received threats from Zionists who use gangster tactics to stifle discussion of Israel's role in the false-flag terrorism of 9/11. Americans need to stand up to Zionist assaults against our freedoms of speech and assembly. 

Washington, D.C. - Last night's presentation, a dinner event at the National Press Club, was an outstanding success. My presentation was given to an overflow crowd of about 50 people in the Winners' Room and the adjacent room. The event was arranged by with the help of the Sarah McClendon group. I spoke at the NPC last in November 2000 after the publication of my article about electronic voter fraud in U.S. elections, "The Death of Democracy or May the Best Hacker Win."                


9/7 - Brooklyn, New York - Wednesday, September 7 at 7-9 p.m. 
The Brooklyn Commons, 388 Atlantic Ave.

9/8 - Hartford, Connecticut  - Thursday, Sept. 8, 6-9:30 p.m. 
NOTE - This venue cancelled due to threats against the church. An alternative venue is being sought.

9/9 - New York, N.Y. - Friday, Sept. 9, 7-9 p.m.
NOTE - This venue cancelled due to threats against the church. An alternative venue is being sought.

The note from the West-Park Presbyterian Church said:  

Unfortunately, due to the continuous emails protesting your event, the West Park Session (the governing body) met in an emergency meeting today, and voted unanimously to cancel your event, citing paragraph A.5 of the Agreement, which in part states: 

...nor will the Licensee engage in any activity or business venture that is prohibited by law or inconsistent with the mission or standards of WPPC...

9/11 Austin, Texas - Sunday, Sept. 11, 12-4 p.m.
Scholz's Biergarten, 1607 San Jacinto Blvd.

“There is no instance of a nation benefitting from prolonged warfare.”
― Sun Tzu, The Art of War (500 BC)

To support the tour,
donate by clicking here
or by PayPal to 
(Note: Not for email)

If you would like to have a Solving 9-11 event in your town, 
send me a note by Facebook Messenger:

or email to:

Christopher Bollyn speaking in St. Augustine, January 2016

For the sake of brevity, the short title of my upcoming speaking tour is “9/11 and Our Political Crisis.” A longer and more descriptive title would be something like: 

“Our Political Crisis:  Ending the Dual-Deception of 9/11 and the Fraudulent War on Terror.”

The word crisis comes from the Greek word for decision:  krisis, which is why the word means the decisive point of a catastrophe or emergency when a difficult decision must be made. Crisis also means the turning point of a disease when an important change takes place, indicating either recovery or death.

The political crisis that Americans are facing is not simply the presidential election of 2016, but the fact that our nation is at a turning point where an important decision must be made concerning the fate of our American republic. As citizens, we must demand that the candidates address the critical decision to end the fraudulent military campaign known as the global “War on Terror”.

The “War on Terror” is an Israeli/Zionist fraud that was foisted on the American people in the immediate aftermath of the terror attacks of 9/11.  Unbeknownst to most Americans at the time, however, is the fact that the terror attacks of 9/11 were an Israeli false-flag operation that was designed to be blamed on Arab Muslims for the sake of kick-starting the long-planned Zionist stratagem known as the “War on Terror,” which is really an Israeli war agenda to be fought by the U.S.

As long as the United States continues to wage the extremely costly and counter-productive “War on Terror” the American people will simply be unable to enjoy the true blessings of peace and prosperity. According to the National Priorities Project, the current military campaign in Afghanistan is costing us more than four million dollars per hour and the total cost of the wars fought since 2001 is more than eight million dollars per hour for a total of nearly 1.7 trillion dollars. These military campaigns are literally taking the food off of our table.

The United States has been at war against Iraq for twenty-five years - since 1991. We have been waging war in Afghanistan for almost fifteen years (not counting U.S. involvement in the Afghan-Soviet War). Isn't it time to raise our voices so that the political establishment and mainstream media wake up to the fact that we want this multi-trillion dollar fraud called the War on Terror to end? It should be abundantly clear that neither the selected politicians nor the media will do anything to end this outrageous fraud unless we make our voices heard.

This graphic illustrates the criminal nature of the War on Terror, which consumes $400 million per victim of terrorism per year. The U.S. has spent nearly $1.7 trillion (all borrowed money) fighting wars since 2001. When do we say enough?

The “War on Terror” is now in its 15th year having been initiated by President George W. Bush in 2001 and continued by Barack Obama since 2009.  The next president will have to decide to either continue this extremely costly and disastrous war policy or to pull back from the “War on Terror” and stop waging criminal wars in places that have nothing to do with our national interest.

If we want an end to the nation-destroying madness known as the “War on Terror”, we the people must make our voices heard by the candidates and the media at this critical point in our nation’s history.  The nation we save may very well be our own.

This is the message of my current speaking tour,
which began in New England in June. 



Even if you have never done anything like this before, it is fairly simple to arrange an event:

Contact me to determine the date of the event;

Book a suitable meeting room in a public library or some other neutral free-speech venue. The room needs to seat at least 50 people and have a computer compatible projector, screen, and sound system.  Public library rooms are usually free although they may charge a nominal fee.

Once the date and location are set, then together we will promote the event using social media, local 9/11 truth groups and anti-war organizations, and flyers.

Together, we can make a change. Let's do it!

Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to spread awareness of the deception of our time.
Donate here or by PayPal to 


Richard Gutjahr - The Israeli Link to the Terrorism in Nice and Munich

July 25, 2016

COINCIDENCE OR PRIOR KNOWLEDGE? Richard Gutjahr, a German journalist married to a high-ranking Israeli intelligence officer, was present at both Nice and Munich terror attacks, which he posted reports and photos of online.

Richard Gutjahr, the German journalist who is described by some as a propagandist.

Einat Wilf, Gutjahr's Israeli wife, has served in Israel's government with Ehud Barak's political party, as an advisor to Shimon Peres, and as a high-level officer in Israel's signal intelligence agency, Unit 8200.

In what must be one of the most uncanny coincidences in the history of terrorism, a German journalist named Richard Gutjahr was present at two recent terror attacks in Europe, and posted photos of both attacks on-line. What is even more unsettling is the fact that Gutjahr is married to a high-level Israeli intelligence officer, Einat Wilf, a lieutenant in Israeli military intelligence Unit 8200.

Unit 8200 is Israel's equivalent of the NSA, an agency that specializes in signal intelligence. The question about Gutjahr's presence at both recent terror events in Europe being a coincidence or something else has been raised in the German media in articles such as "Nizza, München & Gutjahr – Zufall oder nicht?"

I have written about Israel's intelligence Unit 8200 and possible connections to acts of terrorism in my article "Suspicions about the Russian Plane Crash".

The Israeli media is working to downplay the significance of Gutjahr's presence at both terror events, even suggesting that he was not at the scene in Munich because his photos have been deleted from his Twitter account.  This is how the Times of Israel tried to mislead its readers, writing below the headline that Gutjahr was "supposedly" present at both events:  "Gutjahr’s Twitter profile shows he posted pictures from Nice but not from Munich."

The Jewish Press website provides the details about the reason why Gutjahr's photos are no longer available on Twitter:

Now it gets complicated: after shooting the truck massacre in Nice more than two weeks ago, journalist Richard Gutjahr was also present during the police operation at the Olympia shopping center in Munich and tweeted pictures from the incident. Gutjahr shared one picture of a group of armed police at the mall entrance, and another of armed officers crouching behind a wall.

Then he tweeted: “I made mistakes today. Could not believe that I once again ended up in such a situation. The images are now gone. #OEZ” The hashtag stands for Olympia-Einkaufszentrum, the mall where the attack took place.

Gutjahr tweet

What are the chances that the same journalist, who lives and works in Europe, would be present during two separate terrorist attacks within two weeks? Gutjahr himself appears stunned by this coincidence, as his tweet attests. He lost the images he had shot, admittedly that’s suspicious, but could also be explained so many reasonable different ways.

As the event unfolded in Munich on July 22, Mother Jones posted Gutjahr's photograph (no longer online) from the scene, with the text:

Local reporter Richard Gutjahr described the scene at the shopping center as something "out of a bad movie," with the shopping center completely surrounded by police, a helicopter overhead, and police carrying semi-automatic rifles. Gutjahr was not able to confirm reports of deaths or injuries.

Stehe vor dem #OEZ

— Richard Gutjahr (@gutjahr) July 22, 2016

Gutjahr's wife, Lt. Einat Wilf, is also an Israeli politician and served as a Foreign Policy Advisor to Vice Prime Minister Shimon Peres. She was also a General Partner with Koor Corporate Venture Capital in Israel. 

In 2007, she ran for the presidency of the World Jewish Congress, but withdrew before the vote in which Ronald Lauder was elected president.

Wilf entered the Knesset in January 2010 as a Labor party replacement for Ophir Pines-Paz, who had retired from politics. However, in January 2011 she was one of five MKs to leave the party to establish the new Independence party under the leadership of Ehud Barak. Ehud Barak is a former Israeli chief-of-staff and head of military intelligence.  

Sources: "Down Rabbit Hole with Anti-Israel Conspiracy Crowd after Nice, Munich, Tweets," JNi.Media, July 25, 2016

Einat Wilf, Wikipedia, July 25, 2016

Einat Wilf, Profile of Knesset Member

"Ex-congresswoman claims Israel behind European massacres," Times of Israel, July 24, 2016

"Here's What We Know About The Shooting Rampage at Munich Shopping Mall,", July 22, 2016

"Nizza, München & Gutjahr – Zufall oder nicht?" by Marco Maier,, July 24, 2016

"Suspicions about the Russian Plane Crash" by Christopher Bollyn, Updated November 13, 2015

Bollyn Interview on Brattleboro TV

 July 16, 2016

Christopher Bollyn, author of Solving 9-11:  The Deception that Changed the World  and Solving 9-11:  The Original Articles, was interviewed by Tom Finnell and Chris Pratt on Brattleboro Community TV about his 9-11 research on June 22, 2016.

The link to the show is:

Link to YouTube video of interview:

The Event in Charlemont

 June 24, 2016

Christopher Bollyn's speaking event in Greenfield, Massachusetts, ran into organized resistance that resulted in the event being moved from three different venues in town. Finally, after being pulled from three locations due to threats and other demands, we moved the event to a rustic barn in an idyllic setting, just west of Greenfield, in Charlemont.
(Photos by Helje Bollyn)

The new location could not have been nicer or more beautiful.

People met and conversed in the tranquil idyllic setting...

as the venue was prepared.

Children played as the adults did the setting up...

and played with Ajax and his ball.

I was glad that the midsummer event was being held in such a beautiful green setting.

The presentation went very well without any constraints or friction.

What would a midsummer event be without fresh strawberries?

Deb Chandler, here with Dennis Morrisseau at the event in Brattleboro, Vermont, persevered and prevailed, in spite of all of the obstacles thrown in her path by the 9/11 truth gate-keepers of Greenfield.

1968 - Army Second Lieutenant Dennis Morrisseau of Burlington, Vermont, being arrested in front of White House (of Lyndon B. Johnson) while in uniform and carrying a sign: “120,000 American Casualties—WHY?”
Source and Morrisseau bio:

Christopher Bollyn and Dennis Morrisseau in Brattleboro, Vermont.


The Orlando Massacre and the Zionist Propaganda of Alex Jones

Updated June 20, 2016

With the Orlando massacre story, Alex Jones and reveal their primary purpose is to serve as a Zionist propaganda outlet, supporting the deception behind the fraudulent War on Terror.

"Terror is theatre... Theatre's a con trick. Do you know what that means? Con trick? You've been deceived. "
- John Le Carré, The Little Drummer Girl, 1983

"Terrorism is aimed at the people watching, not at the actual victims. Terrorism is theater… The normal objective of state or official terrorism is to enforce obedience and cooperation... Success demands the creation of an atmosphere of fear and the seeming omnipresence of the internal security apparatus."
- Brian Michael Jenkins, "International Terrorism: A New Kind of Warfare," Rand Corporation, June 1974

The Israeli construct known as the War on Terror is a global fraud, a Zionist war agenda that is based on deception and false-flag terrorism.  In my presentations about the dual-deception of 9/11 and the War on Terror I use the Mossad quote from The Little Drummer Girl, “Terror is theatre... Theatre's a con trick. Do you know what that means? Con trick? You've been deceived.”  I advise people to keep this quote in mind whenever an act of terrorism, like the recent massacre in Orlando, occurs.

One needs to remember that the ultimate purpose of false-flag terrorism is to affect public opinion and change the way the target audience thinks about the entity that is blamed. As terrorism expert Brian Michael Jenkins wrote, "Terrorism is aimed at the people watching, not at the actual victims. Terrorism is theater.”

In acts of false-flag terrorism the perpetrators behind the deception come out with information very quickly to create a false narrative, which is then spread by the mainstream media.  In the case of the terror attacks of 9/11 this early planting of the false narrative was done by the former Israeli prime minister and chief-of-staff Ehud Barak, who appeared on world-wide BBC World television blaming Osama bin Laden and calling for “an operational, concrete war against terror” – before the Twin Towers had even fallen.

Ehud Barak presented the Israeli narrative of 9/11 on BBC World television - a global network - before the towers even fell.

By appearing on BBC World right after the planes had hit the towers, Barak was making use of the primacy effect and presenting the desired narrative first, before any evidence could even be examined to determine what had really happened on 9/11.  In this case, Barak evidently had prior knowledge of the attacks and was prepared to be in the London studio of the BBC World to give the world the Israeli narrative of the crime - and the Israeli cure for the problem:  the global War on Terror, something the Israeli military had been pushing since at least 1979.  Barak’s early analysis became the official version of 9/11, of course.

In the case of the mass shooting in the Orlando nightclub, the alleged shooter was identified as an American-born Muslim of Afghan origin - before the number of people killed had even been determined.  Early on June 12, while the death toll was thought to be twenty, Alex Jones’ reporter Paul Joseph Watson posted a video from Dresden, entitled “The Truth About the Gay Nightclub Massacre,” in which he blamed the Islamic religion for being the root cause of the Orlando massacre.  More than 400,000 people watched the inflammatory video in the first day it was online. 

Infowars' “The Truth About the Gay Nightclub Massacre”
Video URL -

There are, of course, many questions about what happened at the Pulse club in the early hours of June 12.  The main question being:  Was the Orlando nightclub massacre another act of false-flag terror?

Were there multiple shooters as some eyewitnesses have said? How did the media know the name of the alleged shooter before it knew how many people had been killed?  Did the shooter really call 911 and make some statement about ISIS and the Boston Marathon bombing?  If so, when will we be able to hear it?  (The FBI has released "transcripts" of the call but is not releasing the audio.  Why will they not release the audio?  How do we know that the voice in the video is that of the alleged killer if we cannot hear the actual audio?)

There is also a big question about Alex Jones and the role he plays:  Why would post a video that blamed Islam before anything was known about what happened at the Pulse club?  Is Alex Jones exploiting the primacy effect for propaganda reasons – just like Ehud Barak? 

There are many people who trust Alex Jones to give them the truth about important matters that are not discussed in the mainstream media.  Jones has a large following, including many sincere truth-seekers who believe whatever comes from his website.  For to post Watson’s three-minute video, “The Truth About the Gay Nightclub Massacre,” and to blame Islam for being the cause of the massacre is worse than irresponsible journalism – it exposes the role played by Alex Jones and as a Zionist propagandist in support of the global criminal fraud known as the War on Terror.

Benjamin Netanyahu's comments on the Orlando shooting are designed to advance the War on Terror, a war agenda being waged by the United States and its allies on behalf of Israel.

Bibi Netanyahu Statement on the Orlando Terror Attack
Video URL: 

Three days after the Orlando shooting, Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, released a three-minute video in which he said the shooter was "not alone" and went on to blame ISIS and the Islamic Republic of Iran.  In doing so, Netanyahu was feeding the War on Terror construct he has promoted since 1979:

In Orlando, a terrorist walks into a nightclub and murders nearly 50 human beings… Why did the terrorist murder them?
Because he was driven by a fanatical hatred. He targeted the LGBT community because he believed they were evil.

Now, the murderer wasn't alone. Regimes and terrorist organizations around the world ruthlessly persecute the LGBT community. In Syria, ISIS throws gays off rooftops. In Iran, the regime hangs gays from cranes...

This week’s shooting wasn’t merely an attack on the LGBT community. It was an attack on all of us, on our common values of freedom and diversity and choice. Radical Islamist terror makes no distinction between shades of infidel. This week it was gays in Orlando. A few days before that it was Jews in Tel Aviv… All of us are targets…

Working together we will defeat them even faster.

The Israeli methods have changed in the four decades since Netanyahu began promoting the War on Terror, but the logic remains exactly the same.  

Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.

Donate here or by PayPal to

What is the U.S. Goal in Afghanistan?

 June 11, 2016

Fifteen years after 9/11, what is the goal of the U.S. war in Afghanistan? 

On its current path, Afghanistan runs the risk of becoming fifty or more separate kingdoms. Foreign extremists have begun to move in, buying houses and weapons. Afghanistan may become unique in being both a training ground and munitions dump for foreign terrorists and at the same time the world’s largest poppy field.
- Abdul Haq in a letter to Ambassador Peter Tomsen, U.S. Special Envoy to the Afghan Mujahideen, 1992

Why are the Arabs here? The U.S. brought the Arabs to Pakistan and Afghanistan. Washington gave them money, gave them training, and created ten or 15 different fighting groups. The U.S. and Pakistan worked together. The minute the pro-Communist regime collapsed, the Americans walked away – and didn't even clean up their shit. They brought this problem to Afghanistan.
- Abdul Haq to Newsweek, October 26, 2001 (shortly before he was killed)

The undeclared and illegal war that the U.S. and its allies are waging today against the elected government of Syria is very similar to the covert war the U.S. and the same allies waged against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the 1980s. While that effort succeeded in expelling the Red Army from Afghanistan, it also created a cadre of Islamist militants against which the U.S. is still waging war.

The fifteen-year-old U.S. intervention in Afghanistan, the first act in the Global War on Terror, has utterly failed to produce peace or democracy, but has yielded large increases in terrorism and opium. If the same pattern is now being applied in Syria, would it be logical to expect a different outcome?

In March, after my lecture in Manhattan, an English woman named Lucy Morgan Edwards presented me with a signed copy of her book, The Afghan Solution:  The Inside Story of Abdul Haq, the CIA, and How Western Hubris Lost Afghanistan


Edwards’ book is a hardbound book of 365 pages with a dust jacket and extensive endnotes, which she said was “a labor of love.” Having spent several years in Afghanistan, Edwards worked as a country advisor for the European Union and served in several other similar positions.  During her years in Afghanistan, she became personally acquainted with many of the key players and the multi-faceted political game that has been playing out in that war-torn nation since the Soviet Union withdrew its forces in the late-1980s.

After reading The Afghan Solution the reader is left with one perplexing question:  Why did the CIA give so much support to radical anti-Western mujahideen like Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and so little to capable and intelligent men like Abdul Haq, a leader with a sensible Afghan plan to end the fighting?

Much of the book is devoted to this question. As one can see from Edwards’ choice of words she suggests that “Western hubris lost Afghanistan,” i.e. that the quagmire in Afghanistan was not intentional.

Edwards explains how the Pashtun fighter Abdul Haq offered a viable Afghan solution to remove the Taliban and al Qaida factions from power in the aftermath of 9/11 – a plan in which the U.S. military would not play a major role, as it has since 2001.

Unfortunately, the path presented by Abdul Haq was the road not taken. With more than 3,517 American lives lost and 20,000 wounded in nearly fifteen years, Abdul Haq’s Afghan solution certainly looks like it was the wiser choice.  The fifteen-year U.S. war in Afghanistan has cost the American taxpayer more than $737 billion and consumes another $4 million per hour, every day that it continues.

As Ken Guest, former British marine and Afghan observer, wrote to Edwards in 2009:

In 2001 there was a far better option on the table that offered an honest and strong Afghan leader, the use of the tribes, sealing the border to prevent escapes and virtually no U.S. footprint, other than discreet use of Special Forces as observers for report back needs. In effect an Islamic rejection of terrorism as un-Islamic, exactly what we, in the West, should have been looking for and supporting.

In 2001 the West advanced without proper contextual understanding… We favoured wide bombing, often wide of the mark, ever expanding U.S./Allies ground force deployment, installing a weak leader, resulting in no government capacity and massive corruption. What we got is what you see now. It isn’t pretty but it was all perfectly predictable, and it is the sort of thing that happens when we fail to properly consider all the options.

The most obvious question raised by Edwards is why?  Why did the U.S. reject the most sensible path?  It seems obvious that the plan presented by Abul Haq would have been the most prudent and most likely way to succeed, if the U.S. goal really were to remove the Taliban from power and eliminate Al Qaida fighters from Afghanistan. So, why did the U.S. reject the Haq plan?

I wrote to Edwards and asked her if she thought it is possible that the CIA rejected the Abdul Haq plan because they did not want a peaceful Afghanistan, but a weak and destabilized country where opium and terrorism could flourish.


As political journalist and writer Dan Glazebrook told RT recently:

We really have to understand that the key goal of the U.S. in Afghanistan is to keep it weak, destabilized, prevent it from becoming a peaceful stable country at peace with its neighbors. Because if that were to happen, that would mean very likely making agreements with Russia, China. It’s a very important country geo-strategically, potentially being a gas supply route and its geographical proximity to Russia, China, India and so on means that the U.S. doesn’t want to risk it becoming a stable, peaceful country. 

Edwards gives the CIA the benefit of the doubt in concluding that the U.S. agency lost Afghanistan due to hubris and incompetence. The historical record, however, suggests that the CIA rejected the Haq plan because the agency’s real aim, at the highest level, was not to eradicate Islamic terrorist groups, but to foment and support them in order to create an Islamic enemy, the opposition against whom the next war, the War on Terror, would be fought.

Richie Allen Show: Bollyn on Israeli Origin of War on Terror

June 9, 2016

I was on The Richie Allen Show​ the other day after I had posted an article explaining how Israeli military intelligence - under Ehud Barak - had trained the most radical group of mujehideen, the Hezb-i-Islami under Gulbuddin Hekmatyar in the mid-1980s. This was exactly when (1984) Hekmatyar and the most famous "Afghan Arab" Osama bin Laden became close. Why were the Israelis training the most radical anti-Western Islamist group? In 1994, most of Gulbuddin's Israeli-trained cadre merged into Al Qaida and the Taliban. The Hebrew-speaking double agent Ali Mohamed, bin Laden's "first trainer" is also discussed.

For more, see:

America the Target: The USS Liberty and 9/11

June 8, 2016

The Israeli assault on the USS Liberty was meant to sink the ship and kill all of the crew. Understanding the truth about what happened to the Liberty is essential to grasp the nature of the Zionist state and its treachery against the United States.

There are people who refuse to accept clear-cut evidence of Israeli involvement in the false-flag terrorism of 9/11 simply because it does not fit with the image they have in their mind of the Zionist state of Israel. The idea that the Israeli military would plan and carry out a terrorist atrocity in the United States, killing thousands of innocent people, in order to trick Americans into supporting the Israeli war agenda known as the War on Terror does not comport with their naïve beliefs about Israel, so they reject the evidence and the facts.


To those who say, “Israel would not do such a thing,” I say, “You don’t know Israel or Israeli history.”

Israelis have attacked America before, on several occasions, with the intention of having the crime blamed on their enemies.  Forty-nine years ago, on June 8, 1967, the Israeli military launched a murderous attack on a U.S. Navy vessel, U.S.S. Liberty, killing 34 men and wounding 171.

I wrote about the Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty in “America the Target,” the third chapter of Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World to give the reader some idea of Israel’s history of treachery and false-flag terrorism against the United States.

Many American Zionists, Jew and Gentile alike, will comfort themselves with the false narrative about the U.S.S. Liberty accepting the Zionist lie that the Israeli attack was a case of mistaken identity. The historical evidence, however, proves that it was not, but that it was a blatant Israeli crime of mass murder and an act of war against the United States.

As I wrote in “America the Target”:


Lt. James M. Ennes, Jr., an officer on the bridge of the USS Liberty, wrote his first-hand account of the Israeli attack in a 1979 book entitled Assault on the Liberty. Lieutenant Ennes' book is documentary evidence that the Israeli attack was deliberate and not an accident of war.  Ennes describes how Israeli torpedo boats repeatedly machine-gunned Liberty sailors fighting the napalm fires on deck and shot her life rafts in the water while an oversize U.S. flag flew from its mast.

The shooting of the life rafts indicates that the Israelis did not want anyone to survive the assault and intended sinking of the U.S. vessel.  Steve Forslund, an intelligence analyst for the 544th Air Reconnaissance Technical Wing in 1967, saw the transcripts from the Israeli pilots and their ground control as they came off the teletype machine at Offutt Air Force Base in Omaha.

"The ground control station stated that the target was American and for the aircraft to confirm it," Forslund recalled. "The aircraft did confirm the identity of the target as American, by the American flag.  The ground control station ordered the aircraft to attack and sink the target and ensure they left no survivors."  Forslund said he clearly recalled "the obvious frustration of the controller over the inability of the pilots to sink the target quickly and completely."

"He kept insisting the mission had to sink the target, and was frustrated with the pilots' responses that it didn't sink."

Israel’s murderous attack on the Liberty is not well known to many Americans because it is a piece of our history that has been suppressed for forty-nine years. Like the Israeli role in 9/11, information about the attack on the Liberty has been controlled in the three critical arenas:  the investigation, interpretation, and litigation of the incident.  In all three arenas the Zionist voice prevailed over the facts, testimonies of the survivors, and evidence.

That the Israelis got away with murdering 34 Americans on the Liberty is largely due to the fact that a brutal Zionist agent named Lyndon B. Johnson occupied the White House at the time.  Johnson actually re-called U.S. Navy jets, twice, that were sent to assist the stricken ship in international waters off the coast of Egypt. Johnson had earlier overseen the cover-up of the murder of President John F. Kennedy, so covering-up the Israeli war crime against the Liberty was easy for the treasonous president.

Survivors of the Israeli assault on the Liberty have struggled valiantly for years to inform their fellow Americans about what happened on June 8, 1967, when they saw 34 of their shipmates murdered by Israel, America’s “friend and ally” in the Middle East. It is very important for all Americans to understand the truth about what happened to the Liberty so that they can grasp the reality of Israeli treachery against the United States.

The Israeli attack on the Liberty reveals the true nature of the Zionist state, showing that it is clearly not a friend of America and that it has repeatedly committed acts of war and terrorism against the United States in its efforts to deceive Americans into supporting its criminal agenda in the Middle East. Understanding the criminal nature of the assault on the Liberty enables one to grasp how the Israeli military could conceive and carry out the crimes of 9/11 in order to advance the Global War on Terror, a Zionist war agenda to be waged by the United States.

Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.

Donate here or by PayPal to

Sources and Recommended Reading:

“America the Target: 9-11 and Israel's History of False Flag Terrorism,” Solving 9-11:  The Deception that Changed the World, Christopher Bollyn

“America the Target: 9-11 and Israel's History of False Flag Terrorism,” audio chapeter read by Christopher Bollyn

“Dead In The Water - The Sinking of the USS Liberty,” May 2, 2009

“Israel's Terror Attack on the USS Liberty,” Christopher Bollyn, June 9, 2010

“The Israeli Attack on the USS Liberty - Dead in the Water” by Christopher Bollyn, May 2009 

How Israel Created the Fiend for the War on Terror

May 29, 2016

In reality, the War on Terror is an Israeli propaganda construct designed to deceive the West into destroying Israel’s enemies on behalf of the Zionist state.

he War on Terror is essentially an Israeli war strategy. It was first promoted on the world stage by Benjamin Netanyahu and Menachem Begin (of the terrorist Likud party) at the Jerusalem Conference hosted by the Netanyahu Institute in July 1979.

Former C.I.A. director George H.W. Bush spoke at the final session of the Jerusalem conference in support of waging war on terrorists.

According to the War on Terror doctrine advocated by Netanyahu, "Islamic terrorists" attack Israel because it is a Western state with Western values. The West, Netanyahu says, is the real target so the U.S. must lead the West in waging a global War on Terror to destroy Islamic terrorists and the regimes that support them. This is exactly what the United States has done since 9/11, at incredible expense to its own population, leaving a trail of devastated nations in its wake.

The Israeli construct was designed to get the U.S. to destroy the enemies of the Zionist state. The Israelis developed the War on Terror construct and then created the Islamic opponent, al Qaida, to serve as the antithesis – the virulent enemy of the West. The real purpose of al Qaida, and its subsequent iterations like ISIS, is to be a moving target used to destabilize and destroy sovereign countries, like Syria, while sustaining the illusion of an Islamic antithesis, posing a mortal threat to the security of the West. The Zionist-controlled media is the essential element in selling the fraudulent War on Terror to the public.

The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 gave Israeli military intelligence the perfect opportunity to create a cadre of anti-Western Islamic “terrorists”, which would become the "enemy" in the War on Terror.

From the early 1980s, the C.I.A. began a covert effort to support Afghan mujahideen in their ‘holy struggle’ or jihad, to remove the Red Army from Afghanistan. The allies who worked with the C.I.A. to arm the mujahideen were Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan.

Charlie Wilson, an extremely pro-Israel Congressman from Texas, acted as an Israeli weapons dealer in brokering an arrangement with Pakistani leader Mohammed Zia ul-Haq and Gulbuddin Hekmatyar to provide Israeli weapons (captured from the P.L.O. in Lebanon) and Israeli training to the Hezb-i-Islami mujahideen.

Charlie Wilson’s Israeli handler was Zvi Rafiah, Mossad station chief in Washington, who had known Wilson since 1973 and who used his congressional office as if it were his own: “Rafiah had always acted as if he owned Wilson’s office. One of the staffers kept a list of people he needed to lobby. He would use the phones, give projects to the staff, and call on Charlie to intervene whenever he needed him.” 
Source - George Crile, Charlie Wilson’s War (2003)

Charlie Wilson got the notoriously anti-Western Hekmatyar to accept weapons and training from the Israelis. Why would the C.I.A. and the Israelis choose to arm the most radical and virulently anti-Western group of mujahideen, the 
Hezb-i-Islami Gulbuddin? Why would it not choose to arm a pro-Western Afghan militia that was more successful in combat, like that headed by Abdul Haq?

The lion’s share of weaponry went to the anti-Western Hezb-i-Islami run by Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. "By the most conservative estimates, $600 million" in American aid went to Hekmatyar's party, which "had the dubious distinction of never winning a significant battle during the war, training a variety of militant Islamists from around the world, killing significant numbers of mujahideen from other parties, and taking a virulently anti-Western line."
Source - Peter Bergen, Holy War, Inc.: Inside the Secret World of Osama bin Laden, Free Press (2001)

While Israeli military intelligence agents trained his group, by 1984 Gulbuddin had developed close ties with bin Laden, while receiving assistance from the C.I.A. and ISI.

Israeli military intelligence provided Gulbuddin’s Hezb-i-Islami with weapons and trained at least 4,000 men in the anti-Western militia. Thousands of non-Afghan fighters join Gulbuddin’s Hezb-i-Islami, including thousands of Arabs, known as Afghan Arabs. Osama bin Laden is the most famous of the Afghan Arabs. Having trained a cadre of 4,000 anti-Western Islamic fighters, Israeli military intelligence and C.I.A. had a database of names to populate the Islamic anti-Western antithesis needed for the War on Terror construct. This database was known as al Qaida.

Having lost Saudi support when it supported Saddam Hussein, and Pakistani support after 1994, "the remainder of Hezb-i-Islami merged into al-Qaeda and the Taliban."
Source -
The Columbia World Dictionary of Islamism

A Hebrew-speaking double-agent of Egyptian origin, Ali Mohamed, was involved in the training of the Afghan mujahideen. Mohamed trained Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri, and the terrorists responsible for the bombings of the two U.S. embassies in Africa. Mohamed is said to have been bin Laden’s “first trainer”. But, where and how did Mohamed learn Hebrew? And how did this Hebrew-speaking agent, involved in all the major terror attacks of the 1990s and sentenced to life in prison, disappear from the U.S. judicial system?

The Hebrew-speaking Ali Mohamed runs like a red thread connecting all al Qaeda terrorist activities during the 1990s. “In 1992, I conducted military and basic explosives training for al Qaeda in Afghanistan... I also conducted intelligence training for al Qaeda. I taught my trainees how to create cell structures that could be used for operations.” Ali Mohamed seems to have been the mastermind behind the terrorist attacks attibuted to al Qaeda. For example, while bin Laden and Ali Mohamed reportedly worked closely to create cells in Tanzania and Kenya to help prepare for the bombings of the embassies, Ali went to Nairobi to set up the terrorist cell.
Source - "United States of America v. Ali Mohamed"

Ehud Barak was head of Israel's Military Intelligence Directorate (AMAN) when Israeli military intelligence agents began arming and training
Gulbuddin’s Hezb-i-Islami. If the Hebrew-speaking Ali Mohamed was training Osama bin Laden, was Mohamed working for Ehud Barak's AMAN?

On 9/11, Ehud Barak appeared on BBC World television and blamed Osama bin Laden and al Qaida before the towers had even been destroyed. Saying that the world would never be the same, Barak ended by saying that it was now time for the U.S. to start an "operational, concrete war against terror." Barak's early analysis became the accepted version and conventional wisdom after 9/11.

Using its al Qaida database, the Israelis engineered the false-flag terrorist attacks of 9/11 to be blamed on Osama bin Laden and al Qaida in order to kick-start their long-planned War on Terrorism. Barak's authoritative statement on BBC World was meant to provide a plausible explanation while the American population was in a vulnerable state of "shock and awe."

On September 11, 2001, reading from a Zionist script, President George W. Bush began by saying that, "our way of life" and "our very freedom" was under attack. "America was targeted for attack because we're the brightest beacon for freedom and opportunity in the world," Bush told the shocked nation.

Twenty-two years after it was born at Netanyahu’s Jerusalem Conference in 1979, the War on Terror moved into its operational phase with the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in October 2001.

By continuously morphing the identity, moving the players, and carrying out acts of false-flag terrorism, the targets set for destruction by the U.S. military have moved with the virulent anti-Western Islamic “enemy” – all according to a screenplay choreographed by Israeli military intelligence - from the beginning.

Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.

Donate here or by PayPal to

The Dual-Deception of 9/11 and the War on Terror

May 23, 2016

The false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 and the fraudulent War on Terror are two parts of an Israeli dual-deception. The political crisis that Americans face in this election year is how do we extract our nation from this criminal Zionist fraud before it destroys our republic?

The false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 were designed to instill fear and rage among Americans in order to get public opinion to support U.S. military involvement in the Israeli war agenda known as the global War on Terror.

The global War on Terror is an Israeli strategem that has been pushed by Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu since the late 1970s. The idea of waging a global War on Terror was first promoted at the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism in July 1979 at the Netanyahu Institute in Israel.

The War on Terror is a fraud that has cost the United States more than $1.6 trillion dollars, devastated a half-dozen nations, and taken more than one million lives. 

The fraudulent War on Terror policy was foisted on the United States by a cabal of Zionist Neo-Con insiders who worked closely with Israel's military and political leaders.

The agenda for the Zionist War on Terror included "taking out" seven countries in five years, according to General Wesley Clark. Five of the seven countries have already been "taken out".

In reality, the War on Terror has been a War of Terror from the beginning. It has resulted in a spike in deaths due to terrorism, particularly in the nations where the U.S. has waged war. If the goal of the policy is meant to reduce the scourge of terrorism we can say it has been extremely counter-productive.

Terrorism is far from being a significant cause of death in the U.S. yet the government spends some $400 million per year per victim, money that could be much better spent on the real needs of the American people.

Realizing that 9/11 and the War on Terror are the two sides of an Israeli dual-deception enables us to understand the nature of this massive fraud and empowers us to stand up and demand that it end  - and that its perpetrators be brought to justice.

Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.

Donate here or by PayPal to 

The Occupation of the American Mind: An Interview with Roger Waters

May 23, 2016
Updated with link to second part of interview

Roger Waters of Pink Floyd is one of the few big-name musicians who has the moral courage to take a stand against the brutal Israeli occupation of Palestine.

I have often said that the 9/11 truth movement needs support from well-known people in the arts, and Roger Waters of Pink Floyd is the name that comes to mind first, because he is a well established star that has shown a high degree of moral courage on the issue of the Israeli occupation of Palestine.

Since he understands the criminal and brutal nature of the Israeli occupation, Waters is well positioned to grasp the Israeli role in the false-flag terrorism of 9/11.  When one comprehends the essence of the problem, it is easy to understand the whole problem when provided with the necessary information. The dual deception of the 9/11 cover-up and the fraudulent War on Terror is a product of the extreme right-wing Likud terrorist faction headed by Benjamin Netanyahu.

The following link is to an excellent 24-minute interview with Roger Waters about how and why he became an activist in fighting the Israeli apartheid wall and brutal occupation of Palestine. This video is highly recommended viewing:

The Occupation of the American Mind
- RAI with Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters

(1/3) -

(2/3) -

Link to the website for the movie "The Occupation of the American Mind"

The Evolution of The War on Terror - An Israeli Mega-Fraud

May 7, 2016

Why is there no serious national debate on ending the War on Terror? How can it be that there is no discussion in the presidential campaigns or from the media pundits about ending the multi-trillion-dollar fraud known as the War on Terror?  It reminds me of the quote of Voltaire:  To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?

Why is no one criticizing the War on Terror and calling it the fraud that it is? The decision to wage the disastrous War on Terror is a political decision, made by the U.S. president as the commander-in-chief. Since it began in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, there have only been two presidents who have approved waging the fraudulent War on Terror, George W. Bush and Barack Obama. It will be a crucial question facing the next president, so why is it not being debated?

After 14-and-a-half years of the War on Terror the U.S. has spent trillions of dollars, waged war across the Middle East and North Africa, and destroyed the lives of millions of people, many of them American. At least seven nations have been devastated under the guise of fighting terrorism:  Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Yemen, and Somalia.  In spite of all the money spent and lives lost, more people are dying from terrorism than ever, particularly in the nations where the War on Terror has been waged. It is not really a war against terrorism, but a "War of Terror" in which terrorism, mostly false-flag operations, plays the key role.

All of the indications point to the War on Terror going down as the biggest boondoggle or criminal scam in history, yet no one running for the highest office in the land is calling for it to come to a screeching halt. Why not?

As Mike Lofgren wrote in a recent article about Donald Trump and the War on Terror:

The "war on terror" is the longest continuous war in US history. Taxpayers have ponied up over $4 trillion to wage it. Yet the consensus of our intelligence community is that we are more in danger than ever. Did we spend more than $4 trillion to make ourselves less safe? Let us unpack the contradictions.

Terrorism in the United States is statistically a negligible cause of mortality: One is about as likely to die from being crushed by a flat-screen TV, and more likely to die falling in the bathtub than from terrorism. Imagine if we had spent $4 trillion to cure cancer or heart disease. Nevertheless, nearly every word US government officials have uttered about the matter during the last 15 years has been designed to instill dread of terrorism in the population. And it has worked.


The War on Terror is a massive deception, conceived and promoted since the late 1970s by Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israelis. To explain how it evolved I have put together some of the basic facts in a timeline.

1977 - The Likud party of terrorist leaders, headed by Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, comes to power in Israel.

Begin, born in Russia, has a long history of using terrorism to achieve his goals.

1942 - After coming to Palestine, Begin becomes the head of the Irgun, a terrorist group with an extremist Zionist ideology of Greater Israel based on the ideas of Vladimir Jabotinsky and his New Zionist Organization. When Jabotinsky dies in New York in 1940, Benzion Netanyahu, the Polish-born father of Benjamin Netanyahu, becomes the head of the NZO.

1946 - Four years after coming to Palestine, in a terror operation carried out with the Haganah, Begin orders the bombing of the King David Hotel, British military headquarters in Palestine, killing 93.

1974 - Begin declares himself "The Father of Terrorism". In 2006, Benjamin Netanyahu speaks at a 60-year anniversary of the bombing of the King David Hotel, attended by the Jewish terrorists who carried out the bombing. The U.S. media does not cover the event.

1977 - Begin and his Likud party of terrorist leaders comes to power in Israel in what is called "the revolution."

1978 - Menachem Begin invades Lebanon up to the Litani River under the guise of fighting terrorism. Israeli troops do not leave South Lebanon until 2000 - 22 years later.

1978 - Arnon Milchan, a high-level Israeli intelligence agent, makes his first movie in which a passenger plane crashes into a skyscraper. Milchan later becomes a Hollywood movie mogul. In the mid-1980s Milchan is caught smuggling components for Israel's illegal nuclear arsenal, but not indicted. His employees are charged with his crimes.

1978 - Milchan's first movie features a plane into high-rise attack exactly like those that occurred 23 years later in New York City.

1979 - Benjamin Netanyahu and his father start the Netanyahu Institute on Terrorism and hold an international conference in Jerusalem to start the global propaganda push for a "War on Terror." The premise and data are seriously flawed but the spark is lit for the "War on Terror." Netanyahu spends the next 22 years promoting the idea that the United States and the western democracies should engage in a global "War on Terror" to defeat those groups resisting Israeli occupation of Palestinian land - and attack the states that support them. George Bush, candidate for vice president, speaks at the conference saying the U.S. would use its military force to wage war on terrorism.

1980 - Isser Harel, the former head of Israeli intelligence (Mossad and Shin Bet) predicts that Arab terrorists will attack the tallest towers in New York City, twenty-one years before 9/11.

1982 - Israel invades Lebanon a second time under the guise of "fighting terrorism".

1983 - "Islamic Jihad" bombs U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, killing 241.

1984 - The U.S. responds to terrorism by withdrawing forces and shelling Lebanon.

1983 - The "War on Terror" needs a foe, so Israel starts arming and training radical jihadists in Pakistan. Ehud Barak is the head of Israeli military intelligence (AMAN) at this time. 

1983 - Ehud Barak is head of Israeli military intelligence (AMAN) as Israel arms and trains the Hezb-e Islami faction of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. Author Peter Bergen states that "by the most conservative estimates, $600 million" in American aid through Pakistan "went to the Hizb party, ... [the] party had the dubious distinction of never winning a significant battle during the war, training a variety of militant Islamists from around the world, killing significant numbers of mujahideen from other parties, and taking a virulently anti-Western line." In 1994, the group merges into the Taliban and Al Qaida.

OSAMA "Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally 'the database', was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians." - Robin Cook, British Foreign Secretary (1997-2001), writing in The Guardian, July 8, 2005.

2000 - Arnon Milchan's television partnership with Rupert Murdoch produces a film in which a passenger plane is remotely hijacked and flown into the World Trade Center. The program airs on FOX TV in March 2001 and is viewed by millions across America.

September 11, 2001 - Calling for "an operational, concrete, war against terror," Ehud Barak is in the London studio of BBC World television blaming Osama bin Laden for the terror attacks - before the towers have even fallen. Barak is blaming the very same cadre of Islamic militants that his military intelligence agents armed and trained in Afghanistan in the 1980s. Barak's analysis becomes the official explanation for the events of 9/11. 

2001 - The Israeli strategy known as the "War on Terror" becomes reality as the U.S. military wages war in Afghanistan. Here, the Israeli chief of staff meets with the Zionist Neo-Cons who have made plans to overthrow 7 Middle East nations in five years.

2007 - General Wesley Clark explains the secret war plan to "take out seven countries in five years" - Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. Five of these targets have already been engaged. This is the real goal of the "War on Terror".

2008 - Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister and head of the Likud party, tells Israelis: "We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq."

Netanyahu's benefit for Israel comes at a very high cost for Americans.
Isn't it time to quit the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror?"

Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.
Donate here or by PayPal to

Bergen, Peter L., Holy War, Inc.: Inside the Secret World of Osama bin Laden, Free Press, 2001

Bollyn, Christopher, "Solving 9-11 Ends the War," March 2016

Cook, Robin, "The struggle against terrorism cannot be won by military means," Guardian Unlimited, July 8, 2005 

Hilali, A. Z. US-Pakistan Relationship: Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005

Lofgren, Mike, “Blowback: Donald Trump Is the Price We Pay for the War on Terror,”, March 1, 2016

Rashid, Ahmed, Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia, New Haven, 2000 

Why is the U.S. Waging War in Syria?

May 4, 2016

On April 25, President Obama announced that the U.S. would send 250 more troops to Syria. But why is the U.S. military engaged in Syria, a nation where we have no national interest and with whom we are not at war?

Why is the U.S. waging war in Syria? Why are U.S. troops in a country where the United States has no national interest? Who are we fighting for? Why is the U.S. training, funding, and arming rebel groups that are fighting to overthrow the democratically elected government of Syria? Why is the U.S. waging war on ISIS, a group that is armed and supported by our allies? 

If you take U.S. policy in Syria at face value it makes no sense whatsoever. To understand what is going on in Syria requires grasping the fact that there is a secret Zionist policy being applied to divide and conquer the nation, but this is an utterly destructive policy that will only increase terrorism and instability in the region. 

Just before President Obama announced that the United States would be sending 250 more soldiers to fight in Syria, he said we are living in the most peaceful time in human history.  “We are fortunate to be living in the most peaceful, most prosperous, most progressive era in human history," Obama said in Hannover, Germany, on April 25.

Obama went on to say that the Islamic State (ISIS) organization, which is openly supported and armed by our allies, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, is the "most urgent threat" facing the West. So, why is the Obama White House playing such a duplicitous game in Syria?

As Obama said:

Right now, the most urgent threat to our nations is ISIL, and that’s why we’re united in our determination to destroy it. And all 28 NATO allies are contributing to our coalition -- whether it’s striking ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq, or supporting the air campaign, or training local forces in Iraq, or providing critical humanitarian aid. And we continue to make progress, pushing ISIL back from territory that it controlled.

And just as I’ve approved additional support for Iraqi forces against ISIL, I’ve decided to increase U.S. support for local forces fighting ISIL in Syria. A small number of American Special Operations Forces are already on the ground in Syria and their expertise has been critical as local forces have driven ISIL out of key areas. So given the success, I’ve approved the deployment of up 250 additional U.S. personnel in Syria, including Special Forces, to keep up this momentum. They’re not going to be leading the fight on the ground, but they will be essential in providing the training and assisting local forces that continue to drive ISIL back.

The first thing to grasp about Syria is that the so-called civil war would be over tomorrow if Obama and his allies were to stop supporting the rebels that are trying to overthrow the Assad government in Damascus. ISIS would also cease to exist if Obama were to demand that the U.S. allies that are supporting it to stop.  If Obama were serious about ISIS (or ISIL) being "the most urgent threat to our nations", why would he allow his regional allies to support it and keep it armed with U.S. weapons?

John Kerry seems completely preoccupied with regime change in Syria, where there is no U.S. national interest whatsoever. "As long as Assad is there, the opposition is not going to stop fighting him, one way or the other," Kerry said on May 3. The opposition he refers to is armed and supported by the U.S.

The war that the U.S. has waged by proxy in Syria has fragmented the nation in line with the Zionist Yinon Plan to "Balkanize" the Arab states, i.e. to break them up into ethnic statelets as was done in Yugoslavia. The Syrian government (red) is currently trying to oust the U.S.-supplied rebels (green) from Aleppo, Syria's largest city and commercial center. ISIS (black) controls a large stretch along the border with Turkey, across which men and weapons freely flow to the terrorist group that is "the most urgent threat" facing the West, according to Obama. ISIS and anti-Assad rebel groups also control Syrian territory along the border with the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.

THE YINON PLAN is the Israeli strategy to dominate the Middle East. It was written in the early 1980s when the Likud party came to power. The Yinon plan calls for the "dissolution of all the existing Arab states" by breaking them up into small ethnic enclaves. This is exactly what U.S. military intervention had done to Iraq and Syria.

The U.S. military intervention in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, as part of the "War on Terror", has resulted in an unprecedented increase in terrorism in all three nations and around the world. This indicates that either the U.S. policy is utterly counter-productive due to incompetence or, more likely, that a secret Zionist policy is at work.

The dissolution of Iraq and Syria is exactly what the Israeli strategy for the region has called for since the early 1980s. If the nations of Iraq and Syria are partitioned into ethnic enclaves, as Israeli military leaders are now calling for, there will no longer be a nation of Syria, which will allow Israel to keep the Golan Heights, which it occupied in 1967. The Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, recently declared that Israel will never leave the water and mineral-rich occupied Golan Heights.

The Rothschilds own the largest oil company in Iraqi Kurdistan and, along with Rupert Murdoch and others, an oil company in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. The legal challenges they face to exploiting the mineral resources of the Golan Heights would vanish if Syria ceased to exist as a nation.

The United States is certainly not waging war in Syria for any noble cause or U.S. national interest. The evidence and results indicate that the U.S. is waging war in Syria in order to advance the Zionist strategy of breaking up the Arab states into weak ethnic statelets, but this is a policy that will only increase terrorism, not defeat it. 

Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.
Donate here or by PayPal to

Bollyn's "9/11 and Our Political Future" Tour being planned

May 3, 2016

Christopher Bollyn's "9/11 and Our Political Future" tour is being planned to begin in late June in New England.

I am planning a tour this summer in the United States about "9/11 and Our Political Future" or something along those lines. 9/11 was clearly a false-flag terror atrocity that was meant to force the United States and the West into a fraudulent and criminal War on Terror that goes on for decades.

It is, therefore, of the utmost importance that we free ourselves and our nation from the utterly false premises about 9/11 and the War on Terror. To allow ourselves or our fellow citizens to remain deceived about 9/11 and the War on Terror is to allow our nation to be enslaved to the false logic of the Zionist war agenda.

We cannot have peace and prosperity in America if we remain enslaved, as a nation, to a fraudulent war agenda that goes on and on. This is an urgent message that needs to be presented in the clearest and most simple way possible because the political elite are simply ignoring the most basic facts. If we make the case simply, clearly, and loudly they cannot ignore the truth. This is why public presentations, reaching people in towns across America, need to be done.

I hope to begin the tour in New England in late June and take my presentation all across the United States until September 11, 2016. Let me know if you would like to arrange an event in your town. All that is needed is a meeting room in a public library with a computer projector and a sound system. 

Donations are needed to support this effort and can be made via PayPal to (not for email) - or by post. 

My email for correspondence is


Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.
Donate here or by PayPal to

Electronic Vote Fraud is Alive and Well in Chicago (and beyond)

May 2, 2016

To have the representation real, the election must be real;
and that where the election is a fiction,
the representation is a fiction also.
Like will always produce like.
- Thomas Paine to the Citizens of the United States, January 29, 1803

I monitored the French presidential election in Avignon in May 2002 and observed how a proper and transparent vote count is done, using paper ballots, in each polling place across France, in full view of the public. It's really very simple, but such proper elections would put the crimocracy out of business, so they force us to use riggable voting systems.

It was in the run-up to the election of 2000 that I wrote my first article about electronic vote fraud in Chicago.  In doing the research for that article, "The Death of Democracy or May the Best Hacker Win" I found that the voting machines being used in Cook County were wide open to vote fraud on a massive scale.  I also found that organized crime was behind the production and use of these rigged voting machines. This is when I concluded that the United States had become a crimocracy, a government of criminals, by criminals, for criminals.

What was very discouraging to see was that nobody really cared that the voting machines used in Cook County were not secure and that there was no way to be sure that the tally produced by the machines accurately reflected how the voters had voted. The fact that the vote count could not be authenticated did not seem to bother anyone. As I wrote then:


Tests of computer vote-counting systems used in Illinois from 1983-1987, which tested tens of thousands of ballots, revealed significant errors in the computer counting in more than twenty percent of the tests. Fulle said that in Illinois today there is “a 16 percent error rate” with ballot-counting machines. He expected numerous problems on election night saying “equipment will fail across the state.”

“I don’t understand why nobody cares,” Michael L. Harty, former Illinois director of voting systems and standards said, “At one point, we had tabulation errors in twenty-eight percent of the systems tested, and nobody cared.”

The indifference of election officials, the people ultimately responsible for the integrity of the elections, proves a point made by a former president of the University of Chicago, Robert M. Hutchins, who said, “The death of democracy is not likely to be an assassination from ambush. It will be a slow extinction from apathy, indifference, and undernourishment."


Today, 16 years later, electronic vote fraud is still the name of the game in Chicago, Cook County, and across the nation.  The following 7-minute video shows that when it comes to vote fraud in Chicago - nothing has changed. This is, of course, not a problem limited to Chicago - it is a national problem.  We want to believe that we have democratic and transparent elections when it is crystal clear that we don't.

It is, of course, very simple to have proper elections, but in our corrupt system there is no political will to have open and transparent elections, like those I have observed in France and other countries. If we had proper and transparent elections we could restore the integrity of our democratic republic. 

To explain how simple it is to have democratic and transparent elections, I wrote an article with photos from my experience monitoring the French presidential election.  The article is entitled "Restoring Democracy in America" 

It is, after all, exactly as Thomas Paine said to Americans in 1803:  "To have the representation real, the election must be real; and that where the election is a fiction, the representation is a fiction also."

VIDEO EVIDENCE The Voting Machines Are WRONG!
(and It’s Being Covered Up)
Video URL -

Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.
Donate here or by PayPal to

Sources and Recommended Reading:  
Christopher Bollyn, 21 articles in the section on U.S. Elections & Computer Vote Fraud 

Israel's ISIS Conspiracy

May 1, 2016

ISRAELI CHIEF OF STAFF AT THE PENTAGON, January 2002 -The Zionist war agenda known as the War on Terror was pushed by the Israeli military and the Zionist Neo-Cons who have dominated policy making at the Pentagon and State Department since 9/11.

The people of the United States have been utterly deceived by the Zionist-controlled government and media about the "War on Terror", the Zionist fraud that was kick-started by the false-flag terror atrocity of 9/11.  This criminal deception has gone on for more than 14 years and has only succeeded in plundering our national wealth, destroying millions of lives, and ruining American prestige around the world.  It clearly has to be brought to an end or it will be the end of our American republic.

I am not encouraged by the lack of honesty about 9/11 in the current political discourse in the United States. Presidential candidates and political pundits who should know better talk about the terror atrocity as if the official version pushed by the government and media, which has been proven utterly false, were true. This is a recipe for national disaster because any policy that is based on lies is bound to fail.

In order to understand how the West has been deceived into supporting the criminal Zionist war agenda it is essential to understand how Israeli military intelligence created ISIS, and its previous incarnations such as Al Qaida.  In the following one-hour video, "The ISIS Conspiracy" (in two parts), Brandon Martinez explains and documents how the U.S. created the very enemy that it claims to be fighting in order to further the Zionist agenda to dominate the Middle East. This is clearly not a policy that is meant to advance any real U.S. national interest, but a prime example of how U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East has been hijacked to advance a criminal Zionist agenda.  This must come to a screeching halt.

It is now a matter of the utmost importance for the United States to divorce itself from this criminal Zionist agenda, which is completely detrimental to our national interest and the real source of the destruction and devastation in the Middle East.

"The ISIS Conspiracy:  Origins"
Video Link -

In part one, Brandon Martinez unravels the murky origins of ISIS and unveils how the group's meteoric rise in Iraq and Syria is a continuation of US psychological warfare designed to facilitate the Zionist-Neocon plan to dominate the region by toppling seven sovereign Middle Eastern and North African States. 

"The ISIS Conspiracy:  US-Israeli-Saudi Intrigue"
Video Link -

In part two, Brandon Martinez unravels the web of deceit that lies behind the manufactured ISIS phenomenon, and shows how the U.S. and Israel have plotted for decades to implode the Middle East.

Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.
Donate here or by PayPal to 

The Israeli Plan: Frighten the West

 April 30, 2016

To understand the ISIS terror attacks in the West, we need to identify the architectural-level players of the false-flag terrorism of our time.

From:  Israel’s Sacred Terrorism by Livia Rokach 

To Aharon Barkatt, then secretary general of Mapai, Sharett painted the following picture of Israel's security establishment:

Dayan was ready to hijack planes and kidnap [Arab] officers from trains, but he was shocked by Lavon's suggestion about the Gaza Strip. Maklef [who preceded Dayan as Chief of Staff] demanded a free hand to murder Shishakly but he was shaken when Lavon gave him a crazy order concerning the Syrian DMZ.

He [Lavon] inspired and cultivated the negative adventuristic trend in the army and preached the doctrine that not the Arab countries but the Western Powers are the enemy, and the only way to deter them from their plots is through direct actions that will terrorize them.

Peres shares the same ideology: he wants to frighten the West into supporting Israel's aims.

Israeli Prime Minister Moshe Sharett, Jan. 1955
“The Lavon Affair: Terrorism to Coerce the West”
Israel’s Sacred Terrorism 


Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.
Donate here or by PayPal to

Israel in Afghanistan & Ehud Barak's $300 Million Rip-Off

April 29, 2016

In July 2015, in what was described as "a startling move," Afghan warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar of Hizb-e-Islami advised his supporters to help Islamic State (ISIS).  Since the 1980s, Hekmatyar's organization has been funded by the C.I.A. and armed and trained by Israel.  Surprise, surprise.

May 1992:  Ahmad Shah Massoud signs agreement with Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, the most wanted criminal in Afghanistan, in presence of their Pakistani and Arab masters. Now, consider that Hekmatyar's group was armed and trained by Israeli military intelligence.

Israel played a secret, but central role, in the Soviet-Afghanistan war, in particular by arming and training a very radical Islamic Party faction - the Hezb-e Islami of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar.  As Wikipedia reports in its "Afghanistan-Israel Relations" entry:

During the 1980s, Israel provided armament and training to mujahideen forces who were fighting the Soviet-backed Afghan government. Thousands of mujahideen fighters, particularly from the Hezb-e Islami faction of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, were trained by Israeli instructors. The head of Pakistan's ISI agency, Akhtar Abdur Rahman, apparently allowed the Israeli trainers into his country.

The details of the Israeli role in arming and training radical Islamic fighters during the Soviet-Afghanistan war are generally not well known. This is largely due to the fact that "of all the members of the anti-Soviet coalition, the Israelis have been the most successful in concealing the details and even the broad traces of a training role," according to John K. Cooley, author of Unholy Wars: Afghanistan, America and International Terrorism (2000).

One reason it is important for us today to understand Israel's role then in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran, is because the radical Islamic faction, Hezb-e Islami, which was armed and trained by the Israelis, went on to become al Qaida. It is also important to note that the Israeli covert operation to arm and train Hezb-e Islami was carried out by Ehud Barak, the head of Israel's Military Intelligence Directorate, AMAN (1983–1985).

When Hekmatyar's radical "Islamic Party" lost Saudi support, after it supported Saddam Hussein; and Pakistani support after 1994, "the remainder of Hezb-i Islami merged into al-Qaida and the Taliban," as per The Columbia World Dictionary of Islamism. This is shortly before Al Qaida emerged on the world stage as the alleged source of terror atrocities in Africa and Yemen.

Ehud Barak, the former Israeli prime minister and chief of defense, also happens to be the first person on 9/11 to blame Osama bin Laden and al Qaida, something he did from the London studio of BBC World television - before the towers were even demolished. How very odd, when one considers that it was Barak himself, as head of Israeli military intelligence, who had overseen the arming and training of the Islamist group he blamed on 9/11 for the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C.

BEFORE THE TOWERS FELL - Ehud Barak was in the BBC World studio in London blaming Osama bin Laden and his Islamist group in Afghanistan - the very same radical Islamist group that Barak had armed and trained as head of Israeli military intelligence (AMAN) from 1983 through 1985. One of the last operations Barak's team in Pakistan carried out was double-dealing to Iran a $300 million consignment of weapons paid for by the U.S. and intended for the anti-Soviet Afghan 
mujahideen. Did Vice-President George Bush know that his ally in the Iran-Contra operation was ripping the U.S. off?


In 1985, when Shimon Peres was Israel's prime minister and Ehud Barak was head of the AMAN, the Military Intelligence Directorate, the Israelis pulled a fast one and sold Iran a $300 million consignment of weapons that had already been purchased for the Afghan resistance fighters. Ari Ben-Menashe, the Israeli agent on the ground in Pakistan, said the Israeli weapons were sold twice, creating a surplus in the Israeli account of $300 million.

THE TROIKA OF TERROR - Shimon Peres (left) and Ehud Barak (right) were the key players in the $300 million rip-off as they armed and trained the radical Islamist group in Pakistan that became Al Qaida.

This means that the same Israelis, Peres and Barak, who played key roles in the events of 9/11, had ripped off the U.S. government and its allies in the anti-Soviet campaign in Afghanistan for $300 million in 1985.  No wonder the Israelis have worked so hard to conceal the details of their business in Pakistan. The Israeli military could not have carried out such an outrageous operation without the knowledge and approval of both the head of military intelligence, Ehud Barak, and the prime minister, Shimon Peres.

The best information I have found about the details of Israel's double dealing in Pakistan is in A.Z. Hilali's book, US-Pakistan Relationship: Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan (2005).  The following extracts from Hilali's book provide the basics about how Ehud Barak and Shimon Peres ripped off $300 million in 1985:


Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.
Donate here or by PayPal to

Sources:  "Afghanistan–Israel Relations," Wikipedia, April 29, 2016

"Enemy of enemy: Hekmatyar support for IS stuns observers" by Tahir Khan, Express Tribune (Pakistan), July 7, 2015

The Columbia World Dictionary of Islamism, Olivier Roy, Antoine Sfeir (2007)

Unholy Wars: Afghanistan, America and International Terrorism by John K. Cooley, Pluto Press (2000) 

US-Pakistan Relationship: Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan by A.Z. Hilali, Aldershot, Ashgate (2005) 

Exposing the Zionist Hidden Hand Ruling Britain and the United States

This article, which I wrote in December 2007, is now being added to

Exposing the Zionist Hidden Hand Ruling Britain and the United States

For all practical purposes, the United States and Britain are Zionist-occupied nations. Because the American and British people are generally ignorant of what Zionism is, the meaning of this statement is not widely understood or appreciated.

The lack of understanding by the public, however, doesn't change the fact that these once great nations have become Zionist-controlled states. The evidence is clearly seen in the self-destructive foreign policies these nations have pursued for the past 40 years or so.

The Anglo-American "leadership" positions in the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq and their support of the costly Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror" is further proof that Zionists control these nations – as if any were needed.

How did these powerful and independent nations become Zionist controlled? Unlike Palestine, where Eastern European Zionist immigrants used brutal terrorism to ethnically "cleanse" and conquer the land, in Britain and the United States the Zionists gained power gradually through "dumbing down" and effectively disenfranchising the native populations.

In Britain and the United States, the Zionists saved the use of terrorism for later, after they already controlled the media and the levers of power and government.

Americans today still believe they are free because the media tells them so and because they don't see the restraints and are able to move around and buy things. Americans are, indeed, free to work and shop, but they have virtually no real political power whatsoever. A good example is that while an overwhelming majority of the U.S. population is against the war in Iraq, the war and the huge spending bills to support it go on unchallenged by their representatives in Congress. Why don't the Congressmen vote to stop the disastrous war that has consumed hundreds of billions of dollars and taken more than 3,000 American lives?

Most Americans in the "land of the free and the home of the brave" are completely unaware that they have lost the most cherished democratic franchise, i.e. the citizen's fundamental right to vote and count their votes. They think their vote counts and don't have a clue that they lost their democratic franchise years ago. They are unaware of this situation simply because the media has not told them.

"If the media doesn't talk about, it must not be a problem" is the American way of thinking.

For the Zionist-controlled media, the absence of any citizen oversight of the vote-counting process and complete lack of transparency in American elections are simply non-issues, just like many other very important subjects of vital importance to the survival of the republic.

As Johann Wolfgang von Goethe said, "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." This aptly describes the difficult condition Americans face at the beginning of the 21st Century.

Zionists, a marginal minority of Polish and Russian Jewish immigrants, were able to gain control of these great English-speaking nations by obtaining control of two fundamental institutions: the media and academia. This is not to say that they don't control other key institutions, but these two are of essential importance because they largely define the intellectual life of a nation.

Having worked in the media and studied Middle East history at an American university, I know what I am talking about here. History of the Middle East and Europe, and virtually every other subject taught at American universities, is viewed only through the Zionist prism.

For example, when I studied the Middle East at the University of California at Santa Cruz, the head of the department was a professor named Edmund Burke who had studied under the famous British Jew, Bernard Lewis, at Princeton. Burke was always recommending the books of Bernard Lewis, which I avoided like the plague.

Bernard Lewis

American historian Joel Beinin called Lewis "perhaps the most articulate and learned Zionist advocate in the North American Middle East academic community."

"Terry" Burke spent 1990 "on sabbatical" with Lewis at Princeton. He returned to Santa Cruz in the late summer, just before the U.S. invasion of Iraq in January 1991. I remember Burke giving a speech in August or September at the federal building in Santa Cruz as the conflict was heating up. The very first words out of his mouth were "Balkanization," something that amazes me to this day. He was unwilling to explain his choice of words when I called him about a year ago.

Edmund "Terry" Burke of U.C. Santa Cruz

Although my main interest was Israel and Palestine, Burke recommended that I read a book about Yugoslavia. Balkanization, the breaking up of nations into ethnic statelets, is the Zionist plan for the entire Middle East, articulated by Oded Yinon of the Israeli foreign ministry in the early 1980s.

During the many lectures and courses I studied on the Middle East, never did I hear a critical word about Zionism or its brutal history in Eastern Europe and Palestine. This is primarily because the professors of Middle Eastern studies and European history are usually Jewish and strongly inclined to support Zionism.

If a professor were to openly criticize Zionism as the racist and violent ideology that it is, he would probably find himself unemployed in very short order.

I understood this and endeavored to present the anti-Zionist perspective at the university. I brought speakers like Ralph Schoenman, the author of The Hidden History of Zionism (1988), to the campus and led a tour of photojournalists to the West Bank and Gaza Strip shortly after the invasion of Iraq. Despite a great deal of effort and years of experience in the region, Burke did not give me "honors" with my degree, most likely because of my anti-Zionist views.

The media in the United States is controlled in the same way as the universities. The editors and journalists are prevented from investigating and discussing the real history of Zionism because the news outlets are usually owned by people who are themselves dedicated Zionists. The takeover of CNN by Gerald M. Levin of AOL Time Warner marked the fall of the last major non-Zionist media network.

Gerald Levin

Today, all major news outlets in the United States and Britain are strongly Zionist. There were a few good newspapers, such as the Christian Science Monitor, that provided some balance to the pro-Zionist "mainstream" networks, but even they have now fallen.

The result is that the populations of the United States, Britain, and Australia are largely ignorant of Zionism and what it has done in the past in other countries -- and what it is doing now -- in theirs.


Selecting issues and non-issues for coverage is the primary method employed by the Zionist-controlled news networks. Issues get a lot of coverage while non-issues get none.

Here are a few examples of issues and non-issues in the Zionist-controlled media:

• Iran's legal and monitored efforts to develop nuclear energy are an issue; Israel's illegal and secret nuclear arsenal is not.

• Discussion of the alleged role of Muslims in terrorist acts is an issue; solid evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 and the London bombings is not.

• The two-year long fake presidential campaign with a host of Zionist-controlled candidates is an issue; how our electronic "votes" are counted by mysterious "private" foreign companies of unknown ownership is not.

I don't know if any other American journalist and 9-11 researcher has been attacked, TASERed, and had their elbow broken by an undercover tactical squad in front of their family in the United States, but I know that when it happened to me in August 2006 it was very much a non-issue with the controlled media.


The position of foreign minister, or secretary of state in the United States, is a very important position, second only to the president or prime minister. Since foreign policy is the only policy coming out of Washington or London these days, these positions are of crucial importance and speak volumes about who is really controlling the government.

In the United States and Britain we have very strange people with odd backgrounds in these high-level appointed positions. The current British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs is a 42-year-old politician named David Wright Miliband, the son of the Belgian-born Marxist, Adolphe "Ralph" Miliband.

David Milliband

The U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, a 53-year-old former professor, holds the comparable position in the American government.

What is most peculiar -- and telling -- is that the backgrounds, loyalties, and ideologies of these two high-level appointed officials are never discussed in the Zionist-controlled media; clearly this is a non-issue.


It goes without saying that both Miliband and Rice are dedicated Zionists, they are, after all, serving in extremely pro-Zionist governments. But why are their personal and family histories not discussed by the media? Don't the American and British people have a right to know the person who is overseeing the implementation of their national foreign policy?

David Miliband, who only became a Member of Parliament in June 2001, was recently in Basra, Iraq, when the British officially stepped back from their failure and turned over control to Iraqi authorities.

Although Miliband and other British officials have tried to put a good face on the disastrous results of the Anglo-American invasion and occupation, the fact that it has been a complete failure is painfully apparent to all.

As a senior Iraqi military officer told ABC News, "The British legacy in Basra is criminal gangs, a corrupt and infiltrated police force, and borders open to all."

Major-General Jalil Khalaf, the new police commander in Basra, told the Times of London: "They left me militia, they left me gangsters, and they left me all the troubles in the world."

Yousif Nassar, one of Basra’s most famous composers, is also disappointed at what the British did to his city. "The British Forces created chaos and failed to deliver what they promised," he said, as reported by the Times of December 17, 2007.

The Times article was entitled "Crumbling services and violence on the streets, but hope follows British pullout."

"We congratulate all of those who have helped achieve this, most notably British and Coalition military and civilian personnel," Defense Secretary Des Browne and David Miliband said in a joint statement when the pullout was announced. How could these senior British officials congratulate anyone for their achievements in Basra? The Anglo-American occupation of Iraq is nothing but an unmitigated disaster. Perhaps that was the plan all along?

Knowing who David Miliband is and what he represents is key to understanding the real power behind Britain's foreign policy. This is certainly the reason the Zionist-controlled media keeps the British population – and the world – ignorant of the Miliband family's roots – in Brussels.

David Milliband

David Miliband is the son of Ralph Miliband, born Adolphe in Brussels in 1924, and Marion Kozak. Ralph was a well known Marxist political theorist. Ralph, who died in 1994, is buried in Highgate Cem